Hess Midstream Partners LP Aktie

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the First Quarter 2026 Hess Midstream Conference Call. My name is Kevin. I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised today's conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Gordon, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Kevin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in our first quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website www.hessmidstream.com. Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements.

These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess Midstream's filings with the SEC. Also on today's conference call, we may discuss certain GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the earnings release. With me today are Jonathan Stein, Chief Executive Officer; and Mike Chadwick, Chief Financial Officer. I'll now turn the call over to Jonathan Stein.

Thanks, Jennifer. Welcome, everyone, to our first quarter 2026 earnings call. Today, I will discuss our first quarter performance and outlook for the remainder of the year and then I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financials. In the first quarter, we continued to execute our operational priorities and deliver our financial strategy. We delivered solid operational performance and achieved our guidance, which included the impact of severe winter weather in January and February. In March, we completed an accretive $60 million share in unit repurchase on the public and our sponsor. And lastly, we increased our distribution 2% or approximately 8% on an annualized basis for Class A shares.

This increase included our targeted 5% annual increase for Class A shares and a distribution level increase following our repurchase that maintains our total distributed cash on a lower share and unit count. Turning to our results. During the quarter, throughput volumes averaged 430 million cubic feet per day for gas processing, 119,000 barrels of oil per day for crude terminaling and 115,000 barrels of water per day for water gathering. In line with our guidance, throughput volumes were down compared to the fourth quarter, primarily due to severe winter weather in January and February, partially offset by recovery in March as well as capture of additional third-party gas volumes.

Consistent with our annual guidance, we continue to expect volumes to grow through the rest of the year, excluding the impact of planned maintenance at TGP in the second quarter that is expected to reduce volumes by 5 million to 10 million cubic feet per day for the quarter. Turning to Hess Midstream's capital program. In the first quarter, we safely brought online the second of 2 new compressor stations after completing it in the fourth quarter of 2025. In the first quarter, capital expenditures were $10 million, seasonally lower than the fourth quarter of 2025 and severe winter weather restricted activity levels.

We expect our capital spend to be seasonally higher in the second and third quarters, as we continue to execute our program including completion of greenfield, high-pressure gathering pipeline infrastructure that we started in 2025. However, with the second compressor station online and reflecting Chevron's move to long laterals, which reduces well connect CapEx for Hess Midstream, we have now reduced our 2026 estimated capital expenditure by 1/3 to approximately $100 million.

As a result of this reduction and together with the deferral of cash taxes, we are increasing our 2026 adjusted free cash flow guidance to $910 million to $960 million, reflecting a 20% increase year-over-year at the midpoint. Hess Midstream remains a leader in shareholder cash returns with one of the highest free cash flow yields across our peer set. In summary, we remain focused on executing safe and reliable operations, while leveraging our historical investment in existing infrastructure to continue generating significant adjusted free cash flow, allowing us to easily provide returns to our shareholders through growing distribution and incremental share repurchases, while simultaneously continuing to reduce our debt leverage.

With that, I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financial performance for the first quarter and guidance.

Thanks, Jonathan, and good morning, everyone. Today, I'll discuss our financial results for the first quarter of 2026 and provide an update on our second quarter financial guidance and outlook for 2026. Turning to our results. For the first quarter of 2026, net income was $158 million compared to approximately $168 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2026 was $300 million, compared with $309 million in the fourth quarter.

The decrease was primarily due to lower revenues, primarily caused by severe winter weather in January and February. Total revenues including pass-through revenues decreased by approximately $15 million, resulting in segment revenue changes as follows: Gathering revenues decreased by approximately $14 million. Processing revenues decreased by approximately $6 million, while terminaling revenues increased by approximately $5 million. Total cost and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, pass-through costs and net of our proportional share of LM4 earnings decreased by approximately $6 million, primarily from lower seasonal maintenance and lower third-party offloads, resulting in adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter of 2026 of $300 million.

Our gross adjusted EBITDA margin for the first quarter of 2026 was maintained at approximately 83%, above our 75% target, highlighting our continued strong operating leverage. First quarter of 2026 capital expenditures were approximately $10 million, significantly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2025, a severe winter weather limited activity. Net interest, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, was approximately $53 million, resulting in adjusted free cash flow of approximately $237 million, an increase of 14% from the fourth quarter of 2025.

We had a drawn balance of $343 million on our revolving credit facility at the end of the first quarter of 2026. For the second quarter 2026, we expect net income to be approximately $150 million to $160 million and adjusted EBITDA to be approximately flat with the first quarter at $295 million to $305 million, which includes the impact of planned second quarter maintenance at the Tioga Gas Plant. We expect adjusted free cash flow in the second quarter of 2026 to decrease relative to the first quarter of 2026, as capital expenditures in the second quarter are projected to be seasonally higher than the first quarter.

As we said in our fourth quarter call, we expect second half volumes to be higher than the first half helping to drive higher EBITDA in the second half of the year. For the full year 2026, we continue to expect net income of between $650 million and $700 million and adjusted EBITDA of between $1.225 billion and $1.275 billion in 2026, approximately flat at the midpoint compared with 2025. As Jonathan mentioned, our cash position is strong and notable among our peers set. We now expect full year 2026 capital expenditures of approximately $105 million and expect to generate adjusted free cash flow of between $910 million and $960 million and excess adjusted free cash flow of approximately $280 million after fully funding our targeted 5% annual distribution growth, which we expect to use for incremental shareholder returns and debt repayment.

As mentioned, we no longer expect to pay $15 million of cash taxes in 2026 and do not expect to pay material cash taxes until after 2028, following the recent interim guidance from the IRS on the application of the corporate alternative minimum tax. In March, we executed an accretive $60 million share repurchase transaction from both the sponsor and the public. And as the year progresses, we will continue to evaluate additional opportunities for incremental returns of capital. So this concludes my remarks. We will be happy to answer any questions. I will now turn the call over to the operator.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jeremy Tonet with JP Morgan Securities.

This is Francine on for Jeremy. Just wanted to zoom in a bit more on the change to CapEx here and what this means for well connect/turn-in-line activity for the year and whether there are any read-throughs or changes to growth expectations year-end or into 2027 that we can derive from this.

Look, if you look at what's been happening with CapEx for us, really since the end of last year, we've really been reducing CapEx as we are approaching the end of our infrastructure build-out, which has been really years in the making, as we continue to build out our strategic footprint in the Bakken. CapEx was low in the first quarter. That was really, as I mentioned, due to really restricted activity due to the weather as well as seasonal dynamics that's normal for the first quarter. And we do expect that to be the low point of the year and then pick up as we continue to build out over the next few quarters, including, as I mentioned, completing our greenfield high-pressure gathering pipeline infrastructure, we started last year and expect to complete this year.

So really nothing in terms of changing strategically, the kind of downsizing, if you will, of our guidance this year from $150 million to approximately $100 million is really rightsizing our CapEx to account for things like upstream efficiencies like longer laterals, which as I discussed, can have the effect of reducing well connect CapEx for us. So that's very positive. And really, if you reflect on that, it's really just an extraordinary business model. That with the lower CapEx that we are spending, we're really going to make significant free cash flow that supports, of course, our 5% targeted distribution growth as well as incremental returns of capital to our shareholders, like the shareholder the share repurchase we did this quarter as well as simultaneously being able to do debt repayment?

That's helpful. And I would just like to touch a bit on kind of the third-party outlook here and whether you've had any changes to that since the Middle East conflict has been ensuing.

Sure. In terms of third parties, I mean nothing, I would say, in terms of major macro changes. We did have some additional third-party volume in the first quarter, as I mentioned, that was really some additional throughput from other midstream providers. And that really highlights, as we said in the past, optionality that we have in our system that allows flexibility for others to be able to utilize it during operational challenges that they have.

We're still targeting 10% third-party volumes, and that's incorporated into our guidance and any additional third-party volumes would be upside, not seeing anything dramatic, just a normal, like I said, third parties coming to you utilize optionality in our system, but nothing -- no major changes due to macro environment at this point.

One more before our next question. Our next question comes from John Mackay with Goldman Sachs.

Last call, you guys spent some time talking about a little bit of evolution on the balance sheet side, thinking about lower leverage over time. I'm just wondering, were a quarter later now, if you've had some time to kind of refine that and be able to kind of longer-term leverage target you want to put out there relative to the kind of distribution growth and maybe some buyback cadence you've talked about?

