Gruppo MutuiOnline Aktie

Good afternoon. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the presentation of Moltiply Group First Half 2026 Results. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Marco Pescarmona, Chairman; Mr. Alessandro Fracassi, CEO; and Mr. Francesco Masciandaro, CFO. Please go ahead.

Well, thank you, and welcome, everybody, to our first half '26 call. This is Marco, and I will start commenting the results starting from Page 19 of our presentation. The presentation is on our Investor Relations website. And so let's start with the revenues. Revenues in the first half '26 are EUR 343.1 million. That's up 13.7% year-on-year and the composition is 63% from Mavriq Division and 37% from Moltiply BPO and Tech.

The EBITDA in the 6 months is EUR 93.4 million. This is up 20.8% year-on-year and this stands for 65% from Mavriq and 35% from Moltiply BPO and Tech. The EBITDA margin is 27.2%, which compares to the 25.6% of the same period of the previous year. The EBIT is EUR 55.9 million. That's up 14.7% compared to the previous year. And finally, the net income is EUR 37.1 million and that's up 69% year-on-year.

And of course, you know that the results are the sum of the 2 quarters and that in the first quarter -- in the first quarter of '25, Verivox was not consolidated yet. So you will remember we had a strong performance in Q1, both good organic performance and the consolidation of Verivox that was a big addition to our performance.

If we only look at the second quarter, we are on Page 20, the results are different, and they are overall in line or possibly even slightly better than what we explained in the Q1 conference call. The revenues in the second quarter are EUR 160.4 million, and that's down 5% year-on-year. And the mix is 60% from Mavriq and 40% from Moltiply BPO and Tech. The EBITDA in the second quarter is EUR 42.1 million, that is flat year-on-year, and accounts for 60% from Mavriq and 40% from Moltiply BPO and Tech. The EBIT is EUR 23.6 million, that is minus 1.5%, and that accounts for 57% from Mavriq and 43% from Moltiply BPO and Tech. And finally, the net income is EUR 14.2 million, and that's up 42% year-on-year.

Here, I think to comment and explain these results and what they mean and where they come from, it's better to look at the 2 divisions separately. So -- and well, I think we can rapidly look at the first half, but then the most interesting part is the second quarter for the 2 divisions. So for Mavriq in the first half, the revenues are EUR 217.4 million. That's up 31.7% year-on-year, but this again includes the consolidation of Verivox.

The EBITDA adjusted for PPA amortization, we started providing this figure, the full year results, we are giving it here again, is EUR 51.9 million. That's up. Sorry the EBIT adjusted. No, let me read it the other way. The EBITDA is EUR 60.9 million in the 6 months. That's up 26.7% year-on-year and it's an EBITDA margin of 28% compared to the 29.1% of the previous year. Here, we are providing also the EBIT adjusted for the PPA amortization as we started doing in the full year results of '25. And this basically tends to track EBITDA because it normalizes the effect of acquisitions. And this figure was EUR 51.9 million for the first half, and that's up 23% year-on-year. And finally, the EBIT is, as reported is EUR 37.1 million, that's up 11.4% year-on-year.

But again, the first half results are really the average of 2 very different quarters. And the update really is the second quarter. And on Page 22, we have the figures for Mavriq for the second quarter. And basically, revenues are EUR 96.9 million. That's minus 1.5% year-on-year. And this is a bit better maybe than what we expected. You remember, we said we would expect a contraction driven by the difficulties in the energy business because of the Iran war. And this happened, but the impact on the revenues overall, considering all the different business lines was negative low single digit.

The EBITDA in the first -- in the second quarter is EUR 25.2 million. That's down 6.4% year-on-year and this is also possibly a bit better than what one could have expected. Of course, we invested a little bit more in marketing to compensate in part from decreasing demand, especially in energy and this also we have fixed costs. So it's quite normal that in this type of situation, we have a bigger contraction in EBITDA than in revenues. And finally, you have the EBIT figure that I'm not going to comment because this is really affected by how and when we started doing the PPA exercise for Verivox the year before. So this is really not meaningful in the second quarter of the past year, there was no amortization of goodwill linked to Verivox. It went in the fourth quarter.

So this is the picture of Mavriq. And this is a picture that, of course, it's not a great picture after many quarters of growth, but it's possibly a bit better than expected. And starting from this, we try to give an idea of possible expectations for the future, even if it's very difficult to have a clear visibility because on the energy side, there is a lot of uncertainty. So we said in Q2, what happened? Basically, what was expected. So we had 2 businesses that had significant headwinds. One was energy because the market, especially in March, in April and May was really not functioning very well, and it started operating a bit better. So there was less switching in general in Italy and Germany in particular.

But also, the credit markets were suffering in different ways in different countries like in Italy, the mortgage market is still down -- was down in the second quarter year-on-year. In Germany, where we have loans business, the market is also suffering and the banks are restricted. And so these are the 2 things that -- as we said at the beginning of the quarter that were hindering our performance. Whereas on the positive side, we had growth in Mavriq Insurance so this was the only area where we had real growth. And Mavriq Shopping instead remained stable, which is an improvement over the previous quarters.

Now what to expect? We believe also because, of course, we have visibility of a portion a good portion of the period. We believe that the performance of Mavriq Energy and Telco, which is mainly energy will be better year-on-year compared to Q2, even if the market still is up and down. And by the way, July look good. August is a slower month and September is a bit uncertain, especially in these days, there are many things happening and it's not clear where it will go. But I mean, I would say, in general, we expect Q3 for energy to do better year-on-year than Q2 that had a very poor beginning of the quarter.

Also in banking, the comparison year-on-year becomes easier. So this should also be a bit more favorable. And for shopping and insurance, there are no things that are basically expected to be comparable to Q2. So the things that were really suffering are going to do better and the things that we are doing well or okay, they are expected to continue. So overall, Q3 will be -- year-on-year, we expect it to be a better quarter than Q2.

It's very difficult to say to have expectations for Q4 because again, this is mostly energy. So I would say I mean in energy, hopefully, this is a big quarter for demand, et cetera. If the market is functioning, this could be a good quarter. So back to normal growth, but you cannot rule out disruptions today. And so I think that one could have like Q3 that is something with some recovery, but not full recovery in Q4 that has full recovery, but there is uncertainty for Q4. So it's impossible to say that Q4 will be back to normal growth or where it will be because again, we are in the hands of the American President and a lot of other unpredictable people.

And finally, we can comment on some positive news that came out in July and then with more details a couple of days ago. Basically with respect to shopping, the European Commission issued a decision against Google for violating the self-favoring prohibition of the Digital Markets Act. And this is very positive. I would say it was expected last year with all the pressure lobbying, et cetera, even things that are expected, you cannot take them for granted. But this happened. And actually, it's a very good decision. I think it's worth reading it, especially if you follow the company in detail. And basically, this decision explains that the shopping box, the box with the different apps that is shown at the top of the Google search results. This is a comparison shopping service, and it's very explicit about this. And for this reason, they say self-favoring is continuing because Google is putting this in the search results and competitors don't have the same opportunity.

And the implications of this are twofold. One, this is a further reinforcement to what everybody in our sector says, which is that the Google abuse of self-favoring didn't terminate in 2017, but continued and is still continuing. So this is like a very clear confirmation of this. And also the other potential outcome is that Google will have to come up with remedies. And the decision is very specific. So the remedies, if they have to be compliant, have to get rid of this box or to give competitors the possibility to appear with another box. We don't know if Google will comply or not because it didn't happen in the past. So we don't know if it will happen now.

We will find out in the coming weeks. But again, we have now a good legal anchoring for further steps and the indications seem to be that they want to ensure compliance. Again, it's not clear what will happen if compliance is not established, how enforcement will work. But in terms of what is okay, what is not okay, I think the decision is very explicit. And that's why I think it's very interesting reading. And with this, I think we and possibly depending on the compliance mechanism, this could have possibly a favorable impact maybe -- well, certainly not in Q3, but possibly in Q4 or afterwards for Trovaprezzi. With this, I'm done with the update on Mavriq and hand it over to Alessandro for Moltiply BPO and Tech.

Yes. Thanks, Marco, and hello, everyone. We are on Page 24. Situation on the Moltiply BPO and Tech side is slightly different than the one that Marco described for Mavriq, meaning that there is more continuity in the results of Q1 and Q2, and therefore, there's not much to read in comparing H1 or Q2. Those basically, the messages are similar. And I would say that also looking forward, we're looking at very, very similar continuing trends for Q3 and the rest of the year, obviously, also it's always taking into account seasonality.

So on Page 24, you see revenues are down 8%. Here, it's important to note that this is an impact due mainly to the really shrinking refinancing market in mortgages. If we take away the pass-through value of notary services, meaning the ones that we invoice to banks, but we have exactly the equal amount that is invoiced to us by notaries, the revenues would have grown 3.7%, so more in line with the rest of what you see here. And EBITDA grew double digit as we expected. Actually, the reason -- so it grew faster than revenues, even the revenues net of notary services grew from EUR 29.3 million to EUR 32.5 million. That's 11.1%. And it means that we see a growth in the EBITDA margin from 21.4% to 25.9%.

The EBIT adjusted for PPA amortization shows a growth of 4.1% from EUR 23.9 million to EUR 24.8 million. And EBIT instead has a growth of 21.9% year-on-year from EUR 15.4 million to EUR 18.8 million. If we look at Q2 financials, you will see similar messages. Actually, the decrease in revenues is a little stronger. It's 9.9%. But again, even here, you would have seen growth in revenues if you take out the impact of the pass-through notary costs that we invoice to banks.

The EBITDA grew 12.1% year-on-year from EUR 15.1 million to EUR 16.9 million, the EBITDA margin grew from 21.4% of revenues to 26.7% of revenues. And at the EBIT level, again, here, there is anyway the impact of the PPA. You see a growth of 23.7% from EUR 8.1 million to EUR 10 million. And obviously, the EBIT margin grows from 11.5% to 15.8% of revenues.

Let's see what's behind the things. Again, we are happy of what's happening. It's basically in line of what we explained and told you would happen. We see a reasonable growth in revenues and margin expansion. That's basically due to a mix effect in a reduction in services like the paranotary services, which have lower margins, and those are substituted by higher-margin services. But also we have been working a lot on efficiency and management is very focused on pruning services that are not as effective in reducing capacity where possible and obviously, also using and implementing AI to do this. And so we're starting to see some results there. And so you see this margin expansion.

Now if we have to look at H2, again, I would say that we will see at the division level, similar numbers to the one that we have seen for H1 year-on-year. When you enter the different business lines that make up the results of the division, trends are a little bit more nuanced. I would say that the star of H1 was the banking business lines, even if mortgages had headwinds, the one that we described with the reduction in refinancing. We still had growth in other services and mortgages, thanks to increasing market share in some of our clients. And we also had interesting growth from the loan services and from banking and also some of the and also in real estate year-on-year, we saw growth, thanks to the new clients that we have this year.

Other services were more weak like the one to NPL services because the NPL demand is down. But for example, this is one of those areas where we focused a lot in adjusting capacity and therefore, bringing back to profitability some of these services, which because of overcapacity, were not contributing positively to the EBITDA. Then if we -- for H1, we have in Moltiply Lease this business line, it's always delivering stable good news. And what happens here, again, it's growth and maybe not double digit, but our market position here is very strong in terms of market share. So it's hard to grow in terms of market share.

We grow thanks to the fact that we are able to increase the number of services that we sell to our clients, and this is what's happening. The trend here is that we are -- we reached some results in a year also thanks to some one-off effect. And then the following year, we are able to fill the one-off effects with more stable revenues. And this is basically what's going on also this time. So we expect that to continue in H2.

And I said that banking was star in H1, the laggard was a little bit Moltiply Insurance, meaning that even if the results are basically at the revenue level, just slightly below the ones of '25. And at an EBITDA level, we are slightly better on this one. This thing is actually going to turn around for H2. So meaning we'll see probably a little slowdown in banking and instead, we will see a growth in claims. And the reason why I see a growth in claims is basically because especially in Q2, we had not a lot of claims coming up from -- or we didn't close a lot of claims from weather events. We didn't have a lot of rain in the early months of the year.

But as you have experienced, I mean, if you have experienced with the Italian weather, actually starting in June and then in July and also in August, we have started seeing weather hail events and rain events and floodings and so on, which obviously are not good news generally speaking, but the good news here is that, thankfully, a lot of people are insured and therefore, the damages that they suffer create claims to insurance companies, and therefore, work for us as loss adjusters or as TPAs in services for insurance companies.

By the way, you know that here as an engine for growth, it's not just the fact that there are these events, but also that we are experiencing, and we're seeing that there is more penetration in terms of insurance to these events because, as you know, starting January 1, 2026, we have seen the complete effect of the law mandate to insure companies, even small ones to these events. So the events that are happening now should impact -- should create more insurance claims than what has happened in the past. And so we are already seeing more claims that insurance companies are trusting in our hands.

But we had a very, very hot summer, and that is according to the weather experts also will probably create more events in the fall months. And so again, here, we do expect Moltiply Insurance to perform well in the second part of the year. And if events are really significant then also in 2027. So to sum it up, again, I expect that Moltiply BPO and Tech will continue to grow at an EBITDA level as it has done in the first half of the year. So a strong performance, stable performance from Moltiply Lease, probably an acceleration in insurance and maybe less sustained growth in terms of pace from the banking business line. But all in all, we should see continuity in the good results in our view that we managed in the first part of the year. So thanks, and back to you, Marco.

