eGain Corporation Aktienkurs
Ist eGain Corporation eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 9.127 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 152,58 Mio. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 91,14 Mio. $
Marktkapitalisierung = 152,58 Mio. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 90,20 Mio. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 79,24 Mio. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 91,14 Mio. $
Enterprise Value = 79,24 Mio. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 90,20 Mio. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
eGain Corporation Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
9 Analysten haben eine eGain Corporation Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
9 Analysten haben eine eGain Corporation Prognose abgegeben:
eGain Corporation Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
SEP
3
Q4 2026 Earnings Call
vor 25 Tagen
|
|
MAI
14
Q3 2026 Earnings Call
vor 5 Monaten
|
|
FEB
3
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
NOV
12
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor 11 Monaten
|
|
SEP
4
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor etwa einem Jahr
|
aktien.guide Basis
eGain Corporation — Q4 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the eGain Fiscal 2026 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results Call.
[Operator Instructions]
Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Byers, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to eGain's Fiscal 2026 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are eGain's Chief Executive Officer, Ashu Roy; and Chief Financial Officer, Eric Smit.
Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this conference call, management will make certain forward-looking statements, which convey management's expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding future financial and operational performance. Forward-looking statements are generally preceded by words such as believe, plan, intend, expect, anticipate or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are protected by safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ in material respects.
Information on various factors that could affect eGain's results are detailed in the company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. eGain is making these statements as of today, September 3, 2026, and assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking information in this conference call. In addition to GAAP results, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income. The tables included with the earnings press release include reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
eGain's earnings press release can be found by clicking the Press Releases link on the Investor Relations page of eGain's website at egain.com. And along with the earnings release, we will post an updated investor presentation to the Investor Relations page. And lastly, a phone replay of this conference call will be available for 1 week.
And now with that said, I'd like to turn the call over to eGain's CEO, Ashu Roy.
Thank you, Jim. Good afternoon, everyone. Right at the end of fiscal 2026, the category we've been building toward for years got a name. In July this year, Gartner published its first ever Magic Quadrant for customer service knowledge management systems and named eGain a leader, positioned highest for ability to execute and furthest for completeness of vision. This inaugural Magic Quadrant matters more than just our position in it. This is the first time a top analyst firm has drawn a sharp boundary around this market and explicitly called out knowledge management for customer service as its own category of enterprise infrastructure.
Now they base it on the volume and kind of client inquiries they get in this area. And therefore, they have chosen to invest Magic Quadrant level resources and attention to it. It's a very important signal for the market and the category that's building around it. As we have said, there's good reason this buying category is emerging now. Generative AI has collapsed the old separation between instruction and data. What an AI agent or agentic workflow does in any live customer or employee assistance conversation is determined entirely by the policies, procedures and know-how it is fed.
When that knowledge is wrong, the AI is confidently wrong. When it's stale, the AI doesn't know it's out of date. So knowledge is no more documentation just for humans to optionally use. It is instruction for AI. Wrong knowledge equals wrong AI. Engineering that instruction layer, governing it, operating it continuously is what we call AI Knowledge ops, a term that Gartner reflected in their Magic Quadrant report as something unique and important that eGain brings to this solution. It is the discipline enterprises are now realizing they cannot skip if they want AI to reliably work in production, not just in pilot.
With this market trend and the analyst acknowledgment, let me walk through how fiscal 2026 came together. Before I do that, let me define a term that we will use moving forward, and that is AI customer. An AI customer is an eGain customer who utilizes one or more of our AI offerings. So with that said, let's look at full year fiscal 2026. Our total revenue grew 3% to $91.1 million. Our AI customer revenue grew 20% year-over-year. AI customer ARR grew 13%, and represented 72% of total SaaS ARR at year-end, up from 63% at the midpoint of fiscal 2026. This is an intentional shift in the shape of our customer base. A growing majority of our SaaS ARR now sits with customers who are using one or more of our AI capabilities.
Turning to new business. Our momentum continued to build. In the fourth quarter, we won several new logos. A couple of examples here. First, a leading European insurance company, they set out to automate their service operation with AI and recognized that they needed to put in place a governed knowledge foundation before they could deploy AI automation at scale. So they selected eGain to modernize their knowledge environment and establish that foundation.
Second, a global multi-energy operator serving millions of customers. They faced a familiar barrier to scaling service, fragmented knowledge leading to inconsistent service quality. They are deploying our knowledge platform and AI agent in one contact center. Based on the successful blueprint from that deployment, they will extend to the rest of their contact centers. They also plan to activate self-service channels and leverage the Knowledge Hub across the entire business.
In addition, we added several new paid pilots this quarter. Increasingly, we see buyers wanting to extensively validate our platform in their own environment before committing to a full rollout, and they're willing to pay for it. This is a shift from where we used to be where we were doing a lot of free quick trials and pilots as part of our innovation in 30 days, the 30-day and no-risk pilot that we have.
Converting these paid pilots into at-scale production rollouts is a focus for us this fiscal year. Give you a couple of examples again. One of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Their use case is that their experienced scientists and specialists retire or change roles in their R&D teams and the company risks losing a lot of deep tacit expertise. They're using our AI Knowledge Hub to capture that tacit knowledge on a continuous basis and turn it into valuable knowledge for their AI engine.
Second, a global leader in testing inspection and certification. They were facing a hard regulatory deadline, and they needed accurate instant guidance in a compliance-heavy environment. Early pilot results of our deployment indicate that the AI agents deliver 95% self-service resolution, and it's enjoying a strong 80% customer user satisfaction surveys.
Third, a global leader in gaming technology. They operate in a complex environment where every answer has to be guided and correct. Stepping back to the market, I want to share 2 trends that we see emerging in the last couple of quarters. First, businesses are treating knowledge as core AI infrastructure, and their tech and AI teams are actively building on top of this infrastructure, which drives demand for richer platform capabilities like real-time knowledge APIs and stringent service levels. So our growing developer-facing capabilities on our Composer platform are being well received.
Second trend we see is growing interest in customer self-service projects. Several new logos in the recent quarters have started out with self-service deployments, something we did not see a year ago when it was more common to start with contact center-based use cases. While contact center productivity is still of great interest, we sense that businesses are increasingly driving for ROI at scale on their AI investments.
Moving to business momentum in fiscal 2026. Our new logo wins increased 27% year-over-year. As I mentioned earlier, several of the new logos we acquired in fiscal '26 have paid pilots in Global 2000 accounts, and they have significant upside, something we intend to pursue this fiscal year. Our pipeline opportunities valued at $500,000 ARR or more, doubled in count year-over-year. And our core verticals, which are compliance heavy like banking, financial services, insurance and health care, we grew our opportunities in the pipeline by 40% year-over-year, exactly where a trusted knowledge foundation matters the most.
Turning to products. Our innovation continues to accelerate with focus. Everything we launched in last quarter, which is in Q4 during our London eGain Solve event in May, fueled the cycle of knowledge and AI. First, we're increasingly deploying AI in our platform to dramatically automate knowledge management. And the result of that generation and maintenance of trusted knowledge with low effort then drives better instruction to AI that is being used to reliably automate customer service and customer operations.
So a few of the noteworthy announcements of new capabilities we made in May. The first was the eGain IVA, which is an intelligent voice agent. What's unique about it is that it is using the same trusted knowledge platform as we use for all our digital self-service tools. So that consistency and quality is something that now we can offer as a complete omnichannel self-service offering.
Secondly, our eGain Agentic Studio, which is a zero-code application building environment we have launched so that business users can assemble these service use cases end-to-end, multistep complex processes with every step grounded in verified knowledge using assured tools and actions and invoking human oversight when needed. It's a complete platform for service automation using agentic capabilities.
The third, which we had announced in the past is the eGain Evaluator, which is our continuous evaluation tool for AI pipelines, but that is -- we made it generally available, and it's a capability that's getting a lot of interest from our large customers who are looking to drive continuous quality assurance of their agentic pipelines.
And finally, we announced a new vertical for health care, which is our eGain AI Knowledge Suite for health care. And this is a governed knowledge foundation purpose-built for health plan and health systems. We will build on this momentum at our upcoming Solve event in Chicago on October 13 and 14 this year. We'll lay out our view of the year ahead, the shift from knowledge management to knowledge automation and the value of agentic AI assembly on top of trusted knowledge. And of course, we'll announce new capabilities and hear from our customers and partners.
So in conclusion, our sustained bet on AI knowledge, the market and products in fiscal 2026 is showing results. And so we are doubling down, and we intend to lead this market. With that, I'll turn it over to Eric Smit, our CFO, to take you through the financial details. Eric?
Thanks, Ashu, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Before I begin, I'd like to note that we are again using slides to support today's call. We believe this provides helpful context and makes it easier to follow our results and outlook. You can access the slides in the Investor Relations section of our website alongside the webcast.
As Ashu noted, fiscal 2026 demonstrated solid financial execution. Total revenue increased 3% to $91.1 million. AI customer revenue grew 20%. Adjusted EBITDA increased to $13.6 million and cash provided by operating activities reached a record $21.2 million.
I'll review our fourth quarter and full year results, explain the transition in more detail to our customer-based AI metrics and discuss our fiscal 2027 outlook and long-term financial framework.
Starting with the fourth quarter results and starting with revenue. Total revenue was $22.2 million, exceeding both our guidance and Street consensus compared with $23.2 million in the prior year quarter. The year-over-year decline in total revenue primarily reflected the lower revenue from our legacy conversation and analytics customers. AI customer revenue grew 11% year-over-year in the fourth quarter. Looking at gross margins, non-GAAP total gross margin for the quarter was 72% compared to 73% a year ago. Non-GAAP SaaS gross margins were 78% compared to 80% a year ago.
Turning to operating expenses. Non-GAAP operating costs were $14.1 million, up 6% year-over-year and 2% sequentially. Sales and marketing expenses were $5.5 million, up 21% sequentially, reflecting our planned investments in go-to-market initiatives, including the eGain Solve event that we held in London.
Looking at our bottom line, GAAP net income was $1.3 million or $0.05 per basic and diluted share compared with GAAP net income of $30.9 million or $1.13 per basic share and $1.11 per diluted share in the prior year quarter. The prior year results included an approximately $29 million tax benefit from the release of the majority of our valuation allowance. Non-GAAP net income was $2.1 million or $0.08 per share on a basic and diluted basis, exceeding our guidance and Street consensus. This compares with $2.4 million or $0.09 per share on a basic and diluted basis in the year ago quarter.
Adjusted EBITDA was $2.2 million, representing a 10% margin and exceeding our expectations compared to $4.5 million and a 19% margin a year ago. During the quarter, we repurchased 1.4 million shares for $10.1 million at an average price of $7.32 per share.
Turning to our full year results. Looking at our revenue, total revenue was $91.1 million, exceeding our guidance and up 3% year-over-year. Within total revenue, AI customer revenue grew 20% year-over-year. AI customer ARR grew 13% year-over-year and represented 72% of total SaaS ARR at year-end. Looking at gross margins and operating expenses. Non-GAAP total gross margin was 74%, up from 71% in fiscal 2025. Non-GAAP operating costs were $55.3 million compared to $56 million in the prior year.
Turning to the bottom line, balance sheet and cash flows. GAAP net income was $8.9 million or $0.33 per basic share and $0.32 per diluted share compared with $32.3 million or $1.15 per basic share and $1.13 per diluted share in fiscal 2025. As I mentioned, the prior year results included approximately $29 million tax benefit. Non-GAAP net income was $13 million or $0.48 per share on a basic basis and $0.47 per share on a diluted basis, up from non-GAAP net income of $5.7 million or $0.20 per share on a basic and diluted basis in the prior fiscal year.
Adjusted EBITDA increased to $13.6 million, representing a 15% margin, up from $8.6 million and a 10% margin in fiscal 2025. Cash flow from operations reached a record $21.2 million, representing a 23% operating cash flow margin, up from $5.3 million or a 6% operating cash flow margin in fiscal 2025. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $73.3 million at June 30, 2026, compared to $62.9 million at June 30, 2025. During fiscal 2026, we repurchased 1.6 million shares for $11.5 million at an average price of $7.16 per share. At year-end, we had $9.7 million remaining available under the $60 million buyback authorization.
Now turning to our AI customer metrics. As Ashu mentioned, instead of reporting by product hub, going forward, we're now reporting based on whether a customer is actively using one or more of our AI offerings. We call this AI customer ARR and AI customer revenue. And we believe it's a cleaner, more forward-looking way to show our AI adoption spreading across our installed base since many customers now use AI capabilities across multiple parts of our platform rather than within a single hub. This is the framework we'll use going forward.
The strategic rationale is straightforward. We have found that the customers' overall adoption of our AI capabilities, not the specific product SKU or hub they originally purchased is the strongest predictor of long-term retention expansion. To better measure and ultimately maximize that dynamic, we completed a full review of our customer base this year and segmented it into 2 groups: AI customers, meaning those actively engaged with our AI platform and all other customers. This is a meaningful shift in how we think about the business.
