Ist Wh Smith eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 9.133 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 554,85 Mio. £ | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,35 Mrd. £
Marktkapitalisierung = 554,85 Mio. £ | Umsatz erwartet = 1,61 Mrd. £
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 1,56 Mrd. £ | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,35 Mrd. £
Enterprise Value = 1,56 Mrd. £ | Umsatz erwartet = 1,61 Mrd. £
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
Wh Smith Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
16 Analysten haben eine Wh Smith Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
16 Analysten haben eine Wh Smith Prognose abgegeben:
Wh Smith Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
APR
23
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
vor 5 Monaten
|
|
DEZ
19
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 9 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
Wh Smith — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to the interim results. I'll start by introducing myself. I'm Leo Quinn. And if I refer to Balfour Beatty, that's because it's my old company, and now it's WH Smith. I do remember about 6 months ago, I thought to myself, this is the last set of results presentation I'm ever going to have to do after 20 years. And I thought, wow, isn't that fun? And of course, now I'm back here again doing it. So, it's not the greatest place to be because it consumes so much time. But good news is I've got one slide and Max is going to do all the work. So it's pretty easy for me.
Looking around the room, I was hoping to see a lot of familiar faces so that I get an easy ride. I don't recognize anybody. So it sounds like I'm going to sort of have to remake my reputation all over again.
I want to start with just a few initial observations. You remember, I've been here now, sort of, 3 weeks, but even 3 weeks walking around the business, you do get to see things. And the first thing I'd say is that we shouldn't discount just how much has gone on in this business in the last 2 years. And my #1 priority is really how do we just steady the ship and allow people to get back to the knitting and doing what they do very, very well.
Over the last 2 years, we've divested the High Street business, and the tail of that is still to be completed. So there's still work going on there.
We've had some big changes around executive management and the Board, which is another big distraction. And then, of course, you've got the accounting issues that you had in North America. All of those things take senior management leadership time away from running the business. Hopefully, as these things start to get under control and actually finish, we're able to get back and focus on the knitting and all the basic things that we do. So I'm here really to apply, I think, what is some leadership and really to sort of steady the ship so that people can do their jobs.
Secondly, I'd make some comments around cost and cash. In the first instance, we've got too much costs, and it's trending in the wrong direction. And in the second instance, we don't really have enough cash, so what we have to do is we have to reverse those two. The decision today around suspending the dividend was just a no-brainer. I mean our #1 priority is to ensure we've got a strong balance sheet. And I don't believe anybody holds our stock today for the dividend at GBP 6 a share. There's far better uses for the money. And if we get to the point where we have surplus cash, what we're going to do is use it to delever the balance sheet. And at the appropriate time, buyback some shares and then look at whether or not we would find an appropriate point to reinstate the dividend.
The other point I'd make is that I don't know if you're familiar, there's an old story, there's a guy standing in Baltimore and he stops someone in the street and says, "How do you get to New York?", and the guy replies to him, "if I was going to New York, I wouldn't sort of start from here."
Well, in the case of Smith, what we've got is we've got some green shoots. And I don't think this is a bad place to start from. In the first instance, we've renewed about 85% of our airport concessions in the U.K. And the minimum extension for an extension is usually 5 years. So that gives us sort of a clear runway ahead of us. But I would put a question mark over that: at what cost, and that needs to be understood and investigated.
The second thing I'd say, if you are travelers, which all of you in this room will definitely be. But as you go through the Heathrow Terminal 5 and some of Terminal 3 and Terminal 4, we've got our new one-stop shop concept laid out there, which is really absolutely fantastic. And it's really quite exciting, especially the T5, it's -- you've got sort of installed iPhone shop and everything in there by Apple. But what we do is we bring this -- we bring real value to the traveling public. You're able to get your pharmacies needs serviced there. You can get your health and beauty, you can cover a snack, you can pick up a book, you can get a magazine, you can buy some gifts, you can buy some souvenirs. So our one-stop shop concept is really so we're seeing some real traction. And I'm hoping that's going to be an engine for growth for us going forward in the future.
Having sort of looked around America in the few weeks I've been here, coupled with the U.K., I'm really quite taken by what I would describe as the energy and the passion of our people, and their commitment is absolutely incredible. And these aren't the highest paid people in the world, but their motivation is incredible. And again, one of the great places to start from with a workforce that is so motivated towards doing the right thing for the customer.
So as I think about it, and as I sort of embark upon this journey, this is a business that's got a fantastic brand. It's a couple of hundred years old, not as old as my oldest brand that I ever ran, which dates back to 1723, which was actually De La Rue's portals. That's the paper factory that they had. So this one is sort of a junior in compared to that, but this has been around for a couple of hundred years. It's a credible, respected, strong brand. So that's really, really powerful.
Secondly, it's got a fantastic business model in that we're not having to attract customers to us. Customers pass our door. It's our job to make sure we bring them in and they spend as much as possible in our stores. And we do provide a real value service to our customers in terms of the fact that you're going through an airport, you need something quickly, you can go through one store and pick everything up, and that allows you to get to your gate on time and relax and get on your flight and enjoy your journey.
So I think I'm the lucky one here because I picked up a fantastic asset, and I think it's got a great future. It's going to take us time to get there. And I've got plenty of time and plenty of patience. So we're going to continue to do the right things in the interest of actually establishing a foundation for the next 100 years for this business.
And on that note, I'm going to hand over to Max, who is now going to do all the hard work.
All right. Thank you, Leo, and good morning, everyone. Let me start with the financial headlines for the half year ended 28th of February 2026. As usual, all the numbers I'm going to refer to today are pre-IFRS 16, and IFRS 16 bridges can be found in the appendix.
Total group revenue increased by 5% on last year to GBP 748 million, and we saw like-for-like revenue growth across all divisions. Headline profit before tax was GBP 3 million, in line with the company compiled consensus. This year-on-year decline has been largely driven by inflationary pressures on the business and the expected disruption from the U.K. store development program.
The group generated a headline EBITDA of GBP 48 million in the half year, demonstrating the cash generative nature of the trading business. Headline net debt at the end of the period is GBP 496 million, and I will come on to talk more about this later in the presentation.
The Board today has announced the suspension of the dividend as it seeks to rebalance the capital allocation of the business and focus on debt reduction.
Turning now to the group revenue summary. In the 26 weeks to the 28th of February, the group delivered like-for-like revenue growth of 2%. By division, the U.K. saw a like-for-like revenue growth of 2%, reflecting the expected trading disruption from our largest ever store development program, including the refurbishment of stores at Liverpool and Heathrow Airport. These refurbishments are now complete.
In North America, like-for-like revenue grew 1%. And within that number, Travel Essentials continued to perform well, increasing by 6% with InMotion down 4%, and resorts down 6%. The Rest of the World division delivered like-for-like revenue growth of 6%. And in the first 7 weeks of trading in the second half, group like-for-like revenue was 2%. By division, the U.K. was flat, largely reflecting a softening in air following disruption to flight schedules to the Middle East.
In North America, we delivered like-for-like revenue growth of 2% with the core Travel Essentials business continuing to perform well and revenue growth of 6%. And Rest of the World delivered like-for-like revenue growth of 5%.
In the near term, the headwinds facing the group remain evident. Whilst we have limited direct business operations in the Middle East, reduced passenger numbers and weaker consumer confidence is having an adverse effect on the business. I will cover more on the potential impact of this later in the presentation.
Now turning to the segmental analysis. Starting with the U.K., revenue increased by 2% on both a total and like-for-like basis, Air was up 2% on a like-for-like basis, Hospitals were up 4%, and Rail was down 2% like-for-like.
In North America, total revenue increased by 10% on a constant currency basis. In the Air segment in North America was up 15% on a constant currency basis and up 3% like-for-like. Within this, our Travel Essentials format, which now accounts for over 55% of revenue in North America, was the key driver of performance, with total revenue on a constant currency basis, up 22% and up 6% on a like-for-like basis.
InMotion, like-for-like revenue was down 4% in the half year and resorts were down 6% like-for-like, driven by the continued reduction in Las Vegas visitor numbers.
In the Rest of the World division, total revenue was up 8% on a constant currency basis, supported by new openings and up 6% like-for-like. On the right of the screen, you can see how we continue to actively transform the group with Air accounting for more than 70% of total revenue.
Turning now to the group income statement. The U.K. delivered headline trading profit in the half of GBP 34 million. Reduction year-on-year reflects the inflationary pressures on the business, and the expected disruption as a result of the store refurbishments across several airport locations in the period.
North America delivered headline trading profit of GBP 2 million with the reduction year-on-year, largely driven by the ramp-up costs associated with the new logistics setup and the annualization of increases in labor costs. The prior half year has been restated for the supplier income and inventory-related items identified at the full year.
And the Rest of the World division delivered headline trading loss of GBP 4 million. This reflects a challenging performance in some locations and the inflationary pressures on staff and logistics costs. These locations are part of the current divisional review. So overall, group headline trading profit was GBP 32 million in the period. Central costs were GBP 15 million, in line with expectations. Financing costs were GBP 14 million, including the cost of the backstop facility, which is now being canceled following the draw of the USPP funding ahead of the convertible bond maturity in May. And this resulted in group headline profit before tax and non-underlying items of GBP 3 million.
Turning now to non-underlying items. The non-underlying items recognized in the period are GBP 28 million, around half of which are noncash items. And more detail can be found in the statement. However, in summary, the group has continued to invest in its multiyear IT transformation program. Costs in full year '26 are expected to be around GBP 7 million and approximately GBP 5 million in full year '27 before the current program completes.
We are also delivering a number of operational efficiency programs to make cost savings and support business performance. We expect the remaining cost for these items to be around GBP 3 million to GBP 4 million in the balance of the year.
The North America remediation and regulatory-related costs in the half year is GBP 3 million, and we expect further costs in the second half of around GBP 3 million to GBP 4 million.
Regarding impairments and onerous contract charges, it largely comprises of GBP 8 million for North America, GBP 6 million for the Rest of the World. And charges are principally risen due to lower trading outlook in certain stores, including the Las Vegas Resorts stores.
In the balance of the year, the group expects there to be further non-underlying costs associated with the North America Resorts fashion store closures, the review of the North America InMotion business and potentially some costs associated with the closure of locations in the Rest of the World. These costs will be largely noncash.
And so turning to the group free cash flow. There are 4 key points to note on the free cash flow in the half. First, the group generated GBP 48 million of headline EBITDA in the period. Second, the underlying CapEx investment in the business was GBP 50 million and includes our store development program. Third, working capital was an outflow of GBP 54 million, with a one-off payable timing headwind linked to one of our large franchisor partners at the end of last year, new store openings and the seasonality of our business. Fourth, a tax refund in a period of GBP 5 million relates to tax recoveries in full year '26 relating to full year '25.
Turning now to headline net debt, which was GBP 496 million at the end of the half year, comprising of the convertible bond of GBP 325 million, drawdown on the RCF of GBP 219 million and cash of GBP 48 million, which gives the group a rolling 12-month headline net debt to EBITDA leverage of 2.9x.
Further cash outflows include dividends paid of GBP 8 million, cash spend relating to non-underlying items of GBP 22 million for the continuing business and GBP 10 million relating to the discontinued business, and this includes timing-related spend from the previous period.
Let's now move on to capital expenditure. In the first half, the group invested GBP 50 million of capital. The majority of this has been invested into new stores and development of existing locations. Our latest flagship stores at Heathrow have just opened and customer feedback has been very positive. Our stores at Orlando Airport are progressing well, and we expect 6 stores to open later this year. The new stores at JFK are also progressing. However, they will not open in the current financial year.
Looking forward, the group has a clear framework and a disciplined approach to growth investments. We have a strong store pipeline and expect capital costs of around GBP 90 million this financial year. Business opportunities are being prioritized based on their relative returns and ensuring that the group hurdles are met by each store opportunity.
Moving on to store numbers on the right of the screen. During the first half, we opened 36 new stores with 7 in the U.K. and 18 in North America, all of which were in Air, demonstrating our clear focus on this channel and 11 in our Rest of World business with 9 in joint venture or franchise.
