Penn National Gaming, Inc. Aktie

Greetings, and welcome to the PENN Entertainment Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Aaron. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining PENN Entertainment's 2026 Third Quarter Conference Call and Webcast. We'll get to management's comments and presentation momentarily as well as your Q&A. And during Q&A, we ask that everyone please limit themselves to one question and one follow-up.

I'll quickly review the safe harbor, then we'll get right into the call. Please note that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For more information, please see our press release for details on specific risk factors.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to PENN's CEO, Jay Snowden. Jay, please go ahead.

Thanks, Joe. Good morning, everyone. I'm joined in Pennsylvania by Felicia Hendrix and Aaron LaBerge, as well as other members of our senior team. As you can see in our release and accompanying investor presentation, PENN delivered record third quarter revenue and strong year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth, driven by same-store performance and contributions from our completed development projects.

The impressive returns from our recent investments in our portfolio underscore the opportunity across our remaining development pipeline and position us very well for future growth. The Retail performance by our best-in-class property management teams was supported by increases in rated revenue and spend per visit across all of our age segments, meaningful contributions from our mid- and high-worth customers, and continued growth in our unrated revenue.

For the third consecutive quarter, segment-adjusted EBITDA margins improved year-over-year, despite unfavorable table game hold in the quarter at the M Resort and increased gaming tax rates in Illinois as a result of Aurora and Joliet moving into higher gaming tax tiers due to their continued success.

As Felicia will cover in a moment, we are raising our full year 2026 Retail revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance to reflect our better-than-expected results in Q3 and our current trends.

Slide 8 in the investor presentation highlights the success we're continuing to see from our completed development projects. The new tower at M Resort has improved performance by capitalizing on previously unmet demands, helping drive record Q3 revenue, slot volumes, and table volumes for the property. During the third quarter, the property also booked its largest group by revenue and room nights, twice the size of its next largest group.

Looking forward, contracted group business revenue for 2027 is pacing 55% ahead of where 2026 bookings stood at the same point last year. At Hollywood Columbus, we achieved all-time record revenues -- excuse me, records for gaming volumes, revenue, and adjusted EBITDA. The 18% year-over-year revenue growth reflects hotel-driven increases in visitation and spend per visit, and 86% of hotel cash revenue was generated by guests coming from over 3 hours away, signaling our expanded market reach.

In Aurora, we saw our active database grow by 96% year-over-year and 2x higher revenue versus prior year, supported by strong growth across gaming and non-gaming amenities. In addition, similar to Columbus, 90% of hotel cash revenue was generated by outer market guests.

Finally, our other new Chicagoland property, Hollywood Joliet, continues to deliver strong results. We also have continued to see revenue growth on a year-over-year basis, despite lapping our opening in August of last year and since the opening of the Aurora property in June of this year, which is very encouraging. We look forward to building on this momentum as the property ramps and the surrounding mixed-use development progresses.

Upcoming projects in our development pipeline include the relocation of Hollywood Council Bluffs, expected in 2028, and the new Hollywood New Orleans, expected in 2029, both of which are highlighted on Slide 9. We couldn't be more excited to begin advancing both of those projects.

In our Interactive segment, adjusted EBITDA improved meaningfully year-over-year, reflecting continued execution against our plan to achieve profitability. U.S. iCasino revenue growth was driven by the strength of our standalone Hollywood iCasino app, which is supported by efficient user acquisition and targeted reinvestment.

In Ontario, increased users and revenue per user contributed to revenue growth across both iCasino and online sports betting as we continue to reinvest in one of our most attractive jurisdictions. We are also pleased with the early performance of our Alberta iCasino and OSB operations, with volumes and users showing continued growth into October. This launch has expanded our presence in Canada and positions us well for future growth should additional provinces privatize.

Additionally, we saw significant year-over-year improvement in gross profit margin in the quarter, driven by a more targeted promotional strategy and with iCasino representing a larger share of our gaming revenue mix year-over-year. We also continued to realize efficiencies across the entire Interactive business, including a reduction in third-party variable costs. We expect these drivers to support additional margin expansion going forward.

Growth in U.S. iCasino and Canada, coupled with our disciplined approach to customer value and cost management, reinforces our path toward sustainable profitable growth in interactive. Importantly, the healthy operating trends we experienced across both our Retail and Interactive segments continued through October. Of note, this past Halloween weekend marked one of our top revenue-producing weekends in all of 2026. Regional gaming in the U.S. continues to benefit from customers staying closer to home in this environment of elevated inflation and gas prices, and we're not seeing any signs of this slowing up.

With that, I'll turn it over to Felicia.

Thanks, Jay. Our Retail segment generated third-quarter revenues of $1.5 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $502 million, which reflects year-over-year growth of 5% in revenues and 7.7% in adjusted EBITDA respectively, while same-store revenues and adjusted EBITDA grew approximately 1% and 5%, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA margins were 33.7%, which represented an improvement of 84 basis points year-over-year.

We generated flow-through of 50% in the third quarter, which was higher year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, reflecting our property team's best-in-class cost discipline and execution. Importantly, we saw broad-based strength across the portfolio as demand remained stable and our completed development projects continue to ramp. Further, rated revenue has grown for 8 consecutive quarters, with the third quarter delivering the second-largest increase over this period.

We are raising our full-year 2026 Retail revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance by $16 million and $10 million respectively to reflect our better-than-expected results in the third quarter and current trends. As such, our revised 2026 revenue guidance is now $5.89 billion, and for adjusted EBITDA, our new guidance is $1.973 billion.

Our Interactive segment generated revenues of $348.4 million in the third quarter, including a Skins tax gross-up of $191.4 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $18.3 million. Notably, excluding our third-quarter investment in our Alberta launch, adjusted EBITDA has improved sequentially in each quarter of 2026. We experienced growth across our key focus areas, U.S. iCasino and Canadian operations. These increases were offset by expected lower volumes across U.S. online sports betting and U.S. integrated iCasino, as well as customer-friendly OSB outcomes. And as Jay mentioned, we generated significant improvement in year-over-year gross profit margin in the quarter.

As we look ahead, we expect fourth-quarter revenue of $445 million for our Interactive segment, including $242 million in Skins tax gross-up and revenues excluding Skins tax gross-up of $203 million. Fourth-quarter adjusted EBITDA guidance is $18.7 million, which will bring us to a loss of $20 million for the full year, inclusive of a $20 million investment for our Alberta launch.

Our fourth-quarter guidance assumes continued revenue growth in two of our key strategic focus areas, U.S. standalone iCasino and Canadian operations, while we expect U.S. online sports betting and U.S. integrated iCasino trends to continue adjusting to normalized levels post theScore Bet rebrand.

Additionally, our outlook reflects continued year-over-year improvement in unit economics, building on third-quarter results, where adjusted gross profit margin expanded significantly year-over-year. We note that our updated 2026 Skins tax gross-up guidance is approximately $25 million lower than our previous guidance, with slightly less than half of that reduction reflected in the third-quarter results. The remainder reflects updated fourth-quarter assumptions based on recent tax payment trends, primarily related to partners with fixed-fee agreements. It's important to note that our revised Skins tax gross-up guidance has no impact on our projected revenue share from our Skins partners, given the fixed-fee arrangements I just mentioned.

We expect the other category adjusted EBITDA to be negative $122 million for 2026. The $3 million increase from our previous guidance reflects legal fees associated with obtaining a favorable tax ruling in the third quarter.

The table on Page 8 of our earnings release summarizes our cash expenditures in the quarter, including cash payments to our REIT landlords, cash taxes, cash interest on traditional debt, and total CapEx. Of our total $59 million of CapEx in the quarter, $17 million was project CapEx primarily related to our development projects. We ended the third quarter with total liquidity of $2 billion, inclusive of $1 billion in cash and cash equivalents. We ended the third quarter with lease-adjusted net leverage and traditional net leverage of 5.6x and 2.3x respectively as we continue to delever.

Looking towards the end of the year, and as we highlight on Slide 5 of our earnings deck, we anticipate 2026 lease-adjusted net leverage to improve by approximately 1.5 turns and traditional net leverage to improve by approximately 2.4 turns year-over-year.

For 2026 cash interest expense net of interest income, we continue to project $150 million. As of the third quarter, our mix of fixed and floating debt on a traditional leverage basis was 50:50, and on a lease-adjusted basis, our fixed-to-floating mix was approximately 85:15. Our debt maturity profile provides us with a significant runway.

Our strong and improving liquidity position provides us with the flexibility to address our $400 million of 5 and 5/8 notes maturing in January 2027, after which we will have no additional maturities until 2029. We are reiterating our 2026 maintenance CapEx guidance of $220 million, while our 2026 project CapEx has been refined to $170 million from our prior $180 million guidance, bringing our total 2026 CapEx guidance to $390 million from our prior $400 million guidance.

We continue to expect total cash payments under our triple net leases to be $1 billion in 2026. For cash taxes, our outlook is unchanged. We do not expect to be a cash taxpayer in 2026. And our fully diluted weighted average common share count at the end of the third quarter was 135.4 million shares. RSUs and stock options are diluted by about 2 million shares annually.

Now I will turn it back to Jay.

All right. Thanks, Felicia. As you can see, we continue to execute against our 2026 strategic priorities during the third quarter. As always, I would like to take the opportunity to thank our amazing team members across PENN for continuing to provide our guests a best-in-class customer experience and for helping us achieve record quarterly Retail segment revenue and improve Interactive profitability. During the balance of the year and as we head into 2027, we will remain focused on growing cash flow, reducing leverage, optimizing our corporate overhead, and maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation.

With that, Aaron, we will open up the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] We will take our first question from Brandt Montour with Barclays.

Congratulations on this result, everyone, and raising your guidance here. Maybe just starting off, the implied fourth quarter guidance has a little bit of a sequential downtick. I just want to make sure, is there anything sort of 1x that you are rolling over or lapping any of the segments in particular? Of the growth that you do imply in the fourth quarter, which is a solid growth rate, don't get me wrong, what is the split of that between new projects and sort of unaffected same-store?

Yes, Brandt, so the mix would be very similar to Q3 in terms of contribution to that revenue and EBITDA growth as we continue to ramp our development projects and continue to feel really good, positive about same-store sales growth across the rest of the portfolio. The guide itself, when you break it down, it would represent the second-highest growth rate both on the top line and bottom line of the year, right behind the third quarter. Does it turn out to be conservative? We will have to wait and see. We did not feel like we wanted to get over our skis. We are 1 month into the fourth quarter. We posted a strong month. The next 2 months, you can have weather impacts. We have a lot of properties in the Midwest, Northeast. We also just broke ground on Council Bluffs. We do not expect there to be any material impact.

We are building in the parking lot, but it does eat up into a little bit of parking. We are just, I think, trying to play it safe here, and we will see where we come out, but we are off to a good start here in the fourth quarter.

I would also add, our fourth quarter guidance does imply growth both with the development projects and also excluding the development projects, so growth on a same-store sales basis as well.

And then a follow-up. Maybe if you could talk a little bit more about the start in Alberta and what you've seen so far from competition there, how folks have sort of launched. Is it similar in effect to Ontario, and where are you sort of tracking versus your internal expectations?

I'm happy to lead, Aaron, feel free to jump in. It was definitely more It was busier at the starting gate than it was in Ontario. You'll recall in Ontario, there were some staggered starts by some of the big names, and in this case, I think everybody was pretty much at the starting gate at the same time. You also had incumbent gray market operators that were flipping over to a regulated business model. So it was busy at the starting gate.

I would say that we're pleased with how we've started in Alberta. The market results came out for July, which was partial month, and then August, September, so we got 2.5 months' worth of data. Two things of note, I think, at a high level is that we're off to a really strong start on online sports betting. We're already scratching at our same market share levels that we deliver in Ontario through the first few months in Alberta, so that's very encouraging.

I would say on the iCasino side, we're about halfway to where we are in Ontario. The more encouraging part on the iGaming side is that perhaps because it's a more mature market in Alberta from the gray markets, the TAM on iCasino looks a lot larger than we anticipated. Sports betting TAM looks about what we expected. Market share, we're performing very well, very close to Ontario level market share. Alberta iCasino, the TAM looks larger than we expected, and our market share, we've got a lot of running room, but we're off to a solid start with more opportunity for upside.

Yes, I mean, not much to add. I would say that the theScore brand in Canada is really helping us. Our share of voice in our marketing is very good. On the OSB side, our handle share grew each month since launch faster than market too. As Jay said, we feel really good about our start.

We will take our next question from Barry Jonas with Truist.

Jay, can you maybe talk about any potential implications you see for PENN from the midterm elections? We are hearing more enthusiasm for Texas, so maybe talk about your positioning there, and any other potential state implications would be great. Thank you.

Yes, happy to, Barry. I would say, just sort of taking a step back before I get into the particulars of certain states, I think Tuesday night was a good day and a good night, I think, for the sector in a lot of ways, and it was certainly a really good day and night for PENN specifically. We don't talk about it every call because it just hasn't been a topic of conversation, and it hasn't really been, I would say, not even hot, it hasn't even really been warm for a variety of reasons. But we have been making investments in the State of Texas for decades, and we have been operating as we own 2 of the 3 class 1 thoroughbred racetracks in Texas, which is Retama, right outside of San Antonio, kind of a little bit in between San Antonio and Austin, great location.

Our other tier 1 or class 1 racetrack, thoroughbred racetrack, is Sam Houston, obviously, in Houston, Texas. The third of those tracks is owned by the Chickasaw Nation, who we have a great relationship with, in the Dallas-Fort Worth market. We actually have been operating in the gaming space through horse racing in Texas for a long time. We've got 22 great assets there, and we're ready to play offense. It's not a defensive play for us.

We also, I think, are positioned well in that we have great relationships with the movers and shakers in Texas. We don't need to get into names and entities, but we've got very strong aligned relationships there, and we have a great lobbying team, I think one of the best we have across the country. We feel really good about the opportunity.

It's always hard to predict what's going to happen. Obviously, you have a new governor, new party there. The House flipped, the Senate did not. What does that all mean when you put it in and just kind of stir it around? We're not sure what comes out, but we will be spending even more time than we typically do in the State of Texas, and we'll be ready for whatever comes out of Texas. But we think we're positioned as well, if not better, than really anybody in the sector if something does happen in Texas. Look, the other states, I would say, before I get into potential retail gaming expansion, for example, potentially in Georgia could happen, given the changes there.

I do think that when you're looking at some of the states that we've talked about from a skill-based gaming perspective, Tuesday was a great day. You had, I would say, most of the pro skill-based game advocates at the state lawmaker level either lost outright or lost a lot of influence and power in those elections in those 2 states. That's good for the industry. It's really good for PENN because we have a lot of properties in those 2 states, 4 in Pennsylvania, plus a VGT route operation business, as well as 3 in Missouri. We've talked before about how in Missouri, since the AG, who I think is a rock star in Missouri, has been shutting down the skill-based games there, Missouri's been producing very strong revenue numbers on a year-over-year basis in 2026. I don't think that's by coincidence.

As we highlight Pennsylvania, which, as you know, the law was changed, skill-based, illegal, should have always been illegal, but determined by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The shutdown date was October 14. I also don't think it's a coincidence that October represents the strongest year-over-year gaming revenue growth that we've seen in Pennsylvania in all of 2026, and it was largely fueled by the back half of the month. I don't know if that continues into future months. I don't know how long it lasts. We'll see what happens legislatively. I do know that was a very good day overall for the industry and certainly for PENN.

I think the last one probably worth highlighting was there was a potential license that was floating in Indiana. There were 3 counties that had a referendum on whether they wanted to host that last casino license. All 3 of them said no. I think that's good as it relates to the incumbent operators in Indiana and Illinois and Ohio. For us, that was also a really good outcome. As you talk about and look out over the coming quarters, what's been really helpful on that same-store sales basis is we just haven't had the headwinds, the whack-a-mole of, these markets are doing great, but 2 new casinos across the state or in this market are hitting us. It looks really good for PENN as you look out into 2027, 2028. We don't have any new big competitors hitting us. Same-store sales look healthy, regional gaming's strong, and our development projects are delivering, and we got more in the queue. So we're feeling really good about that.

Just as a quick follow-up, any updated thoughts on the M&A environment and your appetite there? I know there's some open processes going on, and your balance sheet is obviously getting better and better. Just curious if any updated thoughts there.

Yes, I'm going to try to be as crystal clear as I can on this. I feel like we try to be on the calls, then we hit conferences, and I feel like it's a mixed message. Here's the capital allocation priorities for PENN. Number one, delever. We've been delevering. I think that is great for the company. It's great for our shareholders. We have been talking and spending more and more time with quality, long-only, long-focused, long-term shareholders because they see the leverage profile coming back down. We're going to have a one handle in front of our traditional net leverage in the very near future, and our goal is to have a 4 handle in front of that lease- adjusted net leverage in the very near future, and they're both within sight.

So that is going to be priority number one, has been, will continue to be for the foreseeable future. Do stock buybacks look interesting when your free cash flow yield is over 20% and your business feels as strong as PENN's does? Absolutely, and that's a conversation that we will continue to have at the board level as we go into 2027. I would say delevering is still priority one, but we have to be talking about potentially buying back shares, returning capital to shareholders at these free cash flow yields. #3, we have already opened 4 new growth projects. We have 2 more that we've announced that are in the queue, one opening in 2028 in Council Bluffs, one opening in 2029 in New Orleans.

We have a handful of others that we're continuing to analyze internally, and when we have the conviction that the return profile on one or more of those projects looks similar to the ones we've opened and/or announced, then you'll hear more about that. That's within our control. That's why we love those projects, because we've now opened 3, 2 water-to-land projects, 2 new hotels. The ones that we're analyzing is a combination of those two things, and we feel like we have a good handle on what to expect based on where you're building and what you're building and what the market looks like. So the conviction around the return profile would be much stronger on those internal projects than they would be necessarily on something externally. Then last on that order of 3 would be potential M&A.

Think about the hurdle you have to cross if you're going to do something from an M&A perspective. It's going to have to be a very high implied free cash flow return and carry very little risk. As I've said before, it also needs to have strategic value for us. Is it a new market? Is it a large database? Those would be the factors that we would be considering. So strongest would be delevering, definitely looking at share repurchases as we head into 2027 as an option for capital allocation. Internal projects, high priority, continuing to analyze. Last would be M&A, not a high priority at PENN right now.

We will take our next question from Sam Nielsen with JPMorgan.

It is Sam on for Dan. The margins in the South were higher than we had expected and up meaningfully year-over-year. I know you were lapping the launch of a competitor opening last year in the market, which had an impact, but wondering if there is anything else that drove the strength there, or any one-timers to call out?

No one-timers to call out, which is good. I would say it is more of what you said. We did have a competitor that opened in Bossier City, Louisiana, in Q1 of last year, and so every quarter that you have lapped that, from an anniversary perspective, business tends to look a little bit better. Our team in Bossier City, led by Maureen Wasloski, is doing a fantastic job, continues to. Harold Rowland, who oversees all of Louisiana, and his primary day job is running our L'Auberge Lake Charles property, our largest revenue-producing property, had a fantastic quarter. Top line, bottom line, gaming, non-gaming, we have been making a lot of investments, hotel renovation, new restaurants, gaming floor changes, and Harold and team, Maureen and team are doing a fantastic job in the South.

If I could follow-up quickly, wondering if you could talk about costs in Interactive in the quarter. Looking back at the second quarter, I think comp and benefits were down about 36%, advertising was down more than 50%. Should we expect a similar rate of decline across those two buckets in this quarter?

Well, I think what you can see is we continue to be very meticulous in our marketing, very focused. G&A is coming down. I think if you think about our business, when we were built to be a mass-scale business on the technology and vendor side, we've been finding a lot of opportunity there, and that still continues. We still see a line of sight of continuous improvement there. So I think you can continue to see that happen through future quarters.

We will take our next question from Joe Stauff with Susquehanna.

Can I just follow-up on the earlier Pennsylvania question? Do we know, is it possible to analyze essentially the Pennsylvania AG's approach or views in terms of trying to figure out who's going to prosecute the illegal games now, similar to what the Missouri AG has done?

Well, I would just say that enforcement since October 14th has been real. We're encouraged by the fact that this is not just a date and words. There's been some force behind that. We've seen these games being shut down. I think the AG and others, local law enforcement, are doing a very good job across the State of Pennsylvania. It's a large state. There's a lot to do. I'm guessing that not all of them have been turned off, but I would say that most of them probably have, and you'll continue to see that.

I think what is interesting, in addition to the comments I made earlier about the State of Pennsylvania and our strongest year-over-year revenue result of the year in October, again, backend fueled, is that most of that growth is coming from the unrated segment, which to me tells you exactly what's happening here.

A lot of these guests are guests that maybe used to be in our database, are no longer in our database, or were never in our database, but these are customers that do like to play on machines. They may not know the difference between skill, illegal, and go into a casino and play a real slot machine. That's by design by these skill-based operators. We are seeing some nice growth there. Now, if you take a step back even further, if you're a state lawmaker, if you're the governor, house speaker, senate president, anyone in Pennsylvania, I think this is a great opportunity to take a step back and look at what's happened here. You've shut down an illegal business. That's great. That's what we're supposed to do.

In addition to that, customers that were engaging with these machines are now going to your regulated and highly taxed business. We were taxed at over 50% of our slot revenues in Pennsylvania. So they're going to see, I would imagine, if others are feeling what we're feeling, the State of Pennsylvania, from a tax revenue, tax generation perspective in the industry, is going to have a very good month in October. I don't think that's by coincidence, and I think that that's something that should be eye-opening for everyone here about whether you regulate and tax or you just keep these things shut down because they were illegal.

If it is VGTs and it is done the right way and it is done in partnership with the land-based industry that has made all these investments and employs thousands of people and pays hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue every year, that is a different conversation. But skill-based games should be gone forever.

Just to clarify, a quick one on Alberta. You had said it was similar to Ontario or approaching what you have in Ontario. Is it still fair to say that number is 9%-10% share?

Yes, you are exactly right, Joe. We have always said, very low double digit on the OSB market share in Ontario, and we are super close to hitting that number after the first 3 months in Alberta, and it has momentum, as you heard from Aaron. Our sports betting handle has actually been outpacing the market when you look on a month-over-month basis over the first 3 months. So we are encouraged by what we are seeing. It is early days, but we are off to a really encouraging start there.

We will move next to Jordan Bender with Citizens.

Looking at the non-development retail property performance, if my math is correct, I am getting flow through something around 60% in the third quarter. And Jay, based on your commentary, it might be something around that in the fourth quarter as well. As I think to the back half of the year here, I mean, are you guys seeing an acceleration, whether it is in underlying performance, whether the cost structure is looking better? Just any comments you have there.

I would say it is really more, Jordan, steady than anything else. It has been a steady year for us. I do think sometimes the investors get caught up in the monthly reporting of numbers. In July, there was exuberance, August, there was depression, and then September, it all kind of settled out. So you have to look at combining multiple months. Calendars mean a lot in this regional gaming business.

July was a perfect calendar. August was as imperfect as you could get in terms of weekend days and the Labor Day orientation, which fell almost entirely in September, or did fall entirely in September this year and almost entirely in August last year.

September was a good month. Not quite July, because we did not have exactly the calendar orientation, but it was a great month and/or very solid month. July was great. August was not great for lots of reasons. October, we are off to a really strong start here in the fourth quarter. I would say it is really more, you look at same-store sales growth and the flow through.

Our teams are doing an amazing job of growing revenues responsibly, which is why you see the same-store sales Felicia talked about earlier, outside of our development projects, top line 1%, bottom line 5%. You do not see a lot in the space producing that right now, and I think it is all by design, sharing of best practices and doing what I think PENN does better than anybody, which is just constantly getting better. It helps that we do not have new openings impacting us negatively, as I talked about earlier.

Just a follow-up. In the West segment, margins compressed again. I think you called out bad hold in the quarter. Is that the primary factor there?

Primary, yes. I mean, look, there is, I would say, three things. You had a low table hold at M Resort, cost us a couple million bucks. You had a couple of one-time accounting items at 2 other properties in the West that cost us roughly $1 million. So that is three. I think that is clean to add that back in if you are looking at true performance. The last factor is Vegas was a little soft in the third quarter, but you have heard that from others that have a more concentrated position in Las Vegas. I do not think anybody was happy with their results in the third quarter in Las Vegas, but the hotel is performing well. Occupancy is at or above where we expected it to be in the new tower.

Our rates are good, and the forward bookings around group business and banquet business look a lot stronger as we start 2027 and all the way through 2027, as far out as we can book right now, up 55% year-over-year. So we expect great things from Las Vegas. It was a little bit of a soft quarter for all of Las Vegas. M felt a little bit of that, but there were also some one-time items that impacted us in the quarter.

We will move next to Lizzie Dove with Goldman Sachs.