Our reporting focus is now on growing ARR per account, which we view as a primary measure of success with a specific mix of products or given customer consumes becomes secondary. We believe this customer base view better reflects how customers deploy our integrated platform, how we manage these relationships and the broader retention and expansion opportunity within our AI customer base. It is now our primary lens for measuring the health of our AI business.
AI customer ARR is defined as total SaaS ARR from customers who are actively utilizing one or more of our AI offerings. This amount includes all offerings associated with the customer and not solely the AI offerings. AI customer revenue is defined as the total revenue generated from customers who actively utilize one or more of our AI offerings, inclusive of their SaaS and professional services revenue. This amount also includes all offerings associated with the customer and not solely the AI offerings.
With that context, here are the metrics. AI customer ARR increased 13% year-over-year and represented 72% of total SaaS ARR at year-end. Total SaaS ARR declined 1% year-over-year, driven by the decline among our legacy non-AI customers.
Turning to our retention rates. Trailing 12-month dollar-based net retention for AI customers was 104% compared to 120% a year ago. As a reminder, we had closed a significant expansion deal with JPMC in Q4 of last fiscal year, which drove that increase in net retention. Net retention for all customers was 93% compared to 105% a year ago. Total remaining performance obligation or RPO of $87 million was down 5% year-over-year and short-term RPO of $62 million was down 2% year-over-year.
Now turning to our outlook. Starting with guidance for the first quarter of fiscal 2027. We expect AI customer revenue of between $13.7 million to $14 million and total revenue of between $20.9 million and $21.4 million.
Turning to the bottom line. For Q1, we expect GAAP net income of $500,000 to $1 million or $0.02 to $0.04 per share, which includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $900,000. We expect non-GAAP net income of $1.4 million to $2 million or $0.05 to $0.08 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $1.4 million to $1.9 million or a margin of 7% to 9%. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027, we expect AI customer revenue of between $59.5 million to $60.5 million, representing growth approximately of 8% to 10%. Total revenue to be between $84.5 million and $86 million.
Our outlook reflects 2 different trends within the business. We expect continued growth from AI customers alongside an estimated 20% decline in revenue from our profitable legacy customers. We are using the cash generation from this non-core business to fund investments in the larger AI opportunity. We expect ARR from AI customers to grow approximately 20% in fiscal 2027, while ARR from legacy customers is expected to decline by 60%.
On the bottom line, we expect GAAP net loss of $2 million to $3 million or $0.08 to $0.11 per share. This includes stock-based comp expense of approximately $4 million, non-GAAP net income of $1 million to $2 million or $0.04 to $0.07 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $650,000 to $1.4 million or a margin of 1% to 2%. We expect weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 26.6 million for the first quarter and 26.8 million for the full fiscal 2027.
Today, we are also introducing a long-term financial model that lays out our targets through fiscal 2030. As we complete our transition to a higher-growth AI-led business, we see fiscal '27 through fiscal '29 as a transition period with total revenue growing both increasingly converging with AI customer revenue growth and fiscal 2030 is a year that convergence is largely complete.
Now turning to our long-term financial model. For fiscal 2030 relative to fiscal 2026, we are targeting AI customer ARR of between $100 million to $120 million, up from $54 million in fiscal 2026, a 17% to 22% CAGR as AI ARR compounds towards scale. Total SaaS ARR of $100 million to $120 million, up from $75 million in fiscal 2026, reflecting substantially complete runoff of non-AI ARR and migration to AI.
For AI customer ARR, we expect that's going to represent approximately 100% of total SaaS ARR, up from 72% in fiscal 2026, effectively a pure-play AI ARR base with increasing contribution from our AI business. AI customer revenue of $105 million to $115 million, representing a 17% to 20% CAGR from the $55 million we generated in fiscal 2026 and a 20% plus growth year-over-year by fiscal 2030, making our underlying AI revenue growth increasingly visible in our total results. And total revenue of $110 million to $120 million, representing approximately 15% to 20% growth year-over-year by fiscal 2030, with total company growth now closely mirroring our AI growth.
AI customer revenue representing approximately 95% of total revenue, up from 60% in 2026, supporting a higher quality valuation framework and SaaS gross margins of approximately 80%, maintaining our attractive software margin profile and adjusted EBITDA margin that remains positive while we fund AI growth, a deliberate balance between growth investments and profitability discipline.
We believe our leadership in AI-powered knowledge management, expanding market opportunity and increased go-to-market investment position eGain to pursue durable growth while maintaining an attractive profitability profile.
So to summarize, in closing, AI customer revenue and ARR both grew at double-digit rates in fiscal 2026, and we completed the shift to a customer level reporting that we believe gives investors a clearer view of the business and strengthens our positioning following Gartner's naming of eGain a leader in the inaugural Magic Quadrant for Customer Service Knowledge Management Systems. We also delivered total revenue growth, strong profitability and record operating cash flow in fiscal 2026.
With our strong balance sheet and cash generation, including the cash we generated from our declining but profitable legacy offerings, we are all in on the AI knowledge opportunity, investing to build on that position and pursue sustainable long-term growth.
Lastly, as Ashu mentioned, we will be hosting an Investor Day and Analyst Day in conjunction with our upcoming eGain Solve customer event on October 13 in Chicago. Additional information and registration details are available on our website. This event is a great opportunity for prospective investors and analysts to meet with customers and learn more about our business. We hope you can join us.
With that, I would like to open the call for questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions]
Our first question comes from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.
2. Question Answer
This is Vijay on for Jeff. First one for me, just in the target model and kind of here in the prepared remarks, you talked a little bit about running off the non-AI ARR. Is there a time line for that in mind kind of similar to what you had with the messaging business? And then just how does the profitability of those businesses compare to the rest of the business?
Thanks for that. Yes. So for clarification, if you -- as we sort of described in the model, the expectation is the non-AI business should be substantially -- the goal, obviously, is to convert some of that into the AI business. But from a modeling standpoint, we'd expect that to be to 0 as we get to the 2030 time frame.
Got it. And then you talked a little bit on previous earnings calls about some of the potential impacts of AI more generally on the business, maybe pricing pressure on SaaS products. Are you seeing that show up in the business at all? Or is that still kind of expected later down the line?
This is Ashu here. So I would say that we are seeing some pressure of that, but we are also seeing our ability to create new product offerings, which layer on kind of additional revenue from these value-added AI capabilities. So all in all, the effect has not been as significant as I would have feared. Yet, I mean, we are prepared for it. We do think that there may be -- my sense is 1 or 2 points pressure over the next 2 to 3 years is how I see it. But Eric, do you have anything more to add?
Exactly. Yes, I think that's sort of aligned at this stage. I think given the construction layer that this is building, it's sort of creating opportunities that are different from what we would have seen historically as well, which I think will obviously impact sort of the way the pricing we approach this.
Yes. Got it. And then just for the target model, obviously, I appreciate having that out there. As you look at the growth profile, is there any way you can segment that as far as if you expect 15% or 20% growth, how much of that will be maybe price or new customer adds or adding seats to existing customers or reducing churn? Just what do you think the biggest kind of drivers there will be?
So I think most of the driver will come from new logo acquisition. I think when we look at the opportunity in front of us, especially with now the backdrop that we're seeing with the Gartner MQ, I think this investment to drive the brand awareness and scale up the customer base will be the primary driver. Obviously, we will work hard to move customers that are in the legacy bucket, but that will not be the primary driver for this growth.
[Operator Instructions]
Our next question comes from Erik Suppiger with B. Riley.
This is [ Ethan White ] calling on for Erik. Just one question from me. As companies adopt an ecosystem of AI models rather than just using one of the frontier models, does that dynamic create more demand for a knowledge management solution? Can you maybe speak to that dynamic a little more?
Yes, I'll take that, Eric. Yes, you're right. What we are seeing now is in the last month or so, I'm sure you've seen as well, a lot of talk about people running into sort of token runaway costs and also just cost of AI as the adoption has been pushed hard in enterprises. And what we see with our approach to it is just by being sharper in what you are feeding into these AI tools, you can keep the costs down significantly, sometimes by a factor of 10.
So it's a big advantage by being more precise in how you instruct and guide rather than throwing the kitchen sink of content and context into these models. So that's one thing we see as a very interesting advantage that we bring to the party.
The second one is that we even internally inside the platform tend to be smart about using, if you will, horses for courses, the right models for the right need. And we see that as another way of managing the AI token cost for our clients.
And maybe just one little follow-up. Does that dynamic matter at all in kind of the big frontier models versus open source? Or is that relevant?
It does matter to some extent, the quality advantage, as you know, in terms of benchmarks and stuff is probably not more than 10% to 15% for most of the relevant benchmarks that we are looking at. And the cost difference can be more than a factor of 10. So yes, it does matter. And what we see is as businesses are doing more and more real-time continuous operation to ensure that their knowledge and know-how is always up to date, and that's going to drive up token usage, and that will then require smarter routing to the relevant capable models.
[Operator Instructions]
At this time, there are no further questions. I would like to turn the conference back over to eGain management for any closing remarks.
Thanks, operator, and thanks, everyone, for joining the call today. And again, I encourage all of you out there to look at joining us at the event in Chicago, again, details on the website. Thank you.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
eGain Corporation — Q4 2026 Earnings Call
eGain Corporation — Q4 2026 Earnings Call
eGain liefert solides FY26 mit moderatem Gesamtwachstum, starker AI‑Kundenmigration und klarer Roadmap bis 2030 zur reinen AI‑Ertragsbasis.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Totalumsatz: $91.1M im FY26 (+3% YoY)
- Q4-Umsatz: $22.2M, über Guidance und Konsens
- AI-Wachstum: AI‑Kundenumsatz +20% YoY; AI‑Customer ARR +13% und 72% der SaaS‑ARR
- Profitabilität: Adjusted EBITDA $13.6M (15% Marge FY26)
- Cashflow: Operativer Cashflow $21.2M (Rekord); Kasse $73.3M und fortlaufendes Buyback
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Marktposition: Gartner nennt eGain Leader im neuen Magic Quadrant für Customer Service Knowledge Management — Bestätigung der Marktdefinition.
- Geschäftsmodell‑Shift: Reporting jetzt nach "AI‑Customer" (Kunden, die AI nutzen); Ziel ist Ausbau von ARR pro Account statt Produkt‑SKU‑Betrachtung.
- Produktfokus: Fokus auf AI Knowledge Ops: Releases wie intelligente Voice‑Agenten, Zero‑Code Agentic Studio und kontinuierliche Evaluations‑Tools sowie spezielle Healthcare‑Suite.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q1 FY27: AI‑Customer Revenue $13.7–14.0M; Total Revenue $20.9–21.4M; adj. EBITDA $1.4–1.9M (7–9% Marge).
- FY27: AI‑Customer Revenue $59.5–60.5M (+8–10%); Total Revenue $84.5–86.0M; erwartet: AI ARR +20%, Legacy ARR −60%.
- Langfristig (2030): Ziel Total Revenue $110–120M, AI‑Customer ARR $100–120M; AI‑Umsatz soll ~95% der Gesamterlöse ausmachen.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Run‑off Zeitplan: Management erwartet faktisches Auslaufen der nicht‑AI‑ARR bis circa 2030; Umwandlung in AI‑Geschäft wird angestrebt, aber nicht vollständig quantifiziert.
- Preisdruck durch AI: Management sieht moderaten Preisdruck (geschätzt ~1–2 Prozentpunkte über 2–3 Jahre), gleichzeitig neue AI‑Funktionen als Umsatztreiber.
- Wachstumstreiber: Management nennt neue Logos als Haupttreiber; konkrete Aufschlüsselung (Preiserhöhungen vs Seat‑Upsell vs Neukunden) blieb vage.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: eGain transformiert sich erfolgreich zu einem AI‑zentrierten SaaS‑Anbieter: double‑digit AI‑Wachstum, starke Cash‑Generierung und klare 2030‑Targets. Kurzfristig bleibt Gesamtwachstum gedämpft durch geplanten Rückgang des Legacy‑Geschäfts; Aktieninteressenten müssen Execution‑Risiken bei Pilot‑Konversion und Sales‑Skalierung gegen das langfristige Upside‑Potenzial abwägen.
eGain Corporation — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the eGain Fiscal 2026 Third Quarter Financial Results Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Byers, PondelWilkinson, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to eGain's Fiscal 2026 Third Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are eGain's Chief Executive Officer, Ashu Roy; and Chief Financial Officer, Eric Smit.
Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this conference call, management will make certain forward-looking statements, which convey management's expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding future financial and operational performance. Forward-looking statements are generally preceded by words such as believe, plan, intend, expect, anticipate or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are protected by safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ in material respects.
Information on various factors that could affect eGain's results are detailed in the company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. eGain is making these statements as of today, May 14, 2026, and assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking information in this conference call.
In addition to GAAP results, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income. The tables included with the earnings press release include a reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. eGain's earnings press release can be found by clicking the Press Releases link on the Investor Relations page of eGain's website at egain.com. And along with the earnings release, we will post an updated investor presentation to the Investor Relations page of eGain's website. And lastly, a phone replay of this conference call will be available for 1 week.
