Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci Aktienkurs
Ist Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.930 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 2,52 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,63 Mrd. €
Marktkapitalisierung = 2,52 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 1,13 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 4,89 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,63 Mrd. €
Enterprise Value = 4,89 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 1,13 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
15 Analysten haben eine Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
15 Analysten haben eine Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci Prognose abgegeben:
Beta Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
MÄR
4
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
NOV
12
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
JUL
23
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 11 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for attending REN's 2025 Results Conference Call. Joining us today are the members of our Executive Committee, Rodrigo Costa, our CEO; Goncalo Soares, our CFO; and Joao Conceicao, our COO. Rodrigo will start with his opening remarks, and Goncalo Soares will guide you through the main operational and financial highlights of the year.
In addition, we will also provide an update on our strategic priorities for 2026 and 2027. After the presentation, we will open the floor for a Q&A session, and we're happy to take your questions. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Madalena. Good morning, all. 2025 was a very challenging but a good year both from an operational perspective as well as a financial perspective. We believe we did quite well and achieved very good results.
On my notes regarding 2034, just a year ago, I did a list of the challenges we went through in the last years and there were many. We had COVID, we had a lot of local political turmoil, we had the beginning of the Ukraine war, we had a spike on energy prices, critical drought for a couple of years. And of course, the usual licensing processes delays to develop infrastructures and some challenges in the front of regulation and also high taxes. In '25, we had a blackout in Spain that took our system down. We had multiple storms because not just the ones we had very recently, we had them also in the fall of last year. And of course, with all these, we have been quite busy.
But the truth is that we have been consistently delivering in our plans. Quarter after quarter, the numbers speak by themselves. We keep delivering consistent results and meet the expectations. On top of the good operational and financial work, we saw some important progress with [ sale ]. Also on the tax front, we were able to take advantage again of a regimen that is now more favorable to business. We are also doing well in Chile, developing the business according to the plans you are aware. We believe that our sector remains very interesting and full of opportunities. Our government remains committed to the energy transition, and that's, of course, is quite positive for us.
Energy is at the center of the world development and we are core for that development. We are a catalyst of the energy position, and we are doing what we are supposed to do, developing projects, managing existing infrastructures and being efficient and persistent.
And with that, I will move to Goncalo.
Thank you, Rodrigo. Welcome to you all for the 2025 results presentation. Moving to Slide #4. So I think that's -- what you have before you is a set of very positive results that consolidate the year 2024, clearly ahead of the business plan that we have a defined for you that year. EBITDA is growing 2% this year around that, this is both on the back of growth in Portugal and in Chile. Net income is growing a little bit more almost 5% and this is the result not only of the increase in EBITDA, but better financial results and stable taxes so almost EUR 160 million of this growth of 4.8%. Net debt is stable, but we are improving metrics as the recent upgrade showed you. In terms of CapEx, the signs of acceleration, we are increasing CapEx and this is something that we are going to maintain, but this is already a positive sign as Rodrigo mentioned.
But before I go into a little bit more detail, let me pass to Joao, our COO, so that he comments more on the operating side. Joao?
Thanks, Goncalo. Good morning to you all. On Slide 5, you have the summary of the main points from the operational perspective. And I would highlight the last one on the regulation point, which is the new regulatory framework for electricity. We will go in more details later on in the slide. But to tell you that we've got an improvement versus the previous regulatory framework on the different components. The most important one, the rate of return, which has a starting point of 6.19% base rate, plus incentives and plus some other upsides that we will detail later on.
Jumping to Slide #7, you have the main indicators. I would highlight the fact that we increased the electricity consumption by 3.2% versus last year, and this 53 terawatt hour overall, the 2025 was the highest consumption ever registered in the Portuguese electricity system. Renewable share is approximately the same as the one we got in 2024. There is a slight decrease, and the reason is very simple. As you might remember, we had these blackouts on the 28th of April. And after the blackout, we were forced to generate some electricity with combined cycle plants in order to ensure the necessary levels of security of supply of the system. This is something that we are evolving that affected the renewable share. And it's the reason of the increase on gas consumption of 11.1%, which is basically justified by this increased need of generating electricity with gas sources.
In terms of quality of service and in summary, nothing special to report. We were in line with the previous years. Obviously, considering the blackout as a special event, not affecting the necessary indicators for quality of service. And with that, Goncalo, I give back to you.
Thank you, Joao. So Slide #8 is just the main financial slide. And let me just go through a little bit more detail in them. So on Slide #9 in EBITDA, what you can see is this increase of 2%. So on assets and OpEx remuneration, it's basically an increase in the amortizations revenue that we have due to the investments, plus also an increase in OpEx revenue that did increase this year.
Other revenues increased a little bit more this year, mainly driven by corrections from previous years, okay? So these are typically cost that were not accepted for some reason or some assets that were not accepted. This year, that impact is around EUR 6 million. So it explains almost everything in this line was a little bit higher than normal, but it happens. So it's an unusual, I'd say, element, but it was slightly higher than normal.
Core OpEx, basically, it's a mix of -- and of the increase in personnel costs around EUR 2 million. And then basically, it's also other costs, mainly operational maintenance. I'll go through those. In terms of the [ weight ], you can see a slight increase in the international. So as you know, we are slightly ahead there in terms of the weight that it had [indiscernible]
Moving to Slide #10, basically, no news. We already knew the rates of return since October. So here, things are more or less stable. In Slide #11. So as I said, this is clearly showing acceleration mainly in electricity. We are growing transfers to around more than 10%. We are growing CapEx around 13%. Actually, if you look at electricity, CapEx is growing close to 16% despite, as Rodrigo mentioned, several approval headwinds. So it's still difficult to prove certain in CapEx, but we are still pushing through and accelerating the deployments, which will continue to happen in the next years as we'll comment a little bit after.
In terms of RAB returns, I'd say on Slide 12, it's very clear. So basically, in electricity, the positive impact comes from the asset base evolution. And in gas, there's a big decrease also from the asset base evolution, nothing out of the ordinary. The only thing is that here in this line in electricity, we don't see the impact of solar, but it also exists.
Slide 13 in OpEx, as I told you, the evolution is a little bit [ brief ], both to core external and to personnel costs. Personnel costs increased around 3%, 1.2% of that is increase in headcount, so just more people, and the rest is more the general increases that we are giving. So this increase in [ people ], let's say that in '26, you will see that happen, it will start to taper off eventually.
External costs. It's mostly O&M cost and this is derived from -- yes, a little bit of increase in price, but also the increase in the network as we are building more network. Bear in mind that these costs are then reflected in the regulation and recuperated versus the [ regulation ], although sometimes the increase occur before than the reflection in regulation, okay? There's also a little bit of increase in IT, but it's mostly electricity O&M.
Looking at Chile in Slide 14. So strong performance and the gas part, it's increasing a little bit, but it's basically stable, and we are coming also from record year. So let's say, stability is the key numbers here. Electricity is growing quite a bit. So EBITDA growing almost 34%. This is on the back of the acquisitions also that we did, but not only is the net income almost doubled or more than doubled, and this has to do with also an impact of exchange rate that was positive this year. In 2024, it was slightly negative. And so actually, it has a higher year-on-year impact. But then this is one of the reasons why financial results are also better.
But here in Chile. So we continue our focus of now integrating the small assets that we acquired in 2025 and continuing to pursue our organic growth agenda as we have defined. And so this is accounting almost for 5% now of our EBITDA.
[indiscernible] so in Slide 15, no major news in depreciation, as always, financial results. So it's a mix of several things. So as I said, it's -- first of all, an improvement in terms of the average cost of debt that came from 2.7% to 2.5%. But also, there is a large impact of exchange rates, a positive one this year. So it's slightly about EUR 4.5 million. But given the fact that last year was negative, so the year-on-year impact is almost EUR 6 million. So that's why it's also on a year-on-year basis impact a little bit more here. I'd say that's perhaps the explanation that you are missing from the numbers. Then we have also the impact from dividends that we received, but that's a more normal kind of event.
In terms of taxes, no major news. So what we see is that this year, we still paid the full levy amount versus last year we have a difference in the levy because in '24, we did have, in the account, some positive impact of court cases that we won. We already won more court cases during the year, but they are not completely final. And as usual, we'd rather be more conservative and not put it in the accounts. So we have not accounted for any court case winnings in 2025.
That doesn't mean that there was any change actually, we continue to win court cases in the gas part. In the electricity, there are no news but in the gas part, we continue to win court cases. But since they were not completely finalized, we didn't put anything in the account. But we are expecting that they will start to have in impact now in 2026 again, okay? So that's why in terms of levy, there is a difference in terms of the tax incentives for capitalization is now around EUR 34.5 million versus EUR 35.9 million in the previous year. We actually have guided you to around EUR 30 million. So this year is slightly above. We are not changing, I'd say, the overall estimate of around -- average of EUR 30 million because we think that in the following years, this is going to come down a little bit more. I'd say that on average, the number that we gave you of EUR 90 million should be more or less the same that we are going to get. It's not going to be higher. So I'd say that effective tax rate of 8%, very much in line with what we have in 2024, so positive tax rate also in 2025.