In the same period, we closed 41 stores, in line with our strategy to improve the quality of our space to optimize returns, leaving net store closures of 5 in the first half. In the balance of the year, we expect to close or exit a further 30 to 40 stores and open around 10 to 20 stores with the reductions across our resorts and InMotion channels in North America and openings largely in our North America Air channel.
So moving on now to capital allocation. In the near term, the group's capital allocation priority is to strengthen the balance sheet through tighter cost control and improve cash generation. In addition, the group will continue to invest to grow and protect value. This will be achieved by investing in business development and new space growth with a clear focus on attractive returns.
Furthermore, business assets will be protected through maintenance and transformation projects. And the dividend has been suspended to support the strengthening of the balance sheet, and the group will look to reinstate returns to shareholders when surplus cash is available.
Turning now to the operating performance of our 3 divisions. Starting with the U.K. Here, our areas of focus are clear: to develop ranges and formats that are relevant to the customer at each stage of their journey, enabling them to make best use of their time in traveling, put more products into their baskets to grow spend per passenger and profit.
In Air, we have recently opened 6 one-stop shops, including refurbished stores at Heathrow, Liverpool, Belfast and East Midlands airports. This broadens our offer and improves basket size in these high footfall locations.
Notably, over the past 4 weeks, we have opened 3 flagship stores across Heathrow Terminal 3, 4 and 5. Each of these locations showcase the full breadth of our Travel Essentials proposition, including a full health and beauty offer and in-store pharmacies.
Our key growth categories of health and beauty and food-to-go remain attractive and well aligned to passenger needs. Alongside category development, we continue to focus on the quality of our stores and space growth opportunities. On the screen, you can see some images of our new stores at Heathrow Terminal 3 on the left and at Heathrow Terminal 5 on the right. These openings really are setting a new global benchmark for Travel Essentials with the improved design, in-store navigation and extensive ranges, both with a pharmacy. And we are now the leading airside operator for health and beauty across Heathrow.
On the bottom right, you can also see the new InMotion store within Terminal 5. Here, we have reduced the footprint to enable us to invest more space into higher growth and higher margin categories such as health and beauty and food-to-go.
Moving on to our hospital channel. Hospitals delivered another strong performance in the half with revenue up 8% and like-for-like revenue up 4%. This growth reflects the continued strength of our multi-format approach and the partnerships that we have built.
In addition to our partnerships with Costa Coffee and M&S Food, our own Smith Family Kitchen cafe proposition is performing well, and this gives us a great opportunity for further growth across the U.K. Hospitals. In total, we have 155 stores in over 100 hospitals and there are still significant space opportunities in this channel.
Turning to Rail. And rail delivered a solid performance in the half. We have made good progress with our one-stop-shop format, including our new store opening at London Bridge station, which is performing well.
We've also broadened our food and beverage on-the-go ranges as we continue to evolve our retail mix to maximize customer convenience. And looking ahead, we see further opportunity to expand this model across the Rail estate.
Let's now take a look at our North America division. The priorities in North America are clear: improving and investing in our core Travel Essentials business, taking a selective approach to InMotion and focusing on operational improvements, the exit of our resort fashion stores, scaling down our specialty stores over time and improving the performance of our wider Resorts stores. We're strengthening our operating model and continuing to deliver against our remediation plan, which is progressing well.
Global accounting policies are being rolled out across all divisions with associated operational systems and controls. Key financial reporting controls have been embedded into the North American month-end processes and commercial finance capabilities have been strengthened.
Turning to the Travel Essentials business. And North America is the largest travel retail market in the world, with significant infrastructure investment and long-term structural growth trends. Our Travel Essentials business has consistently delivered a strong performance, growing 19% on a constant-currency basis in full year '25 and up 22% in the first half of this year. This part of the business now represents more than 55% of North America revenue, and Travel Essentials is our most profitable segment and on a fully allocated basis, generates around 10% trading profit margin. As we scale our business and enhance our operations, we expect to grow margins further which, in turn, will support the profitability of our North America business overall.
On the top right of the screen, you can see our new store at Albuquerque Airport, which opened in January. This is a good example of where we have introduced the marketplace format, offering the convenience of everything under 1 roof, very similar to our one-stop shop strategy in the U.K. And we have the flexibility to realign our category mix over the term of the lease to ensure we stay ahead of changing trends. We expect a payback period of less than 2 years, and we have a long-term contract in place.
And at Portland Airport, on the bottom right of the screen, we opened another new store in February, which is also performing well and has a similar payback period. So as you can see, we have a clear ability to win in prime locations, adapt our formats, and we're able to drive attractive returns. We have a strong store pipeline of stores and a healthy tender pipeline expected in the second half, and we are confident in the investment returns.
Turning to InMotion. This brand remains highly regarded by landlords. However, in total, this segment is a like-for-like decline, and we are focusing on our commercial property, reducing the number of product lines, improving key line availability and reducing working capital. In the first half of the year, we closed 9 stores and opened 6 across Dallas, Denver, Detroit and Albuquerque Airports, primarily as part of wider retail packages within these airports.
As we move ahead, we will continue to limit new store openings within InMotion stores being -- InMotion stores only being considered as part of strategically important tender packages where we can open new stores that pay back with strong returns.
We are progressing the review of the existing store portfolio and expect to complete this in the second half of the year. Our review includes undertaking a deeper diagnostic of the estate to determine the factors that need to be in place for these stores to succeed. Over time, we expect the number of InMotion stores to decline by around 20% to 30% with store numbers reducing to below 100 in the medium term.
Despite store closures, we see an opportunity to increase the margin over time with our strongest stores retained, range optimization complete and strengthened operational performance.
So turning to our Resorts business. As we announced previously, we are not planning to open any new stores in Resorts. Following a review of the business, we are in the process of exiting a fashion stores and reducing the number of specialty stores.
In the first half of the year, we have made good progress. We closed 8 stores, 5 in speciality and 3 in fashion, where the leases were short, so there were opportunities to exit without penalty. We have confirmed the exit of an additional 8 fashion stores in the balance of the year. And in 4 locations, we are in discussion with the landlords to reformat the stores. And for the balance of 10 stores, we are reviewing strategic options with third parties. We aim to largely complete our exit of the fashion stores this year.
With regard to speciality, we are reviewing further reformatting options and controlled exits where the lease arrangements run over the medium term. We are continuing to optimize the operational performance of our hotel convenience and Welcome to Las Vegas stores, which remain profitable and with a good margin.
Let's now take a look at our Rest of World division. Here, we delivered total revenue growth of 8% with like-for-like revenue up 6%. Here, we will focus further investments where we already have scale and expertise, ensuring we deepen our presence and strengthen profitability in the markets we know best, with a particular focus in Ireland, Spain and Australia.
During the first half, we agreed new investments in the Republic of Ireland, which is an important market for us, and we will be introducing our successful one-stop shop format, the Dublin, Cork and Shannon airports.
We also opened new stores in Melbourne and Tenerife airports in line with our key market focus. In addition, we continue to actively manage our store portfolio, which will result in exiting and reducing our exposure in subscale markets as contracts expire or through active portfolio management.
During the half, we closed 4 uneconomic stores at Düsseldorf Airport, and we have recently exited our uneconomic business in Norway. We also continue to explore the potential to withdraw from other uneconomic markets while also assessing how we can move to a franchise model in other locations.
As we look ahead, we are sharpening our focus on a less capital-intensive franchise-led model, an area in which we already have considerable experience. This approach will allow us to open any new stores in high-potential markets where we see opportunity to extend our presence. And during the first half, we've expanded our franchise store portfolio with a further store in the Philippines and 2 further stores in Saudi Arabia opened at the start of the second half.
We have also opened 5 stores in Malaysia with our existing joint venture partner. By working in partnership with experienced local operators, we can leverage their local expertise alongside our space and promotional management to optimize performance.
I will finish by summarizing the outlook for the group for the full year. So turning to that now. In light of the uncertainty arising from the conflict in the Middle East, the group is taking a more cautious outlook, reflecting the impact on passenger numbers and weaker consumer confidence. Much will depend on the peak summer trading period, and the group assumes no immediate improvement in consumer confidence and assumes that jet fuel supplies can be maintained.
At this stage, the group expects to deliver full year '26 headline group profit before tax and non-underlying items of GBP 90 million to GBP 105 million. Planning assumptions for the full year ended 31st of August 2026 are as follows: total group revenue of 3% to 5%, in the U.K., total growth of around 1% to 3%, in North America, around 6% to 8%; and in the Rest of the World division, around 2% to 4%.
U.K. headline trading profit margin of around 13% to 14%, North America around 7% and around 4% in the Rest of the World. This reflects the expected reduction in brand marketing, increased promotional activity and inflation headwinds. There is no change to the outlook for central costs or finance costs. Our full year net debt at this stage is expected to be around GBP 420 million.
So let me summarize everything you've heard. The group has delivered a solid first half trading performance, and we have made good progress with the key priorities set out in December across each division. In the U.K., Air business, we have completed a significant store development program ahead of the peak summer trading period.
In North America, while there is more work to do, we're encouraged by the early signs of improvement, particularly in our Travel Essentials business. Across Rest of the World, our focus remains firmly on improving the profitability and cash generation of the business. For the group, we are committed to strengthening the balance sheet while maintaining flexibility to invest selectively where returns are compelling. As a result, as you have heard this morning, we are rebalancing our approach to capital allocation with an increased focus on driving cash and debt reduction.
Looking ahead, given the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, the global economic environment remains uncertain. We are, therefore, taking a cautious view while remaining focused on execution, cash delivery and operational improvements across the group.
Thank you for your time this morning, and we will now take your questions.
2. Question Answer
Jonathan Pritchard at Peel Hunt here. On average transaction value in U.K. Air more recently, could you just explain the nature of that? Is it trading down within categories? Or are people not choosing to buy anything in the category, if that makes sense? Is it they're just buying a lower quality product or just ignoring the category completely?
And carrying on to U.K. Air, just a little comment perhaps on promotional activity and how that's playing out. I know you just mentioned it in terms of a headwind for the second half. And then in the U.S., that transfer of skills you've often talked about in the past from U.K., those skills you have in the U.K. that have been transferred to the U.S., I'm talking about margin enhancement, basket building, et cetera. Is there still more to go there? Or is that largely played out?
Thanks, Jonathan. So in terms of what's playing out in terms of average transaction value in the U.K., I think it's important to probably put those into kind of 2 areas. One, you've got the impact from what's happening in the Middle East. You've got a mix change in terms of the type of consumer that's coming through the airports. You will have had a larger proportion of your consumers coming through or passengers coming through traveling long haul. You've got less of the long-haul flights happening and/or less kind of loads going into some of the long haul, particularly to locations within the Gulf. And so the mix of the passenger and therefore, their buying appetite, the types of things that they're buying will be less.
But kind of simple kind of example of that might be the neck pillow. If you're traveling, you're on a 7-, 8-hour flight, maybe you're buying a neck pillow, if you're traveling now to Portugal, maybe you're not. And that would probably go to the same effect of the kind of quantum of the products that you might buy as well, the basket size being different. And then difficult to disaggregate these things, but kind of the consumer confidence and their propensity to spend, we're also seeing play through in spend per passenger as well.
And in terms of promotional activity, I think this links nicely together. As consumers see that their propensity to spend is less, the importance of us being able to offer value to our consumer and demonstrate value, that's often through the sort of promotional activity that we offer as we -- the meal deal, for example, is an easy one that we often kind of go to, providing value there for the customer is important, and that can have a margin impact. That's really what I'm talking about there.
In terms of North America -- excuse me, in terms of North America and the transfer of skills and services, I think there absolutely is more to go out there. We've seen really positive strides that we've made by sharing resources out of the U.K. and across the group into North America. Easy examples of that would be in the kind of construction world as we've looked to embed and enhance best practices over in North America as we've continued to invest in that part of the business. Space and format as well as part of that.
More recently, in the last 3, 4 months, our operational team in the U.K. has been supporting the U.S. as well. So I think it's proven to really add value. And I think, as you say, there is more to go out there. What we see over the more medium term is embedding that capability locally is important, too. So it can't be run from the U.K. It has to be embedded locally.