And now with that said, I'd like to turn the call over to eGain's CEO, Ashu Roy.
Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us. We delivered a strong third quarter with continued momentum in our AI Knowledge business, driven by customer expansion, growing partner engagement and new products. Revenue was in line with expectations and profitability remains strong. Year-to-date, our AI Knowledge ARR has grown 26%, and we have generated $18.7 million in operating cash flow year-to-date, which is a 27% margin.
Let me share some of the interesting highlights that we are seeing in the business. In the last 60 days, we've seen a meaningful increase in RFP activity in the U.S., most of it from Fortune 1000 BFSI, which is banking and insurance and health care enterprises. These RFPs almost always seem to focus on AI readiness of knowledge, an open architecture for APIs and MCPs and deep integration into the customer service, customer experience stack.
Equally importantly, many of these RFPs are coming through our partners. Year-to-date, our partner-sourced opportunities are up 67%. We see the growing interest in AI knowledge as a natural progression from an early adopter phase to an early majority phase of the adoption curve. Knowledge management, we see is being increasingly seen as a core AI infrastructure, a must-have, not a nice-to-have.
Switching to customers. Now, we had a very nice quarter for product adoption and expansion. These expansions reflect a pattern of customers standardizing on eGain as their enterprise knowledge platform.
Let me highlight some examples. The first one is a top 10 U.S. insurance company. This client expanded from an initial deployment of about 3,000 licenses in one business unit to an additional 5,600 licenses in a second major business unit. This creates a single knowledge hub across these divisions, replacing the fragmented and siloed content and knowledge they had before.
With this platform, the client is now establishing consistent taxonomy, knowledge workflows and content life cycle governance across these business units, while analytics and AI help them continuously refine knowledge. This client is also piloting AI Agent, which is one of our products for the contact center, powered by the trusted knowledge coming from our platform.
The second example I want to share is a top 10 global airline. To support growth in their customer care department, the client has added licenses to ensure consistent knowledge access across all the new teams, reinforcing eGain as the single platform for knowledge-powered service and operational efficiencies.
We're also seeing rapid follow-on expansion from newer clients. I'd give you a couple of examples. After selecting eGain to support a large-scale digital transformation a few months ago, this European financial services conglomerate is now expanding usage across other business units beyond customer service in the contact center to look at self-service options for all their touch points.
Another example is a global engineering services leader. They initially deployed our solution for field service knowledge, and now they're expanding to assist all their service personnel, including contact centers and partners. Across these examples, there is a theme, and that is that once we are deployed in a CX or customer service use case, the eGain platform naturally expands to become the centralized enterprise knowledge platform, both for AI and humans.
Looking at products during the quarter, we introduced several innovations to deliver greater value in some of our strong verticals and also deepen our ecosystem integrations.
First, we launched the eGain AI Knowledge Suite for retail banking. The solution is purpose-built for banks and credit unions to unify knowledge and enable AI-driven service and needs-based guided selling. Early clients like Rogue Credit Union are very excited about the positive user adoption and accelerated time to value, something they shared during a joint webinar last month.
Then we introduced our AI Agent for Cisco Webex Contact Center, strengthening our proposition in the Cisco ecosystem.
Third, we announced connectors into UCaaS platforms, Microsoft Teams, Slack and Zoom Team Chat, all with the goal to enhance employee collaboration with the same trusted knowledge. These connectors will help our clients build knowledge once for CX use cases and then reuse it for employee-facing use cases across their business.
And it's, again, a pattern that we are seeing emerging where we land into the CX world, which is customer service or contact center. And once we show our solution and deploy the success of that then drives a natural extension of that knowledge platform across the rest of the use cases, which are more employee-facing.
Finally, we announced enterprise AI connectors to agentic development environments, including Copilot, Claude, Gemini and Cursor. These connectors enable developers to tap into trusted knowledge managed within the eGain platform via APIs and MCP protocols right from their favorite development environment. As I said before, this idea of a trusted governed knowledge base and a hub is very compelling. It connects and controls all the AI projects, including prototypes and offers governance, explainability, observability to developers and business users alike in the business.
As I zoom out of the customers and specific products that we announced last quarter, all of us would agree that the pace of innovation is accelerating in the market, and so it is with eGain. We see lots of opportunity to increasingly automate the capture, curation and consumption of knowledge, that loop as it relates to customer service and contact centers in regulated businesses and companies with complex products.
Last week, we hosted our annual Solve 26 event in London. We have another annual event in Chicago in October, but this one is a European event in London for customers and partners. The event reinforced what we are seeing across the market, trusted knowledge is becoming the essential foundation for enterprise AI. The reason is simple. Conventional wisdom says that knowledge is nothing more than unstructured data, not true. Knowledge is the instruction layer for AI. It provides the what, and the how and occasionally the why that is used by the models to then deliver automated experiences that are reliable.
To build these agentic systems, enterprises must first centralize, govern and improve this knowledge. So the quality of knowledge determines the quality of AI outcomes. This is especially important in customer service and contact centers, which represents one of the largest near-term opportunities for AI transformation. At the same time, our research shows that more than 80% of organizations are still in the very early stages of their AI knowledge maturity and transformation journey, and that creates a significant opportunity for eGain.
At our Solve event, we also launched several new products beyond the ones we announced last quarter. And these help our clients consume the knowledge more easily in agentic workflows. They enable our clients to evaluate and ensure quality of these AI Knowledge pipelines they're building all the way from content to begin with and automated experiences that the AI tools deliver.
We also launched an IVA product, which brings accurate conversational self-service to the voice channel. And finally, we announced an AI agent for Salesforce version 2, which is a pluggable solution that activates our AI Agent with full context of Salesforce content and data within the Salesforce Service Cloud desktop.
Customers and partners love the new capabilities and what they appreciated the most was their fellow customers sharing their knowledge journey and AI ROI stories. Customers like Achmea, BT, BMI, Specialized Bikes, Worldpay, they shared their insights, including tips and tricks, very, very valuable for attendees. And for us, it is gratifying and inspiring.
On the team front, during the quarter, we strengthened our leadership team with the appointment of Steve Pappas as Head of Innovation. Steve brings deep expertise in knowledge management, AI and customer experience, along with a strong track record of scaling enterprise SaaS businesses and a sharp focus on helping clients modernize their knowledge architecture. His leadership will help us deliver more consumable innovation and accelerate market expansion as we continue to shape the AI Knowledge category.
To conclude, we delivered strong financial performance, expanded within customers and are building a high-quality pipeline driven by growing enterprise demand for AI-powered knowledge. As the market increasingly recognizes Trusted Knowledge as the foundation for enterprise AI, we are well positioned to lead this category.
With that, I'll hand it over to Eric.
Thanks, Ashu, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Before I begin, I'd like to note that we are again using slides to support today's call. We believe this provides helpful context and makes it easier to follow our results and outlook. You can access the slides in the Investor Relations section of our website alongside the webcast. As Ashu noted, we delivered a solid third quarter with year-over-year growth in both revenue and ARR, along with continued strong profitability.
Let me walk you through our Q3 financial results, followed by our outlook. Looking at our revenue. Total revenue for the third quarter was $22.5 million, up 7% year-over-year. SaaS revenue also grew 7% year-over-year and represented 93% of total revenue. Excluding the approximately $600,000 quarterly impact from noncore messaging products we are sunsetting, total revenue and SaaS revenue would have been up 13% and 14%, respectively, year-over-year. Revenue was also impacted by approximately $450,000 due to the 2 fewer days this quarter compared to the prior quarter.
Looking at non-GAAP gross profits and gross margins. Total gross margin for the quarter was 74%, up 500 basis points from 69% a year ago. SaaS gross margin was 78%, up 100 basis points year-over-year. This expansion was driven by continued improvements in SaaS margins and a greater mix shift of higher-margin SaaS revenue relative to professional services revenue.
Now turning to our operations. Non-GAAP operating costs for the third quarter was $13.9 million, up 1% year-over-year and down 3% sequentially, reflecting ongoing discipline as we streamline operations and benefit from automation and our shift towards a product-led sales model.
R&D was up 3% sequentially, reflecting continued investment in engineering talent and leadership. We expect the trend towards approximately 30% of revenue over time as we invest to support innovation and growth. Sales and marketing expense was $4.5 million for the quarter, down 11% sequentially, though we expect this to increase in Q4 as we invest in go-to-market initiatives, including our recently completed eGain Solve event in London.
Looking at our bottom line. Non-GAAP net income was $3.2 million or $0.12 per share on a basic basis and $0.11 per share on a diluted basis, up significantly from $765,000 or $0.03 per share on a basic basis and diluted basis in the year ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 14% at the high end of our guidance range and up from 6% a year ago.
Turning to our balance sheet and cash flows. We used $1.8 million of cash in the third quarter, reflecting typical seasonality and collections, which are weighted toward the first half of the fiscal year. For the first 9 months, cash flow from operations was $18.7 million, representing a 27% cash flow margin, well ahead of our expectations. We end the quarter with $80.5 million in cash, up from $62.9 million as of June 30, 2025, and we have no debt, maintaining a strong balance sheet and financial flexibility.
Now turning to our customer metrics. To highlight the strength of our Knowledge business, we are breaking out our ARR metrics for Knowledge customers. SaaS ARR for Knowledge customers increased 26% year-over-year and SaaS ARR for all customers increased 7% year-over-year. Excluding noncore messaging products, SaaS ARR growth for all customers increased -- would have increased 11% year-over-year.
During Q3 2026, 1 on-premise subscription customer in EMEA chose not to migrate to our product suite in the eGain Cloud and as a result, terminated the agreement with us. This reduced our total SaaS ARR impact of approximately $1.6 million. And of that, the AI knowledge component of their business was approximately $900,000. We view this as a one-off event given the restrictions in the customers' country of origin on the use of cloud-based services. Also, as expected, bookings reflected normal seasonal trends with Q3 typically being the softer quarter based on historical patterns.
Our retention rates also improved significantly. LTM dollar-based SaaS net retention for Knowledge customers was 116%, up from 97% a year ago, while net retention for all customers was 101%, up from 88% a year ago. LTM dollar-based SaaS net expansion rate was 120% for our Knowledge customers and 107% for all customers. Looking at our remaining performance obligations, total RPO increased 11% year-over-year, and our short-term RPO of $48.5 million was up 9% year-over-year. These metrics reflect strong engagement and expansion, particularly within our AI Knowledge offering.
Before turning to our guidance, I'd like to share some additional color on the factors influencing our updated FY '26 revenue estimates. As Ashu stated, we are seeing a clear shift in the market. AI Knowledge is now being evaluated as enterprise infrastructure rather than solely as a contact center solution. This aligns directly with how we're positioning the platform and is creating larger, more strategic opportunities that we believe we are well positioned to win.
That said, these larger opportunities typically involve longer sales cycles, which are affecting the timing of revenue conversion. But, to the guidance, for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, we expect total revenue of between $21.5 million to $22 million.
Turning to the bottom line. For Q4, we expect GAAP net loss of $300,000 to net income of $400,000 or $0.01 negative to $0.01 positive per share, which includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $900,000. We expect non-GAAP net income of $600,000 to $1.3 million or $0.02 to $0.05 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $500,000 to $1 million or a range of 2% to 5%.
For the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, we expect total revenue to be between $90.5 million to $91 million, representing a return to growth for the year. GAAP net income of $7 million to $7.8 million or $0.25 to $0.28 per share. This includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $2.9 million. It also includes warrant expense of approximately $1.4 million, and non-GAAP net income of $11.3 million to $12.1 million or $0.39 to $0.42 per share. and adjusted EBITDA margin of $11.9 million to $12.4 million or a margin of 13%. We expect weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 28 million for both the fourth quarter and the full fiscal 2026.
In conclusion, we delivered a solid quarter with revenue and ARR growth and strong profitability. Our AI Knowledge Hub ARR grew 26%, highlighting continued momentum. We are executing well against our go-to-market strategy. While it's still early, we are seeing encouraging signs, including increased high-quality RFP activity and pilot programs. We remain focused on expanding our market reach and building on our leadership position in AI knowledge.
With that, I'll turn it back to operator for Q&A.
[Operator Instructions] The first question will come from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.
2. Question Answer
Just a few for me. On Ashu, I guess this would be for both of you. On the RFP surge and the increase in activity, can you just put a little more scoping around that in terms of the magnitude of late-stage opportunities at this point maybe versus 6 months, 12 months, 18 months ago? Just I don't know, put some context around that increase in RFP activity that you referenced.
Sure. I would say that the number of RFPs that we are actively -- that we have responded to, right, in the last 60 days is probably about double of what our average rate in 60 days would be, right? So that's one lens to look at.
In terms of the stage of decision around those RFPs and the eventual conclusion into wrap up, I'd say that's a 2- to 4-month process, I would assume for most of them, right? So those are the 2 comments I would make.
