Graphite Bio Inc Aktie

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the LENZ Therapeutics Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Tina. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. My name is Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer of LENZ Therapeutics. We are joined today by Eef Schimmelpennink, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Shawn Olsson, our Chief Commercial Officer; and Dr. Marc Bloomenstein, our Chief Medical Officer.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding LENZ's future expectations, plans, prospects, corporate strategy, regulatory and commercial plans and expectations, cash runway projections and performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors and risks, including those discussed in our filings with the SEC and which can also be found on our website.

In addition, any forward-looking statement represents only our views as of the date of this webcast and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update such statements. The company encourages you to consult the risk factors contained in our SEC filings for additional detail.

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Eef.

Thank you, Dan. Good morning, everyone. Today's results mark an important step forward for LENZ and VIZZ. In the third quarter, we saw more than 50% growth in both product revenue and total prescriptions, with strong momentum continuing into the fourth quarter. On October 1, we marked the 1-year anniversary of this launch.

Over the past year, we've built important foundations, gained valuable insights into what drives adoptions and, importantly, drove encouraging momentum from our consumer-focused initiatives. This last quarter, we continued to see that consumer demand generation is a key driver of growth. Expanding our pilot reading glasses campaign to national TV enabled us to reach a broader group of consumers with a clear message around an alternative to reading glasses.

Our newly established telehealth channel also gives interested consumers a convenient path to evaluation by an independent licensed eye care professional and, if appropriate, a prescription for home delivery. Together, these initiatives have helped to establish a more seamless path from awareness to evaluation, treatment and continued use. And as I mentioned, the results were more than 50% growth in product revenue and total prescriptions in the third quarter, with strong momentum carrying into the early weeks of Q4.

We have built a strong foundation with eye care professionals. This awareness now exceeds 90%, with more than 15,000 prescribing ECPs. At the same time, our launch experience has shown that physician awareness alone is not sufficient to drive adoption at the pace we want. The strongest growth response has come when consumer demand generation is paired with convenient access.

All of this is giving us great clarity on the commercial model best positioned to support durable growth in this category. Based on what we have learned, we announced a strategic reorganization designed to align LENZ with this consumer-led commercial model. Going forward, consumer marketing will be the emphasis of our U.S. commercial strategy, with a much smaller and more focused sales and medical team maintaining important KOL, ECP and trade relationships.

This is an evolution of our launch strategy, not a change in our commitment to LENZ. The reorganization concentrates our people and capital on the activities that are demonstrating the clearest connection to patient acquisition and sales growth. It also creates a more efficient structure for the business we are building.

As part of this transition, we expect our organization to move to approximately 40 employees, and we expect overall operating expense to decrease by more than 50%. We are targeting 2027 operating expenses of approximately $70 million to $75 million, with more than 70% of our projected spend allocated to our consumer-driven sales and marketing strategy. We strongly believe this focused model gives us the opportunity to reach more patients, expand this emerging category and build a durable business.

With that, I will hand it over to Shawn, who will provide more detail on our commercial execution.

Thank you, Eef. As mentioned, we are 1 year into launch and have made measurable progress in 3 key areas: eye care professionals, consumers and access. With ECPs, we have driven awareness of VIZZ to above 90%, achieved more than 15,000 prescribing ECPs, and over 75% of them have prescribed more than once. With consumers, we've launched our national campaign and have continued to optimize ad placement to support VIZZ's continued growth.

On access, this is operating well and growing in all channels. VIZZ is now available through retail pharmacies, the e-pharmacy and [Finch Health] telehealth, giving patients several ways to access VIZZ. This broader campaign and the additional telehealth channel have been the key drivers of the 50% quarter-over-quarter TRx growth in Q3. And impressively, we have done that with Q3 working media spend broadly in line with Q2.

Looking at the performance of VIZZ, the presbyopia eye drop category is still in its infancy. We're focused on growing this market, and it's clear that VIZZ is the leader in this developing category. Since approval and launch through Q3, we have distributed more than 4 million vials, including samples and commercial products, and sold approximately 110,000 packs. This makes VIZZ the #1-selling presbyopia eye drop in the U.S. since its approval.

Furthermore, based on the 2026 TRx data from Symphony, VIZZ has a 94% market share in the U.S. Building a new category takes time and, therefore, a disciplined allocation of commercial resources. The more than 50% growth in Q3 shows what consumer campaigns can do, and that is where we will concentrate our efforts. Consumer marketing will take the lead in our commercial strategy and receive a larger share of our commercial investment, including continued national television and digital advertising on the channels that deliver the strongest return.

As we look towards our year 2 commercial focus, for ECPs, our foundational awareness of VIZZ is built, and we're moving from one-on-one detailing to broad ECP engagement through marketing, supported by a small team focused on key opinion leaders, speakers, national and state-level support. This keeps VIZZ top of mind in the community while allowing us to direct more resources towards consumer demand, which will be our primary focus. We believe this is the right commercial model for durable growth.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Eef.

Thank you, Shawn. Before handing the call over to Dan to discuss our financial results and outlook, I also want to address the leadership transition we announced. After nearly 6 years leading LENZ and more than 25 years in biotech, I have decided to transition from my role as President and CEO, effective December 1, 2026, to be able to devote more time to our patients.

This is a deeply personal decision, and I've come to the point where I feel confident in the direction of the company. We have built an important foundation to this, and we have great clarity on the commercial model ahead, and we're aligning the organization around the opportunity in front of us. Dan and I will work closely together through December 1 to implement the reorganization, ensure continuity and position him for success as Interim Chief Executive Officer.

I have full confidence in Dan's ability to lead LENZ through its next phase. He knows the business inside out and has been closely involved in building the foundation for our commercial growth. Together with Shawn, Marc and the full leadership team, he is well prepared to lead LENZ through its next phase, and I look forward to continuing to support him, the team and the Board as a strategic adviser. I'm very grateful to the LENZ team, our past and present employees, and our Board of Directors for their support throughout this journey. I'm proud of what we have accomplished together, encouraged by the momentum we're seeing and confident in LENZ's future.

With that, I'd like to hand the call over to Dan.

Thank you, Eef. I'd like to start by saying thank you for all of your contributions to LENZ, and I look forward to your continued guidance as we work through your transition. Your leadership has left a lasting mark on LENZ, on me and the team we have built together. I'm humbled by the confidence placed in me by Eef and the Board of Directors to step into this role. I'm encouraged by our momentum.

Our priorities are clear, and we're focused on executing in this next phase at LENZ. As both Eef and Shawn have discussed, early results from the July launch of telehealth and our nationwide TV advertising campaign have been encouraging, as evidenced by a sequential increase of over 50% in product revenue in Q3 over Q2, with meaningful script growth observed across distribution channels.

Impressively, our telehealth channel contributed more than 50% of the incremental scripts this quarter. Reflecting on Q3, we reported total product revenues of $2.6 million, driven by over 38,000 paid scripts, representing a 50% and 51% sequential increase over Q2, respectively, and maintaining our consistently strong gross-to-net ratio of approximately 93%. In addition, we reported $800,000 in license revenue related to the recognition of a portion of the upfront payment received from our commercialization agreement with Vertex Pharmaceuticals signed in late Q2.

I will provide a further update on our global commercialization efforts for VIZZ in a moment. Turning now to operating expenses. Our cost of sales on third quarter product revenue totaled $0.5 million, and we continue to anticipate this to trend to approximately 90% product gross margin over time. Total SG&A decreased to $35.8 million in Q3, or approximately $31.5 million adjusted to exclude noncash stock-based compensation and an additional $0.3 million in one-time noncash charges.

This was a 10% quarter-over-quarter decline from Q2, which was in line with our expectations. Total research and development expenses remained $0 in the third quarter, consistent with recent periods. Our Q3 net loss per share, both basic and diluted, was $0.99 per share in the quarter on a net loss of $31 million, and we ended the third quarter with approximately $197.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

As I discussed today, we announced a strategic consumer marketing-focused reorganization that is designed to concentrate our resources on the initiatives we believe have the greatest potential to drive durable patient growth, significantly lower our cost structure and increase capital efficiency. We anticipate completing substantially all activities related to the reorganization in the fourth quarter, with an estimated $5 million in one-time net restructuring charges.

As we look ahead, we expect our annual operating expenses will reduce by over 50% and are targeting 2027 operating expenses in the range of $70 million to $75 million, with over 70% of our forward spend allocated to our consumer-driven marketing strategy highlighted today. As I have in prior quarters, I wanted to take a moment to provide an update on our global licensing and commercialization efforts.

We continue to see VIZZ as a global product, and with a worldwide population of over 1.8 billion adults with presbyopia, we believe the opportunity to expand our commercial footprint is an important and promising one. In Q3, we continued to advance our regulatory efforts with our commercial partners and now have 11 regulatory submissions under review and anticipate multiple additional submissions and potential ex-U.S. regulatory approvals in the months and quarters ahead. We remain focused on further expanding our global network in additional strategic geographies. And as I mentioned, we'll maintain that effort as a strategic priority as we advance from here.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Eef.

Thanks, Dan. To close, I want to thank the entire LENZ team for the commitment and dedication you've shown in bringing VIZZ from development through approval and onto the U.S. market. We're very encouraged by the momentum we're seeing. We have a clearer and more focused commercial strategy, and we're taking decisive steps to build a more efficient and durable business. I believe in the opportunity ahead for VIZZ and LENZ's ability to execute against it.

With that, we would like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Stacy Ku with TD Cowen.

Nice to see you step in. So just two. First, on telehealth, where do you see the contribution going for VIZZ prescriptions? With strategic changes, there can sometimes be some growing pains. Do you expect to see continued prescription growth in the next few months? And what gives you confidence in this trajectory looking further out over the next few years? And then second, if you look at the prescription trajectory, maybe through Symphony, can you talk about how closely aligned the prescriptions have been, correlating to your DTC strategy?

Stacy, this is Shawn. Thanks for the question. So looking at the telehealth channel. So what we're seeing is, of the growth, telehealth is contributing the most to the recent growth in Q3. And so as we look forward, we continue to see that this will be a meaningful channel for us. What we are also very proud of is with our television campaigns and our advertising campaigns, we're seeing growth on all channels. So all channels remain meaningful to us, and all channels we saw growing in this quarter.

What gives us continued confidence is as we look at the early KPIs, visitors to the website, right, data going into this month, right, we continue to see that growth, and that gives us confidence in VIZZ's continued growth going forward. In terms of the Symphony data, we still believe the Symphony data is more accurate than the IQVIA data, and that's why we referenced the Symphony data in this call, continues to be a consistent amount off. It's hard for us to speculate if that will change going forward. But what we've seen so far is it continue to have about 70% accuracy.

Our next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman with Leerink Partners.

This is Alyssa on for Marc. Now that the telehealth channel has been active for several months now, could you share what proportion of patients have required a live appointment versus completing the asynchronous ECP review? And secondly, could you provide any color on the characteristics or profile of these early adopters?

This is Shawn. Thanks for your question. So when we look at the telehealth channel. So the way the telehealth channel is structured is, first of all, to get into the telehealth channel, it starts by going through a screener. The screener filters out any high-risk patients to make sure that only patients that are appropriate continue on to that doctor evaluation.

And that doctor evaluation, it can be, as you said, both asynchronous or synchronous, asynchronous being done at 2 separate times, synchronous being a call or a video face-to-face. The vast majority are done asynchronously. What we are happy to see is not only is telehealth working for providing new scripts, but it is also screening out patients appropriately. We do see people screened out both in the screener phase as well as after the screener phase when it moves on to the doctor evaluation. I think you had a second question. What was the second question?

Just any detail on the demographics or patient characteristics from this early wave of adopters.

Yes, great question. So what's nice about our e-pharmacy channel and our telehealth channel, we can see that demographic data of the patients. What we see is the telehealth patient is very similar to the other patients that are using the product. In the telehealth channel, the split is roughly 50-50 male, female. It does skew slightly more towards the younger end of presbyopia, right, in that 45 to 55 range. But ultimately, it is a very similar patient to what we're seeing in the other channels.

Your next question comes from the line of Yigal Nochomovitz with Citi.

This is Caroline on for Yigal. Can you tell us more about the sales cycle through telehealth? Specifically, do you have data that tracks when a consumer moves from seeing a digital or TV ad to engaging with the telehealth platform and ultimately filling a prescription? And how does that compare with the traditional in-office pathway?

Thank you, and this is Shawn again. Thanks for the question. So what's great about the telehealth channel is we see a lot more data. What I can tell you is when we first ran our pilot TV campaign in select markets, when we first launched that, we didn't have the telehealth channel open yet. And typically, when we ran in those select markets, it was a 4- to 6-week cycle until we saw the lift from running the TV campaigns, so that patient went into the eye care office.

Here, now that we have the telehealth open, we can see when TV is on and when TV is off and a direct impact and correlation to scripts moving through the telehealth channel. So with the telehealth channel now open, that correlation from advertising and time to visit is within a couple of days compared to multiple weeks prior to the telehealth channel. So that's what we're seeing, and that gives us, again, positivity in our advertising. It also allows us to very easily monitor where advertising is working and where it's not to correlate advertising back to that patient.

Great. And then if I may, are your ex U.S. partners taking notes from the U.S. launch in terms of deploying a sales force or not and leveraging DTC campaigns?

Yes. Good question. This is Dan. I think we're definitely making sure that we're in constant communication with our commercial partners around the world. And to the extent that they can leverage our learnings for their commercial strategy, that's always going to be a positive. Important, though, also to remember that the U.S. market and ex U.S. markets are not the same. So we always characterize our learnings in the U.S. as U.S.-centric. And hopefully, the goal will be for them to leverage those for their specific markets.

Your next question comes from the line of Lachlan Hanbury-Brown with William Blair.

I was wondering if you could talk more about the growth you're seeing outside the telehealth channel. I mean, is that sort of concentrated among certain prescribers? I know you don't have as much data there, but what kind of trends are you seeing there? And then secondly, can you just talk to your confidence level that you don't need as much of a field team anymore? I mean, I get that it looks like the telehealth and the advertising are really driving things, but what gives you confidence that taking the field team or the reps out of the field is not going to impact the growth trajectory moving forward?

Hi, Lachlan, this is Shawn. Great question. I think I heard the first question correctly, but I just want to make sure. I think it was about the prescriber base in telehealth. Was that the first question?

About outside of telehealth. We talked about the nice uptick you're seeing in telehealth, but wondering if that's accounting for about 15% of growth. Obviously, you're seeing growth outside of telehealth as well. So wondering if you can talk about what you're seeing there in terms of the breadth and depth of prescribers and where that growth is coming from.

Got it. Thanks, Lachlan. So yes, we're very pleased that we now have over 15,000 prescribing ECPs. What we've seen since we've turned on our national TV campaign, one, we're seeing consistency in the prescribers, with 75% now prescribing multiple times. But what we're also seeing in growth outside of telehealth is the broad excitement for an eye drop for presbyopia. These new prescribers, a lot of them are not targets.

So what we're seeing is we're driving consumers into eye care professionals around the country that necessarily haven't been called upon. So we're seeing broad adoption and prescribing in the eye care community outside of telehealth, which is very good. And then what was your second question, Lachlan?

So on the impact of the sales force, what gives us confidence in this? So what we have seen is we have 90% awareness in the eye care community.

So they are fully aware that repeat prescribing behavior, what we're seeing is when a patient comes in and asks about VIZZ, it is prescribed. And therefore, the real success is getting more patients to come in and ask about VIZZ. What we are seeing is a lot in the doctor state to proactively bring up VIZZ, and our best focus and allocation of our dollars is to drive the patient in and ask about it. What we've also seen is in markets where we have an empty territory or non-target doctors, they are prescribing VIZZ as much as those targeted doctors. So that gives us confidence in the focus on the consumer campaign.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gerberry with Bank of America.

This is Melanie on for Jason. Just one on the leadership transition. How are you guys thinking about the process for the permanent CEO search, both in terms of timing and profile you're looking for, especially given kind of the shift in commercial strategy?

Thanks for the question. This is Eef. So if you think about the transition, we want to make sure, and I'm making sure, that it's a very smooth one. Like I said, it was a personal decision on my end to transition out. I'll be leading the change that we just announced, making sure the organization is set up well for Dan to then step in as the interim CEO. As I've mentioned, Dan has a wealth of knowledge around the business.

He's been with me and us for a long time now and has been integral to everything that we do within LENZ. So he's extremely well positioned to lead the company. In parallel, the Board has started a search. And obviously, Dan is one of the key candidates in that as well. We're not making any commitments around timelines. Again, both me and the Board have full confidence in Dan to lead the organization into its next growth phase. So we don't expect any impact on our strategy and the execution of it with this transition.

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Caufield with H.C. Wainwright.

Apologies if this has been addressed previously. But in terms of marketing, in addition to the telehealth fulfillment channel, what possible factors would support ultimately turning on the DTC campaign in greater capacity following the strategic commercial reorg? Thanks for any added color there.

Thanks. That's a great question. So again, this is Shawn. So what we continue to monitor on the DTC side is, as we're pulsing different channels, as we turn on TV, what's the response that we're seeing across not only telehealth, but all channels? We do the same thing across Instagram, across Facebook, across TikTok, as well as different ads. So what we continue to look at and measure is what's that consumer acquisition cost of our different ads. And as we drive that consumer acquisition cost down for the ones that we feel are a valuable ROI, that's our signal to turn up that spend or change how much we're allocating dollars to the different channels.

And our final question comes from the line of Biren Amin with Piper Sandler.

This is Michael on for Biren. I was just wondering if you could give a little bit more color on the refill rate. And given the recent cost restructuring, could you share how you're thinking about timeline to profitability?

Thanks, Michael. So this is Shawn. So I'll cover the refill rate. So what we are seeing is we have multiple channels, but the channel where we can see the best data is the e-pharmacy channel and the telehealth channel. Those channels represent the majority of our volume. Now the telehealth channel is still new. It's only about 3 months old. So we're early there. The e-pharmacy channel, we have data for over a year now.

And what we can see in our e-pharmacy channel is that about 60% of the patients purchase more than a 1-month supply. So we're encouraged by that number. For that same group, what we're seeing is over the course of the year, that group is buying more than 5 packs per year. So that's a little bit more color on the refill rate and the total product being consumed by our predominant channel.

And Michael, this is Dan. I'll take your second question as it relates to forward guidance. So ending Q3, $197.3 million in cash. I think what we highlighted today was, as you think about our forward spend, approximately a 50% reduction in our forward OpEx. So what we've guided is a $70 million to $75 million annual spend in 2027 and going forward, I think you should expect to see the full impact of that change in spend trajectory in Q1. We're not providing cash runway guidance or revenue guidance at this time, as we haven't previously. So I think we gave you those inputs for today based upon the disclosures we made here.

This concludes our question-and-answer session as I am now showing no further questions. Thank you for your participation, and we will now conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Thank you. Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call At this time, all participants are nearly in only mode. Following prepared remarks from management, we will conduct a question and answer session and instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Dan Chevalard, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us today. My name is Dan Shovelard, Chief Financial Officer of Lens Therapeutics. We are joined today by Abe Skivel-Pennick, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Sean Olson, our Chief Commercial Officer, and Dr. Mark Odrich, our Chief Medical Officer. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding LENZ's future expectations, plans, prospects, corporate strategy, regulatory and commercial plans and expectations, cash runway projections, and performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these full-of-lifely statements as a result of various important factors and risks, including those discussed in our filings with the Security and Exchange Commission and which can also be found on our website. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent only our views as of the date of this webcast and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date.

We specifically disclaim any obligations to update such statements. The company encourages you to consult the risk factors contained in our SEC filings for additional detail, including our second quarter 2026 Form 10-Q, which is being filed today.

With that, I will now turn the call over to Abe. Thank you, Dan. Good afternoon, everyone. We announced several boards into the launch have a clear view of how adoption is developing. Today, I want to share the progress we're seeing for the latest data that's coming up and how those insights are shaping our priorities for the second half of the year. Q2 reflected continued, though modest, growth. Encouragingly, in July, as we launched Telehealth and expanded our existing diet and reading glasses campaign on national TV, we saw a significant increase in new patient stats and over 45% growth in month-over-month total prescriptions. We recognize that one month does not establish a trend, but these early results are consistent with the direction we hope to see.

We have consistently said that the second half of the year will provide our first opportunity to assess and discuss patient persistence. several quarters into launch we have sufficient data to begin doing that what we're seeing is encouraging Since launch, more than 60% of e-pharmacy patients who have purchased FIS have purchased more than one monthly pack. as part of their initial order or through a subsequent purchase. It's important to note that the e-pharmacy is a dominant sales channel and the channel where we have access to detailed patient-level data. And looking at the more mature quarterly patient cohorts within that 60% provides a promising view of repeat purchasing and refill behavior. Among patients who first purchased this in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 are first two causes of the launch. Purchasing behavior is tracking towards an average analyzed purchase rate of five monthly packs. And our Q2 cohort is showing a very similar pattern, though it's not yet mature enough for the same analysis. These are important proof points. Persistence is essential to building a durable patient base, and the behavior we're seeing reinforces our confidence that patients who experience the benefit of this are choosing to continue using it.

It also reinforces the commercial objective in front of us. We need to continue bringing more new patients into the category and making it easier for them to move from awareness to evaluation to treatment and ultimately to continued use. That focus has shaped our work since the last call. We have concentrated on broadening consumer awareness, making this easier to introduce during routine patient conversations, ensuring patients are well-educated, and simplifying the path from initial interest to treatment. Our most recent initiatives were designed around those priorities, mental health gives consumers a convenient path to evaluation by an independent, licensed eye care professional and, if appropriate, a prescription of home delivery. Expanding our existing campaign to national TV allows us to reach a broader group of consumers with a clear message about an alternative to reading glasses. Together, these initiatives create a more direct connection between consumer interests, clinical evaluation, and access to treatment.