It's Tim Ramskill from Bank of America. Three questions, please. I guess, Leo, listened to your initial observations, you referenced a question mark over the U.K. renewal program and the kind of the costs associated with that. So maybe just interested in perhaps expanding on that topic. So you talk about very good paybacks on North American projects less than 2 years. So maybe a compare and contrast and perhaps just some thoughts about that focus on capital allocation going forward.
And then secondly, forgive me, but I'd look at the Resorts business and really struggle to see why that isn't entirely noncore. So maybe just some thoughts on that. I guess I clearly recognize the balance between the cost of a rapid exit versus something that's measured more carefully.
And then finally, just a quick one, Max, numbers-wise. I think you've sort of on your chart, you had GBP 32 million of non-underlying cash costs in the first half. Just some sense as to what that might end up being for the full year, please?
I'll take the first one very, very simply. Look, there's clearly more competition has crept into the U.K. market, and that requires you to sort of bid competitively. I've not, in all my experience, found that our returns go up in that environment. So I think that is a challenge that we'll have to take on board. On the other matters, back to Max again.
Yes. So in terms of Resorts, I think it's a fair challenge, our Resorts business, it's something we spent quite a lot of time thinking about. And as I laid out in December, we're taking some initial action on our fashion side of the Resorts business and the specialty side of the business. Both of those have been in quite material decline over the last 2 years. And the profitability and the margins that we get from them are very much kind of subscale to the rest of the business and fashion in particular, has been largely loss-making. So I think our initial focus is absolutely to get that part of the business reformatted or closed down or exited.
In terms of our Hotel Convenience business, which is in Resorts, it's actually quite profitable. We're happy with the returns that we're getting there. And our welcome to Las Vegas business as well, also profitable, but we will continue to keep the review strategically as what's the right thing to do there.
I'll just pick up on non-underlying just before we go on. So in terms of non-underlying costs, now I've managed to clear my throat. In terms of non-underlying costs, you're right, GBP 32 million of cash cost, GBP 28 million of P&L charges. Of the GBP 32 million, GBP 10 million of that relating to our discontinued business. So at the end of last year, and that's largely the High Street and Funky Pigeon to be clear. So last year, I talked about there being around GBP 17 million, GBP 15 million to GBP 17 million of cash costs associated with that to flow through into this year, GBP 10 million of that now already complete and somewhere between GBP 5 million and GBP 7 million further cash costs related to our discontinued business in the second half to come.
And so for our continuing business, we had GBP 22 million of cash in the first half, part of that related to costs that we've taken at the end of last year, too. And so in the second half, expecting somewhere between GBP 10 million and GBP 15 million on non-underlying costs -- cash costs to come through.
Tim Barrett from Deutsche. A couple of things. Firstly, going back to the question on the U.K. Your point is very clear, Leo, about inflation and concession fees in this industry. Where does that leave you on longer-term margins? Do you view this as a rebasing now at 2026? Or could you get back to last year's EBIT margin in the U.K.?
The question on Rest of the World. You talked, Leo, about simplifying that. Is there low-hanging fruit that could be produced quite quickly? And then the last question, just very quickly, was Easter in the last 7 weeks in both periods? And has that got any impact on how we should review the 7-week period?
Look, I'd only comment on one thing. There's always -- there's no industry that I've ever worked in where margins aren't always been the other side of the coin in having too much cost, it's an opportunity to save it, isn't it? So what you've got to do is ultimately look at the waterfall of where does that get recovered. And those are things that we will obviously be working on in the next 6 to 12 months. Max, on the other point, Easter wasn't included. I think, yes.
Yes. So Easter is slightly brought forward this year versus last year. So it will have had a benefit in effect to March, and a small impact, therefore, on April overall.
So negative?
Yes, it would have been negative. So if you -- let me talk about maybe -- it's difficult again to disaggregate what's happening in the Middle East. But in terms of volumes, passenger numbers for large Air, I think it was around 8 million in March, expected to be around 12 million for April. And passenger numbers, broadly speaking, over that period are up in large Air, somewhere between kind of 3% and 4% in March and down nearer kind of 2% to 3% in April. So that's what's happening with passengers. Difficult again to disaggregate what's Easter and what is Middle East. Largely, we think the Middle East is the thing that's causing the drag.
Rest of world?
In terms of opportunities and low-hanging fruit, I think we've been very clear on the fact that we want to scale down our direct operations in a number of markets in Rest of the World. We are taking action on that already, as I think I've talked about with Düsseldorf and Norway. We're looking at a number of other locations as opportunities either to franchise or to move to exit as well. So there's not a lot more I can talk about at this stage on that, but making good progress. We obviously have a number of longer-term contracts in place, but making good progress.
Kate Calvert from Investec. A couple of questions for me. The first question is just on the FCA investigation. Have you had any indication on how long this might take?
My second question is just on the store closures in both the U.S. and the Rest of the World. Can you give us an idea on how material the sort of level of losses are within those businesses? And the third question is going back to Rest of the World, how much growth opportunity is there to go after in Australia and Spain?
Lucky you. You get to do it.
Yes. So in terms of FCA and timing, we're continuing to work closely with the FCA. We don't have any update on timing and can't really comment further on it at this stage, but things continue to progress in terms of discussion with them.
In terms of store closures, dealing with Rest of World first. So the 2 that we've closed out initially being Düsseldorf and Norway. On a full year basis, Düsseldorf would have been revenue of around GBP 4 million and Norway would have been around GBP 15 million to give you some kind of feel for the impact of those.
In terms of margin, both very low to not a lot of impact from a P&L perspective and actually upside in terms of cash. And I'm so happy with those.
In terms of the fashion stores and specialty stores, the ones that we've closed so far only a handful really, little impact in terms of revenue. When I come to talk about the fashion store closures in the back end of the year, I'll give you some quantification of what those look like once we know exactly how many we've closed. But the Resorts business broadly breaks into 4. So fashion is about 1/4 of it.
It's Richard Chamberlain from RBC. Could I ask maybe three quick ones as well. Max, what kind of net debt-to-EBITDA level do you think you'd be targeting now for the end of this fiscal year?
Second one is just going back to InMotion. It sounds like you had a more encouraging like-for-like performance so far in H2, which is sort of somewhat odds with the cautious comments on the sector overall. So is that sort of timing issues? Maybe you can just give a bit more color on that.
And then third, sort of intrigued about the comments about the Albuquerque store flexibility to realign category mix and so on. And is that a sort of template for the future? And maybe you can just give a bit more color on which categories you're referring to in terms of potentially moving away from and into.
You're the only qualified one on the table.
So in terms of net debt-to-EBITDA, looking to bring that down closer to 2x from a leverage perspective, if that's what you're referencing. I think given the outlook that we've got and the net debt guidance of GBP 420 million, it's going to be difficult to see that below 2x by the end of the year, around 2x, I suspect, just above it, given where we are at this point.
And that's fairly typical in terms of seasonality for the business, probably important to say that. This is the first time really that we start to get a clearer picture for the year at least in terms of our travel business outside of having the High Street. So as expected, we have this seasonality, but it's pretty acute for us.
In terms of InMotion, you're right. I'd like to say that we're really buoyed by the fact that InMotion is up at 3% in the first 7 weeks of trading, and we are encouraged. I think green shoots is the best we can suggest at this point. We've done a lot of work in terms of ranging. Those kind of 9 store closures helped, the 6 new good ones coming in helps, although not necessarily on like-for-likes.
But the other thing to kind of bear in mind, there was the government shutdown, if I kind of broadly call it that, the TSA impact. And so dwell time was longer. That does have an impact on InMotion. When you've got people staying in the airports for longer, we often see an uptick. So it's good news, but it's early days, still a long way to go on InMotion, I think.
In terms of Albuquerque and the comments around realigning mix, I think there, what you -- what we're trying to communicate and get across is that as you've seen in our U.K. business over the last 10 years, there's been a very constant and regular need for evolution of the different product ranges that we offer to the business. And so we have seen in the past, in some examples in parts of the Rest of the World, I could probably point to where we've got, let's say, a heavy books range and not a lot of optionality of moving away from that even when the customer needs has moved away from that.
And so to your point in terms of templating, as we seek to contract moving forward, and this has been in place for a little while now, looking to make sure we've got some flexibility or at least the opportunity to go back and probably have the discussion with the landlords about what's working, what isn't is important. So we don't get stuck in the zone that we don't want to.
[indiscernible]
Yes, exactly. So what have we seen in the U.K. happen over the last, again, 10 years, news, books, magazines, that proportion of the business being squeezed as we look to expand food-to-go, health and beauty, in particular, over recent years.
It's Harry Gowers from JPMorgan. A couple of questions as well. I get you're obviously targeting less than 2x leverage on net debt-to-EBITDA. Any way you can frame maybe what excess cash might look like and lead to a reinstatement of returns to shareholders in the medium term?
And then second question was just on actually kind of freight and energy costs, how much of the cost base they make up, how those contracts might be structured and what the impact financially is this year as a result of the Middle East and some of the inflationary pressure on those components?
And then the third question, just on the new Heathrow stores, any kind of color you can give more medium term, I guess, in terms of kind of sustainable uplift on average transaction values, kind of returns you might expect on those investments?
So in terms of leverage, we're targeting to be back down below 2x. At this point, I think it would be -- it wouldn't be prudent to necessarily guide in terms of what do we think the future looks like. There's just too much uncertainty. But getting back below 2, getting down towards our overall range that we've still got 0.75 to 1.25, that's the focus, right? So just strengthen the cash position, bring debt down. We're in a position where we've got surplus cash. I think Leo already talked to the sorts of uses of that. We'll come back and talk to you more. So I'm not in a position today to really guide on when that might be.
In terms of freight and energy costs, energy cost largely is a pass-through from landlords where we do have a cost directly for that or it's encompassed as part of the overall rent deal that we have. So there is a bit of impact for us, but it's not too material at this point. Looking at Andrew in the front row, agreeing or shaking his head at the same time. So yes.
In terms of freight cost, that I would say -- so naturally, we're seeing a freight cost increases as we see oil prices rise. In the U.S., it's probably a little deeper than it is in the U.K., just given the scale of the U.S. We've got 2 RDCs, one up in New York and then down in Las Vegas. So we do have a significant amount of ground to cover road and rail with our freight in the U.S. So we're seeing a bit more of a pronounced impact there, which is part of the reason why we've been a little more cautious on the margin for North America.
And in terms of Heathrow in the medium term, not looking to kind of nail ourselves to this, but we've seen successes before. I think Birmingham Airport, Andrew, when he was up on stage in December talked around a 20% uplift that we saw there overall. So we're encouraged by what we've seen in certain sites. We're confident in what we can do at Heathrow, and we're really looking forward to delivering some strong total revenue growth there in the years ahead.
I've got one for Mr. Quinn actually. As you mentioned in your earlier remarks, you've turned around a few businesses before. What lessons from that experience do you tend to draw on for WH Smith going forward?
And secondly is more of a clarification one. You referenced lower passenger numbers, weaker consumer confidence weighing on guidance. News flow is obviously changing by the minute. But can you give us some sort of more color on the precise scenario for this guidance? I mean what exactly is baked into that assumption?
Sure. Very hard for me to sort of delegate the first one to Max, but you can have a second one. Look, I suppose my approach is it's very easy to be a busy fool in business. And quite often, you do have to sort of get people to concentrate on cash and profit. I think there's been a little bit of revenue growth at all costs and planting flags here.
And I put that down to something which I would characterize as forced growth. And I think the real lesson here is that let's sort of rein back on the growth, which usually sort of associates itself with being a very busy fool. But let's just concentrate on those basic things in terms of how do we maximize cash and ensure we get the maximum returns.
The other thing I also find is that although we paid people to lead, very few people actually lead. I think the one thing that this business has is we've got a fantastic retail capability. I've got 9,000 people who know how to do that really, really well. And I think all they need is just -- is direction and leadership. And so my way of describing it to the organization is that my job is to get 9,000 people all pointing in the same direction, all taking one small step, the end of which we'll have one very, very big change. So we sort of convert one person at a time. And I just think that opportunity existed in all the companies I've worked for in the past. And I'm pretty sure it will work here at Smiths as well.
