OmniAb Aktie

Good afternoon, and welcome to OmniAb's First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the call over to Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb's Chief Financial Officer. You may begin. Thank you.

Thank you, Derek, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you all for joining our first quarter 2026 financial results conference call. There are slides to accompany today's prepared remarks, and they are available in the Investors section of our website at omniab.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind listeners that comments made during this call by OmniAb's management will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from any anticipated results. These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in today's press release and our SEC filings. Importantly, this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this live broadcast today, May 7th, 2026. Except as required by law, OmniAb undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call.

Joining me this afternoon is Matt Foehr, OmniAb's President and CEO. Matt is going to cover some of the business highlights. I'll review our Q1 financial results and full year guidance, and then we'll open up the call to questions.

And so, let me turn this over to Matt.

Thanks, Kurt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining our first quarter call. I'll start now on Slide #4. OmniAb delivered a very strong start to the year, largely driven by advancement of our partner programs. We continue to see programs derived from our technologies move into the clinic and into later-stage development. And in many cases and in many respects, that's really where our business model translates into clear and more visible value for our stakeholders.

The progression of these programs gives us a growing line of sight into potential for future milestones and new royalties as our partners' programs advance.

Our business is designed to benefit from durable revenue streams and royalties from differentiated pharmaceutical products are extremely valuable in our view.

In addition, our innovations and our technologies are designed to differentiate OmniAb as a licensing partner and more broadly as a business. and are keeping us at the forefront of next-generation discovery tech.

We believe our novel technologies and our workflows are increasingly positioned to attract partners, while also supporting current relationships, having potentially important impacts both on our business and on our industry.

Both our OmniUltra and our OmnidAb technologies are opening new markets and opportunities and the traction we're seeing is encouraging. And we believe that our innovation, which is informed by deep relationships with partners is a key competitive advantage.

During Q1, we also continued to build a strong foundation for xPloration, which we view as a tremendous opportunity to expand our reach and diversify our sources of revenue. The xPloration sales funnel continues to grow with a lot of high-quality prospects evaluating the system for use in their labs.

And with a very strong start to the year, we've revised our full year financial guidance and increased our revenue outlook, which we view as an important early indicator of the value that's embedded in our partner pipeline. Kurt will speak to our updated guidance in greater detail in his remarks.

Turning now to Slide #5. I'd like to take a moment to highlight some of our novel technology launches, which we believe position us for growth. OmniAb is the only company in the world with a transgenic chicken platform that creates fully human antibody sequences.

Part of the advantage of a chicken platform is based on the evolutionary distance of the chicken as a biological host for discovery versus other animals, specifically mammals. This distance allows our chickens to create a robust response and a diverse set of antibodies against novel targets that a mammal likely wouldn't.

Members of our business development team recently attended the AACR meeting down in San Diego. And at the conference, there were reports and one specifically from BioCentury that about 170 new therapeutic targets for cancer were disclosed at the meeting, many of which had not appeared before in cancer-focused R&D programs. And new targets are generally where biology is not fully understood and technology platforms such as ours can really help understand and advance novel drug discovery.

Traditionally, many therapeutic targets are highly conserved among mammals and that also adds to the value proposition of our transgenic chicken platforms.

We have a number of different types of highly engineered chickens that can create unique antibody repertoires and help discover drugs such as traditional heavy and light chain antibodies, common light chain formats, single-domain antibodies, ultra-long CDRH3 domains and dual modality antibodies and even peptides. These technologies are designed to open new market opportunities and drive partner interest.

Our most recently launched OmniUltra shown at the top right-hand corner of this slide is the first and only transgenic chicken that produces antibodies with ultra-long CDRH3s, which is a structural feature of antibodies typically found in cows. These ultra-long CDRH3s are designed to reach binding pockets not accessible with other antibodies or modalities, potentially unveiling new therapeutic opportunities and can also play a role in such things as being building blocks for multispecifics as binders for CAR-T and for radiopharma therapies and as in vivo generated peptides.

We just launched the new OmniUltratech in December, and our scientists will be presenting on OmniUltra next week at the PEGS, Protein Engineering Meeting in Boston as well as at the TIDES peptide meeting that is also taking place in Boston next week.

Prior to OmniUltra, the most recent novel chicken-based technology we launched was our single domain technology known as OmnidAb, which was launched just a couple of years back. As of Q1, there are now 2 OmnidAb-derived partner programs in human clinical trials. Both got to the clinic very quickly, and one is now already in Phase II trials. I'll touch on this a little more in a few slides when I review our clinical pipeline.

xPloration is summarized here on Slide #6. xPloration is our proprietary innovative high-throughput single B-cell screening platform that leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence. The xPloration platform includes a competitively priced instrument and proprietary single-use consumables. As such, it has the potential to generate multiple revenue streams to our business.

We're seeing continued strong interest in exploration and in demand for demos given its rapid run times, its ease of use and overall robustness. With these user benefits, we believe we have the right technology at the right time as we're entering an era when our partners and the broader industry increasingly recognize the value of lab automation and high-value and high-impact instrumentation for large-scale data generation and AI and ML-enabled screening and selection. We're in the early days of xPloration, but we're very excited about what this technology can contribute to the business.

I'll now turn to some of our metrics starting on Slide #7. At the end of Q1, we had 107 active partners, consistent with year-end 2025. In the first quarter, new licenses included an agreement with Florida State University as we continue to see growing opportunities in academia with agreements that have been prewired with financial terms that allow us to share in the economics of assets generated from our technology.

This quarter, our partner adds were offset by attrition, which is an expected part of the business. The mix of partners across discovery stage companies, large pharma and academic institutions remains very well balanced. A majority of our partners are headquartered here in the United States with the remainder primarily in Europe and in Asia.

We're also proud that 8 of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in the world are active partners of OmniAb. This demonstrates the quality and the strength of our partner base and further validates our technology platforms. And I think it's kind of important to note that these are companies that spend billions of dollars on clinical work and research and development.

So they're deploying substantial amounts of capital to discover impactful medicines that serve global markets, and they leverage OmniAb's technologies as part of their discovery efforts. Management here and our team take pride in that, and so we feel it's important to note.

Now I'll move on to Slide #8, and you'll see here our active programs metric. We ended the quarter with 409 active programs with a net increase that reflects both the addition of new programs and new program starts and the normal attrition that occurs as partners refine their pipelines and portfolio priorities. Importantly, about 98% of our active programs include contracted future economics to OmniAb.

Across our portfolio, we have more than $3 billion in total contracted milestones on standard antibody licenses with an average contracted royalty rate of approximately 3.4%.

On the clinical front, Slide 9 shows our partners' active clinical programs and approved products. At the end of Q1, there were 32 active clinical programs and approved products that leverage our technologies. That total reflects both new entrants into the clinic and attrition. And I want to note that the numbers we consistently report to investors are all net of attrition.

As I mentioned briefly, during the quarter, a second OmnidAb-derived program progressed into Phase I human testing, reinforcing the momentum we're seeing from our newer technologies, and we continue to anticipate multiple new clinical entrants in 2026.

We've seen important clinical advancement within these active clinical programs year-to-date and look forward to further positive advancement activity this year. And I note that we have approximately $350 million in remaining potential contracted milestones to OmniAb for these clinical stage programs.

Turning now to Slide #10. This graphic summarizes our clinical and commercial stage partner pipeline for active programs that carry downstream economics to OmniAb.

The placement of each program here is based on its most advanced stage in any geography or indication. And as you can likely tell, there has been some significant movement in the later stages of development with additional programs now in Phase I, in Phase II and in Phase III.

Now I know many investors follow and reference this graphic frequently, and I do want to point out a few things that developed in Q1 that are playing a key role in driving elements of the business.

First, in the lower left-hand corner of this slide, in the Phase I section, you'll see we have our second OmnidAb-derived program enter human trials. For competitive reasons, this partner wants to ensure that both the therapeutic target and their work in the clinic remain confidential. And we obviously respect that request by our partner.

As we move to the right on this graphic, I want to highlight that we also had a program progress from Phase I to Phase II in Q1. This is also an OmnidAb-derived program and another instance, where the partner continues to want to keep the program and specifically the source of the antibody confidential.

Both programs are what I will characterize as early adopters of the OmnidAb single domain technology, which is really great to see. And both of these are pursuing what we see as areas of substantial unmet medical need.

Moving further to the right, I also want to mention that Ramantamig, which was formerly referred to as JNJ-5322, jumped from Phase I to Phase III on this chart. That was a program that J&J Innovative Medicines highlighted earlier with some impressive clinical data, and it's a trispecific antibody being developed for multiple myeloma.

The right-hand side of this graphic is getting more crowded with what we view as important potential first-in-class or best-in-class medicines. And I should also highlight the TEV-408 anti-IL-15 asset, which was subject to some substantial news in Q1 with a very large investment in the program by Royalty Pharma that was announced by Teva in the quarter.

Teva featured this program prominently on their most recent earnings call last week, highlighting that it has potential in multiple indications and describing it as being on a "accelerated path".

Slide 11 shows a summary of some of the upcoming clinical and regulatory events with 2026 clearly shaping up to be a really active year of news and catalysts for our clinical stage partner programs.

Teva is expecting a few data readouts, including the TEV-408 program for vitiligo in the first half of the year. The drug is being evaluated in a 24-week proof-of-concept study with a week 24 body surface area score as the primary endpoint, which Teva has described as the registrational endpoint in this disease.

The second half of the year features additional expected readouts from Teva as well as from Merck KGaA and from the IMVT-1402 program at Immunovant, which is also a very exciting program with multiple indications.

And as a final slide for me here on Slide #12, we highlight a few of the partner programs that will be featured at the ASCO conference beginning later this month in Chicago. These programs cover a range of cancer types being treated with antibody drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies that are derived from our technologies.

We look forward to seeing these data, which will provide additional visibility into individual assets and continue to highlight our broadly validated technology platform.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Kurt for a discussion of our Q1 financial results and our updated 2026 guidance. Kurt?

Thanks, Matt. As Matt mentioned, this was a strong quarter, driven by the advancements in our partner portfolio. So let me start with Slide 14 with total revenue. Total revenue totaled $14.4 million compared with $4.2 million in the first quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher milestone revenue, reflecting the progress of our partners' programs in the clinic.

We also saw a modest increase in service revenue due to some new Ion channel agreements signed late last year as well as early this year. Revenues from royalties and xPloration were about the same year-over-year.

Turning to Slide 15, you'll see our operating expenses for the quarter. We continue to execute against our plan to run the business efficiently while investing appropriately in our technology platforms.

Our operating expense in the first quarter decreased slightly to $22.3 million from $23 million. Most of this decrease is due to lower personnel expenses and outside service costs related to contract research services and legal costs.

Q1 2026 also included a noncash write-off of $2.9 million related to certain legacy small molecule ion channel intangible assets. Without this, our operating expense would have shown an even larger decrease year-over-year.

On Slide 16, you'll see the change in the new financial metric that we introduced last year, cash cost and operating expense. We define this as our GAAP cost and operating expense less stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization of intangibles. Essentially, it takes the GAAP number and removes all the major noncash items in our P&L. We believe this metric provides a better measure of our spend.

As you can see from this slide, while both the GAAP and non-GAAP figures decline was an even larger decline in our cash operating expense. We focus on driving efficiencies in the business that have brought costs down. But in Q1 2026 due to the noncash write-off, those reductions aren't as apparent when looking at the GAAP figures alone.

Moving on to Slide 17 shows our P&L for the quarter. I'd like to draw your attention to our operating expense line items, where reductions in R&D and G&A demonstrate the impact of cost savings and other efficiency initiatives.

R&D decreased $3 million to $9.6 million in the first quarter of 2026, and G&A also decreased $1.3 million to $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2026. The onetime noncash charge that I mentioned earlier was reported in the goodwill and intangibles amortization line.

Net loss for the first quarter of 2026 was $7.7 million or $0.06 per share. This compares with a net loss of $18.2 million or $0.17 per share in the year ago period. Excluding the onetime noncash charge, our EPS in Q1 2026 would have been a loss of $0.04 per share.

Now turning to the balance sheet on Slide 18. We ended the quarter with a cash position of $49.1 million. You'll also see a slight increase to our accounts receivable, reflecting the milestones that were achieved in the quarter that won't be paid until after the end of the quarter. We continue to believe that the company is well capitalized to execute against our strategy.

Our updated 2026 financial guidance is on Slide 19, which reflects the strong first quarter performance and our view for the remainder of the year. We are raising our full year 2026 revenue outlook and revising expectations for our operating expenses and year-end cash. We now project total revenue for 2026 to be in the range of $28 million to $33 million.

During the first quarter, one of our partners achieved a milestone that was not part of our original guidance, which is the primary driver of the increase in our revenue guidance.

We now expect 2026 GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of $83 million to $88 million. The revised range is driven primarily by the noncash impairment charge recorded in the first quarter.

Importantly, our cash operating expense guidance remains unchanged at $50 million to $55 million as the noncash write-off doesn't impact this figure.

Regarding cash, with the higher expected revenue and no change to the cash operating expense guidance, we now anticipate ending 2026 with cash and cash equivalents in the range of $33 million to $38 million.

The effective tax rate for the full year remains at approximately 0% because of the valuation allowance we record.

I thought I would put our guidance in a historical context here on Slide 20. You can see our 3-year financial metrics are improving, in particular, when it comes to cash usage. We expect revenue to grow significantly in 2026 versus 2025, while cash operating expense is expected to remain in a tight band, driving overall cash use lower.

While we're still in a period, where revenue is largely driven by milestones, which can be highly variable in any given quarter, our portfolio of partner programs has continued to grow and advance. This should generally drive milestone revenue higher.

As we look beyond the next couple of years, we would expect royalty revenue to kick in and start to accelerate that revenue growth and eventually become the larger contributor to our total revenue. The stacking of royalties combined with a scalable infrastructure is the essence of our business model and points to a promising future for the company and our shareholders.

And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Joe Pantginis with H.C. Wainwright.

Two, please. So first, as you mentioned, you have some ASCO data coming up for some of your partners. Are there milestones associated with these data releases? And are they in your current guidance, number one?

And then number two, more for your overall tech platforms. While you're constantly developing new ones, if you will, can you discuss any -- I mean, you don't have to describe any secret sauce here, but for your current platforms, any sort of improvements and refinements that you do to the existing that add to your marketability of those platforms?

Yes. Great. Thanks, Joe. Yes, great questions. In regard to the ASCO data events, maybe I'll answer that by maybe describing generally how our agreements are designed, right?

So partners come to us to get access to our technologies, and we'll generally enter into a license agreement that provides them access to the technologies in exchange for service costs, some license fees and then where the real focus is, are the downstream milestones and royalties.

And while we generally start in about the same place in any negotiation with our 107 partners, every agreement is different in one way or another. But generally, the milestone payments are linked to clinical events, regulatory events, approvals, things like that. So largely, it's Phase I starts, Phase II, Phase III. There are some subtleties around it.

We generally don't have milestones that are specifically associated with, I'll say, data disclosures, but there can be milestones associated with data generation. So hopefully, that gives you a little more color there.

But as far as ASCO, we're actually quite excited about some of the work that our partners will be presenting. I think that's an opportunity for assets to become more in focus for those that are watching the expansion and the growth of our portfolio.