Got it. And then maybe I know you're not giving formal guidance for '27, but can you put some bounds around how you think about the year based on what you've got in ARR, what you're looking at there in pipeline, even if it's broad ranges, do you see positive top line? Is there -- are there scenarios where you think double-digit top line is credible? I don't know, anything you would offer there would be helpful.
So a couple of thoughts there. One, I don't know if I have the numbers right away to give you numbers, but I would say that the number of new logos is going to go up substantially, [ perhaps, ] in the sort of the target profile that we are going after, right? So that I'm feeling pretty optimistic about.
And the other thing I would say is that the expansion in existing accounts is picking steam, and that's something we saw even in the last quarter. And so that to me bodes well in terms of average ARR per customer. So put those 2 together, I feel like our AI Knowledge ARR should definitely grow double digits in the '27 time frame.
Eric, do you have anything to add?
Exactly. Yes. I think, as we see the AI Knowledge piece now 64% of total business, and that will -- we expect that to continue to increase. And certainly, that component certainly we would expect that to continue to grow in double-digit numbers.
Helpful. Maybe just one last question. The -- I guess, there is a 2-part. Just maybe any update on the Cisco relationship. And then obviously, you're building cash. You got a pretty healthy cash balance at this point. Just thoughts on use of cash, returns of capital, how you're thinking about that?
I'll take the first one. Maybe you can take the second one, Eric.
Okay.
So my -- so the Cisco relationship is active and healthy. I think there is more that we can do. And so we are working on seeing how we can partner with them more, especially as some of the AI Agent capability that we have, as you noted, we've announced last quarter in their Webex Contact Center platform. So yes, that's an area that I think is an opportunity for us to further expand our engagement with them in their ecosystem.
And then I think on the use of cash, I mean, obviously, in this environment, having a very healthy balance sheet, we feel very comfortable in this position, both in our focus on the go-to-market execution. So obviously, continuing to be careful in that investment, but recognizing how dynamic and exciting this opportunity is, we want to make sure that we continue to invest in sort of the position and the go-to-market.
Obviously, there are seasonal aspects of when the money gets spent. So Q3 is historically a slower spend for us. That's why the numbers were down, but that's spend -- as I indicated, we are spending more in Q4, especially with the big customer events. So that's typically what you would see.
And then certainly, we will be opportunistic when it comes to other options, especially in this environment, if there's a plan to acquire customers through inorganic means, we're always open to that. But our primary focus here is driving execution on the core business operation. And we do have $20 million -- roughly $20 million available in our buyback program. So again, depending upon where the stock price is, we would certainly look to sort of reengage on the buyback that we paused for the last quarter or so.
The next question will come from Erik Suppiger with B. Riley.
Two questions. One, the RFP activity, why do you think that's increasing? Do you think that is a function of just market awareness for the need for better knowledge management? Or is that more a function of some of the outreach that you've had?
And then secondly, Salesforce announced that it's expanding into the Agentforce Contact Center. It sounds like they're going to be really pushing an integration between CRM and contact centers going forward. Do you think that changes market dynamics in terms of your opportunity going forward as CRM starts getting more blended or the vendors doing CRM get more blended with contact centers?
Right. So the first question about why I think the RFP activity, I would say -- I'd like to say that it has to do entirely with our marketing outreach, but I think it has, as much to do with the market awareness. And awareness around the fact that these AI investments are not scaling and not scaling in ROI positive ways. So that's the theme we are seeing even in our conversations with prospects who are not in our pipeline. They're all struggling with having made big bets on things like Copilot across the enterprise or a few of them working with Gemini, Google or OpenAI.
The theme we hear is consistent and that is the foundation is not right. And so it's like a whack-a-mole constantly trying to figure out what part of it broke down in terms of the inputs into the AI system. I think that is as much to -- as a contribution factor as our marketing efforts.
In terms of your second question, I would say, at this point, I haven't seen that impact any conversations that we are in. And we -- let's say, the most popular CRM system in our target customers is Salesforce. So we do see a lot of Salesforce. We are used to -- we integrate with them, we enhance these -- we work with their content, all that. So we have not seen too many examples of people saying, "Oh, I'm going to throw away my XYZ CCaaS and just go with Salesforce as the entire solution for CRM plus CCaaS yet.
Do you think it would be more difficult or easier for you to get into an account that has an integrated CRM and contact center solution?
It's a hypothetical. I -- we haven't seen any of those, but I would say that Salesforce generally has an open ecosystem architecture. And so we have not seen that being a huge challenge if the clients decide they want to explore a best-in-class solution like ours for their knowledge layer in their AI kind of strategy.
[Operator Instructions] Showing no further questions, this will conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to hand the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Right. Thanks, operator, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Look forward to updating you once we finish out the year and give updated to our plans for FY '27. Thank you.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
eGain Corporation — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
eGain Corporation — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the eGain Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Byers with PondelWilkinson Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to eGain's Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are eGain's Chief Executive Officer, Ashu Roy; and Chief Financial Officer, Eric Smit.
Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this conference call, management will make certain forward-looking statements which convey management's expectations, beliefs, plans, and objectives regarding future financial and operational performance.
Forward-looking statements are generally preceded by words such as believe, plan, intend, expect, anticipate, or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are protected by safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ in material respects.
Information on various factors that could affect eGain's results are detailed in the company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. eGain is making these statements as of today, February 3, 2026, and assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking information in this conference call.
In addition to GAAP results, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income. The financial tables included with the earnings press release include reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
eGain's earnings press release can be found by clicking the Press Releases link on the Investor Relations page of the eGain website at egain.com. And along with the earnings release, we will post an updated investor presentation to the Investor Relations page of eGain's website. And lastly, a phone replay of this conference call will be available for 1 week.
And now with that said, I'd like to turn the call over to eGain's CEO, Ashu Roy.
Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. We saw good business momentum in our second quarter. Both revenue and profitability exceeded our guidance and street consensus, and we delivered strong operating cash flow. We also drove strong bookings in the quarter, including multiple Global 1000 logos and healthy expansions.
Our AI Knowledge Hub momentum continues to grow with ARR from these customers up 27% year-over-year and our total AI Knowledge ARR now representing 64% of our total SaaS ARR. Finally, we saw more than 50% year-over-year increase in top-of-the-funnel AI Knowledge leads. So that's encouraging.
Turning to business highlights. We saw a couple of trends worth calling out. First, 25% of our new logos in the first half of fiscal '26 were sourced by partners. This is more than a doubling of our partner-sourced new logos year-over-year. Our partner momentum is building nicely. We also saw enterprise buying bundled alongside the CX deals in the majority of cases in this quarter.
This convergence of customer service and contact center buying and enterprise use case-oriented buying is accelerated by what we see as corporate AI teams and their interest in knowledge. This is a development that validates our point of view that a centralized trusted knowledge foundation is necessary for AI ROI upscale.
Now let me share some booking highlights for the quarter, starting with new logos. First, we won the enterprise knowledge mandate for one of the largest business software providers in the world. Our knowledge platform will be deployed across over 100,000 users and multiple use cases across CX, employee experience, and AI experience, which now is, as we know, a huge thing. This win also presents us the opportunity to partner with this client to potentially offer our knowledge solution to their global clients, very exciting for us.
Another one worth calling out is a large U.S.-based manufacturer of kitchen cabinets with over 15 brands and 6,000 employees. This company's product and policy knowledge was scattered all over, and it was making it very hard for their service teams to access accurate current answers for long-tail products. As you know, cabinets last for a long time and service questions can be for products you have sold 15 years ago. They selected our AI knowledge hub to centralize all the knowledge, drive consistency, and automate their future AI initiatives.
We also signed a couple of new insurance logos during the quarter, including Achmea. This is one of Europe's largest insurance and financial services groups based in Netherlands. They serve more than 10 million customers. Achmea has been driving a strategic shift towards becoming a digital insurer with customer experience and self-service adoption as their core priorities.
They recognize the need for a knowledge as a service partner, and they selected us to accelerate their digital insurance journey. Our platform now will power 21,000 users across Achmea, including customer service and contact center use cases, but not just customer service.
We are also seeing good momentum with credit unions. One of them that I want to call out is Oregon Community Credit Union. They serve over 250,000 members in Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. They recognized the need to modernize their knowledge system, and they selected us, again, for our open architecture and AI capability. Yet again, in this case, eGain will be used to support all enterprise use cases, including contact center use cases where we are integrated and connected into the Genesys CCaaS platform.
So this convergence that we see of starting with customer service and contact center, but then the knowledge platform being used for all enterprise use cases is a welcome one for us because we believe that while CX is the most compelling ROI proposition for knowledge, knowledge is not limited in terms of its value within customer experience use cases alone. And so applying what works in CX across the entire enterprise provides enormous benefit to businesses that are looking to accelerate their AI ambition.
In terms of thought leadership, we more than ever believe that the market is aligning with our view that a trusted knowledge foundation accelerates enterprise AI ROI. This quarter, as I mentioned earlier, we saw more than 50% year-over-year increase in top-of-the-funnel marketing leads and a 23% increase in pure inbound interest year-over-year.
Turning to partnerships, which is a key area for us beyond our direct go-to-market motions. Our expanding efforts in partner development are bearing fruit. Partner-sourced leads in the first half of fiscal '26 increased 80% year-over-year. On the product front, as we have mentioned before, we announced our developer-focused offering, the eGain Composer in October at our customer event in Chicago.
eGain Composer now is helping us drive more product sales of the AI Knowledge Hub and attract new ecosystem partners. We are seeing growing engagement from developers, both from AI groups within enterprises as well as smaller partners who are building bespoke AI solutions for their clients, which are enterprises. As you know, Composer offers modular capabilities on our composable platform to easily build trusted solutions using our Knowledge Hub.
While it's early days, we see continued and growing interest from smaller partners as well who want to use Composer to build differentiated capabilities in their own go-to-market offerings. As we execute more go-to-market programs around Composer, we intend to expand awareness amongst AI stakeholders, increase engagement, and generate early conversations across diverse use cases beyond customer experience and customer service.
I'm also excited about the fact that eGain was once again noted in the right top quadrant, the leader quadrant in the Gartner Emerging MQ for generative AI knowledge apps. We were also late last year named KM World's Readers' Choice Award winner, and this came back in November of 2025.
To conclude, we're executing well on our go-to-market strategies. We are seeing growing brand awareness as evidenced by increase in inbound interest in our products. We are seeing increased opportunities both in our go-to-market awareness and direct marketing activities as well as partner activities. We are seeing our product-led growth strategy delivering tangible results.
And lastly, we see the market converging centered around CX and customer service, but extending beyond that to cover the entire enterprise for a centralized knowledge foundation that businesses are looking to create, which will then give them the right capability to springboard off for their AI initiatives.
With that, I'll hand it over to Eric Smit, our CFO, to provide more detail on the financials. Eric?
Thanks, Ashu, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Before I begin, I want to mention that we are again using slides to support our earnings call. We believe this will provide helpful context and make it easier for you to follow our results and outlook. In addition to the webcast, you can find the slides in the Investor Relations section of our website, under the updated investor presentation.
As Ashu noted, we had a strong -- had strong business momentum in the quarter with revenue and profitability exceeding our guidance and street consensus, strong year-over-year ARR growth, expanding gross and EBITDA margins, and strong cash flow from operations. Let me share more details about our Q2 financial results before discussing our outlook and guidance for Q3 and fiscal 2026.
Looking at our revenue, total revenue for the second quarter was $23 million, ahead of our guidance and street consensus and up 3% year-over-year. SaaS revenue increased by 5% year-over-year and accounted for 95% of total revenue, up from 93% in Q2 last year. If we exclude the approximate $600,000 reduction per quarter from our noncore messaging products, which we are sunsetting this fiscal year, then total revenue was up 5% year-over-year and SaaS revenue was up 8% year-over-year.
Looking at our non-GAAP gross profits and gross margins. Total gross margin for the quarter was 74%, up 300 basis points from 71% a year ago. SaaS gross margin for the quarter was 80%, up 200 basis points from 78% a year ago. The SaaS gross margin expansion was primarily driven by our product enhancements, which enabled more cost-efficient deployments and delivered operational efficiencies within our cloud and customer support teams.
PS revenue was sequentially lower in Q2 as anticipated due to the timing of bookings that didn't close until late in the quarter as well as the impact of the government shutdown. This contributed to the negative PS margin in Q2. We have rightsized and adjusted our PS organization during Q2, and we'll see the full quarter savings benefits in Q3 onwards. As such, we expect PS gross margins to return to flat to slightly positive as we saw in Q1.
Now turning to our operations. Non-GAAP operating costs for the second quarter were $14.2 million, down 3% year-over-year as we have streamlined and realigned our business operations, increasing our investments in AI product innovation while reducing spend on legacy products.
Looking at our bottom line. Non-GAAP net income was $3 million or $0.11 per share on a basic and diluted basis, up from $1.3 million or $0.05 per share on a basic basis and $0.04 per share on a diluted basis in the year ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 14%, up from 7% in the year ago quarter.