But we sometimes think it can be done really, really quickly. Balfour Beatty took 10 years to fivefold the share price or whatever it started at, whatever it is today. I don't think it will take 10 years, but it's not going to be happening in 12 months either. So the idea is if we give the executive team space, I think they'll produce some extraordinary outcomes. And my job is just to facilitate making those decisions and trying to accelerate the program of transformation.
And in terms of the support that sits behind the planning assumptions, maybe to focus in on passenger numbers. So I think that's one of the key drivers that everybody will have their own visibility and thoughts on in terms of the future. So to frame it, the first half large Air passenger numbers, and I talk about large Air because that's principally the key driver for us and for the U.K. business, was up just under 2%, so 1.9% large Air passenger growth in the first half. Through March, we saw a step-up from there, somewhere between 3% and 4%. And then in April, we've seen it coming back down over 2% decline in April.
So with that weighting, we've actually got a decline so far or -- broadly flat so far in the first 7 weeks of trading, 8 weeks of trading now. And so we are taking that forward through the rest of the year. So passenger numbers in our assumption, broadly flat. So when I'm guiding to kind of 1% to 3%, that's underpinned with obviously the first half, but very kind of little passenger growth, if at all, for the year and the rest coming through spend per passenger, all supported by the broader business like Hospitals and Rail.
This is a very active group. We don't normally get as many questions.
It's Richard Taylor from Barclays. Just got one question, please. Can you help us a bit more with the comments on generating cash? It was a clear part of Leo's comments. Obviously, you suspended the dividend already. The CapEx opportunities perhaps still seem to be there in the U.S. But what else should we be thinking about? Is it a bit meaner on CapEx to the point you just made, Leo, are there opportunities you see in working capital? Or is this longer term in terms of your aspirations to improve EBITDA to drive free cash flow forward?
Yes, I can pick it up. So in terms of what are the key drivers that we see impacting cash and cash generation moving forward, clearly, cost is going to be part of that, Richard. Working capital, I think, is a key part for us, particularly as we look at the working capital that we got tied up in North America. We've seen some good movements in recent months of bringing down inventory, specifically in North America and encouraged by the activities that we continue to have there to bring working capital down.
CapEx, back in December, I guided to $90 million this year, $80 million kind of in the years to come. That will depend on what pipeline opportunities come through. Now with a tight focus on returns, and our kind of scrutiny over that. I'm not going to be changing that $80 million figure at this stage. We'll have better visibility of that by the time we're sitting here in November. The capital is only going to be deployed where we've got the right opportunities.
And non-underlying cost, I guess, was picked up earlier on by Tim as well with the discontinued business falling away and the work that we've had there that we won't have that expenditure, let's say, and other non-underlying areas, we've got a number of programs at this stage anyway due to complete later on this year. So I think pulling on all the possible levers from a working capital and a cost perspective.
If I can just build on that. If you look back historically, this is a fantastically cash-generative business. Every time the till rings, we bring cash in. The one thing we can't control in the current environment and the uncertainty is spend per passenger and getting the -- if the passengers tail off, then cash is going to decline. We can control the outgoing in terms of costs and whatever, and that is vital, and we're focused on that. But it is interesting.
The last report that I looked at when I left Balfour Beatty was the 3:00 Friday cash report. So for 10 years, every Friday at 3:00, I got a worldwide cash flow on my desk. And the really good news is last Friday, we got the first Smith worldwide cash flow on my desk. So I'm a great believer in what gets measured, gets done. And the emphasis is it's not about just top line growth, and it's not about margin, but it's about all of them. So how do we get them all right, including cash? And I think it's just -- it's a little bit like the dashboard on your car. We've got all the gauges there. We've just added cash so that we're optimizing all the facets of the business. And again, that will bring amazing clarity and strength to performance.
That's very helpful. Just a clarification point. The non-underlying items were guided to be GBP 50 million for the year from GBP 30 million previously, I think. Can you just tell us how much of that is cash? I know you sort of answered this earlier, Max, in the question on underlying, but I just want to be clear on whether that includes impairments? And if it doesn't, how much of the cash we should be expecting for the full year?
And then it sounds like there are a few things that are going to spill over into next year on cash, so what cash exceptional or non-underlying, however you want to phrase it, is likely your best guess at this stage for next year?
So in the continuing business, just to talk to that, which ties into your GBP 28 million, and we had GBP 22 million in the first half, again, part of that related to the cost at the end of last year, I'd be saying somewhere between -- I don't think I've written anywhere in here, but somewhere between kind of GBP 32 million to GBP 35 million for the full year. So another kind of GBP 10 million to GBP 13 million, GBP 14 million as we think about cash cost. And that will depend a little bit on when they land through the back end of the year. And just to be clear, that is in support of the IT transformation I've guided to the operational efficiency side, the ongoing work in North America and the remediation fix is there.
The other areas are largely noncash. The only one at this stage that I've signaled that we've got additional cost in next year, I think I said GBP 5 million is IT at this point, which will be a cash cost. The other areas of step-up that I've signaled, as you say, from the GBP 30 million to the GBP 50 million, the main driver of that has been the additional impairment charges, again, largely noncash from the first half. And then the indication of what might come, I haven't provided specifics on it, but what might come in terms of InMotion and Resorts further impairments as we look to close that part of the business down. Again, we'd expect that to be largely noncash.
It's Hai Huynh. I have a couple. First one is on the guidance -- PBT guidance for the year. Is that mostly coming from passenger traffic and the lower operating leverage you have from the lower top line? Or in terms of the cost elements, are you already seeing cost inflation going through and that's already baked in into your assumptions? And also within that, supply income, have you seen a change in appetite of FMCGs and suppliers funded promotions and that affects your income as well within your guidance?
The second one is just a clarification on North America. It might be obvious, but just logistics costs step up there. Is that mostly remediation related to the supply income issue? Or is that something else? And should we expect more of that in FY '27 as well?
So in terms of logistics, I'll do them in reverse order. But in terms of logistics cost, it's the rising cost of effectively petrol on the pump or oil and gas in North America that's driving that as well as in the first half, as we've looked to put in place a new RDC over in New York or the outskirts New York, that's come with some initial kind of cost to set ourselves up there. So that will fall away and actually should be a benefit for us in the medium term. It's really just the inflationary pressures on logistics in the U.S. that's playing through.
In terms of PBT guidance and supplier income, maybe joining those two things together, clearly, we've got the impact on revenue and the volume metrics that's flowing through and the revenue being impacted by both passenger numbers and spend per passenger, as I think I've talked about.
In terms of margin and the costs and the challenges that we're seeing there. So we've got the promotional activity, again, as I think I've given some examples on as part of it, the brand activity and marketing, that really does -- that falls into your supplier income category. So that's what's playing out there as well in terms of impact potentially on the business. So we don't know the exact quantification of that, but that's what we're assuming a reduction of that in the balance of the year.
Great. It looks like we've taken all the questions. Thank you for...
So I think we just need to -- just before we wrap up, we just need to check if there's anybody else dialed in, if that's okay. I'm not sure if there is any questions from those dialed in, but let's just quickly do that and then hand back to you for a wrap up. Are there any questions from anyone dialed in?
Thank you. We have no questions in the queue, so we'll hand back to you in the room.
So just in summary, the #1 priority is to sort of stabilize the ship, get people focused back on what we do really well in terms of travel essentials and focusing on cash and cost in those orders, so to speak.
I think Max has emphasized that we do see some green shoots out there. We'll be very careful we don't trample all over them. We need to sort of water them, grow them and encourage them. And I think if we do that, over the medium term, I think we'll start to see some recovery. And once we move outside of this very uncertain time, I'm looking forward to running a very stable business in the future.
And thanks for a great job, by the way, because you've done all the hard work. So thank you all for attending and look forward to having another check-up in 6 months. Thank you.
Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Wh Smith — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Wh Smith — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us and dialing into the call this morning. I'm Annette Court, Chair of the company, and I'm here with Andrew Harrison, Interim Group CEO, and Max Izzard, our Group CFO.
This morning, I will start by giving some headlines for the group. Max will then present the financials for the year to the 31st of August and importantly, a financial review of our North America division. Andrew and Max will then update on our divisional performance, and Andrew will close with his priorities for the near term and a summary of our guidance for the group for the full year ending 31st of August 2026.
It has been a very busy year. And while the past few months have been difficult, I'm clear that this is a great business, well positioned in attractive travel markets and with exciting future prospects. During the year, we completed a significant strategic reset, disposing of our High Street and Funky Pigeon businesses, establishing our position as a pure-play travel retailer and creating a platform for long-term growth.
We have a clear leadership position in Travel Essentials. Our stores are located in attractive high footfall locations across the globe, and we have a fantastic team of passionate and customer-focused colleagues. Now that we have completed our strategic reset to a pure-play travel retailer, we have reviewed the broader travel portfolio with a sharp focus on profitable growth and an enhanced focus on return on capital.
In North America, we are now in the process of exiting a number of unprofitable fashion and specialty stores. We are also undertaking a store review of our U.S. InMotion business and have put in place a more rigorous approach to any future store openings with any new InMotion stores only being considered as part of the strategically important tender package.
In addition, we have reviewed our Rest of the World division. Here, we will focus investments on our core strategically-important markets, exiting subscale markets and using a less capital-intensive franchise model for future openings. So we are very clear on the actions we need to take to support enhanced profitable growth as we move forward.
Following the recent Deloitte review, we have acted swiftly to put in place a clear remediation plan and we're making good progress. The plan is structured around three key business objectives: to strengthen governance and controls to protect value and restore trust, to embed aligned processes and ways of working across the group supported by new systems and to sustain this through cultural change, enhanced training and monitoring. We have a clear pathway forward, and we look forward to putting this behind us.
In the near term, we continue with our active search for two nonexecutive directors to strengthen the Board, with one area of focus being North America retail experience. And between Andrew and Max, I'm confident that the group is in good hands and will be well managed as we continue the search for a new Chief Executive. I will now hand over to Max.
Thank you, Annette, and good morning, everyone. Let me start with the financial headlines for the year ended 31st of August 2025. As usual, all the numbers I'm going to refer to today are pre-IFRS 16 and following the sale of our High Street division and Funky Pigeon business, all the results are on a continuing basis. IFRS 16 bridges can be found in the appendix.
Total group revenue increased by 5% on last year to GBP 1.6 billion, and we saw like-for-like revenue growth across all divisions. As anticipated, following the review into our North America division, group headline trading profit decreased by 6% in the year to GBP 159 million. Headline profit before tax was GBP 108 million. And the group generated a headline EBITDA of GBP 187 million in the year, demonstrating the cash-generative nature of the trading business. Headline net debt at the end of the year was GBP 390 million, and I will come on to talk more about this later in the presentation.
The Board has today proposed a final dividend of 6p per share, making it a full year dividend of 17.3p per share. This is in line with our stated dividend policy of 2.5x cover and reflects the continuing earnings profile of the group following the sale of our non-travel business.
Turning now to the group revenue summary. Across all our divisions, we saw good momentum in the year with like-for-like revenue up 5%. And on a constant currency basis, total revenue was up 7%, reflecting good operational performance and continued growth in global passenger numbers. In the 13 weeks to the 31st of August, we saw group like-for-like revenue growth of 3%.
By division, the U.K. saw like-for-like sales of 3% with reduced passenger numbers through the peak summer period and the reduced level of spend per passenger. In North America, we saw like-for-like sales at 1%. And within that number, we saw Traveler Essentials continuing to perform well at 8%, with InMotion down 7% and Resorts down 6%. Rest of the World delivered like-for-like revenue growth of 6%.
And in the first 15 weeks of trading for full year '26, we have seen these sales trends continue. Group like-for-like have remained at 3% with the U.K. slowing slightly to 2%, largely reflecting a softening in Rail. North America revenue trends remained at 1% like-for-likes. And rest of the world has continued to perform well with growth of 6%.
Now turning to the segmental analysis for the last financial year. Starting with the U.K. Revenue was up 5% on both a total and like-for-like basis, with a good performance across all three channels. Air was up 7% on a like-for-like basis, Hospitals were up 4% like-for-like and Rail was also up 4% like-for-like.