This is Joey on for Lizzie. Obviously, you've shown very solid momentum in your Retail business over the course of 2026. Just curious to get your thoughts as you look to 2027. Can you talk about some of the factors that give you confidence that the momentum can continue? Any key considerations as we head into next year, including the health of your consumer, the ramp of some of your recently opened properties, and any other factors that we should consider as we head into 2027?

Yes, happy to. I think, look, 2027 looks like a pretty clean year for us in terms of more of what we talked about, stability from a same-store sales perspective. We don't see any significant impacts to us from a competitive perspective in any of our key markets with new properties or major expansions. There's always little ones here and there, but I don't think anything noteworthy or material that's worth mentioning. Our development projects, we're going to have all 4 of them that are continuing to ramp.

Those businesses do get better over time in terms of revenue generation and margin profile, so we should benefit from some of that. Then, you have a portfolio of 40 properties across 19 markets. You're always going to have some that are just a little on the softer side. Tunica's not a super robust market right now.

I give our team a ton of kudos for continuing to work really hard to generate improved results on a bottom line perspective, because top line is strained. So you've always got some markets, like in Mississippi, small property in Illinois, that are challenging environments. But I would say we always have that in the portfolio. When you peel that out, you're looking at a same-store sales growth environment that should continue to be good for regional gaming, all things being equal, from a macroeconomic perspective. Our development projects are going to continue to ramp. So we're feeling like 2027 should be a pretty clean year for Retail.

We will take our next question from Jeff Stantial with Stifel.

Wanted to follow-up on Barry's question from earlier on M&A. Obviously, the priority for now is deleverage and execution on the growth CapEx pipeline. Jay, in the past, you've talked about sort of longer term, more high-level potential interest in expanding onto the Las Vegas Strip, given some compelling rationale around marketing and ability to cross-sell and things of that nature. I guess my question is, does the softer summer results out of Vegas and what seems to be yet again another cycle of sort of proving out better resilience in your regional markets, does that sort of temper your enthusiasm at all as you think about sort of that rationale?

I don't know. Look, that hub-and-spoke model to Las Vegas Strip, it works. We know that. I used to work at Caesars. Caesars Rewards, powerful database. It works for MGM, regional feeding into Las Vegas, tax rate differential. There's arbitrage to some degree there. So it works. There's no question. It would have to be really compelling, right price, right location. Who is the seller? What happens when they unplug their loyalty program versus when you plug yours in? There's all these factors that we've been through this before in terms of acquiring assets from large companies that have large databases and really powerful loyalty programs and have a good feel for what the impact, usually negative, obviously, certainly the first couple of years, would have.

I don't know that there's going to be a lot of alignment, at least currently, or anytime in the near future from the buyer and the seller of what is the value of those assets. What's the true EBITDA on a standalone basis when you take it out of the loyalty program? So it really does depend. I'm not super optimistic that something like that would be in our near future. Would we always be interested in kicking tires? Of course. Hub-and-spoke works. We have an extremely valuable regional database. We have the broadest footprint. We operate in more states than anyone in the country, anyone in the sector.

Plugging that into a Las Vegas quality asset at a great location would provide a lot of value, but we're not going to do that for anyone else unless there's a lot of value opportunity, realization opportunity for PENN. So it'll happen at some point, I believe. I don't know when, but it's going to have to be the right opportunity. I wouldn't get caught up in the Las Vegas Strip. Leisure travel and some destination business is a little soft right now. It tends to be cyclical. Las Vegas has had some great years, mostly great years, and some challenging years. But overall, it's a great market. There's nothing like Las Vegas in the world, and we would love to be there. But again, it would have to be the right opportunity, right price, right location, right everything.

Maybe switching gears over more to the line of thinking on legislation. I think there was a proposal earlier this week out of Colorado that would raise the effective tax rate on the brick-and-mortar side. I'm curious, Jay, just how do you think about that secular risk here that states need to plug deficits with federal funding cuts and things of that nature, that they look to brick and mortar as opposed to online as a source of tax revenues? I guess from your standpoint, is there anything you can be, you are currently doing to educate lawmakers on potential negative ripple effects to jobs and investment and things of that nature?

Yes. Happy to jump in. Look, we were as surprised as you were to read that one. Usually, if there's even a thought of something like this, then you would have the governor and team administration reaching out to the industry to have a conversation. We've been, as an industry, very good to Colorado, and my gut tells me that the incoming governor is going to take a fresh look at that proposed budget by the outgoing governor. That was a weak move to do something like that on your way out, bunch of tax increase proposals, and then, oh, by the way, hand it off to the new governor.

So I anticipate cooler heads will prevail, common sense will prevail. Look, if you take a step back specifically about the industry, we're not hearing any of this. We weren't hearing it in Colorado.

I think that the gaming industry is recognized as a legitimate entertainment industry and is viewed that way. We pay significant tax dollars already. We invest a lot of money with constituents in those states and the communities in which we operate. Very proud of that as a participant in this sector, and certainly our track record at PENN speaks to that as well.

I think that Colorado specifically, if you're the incoming governor, you can do something like that. Think about the implications. You raise taxes in Colorado, the market there, remember, the retail casinos are all based in the mining towns in the mountains. You have to really want to visit because it's an hour-and-a-half to 2-hour drive from the major metro areas of Denver and Colorado Springs into those mining towns.

So if you increase the tax rates, then the casinos are going to have to make cuts to payroll, make cuts to marketing, and now people, instead of driving to the mining towns, maybe fly to Las Vegas, and you wake up one day and say, "Wow, we raised the tax rates. We didn't generate more taxes, and look what's happened here, the aftermath."

So we look forward to sitting down with the new governor and his team and look forward to engaging in this exact conversation and helping out and educating, to your point. But we're not hearing this or seeing this in other markets. I think our industry has been embraced as a legitimate business partner in almost every state where we operate over the years.

We will move next to Steve Pizzella with Deutsche Bank.

As we lap the opening of Joliet and continue to see the monthly GGR data out of Illinois, can you talk about what you are seeing on the cost side, even as revenue growth moderates as expected? Is the property continuing to become more profitable as you optimize the OpEx space?

Absolutely, Steve. Again, we just closed the books on October, and I would tell you that top-line growth, there is a little bit there, which we are encouraged by, given that Aurora is opened and we have already lapped the anniversary with some very strong opening months at Joliet that we are now comping on top of.

What is most important, and we talked about this when we first opened Joliet, is that once you get to that 12 to 14, 15-month post-opening, you really start to stabilize from a margin profile perspective, and our margins year-over-year in October look very different in Joliet. That will be the same when we hit the 12- to 15-month point post-opening of M Resort, of Columbus, and of Aurora as well. But we are delivering on what we said we would at Joliet, and we will at the other 3 projects as well.

Then on the Interactive side, as we look into 2027 and begin to lap some of these Interactive OpEx reductions also, how much additional OpEx opportunity remains?

I touched on this a little bit earlier. This is Aaron. Look, I still think we're going to continue to right-size the business based on what we're seeing, especially since we've rebranded. There continues to be opportunities in our vendor and technology costs, and we're still going to stay really smart, focused on our marketing, making sure that we're retaining the best mid- and high-value users as well. So that will continue through all of next year and beyond.

We will move next to John DeCree with CBRE.

Jay, you provide a great color on kind of the post-election outlook and where you might see some opportunities. If I missed, I apologize. I was wondering if you could kind of give us thoughts on any change in trajectory for iGaming or iCasino legislation post-election. I guess I will throw Quebec in there, which seems to be thinking about opening up as well.

Yes. I think there is probably going to continue. I will start with the second part of your question. I would be surprised if there will not continue to be conversation at the other provinces in Canada. I think Ontario has been a really good story, both from an OSB and iGaming perspective, tax generation, and delivering on what the province there was hoping to deliver on.

Alberta is off to a great start, so I would imagine other provinces are going to be looking at what Ontario and Alberta were able to achieve and probably continuing to take a close look at that. So I am encouraged that that will likely play out over the coming quarters and years. We are positioned, as Aaron said earlier on the call, very well in Canada.

I think Alberta's early results are proving out that theScore is a Canadian brand, it is not an Ontario brand, and our market share results are going to, I think, showcase that as well. I think as it relates to iGaming, not a whole lot changed, I think, on Tuesday, even if in some cases, governor position may have changed or flipped parties, but maybe the House didn't or the Senate didn't. Take Ohio as an example. I think Governor Acton, who is now going to be in office at the start of the year, was definitely more pro or at least open to iGaming expansion. You still have a Senate and a House there that are Republican, and so it is always hard to handicap how those things will play out.

We look forward to spending time with the new governor and her team and talking about the benefits, if done right, with iGaming legislation in a state like Ohio. I think D.C. and Virginia seem to probably be the warmest in terms of potential, what is next from an iGaming legalization perspective. Outside of that, I didn't really see much that happened on Tuesday night changing the trajectory of iGaming. I think it is going to continue to probably roll out, but it will be a slower rollout, obviously, than sports betting was. Although, as I have said before, I think once you hit one of those Midwest states that are all kind of clustered together, Iowa, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, one of those, I think that the other states will probably start to accelerate in terms of how they think about the timing of legalizing iGaming.

Yes, thanks, Jay. That makes sense. If I could ask a quick follow-up on the stat about outer market guests at the 2 new hotels is 86%, and 93% coming from maybe 3 hours away on cash pay. Was that something that you guys had contemplated when you underwrote? Is that a surprise to the upside? Curious if you have any thoughts on that consumer and what's pulling them to the property. Are they gaming-first trips? Are they coming to see you, or are these customers that just need a good hotel capacity in the area, and you're the beneficiary of putting in a brand-new product, and it's an additional customer acquisition channel for you? Just curious on your thoughts. That statistic seemed really interesting to us.

Yes, I would say probably more the latter of the two that you laid out, although I'd say both. In the case of Columbus, you don't have much supply in the market of quality hotel products, and we delivered on that. There's a lot of demand, even for people that are not gamblers, our cash revenue, so we call it non-gaming, but just call it our non-gaming cash revenue in both Columbus and Aurora out of the hotel and food and beverage and entertainment has been higher than what we anticipated. I think that speaks a lot to that demand from the outer markets, and some of that's gaming, but a lot of it's just leisure, it's business, it's transient. We're very pleased because they are spending when they're on property. We have great food and beverage venues and entertainment venues.

The monetization on the non-gaming side of things, both in Columbus and Aurora, we knew it would be at M, and it has been. I would say Aurora and Columbus have been a pleasant surprise for us, and we don't see that slowing down as word of mouth continues to get out about what a quality experience we're offering there.

We will move next to Chad Beynon with Macquarie.

Aaron, understanding that most of your profits in Interactive are going to be driven from Canada, are you seeing any prediction market impact down here in the U.S. in terms of customer acquisition cost or overall consumer MAUs maybe moving to a different product?

Well, nothing material. If you look at our investment strategy, we're really focusing on iCasino in the U.S. because it is challenging on the acquisition side for sports and noisy. But we're seeing a lot of growth on the casino side and in Canada, so that's where most of our investment is. So we're not getting sucked into the noise of prediction markets. But it is aggressive on a user acquisition side. We're staying away from that, though.

Jay, when you talked about some of the, I guess, the priority ladder in terms of your capital allocation, third was growth projects. As we look beyond the two that you've announced, are there additional locations where you would look to potentially expand? And with the rising interest rates and rising cost of projects, how's that factoring into potentially adding new growth projects?

Yes. Chad, I would say our design and construction team is, like our operations team, is best in class. They've done an amazing job. As you know, the 4 that we've opened, there was a lot of cost creep in the years that we were under construction. We didn't change the budget at all. I would say that they also -- our design and construction team feels very comfortable with the budgets that we've publicized for Council Bluffs and for New Orleans. We'll make sure that's the case for any of these other projects as well. If that factors into the return profile, then you may punt on that for a year or two until things stabilize.

I would say right now, our teams are doing such a good job on keeping control of this cost creep and delivering on budgets and on the product and delivering on time. We have not seen that as an issue. If it were becoming an issue because of the data center build-out that's happening across the country, or at least proposed build-out, looks like Tuesday night may slow that down a bit, which could be good for bringing construction costs back in line maybe from where they were a year-ago versus where they were projected to be a year out.

We will move next to Ben Chaiken with Mizuho.

Maybe a follow-up. Recognizing it's only a few weeks of data, Jay, but your comments on Pennsylvania are very encouraging. Are you considering doing anything differently, knowing that there's a potential group of unrated customers coming out of hibernation, so to speak? Meaning, do you try and get more proactive with this group?

It's a great question. We were actually emailing with our property leaders in Pennsylvania last night on this very topic, and the answer is yes. I mean, you know that there's going to be more customers out in the market. So making sure that we're speaking to those customers through social media, other marketing channels, and maybe advertising. So nothing crazy. I think all within how we budget today, but maybe just the allocation of dollars would target maybe more of a retail unrated customer versus and then really continue to focus on your direct communications with your database customers and VIPs. There's definitely an opportunity during this period of time where skill games have been shut down and customers do like to engage in slot machine-like devices, so yes.

Remember too, in Pennsylvania, beyond the 4 casinos that we have, we also are a route operator, a VGT route operator at truck stops. The business there has been robust in October. We're talking like 30-plus percent growth, which again, that's all taxed at a very high level with states because it is regulated and taxed. Pennsylvania, even beyond what you see in the reported numbers, these truck stop locations and route operations are seeing even more pronounced growth so far since the ban went in place.

Maybe switching gears, just any more color on the M that you can provide, maybe what's resonating with consumers? Also remind us, I know we've talked about it in the past, but maybe just remind us, is this destination or more local clientele that have driven the sequential improvement post-investment?

Yes, M definitely is hybrid. You were correct on both. I would say during the week, it is more local casino-focused and convention group business-focused. On weekends, it's much more of a destination for Southern California, 2-day trip, 3-day trip. We have great non-gaming amenities. Our food and beverage there is as good as anything on the Strip. We have a great pool area, great spa, destination entertainment, and we have hundreds of thousands of square feet of meeting space, and the group business is a significant business for us. That second tower was a no-brainer because we were just groups that liked us were outgrowing us, and we would lose them to the Strip. We're seeing them come back to the M starting in late 2026, 2027. A lot of those group planners don't want to go off of a drawing.

They actually want to see the finished product, and so they waited until it opened 10, 11 months ago, and now they're starting to book again. Obviously, we're generating a lot of new business at the M Resort as well. Gaming volumes have been great. We're breaking records every quarter since we opened the hotel. Non-gaming, we're continuing to see really nice progress, and it looks better as we look out into 2027.

Why don't we -- Aaron? Sorry, Ben. Why don't we grab one more question, Aaron?

Certainly. We will take our final question from Trey Bowers with Wells Fargo.

I guess, first question would be, really appreciate the commentary on just kind of where the stock's at and how cheap it is, and you guys targeting some leverage ratios for next year. I guess my question is, why not do both in the interim? Why not continue to delever and buy back stock? Or is there something from a covenant perspective that precludes you guys from doing any buyback before you cross that maybe 5x rent- adjusted line?

Yes, Trey Bowers, there's nothing in our covenants. I mean, this really reflects the strategy that Jay Snowden laid out and one that we've stood by all year. I think that the one thing to think about is, as an OpCo, one of the best drivers of value, in our view, is to de-risk our balance sheet. It's not only our view. When you talk to the majority of the investors that we talk to, also view that similarly. As you know, our $1 billion of rent gets capitalized on our balance sheet by the majority of our investors and the sell-side research analysts. So returning to that sub-5x and sub-2x level is really important, and it's an important objective of ours because we believe that it drives shareholder value.

So given our strong liquidity, we can also invest in our business while delevering, and those are our two priorities. As Jay Snowden mentioned, at a free cash flow yield of about 20% on 2027 consensus estimates, share repurchases are also front of mind. But when we think about our priorities right now, it's delevering and investing in our own growth.

Then just a quick one then on digital. I think some other questions have kind of flirted around this, but one, you guys, I think, are about to put up the best EBITDA quarter ever in that business. And two, any thoughts on kind of like a margin target for that business? Post new market launches, are the days of negative EBITDA in that digital business kind of behind us at this point?

Yes. We won't get into the margin profile. We'll guide on our February call for 2027, and I think we'll be in a position to probably talk a little bit about 2028 as well in terms of how we're thinking about 2027 and 2028. 2027 will be profitable for the year. You can take that to the bank. Q4 this year will be profitable. We were in October and actually a little ahead of where we expected to be, so we're feeling really good about that. I would say it's largely in the rearview mirror. There could always be an anomaly of a low hold quarter that impacts us or a new market that's opening in a new province in Canada. So similar to what we did with Alberta here in Q3, you'd make an investment.

But I would say, generally speaking, we're at a point where we have a really good handle on the business. We have a really good handle on the cost structure. It's going to continue to get better, and we love that our iGaming mix is now roughly 50% of our Interactive revenue, non-Skins revenue, and that should continue to grow as time goes, and that's a much more predictable revenue stream at a much higher margin profile. So feeling really good as we look out on the Interactive business.

Okay. Trey, thanks for the question. Thank you, everyone, for joining, and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Bye for now.

Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.

Greetings, and welcome to the PENN Entertainment Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Tasha. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining PENN Entertainment's 2026 Second Quarter Conference Call and Webcast. We'll get to management's comments and presentation momentarily as well as your Q&A. [Operator Instructions] I'll briefly review the safe harbor disclosure, and then we'll get right into the call.

Please note that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For more information, please see our press release for details on specific risk factors.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Penn's CEO, Jay Snowden. Jay, please go ahead.

Thanks, Joe, and good morning. I'm joined here by Felicia Hendrix and Aaron LaBerge as well as other members of the senior management team.

As you'll see from our release and investor presentation, we continue to execute against our 2026 strategic priorities during the second quarter. We're on track to deliver more than 20% year-over-year adjusted EBITDAR growth this year, driven by strong performance across our retail portfolio and significant adjusted EBITDA improvement in our Interactive segment.

This growth, combined with our corporate overhead optimization is benefiting cash flow growth, which in turn is enabling us to delever our balance sheet this year faster than originally expected.

PENN's best-in-class property level management teams delivered impressive results for the Retail segment, achieving record quarterly revenues in Q2. This performance was reflected across the portfolio with 9 properties setting Q2 records for both revenues and adjusted EBITDAR.

We also saw another quarter of year-over-year growth in rated revenue, supported by meaningful contributions from mid- and high worth customer segments as well as growth in unrated revenue, which has now increased in 5 of the last 7 quarters, underscoring broad-based consumer demand. This momentum continued through July.

Slide 8 in our investor presentation highlights the combination of internal growth drivers and external market tailwinds that support our longer-term retail growth outlook, including our PENN Play loyalty program and omnichannel strategy, our strategic investments in both gaming and non-gaming amenities, our ongoing retail development project pipeline, limited new competitive supply and third-party investments that are helping to drive economic growth in a few of our key markets.

The Interactive segment delivered another quarter of meaningful adjusted EBITDA improvement year-over-year as we continue to execute on our strategy of focusing on growth in our U.S. iCasino and Canadian operations to improve profitability.

Our U.S. Hollywood branded standalone casino app generated quarter-over-quarter as well as year-over-year growth, achieving record revenues in Q2. Our Ontario gaming operations continue to gain momentum, supported by strong growth in OSB revenues, aided by solid World Cup engagement and cross-sell of the reactivated World Cup OSB user base into iCasino.

Revenue in the quarter was negatively impacted by customer-friendly online sportsbook outcomes, particularly in June during the NBA Finals and World Cup as well as lower volumes in part due to our reduced marketing spend on lower value and unprofitable customer segments.

Importantly, this shift is improving our marketing efficiency and is consistent with our disciplined approach to managing the interactive business that we outlined earlier this year. Notably, while our OSB hold rate was flat year-over-year to date, our OSB net win rate improved.

We saw encouraging interactive engagement trends during the World Cup. Approximately 70% of our Sportsbook users placed a World Cup wager with approximately 45% of those World Cup betters placing a soccer wager for the first time. This event served as a meaningful engagement and reactivation opportunity for us heading into the NFL season.

On July 13, we launched the Score Bet Sportsbook and Casino and our standalone iCasino apps, the Score Casino and Hollywood Casino in Alberta, Canada. While still early, we are encouraged by our Alberta user and handle volumes on a per capita basis and believe our exclusive strategic partnership in Canada with the Toronto Blue Jays will complement the strength of the Score Bet brand there.

Our expected investment in Alberta remains approximately $20 million for the year, and our 2026 Interactive segment adjusted EBITDA guidance is unchanged at a loss of $20 million, which Felicia will discuss in more detail in a few minutes. But first, I want to cover some updates on our exciting retail development projects.

Hollywood Casino Joliet, which opened last August, continued to deliver strong results in Q2, and that momentum has continued into early Q3. Our team there, excuse me, is doing a great job.

Meanwhile, M Resort continues to capture previously unmet demand and drive enhanced property performance following the opening of our new hotel tower last December. M Resort generated record net revenue and adjusted EBITDAR in Q2. And notably, we hosted 3 of our top 5 largest groups by revenue ever during the quarter.

We recently opened our new hotel tower at Hollywood Columbus on June 12, strengthening our position as the leading regional gaming destination in the state of Ohio. The property generated an all-time net revenue record in July, the first full month with the hotel open.

Over the hotel's first 1.5 months of operations, we have seen outer market guests account for 85% of hotel cash revenue, which again speaks to it being a regional gaming destination. Additionally, over that same time frame, rated guests have increased their average daily work by 10% when staying at the hotel.

Our final of the 4 growth projects, Hollywood Casino Aurora, opened on June 24, and while still early, has been showing strong growth KPIs, approximately doubling admissions, slot volumes, table volumes and non-gaming revenues versus prior year levels.

Our hotel is also attracting higher worth customers with our rated guests generating 21% higher average daily worth when staying at the property. The property is also driving trial and expanding our reach in the market as 20% of our guests since opening have been new to Hollywood Aurora. Additionally, 25% of our guests since opening were reactivated customers.

Up next in the pipeline will be the relocation of Hollywood Council Bluffs, which is expected to open in 2028. This project will convert a first-generation Riverboat Casino license into a modern and more efficient land-based facility that will connect seamlessly with our existing 444-room hotel.

We believe the new property will greatly enhance our competitive positioning in the greater Omaha market. The project has an anticipated construction budget of $180 million to $200. That budget, the programming and the design will be very similar to the new Hollywood Joliet in Illinois.

And with that, I'll turn it over to Felicia.

Thanks, Jay. Our Retail segment generated record quarterly revenues of $1.5 billion and adjusted EBITDAR of $517.2 million, which reflects year-over-year growth of approximately 4% in revenues and 6% in adjusted EBITDAR, respectively.

Adjusted EBITDA margins were 34.4% and flow-through improved quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year, reflecting our property team's efforts to manage costs across the board, including labor, marketing and G&A efficiencies.

Importantly, we saw strong performance across the portfolio, including, but not limited to, contributions from our 4 recently completed development projects. Underscoring this point, same-store revenues and adjusted EBITDAR grew approximately 2% and 4%, respectively, in the quarter.

We're raising our full year 2026 retail revenue and adjusted EBITDAR guidance to reflect the better-than-expected results in the second quarter and an increase in our prior assumptions for the second half of the year.

The midpoint of our revised 2026 revenue guidance is $5.87 billion. And for adjusted EBITDAR, our new guidance is $1.963 billion at the midpoint, which implies a 50 basis point year-over-year improvement in adjusted EBITDAR margins for the second half of the year at the midpoint.

Our new guidance implies the continued expectation for retail adjusted EBITDAR to grow year-over-year in the mid-single digits, more specifically at a rate similar to the 5.6% growth we just reported for the second quarter. We expect normalized seasonality in the second half of the year.

Our Interactive segment generated revenues of $349.4 million in the second quarter, including a skin tax gross-up of $185.5 million and adjusted EBITDA loss of $9.5 million. On the revenue side, we experienced solid growth across our key focus areas, U.S. iCasino and our Canadian operations, which was somewhat offset by customer-friendly online sportsbook outcomes and lower volumes, as Jay touched on earlier.

On the adjusted EBITDA side, we delivered another quarter of meaningful improvement year-over-year, reflecting disciplined execution of our strategy to drive profitability.

We are fine-tuning our 2026 Interactive segment revenue guidance to $1.57 billion from our prior $1.6 billion to reflect recent and current operating trends. Our new guidance includes a skin tax gross-up of roughly $830 million, up from $820 million prior and assumes modest year-over-year growth in both OSB and iCasino for the second half with iCasino growth higher than OSB growth.

We continue to expect an adjusted EBITDA loss of $20 million in our Interactive segment for 2026, inclusive of a $20 million investment for our Alberta launch. As we have guided previously, the third quarter is expected to be the largest quarterly loss of the year given our investment in Alberta, and we expect the fourth quarter Interactive segment adjusted EBITDA to be positive. We expect the other category adjusted EBITDA to be negative $119 million for 2026, unchanged from our original guidance back in late February.