Thank you, Alessandro. Excuse me, operator. Can you hear us or not?

Yes, I can hear you, Marco.

I confirm all the speakers' line are currently open.

Okay. So Alessandro, did you hand it over to me or not?

Yes, I did hand it over to you, Marco. Yes, I finished and I handed over to you.

Lost like 1 minute of audio. Okay. Perfect. So thank you. So back to the presentation, a quick comment on the net financial position on Page 28. I think there is nothing special to comment here. Actually, it's negative EUR 453 million. There is an explanation of generated cash, which is the operating performance and how the cash was used. Part of it was used for buyback, part of it was used to buy a bit more minority shares. And this is what leads to this net financial position, both the buybacks and the minority shares were already known.

So this is -- this was easily predictable. And net of the minority shares, this amount is EUR 315 million, which is improving compared to the EUR 328 million at the end of the second -- of the first quarter. We don't have other comments to make. So I think the best is to open it to questions. So please, operator, can you do that?

[Operator Instructions] First question is from Tommaso Nieddu, Kepler Cheuvreux.

I have a few. The first one is for Marco on Energy & Telco. You are now guiding to an improved year-over-year performance in Q3 versus Q2. So can you help us quantify what improved means? Are we talking about the business still declining year-over-year, but at a lower rate? Or could it already return to growth during Q3? And if there is any differences in Germany versus Italy. But if I'm not mistaken, maybe you already answered on the last one.

The second one is for Alessandro on BPO and Tech, which delivered continuous margin expansion also versus Q1. How much of that is simply the mechanical reduction in the para-notarial pass-through revenues and how much actually reflects underlying efficiency gains from technology? And the very last one, if you can give us an update on the strategic review around the BPO and Tech that you mentioned a couple of quarters ago, given that also we got some newspaper talking about it.

Okay. Well, I'll start with the first one and then we'll -- okay, we'll share -- we will see the others. So Energy & Telco I think what we are saying, I think that the overall message is this will be a quarter that looks better year-on-year than the second quarter, but it's still not a normal quarter. So it's something in the middle. We had in the past a string of quarters of double-digit growth. This is not what should be expected. What one should expect is something that is better, possibly between a bit better or a bit more better than Q2.

In energy, there are things that are possibly growing and others that are not growing. Like where we have the biggest difficulties is actually in gas because gas is now very expensive. And so that is affecting demand. So I would say it's not even very useful, and we don't really know if we are going from negative to plus 1% in energy or from -- I don't know, I mean not giving you the right numbers, like minus 10% to minus 1%, but it's clearly an improvement. But again, the message is, overall, we should expect a quarter of -- I mean, we are expecting because September is still open, a quarter that is better than the Q2, but it's still not a full recovery. A lot of things are still not working or not working at complete speed.

Then on what you call the strategic review and maybe Alessandro might want to add something. But I mean, we don't have anything particular to communicate. Nothing that is -- that needs to be communicated has been decided or done. So there is really no particular update.

Yes, I second that. I don't think there's anything particular to comment. And even the news basically in the end, we were saying what we told the market that considering or there are reasons for which as we look at the future, it can make sense to have separate ways for the 2 divisions, but that's the only thing that I think we can confirm.

So instead of going back to your question on the composition of the improvement of the margin expansion, the frank answer is that I haven't made the analysis. And by the way, everything in the end is a mix effect, meaning that it's not like the increase in efficiency is in every single business line and in every single services because these are not things that you do across the board. These are things that are very focused on the things that you are doing in the different services.

I mentioned that, for example, in the cadastral services for NPL services, we had a situation where actually the margin was probably negative, and we were able to turn that around by reducing capacity and by improving efficiency in the things we were doing. That is a piece among the fact that we also had the -- and also the AI, it is not across the board. The kind of things we're doing exactly for the kind of services we do are hard to do. They require the vertical expertise that is needed to get into the single process. And so it takes time.

We do process by process, client by client. And as we are able to see the improvements, then obviously, they reflect sometimes to the business line, sometimes we share them with clients. So that's the situation. In any case, it's important to say that if you have looked at our numbers, you know that we are now in a situation where our EBITDA margin is getting closer to the maximum that we have ever had. So it means that it cannot just be the mixed effects, but that also the things that are the different composition of the services are going up, and I would leave it with that.

Next question is from Aleksandra Arsova, Equita.

Three on my end. The first one is just maybe a recap on what you said on the trends in the coming months and quarters. So summing up altogether, it looks like we could expect plus size, a positive growth in EBITDA in the third quarter, maybe low to mid-single-digit growth. And so vis-a-vis what you said during your first quarter results call in May, it seems to me that the EUR 200 million, let's say, consensus EBITDA target for the full year '26 is maybe slightly more achievable currently vis-a-vis a couple of months ago. Is this correct? So this was the first one.

The second one is maybe a little bit of color on your end on the potential, if any impact you could expect from the banking consolidation situation in Italy, since there are a lot of things going on around banking consolidation now. The third one, maybe just a curiosity on the situation with Google. Since you mentioned that the European Commission confirmed that the abuse by Google continues after the last...

Aleksandra, there is a lot of background noise.

Sorry, okay.

Yes, we cannot really hear you.

Okay, sorry. I will end up with my third question, then I can repeat the other ones. On Google, you mentioned that the European Commission confirmed that the abuse is continuing. I was wondering if you will use this in order to maybe ask for higher damages vis-a-vis the EUR 3 billion you already asked for. And maybe if you can provide any timeline you expect on the litigation side in Italian courts. And I don't know if you want me to repeat the first and the second one.

No. I think...

I didn't get the second one, but maybe, Marco, you got it and if you...

I think it was the impact of banking consolidation on our Moltiply BPO & Tech business.

Okay. Yes, we will. Okay. I'll take that one. Okay.

Okay. So I take 1 and 3. So on the trends Yes, I think it's a reasonable interpretation, then it's still interpretation of what we said. Regarding the EUR 200 million EBITDA, we haven't done the calculation. I mean, you have to see what kind of growth you need if you take the like intermediate assumption for Q3, what you need for Q4. And based on that, you can see if it's reasonable or not. But certainly, Q2 was a bit marginally better than I think what we expected. And so possibly, it's slightly better outlook for the year. But I mean, we are not giving any indications.

I think really, you need to rely on the wording what we said in the press release, and we are trying to interpret it a little bit, but it's still not a precise outlook. In terms of this DMA decision, it confirms that abuse is continuing. Google will appeal it almost certainly. And I mean, it has always been our position that abuse continued. So it was already included in any assessment of damages and so on. So this is more a confirmation of our assessment of our approach than anything that could lead -- maybe it could lead to a better probability of getting an outcome is what we want, but it doesn't change our position.

And in terms of timeline, also, we have nothing to communicate. This is like an Italian damage lawsuit. It takes a few years to get the first decision. It has started, but we are still at the very beginning. So it takes a lot of patience. And until the very end, we will have a very little idea. So you can count on a couple of years at least. You will have a lot of decisions in other countries before.

Maybe one update that is useful. I think there were some news, but only on some local papers that also in -- I think in the Czech Republic, there was also another decision saying that Google was liable for this. And I think that the abuse also -- I don't know if -- that the abuse also continued, I think. But I don't know. I think you can look it up. There should be in something about a company called Heureka, a piece of news in some local papers, but it's a small claim. So it doesn't add much, but it's a confirmation of the same approach of Sweden and of Germany.

Okay, very clear.

Yes. And instead relating to the M&A. Okay. Well, let me say a couple of things here. Well, first of all, any impact is on the banking business line. And I think it's useful to remember that the lease part, the insurance part are not affected. Then it's also important to remember that most of our services are BPO services. It means they are additive, meaning -- no, additive, meaning, I love them. When 2 banks merge, they cannot -- they don't eliminate our services. 1 of the 2 does not eliminate our services.

The risk is obviously that somebody that was outsourcing decides to in-source or they have more people and therefore, they decide to insource things that before were not. Let me say, obviously, the scenario with Intesa taking over Monte Paschi and Mediobanca is less favorable to us than the scenario in which the third pole is created around Monte Paschi and Mediobanca as they are now because Intesa as all the largest bank is less prone to use outsourcing services.

Then we really have to enter the single services that we sell them and really what the scenario will be. I really don't know what they'll do with the retail part of Compass and which is really our client within Mediobanca. So it's hard to say. So by the way, the discussion that we had with MPS and Mediobanca before, let's say, June, were all positive. And so we were going in a very positive direction. We'll see. We'll see, frankly. It's hard to say now. And we can start having discussions only the moment where it's clear what's happening and what the plans that they have are really clear.

Okay, maybe last one on this. The situation between UniCredit and Commerz, do you think it would be a way for you to start doing BPO in Germany, maybe?

BPO in Germany, it's really an interesting proposition that we might be looking at in the future and not only in Germany. One of the things that we are looking at is if there are opportunities, both organic and in terms of acquisitions also on the BPO side. Obviously, this is not something that we would do lightly and we need to -- also not necessarily across the board. Maybe the opportunities are not necessarily in the banking area, maybe they are more on the automotive area. So we are actively looking at what opportunities there are. And if we come up with a strategic plan on that, obviously, we'll inform the market.

[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen there are no more questions registered at this time.

Well, if that's the case, we thank everybody for participating for our call. We remain available for one-on-ones, and we look forward to seeing you again at the next occasion. Thank you.

Thank you, everyone. Bye-bye.

Bye-bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones.

Good afternoon. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the presentation of Moltiply Group First Quarter 2026 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Marco Pescarmona, Chairman; Mr. Alessandro Fracassi, CEO; and Mr. Francesco Masciandaro, CFO. Please go ahead, sir.

[Audio Gap] that has been uploaded on our website, and we will start from Page 19 with the Q1 highlights. And as you can see from Page 19, the first quarter was a very strong quarter with revenues of EUR 182.6 million, up 36.5% year-on-year with the revenues coming 2/3 from the Mavriq division and 1/3 from the Moltiply division.

In terms of profitability, EBITDA in the first quarter '26 is EUR 51.3 million, which is up 45.2% year-on-year and corresponds to an EBITDA margin of 28.1%, expanding from 26.6% in the first quarter of '25.

Operating income is in the first quarter of '26 EUR 32.4 million, which is also up -- which is up 46.3% year-on-year, and this also means an expansion of the EBIT margin. Net income finally is, in the first quarter '26, equal to EUR 22.9 million, which is up 87.4% year-on-year. So this is a very strong performance in our mind. Of course, this benefits from the consolidation of Verivox. We had organic growth in Mavriq in particular, and then we had a very positive impact of the consolidation of Verivox.

Looking at the 2 divisions. I'll comment on Mavriq. Alessandro will comment on Moltiply BPO&Tech. Mavriq in the first quarter, on Page 20, posted revenues of EUR 120.5 million, up 80.7% year-on-year. EBITDA in the first quarter is EUR 35.7 million. That's up 68.8% year-on-year, with an EBITDA margin of 29.6%, which compares to the 31.7% of last year.

But of course, this EBITDA margin is affected by the dilutive impact of Verivox, which even if we improve things there, it still has a significantly lower EBITDA margin than the rest of Mavriq. And the EBIT is, in the first quarter, EUR 23.6 million. That's up 59.4% year-on-year.

And I would say -- well, first comment is we had, in general, a good first quarter. Everything was doing pretty well, and I'll go into more details. The only business that is -- that was suffering in the first quarter year-on-year was mortgages and also, to some extent, Shopping. Mortgages is something cyclical.

However, this is where I'm getting, Page 21. Q1 is not representative of what to expect for the coming quarters for 2 reasons. One, Q1 was the last quarter of consolidation of Verivox. And second, in Q1, our Energy business, which is today our biggest business, was doing very well in Q1 and then is suffering in Q2. And so Q2 is going to be quite different. The only business line -- because you remember, we changed the definition of our business lines. So they are by product and within a single product, they're cross-country.

So with this definition of business lines, we had growth in Energy & Telco, which is the biggest business line that we have today. In Insurance, we also had growth in credit, even if mortgages in Italy were down year-on-year. And the only business line that didn't grow is Mavriq Shopping, which is in the end the Trovaprezzi, which is only in Italy.

Now going into the details with reference to Mavriq Energy & Telco, yes, we had very, very good beginning of the year in all the countries. And then all the -- we started being affected by the events in -- with Iran. And we already explained the first things that we observed when we announced the full year results in mid-March.

And so at the beginning of March, we saw a spike of demand -- very strong demand because people were trying to fix energy prices before the providers basically changed their tariff. It takes a few days sometimes before a big company changes its pricing. And so people were running to grab the deals while they lasted. And so we have this big spike at the beginning.

And then, however, quite rapidly in the end, all the providers repriced, and they repriced much higher than where they were before. And the good thing, and we already said this the other time, is that the market kept functioning. So there were just a couple of providers in each market that decided to stop taking new clients, and most of that has reversed. So the market kept functioning, which is quite different from what happened with the invasion of Ukraine, but prices went up a lot.

And basically, because of this, consumers started taking significantly fewer contracts. Basically, our idea is that consumers are waiting because they see expensive prices, and they think that they'd wait 1 or 2 months and they'll get more reasonable prices. And so our volumes are down significantly from, say, the second -- from half of March. So year-on-year, we are down significantly in terms of volumes.