In North America, total revenue was up 7% on a constant currency basis. The Air segment in North America was up 9% on a constant currency basis and 4% like-for-like. Within this, our Travel Essentials format, which accounts for over 50% of revenue in North America, was the key driver of performance with total revenue on a constant currency basis up 19% and up 7% on a like-for-like basis as we continue to increase our spend per passenger. InMotion like-for-like revenue was down 3% for the full year. And Resorts were down 4% like-for-like. This trend has continued in the first 15 weeks of trading with InMotion down 4% and Resorts down 7%. I will come on to talk more about our InMotion and Resorts business later in the presentation.
The Rest of the World division delivered a good performance with total revenue up 12% on a constant currency basis, supported by new openings, and up 7% like-for-like.
On the right of the screen, you can also see how we continue to actively transform the group with Air now accounting for more than 70% of total revenue. Following the sale of the U.K. High Street business, this also shows how the group is now more geographically diverse with the U.K. accounting for just over 50% of revenue, North America at 26% and the rest of the world at 20%.
Turning now to a financial review of the North America division. In North America, we delivered headline trading profit of GBP 15 million. The bridge from the previous market expectation of GBP 55 million is here on the left side of the screen and includes a net reduction in supplier income of GBP 23 million, broadly in line with the value previously announced. This comprises a gross reduction of GBP 33 million, of which GBP 20 million is deferred to future financial years and GBP 13 million has not been delivered due to delays in signing supplier income contracts and the underdelivery of the commercial plan.
Supplier income costs of GBP 3 million have also been incurred. This is offset by a GBP 13 million supplier income restatement benefit from prior years. Also, as previously announced, the expected cost savings related to the North America logistics and distribution network of GBP 5 million were not delivered. The adjusted margin for full year '25 before additional one-off inventory-related costs of GBP 12 million is 6.5%.
The inventory-related items previously announced, net of restatements to the prior years, is GBP 12 million. This includes GBP 23 million of total costs identified with GBP 11 million restated to prior periods. The net inventory items for full year '25 primarily consist of an increase in the stock obsolescence provision of around GBP 5 million. The increase is driven by the aging profile of stock, a marginally worsened stock turn and a revised provision methodology, which has a more granular approach across all our product categories. There is a clear set of activities focused on narrowing product ranges and exiting aged stock for the year ahead.
And secondly, an increase in the stock loss provision for the full year of around GBP 5 million. The shrinkage charge comprises known stock losses realized through stock counts and a shrinkage provision reflecting expected losses since the count to year-end. There is a focus on enhancing controls and stock management processes across the North America business also in the year ahead.
In terms of prior year restatements, you can see on the right of the screen that supplier income adjustments on a net basis are GBP 13 million for full year '24 and GBP 5 million for full year '23. Approximately GBP 5 million of supplier income from these prior years will be recognized in full year '26 and beyond.
Some of the inventory adjustments also relate to prior years. On a net basis, GBP 7 million recorded in full year '24 and GBP 4 million recorded in full year '23. The restated headline trading margins for the prior years are 8.5% for full year '24 and 10.5% for full year '23.
In addition, over recent months, we have also reviewed the nature of one-off items included in the income statement to ensure we have a clear understanding of the normalized trading profit margin in North America. We identified a small number of one-off items, the most notable of which related to COVID rent relief benefits and COVID insurance claims received. After removing the net benefits, the normalized North America trading margin for the prior years of full year '24 and '23 is around 8%. And I will talk in more detail later about how the business will rebuild profitability in full year '26 and grow margin over time.
Moving on to the group income statement. In the U.K., profit improved by 6.6% to GBP 130 million due to higher revenue, improved margins, tight cost control and given the group's overall performance, a remuneration cost reduction of GBP 3 million. As you have just heard, North America delivered a profit of GBP 15 million, and Rest of the World delivered a profit of GBP 14 million, in line with last year. Overall, then, group trading profit was GBP 159 million.
Central costs are reduced year-on-year with remuneration benefits of around GBP 5 million. Tight control of this area will remain a key focus, with inflation headwinds and some group remediation-related costs expected in the year ahead. Financing costs of GBP 26 million include noncash accretion of GBP 9 million relating to the convertible bond. And this resulted in group headline profit before tax and non-underlying items of GBP 108 million.
Turning now to non-underlying items. As you see on the screen, we have recognized a number of non-underlying items in the year. We have continued to invest in our multiyear IT transformation program, providing system stability, longevity and operational benefits. This program will continue for approximately 2 more years as we complete the replacement of our U.K. tilling software and the transformation of finance and supply chain systems. Costs in full year '26 are expected to be around GBP 8 million and approximately half of that in full year '27 before the program completes.
We have also completed a number of operational efficiency programs to deliver cost savings and support our business performance. Across our head office and stores, we have been re-profiling our workforce and improving core processes to deliver in excess of GBP 9 million annualized benefits. The overall program will complete in full year '26 and we would expect the remaining cost for these items to be around GBP 5 million in the year.
The supply chain transformation to consolidate our U.K. distribution centers is now complete. The cost of the North America review conducted to date is GBP 10 million. We expect further cost in full year '26 in the region of GBP 5 million.
With regard to impairments and onerous contract charges, it largely comprises of GBP 25 million for North America and GBP 16 million for the Rest of the World, with GBP 7 million attributable to the U.K., largely related to supply chain transformation. Charges in the North America and Rest of the World operating segments have principally risen due to a lower trading outlook and profitability in certain individual stores across these regions, including our Resort stores in Las Vegas, and one particular group in the North America stores where we have seen significantly increased costs due to a new union agreement.
Other non-underlying costs are expected to be around GBP 3 million to GBP 5 million in full year '26, largely related to the ongoing noncash amortization of acquired intangibles. Overall, the cash impact of non-underlying items in the year was GBP 38 million, and this includes some timing-related spend from previous periods.
Turning now to the group free cash flow. There are three key points to note on the free cash flow for full year '25. First, we generated GBP 187 million of headline EBITDA in the year. Second, the underlying CapEx investment in the business was GBP 81 million and includes our new store opening program. Third, working capital was an inflow of GBP 4 million, with a one-off payables timing benefit linked to one of our large franchise partners, broadly offsetting an inventory increase relating to new store openings and the seasonality of the business.
Turning now to headline net debt, which was GBP 390 million at the end of the year, comprising the convertible bond of GBP 320 million, drawdown on the RCF of GBP 141 million and cash of GBP 71 million, which gives the group a rolling 12-month to headline net debt-to-EBITDA leverage of 2.1x compared to 1.9x last year on a continuing business basis.
In offset to the free cash flow, we had cash spend relating to non-underlying items of GBP 38 million. We had outflow of GBP 93 million for returns to shareholders, with GBP 43 million for the full year '24 final dividend, and full year '25 interim payment and GBP 50 million for the share buyback completed in the year. And we also had a GBP 75 million cash receipt in relation to the pension surplus following the buyout in September 2024.
For our discontinued operations, we had a net outflow of GBP 25 million. This includes the cash receipts for the sale of our High Street and Funky Pigeon businesses, CapEx and trading outflows in the year before the sale and transaction-related costs. We expect headline net debt for full year '26 to be in the region of GBP 400 million.
Let's now move on to capital allocation. We remain focused on maintaining an efficient balance sheet and are strengthening our disciplined approach to capital allocation. On the screen, you can see our three-pillar approach. In the near term, we aim to strengthen the balance sheet through tighter cash control and improved cash generation, diversify our debt structure and reduce our leverage position to below 2x. Secondly, investing to grow and protecting value. We will do this by investing in business development and new space growth with a clear focus on returns and protecting our business assets through store works and transformation projects.
And finally, we deliver sustainable shareholder returns through our stated dividend policy of 2.5x cover for the continuing earning profile of the group following the sale of the non-travel business. As you have already heard, we have today announced that the Board is proposing a final dividend of 6p per share. And when we have surplus capital, we will look to return this to shareholders.
Turning now to our refinancing. As recently announced, we have successfully completed a refinancing of the group's convertible bond, which matures in May 2026. The new financing includes GBP 200 million of USPP notes, which represent WH Smith's debut issue in the USPP market. In addition, we have GBP 120 million of 3-year bank term debt with two uncommitted 1-year extensions. To provide further financing surety for the group, we have put in place a GBP 200 million backstop facility, which runs until the USPP completes and the convertible bond is repaid.
Based on the resulting new financial structure, the backstop facility and the delayed draw terms, we would expect the income statement interest charge to increase from 4.6% to 6.3% by the end of full year '27. Full year '26 interest costs expected to be in the region of GBP 33 million to GBP 35 million.
Moving to our second pillar and capital allocation. In full year '25, we invested around GBP 81 million of capital into the business, which is a reduction versus the prior years, largely due to a lower number of new store openings and strong focuses on cost efficiency and building new stores, particularly in the North America division, where we are seeing tangible benefits from buying at scale and further embedding capability from our U.K. business. Looking forward, we have a clear framework and disciplined approach to our growth investments.
On the right of the screen, you can see that we are prioritizing business opportunities based on their relative returns and ensuring that the group hurdles are met for each store opportunity. We still see North America as a good investment opportunity. This prioritization will lead to a more measured approach to growth, investing where we have a clear understanding of where we can deliver the greatest returns. And in our Rest of the World division, where we will focus on existing scale markets, we will talk more about this shortly.
For the year ahead, we have a strong store pipeline, and we expect capital costs of around GBP 90 million in full year '26. This supports some of our largest and recent tender wins across both the U.K. and the U.S., including at Heathrow, JFK and Orlando airports. Our latest flagship stores at Heathrow will open in the spring of 2026. And while our stores at JFK and Orlando Airports won't open in the current financial year, there is a large capital outlay in developing these stores this year, ahead of them opening. These three large store development programs will account for approximately 30% of the total CapEx in full year '26. Going forward, post full year '26, we would expect CapEx to normalize back to around GBP 80 million.
Moving on to store numbers and better quality space. And our priority here is to focus on improving the quality of our space to optimize profits. As a consequence of this strategy, we expect to broadly close as many stores as we open on an annual basis in the short term. During the year, we opened 78 new stores with 17 in the U.K.; 35 in North America, of which 33 were in air, demonstrating our clear focus on this channel and 26 in our Rest of the World division, of which 9 were franchised. At the same time, we closed 50 stores in the year, nearly all in line with our strategy to improve the quality of our estate, leaving us with net store openings of 28 for the year.
Our current estimate for full year '26 is that we will close around 50 to 60 stores and open around 50 to 60 stores with particular reductions across our Resorts and InMotion channels in North America and stores in our Rest of World division.
Moving on to capital returns on the next slide. We remain focused on strengthening our return on capital. The results of the North America business have reduced return on capital employed. And despite gains in the U.K. division, at a group level, we have seen a decline this year. Moving forward, we will drive additional capital return discipline, focusing on the strongest returns, we will rebuild our North America profitability and complete a strategic review of all of our underperforming stores. As we move forward, we would expect to deliver stronger returns on capital employed in the years ahead, and deliver a return on capital employed above 20% for the group and North America returns above our cost of capital.
Moving on to the divisional priorities, where Andrew and I can share some more details on how we will start to do this. As we look ahead, we have a disciplined approach to our key priorities for each business division, underpinned by a focus on cost optimization, stronger return on capital and enhanced cash flow generation.
Let me begin with our North America division, and our priorities are clear. First, we will focus on improving and investing in our core Travel Essentials business. When it comes to InMotion, we will now adopt a highly selective approach with future store openings and review of the existing store portfolio. We have also completed a strategic review of our Resorts business, where we will look to exit or reformat our unprofitable fashion and specialty stores. And alongside the remediation plan we have put in place, we're strengthening our operating model to enhance efficiency, agility and profitability across the division.
The U.K., which is our largest division, continues to play a pivotal role in driving the group's performance and shaping our future growth. Here, we are focused on retaining category leadership in Travel Essentials. We will continue to expand our presence through targeted and profitable space growth, and we are actively scaling our Health & Beauty and food-to-go growth categories.