The table on Page 9 of our earnings release summarizes our cash expenditures in the quarter, including cash payments to our REIT landlords, cash taxes, cash interest on traditional debt and total CapEx. Of our total $98 million of CapEx in the quarter, $58 million was project CapEx, primarily related to our development projects. We ended the second quarter with total liquidity of $1.9 billion, inclusive of $887 million in cash and cash equivalents.

In April, we refinanced our $1 billion revolver, which is currently undrawn and our $447 million Term Loan A facility, both now mature in 2031. And in May, we repriced and extended our Term Loan B facility, which now matures in 2033. Also in May, we repaid the remaining $106.7 million principal balance of our 2.75% convertible notes due 2026, which eliminates 4.5 million potentially dilutive shares associated with the notes.

And in June, we received approximately $225 million in funding from GLPI for the new Hollywood Aurora. We elected not to take GLPI capital in connection with the construction of our Hollywood Columbus Hotel Tower. Following these transactions to strengthen our balance sheet, our nearest maturity is now our $400 million 5 5/8 notes, which are due in January 2027.

As we highlight on Slide 5 of our earnings deck, our near-term deleveraging goals have improved since we provided them in April, benefiting from an improvement in our cash flow outlook. Specifically, the $31 million increase in the midpoint of our retail adjusted EBITDA guidance flows fully into cash flow given our reiteration of our maintenance CapEx and other uses of cash for 2026.

While we are reiterating our maintenance CapEx guidance of $220 million, 2026 project CapEx has been refined to $180 million from our prior $200 million guidance given a shift of some spend from 2026 into 2027, which brings our total 2026 CapEx guidance to $400 million from our prior $420 million forecast.

We continue to expect total cash payments under our triple net leases to be $1 billion in 2026. For 2026 cash interest expense, net of interest income, we continue to project $150 million. And for cash taxes, our outlook is unchanged. We do not expect to be a cash taxpayer in 2026.

Our fully diluted weighted average common share count at the end of the second quarter was 135 million shares. RSUs and stock options are diluted by about 2 million shares annually. And as I just mentioned, we repaid the remaining convertible notes in May, which removes the related dilution from the share count calculation going forward.

I'll now turn it back to Jay.

Thanks, Felicia. With the second quarter under our belt, 2026 continues to be a year of strong execution for us, and I can't thank our team members across PENN enough. We delivered record quarterly retail segment revenue, raised our retail guidance, continued to improve Interactive profitability and further strengthened our balance sheet.

During the remainder of the year, we remain focused on growing cash flow, reducing leverage, optimizing our corporate overhead and maintaining a disciplined approach to capital allocation.

And with that, Tasha, we can open up the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Daniel Politzer with JPMorgan.

This was going pretty quickly, so I think I got my math right, but the online sports betting or the interactive core revenues, I think you reduced by $40 million, but you did hold your adjusted EBITDA guide for $20 million loss. Can you kind of walk through the puts and takes to that a bit? And were there some cost savings and labor efficiencies in there that you'd call out?

Yes. There's labor efficiencies. We continue to find efficiencies in our cost structure related to technology as well as we look at third-party vendors. And of course, our marketing expenses are down as well. So it's mainly marketing and cost structure improvements.

Got it. That makes sense. And then on the land-based side, obviously, some strong margin improvement there. As you think about kind of the rest of the year and the cadence, I think usually, first quarter through third quarter, it's roughly the same and you step down in fourth quarter, but you have the properties that you recently opened continuing to ramp. So can you give us an idea of how to think about margins and the expansion from here going forward?

Yes, happy to, at least as it relates to the second half of the year. So we beat on revenues, 4% EBITDAR, 6% in the second quarter, and that's exactly what we're guiding to do in the second half of the year as well, kind of just mirroring on a year-over-year basis, the performance in the second quarter. So I think I would look at that the same way for third quarter and for fourth quarter.

To your point, Dan, fourth quarter is the lightest revenue, lightest EBITDAR and lightest margin quarter of the year, but we would expect to see the same 4% revenue, 6% growth -- sorry, EBITDAR growth in the fourth quarter.

So from -- if you sort of shake all that out, our margins -- EBITDA margins were higher by about 55 basis points in the second quarter year-over-year, and we're anticipating the second half of the year to be right around 50 basis points improvement, both third quarter and fourth quarter, if that makes sense.

We'll take our next question from Brandt Montour with Barclays.

So I wanted to start out with iCasino. Obviously, you called out iCasino first grew quarter-over-quarter, year-over-year. It's hard for us to see it in the reported numbers, right? We see iGaming reported down slightly quarter-over-quarter and the overall iGaming growing low single digits year-over-year, but we know that's not the same mix. So could you just kind of maybe flesh out iCasino first growth cadence and trajectory to help us get a sense for how the back half could trend?

Yes. So we're seeing strong growth on our standalone casino product, and we have since we launched. So the somewhat softness there is related to the play from our sportsbook app where people are cross-selling into casino. And so the volume softness there has affected revenue there. But we still feel really good about our standalone business and casino through the end of the year.

Okay. And then on the overall sports business, Jay, you gave us some qualitative commentary on hold with the overall message that hold was an impact. Any way you could maybe quantify that just given we're dealing with small numbers here on a net basis, and so it could actually swing the complexion of the overall digital results here.

Yes. We -- the quick math, easy math on that is it's roughly $3 million impact hold for the quarter. So we would have been closer to a $6.5 million loss had we come in flat year-over-year on hold.

We'll take our next question from Barry Jonas with Truist.

Curious if you could maybe just give a little more color about the Aurora ramp relative to Joliet. And then as we think about Council Bluffs, given all the similarities with Joliet, should we expect a similar ROI and ramp there as well?

Yes, I'll tackle the second one first just because it's top of mind. I would say, yes, with regard to the similarities between Council Bluffs and Joliet, budget, programming, design. And I think even from a ramp perspective, we would expect, just like we did for Joliet to sort of get those margins where you would expect them to be maybe by month 12 to month 15. We're getting really close, I think, on the Joliet side now.

We're anniversarying the opening of that property here in a matter of days. And we're happy with the trajectory of the margins. You see some of that in the Midwest segment where we had a really strong quarter. So I think so from a -- as you're thinking about Council Bluffs in '28, that's probably going to be the best property and the best model to look at in terms of how Joliet ramped over time.

Aurora, remember, we have a hotel now 225 rooms. We did not have a hotel at the old location. So we are seeing really strong demand from VIP segment, customers that we did know, but we're seeing much higher play when they visit us now because they're staying in the hotel. We're seeing an uplift of over 20% when they stay in the hotel from what their worth was previously at the old facility. That's, I think, very good news.

When Joliet first opened, if you recall, the growth on a year-over-year basis was kind of in that 55% to low 60% year-over-year. It's been growing -- since then, the last several months have been closer to call it, 75%, 80% year-over-year. And it's only 1 month.

So I don't want to underwrite this, but just in sharing what we're seeing in the business. Certainly, we're happy with the results, and we shared some of the KPIs for Aurora, but the business has almost essentially doubled in the first full month. Again, things will settle. You get some benefit of everybody coming to see the property in that first month, but we're very pleased with what the response has been and the feedback we're getting is very positive.

That sounds great. Just as a follow-up, Yesterday, we heard from a large OSB operator that they're going to be leaning into reinvestment. I'm not sure what other competitor responses will be, but maybe just comment on that, if anything in your interactive strategy could change as a result? Or do you see any potential risk to your financial outlook depending on how this plays out?

Yes. It's a good question. We read or heard the same commentary. I guess, the way we're thinking about it, Barry, it hasn't changed in terms of our approach because we anticipated football season being quite the arms race this year. You're going to have prediction markets that are targeting customers for the first football season ever given the time line of when they actually went live was close to Super Bowl last year.

So we already assumed it was going to be a very aggressive irrational marketing spend, advertising and new customer acquisition approach this football season. I think this just speaks to it being aggressive not only from a prediction market standpoint, but maybe some of the incumbent OSB digital-only players as well.

So it doesn't change the way we're thinking about it. I think it is a very competitive marketplace out there right now. Michigan is a good example. It's been quite the aggressive environment there with a couple of private operators that have launched in the last couple of quarters, and we've held up quite well in Michigan.

And so we would expect to hold up well in football season. We already assumed in our projections for the remainder of the year that it would be very competitive, and we think we're faring quite well in states like Michigan, where we're already seeing an environment like that.

We'll take our next question from Joe Stauff with Susquehanna.

First question I wanted to ask you is, just to clarify, I don't think so, but within your guide for the year on retail, are you assuming anything with respect to potential benefit in Pennsylvania following the Supreme Court ruling?

We are not building any of that in, Joe. We -- the way that we guided, we basically guided the beat in Q2 and then an incremental $10 million for the second half of the year is the quick math there. And we're coming off of a strong month in July. So I mean one of the things -- the questions that we have been fielding in some investor meetings was is the first half of the year as good as a guess kind of thing for regional gaming because of the tax return being higher this year.

And I would say, certainly within our portfolio, we don't believe that's the case. And we have a slide in our presentation that lays out the tailwinds and sort of the lack of headwinds coming at us right now, and we do feel that momentum continuing into the second half of the year. But that's the quick math on the guide.

And what do you think about like any tailwind that you might expect, say, in Pennsylvania, whether it be in the fourth quarter? I know there's an October 15 deadline or maybe that is some sort of tailwind in '27?

I think it's a good question, Joe. I don't want to sort of bake it into our assumptions until we know how this plays out. Recall that when the Supreme Court ruled those skill games to be illegal, they gave the legislature 120 days to try to figure out if there's going to be enabling legislation to regulate and tax.

And so we have to see how that plays out. We obviously have a big seat at the table. We have 4 land-based casinos in the state of Pennsylvania and are well connected in Harrisburg. So I think we'll just have to see how that plays out over the course of the next -- I think the date is sometime in October.

And if I could just squeeze...

Real quick, sorry. I would say along to your question, Missouri did come to a similar conclusion. The Attorney General in Missouri has been doing a great job of shutting down these skill-based gains. I don't think it's by coincidence that our Missouri properties have been performing very well over the last couple of quarters, not that they haven't previously, but the last couple of quarters, our results in St. Louis and Kansas City have been very strong.

Yes, I appreciate that. And if I could just squeeze something in. Is there -- Aaron, is there anything different within, say, the Alberta kind of operating framework that would suggest that you couldn't get a similar amount of share that you have in October, Ontario in Alberta?

I don't think so. I mean, first of all, our product has never been better. We're going into a competitive market, but we're spending aggressively relative to what we did in Ontario. And early results from a handle perspective, even though it's a slow sports calendar are very encouraging. So we anticipate to be very aggressive, and we hope to have the same and similar market shares to what we enjoy in Ontario. That's the focus, and it's looking good so far.

Yes. Certainly, that's our target, Joe, to your point. And so we figure with it being a more competitive sort of starting gate in Alberta that we needed to be a little bit more aggressive in our spend per capita, and we're feeling good about that decision so far.

We'll take our next question from Jordan Bender with Citizens.

There's been a couple more assets that have been put up for sale at least publicly on the retail casino side since the last time we spoke. So curious to get your temperature on M&A? And could you look to Vegas just kind of given what you know today?

Yes, it's a good question, Jordan. I mean, look, I'd like to be in the position that we are right now at PENN, where we have several compelling options as we think about capital allocation. This year, the big focus has been on delevering, and we're having some real quality and conversations with long-only investors about the balance sheet and the direction of our leverage profile.

And that's going to continue to be a big focus for us at PENN to get that lease adjusted net leverage down below 5x. We're heading there quickly, which is great as you look out to the end of the year and certainly in early 2027, get that traditional net leverage down below 2. Again, we're headed there very quickly. So that's clearly a priority for us. We'll continue to be certainly over the next 12 months.

Share repurchases continue to sound and look very good. Our free cash flow yield on 2027 consensus is still sitting pretty close to 20%. That doesn't make sense to me, but certainly makes buying back shares a lot more attractive anywhere in those sort of mid- to high-teen levels, and that's where we've been trading.

And then lastly, we're -- it's early, but we've been very happy with the results with these 4 growth projects, and we do have other growth projects that we've been analyzing, 3 right now that we're feeling really positive about. And we believe that there's a level of predictability with those investments because we've done it before. I think we know what to expect. It's a little bit more proven versus you're taking a shot on M&A, it's less proven.

So in terms of what the return profile will be. So it's not to say that we wouldn't look. It's just to say that we're probably, in that case, going to wait for an inbound, and it's going to have to check several boxes for us. It's going to have to, with a high level of confidence, deliver a better return than what we can do in some of these other capital allocation categories.

And I think it's also going to have to be something that adds strategic value for us in terms of like geographic location as it get us to a new market or a bigger presence in a market that we enjoy being in.

Great. I appreciate that color. And then a follow-up on the iGaming side of the business, it seems like a big focus, especially in the back half of the year. Can you just kind of talk to as you think about your investment or your customer acquisition within iGaming, how are you focusing that on direct versus cross-sell from sports into iGaming?

Well, we're going to continue to focus on growing casino. Clearly, standalone is on a hot growth path. We're going to lean into that. Casino in general, has very attractive CACs, customer acquisition costs. So we're exploiting that currently. On the Sportsbook side, we are planning to grow through the end of the year. If you remember, we rebranded from ESPN BET to theScore Bet in December.

And as sort of that audience normalizes, what we've realized is theScore brand, while still small and growing in the U.S. is very loyal. And so we're taking care of those users. We saw a lot of engagement and reactivation through the World Cup, and we're keeping those people engaged through football. So we feel good there. So cross-sell should continue as the Sportsbook business grows as well, but very focused on Hollywood.

We'll take our next question from Lizzie Dove with Goldman Sachs.

I just wanted to go back to what you said a question or so ago, just on the desire to kind of do more of these growth investments at your existing properties, which seems to have been going very well so far. And if I heard you right, I think you said there was maybe kind of 3 that were on the docket or consideration list. And so could you maybe expand on that in terms of what the kind of benchmarks are and hurdle rates as you kind of think about which to do or not to do within the remaining portfolio?

Yes. Happy to, Lizzy. Of those 3, I would say one is a very compelling hotel project along the lines of what we're seeing for Columbus. And so again, we're doing the analysis there and feeling better, and we're learning a lot, obviously, along the way, both Aurora -- I shouldn't say both Aurora and resort and Columbus.

So hotel, we're feeling like we've got a really good handle on the right size, the right design, quality, size of room, amenity package to deliver the right return. So I would say that's the -- there's a hotel one that we're taking a hard look at right now. And then there's a couple of water to land conversion projects. And you should expect that we would do those probably in the South region is where those would likely be. There's another opportunity in the state of Illinois as well.

I would say as we're thinking about those projects, we're not in a rush to get them all going at the same time. I think it makes the most sense just from a dollars out the door perspective to spread these out. We have Council Bluffs that is scheduled to open in '28. If we're to announce something else, it would probably be a 29 opening and then the next one will be a 30 opening is the way to think about it.

That's certainly the way we're thinking about it internally so that we can continue to do what we believe the priorities are with -- from a free cash flow and capital allocation perspective. You can delever, maybe buy back stock and pursue these projects simultaneously. But if you do all of them all at the same time, you're a little bit more limited in being able to kind of walk and chew them.

Makes sense. And then it might be a little early for me to ask this question, but just given you've seen this really strong acceleration in cash flow and taking up your guidance today, just how do you think about kind of growing off these levels into '27 and beyond? Just high level, any kind of moving pieces that we should be thinking about?

I mean, it is early. So fair on that. We're not going to get into guiding for next year at this point. We've got another 5 months to go. I would say that we're feeling good about the momentum in the business. And as we look out to '27 and even '28 at this point because casinos take time to build, we're not seeing new supply projects that are being built or have even been announced that would likely impact us over the next couple of years.

Now that could change tomorrow in a market. But the runway for us is about as good as it's been. You consider '26, we didn't really have any new casino openings other than a couple of smaller ones in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. And the next couple of years, it looks pretty clean.

So I think that's something to keep in mind. We're feeling good about heading into next year without having those headwinds coming at us and impacting us in some of our key markets. And we expect the momentum in the business at PENN to continue to move forward into '27.

We'll take our next question from Jeff Stantial with Stifel.

Maybe starting off on iCasino. I want to follow up on Jay something you said in response to Barry's question, which is we talk a lot on the sports and the prediction side on CPAs moving higher and higher. But to your point, there has been some competition coming in on the online casino side as well. Aaron, curious just to get your thoughts here on sort of the competitive environment in casino, iCasino relative to, say, 6 months ago.

And then from a retention standpoint, just help us think about sort of when you do see a new competitor come into a given market, what's sort of the response? You lose a little bit of play out of the gate, stickier players come back naturally? Do you have to bonus to get them back eventually? Just sort of help us think about how you find an equilibrium 1, 2, 3 months after a new competitor comes into a given state.

I think promo obviously, is key in making sure that your product is sticky and serving the user. But then clearly, as competition comes in and people spend on the promo cycle, it's very important that our CRM is really focused not only on our most valuable users, but on retaining them as well. And so that's a big focus.

As I said before, CACs have been very attractive on the Hollywood side, which is where we continue to spend a lot of our marketing dollars and promotion dollars around the brand, and we expect that to continue throughout the end of the year.

That's great. And then maybe switching gears over to the retail business. I wanted to ask on the M Resort project. Jay, curious, if you look at that property's results and maybe compare it against some of the public numbers on the broader market, just curious how much you think the project is growing the overall market versus taking share? And then competitively, have you seen sort of any response from some of the surrounding casinos as they try to build back share?

Yes. The Las Vegas locals results are all publicly reported every month. And so you see the trends there. And they've been, I would say, kind of flattish so far this year. Obviously, with our new hotel, we would expect to be leading in terms of growth, and we are. I'm not saying I know how every property in the market is doing. Obviously, Durango is continuing to do great for Red Rock Resorts.

But M Resort for us, I think we're targeting a bit of a different customer profile. Certainly during the week, we're more of a eating and convention destination for people from all around the country. And then on weekends, there's definitely strong locals business, but we also are a destination for people driving in from Southern California.

So our model is a little bit different, and we have just shy of 800 rooms there now to be able to accommodate leisure customers, casino customers, cash paying, convention business, and we're continuing to do really significant A-level entertainment out by the pool and driving 5,000 to 8,000 people per event.

So I would say we feel like our model is a little bit different there. So I'm not sure that we're really taking share from folks as much as probably growing that part of the Las Vegas Valley and certainly our end resort property as a regional destination. So we're feeling good about the place that we sort of -- we sit in and how that fits in with the rest of the competitive set in the Las Vegas locals market.

We'll take our next question from Shaun Kelley with Bank of America.

Jay or Felicia or Aaron, maybe just a quick -- any quick update you could give us directionally on just how big Ontario's contribution is overall to the online segment now. I know we don't break it out specifically, but that is a market that we just don't get as much kind of data on. And I think the idea here is more to give us some context for trying to size the Alberta opportunity for you going forward.

Yes. We haven't provided that breakdown by market, Shaun, previously. I would tell you that it is our #1 largest market, both on the OSB side as well as in -- well, I would say it's right there with Pennsylvania for us on iGaming. But it is actually by a good margin, our #1 market for OSB. So you can kind of back into how we do in Pennsylvania and assume that OSB is probably closer to maybe 2x or 2.5x what we do in PA and iGaming would be very similar.

Perfect. And then going back to your -- an earlier question on project CapEx for the sort of the land-based piece. I think, Felicia, if I caught it right, if you were thinking about project capital or maybe an opening in 2028 and then a potential next project or land-based conversion being in 2030, would that directionally imply something like $100 million of project capital a year? Again, not trying to hold you to guidance and appreciate these numbers can be lumpy, but just trying to think about how you're thinking about the phasing of cash flow.

Yes. Like Jay said, just to repeat, well, for our future projects, we will probably have a year. It's hard to talk about is it not going to be $100 million a year because the build-outs will intersect. So I think that if you look at what our project CapEx is in 2026, that's probably a good proxy to use for estimates going forward.

Maybe a little bit -- that might be a little bit on the high side, just to have multiple coming in at the same time, but...

Yes, there's some crossover. So it's -- again, in terms of staging them, but if you think about if you want to just build out your model, maybe plus, give or take, what we said for this year, which is $180 million.

We'll take our next question from John DeCree with CBRE.

I wanted to ask, Jay, about the promotional environment. I think in a prior question, you briefly touched on some of the pressures from competitive new supply starting to fade. But this time last year, we were talking about some of your competitors kind of elevating their promotional intensity. From where you sit today as it stands, have you seen anything change in the retail business on the promotional front? Has that subsided a little bit? And we've seen broadly pretty strong regional numbers across the board. So curious how the environment sits today.

Yes. It's -- I would say the regional gaming environment is as healthy as I've seen it in a really long time. There really aren't any markets that stand out as being irrational from a marketing reinvestment standpoint right now. Baton Rouge, maybe a little bit just because you have a new opening there, but we have a high-end property there that targets more of a mid-, high worth customer. And so we're, I think, holding up quite well in Baton Rouge.

But as you look across the rest of the portfolio, those GGR state reported numbers every month are not being driven by higher levels of reinvestment. You see our margin profile in the second quarter, growth year-over-year, 55 bps. We anticipate growing our margins again second half of the year by 50 bps, which would tell you we have confidence in our ability to execute.

And our teams are doing an amazing job. It's not one thing. The teams, both interactive, retail, everyone's focus on driving efficiencies and doing more with less and being really smart on every marketing dollar spent to make sure we've got a strong return on that dollar and challenging areas of the cost structure that maybe would have been considered more fixed costs in the past.

So I couldn't be happier with the performance across the company in the first half of the year, and everyone is laser-focused on continuing to do as good, if not better, in the second half of the year.

And if I could follow up on the M&A question earlier. Based on what you've all seen so far and learned from omnichannel states, you've mentioned a couple of boxes that maybe M&A would need to check. Where does having retail and digital presence kind of rank in the importance of future M&A?

And I guess Canada could be an example where you have a pretty strong digital position, but no retail exposure yet. Is that an interesting enough opportunity with the cross-sell that you've seen thus far that maybe some of those markets where you have digital but not retail are uniquely interesting to you?

Yes. I would say, John, that what really matters in that case, if you want to see omnichannel work is you need iCasino and land-based casino, just having sports betting as the digital offering in land-based, you're not going to see as much crossover.

So yes, I would circle the states that are either already live with iCasino or states that are maybe likely -- most likely to go next, that would certainly check maybe a smaller box from a strategic value perspective for us. We certainly would want to -- we're interested at some point of getting into states maybe that we're not in or there's markets that maybe we have a smaller position than we would like to have.

And so those would be interesting. But again, we're just -- we're not going to -- we're not chasing -- we'll probably wait for inbounds on the assets that will be available through some of the M&A that's taking place in the space, at least for the next 12 months. It would have to be right price, right location and potentially omnichannel to your question.

We'll take our next question from Steve Pizzella with Deutsche Bank.

Just on the 4Q Interactive profitability, can you help us bridge the drivers of that, whether from Alberta, iCasino, OSB margins? How should we think about that bridge?

In terms of profitability through the end of the year, I mean, clearly, it's going to be casino-driven and Canada driven. Those are our big focuses and then operating profitably in OSB states, making sure that we're focused on high-value customers and retaining the ones that we have today that are of high value. So Canada, casino and then profitably operating in OSB states.

Yes. I mean if you look at our contribution margin by category that Aaron just laid out, they're all 3 moving in the right direction quickly in terms of "profitability" at least at the contribution margin level. And that is the team's focus right now. That's the mission, and we're on a really good path.

We'll take our next question from Trey Bowers with Wells Fargo.

Just to continue to kind of beat the drum on M&A. Is a strip property, you mentioned strategically necessary. Is a strip property something that you feel like the customer base is asking for if one were to become available?

And then two, against that, you guys highlighted the free cash flow yield of the stock for '27. And as you think about any M&A, does that M&A need to produce a return that's better or at least equal to buying your own stock at this point? Or are there strategic points to it that would make you guys say, we'll do something that might not have that kind of level of cash-on-cash return?

I mean it certainly Trey needs to be close to those levels. So there might be a strategic reason why you would do something that it doesn't have to be exact or it could be round-up kind of thing. But we have -- like I said earlier, there's -- we have very compelling options from a capital allocation perspective, and that's a good position to be in. I'd like for the share buyback option to be less attractive because our free cash flow yield is lower, and hopefully, it will be soon.

But I would say, overall, M&A, we're going to compare that to what does share buybacks look like for us, what is continuing to delever look like. The growth projects internally have very nice cash-on-cash returns next to them as well. So it's going to -- M&A is going to have to really stand out against all 3 of those options, and that makes it a pretty high bar.

And I would say for Las Vegas, it would probably be in that category of would our customer love if we had a Las Vegas Strip location. I would say, yes, but with the caveat that not any location, not any product, and we're certainly not interested in acquiring an asset that's going to require another $400 million, $700 million CapEx investment because it's got deferred maintenance. So it would have to check a lot of boxes.