Slide 16. So it's just basically the different impacts, okay? So positives of EBITDA and financial results, depreciation coming down as it goes up in EBITDA, fairly slightly negative for the explanation that I told, okay?
In terms of net debt, Slide 17, we see very strong stability and without the tariff deviations, which are now stabilizing slightly below EUR 100 million. You have a small increase of net debt, but clearly slightly better than what we had expected and in line with expectations. Cost of debt improves as we only issued also the debt this year. So it's normal that in '26 and '27, it may go up a little bit because of the issuance of the bond. Debt bond issuance have other impacts. You see that at the end of the year, we have a maturity of 4.7. I can anticipate to you that these maturities, given the recent bond issuance, will go up. It's already up to 5.4. So we want to maintain at 5, so around 5, and so that is the aim.
You don't have it here in this slide, but we also have at the end of the year, slightly more variable than usual fixed rate. We were also waiting for the bond issuance and this is going to change, okay? And so we are going to have more fixed than variable. I'd say that it's going to set in the kind of normal range. So we'll have around 60% fixed perhaps by the end of the quarter. As the interest rate environment also is changing, so we are now becoming slightly more fixed again, which was what we were aiming at. We have this -- but more importantly, also, we have this positive development with S&P, we were upgraded, that shows that rating agencies are looking at the improvement in our credit metrics in a positive way, okay?
Slide 18 is just the share price evolution. So you all know that we have a good share price evolution. Share price has continued to perform well in the beginning of 2026. We have been now in the range of slightly above 3.7%. So we continue to improve in the stock market in line also with the sector or slightly above the sector, okay?
So just going over our sustainability agenda and metrics in Slide 20. We ended up the year stable or reducing slightly scoped 1 and 2 emissions. And this is in the face of, as Joao mentioned, an increase in use of gas given the blackout. So we were able to still improve a little bit, which makes that we are now at minus 57% versus 2019 with a now objective of minus 60% in 2030. So we are well on our way to perform this. The same in Scope 3, we are at minus 29% and with -- our objective is minus 30%. So we are basically there already and carbon neutral [ 2030 ] we are clearly on track. So I think that this shows that we continue to deliver. You have the details of this in Slide 21 but I'm not going to go in detail over this.
And in Slide 22, you see the main -- yes, the standard. So we don't work for this for the standards themselves, but it's good that they recognize the hard work that we do in this area and the commitment. So either we maintain because we are already at the top level or we are continuing to train the improvement in S&P Global.
So looking a little bit and doing a summarized version of what is the strategic update, so this is important because we have been delivering members that are better. Bear in mind that this is a subset of the slides that you have in the longer-form version of our presentations so not all of the slides are here. Of course, and specifically to the analysts, we are going to be meeting you face to face and you have and that information already in the site with some additional information to what I'm going to say so that I don't have to go through all of the slides. But the main messages are going to be the same, okay? But of course, when we meet you early next week and the following week, we'll be happy to go into all the details that we -- in this call is a little bit more difficult to give you.
So on Slide 29, and before going into the update -- I'm sorry, Slide 24. And before the giving you the update, it's important to register that we are delivering and outperforming versus what we gave you. So this is something that nowadays is important to refer because it's not always the case. We clearly came on target in EBITDA. We clearly came very much ahead in net profit. We clearly came on the low range of net debt. We clearly came above the interval and within the interval and ahead of schedule on the CapEx deployment. So this is important to give you that idea. Of course, only in -- we are only giving you some numbers for '26 and '27 not because we don't want to give more visibility that this is the normal timing. Next year, we are going to revise the full business plan. So we are not giving you now a new business plan once. What we are giving you is revision of numbers for these two years. And then next year, we will revise the business plan with all of these components.
But looking at Slide 25, what can we see in the numbers that we are giving you now? First of all, it is an acceleration of CapEx. So clearly, we are giving you and telling you that we are going to be deploying more CapEx already in '26 and '27, okay? And what we are saying is that this CapEx growth is coming basically from electricity. So there is an increase in the electric CapEx, there is actually a decrease in gas CapEx versus what we have in the business plan. This is extremely well aligned with what happened within our regulation. So we are -- this is what is happening now at the time were also regulation from electricity came out positive, as we have already mentioned before, in the end of the year. So it came off with a very healthy rate that allows us now to deploy CapEx with more confidence and to be able to accelerate knowing exactly the returns that we are going to have. So I think that there's this kind of multiplication effect of both things happened at the same time, more CapEx and improved regulation.
Then what I can tell you is that on the fiscal and funding, we are consolidating what we have before. So fiscally, there is a major upgrade in terms of the taxes that is what we have been seeing from the past years with the [indiscernible] gas now going away with the corporate tax rate improving. So there's a lot of small things that are improving tax and continuing to improve and sustain tax. And unlike other companies, we are actually improving credit metrics that the best sign is the upgrade from S&P. So it's a little bit unique versus other TSOs. We are actually improving. The credit metrics, which also allows us to build flexibility into the metrics so that if there is and we hope there is more upside in CapEx coming from in the future. We are going to be able to capture that opportunity as it unfolds.
In Slide 26, you have a little bit more detail on what the CapEx step up is. So as you can see, it is basically a step-up in electricity, okay? So we are increasing in a material way the electricity CapEx range that we have versus the initial targets, right? So it's more than 50% of increase versus the targets. We are decreasing the ones in gas and basically because H2 development is growing at a slower pace, is not something that's consensus. We are deploying it in a conservative way. We are waiting for this to become a higher priority in certain agenda. So we are deploying it as it shows.
But again, let me focus on the electricity CapEx. These strong increases across the board it's mainly linked to integrating more renewable capacity. It's the power supply to these new high demanding zones and the fact that most of these is going to be an [ asset ] in 2027. It's more modernization of assets. So it's more connecting to distribution network. So it's a whole range of things and that is pushing CapEx to grow a little bit more.
To comment specifically on solar agreements, they are, as I had already mentioned, slightly delayed in the deployment, but we are expecting that between this year but mainly 2027 we are going to be catching up with the timeline that we have. In Chile, no major news. I'd say that the major change was that we acquired those assets last year so there is little bit less of organic CapEx that we deploy.
Slide 27, most of this is already -- you already know. So there was a good improvement in electricity regulation and base rate is close to 6.2% with a premium on [ all that ] and we [indiscernible] conservative view on incentives. We should be at or slightly above 7% of return. That is a positive, and we were -- development and constructive development in terms of regulation. So we are much more comfortable with deploying CapEx now in electricity and I think that this is going to have a positive impact as we already know in EBITDA.
So summarizing in Slide 28. So what we are seeing and giving you an updated target. In EBITDA, we are giving you -- and this is only for '26 and '27, a range of EUR 540 million to EUR 560 million. Bear in mind that before the maximum number in the interval was EUR 540 million, and this is now the minimum interval, so around an increase of 12%. So we think this is consolidating what we already were giving analysts as guidance.
In net profit, clearly a very large upgrade. So we are putting around EUR 150 million to EUR 160 million. This year, we were at EUR 150 million. We tend to be always a little bit more conservative in the intervals that we give you, but this is a number that we feel now comfortable for the year. Although as I said, we are already at EUR 160 million in 2025. That's slightly more. We are spending a little bit more CapEx, it's normal that it increases. But the relevant part is that the metrics behind this are improving, okay? So it's not so much that the CapEx is improving or that the net debt is growing a little bit. The credit metrics are -- despite this increase, actually improving a little bit, which as I told you is shown by that rate that we recently have.
In CapEx, we have this interval of EUR 350 million to EUR 450 million. We're increasing it to EUR 450 million to EUR 550 million. So we are increasing everything at EUR 100 million. So we'll see. Again, we like to be conservative. My colleague, Joao has a lot of work in this past few months just redoing what was the impact of the storms in Portugal. So it's a challenging year for his team on the construction side that they have not only to do a lot of new CapEx, but now they have to spend a lot of time redoing CapEx that was [indiscernible]. So we are always, I'd say, conservative in the way that we approach these numbers as we like to be. But we are confident that CapEx is going to accelerate already in the next 3 years.
So concluding on Slide 29, accelerating growth. We are seeing these asset-based growth in electricity of around 9% with regulated and nonregulated assets and solar agreements. We saw this improvement in regulation. We've expected above 7% returns. We continue to see this favorable development in the fiscal part and we are not accounting for, in these numbers, this EUR 40 million a year is even being slightly conservative on the incentive that we have now at EUR 34 million. We are not considering in these numbers any recuperation of levy that we may have in the year. So again, it's a very positive number with upside on top and in funding, as I said, unique and has a position of improving credit metrics, although we are growing and accelerating.