In our Rest of the World division, we are sharpening our focus, and our growth strategy will be increasingly centered on a franchise model. We will limit directly-run stores to our core markets, and we will take a disciplined approach to exit subscale markets. So as we look ahead, we will be more disciplined and as a result, actively drive profits and cash returns.
Let's take a closer look at our North America division. And it is important not to forget that this is the largest travel retail market in the world with significant investments and long-term structural growth trends. And we still see an opportunity here to capitalize on the growth opportunities given our small market share. And as you have heard, our priorities for this division are clear.
Let's start with Travel Essentials. Our Travel Essentials business has consistently delivered a strong performance, growing 19% on a constant currency basis in full year '25, underpinned by customer demand and attractive double-digit margins. On the screen, you can see that in 2022, Travel Essentials represented 37% of the overall business. And over the past 3 years, we have grown it, and it now represents 55% of North America revenue. The Travel Essentials segment is most profitable and on a fully allocated basis, generates around 10% trading profit margin. As we scale our business and enhance our operations, we expect to grow margins further, which in turn will support the profitability of our North America business overall.
Given our priority to deliver the strongest returns, we expect the proportion of Travel Essentials to increase to over 70% in the medium term. We have a strong store pipeline, which we have reviewed in light of the normalized margin levels, and we are confident that on aggregate, they meet our investment hurdle rates. We have also started the process of reviewing all our individual formats within the pipeline.
Turning to the next slide. When it comes to InMotion, this brand remains highly regarded by landlords, particularly as part of tender packages where it adds value to the overall retail offering at airports. And its strong reputation gives us competitive advantage, securing attractive space within the key airports. Our InMotion portfolio is large with 123 stores. Overall, the estate is profitable, and some stores are in growth and driving a strong contribution. However, in total, this segment is in like-for-like decline.
As we move forward, our approach to operating InMotion will be highly focused. First, we will limit new store openings with any new InMotion stores being considered only as part of strategically important tender packages. Where appropriate, we will also move the InMotion proposition into large marketplace stores, providing flexibility on space use over time. In parallel, we will undertake a review of the existing store portfolio. It is imperative that we improve the profitability and sales performance of this channel.
As a result, our focus will include undertaking a deeper diagnostic for the estate to determine the factors that need to be in place for these stores to succeed. We expect to complete this in the first half of 2026. And once complete, we will be in a position to reshape the portfolio to improve profitability and allow us to better target where we can open new stores that pay back with strong returns. And we are focusing on our commercial proposition, reducing the number of product lines and improving availability and reducing working capital.
Over time, we expect the number of InMotion stores to decline as we integrate more tech accessories into our Travel Essentials stores as well as the impact of landlord redevelopment. In the years ahead, we would expect the InMotion estate to contract by around 20% to 30% with store numbers reducing below 100 in the medium term. Despite store closures, we see an opportunity to increase the margin with our strongest margin stores retained, range optimization and strengthened operational performance.
Turning to some examples of our Air business overall. Our strategy to grow in North America airports is delivering really good results. Over recent years, we've secured a mix of stand-alone stores and multi-store packages, combining our profitable Travel Essentials offer with complementary stores such as InMotion. In Kansas City, we opened an eight-store package in February 2023, including six Travel Essentials stores plus a larger format City Market and a localized Made in KC concept store. This tailored approach across the airport meets travelers' needs and drives performance, with like-for-like growth of around 6% and a current payback period tracking to around 3 years and a long-term contract in place.
Our Eastern Market store in the middle of the screen opened in May 2025 and is a good example of where we have introduced a marketplace format, offering the convenience of everything under one roof, very similar to our one-stop shop strategy here in the U.K. And here, we have the flexibility to realign our category mix over the term of the lease to ensure we stay ahead of the changing trends. We expect a payback period here of less than 3 years and also with a long-term contract in place.
And in Palm Springs, we have secured exclusive rights to all the retail locations in the airport. This was a significant strategic win and includes a five-store package with three Travel Essentials stores, an InMotion and a coffee shop. This localized offer is performing very well with like-for-like growth of around 9% and a current payback period of around 2 years, again, with a long-term contract in place. So as you can see, we have a clear ability to win in prime locations, adapt our formats and leverage our brands, and we are able to drive good growth with attractive returns.
Turning to our resorts business in Las Vegas, and we have commenced the review evaluating the current store portfolio based on the performance and the market dynamics of each format to determine the most value-accretive path forward. There are four primary store formats that make up our resorts business. Firstly, hotel convenience, gift stores, of which we have around 20. These sell consumables and souvenirs. Second, Welcome to Las Vegas stores. We have just over 20 of these, and they primarily sell souvenirs, again, with some consumables. We see good contribution from our hotel convenience and Welcome to Las Vegas stores, where despite a decline in like-for-like revenue in the last year, we continue to benefit from attractive margins, and they each contribute cash.
Third, fashion stores. These deliver around 25% of Resort sales and on a comparable basis have declined around 10% year-on-year. At an aggregated level, these stores are unprofitable and do not generate cash. And lastly, specialty stores. These sell categories such as confectionery and represent around 10% of Resort sales. Like-for-like revenue also declined 7% in full year '25, and they are marginally unprofitable.
Following our review, we are now in the process of exiting a number of Resort fashion and specialty stores, particularly where the leases are short, and we are reviewing further formats and other controlled exit options where the arrangements run over the medium term. We are also reviewing where we can strengthen terms for our hotel convenience and Welcome to Las Vegas stores where traffic is in decline, and we will rationalize this estate, if required. While this will take some time, we have initiated the work and the margin and cash benefits along with growth benefits will already support our full year '26 plans.
Turning to my final slide. Given this division has grown significantly over the past years, it has become complex with significant store, supplier and product range expansion. We are, therefore, focusing on refining the operating model with core business process improvements and the appropriate builds required. It is clear that this will be a multiyear piece of work, and our focus areas for the next 12 months will be on our people, our talent and investment into our end-to-end supply chain to improve the current processes and ways of working, both centrally and in stores.
This will be combined with the rollout of two new regional distribution centers, one operated by GXO in New Jersey and a second in Las Vegas, operated directly as an extension of how we operate today. We will utilize these distribution centers to transform our distribution and transportation capabilities and stay ahead of the store growth. We also expect operational savings to deliver a benefit in the years ahead.
So in bringing this all together in the year ahead, we are expecting total revenue growth in the region of 6% to 8%, driven largely by space. In terms of profitability, we expect to grow headline trading margin from 4% in full year '25 to around 7% or 8% in full year '26. This includes trading profit contribution in the region of GBP 5 million; the rebuild of profit, excluding the non-repeat inventory-related costs of around GBP 12 million; supplier income deferral gains of around GBP 5 million year-on-year, offset by operating model changes and remediation investment of around GBP 2 million.
And as we look ahead, we will focus on the five key actions that will strengthen our business and deliver future margin gains, increasing the mix of Travel Essentials, deploying capital with discipline and investing where we see the highest returns and avoiding unnecessary expansion. Every decision will be guided by rigorous financial criteria, strengthening our operating model to improve efficiency, rationalizing the low-margin stores to sharpen our focus on profitable locations. And finally, exiting loss-making stores to ensure our portfolio is positioned for long-term success.
I will now hand over to Andrew, who will take you through the rest of the presentation.
Thank you, Max, and good morning, everyone. As some of you know, I've had the opportunity to lead our U.K. division for the past 4.5 years as we've navigated a period of important progress and transformation. This morning, I want to take you through the performance of that division, share our outlook for the year ahead and highlight the priorities that we will continue to drive future growth. From there, we'll turn to our Rest of the World division. And before closing with our guidance for full year '26 and the near-term priorities that underpin our strategy.
So let's take a look at our U.K. division. This has been another good year for our U.K. business. Revenue was up 5% to GBP 834 million and headline trading profit increased by 7% to GBP 130 million. These results underline the strength of our model and the resilience of our growth strategy.
And our strategy remains clear: to develop ranges and formats that are relevant to the customer at each stage of their journey, enabling them to make best use of their time and put more products into their baskets to grow spend per passenger. In food-to-go, our Smith's Family Kitchen offer has gone from strength to strength with award-winning products and expanded meal deal proposition and an enhanced hot food and coffee range that is resonating strongly with customers.
In Health & Beauty, we've seen strong growth, up 20% year-on-year and sixfold growth when compared to pre-COVID levels as we scale this category across our estate. These extended ranges have enabled us to continue to innovate through format development, ensuring our one-stop shop proposition is credible to customers and landlords alike and, in turn, enhance our space through this format. During the year, we've continued to optimize the estate and review our operating model, realizing substantial cost efficiencies in the face of sustained inflationary cost pressures. We'll continue with this discipline to manage continuing cost pressures.
So overall, in the U.K., we've had a good year, our third consecutive year of strong revenue and profit growth, and we've cemented our status as the leading Travel Essentials operator across our core channels.
Let's now take a closer look at our Air business. Total revenue in U.K. Air was up 6%, supported by good spend per passenger growth year-on-year in Travel Essentials. We've also seen strong average transaction value growth driven by category development in Health & Beauty and food-to-go. Today, WH Smith is the leading Travel Essentials operator across U.K. airports. In the last 18 months, we secured agreements with key airports to enhance our space, including at London Heathrow, Manchester and London Stansted, amongst others.
Therefore, looking ahead, this will be a year of investment. We'll execute our largest-ever store development program, rolling out our one-stop shop strategy across six more U.K. airport terminals, including at Heathrow, laying the foundations for future growth and long-term success. However, with this comes some short-term disruption as we reformat our existing stores. These new formats will deliver greater convenience for customers, and they will be central to our future growth.
And we know this model works. Birmingham Airport is a great example of our strategy in action. Following its refit to the one-stop shop format in 2023, it now has the highest turnover and is the best performing store in our U.K. Air estate. With a full Health & Beauty offer, including an in-store pharmacy and everything under one roof is driving ATV growth of around 20% and sales per square foot, up over 30%. This success gives us confidence as we scale the format further.
On the screen, you can see some of the renders of the flagship stores we're implementing at Heathrow in the spring. This is everything we've done in Birmingham and more. We'll become the leading airside Health & Beauty operator across Terminals 3, 4 and 5 in Heathrow with full category ranges and in-store pharmacies. And we've really raised the bar with our design and proposition. These stores will be true global flagships of our one-stop shop format. So it's a big year for our Air channel as we build on the strong partnerships we have with our landlords and strengthen our foundations for future growth.
Turning now to look at our Hospital channel. Hospitals is our second largest channel in the U.K., and it delivered another strong performance this year with revenue up 7% year-on-year. This growth reflects the strength of our multi-format approach and the partnerships that we've built. We opened seven new stores and have continued to grow with our partners M&S and Costa Coffee. At the same time, we developed our own Smith's Family Kitchen cafe proposition, which gives us a great opportunity for further growth across U.K. hospitals. Our offer for NHS landlords is now truly multi-format, and this flexibility allows us to meet diverse customer needs and maximize returns for NHS trusts. Looking ahead, hospitals remain a significant opportunity for WH Smith. We have a strong pipeline of new stores to open in full year '26, and we see further potential to expand our footprint and deepen our partnerships across the estate.
Now let's look at Rail. Rail delivered another solid performance this year with total revenue up 4% year-on-year. We've made significant progress with our one-stop shop strategy, opening flagship stores at Kings Cross and Charing Cross stations in London. These formats bring together Travel Essentials, food-to-go and Health & Beauty under one roof, creating a seamless experience for passengers and driving higher spend per visit. Looking ahead, we see further opportunity to expand this model across the Rail estate.
Our latest store opening at London Bridge station, pictured top right showcases what's possible as we move forward, combining our Smith's Family Kitchen coffee and breakfast offer with our food-to-go, Health & Beauty and Travel Essentials offer. We've also broadened our food and beverage on-the-go ranges as we continue to evolve our retail mix to maximize customer convenience.