And this is in our main markets, mainly in Germany and in Italy. And this is continuing. And we don't know how long this is going to last. And there are many different scenarios, but it's very hard to predict, I would say. If this continues, we will continue to have year-on-year contraction. Maybe the gap will narrow over time because if this is a long-term situation, people will realize that it's better to fix their prices anyway. So maybe it will improve a little bit, but still be negative. So quite negative in, say, Q2, then less negative in Q3.

And I don't know how it could evolve if the situation isn't fixed. Or the U.S. and Iran reach agreement or in one way or another Strait of Hormuz is reopened. And if that happens, then we could even see an acceleration. So we could be back to growth, and maybe if we are lucky, even have a nice spike depending on what happens to prices when Hormuz reopens.

So I mean, today, we are in a situation of uncertainty and the uncertainty is lasting longer than we expected when we announced our results in mid-March. And this is Mavriq Energy & Telco. Telco Is okay, actually. I mean, it's doing fine, but it's a much smaller than Energy.

Mavriq Banking, it was growing in Q1, as we said, but not on an organic basis, basically because in Italy, the mortgage market is down. And so what one could expect for the coming quarters that would be fully organic in terms of comparison is that instead of seeing growth, you could see here a contraction as well.

Mavriq Insurance is growing organically. Growth rates, as we said, were expected to be different in different countries. But in general, we see growth everywhere, just at different rates. So I think this is the strongest that we have today. Mavriq Shopping here, well, on the Google side, we don't have any news. The European Commission has so far postponed any decision. There are press rumors, let's say, I mean, things that have been published, let's say, that von der Leyen is postponing this not to alienate Trump, but this has to come at a certain point.

And we think this is not positive. All this delay is not positive for operators like us, but it's not also positive for the credibility of European institutions because even when we are very clear in our mind, like violations of European rules, if we're not able to impose fines and bring the infringement to an end, basically, people think that they can do whatever they want in Europe. So it's really a loss of credibility.

And now in terms of expectations for Q2, this will be -- the performance will be determined only by the organic evolution of the business because we haven't made any other acquisitions in the last 12 months. And now we are past the first 12 months of Verivox. And so the main driver is really going to be the contraction of Mavriq Energy & Telco because of the Energy business.

Mavriq Banking, we said, is also organically going to be down, then possibly less and less over the year. Insurance is growing, and luckily, we are seeing a stabilization, so no longer a contraction of Mavriq Shopping.

So all in all, we expect for Q2 a decline in the revenues in the second quarter year-on-year and a more pronounced contraction of the margins, significant, I would rate it as at least double-digit contraction of the EBITDA of the Mavriq division. As I said, this could end any time. This totally depends on external factors. And if energy reopens, we could even have a nice re-acceleration.

And so with this binary scenario, either we have a contraction, or at a certain point, they push a button and reopen Hormuz, and we start growing again and possibly with a fast recovery. And we have no control over this. For now, we continue to run the business for the long term. So we are not trying to optimize short-term performance because still the impact is there, but it's not killing us or anything.

And -- but then we will reassess over time, depending on how the situation evolves. Of course, the situation of the energy market appears to us as absurd and unsustainable that we don't see how we could continue. And for this reason, we don't see any reason to have different expectations for the long-term outlook for our business. At the same time, we have no idea of what could happen for the rest of the year.

So with this, I'm done with this outlook for Mavriq, and I hand it over to Alessandro with a more positive message for Moltiply BPO&Tech.

Yes. Thanks, Marco. Fortunately, the Moltiply BPO&Tech is not exposed to the energy crisis or at least not directly as Mavriq. So the results for the first quarter were impacted just by the reduction of the mortgage market and mostly of the refinancing market, the surroga that went down. So as you see, we see revenues in the first quarter declining from EUR 66.1 million to EUR 62.1 million. That's a reduction of 6% year-on-year. The reality here is that it's really significant, the impact of the pass-through notary costs for refinancing.

As you know, we have a significant business in para-notary services. Our services include also the fees for the notary. You will remember last year when we had the growth that I told you there was a significant price effect because with the equo compenso, those costs are significant.

And so this year, as these activities deflate, we see a significant impact on revenues, which doesn't impact significantly the margin. Actually, the margin is growing, as we will see in a minute. But to give you an idea, if we take out the pass-through cost, so the cost that we paid in notary and then we re-charge our clients, the banks, let me just give you rough figures.

Last year, in the first quarter, they were a little above EUR 11 million, and this year, they are a little above EUR 4 million, so it's a reduction of roughly EUR 7 million. And that reduction, if you take that away, you would see that the real revenues of our services, they go up from EUR 55 million last year to EUR 58 million this year. So it's actually a growth of 5.5%, which is much better what we see then on the EBITDA margin. The EBITDA margin this year grows from 14.1% to 15.6%. That's a growth of just double-digit, 10%. And the EBITDA margin grew from 21.4% to 25%.

Again, it's -- this is thanks on -- the increase in the EBITDA margin is basically due to the mix effect. I mean we have obviously a reduction of these para-notary activities, where I've just given you the idea of how significant the revenues with 0 margins are. And therefore, if you take -- if that part reduces, then obviously the margin -- the operating margin in percentage terms goes up.

But the reality is that all the other activities are basically also growing. The overall growth, as I said, is 5.5%, but we also have some margin expansion not only due to mix effect, but also because we're cleaning out this house in some of the smaller businesses, restructuring costs a little bit and with the impact of -- there is also a mix effect of some good margin businesses that are growing faster than others and also the investment in technology and then the use of gen AI processes continues. This is something that we expect to continue to leverage in the longer term.

At the EBIT level, you see that it grows from EUR 7.3 million last year to EUR 8.8 million. That's a growth of roughly 20%. And the EBIT margin grows from 11.1% to 14.1%. So let's comment on the different business lines within our BPO&Tech business.

As you might remember from last time, we had started to comment on 3 major lines. Those are Banking, Lease and Insurance. And then we have other initiatives. In Banking, here we see overall a decline in revenues, because obviously, mortgages are here, but also here, if you take out the notary effect, you would have seen a growth. So actually higher than 5.5%. And basically, what you see, mortgages obviously are declining, but we are happy to see our market share growing. We are penetrating more some of our large existing clients, and we will continue to do that in the rest of the year.

Loans are growing nicely. That's thanks to a more stable and actually a relatively growing market for salary-guaranteed loans, so cessione del quinto. And also there, we're seeing an improvement in our market share. Wealth is also working well. It's growing. This is a little bit one-off, thanks to our technology project. I already mentioned it last year. This is continuously contributing with our -- the project with our main client.

Real estate valuation services are basically stable. It is actually the sum of a mortgage market going down and our market share going up, but the result is basically -- I mean it's a minimal growth. But in terms of margins, this quarter, this is one of the businesses where we were able to regain profitability. Last quarter, we had the impact of the disappearing -- the final disappearing of the Ecobonus effect. Actually, we had negative margins there, but now we stabilized this business and it is contributing to the overall EBITDA.

Lease confirms a very solid business. As I said, this year -- last year, we had an incredible year. You might remember that. So we aim at doing the same result this year and not a significant growth. But the growth last year was thanks to some one-off effects that we hope to substitute with organic growth, and the first quarter is confirming that. I have to say that the one-off effects were in the last quarter. So we'll see in the last quarter.

But we are on the right track, and this -- and Agenzia Italia keeps being the EBITDA engine of our division. And things are going well, and we will be introducing new services. And as you all know, there is a long-term expectation of growth in fleet services and the rental market in Italy as more and more people and companies switch from owning vehicles to having those as a service. And that's our reference market, independent of the fact that this is done with the leasing or this is done with the rental agreement, the long-term rental agreement.

Moltiply Insurance is growing slightly over '25. And we're actually seeing interesting trends in terms of new claims opening, but then as we all know, this will depend on what are the weather events of this year. And when we will have weather events, there will be an acceleration of growth relative to previous year, thanks to the fact that we have now a full effect the compulsory natural catastrophe insurance.

Basically, with March -- the end of March and the beginning of April, now the law is in full force. As you know, it's the law that has not -- this obligation to have insurance doesn't have a straight punishment, if you're not doing -- I mean not a monetary fee or fine, but what happens is that you cannot take part in any of the state aids that are given in any form if you don't show proof of your insurance.

I tend to believe that this is a quite strong way to enforce this in the end because the aids are small, but they are very widespread. So people will potentially not want to lose them. But I cannot say we'll see that. So also here, overall, and especially if you look at the longer-term, we are happy with the forecasted -- with what we expect in the coming months and in the coming years.

Just a word on the other revenues on Mia Pensione, which as you know is the business that we are dedicated to pension advisory services. It is growing nicely. It's a higher margin than most of our business. And we expect to make it grow even faster than what it's doing. And by the way, here, the sector trend is, obviously, all the boomers are going into pension.

So it is really the bulk of the Italian population right now in terms of potential market. And we are working on bootstrapping the B2B2C model. So basically conveying this service is not just through the web, but also through our clients, both banks and the insurance companies or even investment companies. I mean this is obviously a service that is interesting for anyone at different price levels, depending on obviously which segment of the population you are, from the mass market to affluent to even the private market.

If you are employed, and so you expect to receive the pension from INPS, this is a service that interests you. It's very technologically -- it's very technology, very well implemented. It's a great addition to our portfolio. So in the coming months, I think it's reasonable to expect similar trends to what we've seen in quarter 1. So we'll still see, at least for the second quarter, a very favorable comparison to last year for mortgages that eases in the -- starting the second part of the year, but then we'll see that margin expand, I think.

I hope to see -- continue seeing that margin expansion. And so you have seen it for quite a while now, we have been delivering close to double-digit growth, if not double-digit growth, in the BPO, and that has been mostly organic. So I think we'll continue seeing this in the next quarters, and this is kind of our objective really looking forward.

And obviously, we'll keep looking at bolt-on acquisitions as we've done small things that we can fuel up in terms of growth, thanks to our client base or technological addition. These are things we will continue to look at. So all good on this front. And back to you, Marco, to further comment on the net financial position.

Yes. Thank you, Alex. So on Page 26, you have the evolution of our net financial position. Here, we are, at the end of March 26, at negative EUR 427 million. If you look at the evolution over the last year, there has been a steady improvement. Part of it at a certain point was due to the fact that we sold some treasury shares, which generated some cash.

Then from September, October, the stock price dropped for fears of the impact on our businesses of artificial intelligence. And we restarted the buyback, and actually, we have bought back a significant number of shares. And we are now -- and we were not far from here on March 31, more or less where we were a year before. So -- this is -- I mean you would have to check the numbers, but it is really, in the end, keeping a similar treasury share position at the end of March '25 and March '26, but please check the numbers.

And we also have our MONY shares. Here, what happened to MONY is similar to what happened to our stock price. So they were -- basically suffered of derating for AI fears, we believe. And in fact, this is a financial investment, but we found it so compelling that we increased it a little bit in the first quarter of this year as well, so 57 million shares.

And the financial position, net of the MONY shares is EUR 329 million. And the funny thing is that we have more shares. We have 57 million shares now, and they are worth EUR 98 million on March 31. And we had 44 million shares, so much less last year, and they were worth EUR 106 million, and we thought they were cheap at the time.

So here, there is this question mark on -- I mean we don't have a -- I think we have the answers. And we think we summarized a lot of our answers in the initial slides of this presentation. But the market still is uncertain about what will happen for real. Our stock is affected by AI fears. MONY is affected by AI fears. We are not too concerned, but it will take a while before clarity emerges on this and the market develops a final understanding of what will happen to different types of companies because of this.

So this, I would say, ends the presentation with -- I mean -- yes, I would say this ends the presentation, and we would open it to questions.

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Gabriele Venturi, Banca Akros.

First, could you please provide some more detail on Verivox contribution rate to revenues this quarter? And additionally, could you give us some more color on Mavriq organic growth rate during the quarter? And second, on a year-on-year basis, could you elaborate on how you expect margins and revenues to evolve in the second quarter on a quantitative basis? I mean I know it might still be early to assess, but if the current environment persists, should we expect high single-digit or double-digit revenue decline in Mavriq?

And finally, regarding remortgages, what is the typical EBITDA margins for para-notary services? And what margin level do you believe is achievable over the medium term for BPO division?

Okay. Let's try to answer at least qualitatively. So Verivox had an impact. I would say you can expect an impact of Verivox in the first quarter of this year, similar to the impact of the third -- the fourth quarter of last year. The winter quarters are a bit stronger.

And I would say -- I kind of said it before, but without Verivox, we would still have organic growth within Mavriq, I would say, in the neighborhood of 10% plus/minus something. So the rest is the addition of Verivox. This is in terms of EBITDA. And what to expect for the future? I think you can expect that -- I said we could lose -- we could have a significant year-on-year decline of the EBITDA of Mavriq. We wouldn't say significant for less than 10%, of course.

So of course, this is only affecting Energy. So I think it's reasonable to expect something, which is between minus-10% and minus-20% for Mavriq, but we really have to see how it evolves. And this is already more than what we usually say. Then do we have anything else in terms of questions for Mavriq? Let me -- or shall we go to...

Yes. On the notary services, roughly 10% at the EBITDA level, maybe a little less. And that's the margin on -- the question was how much is the EBITDA on the para-notary services. And on what's the long-term target for the review, well, let's say, we've been saying in the past that our long-term effort is to get the EBITDA to 25%.

We're there now, at least this quarter. Then obviously, it depends on the business mix. And as you see, there are some -- I am actually very happy when the refinancing explodes because it's true that, as I just said, it's a lower-margin business, but all of that, it's variable.