So finally, Slide 21, a very good set of results in 2025. I think that guidance shows you that we are committed, and we are seeing acceleration of growth. And as I said, although we are only giving you this for '26 and '27, this is something that we see continuing for the next year. But this was -- we are only giving this for the next two years.
And also, since this is not a new business plan, we did not update everything. One of the things that we did not update as of now, we will update next year is the dividend policy. So we prefer also to maintain the current dividend policy. We have already anticipated growth one year. So we maintain the 2%, and we are proposing -- or the board is proposing to the AGM a dividend of EUR 0.16 per share. Price has been performing very well and rewarding shareholders. So I think that this is clearly keeping in line with what we have promised the market is 2%.
So thank you very much for your attention. This was a little bit longer than usual, but let's open up to questions that you may have. Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] And now we're going to take our first question, and it comes line of Ignacio Domenech from JB Capital.
2. Question Answer
The first question is on the lower financial costs and the higher financial income in the quarter, I believe Goncalo you mentioned one-off of EUR 6 million but actually looking at the quarter, we're seeing a decline both in the financial cost, but also an increase. So I just want to understand what drove this one-off, which is quite material and to understand if it was a cash impact, okay, if everything was cash.
And then secondly, on your CapEx plans, we saw a material increase versus the [ 2024, '27 ] targets, which you outlined in the business plan. So just wanted to understand here as well what is the -- if this is the right level of investments that we should expect going forward or post '27, we should expect this number to decrease as I assume that part of the CapEx includes the solar direct agreements, okay? Just to see if there is any upside risk there. Thank you.
So on the financial costs, the main change in the quarter is the thing that I mentioned, exchange rates because in the last quarter, it changed a lot in Chile, okay? So you have actually negative exchange rates until then on the third quarter and then they became positive, okay? Because of the elections and on the follow-up of the elections, there was a very strong reversal that became very positive. So that's why you see that change, which is a little bit again, more abrupt than usual. So usually, you would not see any change in this manner, but it's basically that, okay? So that's basically -- [indiscernible] can then give you the details, but it's basically from being negative almost EUR 4 million to being positive almost EUR 4 million.
On the CapEx plan. So as I said, we were not giving you anything after '27. But yes, we are not expecting a decline. So we are expecting things to go up and to stay at a higher level, depending on any given year. So it's not going to be every year, it may be higher or lower. In '26 and '27, mainly there's a lot of CapEx to be done still in the first part of the first solar agreement and the second solar agreement will kick more in '28, so in a few years. But so there is a lot of CapEx. If you go and check [indiscernible] and plans that are given, you can see that there is a lot of CapEx. That CapEx is reflected -- part of it is reflected in the regulation already of the -- that is the OpEx model. So it's already there. So yes, we are expecting that it goes up and it stays higher, mainly in electricity, but it can vary on any given year, okay?
A follow-up question, if I may, on the recurring net profit of EUR 150 million, EUR 160 million. I assume this includes the tax capitalization incentives, right? But it does exclude any upside from tax recoveries from CESE. Is this correct?
It's correct. So we are assuming capitalization there. As I said, we are assuming actually an average that is below EUR 30 million for '26 and '27 and actually in '25 as well, was higher than EUR 30 million, so it's around EUR 28 million, EUR 27.5 million that we are assuming for those years. But it's just because we like to be conservative. We don't have the visibility. We have an expectation that it may come down a little bit. But again, we like to be conservative.
On the levy, we are not assuming any change, we are assuming the same thing on 2026 minus the EUR 10 million of gas. And in '27, basically, you are already assuming a small decrease in the electricity levy because according to the budget, the new assets, the ones that you deployed in '26 are already not [ such to it ]. But you only see that reflected in '27 because these assets are being amortized. The old ones are being amortized and you pay less levy and the new ones you are not paying levy. So you'll see the levy come down, I don't know, EUR 1 million, EUR 1.5 million, EUR 2 million per year, okay? So that's what we are assuming, a very small decrease on the levy on the average for the 3 years, okay? But on a yearly basis, you could see it decreased EUR 1.5 million, EUR 2 million, okay? That's only on '27.
And the next question comes from the line of Jorge Alonso from Bernstein.
Just a clarification in one of your slides on -- regarding on the CapEx. I know that you're not going to give us any figure for '28, '29. But just to understand, the national transmission network plan that you put the EUR 801 billion between 2026, 2029, and then special CapEx for the [indiscernible] region to be deployed by [ '31 ]. Just to understand how overlap is that? So just to understand if basically the [indiscernible] CapEx are expected to be deployed already since 2026? Or it will be more back-end loaded starting maybe 2028 to 2031. That's the first question, just to how to allocate that extra CapEx.
The next -- the other questions are regarding the tax breaks. If you can provide any color about it. Do you think that this can be extended one year more? If not, if any, when should we have news about that? And if you had any view about the potential complete removal of the special energy tax on electricity in the near future? If you think that the mood in the political landscape has changed, and this is now more likely than in the past.
In relating to [indiscernible] Joao can complement, but yes, it's clearly after '27. So before '27 and in the CapEx that we have for these two years, we have not even 10% of that investment. So I think that Joao is starting to going to be doing that in '27 but very small amount [indiscernible] So it's more '28, '29, '30, okay? And the government also is coming out now with a new process for basically new high-demand areas. These are basically linked, as we have said in the past, to data centers and things like this. We -- this is a process that is ongoing. We cannot give you any news now. So it can result in additional CapEx that we won't have in the network. But again, if it does and this is clarified along this year, it's only going to be deployed in '29, '30 and so it's not in the horizon for these 3 years. Next year, so when we can with the business plan for '27, '28, '29 and '30, we are going to give you -- and perhaps that is going to include most of this CapEx that we are talking about. But in these numbers, we have basically almost nothing, okay? so it's an upside that is longer term.
On the tax part, on the tax incentive, we don't know. So it may be that it is extended. We don't know. We only know is it was created by the previous government, it was maintained by this one for already more than two years. So it is something that appears to have some kind of consensus that it is an interesting tax incentive for [indiscernible] that's the only thing I can give you. I am not revising any expectations relating to that. But again, another upside, it may happen. It's an upside, we like to be conservative on this.
On the sales, there's no news, it's what I told you. And on the electricity side, we are seeing there is nothing new on the court side, there's no new news relative to any of the court cases that we have on the electricity are moving, okay? But there is -- there has been a change in the mood of the court, so we will see. The reality is that the budget itself already limited. So no new CapEx is going to have the levy. So even if they didn't change it once and for all, it's already going to be declining starting in '27. Again, I think that there is an upside here that you may read into it in a few years, this may change, but we don't know. So I think this is following the trend of the gas. I think that they are now consolidating that gas has changed. And then I think there's the court case. There is a point where the courts will have to also say that this is -- this doesn't make sense, but we are waiting and hoping that these changes, okay? But there is no specific new news to be to give you on this one.
Dear speakers, there are no further questions for today. And I now would like to hand the conference over to the management team for any closing remarks.
So thank you very much for attending. As mentioned by Goncalo, we are still going to be able to take any of your questions offline. And we'll be discussing these numbers over the coming weeks. So thank you again, and speak to you soon. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to REN's Third Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. We appreciate your presence here today. Joining us this morning, we have the members of REN's Executive Committee, Rodrigo Costa, our CEO; Gonçalo João Soares, our CFO; and João Conceição, our COO. Rodrigo will begin with his opening remarks, and this will be followed by a detailed overview on REN's operational and financial performance for the third quarter.
Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your questions. Thank you again for your attention and continued interest on REN.
Thank you, Madalena. Good morning, all. As you were able to read our results for the quarter didn't bring surprises, and we are very, very busy in all fronts on infrastructure construction, on new developments on the licensing phase, and more to come as new industrial and data center projects are surfacing the news. We'll see what happen, but we -- for the moment, we are already super busy preparing those plans.
We keep working closely with the government to facilitate the planning of all these projects. The [indiscernible] report was published and came out as expected and basically confirmed that we did our job, and we all need to learn from the experience. More reports will follow in the beginning of the next year, and I'm sure they will help our industry.
Our regulator shared their comments on the natural gas investment plans. They are public and more recently on the electricity transmission and distribution regulation with final terms to be published in December. Our Chilean projects are progressing well. We just announced a small acquisition of transmission assets that will increase our critical mass in the operation of [indiscernible].
On the special tax front, sales for natural gas will be over soon, and the same applies for the electricity new projects, both very good news. And this is it.
And now Gonçalo will take us through the details.