While the July data are entirely encouraging, our focus now is on translating these signals into sustained growth. Our investments to date have helped establish this, so broad awareness on human recipes, Expand consumer demand generation and put more convenient access pathways in place. We'll use Q3 to further understand which activities are producing the greatest impact and where we can make the patient journey even simpler. And as we assess the performance of our commercial initiatives, use those learnings to inform both the mix and the level of investment for the next phase of the launch. Going forward, we will need even more discipline in how we allocate capital, concentrating resources on the activities we believe have the greatest potential to drive durable patient growth, and aligning our overall commercial investment with the skill and needs of the business, In parallel, we continue to make progress, expanding this globally. Our partnerships now span more than 20 countries across Great China, Southeast Asia, Canada, the Middle East, and Oceania. During the quarter, we entered into our fifth international commercial partnership covering Australia and New Zealand.

We also have nine regulatory submissions on the review with additional submissions expected by year end. Together, these efforts are establishing the foundation for this as a global brand. In conclusion, as we enter the second half of the year, we have a clear picture of how this opportunity can build. Patient persistence reflected in both multi-fact purchasing and the refill patterns emerging on more mature cohorts provides meaningful evidence that patients who experience this see lasting value and choose to continue using it. July provided an encouraging early indication that our actions to broaden consumer awareness and simplify access are beginning to translate into stronger new patient activity. We clearly understand our path forward. Build on these signals, stay focused on execution, and invest with disciplined, biomechanical activities that drive durable growth. remain confident in the value this delivers and in the significant unmet need it addresses.

Our job now is to translate that value into sustained patient growth with urgency and With that, I'll hand it over to Sean, who will provide more detail on our commercial execution.

Thank you, Abe. Good afternoon, everyone. Building on Ace comments, I'd like to spend a few minutes on our commercial strategy and the actions we're taking to support the next phase of launch. First, First, I want to reinforce what we believe is one of the most important indicators we've seen since launch, our early refill trends. While we're still in the early stages of commercialization, the persistence we're observing gives us a product foundation to build upon as we continue to focus on driving new patient starts. With that foundation in place, our focus is squarely on expanding awareness and ease of access for new patient starts. In July, we began our national TV advertising campaign to broaden patient awareness, and we partnered with our e-pharmacy provider to launch a telehealth prescribing option to ease patient access. As we evaluated the patient journey to access Viz, it became increasingly clear that the journey is more involved than most consumer products. a patient may first see an advertisement, decide to learn more, schedule an appointment, be evaluated by an eye care professional, receive a sample, and then ultimately decide whether to begin prescription therapy.

At each step along that journey, there's an opportunity for patients to delay or discontinue the process. Our objective has been to simplify that experience wherever possible while maintaining an appropriate standard of clinical care. That is why I believe our telehealth initiative is an important strategic addition to our commercial model. The telehealth channel provides interested consumers a convenient pathway to be evaluated by an independent, licensed eye care professional at the moment of product interest. Let's take a moment to map out the patient journey to biz through the Telehealth channel. For example, a patient is watching TV and sees a commercial promoting Viz, and then visits Viz.com to learn more. After exploring the site, they see real patient videos and now have decided they want to try Viz and click on the Order Viz Now button.

This brings them to our telehealth partners website where they start the telehealth process. Now, as I walk you through this telehealth process, there are two key components. One, the medical screener for telehealth eligibility, which was developed by ECPs, and two, the subsequent telehealth evaluation also performed by independent ECPs. So, continuing that journey, once on the telehealth site, the patient fills out a survey on their current vision symptoms and medical history, which will confirm their potential eligibility for VIZ through telehealth. This eligibility must be met to proceed with the telehealth assessments. In the case they are eligible to proceed, they are then evaluated by independent, licensed eye care professionals to determine whether this is an appropriate treatment option. If approved, their prescription is sent to the e-pharmacy partner and visits ship directly to the patient's home.

We launched this initiative concurrently with our national television campaign, which is is intended to expand consumer awareness and ultimately drive adoption of this. Together, these initiatives are designed to create a more seamless path from consumer awareness to treatment initiation. While still early, we have been encouraged by the initial level of consumer engagement, which we believe is reflected in the increase in new patient starts we observed during July. At the same time, our understanding of the eye care professional channel continues to evolve. As we shared on our previous call, aided awareness of this among eye care professionals remains in the high 90% range. So unaided awareness exceeds 80%. Those metrics tell us that VIZ is well recognized within the agri-community as a treatment option for presbyopia. we believe we have successfully achieved our primary awareness objectives with ECT. However, ECP awareness alone has not consistently translated into recurring prescribing behavior.

Well, over 13,000 physicians have prescribed this, and over 75% of them have prescribed multiple times. see the VIZ discussion is often being consumer initiated. As a result, we have increasingly focused our commercial investment on stimulating consumer demand, with the expectation that informed patients requesting VIZ by name will serve as an important catalyst for future continued prescription growth. Overall, we are encouraged by our recent progress, the combination of positive early patient persistence, expanded access through telehealth, and growing consumer awareness provides a foundation for the next phase of VISA's commercial growth.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Dan to review our financial results. Thank you, Sean. As both Ace and Sean had discussed, we have kicked off the second half of 2026 with the July launch of telehealth and our nationwide TV advertising campaign. These strategic initiatives were purposely designed to drive broad consumer awareness and address the key hurdles to product access by providing consumers with a safe and convenient way to be evaluated by an independent, licensed eye care professional online and directly integrated into our e-pharmacy fulfillment for home delivery. As has been mentioned, we are encouraged by the change in our recent script trends, suggesting an over 45% increase in July scripts compared to June. Reflecting on Q2, we recorded total revenues of $5.5 million, including over $1.7 million in product revenue on approximately 27,000 monthly packs sold, a 9% increase over Q1, and $3.8 million in license revenue from our ex-US global partnership agreements. Q2 license revenue included the first regulatory milestone payment under our license agreement with TEA upon submission of its new drug submission to Health Canada, in addition to the first sublicense milestone payment in conjunction with the asset purchase agreement between Everest Medicine and Cork Cell for the rights to these in Greater China. I will provide a further update on our global commercialization efforts for Biz in a moment.

Turning down operating expenses are cost of sales on second quarter product revenue totaled And we continue to anticipate VIZ to trend to an approximately 90% direct product gross margin over time. Total SG&A expenses decreased to $39.4 million in the second quarter, or approximately $34.9 million adjusted to exclude non-cash stock-based compensation. On an adjusted basis, this was a 14% quarter-over-quarter decline from Q1, which was in line with our expectations given our Q1 DTC launch investment. Consistent with prior quarters, approximately 80% of our SG&A was driven by sales and marketing, with the remaining representing general and administrative expenses. Total research and development expenses remain zero in the second quarter of 2026, consistent with recent prior quarters. Our Q2 net loss per share, both basic and diluted, was $1.02 per share in the quarter on a net loss of $31.9 million. And we ended the second quarter with approximately $220 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities.

Looking ahead, we will be deliberate in our capital allocation, directing our investments towards the initiatives with the greatest potential to drive new patient adoption. We believe this disciplined approach positions us to build a durable, consumer-driven franchise while maintaining a strong financial foundation. Before I hand the call back over to Abe, I wanted to take a moment to provide an update on our global licensing and commercialization efforts. As we've discussed on previous calls, we see this as a global product. And with a worldwide population of over 1.8 billion adults with presbyopia, we view the opportunity to expand our commercial footprint as an important and promising one. In Q2, we signed a commercialization agreement with Aerotex Pharmaceuticals, a leading Australian pharmaceutical company and Australia's largest supplier of medicines by prescription volume. This is our fifth ex-US commercialization partnership for VIZ, which now, including Oceana, spans Greater China, Southeast Asia, Canada, and the Middle East region.

We currently have nine regulatory submissions under review, and we anticipate multiple additional submissions and potential ex-U.S. regulatory approvals by the end of this year. We remain focused on further expanding our global network in additional strategic geographies, and we look forward to reporting additional progress in the months and the quarters ahead.

With that, I'll turn the call back over. Thanks, Ben. To Klops, I'm proud of the LAMS team and the work behind the progress we discussed today. We now have meaningful evidence that patients who experience this see value and choose to continue using it. We've also been glad to see encouraging new patient activity as we broaden awareness and simplify access. Our priorities for the second half are clear. We'll build on these signals, stay focused on sustained patient growth, and align our investments with the initiatives producing the strongest results. Remain confident in the opportunity you have missed and committed to pursuing it with urgency and discipline.

And with that, I'd like to open the call for questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask the question, you will need to press star then the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Stacy Kuh with T.D. Cowen. Your line is open.

Hey, good afternoon, guys, and thanks so much for taking our questions. So we have a couple. First is on the refill dynamics. We're appreciative of you giving us this level of detail, but maybe put it in the context of other presbyopia eye drops. products, what strategies is the team employing to keep these patients? So that's the first. And second, if you think about the telehealth launch, maybe speak to the level of comfort around business safety profile. And then last, I know it's still early days, but when would you expect to see nationwide TV advertising drive prescription growth? And as a reminder, just help us understand where you're prioritizing investment when it comes to commercial strategies that are working. Thanks so much.

Great. Thank you, Stacy. This is Sean. So, first on the refill dynamics, as well as the strategies we're taking to make sure that we continue to see those strong refill dynamics. So when you think of the refill dynamics, what we focused on is our e-pharmacy channel, because that's where we can see that patient-level data. And we also look at the cohorts that are the most mature. So that would be people that bought for the first time in Q4 of 25 and Q1 in 2026. And what's great about that is that we have a lot of people that bought for the first time in Q4 of 25 and Q1 in 2026. to see is of those cohorts, you know, 60% of those e-pharmacy patients have purchased more than one monthly PATH. So that includes patients who purchased multiple PATHs on their initial order, as well as patients who returned for subsequent purchases.

The other thing that's important to understand is we focus on the ePharmacy channel not because we can see the data at the patient level, but it's also our dominant sales channel as well. What's great when we're looking at this data is if we look at that Q4 cohort, we're seeing on average they've now already purchased slightly more than five packs and they haven't come up on a year yet. That Q1 cohort is trending to five as well. The Q2 cohort, not yet mature enough, but we're still seeing that similar early pattern, which is grace. Now, when we think of our product, this was really important because it means we have a presbyopia product out there that works and people want to continue to refill. Obviously some of their early launches in this space. Now they're able to get early uptake, but that refill wasn't there.

This we feel really speaks to the durability of our product. In terms of the strategy that we're employing to make sure that we continue to see high refill rates, I think the number one thing you really need is an eye drop that works. And we're excited that we have an eye drop that works for 10 hours. In addition to that, You know, the e-pharmacy channel allows that option to buy three months at a time at a discounted rate. And then as we've launched this telehealth channel, that also enables the opportunity to buy three months at a time, enter into an auto-renew cycle. AND YOU GET LONG DURATION AT A DISCOUNTED RATE. SO THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE REFILL DYNAMICS.

In terms of telehealth and comfort and safety, what's great about the telehealth channel IS THAT WE HAVE GREAT SAVEGUARDS IS THAT WE HAVE GREAT SAVEGUARDS IS THAT WE HAVE GREAT SAVEGUARDS AROUND THAT CHANNEL IN GENERAL. Cell health patients are screened for corrobreness by fully licensed eye care physicians, they have to have no history of retinal complications and be an appropriate canter vis and have a recent retinal exam within the past 24 months. And then after that, still an independent eye care physician evaluates that patient history and suitability prior to prescribing this, or if they feel it's necessary, they'll actually recommend a visit to a doctor in person if they don't qualify for telehealth. IN TERMS OF THE TV CHANNEL, SO OUR TV CAMPAIGN, THAT WENT LIVE JULY 6TH. We're already seeing lists from that national TV campaign, which is great to see. And we'll expect to continue that on because of that list we've seen. We've seen it in the access to the telehealth channel because that is what announced telehealth, but we also see the list in the other channels as well.

But to other minor questions or questions in there, Stacey, I have to answer those. How do we compare against other presbyopia drops? Frankly, we don't see a lot of traction with the current ones on market. And you compare us to view the, interestingly, we're not actually selling more on a weekly or monthly basis than beauty. And importantly, if you compare the beauty retail rates at that peak, it was about 10, 12%. We're tracking at that's 42% of those people that refill that become users of this that we've always spoke about. We're very pleased to see that. And then the last question, how do we expect to adapt? Like I mentioned in my remarks, the commercial investments that we've made so far have been appropriate.

It really helps establish this, build broad brand awareness, among CCPs to expanded consumer demand generation. And with the telehealth, we now have numerous access pathways in place. what we're doing now is we're move through Q3, really assessing the performance of each of those initiatives, the data that allows to continue to adapt both the mix as well as the level of investment that we feel we need for this next phase in the launch. And obviously concentrating resources where we believe we have the greatest potential to drive durable growth. All of that is big is. based on obviously the confidence we have in the value and the opportunity of this, while also remaining very disciplined in how we allocate capital as a company.

Incredibly helpful. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Yigal Nikomovitz with Citi. Your line is open.

Hey guys, great. Thank you for taking the questions. I also have a few here. So just first off, could you just remind us, you said I know that e-pharmacy is the majority of the revenue base, but if you could quantify or just give a little more direction on that comment. And then with regard to the retail, so obviously you have the visibility in the e-pharmacy, but in retail, I guess, are you saying that you just don't have the data, so therefore you can't track the refill dynamics and the, the persistence or is there a different conclusion as far as the persistence in the retail side of the business? And then if you could just comment a little bit on the discipline spend, where are you going to invest more or where are you going to decelerate versus accelerate? Thank you.

So, Yvonne, thank you for the question. So yes, so the e-pharmacy is the predominant avenue of where most of our strips go through. And ultimately, we see a little over 60% of our strips are going through that e-pharmacy channel. And again, we have the most access to that data, so we do a lot of our analytics off of it. In terms of the retail channel, you know, I think as many investors have seen, the retail pickup of Viz, whether it be through Symfony or IQVIA, has been fairly poor and limited. And unfortunately, because of that, we can't do a good assessment off of that data set.

Thanks, Sean. Two questions where we will adjust. Going back to what I just mentioned earlier as well, it will be driven by the data that we will generate in Q3, and that will inform us as next phase. I think it's fair to say that the principle is clear. our commercial investments with demonstrated performance, what's truly driving scripts, the scale and needs of the business will be appropriate for what we're building. We'll keep you all informed as appropriate and once we've made any more final decisions.

Okay, thanks. I just had one quick follow-up, which is more of just a technical thing. So the revenue was 1.7 in this quarter as well as last quarter, but you had 2,000 more packs. So it was a 9% increase. Q over Q. Can you just clarify the dynamics there regarding the volume price equation? Thanks.

Sure, thanks to you all. This is Dan. So the 9% is a volume based metric on units that shipped. Gross that in general was the same. Also what was in Q2 would have included and will continue to include periodically revenues x us so i think overall you'll find that the revenue per unit is similar there will be some fluctuation quarter to quarter but the nine percent is on an absolute volume basis of units that were that shipped uh in the second quarter compared to the first quarter.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mark Goodman with Learing Partners. Your line is open.

Hi, everyone. This is Alyssa on for Mark. Thank you for taking our question. I have two. So, regarding the telehealth platform, can you comment on what proportion of online form submissions ultimately results in a scheduled visit with a provider versus an asynchronous prescription? And how long does that screening questionnaire take? to just submit. And then secondly, can you comment on the patient mix and if it's evolved since the launch of the nationwide DTC campaign? Thank you.

Thank you. Hi Melissa, this is Sean again. Thanks for your question. So yes, so with the telehealth platform, what is great is we want to see volumes going through it. Like that's number one, but we also want to see that it is screening out patients both through the screening process, but also that after the patient does make telehealth, some people, you know, are then actually informed they need to go to a doctor and don't proceed with the telehealth because that's So we are seeing that some patients are being screened out in both the screener as well as during the telehealth visit. We haven't broken out those numbers publicly, but it is good to see that. In terms of filling out the survey, it really only takes a few minutes to fill out the survey. So it's not an over-complicated process. process and again that was developed by ECPs to make sure it had the right screening criteria. In terms of the mixed pre and post TV, really not a big change there in terms of mixed.

Overall, in general, it's about 60% women and 40% men purchasing the products. And also, again, we're seeing a slightly higher interest in that 45 to 55 age group. and it kind of steps down over 65. So no big change in mix of the patient profile.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Lachlan Hanbury-Brown with William Blair. Your line is open.

Hey guys, thanks for the question. Maybe just one on the telehealth to start. talk about the sort of early adoption there. You talked about the good script trends we're seeing in July being up about 45%. Is that primarily being driven by sort of incremental scripts going through telehealth or, you know, is that maybe only part of it and some of it's being driven by maybe the DTC or TV campaign driving people into the doctor. And then the second question, on the stat on average refills of five packs per year, I just wanted to confirm that that is that just among the 60% that do refill and related Could you maybe break out the number that fill a three pack to start with versus who sort of placed the second order?.

I'd like to take the first question. Just to make sure that we got the question right. I think the question was, is the growth that we saw month over month, June to July, driven by telehealth, is it maybe impacting the other channels? The good thing here is that we see that actually the combination with the TV, the national TV campaign, drove all channels up. So telehealth definitely has a significant part of the increase. but it didn't come at the expense of the other channels. So we see good and encouraging growth in the other channels as well. So again, all channels up in July versus June.

And then in terms of your question on the five packs per year. So the five packs per year. Yes. So that is for the 60% of patients. Any pharmacy that have purchased multiple times or multiple monthly tax. Right? So that's how it's calculated. You know, that leaves the other 40% at that single person. per cent per single purchase, you can back into the full map off of that. In terms of those that buy one pack or three packs for their first pack, again, we tend to see people move along that path.

We've seen people start with a one pack and then move to a three pack. We haven't broken out that first start of one pack versus three pack.

Thanks. Okay. And that concludes our question and answer session. As I am showing no further questions. Thank you for your participation and we will now conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

This live transcript is auto-generated without human intervention or review.

[Call has ended.]

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the LENZ Therapeutics' First Quarter 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Following prepared remarks from management, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. And instructions will follow at that time. As a reminder, this call is being recorded.

At this time I would like to turn the call over to Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. My name is Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer of LENZ Therapeutics. We are joined today by Eef Schimmelpennink, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Shawn Olsson, our Chief Commercial Officer; and Dr. Marc Odrich, our Chief Medical Officer.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding LENZ's future expectations, plans, prospects, corporate strategy, regulatory and commercial plans and expectations, cash runway projections and performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors and risks, including those discussed in our filings with the SEC, which can also be found on our website.

In addition, any forward-looking statements represent only our views as of the date of this webcast and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We specifically disclaim any obligations to update such statements. The company encourages you to consult the risk factors contained in our SEC filings for additional detail, including in our first quarter 2026 Form 10-Q which is being filed today.

With that, I will now turn the call over to Eef.

Thank you Dan. Good afternoon everyone. In Q1, our performance was consistent with the expectations we outlined on our last call. We delivered approximately 25,000 paid and filled prescriptions, bringing total monthly units sold since launch to roughly 46,000 and generated $1.9 million in net revenue, including $1.7 million in product sales.

New patient adoption has continued to grow, but not yet at the pace we are aiming for. And I want to address that directly. We've done the work to understand the dynamics. We've identified what needs to change, and we're executing on those changes now.

What continuously gives us confidence are the strong fundamentals underlying that top-line number, and the strength in the category we are building around VIZZ. Our product clearly works in the real world, which is reinforced by consistent feedback from both doctors and patients, underscoring that real-world efficacy is living up to expectations. We have built a growing base of prescribing physicians, with over 10,000 unique prescribers through the first quarter, and new prescribers writing for the first time every day. And we are seeing a very clear productivity signal emerge within our prescriber base.

At this same approximate stage of launch, for our 46,000 filled scripts, VIZZ is generating roughly 30% more scripts per prescriber than VUITY, a pattern that holds true across all our prescribing deciles. In other words, we're reaching the same level of total volume with fewer prescribers because physicians who adopt VIZZ are prescribing it more consistently. This is an example of the encouraging dynamics that we're experiencing as we build a truly new category. Early adoption builds more gradually, but as prescribing habits are developed, they drive consistent uptake.

In addition, we continue to see promising patient adoption and persistence. Once patients move from a sample to purchasing the product, many stay on therapy, which we have seen reflected in early refill behavior and, importantly, in purchasing patterns. Over 2/3 of our e-pharmacy volume is now coming from 3-month prescriptions, a meaningful increase in our e-pharmacy consumer purchasing behavior from Q4 to Q1. This highlights the point we want to make from a sampling launch: our patients try the product first, convert after experiencing the benefit, and then continue use. Taken together, this gives us confidence that we're building the category on a durable foundation, and we view these metrics as important early indicators which will scale over time.

At the same time, and as we've noted during our last call, building a new category will take time, particularly as prescribing habits and patient behavior continue to evolve. Through Q1, the pace of new patient starts and routine ECP prescribing was more gradual than we expected it to be. We have a laser focus on improving that over the coming months and will hold ourselves accountable to demonstrating these upcoming quarters.

As we are now several months into our launch, we believe we have identified the key barriers to adoption. Over recent months, we focused on these areas in depth, including through extensive work with advisory boards and direct engagement with both physicians and patients, to better understand how to improve both the prescribing process and the patient experience.

There are 2 primary areas where we see clear opportunities to drive adoption. First, on the physician side, VIZZ is well understood. Brand awareness is extremely high among ECPs and VIZZ is recognized as best in class. However, it is not yet being brought up proactively enough in the patient conversation. This requires an important behavioral shift, as physicians learn to incorporate a new type of treatment into a routine exam flow. It does not historically include the integration of a novel pharmaceutical option for treatment of presbyopia.