So it's -- so there's absolutely no problem in scaling down the business. When the revenue goes down, we just don't pay the notaries anymore. I mean our part -- our fixed costs -- internal fixed costs are limited. So there is really -- it's a business that it's really similar to all the others, and it's a great business.

So that -- but -- and so I hope it will be big and to -- but it will impact when it's big, what are the percentage margin. But anyway, in the longer term, I do expect to see some margin expansion, and that will be driven by AI and scale effects as we grow our presence in clients and in verticals.

Then, obviously, a part of that will have to be given back to clients, and this is a positive reinforcing cycle. So we will be able to offer better products and at lower prices, and I hope the clients will want to buy more, as I mentioned last time when we talked about the impacts of AI. So I hope to see a growth that I -- in my mind, I have to see up to a 500 basis points growth over the next 5 years in terms of our margin expansion, but we'll see, okay?

The next question is from Aleksandra Arsova Equita.

So a couple of follow-up questions with respect to what you said before. Just can you remind us what was the speed of recovery of energy business last time in 2022, 2023? So once there was a sort of normalization and decline in energy prices, how many months or quarters did it take to recover the business, just to understand what could be the speed if there's a reopening of Hormuz Strait and the situation is over then?

And the second one is again maybe some -- let's say, some sensitivity to model better the future quarters. So assuming that the energy situation is limited to, let's say, the second quarter, do you believe you will be able to broadly achieve the current consensus of EUR 200 million or slightly above [indiscernible] the consensus EUR 200 million EBITDA for the full year?

Okay. So the speed of recovery, it's a different situation from the situation of Ukraine, because in that case, the energy market in Germany was shut, whereas now it's fully functioning. So the type of recovery is different. The type of recovery we would expect is a situation where we have a reopening of Hormuz, an initial drop in energy prices, and then steadily, they possibly drop a little bit more, but there is a first steep drop when they announced that an agreement has been reached, this Strait is reopened and so on.

And we would expect that we could have a spike not as strong as the spike that we saw in the first weeks of March, but we could have a good spike of demand in the very initial months. So we could even have a strong quarter than when -- so not only growth, but stronger than normal. This is what we would expect.

When Ukraine -- First, typically -- I mean what happened when the energy crisis was over in Germany was reopening of the market that started during '23 and was at the peak in Q4 of '23 and Q1 of '24. And those were really strong, but the market has been closed, and it was more prolonged. Here, I would expect something that is a softer spike, yes, but not as strong and maybe concentrated in only 1 quarter.

And then if they reopen in June, possibly in September, people will have forgotten. And it will be a peak season as originally expected. So here really, the question is how long this will last. My guess is that once it finishes, we are almost immediately back to normal. But how long this will last every month, we lose some opportunity, let's say, or we are not able to run at the normal speed.

In terms of consensus, if BPO is doing well, if it's only 1 quarter, I think that's still feasible. The key question is if we have only 1 quarter of energy disruption or if we have longer. That will be the driver. But if it's only 1 quarter, that's still possibly within reach.

[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at this time. I turn the conference back to you for any closing remarks.

Okay. So thank you for the participation, for the questions. Let me summarize by saying that we are quite happy with how the business performed. Until the end of February, we are executing, we think, pretty well in all respects. We are accelerating things. We are integrating well our recent acquisitions. We are deploying AI to improve productivity, to improve our services.

So everything is going well from what we can influence. Then now we are at the mercy of external events. And you have to be a bit patient, but we believe we are continuing to be the great company and have confidence for what is in the future. So thank you.

Yes. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. Bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over, and you may disconnect your telephones.

Good afternoon. This is the conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the presentation of Moltiply Group Full Year 2025 Results. [Operator Instructions] After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Marco Pescarmona, Chairman; Mr. Alessandro Fracassi, CEO; and Mr. Francesco Masciandaro, CFO of Moltiply Group. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome, everybody. We will rely as usual on our presentation published on our website. And as a forward, this year, we decided to make some changes to the format of the presentation. And this is basically because the group has changed significantly in recent years. And so we felt that the description that we were providing was no longer adequate, and we decided to update it a little bit. So this time, rather than just commenting the results, we will also make some comments on the structure of the revised presentation.

So we will start from Page 5, where here, everything is unchanged. We still have two divisions that are separate businesses, both very nice businesses. But then the description of the divisions, as you will see, will be slightly changed. Group structure is on the next slide, there is nothing relevant. I think I'll start commenting on Page 7 with a description of what Mavriq does.

First of all, Mavriq, now we will look at Mavriq through the lenses of four business lines, Energy & Telco, insurance, banking and shopping, and it's pretty clear what's inside these business lines. And this is across all the geographies. So Energy & Telco will mean everything that we do in Energy & Telco in Italy, Germany, Spain, et cetera, in other countries where we are present. In terms of weight, and you have at the end of the presentation in the historical figures, you have the relative weight of the business lines.

Energy & Telco is in 25%, 40%, roughly speaking, of our revenues. Insurance is 30%, banking 20% and shopping 10%. So this is very different in terms of also product mix of the old mortgage broking business we had in Italy years ago. In terms of countries, these are with the flags the countries where we are present. What is important is that there are some products like insurance that we have in every country, others that we have in most countries. And then banking products, which is mainly mortgage or personal loan intermediation, this is mostly an Italian and German business with only start-up level initiatives in the other countries.

And shopping, which is Trovaprezzi, we have it only in Italy. So this is like the map to understand how we see Mavriq and how we will comment on Mavriq going forward. On the following slides, we still have our brands. We have simplified it a little bit, especially the Italian brands. Here, it's only worth mentioning Switcho. Switcho is our digital energy business, which is a fully automated service, not an auto-switch, but a service that allows you to change energy provider without having to talk to a call center, which is a distinctive advantage in Italy, and this is a business that has done very well in '25. For the other countries, there are no changes. This leads us to the slides on the BPO division, that's for which Alessandro will take the lead.

Yes. And here on the BPO division, we have decided to simplify. Also considering the different dynamics, the former six business lines plus other that we had into three major business lines, which are probably also easier to understand. One is banking. And within banking, you will find basically everything that was relating to credit. We had the loans, the mortgages and also the activities that are -- that we were doing in real estate, all those that were strictly connected with credit. And also the line of -- that we had called wealth, which has inside Wealth Management Services and Investment Services, all of this is now included in this business line that we call banking, where obviously, the target clients are banks, consumer credit specialists, asset gatherers and asset managers and also NPL specialists on the servicing side, but also banks who do it in-house.

Then we have the vertical of lease, lease meant in, let's say, the [ Anglo-Saxon ] sense where you will have all the forums that help you use an asset where you don't own the property, and this could be through a leasing contract, so what is in Italy a regulated contract or long-term rental, which is a nonregulated way to use an asset that you don't own.

Here, the target clients are obviously the rental companies, also the rent-a-car companies, the leasing companies and the dealers within the automotive distribution channels. The last vertical is insurance, where, as you know, we mainly do claim processing. But as we look at also extending our services, we felt it made sense to look at these as the insurance vertical. Here, the clients are insurance companies and self-insured entities, meaning corporations or public entities that decide to carry their own risk, but still need processes to manage the way that damages are managed. The key services that we have here are claims management, so the third-party administration of policies and loss adjustments, what we call in Italian Perizia, meaning assessing what is the damages that happened to assets or people within an insurance contract.

And then we also want to underline because it's growing the other revenue piece, where basically we are creating and growing services in a B2B2C model, where the clients are the clients of the previous business line, so mainly banking customers and insurance customer. And here, there are basically three areas of services. One is advisory for pension and social security. This is connected to the Mia Pensione acquisition that we did last year, actually in '24. At the end of '24, the management of inheritance and estate for, let's say, the inheritance of the -- in a inheritance process directly to the people involved.

And finally, sustainable value real estate asset services, sustainable value real estate services. This is somehow all the new life that we are giving to our capabilities and capacities in -- that we were able to build during the Superbonus phase, meaning, as you know, there were incentives to upgrade the real estate assets, and we built the capacity to help people doing this kind of investments and also then banks purchased the credit -- the tax credit that came from these investments. And we feel like looking forward at the new regulations that are coming to play in Europe, this will be a services that most banks and insurance will be interested to selling to their own customers.

So it's a pattern that they're already doing. And therefore, also here, we have started offering some of these services through banks. And so again, with a B2B2C models, and this is the part of other revenues. Here, there are some pages which I will not go through, but that help you get some numbers on the size of this market that we feel.

On one side, they are interestingly large and also complementary. And then on the other side, which is what you see on Page 13, they -- all these three markets show a significant underdevelopment relative not only to the best-in-class in Europe, meaning the best-in-class countries in Europe, but to the European average. And therefore, there is still an untapped potential of growth in this markets, which we believe to be perfectly positioned to capture -- to be in the perfect position to capture. This is what you -- there are some indicators here. I won't go through them. Maybe just look at the last column on Page 13, the one on the right, and you see the gap in terms of percentage of that particular metric relative to the European average.

And it tells you really the growth potential that is embedded in these three verticals that we are pursuing with a model that, as you know, is a model of technology-enabled BPO services where what we target are noncore processes, but critical processes, meaning processes that impact the performance, the business performance of our clients.

Now on Page 14, again, a section we will not go through in detail. But in interacting with investors, we got a lot of questions about the impact of AI. So we decided that it was good to have a meaningful conversation going forward with our investors and analysts in general to put down in a very structured way our thoughts on the impacts of AI.

So I won't go through all the presentation, just basically the headlines. The idea is that we believe that on the -- both business lines are very well positioned on one side, the business model of Madrid, we believe to be very resilient to whatever is perceived as AI threat. And actually, there are also upsides that we will be able to capture in terms of expanding our services using AI with the end customer. And then if we move on to Page 16, and this is part of -- you will find here things that both in meetings and in some of these earnings calls, I've covered. You will see relative to the BPO and Tech business line -- sorry, the BPO and Tech division, you will see on -- here, we believe that AI is actually not a threat, but an opportunity for structural growth.

And here again, on the top of the page, what are the perceived risk of the market in our understanding of the AI disruption. And then here, you see on the left, what are, in our view, the defensive modes for multiply against the threat. But most importantly, how instead AI is for us an opportunity and what are the engines that we can use to actually even increase our growth pattern, thanks to the use of AI. This is obviously true for us and other players in the industry. But we believe that our position is what you see on Page 17 is of having different assets that compound in looking forward being able to capture this opportunity.

And this go from having tons of digital data to having platforms that are already embedding -- starting to embed AI in the processes and to having the skills and the client base that are perfect for the kind of services that we can offer and that can be made much more powerful and effective through AI. And with this, we get finally to the business update, and I leave the floor again to Marco to start going through the full year highlights for the group, and then I'll catch you back on when we discuss the BPO division. Thanks.

Thank you, Alex. So on -- back to Page 19, we have the full year highlights. This is where we normally start our presentation. And we are very pleased with the results of 2025. In '25, we had revenues of EUR 674.1 million, which is up 48.6% year-on-year. This is, of course, also due to the acquisition of Verivox, which was quite sizable. But even without that, we would have seen a very nice organic growth. The EBITDA for the full year is EUR 177.4 million, and this is up 44.5% year-on-year.

The EBITDA margin is 26.3%, which compares to 27.1% of the previous year, meaning that the dilutive effect of the Verivox acquisition was limited. The EBIT is EUR 103.4 million. That's up 40.8% year-on-year. Here, on the EBIT, we will comment later, but it's important to remind that this is also affected by -- and this is quite different from the EBITDA because of the amortization of the purchase price allocation to amortizable intangible assets that we have in the numbers. And so we'll try in later slides to give you some sense of how to normalize that.

The net income, the net income is EUR 29.4 million. This is minus 33.2% year-on-year. The explanation of this minus compared to the very strong performance in terms of operating results is two things. One is that there are, of course, higher interest costs compared to the previous year. And the second is that we have in the full year of '25 EUR 31.9 million of negative effect of adjustments to put & call liabilities on minority stakes. Basically, for us, it's quite a common pattern to make acquisitions where we buy, say, 80% of the company.

And then we keep the management involved and with a stake of, say, the remaining 20%. And then they have typically put & call options over three to five years with typically a multiple. This could be a multiple of a single year, but more commonly two or three years of results. The multiple could be fixed or could have a range depending on growth or other parameters.

But in any case, what we had in 2025, which was a very strong year was that, in particular, one of these participations, I mean, all the companies did well. But in particular, we have one in the energy sector in Italy that did much, much better than what we anticipated. And so we basically -- it contributed to the results. We are very happy, but also what we need to pay has gone up. And this is not only a function of the performance of the year, but also of the expected performance of the future.

And so this is what leads to this adjustment to the put & call liabilities, which are a reflection of a very favorable acquisitions that we made. And going to the next page, we see the numbers for the fourth quarter. Fourth quarter, we have revenues of EUR 207 million. That's up 57.3% year-on-year. By the way, you see that the proportion between the two divisions is now 2/3 Mavriq, 1/3 Moltiply DPO and Tech now. And the EBITDA was EUR 56.6 million in the fourth quarter. This is up 49% year-on-year. And here, the proportion is similar to the proposed revenues. In the Q4, the EBITDA margin was 27.4%, which is, again, a small dilution compared to the 28.7% of the previous year, keeping in mind that we acquired Verivox that was running at lower EBITDA margins.