Thank you, Rodrigo. Good morning to you all. So as was said, I'd say that overall, the main thing is that the third quarter was basically in line with our expectations. The second thing I'd say is that the draft regulation that came seems to be a constructive step in terms of evolution. So -- and third, we think that the news that came from the draft budget on the tax front were also positive. Generically, the main financial numbers at almost EUR 384 million.
The EBITDA, small decrease. So that this decrease will be more stable towards the full year kind of results. Net income of close to EUR 104 million, a strong increase. But this is, as I said, in the previous quarter, impacted by the way we are accounting for the tax incentive. Net debt coming down still. So I'd say stability, and we are clearly building flexibility to accommodate further growth in the coming years. And CapEx is picking up, although there are some delays, and I'll go into that, it's clearly picking up and accelerating a little.
But as of -- for now, I'll pass it to João who will make you a quick update also on the operating side.
Thanks, Gonçalo. Good morning to you all. From the operational side, I would highlight the fact that the renewables share kept approximately the same value year-on-year. We are about 70% of our electricity consumption supplied from renewable sources. The difference, I would say, is the fact that after the blackout, the consumption on natural gas increases, and it offsets the share of imports of electricity from Spain.
In terms of electricity consumption over the past 9 months, we reached the highest level in the last 15 years with an increase of 2.6% year-on-year. And the natural gas consumption is a reflection of what I've just said as a consequence of a higher usage of combined cycle plants to generate electricity from natural gas side. From the other points of the operational perspective, Gonçalo has already mentioned, the most important one is the proposal of the new regulation, which we will speak a little bit further on.
Moving to Slide #7, you have the figures. Part of it I've just mentioned. I would complement only with the fact that we kept the high levels of quality of service, clearly above the target set by the regulator and which are used to calculate the efficiency incentives that we have in today.
And with this, Gonçalo, I move back to you.
Okay. Thank you, João. So Slide #8 is just the main numbers. I think I've already spoken about them. So if you move to Slide #9, I'm sorry, on EBITDA, we see this small decrease on the quarter. And there is, let's say, still a conservative estimate that we are doing on our current incentives for the year. And so that kind of depresses a little bit the numbers. We think that full year, this will probably be recuperated. And there's some -- on other revenues, there's a disappearance of rent trading and its incentive.
On OpEx, we'll go into that, but it's mostly personnel and O&M. But I'd say that for full year, we should expect a more stable kind of EBIT on a year-on-year kind of logic. In terms of contributions, there's a lot of stability on the electricity side, and you start to see an increase on the Chilean contribution, although as always on still being a small part of REN as a whole.
In terms of Slide 10 and looking at ROI, there is no news. I'll just make a couple of comments now about the new draft regulation, and I'll leave it then to [indiscernible] on the Q&A to complement this a little bit. So what we saw was, first of all, a stable framework, which is good news. So no -- apparently no major changes. Second, we saw a 90 bps increase on the base ROR, which seems to indicate that the blended rate without any OpEx gains to be around 7% with the premiums and the incentives that we have to be around 7%.
We also see a recognition from the regulators that we have been very efficient in OpEx as they reduce the OpEx efficiency factor. So overall, we feel that there are still certain things that we should improve. The team -- [indiscernible] team regulation is engaging with the regulator, but we do feel that this is a constructive proposal. And let's wait for the 15th of December to have a final. So on the Q&A, we'll be able to clarify a little bit more, but this is more or less what we know as of now.
Looking at 11 on investments, we see that there is an acceleration of investment versus last year clearly. That being said, and to be completely honest, it's a little bit less than we had expected. So we are still trying to catch up. So some of the CapEx that we had expected to do this year will probably be done next year and probably on the 2 years average, we will be within expectations, but there was a small delay. Most of them were not on our side, were on the solar agreement side. But that being said, I think you'll still see an acceleration and an increase as we've said all along.
In terms of RAB returns, nothing new. So you see electricity improving. And as you know, you should add solar to these returns, but you see electricity improvement, gas distribution more or less stable and gas transportation coming down.
Looking at OpEx, as I said, there is an increase at this stage. This is the same trend that you saw in the first and second quarter. So it's mostly personnel costs, although on a full year, they will probably grow a little bit less than they are growing now. There are some external costs, namely O&M and some IT that is increasing. O&M is increasing because basically, there are some price increases, but we have more kilometers offline. So we have more to operate. So it's normal that this is increasing and then this is reflected as time goes by in the regulatory excepted OpEx.
Looking at Chile, things are progressing as expected this year. You saw and you know that we bought a couple of assets this year. So this is accelerating a little bit the evolution of EBITDA for 2025. It's now increasing a little bit below 30%. Full year, it will probably be a little bit better, which will continue for next year as we consolidate the full year accounts of the assets.
Electrogas is basically stable, a small decrease, small changes in gas volumes, but it's mostly, I'd say, a small decrease, but stable overall. And so I'd say that Chile continues to perform well within and that expectation of being a small part of REN as a whole.
Below EBIT on Slide 15, depreciation, no major news as usual. Financial results. So what we are seeing is clearly a lower debt, which will be the trend for the full year also that impacts financial costs. And we also are seeing a small decrease on the average cost of debt. So this is where probably full year, it will mostly likely stay closer between 2.5% and 2.6%, around that. We will probably not issue this year as we will be waiting for the final regulation to come out in December and the final state budget to come out in December also. So we'll probably issue beginning of next year in the first quarter. And that's when I'd say then the cost of -- average cost of debt will again increase very slightly. But I would say that it is very stable at these levels that we are seeing now.
On the tax side, we continue to account for the capitalization incentive. That is the main driver for the increase of net income on the third quarter. Of course, on a full year basis, this is going to be different because we accounted last year on the fourth quarter. We'll probably have a smaller amount because last year, it was around EUR 36 million as you may remember, we've indicated around EUR 30 million for the years that will come. And so this will probably on a year-on-year be slightly different.
But looking forward, we have good news, as you saw in the [indiscernible] state budget, they are eliminating the levy for the gas assets. That's EUR 10 million more of net income that will probably come next year. They are continuing to reduce the corporate tax rate. They are eliminating the levy also on the new investments that we do in electricity. So it seems to be good news. This is -- as we've been fighting it a very unfair tax for a long time, and it seems that finally it is correcting itself in the next year's budget.
So looking at net profit on Slide 16, you see just what I said. So most of the impact comes from not only a decrease in net debt, but also an improvement in the income tax, which is because of that accounting issue, and this will be smoother. So do not expect a 20% increase in net income for full year. That is not what consensus is, it's not what our expectations are.
Looking at net debt. So this is a reduction for this year. We continue the same trends as we saw in the first half of the year. So this is what we should expect for year-end. So a decrease of net debt amount. As I said, we are now reaching the top of the interval that we have said in terms of FFO/net debt, we are clearly managing the balance sheet carefully to enable us to have flexibility for additional growth in the coming years, but being careful at the same time.
Maturity is a little bit below 5 years because of us delaying the issuance of the bonds, but we are around 5 years, and this will again be above 5 years as we issued the bond for next year, okay? In terms of shareholder price, it has been a good evolution. Prices are above these numbers that you see here already because they've picked up again in October on the back of those news that we've told you. So it seems that shareholder returns will be pretty decent for the full year of 2025.
Looking at ESG, and I'll go through this very quickly. It's more for your reference on Slide 20. You see that the most interesting point is the point that emissions are increasing or the most relevant point, I should say. This is basically due to, as João explained also, a larger use of gas generation facilities due to the blackout that occurred and that then cost for emissions to grow in the grid. And so that's why we have more emissions ourselves, but I'd say that it was a very specific and isolated incident, okay? So that's the main event, I'd say, and the main thing that we see here in ESG. As you read the initiatives, we continue to go and to address this in a very detailed manner.
As you see in Slide 22, in terms of ratings, they are either stable or improving. So this is an area that we continue to address and to give a lot of attention. So as a closing remarks, I'd say so good results, good stable results in terms of net income with signs of investment acceleration, okay? And the second is a good new budget and constructive regulation in the outcome this year. Third, just to tell you, so we'll have still, as usual, a Board in the end of November. This is the usual Board that approves that intermediate dividend that we paid, the anticipated dividend that you should expect as normal to be paid in December as we have done in the past years, okay?
And with this, I conclude and I'll open the floor to any questions that you may have for us. Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] We will now take the first question from the line of Enrico Bartoli from Mediobanca.
2. Question Answer
The first one is on the new proposed regulation. You mentioned an expected return combined around 7%. The base one is 6.1%, if I add also the incentives to the pre-2002 asset, we get to 6.4%. So if you can elaborate on how you get to that level, I guess, adding incentives? Also in the document published by [indiscernible], there is a mention of the possible upside of this return to 7.9%. So if you can elaborate a bit on what could lead to that level and what reasonably could be achieved by REN in order to increase the blended return? In this context, if it's possible to have, let's say, a flavor on, let's say, the possible impact that the new regulation, if confirmed, could have on your CapEx plan in [indiscernible] transmission, if you think that there could be the proper condition in accelerating the investments that you have in the current business plan?