We'd love to be on the Las Vegas Strip at the right time, but it would have to be right price, right asset. And who knows what will come on the market, but that would be some of the criteria.

And I guess just a more micro question in terms of the numbers from the West and the M Resort. There was some margin pressure there and a little less flow-through. Is that just kind of ongoing start-up costs? Or is there anything about that property that we should think about kind of a different margin profile than what you currently have in that segment?

Thank you for asking that question. I probably should have been more proactive. If you look in the investor deck, it's a footnote, which is why I'm sure no one has seen it yet. There's some onetime accounting adjustments in the second quarter, and I'll quickly walk you through what those are. So second quarter of this year, we had basically offsetting accounting adjustments. We had a $2 million, what we call good guy accounting adjustment that hit the Midwest region.

So you can deduct $2 million from the EBITDAR produced at the Midwest and calculate what the margin was. It's very close to what it was last year when you do that. And obviously, we had strong top line growth, but we are still ramping Joliet and we just opened Aurora. So that's why the margin hasn't really improved there yet, but it's pretty close to flat.

In the West, we had a $2 million negative accounting adjustment this year. In addition, in the West, last year, we had a $2 million positive accounting adjustment. So when you're looking at the West, you really need to sort of net out that it should have been $2 million better than what you see and last year's EBITDAR number was really 2 years lower than what you see. So that's how it plays out in the West.

And when you do that math, you'll see that the margins in the West were actually up 10 basis points on a year-over-year basis. So we're feeling really good about M Resorts ramp. It's not like we're discounting the hotel to fill rooms. And so thank you for asking the question. We did put that in the footnote. I didn't want to make a real big deal of it because it's accounting adjustments. They wash out for the second quarter this year. There's nothing to consider as being material, but it does move the pieces between the different regions.

Tasha, why don't we do one more question?

Great. We'll take our last question from Daniel Gugliomo with Capital One Securities.

Just one for me. On Aurora, I know the outlet mall is a big draw for people to that area. Is there a seasonal cadence with people traveling there to shop that is maybe different from the traditional trends of regional gaming in Illinois?

I would say we'll learn a lot. Obviously, I'd imagine that the fourth quarter is probably going to be really, really busy, which is great because that's typically the slowest quarter of the year for us in the gaming business. But with a lot of shoppers at the Chicago Premium Outlet there, I would expect that we're going to see a lot of new customers coming through and a lot of repeat visitation throughout the holiday period, November, December.

So I would say, Dan, give us a little bit of time, and we'll share our learnings with you guys real time. I would expect it to be good for the fourth quarter and probably more even for the other quarters of the year.

Okay. Thanks, Dan. And thank you, everybody, for joining our call. We look forward to speaking with you again in a few months to cover the third quarter earnings. Have a great one.

This concludes today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.

Greetings, and welcome to the PENN Entertainment First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Chelsea. Good morning, and thank you for joining PENN Entertainment's 2026 First Quarter Conference Call and Webcast. We'll get to management's comments and presentation momentarily as well as your questions and answers. [Operator Instructions]

I'll now review the safe harbor disclosure. Today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For more information, please see our press release for details on specific risk factors.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to PENN's CEO, Jay Snowden. Jay, please go ahead.

Thanks, Joe. Good morning. I'm pleased to report PENN's diversified retail portfolio delivered another solid quarter as Retail segment adjusted EBITDA grew year-over-year. Our property performance was encouraging across the portfolio with particular strength in the West segment reflecting the ongoing ramp of M Resort's new Hotel Tower and impressive results from the team at Ameristar Black Hawk.

In the Midwest segment, we delivered strong revenue and EBITDAR growth led by our properties in the Saint Louis market as well as continued momentum at the new Hollywood Joliet in Illinois. Results thus far from our first 2 development projects provide us continued confidence in the anticipated success from the upcoming openings of the Hollywood Columbus Hotel Tower on June 12 and the new Hollywood Casino Aurora on June 24, in addition to our new Council Bluffs property scheduled to open in 2028, all of which are subject to final regulatory approvals.

As we've said previously, we anticipate our 4 development projects will generate 15% plus cash-on-cash returns on our aggregate project cost of $800 million, which is net of the $50 million contribution from the City of Aurora. Overall, increases in both visitation and spend per visit company-wide supported year-over-year theoretical revenue growth across all of our rated worth segments, representing the larger quarterly increase in 3 years for the Retail segment.

Looking ahead, we continue to see solid trends into April despite higher gas prices and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty. Importantly, we are also beginning to see improving trends in those regions where we are anniversarying new supply, particularly in Bossier City, Louisiana and Council Bluffs, Iowa.

Turning to the Interactive segment, we saw significant adjusted EBITDA improvement of approximately $78 million year-over-year in Q1, driven by nearly 15% year-over-year growth in iCasino revenue and approximately 5% year-over-year growth in online sports betting revenue and a significant reduction in marketing spend, coupled with continued cost management. This marks the first full quarter under our realigned digital strategy, which is focused primarily on our U.S. iCasino states and Canada, while operating under a more efficient cost structure overall.

We're continuing to see positive trends in Ontario, including year-over-year growth in average monthly active users, online sports betting revenue and iCasino revenue. These results reflect the ongoing strength of theScore Bet brand in Canada and our realigned digital strategy, which we think bodes well for the anticipated July 13 launch of regulated iCasino and online sports betting in the province of Alberta. TheScore Bet has been approved as a registered gaming operator by the AGLC, and preregistration efforts have begun in the province.

We expect our Alberta launch to result in a $20 million loss in 2026, within the range we previously provided on our quarterly earnings call in February. As Felicia will discuss in a moment, the resulting change to our prior breakeven guidance for 2026 Interactive adjusted EBITDA is entirely attributable to this $20 million investment in Alberta. Said differently, outside of Alberta, our breakeven interactive guide for the year is unchanged.

Slide 5 of our investor presentation underscores our continued focus on our major pillars of growth as our Retail and Interactive segments along with our recently optimized corporate structure and maintenance CapEx spend drives significant improvement in free cash flow generation in 2026, which in turn strengthens our balance sheet as leverage declines and sets us up for an even stronger free cash flow story in 2027.

I'll now turn it over to Felicia.

Thanks, Jay. Our Retail segment generated revenues of $1.4 billion, adjusted EBITDAR of $471.4 million and segment adjusted EBITDAR margins of 33.2%. Our adjusted EBITDAR results benefited from a onetime favorable adjustment related to a legal accrual, which nets out to a $5 million benefit primarily in the South region.

As it relates to 2026 guidance, based on our better-than-expected first quarter Retail results, we are increasing the midpoint of our 2026 retail revenue and adjusted EBITDAR guidance by $20 million and $12 million, respectively, to reflect the upside generated in the quarter. As a result, our revised guidance ranges are $5.73 billion to $5.86 billion for revenue and $1.88 billion to $1.98 billion for adjusted EBITDAR.

As you think about the second quarter, as Jay mentioned, we continue to see stable strength trends carrying into April. And while this is the case, as we noted on our February earnings call, we do expect some temporary disruption in the quarter as the legacy Aurora Riverboat will be closed for about 2 weeks due to regulatory requirements prior to opening the new Hollywood Casino Aurora on June 24. The second half of 2026 should benefit from the contribution of all 4 of our development projects, and we expect adjusted EBITDAR to grow year-over-year in the mid-single digits.

Our Interactive segment in the first quarter generated revenues of $358.3 million, including a tax gross-up of $185.8 million and adjusted EBITDA loss of $10.8 million. We now expect 2026 interactive revenues of approximately $1.6 billion, inclusive of an estimated tax gross up of about $820 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $20 million which, as Jay just mentioned, is entirely attributable to the Alberta launch.

On the revenue side, our revised guidance now takes into consideration the online sports betting promotional spending associated with launching in a new market, particularly in the third quarter as well as further fine-tuning our online sports betting expectations for the year. Importantly, we are also seeing better-than-expected performance in stand-alone iCasino and in Canada, which is somewhat offsetting the factors I just mentioned, and is consistent with our Interactive segment strategic priorities.

We continue to expect small losses in the second and third quarter, but note that the loss in the third quarter will be the largest loss of the year due to the Alberta launch. We expect the fourth quarter of 2026 to be profitable in the interactive segment. Overall, our first quarter '26 Interactive segment performance and outlook reflect the benefits of our increased emphasis on U.S. iCasino states and Canada as well as our more rationalized and nimble cost structure.

We expect the other category adjusted EBITDAR to be negative $119 million 2026, unchanged from our original guidance back in late February. The table on Page 8 of our earnings release summarizes our cash expenditures in the quarter, including cash payments to our REIT landlords, cash taxes, cash interest on traditional debt and total CapEx. Of our total $95 million CapEx in the quarter, $65 million was project CapEx, primarily related to our 4 development projects.

As we remain focused on delevering and strengthening our balance sheet, in March, we issued $600 million of unsecured notes due 2031 at an interest rate of 6.75% and use the proceeds to repay borrowings under our revolver. Accordingly, we ended the first quarter '26 with total liquidity of $1.7 billion, inclusive of $708 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Subsequent to quarter end, on April 16, we refinanced our $1 billion revolving credit facility and refinanced approximately $447 million of our Term Loan A. In June, we expect to receive approximately $225 million in funding from GLPI for the new Hollywood Casino Aurora, which opens on June 24, and the remaining $21 million from the City of Aurora by the end of the year. We have elected not to take GLPI capital in connection with the construction of our Hollywood Columbus Hotel Tower [indiscernible] June 12.

As we highlight on Slide 5 of our earnings deck, we expect to delever by at least 1 full turn for lease adjusted net leverage and by at least 2 full turns for traditional net leverage at year-end, driven by strong free cash flow generation throughout the year and more optimized CapEx spend. Total 2026 CapEx is now expected to be $420 million, down from our prior guidance of $445 million, that total includes $200 million of project CapEx and down from our prior guidance of $225 million and $220 million of maintenance CapEx, which is unchanged.

The reduction in project CapEx reflects the timing shift in CapEx moving from '26 to '27 for the Council Bluffs relocation project, which is now expected to be completed in 2028. Importantly, this is only a change in our planned or date with no changes to scope or budget. We continue to expect total cash payments under our triple net lease to be $1 billion in 2026, and for cash interest expense, net of interest income, we now project $150 million, reflecting our $600 million notes offering and current interest rates.

For cash taxes, our outlook is unchanged. We do not expect to be a cash taxpayer in 2026, given the favorable tax deductions enabled by the 1 big beautiful bill in addition to our acquired NOLs and various tax credits. Our basic can at the end of the first quarter was 133.4 million shares. We also have 4.5 million potential dilutive shares from the remaining convertible notes stub and about 1 million dilutive shares from RSUs and stock options.

And now I'll turn it back to Jay.

All right. Thanks, Felicia. I said during our last earnings call that 2026 would be a year of strong execution for PENN, while we have the rest of the year still to deliver, I'm happy to report we're off to a great start.

Looking ahead, we will remain laser-focused on improving our free cash flow generation while optimizing our corporate overhead and remaining disciplined with our capital.

With that, let me please open the line for our first question, Chelsea.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Barry Jonas with Truist Securities.

Jay, if we look outside of your development projects, what do you think is driving your strong retail trends? I think the consumer is benefiting from higher tax refunds. But as you mentioned, they do have higher gas prices in general macro uncertainty to deal with.

Yes. I think it's really what you laid out, Barry. It's hard for us to know exactly what the drivers are. There's definitely puts and takes. Gas prices are higher. Although as I've said in the past, as you look at regional gaming over the last several decades, the -- really, the economic indicator that most closely correlates to behavior on the regional gaming side is going to be employment. And employment actually continues to be a really good story in the U.S. So gas prices may be a little bit of noise and headwind. The vast majority of our customers in the regional portfolio come within a 30-minute drive. So you're probably not making a decision on the price of gas as to whether you're visiting a casino once every week or 2 weeks or once a month because it's not going to cost you much to get there.

And I would say, no doubt, we're seeing some benefit from tax refunds being higher year-over-year in that from what I read, 11%, 12%. And which is helpful. And I think we'll probably continue to see and feel that. I would say that April feels very much through the first 3 weeks, like a continuation of Q1, which is good. So we're not seeing any cracks in the armor. We're actually feeling really good as we look out for the remainder of the year. And remember, as it relates specifically to PENN in our portfolio, we're now fully anniversaried around the Bossier City new supply, which opened in February of last year. So you probably feel an impact through maybe March, but now that we're here in April, we're starting to see some nice trends on a year-over-year basis out of Bossier City. And then Council Bluffs, Iowa, we saw incremental supply hitting the Nebraska market across the state line probably through about now last year. So by the time you get to the second half of the year, feeling pretty good. You don't see any new supply really impacting us. There's a little bit of renovation competition in Baton Rouge, but that's not going to impact us by much, given our asset quality there in that market.

And we're going to have all 4 of our growth projects up and running, 2 of them fully ramping with M Resort Hotel and Joliet, 2 just opened. I think the learnings we have from the hotel expansion at M and the water to land conversion at Joliet are going to make the Columbus and Aurora ramps probably a bit stronger and faster. It's going to take time, but there are learnings we're applying there.

So overall, I think we're feeling good about the consumer generally, and we're feeling really good about the setup for PENN specifically as we move throughout the remainder of the year.

Great. And then just for a follow-up, maybe for Felicia. I think your free cash flow targets look very strong this year. How confident are you in hitting them and then maybe growing off these levels into 2027 and beyond? And then just sneaking in, how should we think about potential uses?

Yes. We feel confident. That, it's kind of in a asking us about the confidence in our guidance, and we feel good about it. As Jay just said, we feel good about the consumer generally and specifically. And we are -- and we've talked about our pillars, and one of those pillars of growth is increasing our free cash flow production into going forward, especially given our rightsized CapEx and all the other kind of resizing of our overall core structure. So we're in a good place.

Obviously, we've had -- we continue to improve in our Interactive segment. generating smaller losses throughout the year as we get into the fourth quarter generating profitability. So again, we feel good on our free cash flow profile and our free cash flow growth looking forward.

And then as we get into 2027, and we think about our return of capital, right, obviously, looking at share repurchases, continuing to delever. As you can see on Slide 5 of our -- the earnings slides this morning, we expect to generate net lease adjusted net leverage in the ranges of 5.3 to 5.7x this year. So that's a significant decrease from 2025 over a turn lower in our traditional net leverage over 2x lower in 2026. We expect that to continue to decrease into 2027. And then we're in a very good place as we look at typical -- ou typical uses of capital, inclusive of share repurchases and investing growth into our -- investing in our continued growth pipeline and then clearly continued delevering.

Yes. I would just -- I mean, sort of take a step back, we're going to generate $3 plus of free cash flow per share this year. Our stock is trading just under $15 as of yesterday. So you've got a 20% free cash flow yield. A tremendous amount of confidence in the ability to deliver on that this year. And in every category, the story gets better in '27. So we're not going to guide yet for '27, but you should assume everything looks better, which means that free cash flow story and the free cash flow yield is even more compelling as you look out to what is now not that far away, given we're in April '26.

Our next question will come from Brandt Montour with Barclays.

So I just wanted to start off with digital. I was hoping you could talk, Jay, a little bit more about how that business progressed throughout the first quarter. Presumably, you continue to build iGaming stand-alone momentum and perhaps some further cost rationalizations. But we did see the industry iGaming growth slow in March. And so just wondering how you would sort of characterize how your contribution margin exited the first quarter in terms of your trajectory toward breakeven?

Yes. Happy to Brent, and I guess the backdrop here, again, specifically for PENN is that we really have shifted our focus, the last, call it, 6 months and certainly, throughout Q1 from the OSB only states in the U.S. to much more of a focus. And when I say focus, that's going to be prioritization of OpEx and customer acquisition is on Canada.as well as the states in the U.S. that offer both iGaming as well as OSB. So from our perspective, the progression through the quarter looked quite good. Actually, February was kind of like the one softish month that we had. January was solid. March was solid. And we continue to see really good momentum on the stand-alone Hollywood iCasino side of things.

So overall, I'd say we're feeling comfortable. I think we're focused in the right areas. And there is some pressure on the customer acquisition cost side as it relates to U.S. sports betting, and that's been, I think, well covered because of prediction markets and then others in online sports betting space kind of stepping up to respond to that. That's not really a big focus of ours right now. Our focus is on, as I mentioned, Canada, getting ready for the Alberta launch. We feel really good about the setup there. We've done obviously a lot of analysis on what worked for us with the Ontario launch. What maybe didn't, we're doing more of the right things, and we expect to deliver market share results in Alberta that would look very similar to what we've generated in Ontario, where we continue to have momentum.

So I think our story may be a bit unique, and Canada is really in a lot of our results Hollywood stand-alone iCasino in the U.S., driving results in OSB being maybe less important overall to the Interactive story. So we're feeling good about the momentum we have internally at PENN.

Aaron, feel free to add.

Yes, Canada growth in March was very strong. And I just think it's important to note our stand-alone casino growth is very heavy. We're setting record revenues there. Growth in acquisition continues to be strong. As Jay said, we're seeing some softness on the OSB side, but we're offsetting that with our disciplined spend and reinvestment in the areas that matter, as Jay said, casino, specifically stand-alone in Canada, both look really good. going out of this quarter and to last quarter..

Yes. And then lastly, and I think it's implied by what Aaron and I just covered, but our retention really in the U.S. post rebrand is exactly where we expected it to be. It's been very strong with our higher worth customers, which has been the primary focus. We've lost some of the unprofitable and lower worth. That was by design as we pulled back on reinvestment and some key strategic areas, and we're feeling really good about having a handle on everything, which is important as we look out through the remainder of the year.

We knew when we put out the original guide for Interactive that we had some wiggle room on the marketing spend, reinvestment cost structure. And so it's -- we can make adjustments real time, which is what we're doing in Q1 and we'll continue to do throughout the year. I think you'll see really nice momentum in Canada and the U.S. as we close out the year with a profitable fourth quarter.

That's great. Just following on to that because the last bit of that answer, Jay, you talked about marketing spend. In the deck, I think it says marketing spend was down 65%, over 65%. I think we were looking for 50%. And so is that that is sort of efficiencies that you found in the quarter? Or is that sort of timing? How should we think about the rest of the year in terms of that sort of extra savings that you've outlined for the first quarter?

You want to take the first, Aaron? .

Yes. Well, the decrease in marketing spend is also inclusive of what we're spending with ESPN, and the rest of that is just focused efficiency across the markets that are working as we just talked about. So clearly, we were spending a lot more in OSB only states, which weren't as profitable for us. So we've shifted that -- were focused in hybrid states that have both iCasino and sports betting. And of course, stand-alone is showing a lot of great momentum. So we're spending there. And then Canada is starting to pick up as well, so we're spending there. So as Jay said, we have a lot of levers to move around to make sure our marketing is working in the best way for us, and that's what we've been doing.

But there's nothing really onetime driving that decrease year-over-year. Brandt. I think it's just us continuing to get better and smarter and be more judicious in terms of where we're allocating marketing dollars every week, every month, every quarter. [indiscernible] will continue. There'll be a little bit of noise as you get to Q3 just with the Alberta launch. So I wouldn't say bake it in for the rest of the year because of third quarter a little bit of noise.

But we're feeling really good about having a handle on the cost structure, the marketing, the reinvestment, delivering the best returns, where to invest in customer acquisition, where to maybe pull back a bit, and all that with a focus on getting this thing to breakeven or better as we move throughout the remainder of the year and into

2027.

Yes. We're just continually monitoring results, and we're investing where we see opportunity and where it's effective, and we'll continue to do that throughout the year.

Our next question will come from Dan Politzer with JPMorgan.

First, just kind of general on kind of the regional gaming landscape as you see it. Obviously, there's been news flow on potential M&A. I guess where do you stand as you think about your balance sheet and leverage improving relative to potential opportunities if there were assets to come on the market or fall out of any large transaction?

Yes. I would say, Dan, we're obviously staying close to the headlines as you guys are, and we'll see what does or doesn't develop here. Feel better about our balance sheet today than I felt in years, and that's great. And as you look out to the end of the year for us to have our lease-adjusted net leverage back into the [ mid-5 ], call it, the midpoint of what we have here is at [ 5.5 ], maybe a little bit better and traditional net leverage in the low 2s. And then you look out to 2027, whereas if you were looking at doing something from an M&A perspective, it's probably going to take you out to [ 27 ] just because it takes time in our highly regulated industry to transact. So you're looking at leverage levels that would be lower, low eyes on a lease-adjusted basis and into the high 1s, somewhere in that range from a traditional net leverage.

So we're going to have -- it doesn't mean that we would pursue. It'd have to be the right price, the right asset, right market or plural for each one of those. But it does mean that we're going to have more capacity. And we know that -- the history of PENN, M&A is very accretive, just given our overall operating structure. We have the industry's best tax adjusted EBITDAR margins in the space. We've got a great asset portfolio, a very valuable database that can help improve the results of assets that we can acquire.

So we would definitely be interested in taking a look at the right asset, at the right -- in the right market at the right price. And we're going to have the optionality to do that. So I wouldn't say it's going to be something that we're placing calls to do proactively, but if there's assets on the market that are exciting and interesting and attractive from a price perspective, we'll definitely take a look.

Got it. And then just turning to Interactive in the quarter, your iCasino net revenue is up 15%, the online sports book up 5%. How should we think about over the course of the year? It seems likely that iGaming is going to be up more, but I don't if you can kind of put some parameters how to think about the growth of each of those segments for maybe the full year.

Yes. We obviously have assumptions built out in our model and our guide for the rest of the year. I think you will definitely see higher growth from iCasino than you will from OSB. And it really depends also on where the -- how the market is growing. But I would expect for us to be at or above market growth in iCasino and OSB, probably -- again, on a net basis, probably close to where market growth is, handle definitely lower. But we think on a net revenue basis at that market is probably the right way to think about it.

Our next question will come from Joe Stauff with Susquehanna.

Jay, I wanted to ask if you could just maybe an update on Joliet and the progress thus far, maybe in the in the months and the outlook in terms of the ramp? And then the second question is on Alberta. I know the the launch dates kind of moving around. But illustrating, let's say, early July, what are you allowed to do going into that launch really to leverage, obviously, your brand in Canada, especially around the NHL playoffs with Edmonton being built, I guess, 1/3 of the population.

Yes, I'll take the Joliet question. And then, Aaron, you can respond to Alberta. Joliet, we continue to feel really good about it, Joe. I would say that every month, we feel a little bit better because not only are we really seeing strong results on the revenue side. You saw the slide where we share we're continuing to break records from a gaming revenue and non-gaming revenue perspective every quarter and then the end of the quarter in March was our best month ever for Joliet, both in slots and tables. So same thing [indiscernible]. We're feeling really good about these investments and our ability to generate incremental revenue and incremental EBITDAR and EBITDA.

I would say, based on our learnings for Joliet, by the time we hit the 12-month mark in August, we're going to be feeling pretty good about the margin improvement as well from pre versus post. Whereas the first kind of 6 to 9 months revenues are much higher, but you're figuring things out on the cost side, and you've got all your restaurants open and entertainment programs most days of the week. And then you start to dial it back with your learnings.

And so we're in that dial back and optimization phase with Joliet while continuing to see database trends improve. Very excited about month-to-date, what we're seeing in Joliet in April, in addition to what we saw in Q1. So I think we're right where we expect it to be, and it's a good template for what we expect with Aurora applying those same learnings and the time frame to ramp again about 12 months. And then again, M Resorts, there's a lot of learnings that we can apply to our Columbus hotel that's going to open here at the end of June as well.

Yes. And then in Alberta, look, we feel really good about our launch there. Obviously, theScore brand in Canada is very strong. It's actually the #1 media sports brand in the market. We have as many people on the score in Alberta as we do in Ontario, so it's very strong. But we have a, look, full-scale marketing plan that we're building towards that's going to start in July. The date is no longer moving around, it's July 13. So we will have a full-scale launch then. We're already in market with preregistration.

We're going to be active from a brand and performance marketing perspective. And look, we've launched in Ontario and enjoy a very nice market share there today. It's a big part of our gaming business, and we expect to see similar market share there based on the investments we're going to make. So we feel really good about everything that's going on there.

And look, we have a great partnership with the [indiscernible], which ultimately is a national team there as well. And so we're going to be leaning on that. So I think if you were in Region Day, if you're in Ontario, you're starting to see theScore brand all around the city and the same thing is going to continue in Alberta, and we're going to leverage all of our assets, and we're expecting a very successful launch.

Our next question will come from Jordan Bender with Citizens.

It looks like you have the Washington D.C. sports betting market. I guess following the rebrand and now what you see in the business with its settling. Any change to philosophy around operating in certain states, whether size or tax rates?