Second, on the consumer side, the path from awareness to prescription and ultimately to purchase is naturally a multi-step one. Surveys and direct feedback have highlighted where the patient journey can be further improved to support conversion.

Based on these insights, we are sharpening execution and have already taken targeted actions to accelerate adoption. Again, on the physician side, we're refining how VIZZ is introduced in the exam room to make it simpler and more natural to bring into the conversation. One example is a renewed focus on contact lens patients, where VIZZ provides a clear and immediate value to that practice by helping patients stay in their lenses longer. This serves as a practical entry point that corresponds to a significant part of their patient and revenue base.

We're highlighting ECP success stories from peers to illustrate how VIZZ has been integrated into practice, specifically for these patients as examples of real world wins. This helps physicians better understand and use VIZZ more consistently to drive real value, and from there expand usage more broadly across the presbyopia population.

Importantly, as I've mentioned, these refinements are informed by direct work with advisory boards and testing panels of physicians, where we have incorporated real-world feedback on what works and how to improve both the ECP conversation and patient experience.

On the patient side, we're evolving how patients get started on therapy. We've introduced tools, including a simple QR-based getting started with VIZZ experience video, that clearly explains how to use the product and what to expect, helping patients complete the initial trial and transition more confidently to ongoing use. Additional materials to support this effort are finalized and will be rolled out shortly.

In addition, and we've omitted, we're enabling physicians to sell VIZZ directly to patients in their practices. This can simplify access and reduce friction in the conversion progress. Early feedback on this approach has been encouraging, while we remain mindful that this is not available in all markets.

Taken together, these actions are designed to increase both how often VIZZ is introduced in the exam room and the conversion from trial to ongoing use. Shortly, Shawn will go into more detail on how we're executing against these priorities. In parallel, as we scale the product, we're also continuing to improve the overall user experience. We are transitioning to an FDA-approved, large scale manufacturing process that will further improve our direct product cost of goods. This also allows for a tighter formulation specification and enhanced vial format, which we expect will further improve both ease of use and comfort upon instillation. These are natural advancements as we move from initial launch to broader scale, and are part of our ongoing focus on optimizing the patient experience.

Our attention now is on execution against the key drivers that I highlighted today. We expect that these actions will drive meaningful and measurable progress in ECP and consumer adoption as we advance through the year. We have a product that clearly works in a large and under-benefited market, and we continue to see strong validation from both patients and physicians on the value it brings. At the same time, we're building a new category, where both prescribing habits and patient behavior will need to evolve.

Importantly, we have solid and actionable understanding on how we can influence that evolution to accelerate adoption. We've already begun to act on these insights and initiatives. And these actions continue to roll out across the field and the patient journey. We're focused on demonstrating meaningful and sustained script growth over the coming months and quarters.

Lastly, in parallel we're seeing strong momentum outside the U.S. There are recent European and U.K. submissions, as well as meaningful inbound partnering interest from key markets including Europe and Latin America. Combined with our existing partnerships across China, Southeast Asia, Canada, and the Middle East, we believe we're building a strong foundation for global expansion.

With that, I'll hand it over to Shawn, who will go into more detail on how we're executing against these priorities. Shawn?

Thank you Eef. Good afternoon everyone. As Eef outlined, we are in the early stages of building a new category. And our focus is on translating strong product performance and early adoption signals into consistent and scalable growth. From a commercial perspective, we're encouraged by what we are seeing in the field. Eye care professionals prescribing VIZZ are seeing it work in their practices. And that confidence is translating into repeat prescribing behavior. We are seeing a growing number of physicians not only prescribe VIZZ, but write it multiple times. In fact, approximately 60% of prescribing ECPs have now written VIZZ multiple times. Which we view as a strong signal of confidence and early habit formation.

ECP awareness and interest is high. Understanding of the product is strong. And consumer interest and awareness is growing. What we're focused on now is how we translate that interest into consistent prescribing behavior and consumer adoption. And importantly, doing so in a way that shows tangible progress in new script growth in this early phase of launch.

Focusing on our eye care professional strategy. We continue to see strong engagement and adoption among physicians. Just a few months into launch, aided awareness is in the high 90s and unaided awareness is over 80%. Which tells us VIZZ is already well known in the eye care community for the treatment of presbyopia.

We are also seeing that physicians clearly understand the product. They consistently describe VIZZ as differentiated, pupil selective, and ciliary sparing. While delivering a 10 hour duration. That level of clarity is important because it helps address the major barrier of being compared to previous products in this category. Where our focus is now is translating that understanding into consistent behavior. This is about helping physicians bring VIZZ into the patient conversation more naturally and more frequently. And integrating it into their standard eye exam flow.

We are also seeing this translate into prescribing behavior. As Eef mentioned, at a comparable stage of launch, VIZZ is generating significantly higher scripts per prescriber than what was observed with VUITY. And importantly, we see that pattern consistently across the prescriber base. What that looks like in practice is that once physicians begin to prescribe VIZZ and integrate it into their workflows -- into their workflow, they tend to prescribe it more frequently compared to what we saw with VUITY at a similar stage. This is not limited to a small group of high volume writers, but something we are seeing more broadly across the prescriber base.

This ties directly to how we have designed the launch. With sampling, patients experience the product first, and physicians utilize these experiences to build an understanding and confidence in VIZZ. That creates a more natural fit in the practice, where prescriptions are written with greater confidence and consistency. And we see this as an early indicator of how adoption can continue to build over time.

As we've been working through this in the field, this also helped clarify where we should focus to further accelerate adoption. One of the areas we're seeing the strongest early traction is in contact lens patients. This is a well-known challenge for eye care professionals. The contact lens population peaks in the 30 to 39 year old age range. And as this group ages, up to 71% of patients drop out of contact lenses after the age of 50. Often reluctantly, with presbyopia being a key driver. This is not just a clinical issue but a core contributor to practice revenue, where contact lenses and related services play a significant role.

What we're hearing from physicians is that VIZZ provides a very practical solution to that problem. As one physician put it, this is a way to keep my patients in contact lenses and improve their experience at the same time. This is a clear example of where ECPs can benefit for their patients and in their practice, through the regular adoption and prescription of VIZZ, as a patient satisfaction and retention strategy. That ability to both improve patient outcomes and support the practice makes this a highly relevant and actionable use case.

Importantly, this is not just anecdotal. Our most recent consumer survey showed that approximately 50% of VIZZ users reported they used contact lenses as their primary form of distance vision correction, reinforcing that this is both a meaningful and scalable opportunity to drive adoption.

Turning toward consumer strategy, we are encouraged by the early momentum we are seeing. But most importantly, this is where we see a key opportunity to improve conversion and scale adoption. Patients are interested in the product, and we are seeing strong engagement across our channels. What we are focused on now is improving how patients move from awareness to prescription and ultimately to purchase. The journey in a new category for a prescription drug is naturally more complex. A patient sees an ad, learns about the product, schedules an appointment, receives the sample and then decides whether to move forward with the prescription. Each step creates an opportunity to either progress or drop off. And our focus is on making that process simpler, clearer, and more intuitive.

We are already seeing encouraging signals. Our direct consumer campaign is driving strong engagement with significant increases in website traffic and early indications that patients are entering the funnel. We are also seeing that when patients convert, they're engaging in a more committed way. In our e-pharmacy channel, which represents more than half of our prescriptions, over 2/3 of the volume is now coming through 3-month prescriptions, which is a strong signal of intense and early persistence.

At the same time, we're actively refining our approach to improve conversion. On the messaging side, we have shifted to a direct problem solution consumer value proposition centered around tired of reading glasses, which directly connects with the everyday experience of presbyopia and positions VIZZ as a simple alternative.

We are also improving how patients get started on therapy. This includes stronger expectation setting around how the product works, clear dosing instructions and what to expect in the first few days. We have also prepared simple onboarding tools such as QR-based resources that guide patients through the initial experience and help them transition from trial to ongoing usage.

In addition, we are continuing to expand and refine our media approach. This includes testing additional channels such as linear television in select markets while actively optimizing our creative and media mix based on real-time performance data to ensure we're driving the most effective engagement.

We're also seeing increased interest from physicians in directly selling VIZZ to patients from their practices where permitted. This approach is currently being implemented in select markets and structured in a way that maintains our expected economics while giving patients the additional flexibility -- sorry, while giving practices the additional flexibility to serve their patients. We believe this could also offer a significant benefit of convenience for the patient where they can leave the ECP visit with product in hand, reducing the hurdle of pharmacy abandonment.

Finally, these efforts are supported by the expansion of our field organization, which will be fully deployed by the end of this quarter. This increases the reach of our field sales team to approximately 15,000 targeted eye care professionals, allowing us to respond to inbound demand from physicians outside our initial target group and to build higher frequency territories. The combination of increased reach and frequency is critical to reinforcing both physician behavior and patient conversion. Taken together, these actions are focused on increasing the number of patients who move from initial interest to trial and from trial to ongoing usage.

Overall, we're encouraged by what we are seeing in the early stages of the launch. We have strong physician engagement, bigger patient interest and a growing set of levers to drive adoption. At the same time, our focus now is on translating these actions into meaningful and sustained NRx script growth over the coming months and quarters. We believe we have the right elements in place and our priority is executing against them with discipline to build momentum from here.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Dan to walk you through our financial results.

Thank you, Shawn. As both Eef and Shawn have stated, we are encouraged by the performance of VIZZ in the hands of patients and ECPs as we build the presbyopia market. The early signs of broad ECP uptake are there, as evidenced by the over 10,000 prescribers in the first 2 quarters of launch. A figure higher than any recent launch in ophthalmology at this stage. Additionally, consumers are emerging with positive real-world experiences every day as product awareness deepens and our early launch efforts begin to take hold.

Our first quarter results were highlighted by the approximately 25,000 paid and filled prescriptions of VIZZ, which was a 19% increase compared to Q4. Resulting in approximately $1.7 million in net product revenues. Our units continue to be driven by both a combination of new patient prescriptions and increasingly by monthly refill units, including both single monthly packs and 3-month orders, which are available through our e-pharmacy. While it is early at this stage of launch to be declarative about projecting annual refill rates, we are encouraged by what we are seeing in the initial trends.

In Q1, and consistent with last quarter, we noted blended gross to net discounts across our distribution channels of less than 10%, resulting in approximately $67 in net revenue per monthly pack of VIZZ. Additional blended costs of the respective distribution channels of approximately $7 per unit were incurred that flow into operating expenses within SG&A, resulting in a net cash per unit of $60 per pack. That is unchanged from last quarter, and in line with our long-standing expectations.

Additionally, we recognized license revenue in Q1 of $250,000 from the distribution agreement signed in January with Lunatus, our ex-U.S. distribution partner in the Middle East region. As I discussed on our Q4 call, there is significant effort underway with our existing ex-U.S. commercial partnerships as we advance towards multiple additional regulatory approvals for VIZZ, and we remain focused on the continued expansion of our global network of commercial alliances. We look forward to reporting additional progress in the months and quarters ahead.

Turning now to operating expenses. Our cost of sales in the first quarter totaled $1.1 million and was comprised primarily of 2 nonrecurring events, resulting in charges to cost of sales in the period that were unrelated to product sales. The first was a period cost stemming from an out of specification temperature excursion of inventory while in transit from our manufacturer. We expect recovery from this product loss from our insurance provider in the second quarter.

In addition, we incurred a onetime charge for packaging supplies associated with the previously mentioned FDA-approved manufacturing process improvement and transition. Direct product cost of sales related to our Q1 product sales were immaterial, and we anticipate VIZZ to trend to an approximately 90% direct product gross margin over time.

Total SG&A expenses increased to $45 million in Q1 2026, or approximately $40.7 million net of noncash stock-based compensation. This was a 13% quarter-over-quarter increase from Q4 and was driven by our planned DTC launch investment. As is consistent with last quarter, approximately 80% of our SG&A was driven by sales and marketing, with the remaining representing general and administrative expenses. Of note, we anticipate that our Q1 2026 OPEX SG&A and the resulting cash burn is higher than our go forward quarterly run rate over the balance of 2026. Total research and development expenses were 0 in Q1, which is consistent with last quarter.

Finally, our net loss per share, both basic and diluted, was $1.32 per share in the first quarter of 2026 on a net loss of $41.5 million.

We ended Q1 2026 with approximately $258.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and our Q1 2026 net cash burn of approximately $34 million was consistent with Q4 and in line with our budget. As we discussed on our recent year-end call, our current sales force expansion is in our 2026 operating plan and we will continue to target an allocation of approximately 80% of our SG&A to sales and marketing.

In summary, we entered the second quarter of 2026 at an important point in the launch, with a clear operational plan, a strong cash position, and conviction that the actions underway will translate into meaningful growth.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Eef.

Thanks Dan. To conclude, I'm incredibly proud of the LENZ team and the progress we have made over the first 2 quarters of our launch. We're seeing what we hope to see, a product that clearly works, encouraging early signs of patient persistence, and a growing base of prescribing physicians.

At the same time, we're under no illusions about where we need to go. While building a completely new category takes time, and enacting changes in both prescribing habits and patient behavior is crucial. And we have progressed from diagnosing the early adoption dynamics to actively addressing them. We're committed to demonstrating clear and measurable progress over the coming quarters, and we look forward to reporting back on that.

Our focus now is on accelerating new patient adoption through disciplined execution in the field and continued investment behind the category. We believe we are in the early stages of building what can become a significant and durable market. And as we continue to execute our priorities, translating VIZZ into meaningful and sustained script growth. We look forward to updating you on that progress as we move through the year.

And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Stacy Ku with TD Cowen.

And we appreciate the details of VIZZ launch discussion. So we have a few follow ups. First, it's still early days with linear TV and of course the first steps of the sales force expansion. Just help us understand, are you able to go into additional detail on encouraging signs beyond the current prescription trajectory. Are you able to identify a specific type of practice that is prescribing VIZZ multiple times. So that's the first question.

And then on the second question, we do appreciate that 3-month metric from the e-pharmacy, it's very interesting. We wanted to confirm, for the next earnings call, will we be getting specifics on refill dynamics. So that's the second question.

Now the third, we're just trying to understand how we should be thinking about sampling and competitive dynamics. Tenpoint, Yuvezzi, they've now launched. Just help us understand what type of counter detailing we might be seeing in real time. Should we also expect samplings from both Yuvezzi and Qlosi.

And then last, on VIZZ safety. This may be contextualized, what we're seeing in the FAERS database for the launch. Now that VIZZ has been on the market for over 6 months, what are your views on VIZZ's safety profile? And maybe Shawn, maybe you could share perspectives from the patients and prescribers.

Thanks Stacy. Great set of questions there. Shawn will actually start giving you out and give some insights in the signs that we are seeing on our DTC and linear TV impacts. I'll actually now see if -- let me address the refill one first before we then go to the samples and that DTC impact.

Clearly, that's a key that we've been very clear on from the beginning, we will start to share in the second half of this year. And just to repeat what we said earlier, the reason that we've always focused on the second half of the year is that we really want to see those cohorts of patients that we can look at that refill step refill step mature a little bit over time. And if you think about our Q4, so first order of launch patients, obviously order that first script in Q4 and refill in Q4. We're also seeing is that, as we've mentioned, it's time to move over to the 3 pack and logically for our 3 pack you're going be back for a reorder in at least 3 months. So we feel important to see that patient behavior a little bit more, which is why we've always indicated that we'll start sharing those refill data in the second half of this year.

So I'll hand over to Shawn to talk about the DTC impact and samples and what we're seeing competition do. And then Marc will address your safety question.

So safety things for -- or for your question about the DTC. So what I can say so far, the early indicators are strong. So the engagement with the ads are high. We look at the click-through rates. We look at the cost per thousand impressions, and we're seeing the numbers that we want to see there. And our website traffic is up significantly. We see peak of up to 10x what we used to see on our website traffic.

The consumer awareness itself is building. We are hearing that Sarah Jessica Parker is resonating very well, and we have a broad digital reach ongoing. That being said, awareness is still early overall. So we still have more to do on driving greater consumer awareness, but we've seen an encouraging response from that low base and more patients entering that funnel. So what we're seeing is we're having great success on platforms like YouTube, where we're seeing ad recall and ad awareness lifts better than benchmark, and we're seeing a similar ad recall lift on Pinterest as well.

So this category is naturally slower to convert because of all the steps required to get to the prescription. But we continue to monitor this and actively optimize our campaign to ensure we have the best media that's out there and refine the creative testing is needed. As I said in the earlier opening remarks, we leaned in more to the problem solution marketing of tired of readers, here's a solution, which is VIZZ. So our focus right now is that strong conversion improvement, and we expect to see a stronger impact over time because DTC typically takes a few quarters to mature.

So the next question there is around the competitive so -- environment. So we continue to see VIZZ as a category of one product differentiated by its unique MOA. That being said, the market can definitely support multiple entrants. There's a large unmet need and other people out there speaking on the benefits of eye drops and presbyopia is an overall benefit to the category. This is a product where trial is very easy.

So our sampling strategy wants the patient to try the product. We know in head-to-head, if you were to try the different products, our product stands alone in terms of 10 hours of efficacy and that broad patient population. So efficacy ultimately determines winner, and we feel very strong about our efficacy. We know that the prior products didn't really satisfy the market, and this is clearly differentiated with our long duration, broader efficacy, different MOA and only people selective myotic. So that real-world experience is reinforcing that iteration and competition helps build that awareness, but our focus remains execution-driven on driving this.

Before we go to Marc, just 2 quick additions to that. So your question on if the competition is Qlosi and Yuvezzi are they sampling? Yes, maybe not as broadly as we are, with the VIZZ samples but they are putting in the market. And then maybe the underlying part of your question is, for sure, if we were to stop sampling, which we're not intending to do, you would see NRx go up. I think you'd also start to see the behavior that you saw with VUITY. So from the beginning, sampling has been a core part of our strategy. We will continue to do that. And as I mentioned earlier, we're actually seeing the behavior that we want to see being driven by sampling. You sample, they like it, they convert to buying the product, and getting more sticky than if your order is just basically a sample.

So with that, let me hand it over to Marc to talk a little bit more about the safety profile and what we've learned to date.

Thank you, Stacy, for your question. And it's one we're happy to get into because our data is genuinely one of the strongest parts of the VIZZ story so far. 6 months in, we've shipped approximately 46,000 boxes, which is roughly 1.2 million doses, in addition to widespread sampling on top of that. We've created some very broad use of VIZZ.

What we're seeing in the real world is fully consistent with the label. The non-serious AEs being reported are mostly transient and in line with what we saw in the clinical program. On the retinal side, it is important to start with the natural background rate. In the total population, this is about 27 per 100,000, with risk increasing with age and level of myopia.

So considering the background incident rate and the significant use of VIZZ thus far, 0 retinal detachments and only 2 retinal tears is much lower than what you would expect. Importantly, both retinal tears occurred in patients with pre-existing retinal risk factors, meaning they carried elevated risk independent of any treatment. Our retina experts have reviewed both cases and assessed them as likely non-causal.

Honestly, again, given the number of patients now on VIZZ and the background rate of around 27 per 100,000, you would expect to see more events than this. We believe that 2 cases at this level of exposure isn't a signal, but really just non-causal background incidence.

I know everyone is looking at what VUITY saw, so let's talk about VUITY for a moment. At what we believe is a comparable exposure to where we are today, VUITY had about 34 retinal events on the books, 22 of them were detachments. We believe that this shows what we have said all along: aceclidine is a different molecule than the other 2 other miotics on the market, with a different mechanism of action, and we're seeing a really different safety story play out in the real world. VIZZ is the only pupil-selective miotic. It doesn't significantly engage the ciliary body, and ciliary body engagement is the pathway most associated with retinal traction risk in this class. Across thousands of medical discussions we've had with eye care professionals, the ECP community clearly understands that mechanistic difference, and they consistently associate VIZZ with a lower perceived retinal risk profile than other miotics for presbyopia.

As exposure continues to grow, what matters is that the retina-related AE rate stays below background and that we don't see a mechanistic signal. To date, that's exactly what we're seeing. The product is safe, the data supports it, and we'll continue to be transparent as the real-world experience builds.

And to just -- to add on to a little bit to the last part of that question that you had, Stacy, on what the perspective is from the ECPs and the patients. Well, I can tell you from out in the field what I see, the doctors clearly understand that aceclidine is pupil-selective. They completely understand that because of one, the MOA that's in the PI that directly states it. And two, when people use this product, we continue to hear about that benefit of distance vision, which is avoiding that ciliary muscle, and that's why they're getting that benefit in distance vision as well. So the doctor and ECP community completely understands and aligns with the unique nature that is only available through aceclidine.

And from the consumer standpoint, their focus really isn't on that, but when I think of consumers, it's making sure we set that right expectation regarding to the stinging upon instillation or redness that's on instillation is transient over time. And that's where we've been putting a lot of work into the getting started videos and QR codes, as well as training the doctors to set that right expectation for the patients.

Your next question comes from the line of Yigal Nochomovitz with Citi.

Thanks for all the detail. Appreciate all the color as you move through the first few quarters of the launch. You mentioned that the prescribers are not proactively talking enough about VIZZ in their initial patient convos. I'm wondering if you could just sort of expand a little bit more on that. I know you mentioned Eef and Shawn that contact lens wearers was an area of focus. I'm just wondering if there are other categories or other aspects of a patient's profile that would be good natural hooks in order to introduce the VIZZ concept in the course of an initial patient conversation.

And then I know earlier before the launch, you talked about average utilization somewhere in the 5 months of the year range which varies depending upon heavy users versus light users. I'm just wondering if you believe that that's still a valid assumption or if you think that needs to be adjusted.