And second question is on the level of debt that you indicated for the year-end. You anticipated that this is going to decline. If you can also, in this case, elaborate a bit on the moving parts because actually CapEx is going up, then you have the acquisition of the additional assets in Chile. If you can also indicate how you expect the evolution in the fourth quarter of the tariff adjustments?
And the last one is on the outlook for investments in gas. It seems that, let's say, in general, in Europe, there is some, let's say, delay in the implementation of the production of hydrogen, around 50% of your investments in gas in the current business plan are related to green gases. I was wondering if you see some, let's say, risk or some, let's say, delay in those investments considering the current market situation.
Lot of questions, but let's go. So regulation, so you are asking -- actually, most of those calculations were made by the regulator himself, okay? So we don't know a lot of the details, but the 7% that I was talking is clearly those 2 things is one is those 3 old 75 basis points incentive that have some of the assets, the premium. Second is unexpected value for incentives. The regulator in their calculations have put 68 or 64 basis points of expectation. It's their own calculation. And I do not think this is the full amount. So that's more or less where -- what you get is if you calculate that premium on average on the blended and you put around what they estimate, you get around this figure a little bit above or a little bit below, okay?
So if we are able to beat their expectations, we'll actually be higher than 7%. If we miss a little, we will keep -- but this is around the 7%, okay? So that's the calculation. The [ EUR 789 million ], we don't know. I think that their calculation has to do with some expectation of efficiency gains, but we don't know. I would say that this is around 7% is what is easier to compare with other companies. And each company has their own OpEx efficiency gains, and that's a little bit different, okay?
Just to comment on the debt so that I leave the CapEx for rest and João can comment a little bit on those. I mean, we are expecting it to be around EUR 2.5 billion. So that is, I would say, stable to a small decrease versus last year, okay? Of course, CapEx is a little bit stronger at the end, but -- so I'd say that's more or less what our expectations are. So in relation to CapEx, just to tell you before I pass it to João, yes, I think that there is room to accelerate on the electricity side. We actually have a couple of delays this year. So this is what we are expecting.
João, can you comment on CapEx on both electricity and gas?
Right. Starting from electricity, this is a trend that we're already following. So we have different fronts on our CapEx plan, not only to create new connections for injection, so for new solar and other sources of renewables that are foreseen in the Portuguese energy policy, but also on the demand side because as you know, it's public. We have a long queue of requests for new connections, mainly industrial consumption, data centers, green steel, ammonia, batteries -- now for the moment, a little bit spread all over the country, not only in the Sines area, but also closer to Lisbon and Stovall and several other areas of the country.
So I would say that we are not changing the CapEx -- electricity CapEx perspective. Obviously, like Gonçalo said, constructive regulation is positive for that. In what concerns to gas, it's true what you're saying. Hydrogen acceleration is decreasing a little bit. But bear in mind that our plan was always very cautious on what hydrogen is concerned. Our investment in CapEx -- in gas as I would say, 3 pillars.
The first one is maintenance and replacement CapEx that is always needed because several equipment reached the end of their life cycle and needs to be replaced and needs to be upgraded. Then you have a second bulk, which has to do with biomethane. And we are receiving several requests from potential generators of biomethane to connect to the grid and to inject in the grid their biomethane. So this is some importance within the gas plant.
And last but not least, hydrogen. But even hydrogen, our approach was only based in the beginning with the blended of natural gas and hydrogen. And much of what we are foreseeing for the very short term, and I would say the very short term, the time horizon that we need final investment decisions. This has to do with the blending and not new infrastructure purely for transmission of 100% hydrogen.
We will now take the next question from the line of Ignacio Doménech from JB Capital.
I have 2 questions and a follow-up. The follow-up is on the CapEx side, given the acceleration we are seeing in this quarter and potentially in the coming quarters. What would be your best estimate on regulated CapEx for electricity? I don't know if for the period that Rodrigo has said or any period that you can give us, okay, to have a higher visibility there?
And then on my 2 questions, one is on returns, okay? If in your view, it's fair to assume that given that in the past, returns -- the regulated returns on gas have been higher than electricity for many different reasons. If it's fair to assume that at least returns in the next regulatory period would be at the levels that we've seen in this graph for electricity. Okay.
And the second question is regarding the business plan that you presented in 2024. It does seem that most of the objectives have been surpassed. So -- and apologies if you mentioned something in the call, I was having some logistic issues. But if you can give us some color on what are you planning to update the these objectives? How are you thinking on the framework for the next business plan?
Thank you, Ignacio. So I mean, regarding the first one, we are not going to give you it's a quarter away. So the only thing I can tell you is that this year was, in particular in the execution of our agreements a little bit slower than we expected. So we're expecting to have a slightly higher growth this year than we will probably have. That being said, you'll still see a growth in CapEx -- but I think that is going only to materialize next year, okay, in 2026, a higher growth. I'm not going to tell you the numbers of our budget, but this is the discussions that we are having internally, and they are showing that in our internal numbers. I can only signal you the direction and the sense.
Regarding the update that you were referring. So this is something that we've commented with some of the analysts that beginning of the year, probably at the same time with the full year end results of 2025, we may do, let's say, an update of key figures for '26 and '27 as some of the numbers are a little bit outside of the range in the business plan, we may revise this. So this is something that we are working internally. We are waiting for the final regulation and budget to come out. We will discuss this internally, and we'll come to the market. But this will probably not be before we disclose the full year results for '25, okay?
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Guilherme [indiscernible] Neves from Invest GA.
I would like to know what are your perspective long term regarding the availability of interconnections with Spain, given the possible spike in electricity demand with the Sines data center project? Do you plan or consider developing incremental network capacity to bring electricity from Spain?
Thanks for your question. As you may be aware, when we are speaking about an interconnection, the 2 parts need to be in agreement. So it's a long process that we have to interact with the Spanish site. We are working at the moment to conclude the new interconnection in the north of the country, [indiscernible]. We are expecting to be completed by the end of this year, beginning of -- early months of 2026. And then we have to continue to do our network planning arrangements with our Spanish counterparts to see the new developments for the future.
Thank you. We will now take the next question from the line of Flora Trindade from CaixaBank.
I have 2 quick ones. The first one is a question on regulation. So in the previous regulatory framework, there was a review from the draft to the final return. Do you expect this time to see an improvement again?
And then the second question is on your dividend policy. Could you assume that it could make sense to propose a higher dividend considering the strong results you are getting this year and the expectation that you will have, again, recapitalization incentives next year?
Well, just on the regulation question, we will -- we are waiting now for the final decisions of the regulator. And we don't comment on what's going to happen or not. It's now the decision, it's a process. They are getting comments from other parts, and then they will do their decisions and publish by December. Regarding the dividend, same, we never make any comments on -- we have -- today, we have a clear policy, and that's the one that we have, and we will not comment on decisions that will have to be taken, proposal by the Board approved on the registered shareholders' meeting, then that's all we can say.
We will now take the next question from the line of Fernando Lafuente from Alantra.
I'm asking two, please. The first one is on taxes. What are your views ahead of first, on all those taxes that you have paid already -- special taxes, I mean, or the extraordinary taxes that you have paid already and that you will -- you are suing in courts? And secondly, going forward, what are your expectations of tax -- special taxes, both in the positive side -- on this positive taxes and also in the special one for electricity and gas?
And the second one, it's on potential M&A. I believe by your comments that you have plenty of CapEx to be done in Portugal. Hence, my question is if your, let's say, is position or mood ahead of new M&As, probably not big in Chile, if you are considering doing something or if you are well with your current exposure to the country?
Thank you. So relative to taxes paid, as you know, we have been winning in court the levy cases regarding gas assets. So we won some in 2024, and we've also won 2 this year. So we are continuing to see this. There is an amount around EUR 50 million to EUR 60 million paid taxes that we have not put into the accounts as recuperated from that time onwards. So if you account for 2021, '22, '23, '24 and '25, which we pay this year, it's around EUR 10 million a year. So we -- it does seem, but we don't want to make a lot of comments. It does seem that we have a good likelihood of winning those, but we will see have this continue to progress in court. But -- so this is, I'd say, an upside with a good probability for the coming years, okay? So we will see if this year, there's already something in the accounts. But there is clearly a good upside, as I said, good progress.
Looking forward, as we said before regarding the levy, so what we are seeing now is that, one, the gas is gone. That's the good news. Two, on the electricity side, the new assets will not pay sales. That is also very good. So what you'll see is the levy come down progressively as time goes by, okay? We will see if and we still consider that this will have to end someday, but we don't know exactly when it is. Regarding the incentive, which is the other positive, as we said, we have a very strong expectation based on legal opinions that we have for '25, '26 and '27.