Turning now to outlook. As we move forward, we enter this year ahead from a position of strength. We continue to benefit from structural tailwinds, including passenger growth, and we see ongoing opportunities in Air and Hospitals and across our multi-format stores and brand partnerships. There are, however, also headwinds, including a tougher consumer outlook, sustained inflationary pressure of 4% to 5% across most major cost lines and regulatory changes affecting some of our core categories. Category development and innovation remains central to our strategy, driving spend per passenger and reinforcing our leadership in Travel Essentials, as does a continued focus on costs and margin.
As you've heard, the year ahead will be a year of investment as we execute our largest-ever store development program and accelerate the rollout of our one-stop shop strategy. This is a transformational step that will strengthen our estate and position us for long-term growth. While this investment will create trading disruption in the short term, and we expect some margin dilution as a result of this disruption and the cost inflation I mentioned earlier, our focus remains on disciplined capital spend and cost optimization. These actions will ensure we deliver profitable growth and build the foundations for further accelerated returns.
So in summary, for the U.K., we've delivered another strong year and taken decisive steps to position WH Smith for the future. Our strategy is clear. Our foundations are strong and the opportunities ahead are significant.
So now let's take a look at our Rest of the World division. On the screen, you can see our priorities for the Rest of the World division as we move forward. It's been a strong year for revenue growth. Revenue was up 12%, largely driven by new store openings. Headline trading profit was broadly flat year-on-year, with operating investments in the new store openings and gross margin headwinds driven by location mix.
Looking ahead, we remain focused on growing and building scale in our core strategically-important markets, particularly in Australia, Ireland and Spain, where we've established strong brand recognition and proven commercial success. We'll focus further investment where we already have scale and expertise, ensuring we deepen our presence and strengthen profitability in the markets we know best.
In prime locations, we will also look to grow our key categories such as Health & Beauty and further develop our one-stop shop format. As part of this disciplined approach, in the near term, new directly-run stores will be opened only within our existing core markets, allowing us to leverage operational synergies, local market knowledge and established infrastructure. In addition, we'll continue to actively manage our store portfolio, which will result in exiting and reducing our exposure in subscale markets as contracts expire or through active portfolio management.
And the outcome of this is clear. We plan to improve EBIT margins over the medium term and deliver stronger returns. As we look at our next phase of growth, we're sharpening our focus on a franchise-led model, an area in which we already have considerable experience. This approach will allow us to expand across high-potential markets where we see opportunity to extend our presence. By working in partnership with experienced local operators, we can leverage their local expertise alongside our space and promotional management to optimize performance.
This shift will take time, but it offers clear -- several clear advantages. It is less capital intensive and will, therefore, drive stronger returns. It also provides the ability to grow without adding operational complexity. In terms of near-term profitability, we expect headline trading margin to remain broadly stable at 5% in full year '26.
I'll now finish by summarizing the outlook for the group for the full year 2026. So let's turn to that now. We expect group revenue growth of mid-single digits, with the U.K. delivering 3% to 5% growth; North America, 6% to 8%; and the Rest of the World division, around 4% to 6%. On headline trading profit margin, we anticipate 14% to 15% margin in the U.K., 7% to 8% margin in North America, an approximately 5% margin in the rest of the world. This reflects the different dynamics in each market, a year of investment in the U.K., a focus on rebuilding profitability in North America and strengthening our foundations internationally.
Central costs are expected to be in the region of GBP 30 million to GBP 32 million and finance costs are expected in the range of GBP 33 million to GBP 35 million, largely reflecting the refinancing of our convertible bond. Bringing this all together, we're guiding to group headline profit before tax and non-underlying items in the range of GBP 100 million to GBP 115 million for the year.
So now to the final slide to close. It's been a year of change and challenge. Over the past year, we've executed a strategic reset, and we're now a pure-play global travel retailer, operating in attractive travel markets across the globe. Across each division, we set clear priorities to strengthen our leadership position in global travel retail, and we're focused on execution and taking action and we will exit unprofitable stores and markets where we need to.
We're also focused on discipline, tight cost control, rigorous capital allocation and attractive returns on invested capital. This discipline will underpin everything that we do, and it's how we intend to rebuild confidence and create value.
Thank you for your time today, and we'll now take your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Harry Gowers from JPMorgan.
2. Question Answer
First question, maybe I could just ask sort of on the U.K. profit bridge from 2025 to 2026. And if you could give any detail maybe on the moving parts around sort of underlying growth, inflationary pressures and then the reinvestment or disruption costs that you envisage?
And then the second question, just again on the U.K., you talked about a bit of a tougher consumer outlook. So how are you seeing that kind of manifest itself in the U.K. estate? Like are you seeing any pressure on spend across any of the formats or categories?
And then -- and third question, just on North America. Clearly, the more normalized margin going forward is going to be 7% to 8% into next year. But what is the midterm margin potential of this business off the lower base? And is it all about the mix shift towards Travel Essentials and away from InMotion and Resorts? Or what other positive margin drivers should we be thinking about?
I'll pass that to Max and then Andrew perhaps can comment on the consumer piece.
Perfect. Thanks, Harry, for the question. So in terms of U.K. profit, in terms of the key moving parts, as you'd expect, we're expecting still to see some trading upside with the revenue growth that we've got coming through, probably in the region of around GBP 6 million to GBP 8 million and that being offset by some of the disruption headwinds with the big investment that we've got going into the U.K. business this year.
And then the inflation headwinds, as we've called out in the RNS, around 4% to 5% is what we're seeing across the U.K. business. And we made great strides in the last year delivering operational efficiencies into the organization, and the annualization of those cost benefits coming through in full year '26 at GBP 9 million, but that's not going to be quite enough to offset all of the inflation headwinds that we're seeing coming down the line.
So the overall guidance that we've given for the U.K. in terms of profitability at 14% to 15% trading profit margin takes all of that into account. So it will see us as we kind of sit here today at the midpoint, looking at a slight step-back in terms of margin. Over the medium term, we would expect to rebuild that as we get through this year's investment and the disruption that comes. So still feeling really positive about the U.K. overall, and I'll let Andrew maybe comment on the consumer side.
Thanks, Max. Yes, in terms of the outlook, I guess, we're sort of -- in travel, we're more insulated than most retailers when it comes to some of the customer sentiment and regulatory changes. I guess probably the one area of our business that we have seen a slight softening has been in Rail. But what I would say is, we're well versed, we deal with mix change and dealing with sort of different categories facing into certain headwinds. And it's something we deal with all the time. And I think our one-stop shop strategy gives us quite a good opportunity really to sort of play with mix and to shift into different categories. So that's kind of where we're seeing it at the moment.
And North America?
And in terms of North America, Harry, you're right, mix is going to play a big part of the North America profit journey as we step forward. So in the year that's just gone, we've got profit, trading profit margin of 4%. We're seeing that in terms of guidance for the year ahead, stepping up to 7% or 8%. As we look into the medium term, there's a number of different things, as we've started to outline today in the RNS and in the presentation, in terms of the mix change.
So leaning into Travel Essentials continues to be really important for us, managing the InMotion business going forward in terms of the operational delivery that we have, but also thinking about the scale of that business with the margin sitting around the 5% mark in the future. And then the actions that we're taking on the Resorts business to remove any other loss-makers and/or the real low margin business that we have within fashion and specialty in particular.
So we're not guiding specifically today on a medium-term kind of trading margin for North America, but we would certainly expect it to grow from this year, and we feel really positive that we'll be able to do that. I think as a first step, let's get this year, if you like, behind us in terms of North America, now start the delivery and the rebuild and then we can take it from there.
Our next question comes from Richard Taylor from Barclays.
I've got two questions, please. One is on CapEx and returns. You've been very clear you will be returns focused on your investments going forward. So I realize you're not going to chase contracts. But if there are good contracts out there in the U.S., do you have enough headroom in terms of investment capacity in terms of the sort of the debt-to-EBITDA you're happy to run with, albeit noting the paybacks are quite quick by the looks of it. And related to that, is your interest coupon it all affected by the sort of leverage you're running at? And so is there a level of debt-to-EBITDA you would ideally stay below? And does that have any knock-on effects for investment decisions?
And secondly, I know you've talked about the profit bridge in the U.K. But can you give us some color on longer-term margin? It sounds like quite a few headwinds this year from specific items. So how should we think about that longer term versus I think, 15.6% you just reported.
Richard, I'll pass that over to Max, please.
Yes. Of course, yes. So in terms of CapEx for the year that's just gone just over GBP 80 million; in the year to come, we are putting a planning assumption of around GBP 90 million. Around half of that is going into our North America business in the year ahead. And we've got some really big and exciting opportunities. We've got, in particular, the preparation for opening of JFK and Orlando Airports in -- early in full year '27, but some of that expenditure coming through this year.
Have we got specific room in terms of continued capital investment? This is a strong cash-generating business overall. We are investing back into the organization for our future growth. We are going to be very disciplined about the different areas of investment that we are making. And so making sure we're very clear about those returns. And specifically in North America, getting the right mix of Travel Essentials within any opportunity that we take. So I certainly, as I sit here today, I feel confident that we've got the headroom to be able to continue to invest with the growth that we've got still coming through.
But we are going to be very disciplined and very measured in terms of the opportunities that we take for North America specifically. And I guess the interlink, therefore, with the cash outflow on CapEx into our net debt position, which is your question around, therefore, kind of financing and interest costs and where do we want to get the leverage to. As we've laid out today, bringing leverage back below 2x is our ambition for the year ahead. So that's pretty near term. And importantly, for us, we do have coupon-led kind of [ ledges ] as far as the leverage is concerned, so that does play into our overall cost of capital that we have in the business.
We're not today putting out a kind of a more medium-term target. We've obviously got our 0.75 to 1.25 leverage range that still exists. But in the near term, focus on bringing it back below 2 is important for us overall and the strength of the balance sheet and the interest costs. And I'll hand over maybe to Andrew, on U.K. margins.
Well, I'll talk about the year of investment. And I think that all ties together. I think looking forward in terms of the U.K., it really is an opportunity for -- it's our biggest store development program ever. And what that allows us to do is to take the Birmingham example, which we talked about earlier in terms of having taken a store, which through one-stop shop and through the execution of that has gone from probably #12 in our batting order of top stores to #1 on the basis of the range, the format and the fact that we can get customers to shop and put more products into their baskets so they come into our stores.
The opportunity that we're really facing into this year is to do that in another six airport terminals, but also Terminals 3, 4 and 5 in Heathrow. And what we've done in Birmingham 2 years ago, we've moved on again. So this is our latest generation. And so we're really quite excited about getting that platform into place, and then that allows us then to continue to grow in terms of the different ranges that we can offer and the spend per passenger. So that's how we think we'll see the margin grow in the future.
Richard, does that Answer your question?
Yes.
Our next question comes from Jonathan Pritchard from Peel Hunt.
The customary three, if I may. Just a follow-up on Harry's question on Travel Essentials, margin in the States. Can you just give us another level of granularity? I understand the way that the mix in the States will be affected by more Travel Essentials in the mix. But how specifically will you widen that Travel Essentials margin? That's the first question.
Secondly, we've got the sort of medium-term dream for the States. We've got the medium-term dream for the U.K. Just give us the long term -- medium, long-term Rest of the World dream from a margin perspective. I get 5% for next year, but where can that go?
And then a lot of people have written a lot of words on this, but what's your opinion here? What's wrong with Las Vegas? Maybe there were some structural issues with the fashion and specialty stores, but it seems as though Vegas isn't quite the wonder city it once it was. So what's your view on that?
Okay. Thank you, Jonathan. So I will hand over to Max initially.
Sure. Thanks, Jonathan. So in terms of margin for Travel Essentials, and I guess really margin for North America overall, starting with that, as you say, getting the mix into Travel Essentials is important. But then in terms of building on the Travel Essentials margin, we've got a number of different actions and activities that we are undertaking there. So we've got the operational performance that we're very much focused on with Huw and the team in North America set to kind of drive the operational performance.
There's the expansion of the ranges into Health & Beauty and also bringing in tech accessories as we look to kind of adopt some of the one-stop shop setup that we have been so successful with in the U.K. And importantly, and this is probably the key driver over the next 2, 3 years, is then the scaling of that part of the business and being able to leverage the fixed cost base that we've got to support Travel Essentials overall, not just in terms of the distribution centers that we got, but the core actual operations of that business.
And again, I'll kind of turn back to a couple of the exciting opportunities that we've got with JFK and Orlando Airports. Those are big businesses set to grow our overall kind of revenue and profit base quite considerably in the coming years. And so being able to leverage that fixed cost base is going to really help to drive our overall margin for that business forward as well.
In terms of the medium term for Rest of World, you're right, we haven't kind of put too much out there in terms of where the medium term for Rest of World is. We've previously spoken about Rest of World heading towards kind of high single-digit margins. And I think I'd probably be still comfortable with thinking about it in that way today. But we've got quite a lot of work to do in terms of our Rest of World business. We need to embed a lot of the existing formats that we've got within Rest of World and make sure that they are operating well.
And where we are focused, as we've talked about today in terms of our core markets, growing the margin in that part of the business alongside what do we think we can do in terms of franchise. I think we'll move our margin forward, but it still feels as we sit here today, that, that's more medium term rather than near term.
And in terms of Las Vegas, what's wrong with Las Vegas, I don't think there's anything wrong with Las Vegas and maybe turn to Andrew on this as well. What we have identified and we're really clear about is that there are parts of Las Vegas and the operations we got there are highly profitable and cash generative, and we're really happy with the performance of those stores and for those to be part of our portfolio, we have got headwinds, and we are seeing that the overall kind of Las Vegas environment has seen a cooling over recent years. But we've also identified, we've got parts of that Las Vegas business, as you say, structurally aren't working for us, and we need to act on those and do something quite different. But Andrew, anything else on Las Vegas?
No. I mean I think the stores you're referring to are the Welcome to Las Vegas stores and the hotel convenience stores. They're much more akin to our core Travel Essentials. There's much more of a synergy there than, say, a fashion store, for example. So what we're really talking about when you boil down our whole sort of approach, really, it's really about a real focus on Travel Essentials, and that applies equally to Las Vegas and certain categories. And it's about getting out of the things that aren't core to that.
Absolutely. Does that answer your question, Jonathan?
Yes.
Our next question comes from Fintan Ryan from Goodbody.
Just one question for me, please. And I think really following on from the last point around the U.S. margins. I appreciate there's a lot of things that have been revealed in the last few months. But if we were comparing to the 13% to 14% margin that maybe people had in their numbers from sort of June, July for North America versus the sort of 7% to 8% margin that you're talking to now for FY '26, can you sort of -- I appreciate you've given bridges in terms of supplier financing and inventories. But now that you've given the disclosure around the Resorts, InMotion and sort of Travel Essentials, can you sort of bridge that gap in terms of like what was previously in your numbers? InMotion, was a double-digit margin, now it's a 5% margin. And like Resorts was mid-teens, now it's under 10%.
I guess just with that point as well, given you're taking a review of some of the InMotion estate and the Resorts part of the estate, is there a risk or a need to maybe review some of the contracts that you have in your sort of core Travel Essentials business and like potentially go back to landlords for rent reviews or other sort of things that might have now come out of the woodwork given the more forensic approach that you're taking to that region.
I'll pass that to Max, please.
So in terms of the U.S. margin overall, you're right, full year '23 and full year '24 margins before the restatement sitting around 13%, 14% and those after restatements coming down to kind of around 8% to 10%. And then with the normalized review that we've been doing, sitting around 8% overall. I think important to say that the impact of the supplier income review that we've done is across all categories. And so it has had an impact on each of the different parts of our business, whether it's consumables, in Travel Essentials or tech in terms of InMotion. Far less in terms of the Resorts and/or fashion stores specifically or specialty for that matter.
And so it has given us further pause for thought in terms of InMotion and how we think about that business and i.e., the margin that we thought it was delivering is actually a little further behind than where we now know it to be in. So where stores might have been marginal before or low margin, it may well have moved them into a loss-making position. And so for us, overall, that is absolutely meaning that the review that we are now undertaking and the guidance that we've given on scaling back the InMotion business is the right thing for us to be doing.
In terms of Travel Essentials and the consumable mix overall, there is, as I say, some impact in terms of those restatements, whether it be on kind of the inventory side or the supplier income side. But overall, still really confident with the margin in Travel Essentials at or around 10%, with the growth that I've already laid out.
So I think in terms of the U.S. position overall, still strong. Is it giving us pause for thought on some travel essentials? And are we working with landlords? Absolutely. You would expect us to do that anyway as we continue to be focused on driving the right profitability for North America. Reviewing our pipeline actually is also a key part of that. And making sure -- I think, we've got around 70 stores in the pipeline now for North America with more than half of those to open this year.
So pipeline review in aggregate actually is within our hurdle rates, even on the adjusted position, so we still feel really positive about that. But again, there will be elements within that, that we might want to take a look at and think about how do we maybe change the formats or maybe operate them slightly differently and/or engage with our landlords in a different way moving forward too.
Our next question comes from Tim Barrett from Deutsche Numis.
I just wanted to start with a big picture question really in terms of the 4% to 5% cost inflation you're talking about in the U.K. It feels a bit higher than I might have guessed. What are the main contributors to that? And do you think you can pass much of it on through price in the year ahead?
And I think just secondly, a procedural thing really, how long do you think the FCA investigation will take? And have you put anything in terms of any outcome of that in your net debt guidance?
Okay. So I'll take the FCA question and then pass to Andrew. Tim, so yes, as you say, the FCA have now launched an investigation to the company. We were notified by them yesterday. So as you would expect, we will fully cooperate. We expect this would take quite some time, and there's really nothing further that we can say at this stage with regard to the costs associated. And obviously, we'll keep you updated as things progress.
Tim, I'll take the question on the big picture on cost. Yes, I mean, I think the cost inflation we're seeing across a wide range of areas, whether that's staff costs, whether that's cost prices and even landlord costs as well. So -- but we're used to this. It's something that we deal with all the time. We're a lean business, and we're very much focused on how we drive operational efficiencies and that kind of thing.
In the last year, we drove GBP 10 million worth of efficiency through the business, and that was looking at our -- looking through our store lens, but also our support centers and our distribution centers, and we'll continue to do that. And of course, I guess there is the opportunity to reflect things in price, but we always look to try to deal with these kind of things through operational efficiencies and being agile in the way we operate our business as we always have done.
Okay. And sorry, just a boring follow-up, business rates. Is there much inflation there following the budget? How does that work actually in airports?
Yes. So I mean, airports are over half of our business. And those contracts in airports are concessions. So therefore, it's the airport that plays the business rates, not us. So we're not as exposed as many other businesses to business rates. And so from that perspective, alongside the other areas of cost, it's manageable.
Our next question comes from Hai Huynh from UBS.
I have a couple of questions, please. First of all, on the like-for-like. So in North America, so in current trading, it's around 1%. Could you walk me through how you're building up to the 6% to 8% total growth guidance in North America, given that you're also doing a portfolio review there, right, opening 35 to 40 stores, but closing 30 stores. So that's the first question.
The second one is on the U.K. Also a similar kind of question where like-for-like is 2% year-to-date. How do you get to 3% to 5% growth given there will be trading disruptions from portfolio review as well? And actually, on that, on the U.K., are you also seeing a softening in terms of airports besides the U.K. rail softening?
I'll pass the first one to Max and then to Andrew for the U.K.
Hai, so the overall position for North America, as you say, with like-for-like is currently around 1%. Largely, the growth in North America from a revenue perspective will come from a net space gain. We do have closures in the year, and that includes some of the things that we are talking about here today in terms of Resorts and so on. but space still growing overall and contributing well this year in terms of Travel Essentials growth. So the position that we've outlined in terms of revenue of 6% or 8% for North America is on a net basis.
So if we were to be in a position to accelerate some of the closures that we want to do, that's something we would probably need to come back and update you on, I expect, around the half year. But as we sit here today, 6% to 8%, largely driven by space with some like-for-like growth, not dissimilar to where we're currently tracking, 1% to 2%.
Hai, I'll take the softening question in Air a bit first, and I'll go to outlook. So softening in Air, basically, what we're seeing here is that we're continuing to grow spend per passenger. We're continuing to grow sales ahead of passengers. Really what we have seen in Air though is that it's just a return of passenger growth to more normalized levels. So for example, in the last quarter, passengers have been growing at 2%, if I go back a year, that would have been growing 7% year-on-year. And if we go back 2 years, that would have been growing 15% year-on-year. So you can see a return to normalized levels of passenger growth.
And it's important to stress, this isn't normalized levels of passengers, it's normalized levels of passenger growth. We're still growing, but just at the longer-term rate. And within that, we're still growing spend per passenger.
In terms of the outlook for the year, how we get there is a mixture of all of those things. Clearly, we've got -- we've got the spend per passenger and passenger that I just talked about. We've got that sort of relationship. We've got the new stores. And as I mentioned in the spring, we've got new flagship stores opening in Heathrow, which will clearly have a big effect for the second half of the year. And clearly, offsetting some of that, we've got the disruption. So broadly, that's how you bridge, and you get to the 3% to 5% outlook from where we are at the moment.
Understood. And sorry, just to follow up with the last one in terms of -- so this year, it looks like elevated closures as you go to portfolio review and moving to franchise model in Rest of the World. But how do you see the medium-term store opening target going forward?
For the group or...
The Rest of the World, I think, was the question.
Was it for the group or for...
As in just -- for the group overall, yes.
Okay.
I'm happy to take that. So I think what we've outlined today, and I think it's about it's about driving profitable growth. And I think one of the words that Max uses internally is about being measured and being disciplined, and that's exactly what we do. What has made our business successful has been being really, really focused on the use of our space and being forensic about how we use our space. And that's what we -- that's the yardstick we're applying to all of our investment decisions.
What that means is, therefore, we're targeting better and better -- more and better-quality space rather than trying to drive store openings as a number in its own right. So that's really the thing that's driving us and not being sort of hamstrung by trying to deliver perhaps a stores number that we've had out in the market. So I don't know if that -- does that answer all of your question, Hai? Is there anything else in there that I can help you with?
That's it.
Our next question comes from Nicholas Barker from BNP Paribas.
Just for a little bit of a clarification one. So you've explained how you can widen the North American Travel Essentials margin from around that 10%. Will that ever reach the kind of 14%, 15% margins seen in the U.K.? And if so, why not? And if so, how quickly could that happen?
And then my second question would just be on the CEO recruitment process. How is that going? And is there any update there?
If -- I'll take the CEO one and then we'll pass on to margin. So Nicolas, so as you said, we've got a process ongoing using an external search firm. I think it's important to say that, obviously, we're looking for somebody that's got retail experience, is an agent for change and has a strong track record, including turnaround capability. We're in the process of -- there's nothing further to update on other than to say that we are actively -- or I am actively working on this.
Shall I take margin for North America?
Yes, please.
I think what we've put out today is a very clear margin position for the year ahead. I think I can be really confident to say that we will be building from here in North America and the Travel Essentials business will be the mix lean that enables us to do that. We're really confident still with the North America operation and the opportunity that we still see there in terms of our future growth.
What we're not going to be kind of drawn on, if you like, today is where do we see the margin in the future. But we absolutely see that there's future margin build and future margin gain to be had. And so we're still excited about the market. We still believe in it. But you're not going to be drawn necessarily on the margin for the long term.
This concludes our Q&A session. So I'll hand back over to Annette for closing remarks.
Thank you. Thanks for dialing in, everyone. It's been good to talk to you this morning. I hope you'll see that we're taking affirmative actions and that we're moving forward with transparency. And as I said at the start of the presentation, I have every confidence in Andrew and Max to lead the group over the months ahead. So thank you, and happy Christmas.
Thanks very much.
Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Finanzdaten von Wh Smith
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Feb '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 1.350 1.350 |
7 %
7 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | - - |
-
-
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 106 106 |
15 %
15 %
8 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 2 2 |
33 %
33 %
0 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 104 104 |
15 %
15 %
8 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | -128 -128 |
967 %
967 %
-9 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen GBP.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur Wh Smith-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
Firmenprofil
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Vereinigtes Königreich |
| CEO | Mr. Cowling |
| Mitarbeiter | 9.290 |
| Webseite | www.whsmithplc.co.uk |