Good question, Jordan. That's something that we're always evaluating. I would say, generally speaking, that staying in OSB only markets. If we can get those to be close to breakeven from a contribution margin perspective is going to make sense for us. As you think about iGaming, maybe eventually passing from a legislative perspective in many of these states, if not eventually all of those states. Your #1 feeder into iGaming is the cross-sell from online sports betting, 60% of our online gaming business and the states that offer both came from or sourced from online sports betting initiation. So that's obviously compelling.

And if you're not losing money in a state and you've got volume of customer activation and retention and you've cultivated relationships, it makes sense to stay in those markets. That's certainly our view of it, but we're going to continue to look at each market individually. DC, we didn't have much volume. So it didn't make sense for us there. But I would say everywhere else, as of the last time we analyzed, it made sense to stay in the game.

I mean that's the beauty of having a scale platform that we do is you can launch and operate at an efficiency level that is even or better than it doesn't really cost you anything to stay there. D.C. was really the only obvious thing for us to look at currently. There's no really plans to change our footprint right now.

Understood. Felicia, I think your comments from last call, [ 0.2 ] sports betting and gaming margins maybe being a little bit under what you expected for the quarter. Is it fair to assume there was a couple of million of bad holds in the EBITDAR number in 1Q?

Yes. I think that's fair.

Yes. We came in at 8.4% versus a structural hold of 9%. So that was some of the impact in Q1. But overall, we were pretty close to where we expected to be. So we didn't really call it out. And generally speaking, March Madness just doesn't hold as well as other sports because you don't have the same game parlay volumes there that you do with NBA, that you do with NFL, that you do with [indiscernible] . So we weren't disappointed. But I think Q2, it's more likely to be sort of at that structural hold number of 9% or better depending on how things go for the playoffs in NBA and NHL.

Our next question will come from John DeCree with CBRE.

Jay, you probably touched on this a little bit, but maybe to ask directly on the kind of progress of an omnichannel strategy. Can you talk a little bit about where your kind of iGaming customers are coming from? Are there cross-selling from OSB? Is that kind of activating the retail database? Just kind of curious as to how that strategy is going and kind of how customers are kind of coming into the system and bring around?

Yes. It's obviously been a big focus continue to be for us, John, given where the industry is, and I think important where it continues to head I think having a digital and a retail relationship with your consumer is absolutely critical [indiscernible].

So we're happy today with our ability to execute on that. Specific question on iGaming. I mentioned roughly 60% of that business comes directly from online sports betting, and you should assume that in the states where we have a retail footprint, so less to New Jersey, but more on the Pennsylvania and Michigan side that most of the rest of our business does come from our Retail database. And then you've got some organic, of course, through the brands and through performance marketing efforts and customer acquisition investment, things of that nature.

So I would say overall, we're continuing to get better. We have -- we're continuing to work on our system integrations to make it a lot more automated, and that's going to be better for the customer experience from an omnichannel perspective. The ideal scenario, and I don't think we're that far away from it, would be one platform, one app and one wallet for everything. And obviously, it all integrates with your retail experience when you're on-premise.

So feeling really good about omnichannel execution. I think we do it very well relative to the rest of the market. And that story is only going to get better as we continue to invest in resources and capital allocation over time.

Yes. And look, we've got a lot of early growth from our database as Jay mentioned, Pennsylvania, Michigan. But the brand is really strong. And so as we start doing brand and performance marketing to continue that growth, which you see in our numbers, it's just really building on itself. So it's a nice kind of 1, 2 punch to leverage your database and then support that with marketing and then pulling new users. And we're not seeing signs of that stuffing based on our marketing spend. And so - you can see that in our casino growth numbers, and we expect to continue that success especially in hybrid states.

Our next question will come from Shaun Kelley with Bank of America.

Jay or Aaron, I just want to build on that last question a little bit. I think, Jay, you mentioned 60% of iGaming coming from some form of sports betting cross-sell. I mean maybe just more broadly or overall, I think we've seen this slowdown in OSB trends, and you can see it in the 5% growth rate number. So kind of what's the offset for PENN? Because, again, I'd say your data looks like it is outperforming what we're seeing in the broader market. We're seeing that the correlation between OSB slowdown and iGaming down a little bit for those that rely on cross-sell. So what's kind of working for you guys to kind of stay above that trend? It sounds like Ontario is [ 1 point ], but anything else you could provide for color there would be helpful.

Yes. Well, I'll jump in and then you can go ahead to jump in. I would say overall, the way to think about it would be we're -- Ontario clearly is an area of strength for us. And then the launch of the Hollywood stand-alone casino. We haven't -- we're just now starting to anniversary those launches from late Q4 and early Q1 of '24 into 25. And so for us, it's still being relatively new as a stand-alone with that brand lead. And for us, that's very compelling given that's the flag on our properties, brick-and-mortar properties in Pennsylvania and Michigan, and we're continuing to put some extra weight into Canada.

So in the areas where you would expect us to have some brand equity and we do have brand equity in those markets. We're leaning in and why we're seeing maybe performance a little bit better than the market. We would expect that to continue because we're we're continuing to learn what's working, what's not, but it's definitely Ontario and Hollywood stand-alone driving most of that.

Yes. I mean, Ontario, obviously, the strength of theScore brand really helps us, so the sports book is growing, and therefore, that cross-sell number, which is really high, drives gaming revenue. But we actually have seen growth in our stand-alone score casino as well, which we're investing in. So that's a nice kind of 1,2 punch in Canada.

In the U.S., obviously, cross-sell is important, but if you're getting lower gaming volumes, then it's going to affect your casino revenue on that cross-sell which is why we've been offset somewhat by the success we've seen in Hollywood. So we're moderating between the two. They're both still super important to a healthy business, but we are seeing more growth on the casino-only side. But we're really focused on making sure that we can still continue to drive OSB in hybrid states because the cross-sell is important.

And then just as a quick follow-up, could we just get a quick legislative update on -- there are a few proposals out there, maybe as many as in years past, but still things, I think, on the [indiscernible] Michigan around potential iGaming OSB tax increases, some proposal in Ohio, discussions around, I think, Massachusetts and Arizona. So some of these are maybe not as big of a focus as you kind of focus a little bit more purely in iGaming, with Michigan in particular? And then Maine as well, if you could just give us a couple of quick thoughts.

Happy to. I would say, generally speaking, on the states that you mentioned, it's still relatively early in the process. We need to see how it plays out. I would say that since prediction markets have really gotten aggressive on spending, and it appears there's some impact, at least on the customer acquisition cost side and potentially on the OSB handle side of things, the legislators at the state level and lawmakers, the leaders that we're speaking to, understand that now would not be a good time to be thinking about raising taxes on the incumbent operators, especially on the brick-and-mortar side. So I would say those conversations have been ongoing but productive.

As it relates to Maine, there is litigation pending with regard to the iGaming legislation that passed the -- we'll see how that plays out. We're obviously not happy with how that was put together in Maine as one of the two land-based operators who have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes and invested a lot of money and employ a lot of Mainers in the state. So if that does end up being implemented the way that it was proposed [indiscernible] PENN to be investing X to 0 in the state of Maine going forward.

Our next question will come from Chad Beynon with Macquarie.

Wanted to ask about the Chicago market. I know the VGT bill to permit restaurants in [indiscernible] County and Chicago was passed. And it looks like restaurants can start that in the third and fourth quarter. Just given your presence in the area, I know you're a little further out kind of into the burbs, but do you think there will be any impact from this? And is anything factored into the guidance in the back half?

I would say, no, in terms of impact, just given where our properties are located, to your point, chain in the burbs. Aurora, our primary competitor is [indiscernible] and we don't really compete with folks that live or would plan on spending the majority of their gaming budget in downtown Chicago, just given the traffic and commuter dynamics in Chicago lands. And same thing with Joliet, our primary competitors, [indiscernible] in Joliet, that won't change.

If anything, I would say we're excited about being able to -- remember, we have a Prairie State Gaming VGT Route Operation business in Illinois that does quite well for us, continues to grow both on the top line and on the bottom line. So we anticipate actually participating in the expansion of VGTs in the Greater Chicago area, and that should be overall for us. We think that positive.

Interesting. And then just with the increase that you've seen on the retail customer, what's the current status or update on cashless gaming. I know you guys were a leader with that. It's taking a little bit longer to kind of hit maybe some of the returns. We did hear from a strip operator this quarter that's kind of stepping away from that. But do you think this will continue to progress and maybe with some of that retail business coming back, you could see some more green shoots there?

Yes. I would say the dynamic on the cashless side for us is the customers who are engaged with cashless love it and use it almost every time they visit us in our retail properties, and we see a lot stronger retention and LTV with those customers. So we're not planning to do anything wildly different.

We're looking to continue to improve the experience overall. And that won't change. I think we continue to make the experience better, particularly as we think about new openings like Joliet and Aurora and what adoption looks like. It's probably more an education thing than anything else. I think those that, like I said earlier, have engaged with our cashless product, do like it. But the percentage is overall of those that do engage is still below where we want it to be. So we're continuing work on that.

But overall, I would expect adoption to continue to improve over time.

Our next question will come from Jeff Stantial with Stifel.

Just one from us on the retail business. It seems to us just looking at news flow that there's a bit more pushback recently against on regulated skill gains and other [indiscernible] ray market distributed gaming. You saw pretty recently the rate Governor [indiscernible]. [indiscernible] seems to be starting some legal enforcement, is the court case makes like Pennsylvania? .

Jay, just curious to get your sort of high-level views on this trend, if you agree that seems to be shifting against these machines. And in particular, how much of a tailwind that you think this could be if machine counts go down materially in any of these key states?

Yes. I would say that we're feeling better about where seeing sit in states like Pennsylvania and Missouri than we probably ever have. The still game legal case is going to be in front of Pennsylvania State Supreme Court in the next couple of months. We'll see how that goes. But we obviously have a very strong opinion as to skill games and legality and from our perspective, legality of those devices in most of these markets, if not all. And in the case of Missouri, you've got an attorney general there that we think is doing a fantastic job of really stepping up and shutting these devices down.

The argument is always interesting to me that you've got, in many cases, bar and tavern owners that have these machines, they say, "Well, we need the machines or else, we may not have a profitable operation." But the reality is these are -- they're illegal. I don't think that we would make that argument in really any other areas of life. So if you're operating illegal machines and the State Attorney General says shut them down, they need to be shut down, and they probably should never have been in operation in the first place.

So we're definitely feeling encouraged by what we're seeing in Pennsylvania and Missouri. There's still time for things to play out. So we'll stay close to that. And clearly, if that moves in the direction that we hope it does, it would create some sort of a tailwind for us on the retail side. It's hard to measure given a variety of variables that we would have to see how it plays once implemented. But I would imagine that would be ultimately a tailwind for us.

Our next question will come from Ben Chaiken with Mizuho.

A few on Aurora. I guess, how long will you be in transition? Presumably, there'll be some downtime from your comments? I'm guessing it's largely in May. And then is there anything notable that this opening and project versus Joliet uliet. I guess my perception is that the surrounding area around Aurora is a little more developed versus Joliet. And then lastly, what are some of the learnings you alluded to earlier in the Q&A, I think you described it, if I caught you correctly, Jay, it's potentially stronger and faster?

Yes. Happy to, Ben. The Aurora project, you're correct, it will be roughly a 2-week operational shutdown. That will happen in June, and it happens literally right before we open. So you should expect that to happen maybe a little bit late May, but the rest of that is going to be in June. It will be entirely in the second quarter of 2026.

And I would say having done it once before and worked with closely with the Illinois regulators, we expect this to go smoothly given that the Joliet transition also went smoothly. The biggest difference between Aurora and Joliet, definitely surrounding area, to your point, the rock run development around Joliet, it's just now starting to come out of the ground. We have 250 residential units that are going up adjacent to our Joliet property that will be open, we believe, by the end of this calendar year. There's a 250-plus room hotel that's going to be opening soon or breaking ground soon, excuse me, in '26 and opening by the end of '27 is what we're told. That will be walking distance to Joliet.

So it's going to be, I think, for Joliet, a really good long tail in terms of the upside for that property as good as the start has been. It should just get better and better over time.

Aurora, we're expecting there to be a ramp that's going to continue to improve over time as most new openings do. But I think the biggest difference is that it is a more mature area. We're adjacent to the Chicago premium outlet mall, which generates millions of visits a year. We're going to have a hotel at Joliet, over 200 rooms with suites, a spa. We don't have that at Joliet. The casino floor is going to be larger. We're going to have more F&B entertainment space, outdoor entertainment. So think about Aurora just being sort of a bigger and a few more amenities offer versus Joliet, but in an area that's very mature, and it's right off the interstate. So we're feeling pretty bullish about that Aurora opening given what we've seen in Joliet so far.

Okay. That's super helpful. And then one just on Alberta. What were some of the considerations when you're thinking about customer acquisition and marketing? You talked about strategies that worked and didn't work with Ontario. And then related, are there any nuances you can share about your expectations, whether that's player behavior or market size?

Well, the consideration that when we launched in Ontario, it was a lot less competitive. So there's a lot more applicants and people in market for Alberta. So that was -- that's a factor that we're looking at. And of course, leaning on theScore brand, I think, is going to help us break through some of that noise.

And then in terms of the players, it's hard to tell because we don't -- they're not playing today. So right now, we're modeling them as similar behaviors as what we see in Ontario, and we'll adapt from that.

Our next question will come from Trey Bowers with Wells Fargo.

I just wanted to dig back in a little on digital. Just as we look through the balance of the year, is there any kind of incremental detail you can give us on the cadence. When you say a small loss, should we look to Q1 is kind of a good idea of what Q2 and Q3 should look like and then get to a Q4 level of kind of exit profits? Just any further detail to kind of set some bogeys out there would be great.

Yes. Happy to, Trey. I think Q2, looking very similar to Q1, maybe a touch better, but right in that range of Q1 in terms of small loss. Q3 would be a loss a little bit larger just because you have the Alberta launch sitting in Q3 for the first 3 months of that market. And then Q4, to be profitable and get us to a total loss for the year of $20 million. So that's the cadence that I'd be thinking about.

Okay. Perfect. And then as a follow-up, just going back to your comments on M&A earlier in the call. Just with the shares where they are, how do you think of kind of a hurdle rate for M&A just versus buying your own stock, especially given you even referenced the 20% plus free cash flow yield?

Yes. Trey, you can appreciate this is a topic that we spend a lot of time on at the Board level, and we'll continue to. We're constantly evaluating what those options are for us from a capital allocation perspective. You would imagine that something on the M&A side would have to look really cash -- free cash flow accretive to us, to invest there. And it's not to say that we wouldn't find something, it's just to say that if you've got a free cash flow yield at 20-plus percent, that's what you have to measure it against. And there's some different variables that you would add to the equation. But generally speaking, that's pretty straightforward. And we think that there could be potentially depending on the market and the value that our database could deliver and our operating cost structure could to an acquisition, that you can get a really nice return in that same neighborhood, but there's no doubt that our stock is very attractive at these levels and especially as you look out to 2027.

Our next question will come from Bernie McTernan with Needham & Co.

Want to start on the retail guidance rates for this year was really only flowing through the 1Q beat. So I was just hoping you can talk about that. And was it just a earlier than expected impact from the growth projects? Or just any other color you can provide could be helpful.

Yes, happy to, Bernie. I would say it's still early in the year. So we're feeling really good about what we see in April, but didn't want to get ahead of ourselves. There's a lot of geopolitical macro noise, and it seems every day, every week, the markets are fluctuating. So I would just say, based on where we are in the calendar year, was more of a factor than anything if the trends that we're seeing -- that we saw in Q1 and are seeing in April continue, then we would have guided higher than what we ultimately did, but we just wanted -- want some more time under our boat. Obviously, we want to get the two new properties opened up, with Columbus and Aurora, and then we'll have more share. The next time we're on the call will be in August, and we'll be in a position to, I think, be even more clear about what the rest of the year looks like.

Okay. And I was hoping we asked a question on OSB and maybe peel back the onion a little bit. OSB revenue growing 5% this quarter. It seems like MAUs were down. So presumably, handle was down. So the growth in higher GGR hold and in lower promotional intensity. And so I was just hoping you could frame what the runway would be if MAU trends and handle trends stay this way, >what the runway would be to keep stable to slightly growing that OSB revenue base would be?

Well, I mean, you hit it. I mean hold is helping us as our volumes are down. But obviously, we're going to focus on maintaining volumes and growing them slightly. Although our plan was to our volumes were going to go down as part of our new structure and our new focus. So obviously, casino volumes are important. Canada is important. And OSB and hybrid [indiscernible] are important. But we are focused on getting volumes up in flat. If flat, to up. So that's going to be our continued focus here. But we did see that softness as you noted.

But luckily, we held well and we continue to make improvements in our risk and trading. We have a lot of confidence in and how we're holding and improvements we're making as we move forward. So we think [indiscernible] is going to continue to help us as well as volumes are flat.

I would just say, too, that as you look on a year-over-year basis, that the MAU declines have been pretty consistent. So it's not as though these are further accelerating in the wrong direction. It's been very stable on a year-over-year basis from a post rebrand perspective as you look throughout Q1. So the goal really is to do that here in 2026, have stability and then to start to hopefully see some growth in those MAUs and continue to see growth in [indiscernible] as you move throughout this year and next year.

And we're very focused on our higher worth customers on the sports betting side. That's working for us. Retention in those areas has been, I'll say, fantastic, and we expect that to continue. So we want to be above the flat mark in terms of OSB net revenue. We accomplished that here in Q1. We want to continue to accomplish that as we move through the rest of the year and into '27.

Why don't we take one more question, Chelsea?

All right. Our last question will come from Stephen Grambling with Morgan Stanley.

Just sticking with the OSB or actually really just the overall digital, a clarification on turning profitable in the fourth quarter. Would you anticipate that you could be profitable even if we kind of strip out the licensing or skin revenue? And then as we look longer term, what are some of the ways that you think through how Canada versus the U.S. kind of ex the skins will contribute to EBITDAR going forward, if there's any kind of puts and takes to think about in each?

Yes. Look, Stephen, we'll have a lot more to share on those questions as we move throughout the year. Overall, for Q4, based on what we're anticipating right now, obviously profitable overall inclusive of the skin revenue. And I would say probably pretty close to breakeven without the skin revenue. It's not a little bit positive. Again, we just need more time under our belt from a post rebrand perspective. But that sets up very nicely as we head into 2027. We obviously want to get this business to profitability overall. And then you want to get to profitability after skin revenue. And we're going to do that.

Obviously, the trends are moving in the right direction from an NGR, from a cost structure and from a contribution profit perspective, and that will continue to get stronger and stronger every quarter as we move forward as we conclude the year and then head into '27.

And maybe I know you're going to have more data under your belt, and we'll see where our market share kind of continues to track. But is there any reason to believe that the margin structure kind of long term would be different in Canada versus the U.S. as we think about them on an apples-to-apples basis kind of excess skin revenue?

Yes. I mean, look, Canada is going to be our strongest margin market in North America, and part of that is driven by volume and market share, and part of that is driven by tax rate and the fact that you have iCasino and OSB. So there's no doubt, Canada for us is going to be market #1 from a margin and profitability perspective. But obviously, we're in a lot more markets in the U.S. And the states that have both OSB and iCasino, we're going to see much stronger margins than the OSB only states. But again, we're of the opinion it's probably a matter of time before many of these OSB only states turn to some form of iGaming and we want to stay in the business and be ready when that day comes.

Thank you. We've now reached our allotted time for questions. So I'd like to turn the call back over to management for any additional or closing remarks.

All right. Thanks, everyone, for dialing in. I know it's a busy morning in the space. And Chelsea, thank you, and we look forward to speaking to all of you again in August.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation, and you may now disconnect.

Greetings and welcome to the PENN Entertainment Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Nicky. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining PENN Entertainment's 2025 Fourth Quarter Conference Call. We'll get to management's comments and presentation momentarily as well as your Q&A. During the Q&A session, we ask that everyone please limit themselves to 1 question and 1 follow-up. Now I'll review the safe harbor disclosure. Please note that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For more information, please see our press release for details on specific risk factors. .

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to the company's CEO, Jay Snowden. Jay, please go ahead.

Thanks, Joe. Good morning, everyone. I'm joined here in Wyomissing by Felicia Hendrix and Aaron Laberge as well as other members of our senior executive team. I'm pleased to report PENN's diversified retail portfolio delivered another solid quarter during which retail adjusted EBITDA grew year-over-year after adjusting for poor weather in December. In our Interactive segment, we successfully rebranded our U.S. online sportsbook to the Score Bet on December 1 and achieved positive adjusted EBITDA in December, driven by continued momentum from our iCasino products disciplined cost management and strong online sports betting hold rates. 2026 is an exciting year for us in which we expect to generate year-over-year segment adjusted EBITDAR growth of 20%. And we are well positioned to benefit from the strategic investments we have made over the last several years and are laser-focused on improving free cash flow generation, deleveraging and opportunistically returning capital to shareholders. I want to highlight the foundation that set us up nicely to deliver on our goals for this year and beyond, which are summarized on Slide 6 of our investor presentation.

First, our diverse retail business is healthy and growing, generating sustainable free cash flow. In addition to anniversarying much of the new supply in several of our key markets, we will have 2 more retail growth projects opening by the end of the second quarter this year. and we're seeing continued momentum at 2 that we opened last year. Second, we expect our Interactive segment to inflect to breakeven adjusted EBITDA for the full year, which would represent a $268 million year-over-year improvement. Third, we have rightsized our maintenance capital spend on a go-forward basis, which we'll touch upon more later. And fourth, we will begin to realize synergies from our corporate restructuring and cost optimization initiatives. The new organizational structure we announced in early January will allow us to become a leaner and flatter organization, enabling business leaders to be more empowered and drive greater productivity.

All in all, we expect to save over $10 million in annualized run rate expenses for the company as we streamline the organization, which will mostly phase in over the first half of the year. The operational benefits are already in flight. In terms of rightsizing our property maintenance CapEx, we have done an excellent job over the last 6 years of upgrading our casinos, refreshing our slot floors and investing in non-gaming amenities like updated hotel rooms, new tel sports books, new restaurants and entertainment venues. In addition, our dockside to land-based growth projects are expected to meaningfully reduce our maintenance CapEx cost going forward. With the improvements we have made to our properties, we feel comfortable with bringing our recurring maintenance CapEx levels down by $20 million and returning to near pre-COVID level spending.

Slide 7 really drives some of the significant free cash flow we expect to generate in 2026 and beyond. Importantly, this growth in free cash flow will enable us to delever meaningfully in 2026 and opportunistically return capital to shareholders. In fact, we expect to generate more than $3 per share of free cash flow in 2026 and reduce our lease-adjusted net leverage by more than 1 turn. Returning now to our results for the quarter. On the retail side, we experienced another quarter of year-over-year growth in theoretical revenue across all rated worth and age segments with our older demographics and VIP play contributing meaningfully to these results. The bad weather in December negatively impacted segment adjusted EBITDA by approximately $7 million. In addition, our segment was negatively impacted by new supply, Bossier City and New Orleans, in those markets in Louisiana and our Midwest segment was impacted by new supply in Council Bluffs, Iowa.

Core business trends were otherwise stable across the portfolio with regional strength in Ohio and St. Louis as well as our LaBerge, Lake Charles property. We're seeing continued momentum at our new hotel tower at M Resort in Las Vegas, which is capturing previously unmet demand including booking 2 of the largest groups in the property's history recently. In December, the property achieved record gaming volumes. And in January, we generated record net revenue at M. Meanwhile, the new Hollywood Casino Joliet is delivering strong results both from new and reactivated customers with a nearly 13% year-over-year increase in the number of active players helping to drive meaningful increases in both gaming and nongaming revenues. The early performance of these projects provides us continued confidence in the anticipated success from the upcoming ownings of the Hollywood Columbus Hotel Tower and the new Hollywood Casino Aurora, in addition to our new council properties scheduled to open in late 2027 or early 2028.

As we said previously, we anticipate all of these development projects to generate approximately 15% plus cash-on-cash returns. On the interactive side, we experienced rec gaming revenue in the fourth quarter driven by the continued growth of our stand-alone Hollywood Eye Casino products and increased cross-sell as well as improvements in our online sportsbook product offering and operations. Revenue growth, excluding tax gross-up of 52% year-over-year was primarily attributable to iCasino growth of 40% plus and online sports book growth of 73%. including strong revenue and positive adjusted EBITDA in December, our first month operating as theScore bet in the U.S. Additionally, adjusted EBITDA improved $70 million year-over-year in the fourth quarter, driven by strong adjusted flow-through of 95%. We are encouraged by the upward trajectory of the interactive business. Our sports book is maturing through a more disciplined regionally focused marketing strategy that prioritizes iCasino jurisdictions.

Our reduced fixed media spend provides us much more marketing flexibility to strategically invest more in Canada as well as the U.S. hybrid states with both iCasino and online sports betting and in customer cohorts with more compelling returns, particularly as we look ahead to new market openings like Alberta, which is anticipated later this year in 2026. Importantly, we've retained users through the Score Bet rebrand and continue to engage them across our ecosystem. Retention and new user growth will remain our top interactive priorities and the foundation for our long-term growth in that segment. The positive trends in our Interactive segment give us confidence to recommit to achieving breakeven adjusted EBITDA in 2026.