'25 is already going. It was in the budget. '26, it's still in the budget and is being proposed by the government. So there seems to be a certain maintenance and a certain field on the tax authorities, but this is an incentive to be maintained. Even if it was not in the budget, as we told you, we felt that we would be entitled to it. So -- but it is better that it is in the [indiscernible].
Regarding M&A, we don't have any idea. So these small things that we did in Chile, we almost don't even consider it M&A, acquisition of very small assets. It's almost a greenfield more than M&A because it's very small. We don't have any plans to do any M&A or any acquisition, okay?
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back to Madalena Garrido for any closing remarks.
So thank you, everyone, on the line, and we remain available to take any additional questions that you may have. Thank you, and have a good day.
Thank you very much.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to REN First Half 2025 Results Conference Call. We appreciate your presence here today.
Joining us are the members of REN's Executive Committee, Rodrigo Costa our CEO; Gonçalo Morais Soares, our CFO; and João Conceição, our COO. Rodrigo will begin with his opening remarks, and this will be followed by a detailed overview on REN's operational and financial performance for the first half. Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your questions. Thank you again for your attention and continued interest on REN.
Good morning. Thank you, Madalena. We have -- we all saw -- you all saw the presentations. I think we are on a good path. We are just finishing -- just finished a quarter with where we were extremely busy, and I think it will remain like that for the remainder of the year.
Today, we will talk about a few things. I'm sure we will cover again, a little bit about the blackout. On sales, we have some news that we will try also to provide some context. And we are very busy now with the project for the new regulation on electricity coming for the next year. Also, we have a lot of work done working with energy agency, the government, the regulator regarding what should be the next plans for the coming years because from what we learned in the past few months from the comments we are getting from the market, the experts, from our own people. And all in all, super, super busy. And I think even during the holidays, we'll keep being very busy preparing the remainder of the year, as I said.
And with that, I move to Gonçalo.
Thank you, Rodrigo. So good morning to you all. And so if you want to move to Slide #4 with the overview. So I'd say that no surprise kind of quarter and first half. EBITDA, very much in line with what we had last year coming to EUR 256.6 million for the first half. I'd say both domestic and international are more or less in line when growing a little bit more stable, but I'd say more or less in line with last year.
On the net profit front, you see material increase of 35%, that results mainly on the way that we are accounting for the tax incentive that we had already last year, but some additional tax good news, okay, that I'll go a little bit more into it and share a little bit more detail also on what we know about the sales and the news.
The third thing is, as you see, continued discipline and good behavior in terms of net debt. So not only the average cost of debt, net debt overall actually coming down a little bit. This, I believe, continues to be a differentiating factor from us from some of our peers that are also growing quite a bit in terms of investment, but I think we are and have been able and to manage leverage in a more conservative and positive way. CapEx, as you see, is growing and will continue to grow. It's a little bit early, but we will continue to grow for the full year.
Okay. Let me just pass to João that will comment a little bit on the key operational highlights. João ?
Thanks, Gonçalo. Good morning to you all. From the operational side, obviously, the most relevant issue during this first half of 2025 was the blackout on the 30th of April. This has obviously impacts on our operations, not only in terms of the way the consumption is evolving between electricity and natural gas, and I will briefly mention that in a second, but also on the responsibility that we have to implement additional measures to try to avoid similar events in the future.
On Slide 5, before speaking about the context in terms of consumption and the setup of the portfolio of generation capacity in Portugal, let me highlight one issue from the regulation side, the fact that we have been appointed the provisional Portuguese entity in responsible for planning, developing and managing the future hydrogen infrastructure. This is a relatively important issue because it confirms the work that we are doing within the hydrogen sector. Obviously, waiting for the developments in terms of the needs and requests from the other stakeholders.
I will jump to the Slide #7 and to briefly comment here the business highlights. So starting by the electricity sector. Despite the blackout, which will have an impact on that specific day. We -- in the first half of the year, we have an increase of 2.2% in terms of consumption. And if we make the correction -- the normal correction for the temperature and the week base, we slightly decreased to 2%, but it's still an increase. And it's more or less in line with our forecast for the full year of 2025.
In terms of the split of technologies, we keep with a high level of incorporation of renewables, 77.3%, which is roughly the same figure of the full year of 2024. And the split between the different technologies in terms of renewable energy is more or less the same, with the major components being the hydropower and the wind power, with solar picking up as we are getting more and more projects connected to the grid.
The big difference is the fact that we reduced significantly the imports from Spain versus 2024 from 20% to 10%, and we increased the share of the electricity generation with natural gas, which increased from 6% to 10%. And that fact is though responsible for the increase in gas consumption that you are seeing in this slide, the 10.1% of increase is very much as a result of a sharp increase on the gas consumption to produce electricity, which comparing 2025 and 2024, we saw an overall increase of 153.5%.
Speaking about the quality of service. On the natural gas side, no big issue to report. We are keeping very high levels of availability of our infrastructure. On the electricity side, what you see here is the overall figures. Obviously, without considering the blackout events of the 28th of April, which we are considering that sooner or later, we'll have the classification of an exceptional event as this was not caused by any sort of an issue in Portugal.
And with that, Gonçalo, back to you.
Thank you, João. So if you went to Slide #8 which is the main financial highlights. I'll jump that one. We go to Slide #9 and focus on EBITDA. So you see that there is a mix of impact here. We'll go into those in more detail, but the first asset and OpEx remuneration little bit has a mix of impact, amortizations going up, gas returns coming a little bit down. We're being more conservative on the incentive on the electricity this year. So there's a little bit of a mix. And the other revenues, mostly some corrections that were made, there's deviations on last year. There's a lot of impact, but those are I would say the more, the ones that have a stronger impact.
Core OpEx is growing, we knew so it's personnel in some other costs, namely O&M, running a little bit. International segment is adding a little bit. We'll see and now going to details, it will continue to grow, and it should grow a little bit more until the end of the year. Components of the business, I say, are mostly stable in the first half of this year.
On Slide 10 and looking at our evolution, very much in line with what we've had last year. So no major changes. I say things are very much stable. And so no news on this front, okay?
On Slide 11, I'm looking CapEx. As you know, it's a little bit early as always. I'd say that on the third quarter, you have a pretty -- or a better visibility input will happen. That being said, I can say that we are expecting CapEx to grow, still quite a bit, and we are very comfortable with the interval that we gave you on the business plan, and we are going to be I'd say clearly ahead of that average.
And that being said, we still are facing some challenges, both in the, I'd say, the normal project and in the solar agreement. We still are facing some challenges in licensing. So I say that if João's team didn't have those constraints, they would be executing clearly more this year, but it's what it is. I don't think it affects or impacts anything materially. If they don't do it this year they'll do it next year. But it's just for you to know. So it's nothing that concerns us. It's something that we have to live with. So I'd say that's more or less it. But nevertheless, CapEx is expected to continue its strong evolution, okay?
Slide #12 in RAB returns, I'd say it's more or less more of the same story. And just to tell you that you see here the decrease in gas transportation, the increase you see in RAB returns in electricity is less than it is. You should have also on these returns that we are having are considering from solar agreement. So those also have. And if you also look at the RAB evolution, when you look at that in electricity and as the Solar Agreement passes, of course, they are growing much more than the normal RAB, and we will be approaching I'd say, more or less 4% this year, the 4% that we were targeting in terms of the business plan if we have those inside electricity this year.
And as João also said, also so yes, but I'll leave this for you to comment a little bit more on the Q&A. There's a new regulation approaching. You know that in October and December, in the middle of those months is when we have the draft and then the final resolution. We think that clearly the increase that we Spain in is positive news for supportive news in that respect. But João will be able to comment a little bit more in the Q&A, and I'll leave that to him at that stage.
On Slide 13 and OpEx, as I said, this is more or less what we had expected. So we are continuing to see increases in personnel. This is mostly driven by more people as we have more to do, okay? So we are building much more agreements, much more things. So this anticipates a little bit the growth that we also see in the asset part.
In terms of core OpEx, there's a couple of impacts. Part of it is the electricity costs. Electricity costs have increased quite a bit since last year. That being said, be mindful that this tends to be then neutral. So you see here the OpEx, but there's also a revenue associated with this. So the impact is lower on a net, let's say, a net way of looking at it.
In terms of maintenance costs, they are also growing. We've seen that maintenance costs are going up a little bit. So it's something that we have to manage and will be managed this in the next coming year, okay? But I would say no major surprises from what we are looking at.
In terms of Chile, let's say, also no news. In Electrogas on the gas part, we are decreasing a little bit EBIT as expected. Gas volumes are coming down a little bit this year. But actually, I think that gas volumes are very much stable on a medium-term kind of outlook. We know that Chile is importing more not only in the South, but in the North gas from Argentina. There is a large availability of gas from Argentina, so we are expecting to have sustained revenues in this business unit in Chile.