Thanks, Yigal. So starting with the prescribers focused on how often they bring up VIZZ. So we need them bringing up VIZZ more often in their standard exam. Their standard exam is pretty quick, right? They'll go through an eye exam in 20 minutes, and they have a regimen that they follow. And once you get it into almost like a muscle memory, you consistently do the same thing unless the patient proactively brings up VIZZ. So we need to help them change how they run through that standard process.

And so what we did and what we're doing to do that is we actually worked a lot on our message sharpening, so we're making it easier for the doctor to bring it up quickly. And part of that is this video and QR code. Now they don't have to spend the time, as much time walking the patient through expectation setting as well as how to use the drop, how to put in an eye drop, we've moved that over to a digital video format. That way, the doctor can bring it up easier and quickly in their natural eye exam. So this product still has broad adoption, but in our research, what we've seen so far of consumers is 50% almost of our patients that are on VIZZ use contact lenses as their primary vision correction. And that's a natural benefit for both the patient and the practice.

So that's why we're focusing and leaning heavier into the contact lens strategy right now to create that muscle memory for the doctor. It's clear physician value, and it's a clearly identifiable patient. And by doing that, we can help create that cycle of I can always bring up VIZZ, and I can do it quickly. So that's really where we're focused in terms of making sure the prescribers bring it up more often.

Two other parts of that question beyond contact lenses, like Shawn mentioned, it's an important group. It's 10 plus million people, a very valuable one. We're seeing the groups that we've mentioned before. So without too much detail, it's the people that have had LASIK before, the people that are striving for an active lifestyle. We're also seeing great success in emmetropes, so people that have never been to a optometrist, they come in because they're now becoming presbyopic. So all those categories play. The contact lens one is one that we can very easily help the doctor understand what the value is for a patient and for them.

And then on the refill rate, yes, we've always spoken about the 5 refills a year, and you can see our commentary on conference in light of what we said before.

Your next question comes from the line of Iren Amin with Piper Sandler.

Maybe to start, you talked about going to physician offices directly to sell VIZZ in select markets. Can you maybe just talk about how this might impact your margin? Because there would be an economic incentive to physicians. So I was just wondering how the math will work for both the company and for physicians. And I guess, what target markets are you expecting to reach out to, and how many of these are in your top 1,000 ECP prescribers?

Thank you. This is Shawn, and I'll cover a key aspect to the selling direct model and explain how that functions and operates. So for optometrists, generally, in about half of the markets in the U.S., half of the states, optometrists are able to sell prescription drugs out of their practice. So where it's allowed we offer the opportunity for doctors to buy the product directly from LENZ. That product ships to the doctor's office. From that point on, they're able to prescribe it and sell it to the patient.

From an economic standpoint, you should think of this as the same economics to LENZ as a product that flows through our e-pharmacy or a product that flows through a retail channel. And our target markets are those ones, and specifically, where this is an optional avenue, which goes back to about 25 of the 50 states.

I think, Biren the only thing I would add to that is the revenue transaction is when we talk about gross to nets and net kind of the net price per to the company of $60 net cash per monthly unit, you can roughly estimate that from a modeling standpoint. So I wouldn't differentiate it from a channel perspective. It's just different kind of methods of selling direct and avoiding some of those costs of the wholesaler or the other distribution costs. Otherwise, very high-quality revenue transaction because it's a direct transaction between us and the doc. So in short, no meaningful difference in net economics to the company.

And then maybe if I could have one more question. I think at the end of March, the company stated that emerging presbyopes were identified kind of as early adopters, and you wanted to expand beyond this group. Can you maybe talk about those efforts in terms of expanding beyond the emerging presbyopes to a broader group over the last 6 weeks or so?

Thanks, Iren. As said, maybe you referred to it that in the last call, indeed, we said that not so much from a consumer point of view, but from a ECP point of view, their initial focus on who had this product, patient type, for whom this product would work well was we saw somewhat limited to early presbyopes. That was a carryover, frankly, what we believe and what we hear from VUITYs launch, because they have that limited efficacy. They really focused on this group early, emerging emmetropic patients of presbyope.

We clearly work in a much broader population. That's part of what that sharpening and messaging is to continue for our sales force to remind the doctors that while that is a appropriate category, it's just a fraction of the patient population that you can use this product in. So again, that's part of where the messaging has changed.

And so tactically, what that has means actually move that knowledge to the doctors. We actually developed an additional piece for the field that they're out there using, specifically focused on that broad inclusion of our study trial, where it showed that we worked just as well in both moderate and advanced presbyopia as well. Tactically, also, what it means is we've updated some e-mail campaigns and posts that are targeted at ECPs that bring in peer-to-peer statements of other doctors sharing those successes that they've had with VIZZ in nonearly presbyopes to help bring that across from a peer-to-peer view as well as an advertising view.

Your next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman with Leerink Partners.

This is Alyssa on for Marc. Thank you for all the detail on the update. Just a few questions from us. Could you give a little bit more color on the ECP direct sales initiative? I know you said they could order directly from LENZ, but would that be timed shipments, or would it be at-will ordering as they deplete their inventory? And also could you discuss the network TV direct to consumer advertising and what markets exactly you're launching that in the pilot period? Thank you very much.

Great. Thanks for the question, Alyssa. This is Shawn again. Just a little bit more color on the ECP direct sales initiative. So these are an engagement that we enter into with the doctor. We have a contract between us and them that outlines the rules and the model itself. It is at-will ordering, so they have to order a case of product at a time, and then we ship it to them directly. At that time, they're charged and we collect payment ahead of us shipping the products out to them.

So it really is a very simple model. We enter a contract with the doctor, we send the doctor an invoice for at least one case at a time, they pay the invoice for the case, we ship it directly to that doctor, and from there, they can then prescribe and sell the product to the patient in their market. So it's at-will under a contract.

And then in terms of our network TV, so we've just started to do network TV in select key markets. There are a few different markets across the U.S. that we're doing this in, and we're doing it to make sure we can see what the signal is in those markets. We're running linear TV. We're still only a few weeks into it's too early to provide any details on that list.

Your next question comes from the line of Lachlan Hanbury-Brown with William Blair.

Maybe on the direct to ECP sales approach, should we read from that you are maybe seeing some abandonment obviously between writing the script and patients actually filling it and that this is obviously going to sort of hopefully reduce that issue? Or is this maybe also obviously to get the physicians incentivized and make it top of mind for them, if they're seeing it in their office every day?

And then maybe a second one, Shawn. I know you mentioned the change in the, certainly the name of the DTC campaign. Wondering how much more of the sort of actual content of that has changed with this new sort of problem/solution approach that you're taking?

Thanks a lot. I appreciate the questions. So the Direct to ECP Program, that initiative was came out of just pure ECP demand as well as consumer convenience, as we want to make sure that process is easy as possible. It didn't come out of an abandonment issue. It truly was something that the doctors have been requesting for a while, and we now have the infrastructure in place to support.

In terms of the content of the DTC. The tired of reading glasses and then the solution of VIZZ was a change to bring a direct alignment between those that are in readers and frustrated as a solution to that. It doesn't result in an overall change of any core creative. The creative itself still stands strong. SJV continues to test well. It's more about creating that direct connection right off the bat when people see the ad. So that's the only reason for that change.

When you think of that lean into these contact lens patients, those are the people in reading glasses. When you think of those LASIK patients, those are the ones in reading glasses, so it's just bringing a tighter connection on the value proposition of VIZZ.

So maybe one other just on the direct to ECP. Do you have clauses in those contracts to ensure that they charge a certain price? Or is there a sort of ceiling or floor to what they can charge in there?

Yes. So the way that it's structured to make sure that we're setting up the right way, so we have the price that we sell it to the doctor and then the doctor can set their own final price to the patient. However, with the guardrails we have in place, so it is very clear in our materials that for $79, you can buy it from the e-pharmacy. We've got our Rx card at $79. We have a retail structure in the background. So those now are on the actual pricing pressures. We'll hone in that price for the ECP.

Our final question comes from the line of Matthew Caufield with H.C. Wainwright.

Regarding the refills, any further observations on switching from the 1-month to the 3-month dynamics? And is that something that could have greater clarity during second half 2026? And then just additionally, with the R&D dropping to 0 for the quarter, is that drop anticipated to remain for the foreseeable future, keeping the R&D at 0 and the OpEx essentially just concentrating on the SG&A for the launch moving forward?

So on the refills, yes, we definitely see patients move. Classic example is somebody ordered a 1-pack first, and then because they like it, they move to 3-pack and they continue to do that. So that dynamic is an important one and one that we highlighted. If you look at the e-pharmacy site, which is obviously the only place where you can get a 3-pack, but that channel represents, more or less, well, the majority of our volume. You see that 3-pack now drives about 2/3 of the volume that we sell through e-pharmacy. So definitely an important factor of what we're selling.

And going back to what we said earlier, we do anticipate as we move into the second half of the year, we'll be able to little bit -- to give a little bit more color on some actual statistics around that refill behavior. And then on the R&D, Dan?

Yes. I will take that question on the R&D spend. So I think the short answer is yes, you should expect R&D to be substantially 0. We kind of signaled over the course of 2025 a shift in the capital allocation of the company with the completion of the CLARITY studies in early last year and movement towards commercial. So you would've seen R&D be effectively 0 in Q4 and again in Q1, and that should be the expectation for the foreseeable future.

Got it. Congrats on the progress.

And that concludes our Q&A session as I'm showing no further questions in queue. Thank you for your participation, and we will now conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Lenz Therapeutics Year-End 2020 Financial Results Conference Call. [OperatorInstructions]. At this time I would like to turn the call over to Dan Chevallard. Thank you.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. My name is Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer of Lenz Therapeutics. We are joined today by Schimmelpennink, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Shawn Olsson, our Chief Commercial Officer; as well as Dr. Marc Odrich, Chief Medical Officer, who will join us for the question-and-answer session.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding LENZ's future expectations, plans, prospects, book strategy, regulatory and commercial plans and expectations, cash runway projections and performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors and risks, including those discussed in our filings with the SEC and which can also be found on our website.

In addition, any forward-looking statements represent only our views as of the date of this webcast and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We specifically disclaim any obligations to update such statements. The company encourages you to consult the risk factors contained in our SEC filings for additional detail, including in our 2025 Form 10-K, which will be filed later today.

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Evert.

Thank you, Dan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We are now about 5 months into the launch of this that will summarize what we are today in 3 simple observations. First, the product clearly works. Hoping many of you are all are hearing as you read your own parties.

Second, what we're seeing so far suggests the promising share of patients for byproducts and the refill. And third, we are clearly knowing a new treatment category. And while new categories take time to develop, the signals we are seeing reinforce our confidence that this can become the muster market opportunity, we've always envisioned -- at this early stage of the launch, our priority is putting the right foundations in place, list every and scale and adoption can accelerate over time.

Importantly, we are executing this launch from a position of significant financial strength. We closed the fourth quarter with over $292 million in cash which gives us the resources and flexibility to continue investing in building this category. Let me take you through each of these observations, starting with the product itself.

Across the field, we continue to hear consistent feedback from both doctors and patients. The clinical performance result in our trials is translating directly into the real world. This work strictly but 9 patients noticing the effect within about 30 minutes and with the benefits of the near vision typically lasting throughout the workday.

Importantly, we're also seeing the same broad patient profile we observed in our clinical program. Net brand manager considers the scale of the opportunity, but the cafe approximately 28 million people in the United States, and this is the first important only once daily eyedrop capable of addressing such a broad segment of that population. -- ultimately creates the opportunity for a large and durable category.

From launch through the end of this quarter, we believe that we are on track to have sold over 45,000 boxes of this described by more than 10,000 eye care professionals, creating a strong and rapidly expanding base of physicians adopting the products. In fact, the number of subscriber factors we have seen at this stage of the launch already significantly exceeds what we observed with several recent eye care launches.

Importantly, we are seeing strong mortality within that base as we will beat up into prescribing behavior, we're seeing a very encouraging pattern among the highest volume prescribers. From a normalized same script volume for our employee 5,000 scripts and compare prescriber frequency across top deciles of our CPs. The data suggests that our top 1,000 prescribers are filling over 40% more scripts per doctor than what was reserved at comparable point in the view we launch.

And based on the same data, we estimate that the total amount of prescribing practice that the beauty to get to this volume is approximately 2x terms. But this tells us is that once physicians understand how to integrate this into their practice, they are successful with it. We view it as an important signal because it suggests that the opportunity is not only do things to bring more physicians into the category, but also to increase productivity across the broader ECP base as we learned from these sub-prescribers and use those insights as a blueprint to scale across the fuel.

Equally important, we are seeing encouraging early signals around patient persistence. What we are seeing so far suggests that patients, who try to product and use the purchasing after continue using it. This is exactly behavior we hope to see at this stage of the launch. Our sale strategy is a key part of this by allowing patients to try the product first, we see a natural self-selection dynamic -- of patients who experience the benefit and choose the purchase are more likely to continue using it.

This does mean that the early new patient numbers develop differently compared to the launch of Beauty, but patients often had to purchase the product before trying it. That approach us to a faster initial ramp, but also a rapid drop off as many patients did not continue therapy. Our approach is designed to build a more durable patient mix from the stat. Even if that results in a more gradual pay ramp in new patients.

On the retail signals we are seeing are encouraging, the pace at which new patients are coming on true therapy is, therefore, developing more steadily, which is consistent with what we often see that an essentially a new treatment category is being established. These other typical dynamics you see when new categories are introduced and new prescribing helps are being developed.

And importantly, they are very investable through focused execution in the field, combined with effective issuer marketing. So let me discuss that some more. From our composition in the field, there are 2 themes that emerge ECPs as they've built prescribing habits that will get this recommended to more patients more often. First, is must learn how to best work this into their patient discussion and start from a place of unfamiliarity with respect to how to consultations or presbyopia hydro.

Second, many physicians primarily think of this or early [indiscernible], basis are just beginning to experience near basin challenges. The reality is much simpler. This can be introduced during a routine exam with a short 102nd discussion, and it works for a much smaller patient population than only emerging areas.

Taking that mindset and helping physicians integrate the product naturally into their exam level is a key focus for us. Based on what we've learned over these first months of launch, -- we are leading in operationally to accelerate production with sharpened physician messaging to address the 2 themes I just discussed.

Specifically, our sales force is working closely with eye care professionals on how to naturally integrate this into the patient proposition and introduced to products during a routine exam by a simple, quick discussion. At the same time, we are reinforcing the breadth of the patient population. This works across a wide range of results, including contenders, patients with biolytic to the patients and not only early emerging as was.

In addition, we are expanding our field presence to a total field organization of 117 reps. This expansion will allow us to increase scope frequency with existing prescribers, while also expanding the number of physicians we actively cover, enabling us to react to strong inbound interest from Dr. [indiscernible] that's currently in a target panel, but already was prescribing this because patients are asking about it or because they learn about the products through other channels.

We are making this investment because we see a clear opportunity to accelerate adoption in the field, further integrating this into everyday clinical practice. Besides Brazilian Atlas, creating a new category also requires consumer awareness we are continuing to build the subside of the category.

Many of you have complemented us direct to consumer campaign, which features series partner and asked when we expect to see that translate into prescription trends. As a reminder, we launched a DTC campaign in mid-January, is February group representing the first full month of activity.

We are encouraged by the early cycles we're seeing. The campaign is resonating with consumers and clearly driving engagement. But syntactic is now running roughly 5x higher than our baseline levels and during national activations -- we've seen spikes of up 10x normal track. At the same time, we see regulation in a new category takes time. Across good human-driven categories, people typically need to see it at 5 to 7x foot economy.

In our case, the journey from awareness to prescription naturally takes longer. The consumers see the advertisements learns about the product, potential employment with IT professional received a sample only then transitions to purchasing a prescription. Pharmaceutical direct campaigns like ours that will typically take at least 2 quarters to translate into prescription trends.

What we are seeing today are encouraging early indicators of that process, and we would expect a more meaningful impact on script volume as we move into the second half of the year. In other words, the consumer awareness engine is now beginning to build momentum, while in parallel, we continue to focus on helping physicians integrate this more consistently into that patient discussions.

With that, let me briefly summarize, where I believe we are today. We have a product that clearly works and is delivering the real world results we expected to see. We are seeing encouraging further signals of our patient assistance and we have already built a strong and rapidly growing foundation of prescribing physicians.

At the same time, we're building a new treatment category, which naturally takes time to that. But as I've noted the early signals we're seeing give us confluence that we are underwrite path. With the operational actions we're taking the deals expansion of the sales force and the growing consumer awareness to provide direct-to-consumer campaign, both the physician and consumer reduction engines and now be able to build momentum.

As prescriber has built, and consumer lens grows, we expect to see an acceleration in new patient starts from that foundation. The opportunity in front of us remains exactly what we've always believed to be a large and underpenetrated market with 128 million smiles in the United States as a product that can meaningfully improve operations managed and near vision.

Our focus now is straightforward, continue executing, continue expanding adoption and continue building what we believe can evolve blockbuster category.

With that, I'll now turn the call over to Shawn to give more insights into our commercial strategy.

Thank you, Evert, and good morning, everyone. As a quick reminder, Presbyopia is the largest unmet vision condition in the United States. It impacts approximately 128 million people, a population nearly 4x larger than those of dry on -- in fact, we FX, more Americans than dry eye, Dymedex, tonomyopia, macadegeneration, diabetic correct and glaucoma combined.

This is uniquely positioned to address this opportunity. and performing exactly where it matters. The product works and early persistent signals are encouraging. Because this is a new category creation, as they've noted, ramp of new patients is developing gradually as physicians are starting to build the habit of introducing eyedrop option for routine business.

We're focused on accelerating update by sharpening our physician messaging expanding our sales force to increase reach and frequency and building consumer pull through DTC so that more patients are offered is in the exam room and more come in asking about this. I will unpack these details and insights across our key strategic pillars. Doctors recommend us and consumers request us pine. Focusing first on our eye care professional strategy. We are encouraged by the progress of doctors to recommend this.

First 5 months of the launch, aided awareness is already at 98% and unaided awareness is already at 79%. As a reminder, unaided awareness means that by doctor brought a bid in the survey as an edoxagypribeopia unsolicited. So both metrics are above our targets and demonstrating that ECPs are very aware of this.

In the same survey, we're also seeing accuracy of TVS messages resonating ECPs as they're prompted to write in what they know about this. We see consistent answers, such as fecal selected, fuel selective, different MOA, not iloparbine last numbers. The results demonstrate that ECPs understand this well.

Confidence and this is also clear as reflected by more than 14,000 ECT locations enrolled in our fund. And most importantly, we expect to have over 10,000 prescribing ECDs by the end of Q1, which exceeds what we observed of several recent eye care product launches, including Milo and XMD at this stage of their launch.

In addition to the broad PCP prescriber base, we're also seeing ECB confidence as over 55% of these doctors have written me multiple times. As we look at the first 5 months of launch, we're also gaining important insights that continue to reinforce our confidence in the opportunity for this. First, we're seeing that access optometrists and ophthalmologists is not a meaningful barrier for LENZ.

As evidenced by our consistent execution of our field team, which continues to deliver approximately 7 calls per day. Secondly, our sampling strategy is working. We see that most patients are able to obtain a sample. And when they do to help identify those who like the product, which in turn has supported encouraging recirates.

In terms of prescriber mix, it remains 80% optometry and 20% ophthalmology with our expected top prescribers performing as anticipated. As stated earlier, once these ECPs have integrated vision of the practice, they are successful with it as data suggests, our top 1,000 ECPs are building over 40% more scripts per doctor than what was observed at a comparable point with view.

Interestingly, we're also seeing adoption broadened across lower decile liters, which is an encouraging sign for the depth of the opportunity. Particularly notable is the growing number of eye care professionals writing this multiple times, who never of duty. We view that as an important proof point. It suggests that this is not simply capturing prior prescribers in this category, but it's expanding physician engagement with the prescription presbyopia opportunity more broadly.

And finally, while others under this market airline success means this remains a true category build effort. We're working to build new prescribing attracts and overcome legacy perceptions from prior costs. And our market research confirms there is still an opportunity to further educate PCs that made us not just for early price deals and have more routinely integrate business discussions into the standardizing fan.

Based on what we've learned in these initial months, we've already begun to implement clear step coleoption. We're expanding -- we're excited to expand our field organization from 8 representatives to 117 representatives as I noted earlier. We follow an in-field organization to cover a broader set of EVPs who are already prescribing this and increased call frequency with high care professionals.

This expands the outside fields team reached to approximately 15,000 ECPs. We believe that added recent frequency on part supporting behavior change needed to build a category and integrate this as a routine part of the press VOP discussion. We've already been nonrecurring expanded field and expected to be fully on board in Q2.

At the same time, the field is focusing on the messages that matter most to bring up bids more often, including the broader legion criteria from our clinical studies, which included moderate and Vance presbyopia and strong success that we're seeing in the moderate and advanced redials as well as practical tools to make operating visits to patients a simple and seamless addition to the office business.

Moving to our consumer strategy of driving patients to robust bid by name. We are encouraged by the early momentum we're seeing. This launch and through the end of March, we expect to have sold more than 45,000 monthly tax events -- and importantly, this is proving to be a product that works for patients and is generating encouraging repo behavior. We are already seeing patients on aquarefills, transition from 1-month to 3-month prescriptions and, in many cases, start directly with a 3-month order, which reinforces our view on the benefit of the product that is the most important near-term driver of growth is focusing on increasing NRxs.

To support that, in addition to our work we just discussed with ECPs to bring visitation more often, we've recently launched our direct-to-consumer campaign and has seen strong early update the on shortly.

Our spoke first in Seresto Parker is resonating well with this consumers and our advertising is now running across a broad mix of high-impact media, including YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, ESPN, Paramount+, Uber, Pinterest and other platforms, helping us reach consumers where they spend their time and driving not only sustained increase in our visits but up to a 10x increase in visits to this com.

We've also been activation influencers across a diverse set of audiences from well-known realty personalities, directly is voices and sports media and iconic actors who are now the presbyope age. In addition, we're seeing strong pickup across broad media platforms, including Good Morning America, New York Live, New York Times and Late night TV.

As we look at what we are learning from our early consumer launch efforts, our consumer mix today is approximately 60% female and 40% male, with the majority of the users between the ages of 45 and 65 which is consistent with the audience we target and expected to reach. As we highlighted earlier, it typically takes a couple of quarters to see DTC take hold and are encouraged by the early performance indicators of our advertising.

For click-through rates and cost per impressions are exceeding relevant benchmarks. For example, our early and brand awareness from YouTube is performing 2x above benchmark. We're seeing similar lifts across both men and women and demographics. Just as importantly, these campaigns are giving us useful insights into how our various creative assets perform on cross-format and audiences. Including which visuals, messages and executions are resonating the most strongly with consumers.

Even with our early encouraging DTC metrics, we're actively optimizing our creative ads and media placement to maximize impact. for increasing investment allocation behind the higher-performing placements while reducing the allegation of lower-performing media, allowing us to concentrate resources where we are seeing strongest respondents. We're also introducing new permutations of trades into the next, which bring up the everyday frustration with reading glasses, which we believe is an important point of recognition as consumers consider this.

Starting in April, we will pilot linear TV commercials in select markets across our top states to test patient response. Linear advertising is our traditional TV commercials on your common network stations like ABC, NBC and cable through typical providers like Comcast. Together, these actions will continue to optimize our media mix add messaging and build additional consumer demand for biz.

We're encouraged by the progress we've made, we are seeing broad physician adoption, growing commercial demand an encouraging early repeat behavior. And the first time that our consumer campaign is beginning to activate that market. We continue to believe this is a category 1 -- as the only approved Presbyopia eye drop with up to 10 hours of duration, this offers the differentiated profile that we believe is well aligned with in need of both consumers and eye care professionals that is demonstrated by the DCP adoption encouraging patient persistence.

I'd now like to hand the call over to Dan Chevallard, our CFO, to step through our financial results.

Thank you, Shawn. As both Evert and Shawn Shane outlined, the fourth quarter in Houston trade launch has been a tremendous time for lens as we have proudly introduced this into the U.S. marketplace, representing a novel solution for the treatment of presbyopia with 128 million Americans frustrated with their near vision.

As has been highlighted, this is a true market build and 1 that we're doing for a position for financial strength. This morning, I'd like to focus my remarks into 3 sections. First, summarizing our 2025 financial results, then discuss our outlook on 2026 capital allocation and I will conclude by highlighting the significant progress made on the global expansion of this through our international partnership strategy.

First, and as has been mentioned, we continue in the launch of this from a position of financial strength. Ending 2025 with approximately $292.3 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We remain at 3 and ended 2025 with approximately 31.3 million shares of common stock outstanding. Our Q4 results were highlighted by net product revenues of approximately $1.6 million in our first quarter of product launch with over 20,000 monthly paid and filled prescriptions.

As you will recall, we launched this with availability through 2 consumer channels. The first, our e-pharmacy perceives prescriptions from the ECP processes individual orders and ship product directly to the consumer's home. We recognize revenue when our product is delivered to the consumer. Our second channel, the more traditional retail pharmacy is a channel supplied by our network of wholesalers.

As is typical through this channel, we recognize revenue and shipments of bids are received by the wholesaler, not upon delivery to the patient. Turning now to our operating expenses. We've discussed in previous quarters our planned ramp in spend as we move into launch, specifically driven by our commercial strategy. Our total Q4 operating expenses was approximately $40 million, including $4 million of noncash stock-based compensation expense compared to $31.4 million in Q3 of 2025.

Importantly, net cash earned in the fourth quarter was approximately $32 million. Passive goods sold in the fourth quarter totaled $400,000 and was primarily driven by indirect product costs associated with nonrecurring manufacturing processes. Going forward, we anticipate this to trend to an approximately 9% direct product gross margin.

Total SG&A expenses increased to $39.6 million in Q4 2025 were approximately $35.9 million net of noncash stock-based compensation compared to $9.4 million for the same period in 2024. I driven almost entirely by the establishment of sales force and launch of this, including a significant nonrecurring investment in Q4 to enable the launch of our DTC campaign in early Q1 of 2026.

Sequentially, quarter-over-quarter, SG&A increased by approximately 43% from $27.6 million in the third quarter. In recent quarters, we have discussed the importance of capital allocation at lens and a significant weighting of our SG&A spend towards sales and marketing to support this. In Q4, approximately 80% of our SG&A was driven by sales and marketing with the remaining representing general and administrative expenses. This is a trend that we expect to continue.

Total research and development expenses decreased to 0 in Q4 2025 compared to $5.9 million in the same period last year. Sequentially, R&D expenses decreased quarter-over-quarter by 100% and from $38 million in the third quarter. This reduction was anticipated and was primarily a result of the conclusion of our positive Phase III CLARITY study and subsequent approval of this in July.

Finally, our net loss per share, both basic and diluted, was $1.16 per share in the fourth quarter of 2025 on a net loss of $35.9 million compared to a net loss per share of $0.46 in the fourth quarter of 2024 and a net loss of $12.7 million. As we look ahead to 2026, I wanted to highlight a few points to help further characterize our P&L. First, on the revenue front, and after our first quarter of sales, we noted a better-than-anticipated blended gross to net ratio of approximately 90% or $67 per monthly package of this.

Additional non-gross to net cost of the respective distribution channels have consistently resulted in a net cash per unit of $60 per monthly package with the difference going into our SG&A line. This net cash created of $60 is consistent with our long-standing expectations. Our Q4 2025 cash burn was substantially in line with our go-forward quarterly expectations over 2026.

The recently initiated sales force expansion was in our 2026 operating plan -- we will continue to target an allocation of approximately 75% to 80% of our OpEx to sales and marketing with an aim to maintain recently flat G&A spend period-over-period. R&D spend now becomes a de minimis line item on the P&L.

The last point I'd like to highlight is an update on our recent progress, advancing the global expansion of this for our international partnership strategy. We've seen significant progress across the globe in recent months and now anticipate potential approvals in multiple geographies in early 2027.

Breaking that down, as we initially announced in Q3 of last year, the NDA review in China is now well underway. In May 2025, we executed a commercialization agreement with Lotus Pharmaceutical and are happy to report that of the eighth country license in Southeast Asia, we have NDAs submitted and under review in 3 countries, including South Korea, Thailand and Singapore.

As announced in early March, we recently submitted our central marketing authorization application to the European Medicines Agency for approval in Europe. With our submission of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency or MHRA in the U.K. to follow. Tea, our commercial partner in Canada continues to make progress towards their submission to Health Canada and significant regular regulatory activities are already underway with Lunatus, our commercial partner for the recently signed 9 country distribution agreement in the Middle East region.

In total, Five ex-U.S. NDA or equivalent submissions have been completed, and we anticipate over 10 to be completed by the end of this year with multiple potential approvals possible in 2027. In summary, we feel confident about where we are both financially and strategically, and the team is well positioned to execute and advance this on the back of a strong balance sheet with a broad strategic network of partners making regulatory advancements globally.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Eve.

Thanks, Dan. To conclude, I'm incredibly proud of the land team and the progress we are making in these early months of launch. We're seeing what we hope to see. The product clearly works, encouraging early signals of patient resistance and a growing base of prescribing physicians. We are now focused on accelerating new patient adoption through disciplined execution in the field and continued investment behind the category.

We believe we are in the early stages of Bilia can become a significant and durable market. As we continue to execute on describing how it's built and consumer lands grows -- we expect to see a declaration in new patient starts from this foundation. We look forward to updating you on our continued progress in the quarters ahead. With that, I'd like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Stacy Ku with TD Cowen.

We really appreciate all the detailed commentary on the Viz launch so far. We have a couple of questions. So first, maybe further discuss that sampling dynamic to NRx and the retention that you're seeing how is refill, let's say, high level tracking to your internal expectations so far? So that's the first question. And then second, as you're trying to broaden patient demand, -- maybe talk a little bit more about the investments and where you think they can help with the friction points that you listed? Do you believe that select television advertising plans will also take about 2 quarters to lift prescriptions.

We're asking because -- from what we remember, our consultants told us that duty ads were everywhere. Of course, the prescribers were not necessarily prepared to set expectations on beauty's efficacy profile, which has been your focus, but just help us understand that dynamic. And maybe a reminder on the size of the Beauty sales force as you're expanding your sales as well?

And then the third question is on the prescriber additions. If you're willing to comment, what percentage are from your initial target group versus the inbounds from patient demand? And are you seeing a certain practice profile, where the prescriber becomes a repeat?

I appreciate your questions. Let me start off with the NRx and refill dynamic and give a little bit more color and then Shawn will talk about the BCC and EDP question. So we feel very good about where we are or actively, as I've mentioned, accelerating option. If you look at the strong foundation that we built with the over 10,000 prescribing ECPs and more than $45,000 is sold.

We believe that that's a great start. And what most early is to see that it works, as I've mentioned, that we see that patients who choose the purchase continue to use it, and we're seeing both. So new patient sites are developing as expected for a new category that takes it is time, I mentioned, -- we're actively working to continue to accelerate that as per plan.

So significantly or specifically, we're expanding our sales force, like I mentioned, 59 batch to drive both breadth and frequency and sure, I'll probably talk about that a little bit more as to answer your ECP question, because it allows us to increase coverage of physicians that are already showing interest and also increases how after we engage with those existing prescribers -- how long that, as I mentioned, we'll continue to build the consumer end through DTC and that ties into your second part or the third question.

I think -- so as we go to pivot into the refills -- we know that this is a refill driven category and early sales are encouraging. We're seeing patients come back and reorder. If we now look at that goal or of patients that got that first quarter in Q4 over the first quarter of our launch. We're seeing them come back and we are -- we see patients move from initially a 1-month back now to a 3-month impact suggesting that they are committed and they're liking the product.

We're also seeing patients on new product not starting initially on multi-month supplies. So in online, that tells us that they had a chance to settle back to say we say works elite in the life product in up to start at with treatment. So all of that, we feel very consistent with a product that's delivering for patients. It's still early. So we want to make sure that we see this dynamic develops over multiple quarters again the fans that we're seeing so far aligned with what we would expect.

So with that, let me switch over to Shawn to talk about the CCP.

Thanks, Stacy, thanks for the questions. When we look at broadening the patient demand and where we're focusing our investments to help -- our primary focus has always been digital advertising to hit the patients where they are. So we know what these patients look like and we do that prior to launch, right? We knew that to make over $100,000 a year. They're mostly between 45 and 65. They're in major city centers.

And that digital marketing is working. What we look at every single day is what's our click-through rates of different ads what's our cost per impressions of not only for ads for different media placements. So inside that digital aspect is really a lot of optimizing, right? Do we actually see more benefit when we're putting the assets on YouTube versus when we put them on Instagram and how that translates to business to our website.

So that's a lot of optimization. The influencer standpoint, same thing, we look at the influencers post and we say, okay, and we saw the post by Heather Dubrow and she got 650,000 views. What does that look like and what it translates -- so a lot of them is optimizing. With the addition of Linear, what we're also seeing is there are select markets where the patients are early adopters -- and therefore, as we continue to evolve and optimize that media mix, it's a good opportunity to bring linear TV in those select markets and past that response that we continue to optimize to get that broader adoption.

You are correct when Vuyo launched, they put -- we're putting a big substantial media plan out there. So we're being much more focused with targeting each individual that we want to drive in versus driving a shock an approach of selling a 125 million people about it to make sure we have an efficient campaign. You also brought the sales force size -- so looking into more and more about the V launch. It appears they had a sales force of roughly 300 people specifically focused on duty.

So therefore, expansion from to 116 it also makes sense, but also a more rationally sized sales force. So jumping into that, which was the second part of your question on the target groups of ECT and where are they sitting? So our field, the outside portion of the field was focused on performing about 12,000 eye care professionals that covered decile 4 through 10 of beauty tending the highest prescribers -- and we continue to see that today, our decile 10 doctors are our highest prescribers as well, and we have the inside sales team covering the lower decile.

The growth from targeting 12,000 to 15,000 ECPs on the outside field is because we were seeing those lower decile ones prescribing repeatedly as well as a good portion that we actually called in our analysis MA. These are doctors that have never written viewing. So we have doctors at never real beauty that are now wanting to write bids.

And so a good way to think about it is our target initial group of outside sales was 12,000 ECPs, and we've now grown that to 15,000 ECPs because of those deciles that were not on targets. Now when we do that, we're growing not only the number of targets, but when we expand this field from 88 to 117, which are also seen in the ECPs per rep. -- is being smaller.

So we can get in that doctor office more often and really work with them to make sure that you get to that 10 set conversation to bring it up to every patient and understand that they can offer this to more patients, not the early presides.

So hopefully that answer your question, Stacy.

Your next question comes from the line of Yigal Nochomovitz with Citi Group.

Yes. Just a few questions here. I'm wondering if you could spend a little more time talking about the these top 1,000 writers in terms of their behavior and how they approach the conversation with the patient knowledge of the product. I know you mentioned that many of the ECPs that aren't familiar with this believed apparently romaneously that it was only for the early presbyopes and not for the other categories you mentioned, Shawn, like the contact lens wearers, the ones with prior Lasan the pseudophakic -- so I'm just curious how that crept into the message that some people apparently didn't understand that it was for a much, much broader set? And how are you planning to help correct that perception and then discuss the behavior of these top riders that seem to get it and have gotten it from the very beginning. So that was my first question.

Thanks, great question. Shawn, and I will tag team on that a little bit. So just to double click on that a has very encouraging for us to see those 2 things that I've said. One is that it's only taking us about half of the amount of prescribing doctors to get to the same script volume that Beauty got to 45,000. So I think what that tells us is that doctors are enthusiastic.

They like working with a trial. And especially like [indiscernible]. as you in that group, it look at the top 100 you see that they're actually riding 40% more. So those are the factors that grow the most of beauty providing even more for us. And your question on what makes and different again, I'll hand over to Shawn shortly.

It's really around taking out how to, one, bring this up consistently and easily and quickly and operate as an alternative option to their patients, setting their expectations around what to expect from a drug and then realizing that, as you've mentioned as well, this is truly something that they can offer to pretty much every eligible presbia in that practice.

So I think that's what makes them different. And we're obviously trying to bundle it up and share that with all the other doctors out there already describing on all the new ones that we're tapping into to that vendor over for Shawn to give you some even more color on that.

Yes. Absolutely. And thank you all for the question. So as it on a lot of the key points, but jumping in a little bit deeper. So our top 1,000 prescribers. Again, they're tied to those higher destocounts. So these are doctors that are more comfortable implementing new technologies, historically are also higher prescribers. So this is something that they are more used to doing in general on a day-to-day basis.

What we're seeing is they follow that standard process, which we always can do message, make sure to give the patient an example and attracts right, allow all the patients to try and then give them the script as well. And as they expanded, they offer up as an option to more patients. They figured out how to do the 10-second pitch, how to offer it inside our expectations.

In terms of your questions on the understanding of the broader use, why are some still thinking only about the early read deal, but this is really an effect of the previous product on the market, which really was tested in the under population and the Apex really only worked in that very early emerging resi, therefore, people naturally go there. It is sticky more to make sure people understand that we really did show just as much success in moderate and advanced presbyopia.

And then we show them the graphs actually show those that have worse presbyopia, gain more lines -- and that's a process to understand that this product truly does work for that full scope of press.

Okay. Awesome. And then this is really quick, just maybe for -- maybe Shawn also -- this is just more of an operational question. You mentioned doing the TV ads. I think that wasn't in the original blueprint I'm sure it was one of your scenarios. But I assume this doesn't mean that your emphasis and investment in terms of targeting the regional influencers, 1 layer below the SAPs that that's still in place as it was with the initial plan?

And then also, are you able to track -- I know I mentioned the conversion to the uptick in the web traffic when you have various campaigns that are delivered to the market. Are you able to track the conversion rates there? And are you seeing higher conversion to Rxs as a result of these waves coming to the website?

Great questions, Yigel. So first, about the CBS. So our strategy remains the same on primarily focused on digital ads and the influencers. So we never plan to do a broad national linear TV campaigns. However, what we're seeing is there are key markets that are prescribing a lot more often than others. And so this is a perfect opportunity to drop linear advertising on network TV and cable in those targeted markets in a responsible, financially responsible way to see what response we see.

So that's the opportunity that's now provided itself of linear TV. So because as key markets, we test the response and in testing those responses, you need exactly what you just brought up. How does that translate to then visits to the lab -- and then does that then translate to actual scripts later on. And that's exactly what we're continuing to look at every day.

So we can see when we actually run different ads in different markets, other than responds to long traffic. I think we're early on in DTC. So we don't have a durcorrelation from the webcast to then a strip later on. There's a connection there, but it's something that we'll continue to look at for correlation to make sure we continue to further optimize those CTCs.

Your next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman with Lee Partners.

This is Alyssa on for Mark. So you previously highlighted 3 different patient categories as the foundation of the advertising strategy. Could you update us on which of the segments are driving the early adoption today? And then secondly, I might have missed this, but on the distribution, can you clarify whether prescriptions are being fulfilled entirely through the e-pharmacy channel? Or if retail is now kind of contributing to that? And how is the mix between those 2 and it sell.

Great. Thanks for the question. So if you think back to our strategy in terms of early adopters, we want to focus on those that are in contact -- we want to focus those that have had post refractive surgery and what we call the active lifestyle. So we commissioned a survey of patients that have recently received the product.

And what we're seeing is those targets are right. when we actually look at the data, we're saying about half of the patients on this have on contracts, about 1/3 of them have had leased in the past and that about 1/4 of them have been BOTOX in the past 12 months. Now that quarter number is a little bit bias because we have an equal split of men and women, about 60% female, 40% male in terms of our prescriptions.

And BOTOX does tend to be about 90% women, 10% men, so that will lift up that percentage overall. But we feel good about our targets that we're focused on there. And then in terms of the mix of the retail as well as the pharmacy both meaningful channels we've not broken out or shared that mix yet.

Your next question comes from the line of Biren Amin with Piper Sandler.

For Q1, can you maybe tell us what the split is between the 1-month pack and the 3-month pack -- my second question is I think previously you had estimated 5 refills per year. In your early adopters, do you feel that, that still would align with your annual refill projections?

And then third question -- or third question is, can you talk about how many of the samples in Q4 converted to scripts in Q1, I think that would be a good barometer of patient experience.

Thanks, Biren. Great questions. And obviously, we all know that ultimately, these distis are going to be very important to detect the progress of the launch. We're also remaining with what we said before that we fill actual refill percentages is something that we really start to look at in the second half of the year, we'll start to communicate that.

But what we do see at the moment on your various questions is that as I mentioned earlier, that fact is important in the market, and we're seeing that move. And this is early days -- so like for many of these statistics and the parameters that we've spoken about, we really want to see a couple of quarters to see how to square bugs before we feel that it's a reasonable number that we can start to share.

Same goes for refills. Like I mentioned earlier, we're encouraged by what we're seeing. We also need to remind ourselves that the coat that we already can follow hit the 1 from Q4 of last year. So first 3 months of being in the market with this. But first, consumers have genes to buy the part and that's probably a mix between initially when we just started to bring samples out resumes at both the having sampled and later in the quarter that we now most of the people want had a chance to sample.

So on top of that, you see that somebody bought a treat, for example, in December is clearly happening you would expect that person to come back until maybe late Q1 or even into Q2. So that means that the numbers that we're seeing now, we're really looking at them more as a barometer than the actual number.

But clearly, as we said, what we're seeing is encouraging us, and we feel that we have a product that has led up to what we want to see that people like that once they order it been sticky and they continue to buy.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gerberry with Bank of America.

This is Melanie on for Jason. First, can you share any more details about indicators that are most encouraging regarding the DC program that can spur growth? And secondly, anything you can share about key thresholds you're looking to see in NRx and refills in the second quarter.

Thanks, Melanie. I appreciate it. So in terms of the DTC program, when we think of our DTC, what we're really looking to see is are we driving consumer activation, right? And so in terms of this stage of a DTC program, wherever so fairly early on, the easiest items to look at that we're looking for or indicators are, are we driving awareness? And are we driving increases in web traffic -- and are we doing at a responsible financial spend.

So the indicators we continue to look at are we increasing people that are going to website. ERPs a sustained increase in most that visitors we're staying up to a 10x increase in web visitors depending on what we're running. That's very good. When I look across the metrics of our DTC, I'm looking at what are we paying for 1,000 impressions, what are we paying per click.

Again, what we're seeing right now with our ads, we're testing well. We're actually doing better than benchmarks or click-through rates as well as spend per impression. So that's looking positive -- and then what we continue to look at is as we talk to the patients, serving them so ad, did that time come in. And so those are all the metrics that we're continuing to look at.

The second question was around key thresholds that we're looking for as we enter into the second quarter. I think just moving back to what I said earlier. There's 2 elements that we're focusing on and that Chorus highlighted as well, activating the doctors to redo more patients more often. Obviously, that's something that's ongoing. And then you really start to see that BDC play out. build things all take a little bit of time. This is why we said that.

The -- this is not only for us but in general and Nielsen report that you pick up, we'll show you that it takes at least 2 quarters to really see that translate into B2C and early indicators that Stronach we're seeing very positive Similarly, with the expansion of the sales force happening in Q2, we would expect that to take the time for that to take effect. But we really are expecting more of a step change and acceleration of new patients as both of these mechanisms will take hold closer to the second half of the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Lachlan Hanbury-Brown with William Blair.

I guess the first, I'd be curious what you're finding in terms of how often or how many samples doctors are giving out. Finding the reps when they go back for fridges empty or they still have some. Do they have to go back earlier, just spoken to a few docs that tend not to give the samples. They refer to rightescript. So kind of curious to see what you're seeing on the sampling in the volume front there.

And then maybe a second 1 on the prescribers curious what you're seeing in terms of the time it takes for them to go from a single prescription to become a repeat prescriber? Is it -- is there -- there's a cohort of doctors that basically immediately prescribe it to multiple people and then others that prescribe 1 and takes much longer? Or is there a trend you're seeing there?

Thanks, Lachlan. Good questions. Let me start off with dissembly and then build a little bit more on the sampling strategy and the conversion and how we think about that. So sampling in case is really designed to bring the right patients so it's a central part of our strategy, as we highlighted early on -- because of the products has such an immediate observable effect. So we want to get samples out there that's how what we focused on.

If we get as many samples as needed to as many offices as possible to make sure that those patients can reexperience the products first and then self-select in titan we're seeing that, that's working. We believe that currently probably more than 90% of people that start with this or new patients have had a sample first. So again, that strategy is working. What's also important is to understand how this samples works.

So the samples are dispensed as you've mentioned, directly by physicians -- so once our reps leave the samples with the doctor, there's no way for us to track individual samples and how they're being handed out to patients and how many are being head on, but what we do see is that most of the doctors now handing on because like there's a group of doctors that you just prefer to write a script directly.

And we'll continue to work with them to actually start to change that have as well. So we actually and don't really look at conversion as a key metric at this point. The samples for us are very cost effective and it's really a way to get as many people as we can to try to put make some they like it and then they're self-led in, like I said earlier, that this do lead to indeed a much more sticky patient population.

I think your second question was around prescribing dynamics. And what we see is that, as you would expect at this stage as a mix. What Shawn highlighted, there's a great amount of doctors that are already doing what we would like them to do, provide a sample together with the script -- there's also reactors that wants to sample first and have the patient pull back, like the rig script, the doctor is said to your point, right scripts meaningly to sample.

So all the different flavors that you can pick up are going out there and that focus of us now to take that and Blue brings up factors that we know are very successful with the product, the high percentage of the patients converting start to apply that or cat to the rest of the Dr. Cohorts.

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Caufield with HC Winright.

Can you speak more to the nuances you're seeing in terms of that initial refill patients? Like for instance, have the refills been predominantly those early presbyopes so far?

Yes, great question. So when we look at the consumers get in a little bit more detail. So we dig into it and look at those people are adopting the fastest, and we're seeing the repos come through. Again, what we're seeing when we break it down, it's 50% win and 40% men, predominantly that 55 to 64-year old, there are certain states that we see perform better than others, -- and when we dig into them, they are our target patients that are doing it is, as I stated earlier, after those patients have 1 context in the past, about 1/3 of them have had leased it 1/4 had BOTOX, but again, it's a bit biased by the next Melmar.

So we are right on that core target. We're hitting the right patients that want to use it. I think the most important thing is they get a sample and try it because that self-selection is so important. And that's what really drives that repeat behavior is getting us to self-select and try the product, know is for them and they continue to use it. I think that's the important we want to focus on.

That concludes our question-and-answer session. As I'm showing no further questions. Thank you for your participation, and we will now conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Okay. Welcome, everyone to the third day of Citi's Global Healthcare Conference. I'm Yigal Nochomovitz, biotech analyst here at Citi. So we have a really, really super interesting company next, its LENZ Therapeutics. I have with me the CEO, Evert Schimmelpennink. Thank you, so much for joining.

Obviously, a tremendous amount of progress since you did the reverse merge, did the Phase III data successfully built the commercial infrastructure, got the approval and now, of course, have launched the product biz. So tell us where you are? Tell us a little bit about the early launch? How it's going? What you're preparing for 1Q just -- set the stage?

Absolutely. Thanks, Yigal. Obviously, thanks for the invite. Great to be here at the Citi Conference. Yes, we're very excited about everything that we're seeing. And to your point, and just facing our focusing on the last couple of months from the approval that we got the early -- late July, to the launch, which we executed early October and then now 8 or 9 weeks into the launch. It's been an extremely exciting time for the company.

Everything that we're seeing either from the numbers side and we're obviously seeing a lot more than what's in the public domain to the feedback that we're getting from doctors on how to product works in real life, to, frankly, what we're hearing from investors at all these conferences that are all doing their own doctor checks as they shoot.

The feedback is very, very aligned on how the products works in the real world. It works really well for pretty much every patient, which is very aligned with our clinical trial. It works very rapidly. People notice a near vision, improve and get back to real good near vision in 10, 15 minutes.

It's got a very long duration. So it absolutely works for the full workday just as we saw in the clinical trial. Anecdotally, we're hearing 11, 12 hours. The distance vision impact that we noticed in our clinical trial as well is real. People talk about that, "Hey, my distance vision is getting crisper, clearer, more vivid. So that's great to hear. That's not a label claim, but it's a very nice obviously added benefit that patients or consumers experience.

And it's a very comfortable product in its use. In the clinical trials, we were very much focused on the headache rate. Miotic have a tendency to create mild headaches. We saw very little of it in the clinical trial to begin with. And hardly anything we're hearing about it in the real world. So that's great. The two things that come up is the product might give a little bit of a sting on first installation, a 10, 15 second, thing if it happens, doesn't happen anymore on day 2, day 3.

Similarly, people may notice a little bit of hyperemia, also that's very transient. If it happens, it lasts maybe up to 30 minutes on day 1, maybe half of that in duration day 2 and then day 3, 4, 5, no longer really happens. So highly tachyphylactic and something that doctors feel it's very easy to manage for patients. And we're seeing that again in our numbers. The numbers continue to give us a lot of confidence in the launch. if I see in this stage where it's really around getting docs to recommenders, and I'm sure we're going to talk about that and not yet have we turned on the DTC, which we'll do in the Q1.

So you started with e-pharmacy at the very beginning. Before that, I guess you just started with the samples and then you sort of dialed in the e-pharmacy. Now you're starting to dial in the retail component -- the retail pharmacy component. Can you speak to that as far as how it's going to start to boost the trajectory? That's before, of course, turn on the direct to consumer.

Absolutely. So both channels are now fully available. So if you think about how we launched the product, so early October, October 4 is when we first had samples in the market. And at that moment, we also have product available at the e-pharmacy. So e-pharmacy, in our case, is more of a fulfillment station where we have products sitting there as orders come in, they get fulfilled and that ship to the consumers.

Pretty much at that moment, we also had product at the wholesalers, but that just takes a little bit of time to propagate it into the channel. So we've always been very clear around the fact that we expected that by mid-November, both channels would be fully up and running, and that's exactly the case. So you can order your product through e-pharmacy and get a deliver to you home, guaranteed fixed price, or you can just get it sent it to your local CVS, Walgreens and pick it up there. And again, both are fully available now.

Is it a bit too early to tell as far as utilization for patients that have gotten scripts, they're probably still in their first 25 days, right? So it's maybe a little early to know about the refill rate. That's more something to learn later next year.

Absolutely. No. So it's good to see that without going into numbers, but we are seeing people refilling. We are seeing people ordering 3 packs. But indeed, it's much too early to go into, and it's not really telling a whole lot at this moment. So -- as I think about what we'll start to share with the Street going forward is we'll continue to focus initially on the numbers or the stats that we gave at our November earnings call, which were all around what's our awareness. It was already up over 90%, which is phenomenal for a new product to have a 90-plus percent awareness, but talking about how many practices, how many doctors have access to samples. And just to double click on that a little bit. For us, it's really important that ultimately we get to a stage where most, if not all of our target factors have samples available.

So we want to make sure that as a consumer, actually once we turn on DTC, if you think, hey, this is something I want to try that you don't have to go and look for which practice has samples. You can go into your local Main Street and the 3 optometrists there, should all have samples available. So that's one thing that we continue to strive for. So we'll give an update around where we are there.

And then we'll give updates around what are the unique amount -- what are the unique doctors that have prescribed. So 4 weeks in. We had 2,500 doctors that already wrote, which I believe is a phenomenal number. But we extend 40% had already written more than once. So we'll update that number for the end of the quarter.

And similarly, we'll update the amount of scripts that have been filled. So that was 5,000 in the first 4 weeks in. And again, we'll give an update on that number. We'll then turn DTC on, and I think what we're focused on in, let's call it, the first half of the year is how that driving new patient starts. So that's the main metric for the first half of the year. Turning DTC on usually takes a couple of months to see that effect. Again, that's not unlogical. Somebody sees the ad, they usually need to see it a couple of times, that make an appointment, get the eyes checked, get their sample, turn in or turn towards buying a script.

And then if there's a 1 month, which is the minimum, it obviously takes at least a month before they refill. If they buy a 3 pack, it's going to take at least 3 months. So first half of the year, I think of it really as you want to see that nice steady growth in new patient stats and more towards the first -- in the middle of the year, we'll start talking about, okay, what is the refill rate that we're seeing that because that's the key second metric for this to all work.

So long-winded to your answer on when is it that we'll start to get insight in the refill rate and think of it more as a Q2, Q3 type metric.

Tell us more. There's a lot of components to DTC. It sounds simple, but it's not simple. It's a lot of strategy. You've hired really, really strong head of marketing. We'd love to hear more about the choice of the celebrities, folks person. What are the facets of the DTC campaign? How do you target? The technology is obviously really good where if you're near a place where you potentially are a customer, you could be tagged on your phone. Just kind of go through all that and where the ads are going to appear? Who are you going to target? What that's going to look like?

Yes. Indeed, there's a lot of different aspects in it. So let's maybe start with spokesperson, Sarah Jessica Parker, who we've had her as a topic from day 1. But it's great that -- I thought it was great, and Sean thought she was great. Obviously, while we're decision makers, we're not the experts in this. So how that works as you think about who's your target customer. We know that a product like this skews slightly female. And we're seeing that even in our current script data coming in.

It's like 60-40 female, male. Its slight -- it skews a little bit more to the 45 to 55 year olds. We're seeing orders all over the age spectrum up to 75-year-old, but a little more in that age group. And then it's a little bit more city center urban buying there. So if you think about how do you get that group activated, you look for somebody that really speaks to that group.

We also look at our product, which we really look at as a category of 1. So this is the only product that gets below 2 millimeters. This is the only product that really improves your near vision. So we also want a category of 1 spokesperson. So this needs to be somebody that's an A list, the lead character in her movies needs to be a female. So that's how you build that list. We ultimately will win it down to about 5 with Sarah on the top.

And then you start to do what's called scores. So here's where companies do a lot of surveying where they show somebody the name or show somebody a photo and go across all age groups and dynamics to see is this somebody that really resonates. And she does like she's the ideal person for this. So her role in the DTC to get to your question is she needs to stop people when that's calling on their Instagram or their TikTok or their Facebooks where they go, oh, what she's talking about.

So you click on, you look at the ad and then she brings you into our campaign into our website, gets the brand awareness. So that's really her role. So you'll see her show up in all our commercials, and those commercials are showing up mostly digitally. So on the same platforms that I was just talking about on the Hulu's, the Disney's, all the nonlinear TV because that's where we can really target people. Like we don't need to target 128 million people or 300 million people and find the ones that have presbyopia because we know if you're over 45, you have it. We know if you're over 45 in contact lenses, you even over index in interest, LASIK, if you're active aging, you use BOTOX.

So those groups, we can target very easily digitally. So that's what we'll do. Now underneath that brand figure, there's a lot of influencers that you'll start to see coming up. Those are the people that you actually follow. So you have more confidence and interest in what they're saying. So that is how that all wraps together. And the nice thing is that you can fine-tune that like almost minute by you can run something different in Houston versus Phoenix and see how that difference works and what plays better. And think of it as a huge dashboard that have a lot of dials that you continue to fine-tune.

You've hired the right people in the advertising world to measure the effectiveness of these digital ad campaigns. And as you say, they can be rapidly fine-tuned shift if necessary as you collect more data on the uptake.

Absolutely. So frankly, from the beginning, let's call it, 5 years ago, when we started into what's now LENZ. Our approach has always been to work with the best. That means we work with the best team. We bring the best people in-house, but we also work with the best companies to support us. And we've done that with manufacturing. We've done that for development. We've now done it logically also with everybody, everything commercially. So the companies that are and the firms are supporting us aren't the number one firms in that field, whether it's on commercial side, on the marketing side, whether it's on the ad buys, which is what this is all about, whether it's how do you find your talent, how do you do the commercials. These are all the tough for us.

I mean I know you can't speak to specific numbers post the earnings call, but just sort of generally speaking, you see the data. How are you feeling about the trends post the earnings call and as you move. And the update, just to that question, you mentioned the update. So is that going to be like an early January update where you're going to give a snapshot of what 4Q looks like? Are you going to get that one on the 4Q call in like late Feb. Can you tell us about that?

Yes, let me answer both. So first off, like, again, we strongly believe that we had great data and great stats coming out of the first 4 weeks. I don't think there's a lot of products that in the first 4 weeks, drive 500 scripts, 2,500 doctors that have written a script right off the bat. So that shows that there is a lot of interest in the products and a lot of confidence in the product, and that's what this faces all around.

I mentioned before, creating awareness in the doctor community, giving them confident, giving them samples, the first thing they do is they open up a pack and use it in their own eyes, give it to couple of staff members. Maybe 1 or 2 patients in that early phase already get to that amount of scripts.

5,000. Just to clarify, 5,000.

5,000 scripts, 2,500 doctors that have written. So that's great data right there, and we're seeing that trend continue. And again, this is all before we turn on DTC. So all these patients are patients that are getting it because the doctor talks to them about it. That's going to change once we turn on DTC like we just talked and spoke about.

We know how focused everyone is rightfully so script data and all the other stats, we also know that neither Symphony, nor IQVIA is accurate at all and give you insight and how the launch is going. So you can imagine that early January will give an update around those steps that I just said, doctors that are prescribing, how often and how many scripts in first 4 weeks.

Then there'll be another update around our earnings call in March. And the next update is like going to be in May around Q1 update. So you'll see that there's like roughly a 2-month cadence that will give inside in how the launch is going. Just to make sure that everyone has to keep on guessing.

Right. So it's an important point you made that IQVIA and Symphony are not doing a good job of tracking or people attempt to use those channels to project or model that -- there was a point where you were saying it was good, but that was like in the first week or something.

Correct.

Now it's not, it's diverged.

So we'd always said that don't look at IQVIA or Symphony because it's not be accurate and the reason that it's not accurate as we use both e-pharmacy channel like we just said, and then the retail channel, both those firms buy retail data and then extrapolate it into what ultimately will be call a pretty accurate number. Nobody on the e-pharmacy side sells that there.

So we were always saying that they're not going to catch anything on the e-pharmacy, you'll need to rely on us. We were a little bit surprised in the first 4 weeks to see that Symphony, not IQVIA, but Symphony somehow had piped into some data, which was directionally correct. Like it wasn't perfect, but it was correct enough for us to wanted to explain or at least highlight that to the Street that in the first 4 weeks, they were picking up scripts and directionally it was correct. Now that accuracy has gone down. And it's not like it's up week by week. So the percentages is different week by week that they catch, but it's definitely wrong. And the same is on the retail side. So as much as I'm going to continue to say, don't look at it, I know everybody will, but it's not correct.

Okay. So then tell us a little bit more about plans. Of course, you're launching in the United States, but you do have some agreements and partnerships in place ex U.S. Let's hear a little bit about that.

Yes. So you all may have seen that on Monday, we announced that the submission of the NDA went in, in South Korea. That's through our partnership with Lotus. That's something that we signed earlier in the year for Southeast Asia. So obviously South Korea, used market and very interesting markets around that. So that's with Lotus Pharmaceuticals. Then we have a partnership in place for Greater China, actually signed that a couple of years ago, like 3 years ago, because they had to do our own clinical trial.

That clinical trial read out identical to our trial, which itself was great validation that in different company, different cohorts of patients, different PIs, obviously, exactly the same data, highly validating for the product. And again, a great predictive of what we see in the market now. So they submitted their NDA in June, and then we signed an agreement with for Canada earlier this year as well. So these are partnerships that are in place. Other key markets, obviously, Europe is one.

We're actually pushing our own registration there. We want to make sure that we get that market the time to realize what the value of the product is, there's a lot of interest already. But you can imagine that, the better we launch and the more value we show in the U.S., the more valuable that license become.

And you'll continue to see us do deals in auto territories as well. So there's a huge market opportunity ex U.S. 1.8 billion presbyopes outside of -- globally, 128 million in the U.S., so a very large market that we'll start to tap into.

Speaking about globality and everything related to manufacturing and supply chain. I mean you had some important wins in terms of how the United States orders and customers rated or characterized your product. Can you talk about that?

Absolutely. Yes. And it was certainly a question that we got a lot about 6 months ago on how the tariffs are going to impact us. If I think about our supply chain, the API cycle in is made in the U.S. The IP around the products also sits with the company and there for in the U.S. So it's a completely wholly owns product for us.

Those 2 make that this is a U.S.-based product is a U.S. manufactured product, even though we ship the API to Europe to have the fill/finish done. So that's where the actual little low field seals, little containers get made and then it comes back into the U.S., but it comes back into the U.S. duty-free, tariff-free. So it's a U.S.-based product for all those reasons. Excellent supply chain, like I said earlier, we wanted to work with only the best firms out there. The supplier of these b-field seals is actually the company that way back when, invented how to do that technology. Having said that, and even though the supply chain is fully capable of doing massive volumes, just for redundancy, we're making sure that we have second source API and second source fill/finish in place as well, and that's near to those missions.

So that's a very good summary. As far as other products, is that something that you would consider, are you fully focused on biz at the moment.

Yes. We're fully focused on this. I mean there's not that many, let's call it, $3 billion-plus opportunities out there. So it's in our interest and frankly, our shareholders' interest to make sure that we fully focus on getting this one, right? So the majority of all the brain cells, all the human power that we have is focused on that. Having said that, this can and will be a phenomenal cornerstone product, a much larger portfolio. That's all going to be BD and M&A driven.

So a few of us keep our eyes out, no pun intended, on what's out there. I see that more as a post-2026 opportunity. So we'll definitely be active, but we want to make sure that in the next 12 months, we really show the opportunity and the success around this, and then we'll start to pivot into the broader company strategy.

And I think it's also important to spend a few minutes just talking about what's happened in the past in the presbyopia field and some of the products that have been successful that they not been so successful. So if you can just speak to that. And then are there other competitors that are noteworthy that you need to pay attention to currently?

Yes, great question. So there's 3 -- just to sketch it at a high level. So there's 3 miotics, so 3 active ingredients. You got pilocarpine, which is what VUITY launched with. VUITY was the AbbVie drug that launched 3 years ago, you have the aceclidine, which is obviously our active ingredient. We're the only ones with aceclidine and then you got [indiscernible] call carbachol. The aceclidine is the only pupil selective miotic. So there's 2 muscles in the eye that are important for presbyopia.

There's the iris sphincter, that's the muscle that you want to stimulate that gives you that small penal pupil. And then the ciliary body that you want to avoid because that impacts your distance vision and can drive other side effects. That's also the reason why both VUITY, what you saw there was mostly focused in the study on ametropes and then carbachol, which is a 10-point product is 100% focused on ametropes because they impact that distance vision. So if you work with people that are amotropic, which have good distance vision, you hope to minimize the effect there. So VUITY had a good launch because they solve the promise of an eye drop that solves for presbyopia or clears up your blurring near vision.

But in order to do that, you need -- your people needs to be below 2 millimeters. That's undisputed. All the data shows that. It's not only our data, it's actually AbbVie's data, the VUITY data that shows that all the academic data. If you're not below 2 millimeters, you're not going to see a good near vision impact.

The smallest people size that VUITY got to was 2.3 millimeters, then they quickly bounce back up. Their statistical significance that lost that at hour 3. So in the market, once people use the product, they actually realize that, one, it doesn't work a whole lot of people, only works in 1 in 4 people.

If it works, it works maybe for 2, 2.5 hours. That's why VUITY failed. So to solve the promise, a lot of people bought into the promise, bought 1 bottle and never refilled. We obviously have a completely different profile. If you compare our profile to VUITY, we're at least 3x more efficacious. So up to 75% of efficacy on clinical trials, 93% if you look at 2040.

So this works for almost everyone. Our 10-hour data is better than VUITY's peak efficacy. So it works at least 2x longer for 6x larger population because we're effectively an all-comer study. So if you now compare some of the other profiles, and there's not that many left, either the other pilocarpine product or the carbachol product, it is like VUITY. So if you just overlay the couple size and efficacy, it's like VUITY. So we'll pay attention to any competitor, but we continue to really see this as a category of one, our market to frankly build because there's no market at the moment and our market to dominate.

The commercial strategy also is quite different than what VUITY did, right? Because VUITY was focused more on the ophthalmologist unless on the non-ophthalmologist, the optician market.

Yes. No, good point. So Vuity obviously was part of the back that Allergan AbbVie already carried, which was heavily focused on ophthalmology. So the call points were mostly ophthalmology. But you see that this product gets sold mostly or written, I should say, mostly through optometry. And we've always looked at it like an 80-20, 80% optometry, 20% ophthalmology.

That's why our sales force is set up in that way. That's why our call points are like that. And we see that split exactly like that coming through in these first 8, 9 weeks of data. It is truly 80% optometry, 20% ophthalmology. So that's one difference. I think the other big difference is that -- and I touched on it earlier, but very heavily sample focused. VUITY did the opposite.

They started with samples, but then realize if you give somebody a sample, VUITY, they're not going to buy it because the product doesn't work. So they actually pull the samples away from the doctors. Like I said a couple of times now, Q4 is focused on getting as many samples in doctors' hands, predominantly to make sure that they get that confidence that then patients can use it.

So I would expect us to have the uptick that we're currently seeing a nice steady, good growth at a good clip, but then continued growth where VUITY tapered off real quickly because they obviously showed that they didn't work.

I mean that was an important point that I think some investors may have gotten confused by around the earnings call related to the samples and how to think about the samples relative to the paid scripts. And maybe you could just spend a minute or 2 just clarifying or helping people understand that you will continue with the samples as you continue to build the paid market.

Absolutely. No, thanks for bringing it up and giving me the opportunity to clarify that. So during our earnings call, we indicated or we shared that we had, at that point, distributed 70,000 samples into the market, which roughly equates to about 7,000 offices or doctors. That didn't mean that there's 70,000 consumers that have tried a sample, obviously.

And in our mind, that was not something that we have to clarify because we're continuously putting samples out there as we are still doing today. I think some investors willingly or not move to -- well, if you have 70,000 samples in the market, there's 70,000 consumers that use the product and you get 5,000 scripts, what's that conversion rate?

That's obviously not how it works. So we have those samples in doctors' offices, like I said earlier, the first pack, the second pack, the third pack is used by the doctor themselves, then some go to the office staff. By the time that a patient gets a pack, that's maybe pack 9 or 10.

And then a lot of offices just have those samples. So we're going to move to describing the amount of offices that have samples because that's the more important thing like I referred to earlier. We want to make sure that all those offices have samples. So what we're currently seeing is that our reps are going back in.

So we have a 3- to 4-week call cycle. First thing they do is check how many samples are left. If there's 0 samples and the doctor has written 20 scripts, great, they're going to get 20 samples the next time or maybe even 30. If there's 0 samples left, but no scripts, clearly, the samples are used in the wrong way. So that's the dynamic that's happening now. There's doctors' offices that are on there, the second that third refilled already. So we're going to focus on the next updates, like I said earlier, say these are the amount of doctors that have samples.

That's a relevant metric. And then to your second point, yes, we'll continue to do this. Like there's 4 million new press release every year. There's 28 million out there. So the samples are a very cost-effective way for us to get people to try the product. It's not a huge line item in our P&L, so you can continue to see us sample lightly.

And then the other one, which would be good to clarify is you mentioned hyperemia earlier. Help people understand -- for those that haven't read my explanation, you've had the explanation, what happened there in terms of how in clinical trials, there was somewhat of a disconnect in how that was recorded or not reported versus what people are seeing in the market?

Yes. So if you think about hyperemia happening here, it's like I said, it's very short-lived. It's maybe a maximum of 30 minutes or so for most people, and it's very tachyphylactic. So after a couple of days, it doesn't even occur anymore.

So how the clinical trial is set up, like in most instances, patient gets the drop in their eye, gets set into the waiting room. Hyperemia is not something that you notice as a person. Like you don't notice your eyes are, unless you look in a mirror like it doesn't itch, it doesn't burn, it doesn't hurt.

So there's people sitting in the waiting room and actually being very excited because within 10, 15 minutes, they can see their phone again. So they're focused on that. They go, wow, this thing works. This is pretty amazing that an eye drop can do that. And 30 minutes later, they're actually called back in. That's the first time that the doctor sees them.

And actually, they obviously do all the vision tests and they get their eyes looked at. 30 minutes in, like I said earlier, for most people, the hyperemia is dissolved. And for those that it's not, it's very mild. So that's how we, if you combine the 2, had about a 15% hyperemia rate in the clinical trial.

That's why that was out there in real world, have all these doctors that are using it, using it on themselves, and they are looking in the mirror. So they are looking at other people's eyes, and they are realizing that maybe it happens a little bit more. For them, that's not really an issue.

Like when we were talking to them, they're going like, well, why is this a big issue? If I fit somebody with contact lenses, they're going to get red eye for the first day or 2. If somebody if I give somebody a dry eye drop, it's way worse than what we're seeing here. It's so transient. If it's really an issue for somebody even dosing your first 2 days, then put a double [indiscernible], it clears up in 2 days. So I think that clarification, how we've changed the messaging around that has landed very well as we can see in all our data now.

And interestingly, it's the opposite with the headaches, you're seeing -- why are you seeing less headaches, which is good. You're seeing less headaches now versus in the studies. What's is there an explanation for that or...

No, we were -- like we saw it, frankly, like 11% in the study, which is, if you take out the normal rate, it's not that high to begin with. Think about this, people would come in 7, 8, 9 times over the course of the study. And every time they're asked, how you're doing, if you score a little bit of a headache once, then you score obviously is 100%. That's how it works.

So I think it's something that if you focus on it enough, you'll see it. In the real world, it's something that doesn't really happen. But also there, and we saw it in a clinical trial, that's also highly tachyphylactic. What we saw in the trial is that if you want of the 11% that has a headache, chances that you have it on day 2 are only 44%, 7 days in, it's like 25% roughly. So it's tachyphylactic to begin with. It's great to see that we're not seeing it in the real world.

I think we talked earlier about refill rates. And since you have the 1 month and the 3 month, talk a little bit how are you going to talk about the refill rate? If I go and get a 3 months, it's as though I could have gotten 2 refills, right?

And that's how it comes.

So how are you going to just mathematically like talk about that to the market?

Yes. So a 3-pack gets registered as 1 NRx, so 1 new script and 2 refills. So that's how we'll report it. That's also IQVIA and Symphony will pick it up. So you'll see it there as, again, 2 refills on your first script. We're seeing people ordering 3 packs, which is encouraging.

But frankly, we're not reading too much into it at the moment. Like at the moment, I don't even know if that person had a sample yes or no or whether they were just intrigued by the idea and want this. We won't know if they're reordering the 3-pack logically until at the earliest month 4. So again, it's great to see that people are ordering them, but this is something that we'll be much more focused on, let's call it, Q2, Q3. This period is really around how many patients are starting.

I know over the years since you've been talking about the launch, you identified certain market segments that you would expect to be have high uptake. Are there areas where you're seeing uptake? I know it's very early and you're still analyzing the data. But are there areas where you're seeing surprisingly higher uptake than you would have expected based on some other demographics and you said, oh, that's interesting? We wouldn't have expected to see that piece of the market demonstrate interest.

Yes. So what we're seeing at the moment from a data perspective or a segmentation perspective is relatively limited. So we have obviously up-to-date and daily information coming through the e-pharmacy. And that's why we see age of the patient group, male, female, and the location. That's the basic information that we're getting.

But the good thing there is that it's playing out exactly like we predicted and how we planned and how we put a strategy around it. So like I said earlier, it's SKUs, slightly female, so 60% female, 40% female in the orders that we're currently seeing. 45- to 55-year-old, order more than the 55- to 65-year-olds, who order more than the 65 and over, but we see scripts in all categories.

And we are seeing it more being ordered in those urban areas that I spoke about. So it's playing out exactly like we thought. Those other groups that we've spoken about before, the people that are in contact lenses, the people have had LASIK, people are active aging, that's info that we'll start to get once we turn the DTC because that's when you specifically start to target them and you can do metrics on that. So a little bit too early to see that. But given that everything that we're seeing now is spot on, we have confidence that we are right there as well.

And you picked up -- I mean you did a lot of work, as I understand, to pick the price. So just kind of walk us through how you did that? Why was that the right number?

Yes. So how you set pricing on a product is most of us will work with a company called Kantar, who are the, again, the best company to do this with. So you do large pricing studies where you have whole panels of consumers or future consumers that basically price point by price point, you ask, would you still buy this? So that's how you build your price elasticity curves, and we've done that multiple times over.

It very clearly shows that the $79 that we sell at a monthly pack maximize price. Interestingly or maybe not so interestingly, that was exactly the price that we sold that as well if you use the same company. So $79, that's where you revenue optimize. Now you do see a smaller but still interesting other price point that people buy at, that's around $65, $66.

So that's why we're having that 3 pack that at $198, which works out to be $66 a month. If you buy the 3 pack, that's what -- that's the price that you pay there. So that's how those 2 price points came to be. We're not hearing any pushback on price, like we're not hearing back from the market that I want to use this, but like $79 is too much for me.

Just to emphasize, it's cash pay, but you need a prescription. So -- and what else has to happen for the physician to give the prescription, what other tests or checks do they have to do for...

Yes. So nothing mandatory, but recommended and it's good practice to begin with, is an eye exam. So we encourage that, and we train our sales force and our physicians on it that the ideal patient comes in, either you tell them about this or they come asking about this once we've turned DTC on, you -- do your normal eye exam, then you do a retina exam.

And then following the retina exam, you tell them about the product, how to use it, what to expect, glad to have them leave with a sample and a script. So that retina exam, again, it's good practice to begin with to do that annually is good practice for a product like this.

And last question. So Sarah Jessica Parker, obviously, a big name. Like is there a date or is there a reference point like when in 1Q, is this -- are we going to start to see her face on your side and on the phone. Can you characterize like when is it actually going to happen? Is there a launch date for her being the spokesperson?

Yes. No. So we're -- like what we're saying is it's going to happen. We'll turn DTC on in Q1. We're ready for it. Like what we -- and the reason that we did Q1 and not Q4, and frankly, most companies would wait 12 or 18 months is that we're a self-pay product. So we don't have to wait until the product is on formulary and covered by insurance.

So we're not helped on the back end by that. At the same time, you don't want to do it too early because you want to make sure that your doctor base is ready to serve all those patients that are coming in, that they know about the product, you going back to that, that there is awareness that have confidence because they've used it, and therefore, they're ready to prescribe. We're at that point now, we feel. We'll continue in the next couple of months, and it will continue to grow, but we're getting very close to, in our mind, being ready to start the DTC.

There is a practical component to it. We shut the commercial a couple of weeks ago in New York. That needs to go through production that needs to be signed up. That needs to go through an RN, what's called MLR, then it needs to be shown to the FDA. So there's just steps involved, logistics involved that need to take that course. But you'll see it and you won't be able to miss it.

Okay. All right. Thank you very much, Evert.

Thank you, Yigal. Really appreciate it.

Thanks, everyone.

Okay. Thanks.

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the LENZ Therapeutic Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded.

At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. My name is Dan Chevallard, Chief Financial Officer of LENZ Therapeutics. I'm joined today by Evert Schimmelpennink, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Shawn Olsson, Chief Commercial Officer; as well as Dr. Mark Odrich, Chief Medical Officer, who will join us for the question-and-answer session.

Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements regarding LENZ's future expectations, plans, prospects, corporate strategy, regulatory and commercial plans and expectations, cash runway projections and performance. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors and risks, including those discussed in our filings with the SEC, which can also be found on our website.

In addition, any forward-looking statements represent only our views as of the date of this webcast and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We specifically disclaim any obligations to update such statement. The company encourages you to consult the risk factors contained in our SEC filings for additional detail, including in our third quarter 2025 Form 10-Q, which is being filed today.

With that, I will now turn the call over to Ev.

Thank you, Dan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. This is an incredibly exciting time at LENZ as today marks our very first earnings call as a commercial company. The third quarter and recent period have been truly transformational for us, defined by the FDA approval of VIZZ in July, which came ahead of our August PDUFA date and by the successful commercial launch of VIZZ in the U.S. in early October.

VIZZ is the first and only aceclidine-based eye drop for the treatment of presbyopia in adult. We are proud to have brought this important innovation to the market. We're now just 1 month into the launch, and our main focus is on giving doctors the opportunity to experience VIZZ in the real world, trying it themselves, with the staff and with some other patients. And already, we're seeing tremendous enthusiasm from the eye care professional community as VIZZ makes its way into their practices.

As of the end of October, more than 2,500 doctors have already prescribed VIZZ. What's particularly impressive is that 40% of those prescribers have already written multiple prescriptions. All of this has led to over 5,000 paid scripts for VIZZ being filled by [indiscernible] in October, a number that represents a very impressive start of our launch, clearly showing both consumer interest and satisfaction with VIZZ. And these are just some of the early milestones, only about 4 weeks into our launch that we're very encouraged by.

This early adoption is aligned with the consistent and very positive feedback we are hearing. Doctors tell us, VIZZ delivers rapid meaningful improvement in vision and a long duration of effect for a broad group of presbyopes. They also point out that it's clearly differentiated from anything that used before. Anecdotally, we hear about noticeable improvements in distance vision and the early feedback that we're getting from the fields also suggest that instances of headache, the side effect that we were most focused on in our clinical trials appear to be minimal.

All of this aligns with the fact that aceclidine is the only pupil-selective and [indiscernible], which again really bodes well for the uptake of VIZZ. In line with our label, the most noted AEs appear to be brief initial staying on installation and transient hyperemia. And based upon early results, we're hearing more of it than we initially expected. AEs in our trials, like an all well-run clinical studies are a combination of doctor observations and direct patient feedback doctor asks for.

Our initial thoughts on the potential variance is driven by 2 main factors. First, in our trials, doctors would dose the patient and then return to them for the first set of measurements 30 minutes later. By then the redness, if it happens, lessens or resolved. And second, the following 5 days, subjects would dose at home. And by day 7, the next in-office visit, the patient had already progressed past the Tachyphylaxis phase.

This appears to be very much in line with what doctors and patients are reporting now. But stinging and redness tend to be short-lived and fade quickly for most people and the rapid and very noticeable improvement in near vision outweighs these highly transient early effects. Importantly, many doctors describe it as Tachyphylactic, meaning it becomes less noticeable after just a few days, in line with what we're hearing from patients as well.

We've already tailored our field messaging based on this feedback, helping doctors to set expectations and share their experiences with confidence, so patients know exactly what to expect and why it's worth it. And we're seeing this work in their practices. As I mentioned, this fourth quarter is really focused on providing doctors with confidence and the right processes to prescribe VIZZ. That is essential groundwork as we prepare for our direct-to-consumer campaign early next year. Ensuring that ECPs and their staff are ready to serve what we believe will be a significant inbound wave of patients.

We think of our DTC campaign as the second phase of our launch, and we're thrilled to announce that Sarah Jessica Parker will serve as a spokesperson. She needs no introduction. SJP as we prefer to be called, is an iconic figure and like this truly represents a category of 1. We believe this partnership perfectly reflects our brands and the confidence, style and authenticity we wanted this campaign to embody. And we are excited to share more as we roll out the campaign in early 2026.

We also strengthened our balance sheet during the quarter. In October, we completed a direct placement to a single large institutional investor through our ATM, raising more than $123 million and bringing our current total cash position as we launch VIZZ to roughly $324 million. All these significant milestones position LENZ as a disruptive new entrant into the ophthalmology space as we look to establish this as a standard of care for adults frustrated with presbyopia.

We've talked before about the 3 phases each doctor moves through as they get ready to recommend us, awareness of VIZZ, confidence in the product and willingness to prescribe. Let me touch on where we are in each of these areas at the end of October, roughly 4 weeks after the first samples reached the field.

First, we've made tremendous progress on awareness for VIZZ among the eye care professional community. The mid-October survey showed awareness among doctors at 90%. This is an outstanding number for such an early stage of launch and speaks to the strong engagement we're seeing. And we believe it bodes well for product uptake and long-term adoption.

Moving to confidence. As we spoke about, VIZZ is built through real-world experience. It's about doctors using VIZZ themselves, observing its effect and hearing positive feedback from start and early patients. Driving that experience for October alone, we've already distributed more than 70,000 samples to roughly 7,000 offices, initial average of about 10 five pack samples per office. The interest level has been very high, not only from our target doctors, but also from many outside vet group. That tells us the word is spreading and the enthusiasm is broad.

And finally, willingness to prescribe. This is where awareness and confidence translate into action. As I mentioned earlier, more than 2,500 doctors have already prescribed VIZZ in the first few weeks and over 1,000 of them have prescribed multiple times. VIZZ has resulted in over 5,000 filled scripts in October. That's an incredibly strong start VIZZ early in the launch, something we're pleased with and want to recognize our sales force for. We've been lucky to have been able to pick the best of the best at our specialty reps, and they are out in the field delivering each and every day.

Having them building this willingness to prescribe with the ECP community is fundamental to our success and sets us up for the next phase, our direct-to-consumer campaign in the first quarter of 2026.

Before I hand it to Shawn, I want to reiterate our confidence in VIZZ and the strength of this launch. We know the efficacy of VIZZ is excellent and what we're hearing from doctors in the field continues to align closely with them, if not better in some cases. VIZZ is the first and only truly practical pharmacologic solution for presbyopia, one that restores near vision without compromising distance vision and that integrates seamlessly into everyday practice.

As I said before, this is more than just a product launch. This is the start of a new category, one built on real-world efficacy, genuine doctor and patient confidence and seamless access to both samples and product.

With that, I'll hand it over to Shawn Olsson, our Chief Commercial Officer, to share more color on how the launch is progressing. Shawn?

Thank you, Ev and good morning, everyone. As a quick reminder, presbyopia is the largest unmet vision condition in the United States. It affects approximately 128 million people, population nearly 4x larger than those of dry eye. In fact, presbyopia affects more Americans than dry eye, demodex, child myopia, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma combined.

Our commercial organization remains fully focused on one clear objective in Q4 and the first pillar of our commercial strategy, driving doctors to recommend VIZZ. We know that eye care professionals adoption is the critical foundation for our launch, and we're executing a clear 3-step strategy.

First, driving eye care professional awareness of VIZZ, then building confidence and ultimately establishing willingness to prescribe. Let's start with driving awareness of VIZZ. Our awareness phase has been highly successful and is largely complete. As Ev mentioned, we successfully achieved 90% eye care professional awareness of VIZZ since approval.

This is a phenomenal awareness driven by a robust multichannel campaign. This included a broad media plan with over 5 million digital impressions, a strong presence at major industry events such as Vision [ XO ] West, Academy Optometry and the Academy of Ophthalmology and the exceptional effort of our 88-person field sales team. We're conducting over 13,000 calls every 4 weeks. Our memorable singles global brand name has also contributed to this remarkable awareness.

Moving into building confidence in VIZZ. In October, we progressed from the awareness of VIZZ to the confidence in VIZZ. This stage is powered by real-world experience through our sampling strategy and peer-to-peer engagement at speaker drove app. To date, we've distributed over 70,000 samples to 7,000 ECP office, driving exceptional engagement. We're seeing positive organic stories emerge across LinkedIn, TikTok, Facebook and other social media platforms as both ECPs and patients share their experiences.

One notable story involved a skeptic doctor converting to a VIZZ believer after a LENZ sales rep challenged them to put VIZZ to the test. This ultimately ended up with the eye doctor and patients sharing their positive experience with VIZZ on FOX News, which ultimately was syndicated across multiple markets.

We also launched our KOL-led speakers bureau in October. We have already held over 50 of the 140 events planned for Q4. These sessions highlight VIZZ's unique MOA, robust clinical performance and ease of integration into the practice. To ensure credibility, our speakers were among the first to receive product samples and share their real-world results. Ultimately, we're seeing great progress and the confidence in this phase. The feedback is positive, and it's clear this product is highly effective at restoring near vision with a rapid onset and long duration.

As a reminder, the primary issue with the long-term adoption of UE was for most patients, it did not work. And when it did work, it did not work long enough. We continue to see this as a category of 1, and this stands alone in this category as the only drug achieving the necessary sub-2 millimeter people to restore near vision for up to 10 hours in both clinical trials and real-world use. We continue to hear great feedback from eye care professionals and their enthusiasm and person experiences are building strong confidence in both the product and its result.

Finally, we move to willingness to prescribe, the culmination of awareness and confidence. Our goal is to bring ECP to this stage by the end of Q4. Already more than 2,500 ECPs have prescribed VIZZ with 40% writing multiple prescriptions, resulting in over 5,000 prescriptions filled through October. We believe this clearly demonstrates a strong belief in the product's performance and alignment with the patient's need is already being established for an effective presbyopia solution in the first few weeks of launch.

Looking ahead to the consumer phase, as we prepare for 2026, we are well positioned to transition to the consumer phase of our launch. This category has proven to be highly responsive to promotion, both from prior launches and the organic virality surrounding VIZZ. In Q1 of 2026, we will initiate our direct-to-consumer campaign, driving the second pillar of our commercial strategy, which is consumers to request us finding.

Our team has been preparing extensively for this consumer campaign. As a Category 1 product, we must break through the advertising clutter as we compete for the consumers' views, inspire authentic belief in VIZZ and ensure consumers see VIZZ as a worthy investment. To achieve that, we knew we needed a direct-to-consumer campaign spokesperson with stopping power. who resonates with our target consumers, who is an authentic user of VIZZ and aligns to a category of one lifestyle product.

We are excited to share that we achieved all of these objectives and partnered with Sarah Jessica Parker to lead the VIZZ DTC campaign. In fact, our marketing team just completed the commercial shoot in New York City with SJP yesterday, and we are thrilled. The marketing team's efforts are now focused on finalizing the creative assets and ad spots to support our Q1 2026 consumer campaign launch. We look forward to providing further details on our exciting DT strategy in the months ahead.

With that, I'll hand the call over to Dan Chevallard, our Chief Financial Officer, to highlight our financial results. Dan?

Thank you, Shawn, and good morning. As has been mentioned, the third quarter of 2025 and recent period has been an extremely productive and exciting time at LENZ, headlined by our FDA approval and the commercial launch of VIZZ, but also included great progress with our ex-U.S. strategic partners and more recently, from the standpoint of substantially strengthening our balance sheet, which I will go to in a moment, not to mention the exciting news that Shawn just shared on our DTC campaign.

Importantly, and before I proceed, please note our first product sales of VIZZ occurred in October. So, there were no product revenues in the third quarter. The script data that we highlighted today was from the month of October only. As Ev mentioned, in early October, we received a meaningful inbound inquiry from a single large institutional investor on our ATM, which ultimately resulted in an initial block trade of $80 million, but was then followed by a second block trade of approximately $44 million, exhausting the remaining available balance on our ATM program.

Pro forma for these placements, we ended Q3 2025 with approximately $324 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We view the timing, magnitude and conviction of this single inbound as a tremendous validation of our launch strategy and the promise of this and again, reiterate our cash on hand is anticipated to fund the company's cash runway to post-launch positive operating cash flow.

I'd like to now turn to our ex-U.S. strategic partnerships where we had progress and advancements on multiple fronts. In the third quarter, we recorded total license revenue and received cash payments of $12.5 million, which can be broken into 3 parts. First, we recognized revenue -- license revenue and received payments for 2 separate $5 million milestones under our development and commercialization agreement with Corxel Pharmaceuticals in China, totaling $10 million, including a China-based regulatory milestone upon submission of the NDA for LNZ100 to the Center for Drug Evaluation of the NMPA in China and a U.S. FDA-based regulatory milestone upon the approval of VIZZ in the United States.

In addition, and as we announced in July, we executed an exclusive license and commercialization agreement granting Laboratoires Thea to register and commercialize VIZZ for the treatment of presbyopia in Canada. Under the terms of the licensing and commercialization agreement, LENZ received and recognized as license revenue a $2.5 million upfront payment and will be eligible to receive over $67.5 million in additional regulatory and commercial milestone payments, as well as tiered double-digit royalties on net sales.

Moving on now to our third quarter operating expenses. I previously discussed a planned ramp in our total operating expenses, specifically driven by commercial spend as we move into the second half of 2025. As anticipated, our total Q3 2025 OpEx increased to $31.4 million, a 44% increase over Q2 and well aligned with our operating plan.

Total SG&A expenses increased to $27.6 million in Q3 compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2024, driven primarily by the increase in commercial headcount, including the full financial cost of our sales force for the entirety of the quarter and substantial pre-commercial marketing, advertising and other commercial planning activities to support the commercial launch of VIZZ. Sequentially, SG&A increased quarter-over-quarter by approximately 116% from $12.8 million in the second quarter.

I would like to highlight a key point that we have made on previous calls and in what will be a consistent objective and that we will continue to be measured in our spend on the general and administrative side of the organization as we aim to remain lean and efficient G&A team and have the predominant growth in SG&A be driven by spend to support our commercial strategy.

Total research and development expenses decreased to $3.8 million in Q3 2025 compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2024. Sequentially, R&D expenses decreased quarter-over-quarter by 58% from $9.1 million in the second quarter. As a reminder, the majority of our research and development expenses prior to FDA approval of VIZZ enjoy -- prior to the FDA approval of VIZZ in July of 2025 were dedicated to our manufacturing operation efforts to establish pre-approval commercial product and sample inventory to support our launch.

Finally, our net loss per share, both basic and diluted, was $0.59 per share in the third quarter of 2025 on a net loss of $16.7 million compared to a net loss per share of $0.38 per share in the third quarter of 2024 on a net loss of $10.2 million. We ended Q3 2025 with approximately 28.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. Pro forma for the October ATM activity I noted previously, we have approximately 31.3 million shares outstanding today.

In summary, we feel this quarter and recent period has been on schedule from a spend perspective and are pleased to have recently bolstered our balance sheet from both dilutive and nondilutive sources. It has never been in a stronger financial position than we are today to support the VIZZ launch.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Ev.

Thanks, Dan. To conclude, I'm exceptionally proud of the LENZ team for all that we have accomplished, an early FDA approval for VIZZ, preparing the team for launch, maintaining an extremely strong financial foundation and now seamlessly executing in these first weeks of our launch. Driving ECP awareness, confidence and willingness to prescribe ahead of activating our DTC campaign in Q1 2026. We look forward to our early momentum to continue and updating you on our progress as we launch this as a true category 1 product.

And with that, I'd like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Stacy Ku from TD Cowen.

Thanks so much for providing such a fulsome update. So, first question is on the speaker-led bureaus and maybe some of the other approaches you are all taking to appropriately set expectations. Could you maybe talk further about how the commercial team is working with these KOLs to maximize discussion and expectation setting on the VIZZ profile, just provide a little bit more detail here. I just want to make sure we understand how motivated patient is able to appreciate the efficacy versus the transient redness and stinging. That's the first question. And then second, wondering if you're able to disclose some of the week-over-week cadence of prescriptions for October as we think about those over 5,000 prescriptions that are coming from the clinicians. And then last question, I wanted to just understand -- still early days, but if you're hearing any anecdotal feedback, be curious if any folks are immediately opting for the 3 months versus 1 month. Just trying to understand how the patients are trialing these days.

Thanks, Stacy. Good questions in there. We'll pick them up one by one and tag team on it. So, on your first one, I think importantly, just to highlight that what we're not hearing is this product doesn't work. So, the discussion actually usually focuses on that, that people realize and doctors realize that as soon as you put a drop in somebody eyes, but in and totally 10, 15 minutes, your vision improves. That's very important to realize, and that's what we continue to hear back. And like we said, what we're also hearing is that people notice that also the distance vision in many instances approves. That's always the center of the discussion.

Now no different than when we launched this product and how we prepare for it. Like with every product, it's important to set expectations and tell patients that these are the positive things that you are going to likely experience and you may be one of the patients that experiences one of the side effects that is on the label. That's setting up expectations was always and continue to be a focus of our sales force and are doing that extremely well. What we've seen is, as I highlighted in the call is that I think like most miotics, we were in our trial and in preparation for launch, most focused on potential headaches in a small subset of the population, and that doesn't appear to be happening a lot.

So, one of the few almost minor changes that we've made there is that as the sales force talks about some of those potential side effects, the focus has now shifted away from this potential headache more to the potential redness. Our trend here is I think that's important to highlight as well and that with a few days of use, that's something that for most patients no longer happens. And again, there, it's important to realize that this is nothing new for an eye doctor. If they fit somebody with bifocal lenses, they tell them to use it for a couple of weeks to get used to it. Same for many other products. So, this truly is not a big thing. What we're hearing from doctors and for many of them is if this really is something that allows patients, they immediately offer up some eye whitening agent to use in those first couple of days.

So, that's what we're doing on the sales force end in those 13,000 calls that they're doing on a 4-week basis. Maybe Shawn can talk about what we're doing on the KOL side on the speaker bureau.

Yes. Absolutely. So, thanks for the question, Stacy. So, when you think of all these speaker bureau events, we're running over 140 this quarter alone, and that will continue on in 2026. So, obviously, in our speaker bureau, we lay out the expectation setting for patients in there as well as how to introduce it to the patient. In that section specifically, we've now updated our speaker bureau deck, and we actually lead with highlighting the discussion around eye redness and how its transient goes away. I think that's very important.

We've also incorporated actual real-life photos of the before and after every -- at 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes, so people can see the transient nature on it, as well as the pictures of the eyes from day 1 and day 4. And so it can contextualize for the doctors. Again, this is something they're used to. This is a item that really focuses on near vision and it does a great job restoring your vision quickly and long versus the transient nature of the redness.

Thanks, Shawn. And real quick, and I'll combine your next 2 questions on trends in script data and [indiscernible]. Important again is that we really look at this fourth quarter as getting that experience of VIZZ out there. We're truly very encouraged by the initial script data that we see. Just to remind everyone, initially and up to, frankly, not even fully now, the product was only available in the pharmacy, which is why we continue to highlight that full availability of the product is not going to be until the middle of November.

What that means is that not all retail pharmacies are fully available or patients that go there might not immediately be able to get that product. So, against that backdrop, we are very encouraged to share that we've already had 5,000 filled scripts. I think it's too early to start sharing what the trends are. One thing that we do notice that actually, if you look at Symphony data, it's more accurate than we initially thought. So, I'll leave you with that comment there.

And then we are seeing some patients opt in for the treatment. Again, that's only available through e-pharmacy. So, it doesn't make sense at this moment to comment on what that percentage is. That's something that we feel once we have that full quarter behind us, this full quarter behind us, and we truly have both channels fully available, that's a more meaningful step to look at.

Your next question comes from the line of Yigal Nochomovitz from Citigroup.

Congrats on the early launch process. I had a few. I guess with regard to the 5,000 or over 5,000 paid scripts, I wonder if you could contextualize that in the context of what we saw with VUITY and how you compare in the early days there. And then obviously, you're essentially flooding the market with samples. And so could you just comment on the conversion from samples to paid scripts and how you expect that to evolve over time? And then lastly, if you could briefly just comment on the choice of the spokesperson in SJP, how did you arrive at her? Has she used the product yet?

Thanks, Yigal. Great questions. Like I said, we're very encouraged by what we're seeing in our launch. I think different than VUITY this is very much focused on driving that experience. So, getting to the amount of scripts that we've just shared, again, like I said earlier, not the full channels firing just yet is something that we think bodes really well and compares really well to what we saw there.

I see the second part of your question there, the sample conversion?

Yes.

Yes, sorry. The sample conversion is something that I know is something that people look at for maybe more traditional launch. Remember that this sample is just a 5 pack, and it's all about making sure that whoever wants to try the product has access. So, definitely just early in the launch. We're not as focused on what that conversion is, but much more focused on making sure that really every meaningful doctor's office in the country has availability of samples. Also, what we're seeing is that the very first thing that happens as our reps deliver the samples is the doctor reps open a pack, product in their own nice and the staff. So again, I think early on, it's not really a metric that we're focused on also from a cost of goods perspective. This is not a very meaningful part of our P&L.

So, in short, we'll continue to float the market with samples. We think it's a great tool that will drive patient uptake.

And then the last question on the choice of spokesperson. So, when we're evaluating the spokesperson for VIZZ, we had a lot of criteria that we analyzed against. One, the person had to be authentic, right? Really had to be someone that was a presbyope. It had to align to our consumers. Again, when we look at the early sales of VUITY, we knew that it was predominantly in major metropolitan areas. It also biased a little bit more towards female than male. We want to make sure we got consumer aligned this.

We want to make sure we also had alignment with our brand. When we think of VIZZ, we wanted someone that's elevated, someone that's a category of one or someone that stands out amongst everyone else. And our first choice was Sarah Jessica Parker for this, and we couldn't be more happy.

Now this is a person who is authentic. One of our requirements is they must have used the product, tried the product and they liked it. And one of the reasons we waited until now to share who that slurry was is we need to get them samples so they can try the product and get them on to VIZZ. And so this person -- Sarah Jessica Parker has used the product and does like the product. We're really excited to partner with her and to launch in Q1 of 2026 with that campaign.

Your next question comes from the line of Biren Amin from Piper Sandler.

And thanks for sharing a lot of the metrics around the launch. I had a question around that. So, you highlighted how you detailed the 17,000 unique eye care professionals. And of those, I think about 7,000 ECP offices have been sampled and then 2,500 ECPs are now unique prescribing. So maybe just talking through that funnel, is the expectation in the next few months that the remainder of the 10,000 ECP detailed that haven't been sampled will be sampled. And then the conversion rate from sample to prescribing ECP, what characteristics are you seeing on that? And is the expectation that, that number will grow given the samples across the 7,000 ECPs?

Thanks, Biren. Shawn, I will again tag team him on this one. So, as we think about providing samples to these offices, again, the call rate at the moment, and we've got no reason to believe that this is going to change is about 13,000 visits every 4 weeks by our sales force, which again is a tremendous achievement and want to highlight the great work that they're doing out there.

If we say 7,000 sample or 70,000 samples delivered, that's 7,000 offices. What we know and what you see is that many of these offices have more than one doctor in it. So, the actual amount of doctors that have samples will be slightly higher than the 7,000. But ultimately, as I mentioned earlier, the aim is indeed to have samples available at every office that wants it. So, we'll continue to push for that. The current focus is really to get our sales force to those targeted doctors, doctors that are prescribing doctors that have maybe previously prescribed VUITY.

But what we are seeing, and I mentioned that in my prepared remarks as well, is that there's a lot of interest from offices outside of those initial 12,000 to 15,000 that we're focused on. So, we're definitely putting mechanisms in place to ensure that we can provide them with our background and samples for the product as well. And definitely, that number continues to grow. And we see that, frankly, on a daily basis on the numbers that we see coming in.

So, maybe Shawn can talk a little bit more on what we see in doctors that are -- those first ones that are converting into being less.

Yes. So, we'll continue to roll out these samples over the next few months. Our samples, as a reminder, will be always ongoing. We want the patients to try the product before they actually move into a script. When we look at these writers, what we're seeing is, again, general trends as expected, right? When we look at the VUITY launch, we saw that the early adopters are those in metropolitan areas, those that are predominantly optometrists, and we continue to see that, and we continue to focus on those people in terms of our call cycles and continued rollout of samples.

Your next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman from Leerink Partners.

Two questions. First, for the patients who've gotten prescriptions, can you give us any sense of like what are they like? Are they men? Are they women? Do they tend to be your typical early presbyopes? Are they a little bit later? Just anything you can tell us about them and what would be unique about them? And then second, on the DTC, just how extensive will this be? Is this going to be like analog where you're watching 6:30 news on television like the old days? Or is it digital only?

Yes. Great question, Marc. Thanks for that. So, if we look at the filled prescriptions to date, because this is coming through our e-pharmacy, we do have a lot of information on the demographics of patient. And again, it's in line with what we expected, right? So, we see the prescriptions. It's mostly people in that 45 to 65-year-old age group, right, still gainfully employed. We are seeing a bias towards female over male, again, as expected, and we're seeing it in those metropolitan areas. So right, really those more developed areas along with what we saw with VUITY and being the biggest space in markets.

This is great confirmation before I move on to what your second question is your DTC. These are the areas the adopters expected and that we're seeing and our DTC has targeted them as well. And what we find in these early adopters is they're not necessarily on analog TV or linear TV is the other common name for it. What we see is they're spending time on a more digital environment, which is your Instagram, your Facebook, your YouTube and your Pinterest. And so that's where the majority of our DTC will be focused. So, it is predominantly digital and hitting on where they spend the time.

The great news is with our already market research that told us the early patients are as well as the confirmation of what we're seeing in early patients, we can further target them through where they live, what they research online, what their annual income is to have a successful DTC campaign.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gerberry from Bank of America.

This is Pavan Patel on for Jason. First is, can you maybe help us break down the use of e-pharmacy versus traditional retail pharmacies within those initial 5,000 scripts? Just trying to get a sense of how closely we're going to be able to track those patients and get a sense of expected refills. And I think Ev may have mentioned that there's some supply that's being available on e-pharmacies that is different versus retail pharmacies. Just if you could clarify those comments. And then my second question is with regards to the SG&A run rate for 4Q. I guess, how should we be thinking about that? And then as we look towards 1Q of 2026, can you just help us quantify the expected step-up in spend associated with the new DTC campaign with the spokesperson? Thank you.

I'll take the first one and Dan will talk about the SG&A. So, like I explained earlier, currently in these first weeks of launch, initially, the product was only available through e-pharmacy. And only in the last couple of weeks, slowly, the retail pharmacy has come online. So, whatever that split at the moment is, it will not be representative of how this will go forward. So, I think it's too early to give any call on what that split is. What we are seeing, and I think that's expected is that Symphony and IQVIA as it comes online will have a good sense, we expect of the product that's flowing through retail, less so on the e-pharmacy side, although as I mentioned earlier, we're surprised to see that Symphony is tracking the e-pharmacy side to a degree.

And then I think your question was around the difference in availability of product through e-pharmacy. I think as we mentioned a lot, there's a 3 pack that's available for consumers to buy at a discounted rate of $198 per pack. That $66 that could translate into $66 a pack, which obviously compares to the $79 if you do a one pack. Importantly, from a bottom line perspective, it's the same to us, but obviously gives that advantage to the patient. That pack is only available through e-pharmacy. So that's the difference there.

And then on the SG&A side, I'll hand it over to Dan.

Thanks, Ev. And Pavan, thanks for the question. So just to break down the OpEx overall, what we talked about this year were 2 trends. One was you should expect SG&A to ramp into the second half, which I'll characterize for you. And then you also should expect R&D to do the opposite, which also has done. So, R&D of $9.1 million in the second quarter down to $3.8 million in the third quarter, you should expect that to continue to taper.

And on the SG&A side, having spent $12.8 million in Q2 for SG&A and that bumping to $27.6 million in Q3, that trend is what you could reasonably expect. Now Q3 did include some one-timers you would expect around the moment of launch. There were some onetime costs. But what we've always said for 2026 was assume a commercial spend of $80 million to $100 million per year, inclusive of the DTC. And then layer on top of that, the G&A spend on the order of $20 million to $25 million. That kind of 4:1 ratio we've consistently talked about of sales and marketing versus G&A.

I would just reiterate that at this point in time. So, if you take those assumptions and model them into 2026, we would be comfortable with that and are continuing to guide in that way.

Your next question comes from the line of Lachlan Hanbury-Brown from William Blair.

Congrats on the progress. I guess, you mentioned that there's been a decent amount of nontarget doctors that have expressed interest and you're putting mechanisms in place to support them. Can you just elaborate on what that is? I mean are you going to need more sales reps to support what looks like thousands more doctors than the current target list? And then maybe a quick second one. Any comments on the sort of average time to fill at the moment that you're seeing in the e-pharmacy so far?

Great question as well, thanks. So, on the non-targets, one of the mechanisms that is in place is that we also have an inside sales force of 10 people that are available to connect with those offices. And we do have a mechanism where we can actually ship samples to them. What you also see is that for sales force, and we definitely again want them to continue to focus on our target accounts even in the same literally street as an untargeted one that is prescribing and that's obviously data that's all available. That's an easy stuff for them to make as well.

But some of the things we've always spoken about, and you guys know that, that over time, we may increase the sales force. We have no plans to do that any earlier, but it is obviously something that we'll continue to look at. And as soon as that makes sense, we will pull that, that trigger. So that's on those 2 mechanisms.

And then time to fill can be very quickly. We see and that's what's in place on the e-pharmacy side that you leave the office with a script in hand, you fill it out on your phone and just normal shipping is in most instances, 2 to 5 days. If you really want the product earlier, that's a priority shipping in place as well. And we see that work well on the retail side, similar timelines at the moment. So, we don't think that there's like a hurdle or a delay in filling the script.

Okay. And then maybe another one. You mentioned in the press release, I think there are about 9,000 ECPs have opted into the find a doctor tool on.vizz.com, which seems like a great number so far, but that's obviously not the whole target universe. So, I was just wondering what is sort of the barrier to getting the rest of the targets to opt in? Is it that they want experience or you just haven't got to them yet to talk about it?

No. Thanks for actually bringing that question up. I think it's an important distinction that unlike different companies or what we often see is where you just buy a data set, but in our case, eye care professionals, we want this to go very differently. It's an opt-in process. So, doctors have actively one BD their own, 2 have samples and then 3 opt in to find a doc, it's a bottoms-up fill. And again, I think the number that you're seeing there highlights the enthusiasm that doctors have for the products.

Anything you want to add, Shawn?

I say again, it's early in the launch. We're already continuing to see that grow very rapidly. And the great thing is by making sure it's this bottom-up build, it's people that we know that we've spoken to multiple times, they're understanding the MOA differences, they believe in the product, and then we're bringing them on to this process of our money back.

Your next question comes from the line of Gary Nachman from Raymond James.

So, back to the initial people using VIZZ, so the 5,000 first Rxs, can you also profile them a bit in terms of the buckets you've talked about? Are they contact lens wearers, LASIK patients, those getting aesthetic treatments? And are you seeing any pushback at all with consumer sentiment generally pretty low with the price of VIZZ? Is that holding back any Rx uptake?

Great question, Gary. Thanks for that. So, when we look at the initial users, we can't see a lot of data. What I can tell you on these initial users is there are people that are already in the practice because we haven't turned on DTC yet, it's really doctors speaking to patients that are already coming through their practice. So, it's mostly those. We can't break it out into which bucket yet of are they post LASIK or not. We'll be able to get better insight in that after we turn on our DTC and we've targeted those groups. But it does appear to be those already in the practice would then lend itself more towards like the contact lens users or people that are just going in for random checks more than the other groups.

In terms of pricing, we're not hearing much pushback at all on pricing, which is great. I think the biggest feedback we're hearing is, hey, this product works, it works fast and it works long. And so, we really see that as promising and haven't seen pushback on pricing.

Okay. And then just one more for Ev. The distance benefit that you're hearing pretty consistently, it sounds like in addition to the near vision benefit. How important is that for VIZZ's overall profile and how patients are viewing that? And will you consider a study looking at distance vision maybe to add to the label in addition to whatever data you have already?

Thanks, Gary. So, we are indeed hearing it, and that's great and something, obviously, in our Phase III data, we saw that some 41% of people in the study show if we measure the distance vision improvement there. That's clearly something that in practice translates. So that's great. It's all anecdotal at the moment. It's not key in our mind to make this successful as a near vision improvement drug. But obviously, it's a nice added benefit. We're hearing doctors experiment with it in that way and maybe experiment is not the right word, but they see again highly anecdotally that people that are minus half, minus 1, minus 1.5 are able to go without their distance correction.

Highly anecdotal, something that we are obviously following, something that we are thinking of maybe ultimately do a different study on because that could be a group of patients that you can actually serve with our product as well. So again, great to see encouraging, not a make or break for the success of this as a presbyopia drop, but obviously very nice benefit.

Your final question comes from the line of Matthew Caufield from H.C. Wainwright.

And obviously very excited for the launch. You had mentioned the focus on optometrists compared to ophthalmologists. And I was just curious how you anticipate that specific split playing out in the near term regarding the sales force targeting for driving the launch and how that might evolve in the coming quarters?

Yes. Thanks, Matt. So when you look at our sales force targeting, it's aligned to where we saw the early prescribers of VUITY. So their targets are roughly 80% optometry and then 20% ophthalmology. And so, we'll continue to look at the prescriber base, but don't see any changes to that mix in the near term right now. We're seeing consistently that, again, this does continue to be an optometry play product. And so, we're confident in that 80-20 split.

That concludes our question-and-answer session. As I'm showing there are no further questions, thank you for your participation, and we now conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.