And with that, I'll turn it over to Felicia.

Thanks, Jay. Our Retail segment generated revenues of $1.4 billion adjusted EBITDAR of $456.4 million and segment adjusted EBITDA margins of 32.3%. Inclement weather in December negatively affected retail adjusted EBITDAR in the quarter by $7 million, with the largest impact in the Northeast segment. We expect the combination of our high-quality portfolio plus our new growth projects to generate year-over-year retail net revenue and adjusted EBITDA growth in 2026, For retail net revenues, we forecast a range of $5.7 billion to $5.85 billion and retail adjusted EBITDA will range from $1.86 billion to $1.98 billion. .

As you think about your quarterly modeling, the severe weather in the first quarter thus far has negatively impacted retail adjusted EBITDA by approximately $5 million to $10 million. For the second quarter of 2026, at our new property in Aurora, we expect to have approximately 2 weeks of downtime as we look to open the new land-based facility. And as you know, our second half results will benefit from the opening of all 4 of our retail growth projects. All of these items are reflected in our guidance. Our Interactive segment in the fourth quarter generated revenues of $398.7 million, including a tax gross-up of $182.7 million and adjusted EBITDA loss of $39.9 million. For 2026, we expect Interactive revenues of approximately $1.6 billion inclusive of an estimated tax gross-up of about $760 million or a revenue improvement of roughly 20% year-over-year, excluding the tax gross-up.

This growth will be a function of the playbook we initiated in December as we transition to the Score Bet sports book in the U.S. and shifted our focus and resources to our U.S. iCasino states in Canada with a focus on iCasino and cross-sell. Complementing our revenue growth is a more rationalized cost structure. Our marketing expenses will decline significantly year-over-year as we made our last payment to ESPN in December 2025. We anticipate our marketing spend to come in approximately $150 million lower than in 2025 as we align spending with our revised regional strategy focused on iCasino and Canada. With performance and brand spend fully in our control, we will adjust allocations based on results. Further, we have rightsized our interactive operations to fit our new structure with payroll and G&A declining proportionately. As a result of our revenue growth expectations and more rationalized cost structure, we continue to expect our Interactive segment to generate breakeven adjusted EBITDA in 2026 and note that we will expect all components, U.S. OSB, iCasino and our Canadian operations to generate positive contribution margin in 2026.

This forecast does not contemplate any new jurisdictions launching in 2026, including Alberta. As we look to full year 2026, we expect U.S. OSB MAUs to decline year-over-year given the transition from ESPN BET to the Score Bet while U.S. eye Casino as well as Canadian OSB and iCasino MAUs should increase year-over-year, reflecting our strategy to realign our digital focus. We expect the OSB and iCasino hole rates to remain around 9% and 3.7%, respectively. As for quarterly EBITDA cadence, the first 3 quarters of 2026 should generate small adjusted EBITDA losses, and we expect the fourth quarter to be profitable. We expect the other category adjusted EBITDA to be a loss of $119 million for 2026. The table on Page 9 of our earnings release summarizes our cash expenditures in the quarter, including cash payments to our REIT landlords, cash taxes, cash interest on traditional debt and total CapEx. Of our total $190 million of CapEx in the quarter, $85 million was project CapEx, primarily related to our 4 development projects.

We ended the fourth quarter with total liquidity of $1.1 billion, inclusive of $687 million in cash and cash equivalents. On November 3, 2025, PENN received $115 million in funding from GLPI at a 7.79% cap rate in connection with the second hotel tower construction at the M Resort Las Vegas. In conjunction with the opening of the $360 million Hollywood Aurora in late 2Q we expect to receive $225 million in funding from GLPI near project opening and the remaining $21 million from the City of Aurora by the end of the year. We have elected not to take GLPI capital in connection with the construction of our Columbus hotel tower. The combination of this funding with a strong free cash flow and more optimized CapEx spend Jay discussed earlier, will enable us to delever nicely throughout the year. Total 2026 CapEx will be $445 million, which includes $225 million of project CapEx, down from $408 million in 2025 and $220 million of maintenance CapEx compared to $239 million in 2025.

We expect total cash payments under our triple net leases to be $1 billion in 2026. For 2026 cash interest expense, we project $145 million. For cash taxes, we do not expect to be a cash taxpayer in 2026 given the favorable tax deductions enabled by the One Big Beautiful Bill in addition to our acquired NOLs and various tax credits. Our basic share count at the end of the fourth quarter was 133.2 million shares. After the June 20 repurchases of the convertible notes, we now have 4.5 million potential dilutive shares from the remaining convertible notes stub and about 1 million dilutive shares from RSUs and stock options.

I will now turn it back to Jay.

All right. Thanks, Felicia. In closing, I want to say that I'm proud of what our property interactive and corporate teams were able to accomplish in 2025, including the resilience shown on the retail side and the successful rebranding of our OSB product to the Score Bet. I couldn't be more excited about the many catalysts we have ahead of us in 2026, including the opening of our new Aurora property and the Columbia Hotel. The continued ramp of Joliet and the M Resort Hotel tower and achieving breakeven in Interactive. I'm also excited to welcome our 3 new board members, Heather, Jeff and Fabio, who bring a lot of relevant experience and fresh perspectives to our board. We look forward to this being a year of strong execution at PENN with an emphasis above all on free cash flow generation and deleveraging and transforming our strategic investments into consistent long-term returns and value creation for our shareholders. .

And with that, can we please open the line for the first question.

[Operator Instructions]

We'll take our first question from Brandt Montour with Barclays.

Thanks for all the details this morning. Maybe starting off on digital and drilling into that top line '26 target of 20% revenue growth ex gross up. Jay, maybe you could put a finer point on that or just flesh it out a little bit. We know that you're growing iGaming in excess of that. there's more moving pieces on the OSB side with handle down because of, obviously, the exit of and then, of course, hold was probably a benefit or was a benefit here in the recent months. And so we kind of really don't know what the run rate top line OSB is at right now. So just what's growing faster within that 20% iGaming. But if you could just flesh out what's going to get you to that 20% and how conservative it is?

Yes. Happy to, Aaron, feel free to jump in as well. certainly being driven primarily by growth in iGaming. We've seen really strong growth rates throughout 2025, and I'm happy with what we're seeing so far at the start of 2026, our products continues to get better on the stand-alone Hollywood app. We're seeing really, really strong retention. We were before the rebrands and obviously, we weren't affected as much on the iGaming side from the sports betting rebrand of ESPN BET to the Score Bet, so primarily driven by iGaming growth. We also expect to see NGR growth on the sports betting side despite lower handle. As you can imagine, we've taken a really, I would say, refreshed look at our entire database on the interactive side. If you look at from a retention perspective across the worst cohorts and the interactive database the top -- we sort of break it down into 8 different categories and the top 4 are virtually unchanged from a retention perspective. both before the rebrand and after the rebrand on a month-over-month basis.

So feeling really good about retention at the mid-worth and high-worth segments. And where you're seeing falloff on the retention side is where we're doing that by design is at the lowest worth segments. Most of those are unprofitable customers. And so pulling back on reinvestment at the low worth is going to help on flow through overall. It's going to lower our promotional reinvestment overall and focusing on our higher worth VIP and mid-worth customers just generates much more efficient business. So you'll see NGR growth despite some handle declines in 2026.

Yes, not much to add. I mean eye Casino is currently growing faster than 20% right now, which we're happy about. Obviously, OSB is going to continue to go down. But as Jay mentioned, we're going to moderate that with lower promotional expenses to improve flow through. So we feel pretty good right now with what we're looking at for the year.

Okay. That's super helpful, guys. And then over in the retail, the promotional environment was a headwind in '25. To some extent, there was obviously supply pressure. Can you just talk about those 2 items? Obviously, they're related into '26 and what you're expecting for the year?

Yes. We're happy to share that we're seeing less impact. I think there was some sort of initial shock to some changes in reinvestment and some customer shifts and movements in a couple of markets. It's really primarily where we felt it the most is in a couple of markets in Louisiana, really 3 markets, Baton Rouge, New Orleans and, of course, Bossier City, which we talked about. And then in Council Bluffs, Iowa, the combination of new competition, new supply in Omaha, Nebraska and then another competitor in Council Bluffs, where we saw some higher reinvestment levels. We're seeing that all starts to sort of fade and we do lap finally. We lapped the opening of the new supply in Bossier City here this month in February. We're feeling good about trends at our properties in Bossier City now that we've lapped that opening. .

There'll probably be some residual impact maybe the next month or 2. But we should be in the clear, I would say, in mid Q2 in terms of Bossier City. And I would say Councils Bluffs, there was a pretty major expansion of a new competitor in Omaha, I believe it was April of last year. So by the time you get to mid to late Q2, you've anniversaried the new supply shocks and competitive reactions. So I think the second half of the year should be feeling pretty good in terms of that acting then as a tailwind when you look at it on a year-over-year basis.

We will move next to Barry Jonas with Truist Securities.

Yes, Jay, why don't I take that second question you gave there maybe expanded as we think about the guidance range. Maybe what are you assuming between the range for new supply impact, something like more first half versus second, but also any assumptions embedded there for new project growth, anything for One Big Beautiful Bill. Just want to get a sense like what the -- what the difference is between the high and the low end of the guidance range.

Yes. We anticipated and contemplated all of the factors that you just highlighted, Barry. I do think that as I look at what consensus looks like by quarter, we probably feel stronger about the second half of the year than the first half. There's some weather impacts here in the first quarter that Felicia highlighted between $5 million and $10 million impact. We built that into our full year guide. So that's no change to the full year guide. But in terms of the cadence from Q1 to Q2, Q3 and Q4, there's a little bit of noise in Q2, and that we'll be opening our Aurora property. And you'll recall that when we opened Joliet, we had to shut the property down for 2 weeks. And so there's obviously a cost headwind to not generating revenue, but still having the costs flow through the P&L as we get ready to open Aurora. .

The second half of the year, we really feel like we're in the clear. We're going to have all 4 of our growth projects that we've been talking about for the last couple of years. We'll be open, 2 of them fully ramping, the ones that we opened in 2025. And feeling pretty good about launching the other 2. They're likely to open at the very end of Q2. The current construction schedule has us opening the Columbus hotel as well as the Aurora property, really at the tail end of Q2, call it, end of June. We'll firm that up in the next probably 1 month or 1.5 months publicly, but that's the way I would model it. And as you think about same-store versus new when you look at the EBITDA projection or guide for 2026, we look at our same store, including the markets with new supply as being basically flat year-over-year from an EBITDA perspective. And then the upside you see on a year-over-year basis, the 3% growth overall is being driven by the 4 growth projects.

Got it. And then I wanted to follow up on interactive, really nice to see the breakeven guidance this year. But at least conceptually, how should we be thinking about the maybe profitability scenarios for the segment in the years ahead. Clearly, new iGaming legalization will be a major factor, but it does seem like the royalties are a major positive today that could tail off at some point.

Yes. We are the only market we're aware of that is going to launch new this year is Alberta. That will happen. We leave some time around midyear that hasn't been firmed up yet, but that's what we're anticipating. That should be a good market for us. Obviously, our strongest market, I've highlighted before, has been Ontario from a market share and a contribution margin perspective. So we expect Alberta to be a good market, reasonable tax rate similar to Ontario, both online sports betting and online casino. There will be some investment that goes into that mark similar to when we launched Ontario, but we would expect to have similar market share results in that market as well. The Score brand really does carry across the country. It's not just specific to the province of Ontario. So feeling pretty good about that.

And I think to answer your question of how does breakeven in '26, what does it look like? How does that bridge to '27, '28. We just need, I think, another couple of quarters to see what is the revenue trajectory, both on the iGaming side as well as in OSB? How does the launch go in Alberta? So look, we're in control of all of the levers. That's a great feeling as we here head into 2026 here. And we feel really comfortable with being able to achieve breakeven. There's different paths to getting there, which would impact what your '27 and '28 outlook is. So we just need a little bit more time under our belt. We're feeling good about the first couple of months post rebrand.

We provided you some KPIs in the slide presentation for what December and January look like on a combined basis. And feeling pretty good about that. It's actually quite rare that when you go through a rebrand and you're making assumptions, obviously, you're building out what your assumptions are and then make adjustments on the fly. We've been really close to what we assumed we would be from a retention as well as a new user perspective. There's been little tweaks here and there that we've made. But overall, feeling pretty good about what we anticipated and what we're seeing in the business.

We will move next to Jordan Bender with Citizens.

I want to start on the casino side. So the bulk of the project CapEx is coming to an end in the coming months outside of Council Bluff. Jay, you might not be able to say anything on it today, but how do you view the development pipeline in the casino business over the next coming years?

Yes. I'll answer it, I guess, sort of internally looking if that's where you're headed directionally, I'm happy to answer thoughts on externally. But within PENN, we do have a few more projects that we're analyzing right now. I've mentioned before on our other calls that we've got some other aging river boats in markets like Louisiana, Mississippi and 1 more actually in Illinois, that actually -- as we do the analysis, the return profile looks quite similar to what we're seeing in Joliet real time and in M-Resort. Now that 1 is hotel expansion, but we'll we anticipate with Aurora, the water to land conversion. So I would say stay tuned on that. We've been analyzing these for some time, and I think you should expect to hear more about that here in 2026. But you're right in terms of project CapEx, it's was really at its peak in 2025 at over $400 million, and Felicia highlighted the first half of this year as we sort of finished up at Columbus and Aurora, another $225-ish million.

So that there'll be some Council Bluff spend as we get to the end of 2026 and head into '27. We anticipate that property opening up sometime towards the end of '27, it might leak into early '28. Anything else that we have planned as long as it pencils and we've got the support locally, which are all the things that we're working on right now and you should anticipate hearing more about that in the coming quarters.

Great. And then on the follow-up for the interactive guide, a lot of positive comments around kind of what's going on following the rebranding but the guidance I believe you guys did go from breakeven to positive to just breakeven. Can you kind of just flesh out what you're seeing in real time that's caused that shift?

Yes. Look, you have to take a midpoint when you're putting out a guide. And so I think that just feels comfortable right now. Again, we were positive EBITDA in December. I feel good about the business result in January. We're still in the middle of February. Super Bowl overall actually worked out in our favor. We did well, not so much on the Moneyline wagers, but player props definitely worked in our favor and same game parlay most of the star players did not score touchdowns in that game. So overall, Super Bowl was good. The other sports in February have been okay. So hold has been, I would say, pretty close to where we anticipated through the first 2 months of the year on a combined basis. So just -- we've built our budget from the bottom up, and it told us that we felt comfortable putting breakeven out there, and we're delivering against that now. obviously continue to update all of you on our quarterly calls as to how the year is progressing. But in terms of being 2.5 months, close to 3 months post rebrand we're right where we wanted to be.

We will move next to Dan Politzer with JPMorgan.

I wanted to follow up just on regionals. I know you called out the first quarter, you've seen a little bit of weather impact, but perhaps the other side of that, have you started to see any of the stimulus benefits, the tax refunds start to flow through. And historically, what is the relationship between those tax refunds and maybe the uplift that you would see in your properties?

Yes, it's a good question, Dan. It's really hard for us to know when we see really good volumes on a weekend, how much of that is -- there's been a break in the weather. How much of that is that there's tax refunds are starting to flow, and they're higher than people anticipated. So I think the answer is that we're seeing some of all of that. I would tell you that as bad as the weather was in January, and that really hit us across every 1 of our segments, regional segments other than West but even hit us in the south, You'll recall the storm was really across the country. And then in February, Midwest weather has actually been fine. It's the Northeast where we've gotten beat up. We had to shut down a couple of our properties early this week. So there's definitely noise there, but I would tell you that when the weather breaks, whether it's a weekday or certainly on the weekends, we're seeing really strong volumes.

We're seeing really strong spend per customer when they visit. And I think that's probably going to continue now that the tax dollars are starting to flow through into people's accounts. we would anticipate finishing up February strong. The weather looks good in the 10-day forecast really across the country. And March is set up to be a good month. The calendar doesn't work in our favor as well in Q1. Something else to keep in mind, we had an extra weekend day this year in January, which is the weakest month of the 3. Last year, you had an extra weekend day in March, which is the strongest month of the 3. So something to keep in mind, again, just in terms of your quarterly modeling, Q1, maybe not as strong as maybe you would anticipate relatively speaking, but it's going to get stronger throughout the year, especially for PENN as we have the second half of the year, the 4 growth objects all open and starting to hit a run rate that we're comfortable with.

Got it. That makes sense. And then just pivoting to capital allocation. I think in your slide, you refer to those capital return optionality. One, it is a 2-part. Is there a number for the full year for the repurchases that you ended up doing? I'm not sure if there was any incremental versus when we got the update on the last call? And then how are you thinking about that capital return as you referenced the optionality with returning to shareholders versus reducing debt versus some of those growth investments that might be on the horizon?

Yes. Thanks, Dan. Yes. So in 2025, as you know, we set out to purchase 350 million shares. And as we discussed in our last quarter, we ended up buying back [ 354 million ] for 2025. And just putting that into context, that's about 14% of our shares outstanding in '25. And then since 2022, we repurchased $1.1 billion of stock or 25% of our shares outstanding. So we've demonstrated repurchases are an important part of our capital allocation strategy and continue to be so, but also delevering and investing in our development pipeline, where we expect to generate 15% cash-on-cash returns are also important parts of our capital allocation strategy. So we talked about earlier that we expect to generate $3 per share of free cash flow this year. .

And then you couple that with the $225 million in funding we should receive from GLPI for Aurora before the end of the second quarter. And then the remaining $21 million that we'll receive from the city of Aurora before the end of the year, all that's going to enhance our liquidity and reduce our leverage. So really then, at the end of the day, it's about our balance, right? And we'll remain focused on all 3 of those components, buyback delevering and investing in our growth throughout the year.

We will move next with Joe Stauff with Susquehanna.

I wanted to ask maybe a couple of questions to dig in a little further on the early returns, obviously, Julia and M Resort. And just kind of lessons and how we think about the ramp from here, we can all see the Joliet kind of win per unit per day somewhat flattening out. I don't know if that's the weather or maybe there are some marketing campaigns that you are thinking about. But -- and also in M Resort, obviously, you have a lot more capacity. You talked about record gaming volumes in December in January. So I was wondering, is that a function of higher capacity, higher visitation. What are you seeing there in terms of maybe derisking, say, the 15% cash on cash return going forward?

Yes. No, good questions, Joe. Let me take a step back for a second, just in terms of the hotel expansion projects versus the water to land conversions. The hotel project expansions, you see really a more immediate pack positively to incremental revenues and incremental EBITDA. And the reason for that, I think, is relatively intuitive, which is that you're adding a hotel. There's not a whole lot of labor add. You've obviously got housekeeping front desk, valet. But the Columbus property and the M Resort property were built for more hotel rooms, right? In the case of Columbus built for a hotel in terms of restaurant capacity, entertainment venue capacity, gaming floor. We don't have to we didn't have to invest in expanding any of those areas as part of those projects. So we knew that we had a lot of demand -- unmet demand that we couldn't handle at the M Resort and we were sort of cultivating these relationships with many of these groups and conventions that would come through.

And then they would just outgrow us because we only had 390 rooms. We've essentially almost doubled the capacity pretty close to 750 total rooms at M now. And so we've got groups both coming back and new large groups coming in for the first time. we can deliver a level of service and personalization that they just won't find on the strip because those hotels are so large and those groups sort of can get lost. So feeling really good. I mean if you look at the resort results, which we do every day and you look at occupancy and you look at ADR, you almost don't even realize we added -- we doubled the number of rooms because the occupancy has been almost as strong as it was prior year with half the room, the same thing on an ADR basis. So we're feeling really good about M Resort, the return profile gets us even more excited about Columbus.

Columbus, believe it or not, this is kind of an odd step, but it's our #1 property in the portfolio from a cross-property visitation standpoint, and that's with no hotel today. So we obviously are feeling really good about being able to generate much stronger VIP cross-sale from other markets, both in Ohio and outside of Ohio that it is a destination for us. especially during the Ohio State football season. So that's kind of the hotel expansion wrap up. I would say. As it relates to Joliet, we're feeling really good because remember, and you've been there, Joe, you were there for the grand opening. That property was really the first location or amenity or offering to open up in what is a very large mixed-use development called Rock run. There's actually a 250-plus residential development that's opening up right next to our later this year. There's a 285-room flagged hotel that's opening up within walking distance of our property sometime in 2027.

There's a number of restaurants and entertainment venues. I mean this is -- it's a real mixed-use development. For those of you that have been St. Charles, Missouri close to the Ameristar property there. It's the same developer. And we expect to have a similar critical mass when all is said and done over the next couple of years. So Joliet as good as the start has been. And the way I sort of summarize the demand figures that Joliet, we've seen our active database, which we covered on the call earlier, 130% growth from pre to post. We see daily visitation has doubled. Our table volumes have doubled. Our nongaming revenue doubled and our slot revenue is between 40% and 50% growth. And so I think there's an opportunity to still grow that slot business higher than that base of 40% to 50%. And anything above that just makes the return profile that much stronger.

And the difference, again, between the hotel expansions versus these water to land casino conversions is that when we first opened, like we did at Joliet, the first few months, you've got a lot of slot leased product on your floor figuring out what your customers are gravitating toward from a slot content perspective. You have all of your restaurants open every day, all of your bars and a lot of entertainment programming, you're figuring out what works. And so your margins are going to be lower those first call it, a couple of quarters post opening. And then you start to fine tune. And I think we're the best of business at doing that. And so you should expect the margins for Joliet over the next couple of quarters continue to improve. And by the time you hit the 1-year anniversary, you're really cranking from a top line and a bottom line perspective. I would expect the same sort of cadence from quarter 1 to quarter 4 post opening for Aurora as well, whereas Columbus, you're going to see a more immediate impact both on the top line and bottom line as well as in your margins.

And just a follow up. Is the Aurora property, the newer property, obviously, is that also opening up? I hadn't been there. in a mixed-use development as well similar to Joliet?

It is not, but we stand to benefit that we literally sit next to immediately adjacent to the Chicago premium outlets. And when you're entering and exiting that mall, which is -- I don't have the stats in front of me, it's millions and millions of vehicles and people per month. And when you're exiting the Chicago Outlet Mall, you're at a stoplight, you turn left to go on the interstate or you go straight and you roll right into our parking drug. So I would say it's actually a little bit better in the sense that just from a timing perspective, it's already developed and already has critical mass on a daily basis. And so we stand to benefit the Chicago Premium outlets really don't have any sort of mid-tier or higher end restaurant offerings, and that's something that we will have. Remember though we don't have a hotel at our Aurora property today on the water, we will have a hotel, we'll have a spa, outdoor entertainment, lots of restaurants. It's a sort of a bigger more higher-end amenity mix version of what you saw at Joliet. So we're feeling really good about being able to feed off of the Chicago Premium Outlet Mall there as well.

We will move next to Shaun Kelley with Bank of America.

Jay or Felicia, if you could just remind us on the kind of size or scope around the Alberta launch costs. Ontario was quite a while ago, and I can't actually remember if it was done under the sort of more of the Score model before your acquisition. But just kind of if you could help us put some parameters around if that market goes, I know the timing is a little uncertain. But if that market does open this year, what's the kind of range of J-curve investment you guys might expect to make there? That would be helpful.

Yes. We're still sort of finalizing our marketing launch plans there and taking the best of in terms of what works with our Ontario launch and eliminating the things that didn't work. So I would say it's going to be probably somewhere in that $15 million to $20 million range, but give us another quarter to fine-tune our marketing plans and get back to you. on that. Obviously, it's a really important market. And we've all learned through the years that those initial sign-ups, you get those are the most valuable customer cohorts that you end up with. And so we got to make sure that we launched successfully in Alberta like we did in Ontario and when you do, you tend to hold on to your market share much more effectively. So I would say stay tuned. But generally speaking, that's probably the range.

Perfect. And then sort of a strategic follow-up, Jay, last quarter, you had, I think, some really defined views the broader prediction market landscape, we continue to see a lot of sequential growth in that business. I'm kind of curious on twofold. One, any identification you guys have on just your kind of core business on handle metrics as to any impact you might be seeing. But I think much more importantly, just your kind of -- as this continues to evolve, we continue to see spin-offs of more and more gaming like mechanics. Where do we sit today from where we were 3 months ago on your view? And how do you think the industry is kind of coming together here as it relates to this because we have seen, obviously, the CFTC come in with some pretty public remarks blessing these markets and continue to see a lot of people moving forward?