Electricity continues to grow. We are already consolidating TENSA, a small acquisition or a very small acquisition that we made. At this stage, it actually has a negative because we have some transaction costs associated with it that is pushing OpEx down or up and so EBITDA down. These are small numbers, so very small things tend to affect this. But I'd say that we are clearly on the trend to increase EBITDA a little bit more. And we are, as I said, not expected to do any large increases here because what we have in the plan we came from a contribution to EBITDA of around 4.5%. What we had in the plan is to be around 5.5%. So even if we grow a little bit faster, we are going to be 6.5% of EBITDA. So Chile is a small unit that is growing well, but is growing in a disciplined way that we want to do mainly in electricity. And I'd say that's relative to Chile.
But looking at below EBITDA on Slide #15. No comments on depreciation, financial results. Net debt coming down. I'll look a little bit more into it. In terms of average cost of debt, clearly stabilizing, even decreasing very slightly. So this is around 2.7%, but the reality is a little bit over 2.7%. Now it's a little bit below 2.7%. So it has come down very slightly, but I would say that it is stabilizing. So it should be around these numbers. I do not expect this. We also see ECB stabilizing rates in the market. So I'd say that this is it.
In terms of taxes, so what you see first is that contribution from the accounting of the tax expenses. So you are seeing that we have two quarters already in, so 15.5%. So total amount full year of around expected 31%. We will see at the end of the year, but it should be around this, okay? So this is the estimate we are making now.
There is also some tax recovery from previous years. I'd say in some normal months, somewhere related to R&D that we did. So if you see these are -- and could still -- there are still some of them that we are still going to recuperate in the remaining of the year in principle. So I'd say that it's a little bit larger than usual. The reality is that every year, we will recuperate some taxes here. So I think that this is a very good management that we've also done at this line.
And third, in terms of [indiscernible] just to comment a little bit. So the news -- positive news that we had is that the Constitutional Court has said that for 2019 and for the gas assets, it is generically unconstitutional. So all the court cases that were related to those assets for that year are lost by the state. So if you remind, if you don't know, we have already won two since 2019. We have one that we have not won. So this is -- amounts to more or less EUR 5.4 million. So this is an amount that is not in the account that we should expect to be in the accounts, I'd say, in the short term. So if it's not in the third quarter, it's in principle until the end of the year. The lawyers are looking at what the constitutional court says, but apparently, it's kind of done.
Secondly, and kind of looking forward, it doesn't mean anything formally for '20, '21,'22. But informally, I think, increases the probability that we will have mainly in the gas part, that we will have a positive outcome for us, right? So I think good news for 2019. It's good news for the following years, although as I said, we only know about 2019, so we have to wait further up.
In terms of net profit, 16 is just the sum up of this, explaining why it's increasing 35%. But moving to Slide 17 and talking about net debt. As I said, I think this is something that is differentiating us from some of our peers. We have, as I said, increasing CapEx, but at the same time, actually decreasing debt. And you can see debt is not only driven by tariff deviations that still I'd say decreased versus last year, but are more or less stabilizing, slightly below EUR 100 million, I could say, EUR 100 million, more or less, and it's also driven by the fact that, as we said, we received a little bit more of money in advance from solar agreement. We are executing. We have found a way. So in terms of cash flow, CapEx is a little bit below once we thought it would be. And so that's why we are, let's say, decreasing a little bit more than net debt than we had anticipated, okay?
So I'd say that this is not what you should expect, you should expect net debt grow a little bit more, although actually, looking at credit metrics, those are improving or stabilizing quite a bit. But you see that there is a very well slight maturity in terms of net debt, net debt close to 5 years of maturity, a lot of liquidity available. So I think we are in a very, very comfortable position. And we are also expected during -- more later in the year, to be considering issuing bonds. It's something that we do on a recurring basis to maintain not only maturity, but to reposition again and the liquidity. So that is something that in principle will happen until the end of the year.
Slide 18, just looking at share price and return. We are doing okay. Share price is actually a little bit higher than what you have now in this number. So I think good performance clearly in the year. I think that some of these as I told you about, will we talk through. I think that the business plan is being executed. So that also gave comfort. So I think there's a lot of good things that are impacting shareholders.
Going very fast to ESG in Slide 20. So you have the numbers here. The only thing that I want to highlight to you, as you can see, is the increase, which is kind of a different trend in the past year in the greenhouse gas emissions in scope 1 there's 20% increase.
The explanation is in the next slide, on Slide 21. And so João also -- in these highlights also explained. So first, there is slightly less renewables in the first half versus last year, that accounts for a little bit. But secondly, mostly as João said, gas has contributed more in terms of generation of electricity that was a result of the blackout as continues to be not only because of those days because of safety of system and that has an impact in these metrics. We are following this, and we are and continue to be strongly committed to the targets that we have. We were clearly ahead of schedule. I think that this is something that we look into, but we are not confined.
On the ratings, no major news, also a change here in first analytics, we are kind of -- I don't understand really the rationale, but this is also tied to the blackout, which -- as João said, we have nothing to do with, but we are talking with them and explaining to them that in our opinion, this doesn't makes sense, but it has an impact on some metrics, but we correct this view, and we will continue to interact with them.
So closing remarks, I'd say that everything kind of on track and additional positive tax news both recuperated and looking for it on sales, but I'd say that on track also for a strong investment and CapEx, okay?
So with that, I conclude, and we'll open up the floor to any questions that you have. Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] We are now going to proceed with our first question. And the questions come from the line of Fernando Garcia from RBC.
2. Question Answer
I have two. The first one is about the fiscal effect related to the capitalization of operational companies that you have accounted there, EUR 15.5 million in the first half. It looks like you treat that this item as nonrecurring in first quarter, but I think now you are considering it recurring. Let me know if I am right in this appreciation. And if that is the case, can you explain the rationale for that?
Then the second question, about the constitutional court in gas. So also this EUR 5 million remaining for 2019 that you mentioned, Gonçalo. What else do you need to account for it? And then what else do you need to happen for the following years? And also, if you think that the rational use for gas, if there is something that can be applied as well for electricity?
Okay, Fernando. Thank you for the question. So the EUR 15.5 million, we are treating it as nonrecurrent because, I mean, this is something that we have in '25, '26, '27. We don't feel that it portrays the nature. We do feel that is recurrent. We've told you and explained and why we have this expectation. So that's a little bit the change to make it more coherent and that's it. So this is the amount that's around EUR 31 million we are expecting this year. We have told you that it should be around EUR 30 million. So it can be one year, EUR 31 million, the other EUR 29 million. So we are not certain, but it is recurrent at least for these 3 years that we told.
Second, in terms of the constitutional court, the EUR 5.4 million. So this was very recent. So this was very recent, and that's why we haven't accounted it. It was actually after another quarter. So we are just looking and making sure that everything is okay legally. But I would say that there is strong probability that either in the third or in the fourth quarter, this EUR 5.4 million are going to be accounted for because legally, we have, I'd say, the case is already made. So there is no reason for us not to account for it. But this is the way that you look at accounting in any industry, you have to have the decision, and that applies for the following year.
But Rodrigo, I don't know if you want to comment.
Yes. Thank you, Gonçalo. I think what is happening to -- sometimes we forget that on the sales case, every year, is, let's say, an independent case. The decision was on the gas side for 2019. That one, it's supposed to be closed. As Gonçalo said, it happened already after the second quarter.
We are now trying to understand exactly if the judges, if the court is going to make any decisions regarding the future cases. But in '19, as '20, '21, '22, '23, '24, they are single cases. It's a law that is published every -- each year. And when the court decides, they decide regarding that single year. We don't know exactly, and there is no way we can know, of course, how they will decide regarding the future cases.
When we are asked, if this creates a precedent for the future, of course, we do believe it creates a precedent. If we are asked, if this will have impact on the electricity cases, I think it should have an impact also. But we -- something we learned a long time ago, we are not supposed to anticipate judge's decisions. They are the ones who have to make them.
And regarding another question that we always get is, hey, but how much money are you expecting to recover? To be honest, in the past, we lost some cases. We already won some cases. In the future, we expect to win more cases, but we don't know, period. And that's why -- and again, we have our lawyers dealing into the case, investigating, trying to understand what should be our expectation. But that's where we are today.
We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Enrico Bartoli from Mediobanca.
First question is regarding some comments that you may have on, let's say, the work that you are doing on the new regulation for electric transmission. In particular, if you have any comments on possible read across from the first proposal that was made for the remuneration at around 6.5% in Spain from the regulator there? And what you think that could be, let's say, a satisfactory level of return that you would consider from the upcoming regulatory review?
Second question is regarding the evolution of operating costs in the first half. You highlighted that there was some increase. If I understood well from your comments, you said that those increases will be offset from higher OpEx revenues over the next quarter. If you can comment on this if, let's say, my understanding is correct?