Now again, on the EBIT. Here, in the EBIT, what I mentioned before that this is affected by PPA amortization. It's important also to be aware of the fact that when we do an acquisition, we do the purchase price allocation at the end of the year, and we put all the amortization in the last quarter. So the EBIT is here almost -- I mean, EUR 27.9 million, only 14.3% up year-on-year because here, we have put in only one quarter all the Verivox PPA amortization, because the exercise of the PPA is completed only at the end of the year.

And finally, the net income. Net income is again the same story in the quarter, by the way, the EUR 30-plus million of put & call adjustment for EUR 20 million in Q4, again, because that's when we had the visibility and because also it depends on the revised expectations for the future that we were able to have with clarity only at the end of the year. So this is in terms of the overall performance of the business. Then when we look at the two divisions, when I comment for Mavriq, Mavriq the EUR 406.4 million, that's up 83.8%. I mean these are very, very, very big growth. So it's -- of course, a lot of it is Verivox, but a lot of it is also organic.

EBITDA is EUR 116.6 million. That's up 74.5% year-on-year. The EBITDA margin is 28.7% in '25 compared to 30.2% in the previous year. And what is new that we didn't have in the past presentations is this box at the bottom left, where we show the EBIT adjusted for PPA amortization. Basically, we add back the amortization of only the PPA, not of, I don't know, other investments, capitalizations, IFRS 16. That's all included only what comes from this, let's say, maybe it's not the right word, [ cigulative ] effect of the PPA exercises.

And we think this is more meaningful way to look at the EBIT. We were before providing always the figures to do the normalization, but we thought we figured out that it could be more convenient just to show also the result. And you see this is very similar in terms of dynamics in this case to the evolution of the EBITDA.

And we try to keep this data also in future presentations. So this EBITDA adjusted for PPA amortization is EUR 102.3 million, and that's up 72% year-on-year. Then there is the EBIT as it is reported, which is EUR 72.9 million, which is 66.8% up year-on-year. Looking at Q4, well, in Q4, revenues more than doubled at EUR 138.2 million. This is up 115.6% year-on-year. EBITDA was EUR 38.5 million, up 87.6%. This EBIT adjusted for PPA amortization had virtually the same growth as EBITDA, and it was at EUR 30.6 million in Q4.

And finally, EBIT was at EUR 18.5 million, up 35.5% year-on-year. So these are the figures for the past performance of which we are very pleased. Now we will comment a bit more at the level of the business lines and also in terms of outlook. And well, we had very nice organic growth in all Mavriq business lines with the exception of shopping, which was down a little bit in terms of revenues, down a bit more in terms of EBITDA contribution. But let's first of all, say that the consolidation of Verivox was I mean, significantly changed the scale of the division, the geographical reach and the product breadth.

And basically, this made the group look very, very different, at least Mavriq from what it was before. And this has led also to this change in how we present things, of course. And one thing that you remember is that Verivox. For Verivox, we had an earn-out. And here is -- you see it in the annual report, but we decided to put here as well as the answer that you don't have to ask.

The earn-out liability that we estimate for now is EUR 5.3 million at the end of December. This is subject to potential adjustments. So it could be higher, could be lower. This is our current estimate. And by the way, this doesn't go into the put & call adjustments because it doesn't go in the net financial position.

Anyway, we will have, I'm saying things that are obvious, very strong year-on-year growth also in Q1 of '26, in part because the business was, as you will see, was doing well, especially energy, but also simply because Verivox was not consolidated yet in Q1 '25. For the rest of '26, the outlook is, as you will see based on the comments below, of moderate growth, organic growth, because we don't have any acquisitions for now announced or anything.

But there is potential downside risk because of the situation in the Middle East. We said energy is our biggest business. This has been positive in '25. But now that there is war in Iran, this is also a potential source of uncertainty. Let's start, in fact, with Energy & Telco, commenting more in the details. So here, we put all the utilities. And -- this is electricity and gas. These are the predominant -- the main products.

And then there is broadband. But broadband is a nice product, but the bulk of the business here is electricity and gas. And this is in all the markets where we have these things. And revenues were up 5x. Even if we already have a nice energy business in Italy, but we had the addition of Verivox, but we also are developing an energy business in Spain. So this grew both very nicely organically and thanks to Verivox. Verivox started '25 with a very weak demand. Basically end of '24, early '25, it was weak, and we were a bit concerned and then it improved and accelerated. And in the second half of '26, we already said it many times, there were better conditions to save money on energy in Germany.

So we saw a lot of switching behavior. And this continued also in early '26. So January, February were nice months. And then, of course, you know what happened. They started bombing Iran and energy prices have rapidly increased. And it's an interesting situation. It has some parallels and some differences to the war with Ukraine, because also the war with Ukraine also triggered an energy shock.

Here, it seems to be a bit more contained. Basically, there were no major disruptions to supply so far. So in our business, we match demand and supply. And we -- of course, people will switch more if they can save more money or get better conditions. But after the war in Ukraine, there were situations and markets where a large portion of the supply disappeared from the market. Energy companies were not willing to acquire new customers.

Energy companies were going bankrupt. Only variable price tariffs were available. So those were very serious disruptions. For now, we are not seeing anything like that. Apparently, the system has been made more resilient also from a regulatory standpoint. So suppliers are still in the market, still happy to acquire new customers. The only problem is the offers today available are much less attractive. So people find it difficult to save money in many situations. So today, we have a functioning market, but with weaker benefits for consumers and so a lot of interest and then less transactional interest. So it's okay, but it's not as good as it was before.

And again, and if here something really bad happens in terms of the hostilities or anything, then we could go more towards a Ukrainian style situation. On the other hand, if the situation resolves, this will have generated so much interest again on energy that we will have booming demand. So this could go both ways.

And this is our uncertainty for now. And then for the other business lines, it's a bit more usual things. So insurance, we had double-digit organic growth in '25. We had the acquisition of Verivox also. Growth continue in '26. We are seeing maybe some slower growth, still growth in some more established markets. This is possibly linked to how the premiums are moving. So we don't worry about that, but we think there will be growth, but possibly a bit more moderate than in previous years.

And then there is banking. Banking for us is mortgages in Italy and consumer -- also in Germany, but Italy is the main country for mortgages and consumer loans, where Germany is bigger than Italy and then also some business with bank accounts. And we had solid growth in '25. We saw the acceleration of Italian mortgage demand in the second half. But overall, for the year, it was very nice organic growth. And then, of course, we had in the year the benefit of the Verivox consolidation. What is the outlook here? We sit down for mortgages in Italy, especially the mortgages are down significantly in the first half, and then we don't know for the second half.

On the other hand, we think we could see a positive contribution from growth potential from personal loans, both in Germany, where we have a nice business and in Italy. Finally, shopping. Shopping, this is mainly comparison shopping, and then we have an online review business in Italy, like the sort of Trustpilot, but it's only in Italy. And the business contracted, as you see a little bit because minus 1.7% year-on-year in terms of revenues compared to '25, but it was worse in terms of EBITDA.

And the situation is the same. We are still competing with Google's own comparison service, which is embedded in the search result. Google continues to operate like this despite the antitrust decision, the Google Shopping decision, but more importantly, despite the fact that at least preliminarily, the European Commission found this embedding of, of Google's own services in search in violation of the DNA and in particular of Article 6.5 that prohibits self-favoring.

But two years have passed since they opened an investigation, a year has passed since they told Google that they found evidence of noncompliant behavior, but no decision has been issued and nothing has really changed. So the outlook for now is that we continue to see more of the same stability to moderate contraction in '26, if nothing changes. Then if the commission finally decides on this matter and maybe issues a prohibition decision or does something effective, then we could have a relief and actually could have potential upside on this business as well. So this ends the comments and outlook for Mavriq, and I hand it back to Alessandro for Moltiply BP and Tech. Thank you.

Thank you, Marco. We are on Page 26, and we'll start with the results for the overall year. Again, we look at this as a strong performance from the Moltiply BPO and Tech division. We have a top line growth of 15.1% year-on-year. It's still double digit also if you take out the acquisitions of MiaPensione, which contributed to this growth.

On an EBITDA level, we are at 8.6%. Here, and I can comment -- so we grew from 56% to 60.8%. The margin slightly decreased from 24.1% to 22.7%. As I have commented throughout the year, this dilution effect is -- the reason for this dilution effect is twofold. On one side, we have the significant impact of para-notarial services that had a price effect with the unit margin in euros remaining constant and with the cost of the notaries becoming almost double.

So that creates an inflation in revenue, while which impacts -- which creates a dilution in the EBITDA margin percentage-wise. And the other reason is that impacts, especially in the fourth quarter, the numbers are on the following pages. You might remember that we had an incredibly strong quarter in '24, and that was mainly due to the closing of most complex claims on the insurance vertical. Those claims were connected to the events, the weather events of the summer and the fall of '23 and the longer ones took over a year to finish the processing and those claims are normally the ones where we have higher margins because it's a more professional job that we do on those.

And therefore, there is a higher margin. If we look at the performance in terms of EBIT, both adjusted for PPA and EBIT. They tell a similar story, although here, there is a negative impact, and that's the reason why the numbers are lower in terms of growth of increased amortization, immaterial amortization in connected especially software development and especially in the lease vertical, where, as you know, we had acquired Trebi, which we have renominated -- renamed as Moltiply Tech. That was mainly a legacy system, which is very predominant in the lease vertical.

And we're basically doing two things. On one side, we created a brand-new future-proof platform on the rental part of the business, which we started selling during 2025, actually at the end of 2025. And also, we started investing in renewing the platform for lease. So that's the reason why then we have an impact on the amortization here. And that's true. Basically, there is no -- in showing the PPA -- the EBIT number adjusted for PPA, there is here no significant change in PPA between '24 and '25. And therefore, the different -- the numbers just shift downwards when you consider this noncash effect of PPA, but -- and the percentage change because they are obviously on smaller numbers, it's just a mathematical factor.

But more or less, the growth over the year is in absolute terms similar. Now the comparison for -- with Q4 is here, it seems to tell a story, which is not good, but to us, this is actually a great quarter because it's -- the comparison is relative to a quarter that was incredibly strong in '24 and the ability to beat that to having reached that -- top that result to us is actually very, very significant, also because we substituted a very, very extraordinary quarter with something that still has some one-off effects, but definitely not as major as the ones that we had in '24, but it's mainly organic.

So here, really, we should not see this as a slowing of growth, but just as a comparison that was particularly difficult for '26. And I believe that having topped the '24 -- for '25, sorry. And I believe that having topped the '24 result is actually a great performance.

So moving on to the next page, on Page 28, a comment on the outlook at the division level. Well, first of all, on the '25 results, most of the comments I've already made. What is -- let me see if there's something else. No, I guess that we basically said everything already commenting the numbers. Then let's look at the outlook in '26. We expect to be able to continue to deliver the organic growth as you have seen us doing in the last couple of years at a revenue level.

We actually do expect to expand EBITDA margin. This is also because we'll see on one side, efficiency brought in by all the efforts in technology and AI that we are doing. And on the other side, also the mix effect of mortgages will taper off as para-notary services and especially refinancing will reach maturity and start declining, as Marco has already commented during '26. So the growth will come mainly we expect from banking and insurance, at least an EBITDA level. And then we expect lease to be able to replicate organically the results of '25 which let me say, again, those are record results.

And again, the lease vertical has been consistently delivering organic growth in -- on average through the years at a double-digit pace, and we are very pleased with this vertical and with its management.

Again, technology investments will continue both to renew our platform, but significantly to better our processes and to include and continue working on AI. As you will be able to read on the pages dedicated to AI, I believe that putting AI within regulated financial processes is not just about technology. So it's not just a technological investment. It's something that is instead at the same time, also an effort in designing processes, in putting in governance, in putting in the right KPIs and in deciding where the human should remain in the loop and how the human control is impacted.

As I -- as we reason on these things, we saw a very clear parallel to the efforts that we have done in the early 2010s when we started using nearshoring. Also there moving things from Italy to Romania was not just about copying processes or actually cutting processes from Italy and pasting them in Romania. It meant changing it, deciding which pieces should remain in Italy, which businesses could go to Romania, deciding where the performance of our Romanian colleagues was actually more efficient or as efficient as the Italian and so on.

I mean all of these, it is very, very similar and it takes time, and it's not just very similar when you think about moving processes and having AI embedded in those processes. And this is what we will continue to do. And I think we will continue to see results in the growth of our EBITDA margin. Now commenting the different business lines. Relative to banking, I'll still give a flavor of the different parts within banking at least for some time and each time it's necessary to explain the trends. So banking, it's our largest revenue contributor, and it was up 36.9% year-on-year. This is all organic growth.

Mortgages were the main driver of this growth. Actually, they basically we basically doubled our revenues here. As I have commented already, a lot of this came also from the para-notary services and the price effect of the increase of notary fees, but also the quantities went up very significantly. Wealth Management grew and grew significantly, 18%. This was driven mainly by tech offering and also some client expansion.

Real estate instead, loans, what we used to call loans remained -- showed a little bit of growth, but they were basically stable. And real estate instead, as you all know, went down, went down in revenues 21%. This is the end of the Superbonus phaseout, and we think now we are at a structural post incentive base line, now we expect to stabilize and be able to grow over this. Where will the growth come in '26? This will be mainly growth with existing clients, either because they increased their market share within a market that we do not expect to be particularly growing in '26.

So we expect our clients to increase their market share and our market share to increase within services of clients. There are some clients that are switching to us from other providers and will continue to do so during the course of '26 and some clients where we are increasing the services that we -- the number of services that we are selling them. Then let's move on to [indiscernible], which will present as the second business line.