Turning to our balance sheet and cash flows. For the second quarter, we generated strong operating cash flow of $10.1 million, representing a 44% operating cash flow margin compared to $6.4 million and 29% operating cash flow margin in the year ago quarter. Our cash collections have historically been front-loaded in the fiscal year due to the timing of large deals and renewals.
Our balance sheet remains very strong and with a healthy level of cash and no debt. Total cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter were $83.1 million, up from $62.9 million as of June 30, 2025. During the company -- during the quarter, the company did not repurchase any shares of common stock. And as of the end of Q2, we still have $19.7 million remaining available under the company's current authorized buyback program.
Now turning to our customer metrics. I've broken out our AI Knowledge ARR metrics from the total metrics to highlight the momentum of our AI Knowledge business. SaaS ARR for AI Knowledge customers increased 27% year-over-year, while SaaS ARR for all of our customers increased 7% year-over-year. Excluding the noncore messaging products, which we are sunsetting this fiscal year, SaaS ARR for all customers increased 11% year-over-year.
Turning to our net retention rates. LTM dollar-based SaaS net retention for AI Knowledge customers was 116%, up from 99% a year ago, while net retention for all customers was 101%, up from 89% a year ago. Our LTM dollar-based SaaS net expansion rate was 119% for our AI Knowledge customers and 108% for all customers.
Looking at our remaining performance obligations, total RPO increased 15% year-over-year, and our short-term RPO of $53 million was up 4% year-over-year.
Now turning to our guidance. For the third quarter of fiscal 2026, we expect total revenue of between $22.2 million to $22.7 million, and as a reminder, the fewer number of days in Q3 has an approximately $400,000 negative impact on revenue for the quarter when compared to Q2.
Turning to the bottom line for Q3. We expect GAAP net income of $1 million to $1.5 million or $0.04 to $0.05 per share, which includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $800,000. We expect non-GAAP net income of $1.8 million to $2.3 million or $0.06 to $0.08 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $2.6 million to $3.1 million or a margin of 12% to 14%.
Looking at our full year ending June 30, 2026, we expect total revenue to be between $90.5 million and $92 million, representing a return to growth for the year. This remains unchanged from our initial guidance provided last quarter.
We now expect GAAP net income of $4.5 million to $6 million or $0.16 to $0.21 per share. This includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $2.9 million, also includes warrant expense of approximately $1.4 million. Our non-GAAP net income of $8.8 million to $10.3 million or $0.31 to $0.36 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $10.9 million to $12.4 million or a margin of 12% to 13%.
Looking at weighted average shares outstanding, we now expect approximately 28.3 million shares for Q3 and 28 million for fiscal 2026.
So in conclusion, we delivered revenue and profitability that exceeded our guidance. Our AI Knowledge ARR growth continues to gain momentum, increasing 27% this quarter and now accounts for 64% of total SaaS ARR. We're executing well on our go-to-market strategies and seeing positive results, and we are well positioned to capture market leadership in AI-driven knowledge automation and to drive sustainable revenue growth and increased profitability going forward.
Lastly, on the Investor Relations calendar, tomorrow, we will be hosting virtual meetings with institutional investors throughout the day as part of the Oppenheimer Emerging Growth Conference. We hope to see some of you virtually. And next month, we will be at the Annual ROTH Conference on March 23. We'll provide more details as we get closer to the date and hope to see some of you there in person.
This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, we will now open the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.
2. Question Answer
A couple of questions for me. First, congrats on the large software deal, and I'd love to hear a bit more about that deal, the cycle, the competitive landscape, what you're replacing?
Sure. This is Ashu here, Jeff. Yes. So let's go in order. So the first thing was it was a fairly long sales cycle. We've been at it for, I would say, seriously for about 1.5 years, but we've been talking to them maybe a few months before that, went through the whole RFP process. And eventually they selected us. So that was one.
The second was in terms of what we were replacing, they didn't have an enterprise-wide knowledge platform up until then, but they did have other competitors for AI search in some of their functional groups, but they didn't have an enterprise-wide knowledge solution up until then.
Got it. And then, Eric, just on the numbers front, just so I'm thinking about this right, the March quarter versus the December quarter is a clean sequential compare. We've had the full run here of the large JPMorgan deal. And then if I recall, the messaging was going to sunset in tranches. And I think you had said that was Q1 '27. Just trying to validate if I've got all that right.
Yes, that's correct. The -- just to be clear, on the noncore messaging, we had 50% of it reduced in the Q2 quarter and then the balance will be reducing in the first quarter of '27.
Yes. Okay. All right. Got it. And then on the partner side, I mean, obviously, having some real good impact. Can you just narrow that down? Is that concentrated within a small basket? Are there any particular partners that are driving the strength on the partner-driven lead gen?
Yes. The ones that seem to be working, 2 areas that seem to be quite promising. One is small boutique kind of knowledge consulting shops, which have existing clients, and they are looking to kind of refresh the platform for the clients and some of the legacy knowledge vendors who these boutique SI shops have worked with. So that's one area where we are seeing good momentum.
And the second area we're seeing some early but very promising momentum is just pure contact center knowledge deals through sort of the TSD kind of networks.
And congrats on the cash flow, guys. Great cash flow there.
The next question comes from Richard Baldry with ROTH Capital.
Sort of an esoteric question, but there seems to be a stable developing that people can use AI and sort of instantly create software companies. So could you talk a little bit about the challenges to replicating a system of record class software platform that a vibe coding session clearly couldn't replicate. So you've been building this for a decade plus. I'd like to just put a pin in that myth, sort of one company at a time. So if you can talk about sort of the barriers to and the moats around what you've built, I think that would be helpful.
Yes. That's a tough one, Richard, but I'll try to take a crack at it because the fact is that you're right, basic programming and even complex programming, given appropriate constraints and very good prompting and kind of co-coding, if you will, with very good programmers -- human programmers on the other side is accelerating the phase of software creation, which we typically call coding and development, right? So that part is definitely true and we are taking advantage of it just as anyone else is.
The parts that I think are still seem more work, though I wouldn't ever say that it's not solvable because the trajectory seems to be quite interesting, is architecture, understanding of use cases, understanding things that are nonfunctional in nature in terms of reliability, scalability, performance, and so on. And then putting it all together. What I'm trying to say is I think the barriers are definitely coming down for everyone, right, whether it's a 1-person shop or whether it's a 500-person shop like eGain or it's a 300,000-person shop like Google. And the focus and the use case understanding and the ability to put things together that have proven track record are going to be the differentiators really.
And then think about internally then, how much do you think you can use the tools internally to either speed up your own future development and/or lower your cost to deliver the service? And maybe a broader way to think about it is in a pre-generative AI world, do you think your profitability would be higher? Or is it higher in a post-world because you can lower some of your internal costs?
I think assuming that pricing holds, we would definitely be more profitable, right? But I do suspect that there's going to be pressure on pricing over time for all of us, not just eGain. Everyone is going to feel the pricing pressure. And so I feel like there is a big opportunity to become the enterprise knowledge fabric. Yes, we're starting from the vantage point of customer service and customer experience. But as I mentioned, a big majority of our deals now are starting in CX. And in the first purchase itself, they end up including enterprise use case.
So I think that it's a land grab really at this point. And so we are focused on this knowledge piece and we hope to grab more land than others and then play the game as well as anyone else from there on.
Got it. And maybe last for me. The cash pile start building up pretty fast. Any thoughts on the best way to efficiently deploy that in the current environment?
No. I think as we've said before, I think we will keep focusing on our internal investments to drive the top line growth. I think we'll continue to -- on that momentum, I think we're obviously benefiting from the AI innovations that are sort of helping us save some of those money even as we're spending it on R&D and ramping up the teams in Sunnyvale. I think some of those cost savings are resulting in those improved profits in the short term.
But I think we certainly continue to see that as a primary focus. We obviously still have the share buyback in place. So we'll see whether that's an appropriate vehicle. And then finally, opportunistically looking at inorganic options. Again, this is not something that's a primary focus. But of course, we will continue to evaluate those as they come in as we look forward.
And maybe one last one for me. How are you thinking about hiring plans? You're sort of midway through the year executing against the plan. When you look forward, whether that's pipeline-driven, opportunity-driven, do you think hiring will be concentrated in sales and marketing? Do you think there's a flat period for some like development while you adopt the new tools that are getting you higher throughputs there? Just how do we think about that as you head into the second half?
So we've been, as Eric mentioned, Rich, we've been investing pretty smartly and actively in hiring new talent in product over the last year, right, in locally in the Bay Area. And that has proven -- that's borne fruit. We're very happy with that. Now at the same time, we have been reducing from some of the other sort of distributed teams that we had, thanks to automation that we are driving in the business. So the net impact doesn't seem like much is happening, but there's a lot of reallocation going into much more high-end engineering and technology talent on the product side, both in product management as well as engineering and architecture and AI.
Then moving to marketing, we -- as you know, we brought in a new marketing head. He's brought in a couple of new people now. And I think marketing is going to see a lot of increased activity and investment for us in the second half of this fiscal year, right? And then finally, sales, which while we are very happy with the pipeline, I still think that given the way we are product-led now, our sales motions are kind of different. They're much more expert-led, much more specialist-led, especially in large organizations where there's very early contact with tech and AI folks.
And so the composer proposition is resonating very well, and we are investing in that group, right? So that's kind of where we are now as it scales, which I believe it will, then we will add more sort of systematic sales muscle and headcount to meet the demand.
The next question comes from Erik Suppiger with B. Riley Securities.
Congrats on a real solid quarter there. One, I just want to be clear, is the deployment at JPMorgan, is that fully rolled out? Or is that still in process?
And then two, you had talked about some additional areas for opportunities across the enterprise. Can you discuss what are some of the logical kind of low-hanging fruit once you move past CX?
Sure. So first on the JPMC question, we are not fully rolled out as planned. We are halfway there and we expect to be fully rolled out later this year as planned. So that's good.
The second question in terms of other use cases, we are currently working on a few, Erik. I think maybe this is a good time for me to mention that we pulled up our Europe-based customer event, which normally we would do in June. Now we're doing it in May this year. And so we'll have our eGain Solve customer event in London on May 6 and 7. And those are the 2 events, one in Chicago, one in London, where we bring out our new products and capabilities.
And so I would say we look forward to sharing more in that forum as to what are the other use cases we are looking to roll out. But you can logically think of the other use cases. But to me, the first expansion is going to be concentric around broadly customer operations as opposed to just customer service and from there on into other enterprise-facing areas.
Okay. And then just in terms of some of the wins that you had, are most of those greenfield wins? Or are you displacing anybody's solutions?
I would say that in more cases than not, we are replacing some tactical solution or some big solution that has just run out of gas in terms of new innovation or AI readiness. That's one of the things we are seeing a lot of is existing AM solutions in CX areas that just don't seem to be investing in modernizing and making it sort of AI ready, if you will. And our knowledge automation capabilities are -- and composer capability. These 2 things are super attractive to businesses that are looking to drive sort of their AI projects with trusted content feeding into those systems. That seems to be one of the big trigger points.
Are customers using CRM platforms for that and they're finding that they're insufficient? Or what is it that they're trying to use for that?
I say there are 3 things, right? One is they just have a whole bunch of SharePoint and they have tried to rag kind of retrieval augmented generation on top of lots of SharePoint repositories to try to deliver the right content to AI systems on the front end. And they just run out of gas trying to make it work. That's one. I'm giving you some archetypes here.
So the second is they have knowledge sitting in salesforce, and they just run out of patience waiting for salesforce to deliver to what the commitments have been. Let's just say that.
And the third is they have tactical or point knowledge management solutions that have not kept pace with the AI expectations that these businesses have. Those are the 3, I'd say, most popular ones.
Since there are no more questions, this concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.
Well, thanks, everyone, for taking the time today. We look forward to providing you the update when we do our Q3 results.
Thanks.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
eGain Corporation — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
eGain Corporation — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to eGain Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Byers, PondelWilkinson, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to eGain's Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are eGain's Chief Executive Officer, Ashu Roy; and Chief Financial Officer, Eric Smit.
Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this conference call, management will make certain forward-looking statements, which convey management's expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives regarding future financial and operational performance. Forward-looking statements are generally preceded by words such as believe, plan, intend, expect, anticipate or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are protected by the safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ in material respects. Information on various factors that could affect eGain's results are detailed in the company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. eGain is making these statements as of today, November 12, 2025, and assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking information in this conference call.
In addition to GAAP results, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income. The tables included with the earnings press release include a reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. eGain's earnings press release can be found by clicking the press release link on the Investor Relations page of eGain's website at egain.com. Along with the earnings release, we will also post an updated investor presentation to the Investor Relations page of eGain's website. And lastly, a phone replay of this conference call will be available for 1 week.
And now with that said, I'd like to turn the call over to eGain's CEO, Ashu Roy.
Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. We are off to a good start to our fiscal year with strong first quarter results across the board and ahead of consensus. Our total revenue was up 8% year-over-year. Our SaaS revenue was up 10% year-over-year. And our AI knowledge line of product business, the ARR for it was up 23% year-over-year. So we're making progress in the right direction in this exciting space of AI knowledge that we are now firmly leading.
Turning to business highlights. Let me share a couple of notable new logo wins in the quarter. First, we signed up one of New York's largest insurers -- health insurers. They serve 2 million members roughly. This company saw the critical gap in their business operation where lack of trusted knowledge that was available to all their employees and clinical staff was hurting compliance. They were struggling with their knowledge content fragmented across silos, some were SharePoint, some were Confluence and then many other repositories. So following an extensive process RFP and so on, they selected us to centralize their knowledge across the business for 8,000 users.
Now what's interesting to us is within 100 days, they've gone live with our solution with a powerful, scalable AI experience that aligns perfectly with their mission to deliver great health care to New Yorkers.
Another one, which is quite interesting is a multinational energy company that we recently won. They serve over 20 million customers across gas and electricity. This company, they have set up an ambitious goal to achieve a top quartile CSAT ranking because that would enable them to compete for millions of pounds of government incentives.
A key challenge for them as part of this is replacing their outdated knowledge experience for something that is spread across thousands of different documents, PowerPoints, SharePoint, word documents. And so they're replacing that with eGain, a modern solution to support their contact center, their field agents and their service engineers. Again, this client went live within 100 days. They're already live now with our AI knowledge solution. They internally call it WATT, WATT, a fitting name for a knowledge tool in an energy company.
On the expansion front, we are seeing a nice pattern where existing knowledge clients are increasingly coming to us to add the AI agent products to leverage the trusted knowledge they have in their knowledge base and either going to the contact center to assist the agents or in some cases, expand it into customer self-service directly. So for example, one of our branded manufacturing clients last quarter decided to expand their core knowledge implementation now into customer self-service.
And this is a leading manufacturer of premium bicycles. And what we have been able to now do is reduce a lot of their inbound contact center volume, and they can drive a lot more growth without increasing cost of service. So this combination of AI and knowledge is really working for our customers now, and we are seeing more and more of them starting to drive that expansion and build-out of agentic capabilities on top of a trusted knowledge infrastructure from us.
The other thing, just looking at the exciting stuff we've announced recently is we made a whole bunch of new product announcements at our Solve 25 event last month. It was very successful. We held it in Chicago. About half a dozen of our Global 2000 clients shared success stories with pretty much a common theme, and that was the power of trusted knowledge and agentic AI working hand-in-hand to deliver both contact center improvements in performance as well as self-service improvements.
The 3 new capabilities that we announced at the event, incidentally, that's our biggest product announcement ever where we have announced 3 new capabilities. So that's sort of testimonial to the great work that I've been -- our team has been doing for the last 1.5 years in this area of AI knowledge. So the first product we announced was more a process that we have now translated into a product. This was our -- what used to be called the eGain Knowledge method.
The knowledge method was our way, our proprietary way of building out and maintaining enterprise knowledge in a very efficient way for our business clients. And what we've been able to do is to apply AI to that and develop what we are now calling the eGain AI knowledge method. This includes comprehensive AI-powered knowledge intelligence, content orchestration and answer synthesis capabilities. All that put together with expert in the loop to ensure that quality and compliance are always front and center.
With these automation capabilities, we are confident that we can accelerate most knowledge management tasks by a factor of 10, and also reduce customer implementation time by 2x to 3x. In fact, when I mentioned the other 2 clients earlier, they were benefiting from some of the early usage of this capability of AI knowledge methods.
Our attendees at the conference were simply delighted with this because for the longest time, knowledge management has been a great ROI, but the investment required has been a lot of manual labor. Now with automating that with our AI capabilities, that just creates a lot of energy around knowledge and the priority businesses are able to put on to knowledge automation, not knowledge management.
The next product we announced was the second version of eGain AI Agent. And so we -- it's a breakthrough approach we have taken now to enhance the first version to automate conversations in customer service. And what we are doing there is we are combining hybrid AI with in band expert assurance where needed. And by doing that, we can deliver nontrivial use cases, which involve transactions, which involve decisions that are compliance oriented to customers using AI and automation.
And that's something which we have seen is a big gap in the industry where a lot of agentic solutions that are out there now talk about in automation, but really, when we see the automation in practice, it's all around very trivial use cases because these agentic AI solutions will occasionally make mistakes. And so you need to have a hybrid AI approach where you combine the deterministic reasoning with model reasoning and you do that intelligently and with compliance in mind. And that's what we have implemented in AI Agent to.
Finally, we announced the eGain Composer, which is our first product, first product targeting developers. It's a modular AI knowledge platform for developers that leverages trusted knowledge sources to power agentic automation. And so now what we're doing is these developers can now mix and match the components we have on our platform, including the Knowledge Hub, the retrieval engine, the agentic flows and the user experiences. So they can decide to configure what we already have, or they can decide to develop their own components and plug them in to meet specific needs using our extensive APIs and SDKs and connectors that we announced as part of the Composer solution.
Now over the last couple of years, we've been working with many enterprise AI teams in our clientele. And what we have seen is a common pattern where these AI teams are looking to deploy the same sort of reliable, trusted knowledge-powered agentic capabilities increasingly that we are doing in the customer service groups and CX groups. They want to do it outside of those groups. But in order to do that, they need more flexibility. They want to use the common knowledge architecture and infrastructure, but they also want the ability to develop their own Agentic layer on top of it. And the Composer offering allows them to do just that. So we've seen some good interest from our existing customers around Composer and some new partner interest in that in the short period of time that we have announced it. Very exciting for us.
Looking at the third aspect, which is, again, very interesting now for us is the team and how we are adding some key talent as we are growing the business and investing on top of this product-led growth plan that we have put in place. So a couple of new hires I want to highlight. We did a press release around John Copeland, who is our new VP of Marketing. He comes in from ServiceNow. And before that, he was with Adobe and eBay and McKinsey. He is leading our marketing effort. Our Solve event last month was his public introduction to the eGain stage.
The next person that I want to mention and very happy to have him on board is Vikas Paliwal. Vikas has joined as our VP of Product Marketing. He comes to us from the AWS AI team. And before that, he was with Intel and Broadcom and a host of other technology-heavy companies. He brings deep experience in the product development, the product management and now leading product marketing. So at eGain, his first mandate is to drive the GTM for our new Composer product. As I mentioned, we are targeting developers and partners who are looking for a composable platform to operationalize their AI solutions built on trusted knowledge.
And finally, we're very happy to have Gautam Garg, who's joined us as the VP of Finance. He's joined Eric's team and comes to us from BTIS, which is a respected investment bank and before that with Oracle in a variety of roles, starting in engineering and moving on to business and product. So Eric, I know is quite excited about having him on the team, looking to kind of further automate our finance and operations as we drive our growth plans.
So with a lot going on, just to conclude, we are pleased with our first quarter financial performance and what I see as growing market momentum. Our recent product introductions are resonating in the marketplace, the 3 we talked about. So that's the time we are now investing in building out the team. And so we are excited to expand our leadership team with the hires that I just mentioned.
With that, I'll hand it over to Eric, our CFO, to provide more detail on the financials. Eric?
Great. Thanks, Ashu, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Before I begin, I want to mention that we are again using slides to support our earnings call. We believe this will provide helpful context and make it easier for you to follow our results and outlook. In addition to the webcast, you can find the slides in the Investor Relations section of our website and the updated investor presentation.
As Ashu noted, we are off to a good start to our fiscal year with revenue and ARR growth year-over-year, expanded margins, increased profitability and strong cash flow from operations. Let me share more details about our financial results for Q1 before discussing our outlook and guidance for Q2 of fiscal 2026.
Looking at our revenue, total revenue for the first quarter was $23.5 million, reaching the high end of our guidance and increasing 8% year-over-year.
SaaS revenue increased by 10% year-over-year and accounted for 93% of total revenue versus 91% of total revenue in Q1 of '25.
Looking at non-GAAP gross profits and gross margins. Total gross margin for the quarter was 76%, up 600 basis points from 70% a year ago. SaaS gross margin for the quarter was 81%, up from 77% a year ago. Total gross margin expansion was driven by SaaS gross margin expansion plus a greater shift towards SaaS versus professional services revenue.
Notably, SaaS gross margin expansion was primarily driven by our product enhancements that enabled more cost-efficient deployments and delivered operational efficiencies within our cloud and customer support teams.
Now turning to our operations. Non-GAAP operating costs for the first quarter were $18.8 million, down 9% year-over-year as we have streamlined and realigned our business operations because of automation and the continued shift towards a product-led sales model. Notably, we have redeployed these cost savings into R&D, which reflects our ongoing focus on growth and product innovation.
Looking at our bottom-line, our GAAP net income includes a $1.4 million warrant expense recorded as a onetime stock-based charge during the quarter. As we mentioned on our last call, this expense relates to the warrant we issued to JPMorgan in August as part of the strategic agreement that includes the appointment of a senior JPMC executive as a Board observer.
Non-GAAP net income was $4.7 million or $0.17 per share up significantly from non-GAAP net income of $1.3 million or $0.04 per share in the year ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 21%, exceeding our guidance and up from 6% in the year ago quarter.
Turning to our balance sheet and cash flows. For the first quarter, we generated strong cash flow from operations of $10.4 million or 44% operating cash flow margin compared to $1 million or 4% operating cash flow margin in the year ago quarter. This was ahead of our internal target due to better-than-expected cash collection efforts in the quarter.
During the quarter, we bought back $1.5 million in stock at an average price of $6.38 per share.
Our balance sheet remains very strong. Total cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter was $70.9 million, up from $62.9 million as of June 30, 2025.
Now turning to our customer metrics. I've broken out the ARR AI Knowledge metrics from the total metrics to highlight the momentum in our AI Knowledge business. Looking at ARR, SaaS ARR for Knowledge customers increased 23% year-over-year, while SaaS ARR for all customers increased 8% year-over-year.
Turning to our net retention rates. LTM dollar-based SaaS net retention for Knowledge customers was 112%, up from 103% a year ago, while net retention for all customers was 102%, up from 90% a year ago. Our LTM dollar-based SaaS net expansion rate was 119% for our Knowledge customers and 110% for all our other customers, all customers.
Looking at remaining performance obligations. Total RPO increased 23% year-over-year, and our short-term RPO of $58 million was up 7% year-over-year.
Now turning to our guidance. For the second quarter of fiscal 2026, we expect total revenue of between $22.3 million to $22.8 million. The sequential decline is primarily due to an approximate $600,000 reduction in revenue from our messaging platform business, which, as we had mentioned on our last call, we will be sunsetting over the next year. Furthermore, the recent government shutdown has introduced delays and near-term uncertainty for certain professional services engagements with some of our government customers.
Turning to the bottom-line. For Q2, we expect GAAP net income of $1.2 million to $1.7 million or $0.04 to $0.06 per share, which includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $700,000.
We expect non-GAAP net income of $1.9 million to $2.4 million or $0.07 to $0.08 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $2.7 million to $3.2 million or a margin of 12% to 14%.
Looking at our full fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, we expect total revenue to be between $90.5 million and $92 million, representing a return to growth for the year.
GAAP net income of $3.5 million to $5 million or $0.12 to $0.17 per share. This includes stock-based comp expense of approximately $3.4 million and the warrant expense of approximately $1.4 million.
Non-GAAP net income of $8.3 million to $9.8 million or $0.29 to $0.34 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $10.4 million to $11.9 million or a margin of 11% to 13%.
Looking at our diluted weighted average shares outstanding with the recent stock price movement, we now expect approximately 28.8 million shares for both the second quarter and full year. This expected increase in outstanding shares has a 1% impact to our EPS guidance for FY '26.
In conclusion, we are off to a good start to the year with solid results that beat consensus across the board. Customers and partners are responding enthusiastically to our expanded suite of AI-enabling knowledge solutions, and we are well positioned to build on this momentum and drive sustainable growth and profitability going forward.
Finally, on the IR front, eGain will be meeting with investors at the 14th Annual ROTH Technology Conference in New York City on November 19. We look forward to seeing some of you there in person.
With that, I'd like to open the call for questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] And your first question today will come from Richard Baldry with ROTH Capital.
2. Question Answer
It looks like sales trends are sort of firming up and -- but by contrast, the actual dollar spent on sales and marketing in the quarter stepped down sort of sequentially and year-over-year. Can you talk about what your strategy is there, whether you think that it might be time to start investing there more aggressively? Or do you feel that you have the capacity you need to address the opportunities that are starting to come?
Yes. So 2 things. One, there's just a summer slowdown with marketing spend. So for example, for this current quarter, again, things will go up, right, because the marketing spend is going up.
Second, to your point about sort of building out capacity, I think right now, people-wise, we have good capacity because we are driving, as we mentioned, sort of a product-led sales motion with much more solution expertise-oriented pipeline execution. And so that is working well for us. But we do think that in the second half of this fiscal year, we will step up the sales hiring investment as well.