Yes. It's a fully loaded question on a really controversial topic. I laid out a lot of my thoughts on the last call. I would say those thoughts really haven't changed. What has continued to evolve is that it's really clear as mud today in terms of where this is going from a legal perspective. You've got regulators and attorneys general that are suing prediction markets and then you have the prediction markets that are suing regulators and trying to beat them to the punch, It's obvious to anybody who's ever been in the gambling business. And even those who aren't that sports betting is gambling. I don't know how you defend that, that it is not. And I know regulators have taken that view. It really puts the PENNs and the MGMs and the Caesars of the world in a very awkward position. We have our land-based businesses that generate tremendous cash flow.

We employ thousands and thousands -- tens of thousands of team members across the country. We are big contributors to our communities. And those gaming licenses are the most valuable assets we have. We're not going to put those at risk. So when regulators say this is illegal gambling don't do it, we don't do it. But there are those that are able to do it and are doing it in other states. And so it's just -- it's very -- it's confusing. I would say, the impact overall in terms of what we're seeing today on our sports betting business we can't really tell what the impact is. We all see the handle trends. I think there's lots of variables that impact handle, prediction markets certainly are 1 of those, how much we don't know today. This really can't get in front of the U.S. Supreme Court fast enough. I mean, that would be my ultimate perspective and answer because we're just going to keep seeing this get delayed and delayed and delayed and the businesses get bigger and broader and what are they doing? We don't know the answers to some of those questions.

But we're obviously not going to put our licenses at risk. We're going to stay very close to our regulators. I do think, as I said on the last call, that we as an industry of land-based casinos that aren't able, aren't allowed participate in prediction markets, we've got -- I think the best defense is offense, and we've got to figure out how to play more offense here. And I've got ideas. I've shared that with some of my counterparts. And we continue to discuss those ideas with our regulators as well as lawmakers on how we can play more offense as an industry and turn this into a win for them, meaning the states and also for the operators like us.

And I would say on the sports betting side, you're seeing a lot more competition on the marketing side going after sports betters directly. So we are seeing that versus going after investors, they're going after sports betters. So that's become pretty evident over the short term here.

We will move next to Chad Beynon with Macquarie.

I wanted to ask about the main iGaming bill that was passed, obviously, unique in terms of the partners that are there. You guys have a good database and could potentially partner with somebody. Can you talk about if this bill goes into existence in terms of operations, maybe your opportunity to benefit economically in that market?

Sure, Chad. I mean that's -- I can't answer that 1 today because we're still in discussions. I would just take a step back. What happened in Maine is mind blowing. We've been operating as a casino entity there for 2 decades. We've invested hundreds of millions of dollars. We've employed hundreds of Mainers. We're great -- we're -- as involved in the community as you're going to find any business leader. And the governor in Maine decides to hand a monopoly to a third party that's never invested dollar in the industry. I don't understand that. It doesn't make sense to me. It shouldn't happen. That said, it's being challenged legally as it should be and we'll see where it goes. If it ends up standing, then we're going to do our best to figure out a way to compete in that market. But the way that this was done was not popular publicly, and that's very evident. And I'm not sure how the governor concluded that was the best course. But it is what it is. We'll figure out a way to compete if it doesn't upstand legally.

Okay. And then separately, on the retail guide, it looks like margins are going up by a few basis points, 45% flow-through at the midpoint. You guys are going to benefit from the new properties. You talked about the returns there. But just as we think about the same-store expenses, maybe labor, utilities, et cetera, the nontax items. Do you have high confidence that there's not going to be much inflation in '26? And if you hit those revenue targets, at least at the midpoint that you can hit on that flow through?

Yes. From what we can see today, Chad, I would say, yes. We have a couple of labor negotiations in 2026 that we thought we've got a pretty good handle in terms of what the outcomes -- the range outcomes will be. Got a good handle on utility and insurance expenses, things of that nature. So it really is more of a -- think about it as a first half of the year, you're still going to feel some impact from those new supply markets that we haven't anniversaried yet or in the process of anniversarying. You've got the Aurora opening, which again, will be -- will hurt margins at least for the first quarter, maybe 2 quarters. The other 3 growth projects that we've -- we'll be ramping at Joliet and margins will be in a really good place. certainly the second half of the year, M Resorts margins are in a great place right now. Columbus will be out of the gate in a great place. So that's sort of the impact. Just think about it maybe as a first half of the year, maybe not as much upside same-store [indiscernible] at the second half of the year, you'll probably start to see more upside in terms of margin growth the same-store level.

We will move next to Jeff Stantial with Stifel.

Jay, Felicia, Aaron. Maybe starting off on the Interactive business. We haven't seen a bit of an uptick in the promotional environment this quarter on the sports side of things. The private operators continue to spend quite aggressively and then some of the larger operators have come out with parley insurance and other initiatives like that. Jay or Aaron, whoever wants to take this. Is this something you're noticing an impact on retention in sports that you could actually pinpoint in the quarter? Are you fast following any of the parlay focused generosity initiatives? And if you could just help us think about, I guess, overall sensitivity and the projections to the promotional environment, specifically in sports, just given the shift in strategy, that would be helpful. .

Yes. This is Aaron. We are seeing that in sports, although as you know, our strategy has really shifted to focusing on iCasino in hybrid states. and in Canada. So when we're looking at OSB only states, we're taking a much more methodical look at our promo dollars and users that we're trying to retain and attract. So we have great retention at the high end of value, kind of the promo chasers and the people that are looking for gimmicks and promos in the low end tend to be churning out, which is what we expected. And then we use that money to reinvest in hybrid states where there's iCasino and sportsbook. So it is happening, but we are not necessarily competing in that market anymore as vis-a-vis Fandora Draftkings, we don't see ourselves in that realm, although we do try to find opportunities to provide value where they don't. But your observation is true. It is getting competitive, but we're kind of staying out of that right now.

That's great. And then maybe staying on the Interactive business. Felicia, in the past, you've given us some frameworks for just thinking about market share across the 2 verticals, maybe without having to get into specific numbers this time, can you just talk directionally on how you think about overall market growth relative to market share expansion on the casino side that's sort of embedded in the '26 guide.

Yes. I'll grab that one. This is Jay. I would say that we expect -- we've essentially said it already. We would expect to continue to grow our market share on the iCasino side and see that our handle share will shrink on the OSB side. That's the best way to think about it. We're really focused on retention and driving profitable new users as first-time betters into the ecosystem. So [indiscernible] we're hyper focused on the states that offer both online casino and OSB. OSB only states we're likely to have a different new sign-up offer. We actually already deployed that, that differentiation between OSB only versus hybrid. And so that's where it's going to be in 2026. We feel we also have a great opportunity on reactivation, people that over the last several quarters and years have registered and signed up and made deposits, maybe taking advantage of a promotion and they're either inactive, dormant or they're not as frequent players with us or gambles with us as we would anticipate. So we're really focused on reactivation as well. And that's really, all of that just feeds into the P&L story for this year. It's going to be a much more efficient approach to the business and 1 that we think will generate a much higher return long term.

We'll take our next question from David Katz with Jefferies.

I wanted to just talk about the land base or retail portfolio. You've made some obviously very effective investments in upgrading that. And do you have a pipeline of more of those? Should we expect to see more of those kind of upgrade projects? Clearly, the retail landscape has gotten much more competitive post-COVID.

Yes. I had mentioned earlier, David, we do have some more opportunities in states like Louisiana, Mississippi and actually 1 more of our water-based facilities in Illinois. So we're analyzing the return profiles on those projects, working with local leaders, lawmakers, community leaders and figuring out which of those may make sense for us as long as they hit our return profile that we're comfortable with, which would be that 15-plus percent cash on cash. We've got others that we believe will fit that return profile. We just have to make sure that everything else lines up and I would say stay tuned for more on that here in 2026.

I appreciate it. If I could just follow up to that end. I don't expect you to give us a number today and in this forum, right? But is it a majority of the portfolio, right? Is it 2 to 3 properties, 3 to 5 properties? Any order of magnitude, I think, would be helpful here.

It would be certainly low single digit, less than a handful, but yes, there's -- across those 3 states I mentioned, call it, 3 or 4 projects that we're looking at right now. .

Thanks, David. And Nicky, we'll take 1 more question, please.

We do have a question, comes from the line of Stephen Grambling with Morgan Stanley.

Thank you for sneaking me in here. This should be maybe a quick one. Just -- I know that you gave a guide that implies kind of an OpEx growth rate on the property side. Just curious if you could provide any more details on some of the puts and takes that maybe underpin that.

Yes. I would say a pretty typical year of OpEx growth we're comfortable with the flow-through on the incremental revenues that we're showing there at around 45% could end up being a little bit better than that, but you're going to have typical growth in your labor number primarily annual merit increases. Like I said, we have a couple of labor negotiations that we're working through. So primarily there, we don't anticipate strategically any changes in our marketing reinvestment overall. You're going to have some natural growth in areas like insurance, sometimes utilities, but that would be driving the lion's share of it, Stephen.

All right. Thanks, everyone, for joining. We look forward to catching up with you again next quarter.

Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.

Greetings, and welcome to the PENN Entertainment Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Joe Jaffoni, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Risa. Good morning, and thank you for joining PENN Entertainment's 2025 Third Quarter Conference Call. We'll get to management's presentation and comments momentarily as well as your questions and answers. [Operator Instructions]

Now I'll review the safe harbor disclosure. Please note that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For more information, please see our press release for details on specific risk factors.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to the company's CEO, Jay Snowden. Jay, please go ahead.

Thanks, Joe, and good morning to everyone. I'm joined here in Wyomissing by Felicia Hendrix, Todd George, Aaron LaBerge and other members of our senior management team.

Earlier this morning, we issued a joint announcement with ESPN regarding our mutual and amicable decision for an early termination of our exclusive online sports betting marketing agreement on December 1. I want to start off by saying that we are grateful for the exhaustive and collaborative efforts by our friends at ESPN and the PENN Interactive team to compete for a podium position in the highly competitive OSB space.

Although we made significant progress in improving our product offering and building a cohesive ecosystem with ESPN, we were unable to establish ESPN BET as a scale player. It is the right time to realign our interactive focus, prioritizing our digital assets in Canada and our Hollywood iCasino product to further leverage our core retail casino business and overall omnichannel business model. This shift emphasizes cross-sell opportunities across our ecosystem and enhances connectivity with our 33 million-plus PENN Play customer database.

Going forward, as of December 1, pending final regulatory approvals, our U.S. and Canadian OSB brands will be theScore Bet, which, as you know, has been delivering strong results for years in Ontario, one of North America's largest and most competitive online markets. Aaron LaBerge and his best-in-class team are currently working on a seamless customer experience that includes the current app being automatically updated to theScore Bet when you open it on the date of transition. All account information, balances, betting history, pending bets, marketing offers and promotions transfer over automatically. There will be no new app to download or new registration process to go through.

Our digital realignment will free up resources to strategically invest in the North American markets and customer cohorts with the strongest return potential, which we expect will drive enhanced unit economics and profitability. We will also continue to build our digital database in states with a PENN retail property in order to leverage cross-sell opportunities and prepare for the potential legalization of iCasino in those markets down the road.

Lastly, the transition to theScore Bet will present an opportunity to optimize our digital business and operate more efficiently, including replacing fixed media spend with performance-based and regionally targeted marketing that complement our retail and iCasino footprint.

Digital engagement with current and potential new customers is essential to our company's long-term success. 64% of our total company player database growth since 2019 has come from our digital channels. This has allowed us to attract a much younger customer demographic and to create significant and unique cross-sell opportunities and experiences for them. Our data shows that customers who play with us across multiple channels are significantly more valuable than single channel customers and have much higher retention, which is critical as the industry continues to evolve rapidly.

Our North America iCasino business achieved its highest quarterly gaming revenue to date, an improvement of nearly 40% year-over-year, driven by record cross-sell from OSB of 62% and strong growth from our stand-alone Hollywood and theScore Bet iCasino apps in the third quarter. Going forward, OSB will remain a strong top-of-funnel customer acquisition driver for Hollywood iCasino, which will continue to be embedded into our OSB offering in states where it is legal, and Hollywood iCasino will also continue to operate as a stand-alone app.

As highlighted on Slide 8 of our investor presentation, the introduction of our stand-alone app, along with improved cross-sell from online sports betting has led to a 79% increase in iCasino MAUs during the third quarter. It is worth noting that as encouraging as our iCasino results were in Q3, we set new all-time monthly records for MAUs, GGR and NGR again in October.

The momentum is continuing to build in this exciting growth channel. As you'll see on Slide 11, over the last year, we have significantly improved the velocity of our product innovation in order to drive results in key areas of our interactive business, with a particular focus and significant year-over-year improvement in the area of customer retention.

Let me wrap up our digital update by sharing that interactive -- our interactive financial goals for 2026 of being breakeven or better have not changed. We will have complete control over our digital cost structure and marketing budget for 2026, which will primarily focus on the highest margin markets and customer cohorts. We will provide a more detailed earnings guide on our Q4 earnings call in February.

Shifting to our core regional casino business. As you'll see on Slide 12, our talented teams across the country executed very well and demand was stable across gaming and non-gaming amenities during the quarter, particularly at our properties not impacted by new supply and increased competitor promotional activity in those same markets. We saw particularly strong results in our West segment at our properties across Ohio as well as in St. Louis and Illinois. Similar to Q2, we also saw increases in theoretical revenue across all of our rated worth segments of our retail database, along with overall growth in both total visitation and spend per visit in the aggregate across the portfolio.

The fourth quarter is off to a solid start, and we are encouraged by early trends at our new Hollywood casino in Joliet, which is driving both impressive volumes and database growth through its best-in-market offering, consistent with our long track record of delivering solid returns on our regional gaming investments across the country. We are also pleased to share that revenue from Joliet so far has been almost entirely incremental to our Hollywood Aurora property. We've seen a 42% increase in our active database at Joliet since opening and more than 50% of our -- of that growth, excuse me, was from previously inactive customers, showing the benefits of the much improved product and location. And our new offering has also been highly efficient at activating digitally native customers in Illinois.

While our other previously disclosed development projects remain on track. In Henderson, Nevada, the second hotel tower at M Resort is scheduled to open on December 1. Our Hollywood Columbus Hotel Tower and new Hollywood Aurora Casino relocation are scheduled to open in late Q2 of 2026, subject to final regulatory approvals, and the relocation of Hollywood Council Bluff is anticipated to open in late '27 or early '28.

And with that, I'll now turn it over to Felicia.

Thanks, Jay. As highlighted on Slide 4 in the investor presentation, under the terms of our early termination agreement, cash payments to ESPN will cease at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025. Starting in 2026, we will no longer have any marketing obligations with ESPN. Pursuant to the termination agreement, a total of $38.1 million will be paid to ESPN in the fourth quarter of '25 for the marketing services we will incur through December 1. From December 1 to December 31, we will pay a total of $5 million to ESPN for traditional media to support theScore Bet and/or Hollywood iCasino offerings.

Regarding the warrants, all unvested warrants and performance warrants will be forfeited by ESPN. ESPN will retain roughly 8 million of vested warrants with a weighted strike price of approximately $29. As a reminder, these warrants are subject to net settlement in stock or cash at our option. At an assumed exercise price of $29, the vested warrants would represent potential dilution of roughly 320,000 shares, which when compared to our 138 million shares outstanding is 0.2% dilution. So really no material dilutive impact from the example I just provided due to the net settlement. The noncash expense related to the vested warrants in the fourth quarter will be roughly $14 million.

Our retail segment generated revenues of $1.4 billion, adjusted EBITDAR of $465.8 million and segment adjusted EBITDA margins of 32.8%. Earlier, Jay touched on our stable core demand in our retail segment, particularly at our properties not impacted by new supply and increased competitor promotional activity.

We have a lot to look forward to in the fourth quarter for our Retail segment. The quarter is off to a nice start through the first weekend of November. Hollywood Casino Joliet trends are encouraging, and we are also excited about the December 1 opening of the second hotel tower at M Resort. For our Retail segment, we expect fourth quarter '25 revenues to range from $1.41 billion to $1.43 billion and adjusted EBITDAR to range from $455 million to $475 million.

Our Interactive segment generated revenues of $297.7 million, including a tax gross-up of $139.5 million and adjusted EBITDA loss of $76.6 million. Gaming revenues and adjusted EBITDA in the quarter came in below expectations due to customer-friendly hold across our digital operations and lower-than-anticipated OSB volumes. Given our brand transition and our targeted retention campaign, our fourth quarter '25 Interactive segment adjusted EBITDA results will look different than the guidance we provided earlier this year. We will incur a loss in the fourth quarter, but to provide guidance with a high degree of precision today is challenging given the unknowns around retention following the rebranding on December 1.

In addition to well-known customer-friendly sports outcomes in October, the quarter will also be impacted by a number of onetime expenses that will not recur in 2026 as we exit the relationship, make changes to our current cost structure and focus on rebranding and retention efforts. Based on what we know today, we expect the fourth quarter loss to be smaller than that of the third quarter. Importantly, our cash payments and noncash warrant expense to ESPN will cease at the end of the fourth quarter this year, which provides us with significantly more marketing and financial flexibility and a clean runway as we head into 2026.

Corporate expense of $34 million included $3.9 million of legal and advisory costs related to activist activity in connection with our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We continue to expect other segment adjusted EBITDA, which includes corporate expense, to be negative $121 million for the year before any further legal and advisory costs.

The table on Page 10 of our earnings release summarizes our cash expenditures in the quarter, including cash payments to our REIT landlords, cash taxes, cash interest on traditional debt and total CapEx. Of our total $172.7 million CapEx in the quarter, $122 million was project CapEx, primarily related to our 4 development projects.

We ended the third quarter of '25 with total liquidity of $1.1 billion, inclusive of $660 million in cash and cash equivalents. In the third quarter, we repurchased $154.1 million of shares at an average price of $19.34 per share. Since September 30, we have repurchased an incremental $85 million of shares at an average price of $17.44 per share, which takes us to a total of $354 million of shares repurchased as of November 5 at an average share price of $17.64 per share in connection with our previously stated goal to repurchase at least $350 million of shares this year.

Since the beginning of 2022, we have repurchased $1.1 billion of shares or 25% of our shares outstanding. We have $395 million remaining under our current share repurchase authorization, which expires at the end of this year. To that end, this morning, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized a new 3-year $750 million share repurchase authorization, which commences on January 1, 2026.

As we have demonstrated over the past several years, we consider share repurchases a major component of our capital allocation strategy, which also includes delevering and investing in growth capital. Looking forward, we plan to continue to be opportunistic with our share repurchase activity. We expect to continue to delever, especially as the large losses in Interactive are behind us, and we continue to evaluate our pipeline of future growth projects.

Transitioning to our retail growth projects. On November 3, we received $150 million in funding from GLPI at a 7.79% cap rate in connection with the $206 million second hotel tower construction at the M Resort in Las Vegas. This follows the $130 million in funding from GLPI we received in early August related to the $185 million Joliet project. And for the $360 million Aurora project that opens in late 2Q 2026, we have already committed to take $225 million of funding from GLPI at a cap rate of 7.75%. We will draw from GLPI close to the opening of Aurora, and we have not yet announced our funding plans for the $100 million hotel tower at Columbus.

We expect total cash payments under our triple net leases to be $246 million for the fourth quarter, reflecting a full 2% escalator on the amended and restated PENN master lease and a 1.5% fixed escalator on the 2023 master lease, both effective November 1.

As we head into the final months of the year, we are updating our 2025 CapEx forecast to reflect the shift of some project costs into next year. We now expect project CapEx of $430 million, which compares to prior guidance of $490 million. Our total 2025 CapEx is now $685 million compared to our prior guidance of $730 million, which reflects this shift, slightly offset by a pull forward of some maintenance CapEx into 2025 from '26. For 2025 net cash interest expense, we project $160 million. For cash taxes, we do not expect to be a cash taxpayer in 2025, and our basic share count at the end of the third quarter was 138 million shares. After the June 20 repurchase of the convertible notes, we now have 4.5 million potential dilutive shares from the remaining convertible note stub and about 1 million dilutive shares from RSUs and stock options.

I will now turn it back to Jay.

All right. Thanks, Felicia. I'd like to conclude by reiterating my sincere thank you to ESPN Chairman, Jimmy Pitaro and his entire team at ESPN, who have been great partners throughout our time together. There is a lot we will take away from this partnership, including 2.9 million new users into our ecosystem, a vastly improved product and feature set and a best-in-class digital team led by Aaron LaBerge, who will continue to oversee our interactive businesses and our transition to theScore Bet.

As I mentioned, we're looking forward to the launch of a unified online sports betting brand across all of North America, which will provide a path to stronger unit economics with a simplified cost structure. Our reduced fixed media spend will now provide us much more marketing flexibility to invest more in Canada as well as in U.S. iCasino and OSB markets and customer cohorts with more compelling returns, particularly as we look ahead to new market openings like Alberta, which is anticipated later in 2026.

Importantly, we are in full control of our entire business moving forward. We own our brands, we own our database, we own our tech stack, and we have extremely talented teams. This will enable us to better manage and forecast our digital business with greater precision, much like we have done in our regional gaming portfolio for many, many years. PENN's unique omnichannel strategy going forward is clear, compelling and growth focused. We have a high-quality and extremely well-maintained portfolio of land-based properties across the country that generate the highest tax-adjusted margins in the industry, along with significant free cash flow, and we have several growth catalysts over the coming quarters, coupled with less headwinds than we have seen in many years.

Our digital business is complementary to the land-based segment. It is primarily focused on our Canadian operations and iCasino first markets in the U.S. We will continue to use OSB across the U.S. to drive top-of-funnel database acquisition and cross-sell to PENN's retail and digital casino assets, but at a cost structure focused on overall profitability for the digital segment. The team and I are focused and excited to execute on this strategy to create compelling value for our shareholders over the short, medium and long term.

And with that, let's go ahead and open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Barry Jonas with Truist Securities.

With the ESPN exit, can you talk a bit more about any puts and takes for near-term as well as maybe longer-term profitability for Interactive and then maybe throw in omnichannel's contribution to retail in that as well.

Thanks, Barry. So yes, let's take a step back for a second. As you think about the investments that we've made in our digital business over the last, call it, 5 years, we really had 4 primary goals as we made those investments. We knew that getting into the digital business, particularly sports betting, was going to be a great top of funnel driver for the company. And we would be able to feed the database with a younger set of customers that just weren't visiting our retail casinos. The average age of our retail database was getting older, and we knew this is an opportunity for us to really bring the average age of our database down.

We've been successful in doing that. You see in one of our slides there, and we've talked about it before, the average age of our active database is younger by 7 years from 2019 to where we are now in 2025. So that was goal one. I think we've done a great job with that. We're still working at it, of course.

Number two is once you have those younger customers and new customers in your database, you want to be able to cross-sell them to your profitable land-based casino businesses. And we've shared with you before, we've been successful in doing that. And again, that's going to continue. It's a very important goal for us is the cultivation of those relationships and to provide great experiences and ultimately provide monetization opportunities for the company with those new customers. So check that box. I think we've been effective at doing that, again, more work in front of us.

And I think number three for us was we want to make sure that we were preparing for the future and making sure that PENN as a company is set for where the industry is headed. And I'm sure we'll talk about plenty on this call. There's a lot going on in this industry right now. I feel like we're really under attack from a number of different directions. But I think the company today is positioned extremely well to compete regardless of which direction we end up going as an industry and what we want to do and accomplish digitally, what we want to do and accomplish in our retail footprint. And of course, it all comes together with the omnichannel strategy that we mentioned earlier. So I would say check the box. We're -- we've built this company. We're prepared for the future, really important goal.

And then lastly, of course, we've made these digital investments to make money, to deliver a return for our shareholders. We have not done that yet. That's the focus in 2026 and moving forward is to start to deliver profitability for our shareholders, which will only grow over time. So I think at a high level, that's the way we've been thinking about it. It's nice to be able to turn the corner and speak to profitability, and we'll have more to speak to on that specifically for 2026 and beyond when we get on our call in February with all of you.

Great. And then just -- I might ask a follow-up on retail. You sort of cited increased competition and promotional activity. Curious how that's been impacting your operations beyond initial expectations and maybe how you're responding.

Todd, do you want to grab that one?

Sure. Thanks, Jay. Listen, it's -- I think there's been plenty of discussion around some of our competitors in the space and how they've responded. I think we're seeing kind of the double, double here. It's really about the new competition in key markets. I think Slide 12 in the earnings deck shows a lot of the way we look at the business and what we're seeing in markets not impacted by new competition, performing really well. In the markets where we have new competition, there's also been a competitive response that has increased promotional reinvestment. And what that usually does is it can lead to increased marketing costs. But any time you have a new competitor coming in, you'll have a little bit of a spike in labor costs. You'll see some retention bonuses for some key positions, but you also see accelerated wage growth. The good news is fairly temporary, some onetime expenses and then things normalize over time. But if you look at Slide 12, it shows a good snapshot of the way we performed around the country.

I would just add, too, and this speaks to the job that Todd and our regional heads and our general managers in the company, we've never stopped investing in our properties. And we deliver best-in-market offerings and experiences in almost every one of our markets. So look, Todd and I have both been asked this for too long to even say these days, but these things happen, you get promotions that kind of ramp up and ramp back down. The reality is in these mature markets, customers may chase a promotion once or twice. They end up settling back to where they feel comfortable, where there's a really good value proposition. And we like how we stack up against everybody in the regional gaming space in terms of overall asset quality, customer service delivery and experience. So we'll be fine. This will be a little noise for a short period of time. It will calm down and on we go.

Our next question comes from Brandt Montour with Barclays.

So the first one on digital. I know that we'll be waiting or we're going to wait to hear more about your plans on profitability. And I know there's multiple moving pieces of profitability, including retention risk on the revenue side. But if you could just, Jay, focus on the cost side and talk about the fixed cost removal for ESPN, $150 million a year. And you said that would replace that with the marketing you're going to need to support the score. Is it fair to assume that sort of just looking at those 2 pieces that marketing score should, by definition, come in below what you were paying to ESPN?

Significantly below, I would say, Brandt. I mean, as you think about the marketing dollars we've been spending with ESPN, most of those dollars will take down to the bottom line. And some of those dollars will be redeployed to the markets and the customer cohorts that we talked about, the ones that will deliver us the highest returns, primarily our business in Canada. We've been competing really well there with not a lot of marketing spend, and that's going to change.

We're going to be able to spend more money in Canada and continue to grow our share, I think, profitably there. And the iCasino hybrid states in the U.S., those are going to be the primary markets of focus, obviously, highest value customers. That's the way that we think about it. So again, we'll have more detail for you, but you should expect to see, as we talk about 2026. We're going to learn a lot in the next 2.5 months before we get on a call with you again sort of post rebrands. We understand what retention looks like. I think we have a very good plan around retention. We've been working on this plan for a couple of months now.

And so we're going to know a lot more in February, and we're going to continue to adjust our cost structure and our marketing spend assumptions based on what we're seeing around retention and revenue projections as we go into 2026. So long-winded way of saying we have full control over all of those variables. And so stay tuned. We'll have more to share in February, but the goal is to stop -- to move away from losses in digital and turn that around and really start generating significantly more free cash flow as a company.

Great. And then just a quick one on the retail side on the back of various questions. I'm assuming the guide down at the EBITDA line at retail was mostly that competition you cited. Could you just maybe bifurcate between competition that you had been seeing in supply-impacted markets like the reaction that I think you were talking about from other competitors in those markets. Between that and potentially any increased promotional environment or promotional activity in markets that are not supply impacted, and I think you know who I'm talking about. If you could just sort of bifurcate those and let us know if the second one has become a bigger headwind as of late.

Yes. Brandt, this is Todd. Look, the reality is the group you're talking about also happens to be in every market where new competition has come in. So that's kind of that double impact that we saw. In the other markets, for the most part, those are healthy markets where we have really good properties where we're typically market leader or buying for #1 consistently. So a little bit less there. And obviously, there, you don't have the labor impact. So it really is kind of confined to that marketing promotional environment, which, as Jay mentioned, we take a bit of a different approach where reinvesting in our properties, creating that experience, people will gravitate back towards that experience versus what offer is in my hand, what coupon is in my hand.

Our next question comes from Joe Stauff with Susquehanna.

I wanted to ask just a couple of questions to refamiliarize myself with theScore Bet. And wondering, I guess, maybe the updated share that you have in Ontario. I assume, obviously, you'll launch in Alberta. And wondering for the U.S. customer database within theScore, is there a concentration of adjacent markets in and around Ontario? Or is it like a wider distribution? Just wondering how to think about that.

Yes, happy to, Joe. And Aaron, anything I missed, feel free to jump in here. Here's the way to think about theScore Media app and our offering is that we have roughly 4 million monthly active users across North America. That's been wildly consistent even though we haven't paid as much attention to that business as we should be and will be going forward, but it stayed remarkably consistent really since the time of acquisition of theScore.

Of that 4 million, roughly 2/3 of those are in the U.S. and 1/3 of those are in Canada. The popularity of the -- and theScore Media and theScore brand is really spread across Canada. You see it as just overly concentrated in Ontario, all provinces across Canada, there's about the same level of popularity and market share from a digital sports media perspective, which is why we are very encouraged about the opportunity in Alberta.

As you think about the U.S. and the 2/3 of that 4 million or, call it, 2.6 million monthly active users, roughly 2/3 of those users are in states currently that are online sports betting legal states. And so having that brand connection, we think will be helpful. It has been in Canada from theScore Media to theScore Bet from a sports betting perspective. We'll be able to do essentially the same -- we'll be able to deploy the same playbook here in the U.S. from a sports betting perspective. That has been effective for us there. We'll see what that gets us, but we do think that, that could be helpful.

And look, Aaron and team have done a great job improving the product and the experience, our feature set, the UI/UX. And if you look at our retention results this year at the first 2 months of football season versus last year, significant improvement. So we're going to be laser-focused on retention of existing users and then also getting some of these theScore Media users that maybe currently aren't using ESPN BET to use theScore Bet in the U.S. as we move forward.

That's great. And maybe two quick kind of clarifications. I guess, one, just based on your commentary and based on my understanding historically is you own all the customer data associated with ESPN BET. And the second clarifying question is, I didn't see an expiration on the 8 million warrants that ESPN will own going forward.

I'll tackle the first one, and we'll get an answer for you on the second one in a moment. So you are correct that the customer data of the 2.9 million users that I referenced earlier that we've been able to build in our database since the beginning of our relationship with ESPN BET, we own that customer data set. So that's exactly correct. And for regulatory reasons, we're the only natural owner of that customer data set. ESPN, because they're not licensed and they're not regulated, they can't have access to it. So that's just the way the deal goes. That -- I'm not sort of pointing out anything other than the way that it has to work from a regulatory perspective. So customer data stays with PENN, and that's something that obviously, we're going to continue to work on is reactivation and the things that we have in this football season. We've been fortunate to see some good results there that will continue. With regards to the warrant expiration?

Yes, Joe, those were part of the 10-year deal. So at the end of 10 years, they expire.

Our next question comes from Jordan Bender with Citizens Capital Markets.

This is kind of the first time that you've run a unified online strategy across both Canada and the U.S. kind of since you started your digital operations here. Curious, as you start to dig into databases and expand digitally that way, does it start to make sense to look at potentially buying retail properties up in Canada to cross-sell and further dig to that customer database?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Jordan. I would say that's something that's sort of been on our radar before. I would say it would remain on our radar. I wouldn't necessarily think about it as moving up significantly in the list of priorities. But there's not a lot of options there. There's sort of 2 large operators in Canada from a retail perspective. And so if opportunities presented themselves at the right time and the right price, we would definitely take a hard look at that. And to your point, there would -- there would be synergies from an omnichannel perspective, similar to what we've seen in the U.S. But I would say it's not really ratcheting up on the priority list, but we would be opportunistic if the opportunity presented itself.

Appreciate it. Felicia, just kind of following up on your comments around capital allocation and the balance sheet. You've loosely kind of guided us or talked us to leverage targets or kind of how you want to run the business over the years. I mean, as we move kind of into the score and cleaning up some of the online losses, is there kind of a level or a leverage target that you would roughly want to run the business kind of as we look out into '26, '27, '28?

Yes. Thank you for that. Yes, I would say over the longer term, our optimal lease adjusted leverage level is probably somewhat below 5x. So we're going to remain focused on getting to that level over the next several years. But just keep in mind that, that deleveraging trajectory, which we are obviously very focused on, just may not be perfectly linear because we're going to continue to be nimble as opportunities present themselves, right? We'll continue to be opportunistic buying back stock, and we're going to continue to invest in our own growth opportunities as we look at our pipeline, right? So again, focused on delevering, getting below 5x, but that may not be perfectly linear.

Yes. I would just add that we do have -- and we're obviously encouraged. It's early, but we're encouraged by the results of our Joliet Water to land project. And we've announced a few others that you're all aware of. And we've got others we're looking at right now within the company's portfolio that we think can also deliver really nice returns. So it's about balancing -- I mean, Felicia said it very well. It's about balancing all 3 of those. They are all 3 priorities, and we think we can effectively balance them as we move forward.

Our next question comes from John DeCree with CBRE.

I know we talked a little bit about the kind of users acquired with ESPN, Jay, but wondering if you have any initial thoughts, and I realize this might be a tough question about customer retention in the digital channel when you rebrand to theScore. You obviously have some experience with that when Barstool went to ESPN BET. So are there any kind of strategies or expectations you have about kind of retaining those customers and getting them to kind of stay with theScore when the rebrand occurs?

Yes. It's a great question. I would say that it's kind of apples and oranges when you think about what we did at the time of that of that brand change versus where we are now. We had -- we put our customers through a lot of hoops to jump, and we had a new technology stack. We were down for several days. We asked them to come back in and reregister and redeposit. There was a lot going on that created noise in addition to the brand change. And I think we feel like we're well positioned here. We've delivered what is one of the best online sports betting and online casino experiences, not just as we see it, but as independent third parties that review and rate these apps and these experiences. We rate very high both in iCasino and online sports betting. We've been moving up the rankings. As a matter of fact, one just came out earlier this week, we moved up a couple more spots.

So we feel like from what we're seeing on product quality and retention overall this football season compared to last year, we're in a good spot. I don't want to predict what retention and churn end up looking like over the coming months, but we feel like we're positioned well. We deliver a great experience. And our users -- we know that most of our users we're their #1 app. And so we want to make sure that, that stays the case. And we have a full calendar planned out, as you can imagine. And we have the ability to target and personalize from a marketing and CRM perspective today that we just didn't have even a year ago. And so we've got a full marketing plan, and we're going to be ready to go. And if some don't respond initially, there's going to be bounce back follow-up offers, and we feel pretty good about the overall strategy. Aaron, anything you want to add?

Yes, I would just say to underscore what Jay just said, it's the same exact app this time. So you don't have to download a new app. You don't have to reregister, as you said, you'll show up, your icon will change. And once you're in the app, the user experience is exactly the same. The logo and the app will change, but it's the same experience. And as Jay said, our retention has been really, really good this year as a result of all the product enhancements we've been making.

So we feel really strong and confident that people will still have the same experience. We'll communicate clearly that the brand has changed, but nothing else has. So the people that love using the app are still going to have the same level of generosity and interaction with us, personalization that exists today. So we feel pretty good. Obviously, we're going to be watching it closely as we rebrand.

That's really helpful. I appreciate that. That's good commentary. And maybe a quick one for Felicia. If I missed it, I apologize, but I know you took the financing for M Resort from GLPI. I think Aurora, you're expected to do that next year. And anything for Columbus at this point and maybe it's a little too early, but figured how to ask anyway?

Yes, that's right. It's too early. We'll make that decision as we get closer to the opening of Columbus.

Our next question comes from Dan Politzer with JPMorgan.

I just wanted to follow up on 2026 and Jay, your comments that you'll still be breakeven or better, and that hasn't changed. I guess directionally, we think about you more -- you're going to be more operationally efficient, ESPN BET and all the associated fees and marketing costs go away, but you guys are investing in Score. I mean, directionally, have -- should the outlook be better today than it was, say, 2 or 3 months ago? Or is it really just truly no difference at this point?

I think the target and goal for '26, we feel -- as we sit here today and until we better understand what retention looks like post rebrand, it stays the same as it was earlier this year. Obviously, going into next year, it would have been more challenging for us to be breakeven or better if we weren't able to exit early because the fees weren't changing, but the market share wasn't moving as fast as we needed to and at the levels of what we had forecasted as to all of you on our last earnings call for football season. So this sort of gives us that clean runway as we -- clear runway as we move into 2026. And we feel like we've got a real good handle on all of the puts and takes, which is for the team and I, it feels very good. It's no different than how we feel about our regional gaming business. I think we've been one of the best in the industry of forecasting what's going to happen with a level of precision that is as good as anyone. And we want to get there on all aspects of our business and 2026 will be a step in that direction for digital as well.

Got it. And then just a follow-up. I don't know to the extent that you -- maybe you could just comment or opine the kind of background, how you got to this point? Was there a breaking point? Did prediction markets enter into your decision process at all? Just kind of any background you can discuss and obviously, given you have a competitor that now kind of stepped into that deal.

Yes. I would say the lines of communication, certainly between Jimmy and I and our teams has been positive. It's been open and it continued to be since our last earnings call, but we also know what that threshold level was of market share to be at by the third anniversary. And we could see through the first couple of months of football season, though we're making a lot of improvements in a number of areas that we've shared with you, we weren't on a path, a trajectory to get to that level of market share. And so you know where it's headed and why sort of string this along, let's get together and figure out the best path forward for both companies.

I've been talking about this the last several quarters. There is that 3-year out, and both companies are going to have to do what's in their best interest. And I think that we figured out a path forward that was in both companies' best interest and was done in a way that was, I think, professional, and that's the way the relationship was all the way through the first 2 years in change and think very highly of Jimmy and the entire team at ESPN and wish them nothing but the best. We'll still be very likely an advertising partner of theirs. There's no part fillings. We had aspirations. We had goals to be a podium player, didn't work out, and we're moving on from that, and they are, too. And that's -- I think that's perfectly fine.

Our next question comes from Shaun Kelley with Bank of America.

Jay, I think there are two strategic questions I have. First, I think as we all think about the Interactive business, historically, there have kind of been actually 3 or 4 parts, right? And I know an integrated strategy moving forward under theScore Bet Moniker makes a lot of sense. But we kind of think about Canada and some success up there. We think about market access as sort of a fee profit pool for this business. And then we think about iGaming, the Hollywood casino brand and probably contribution profit positive and then obviously, the OSB investments. So like my question is very high level, as you thought about those different pieces, is there more to come here on the strategic side? Or as you've kind of done the full rework here, is -- like are all those different pieces kind of set and this is the go-to-market for the next year or 18 months for PENN and you as a management team? Or are there any other of those pieces that are influx or you might be looking at as you just kind of think about the right fit for what PENN's business is moving forward?

Yes. Look, I think strategically, what we've laid out today, we feel like that we can execute against this. And again, what's the most important factor here is we have full control over all of the puts and takes. And we're -- I think we're a company that delivers when we have full control over what's in front of us, and that will be the case on the digital side moving forward. The 4 parts of the digital business you laid out, you're right about that. I would say, however, that Canada has sort of been more of a stand-alone because you have one brand for both sports and iCasino up there. And what we're talking about today and this brand change doesn't affect our Canadian operations at all. We've got nice momentum there. We had an all-time best iCasino month last month in Canada. So we've got some nice momentum there, and we're going to have -- I believe we can build on that with more of a focus and more resources and marketing dollars headed up north of the border.

And market access, I think we all -- that's a nice revenue and EBITDA stream. It's not going to be as high as it is today forever, right? These deals will eventually expire over time. And so we want to make sure that we're not just relying on that because it's not there forever, and we're taking some of that money, and we're investing and building this company up for the future, as I mentioned earlier, and we've done that. I think as it relates to U.S. iCasino and OSB, they're so interconnected. You can't really -- I don't think you can look at iCasino as its own opportunity because think about our iCasino business in the U.S., most of it today still comes from within the integrated sports betting app.

So if you can't -- you'd have a hard time extracting all those players onto your stand-alone Hollywood iCasino if they've been playing slot machines and playing Blackjack through your sports betting app. And so those 2 really are connected together. All of this is -- has created a very large digital database for us that we do cross-sell into our land-based properties. And 3/4 of our land-based properties are in states where OSB is legal and almost 40% of those digital native customers live within 50 miles of our properties. And you visit our properties today and you see it, you feel it. There's a younger customer. They're in the sports books, playing tables, they're in our restaurants, and they're playing slot machines, which is very encouraging.

So I understand the way you're thinking about that. I would say, strategically for us, it all pulls together, and it really sets the company up the way we need to be set up for where the industry is headed. Prediction markets, I think, is an interesting topic. I actually -- my view on prediction markets is that this is a major threat to the industry. Taking a step back, we're, of course, give you the can expression everyone else does, we're monitoring the situation. I think importantly, we're going to very clearly take our direction from our state regulators. We always have, we always will. That doesn't change.

With all of that said, I do think as an industry that we've got to play some offense here. When I say industry, I think it's operators, it's working with our regulators, working with our state legislators and lawmakers because the posture that we're taking at this point is very defensive. It's going to take a long time to play out, and it doesn't feel at the moment like a winning hand. And prediction markets are -- they're live across the country. And I think that as an industry, we feel like we can outperform those guys if we're in the same market as they are with the same product, i.e., sports betting.

We think our sports betting product is much better than prediction markets, and I think that's proving out. But where they are building a real business is in states where it's not legal. It's legal sort of at the commodities federal level and -- but it's not at the state level. And so how does that play out in the courts, it's going to take years. And so I just don't -- I don't think that the winning hand for us is going to be to try to fight this out through the courts. It's likely to be appealed over and over again, take a long time. And look, who loses out here? Customers do, there's no responsible gaming protections, know your customer. All of the customer protections and regulations that we deal with and have been for decades, those don't exist at the prediction market level.

So again, I think there's a lot more to do here. I think as an industry, we need to come together and figure out how to play offense. So I would say stay tuned. I don't think us all sitting around and monitoring what's happening is going to be -- it's not going to be a viable strategy.

You kind of stole my second question. I'm not even sure I actually asked on prediction markets, but I -- that was really definitely where I was going. So just be one very short follow-up because I appreciate the depth of that answer would just be -- have you looked at all into the possibilities of casino mechanics as it relates to either prediction market to prediction market overlays? There was something that came up at least on the sports betting side, a mechanic that Hard Rock just kind of went live with in Florida? And yes, I mean, how far down the rabbit hole are you going? Because I mean, realistically, it feels like some of these things are actually possible. I know it seems crazy, but they are kind of possible. So have you kind of thought about that? I know it's really far off today, but the pace of innovation, I think, as you alluded to, is actually pretty incredible.

I actually don't think it's that far off, Shaun, at all. And you mentioned what Hard Rock is doing in Florida. So now you're talking about past motor races and sports betting, but it's spinning a slot machine. historical horse racing has been done in the land-based businesses. Let's -- I mean, let's be very clear about this. I would be shocked if prediction market operators as they're raising money at significant valuations and seem to be doubling every few months aren't talking about this. And if you can move forward with prediction markets and sports -- what would stop you from offering prediction markets and contracts on the next spin of a slot machine, the next hand of Blackjack, the next spin of the bow for a roulette table. So this is existential. Like this is not -- like we're going to be talking about this, I think, in a matter of months, not years. And I think as an industry, we've got to play offense and figure out how do we stay ahead of this. And we got to come together quickly, though, like we don't have a lot of time here. And I think there's some natural opportunities and some natural potential solutions here.

So to your question, should we be looking at a prediction model launch along those lines? Maybe I think there's other paths that could be a lot more effective that would more level the playing field and allow us to do what we do best and offer great products and experiences that would be better than what they can offer, but we do need to work with the other constituencies in the space.

Our next question comes from Chad Beynon with Macquarie.

With respect to iCasino, obviously, a lot of moving items announced today and in the past couple of months. Jay, what's your appetite to look at non-North American markets given that you have the tech, the staff, the improvements to maybe have kind of a leg up against some of the other companies that are in non-North American markets and aren't fully integrated? It appears that they're having a harder time. Yes, what's your view on that?

Yes. I would say that let's talk in a few quarters. Right now, obviously, the focus is all about retention as we go through the rebrand on December 1, again, pending final regulatory approval. We feel like we've got a good plan, but we've got a lot in front of us. We need to execute and stay heads down laser-focused on delivering the best possible result as we head into '26 for our digital business and cross-sell in our retail businesses, our retail openings. So but we also can walk and chew gum.

So I would say that if there's an opportunity that presents itself, I think we're feeling like as though we have a world-class team. We know we have one of the best products, both in OSB and iGaming in the United States. And we think we could compete anywhere. We're just not going to be looking to do that in the near term. But if opportunities presented themselves or we felt like we were at a point where we're ready to go elsewhere, we would strongly consider that. It's just not something that you would expect to hear from us. You shouldn't expect to hear from us in the shorter term.

Okay. And then lastly, on Joliet, have you seen repeat visitation? You talked about some of the activation in the early numbers, and I know it is pretty early overall. But do you think some of the added customers could begin to come at the property maybe at the same rate or pace as your portfolio or kind of what you would expect?

Chad, it's Todd. Yes, listen, I think there are so many good takeaways right now and again, at or above our expectations in all the major KPIs. But the frequency that we're seeing there is in line or better than some of our best-performing properties and significantly better than the prior Joliet property. But I'd also point to just there's a slide in there, and it shows the 42% growth in the database, which is a combination of reactivation as well as new members. And again, you're catering to -- you start looking at total spend at the property. So greatly improved offerings around the food and beverage area. So you've got people coming in now for more of that entertainment experience that we talked about before.

So they're spending time on a slot machine or a table game or electronic table game and then making the way to food and beverage and then hopefully back to the gaming floor. So -- and then from a frequency standpoint, when you start evaluating how properties perform, you look at guest count, you look at frequency, you look at daily spend, all of those are going in a very good direction.

If we could take one more question, please.

Our final question will come from Jeff Stantial with Stifel.

Maybe starting off on the land-based business, margins down about 90 bps year-on-year in the quarter. Jay or Todd, whoever wants to take this, can you just give us a sense for how margins trended for that cohort of assets that were not impacted by new supply? And then if you take that even one step further, can you unpack some of the key drivers to that performance, meaning was there more geographic mix shift in taxes again? How has wage inflation trended? Are there other pockets of inflation right now? Just any color there would be great.

Yes. This is Todd. I think it's, again, directionally focused on that Slide 12, and it will show you the impact on both revenue and flow-through. But then you start looking at some of the expense items that I mentioned earlier with both marketing as well as labor. Also keep in mind, this will come up periodically, but you've got your controllable and then there's the payroll related. So every now and then, you do see a little bit of an uptick in payroll related. We did see some of that, especially in the South segment. You also -- we've got some nice properties that have high-end play. So at times, you're going to take a small hit to bad debt expense. So there's those types of things that find their way in and out of an income statement. This quarter, we happen to have a few more going that way. But I think overall, looking at October trends, really nice year-over-year. You're starting to see the state numbers come out, and you'll see that trend continue. Again, not just us, healthy for the entire industry, but where September ended, October took right back off, obviously, helped by the calendar with 5 Fridays. But we're really happy with the way that Q4 has started out. Felicia touched on the first weekend. That continued into the month of November as well.

That's great. And then switching gears back over to the Interactive side of things. You talked throughout the call on reallocation of resources over to iCasino and the Canadian business and then more of that higher-value player cohort. As we just think about the benefits of sort of more financial and operational resources being freed up, I'm curious what sort of opportunities you see more on the product development side, if this can increase your velocity of new games coming out, maybe optimization of the CRM and the bonusing models, anything like that? And then back on the marketing side of things, should we just think about this as more pushing heavier into UA reinvestment for that higher LTV iCasino-led player? And then how should we just think about maybe other marketing channels that you might now push on whether that's more top of funnel spend outside of ESPN driving awareness for theScore brand in the U.S. or maybe more allocating reources further down into the funnel to higher CAC channels? Just any thoughts there would be great.

This is Aaron. So a few things. One, on the marketing side, if you think about ESPN BET and the marketing spend that we had there, it was a national brand and a national platform. And we spent a lot of time trying to make that work. At the same time, we do have a set of marketing spend that we manage ourselves around performance marketing and acquisition that is very effective for us from a CAC perspective. And so if you look at our growth in iCasino, largely part of that is coming not only from our retail database, but also from our targeted marketing.

And so now all the marketing spend that we drop to our operating model from the ESPN deal is now going to be able to be applied in a very precise fashion, targeting states that are iCasino and OSB only -- asino, OSB and retail, Ontario, Alberta is coming. So we feel like we have a lot more control and precision from a marketing perspective, and it's been working already. So we're not guessing about how effective this will be. We now have more money to actually drive the business.

From a product perspective, if you look at the difference between ESPN BET from a year ago to today, it's night and day. And by the way, I just came out with a report, ESPN BET was most improved. Our retention is better than it's ever been. The product is very competitive. So those same people are actually our team that builds our casino product as well. So if you think about the level of innovation, the velocity of change to the app, a lot of that's going to apply to our casino product as well because obviously, in a casino-first strategy, the score is going to be a big component of that and theScore Bet.

But a lot of our development time is going to be spent on making sure that we have the best casino product in market. And the same people that have been building that for ESPN BET and focusing all of our resources to try to make that work given our expectations there are now going to be working on Hollywood as well. So we're really excited about the product. We're really excited about the marketing flexibility. I mean, as Jay said, between theScore Media, theScore Bet and Hollywood Casino, these are brands that we own and we control everything about how those operate. So we're pretty optimistic about moving forward.

All right. Thank you, everybody, for dialing in. We look forward to speaking with all of you again in February on our Q4 call. Have a great day.

This concludes today's program. Thank you for your participation, and you may disconnect at any time.