This is because it's the second contributor in terms of revenues, but it's actually the largest contributor in terms of EBITDA and the contribution, it is very significant. It is much larger than the one of revenues. I mean, not the double, but close. By the way, on Page 42, you will be able to see the reclassification of our revenues in the different verticals historically. And if you look at '25, just to mention these numbers because I didn't do it before, 52% was coming from banking, 27% is coming from lease and 70% coming from insurance and the remaining 4% is our B2B2C initiatives that we classify as other revenues.

So Moltiply Lease had a record year. Again, it's a growth of 11.1% year-on-year. This growth includes the revenues of Evolve. Without Evolve, we would have grown 6.7%. Now I wouldn't worry too much on the EBITDA level because Evolve was not an acquisition that was done basically to increase our EBITDA. This is a company that was kind of captive in terms of services, meaning these guys do document management and document handling. And we were already representing basically half of the revenues.

They were located near our offices in Veneto, where most of our business line is located. And we felt that we would have a more significant control here, and we would be able to optimize it better if we owned it. And that's the reason why we decided to buy it. And that's why it's now in the perimeter. But again, it was not a significant contributor to the growth, therefore, you can expect the organic growth here to have been more closer to the 11% number than to the 6.7% number.

Okay. Within the lease, anyway, Agenzia Italia is the main contributor and also the main contributor to growth. And we believe that in the long term here, all these services to fleets have the possibility to continue growing because even if there is a stable market for new vehicles, the percentage of vehicles that are owned by fleets, either to use in corporations or to then be given to retail users will increase, and this will be also driven by the increased penetration of hybrid vehicles.

By the way, hybrid and electric vehicles. By the way, these electric vehicles also bring with them complexity in the administration. Just one, for example, to quote one, electric vehicles don't have to pay the annual registration fees with the [indiscernible], but only for some time and the time depends on in which region you use the vehicle. So it could be two years, it could be three years. All of this, as you can imagine, is an nightmare to manage. And it's what we do on, for example, on behalf of the long-term rental companies. Q4 was particularly strong. The reason why it was strong, it's because we were able to start selling new services. When you sell a new services to such a significant client base, you obtain one initial effect of basically catching up on the complete fleet that you're managing with them and then you sell it in the following years only on the continuing new business that you come in.

So it is structural, the fact that you sell new services. But the moment you sell them to one client, you have a one-off effect that is not replicated afterwards. We were able to capture some of them in '25. We'll capture some of that also in '26, but that was particularly significant at the end of last quarter. It was obviously a pleasant surprise for us.

We hope and we aim at replicating these results in '26. I do realize that this is something that when we meet in March like now is something that I always say that there were some interesting one-off effect in lease that boosted our performance and that we hope to replicate them and make them organic in the following year. And I say it again, and then we normally do better. But as of today, we aim at replicating the strong performance, especially at an EBITDA level.

And there is potential for upside, but this is today the expectation. Finally, insurance here, there is a minus sign in front of, obviously, the numbers. We went down from 52.2% to 45.7%. This is what we expected and we told investors all along during the year. But this -- we basically we have a normalization of the extraordinary claims volumes that we saw in '23 and in '24.

Anyway, current rate, as you see, structurally above '23 levels. So we continue growing here. Long-term average organic average is all the way close to double digit. And as you know here, there is a secular trend that will help us -- a regulatory change that will help us continue growing even more in the following years is the impact of NatCat insurance obligation that went in effect on March 31 for large enterprises and October 1 for small [indiscernible]. Obviously, we will see the impact in '26, but probably more in the following years.

And the majority of the impact will come when there are weather events that are covered by this NatCat insurance. So we expect it to be a growth engine -- but the timing of this growth will be obviously depending also on when the events happen. In terms of our platform, we are -- we finished the investments basically in 2025, and we are now starting to roll it out. This has been a long investment through the years, stable but long. When we acquired GruppoLercari, one of the value that as a company we brought to the table is technology and we [ owned ] completely their systems.

That was absolutely necessary to do. They were legacy systems part of that was based on [indiscernible] technology, just to give you an idea. So we had to [ reorder ] them completely, and now we are finishing by the half of the year '26, we'll finish the rollout. That also depends on, obviously, our partner insurance companies because there are some interactions with their own systems. This is important, not just technology for the sake of technology, but it's also important because this is a technology that is ready to embed the AI improvements. AI improvements in this case are more about increasing capacity more than necessarily spending less with the loss adjusters, which are an external workforce.

The point here is that this external workforce is actually a constraints in quality and quantity for growth, and we have fit when there are big events that impact. So the ability to increase the productivity for us is mainly a competitive advantage in being able to capture more market share in a way that otherwise would not be possible. So this completes the outlook for the BPO and Tech division, and I hand it over again to Marco for the last comment on the net financial position and dividend.

Okay. Thank you. So we are on Page 32 with the net financial position. The reported net financial position is negative EUR 441 million. And basically, this is the result of our acquisition of Verivox during the year. And on the other hand, of the strong operating performance of the business throughout the year that, of course, generated cash. You'll see the cash flow statements in the documents and the comments in the annual report.

So I think that's the best way to -- if you want to go into the details. But there is -- nothing particular. Most of our already know this of our indebtedness now is long term.

In terms of reading this net financial position, what you see in line see other current financial assets are simply exchange-traded funds, money market ETFs, they pay a little bit more than back deposits. And -- and then again, the only thing to point out is that the short-term component is much better than the year before.

And what I said before about the balance. Now for most of our banks, what is relevant is the statutory net financial position with some adjustments. So we have some little adjustment, but this is basically, the reported number is indicative what the banks would look at. We used to have -- we still have with one bank also net figure net of the money shares as of December 31.

We had shares in many worth EUR 109 million -- EUR 110 million. Now that was a bit less, but based on those figures led to a net financial position adjusted for this of EUR 331 negative million. And the only comment we have is that we are quite comfortable with the current situation. The little ABB that we did in '25 allow us to move to the favorable setup of our biggest loan basically it has like things that varied both in terms of rates and in terms of constraints, depending on the leverage, it allows us to move faster in that direction.

Then -- of course, you also know that, especially since the stock price started going south for these concerns about AI, et cetera, we resumed our buyback. And today, we have put back a good chunk of what was sold in the ABB. So these are the financial comments. The dividend payout we are proposing as a Board a dividend of EUR 0.15, which is a bit higher than last year -- this is to take into account our strong performance. But the reality is we still have significant leverage, and we might also have interesting M&A opportunities in this, in general, uncertain setting.

And so we will stick to limited payout. This ends all our comments and we can open the floor to questions. So operator, please go ahead.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. The first question is from Gabriele Venturi, Banca Akros.

I have 4 questions. First, it appears that your two division will be exposed to AI-driven changes in very different ways over the coming years. Given the operational synergies between them, does it still make strategic sense to keep both divisions within the same group structure over the long term?

Second, could you provide an update on the digital service tax across your European footprint? From 2027, you could become a liable for the tax at least in Italy probably. And there have been recently been a proposal to introduce a similar framework in Germany. Do you expect this to become a material financial buffer over the medium to long term?

And third, could you give us more color on the slowdown in the BPO division growth in the last quarter and the main factors that drove this deceleration? I know you said the difficult comparison with last year, but just if you can give us some more info. And finally, regarding the moderate growth outlook, should we interpret this as implying a mid-single-digit organic growth? And could you share indicative revenue and EBITDA figures for [ box ] for the year or at least the total M&A contribution?

Okay. Thank you. Well, I'll try -- this is Marco. I'll try to give at least a partial answer on the first question. Alessandro, please jump in. But this is the same question that we get all the time. There are no synergies between the two divisions today. There used to be capital allocation synergies for a number of years. Now that we have more M&A opportunities for both divisions, this is no longer the case. Actually, we have conflicting opportunities, and we have to figure out what is best. And if we do something for Mavriq, we don't do it for Moltiply BPO and Tech and vice versa. So...

I think there are reasons to look at a potential split. One of this is the digital service tax, as you all know, because this is a tax that is payable by groups that have consolidated. We consolidated means in the annual -- in the consolidated annual report, revenues of more than EUR 750 million, and we are not far from that. So we could get there with maybe one year of organic growth or we can get there faster with just one acquisition.

So the digital service tax is on digital revenues. The threshold is for the entire revenues of the group, even if you have a chain of supermarkets, it counts, but you pay the DST only on digital revenues. There is a little bit of uncertainty as to the definition of digital revenues. If you -- it could be all the Mavriq revenues in a country or could be only, let's say, the ones that are not from regulated businesses depending on the interpretation.

But our estimate is that now this is in force in Italy, Spain and France. And our estimate is that this could cost us easily EUR 3 million, EUR 4 million a year. And the problem also is that they are talking about -- there is a lot of debate about introducing this in Germany. And in Germany, by the way, energy is not -- I mean, it is possible, quite possible that the energy business or the telco business would be subject to this.

So this would be quite a lot of additional money to pay. So maybe another minimum EUR 3 million, EUR 4 million, it could double the potential bill for this if we reach the threshold. So this is certainly a reason to consider a potential separation. On the other hand, it depends on the right timing, the right opportunity. And until we are at the threshold, we have another couple of years at least of time to do it, depending -- or we could do it in many ways, by the way.

So I think it's something that we are very, very clear in mind. I'll also answer the fourth question about the moderate growth outlook for Mavriq. Yes, I think you could read it as single digit and maybe mid-single digit. The reality is we have this big uncertainty on energy. So I think in a few months, we should be able to give either a more bullish outlook or say that for a quarter or 2, the results will not be great. I think this is more important than this overall expected rate, but I think like a mid-single digit for now could make sense in interpretation.

Okay. Just to answer the -- your question on the slowdown of growth. Again, I really don't see this as a slowdown, but just as the wrong comparison. For example -- and you can reconstruct this easily if you go and look at numbers of other -- take another year. If you go back to '23, I'm just watching and looking at the numbers of '23, the EBITDA for the BPO division in '23 was EUR 13.2 million. The EBITDA in '25 is EUR 18.4 million. So it's like a 38% increase over 2 years, you calculated the [ COGS ]. I mean, there is really no slow -- no slowdown in growth.

We are just -- it's just really that Q4 of 2024 was particularly strong, but and it's not strong because of seasonality. It was really strong because, again, the weather events of '23 were so significant that they created this big blip that it impacts the way you see things. But do the exercise of looking at growth, the average growth over 2 years, and you see no slowdown going back to '23 and seeing an overall growth, which is strongly double digit, so at an EBITDA level. So I seriously don't see this as in any way, I would not read anything in a growth. If you look at Q4 compared to Q3, again, here, you see significant growth. So I don't have a comment more than the one I just did.

The next question is from Tommaso Nieddu, Keplex Cheuvreux.

I have a few. The first one is on Verivox. You have given already some color on top line. So could you provide more detail on the underlying profitability and how is it tracking versus your initial expectation, given also that you said there was a low dilution. The second question is on -- again, sorry, on the potential spin-off of the two divisions, if the transfer of the money stake from Moltiply to Mavriq goes into this direction and that is the rationale -- and the third one is more on AI, and it would be if you are seeing any evidence of traffic coming from AI-based channels? And if so, how does that traffic behave versus traditional channels?

Okay. Well, on money, we -- in Germany, for some reason, our competitors don't even publish their annual report, and we don't do this and we don't either. So we are not able to give very detailed information regarding variables. I would say it started weak in '25 and then it improved throughout the year. Part of it because the market improved, part of it because maybe we improved some stuff.

And we are happy of the acquisition. It's a company that has a strong trademark. It's a company that requires work. We are dedicating a lot of attention to it. And I think we'll be happy. In terms of the margin -- limited margin dilution, this could be that Verivox improved a little bit. It could also be that our existing business has improved, and we are not providing the details. And it's possibly both, a bit of both.

In terms of the potential separation of the two divisions, this could be done in many ways, could be split, could be with an M&A transaction, could be share split, many different things. What you referred to the fact that you saw that we had some money shares with Mavriq was, in fact, just a temporary effect because all the Mavriq -- the money shares are now multiplied. So this is not indicative of anything.

And it's connected to the tax reasons, right? So.

Yes, it was more like optimization of things. And AI traffic is a very interesting question in general because there are two things to say. One is your question, but one is, I think, broader. To your question, the traffic from AI chatbots is limited, is very few percentage points. And this is across all businesses, and this is also for other companies. So we think this is representative. And the traffic is good quality.

It's a sort of organic traffic. So it's a small portion of organic traffic. And the reason why it's not bigger, I think, is everybody is using these systems. But the reason why this is not big is that all the chatbots are keeping users within their interface. It's very difficult to click out of ChatGPT or cloud or anything. They're not designed like that. I think this is going to change a lot when advertising will become available in ChatGPT, especially because if they want to monetize, they want people to click on the ads and advertisers are going to pay if these ads to people to their websites.

So I think this will change a lot. The other question -- the other point about traffic in the last 12 months, is that I think if you ask anybody who has an online business, they will all tell you that, for instance, organic traffic has dropped significantly. And this is in part due to the AI, but in an indirect manner. What is happening is that Google has changed significantly its interface.

They have embedded what they call AI mode in the answers that leads then to a separate AI -- sorry, they have embedded AI overviews, which then leads to AI mode. And a lot of people are finding answers to informational queries directly on Google, and this is reducing organic traffic, particular traffic that was not converting much. So the impact of business is much less than what it looks like if you look at the traffic numbers, but it is there.