And it looks like agentic AI Agents starting to highly proliferate them, be generous. But none of them -- because it seems like integrating a Gen AI engine with some of that functionality is okay, easy enough, but they don't seem to have access to the data behind it. So do you think that the proliferation of those, what I think of as almost dumb agents actually helps you or does it commoditize that segment enough that it will push more people to try to have to work with partners like yourself to make them specifically intelligent on a customer-by-customer basis?
I believe so. I believe so. I think that's what we are seeing. We are seeing people playing with AI, agentic AI, and then we are seeing them talking to us after that, right? And so yes, to your point, if you want to do something serious, you need to make sure that you're not feeding a garbage that you're connecting into really critical data systems to solve nontrivial experiences and use cases. And that's where we are coming in. And we are seeing that even with our existing customers. They have -- they are large companies. They have lots of AI teams that are developing cute little prototypes on the side, but they all are coming back to us to say, okay, we need to connect to your knowledge back end. So it's going to be exciting for us.
And last for me, if you look at the Composer product, it's a new set of targets you're going after with developers. How complete is that for them to pull in to be able to work with not only the different components that you can bring to the table, but can they integrate with a variety of GenAI engines? Or is it specific to a few you've tuned it for? How difficult would it be to sort of pop in different AI engines on top of your system?
Yes. Great question. So to your point, this is the first version. So by definition, it's not the most comprehensive. But what we have going for us, I believe, is 2 things.
One, we have the trusted knowledge back end and making that available very easily for people to plug into whatever agentic solution they are building. And so that we have made it very easy with our APIs and SDKs. So for example, we will plug into OpenAI's development environment or Azure, Copilot development environment. So if people are building agentic workflows in other places, we are providing a connector into those work environments so that they can use those -- use our APIs to get the trusted knowledge. So that is point one.
The second is we are also -- to your earlier -- second part of your question, we are enabling it within what we call the bring your own model architecture. So if an enterprise says, no, we are going to use Claude and not use OpenAI, that's fine. We are making it possible for people to plug in their choice model into our platform to do AI stuff. So those are the 2 things that we have done to make it easy for people to start consuming right away.
Great. I thought that was my last question, but I'll try to sneak in one more. You've got a pretty big cash balance now and it went up pretty substantially in the quarter despite some buybacks. Can you talk about strategically what you really think that's best deployed against? Is it a more aggressive buyback? Is it tuck-in acquisitions to expand your capabilities in this knowledge management, agentic world? So how do we think about that asset?
Eric, do you want to talk to that?
Sure. I mean I think we'll obviously continue to look at the buyback. I mean, as we've disclosed in the last call, we had increased that capacity. So that certainly still continues to be one avenue. But I think to your point of sort of exploring tuck-in acquisitions or inorganic, it's something that we're always open to, but for sure, it is not our primary focus. But I think more importantly, just having that ability to continue to invest in the business as well is something that gives us that comfort with that buffer. So we don't have any distraction around the viability of the business. So those are the items that I would highlight.
Congrats on a good quarter.
Thank you.
Next question will come from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.
This is Vijay Homan on for Jeff Van Rhee. First for me, just last quarter, you talked about a pipeline of several 7-figure knowledge Hub opportunities and kind of an increasing pilot conversion rate. I was wondering if you could just give us an update on those opportunities and what you're seeing in those sales cycles.
Yes. So I think the progress is good. Progress is -- us -- I'd say these large opportunities take time to mature. And so what we are seeing is steady progress. So I'm quite pleased with that because with large opportunities, sometimes they stall along the way. I'm not seeing that. I'm seeing steady progression. So I'm quite excited. And I also see more engagement on the partner side. We are seeing more interest from partners who are starting to see this area as a viable category to add value. So those are 2 things that are quite exciting for us. First, the pipeline progression; and second, starting to see some good partner activity.
Got it. Appreciate that. And then next one, I know the intent was for the -- for JPMorgan to deploy by the late fall. I was just wondering how that deployment is going? And any other updates on that rollout or learnings would be helpful.
Yes. So yes, I'm happy to report that they have gone live with what the first phase plan was, and we are actively working the next phase. So I think it's gone to plan, which is great. As I think I've mentioned earlier, we deployed their first phase in half the time that we had originally discussed and agreed with them on. So it's pretty exciting for us. The speed of getting these projects live and used is, to me, a barometer of the interest and priority that enterprises start to place on these kinds of technologies.
[Operator Instructions] We see no further questions. This will conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Thanks, operator, and thanks, everybody, for participating and look forward to updating you with our Q2 results. Thank you.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
eGain Corporation — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
eGain Corporation — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon and welcome to the eGain Fiscal 2025 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Jim Byers, PondelWilkinson Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon everyone. Welcome to eGain's Fiscal 2025 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Financial Results Conference Call. On the call today are eGain's Chief Executive Officer, Ashu Roy; and Chief Financial Officer, Eric Smit. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this conference call, management will make certain forward-looking statements, which convey management's expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding future financial and operational performance.
Forward looking statements are generally preceded by words such as believe, plan, intend, expect, anticipate or similar expressions. Forward looking statements are protected by safe harbor provisions contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to a wide range of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ in materials respects. Information on various factors that could affect eGain's results are detailed on the company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
eGain is making these statements as of today, September 4, 2025, and assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking information in this conference call. In addition to GAAP results, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP operating income. The tables included with the earnings press release include reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
eGain's earnings press release can be found by clicking the Press Releases link on the Investor Relations page of eGain's website at egain.com, and along with the earnings release, we will post an updated investor presentation to the Investor Relations page of eGain's website. And lastly, a phone replay of this conference call will be available for one week.
And now with that, I'd like to turn the call over to eGain's CEO, Ashu Roy.
Thank you, Jim, and good afternoon, everyone. We finished fiscal 2025 with a strong bookings, a good revenue growth and improved profitability in the fourth quarter, ahead of our projections and Street consensus. I note that our fourth quarter results also include onetime tax benefit from the release of our full income tax valuation allowance. So let me start with some business highlights.
Last quarter, we signed up the largest nonprofit health care network in New Jersey as a client. They run 18 hospitals and have 36,000 team members. This client faced an urgent need to unify their knowledge management with strong governance because it was critical to support their rapid growth. They chose our solution to unify these knowledge assets and these correct, consistent, compliant answers now coming out of the Knowledge Hub will be delivered to their contact center agents on the desktop provided by Cisco in the flow of the conversation with the patients.
Another new client we won was one of the nation's largest credit unions. They set out to implement an enterprise knowledge management system and in the past had, had a challenging experience with another vendor. They recognized the value of our AI Knowledge Hub. And now they'll be using it to deliver trusted answers to all employees, including contact center agents who are using a Genesys CCaaS desktop.
Another great win for us last quarter was a deal we signed with an existing client. This is a global leader in workforce services. They support employees of over 4,300 businesses, including 70% of the Fortune 100. They will be deploying our AI Agent for contact center. As you know, this is a new product we launched last quarter. This solution will help their service associates better handle over 15 million phone calls every year. This will scale up next year to that level with proactive real-time guidance powered by trusted answers from our Knowledge Hub. It's very exciting for us to see the early interest in our AI Agent products.
We are now engaged with many CX leaders who we note have been unsuccessful as they have tried to implement agent assist solutions from other providers over the past couple of years. They seem to now understand that without a trusted knowledge infrastructure, all the AI-powered agent tools cannot deliver value because you cannot rely on those answers.
Stepping back, I also want to share what I think is an important update to the large deal news that we talked about last quarter at the earnings call. As you may recall, we signed one of our largest deals in company history in April with a U.S. mega bank. That bank is JPMorgan Chase. This deal was our third win inside the bank. Building on our success in their Travel Group and their international business unit. Our AI Knowledge Hub will now serve all bank employees in their U.S. Chase business. What is exciting for us is that we are now actively partnering with JPMorgan Chase to improve customer experience and drive AI efficiencies across the business.
To strengthen this partnership, we issued warrants to JPMC in August, and they agreed to nominate a senior executive to join our eGain Board as an observer. She will be a great addition to our strategic brain trust. I'm super excited about our innovative partnership with JPMC. As we know, they are one of the most tech-savvy banks in America. They understand the criticality of a trusted knowledge infrastructure to scale their AI ambitions. They are better in eGain, we will deliver. And we will also benefit from their strategic insights and needs as we partner with them to design our next-generation products.
Looking at the market, AI is starting to move down from what we would all agree as the hype peak towards more pragmatic pastures. Most of you probably read the recent MIT study based on an extensive survey of businesses, it reported that 95% of AI investments are not showing significant ROI. We know one big reason why. Without trusted knowledge, generative AI is stuck in the rut of garbage in, garbage out. No amount of language model improvement and deep reasoning solves this problem. The student can do only so well as the book she reads. Increasingly, businesses are recognizing this foundational need for trusted knowledge to deliver AI ROI.
Our bookings in fiscal '25 have started to reflect this growing demand. Our total AI Knowledge ARR grew by 25% year-over-year. We expect that our total AI Knowledge ARR will grow by 20% or so in fiscal '26. To continue to extend our product leadership in this critical AI infrastructure market, we will continue to invest and, in fact, modestly increase our product development investments.
Our R&D spend in fiscal '26 will grow by roughly 6% year-over-year. At the same time, we are defocusing from less strategic products in our portfolio. So our messaging products, which have been in sustained mode for a few years, will now be sunset in fiscal 2026. On the operational front, we are streamlining our business with AI. This is improving productivity and quality, and we are deploying some of those savings into R&D and the rest goes to our bottom line.
Thanks to increased investment in R&D in fiscal '25, we launched our new AI Agent products, one for customer self-service in March and the other for contact center in June. Since then, we have enhanced the products with deep connectors to enterprise platforms like SharePoint, Genesys and Salesforce. These products are well received now in the CX market, where businesses are looking for solutions that deliver real ROI.
We saw this interest firsthand at our eGain Solve customer event in London this June. Our demo lounge and the AI Agent workshop were packed with attendees who wanted to play with the product and configure their own use cases. And so new pipeline opportunities have started to grow out of those engagements. Our next eGain Solve customer event will be held in Chicago on October -- sorry, October 14 and 15 at the Hyatt Regency O'Hare. In addition to customer success stories, new product intros, demos, workshops, we will also host an Analyst Day at the event, and we look forward to seeing some of you there.
So to conclude, I believe we have made good progress in fiscal 2025. With a sharp focus on the AI Knowledge opportunity and customer service, we invested early and heavily on R&D. We launched eGain AI Agent, a new product set that effectively leverages our deep differentiation in knowledge management. We also acquired good logos in our target market, including JPMC, a marquee client and now a design partner in our journey to deliver the most trusted knowledge infrastructure for AI.
With that, I'll hand it over to Eric Smit, our CFO, to provide more detail on the financials. Eric?
Thanks, Ashu, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Before I begin, I want to mention that this is the first time we are using slides to support our earnings call. We believe this will provide helpful context and make it easier for you to follow our results and outlook. In addition to the webcast, you can find the slides in the Investor Relations section of the website under the updated investor presentation, and I will refer to them throughout my remarks today.
As Ashu noted, we finished the year with solid bookings, a return to revenue growth and strong profitability in the fourth quarter. Let me share more details about our financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year of fiscal '25 before discussing our outlook and guidance for fiscal '26.
Looking at our revenue, total revenue for the fourth quarter was $23.2 million, up 11% sequentially and up 3% year-over-year. This represents our first year-over-year increase in revenue in 8 quarters. We believe we are now poised for growth in the coming fiscal year with momentum building in our AI Knowledge business.
Looking at non-GAAP gross profits and gross margins. Total gross margin for the quarter was 73%, up from 71% a year ago. SaaS gross margin for the quarter was 80%, up from 76% a year ago.
Now turning to our operations. Non-GAAP operating costs for the fourth quarter were $13.3 million, down 3% sequentially and down 2% year-over-year. Looking at our bottom line. In the quarter, we recorded an income tax valuation allowance of approximately $29 million, which resulted in GAAP net income of $30.9 million or $1.13 per share on a basic basis and $1.11 on a diluted basis.
Adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 19%, up from 11% in the year ago quarter. For Q4, non-GAAP net income, excluding the valuation allowance was $2.4 million or $0.09 per share compared to non-GAAP net income of $2.5 million or $0.08 per share in the year ago quarter. Last note on the quarter, we bought back $3.8 million in stock at an average price of $5.97 per share.
Turning to the full year results. Looking at our revenue, for the full year, total revenue was $88.4 million, down 5% year-over-year, mainly due to the churn in our messaging business at the end of fiscal year '24, which we had previously discussed. For the full year, SaaS revenue was $81.9 million, accounting for 93% of total revenue.
Looking at non-GAAP gross profits and gross margins for fiscal '25, SaaS gross margin was 78% up from 77% in fiscal '24, and total gross margin was 71% compared to 72% in fiscal '24.
Now turning to our operations. Non-GAAP operating costs for the full fiscal year were $56 million, flat compared to the prior year. R&D for the full fiscal year was up 15% year-over-year, reflecting our investment in product innovation to capitalize on the significant AI Knowledge market opportunity.
Looking at our bottom line, adjusted EBITDA margin for the fiscal year was 10% compared to 12% in the prior fiscal year. For the full fiscal year, non-GAAP net income, excluding the tax benefit, was $5.7 million or $0.20 per share compared to non-GAAP net income of $12.3 million or $0.40 per share on a basic and $0.39 per share on a diluted basis in the prior fiscal year.
Turning to our balance sheet and cash flows. For the full fiscal year, we generated $5.3 million in cash flow from operations or 6% operating cash flow margin compared to $12.5 million or a 13% operating cash flow margin generated in fiscal '24. Our balance sheet remains very strong. Total cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year was $62.9 million compared to $70 million as of June 30, 2024.
During fiscal '25, under our share repurchase program, we repurchased 2.6 million shares at an average price of $6.03 per share, totaling $15.8 million. Of the $40 million authorized, $1.2 million remain available under the program at year-end. As we announced today in a separate press release, our Board of Directors approved a $20 million increase in our stock repurchase program, bringing the aggregate amount we may purchase from $40 million to $60 million of our outstanding common stock. This reflects our belief that our shares are undervalued and our confidence in our AI Knowledge market opportunity.
Now turning to our customer metrics. I've broken out the ARR Knowledge metrics from total metrics to highlight the momentum in our Knowledge business. Also before sharing the metrics, one additional point is I will share actual and constant currency numbers, where on previous calls, the ARR numbers shared were only in constant currency.
Looking at ARR first, SaaS ARR for Knowledge customers increased 25% year-over-year or 22% in constant currency, while SaaS ARR for all customers increased 11% year-over-year or 9% in constant currency.
Turning to our net retention rates. LTM dollar-based SaaS net retention for Knowledge customers was 115% or 104% in constant currency, up from 98% a year ago, while net retention for all customers was 105% or 103% in constant currency, up from 88% a year ago. Our LTM dollar-based SaaS net expansion rate was 121% or 118% in constant currency for our Knowledge customers and 114% or 111% in constant currency for all our customers.
Looking at our remaining performance obligations. Total RPO increased 17% year-over-year and our short-term RPO of $63 million was up 4% year-over-year.
Now turning to guidance. For the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we expect total revenue of between $23 million to $23.5 million. Turning to the bottom line, for Q1, we expect GAAP net income of $900,000 to $1.6 million or $0.03 to $0.06 per share, which includes stock-based compensation expense of approximately $800,000 and warrant expense of approximately $1.4 million. The estimated warrant expenses in connection with the warrant we issued to JPMorgan as discussed by Ashu. For more details, please refer to the 8-K we filed August 18, 2025.
We expect non-GAAP net income of $3.1 million to $3.8 million or $0.11 to $0.14 per share and adjusted EBITDA of $3.7 million to $4.4 million or a margin of 16% to 19%.
Looking at fiscal 2026 full year ending June 30, 2026, total revenue is expected to return to growth for the full fiscal year and be between $90.5 million and $92 million. GAAP net income of $3.5 million to $5 million or $0.13 to $0.18 per share; non-GAAP net income of $8.3 million to $9.8 million or $0.30 to $0.36 per share, where we estimate stock-based comp expense of approximately $3.4 million and warrant expense of approximately $1.4 million.
Adjusted EBITDA of $10.4 million to $11.9 million or a margin of 11% to 13%. Looking at weighted average shares outstanding, we expect approximately 27.5 million shares for the first quarter and for the full year.
In closing, our FY -- our fiscal '26 guidance reflects our excitement in the market opportunity as increasingly businesses are recognizing the foundational need of the Knowledge Hub to feed trusted knowledge to AI agents. Based on this, we are targeting 20% plus growth in ARR from our core AI Knowledge offering. This growth will be partially offset by the sunsetting of our noncore messaging product, as Ashu mentioned, as of -- this will take place through fiscal '26, and the current ARR impact of that is approximately $4.7 million. We expect to see gross margin expansion to be between 74% and 75% for the year, up from 71% in fiscal '25, driven by streamlining our business with AI automation.
To extend our product leadership in the AI infrastructure market, we plan to redeploy some of the savings into R&D investment with an increase of 6% year-over-year, while still targeting an adjusted EBITDA increase of between 20% to 40% year-over-year.
Lastly, we will be hosting an Investor and Analyst Day event in conjunction with our upcoming eGain Solve customer event in October 14 and 15 in Chicago. This event is a great opportunity for prospective investors and analysts to meet with customers and learn more about our business. You can register for the event on our website. We hope you can join us. And in November, eGain will be meeting with investors at the ROTH Conference taking place on November 19 in New York. We'll be providing more details as we get closer to that date and hope to see some of you there in person.
With that, I would like to open the call for questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is from Richard Baldry with ROTH Capital.
2. Question Answer
Curious about the timing on the sunsetting of the messaging products. It looks like you'd be queued up for a pretty good year and instead that's going to be a pretty meaningful OpEx headwind. So what really drives that choice heading into fiscal '26?
Good question there, Rich. So 2 things. One, we realized that we -- because we are not investing as much in that -- well, we're not investing much at all in new product capability. We are coming under increasing pressure trying to hold on to clients, and these clients are looking for new solutions, and they're looking for new capability, and we have a choice to make. And we believe that focusing on AI Knowledge, which is what we are doing now, will have a much bigger sort of ROI for us.
And can you talk about sort of the pacing at which you expect that to come out of the numbers so that we get an idea for -- you've guided for first quarter, but how should we look at that headwind versus the other side coming up as an offset throughout the year?
Yes. Rich, I'll take that. So I think the expectation is that we will see the impact beginning in Q2, where the run rate will reduce by roughly 50%. And then by the end of fiscal '26, as we get into the first quarter of fiscal '27, we'd expect that to go down to 0.
Got it. Then on the JPMorgan side, can you talk about sort of the thought process around, structures around sort of intentions on that the Board seat the warrant $1.4 million in compensation for that. It's sort of a one-off event. So the more you could flesh that out, I think the better for us.
Yes. Look, we see JPMorgan as not just a great client, but also given how much they are investing in AI and automation, we see them as an amazing design partner for us and a thought partner. So this is our way of kind of strengthening that relationship so that, of course, we are still vendors to them, and that is important to keep in mind, so we do have to deliver. At the same time, I think we'll be able to get ahead of a lot of other providers in terms of knowing what the needs are and how best to address them, especially in the financial services vertical. So I see it as a strategic opportunity for us to get an unfair advantage to build on top of the core technology that we have.
Then we're hearing a lot of people are sort of tire kicking on the AI type solutions. Can you talk how much you're sort of working on active betas and how the sort of conversion to live deals, paid deals, active deals is working, how that's trending?
Yes. No, that's -- you're right. I think pure AI solutions are getting pick tested and pressure tested. And I would say we are getting the same treatment, right? People are running pilots with us, and we are happy to run them for them using our innovation in 30 days. And now we have the self-sign-up model as well, so people can sign up and play with solutions. Of course, they can't build complex use cases without some guidance from us. So what we are seeing is that our AI pilot to conversion to deal rate.
In the beginning, it was, I would say, a year ago, it was very volatile because we were learning how to make the solution work really well. And there was also the managing the expectation and understanding the expectation of the customer. But now I think we are in a better place. I'd say the 2 out of 3 conversion still stands even on AI solutions for us now. So I'm feeling good about that.
And last for me, back to sort of the P&L. There's a pretty good increase in or decrease to the OpEx side and the COGS side. How do we think about whether each of those lines are one-off or more sustainable in nature, maybe particularly on the COGS side. And if there's some costs coming out as you sunset the messaging product, where would those typically be coming out of?
So I'll make a couple of comments maybe because they do go deep into the way we are organized. So two things that have happened on the COGS side, I'll focus on that. One is that we completed our migration of all clients over to the new architecture, the new platform, the cloud platform that we have been working on for a few -- couple of years now. So we had mentioned that in the past. So that is one place where we are seeing benefits, which now will continue to be there, right? So that's one.
But the second one is with not just AI, but also our ability to develop new products and capabilities faster, we are automating the process of supporting and operating our cloud and being much more efficient on the cloud resources that we are using, all three of those. And so that is another big chunk of improvement that we are able to create on a sustainable basis.
Congrats on the big step-up to the EBITDA.
The next question is from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum.
Can you hear me?
Now we can.
Okay. Great. Weird on my end. Maybe just -- maybe I missed it, but Eric, in terms of the SaaS, the ARR related to the SaaS side, if you could break it up Knowledge, I think you gave last quarter was 54%. Just break down the components because it sounds like the messaging is going away, but I'm a little hazy on what the breakup of the ARR is.
Yes. So I think the 54% sort of we get -- we're almost up to 60% now of the total ARR is for the AI Knowledge and yes. So that's...
And of the remaining 40%, we've got messaging, which you're sunsetting. And then what's the remainder?
The remainder is then broken out between the Analytics Hub and the Conversation Hub component sort of making up the balance of that.
Yes. So obviously, you've got some pretty good momentum on the knowledge side, and congratulations. I mean it sounds like you're definitely tapping into a real need there. On the Analytics and Conversation Hub, how do you feel there? I mean I know messaging, you can see that with LivePerson and others has been really difficult and has changed pretty dramatically. How do you feel about your competitive position on the Conversation Hub to the degree you're leaning in there on product development? Just a little thoughts on Conversation and Analytics of what you're seeing there.
Yes. So let me start with analytics. I would say that analytics, while we continue to have a lot of focus on analytics as it is integrated into the Knowledge Hub and the Conversation Hub, but the part that Eric is talking about for Analytics Hub revenue, that's really a stand-alone for contact center analytics and particularly around large voice contact centers and Cisco contact centers, right? So that -- as you know, that was a business we had acquired and then we kind of built it up a little bit.
I feel that, that Analytics Hub revenue stream will be a cash cow for us and will slowly probably go away. But I think that trajectory is going to be fairly slow in terms of the reduction. On the Conversation Hub, I'm actually a little -- I'm optimistic because I feel like as the AI Knowledge Hub -- and we are seeing that a little bit now, as the AI Knowledge Hub business grows, that will pull in more and more of the -- what I would call now the escalation management because the front end is being automated. And so I feel like there'll be some positive win there, not necessarily in fiscal '26, but I feel that in fiscal '27, we will see some upside to that.
Yes. Helpful. And on the pipeline on the Knowledge side, I mean, obviously, JPMorgan, a huge win kind of big flag waiver to help you drive other business. When you look at the pipeline and you look specifically at mega deals that you're working on, just give us some color, are there others of that caliber in the pipeline? And any other color on the pipeline would be helpful.
So I'll say a couple of things. First of all, at this point, I don't think we have a JPMC sized deal in the pipeline. But we do have a good set of what I would call 7-figure opportunities, right, which are also very attractive, and we want to get more of those. So that is a -- that's happening for 2 reasons. I would say one is, of course, the core AI pull, which is there. But the second one, which is a good one for us, is that these deals are starting out in the contact center, but they are encompassing the rest of the employees as part of the sale. And so that ups the size of these opportunities.
Okay. And Eric, on the number side, you gave a glimpse into the overall gross margins. I'm just curious your thinking on the services gross margins. Obviously, not the focus of the business going forward. Should we just think of it as a continued sort of minus 15%, minus 20%? Or how do you think about service margins?
No. Thanks for the question. So I think our goal, I think along the lines of the optimization and efficiencies that we've been driving, we expect to get the services margins closer to breakeven, maybe slightly positive as the year progresses.
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.
Thanks again for joining us today. Hopefully, we see some of you at some of the upcoming events, and we'll catch up at the next earnings call. Thank you.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
eGain Corporation — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Finanzdaten von eGain Corporation
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 91 91 |
3 %
3 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 24 24 |
8 %
8 %
27 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 67 67 |
8 %
8 %
73 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 29 29 |
5 %
5 %
32 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | 29 29 |
1 %
1 %
32 %
|
|
| EBITDA | 8,35 8,35 |
75 %
75 %
9 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 0,39 0,39 |
15 %
15 %
0 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 7,97 7,97 |
80 %
80 %
9 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 8,88 8,88 |
72 %
72 %
10 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen USD.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur eGain Corporation-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
eGain Corporation Aktie News
Firmenprofil
eGain Corp. beschäftigt sich mit der Entwicklung, Lizenzierung, Implementierung und Unterstützung von Softwarelösungen für die Infrastruktur des Kundendienstes. Zu ihren Lösungen gehören Finanzdienstleistungen, Versicherungen, Einzelhandel, Reise- und Gastgewerbe, E-Commerce, Helpdesks und Marketing. Das Unternehmen wurde im September 1997 von Ashutosh Roy und Gunjan Sinha gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in Sunnyvale, Kalifornien.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | USA |
| CEO | Mr. Roy |
| Mitarbeiter | 445 |
| Gegründet | 1997 |
| Webseite | www.egain.com |