In terms of the technology platforms, obviously, I talked through some of our platforms today in the prepared remarks, specifically around our chicken-based technologies. And I think it's important to note, even beyond our [ night branding ] of each of those technologies, our brand team is obviously proud of that.

But even beneath those, there are different kind of highly technical subflavors, if you will, of each of those animals that we pair with partners' programs. And I think that's one of the reasons why we've continued to be successful in growing the portfolio, why partners kind of understand the quality of the technologies that we produce.

And for us, those continued innovations and the things we add on really are informed by these deep relationships with our partners. So really leveraging this ecosystem of partnerships and these deep relationships around discovery, that informs our continued innovation. And we expect we'll continue to innovate around our platforms, another area I will highlight is workflows as well.

We continue to innovate around more efficient workflows, leveraging big data management, AI and ML and our data work, those kinds of things, partners have known that about us for years. But all of those things kind of together, I think you'll continue to see those sorts of innovations out of us in the future.

Your next question comes from the line of Srikripa Devarakonda with Truist Securities.

I had a couple of questions. One is around Teva, the TEV-408 with Phase Ib vitiligo data expected in the first half, and you were just talking about it, Matt, milestone -- when we think about milestones, would that be -- would we have to wait until Teva formally elects to move the program into Phase II or Phase III or at the end of Phase Ib, knowing that they're moving ahead, is there a milestone there?

And then second one is Immunovant recently announced batoclimab failed Phase III trials in TED. This was, at least for a section of investors, one of your most advanced and visible programs. Can you talk a little bit about how this impacts your long-term royalty projections in the context of having Immunovant IMVT-1402 as well?

Yes. Great. Maybe I'll start with your second question, Kripa, on Immunovant. And for a long time, they have remained highly focused on rapidly advancing the clinical development of IMVT-1402. And they've really been signaling that the last almost couple of years.

Obviously, IMVT-1402, it's an investigational FcRn blocker. They're looking at it across multiple autoimmune diseases with -- that significant unmet medical need. So Graves disease is one of their key strategic priorities. And -- but they're going after multiple diseases as well with IMVT-1402.

So in addition to Graves, they're looking at difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis and lupus, where they think they can be potentially first-in-class and best-in-class. And then also looking at myasthenia gravis and CIDP and Sjogren's disease, where they've generally described it as a potential best-in-class drug.

So we have really seen and they have signaled that pivot towards IMVT-1402 for quite a while. So the Batoclimab update that occurred really had no impact on our planning or our guidance, et cetera. So we're obviously cheering them on and with all the great work that they're doing on IMVT-1402.

Switching gears a little bit on your question around TEV-408 at Teva. While I can't disclose kind of the final details of any individual contract, I kind of go back to my general comments around how our agreements are generally structured that I mentioned earlier, but that is an asset that I think is becoming much more in focus now.

It's an asset that they're highlighting quite a bit. They've described it as having quite a unique binding site. They call it the antibody with the highest affinity for IL-15, and they're going after multiple indications. So right now, they have vitiligo and celiac. Vitiligo is a disease with really tremendous unmet medical need with a lot of psychosocial burden, social stigma, et cetera, and they'll have top line results from that here in the first half of the year. They also have a trial running in celiac.

And then more recently, they've also referenced other indications for this as well, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis and potentially others as well. So we're obviously cheering them on. It's great to see not only their efficiency of acceleration of clinical work, but they've also, in some of their recent presentations, talked about potential market size and seeing a potential for peak sales of $1 billion in just in vitiligo and $1.5 billion to $2 billion in celiac. So we're cheering them on as well. And they've been a great partner, long-term partner of ours. So that's good to see.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Brendan Smith with TD Cowen.

This is Jackie on for Brendan. Maybe a broader question to start for us. We've been seeing a lot of pharma and academic users increasing their own adoption of AI within their workflows. So how should we think about how that ramp in adoption should impact demand for your specific products and services? Do you expect the increase in partner model training could potentially accelerate demand for your platform, which is very data generating?

Yes. Thanks, Jackie. Yes, good question. Simply put, we see AI as a tailwind for the industry as a real positive for a lot of different reasons. One, and there's been a lot of reports of AI playing a role in accelerating the potential early identification of new targets.

And I think we kind of see some early evidence of that with some of the things that came out of the AACR meeting this year that I was referencing in the prepared remarks with over 170 previously untracked oncology targets now being visible.

Our partners have known about us for a long time, and you can look at our history of announcements, et cetera, that we've leveraged AI for quite a while. We've been deep in that space. It's a natural place for us to go when you have novel biological systems that are generating billions upon billions of sequences it was always a natural place for us to go.

That's something -- a few years ago, we rolled out our OmniDeep platform, which is essentially a way for us to kind of brand the in silico tools that are woven throughout our technology platform.

I've told this story a couple of times, and I was kind of reminded of it because I saw this partner recently, but there was a partner, who was talking to me, who was describing the success they were having with our platform and talking about how much there is still to learn about novel biology.

And that's especially true when you're going after a disease target that might not be fully understood. And she was comparing the data about target biology that exists in all of the public databases and even within individual companies only as sort of a bathtub of data, if you will, whereas when you're going after a novel target, you need to explore the ocean.

And she was sort of connecting our animals as being a way to navigate that ocean, right, that you can generate these bespoke repertoires and then downstream from that, you can really leverage AI and machine learning to help you focus and hone and do downstream work. So we're excited about the impact of AI across the industry, and I think we're really well positioned.

So more of Dolphin and less of a [ rubber ducky ], I guess, in that analogy. But maybe just -- it might be too early to tell, but just as a follow-up, are you seeing any shift in new partner interest towards like more data and tech-focused partners away from more of the biology pure plays? It might be too early to tell that, but are you seeing any of that kind of mix shift over to tech?

Well, I do -- the comment I'll make and it sort of relates to our xPloration platform is that I do think there is -- and it's part of the reason we feel like xPloration is well timed. There is a thirst for more data, right, and big data analysis. And I think that was one of the things that I think partners saw in us and can see our technology platform developing and producing. So hopefully, that gives you some color.

Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Willey with Stifel.

This is Josh on for Steve. So I know that you said you have this new license out of the Florida State and just kind of thinking about -- I know you had said you share economics generated from partnerships like this, but I wanted to kind of dig a little deeper into kind of the differences in the economics associated with maybe a more academic deal versus more industry-focused deal and what kind of differences there are there and maybe if there's any kind of priority for one or the other moving forward?

Yes. Good question. The way we describe and really design the architecture of our agreements with the academics is in a simple sense, they're -- we'll call it a revenue share, right? But they're designed that way specifically to enable academics who are focused on asset monetization or company formation, right?

And we've seen -- we've already seen examples of that. That's something I think, with some dynamics that exist in the greater academic landscape, we'll see more universities who are motivated to spin companies out, out of some of their basic biology technology and that sort of thing.

So the way they're structured, there's a sharing of revenue that will flow back to OmniAb. And that can come in a variety of forms, whether it's license fees -- sublicense fees to a new entity that's formed, whether it's in the form of equity of the new formed entity that would also flow back to OmniAb. And so those kinds of scenarios and, of course, milestones and royalties as well.

So those agreements are specifically structured to enable that. That's something that we think is quite unique in terms of how we do licensing with the academic space, and it's something that I think does attract partners.

And some of the research that these places are doing is quite exquisite. I'm very impressed with some of the things that have been produced by some of our academic partners who from the very beginning are planning to potentially form companies. Now that obviously takes time, but it's a good thing to see. So hopefully, that gives you a little more color.

Yes, definitely. And then just a follow-up. I know there was a previous question on kind of some of the milestones attributed to maybe some of the catalysts for the second half of this year. And just trying to think about some of your milestone and license revenue assumptions for the remainder of the year. Is it fair to say with some of these clinical event catalysts coming up that maybe some of your milestone and royalty revenues will be more second half weighted in terms of your guidance that you provided?

Well, I think we provided full year guidance for revenue. Q1 was a pretty strong quarter for us. Most of the revenue that sort of is slated for 2026 is kind of milestone-based. That can be lumpy. So we had a really nice Q1, but we're also looking forward, we sort of have forecasted a number of nice clinical events to happen throughout the rest of the year. So we're off to a good start, but we see more to come.

Your next question comes from the line of Puneet Souda with Leerink.

You have Micheal Sonntag for Puneet. Congrats on the quarter. My first question regards to OmniUltra. I was wondering if you could offer any insights on traction you're seeing with expanding into like new customer types and modalities that you've highlighted peptides is one area that this model unlocks. Any color you can offer there?

Yes. Great. Thanks, Micheal. Yes, obviously, OmniUltra is our newest technology. We just launched it in December, as I mentioned, our team is actually going to be highlighting it at the PEGS conference as well as the TIDES conference in Boston next week, and it opens up a whole host of new opportunities for us. still early days. I'll say the reception is good. We obviously have multiple programs running with OmniUltra partner programs already. We disclosed that previously.

And I think for the antibody space, the players that know OmniAb very, very well in the antibody space, it's a very natural expansion, and we're obviously working on a number of work plans and expect some other starts coming here soon around OmniUltra.

And those are folks who are interested in, I'll say, kind of the Pico body element as well as the ultra-long CDRH3 element that the OmniUltra platform produces.

On the peptide side, it really is kind of a completely new way of discovering peptides, right? So you're looking for inherently or you're screening right out of the gate, essentially inherently biologically active and peptides that are also evolved for stability, you get high diversity in those repertoires.

But it is a bit of a new sell, right? These are new customers for us, which is great. I see a real nice opportunity there. But there are over 130 companies that previously were not in our call file that are now in our call file that our BD team is -- has been reaching out to and dialoguing with.

So still early days, but we're excited about it, and we are really looking forward to highlighting the OmniUltra technology at these conferences next week as well.

And then I wanted to also ask on the new program starts this quarter. It came in maybe a little bit softer than we were expecting. And we did have a larger tool company, particularly leveraging the preclinical space, highlight some headwinds in the early-stage [ biotech ] affecting their results. I'm curious if you could offer any color on if you're seeing any of that or if this is just your standard fluctuations in the starts.

Yes. I'd characterize it as standard fluctuations, right? We see lumpiness in program additions. We saw a big bolus of programs come in very late in Q4. And sometimes there will be impacts on when we receive annual or biannual reports from our partners. So it can have -- that can also be part of that as well.

But no, we actually -- we see the industry really -- a couple of years ago, there was a lot more, I'll say, macro headwinds in the industry. We're really seeing the industry get back to work, and we're excited about that. So I just would describe it as kind of the standard lumpiness that we see.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael King with Rodman & Renshaw.

This is [ Tanay ] on for Mike. Congratulations on the updates. Just a quick one on your active programs. You had 9 additions and 7 terminations and that base the guidance for this year. Just wanted to ask, is the value of the newer contracts higher than the older ones? Or if you could provide some more color on that?

Yes. So as we look across our whole portfolio of programs, right, we've got over $3 billion in contracted milestones and average royalty rate of 3.4%. As you look at what our average royalty rate was a couple of years ago, that it's actually improved over time. When you have that big of a denominator, right, it can take time to continue to evolve that.

But as we continue to have a further validated platform and invest in it, that's allowed us to command, I'll say, strong economics. The way program additions and starts work, right, they're going to be linked to an individual partner and a contract. So they're not always linked to a contract that would say, just signed in the last quarter or so, right?

Some of the programs that are going to be spinning up are ones that are from an agreement that may have been signed a couple of years ago, right? So there's a variety there.

But again, I kind of direct back to our total portfolio from that perspective. But we are excited about the novel targets that our partners are going after. We're noticing bigger companies taking bigger swings, if you will, from a target and an indication perspective. And I think that's good to see, that's healthy to see, and that's something that we're excited about as well.

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Matt Foehr for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, operator. We look forward to discussing our second quarter financial results in a few months. And in the meantime, we'll be participating in some investor conferences over the coming weeks, including Benchmark's Healthcare House Call Virtual Investor Conference that will be later this month. And then we'll also be at the Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference in New York City in June. So we hope to see some of you there. So thanks again for joining our call, and have a great day.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.

Good afternoon, and welcome to OmniAb, Inc.'s First -- Fourth Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the call over to Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer. You may begin. Thank you.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon to everyone. Thanks for joining our fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results conference call. There are slides to accompany today's prepared remarks, and they're available in the Investors section of our website at omniab.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind listeners that comments made during this call by OmniAb's management will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from any anticipated results. These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in today's press release and our SEC filings.

Importantly, this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of the live broadcast today, March 4, 2026. Except as required by law, OmniAb undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call. Joining me this afternoon is Matt Foehr, OmniAb's President and CEO. Matt is going to cover some business highlights, and I'll cover some financial information, and then we'll be opening the call up for questions.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Kurt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining our call. I'll start now on Slide #4. Our business built some nice momentum in 2025 that we sustained throughout the year. specifically related to broadening both our roster of partners and the number of active programs enabled by our technologies. By year-end, we're happy to report that we had 107 partners who are running 407 active programs.

And as our partner pipeline advances, there are certain later-stage programs that are now coming into focus with the potential to drive meaningful milestone revenue and create value over time. headed towards the generation of significant future recurring royalty revenue streams. On the innovation front, we introduced OmniUltra at the Antibody Engineering Conference down in San Diego in mid-December. OmniUltra is the industry's first and only transgenic chicken platform to express ultra-long CDRH3 on a human antibody framework. We see OmniUltra as an important new growth driver that can help us gain additional partners, generate new program starts, create incremental near-term revenue opportunities and extend our reach into peptide focused discovery applications.

Additionally, we're building a strong foundation for our exploration platform, which brings our high-throughput single B-cell screening capabilities directly into our partners' labs. We think exploration is very well positioned for significant growth with an expanding pipeline of high-quality prospects and increasing engagement as more partners are actively evaluating the platform for use in their labs and we expect exploration to be additive to the business and to contribute to our growth.

And I note with the growth in our base of partners and our partner program portfolio, it's becoming easier to highlight that our differentiated platforms and business are highly scalable, allowing us to add new programs while maintaining operating efficiency, positioning OmniAb on a sustainable path to future growth. And as Kurt will describe in his section in a bit, we're on a trajectory to positive cash flow.

Moving to our key business metrics, starting on Slide #5. As I mentioned, at year-end, we had 107 active partners, reflecting a continued growth and diversification of our business from that perspective. During Q4, we executed new license agreements with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Mabtrx Biosciences, which is a newly formed between, Arrowmark Partners and Viking Global Investors and with 2 global big pharma companies.

The partner mix across discovery stage commercials and academics continues to evolve and has remained relatively constant percentage-wise. A majority of our partners are headquartered here in the U.S. and the remainder are primarily in Europe and in Asia. We continue to broaden and diversify our partner base, which I think demonstrates consistent strong execution by our business development and scientific teams. 2025 was an especially strong year for us in terms of partner additions. I also note that we're proud of the strength of our partners as well, which I think says a lot about the quality of our technologies. Eight of the 10 largest pharma companies in the world are active partners of OmniAb.

Now on to Slide #6, you'll see our active programs metrics. We exited 2025 with 407 active programs, representing a net increase of 44 programs during the year. We saw 84 program additions in 2025 with a significant share of additions originating from our newer technology offerings. Our number of program additions in 2025 was substantially higher than recent years and more than 20% higher than 2024.

Now a trend is obviously a natural and expected part of [ drug every ] in development. And I note that we had 40 program terminations during the year, consistent with the normal ebb and flow we expect as partners adjust portfolios and budgets and adjust technical priorities. And lastly, and I think it's important to note here that over 98% of our active programs have contracted future economics to OmniAb. We have over $3 billion in total contracted milestone payments for active antibody programs and an average royalty rate of 3.4% and across our portfolio.

Slide 7 provides another look at our active programs and shows the strong advancement activity we saw across our partner pipeline throughout 2025. The figure here on this slide includes our entire partner program pipeline. And as you can see on the left side of this pyramid graphic, during the year, we added the 84 new programs I just referenced, demonstrating the continued strength of our technology platforms. And again, this was a very strong year from that perspective and substantially higher than recent years.

In terms of active program progression, we have 25 advancement or progression events in 2025 -- [ 16 ] programs advanced from discovery into preclinical development, which reflects our partner's progress and the identification of promising therapeutic candidates to take forward towards human trials. We also saw some healthy advancement further in the development process. 4 programs moved from preclinical into Phase I clinical trials and a couple of programs advanced into each of the clinical phases thereafter. And notably, 1 program reached the registration stage during 2025.

This slide shows each advancement event and I note that a couple of programs advance through more than 1 level or stage during the year. On attrition, which is depicted on the right side of this pyramid graphic, we had the 40 program terminations across various stages and 4 program regression events during the year.

Now program regression is far less common but does happen from time to time in a portfolio of active programs that has grown to the level that ours has in recent years. We see the level of attrition shown here is consistent with the normal dynamics of drug development. What's particularly encouraging and exciting are the 25 total program advancement events we saw as programs move from 1 development stage to the next. This progression demonstrates that OmniAb enabled therapeutics are continuing to perform well for our partners in development and in the clinic and are moving closer to potential commercialization, which supports our milestone and royalty revenue opportunity over time and increases the value of the individual programs to our stakeholders.

Slide 8 shows the growth in the postdiscovery stage programs over recent years. This, again, I think, demonstrates the value that our technologies bring to our partners and I know both the overall growth and the progression into the preclinical stage over recent years.

Slide 9 shows the number of active clinical programs and approved products which totaled 32 at the end of Q4. These numbers are net of attrition and reflect new clinical entrants as well as attrition and a regression event during the year. The fourth quarter saw a very important milestone with the first OmnidAb-derived program advancing into human clinical testing. This program entered human clinical trials less than 2 years from when we introduced the OmnidAb single domain discovery platform. So having it generate a program that reached the clinic that quickly underscores both the technology's traction with our partners and its potential to drive future value for our stakeholders.

We anticipate the potential for multiple new entries into clinical development for novel OmniAb-derived programs this year, including additional OmnidAb programs. We look forward to the continued progression of these active clinical programs, which have over $350 million in remaining contracted milestone payments to us.

Turning now to Slide 10. Here, we're highlighting and only listing our active clinical and commercial stage partner pipeline programs that are active and that carry remaining downstream economics to OmniAb. The placement of each program in this graphic is based on its most advanced stage in any geography or indication. We found this figure can be a helpful visual for investors who follow some of our more visible partner programs.

Turning now to Slide 11. I want to highlight a few recent updates for our partner programs that are leveraging our technologies. Immunovant continues to make what we see as strong progress and report clinical momentum in anti-FcRn space across a range of important indications with major unmet medical needs. Their next-generation candidate IMVT-1402 has a potentially registrational trial in difficult to treat rheumatoid arthritis that's fully enrolled with top line data expected in the second half of this year. Top line data from our proof-of-concept trial in lupus are also expected in the second half of this year. IMVT-1402 development is progressing across a range of indications with potentially registrational trials in Graves' disease, myasthenia gravis, CIDP and [ Sosei's ] disease, all remaining on track and with top line data for Graves' disease and myasthenia gravis expected in 2027.

Immunovant also anticipate sharing top line data from its 2 Phase III studies evaluating [ datamab ] as a potential treatment for active moderate to severe thyroid eye disease in the first half of this year. In addition, [ Hana ] reported ongoing preparation for an NDA submission in Japan for batoclimab as a treatment for myasthenia gravis.

Moving across to the center of the slide here. At the time of the JPMorgan conference in January, [ Teva ] announced a funding agreement with Royalty Pharma of up to $500 million to accelerate the clinical development of their anti-IL15 antibody, TEV-'408, specifically for vitiligo.

Top line results from the Phase Ib trial in that indication are expected in the first half of this year and top line results of a Phase IIa trial evaluating 408 for celiac disease are expected in the second half of this year. With recent developments and disclosures, this is an asset in a program that is rightfully gaining more attention.

Lastly, Merck KGaA indicated that based on Phase I data, it plans to advance M9140 directly to Phase III trials in metastatic colorectal cancer. This compound is a novel [ anti-C5 ] antibody drug [ Condit ] with a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor payload. It's been disclosed that the Phase III study is anticipated to start in the first half of this year which represents a pretty significant acceleration of the program's development.

On Slide #12, we show some of the upcoming events that I just mentioned. 2026 is positioned to be a fantastic year for potential value-creating events. This calendar of near-term events is the strongest in recent memory. And in addition to the data and regulatory events highlighted here, we also expect new Phase I, Phase II and Phase III trial initiations this year. We'll talk more about this as we go through the year, but early views are that 2027 is also shaping up to be a year that will have some important events, including for some of the programs that I mentioned on the prior slide.

Turning to Slide 13. I'd like to take a moment to highlight our 2 most recent technology launches, which we believe position us for substantial growth while reflecting our commitment to innovation, which we think differentiates OmniAb in the eyes of our partners.

OmniUltra is the first and only transgenic chicken produced antibodies with ultra-long CDRH3 which is a structural feature of antibodies typically found in cows. These ultra-long CDRH3 are designed to reach binding pockets not accessible with other antibodies or modalities, potentially unveiling new therapeutic opportunities. What's particularly exciting about OmniUltra is the potential ability of these ultra-long CDRH3 to create novel picobodies. At roughly 1/3 the size of a nanobody, picobodies are the smallest functional antibody fragment and have a range of potential uses, including as building blocks for multispecifics as binders for CAR-T and as a radiopharmaceutical therapies as well as in vivo generated peptides.

On the Ultra, not only expands our antibody discovery capabilities, but it also creates a meaningful entry point into the peptide therapeutics space. As I think almost everyone knows by now, peptide therapeutics have experienced substantial growth and industry attention and investment, driven in large part by the success of the GLP-1s over the last couple of years.

Moving to the right panel on this slide. Last May, we launched our exploration partner access program. Exploration is our proprietary innovative high-throughput single B-cell screening platform that leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence. The exploration platform includes a competitively priced instrument and proprietary single-use consumables as well as annual software subscriptions and maintenance contracts. As such, it has the potential for multiple revenue streams.

Deployed instruments are performing extremely well for partners, and we're seeing strong continued demand for both on-site and virtual demos. Together, OmniUltra and exploration represent important new engines that broaden our technology offering, expand our addressable markets. and strengthen our competitive position in the discovery platform space.

And with that, let me now turn the call over to Kurt for a discussion of our financial results. Kurt?

Thank you, Matt. On Slide 15, I'll start with a review of revenue. Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2025 was $8.4 million compared with $10.8 million in the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in license revenue, which was partially offset by an increase in milestone revenue. Royalty revenue increased, but this was due to an adjustment in the prior year period to reconcile royalties to actual product sales. And we also saw a small contribution from exploration in the fourth quarter.

Slide 16 shows our cost and operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2025. As Matt mentioned, even with our growing program portfolio, we have a scale platform that has allowed us to be very disciplined with our cost structure. As you can see from the chart, our operating expenses in the fourth quarter decreased to $24.1 million from $26.7 million. Most of this decrease was due to lower personnel costs, but we also saw lower outside service costs, primarily related to reduced spend for our legacy small molecule ion channel programs. Q4 2025 also included a noncash impairment charge of $3.9 million, primarily related to certain small molecule ion channel property and equipment. Q4 2024 had a similar-sized write-off associated with intangibles.

Turning to Slide 17. I'll focus on the bottom part of the P&L here and make just a few comments. If you focus on the tax line, as we previously guided for taxes, we recorded a full valuation allowance against the income tax benefit associated with our net loss, which is why our effective tax rate is close to 0%. Our net loss for the fourth quarter was $14.2 million or $0.11 per share compared with a net loss of $13.1 million or $0.12 per share in the prior year period.

On Slide 18, for the full year 2025, revenue was $18.7 million versus $26.4 million in 2024. The difference related to both a decline in license revenue and milestone revenue. Service revenue decreased as a result of the completion of certain small molecule ion channel programs. and these declines were partially offset by approximately $800,000 of exploration revenue as a result of the launch of our exploration partner access program.

On Slide 19, we have our operating expense for the full year. Operating expense in 2025 decreased to $87.6 million from $100.9 million last year. R&D expense for the year was $47.8 million down from $55.1 million in 2024 due to lower personnel costs and stock-based comp and external expenses. As I mentioned in Q4 of 2025, there was also a noncash impairment charge of $3.9 million related to legacy small molecule ion channel assets. G&A was $29.2 million in 2025 compared with $30.7 million in 2024, primarily due to lower legal fees and stock-based compensation.

Moving to Slide 20, which shows our P&L for the full year 2025 versus 2024, once again, focused on the bottom line here. The net loss was $64.8 million or $0.57 per share compared with a net loss of $62 million or $0.61 per share in 2024. Excluding the noncash impairment charge we took in the fourth quarter, earnings per share in 2025 would have been $0.54.

Slide 21 shows the company's P&L for the year, broken out by quarter. As we've mentioned previously, and you can see in this table, our revenue is lumpy as much of the revenue comes in from the achievement of milestones and one other thing I wanted to point out here is that you'll see a general trend of declining R&D and G&A expense, obviously, excluding the impairment charge we took in the fourth quarter. In 2025, we implemented workforce reductions of 22 employees, which resulted in savings in 2025 and going forward.

On Slide 22, we've got the balance sheet as of December 31, 2025, and 2024. We ended the year with $54 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. You also see here the normal reductions to goodwill and intangible assets. These intangible assets relate to prior corporate and technology acquisitions, which are amortized over time. property, plant and equipment is also lower due to normal depreciation as well as the noncash impairment charge we took in the fourth quarter.

On Slide 23, we've got our financial guidance for 2026. The revenue guidance is based on information that our partners have disclosed to us as well as information they have disclosed publicly about their programs. And based on this information, we expect revenue in 2026 to be in the range of $25 million to $30 million. We expect operating expense to be in the range of $80 million to $85 million as we continue to realize efficiencies in the business.

Cash operating expense is expected to be in the range of $50 million to $55 million. We define cash operating expense as GAAP operating expense less stock-based compensation, depreciation and the amortization of intangibles. We expect the combination of these noncash items to be about $30 million in 2026. In addition, the company expects to end the year with a cash balance in the range of $30 million to $35 million. And just as in 2025, the 2026 full year effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 0% due to the valuation allowance.

Turning to Slide 24. In addition to providing 2026 guidance, we wanted to provide some thoughts on our longer-term financial outlook. The financial side of our business model is one that is highly scalable. As we look out into the future, our revenue is affected to transition from more milestone driven to more royalty driven. That being said, we've got over $3 billion of contracted milestones in our existing antibody programs and $350 million of that is for programs that are already in the clinic. The average royalty across our antibody portfolio is approximately 3.4%.

These types of revenue streams don't have corresponding cost of goods or selling costs. We've also been realizing efficiencies in our operating costs in recent years. We have a focused business development team dedicated to bringing in new partners while most of our R&D costs relate to maintaining our animal colonies with a small amount directed towards new technology development. This creates a highly leverageable business. As you can see from these charts, we have and will continue to control operating costs to capture that leverage that is built into our business model. Our maturing portfolio programs are expected to drive revenue higher. Combined with tight control of our operating expenses, we are driving our cash use lower, and this puts us on a trajectory to being cash flow positive.

And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]. Your first question comes from the line of Puneet Souda from Leerink.

First one on the partner programs. Given the sort of the backdrop of the markets, fundraising activity that happened in the second half last year and it still is ongoing, one on the clinical assets. Just wondering if you're seeing any effect from that? And how should we think about the new program's growth this year despite the strong 2025 that you had. So maybe I know it's always hard to sort of outline that. But just wondering, how are you thinking about the new program growth this year and any feedback from the business element side?

Yes. Yes. Thanks, Puneet. This is Matt. So yes, we observed really nice momentum in program additions and also a really strong year in terms of partner ads as well. We noticed a shift beginning last year as I think the industry started to get some more winded in sales. We saw partners, both existing and new partners initiating new programs. Many of those are attracted to us because of our newer technologies. Some of the technologies we had launched that being OmnidAb -- the year the prior or the prospect of OmniUltra coming, which we launched in mid-December. So we feel like we're very well positioned for this year with coming on the tail end of new technology launches and are obviously really pleased to see partners actively progressing, looking at accelerating development and that sort of thing. So we feel very good about that element as we look forward.

Got it. And then on exploration, Nice to see some revenue there. I don't know if you can quantify it, but maybe, for the full -- I would love to know if you have a number in mind for the full year? What sort of growth you can see on that platform. It's a nice addition of revenue on top of the poor animal models and programs that program growth that you're seeing? And then also wondering if you can provide anything on the pull-through side of the exploration.

Yes, Puneet, I'll give a little color there. Obviously, we launched exploration midyear last year with our partner access program, highlighted at the PEGS conference and sold an instrument right after that, obviously, deployed instruments now are performing extremely well for partners, portion obviously has the potential to contribute revenue in a variety of ways, not only from instrument sales, but also from the single-use consumables, which are at a nice -- very nice high margin as well as subscriptions and maintenance contracts.

The flow of interest is very strong. It's with our, what I'll call our highest tier of partners, these are ones who are obviously doing a lot of discovery work and I think are attracted to exploration because of its -- it's a throughput and ease of use, the ability to do multiple runs in a day and the ability to generate huge amounts of data, which I think is very well timed for some of the interests of the industry. So yes, we do expect it will be contributing this year. We're excited about that. We've not broken down the various parts of revenue guidance, but we do see significant growth for exploration and contribution this year.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike King from Rodman & Renshaw.

First is Nice to see you guys are cattle -- light and keeping the expenses under control. But as a valuation metric, it would seem to me to be more important for you guys to be adding programs and advancing things in the pipeline. So I'm just wondering how sacrosanct the cash flow neutrality or positivity is relative to additional investments that you might want to make to generate additional partnerships?

Yes. Yes, Mike, good question. I mean we are obviously building this business to be differentiated from the perspective of technologies that we know the industry needs, right? But to do that in a really efficient way that benefits our shareholders and our stakeholders. We -- really, I'll say, envious and unique position in the industry, right, with 107 partners. Over 407 programs that partners are progressing through various stages of development gives us a really valuable perspective on the industry, right? We can see -- we understand the targets that are of most interest to the biggest and most valuable pharma companies in the world, right? And that informs kind of how we invest in our technologies. It informs kind of the work that we do and how we work with the partners.

And I think you're seeing the benefit of that in many of our metrics, right? So for us to add incremental partnerships we can do that quite efficiently in the model that we have. We talk a lot about the innovations that we choose to invest in. And we do it really with that knowledge of not only where the industry is right now from the perspective of discovery and innovation. But knowing where it's heading as well, right? And that's what informed our investments over past years and things like our Omni dab single domain technology.

And then more recently, with the December launch of OmniUltra, which is -- it sounds [ Buck Rogers ], but it's a chicken that makes [ call-like ] antibodies with fully human sequences. That was something that was -- we knew there'd be demand there based on our dialogue with partners. So for us, I think we can do that very efficiently. We think that benefits all of our stakeholders, and that's where we're going to continue to focus.

Okay. And then just real quick follow-up. Jumping to share count in the third and fourth quarter. What can we attribute that to?

Yes. Thanks, Mike. We did raise some capital, and so that raising capital increased the share count during that period of time.

Your next question is from the line of Matt Hewitt from Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

Maybe to dig in a little bit more on the exploration opportunity. It sounds like you're seeing strong demand. What was the number of systems that were placed or deployed exiting this past year? And given the pipeline, where could that go in '26?

Yes, yes. Thanks, Matt. Yes. So a quick answer to the first part of the question is 2, instruments deployed as of the end of 2025. And as we look to this year, as I said, we expect growth out of exploration. We're excited about the flow of interest from our highest tier partners. These are obviously larger capital purchases for many companies. So there can be longer sales cycles, which we fully expected when we launched the technology. So they go through budget and capital approvals, et cetera. But the reception is quite positive. It's keeping our team very busy, which is great and the interest in demos and the performance in those demos has really been fantastic. So Hopefully, that gives you the color you need.

Yes. No, that's great. And then you talked about Kurt, I think you were talking about this a little bit during your prepared remarks as far as your trajectory towards a cash flow breakeven, given the pipeline and Matt, you spoke to this as well, given the pipeline of opportunity, things progressing through the channel, or through the clinic, I should say, this year and into next year, when do you think that you could hit breakeven? Is that something that you see potentially exiting '27, maybe a little bit longer? Just trying to get a sense for time frame is when you could get to that level?

Yes. Thanks, Matt. Great question. Our future revenue is largely based on clinical and regulatory advancements by our partners for our partner programs. And while we're not giving a precise date for when we achieve breakeven, the growing and maturing portfolio of our partner programs gives us confidence that we are on the right path and that our trajectory can take us there. So we see it coming, but we can't give you an exact date right now, but we do see it coming.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Pantginis from H.C. Wainwright.

So on the flip side for exploration, obviously, we see the opportunities there. So just curious, how would you describe -- I mean, it sounded like you placed 2 machines in '25. But looking forward, your manufacturing needs and investment on your end and impact on op expenses as the program gets larger?

Yes, Joe, good question. This is an instrument that we use here for our own research. So we have a team of folks that understand the instrument is using it all of the time. And so there's not a large incremental investment in terms of staff that we need to make to go do this. This is a program that we've made available to our partners. For the most part, instruments would be built kind of to suit, if you will, or build for these folks when they order one. And so there's not even a large sort of investment in inventory, if you will, to go do that. So we're keeping this really lean right now as we want to make sure that this is something that is accretive to the business as we possibly can make it going forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Brendan Smith from TD Cowen.

This is [ Jack Levin ] on for Brendan. I'd like to kick it off with Ultra. How is the initial response from partners been? And have you seen the beginning of that ramp in demand that you kind of called out last quarter?

Jack, thanks. The Ultra launch is going fantastically well. I've been really pleased with the reception. Obviously, it's still very early days. We just launched it in mid-December. But we did really a massive amount of validation work around Ultra before we launched it, the presentations that were given at the AET conference in December highlighted a broad array of therapeutic targets that we had assessed at the time of launch. We also had 3 partner programs already progressing at that time. That number has increased and we expect it will continue to increase. So we're seeing really strong engagement. The technology is performing extremely well. And so we feel real good about how it will impact the business going forward.

That's awesome. Are you seeing any like specific traction amongst other modalities that you would call out of interest?

Yes. I mean I think there's been a general trend in the industry, and I'll say, smaller is better, looking for smaller binding units, if you will, that can be strung together in multispecifics. There's obviously been a big growing opportunity in the radio pharma space. That's something that the industry has observed. And then, of course, we've opened up totally new opportunities and a completely new call file in the peptide space, right? So peptides are an area of growing and increasing interest -- there's significant growth in that space and really opened up our call file, if you will, to well over 130 companies that are new potential targets for us. So for all those reasons, I think we're excited about it. Again, early days, but we're building some nice momentum and we're excited about it.

Totally. I'm going to be that guy. I'm -- one more question in. But for your fiscal year '26 rent guide, it's kind of hinting out a return to 2024 levels. Would it be safe to say you're seeing early signs of recovery in the market? And what kind of visibility do you have into your partner spend expectations that could inform that outlook?

Yes. I think most of -- a big chunk of our revenue is milestone-based. And so as we -- we talked about it on a quarterly basis, the revenue number is lumpy. It actually is for years as well. So it sort of is just really a function of what kind of clinical or regulatory events are going to be happening. And as we sort of project forward into 2026 based on what partners have said, we project out what those milestones might be. And so I'm not sure it's really sort of kind of whether the industry or the overall market is what's driving that as much as us taking a look at the very specific events that are happening with the programs that we've got. Any events that are sort of coming up for 2026. That's really more the driver of it.

Your next question comes from the line of Srikripa Devarakonda from Tourist.

This is Anna on for Kripa. One question on exploration. Could you kind of qualitatively describe how the interest in exploration is shaping up in terms of interest from any new partners or kind of strengthening that existing partner relationship?

Yes. Great question. The answer is bold -- I mentioned that of our existing partners, the ones that obviously have the quick engagers in evaluating exploration with strong interest have been that highest tier of partners, right? These are the ones that are doing a lot of antibody discovery work, have a thirst for more data, are attracted to the high throughput and ease of use of the instrument, it is also attracting others as well who are not current partners of our repertoire generation discovery technology. So that's one of the things I referenced when I generally say I think there are benefits and advantages that exploration creates for the business is not only deepening those relationships with existing partners and building structures that allow us to create value earlier in a product life cycle or a program's life cycle or the relationship, but also attracting others as well who we can also bring in as a more broader partner in the process. So I think that is another benefit of exploration.

Great. And on OmniUltra, are there any milestones we should expect from OmniUltra in 2026?

Yes. I obviously will expect to continue to be adding partners and programs with OmniUltra. That's going to be our initial focus as we launch the technology. As those programs obviously go through development and graduate to later stages of development. We expect that will happen in due time, but the initial is going to be driving new partnerships and new programs and leveraging the technology in that way.

Your last question comes from the line of Stephen Willey from Stifel.

Just actually had a question about a footnote on Slide 24, where I think for programs with tier of royalties, you're making some kind of sales assumption and using a blended royalty calculation. Is -- have you said or can you speak to what proportion of the programs that are active have either a tiered or fixed royalty structure?

That's a good question, Steve. I don't think we've given that number out before. It's more than a handful, but I'm not -- I wouldn't say it's a majority. I don't know, Matt...

Yes, more than handful that have here -- majority of our deals are flat royalties. There are some instances in which they are tiered, but the majority are a straight royalty.

Got it. And then just also curious where you think that average, I guess, it's 3.4% royalty rate. Could trend to over time and whether you're trying to command a higher royalty rate on some of the newer technology offerings like OmnidAb and OmniUltra.

Yes. I think for Discovery Technologies, Steve, there's always a dynamic there of how far you can push, right, on royalties. Obviously, the level of innovation allows us to drive better economics more generally, but those economics can be an interplay between upfront payments, service payments, milestones that are paid along the way in royalty. So it really depends in many instances on the negotiating dynamic the soft points or the points of the -- of interest of the partner. But I will say that more innovative technologies do drive more value for our shareholders. And that's one of the reasons why we've launched new technologies like OmniUltra, like OmnidAb, but that kind of gives you a little color on the dynamic.

Understood, thanks for taking my questions.

There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back to Matt Foehr for closing comments. Sir, please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. I'd like to thank everyone for joining today's call and for your questions and engagement. We look forward discussing our first quarter financial results in a few months. In the meantime, we'll be participating at the Leerink Global Healthcare Conference which is next week in Miami. So we hope to see some of you there. We also expect to be on the road likely in the spring with NDRs and the like.

So thanks again, and have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Good afternoon, and welcome to OmniAb's OmniUltra Launch Virtual Investor Event. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the call over to Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. This is Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb's Chief Financial Officer, and thank you all for joining us here to hear a little bit more about the launch of our latest technology, OmniUltra. There are slides to accompany today's prepared remarks and are available in the Investors section of our website at omniab.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind listeners that comments made during this call by OmniAb's management will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from any anticipated results. These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in today's press release and our SEC filings.

Importantly, this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of the live broadcast, today, December 15, 2025. Except as required by law, OmniAb undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call.

Joining me on the call this afternoon is Matt Foehr, OmniAb's President and CEO. And also with me is Dr. Yasmina Abdiche, who is our Senior Vice President of Exploratory Research, who just finished up her presentation here at the A&T conference; as well as Todd Pettingill, who heads up Business Development and Strategy.

During today's call, Matt will provide an overview of our new OmniUltra technology and at the conclusion of the prepared remarks, we'll open the call to questions.

As I mentioned, we're here at the Antibody and Engineering Technology Conference in San Diego, where Dr. Abdiche just finished up a talk titled OmniUltra, a New In Vivo Platform for Discovery of Novel Mini-Proteins and Structured Peptides.

Tomorrow, we have another podium presentation titled OmniUltra Leveraging Evolutionary Distance for the Discovery of Ultralong CDRH3 Antibodies with Broad Epitope Coverage. This technology is also being showcased in 2 poster presentations that you see listed on this slide. And the slides for these presentations and the posters can be found on our website in the Scientific Publications section under the Technology tab.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Kurt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining our OmniUltra launch call. Yas's presentation this afternoon here in San Diego was the first technical and scientific introduction of our newest technology that we've branded as OmniUltra. We believe OmniUltra is a really important advancement and the next evolution of discovery tools as it's the first and only transgenic chicken producing ultralong CDRH3s, which is a structural feature of antibodies typically seen only in cows.

Our new OmniUltra chicken has been engineered by our scientists to create antibodies with this special feature found in cows, but with human sequences to make them suitable as human therapeutics. The relevance of the chicken host species is to leverage the evolutionary distance to enable robust immune responses to human targets, even highly conserved ones.

So essentially, OmniUltra combines features of cow, human and avian immune systems to really reinvent the way we can discover certain types of therapeutics and extends us at OmniAb beyond antibodies crossing over into the peptide space.

Ultralong CDRH3s are designed to enable getting at unique, deep or recessed binding pockets and previously inaccessible epitopes potentially unveiling therapeutic opportunities that we think are beyond the reach of other modalities.

One of the things that our team is really excited about is the potential, which we've now demonstrated with multiple targets of these ultralong CDRH3s to be isolated as autonomous binding fragments known as picobodies. These can open up entirely new applications for partners when accessing this newest technology of ours. So OmniUltra is creating a new way to discover a variety of therapeutics.

We see new opportunities with OmniUltra as highlighted here on Slide #8, not only as a new antibody discovery platform, but one that's also leverageable for peptide therapeutic discovery, which is also an area of substantial and growing interest by the industry. This launch further highlights our team's innovation leadership, and we think can create more value for our partners and for all of our stakeholders.

Importantly, OmniUltra can be leveraged within the infrastructure of our increasingly efficient operations at OmniAb. The science behind this is really remarkable as it's something that's never been achieved before. As Yas mentioned in her presentation just a bit ago, this isn't just an incremental improvement for novel drug discovery, it's really a leap forward in methodology that we think opens up some totally new possibilities for the industry.

And I'm now on Slide #9, and I'm going to get into a little bit of the science here. I think it's important just as a baseline to note that alternative antibody formats are found in nature, and these arose independently during species evolution for a variety of reasons. Now for cows that are shown on the right-hand side of this slide, about 10% to 20% of the time, they make antibodies with these ultralong CDRH3s. And we and others in the industry think these structures have the potential to be really important.

Slide #10 references a peer-review publication from about 5 years ago that got attention in the industry and that showed that a tau-derived antibody could target epitopes that were not reachable by other methods.

The ultralong structures allowed the penetration of barriers like glycan shields and enabled binding to recess epitopes that are seen here in the crystal structures of cow antibodies targeting the HIV gp120 protein. This unconventional binding mode using only the tip of this protruding feature in some ways, inspired the design of OmniUltra, which brings the power of ultra-long CDRH3s into a human compatible scaffold designed for therapeutic discovery.

Now on Slide #11, those that follow OmniAb know that we often reference the concept of what we coined years ago as biological intelligence. It's essentially a core belief that molecules that are generated in vivo are superior to ones from other sources because they're naturally optimized through an iterative process that preferentially selects for molecules with excellent specificity, matured affinity and favorable developability profiles. This can increase efficiencies in discovery and probabilities of success, which we think is an important part of why partners continue to come to us to access our technologies.

We have an internal innovation engine around this that has continued to strengthen our differentiation in the industry, especially in relation to our growing suite of genetically engineered chicken-based discovery platforms.

Moving to Slide 12. Now chickens are relevant because of their extreme evolutionary distance from us and other mammals. This evolutionary distance can be leveraged because chickens can inherently see more, if you will, from an immune system perspective. This allows you to generate immune responses in a chicken that you could not in other ways and in turn, create repertoires of potential therapeutics to targets of interest.

About half of all of the therapeutic targets are more than 90% conserved in mammals. So using a chicken as an immunization host species for discovery, it can be really important and valuable in many instances. So our scientists considered how we can leverage our engineering capabilities and the evolutionary distance of chickens to create something that would meet a significant industry need. And that's in part what led us to the creation of OmniUltra.

Slide 13 shows some of the data we're presenting here for the first time at the AET conference, showing the strong immune responses of OmniUltra chickens to a variety of therapeutically relevant targets that are of interest to the industry. And I call out here BDNF, which is a target that's what's referred to as 100% conserved in mammals. So one would have significant problems eliciting immune responses in other sources. I also note here that we've already done 3 partner programs with early adopter partners. Those targets are confidential at this point, but our programs -- but we and our partners are very excited about these programs.

And well beyond the strong immune responses, as you can see here on Slide #14, with data for NKp46, EGFR and B7-H3, we've demonstrated that you can get to novel epitopes with OmniUltra-derived compounds.

And then next here on Slide #15, and this is perhaps one of the most exciting parts from a technology perspective, and that is that -- and really is one of the key points of today. Essentially, it's a new paradigm for discovering therapeutic peptides. We've shown that molecules discovered out of our OmniUltra animals can then be chemically synthesized as stand-alone peptides and still retain binding activity to their target. This has been done simply using standard custom synthesis techniques following discovery.

This flexibility opens up entirely new therapeutic possibilities and can drive significant efficiencies for license partners and shows that this is a potentially more efficient way to access libraries of peptides and to get to cost-effective manufacturing downstream.

We think this is a pretty big deal from a technology perspective as we're leveraging that biological intelligence of our engineered animals and getting the benefit of the evolutionary distance of the chicken and then using that in a really efficient way to find peptides with antibody-like affinity and specificity profiles that can be efficiently manufactured.

Slide 16 is showing various peptide discovery approaches that have been used in the industry over time. Traditional peptide discovery takes 2 main paths that are conceptually distinct. The first and their more aged path is a commentorial chemistry approach that is combined with display technologies, which is sort of a brute force approach that screens massive libraries of sometimes random peptides with literal prior knowledge of what a hit might actually look like.

The second path is rational design, which starts with a defined peptide or structural insight and refines it using models, structural data and computational tools. Each method has strengths and limitations. One explores things broadly while the other optimizes more deeply, and they can be combined or mixed and matched to some degree.

Now by contrast, OmniUltra starts by using in vivo optimization to generate antibodies with cow-like ultralong CDRH3s in a stabilized human scaffold in a chicken host species. This approach allows for the discovery of peptides containing the entire antibody binding paratope in a small unit while also reducing immunogenicity risks.

And again, by using a chicken of the divergent host species, we can leverage evolutionary distance to ensure robust immune responses and expanded epitope coverage to human therapeutic targets. We think this fills a critical gap by sourcing peptides from nature's own optimization engine, the immune system, rather than relying solely on brute force screening and design. This approach ensures high functional diversity and leverages peptides that are inherently bioactive and evolved for stability. Combined with a validated knob scaffold, OmniUltra offers a really powerful alternative to traditional methods.

Now I'm going to switch gears just to spend a few moments on the new opportunities that we think OmniUltra creates for the business. Now on Slide 18. Peptides are an important and growing drug class, fulfilling a unique role in the pharmaceutical industry, partly because they combine properties of small molecules and antibodies, making them versatile modalities across a broad range of therapeutic areas such as diabetes and weight loss, heart disease and cancer.

While peptides offer many attractive attributes such as high on-target specificity, structural versatility, low immunogenicity risk and rapid tissue penetration and clearance, they've been limited historically by their intrinsically unfavorable biophysical properties and some manufacturing challenges, which we think OmniUltra helps to alleviate in some respects.

There's been an increase in focus on peptide therapeutics by the industry, as shown here on the left side of Slide #19. You can see the substantial growth in the number of new peptides that have entered clinical trials and an acceleration of that in recent years. And the right-hand side shows third-party projections of estimated global peptide sales, which are also expected to grow significantly.

Slide 20 highlights the broadened applicability of OmniUltra and the potential total markets. What's shown here are the estimated sales of end drugs by relevant modality. And as you can see, where our relevant OmniAb discoveries each apply. Needless to say, these are very big markets. So the motivation of partners to get access to latest discovery technologies is high.

And lastly, here on Slide 21, from a business perspective, we think OmniUltra opens up new opportunities in licensing and can create more opportunity to drive chicken-based collaboration and service revenue at OmniAb. Importantly, OmniUltra is also opening up our call file to a large number of new companies, over 130 that have peptides in active development. And we hope can drive dealmaking and increase the diversity of deal structures.

And with that, and we have Yas and Todd here as well, I'd like to open up the call for questions about our newest technology, OmniUltra. Operator, I'll turn it back to you.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Stephen Willey from Stifel.

This is Tuuli on for Steve. Congrats on the launch. We just have one from -- on our end. So you mentioned that there is already a strong industry engagement with 3 partners already using this platform. Can you please provide additional color on what indication they're using, whether these -- I understand that targets are confidential, but like whether there are any like preferential modalities that they're using for these indications, et cetera?

Yes. Tuuli, thanks for the question. And yes, you're right to highlight in the slides and in one of the presentations that we're doing here at AET, we highlighted a broad array of therapeutic targets that have already been assessed with the OmniUltra technology that included the 3 confidential partner programs. I'll say they're ones that scientifically, our team is really excited about, but we're really not at liberty to go into much more detail about the types of targets or the therapy areas at this point. We generally look to our partners and when they're comfortable disclosing their targets and what work they're doing, we'll obviously echo that and make a point to point that out to our stakeholders. But at this point, there's not much more we can add. We do expect at some point, they will present data on these programs.

Your next question is from Puneet Souda from Leerink Partners.

Just if you could elaborate a bit on how does OmniUltra help you penetrate the existing accounts? And at the same time, potential other partners that are not partnering with you today. Maybe they have tried your technology in OmniClic, OmniClic or other approaches and are amenable to open to trying OmniUltra. Just want to understand sort of as you think about the partner and the opportunity for OmniUltra, where do you see it with the existing partners or with the newer partners?

Yes. Great. Thanks, Puneet, for the question. Maybe I'll offer some high-level perspectives and then Todd can fill in any color that I leave out. I'll start by saying what sort of fuels innovation at OmniAb in a lot of ways is simple at its core, which is just listening to our partners. Now with over 104 partners spread throughout the industry, we make a point of really listening not only to where they are now, but where we think they are headed, right? And because we have established ourselves really as technologists who are here to help drive, meet those partners' needs, for us, that innovation becomes simple from the perspective of what tools we want to provide.

There's a lot of complexity in terms of doing it. What has been achieved here by our scientists from a scientific perspective, I think, really hasn't been achieved before, and I think that's exciting. So for some of the partners like the 3 programs we highlighted in the slides, those are what I'll call early adopter. Those are folks that we know from the sorts of targets that they're working on that this is a technology that they will want to use.

I think on the peptide space, it's all quite new. So Todd and his team have known this technology has been coming for a while. They've been positioning themselves to be ready for this launch that obviously started today. And the peptide space, I think, is one that matches quite well with where we want to go, not only from a technical perspective, it's a nice place for us to expand into, but also from a business perspective. So Todd, anything you want to add?

Yes. No, I think Matt covered pretty much exactly what I would say. I would just reiterate, OmniUltra has a broad applicability to a wide range of different modalities bispecific, radiopharma, CAR-T engagers. We have partners in all those spaces, but this is something that's new that nobody else has. And so this is something that will be interesting to an additive to what they're using us for. But really, the big open kind of greenfield is the peptide space. That's not something that we've been involved in, in the past, and there are over 130 companies in the space that are new points of contact, new areas of potential deals. So we're really excited about the opportunity.

Yes. And Todd, I mean the point you raised about modalities is a good one that I left off. I think partners increasingly realize that we've established ourselves as innovators around new modalities. Really, I mean, a couple of years ago, we launched the OmnidAb single domain technology. Now we're at the point where there's already one in the clinic. There are others who are advancing quite quickly. And maybe, Yas, if you don't mind, you could probably provide a little more color on how partners see us from a novel modality perspective and helping them achieve their needs.

Yes, happy to do so. I see the main kind of value proposition for this is that it provides a way of constructing unique molecular geometries. For example, in multi-specific, even if you have antibody units, putting them together to make a functional molecule, the modality and the actual geometry, all of that matters. But this gives another type of building block that may be small enough to do something or fit in a certain way.

The other aspect is the stand-alone peptide things for radio. So people have been using antibodies or antibody fragments for radio, but a peptide that has an antibody-like character probably optimal for radio to be seen. But those are the kind of areas where our partners are really interested to try a different type of modality.

Got it. Super helpful. And then just a quick follow-up. Among those 130 peptide companies, could you maybe just elaborate where you are today, sort of what penetration you have? And then how should we think about that metric to be potentially by end of '26?

Yes. No, great question, Puneet. I mean, obviously, we're just getting started, right? We know we've got some existing partners who are active in the peptide space and are interested in it as well, right? So I expect we'll see nice adoption, but we'll obviously provide updates as we add partners and programs as we commonly do.

Your next question is from Joe Pantginis from H.C. Wainwright.

Two, if you don't mind. So first, just going on your BD comments so far. What sort of strategy do you see potentially changing here? Obviously, you're going to focus more on a lot of new clients, but also what kind of efforts will you be sort of changing or adapting or just keeping status quo with regard to marketing this to existing clients?

Yes. Thanks, Joe. Really, strategy of the company completely unchanged, right? We are creating technologies that the industry needs. It's really the market opportunity that has grown and our ability to leverage our technologies to drive other -- drive elements of the business. So for instance, collaboration and service revenue element of the business and also to continue to differentiate ourselves as being really at the forefront of new technologies. So in terms of how we're planning on implementing it, right, we can leverage it within our existing infrastructure, which has become increasingly efficient over time. And we will be present at some other conferences from a technical and scientific perspective. We'll likely be publishing in other places, right, because we have a broader audience, but our overall strategy is unchanged.

No, that's helpful. And then, look, more to the technology itself and even your other platforms. You mentioned today, obviously, looking to reduce immunogenicity of these products. But just playing devil's advocate, you have all these different technologies, multiple different kinds of structures, novel structures and very diverse or a lot of genetic diversity there. So can you talk a little more to how this could potentially reduce immunogenicity based on the novelty of all these products?

Yes, Yas, do you want to take that?

Yes. Thank you for the question on immunogenicity. So very typically, the smaller something is, the kind of less chance it has to be immunogenic. So these are very, very small relative to even a nanobody or a fab or an IgG. So there's less opportunities for immunogenicity. These are also a knotted structure. So oftentimes, that comes with some stability that also can reduce immunogenicity because potentially it could be kind of better developability, so kind of less floppy, less kind of aggregating things like that. So just the size and the more stabilized format lend itself to potentially be less immunogenic.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question is from Brendan Smith from TD Cowen.

Great. Maybe just a couple of quick ones from us, kind of piggybacking on some of the earlier ones. I guess, first, I fully recognize it's early days for the platform, but do you maybe have any sense of how we should think about really the cadence of new partnerships moving into '26 and '27? Just kind of curious even broad strokes how you're thinking about near-term impact versus kind of your historical cadence there? And maybe related to that, are you actually expecting that as folks are getting their '26 budgets together in the coming weeks that maybe some of the partnering decisions could actually be pretty imminent as those numbers get finalized? Or should we maybe expect a bit longer tail for most of these over the coming quarters?

Yes, Brendan, thanks. I appreciate the question. In terms of partner cadence, one of the things -- as we look back on this business, one of the things that's clear is when we launch new innovative technologies, that generally drives not only new program starts, but also attracting new partners, right? In some instances, it can lead to maybe reviving programs from the past or something like that with a new angle, things like that, right?

So hard to give you any exact number on what a launch like this will do to partner cadence. But I can say based on our past history that when we launch new technologies like this, it increases the work that our business development team is doing, their funnel, if you will, in terms of all of the discussions that are ongoing, the number of partners that get under, say, CDA or negotiating licenses. And so I would expect that here as well. In fact, we're, I think, already seeing it. It was great seeing the response to Yas's talk just an hour ago now and just seeing the flow of questions and the follow-up really with our BD folks really immediately after the talk. So all of that was really, really good to see.

And then in terms of your question around budgets and things like that, deals can take a variety of structures. Some deals get stitched together very quickly, some take more time just given the broad nature of our portfolio of partnerships and partners, we kind of see all sorts. But generally, from an industry perspective, we've been really encouraged by what we're seeing in terms of the industry ramping up new programs, and focusing on R&D investments. So we think those things bode well for us as we kind of look into finishing up the year here and really seeing momentum build around this.

Your next question is from Matt Hewitt from Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

Just one for me, but the -- given that there's over 130 peptide companies that you're now targeting, is that going to require some incremental investment either from a sales and marketing perspective or on the BD team or even in-house from a services perspective?

Yes, Matt, thanks for the question. As I kind of generally referenced in prepared remarks, we -- OmniUltra really can be leveraged within our infrastructure and what we see as an increasingly efficient operation. We've really designed our technologies to be very platformable, right? And the performance of the technology and in this instance, obviously, the transgenic chickens and our downstream workflows with exploration really allow us to have a very scalable business. So we feel like with the investments that have been made really years ago now in facilities and infrastructure, we are really at a point where we can leverage that efficiency in the business.

From a business development perspective, it's really a very similar model in many ways in terms of how we leverage the Todd and his team from a business development perspective, how we leverage the science that is produced. So we really see this as fitting in within our existing infrastructure. We think this is highly leverageable, and we're excited to show that.

[Operator Instructions] There are no further questions at this time. Please proceed with the closing remarks.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all for joining today. We look forward to updating you on our full year results, which are expected in early March and hope everyone has a great finish to the year and happy holidays, and I want to end by thanking our team at OmniAb, both the science team and the business team, we've done a lot to get to this launch today, and we're excited to keep you updated. Thank you.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our conference call for today. Thank you all for joining. You may all disconnect your lines.

"

"

"

" Leerink Partners LLC, Research Division

"

" Truist Securities |

" Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division

" TD Cowen, Research Division

"

Good afternoon, and welcome to OmniAb's Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. And I would now like to turn the call over to Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb's Chief Financial Officer. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. This is Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb's Chief Financial Officer, and thank you all for joining our third quarter 2025 financial results conference call. There are slides to accompany today's prepared remarks, and they're available in the Investors section of our website at omniab.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind listeners that comments made during this call by OmniAb's management will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from any anticipated results.

These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in today's press release and our SEC filings. Importantly, this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of the live broadcast, today, November 4, 2025.

Except as required by law, OmniAb undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call. Joining me this afternoon is Matt Foehr, OmniAb's President and CEO.

During today's call, we will provide highlights on the company's business and operations, partner and technology updates as well as our recent financial results and outlook. At the conclusion of the prepared remarks, we'll open the call to questions. And with that, let me turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Kurt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining our Q3 call. Starting now with Slide #4. We continue to have nice deal flow throughout the third quarter, and the number of new program additions this year is far outpacing last year.

Our program adds as of the end of Q3 already equaled the program adds we had in all of 2024.

We've also grown and diversified our base of active partners, reaching a record high level, now exceeding 100. We see this as further validation of our differentiated proprietary technology platforms and their proven value to enable the discovery of next-generation therapeutics for our partners.

We're building the foundational momentum for our recently launched xPloration partner access program, which is designed to put our high-throughput single B-cell screening platform in the hands of our partners.

The xPloration sales funnel continues to grow, generating strong interest and new opportunities for us. And as the latest example of our commitment to pioneering innovations and sector leadership, in December, we'll be launching a brand-new technology to add to our stack.

We're excited to share a little preview today of OmniUltra, which is the first transgenic chicken that produces cow-like antibodies with ultra-long CDRH3s.

OmniUltra has the potential to open new markets and new business opportunities for us and to expand our reach into enabling the discovery of novel peptide therapeutics. I'll provide more on this technology in a moment.

While we continue to grow the number of partners and programs, we also realigned staffing levels in Q3 and further reduced operating expenses to drive efficiencies in our lean yet scalable operating model. In addition, we enhanced our financial flexibility and strengthened our balance sheet with the closing of a $30 million private placement in late August. I want to welcome our new shareholders and thank the existing shareholders who participated in the transaction for their support.

Moving to a review of our key business metrics now starting with Slide #5. We ended Q3 with 104 active partners.

During the third quarter, we've highlighted that we completed new license agreements with A*Star and the University of Leeds. The distribution of our active partners by type, including discovery, commercial and academic continues to hold steady. And the same holds true for our distribution of partners on a geographic basis with just over half of our partners based here in the U.S.

And I note that our international reach has continued to grow as we make a concerted effort to expand and diversify our partnership base.

With regard to new partnerships, increasingly, we also think there are innovative ways in which we can create value in a variety of time horizons, leveraging our technologies or assets that come out of our novel technology development and validation work.

On Slide 6, the number of Active Programs leveraging our technologies increased to 399 as of the end of Q3. This includes a net addition of 36 programs year-to-date, of which 18 were added during the third quarter as we continued to see strong program addition momentum.

During the third quarter, there were 6 programs that were terminated. And as I've said before, and I say often, program attrition is a normal part of our business and will continue to be due to shifts in partner priorities as well as budgetary and technical factors at our partners.

The graphics on Slide #7 highlight growth of our post-discovery stage programs that are in our portfolio as well as the advancement of these programs into and through clinical development. The number of programs in the post-discovery stage increased by 15% year-over-year. A number of new programs progressed to the preclinical stage of development.

And in Q3, one program moved to the registration phase. These 61 post-discovery stage programs have contracted remaining potential milestones to OmniAb of approximately $1.3 billion, including $700 million from small molecule ion channel programs.

Slide 8 shows the number of active clinical programs and approved products, which totaled 32 at the end of Q3. As of September 30, 2 new partner programs had entered the clinic in the year and 2 came out.

We are proud to report that subsequent to quarter end, the first OmnidAb -derived program entered into human clinical trials. As we launched the OmnidAb single-domain discovery platform less than 2 years ago, this is a significant milestone for a new technology, especially within such a short period of time. We also received confirmation that another bispecific antibody derived from our rodent platforms entered human clinical trials just last week.

We'll talk more about both of those new clinical programs after our partners have disclosed more details publicly.

Overall, given our latest discussions with our partners and our line of sight into their work, we see the potential for a total of 5 new entries into clinical development for novel OmniAb-derived programs this year. This is at the lower end of our previous range of projected clinical starts, primarily resulting from select partners simply shifting timing of clinical program initiations into early 2026. Also in regard to clinical programs, I note that we have multiple partners who will be presenting data at the ASH Annual Meeting in early December. So we're looking forward to that as well.

Turning now to Slide 9. Here, we've highlighted select recent updates for partner programs that are leveraging our technologies. At the Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association, Immunovant presented 6-month durability data from its Graves' disease study showing sustained remissions with batoclimab. Their next-generation candidate, IMVT-1402, is advancing in 2 potentially registrational Phase III trials in Graves' disease with top line results expected in 2027.

Moving to the right on this slide at ESMO, Arcus Biosciences reported median overall survival of 26.7 months from its Phase 2 EDGE gastric trial. The study combines domvanalimab with OmniAb-derived zimberelimab and chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer, clearly reinforcing the potential for this treatment approach.

Salubris Bio announced that China's NMPA accepted its NDA for SAL003, which is a recombinant fully human anti-PCSK9 antibody for dyslipidemia. So this program moved from our Phase III bucket to the registration stage in Q3.

And lastly, Rondo Therapeutics abstract on its first-in-class CD28 and Nectin-4 bispecific antibody was accepted for presentation at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Meeting, which is taking place this week.

Turning now to Slide 10. Here, we highlight our clinical and commercial stage partner pipeline for Active Programs that carry downstream economics to OmniAb. Placement in this graphic is based on a program's most advanced status in any geography or indication.

Our partners continue to advance OmniAb-derived antibodies into and through the clinic. And this latest update shows Salubris Bio's SAL003 moving to the registration phase, as I just mentioned.

On Slide #11, I'd like to take just a quick moment to highlight progress with our xPloration partner access program. The early feedback we're getting from partners using the instrument is that xPloration is performing extremely well and that it's driving efficiencies in discovery workflows.

We're really pleased with the response so far as xPloration continues to gain traction since its launch in Q2 with a strong demand for lab demos from partners throughout Q3. The efficiency and ease of use of xPloration are significant differentiators. This platform complements our core technology licensing business as we expect xPloration to be accretive to earnings and cash flow in both the short and the long term.

As we grow our installed base of instruments, we expect to broaden our revenue channels with recurring single-use consumable sales, annual subscription services for software and maintenance contracts.

Ultimately, we're clearly seeing that xPloration deepens engagement with partners, has the potential to drive new program growth and showcases OmniAb's innovation in integrating automation, AI-powered methods and discovery.

Turning to Slide #12. Our internal innovation engine continues to strengthen our differentiation, especially with our growing suite of genetically engineered chicken-based discovery platforms. We've had an established history of pioneering the development of advanced discovery technologies that the industry needs.

We talk a lot about the advantages that a chicken immunization host presents for novel molecule discovery as about half of all therapeutic targets are more than 90% conserved in mammals.

So using a chicken as an immunization host species for discovery can be really important and really valuable in many instances.

Our OmniChicken technology shown on the lower left of this slide remains the world's only validated humanized transgenic chicken for antibody discovery. Leveraging the evolutionary distance between birds and mammals, OmniChicken delivers robust immune responses and generates highly diverse antibody repertoires. This platform has become foundational to many of our partners' discovery pipelines.

Building upon this, OmniClic incorporated a fixed light chain design, enabling seamless combinations of antibodies for bispecific and multi-specific applications. And OmnidAb, our single-domain antibody framework extends the utility of chicken-derived antibodies into small, stable therapeutic formats and opens up opportunities across a range of modalities.

Molecules from OmnidAb are well suited for modular and multi-specific architectures while maintaining advantages in terms of manufacturability and stability. And as I mentioned, OmnidAb was launched less than 2 years ago, and it's attracted a lot of new partners and already has generated a program that has entered the clinic.

And now as the latest entry in this stack, in December, we're launching our newest transgenic chicken platform, which we are branding as OmniUltra.

Moving to Slide #13. OmniUltra represents the next evolution of discovery tools as it's the first and only transgenic chicken producing ultra-long CDRH3s, which is a structural feature of antibodies typically seen only in cows.

Put another way, OmniUltra chickens are engineered to create antibodies with the physical characteristics that are found in cows, but with human features to make them suitable as human therapeutics. These ultra-long CDRH3s are designed to enable antibodies to reach unique heat or recess binding pockets and previously inaccessible epitopes, potentially unveiling therapeutic opportunities beyond the reach of conventional antibodies or conventional modalities.

What's especially exciting is the potential ability of these ultra-long CDRh3s to be isolated as novel or autonomous binding fragments known as Pico bodies, which are the smallest known functional antibody fragment, roughly 1/3 the size of an antibody. Pico bodies could open up entirely new therapeutic applications and modalities.

Turning now to Slide 14. So OmniUltra is not only expanding the boundaries of antibody discovery technologies, but also potentially opens up entirely new opportunities for us in peptide-based therapeutics. Along with its novel architecture, OmniUltra is engineered for in vivo optimization, allowing for the generation of molecules to essentially be preselected for specificity, affinity and structural stability. This process enhances the discovery of antibodies with unique binding domains with the potential to target previously inaccessible epitopes.

And importantly, as I said, OmniUltra is also leverageable for peptide therapeutic discovery. Now peptides are obviously a class of molecules that have seen a substantial increase in attention by the industry, in large part as a result of the GLP-1 drugs that have been so important to patients and to the industry globally. That's led to significant growth and investment around peptide therapeutics from a discovery, development and downstream capacity and infrastructure perspective. And that's part of why we think OmniUltra is really well timed.

Unlike traditional peptide discovery methods, OmniUltra uses a transgenic chicken host to biologically produce optimized structured peptides on a validated scaffold. This capability could establish new classes of biologically derived therapeutics with potential applications across modalities.

OmniUltra highlights our team's innovation leadership and extends our platform advantage into new therapeutic spaces, further differentiating our technology platform and reinforcing our long-term growth potential.

Slide 15 sets the stage for OmniUltra's formal launch, which is planned to be at the Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics Conference down in San Diego next month.

At AET, we have 2 podium presentations and 2 poster presentations. There's a lot more to say about OmniUltra beyond today's little preview. So while at AET, we'll be holding an investor webcast related to the OmniUltra technology, discuss the potential market use and applications and review the potential business impact of this highly innovative and pioneering technology.

The tech validation work that we completed with OmniUltra included a broad array of therapeutic targets, and we will touch on that work as well.

We'll be announcing details of the webcast as we get closer to the event. But for now, please mark your calendars for Monday, December 15, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Moving now to Slide 16. We're excited about the prospects for OmniUltra as it significantly increases our potential universe of partners into the peptide discovery space and also obviously opens up new doors and opportunities in the antibody discovery space as well.

As most of those who follow us know, our technology license deals generally have several components, including collaboration and service revenue, milestone payments and royalties upon commercialization of a program.

I want to highlight that OmniUltra builds on our established transgenic chicken capabilities, which require a service contract as our partners cannot perform the discovery service work on their own. And we think the new OmniUltra platform can drive higher collaboration and service revenue in the near term.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Kurt for a discussion of our Q3 financials. Kurt?

Thank you, Matt. So on Slide 18, I'll start with a review of revenue. For the third quarter of 2025, we reported revenue of $2.2 million, and this compares to $4.2 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to a reduction in milestones achieved and lower service revenue. Service revenue declined primarily due to the completion of a couple of small molecule ion channel programs earlier this year.

And as a small offset to this decrease, the 2025 third quarter included xPloration revenue derived from the sale of consumables and a modest increase in royalty revenue.

On Slide 19, we show our cost and operating expense for the third quarter of 2025, which decreased to $20.4 million from $23.9 million for the prior year period.

We saw decreases in both R&D and G&A expenses compared with last year, and this quarter also included a nonrecurring charge of approximately $800,000 related to a headcount reduction we made earlier in the quarter.

Turning to Slide 20, I'll focus on a few of the operating expense line items, starting with R&D expense, which decreased to $10.4 million from $13.3 million in the year ago period, primarily related to lower headcount and stock-based compensation as well as a decrease in external expenses due to the completion of certain ion channel programs earlier this year.

G&A expense was $6.8 million for the third quarter of 2025 compared with $7.1 million for the same period in 2024, with the decrease primarily due to lower legal fees and stock-based compensation expense.

Net loss for the third quarter of 2025 was $16.5 million or $0.14 per share compared to a net loss of $16.4 million or $0.16 per share for the same period in 2024.

On Slide 21, we have our balance sheet as of September 30, 2025. We ended the quarter with $59.5 million in cash. And as Matt mentioned, during the quarter, we completed a $30 million private placement of common stock, which netted the company $28 million.

I'll conclude with Slide 22 with a discussion of our 2025 financial guidance. We've recently received information that a few of the milestones that we were expecting in the second half of 2025 will now be pushed to 2026.

We also identified further efficiencies in our operating structure. And as a result, we're updating our guidance for this year. We now expect that 2025 revenue will be between $18 million and $22 million and operating expense will be between $82 million and $86 million.

As a reminder, approximately 40% of our operating expense is noncash, mostly due to stock-based compensation and the amortization of intangibles, primarily from historical company or technology acquisitions.

We continue to expect that our cash used in 2025 will be lower than the cash used in 2024, excluding financings in both years. and we expect our year-end cash balance to be between $52 million and $56 million.

And finally, our guidance on the tax rate remains unchanged at approximately 0% due to a valuation allowance. And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from Puneet Souda from Leerink.

You have Micheal Sonntag on for Puneet. Congrats on the quarter. I just want to start my first question on the private placement. I was curious if you could offer some color on what motivated the timing of the placement and if you have any thoughts on the cash runway this now gives you if you expect this to get you to where you're consistently cash flow breakeven?

Yes. Maybe I'll provide some additional or some thoughts and then maybe Matt can jump in there.

These are conversations that we have with our Board. We took a look at our forecast and decided it was the right time to sort of bolster the balance sheet. Markets seem to start becoming a little bit more favorable. And so we took that opportunity to strengthen the balance sheet.

We don't provide any sort of long-term guidance. I kind of gave you the guidance that we have for this year with regards to cash burn and cash balance. But I think this puts us in a good position. I feel like the company is now well capitalized. I don't know, Matt, anything else to add?

Yes. I mean I'll add as well. Again, this provides us a level of flexibility for the business and made sense. And as Kurt said, we think the business is well capitalized. As we look out into the coming years, we'll provide further guidance, but we feel good about where we are.

Okay. Great. And then on xPloration, I was wondering if you could provide some, I guess, additional color on customer conversations. What kind of customers in your partner base are you seeing some more interest? And if you have any thoughts on, I guess, bookings or order timelines? Any color you can provide there would be helpful.

Yes. Yes, Michael. Yes, it's been very busy on the xPloration front and interest has been very strong. I would say, generally, now we've got obviously a partner base or a partner universe now of 104 partners. It is definitely the higher tier of partners who are the ones who are the most active and likely the ones who will benefit the most from xPloration. We've been very busy with demos here at our Emeryville site as well as at some partner sites as well. So I think that bodes well for how things are lining up.

Obviously, xPloration itself in terms of the instrument purchase is a capital expenditure, and we feel like our timing of launch was quite good and being very busy in the demo space in Q3 and into Q4 is very good timing as partners develop their budgets for 2026 and their capital spend plans. So we feel good about where we're placed.

The feedback has been very positive around the efficiency of the instrument, the ease of use and kind of the broad user base from a lab perspective that xPloration can enjoy. So we're feeling good about that.

Your next question is from Joseph Pantginis from H.C. Wainwright.

Can you hear me? This is [ Sara ] on for Joe. Sorry if it was muted.

We can hear you now, Sara.

Yes. Just had one regarding OmniUltra. And just wanted to get a sense of launch readiness and if you're able to, at this point, elaborate on the readiness of OmniUltra for launch? Has there been any beta or pilot projects completed or any potential partners that you already have lined up to adopt the platform once it goes live next month?

Yes. Yes, Sara. We've done a substantial amount of validation work around OmniUltra with many, many targets that we know are of interest to the industry. So that's work we've been doing here internally. And part of why we're launching the technology with 2 podium presentations at the AET conference. So we'll talk in a lot more detail about that specific work at the scientific conference at the time of launch. So we have a really good sense of the breadth of applicability of this technology and I think are really well positioned for the launch in December. So hopefully, that answers your question.

Your next question is from Kripa Devarakonda from Truist.

This is Alex on for Kripa. We also have a question on xPloration. It sounds like the conversations have been going really well. And do you have any update on the new thinking as to how much revenue can be generated from xPloration and over what time period?

Yes. It's still early days in the xPloration launch, obviously. We have said we expect xPloration to be accretive to both earnings and cash flow in both the short and the long term. That has a lot to do with kind of how the technology has been designed and how we're implementing the launch. There are multiple revenue streams that are associated with xPloration.

Of course, the instrument sale itself, which will bring revenue, and we have a nice margin on the instrument. And then we also have single-use proprietary consumables as well as service contracts and maintenance contracts. So we've not given precise guidance at this point. I think as we progress through the launch, as we get additional instruments sold and deployed, we'll have more visibility there, but we're feeling really good about how it's positioned.

That makes sense. And a little bit of a follow-up. Are there other trade shows that you're also demonstrating the technology and partnerships with? Or is it done mainly through the conversations directly with the company?

No, we are also present at trade shows where we know our partners will be.

Actually, in addition to launching OmniUltra at AET, for instance, we'll also have a substantial xPloration presence there as well. And then we have some other ones lined up as well where we'll have demo units and be doing either virtual or planning in-person demos with partners.

Your next question is from Matt Hewitt from Craig-Hallum.

Maybe first up, it sounds like you had -- and I realize this is just part of the business, but you had a couple of customers that pushed out programs until 2026, milestones that you had anticipated later this year got pushed to '26. Are you seeing any improvement?

We've heard from several companies this earnings season that between the M&A activity that's been pretty active as well as the funding environment that's been improving for small and midsized pharma that the R&D budgets are kind of coming back online, that they're starting to spend.

And I'm just curious if this is just kind of a one-off with a couple of partners? Or are you seeing a little bit more of a broad trend that things are getting pushed to 2026?

Yes. Thanks, Matt. I mean, broadly, and we kind of noted this really starting late in Q4 of last year with strong program addition momentum, right? We are seeing continued momentum in program additions that has been sustained through this year, which is very good to see. And I think we're continuing to see momentum there.

The connection or the element of milestones being pushed into 2026, I would, in this instance, categorize that as more what I consider standard development stuff, right? So it's timing of clinical batches or processes in clinical start-up, things like that. In some instances, these were programs where partners had communicated to us their plan to start in Q4 and also had committed that plan publicly, but just with kind of standard development items had drifted into early 2026.

So a variety of factors. But we are seeing similar to what you were describing in terms of industry momentum, we're seeing that in the form of strong program additions.

Interestingly, we're also seeing with some of our academic partners an increased focus on forming spin-out companies around assets and being much more focused on monetization of programs and assets that have come or can come out of our technology. So that's kind of another interesting thing we're starting to see as well. But hopefully, that gives you some color.

No, that's very helpful. And then maybe kind of a similar line here, but -- and I realize it's early, it's October. But as you're having these conversations with your partners, what are you hearing as far as '26 R&D budgets are concerned? I think there was a lot of, I guess, excitement that 2025 budgets look pretty good relative to '24. And I realize there's been some fits and starts during the year, but it does feel like maybe those budgets are going to get spent. Are conversations kind of indicating that we might see an increase in R&D budgets? And I guess, tied to that, with xPloration, do you anticipate that the feedback that you're getting is that this is a Q1 purchase decision? Or could you still see some of these boxes sold already this year?

Yes. Matt, so probably our -- one of our best barometers is in the form of program starts, right? That's really what we see is that when you see a new program start for a novel target, right, a lot of work in terms of novel biology goes on upstream of that by the partner. They've obviously committed a project team, and they're starting a program. So that, again, we've seen really nice strong program addition momentum this year, and that's been good to see. So I think that's a good indicator.

Most of our specific discussions around budget and budget planning more recently have been centered around xPloration, and that's really just in the capital realm.

And then downstream exact timing of orders can obviously be dependent on a variety of factors at the partner in terms of what work they're doing when and how they're gating out their capital spend in 2026. So yes, that's kind of what we're seeing.

Your next question is from Brendan Smith from TD Cowen.

Maybe just a quick one first on OmniUltra. Again, I fully appreciate it's early, but can you maybe just help us understand how you all are thinking about the potential economics of some of those partnerships, maybe just relative to some of the other offerings that you guys have or ones on the books?

And if you're envisioning maybe there could be different terms based on how they want to use it, whether for antibodies or peptides or what have you? And maybe just if you anticipate any of those could potentially replace some of the existing partnerships in any instances?

Yes, Brendan, I think we see OmniUltra as additive to the business, right, broadly applicable and opening up new fields for us. Obviously, our stable and large ecosystem of antibody-based partners now at 104. Many of those have -- or will have or already have expressed interest in OmniUltra for things like bispecifics or CAR-T therapies.

We have a number of partners in the radiopharma space, which is also a space that is growing rapidly as well, and I think we'll continue to expand. But this really also adds an entirely new set of potential partners who are interested in peptide discovery.

For some of our larger partners, they also are working in peptides as well as antibodies, but then there is a completely new set of partners who are more peptide focused. And that has really increased over the last couple of years with the successes of the GLP-1 drugs, et cetera. So there's a lot of investment going on in the peptide space. So we see it really as additive.

In terms of your question of agreement structure, I think this does open new opportunities for us to drive service revenue in the near term for a variety of reasons. There's also a lot of precedent out there for peptide-related discovery deals that follow the frameworks that we've built around upfront payments, service payments, milestones and royalties.

But precise terms will obviously be an interplay of a variety of factors associated with each license.

Okay. Got it. And then maybe just quickly, if I could, just a follow-up. Just on the partner pipeline -- can you just speak a little bit to how you all are thinking about maybe the initial ramp in some of these royalties? Just I know it's kind of a range of different spaces you all are partnered in between FcRns and PCSK9 and PD-1. So just kind of wondering where you maybe see the fastest opportunity for some of those royalties to grow versus others that might just take a little bit longer to get up and running?

Yes. Yes. I mean maybe I'll talk generally about some of the programs, and then Kurt can maybe talk a little bit about kind of the revenue generally modeling around how milestones and royalties come into play. But now obviously, we have 2 drugs that are in the registration bucket, both of those currently in China. The newest is the SAL003, which is the anti-PCSK9 you referred to. So that was news here just from 4 weeks, 5 weeks back from Salubris.

And they reported they submitted their NDA submission. It was accepted in China. They mentioned in their public disclosures that the NDA aligns with China's accelerated approval framework for high-impact biologics. So that was generally good to hear. And then they've stated publicly they're positioning for market entry in 2026. They've also kind of highlighted comparable or superior efficacy to other anti-PCSK9 therapies and one that will be -- that was developed domestically in China.

So we'll continue to keep an eye on that. That's a drug that came originally out of our early partnership with WuXi for our rodent platforms, and it has a 3% global royalty associated with it. So that's probably the newer one.

And then as you look at the Phase III assets and Phase II assets, there are a number in there that folks are rightly paying attention to. Immunovant is doing great work around IMVT-1402 and has a couple of expected data events next year that we're obviously keeping an eye on. Acatilimab with Genmab is in Phase III trials as well. That's another one that folks are paying attention to.

And then now we're starting to see growing attention around Teva's 53408, which is an IL-15 for celiac, and they're also pursuing some other indications. They've been really moving that quite aggressively and highlighting the program. So we're cheering that on as well. But Kurt, maybe you want to talk through the...

Yes. I mean I think in terms of how we think about the royalty ramp, we typically take a look at what analyst consensus are for these drugs. So both acasunlimab and the 1402 compound, I mean, Genmab has been out there, said that they expect to launch in 2028.

When I take a look at analyst estimates, that's sort of what they're projecting as well, and there's a ramp associated with that. It's similar with -- similar timing for 1402. So we take a look at those analyst expectations in terms of how we model the royalties that we might ultimately get. And they're pretty nice ramps and people have pretty nice forecast associated with both of those compounds. They're expected to be very large drugs.

Your next question is from Stephen Willey from Stifel.

This is [ Josh ] on for Steve. I just had a quick question on OmniUltra and how it differs from OmniTaur. I think I remember the OmniTaur platform sounded very similar with this generation of these ultra-long CDR3s or CDRH3s. Could you maybe just provide some color on how these platforms actually differ?

Yes. Great question, Josh. And I'll try not to get too geeky and technical. OmniTaur actually leverages cows, right? So these are sequences that are derived out of cows. And also, we've developed some downstream workflows and other things that drive value in OmniTaur.

And we actually have a number of active OmniTaur programs, some of which are now at the preclinical stage approaching IND.

OmniUltra leverages a chicken host to get that advantage of the evolutionary distance, right? So you're able to leverage that distance of chickens from mammals to elicit a stronger immune reaction.

And we've also engineered in some other features that have increased kind of the broad applicability of OmniUltra into a variety of spaces, including opening up opportunities in the peptide space. So at the core, the difference is the host, but there are obviously a number of other kind of finer technical details that broaden the applicability of OmniUltra.

Okay. Great. And then just another question on the xPloration revenues. Is there any color you can maybe offer as to the breakdown between maybe the consumables versus the software versus the hardware? And do you think -- do you anticipate maybe in the future providing any kind of metrics around the breakdown of sales related to the xPloration platform?

Yes. No, it's a good question. I think there's not really a breakdown that we'll have for you this quarter. It wasn't a huge amount of revenue. It was -- I guess I would say it's mostly related to consumables. I think it's still early days with the xPloration launch. As we get more into it, I think we'll probably be able to provide some -- a little bit more color on sort of what the average consumable usages per instrument and put out some other metrics like that.

But at this point, it's still pretty early. So stay tuned for that. As we see the launch continue and progress, hopefully, we'll be able to provide that type of color.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will now hand the call back over to Matt Foehr for the closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, operator. I'd like to thank everyone for joining us today on today's call and for your questions and engagement. We look forward to discussing our fourth quarter financial results early next year.

In the meantime, we'll be participating in a number of investor conferences later this month, including Truist's BioPharma Symposium this week in New York, Stifel's Healthcare Conference that is next week and the Jefferies Global Health Conference in London.

So as I mentioned, on December 15, we'll also have -- we'll be formally launching OmniUltra, and we'll have an investor webcast that day as well. And we look forward to providing additional details on that webcast next month. So thanks again, and have a great afternoon.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now ended. Thank you all for joining. You may all disconnect your lines.

Good afternoon, and welcome to the OmniAb Inc. Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Business Update Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb, Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. This is Kurt Gustafson, OmniAb's Chief Financial Officer, and thank you all for joining our second quarter 2025 financial results conference call. There are slides to accompany today's prepared remarks, and they're available in our Investors section of our website at omniab.com. Before we begin, I'd like to remind listeners that comments made during this call by OmniAb's management will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from any anticipated results. These forward-looking statements are qualified by the cautionary statements contained in today's press release and our SEC filings. Importantly, this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this live broadcast today, August 6, 2025. Except as required by law, OmniAb undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call. Joining me on the call today is Matt Foehr, OmniAb's President and CEO. And during today's call, we'll provide highlights on the company's business and operations, partner and technology updates as well as our recent financial results and outlook. And at the conclusion of the prepared remarks, we'll open the call to questions.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Kurt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today on our Q2 call. I'll start now with Slide #4. As I mentioned on our last call, we started the year with strong deal flow, and this continued in the second quarter with a number of new partners added in the first half of the year, setting a pace for one of our strongest years yet. We continue to see a robust pace and quality of deals. And we think this is a testament to our differentiated technology platform, which continues to evolve and expand and to our team's relentless pursuit of innovation that leverages our unique vantage point in the industry. Our partners are actively advancing programs into human trials with the start of a new clinical stage program during the second quarter and several others that are progressing through development. And on the third highlight here on Slide 4, the recent launch of our exploration partner access program has been very well received with a strong response from existing partners and others. Within weeks of launch, we sold and installed an exploration system, and we are managing a robust pipeline of leads and business activity for this new technology that's expected to be accretive to the business and to further diversify our sources of revenue. Our platform is attracting new partners and facilitating the addition of new programs. We continue to drive efficiencies in our business through leveraging our technologies, including exploration and through the streamlining of our business practices, all with the goal of creating long-term and sustainable value for our stakeholders. We've been realigning our staffing needs and recently reduced some costs in our headcount. This is in addition to the staffing realignment we disclosed back in February related specifically to the small molecule ion channel element of our business. We began 2025 with 114 employees, and our go-forward headcount is at 87 employees. And Kurt will provide some financial details in his remarks. So in summary here, our outlook for 2025 remains very much on track, and we feel we're extremely well positioned to deliver on our strategic goals to expand the reach of our technologies and to execute on our current exploration launch and the upcoming new technology launches that we're also very excited about. Additionally, we're constantly seeking further workflow efficiencies and technology innovations in what we see as a highly scalable business. So now I'll review some of our business metrics, starting here on Slide #5. We ended Q2 with 100 active partners. During the second quarter, we signed an asset deal with Angelini Pharma for a small molecule ion channel modulator that targets KV7.2, which we discussed on our last call. In addition, we executed multiple license agreements, including new deals with Veraxa Biotech, Duke NUS, the University of Strathclyde, the University of Maryland, AB-Ray Bio and an undisclosed global CRO. As you see on the slide, we're also providing some updated detail on the distribution of our active partners by type, including discovery, commercial and academic as well as the distribution of our partners on a geographic basis. Although our partners are mostly based here in the U.S., there's been a steady diversification of our partner base as we've been successfully increasing the reach of our platform. Turning to Slide 6. You can see the number of active programs increased to 381 as of quarter end. We've continued to experience positive momentum with a year-to-date net increase of 18 programs. And we're continuing to see the strength in program additions that started late last year. Attrition is obviously a natural and expected element in drug discovery and development generally. And we do continue to see and expect to see attrition, which can be driven by a variety of factors, including partner therapy area focusing and budget decisions and timing of receipt of reports or updates from our partners. That said, the net addition of 18 programs year-to-date shows some significant strength and has more than doubled the number of net additions through the first half of 2024. Slide #7 breaks down our 381 active programs by their license type and summarizes elements of overall contracted downstream economics. Importantly, about 99% of our active programs have potential future economics contractually owed to OmniAb. The 1% that don't are generally linked to legacy agreements with prepaid licenses that were signed years ago by companies that we acquired. 90% of the programs are linked to what we generally refer to as antibody standard licenses and 7% are through what we call revenue share license agreements, where we get a defined portion of whatever form of value our discovery partners get, be that equity, cash or other forms of value. These revenue share deals are mostly with academic institutions that incubate OmniAb-derived assets prior to planned corporate formation events. Our antibody programs have over $3 billion in total remaining contracted potential milestone payments and an average royalty rate of 3.36%. This 3.36% average is an increase from an average royalty rate of 3.2% that we reported in November of 2023. I think the ability to command strong royalties reflects the value of our technologies and their relevance to the industry. It also speaks to the value our team is creating for our partners and for our stakeholders. Here now on Slide 8, we're putting a bit of a spotlight on the continued growth of the post discovery stage programs in our portfolio as well as the advancement of these programs into and through development. During the quarter, a number of new programs progressed to the preclinical stage of development and another one is recruiting for a Phase III clinical trial, which is Immunovant IMVT-1402 for myasthenia gravis. We're really encouraged by the expanding number of post-discovery stage programs, which have experienced 22% growth from the prior year period. The preclinical programs also have nice diversity of indications and include inflammation, fibrosis, renal, dermatology, CNS diseases and others in addition to the historical strong showing in oncology. Importantly, these 61 programs that are post discovery stage are associated with approximately $1.3 billion in contracted remaining potential milestones to OmniAb. The total potential milestones associated with the later-stage programs has continued to increase, and that increase has been fairly dramatic in the last 8 to 12 months. And you can see here the contribution of $700 million from small molecule ion channel programs that have now moved into preclinical. We think the growth here demonstrates potential value-creating events in the pipeline, the progress in the pipeline overall as well as our partners' conviction around assets that have been discovered with our technologies. Moving now to Slide 9. The number of active clinical programs and approved products was 32 at the end of Q2. A new OmniChicken-derived program entered the clinic in the quarter from Seismic Therapeutics. This marks the third OmniChicken-derived antibody to enter human clinical trials following programs with Boehringer Ingelheim and Teva. Through Q2, we've had 2 novel programs initiate first-in-human clinical trials in 2025. We've seen attrition or stage of development modification in Phase I assets with a CN1 program returned from Huron to WuXi that WuXi now characterizes as preclinical. -- and a Genmab program that entered an initial Phase I trial in Q1 and then exited that trial in Q2. As I've said, and as we often say, attrition is a natural part of drug development. Based on dialogue with our partners, we continue to see potential for a total of approximately 5 to 7 new entries into clinical development for novel OmniAb-derived programs this year. Slide #10 illustrates our clinical and commercial stage partner pipeline for active programs that carry remaining downstream economics. As you see, this pipeline flows from Phase I through to later stages and product approvals from left to right. Placement in this graphic is based on a program's most advanced status in any geography or indication. In the last couple of quarters, it's been great to see the growing number of programs moving to the right on this graphic, the latest of which now includes the recent addition of Immunovant IMVT-1402 shown in Phase III, as I mentioned. Turning to Slide 11. We've highlighted select recent partner updates, including presentations at ASCO from J&J and Merck KGaA. The disclosed J&J data for their trispecific 5322 program is especially notable to us with the 100% response rate that was observed in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients. The initial data were described as suggesting a potential paradigm shift for the treatment of these patients. So there's a real opportunity with this program to significantly elevate the standard of care for multiple myeloma. J&J indicated publicly that they look forward to seeing the results from planned Phase II and Phase III studies for the 5322 program. And on their most recent earnings call, they highlighted these data again while saying they are now closer than ever to their ambition of curing multiple myeloma. Other highlights shown here include Teva receiving Fast Track designation for TEV408 for the treatment of celiac disease. And I want to note that this program is also in clinical development for vitiligo. Teva additionally announced a partnership with Fosun for TEV-278, which is a partnership established with the goal of accelerating clinical development of the compound that's in clinical trials now for the treatment of various forms of cancer, including melanoma. Now to conclude my section here on Slide #12, we've highlighted our recently launched exploration Partner Access program. Exploration is a high-throughput single B-cell screening instrument that leverages machine learning and AI. It offers 10x more single cell screening throughput versus other instruments, which allows users to screen in a far more efficient fashion. We believe this system has unmatched screening throughput and superior hit recovery, along with exceptional ease of use and reliability. We highlighted exploration in a presentation at the Boston PEGS Conference in May, where the system was awarded Best of Show honors. Just weeks after launching, we sold and installed exploration at a global partner, creating a new revenue stream derived from the sale of the instrument as well as recurring revenue from proprietary single-use consumables and subscription services for software with maintenance. It's still early in the launch, but the response from the market has been extremely positive. And we're building a pipeline of sales leads from our growing roster of partners based on new availability of the platform, and we're also getting inquiries from others who are interested in becoming OmniAb discovery partners specifically to get access to exploration. With exploration, we're able to further empower partners with the latest technologies to improve their probability of success in a really efficient and scalable manner. that's part of why we see exploration as a nice complement to our current core business as it supports our mission of enabling the rapid development of innovative therapeutics. The feedback we are getting indicates to us that this is the right time for exploration as the industry embraces the value of lab automation and instrumentation for big data generation to also leverage AI and ML-aided screening and selection. We're very excited about the prospects of this new offering as it continues to demonstrate our commitment to innovation and to customer service while diversifying our revenue streams.

And with that, let me now turn the call back over to Kurt for a discussion of our Q2 financial results. Kurt?

Thanks, Matt. On Slide 14, I'll start with a review of our revenue. For the second quarter of 2025, we reported revenue of $3.9 million compared with $7.6 million for the same period in 2024. The decrease was primarily related to lower milestones achieved in the quarter and lower service revenue. Service revenue declined primarily due to the discontinuation of a small molecule ion channel program last year, which also resulted in the acceleration of noncash revenue in that quarter, which overinflated last year's number. The decrease was partially offset by the new exploration revenue this quarter, and this revenue primarily includes the sale of an instrument as well as the sale of various consumables related to the exploration platform. Slide 15 shows our cost and operating expenses for the second quarter of 2025 which decreased to $20.1 million from $23.9 million for the prior year period. We saw decreases in both R&D and G&A expenses relative to last year, and I'll go into some of those details here on the next slide. So turning to Slide 16 and focusing on operating expense. You'll see a new line item for the costs associated with the exploration revenue, which were approximately $300,000 this quarter. This represents the costs associated with the manufacturing of the exploration instrument as well as the related consumables sold in the quarter. Research and development expense was $10.9 million versus $13.9 million a year ago, with the decrease primarily due to lower stock-based compensation, lower headcount as well as lower external expenses associated with small molecule ion channel programs. G&A expense declined to $7.7 million from $8 million for the same period in 2024, with the decrease primarily due to lower legal fees and lower stock-based compensation expense. The other operating income line includes a gain of $3 million for the sale of the KV7 asset to Angelini, which was partially offset by an increase to our CBR liability associated with the sale. The net loss for the second quarter of 2025 was $15.9 million or $0.15 per share, which compared with a net loss of $13.6 million or $0.13 a share for the same period in 2024. As Matt mentioned, we had a further reduction to our headcount in July. This reduction is expected to have onetime expenses of about $1 million that will occur primarily in the third quarter. We expect that the combination of the actions that we took last February and this one here in July will result in approximately $7 million of annual cash savings going forward. Turning to Slide 17, you'll see the balance sheet as of June 30, 2025. We ended the quarter with $41.6 million in cash, and our cash used in the quarter was $2 million. During the quarter, we received milestone payments for Genmab's1078 and Acasunlimab as well as the upfront payment from Angelini related to the sale of the Kv7 asset. So let me conclude with Slide 18 with a discussion of our 2025 guidance. We continue to expect that 2025 revenue will be between $20 million and $25 million and operating expense will be between $85 million and $90 million. As a reminder, approximately 40% of our operating expense is noncash, mostly due to stock-based compensation and the amortization of intangibles, primarily from historical company or technology acquisitions. We also continue to expect that our cash used in 2025 will be lower than cash used in 2024. And finally, our guidance on the tax rate remains unchanged at approximately 0% due to a valuation allowance.

And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions. Operator?

And your first question comes from Puneet Souda from Leerink.

You have Michael on for Puneet today. Congrats on the quarter. My first question has to do with just large pharma versus small biotech trends. So we've heard a lot from CROs talking about small biotech moving forward on their trials. And I'm wondering if you're seeing any of that flow through either positive or negative in terms of your discovery. Any color you can provide there or if it's a completely separate from, I guess, more later stage?

Yes, Michael, thanks for the question. This is Matt. We've been pleased with the continued growth in both partners and programs. We saw really nice momentum starting to build in that coming out of last year. That obviously has continued, and you can see it in the performance and the numbers through Q2. We've had nice net growth in both partners, right, which is a nice metric of our technologies and their relevance to the industry and how they're attracting new partners as well as programs. We also see a nice mix of large pharma partners starting up new programs as well as smaller players as well. So we're seeing contributions from both as well as academics who are now incubating assets to spin those out into companies. But in terms of your question around small and large, we're seeing it on both -- from both.

Okay. Great. And then a quick question on the guide. I was wondering if the reiterated guide continues to exclude any benefit from exploration or if the reiteration sort of includes expectations now that you're 1 quarter in with the launch.

Yes. I think as we said, we had indicated that exploration would be additive to what we had. I mean this number that we have here in Q2, it's a great start to this, but it's pretty small numbers, but no change to the guidance, but this exploration should be additive to that.

Yes. And still no change also, Michael, to the -- we see exploration as additive and accretive to the business, right, in terms of how it's designed to run. We've been preparing for this launch for quite a while, and we're excited about it. The feedback has been great.

And your next question comes from Matt Hewitt from Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

This is [ Jackson Siedow ] on for Matt. Congrats on the quarter. Yes, I wanted to dive into exploration there a little bit, seeing revenue flow through. Curious if you guys could provide a little color on the pipeline as to how that's going, maybe even if not numbers, help give some guidance on that.

Yes. Yes. Thanks, Jackson. We launched the partner access program, obviously, in May, mid-May at the PEGS conference in Boston. That was really a perfect place to launch the technology given the attendees of that meeting. We were really happy with the reception we got. We were voted the Best of Show, which was cool. But a lot -- more importantly, a lot of really great dialogue kicked off there. We're now at 100 active partners, obviously, who are candidates, if you will, for exploration, some -- for some of whom it's more relevant than others, obviously, just given business model. But we are really happy with the fact that we sold and deployed an instrument really within weeks of the launch at a global partner. And I think that bodes very well for for how we're positioned. The book of business is filling up really nicely. We're managing a lot of business activity around it. These are obviously capital acquisitions. So the process is slightly different than a standard technology licensing process. But we are really pleased with the feedback we're getting and the momentum that the exploration team is building up and for what the technology is doing for the business. I'll also note, too, that we are also getting interest from others who are not currently OmniAb partners who are sort of leading with exploration, wanting to become discovery partners, specifically with exploration in mind. And I think that really speaks to some of the comments I made earlier about this really being the right time for exploration from a lot of different perspectives.

And your next question comes from Brendan Smith from TD Cowen.

Congrats on the quarter. This is Jackie on for Brendan. I was just curious what that time line looks like for existing partners that want to become a part of the access program? Is it kind of a blanket requirement to purchase an instrument? Or are you guys also offering a sort of data generation side separately for those partners?

Yes. Yes, good question, Jackie. Obviously, exploration, I'll just kind of step back first and say exploration has been a part of our workflows internally for many years, right? And that's kind of what I mean in terms of us preparing for exploration launch and deployment for partners for a while. Exploration has also been a key part in how we leverage big data generation, our AI and ML tools that we've branded OmniDeep. And those are all things that we continue to do for our standard discovery partners, right? So -- and that also attracts partners not only the ability to get access to 4 species of animals and novel repertoires of fully human antibodies, but also those downstream workflow abilities that we've built up over time that allow us to provide them with a wealth of winners, if you will, from an antibody sequence perspective. So our partners still get access to that. They still get access to exploration through us. That said, there are some partners who have their own wet labs and are interested and are doing the amount of work and the number of campaigns per year that it makes sense for them to have an exploration instrument in-house. So the answer is really no change to how we interact with our partners in terms of data generation and sharing. But now certain partners obviously have the ability to buy an exploration instrument. Kurt is going to add.

Yes. Let me add on, Jackie. So let's say somebody comes to us and they're interested in an exploration instrument, and they're not currently a partner. So we will have that dialogue and say, we let them know that this is a partner access program. And if they're interested in becoming a partner, then we would work out and do a license with them to give them access to our technology stack and it could kind of be done at the same time. They'll sign that license to become a partner, and then we could engage in the discussion on the sale of an exploration unit. So that's how it would work.

That's awesome and super helpful. I appreciate the color. Maybe just -- obviously, you might not be able to say much about this, but any color on where you expect your second tech launch to land regarding maybe whether it's going to be kind of continuing more on this AI/ML data portfolio side or more towards the antibody legacy business?

Yes. Yes. Great question, Jackie. I will say we are planning an additional technology launch this year. We've generally launched our new technologies at major scientific conferences that are very relevant to our partner set, right? The technology we're going to launch is informed by, obviously, the deep relationships we have with our 100 partners and growing and also kind of leverages that vantage point that we have on the industry. So we'll talk more about it when we launch it. I'll just say we will launch it this year. It is certainly highly relevant to our strategic mission to help partners discover antibodies more quickly and efficiently. And we think it will actually be a pretty impactful one with a lot of novelty to it.

And your next question comes from Stephen Willey from Stifel.

Just with respect to the Johnson trispecific, the data does look quite interesting. Does that fall into the grandfathered prepaid license bucket? I guess I asked the question because I know that the prior bispecific that Johnson got approved teclistamab, I believe, was also prepaid in nature.

Steve, good question. You're correct in that the disclosed economics around the Janssen deal. Actually, it wouldn't qualify as prepaid as you've described it here. There are actually $35 million of milestone payment associated with first sales. And that's the same path that was disclosed back when [ TECVALI ] was approved and launched in the U.S. and Europe. So there's payments associated at launch. So it wouldn't -- it's not a fully paid license.

Got it. Understood. And then I understand it still early in exploration, and it's probably hard to give guidance around anything at this point. But just curious if you guys have a rough estimate that you might be willing to proffer up with respect to what the back-end stream of consumable and subscription revenue may look like on a per instrument basis. Is that a number that you guys would be willing to disclose? Or is there, I guess, kind of an industry reference that you would point us to?

Yes. It's a good question, Steve. I mean we have estimates of what we think those might be, but it actually varies depending on the customer that's using it. So I don't think we're ready to provide what those estimates are at this point, but it could be different depending on the type of customer that is using the instrument. So I don't know, Matt, anything to...

Yes, I think it's still -- yes, nothing really to add there other than it is still early days. But it's a high-margin business on the back end, which I think bodes very well for the exploration line.

Okay. And then you talked about the seismic molecule being the third Omni chicken-derived antibody into the clinic. do we know just, I guess, roughly of what proportion of those assets that are preclinical and beyond? I guess it's -- those 61 assets are derived off of that platform as well. And does that technology tend to command a bit of a higher royalty rate relative to the average -- relative to the overall average of the portfolio that you provided?

Yes. Steve, obviously, a range of royalties as you look across our full portfolio, right? And as that mix has evolved, we're seeing improvement in the average royalty with evolution of the mix across the portfolio. just sort of speaking generally about the chicken platform, as I said, we've had 3 now Omni chicken-derived antibodies enter the clinic. Chicken generally has within it a number of technologies, our standard OMNI chicken, which obviously is a chicken that produces fully human antibody sequences. We also have [ OmniChicken ], which is a chicken with a common light chain that also produces fully human sequences, really designed specifically around bispecifics. We launched OmniAb not that long ago, about 1.5 years or so ago, which is a chicken that produces domain antibodies, which are really interesting in CNS and other areas. And then we continue to innovate around the chicken as well. It's a highly differentiated technology for a lot of reasons. In terms of the questions around the 61 programs that are post discovery stage or preclinical or later, there are definitely a number of chicken programs in there. In fact, we have an OmniAb represented in there as well, which is a pretty quick progression for a newer technology. But we've not kind of broken it down by source technology at this point.

And your last question comes from Connor McNamara, RBC Capital Markets.

This is Carter on for Conor. Congratulations on the quarter. I just had a question about the business plan for exploration. Is that mostly selling instruments and then also selling consumables? Or is that a reagent rental kind of plan that you want to do with the exploration?

Yes. It is selling instruments. You're right, the way you described it, where we will sell instruments to partners. And then downstream of that, they will buy from us proprietary consumables as well as software license with maintenance as well. There are 2 primary consumables, which are chips and plates that are needed for runs of the instrument.

Perfect. Just congratulations with the new additions of programs and partners. As you look in your funnel with folks who are looking at the platform, what are some of the themes that you're seeing for the programs that your partners are exploring? Has it changed from oncology to CNS or infectious diseases? Or could you give just broad themes as to what you're seeing right now?

Yes. Great question. One of the things that we do think about when we innovate around new technologies is kind of not only where the industry is right now, but where the industry is headed. And I think now with 381 programs growing, over 100 partners continues to grow, we have a pretty interesting vantage point on the industry. And so we think about what technologies partners want. We also think about ways to diversify our platform and diversify our portfolio, I should say, from a therapy area or other use perspective. So we look into our preclinical assets, we see, of course, oncology, as you'd expect in the industry, but we also see inflammation, fibrosis, renal, dermatology, a growing subset of CNS diseases. We see some metabolic -- we see a lot of interesting trends in the discovery space as well as my perception is that as big pharma starts to take bigger swings at bigger areas, we see that in the types of targets they're going after. So it's a cool vantage point on the industry, but we're also seeing a lot of diversity there forming in our pipeline.

There are no further questions at this time. Mr. Matt Foehr, you may proceed.

Thank you all for joining our call today. We appreciate your interest and engagement with OmniAb. We look forward to discussing our third quarter financial results at our next conference call, which will be in early November. In the meantime, we're looking forward to participating in a number of investment conferences in the coming weeks and months, and we'll announce those details shortly. So thanks again, and have a nice afternoon.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you very much for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.