And by the way, this is not so much a matter of AI changing the way things operate, but just Google changing its interface, which is a different story. And by the way, could also be linked again to the issue of favoring of shopping and so on. So you have Google that has the dominant search engine that has bought all the defaults in the browsers. And now what they do is they send people -- they embed their AI system within the search results and now they are, in a way, favoring their AI systems as they were favoring shopping.

So this is not something between a business decision that could have some other implications more than -- that has to do with technology, but it's not a consequence of technology. It's a consequence of a business strategy. So this is to give more color on AI traffic.

Next question is from Aleksandra Arsova, Equita.

Some follow-up questions on my end. So on Money Group, you mentioned that you increased the stake slightly. So maybe some, let's say, some color on the reason behind this and if it still remains a financial investment rather than a strategic one. The second one is on M&A. Again, you said that you're keeping, of course, leverage under control and dividend and everything also to maybe take advantage of any opportunities on the M&A side. So just to have an idea what kind of target size and firepower you are willing to put into this in the coming quarters?

And then the last one, maybe a more qualitative one, more than ones during the conference call, you told that maybe in the BPO, there were some clients switching to Moltiply vis-a-vis some of your competitors. And also the organic growth we saw in the Mavriq division in insurance, but also in other products is definitely higher than the, I don't know, the average premium in insurance in car insurance. So I was wondering how the market shares are moving there if you are taking some market share over your competitors in Italy and also abroad?

So the money stake remains financial investment. We increased it from 8-point-something percent to 10% at the end of the year because for you that live in Italy, those of you that live in Italy will remember, there was a lot of talk about changing the taxation of participations in companies. Historically, the capital gains on participations held by a company were tax exempt, full participation exemption. And then to find some tax money, the government started saying that the requirement to have this exemption would be to have a participation of 10%. And we actually passed the draft of the law saying that participations were exempt on both capital gains and dividends if they were of at least 10%. We were at 8.5%.

So we thought it's not far and money is trading at still an attractive price. And so we decided to get to the 10%. Then at the very end, like two days before the end of the year or very close to the end of the year, but we had already done this. They changed the law and they put the threshold finally at 5%. So this was not needed. But this is the reasoning we have done.

And so we still see there as a financial investment, and this is the explanation of increase. Then of course, we see our stock price. I mean, I cannot maybe judge, but we see a lot of companies, including many as having very depressed stock prices despite having business models that we think are not particularly at risk. So it's a tempting investment, let's say. But we already have a significant stake, and it's a financial investment.

In terms of M&A, I think. We can look at things of the size of what we did in the past. So from medium, small to more sizable depending on the timing. And we'll be a bit opportunistic. We are very busy working on our businesses. We are busy working on integrating the international assets, in particular Verivox. We are busy delivering on AI, both in BPO and within Mavriq. So there are many things to do. But if we have the right opportunity at the right time, we will consider it. And again, the size could be up to what we did in the past, I would say. Then for the BPO clients, et cetera, I think Alessandro is the only one that can answer.

Yes. And just a small comment to say that on M&A that as you have seen, I mean, Marco explained very well before, the capital allocation synergy that kind of went away when we started having very significant opportunities also on the Mavriq side, opportunities that we have captured, and we are very happy to have captured them. But we have continued on the BPO side to do small bolt-on acquisitions.

We still have a pipeline there. I mean it's a small things that to me, I would not even consider them inorganic growth. They are more like investing in a product and deciding that it's best instead of developing it in-house to, to just get it on the market or a number of contracts. I mean these are things that we have a pipeline there, and we continue to do it. These are small ones. Then obviously, we would also have opportunity on the larger opportunities, but this is where all the things that Marco finished saying are true. And so we are focusing on AI and on the integrations and the efficiencies and -- but we will still be very, very tactical. And if good things appear on both sides, then we'll see if we can consider them.

The market share, yes, we -- we do track -- okay, first of all, saying that we will be able to capture volumes from a competitor is a sensitive information. So I cannot give too much color on this. But let me say, I mean, differently from maybe the Mavriq side here, the competition is focused on single clients, right? And it's a step effect. It's not something like it happens slowly.

What happens is that the client might take the decision that it will increase volumes to you. And then basically, as you start building the capacity, it will start giving it to you. We first build some capacity, it will give it to you and so on. So there are players in the market that try to treat banking clients as cash cows, trying to leverage the stickiness of clients.

And the reality is that the stickiness of clients is such up to a point, Aleksandra. So -- and you talk to banks every day, and you can imagine what I'm referring to. So there are points where banks get set up of being treated as cash cows and they start looking at opportunities elsewhere.

This is good news and bad news on the other side, it means that there is a limit to pricing power, obviously, and you can exercise it for a bit, but it's not really the big leverage here. The big leverage here is providing better services at a more competitive price, thanks to technology, is endearing your customers to -- thanks to the quality of the things you do and avoiding to mess up.

[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at this time. I turn the conference back to you for any closing remarks.

Okay. Thank you, and thanks, everybody, for participating to this call. And -- as always, we are available for one-on-one, if you have any follow-up questions or anything. .

Yes. Thank you. We've given you more information to digest at this time. So we'll be happy for any follow-up in discussions and the things we've written about AI, we'll be happy to discuss them with you. So thanks again and see you next time. .

Thank you. Bye-bye. .

Ladies and gentleman thank you for joining. The conference is now over, and you may disconnect your telephones.

This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the presentation of Moltiply Group Third Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions.

At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Marco Pescarmona, Chairman of Moltiply Group; and Mr. Alessandro Fracassi, CEO of Moltiply Group. Please go ahead.

Thank you. This is Marco Pescarmona. And by the way, Francesco, our CFO, is traveling, so he's not able to participate today and we will rely as usual on the presentation that was published on our website, and we'll start from Page 18 of the document and look at the results of the first 9 months. In the first 9 months, the results are quite strong. Of course, revenues are EUR 467.1 million, up 45.4% year-on-year. The EBITDA in the 9 months is EUR 120.8 million, and that's up 42.4% year-on-year. And it corresponds to an EBITDA margin of 25.9%, which compares to the 26.4% of the previous year. And the EBIT is in the 9 months, EUR 75.5 million. That's up 54% year-on-year.

And finally, net income is EUR 38.6 million which is up 25.8% year-on-year. Of course, these numbers exclude discontinued operations, which means the small regulated entities that we used to add that is in the process of being sold. It's very tiny. And if we move to Page 19 with the Q3 highlights, we can see that there are -- the results are very much as we expected a continuation of the performance of Q2. So revenues for Q3 '25, EUR 165.4 million. That's up 55.3% year-over-year. EBITDA is EUR 43.5 million, that's up 52.2% year-on-year.

And by the way, with an EBITDA margin of 26.3% which compares to 26.8% of Q3 of the last year. EBIT is EUR 26.8 million. That's up 60.9% year-on-year and net income is EUR 16.3 million, which is up 64.2% year-on-year. The important thing that you all already know to point out, if we look at the quarter, for the quarter, the year-on-year comparison benefits from the inclusion of Verivox in Germany in the consolidation area.

And so there is not only the numbers solid organic growth, but there is also this enlargement of the consolidation area, which started in Q2, and that's the reason why we said this year rather than focus on year-on-year growth, it's better to look sequentially an evolution because the change of the enlargement of the consolidation area is really quite significant.

If we want to go into more detail on the division -- of the divisions. On Page 20, we have some details of Mavriq, which is our broking division. Mavriq revenues are EUR 268.2 million, that's up 70.8% year-on-year in the 9 months. EBITDA is EUR 78.1 million, which is up 68.8% compared to the previous year. And we also noticed that EBITDA margin is 29.1%, which is not so far from the 29.5% of the previous year despite the inclusion of Verivox in the consolidation area, which means that the EBITDA margin of the traditional perimeter improved in a significant way.

And the EBIT is EUR 54.5 million in the 9 months, that's up 81% year-on-year. It's important to keep in mind, however, that the EBIT figures don't include for now any amortization of intangible asset that will result from the purchase price allocation of Verivox. So we still have a provisional goodwill and probably by the end of the year, we will allocate this goodwill and some of it will be allocated and intangible assets such as software or trade [indiscernible] that are subject to amortization and you'll see all that impact concentrated in the fourth quarter of the year.

If we go to Page 21, we have the Q3 financials of Mavriq, the effect is even stronger. Revenue was almost double. So the EUR 103.2 million, which is up 91.8% year-on-year. Again, Verivox is a very big object. So this makes a significant impact even if we still -- we will also be significant organic growth. EBITDA is EUR 30 million in Q3. That's up 78.9% year-on-year. The EBITDA margin is 29% in Q3. That compares to 31.1% in Q3 of the previous year. And the EBIT is EUR 21.3 million. That's up 86.8% year-on-year.

In terms of comments on the business, there are no particular news. I mean, it's we did strongly even from an organic point of view in all different businesses with the exception -- notable exception of e-commerce price comparison, which continues to suffer from basically the competition of Google, which is -- they're under investigation for noncompliance with the DMA but no decision has been issued yet. And on top of the organic growth, there is the enlargement of the consolidation area, which again prompts us to look at things more or less sequential than on a year-to-year basis because it's -- the change is too big change.

For the coming months, we can expect foreseeable evolution, of course. One is there will be likely a slowdown in mortgage demand, especially for mortgages in Italy because the mortgages tend to be let's say, not seasonal, like are concentrated in periods when interest rates go down, and then may disappear or will slow down a lot for a while and then come back again when interest rates move. So we had a favorable environment for mortgages and that's slowing. On -- so this is on the less favorable side, even if the real estate market remains strong. So it out it's mostly are mortgage effect here.

And on the other hand, we see a moderate recovery in energy demand in Germany, especially compared to the first part of the year. So savings available to consumers in Germany that decide to switch energy providers are better than they used to be a few months ago. So this is a positive, even if we still have to see the entire peak season, so it's still a bit on the side. And for the rest, the other markets are developing continuity. There is nothing new to report. And with this, I'm done with the update on Mavriq, and I hand it over to Alessandro for BPO.

Yes. Thanks, Marco, and good afternoon, everyone. Good morning for our friends in the States. We're on Page 23. As you see, the 9 months financials for the Moltiply BPO&Tech division are strong. We grew 21.2% year-on-year from EUR 164 million to EUR 198.8 million, and EBITDA grew from EUR 38.5 million to EUR 42.6 million. That's a growth year-on-year of 10.7%. This different growth, which is also reflected in a change in the EBITDA margin is basically connected to, as you all know, because I've explained it quite some time this year, the impact of the new law on notary fees.

So we have, obviously, in these results, a significant percentage of para-notary activities. And as you know, we had an increase in prices for the services of notaries which did not impact our absolute margin, but it did impact our percentage margins. So there is a lot -- this dilution effect if you look at the EBITDA percentage relative to revenues. But the growth, which is at least 70% of this growth is organic.

So I think it's a significant good performance in the 9 months, completely in line with what we expected and what we communicated. So we keep this double-digit growth, which is obviously, our long-term target. Looking at EBIT, also here, you see that now the trends of EBITDA and EBIT in terms of growth are very similar and we grew 11.2% year-on-year from 18.9% to 21.0%. And the EBIT margin also here, obviously, you have the dilution effect, went down from 11.5% to 10.6%.

Relatively -- if we go to the next page, we can see the third quarter results. The third quarter has actually been a little better than the second quarter. And in fact, the impact on the overall year and the 9 months performance has been a little improvement. The growth in revenues 18.0% year-on-year. The growth in EBITDA margin is 14.3%. And basically, here, you would have had also a double-digit growth even if you just kept the organic piece of it. So the EBITDA grew EUR 11.8 million to EUR 13.5 million, again, 14.3% year-on-year growth.

EBITDA margin. Again, we have the same dilution effect. 22.4% down to 21.7%. The EBIT margin in the third quarter grew 4.8% from EUR 5.3 million to EUR 5.5 million that is a growth of 4.8%. The -- basically the comments as always in -- when we're talking in the out quarters are reasonably short. But the reality is there is not a lot to comment, meaning that basically what we told you at the end of August, beginning of September in terms of the trends, they're very similar.

The growth is basically driven by mortgages, by the lease business line and also wealth is doing well. although the growth of wealth is connected to a significant and important project on the IT part. So that will -- is not really -- there will not be a significant repetition of that in the next year. And instead, we are seeing obviously a normalization, as we have mentioned a lot of times of claims and real estate. So we expect this growth to continue. Now in the coming quarters, quarter 4 was exceptionally good last year. You might remember, it kind of even turned here around.

So we see how we will compare just looking at Q4, but the trends that we discussed basically continue. What Marco said about slowing down in remortgages will impact also the BPO division, specifically with para-notary activities that I just finished mentioning. So there will be a little bit of that. But or the rest of the trends are generally being positive and in line with what we told you. We keep working, obviously, on the processing efficiency.

And as you all know, technology is playing a more and more significant role in increasing efficiency. And obviously, we will be -- this will be the name of the game looking forward in the next quarter and in the next years. And I think this basically ends my comments. And obviously, I'm very happy to take questions. But before that, let me pass it back to Marco with comments on the net financial positions.

Thank you, Alessandro. And let's finish with a couple of words on net financial position on Page 27. Here, the statutory net financial position is negative EUR 455 million. That's an improvement to the negative for EUR 467 million of June 30, or the EUR 515 million of March 31. And basically, this is -- the improvement is benefit from the cash generation of the business. Just a reminder, we spent some -- we did 2 transactions in Q3, one which is neutral on net financial position, which is the acquisition of the large majority of the remaining stake of Lercari. Basically, we bought the majority of that stake paying cash. Plus we have a prudent call on the residual portion, which I think is 12%.