And the last one is regarding the CapEx for the full year. If I understand well, you are seeing some delays in some authorizations. If you can provide some more comments and more or less a level of CapEx that would be reasonable to expect to be achieved at full year level.
Well, thanks for your questions. I will try to start with the first one on the regulation. As you know, what we know so far is what is public, which is the public consultation that the regulator, the Portuguese regulator made with the guidelines for the new framework of the regulation. There, what we can see is that in terms of the model, the regulator is proposing or thinking about proposing something stable compared to what we had in the previous period, specifically speaking about the TOTEX model and the way it works. So we don't see any substantial difference in the modeling of these TOTEX.
The news are coming from the incentives because they are upgrading the availability incentive, introducing some additional parameters and mostly from a new incentive that they are thinking about to apply to the system operation activity in terms of maximizing the participation of renewables in the ancillary service markets and also in very detailed technical issue on dynamic and rating management of our grids.
And specifically with your question on the first proposal in Spain, the 46% of ROR. Obviously, we see this as a positive sign because it reflects the trend of increasing versus what we have today. Traditionally, regulators benchmark what other regulatory models are doing, but that that's not necessary, meaning that they are going to do exactly the same. So our expectation is obviously to see an increase in terms of the rate of return as a reflection of the new market conditions.
Okay. So on the OpEx cost, just to clarify. So what I said is that part of the cost, the electricity ones that are relevant, have an offset in terms of revenue. So the impact is not directly. So you see it in OpEx, but there's a counterpart. So in EBIT, it is an impact, but the other costs and some other costs on O&Ms and personnel, they are increasing. We are expecting operating cost decrease in the year, okay?
In terms of CapEx, as I said, also -- so we do have some delays. As most things do have some challenges, but we are expecting versus last year CapEx to increase, okay? So I don't know if it's 10%, if it's more, if it's less, but we are expecting CapEx to increase this year again versus what we had last year that was already an increase, okay?
We are now going to proceed with our next question, and the questions come from the line of Ignacio Doménech from JB Capital.
The first one is just if you could remind us of the portion of the special energy tax related with the electricity assets from 2019 to 2024?
The second one is related on the investment plan. If I remember correctly, the regulator recently asked REN to draft this investment given that it could actually be ahead of the of the schedule of the EUR 1.7 billion plan. So just wanted to get a clarification on the relationship between electricity and gas, particularly on green gases, given the delays in the deployment of hydrogen. And in the Event that there's a better or a regulation that incentivizes the investments in electricity, if you would actually prioritize electrically versus natural gas?
So Ignacio, I don't know if the first question was relating how much we had paid back sales back in 2019. So the value was around EUR 28.3 million. It's around EUR 17.4 million electricity and the rest is gas. Of the ones that are gas, as I said, there's EUR 5.4 million that we still have to get. And the other two items that we already got last year, those are the ones that contribute to those EUR 5.6 million that we accounted for, okay? So the EUR 5.4 million is what we are expecting then to account this year. The EUR 17.4 million of electricity, we have no news to give you. This number then is more or less the same in '20, '21, '22, '23, '24. So they vary between EUR 28.5 million and EUR 27 million. That's how it varies along these years. So it's more or less around EUR 28 million, okay? More or less the same thing, more or less the same thing, okay? Investment then, João, you want to comment?
Yes. Well, regarding the fleet and the electricity plan -- the electricity investment plan, you are right. Actually, we presented a plan of around roughly EUR 1.7 billion for the next 10 years. The regulator did the public consultation and that's already released its own opinion. And basically, if you see the opinion, our understanding is that in what concerns to what we call the base projects or the projects that derive from a proposal from needs for the network.
The regulator gives a favorable opinion to a large majority of the projects related to the first half of the 10 years and give an opinion subjective to two main conditions that we believe that we can justify when we present the final draft, specifically for projects that are related to equipment necessary to improve the conditions of managing the voltage fluctuation and the voltage control, which was identified as the main issue for the origin of the blackouts in Spain and then in subsequently in Portugal.
So we believe that we have -- we presented this in December. So obviously, we have no idea that we would have a blackout in the end of April, but it now has the best justification for the need of this investment. So we believe that a significant part of the -- or almost the total value of the investments we propose that requires a final investment decision on the short term, and those are applicable to the first half of the 5 years, projects that are proposed by us. We got a favorable opinion from the regulator.
What the regulator says regarding the other part is that for projects that are related to the second half, as we have to present to -- as we will have to present a new plan in 2 years' time, his opinion is that we should analyze these future projects when we present this new plan in 2 years' time.
Finally, regarding the projects that derive from needs that the government decides, the regulator basically says that this has to be the government that has to take the decision. So we believe that this opinion is favorable for what we need related to final investment decisions on the relatively short term, I would say, the first 5 years' time of the investment plan.
In what concerns to hydrogen. The hydrogen investments are presented in the equivalent plan for gas or some specific requests we present to the government directly. This last one was we got recent approvals of some CapEx for this new first step into the hydrogen blending within our infrastructure.
In what concerns to the gas plant, the public consultation made by the regulator just finished a couple of weeks ago, so we need to wait for the opinion of the regulator.
[Operator Instructions] We are now going to proceed with our next question. And the questions come from the line of Fernando Lafuente from Alantra.
Just one question and a follow-up. The follow-up is on CapEx regarding your guidance of your -- basically your assumptions of growing CapEx in '25 compared to '24. What should be the trend if we exclude the CapEx related to solar? I mean regulated CapEx is also expected to grow in '25 compared to '24.
And the second question is related to hydrogen and following up again on the comments you made in the previous question. Assuming a normal scenario in which hydrogen goes ahead, what is the investment potential for the next, let's say, 5 to 10 years in the Portuguese system? Do you have kind of an estimation of where investments could go over that period?
Fernando, that's a little bit of details if you want what you are asking. And so of course, CapEx without the solar grow a little bit less. I mean, we don't usually actually separate it. For us, we put everything together. So we look at electricity, everything together. But it is also, I'd say, electricity CapEx tends to be a little bit more stable and growing and the growth comes clearly or a lot of the differential in growth comes clearly also for electricity in the solar agreements which is where teams are executing most. So I'd say that -- and when I say that there's some delays in solar, that's why we are also saying that we are seeing some delays in overall CapEx because that's where most of the CapEx is '25 versus '24 in terms of growth is also coming from, okay? So I hope that clarifies what you are asking. Rodrigo?
Yes. Well, regarding the hydrogen, I think it's important to understand where we are at the moment. First, I think it's still missing a lot of, let's say, information and decision from Brussels, then we will need also decisions from the local government.
We are working, like I already mentioned before, we are working in several projects. Some are in Portugal, focusing on some industrial projects that are happening, and we are planning to build some of the infrastructure to carry the hydrogen in those areas. We are also working in terms of doing the certification of our network -- distribution network inclusive, which we already did to support a blend of hydrogen. We are also working with our European partners in Spain and France and also in Germany to design them, to present a solution to -- that will be a cross-border hydrogen pipe that will start in Portugal and it will end in Germany. We are already working. We are doing some studies for the connection between Portugal and Spain.
But going back to your question, how much investment we are predicting? I think at the moment, it would be absolutely impossible to give you a number. Maybe by the fall, end of the year, we will be able to have more data and we can give you a number. But for the moment, I don't know, João, if you want to add something extra?
Just the only number we can give, and it's public, is actually what we presented in the gas plan that was under the public consultation. And specifically for hydrogen and in terms of the upgrading of the existing gas infrastructure to accommodate a full blending of gas and hydrogen, we forecast around EUR 111 million of investment for the period of the plan, which is basically 10 years. But as Rodrigo said, this is very much subjective to the pace of development of the hydrogen within the energy equation. If it goes faster, we will have to execute this. Otherwise, you don't have the infrastructure to inject the hydrogen that is produced. If it goes slower, we can adjust the timing of these investments and spread it a little bit for a longer period. So this is what we can say for the moment.
We have no further questions at this time. So I'll hand back to you for any closing remarks.
Thank you, everyone, on the line. And we remain available for any additional questions that you may have. And have a good day. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you so much. Bye-bye.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
Finanzdaten von Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Mär '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 1.626 1.626 |
7 %
7 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 518 518 |
15 %
15 %
32 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 1.108 1.108 |
3 %
3 %
68 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 290 290 |
2 %
2 %
18 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 789 789 |
4 %
4 %
48 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 402 402 |
5 %
5 %
25 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 386 386 |
3 %
3 %
24 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 234 234 |
15 %
15 %
14 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen EUR.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur Ren - Redes Energeticas Naci-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
Firmenprofil
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Portugal |
| CEO | Mr. Costa |
| Mitarbeiter | 787 |
| Gegründet | 1994 |
| Webseite | www.ren.pt |