Yes. No, I can talk to that. And there's -- and thanks, John, for the question. There's no change read to our return of capital approach that we outlined in our December guidance now or as we talked about and our Q4 call in February. So we do plan to use a portion of our free cash flow, as we said then, after distributions to pay down debt. And it's a conservative financial strategy that's consistent with the volume profile and -- target for about 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day plateau production in the Bakken.

So we'll still have a balanced strategy though. That includes an incremental return of capital beyond our 5% annual distribution growth and we plan to have a stronger balance sheet as a result. So all of that is underpinned, obviously, by the MVCs that we have out to 2028, and they continue to provide some significant downside protection. And we're still aiming for about $1 billion of free cash flow after distributions through 2028. And as I said, we'll use that. Obviously, every distribution or every share buyback is approved by our Board, and that will be set by our Board, but we plan to use that for incremental return of capital and paying down our debt. So no change there really.

All right. I appreciate that. Second one, I apologize, it's a little bit in the weeds, but terminals revenue was really strong in the quarter. Just wondering if there's any kind of one-off in there or this new kind of implied rate is the go forward we should think of?

Yes. I think you're reading that right. There is an element of implied rates in there in the terminals. And that's -- as you recall, it's a cost of service rate that gets adjusted every year for our expectation of OpEx, CapEx and any volumes that drives a targeted return on that. So that's part of the reason why you're seeing better stronger performance there is just a tariff adjustment.

Do you mind just reminding us kind of the structure of that contract going forward?

So that goes through to 2033, and it's rebalanced every year as part of a calculation that aims to return a specific like mid-teen return, and it will be based on what we anticipate as the actual volumes, CapEx, OpEx in order to serve that and to generate that return. So the tariffs reflect up and down accordingly. So if we have lower volumes anticipated, then the tariff will go up. And if we have lower CapEx, for example, then the tariff will go down and that's through to 2023.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Doug Irwin with Citi.

I just wanted to pick up on the second quarter guidance you gave here. I think my math, just looking at the full year midpoint implies something around 8% growth in the second half of the year. Can you maybe just talk about some of the drivers you see contributing to that growth in the second half and where there might be some risk to the upside or downside from here?

Sure. Let me just -- let me start. I mean, on the volume side, really, as we said, Q1 is, I'd say, really the low point in terms of volume, would you have planned maintenance in TGP in the second quarter. So that takes out 5 million to 10 million cubic feet per day. Absent that, we would have seen some additional growth into Q2. And then as the year really progresses, obviously, better weather. Chevron continues to do longer laterals, so you'll start to see that pick up as those completions get completed later in the year and more wells come online. So that will also drive some additional volumes as well as we continue to grow through the year.

So no change to our overall guidance. And yes, that's about 8% on the EBITDA basis increase in the second half and really it's going to be driven by just really the flow of cadence, if you will, of volumes as we kind of come off this low point related to weather, get through this maintenance in second quarter and then continued volume growth from there?

Understood. And then my second, just maybe on the broader growth outlook beyond '26. I mean we have Chevron gene to plateau in volumes in the Bakken around that 200,000 barrels of equivalent level. But you seem to kind of keep squeezing out more free cash flow from the business. I'm just curious if there's any appetite to pursue inorganic opportunities or maybe any other ways to kind of put some of that free cash flow to work from here? Or should we really just kind of expect the buybacks and debt repayment to be the primary focus from here?

Sure. Let me start, I'll then turn it over to Mike. You can talk a little bit about capital allocation. But I think it's a good opportunity to really reflect that if you kind of look around -- there's been a lot of changes around us for the past year or 2. And here we are 9 to 10 months after the acquisition of Hess by Chevron. And really, I think so much at Hess Midstream remains the same. In terms of where we are now, as you mentioned, Chevron targeting approximately 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day while continuing to optimize the development plan -- that really -- that development plan underpins our volume guidance and EBITDA growth. And remember with that EBITDA growth, really driven by inflation escalates and reduction in CapEx.

While also Chevron continues to bring lessons from other basins to the Bakken, like longer laterals, workover optimization and increased chemicals to improve productivity, we're also benefiting from that along the lateral, for example, obviously, make the wells economics by decreasing the breakeven. But also, as I talked about, impact has been given a positive way by reducing our well connect capital requirements as less wells are needed and that's really the driver of that free cash flow.

So our financial strategy continues to be the same, 5% distribution growth can be achieved even at MVC levels and significant obviously, free cash flow. So with all the things that have changed around us, we continue to have all the elements of visibility, consistency, shareholder returns and balance sheet strength. They've always been our hallmark. And so with so much changing around this, we're continuing to execute our strategy, focused on operating our assets safely and reliably and executing our financial strategy.

So all that says a lot remains the same in terms of looking at bolt-on opportunities, we've always said that we'll look at those, but the bar remains high relative to our existing business model, which continues to be really differentiated relative to others in the sector. Maybe I'll turn it over to Mike, you can talk a little bit about with this higher free cash flow, really a lot of the same in terms of our capital allocation strategy as well.

Yes. No, thanks, Jonathan. I think you summarized it pretty well. I think what I'd add to that is, obviously, as we think about our that EBITDA leverage target. We don't have a specific target in mind, but we will naturally see our 3x current debt leverage drop as we continue to grow EBITDA without increasing the absolute level of debt. And as we -- that will naturally delever us, but with some portion of our free cash flow after distributions that we'll use for debt payment, we'll see that delever even further.

But what I would say is that with our current guidance out 2028 and with the ambition to continue to do some shareholder return of capital, then the math would not support us getting really done far below 2.5x leverage by 2028. So that gives you a bit of a range as to where we're expecting our leverage to sit in the longer term through 2028. But as Jonathan said, it's steady as she goes. We are pretty good from a cash position. And we look forward to rolling out the next 3 years with some good coverage with our MVCs and with transparency to our volume throughput driven by Chevron's targeted 200,000 barrels of oil per day planned production.

One for our next question. Our next question comes from Praneeth Satish with Wells Fargo.

So beyond the drilling and completion efficiencies that Chevron has highlighted in the Bakken, are there any other longer-term costs or structural opportunities or changes that you and Chevron are working towards that could show up in your business. Maybe put differently, as your capital intensity comes down, are there scenarios where some of those savings kind of flow back to Chevron through alternative commercial structures or anything like that?

Well, what I would say is, look, in terms of efficiencies and optimization, those are all really win-wins. I gave an example of a lot of the laterals, which reduced the breakeven, obviously, increased number of wells available economic to drill and then also, as I said, reduces our capital and makes it just all efficient, all around. In terms of the contract structure, if that's what you're kind of alluding to there, look, just a reminder, 85% of revenues are fixed fee. That continues together with the cost of services, Mike mentioned on the terminaling and water gathering that continues through the end of 2033.

So really including this year, another 8 years, that contract structure provides Hess Midstream with visibility and consistency. As I mentioned, 2 of our hallmarks of what we've always been part of. So look, before the 2033, there's no contractual mechanism to change the task to renegotiate the contract. There's also governance guardrails including the need for special approval, including at least one of the independent directors to prevent any notable action by Chevron. Initially, of course, they're just normal conflicts committee process for any proposed contract changes. So look, right now, we're focused on working with Chevron in terms of optimizing operationally to really continue to help develop the Bakken in just the most optimized way possible.

Got you. Now that makes sense. It seems like a win-win here. Maybe just a clarifying question on terminals. So you mentioned it's a cost of service contract. It stepped up this quarter. It was quite a large step-up, I guess, when we kind of translate that to EBITDA. And so just to be clear, is this kind of the Q1 run rate? Is that something that we can assume for the balance of the year kind of going forward?

Yes. I think it will be -- it is based on both the tariffs and also what throughputs we had now Q1 I'd say, was a little bit of an impacted quarter because of the weather. And so we'll see how that plays out when we get into more stable territory in Q2, Q3 and the rest of the year. But yes, I think a part of that is obviously the step-up in the tariffs because of the cost of service formula. And so I wouldn't say that I would extrapolate completely on the Q1, but definitely, that's going to be a factor.

Yes. Look, the only thing I would just say on terminaling also, as Mike explained the rates not you to repeat that. But you do see more third parties terminaling one-off, can have some variation quarter-to-quarter because that's a place where people can just come up and do short-term terminaling kind of lockup, so to speak, or short-term arrangements.

At this time, there are no further questions. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter 2025 Hess Midstream Conference Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Gordon, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Gigi. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in our fourth quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website, hessmidstream.com.

Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess Midstream's filings with the SEC. Also on today's conference call, we may discuss certain GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the earnings release.

With me today are Jonathan Stein, Chief Executive Officer; and Mike Chadwick, Chief Financial Officer. I'll now turn the call over to Jonathan Stein.

Thanks, Jennifer. Welcome, everyone, to our fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. Today, I will review our 2025 performance, our 2026 and long-term guidance issued in December, and then I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financials.

In 2025, we continued our record of strong performance execution, completing our multiyear projects on time and on budget and strategically growing our gas gathering and compression system. With the system now substantially built, our projected capital spending will be significantly lower. For 2026, we expect to spend approximately $150 million, a 40% reduction in capital spending relative to 2025. We expect our capital spend to decrease even further in 2027 and 2028 to less than $75 million per year.

This lower capital highlights our ability to leverage our historical investments to drive significant free cash flow generation that supports our unique combination of shareholder returns and balance sheet strength through a combination of targeted 5% distribution per Class A share growth through 2028, potential incremental share repurchases and debt repayment.

Now turning to Hess Midstream results. Fourth quarter volumes were generally flat year-over-year, but down relative to the third quarter due to severe weather through the month of December. Gas processing volumes averaged 444 million cubic feet per day. Crude terminaling volumes averaged 122,000 barrels of oil per day and water gathering volumes averaged 124,000 barrels of water per day. For full year 2025, Hess Midstream's gas processing volumes averaged 445 million cubic feet per day, crude terminaling volumes averaged 129,000 barrels of oil per day and water gathering volumes averaged 131,000 barrels of water per day, resulting in full year adjusted EBITDA of $1.238 billion.

Looking forward, for the first quarter of 2026, we expect lower volumes across our systems as severe winter weather has continued through January and into the start of February, together with normal contingencies for the rest of the winter period. On a full year basis, we are reiterating the volume guidance that we gave in December for the full year of 2026 and expect growth in volumes across our systems through the rest of the year, consistent with historical seasonal volume expectations.

With revenues that are approximately 95% protected by MVCs on a full year basis, we anticipate net income and adjusted EBITDA to be higher through the rest of 2026 relative to our first quarter guidance. Looking beyond 2026, leveraging our historical investment in infrastructure and consistent with Chevron's optimized development program for the Bakken, we continue to expect 5% annualized net income and adjusted EBITDA growth and approximately 10% annualized adjusted free cash flow growth through 2028 that is supported by gas volume growth, contracted annual inflation tariff rate adjustments and lower operating and capital spend.

In summary, with adjusted EBITDA growth and a moderating capital program, we expect significant adjusted free cash flow generation in 2026 of $850 million to $900 million, reflecting 12% growth over 2025 at the midpoint, followed by annualized growth of approximately 10% through 2028, which we expect to use for incremental shareholder returns and debt repayment above and beyond our 5% targeted distribution growth that can be delivered even at already set MVC levels.

With that, I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financial performance for the fourth quarter and guidance.

Thanks, Jonathan, and good morning, everyone. Today, I will summarize our financial highlights for 2025, provide details on our first quarter financial guidance and outlook through 2028, which we issued in December. For 2025, we delivered strong results with full year net income of approximately $685 million and adjusted EBITDA of $1.238 billion. This adjusted EBITDA represents a growth of approximately 9% from 2024. For the fourth quarter, net income was $168 million compared to approximately $176 million in the third quarter.

Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter was $309 million compared with approximately $321 million in the third quarter. The decrease is primarily due to lower revenues caused by severe winter weather followed by a slow recovery through December as well as lower interruptible third-party volumes and annual maintenance at LM4. Total revenues, excluding pass-through revenues, decreased by approximately $19 million, resulting in segment revenue changes as follows: Gathering revenues decreased by approximately $11 million. Processing revenues decreased by approximately $6 million and terminaling revenues decreased by approximately $2 million.

Total cost and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, pass-through costs and net of our proportional share of LM4 earnings decreased by approximately $7 million, primarily from lower allocations under our Omnibus and employee Secondment Agreements, lower seasonable maintenance activity, partially offset by higher processing fees, resulting in adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of $309 million.

Our gross adjusted EBITDA margin for the fourth quarter was maintained at approximately 83%, above our 75% target, highlighting our continued strong operating leverage. Fourth quarter capital expenditures were approximately $47 million, marking lower fourth quarter activity as well as the completion of our compression build-out. And net interest, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, was approximately $54 million, resulting in adjusted free cash flow of approximately $208 million. We had a drawn balance of $338 million on our revolving credit facility at year-end.

For the first quarter of 2026, we expect net income to be approximately $150 million to $160 million and adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $295 million to $305 million, including the impact of severe winter weather that continued through January and the potential for additional winter weather events through the quarter. We expect adjusted free cash flow in the first quarter of 2026 to increase relative to the fourth quarter of 2025 as capital expenditures in the first quarter are projected to be lower than the fourth quarter.

Turning to our rates for 2026 and beyond. The majority of our systems that represent approximately 85% of our revenues are fixed fee with rates increasing each year based on an inflation escalator capped at 3%. For our terminaling systems, water gathering systems and a gas gathering subsystem that represents approximately 15% of our revenues, we continue to reset our rates through our annual rate redetermination process through 2033. In general, tariff rates across most of our systems are higher in 2026 than 2025 rates.

For the full year 2026, we continue to expect net income of between $650 million and $700 million and adjusted EBITDA of between $1.225 billion and $1.275 billion in 2026, approximately flat at the midpoint compared with 2025. As Jonathan mentioned, approximately 95% of our revenues are covered by minimum volume commitments in 2026. We continue to target a gross adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 75% in 2026 with total expected capital expenditures of approximately $150 million.

We expect to generate adjusted free cash flow of between $850 million and $900 million and excess adjusted free cash flow of approximately $210 million after fully funding our targeted 5% annual distribution growth, which we expect to use for incremental shareholder returns and debt repayment. Looking beyond 2026, we have visible drivers, including gas volume growth that continue to make up 75% of our revenues, inflation escalators and lower capital spend that support the guidance we issued through 2028 that results in annualized adjusted free cash flow growth of approximately 10% through 2028 from 2026 levels, generating approximately $1 billion of financial flexibility to continue return of capital to shareholders and pay down debt.

This concludes my remarks. We'll be happy to answer any questions. I'll now turn the call over to the operator.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first question comes from the line of Doug Irwin from Citi.

I'm just trying to start maybe with the balance sheet. You've made a few mentions here of debt repayment maybe taking more of a priority this year. Historically, I know you've pointed to about 3x leverage being the optimal level for Hess M. I'm just curious, is that still the right way to think about it? Are you maybe targeting a lower level today? And if so, could you maybe just provide some more commentary around maybe what drove that decision and then how that might impact capital allocation decisions here moving forward?

Can I take that one, Jonathan? So we plan to use a portion of our future cash flow after distributions to pay down debt as the guidance in December indicated. And the conservative financial strategy we're following there is consistent with our volume profile and Chevron's target of 200,000 barrels of oil per day plateau production in the Bakken. So we'll still have a balanced strategy. So that includes the incremental return of capital beyond our 5% annual distribution growth and balance sheet strength.

So in terms of our 3x leverage, so we will expect to naturally delever below the 3x in the next few years. Our EBITDA will grow, but we won't be increasing the absolute level of debt. So with some portion of our free cash flow after distributions being used for debt repayment, we expect to delever below this level of 3. As we said in our December guidance release, we're also funding incremental shareholder returns from free cash flow after distributions rather than leverage buybacks. And so it's just a bit more of a conservative approach that we're following that is in line with our profile and Chevron's target of 200,000 barrels of oil per day plateau.

Having said that, we've got significant free cash flow that we see being generated that will enable both the paydown of debt and further distributions back to shareholders. I don't know, Jonathan, if you want to add anything there?

I don't. That's great.

Understood. And then a follow-up maybe just on the third-party outlook. We've heard commentary from at least one big player in the Bakken talking about scaling back activity in the current crude environment. Just curious what you see as the impact to Hess M there, if at all? And if you could maybe just provide a bit more commentary around what you're hearing from third-party customers in general -- and then I guess tying on to that, I know you mentioned the 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent day from Chevron, which they've kind of stood by. I guess, is there an environment where that outlook might be at risk in your view just based on the discussions you've had with them?

Sure. Okay. So on the third party, really no change to our outlook there, still expecting 10% on average across oil and gas. Of course, quarter-to-quarter, that could have some variability. If you go back to the third quarter of last year, we had probably higher. We did have higher third parties as there was maintenance on Northern Border, and we were able to provide additional optionality for third parties to be able to additional routes, alternative routes to get to Northern Border as well as optionality for other takeaway. So from time to time, we may see a little bit more, sometimes a little bit less. But on average, we expect to continue to see 10% third parties as part of our volumes and no change to that going forward.

In terms of the 200,000, I mean, no change there. You just heard Chevron recently just Friday on their call, reiterating the 200,000 barrels a day target with continued optimization program. And I think it's important to highlight the guidance that we've given out in terms of the volume guidance and the EBITDA growth through 2028 as well as reduced capital spending that supports our free cash flow growth over this period is also consistent with that plan. So no change there expected, and we're continuing to work with Chevron to work through the optimized development program and optimize our volumes as well.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet from JPMorgan Securities.

This is Elias on for Jeremy. Just wanted to get a sense of growth drivers further out in the forecast horizon in that 2028 time frame. How much of the outlook is based on cost cutting? And how does that contribute to the growth outlook?

Sure. Let me just start and say that as we look forward, right, as I just mentioned, the plan that we've given out the guidance, which includes the EBITDA growth and net income growth as well as our free cash flow growth is consistent with the plan that Chevron has laid out. That growth in terms of EBITDA is really driven by -- we have inflation escalators, a bit of growth in gas as well.

And then the free cash flow growth is also increasing even more than that as a result of the result in reduced capital as we go from our -- complete the infrastructure build-out and move to even a lower capital level going forward. So down to $150 million this year, 40% lower than $75 million in '27, '28. So those are really the drivers of the growth. And I think it's important as we think about this long term and the business plan going forward for Hess Midstream, we've gone through a period here of transition and gone through a period here of integration with Chevron.

And while many things have changed as we've optimized our plan together with Chevron, I think it's also important to highlight take a moment just to highlight the unique combination of elements that's still a part of our plan. That includes significant free cash flow generation, leveraging the historical spend with significantly lower capital that I just talked about that's driving that 10% free cash flow growth through 2028. We have distributions that have continued to target to grow at 5% per share annually, fully funded by free cash flow and able to achieve that growth even at MVC levels. And we have significant free cash flow distributions -- free cash flow after distributions that supports, as Mike said, both incremental shareholder returns and balance sheet strength.

And all of this is consistent, as we said, with Chevron's development plan that targets 200,000 BOE per day with continued opportunities for optimization as well as 95% MVC revenue protection this year in 2026 and 90% MVC revenue protection in 2027. So we've talked a lot about changes as a result of the transition, but I think it's important to highlight that we continue to have the elements of visibility and consistency, the shareholder returns and balance sheet strength that have been and continue to be the hallmark of Hess Midstream and really a differentiator in the strategy. So when we talk about the long term for Hess Midstream, while things have changed, it's really a lot more of the same unique combination that has always been our hallmark.

Got it. That's great color. And then maybe just to pick up on some of the remarks you made about CapEx just there. How low could we see CapEx actually be flexed? I think you've given some parameters around it, but just get a sense of how low that could get.

Mike, do you want to start?

Yes, sure. So in the first quarter, we're expecting CapEx, as I said in my remarks, to be lower than the fourth quarter. And we've guided $150 million for 2026 and $25 million of that is for completing the compression and gathering pipeline build-out. And then we've got about another $125 million for the gathering systems and well connects and maintenance. We've guided that in 2027 and 2028, we expect to be about $75 million, if not lower. And this is a trend that is following the reset that we said earlier about 2026 following the rigs coming down from 4 to 3 from Chevron, and it's consistent with that plan. Jonathan, I don't know if you want to add any further color around that.

Yes. The one thing I would just add is there's been a lot of discussion. Obviously, we're -- as we've kind of gotten to the end here of our big build-out, we really spent years building out our gathering and compression system. And just a couple of things to highlight.

First is our ability now to go to this lower CapEx level, really leveraging the historic investment. First is a function of the partnership that we have, the tight integration that we have with Chevron that historically with Hess and now with Chevron, that allows us -- has allowed us to optimize our upstream and midstream investments. So we don't overbuild and overinvest. And that -- the result of that is one of the best EBITDA build multiples in the sector.

The second thing I would say is that as Chevron talked about the development plan and optimizing the plan, that is also driving, of course, lower CapEx for us. And one of the things, just as an example, as you heard Chevron talk about having increasing percentage of longer laterals. So if you think about that from our point of view, longer laterals not only make the wells more economic, so significantly increasing the breakeven, but also, in general, produce essentially the same volume, but with less wells, reducing our well connect capital requirements. So also a very positive effect there.

So all that means that we can really continue to see this downtrend -- this year, we have a little bit left to do in terms of pipeline build-out at $150 million, still 40% less than last year. And then we're moving down to a much lower level at that less than $75 million on an ongoing basis as we really just have ongoing capital going forward to support the system and drive the significant free cash flow that comes out of this business model.

Our next question comes from the line of John Mackay from Goldman Sachs & Co.

I think a lot of them have been answered. I want to just zoom in a little bit more on the weather piece, though. Is there any way you can kind of give us a snapshot of what you're seeing on the ground right now? Particularly, are you seeing some of the issues we've seen in past years with power down, et cetera? Or once the weather starts to improve a little bit or once the temperatures start to improve a little bit, should we start to see production coming back online? Maybe just frame it for us relative to maybe some prior years.

Sure. Yes. I don't think this is -- you think back a few years ago where we had the significant power lines down across the state, and that really went on for the first half of the year. We're really just seeing significantly extreme cold weather, some snow, but really the cold, which has an impact on our system across the board and so particularly on the gas side. So that, I think, as we do start to see improving weather, certainly, that would be helpful and that allows more activity to occur and also just to begin the recovery in terms of getting more production online and getting our -- making our system optimizing it back again.

So we do still have in our -- as we mentioned, contingencies in the -- I'd say the weather has continued certainly all through the month of January and a bit here into February, just getting started. We have continued contingencies in our forecast and our guidance for the rest of the winter. But certainly, as we come out of the winter, we certainly -- as we talked about, we expect to see increasing volumes seasonally as we get into the second and third quarter. I don't know, Mike, do you want to just talk about the thing the rest of the year?

Yes. I think as Jonathan said in his opening remarks that we're going to see the first half of the year's volumes lower than the second half. So there will be a pickup in the second half of the year. One thing I'd highlight, though, is, obviously, we're at 95% coverage with our MVCs. So there's a floor. If production were to be lower, we've got 95% covered with MVCs. And that translates into 2027 as well at 90% before getting to 80% in 2028. So there's good protection for any downside. In terms of phasing, as Jonathan described, first quarter, we've been hit by the weather, and we'll be recovering from that. Second and third quarters are typically better months, and we'll get more production from that. And then the fourth quarter, we typically dial in some conservatism because we start getting back into winter weather again and the OpEx again there as well will have an element of reduced -- and that's just phasing, seasonal phasing.

That's great. I appreciate all the color. Super quick second one for me, just following up on Doug's question, and apologies if I missed it. But do you guys have a kind of longer-term leverage target in mind now specifically? Or is it just say, hey, we expect to kind of put some more cash towards that over time and delever as EBITDA grows? I'm just trying to think if you have a new target.

Yes. I think what we're planning to do over the next 3 years with our free cash flow after distributions is just use that to both strengthen the balance sheet by delevering, by paying down debt and including that as part of our fundamental incremental shareholder returns. So it's not a designed level that we want to get to. It's just going to naturally occur that as EBITDA starts to build back up as we don't increase the absolute level of debt and as we include some free cash flow towards paying down debt, our 3% -- our 3x leverage is naturally going to delever.

But there's no specific target we're going to get to. One of the key things that Jonathan has highlighted, obviously, is the free cash flow that we expect to generate over the next 3 years. And that's going to be substantial in the context of being able to fund not only our growth of 5% on distributions within the MVCs, but also to pay down debt and also provide shareholder returns over the next few years, supported by our strong MVC position. Thank you.

Thank you. At this time, there are no further questions. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2025 Hess Midstream Conference Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions].

Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Gordon, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Gigi. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in our third quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website, hessmidstream.com.

Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess Midstream's filings with the SEC. Also on today's conference call, we may discuss certain GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the earnings release.

With me today are Jonathan Stein, Chief Executive Officer; and Mike Chadwick, Chief Financial Officer. I'll now turn the call over to Jonathan Stein.

Thanks, Jennifer. Welcome, everyone, to our third quarter 2025 earnings call. Today, I have some brief opening comments and will review our operations, and then I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financials. In the third quarter, we continued to execute our operational priorities and deliver our financial strategy that prioritizes return of capital to shareholders. We delivered strong operational performance, with gas throughputs increasing from the second quarter despite the impact of localized flooding in August.

Third quarter results benefited from an increase in third-party volumes as our customers navigated Northern Border pipeline maintenance towards the end of the quarter. This provides upside to our results and is a good reminder of the strategic nature of our midstream assets in the Bakken, we also executed a $100 million share and unit repurchase in the third quarter and increased our distribution by 2.4% and or approximately 10% on an annualized basis for Class A share. That included our targeted 5% annual increase for Class A share and a distribution level increase following repurchase that we obtained our total distributed cash on a lower share and unit count.

During the quarter, throughput volumes averaged 462 million cubic feet per day of gas processing, 130,000 barrels of oil per day for crude terminaling and 137,000 barrels of water per day for water gathering. Throughput increased approximately 3% in gas gathering and processing compared with the second quarter. We expect fourth quarter volumes to be relatively flat with the third quarter on lower expected third-party volumes as announced in our September guidance update into law for winter weather contingency and planned maintenance at the Little Missouri 4 gas plant.

Turning to Hess Midstream's capital program. In the third quarter, we safely completed and brought online the first of 2 new compressor stations for the year and expect completion of the second compressor station in the fourth quarter. As announced in September, we have suspended activities on the Capa gas plant and we move the projects from our forward plans. As a result, full year 2025 capital expenditures are now expected to total approximately $270 million. We remain committed to our ongoing strategy, which prioritizes ongoing return of capital to our shareholders, but both excess free cash flow after distribution and leverage capacity relative to our long-term leverage target of 3x adjusted EBITDA.

As we noted in our recent guidance update with the removal of the Capa gas plant from our forward plan, we expect significantly lower capital going forward providing additional free cash flow to support our return on capital framework. Looking forward, we will release guidance for 2026 and our 2028 MVCs after our budget process concludes in December.

With that, I'll hand the call over to Mike to review our financial performance for the third quarter and guidance for the fourth quarter.

Thanks, Jonathan, and good morning, everyone. Today, I'm going to review our results for the third quarter and our financial guidance, and then we will open the call for questions. For the third quarter of 2025, net income was $176 million compared to $180 million for the second quarter. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2025 was $321 million compared to $316 million for the second quarter.

The increase in adjusted EBITDA relative to the second quarter was primarily attributable to the following: Total revenues, excluding pass-through revenues, increased by approximately $7 million, driven by higher third-party gas gathering and processing throughput volumes, resulting in segment revenue changes as follows: Gathering revenues increased by approximately $4 million; processing revenues increased by approximately $3 million; total cost and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization; pass-through costs and net of our proportional share of Little Missouri 4 earnings increased by approximately $2 million, primarily from higher seasonal maintenance and employee costs.

That resulted in adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2025 of $321 million. Our gross adjusted EBITDA margin for the third quarter was maintained at approximately 80%, above our 75% target highlighting our continued strong operating leverage. Third quarter capital expenditures were approximately $80 million and net interest, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, was approximately $54 million, resulting in adjusted free cash flow of approximately $187 million. We had a drawn balance of $356 million on our revolving credit facility at quarter end. In January, we announced we are targeting annual distribution per Class A share growth of at least 5% through 2027, which is supported by our existing MVCs.

Last week, we announced our third quarter distribution that included our targeted 5% annual growth per Class A share and an additional increase utilizing the excess adjusted free cash flow available for distributions following the $100 million share repurchase completed in the third quarter. Turning to guidance. For the fourth quarter of we expect net income to be approximately $170 million to $180 million and adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $315 million to $325 million, reflecting scheduled maintenance and lower third-party volumes as discussed in our September guidance release. We are narrowing our full year guidance for net income to $685 million to $695 million and for adjusted EBITDA to $1.245 billion to $1.255 billion, implying EBITDA growth of approximately 10% year-on-year at the midpoint of the guidance range.

Consistent with the suspension of the Kappa gas plants and the removal of the project from our forward plans, we now expect capital expenditures of approximately $270 million and adjusted free cash flow of approximately $760 million to $770 million. With distributions per Class A share targeted to grow at least 5% annually from the higher distribution level, we now expect excess adjusted free cash flow of approximately $140 million after fully funding our targeted growing distributions. We expect continued adjusted free cash flow growth through 2027 to support our targeted annual distribution per Class A share growth of at least 5% through 2027. And financial flexibility for incremental return of capital, including potential share repurchases.

As Jonathan mentioned, we will release guidance for 2026 and our 2028 MVCs after completing our budget process in December. We remain committed to our ongoing strategy, which prioritizes return of capital to shareholders. This concludes my remarks. We will be happy to answer any questions. I'll now turn the call over to the operator.

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet from JPMorgan Securities LLC.

Hi. Good morning. Just wanted to dive in a little bit more on, I guess, Bakken trends here. And just wondering if you could talk a bit on how GORs are trending over time and how you think that projects going forward at this point impacting your business?

Okay, sure. As you know, in historically, has not had increasing GORs because they've had a very active program Chevron now operating 3 rigs, certainly, as an active program that tends to keep lower than in the program where you have less rigs and less activity. But in general, as we've talked about, our expectation is based on the new guidance that we gave out 3 rigs that Chevron is running, we expect to maintain oil to plateau and then gas to increase over time, and that basically is driven by GORs.

Because at this point, we're really at almost full gas capture. So really the trend in gas is really going to be GR driven. So with that, that will really continue to drive growth for Hess Midstream over the long term as gas represents 75% of our revenues.

Got it. That's helpful. And then given that backdrop and not to get too far ahead of ourselves here, I was just wondering if you could provide any thoughts into 2020 beyond how MVCs might be shaping up expectations there, given Chevron moving to 3 rigs as you described there.

Yes. I'd say, look, we're going to finish our development planning here with Chevron, will approve our budget in December, and then we'll give our guidance, including 2026 guidance, but also our 2020 MVC. So we'll just wait until then, it's not too far away.

Got it. Just the last one for me. We've seen some volatility in the share price here. Just wondering if you could provide any thoughts, I guess, on the cadence or approach to buybacks in the future?

Yes, I can talk to that one. And I think as we can see at the moment, our leverage is at 3x. And we guided in September that we would have flat EBITDA in 2026 and then we'd return to growth in 2027. However, we would have significantly lower CapEx, as Jonathan mentioned, that will be an assist to our free cash flow. And then we'll also be able to have our 5% growth on distributions continue. And so we feel very comfortable that we'll have the financial flexibility through 2027 and to continue with our capital repurchase or capital returns policy and any share -- potential share repurchases.

Our next question comes from the line of Doug Irwin from Citi.

Maybe to start on the CapEx outlook. You've talked about kind of expecting significantly lower CapEx over the next couple of years, and I know we're about to get guidance in a month or I think in the past, you've put out $125 million is kind of what you view as more of a base level they'll connect to run rate going forward. Is that kind of the right way to think about the starting point for '26? Or are there maybe still some additional discrete growth projects in the backlog that we should be looking at next year as well.

Sure. Let me start, and then I'll hand over to Mike. I mean, I think in general, as we said, historically, $125 million is our expected ongoing capital. That includes well connects, as you mentioned as well as maintaining third parties at about 10% of our volumes. I think certainly, we said we're going to be significantly lower than the original guidance we had of $250 million to $300 million for '26 and '27.

I think we do have some small growth projects, so it might be slightly above that 125, but somewhere between that $125 million and significantly below the $250 million to $300 million, again, we'll give guidance coming up here. once we complete the business plan, but that gives you at least some kind of a range to think about.

Let me turn it over to Mike. Just anything you want to add there?

Yes. Thanks, Jonathan. And just like I said, just now, I'd just say that the lower capital expenditure that we're expecting that will drive continued growth in our free cash flow will support financial flexibility for incremental return of capital and that includes any potential buybacks.

And just to underline that, that already starts next year, right? So we had expected, as I said, $250 million to $300 million previously in 2026. So next year already, we'll already see the benefit of that lower capital. And so while we had talked about EBITDA being flat, relatively flat next year, and again, we'll give more details in the upcoming guidance but do you expect next year to see growth in free cash flow, and that will provide the flexibility for return on capital as early as next year.

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just a higher level one, given some of the changes that the sponsor here. And I realize you can't speak to Chevron, but just wondering if you could comment on how that relationship has evolved now that you've had a few quarters under your belt working with them as your sponsor. And more specifically, just any updated thoughts on how Hess Midstream kind of fits with them their broader strategy here moving forward and how that maybe feeds into your growth outlook and capital allocation from here.

Sure. I'll leave the last part to Chevron. But in terms of how is it going, we're working our way through now integration and it's gone very well. The board -- new board with the new Chevron Board Directors has met obviously several times, and we've approved 2 distribution increases. I think both our base targeted 5% annual increase as well as 2 distribution level increases, 1 this week following repurchase we also approved the share repurchase that we did there in the third quarter. So going really well, really at the Board level, continuing to execute on plan. We're focused on running Hess safely and efficiently focused on capital discipline and continue to execute our capital framework for our shareholders.

So also I would say that as we announced the May were underway for the search for a fourth independent Board member. So going very well, working very well with Chevron. It's a natural fit for us and looking forward to continuing.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Praneeth Satish from Wells Fargo.

Maybe just first, starting on 2026. So you kind of mentioned that it's going to be flat with 2026 EBITDA is going to be flat with 2025. So I guess the first question is, why would it be flat if we're seeing rising gas volumes? Is there something there kind of offsetting that. And then as a follow-up to that, Chevron is reducing the rig count, but I think potentially moving towards longer laterals than what Hess did. So is that kind of baked into that outlook for '26 and '27 kind of moving to longer laterals? Or would you consider that upside?

Sure. I can -- I'll kind of answer both those together. Really early guidance that we gave out recently was really designed to provide a shape for our guidance based on our current expectations after we complete the business plan process in December, we'll provide more detailed guidance for 2026, and that's going to include, of course, a range for volumes as well as EBITDA and other financial metrics as we always do. Of course, that final EBITDA range is going to be a combination of oil and gas volumes rates, including our inflation escalator, OpEx expectations.

And of course, the business plan -- development plan that we get from Chevron will incorporate their expectations in terms of increased efficiencies and productivities, including things like longer laterals, as you said. I think critically, I think I just want to reemphasize what I just said earlier there that we expect continued growth in free cash flow as a capital plan reduces with the removal of the gas plant. So still under any scenario, expecting that continued growth in free cash flow. And again, we'll give more details in a range of outcomes when we give out our EBITDA guidance and our annual guidance after the budget is completed and we finished Board approval in December. Mike, anything you want to add on to that?

No, I think you summarized it well, Jonathan. And I think we will obviously provide the updated guidance after the finalization of the plan in December. But I think, no, we've got a good runway with financial flexibility towards 2027 at the very least, and we'll update when we get the 2028 MVCs.

Got you. No, that's helpful. And then I guess based on your discussions, recent discussions here with Chevron, they move to a 3-rig program. Are there any indications that they might further reduce the rig activity and go to 2-rigs? Is that kind of in some of the conversations you're having? And then just conceptually, if that were to happen, should we roughly think about oil maybe declining a bit and gas volumes to be flat with rising GORs? I understand maybe that's not your base case, but just trying to frame downside risk.

Sure. I mean I think let's just start with the base case. As you said, currently, shares running 4 rigs as they said they expect to release the rig in the fourth quarter. As we've said, 3 rigs, again, oil plateau in 2026 and gas will continue to grow at least 2027 and then we'll give again more update when we give out our guidance for 2016 and then through I think it's important to note, Chevron, just last week, you announced and said in the call that their goal is to maintain a plateau at 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day for the foreseeable future. That model works really well for the Hess Midstream model where we're focused on long-term execution.

And at that level, 200,000 barrels oil per day that provides ongoing free cash flow generation and ongoing financial flexibility. Also would highlight, of course, as we've always said, the 5% dividend growth can be delivered even at MVC levels. So in terms of our return of capital program, that's always kind of at the base and that's well protected. And above and beyond that, we at 200,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, we expect ongoing free cash flow that can generate incremental financial flexibility on that. So I don't want to speculate beyond that. And -- but again, we'll give more details on our current plan and expectations when we finish our budget and development plan here in December.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of John McKay from Goldman Sachs.

I want to pick up on that last question a little bit. Can you just -- I know you guys go through this every year, but can you just remind us how the 2028 MVCs will be set again effectively what kind of plan does Chevron kind of need to walk you through and it's just interesting because it's going to be our first time doing it with them. Just curious if that's going to differ at all from the Hess process before.

Yes. There's no change to the process. The process is really baked into the commercial agreements that we have now with Chevron. And the process is essentially they deliver to us their development plan through the end of the term of the contract. We develop a system plan, which is really the infrastructure required to develop that plan. And then essentially, the MVC is set at 80% of the third year of that development plan. So that's really no change. It's a very mechanical type process. Obviously, we work together to put together that development plan and system plan together with the goal of optimizing the Bakken, that's a win-win and in everyone's best interest. But in terms of the process of the mechanics of a MVC, that's really the process that's defined in the commercial agreements, and that hasn't changed at all.

That's helpful. And then maybe just one clarification. I think if we go through what you guys have been talking about before, you guys are pretty comfortable, I think, arguing that the 200 a day run rate that Chevron wants to flow. That can be hit on the 3-rig program. So the 4 would have put you, I guess, decently about that. Is that the implication?

Yes. I think what I would say is, and you could see that in our previous guidance before we updated it. That was based on a 4-rig program, and we had growth in both oil and gas and the gas being a function of the oil growth and obviously associated gas you're going to have growth in gas plus then just GOR is increasing as well. So then now under the current plan, you're really seeing oil plateau and gas continue to grow. So yes, the implication there is that previously in 4 rigs because of the efficiencies and productivities that has now, Chevron has been able to achieve, they were able to achieve what they're able to get historically at 4-rigs, they were able to now get a 3-rig and continuing to run at 4-rigs would have really taken you above that goal of plateauing a 200,000 BOE per day.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2025 Hess Midstream Conference Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions]. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Gordon, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Gigi. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for participating in our second quarter earnings conference call. Our earnings release was issued this morning and appears on our website, www.hessmidstream.com.

Today's conference call contains projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in such statements. These risks include those set forth in the Risk Factors section of Hess Midstream's filings with the SEC.

Also on today's conference call, we may discuss certain GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the earnings release.

With me today are Jonathan Stein, Chief Executive Officer; John Gatling, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Mike Chadwick, Chief Financial Officer. I'll now turn the call over to Jonathan Stein.

Thanks, Jennifer. Welcome, everyone, to our second quarter 2025 earnings call. I have a few opening comments, and then I'll hand the call over to John Gatling to review our operations and Mike Chadwick to review our financials.

I wanted to first say that we are all excited and eager to work together with our new Chevron colleagues to continue to drive value for our shareholders. Our new board members, including our new Chair, [ Andy Walls], Chevron's President of Downstream, Midstream and Chemicals have significant experience across the upstream, midstream and downstream businesses and complement the operational and financial expertise of our current Board members.

I am also excited to welcome Mike Chadwick to his new role as Chief Financial Officer of Hess Midstream. I've worked alongside Mike for the past 20 years as these progress through various financial roles at Hess Corporation, and we are fortunate to have his experience and leadership capabilities working with the midstream.

I am also excited to step into my new role as CEO of Hess Midstream. Since our IPO, we have created value for shareholders through operational excellence and execution that drives a visible trajectory of growth and supported by a financial strategy that includes a differentiated combination of balance sheet strength and a priority on shareholder returns. With the continuity of the midstream team in place, we are excited to take this strategy forward as we continue to build Hess Midstream with a unique combination of sector-leading growth and shareholder returns.

Today, I want to focus briefly on 3 themes. First, we continue to deliver outstanding operational performance, which you can see reflected in the quarter that we reported today and also in our fourth annual sustainability report, which we issued a few weeks ago and which highlights our commitment and track record of safe and reliable execution.

In the second quarter, throughput increased across all segments, and we are in line with our annual guidance for volumes to grow by approximately 10% across all oil and gas systems in 2025 compared with 2024. Second, we continue to deliver outstanding financial performance. We are estimating an approximate 11% increase and adjusted EBITDA growth in 2025, with approximately 7% growth at the midpoint in the second half of the year.

With total expected capital expenditures of approximately $300 million, we expect to generate adjusted free cash flow of approximately $725 million to $775 million, which more than covers our targeted 5% annual distribution growth and generate excess free cash flow.

And third, we are committed to our ongoing financial strategy, which prioritizes return of capital to our shareholders and has made Hess Midstream's total shareholder return yield, one of the highest of our midstream peers, while also maintaining one of the lowest leverage ratios.

Highlighting our balance sheet strength, last week has Midstream's senior unsecured debt was upgraded by S&P to an investment-grade rating of BBB- following the close of the Chevron Hess merger. Since 2021, we have returned greater than $2 billion to shareholders through accretive repurchases and have increased our distribution per Class A share by more than 60% to 5% targeted annual distribution growth and distribution level increases following each share repurchase transaction.

We expect to generate greater than $1.25 billion of financial flexibility through 2027 for incremental shareholder returns, including the potential for further unit and share repurchases over this period. With a consistent strategy at Hess Midstream, we are excited for the future. We have a visible trajectory of growth that underpins our unique and differentiated financial strategy with a continued focus on consistent and ongoing return of capital to our shareholders. With that, I'll hand the call over to John to review our operational performance for the second quarter.

Thanks, Jonathan. Today, I'll discuss our second quarter performance, then Mike will review our financial results and guidance.

In the second quarter, Hess Midstream delivered record operating performance. throughput volumes averaged 449 million cubic foot per day for gas processing, 137,000 barrels of oil per day for crude terminalling and 138,000 barrels of water per day for water gathering. Throughput increased across all segments of our business, with gas processing and oil terminaling volumes increasing by approximately 6% and 10%, respectively, from the first quarter, primarily driven by outstanding upstream production performance and high midstream system availability.

Turning to Hess Midstream guidance. We're again reaffirming our previously announced full year 2025 oil and gas throughput guidance. In the third quarter, we expect volume growth from the second quarter across our oil and gas systems, partially offset by higher seasonal maintenance activity.

Turning to Hess Midstream's capital program. Our multiyear projects continue as planned. In 2025, we remain focused on the completion of 2 new compressor stations and associated gathering systems as well as continuing to progress the Capa gas plant. Full year 2025 capital expenditures remain unchanged and are expected to total approximately $300 million.

In summary, we remain focused on executing our strategy of disciplined low-risk investments to meet basin demand while maintaining reliable operations and strong financial performance. We expect our growth strategy to generate sustainable cash flow and create opportunities to return capital to our shareholders. I'll now turn the call over to Mike to review our financial results and guidance.

Thanks, John, and good afternoon, everyone. I wanted to say first that I'm really excited to join the Hess Midstream team and look forward to meeting you in the future. Today, I'm going to review our results for the second quarter and our financial guidance and then we will open the call for questions.

For the second quarter of 2025, net income was $180 million compared to $161 million for the first quarter. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 was $316 million compared to $292 million for the first quarter.

The increase in adjusted EBITDA relative to the first quarter was primarily attributable to the following: total revenues, excluding pass-through revenues, increased by approximately $30 million, primarily driven by higher throughput volumes resulting in segment revenue changes as follows: gathering revenues increased by approximately $16 million, processing revenues increased by approximately $9 million, terminaling revenues increased by approximately $4 million and third-party services and other income increased by approximately $1 million.

Total costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization, pass-through costs and net of our proportional share of LM4 earnings increased by approximately $6 million, primarily from higher seasonal maintenance activity and third-party processing fees. This resulted in adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2025 of $316 million. Our gross adjusted EBITDA margin for the second quarter was maintained at approximately 80%, above our 75% target, highlighting our continued strong operating leverage.

Second quarter capital expenditures were approximately $70 million and net interest, excluding amortization of deferred finance costs, was approximately $52 million, resulting in adjusted free cash flow of approximately $194 million. We had a drawn balance of $273 million on our revolving credit facility at quarter end.

In January, we announced that we are targeting annual distribution per Class A share growth of at least 5% through 2027 which is supported by our existing [ MVCs]. This week, we announced our second quarter distribution that included our targeted 5% annual growth per Class A share and an additional increase utilizing the excess adjusted free cash flow available for distributions following the repurchase.

Turning to guidance. For the third quarter of 2025, we expect net income to be approximately $175 million to $185 million and adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $315 million to $325 million, reflecting higher volumes and revenues, partially offset by seasonally higher maintenance costs.

We also expect CapEx to increase in the third quarter, consistent with seasonally higher activity levels. For the full year 2025, we are updating net income and adjusted free cash flow guidance to include the impact of an incremental $15 million in expected interest expense, mainly on higher debt balance following the repurchase transactions completed so far this year.

The updated net income guidance also includes the impact of an incremental $15 million in expected income tax expense resulting from ownership changes following the previously completed secondary equity offerings and repurchase transactions. As a result, we now expect net income of $685 million to $735 million.

We are maintaining our adjusted EBITDA guidance range of $1.225 billion to $1.285 billion implying growth of approximately 7% in adjusted EBITDA at the midpoint in the second half of the year. With total expected capital expenditures of approximately $300 million, we now expect to generate adjusted free cash flow of approximately $725 million to $775 million.

With distributions per Class A share targeted to grow at least 5% annually from the new higher distribution level, we expect excess adjusted free cash flow of approximately $125 million after fully funding our targeted growing distributions.

We continue to have more than $1.25 billion of financial flexibility through 2027, that can be used for continued execution of our return of capital framework, including potential ongoing unit and share repurchases. This concludes my remarks. We will be happy to answer any questions. And I will now turn the call over to the operator.

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet from JPMorgan Securities LLC.

This is [indiscernible] on for Jeremy. I wanted to start off with the Hess deal now closed, if you guys have any insight into Chevron's view on the Bakken and whether the rig count there could change and if there were to be changed, could you remind us of the sensitivity to HESM in terms of the EBITDA growth you guys have laid out in the expectation for higher volumes across the systems in '26 and '27?

Yes. Maybe I'll touch on it and then Jonathan and Mike can hit it as well. But just from our perspective, we're currently running 4 rigs. We've seen very strong upstream performance level delivery with our increased laterals and the midstream availability has just been phenomenal. We'll continue to execute strongly and stay focused on that. And as we -- every year, we'll update our development plan as we get an update with Chevron coming in as our sponsor. So that will happen at the -- towards the end of the year, and then we'll be issuing guidance in January.

Got it. And then turning to capital allocation. I wondering if you could talk a little bit specifically about your appetite for buybacks at current prices. And with [ GIP ] sell down now complete, if we should think about any change in the magnitude of repurchases going forward.

Yes. So with buybacks, as we announced in January, we have about $1.25 billion of financial flexibility through 2027, and we expect to do multiple repurchases a year as we've done in the past. So there's no change to that guidance. As we previously mentioned, our January repurchase that was in lieu of not having completed a repurchase in Q4 of last year. Our May repurchase of $200 million which included the public for the first time. That got us back into our cadence of about $100 million every quarter. However, the size of that is not set in stone. But generally, $100 million a quarter is what we will be completing as we have done over the last couple of years.

And this is Jonathan. As we said at the beginning, as I said in my comments, overall, there's no change to our strategy in terms of our business strategy and to our financial strategy. And you saw that just this week we issued, as Mike said, our quarterly dividend announcement on Monday night that included our distribution level increase as well as the $200 million increase on the $200 million share buyback that we did earlier.

So really no change in our return on capital program going forward. You mentioned [ GP], obviously, [ JP ] out in terms of secondaries. That's not something that we expect. But in terms of return on capital, which is really always focused on that framework that continues as is.

Our next question comes from the line of [indiscernible] from UBS.

I was wondering how are you guys seeing [ GORs ] trending in the near term? And along with that, what's your outlook on the Bakken for heading into 3Q?

Yes. So the [ GORs ] really haven't changed. As the basin matures over the longer term, GORs are expected to increase, which they're acting as exactly as we would expect them to. Looking at the North Dakota Pipeline Authority, [ Justin Krinsted ] and the team there are kind of looking at longer-term basin growth in the gas space.

And it is anticipated that Bakken gas is going to grow over the long term. And we would expect the Hess and Chevron Bakken volumes to basically do the same trend the same way. So we're expecting oil to remain in the pipeline authorities forecast, they're expecting oil to remain flattish with gas growing over the longer term.

Got it. And then could you detail where gas processing volumes are at now over the past months? Any changes to note? Just trying to understand the cadence and same with oil terminal.

Yes. I think generally speaking, we've seen and expect to continue to see the growth through the end of the year as our guidance has supported that. So again, we had a very, very strong second quarter. We do continue to expect to see growth in the third and fourth quarters and finish the year at guidance.

So I would say you would continue to see that grow through '26, '27 as the MVCs have kind of outlined. And again, if there's any changes to the development plan that will happen as part of our normal annual development pro process, and that will be updated in January.

Our next question comes from the line of Doug Irwin from Citi.

Congrats, Jonathan, Mike, on the new roles as well. I'm just trying to start with the guidance range here. If I just take the first half guidance, first half '25 guidance, just in the aggregate, I think you're turning about $15 million above the guided midpoint year-to-date and now third quarter is pointing to a bit more growth from here. Is it fair to say you're turning above the annual midpoint at this point? Or are there may be some variances versus your initial outlook that has kind of shifted around the timing throughout the year here versus your initial second half expectations?

Maybe I'll touch on the operational side, and then I can hand it over to Mike and Jonathan. But overall, again, we had an extremely strong second quarter, very little weather impact, essentially no maintenance activity. Coming out of the first quarter, which was a bit more challenging, we were really just trying to stabilize operations, and I think we are very pleased with how both the upstream perform, but also how the midstream performed we're going to continue to see that growth going into the third and fourth quarters.

But as we transition in, we are expecting to see a little bit more maintenance in the second half of the year. And that will probably be kind of in the later part of the year. We're still kind of planning all of the activity, but there's still some room there. And we're -- again, I think we're still very comfortable with the guidance that we've got currently.

Yes. Thanks, John. And I'll just tag on the back of that as we have seen -- we're keeping our adjusted EBITDA guidance for the year, which already includes quite a lot of growth baked into the second half. As Jonathan said and I said in my notes, taking the midpoint of our full year guidance, we expect about 7% higher EBITDA in the second half of the year compared to the first half.

And so while revenues are expected to grow on higher volumes, as John described, phasing of maintenance costs means expenses are expected to be higher in Q3 and we also retained some winter weather contingency in Q4. And while winter where they can also lower maintenance costs, Q4 also typically see some variability in our allocation costs. So we're keeping guidance there for the second quarter.

Okay. That's helpful. And then -- maybe another on buybacks, just asking a slightly different way. It's obviously early on in the relationship with Chevron here. I'm just curious if you expect them to participate in buybacks kind of similar to how Hess did or will buybacks going forward pretty much be entirely dependent on buying back shares from public owners. And to the extent that you are buying back more public shares does just general liquidity of those public shares impact kind of your ability to maintain the run rate kind of in a smooth cadence as you have in the past?

Sure. This is Jonathan. Yes. Look, there's no change. As we had said in the past, when we had secondaries and buybacks happening simultaneously, there are really 2 separate objectives. While the secondaries were changing ownership level. The buyback program is really just a return of capital program.

And so you would expect over time that we'll have the same participation, more closer to the relative proportional levels of the public and Chevron going forward. So really no change to our approach there. We did include, as you know, now we have the kind of [ road tested alcohol use ] the ASR process last time to include the public in our buyback program and have that mechanism available for us to be able to do that going forward as well.

So really no change there. And in terms of our liquidity, I think you've seen that our liquidity has continue to increase as we did all the secondary transactions and the public ownership went up or liquidity at this point in average -- a trading volume is more than sufficient to handle our buyback program at the level that we've done in the past and expect to do going forward.

Our next question comes from the line of Praneeth Satish from Wells Fargo.

Also congrats, Jonathan and Michael on the new roles. Maybe can you just provide any more context around GIP's decision to exit its investment in Hess Midstream back in May? I mean selling down their stake. So it wasn't really a surprise. But I guess why do it in May versus maybe after the merger with Chevron?

Sure. So as you know, we've -- over the past 3 years plus, we've been executing secondaries in a very disciplined fashion. Each one increasing in size generally over time and with increasingly tighter discounts, a very disciplined approach. GIP saw an opportunity, as we always said, the second were based on demand from investors, and then [ JP ] would assess that relative to their value proposition expectations and that opportunity existed in May and so they continue taking that opportunity.

They, of course, have their own investors and time line and really, really executing relative to demand and the expectations really independent of at that point, any potential merger timing. So really just continuing the disciplined execution that we had in the past an opportunity presented itself.

Got it. And then maybe as a follow-up, I guess, right or wrong, some investors have viewed GIP is providing an independent voice that's kind of helped balance the sponsor interest with those of the public. So I guess with GIP now out, how do you think about the new governance structure versus having that third-party institutional investor at the table?

Sure. Yes. No, we agree that one of our differentiating strengths relative to other sponsored midstream companies has been our balanced governance and certainly with GIP. Historically part of the Board that provided some level of that.

So consistent with that approach, as you saw, we updated our governance in June following the GIP's exit, and that included that certain key decisions require the approval of 1 independent director. That includes things like leverage above a certain level, issuing equity or major capital decision, among other key strategic decisions. That mechanism is now in place.

As you know, we're adding also a fourth independent Board member, but this mechanism is in place independent of the number of Board members at the time or the timing of the fourth independent member joining the Board. So I think it really highlights our continued belief in the value of a balanced government that we've had historically. And then with this new mechanism in place that we will continue to have going forward.

Our next question comes from the line of John Mackay from Goldman Sachs.

I wanted to pick up a little bit more on the Chevron side. I totally understand it's early, and you'll have your annual review of activity levels later in the year. But has it been talking about this kind of 2000 [ BOE ] a day target for a long time, and then we've kind of thought about that as the reasonable run rate for the footprint.

Could you maybe just -- and acknowledging that can, I guess, change, but can you maybe just remind us kind of how that 200 a day level was set kind of what the thought process behind it was? And then maybe from that any read on why that might be the right level going forward?

Again, I think as we think about the 200,000 barrels a day it was really kind of hitting the over 100,000 barrels a day of gross oil or of net oil and then the gas growth over time. And as we've been doing just from an overall field development plan perspective, as we've really been trying to optimize the upstream drilling activity with the midstream infrastructure plan.

And so it's really about having the infrastructure in place and then keeping that infrastructure as utilized as it possibly can be. And so we -- when we looked at the build over time and looked at the infrastructure development and kind of where we felt like the development -- the field development from a drilling perspective was happening, we felt like that, that 200,000 barrels a day is about the right level.

So outside of the 2 compressor stations that we're building this year were in the process of progressing the Capa gas plant. As far as material long-term infrastructure activity, we're kind of at that level where the infrastructure is stable. And so from our perspective, we're kind of looking at this as how does the drilling activity and the infrastructure system really complement each other so that you get very, very high utilization of that equipment and really optimize the system itself.

So that's really kind of where we are and how we've continued to look at it. And as we continue to look longer term, we'll look at our development plan again, which, again, it's a very integrated activity between the upstream and the midstream. That will happen in the fall, and then we'll be updating our longer-term guidance in January.

This is Jonathan. One thing just to highlight, John really picked it up on the end, and I think it's important to highlight at this stage, which is one of the historic strengths of Hess Midstream has been the partnership that we've had between the upstream and the midstream between Hess Midstream and the upstream it has to be able to develop the Bakken in the most optimal way.

And now as we go forward with Chevron, there's no change to that partnership. There's no change to the focus on both of us working together to optimize the Bakken and develop it, as John described, and as you said, the normal process will continue, where we get an updated development plan, we'll figure out what's the right infrastructure required to meet that development plan going forward and then we'll update our guidance based on that going forward. So really continuing in that strong partnership that has really been a hallmark of our relationship historically.

That's helpful. And that's all clear. Maybe just one related one. Since you've seen kind of increased efficiencies on the upstream side there. Just what's been the latest commentary around related inventory life?

Yes. I mean I think we're still -- everybody gets still hung up on rig count and well counts and all of that. And really as we move into an extended lateral program, it really is the lateral footage drilled. And so from our perspective, the overall lateral footage that's been drilled as far as what's available to develop really remains unchanged.

And in fact, we're actually seeing a little bit of growth in that space just from the standpoint of as those extended laterals become a bigger part of the portfolio, that creates opportunities for improved economics on those wells where they may be in more challenged areas. But if you're drilling a 3, 4-mile lateral, your -- the economics get much better, and that unlocks some of the rock that may have been challenged before. So I think we're -- we continue to be extremely optimistic in that space, and that's something that continues to be a tailwind for us as we look forward for the basin development.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.