And -- but the amount of the cash outflow plus the new liability is -- corresponds basically to -- ballpark to the liability that we had already recognized. So this is neutral on the net financial position. What is not neutral is the fact that we acquired -- also the entire minority in our company, with a company with a third-party shareholder that was providing para-notary services and this is an agreement to acquire that for a consideration of EUR 15 million, of which EUR 8 million were immediately paid. So this affected the net financial position, and that's a first point. The second point is the kind of adjustment net financial position, including the value of the MONY shares. That's basically stable year-on-year because the stock price of MONY went down. And this is not so relevant because for the majority of the banks now we have like a custom-made definition, which doesn't take this into account. But still from our point of view, it's an interesting parameter to look at, and we still have a couple of like legacy loans that look at like net financial position, including MONY.

And so with this, again, we are a 355 million. Clearly, you do the multiples our net financial position already is below 3x EBITDA, the statutory work and the, let's say, the adjusted one would be a bit more than 2x of EBITDA. And so we are in comfortable situation. And also, we are benefiting from reduced rates thanks to this lower net financial position more favorable rate on our financing. With this, we are finished with the comments and we can open it to comments. So operator, please, you can open the floor to questions.

[Operator Instructions] First question is from Gabriele Venturi, Banca Akros.

Three questions on my side. First one, we have seen recent rulings awarding significant claims to other price comparison platform in Germany against Google and do you see any positive reduction or increase the visibility for your case against Google?

Second one, following last week, it was on Azimut new banking project. Will you share your view on any potential implication for the wealth segment within your BPO division?

And the last one, could you provide more color on the margin evolution within the Mavriq division and how Verivox profitability is progressing post the consolidation?

Okay. I will take the first and the third question and Alessandro, of course, will handle the second. Regarding the news about -- from Germany, just as a refresher, basically idealo is a smaller price comparison websites as called the success in the German court being awarded the image is exactly for the same thing that we are pursuing against Google. So basically, the growth in Germany, from what we know, confirm the -- that of course, the abuse of dominant position is proven, but this court confirmed not only relied on the proven abuse, but also confirmed that the abuse continued after 2017. And this is how we understand it.

And so in terms of the fact that there were damages and in particular, the use continued was very favorable to the claimants. In terms of the award, the amount is nice, but it is significantly lower than the original claim because the original claim was for more than EUR 3 billion and the awards was to allow something below EUR 500 million. And on one side, I think this is a bit disappointing. On the other side, in Germany today, they just explained to me that the largest claim ever awarded in Germany for a similar situation was EUR 60 million.

So this time, they awarded 8x the largest claim ever awarded in Germany. So it was also a big departure from past very conservative approach by German judges on the quantification of the claims, this concept of prudence and so on. So I don't know, I think it's like done to be favorable to companies in general. So I think the very good news is the general win on the infringement and the continuation of the infringement on the amounts, we hope that we don't get 14% of our ask. We get significantly more.

It's also important to point out that there are other cases that are being ruled these days. And so far, the rulings have been confirming the infringement and the fact that damages are due. So I think it's again good news. This will reinforce the conviction of judges that the [ quantum ] will depend on the work of the local experts. And again, we hope to get more than the percentage that they got. And the other question about the margins of the Mavriq division, the margins were slightly down year-on-year, especially if you look at the single quarter.

But you have to keep in mind that we are now consolidating Verivox, which is a very large entity that has lower EBITDA margin than our other businesses. So the way you should read the margin evolution is we have a significant margin expansion in everything I mean, not everything because like the price comparison goes down in terms of margins, but in almost everything, plus a big dilution from a large object like Verivox, where the EBITDA margin is significantly lower than the rest of the division. So this is how to read it, this is done.

Okay. Relative to the T&D project, obviously, here I have to be a little careful as we're talking about the client in a delicate situation. Well, I mentioned this project last -- when we were, in September, discussing the half year results as I was looking forward. And I mentioned that as something that I still didn't know which way it would go. because obviously, this means the project is basically splitting Azimut in 2. And I know and like the Federal scope as of today as we are providing significant services to Azimut. And obviously, that could be an opportunity, given the fact that the scope of the new bank, becoming a bank, it will increase the number of services that they need.

But still, I'm not in the position to say that we will necessarily continue to be offering services to them. And so the way to look -- as a Moltiply shareholder, the way to look at the news of delays in the launch of T&B kind of connected to what's going on in Azimut right now, it is conceptually neutral looking at the status quo. I mean we will continue to provide the services if the company remains with the current perimeter, if it will split and when it will split some months ahead, I don't know how it will work. And obviously, I'll be explaining to our shareholders and to the market in general, what the expectations are.

Today, this is basically the news is that this thing is being pushed forward. And actually, things about remediation of the things that need to be done. They were not -- if you look -- were not many comments of Bank of Italy relative to the operating model. It was more about the overall governance. And so we -- let's say, we are not part of the problem. possibly in the next weeks and months, we will be part of the solution. So relatively speaking, this is, as I said, a delicate moment for Azimut, but I don't think there should be any read across to us, definitely not something negative on us because of this.

Next question is from Aleksandra Arsova, Equita.

A couple on my end. The first one is maybe a little bit early, but just the sentiment you have on 2026, so how you will enter the year, considering what you already told us about overall trends, a little bit decelerating mortgages, overall positive trend for most of the other divisions. So I was wondering, is it reasonable to assume a sort of normalized growth rates for the BPO in mid-single-digit range for revenues and maybe high single-digit range for the Mavriq Broking division. This is the first one.

And the second one is a follow-up on the, let's say, the Google issue. So maybe do you have any clue idea of what could be the timing of the Italian courts to go on with the case? So just to understand whether we have a time frame for this issue?

And also connected to what you were mentioning before on your expectation to get maybe even more than the amount got from idealo. So if I remember correctly, both you and idealo are requested for roughly EUR 3 billion in damages, maybe idealo a little bit more, but broadly EUR 3 billion. So just to understand better the underlying. So as far as you know, the period covering these damages is the same for you and that for idealo. And so if you can maybe remind us of how you calculated or estimated this EUR 3 billion damages.

Okay. Well, in terms of sentiment, I mean, it's a bit too early to tell. We have now a very diversified business. We have grown pretty well in recent years. And I mean it's really hard to comment on whether the specific figures you quoted are appropriate or not because we don't give guidance. In general, I would say we tend to have analyst estimates that tend to be a bit on the conservative side for the future. So we tend to do a bit better. I would look at to the extent that it is possible to the past to have an idea to what happened in the last couple of years, that's easier for BPO for broking there is the issue of Verivox.

And if we do well, we will be able to deliver performance by being more effective with Verivox. This will be an important driver. Of course, the jury is out to see if we are able to deliver or not. But that's potentially for the next couple of years for broking a very relevant source of performance. But again, even in terms of -- even giving some vague indications, we are not ready for that. We will try to do it with the full year results.

Marc, if I can just add one thing on the BPO. Aleksandra, correctly, you were referring to something like normalized. But I really want to stress out is we will also be clear when you will see the different divisions when we -- the impact of the different business lines when we give the full picture with the full year results. But it's true that we have a very strong -- we had a very, very strong performance on mortgages.

But I think you should not discount that there was really a very significant drawback on claims and on real estate because of, on one side, the normalization of statistical normalization of what has happened in '23 and '24. So when you look at '26, obviously, there will not be anymore this normalization because the whole of '25 has been without Ecobonus and the whole of '25 has been with basically normal weather events.

And then as you know, one of the things that at a certain point, we should start seeing some impact instead is the new law on natural catastrophes. So as you know, the full impact of the law is basically at the end of the year, meaning that everybody has to take on insurance. So I think that the first year, where we will see -- we'll start seeing some impact for BPO is -- for our claim BPO is 2026. So keeping still our qualitative comments, I just wanted to make sure that this is what you're looking at. So as Marco said, probably looking at the past is the best way to see what we can be doing in '26.

And in terms of the timing of the Italian court for the claim, Italian courts are normally take 2 to 3 years to reach decisions. We have no visibility of the exact timing. And I don't think we will be able to provide updates throughout the process. I think before hearing anything about -- from us about outcomes, you will hear a lot of decisions of other -- in other jurisdictions. By the way, all these decisions, if they continue to be favorable to the claimants, we just, I think, reinforce the conviction of our judges. So I mean, don't expect anything in terms of amounts, decisions or anything at least for all of '26. We might have some -- our own feelings, but until we have a judgment, it's all up in the air. We don't know. It could be nothing. It could be a lot of money. Until we have a decision, we are in the dark, let's say.

Okay. And maybe the last one on how you calculated the EUR 3 billion and the number of.

Yes. It's difficult, in fact, to make comparisons between the claims of different countries or different players for a number of reasons. One is exactly how the claim is structured for what you are claiming damages if it's for a certain period, for a longer period and so on. And also, these damages, the contract that we are discussing, the abusive combat that have been observed also have permanent effects. So if I -- I don't know, like if I crush your end, then maybe you don't lose the end, but you'll not be able to manipulate things in the future, and that's a permanent damage.

And this is the same, once a player that has a very strong market position in a market with tipping network effect becomes #2, they will not -- they will be a little bit crippled compared to how they were before. So part of the damages is also that, depending on how you phrase it and so on, it could be done in a way or another. So I would say from what I read, the idealo claim is possibly doesn't have the terminal value, stops at a certain point in time. I don't know what kind of assessment they did on permanent effects or if they reserved the right to do a further claim. So I mean it's really hard to do a comparison.

Idealo is significantly bigger than [indiscernible]. This is important to know. But again, this doesn't mean much. There is a company in Sweden that made a claim just like a couple of weeks ago of EUR 7 billion. So I mean, our claim is well grounded. It's based on econometric models based on -- all these things are done with counterfactual scenarios. So the way it works, this is very general in terms of concept. When you have these abusive conducts, the way you determine the damages is by determining -- finding a counterfactual scenario. Normally, there can only be one counterfactual scenario. This is something that typically the court has to decide -- so exactly what is the counterfactual scenario.

And then in this counterfactual scenario, you have to estimate the economic performance that reasonably you could have achieved. And then the damage is the difference between your actual economic performance and the economic performance in the counterfactual. And then, of course, there is this issue of the permanent component that also has to be determined. It's a bit like a concept of terminal value. This makes sense only if there are externalities and so on, which in our case, we think are very strong. But these are the generic concept, but it's very difficult to make comparisons.

Next question is a follow-up from Aleksandra Arsova, Equita.

Since we have a little bit of time, maybe a more general one on the businesses in France and Spain and the Netherlands. So in past occasions, you mentioned the work you were doing apart from the operating margins was on the top line and on marketing cost on the supply side. So maybe an update on the aspects on LeLynx, Rastreator and Pricewise.

I think we are, in general, very happy of the work that we have done, especially in Spain and France. The Netherlands is a more recent acquisition. So it's still more -- it's a bit more work in progress. I think the key aspect is the fact that we have put in place strong management teams with more and more autonomy. The teams -- the new teams, new people, part existing people because we also have strong people in several cases from the original teams. But basically, thanks to the management teams, these companies are delivering strong performance and with a good level of autonomy now.

And in the Netherlands, we just appointed a new CEO. So we are a couple of years behind in terms of this process. But this is a very important process because it accelerates any knowledge transfer that we might be doing because it improves the execution. First, this improves the execution basically. And then -- and initially, the execution is more like asking as -- as asking them to do things that we think could be beneficial. But then after the easy things are done, the execution will be local innovations or doing things that have to do more with partners or other things that are inherently local.

And with good things, we are in very, very safe hands. And this also allows our core leadership team from Alessio to his closest team to concentrate more attention on Germany because in Germany, we have a very big opportunity. But of course, it's a big organization. And we don't want to -- we want to do a good job, let's say. And so the strong teams in the different countries are delivering. And also, they are freeing up resources so that we can focus more on Germany. So it's -- we are very happy with the overall situation.

Gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at this time.

Okay. Let us make 2 final comments. One, I understand some of the questions you are asking. I mean we will be thinking about how to represent the business in a possibly slightly different way from next year in terms of giving maybe more visibility on the international part and maybe aggregating things in Italy because it no longer makes sense on the Mavriq side, possibly given the relative sizes of the different things to talk about mortgage broking in Italy, insurance broking in Italy and then like one big object, which is international markets.

This is with 2/3 of the stuff coming from international, not exactly representative. So we'll have to think about it. And maybe also on BPO, how we aggregate things, we think a little bit exactly the design of our business lines. So this is first comment.

And second comment, which is a bit stupid, but we -- you saw the stock price on Friday going down like 5%, et cetera, and we got feedback from a couple of people that maybe it was because we had moved the call to another day and what could this imply, et cetera. But basically, this implies that I was going to the seaside and Alessandro that Dennis mentioned, we couldn't match the 2 things together. So I mean, in our case, then we suggest that you don't read too much into the fact that we move a call or anything. It's -- yes, it's really everything for the long term.

And the normal explanation is normally the easiest, let's say, just to clarify that because we found it very funny that because we moved the call, the stock price will go down because maybe you know what could this mean? It meant, again, we had other things to do and we just couldn't make it work. So with this comment, I think we have finished -- thank you for participating to our call. And as always, we are available for one-on-ones. And otherwise, we'll talk to you at the next call. Thank you.

Thank you, everyone. [ God speed. ] Bye.

Bye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones.