First Western Financial, Inc. Aktienkurs
Ist First Western Financial, Inc. eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.921 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 320,96 Mio. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 104,68 Mio. $
Marktkapitalisierung = 320,96 Mio. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 118,12 Mio. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 365,78 Mio. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 104,68 Mio. $
Enterprise Value = 365,78 Mio. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 118,12 Mio. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
First Western Financial, Inc. Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
8 Analysten haben eine First Western Financial, Inc. Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
8 Analysten haben eine First Western Financial, Inc. Prognose abgegeben:
Beta First Western Financial, Inc. Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
APR
24
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor 2 Monaten
|
|
JAN
23
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 5 Monaten
|
|
OKT
24
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
JUL
25
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 12 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Western Financial First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.
Now it's my pleasure to hand the conference to Tony Rossi. Please proceed.
Thank you, Carmen. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for First Western Financial's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Joining us from First Western's management team are: Scott Wylie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Julie Courkamp, Chief Operating Officer; and David Weber, Chief Financial Officer.
We'll use a slide presentation as part of our discussion this morning. If you have not done so already, please visit the Events and Presentations page of First Western's Investor Relations website to download a copy of the presentation.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of First Western Financial that involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website. I would also direct you to read the disclaimers in our earnings release and investor presentation. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call.
Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today as well as a reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Scott.
Thanks, Tony, and good morning, everybody. We executed well in the first quarter and saw positive trends in many areas including loan and deposit growth, net interest margin expansion, well-managed expenses, higher mortgage banking revenues and improved asset quality. This resulted in another increase in our level of profitability with EPS up 85% quarter-over-quarter. We continued to maintain a conservative approach to our new loan production with our disciplined underwriting and pricing criteria.
As a result of the additions we've made to our banking team over the past few years as well as a generally healthy economic conditions in our markets, we had a solid level of loan production which was diversified across our markets, industries and loan types. As a result of our financial performance and the balance sheet management strategies, we had a further increase in both book value and tangible book value per share.
Moving to Slide 4. We generated net income of $6.2 million or $0.63 per diluted share in the first quarter which was higher than the prior quarter. This represented our third consecutive quarter where we generated an increase in net income and earnings per share. With our prudent balance sheet management, our tangible book value per share increased 3.3% for the quarter-over-quarter.
Now I'll turn the call over to Julie for additional discussion of our balance sheet and trust investment management trends. Julie?
Thank you, Scott. Turning to Slide 5. We'll look at the trends in our loan portfolio. Our loans held for investment increased $41 million from the end of the prior quarter. We continue to be conservative and highly selective in our new loan production. But with the higher level of productivity we are seeing from the additions to our banking team that we have made over the last several quarters, we are seeing a solid level of new loan production. New loan production was $116 million in the first quarter. That production was diversified across our portfolios, and we are also getting deposit relationships with most of these new clients. We continue to be disciplined and are maintaining our pricing criteria. This resulted in the average rate on new production of 6.31% in the quarter.
Moving to Slide 6, we'll take a closer look at our deposit trends. Our total deposits increased $95 million from the end of the prior quarter with growth in all types of deposits. The increase was driven by both new deposit relationships and inflows from existing deposit accounts. Notably, noninterest-bearing deposits increased 10% or $35 million in the quarter. The deposit growth in the quarter brought our loan-to-deposit ratio down from 96.5% in the prior quarter and 9.4% from a year ago to below 95%.
Now turning to trust and investment management Slide 7. We had a $43 million increase in our assets under management in the first quarter, primarily attributed to lower market values, which were partially offset by the addition of new accounts. Net new accounts and contributions contributed a net increase of $42 million in the quarter. On a year-over-year basis, our assets under management increased by approximately 1%.
As David will cover shortly, our trust and investment management fees have increased 5.3% from the second quarter of 2025 as we have restructured that team for growth.
Now I'll turn the call over to David for further discussion of our financial results. David?
Thank you, Julie. Turning to Slide 8, we'll look at our gross revenue. Our gross revenue increased 3.4% from the prior quarter due to increases in both net interest income and noninterest income. Turning to Slide 9. We'll look at our trends in net interest income and margin. Our net interest income increased 1.5% from the prior quarter due to an increase in our net interest margin.
Our NIM increased 10 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.81%. This was due to a reduction in our cost of funds, which was primarily due to lower rates on money market deposit accounts as a result of the company reducing deposit rates commensurate with the short-term decrease -- short-term rate decreases in 2025 and runoff of higher cost deposit accounts.
Our net interest income increased 19.7% from the first quarter of 2025 due to an increase in net interest margin and an increase in average interest earning assets.
Now turning to Slide 10. Our noninterest income increased by approximately $600,000 from the prior quarter. This was primarily due to increases in gain on sale of mortgage loans risk management and insurance fees and trust and investment management fees, which increased for the third consecutive quarter.
Now turning to Slide 11 and our expenses. Our noninterest expense decreased by $1.1 million from the prior quarter. The decrease was due to an OREO write-down in the fourth quarter of 2025 and the decrease in professional services partially offset by an increase in salaries and employee benefits due to payroll tax seasonality and an increase in bonus accruals as a result of the improved earnings in the quarter. Our efficiency ratio improved for the sixth consecutive quarter as we continue to tightly manage expenses while also making investments in the business that we believe will positively impact our long-term performance.
Now turning to Slide 12, we'll look at our asset quality. As Scott indicated earlier, we saw improved trends in the loan portfolio in the first quarter with decreases in nonaccrual loans and NPAs. This was partially driven by the sale of the last OREO property we had on the balance sheet. Additionally, we had no loan charge-offs in the quarter. Our allowance coverage was 77 basis points of total loans as improved trends during the quarter drove a release of provision.
Now I'll turn it back to Scott. Scott?
Thanks, David. Turning to Slide 13. I'll wrap up with some comments about our outlook. Based on our first quarter performance and what we're seeing in our markets, our expectations for the year are unchanged from what we provided at the start of the year. Overall, we continue to see relatively healthy economic conditions in our markets. We're seeing good opportunities to add both new clients and banking talent due to the ongoing disruption from M&A activity, particularly in the Colorado banking market.
We're also seeing -- what we also recently added a new market president for Scottsdale, Arizona, where we see good opportunities for growth. Our loan to deposit pipelines remain strong and should continue to result in solid balance sheet growth in 2026 with loan deposit growth at similar levels to what we had in 2025. In addition to the balance sheet growth, we expect to see more positive trends in our net interest margin, our fee income and more operating leverage resulting from our disciplined expense control. We had net interest net interest margin expansion of 26 basis points in 2025. And while we expect further expansion in 2026, it may not be at the same level as last year. While we remain disciplined in our expense control, we believe that investing in the business will drive future shareholder value and ongoing disruption from the M&A activity in our markets creates unique opportunities for us to add banking talent. We will take advantage of those opportunities if and when they materialize as well as opportunities to add new clients.
Based on the trends we're seeing in the portfolio and the feedback we're getting from clients, we don't see anything to indicate that we'll experience any meaningful deterioration in asset quality. The positive trends we're seeing in a number of key areas expected to continue and which we believe should result in a steady improvement in our financial performance and further value being created for shareholders in 2026.
So with that, we're happy to take your questions. So Carmen, please open up the call.
[Operator Instructions] One moment for our first question. It comes from the line of Brett Rabatin with Stonex Group.
2. Question Answer
Wanted to start off, obviously, great to see the trends this quarter in a number of categories. How many MLOs have you guys added? And then just obviously, a stronger start than usual on mortgage, how much production that you guys had this quarter? I know it was better than usual for 1Q?
I think we had one new MLO this quarter, and we added another 7 folks in front office banker type jobs. The MLO additions are especially nice if they're a good fit for us and producers because they have very low fixed costs and their compensation largely comes from rare cost from production. Scott, do you have the data for last year, Handy? For last, we will add. We'll look up that number, Brett.
And then just mortgage production totals?
Yes. Mortgage had a good, strong first quarter. We saw gains on mortgage loans go from $800,000 in quarter 4 to $1.5 million in quarter 1. So severally strong production, good economic conditions, I think per that, but also the MLO ads we've been doing over the last several quarters have just given us a level of ability to produce mortgages.
Yes. And lock volume increased a little under $40 million quarter-over-quarter. We were just under $180 million in secondary lock volume for Q1. And then we added in -- in 2025, we added 8 MLOs.
Okay. That's helpful color. And...
Just on that point, I would love to tell you that we were expecting a strong first quarter. But actually, our experiences first quarter tends to be pretty quiet. And we had been thinking that with the pent-up demand from slow mortgage markets in our geographic region that eventually, we see some kind of demand come out in play and drive some volume. And I think that's what happened in Q1 is a combination of pent-up demand. Of course, we had seasonally warm weather in our markets, unseasonably warm weather in Q1 and then definitely the impact of the new MOs we've added. So those were -- those are really nice results to see.
Yes. Brett, I'll add one more data point. We did not see a material decrease in lock volume in March when rates materially increased. So that's what gives us comfort as far as what was driving the mortgage origination volume that it really wasn't solely dependent on improved rates because in March, that obviously didn't happen from a rates perspective and our volume still looks good at large.
Okay. That's helpful. And then you mentioned Scottsdale New market president. Any other markets that you're keen in on trying to grow stronger organically? And then I saw P&C had made quite a few layoffs. I'm sure mostly back office, but just wanted to hear if you guys are being able to capitalize on any disruption in Colorado? And just maybe an update on what you're seeing from that perspective?
So let's start with Arizona. In Arizona, we were feeling like we needed a leadership team that others would follow, and that could really help us build our teams out there. We have two offices, one in -- and one of Phoenix that we've been open for years, and they've had good growth and they're profitable. But we have tiny market share in Arizona. And we think we have a platform that would be attractive and unique and differentiated in that market, but we didn't really have the leaders to put the teams together to make that happen. And so we recruited 1 of the top folks out of First Republic JPMorgan and added him 9 months ago, something like that, the summer right, Julie?
Yes, over .
And then we hired one of the top folks out of First Bank/PNC that started maybe a month or two ago. And those two skill sets of the -- those two executives have a very complementary set of skills and they work really well together so far. I mean who knows. But seems like they work really well together. And so we're excited about what they can accomplish. So we're feeling really positive about these hires we've made for Arizona and where that team is going to go. .
In terms of your second part of your question about kind of the market opportunities in other markets, it's everywhere. I mean, it's amazing to see the quality of talent that we're seeing in -- when we open up a position. And I just think it's like a generational opportunity for us. And we've hired several people already. We've got several more in the works that are going to be real value drivers for us, I think, going forward. And we've done it all in a fairly well contained cost environment. We've been spending between $19 million and $20 million a quarter for something like 12 quarters now. And it looked higher in the fourth quarter last year. But remember, we wrote down $1.3 million and OREO because we had that last area under contract, and we knew the price is going to be down $1.3 million from our book value. So that actually shows up as an operating expense even though it's nonrecurring, obviously. So those expenses appeared inflated -- more inflated in Q2, Q4 of last year that they really were on an operating basis.
And then your last question on P&C. I mean I think that -- and we've talked about this before on this call, that there is a really unique kind of emotional connection between color ends and First Bank that had long deep roots here that we could talk about, if you want. But I just think it's a real challenge for any acquirer from the outside to come in and navigate that. And certainly, the news this week that they were laying off 800 people or whatever it was, was big news. And I had phone calls this week from people just calling to say that they were sad, like that this was a real tragedy for our economy here and stuff like that. And so -- so I think that, that is just going to continue to create opportunities for us, and we see that -- I mean, personally, I don't want to say I see it every day, but pretty much every day. it's going to continue to create opportunities, I think.
And P&C, I think, is making a big effort to analyst food transition and all that. I mean, no knock on P&C. I think what the task they have is a real challenge.
Okay. And with all that said, Scott, you've started the year at a stronger pace than last year on loans, in particular, -- would it be too aggressive to say you guys could be a double-digit grower this year?
Well, if you look at our -- if you look at our loans year-over-year, I think we grew 11%, and our deposits, we grew 13% year-over-year. So I think our guidance we've been giving is kind of high single digits. Although if you take out kind of the quarter-over-quarter puts and takes, I feel like we seem to be around 10%-ish, which would be double digits, I guess, to your question, I think the fee income, we've really seen that flat for years, and we've made many changes now into that area in particular. We talked about the organ already, but also in the wealth side, we've got some changes that we feel very positive about.
We've talked a little bit about it, but we're seeing some green shoots there that are pretty exciting. And so yes, I do think that we'll see continued revenue growth this year with really nice operating leverage. If you look back, again, kind of take out some of the bumps here, we did $0.54 in EPS in '23, $0.87 in '24; $1.34 in 2025. And now our run rate is easing pretty clearly over $2. I think that, that bodes well for '26, '27 earnings.
One moment for our next question. It comes from the line of Wood Lay with KBW.
I wanted to start on the net interest margin. It's been two consecutive quarters of pretty meaningful expansion. I believe you noted you expect the expansion to moderate, but it still feels like the NIM is tired. So any thoughts on how we should think about the trajectory there?
Well, I've been saying for, I don't know, 6 quarters, few quarters, something like that. But I believe that we will ultimately get back to a $3.15, $3.20 kind of of a NIM because that's historically what we've seen in normal markets with normal yield curve and sort of normal economics, normal competitive environment over my 40 years of running my banks. And so I think we'll still get there. The pace is just hard to predict. And I think for the finance team, in particular, they're reluctant to say, well, not knowing anything about what's going to happen in the future in the Fed and the war and whatever, we're going to see 10 basis points improvement in a quarter. I mean I think David would feel comfortable saying we're not going to see that in 2026. But we have seen, as you said in your question, really good really good improvements.
And I think what's driving that, and David, I encourage you to speak to this point, but our people are doing a really good job of having pricing discipline, and that shows up on the loan side. We saw loan yields in Q1 down slightly when actual rates were down 50 basis points. And I'll tell you, we're seeing -- with all these acquisitions, we're seeing acquires wanting to prove they make a decision, they're out doing really aggressive loan pricing, and we hear about this stuff. And we're like, well, we're not going to compete with that. And people are still producing nice growth with high-quality credits that produce loan losses like we've had now again. And then on the deposit side, again, we saw 50 basis point decline in Q4, and we put all that into our deposit pricing, which a lot of banks here didn't and we didn't see any run -- we actually saw a nice deposit growth. So I don't know, David, did I miss anything big there?
No, you covered it.
You're guiding the 10 basis points a quarter?
Not quite.
I mean I guess as a follow-up to that normalized $3.15 to $3.20 margin, it's not going to happen this year, but what's a realistic time line to getting the net interest margin back to those levels?
I just think it's hard to predict. It's -- there's so many variables that go into it. And we just talked about 4 or 5 of them on that last answer. So I won't repeat that. But -- I'm hopeful that we're back with a 1% ROA in 2027. Whether we get there for the full year, whether we get there in January, where we get there in December, I don't know yet. But I do think that we've come a long way since all that excitement or the rapid run up in short-term rates, the very yield curve, the failure of the big regional banks, all that stuff. -- we said we were going to play defense. We did. We said we're going to go back on offense. We have. We've got some really historic opportunities in the markets right now that I think we're doing a great job of taking advantage of and our see that play out. I think that's going to drive more operating leverage, more profitability and some nice outcomes for our shareholders.
What our ability to materially improve NIM is -- there's a very large opportunity for us in DDAs. And just our organization is extremely focused on that. There's a lot of different things that we're working on. And hires that we're looking to make or have made in that area. So I think that -- to the point, we can't really predict it, but there's a lot of effort going into focusing on that. Noninterest-bearing deposits and timekeeping, as we've mentioned, our discipline on loan pricing, which has been something that we're also quite focused on. So I think that those 2 points are really kind of organizational focus of ours.
Yes. No, I really appreciate you walk into the moving pieces there. Maybe just last for me on the Trust business. It's great to hear the commentary on new accounts opened and fees were up quarter-over-quarter. You've made some changes to that business to emphasize more of a growth on business model. So where do we sort of stand in the trajectory of that business?
We brought in a new head of Wealth with a year ago now and started on April 1 of last year from Goldman. And he was in a senior wealth role over there. And we, through him, he's leading it, have done a complete overhaul of our planning function here of our trust function here of our investment management which those 3 areas also include our insurance area and our retirement services. We've replaced the leadership in all those areas and build stronger teams. We built out some new products and services, which we've been test marketing and that's all gone better than we had expected.
And then in addition to those things, this new hire is news brand in summers, he was particularly had an expertise in selling B2B in wealth services. And we -- that's not something we've done before and was a big part of why we wanted him and recruited him to join us. And so we've also launched a B2B offering, which is similar to what you see at the big Fortune 500 companies where the company will hire a specialist firm like Goldman Sachs, for example, to provide wealth consulting services to their executives as a benefit to them. Obviously, we don't have a lot of Fortune 500 companies in our market here and we don't really want to compete against that business. But for our target clients, which are lots of entrepreneurial and some good-sized businesses, they don't have a product offering like that. And so we've created a trademark offering called Work wealth, and we're out selling that and we haven't the person dedicated to marketing that. And we think that, that's going to be really impactful in the future. Of course, there are really nice synergies between that and selling corporate banking services and back to Julie's treasury management and the DDAs, right? This is all -- has really nice synergies to what we're doing anyway. And so I guess, would be a little summary of what we're doing on the whole wealth management side. That's, I think, really exciting starting to show results, as you said, but really just green shoots at this point. We're going to see a lot more impact to that, I think, in the next couple of years.
Our next question comes from Matthew Clark with Piper Sandler.
I want to touch on interest-bearing deposit costs and maybe the spot rate at the end of March, if we could have it. And then how you're thinking about additional relief from here with the Fed on hold?
That's one question for David to be.
Thank you. Matt, the spot rate on deposits was [ $279 ] million for the end of the quarter. And with the Fed on pause, I go back to Julie's comments, we have a lot of opportunity from a funding cost perspective with growing our DDA balances. And even with the Fed on pause, we feel with the company's focus there and the things we've laid out and we're working on accomplishing that we have opportunity to grow that portfolio, which will then help obviously bring down our average cost of deposits and average cost of funds.
Okay. And along those lines, your noninterest-bearing deposits tend to decline in the second quarter. Is that -- should we still expect that to be the case? Or is it different this time?
I wouldn't say anything different at the moment. We typically see deposit outflows as you mentioned, related to tax payments in the second quarter. So I don't know that there's anything that we know today that would make that difference. So I think that's what we're thinking about as far as
Okay. And then your -- the FHLB borrowings that you have, can you just remind us that those are overnight or if there's some term to them? And is there a plan to use excess cash to pay those off?
Yes. The FHLB borrowing, it was an overnight that was swapped, and that actually -- that's what matured in early April. So we -- depending on how our liquidity evolves going forward, we'll see if it makes sense to pay that off and keep it at 0 or if we need to replace that. We'll just have to see how things evolves...
Okay. So it's 0 as of in April here? Is that what you're saying?
Sorry, say that again?
It's a 0 balance in April as of now?
Correct. .
Okay. Sounds good. And then in terms of the near-term NIM, I know there's a little bit of relief on the deposit side, but assuming you lose some noninterest-bearing seasonally, you got the benefit of the FHLB going away. It does seem like maybe the margin is flattish in the near term to flat to down slightly. I haven't have to recast the numbers, but that's kind of where I am.
I think we still have opportunities to continue to see NIM expansion in the remaining quarters in 2026. To Scott's point earlier, I don't think it's going to be 10 basis points a quarter, but I do feel that we will continue to have opportunities to expand them.
Okay. Great. And then just last minor one. You bought back a little bit of stock. It's not a big amount, but just curious what price you paid?
Yes. It was $23.85 on an average basis.
Our next question comes from the line of Bill Dezellem with Titeon Capital Management.
A couple of questions. First of all, the deposits grew at roughly 2x the rate of loan growth in the first quarter. Would you step back and just walk us through the general dynamic behind that, if that is a normal seasonal phenomenon? Or if there is that was something specific to your activities that led to that ratio?
Well, I think over the last many quarters now, again, I'm not really sure whether it's 8 or 12 or whatever. But we have put a much more significant focus on deposit growth. And our feeling is to get to be the bank that we want to be at $5 billion or $10 billion, we need to have as strong of a deposit story, as we do on the loan and the PTM side. So it's definitely been a focus for us now for several quarters. Bill, we don't really do loans here that don't come with a primary banking relationship. We literally write that into our loan documents here now. And so it's part of the expectation that we have with any conversation we have with any prospective client. It's a part of the conversation we have with existing clients. We report on it internally, what loans we have that don't have deposits associated or have smaller ones, it's a very routine part of the conversation here just being good bankers, and driving relationship-oriented clients.
So I think the fact that in one quarter, we saw a little bit more deposit growth and loan growth, I wouldn't read too much into that. We saw something like that in third quarter last year, you'll recall, and I think some of the feedback, what we got was you should try and manage that. So it's more consistent and is no way of doing that. It just kind of happens when it happens. I think the more relevant number for me is the fact that we grew deposits 2% more than we grew loans over the last 12 months. I think that's probably a really relevant and helpful data point. And if we see some decline in deposits in Q2, which is likely, I wouldn't read anything into that, either that's just part of who our clients are and the fact that they pay taxes in Q2 that pulled down the money market accounts and what the here. So think I wouldn't read too much in that.
That's helpful, Scott. Let me take it one step further though. Over time, where would you anticipate that the loan-to-deposit ratio would end up? You said sub-95 now. And if you keep up the trend that's been in place for several quarters, you'll be at sub-85 and then sub-75, and next thing you know, we're sub-50%. And I suspect that's not where you're headed on being a bit facetious of course. But what's your long-term thought?
That is true that is not where we -- what we have found, and again, I've been doing this a long time, Bill. And so I never really know where the next $1 billion of deposits are going to come from. But our clients do have a lot of liquidity, and we find that we're always able to produce deposits when we want them, and that doesn't mean you don't have to focus on it. It doesn't mean you have to do the things that Julie was just talking about in terms of focusing on deposit strategies and strengthening our treasury management team, improving our technology stuff like that. But at the end of the day, we've historically operated First Western and my prior banks with loan deposit ratios in the 90s. And I think when it gets into the high 90s, we get more uncomfortable when it's in the low 90s, we think that's fine, but we're not going to pay out for higher cost deposits. And I think that, that all has fueled nice growth for us over the years and continue to do that and provide the operating leverage we need to drive earnings that can support the growth of what we want to do.
Great. Now that's really a nice perspective. And lastly, with the geopolitical events, specifically the Iran War, What, if any, impact have you seen from your customers' behavior on either the loan or deposit side or the pipeline of activity?
Yes. I actually was thinking about that before this call, Bill. And over time, what I have found is when our clients get nervous, they kind of stop doing things, and they just say, "I can wait." And we haven't seen that yet in this case. And I'm not sure why that is. I think maybe Middle East seems like a long way away from the Rocky Mountain region. I'm not sure why we're not seeing it and knock on what it hasn't had any negative impact on us so far. But we really haven't seen any impact. And I'm not hearing about it in my conversations with client prospects or with our folks in the field at this point. That could change, I don't know. But right now, I would say our days are much more consumed by all this market disruption that we're seeing from the M&A activity than it is kind of that global economic stuff, political stuff.
Our next question comes from the line of Ross Haberman with Rlh Investments.
I'm sorry, Scott. I got I got on a bit late. So if you address these questions, I do apologize. Could you talk about loan growth and what your expectation is for '26 in terms of net loan growth? And what offices do you think it's going to originate? Or what are you seeing better demand from? Is it Arizona, Colorado or elsewhere?
Yes. So great question. We didn't really talk specifically about that. I did mention that we're seeing loan growth across the platform in terms of geography and industry type. And so I think that we're not seeing weakness in one place or another. We're also not stretching anywhere. I would tell you that our owner-occupied CRE number was getting a little higher than we felt comfortable, and we have pulled that down. I don't have that number handy. Is it from 2.60 -- 3.60 to down to like 3.25 now?
Yes, in that range, yes.
And so that's a change that we're driving. We're actually seeing probably more owner-occupied CRE demand than ever, but we're being very selective there. The guidance we've given for balance sheet growth is high single digits, but I did say early in the call that we're up 11% year-over-year in loans were up 13% year-over-year in deposits. So I don't think we're ready to jump out and say, we're going to see mid-teen growth this year, but it does seem like 10% would be a reasonable guesstimate from where we are today.
Is a lot of that coming from the Arizona branch or Montana?
What was the beginning of the question, our loans?
I said, is a good amount of the growth of the loans coming from Arizona and/or Montana?
I would say in the in the backward-looking data, no, neither one. But I would also tell you that we're seeing some nice opportunities in both markets. And I think that you're going to see nice growth out of both those markets in the next 12 to 24 months. We've got really good people there, and they're working hard. And we do live the market disruption in Colorado more than elsewhere, but it's everywhere. We're seeing it in Wyoming. We're seeing it in Arizona. We think there are lots of opportunities for us in Montana, too. So the numbers are just bigger in Colorado and more immediate for us because we're in Denver. But we're seeing opportunities everywhere. And Ross, pretty well about our theory about market share. I mean we just have tiny market share. And I think by just showing up and doing a good job of what we do differently than everybody else, which is we're local, we're trusted and we're expert. Those three things play really well in the market today.
Are you seeing a number of other banks I'm talking to are really beginning to see some pressure on the deposit side, particularly from some of the bigger banks in different markets. Are you seeing pressure to raise deposits rates on the deposit side? And is it coming from the bigger banks in your markets today?
I would take a stab at that question, David, and then maybe I'll be really interested in your answer, too, because it seems like less to me, but you answered from what you're seeing. My answer, Ross, would be of the conversations I'm having. People are calling or I'm calling them and they're saying, "I don't want to be with a big National Bank, I want to be with a local bank." And they don't even say the word rate. They say, "When can I move?" And we've actually created here a conversion concierge, the internal people call it, I call it the SWAT team, the Swiss SWAT team actually. And where we tell people that we have a Swiss SWAT team that will come out and help them transfer their accounts here and simplify the whole conversion process. They love it. And again, they're just -- I mean, I literally don't hear the question, well, what rate are you going to give me? And so again, I think we have a really extraordinary window of opportunity here, and we're doing everything we can to jump through it. But that would be my answer. David, what are you seeing in terms of the day-to-day stuff?
Yes. My simple answer would be is the pricing market for deposits still highly competitive? Yes. Am I fielding a bunch of calls from our bankers saying we need to raise deposit rates? No. So I think that -- those are the dynamics that we're seeing in our markets at the moment.
And just one final question, if I may. Have you announced any new plans for new -- for new branches in any of your markets? Or if you found something small to buy as a fit in or would you consider buying that today? Or any growth you really want it to be organic?
Well, we're very focused on organic growth without a doubt. We haven't talked about it because we don't have anything to talk about yet, but -- but as part of the whole market disruption thing, we're seeing really good people that are available that we're trying to bring here. And some of those are -- well, most of them so far, all of them have been in our existing footprint, but there are some that are in adjacent footprints that would be very attractive to us. And hopefully, we'll have something to talk about later this year there. That would be a big plus as far as I'm concerned. If we could bring a couple of well-established teams that want our toolbox to be able to go out and sell it, that would be fantastic in new market.
And as I see no further questions in the queue, I will conclude the session and turn it back to management for closing remarks.
Well, thank you, and I appreciate everybody dialing in on the call today. We talked about some of the noise in Q1 and that was built off of the noise in Q2. But clearly, we're seeing really nice trends in operating leverage that's translating into great EPS results. And again, if you kind of back up and look at that year-over-year, we've seen a nice multiyear trend. Our NIM is continuing to improve. Organic growth is continuing across the platform. Our asset quality continues to be very strong, and we don't see anything today that would change that. And I think that, that's very encouraging referendum on the credit quality that we pursue here.
Our efficiency ratio has really trended down nicely from 79% a year ago to 73% and that's not going to stop, I don't think. Our goal here is to get our ROA back over 1% with -- our capital efficiency is going to drive a nice ROE in the low teens and really, I think, get First Western back towards a financial performance where we should be.
So with that, thanks, everybody, for dialing in. We really appreciate the support and your interest in First Western. Have a great weekend.
And this concludes our conference. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Western Financial Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.
I'd now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Tony Rossi. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Marvin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for First Western Financial's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call.
Joining us from First Western's management team are Scott Wylie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Julie Courkamp, Chief Operating Officer; and David Weber, Chief Financial Officer.
We will use a slide presentation as part of our discussion this morning. If you've not done so already, please visit the Events and Presentations page of First Western's Investor Relations website to download a copy of the presentation.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of First Western Financial that involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website.
I would also direct you to read the disclaimers in our earnings release and investor presentation. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call. Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information we discussed today as well as the reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Scott. Scott?
Okay. Thanks, Tony, and good morning, everybody. We executed well in the fourth quarter and saw positive trends in many areas, including loan growth, net interest margin expansion, well-managed operating expenses and generally stable asset quality. This resulted in an increase in our level of profitability.
The market remains very competitive in terms of pricing on loans and deposits, but we continue to successfully generate new loans and deposits by offering a superior level of service, expertise and responsiveness rather than winning business by offering the lowest rates -- highest rates on deposits and the lowest rates on loans as other banks are doing.
We continue to maintain a conservative approach to new loan production with our disciplined underwriting and pricing criteria. As a result of the additions we've made to our banking team over the past few years as well as generally healthy economic conditions in our market, we've had a solid level of loan production, which was diversified across our markets, industries and loan types. As a result of our financial performance and the balance sheet management strategies, we had a further increase in both book value and tangible book value per share.
Moving to Slide 4. We generated net income of $3.3 million or $0.34 per diluted share in the fourth quarter, which is higher than the prior quarter. We had a write-down of value of an OREO property that reduced our earnings per share by $0.10 after tax in the fourth quarter. With our prudent balance sheet management, our tangible book value per share increased 1.6% this quarter.
So, now I'll turn the call over to Julie for some additional discussion of our balance sheet and our treasury -- trust and investment management trends. Julie?
Thanks, Scott. Turning to Slide 5. We'll look at the trends in our loan portfolio. Our loans held for investment increased $59 million from the end of the prior quarter. We continue to be conservative and highly selective in our new loan production, but with the higher level of productivity we are seeing from the additions to our banking team that we made over the last several quarters, we are seeing a solid level of new loan production, while we are also seeing an increase in our CRE loan demand that meets underwriting relationship and pricing criteria. We also saw some construction loans that moved into our CRE portfolio after completion of their projects. New loan production was $146 million in the fourth quarter. The new loan production was diversified with the largest increases coming in our commercial real estate portfolios, and we are also getting deposit relationships with most of these new clients. We continue to be disciplined, and we are maintaining our pricing criteria. This resulted in the average rate on new production being 6.36% in this quarter.
Moving to Slide 6, we'll take a closer look at deposit trends. Our total deposits increased $102 million from the end of the prior quarter. While we continue to successfully add new deposit relationships, this was partially offset by seasonal outflows we saw largely related to title company operating accounts who typically see declines in their deposit balances during the fourth quarter due to lower home purchase activity. In addition, we were able to run off high-cost deposits as a result of the strong core deposit production in the third quarter. Average deposits increased 10% in the fourth quarter of 2025 compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.
Turning to Trust and Investment Management on Slide 7. We had $155 million decrease in our assets under management in the fourth quarter, primarily attributed to net withdrawals on low fee and fixed fee product categories, which was partially offset by improved market conditions on investment agency accounts that carry a higher variable fee, which increased $15 million or approximately 1% during the quarter.
Now I'll turn the call over to David for further discussion of our financial results. David?
Thanks, Julie. Turning to Slide 8, we'll look at our gross revenue. Our gross revenue increased 1.5% from the prior quarter, primarily due to an increase in net interest income. Relative to the fourth quarter of 2024, our gross revenue increased 12.2%.
Turning to Slide 9. We'll look at the trends in net interest income and margin. Our net interest income increased 5.6% from the prior quarter and 21.7% from the fourth quarter of 2024 due to an increase in our net interest margin. Our NIM increased 17 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.71%. This was due to a reduction in our cost of funds, which was primarily due to lower rates on money market deposit accounts as a result of the company reducing deposit rates commensurate with the short-term rate decreases and runoff of high-cost deposit accounts.
Now turning to Slide 10. Our noninterest income decreased by approximately $800,000 from the prior quarter. This was primarily due to a decrease in gain on sale of mortgage loans, which typically see seasonal declines in the fourth quarter and a decrease in risk management and insurance fees. We have successfully transitioned to previously discussed new leadership and focus in Trust and Investment Management and insurance that are expected to produce improved results going forward.
Now turning to Slide 11 and our expenses. Our noninterest expense increased $1.2 million from the prior quarter. Our noninterest expense was impacted in the fourth quarter by a onetime $1.4 million write-down we took on the value of an OREO property. Excluding the write-down of the OREO property, our noninterest expense decreased $100,000 in the quarter. Most areas of noninterest expense were relatively consistent with the prior quarter as we continue to tightly manage expenses while also making investments in the business that we believe will positively impact our long-term performance.
Now turning to Slide 12. We'll look at our asset quality. As Scott indicated earlier, we saw generally stable trends in the loan portfolio in the fourth quarter with decreases in nonaccrual loans and NPAs. And we had a minimal level of net charge-offs in the quarter. Our last piece of OREO is currently under contract for sale and is expected to close during the first quarter. Our allowance coverage remained unchanged at 81 basis points of total loans as the decrease in nonaccrual loans and NPAs resulted in a more normal level of provision during the quarter.
Now I will turn it back to Scott. Scott?
Thanks, David. Turning to Slide 13, I'll wrap up with some comments about our outlook. Overall, we continue to see relatively healthy economic conditions in our markets, and we're seeing good opportunities to add both new clients and talent due to the ongoing disruption from M&A activity in the Colorado banking market. We also recently added a new market presence for Arizona, where we're seeing good opportunities for growth.
Our loan deposit pipelines remain strong and should continue to result in solid balance sheet growth in 2026 with loan and deposit growth at similar levels to what we had in 2025. In addition to the balance sheet growth, we also expect to see positive trends in our net interest margin, our fee income and more operating leverage resulting from our disciplined expense control. We had net interest margin of 26 basis points in 2025. And while we expect further expansion in 2026, it may not be at the same level as we saw last year.
And while we remain disciplined in our expense control, we believe that investing in the business will drive future shareholder value. The ongoing disruption from the M&A activity in our markets creates opportunities for us to add banking talent, and we will continue to take advantage of these opportunities if and when they materialize as well as opportunities to add new clients.
Based on trends we're seeing in the portfolio and the feedback we're getting from our clients, we're not seeing anything to indicate that we'll experience any meaningful deterioration in asset quality. The positive trends we're seeing in a number of key areas are expected to continue, which we believe will result in a steady improvement in our financial performance and further value being created for our shareholders in 2026.
With that, we're happy to take your questions. Marvin, please open up the call.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Brett Rabatin of Hovde.
2. Question Answer
I wanted to start off on the margin and just the outlook in terms of magnitude of margin expansion opportunities you see in the next few quarters. And then if you add it, the amount of loans that are repricing this year at lower rates from fixed rates?
Yes. So we had -- certainly had good NIM performance in the fourth quarter. Pretty pleased with the expansion that occurred there. That was primarily driven by our ability to reduce our -- primarily deposit costs. And we do expect further expansion to continue through 2026. Now it may not be at the same level that we saw through 2025, if you look at Q4 '24 to Q4 '25. It may not be at that same level, but we do expect to continue through 2026.
And then specifically on the loan portfolio, we have about $250 million in fixed loans -- fixed rate loans maturing over the next year. And those average yield on those is in the low 5s. So that does give us an opportunity, obviously, to continue to reprice our loan book and see some positive trends on the yield on interest-earning assets.
The only thing I would add to that is we have shifted our balance sheet interest rate risk to be closer to neutral over the last six months, and we feel like continued improvement in NIM is not dependent on continued rate cuts. If we do see rate cuts, that will be beneficial to us. But we're expecting for the purposes of planning and budgeting, no rate cuts. I think we could debate that one all day, but the feeling is that we should have the balance sheet more neutral, and that's where we are today.
Okay. That's helpful. And then on the asset management, wealth management business and the mortgage banking operation, you've obviously made some changes. I was hoping for maybe some clarity on the AUM levels in the fourth quarter relative to 3Q, if you had clients that were just taking money out to do things? Or what was the driver behind the trends in that business in the fourth quarter? And then just thinking about '26, given the changes, what do you think those businesses might do? Obviously, rates will impact mortgage, but just any thoughts on those businesses and the growth of fee income?
Yes. So, maybe I'll start on that one, Julie, do you want to pick it up.
So with respect to the wealth management fees, the AUM, we obviously did a deep dive on that because we were a little surprised to see the decline happening in the quarter. And what we have seen is a lot of the lower-yielding categories and the fixed rate categories have had reductions. We're actually in the higher-yielding categories for us on the AUM side that we're seeing improvements.
So, I think the trend there is positive. It looks negative on the surface. But in reality, those are actually things that we're trying to do to improve the trend on PTIM over time. We've made a pretty major shift there over the last year, which we've talked about a little bit before from being so investment management focused and led in the PTIM world over the last 20 years to being more fiduciary and trust and especially planning driven now. And we've talked about the change in leadership there and a number of very positive changes that have been underway over the last six months. We've seen a lot of progress here in the last few months, and that's going to show up in the numbers in 2023 -- 2026.
The other thing that I think you asked about in there was the risk and insurance revenues. And those are typically quite strong in the fourth quarter, and they were not in this quarter. And we've also made a pretty big restructuring of that group. And there were two very high-cost leaders for that group that we're comfortable operating as a loss leader. We're not a big believer in loss leaders here. And so we have made some changes there and brought that into the wealth planning team more directly. And you don't see the expense save that went with that, and you do see the cost reduction. So, I think that those were actually very positive developments that we wanted to see in Q4 there.
What I missed, Julie?
Maybe something on mortgage. I don't think that was part of your question as well. But Q4 mortgage production, Q1 mortgage production for us is typically lower just given the seasonality. But we continue to remain very focused as a strategic part of our business. We've added, I think, eight MLOs in the year of 2025. And as you know, it's hard to move MLOs whenever times are strong. So we feel like continuing to make that effort. Even though overall, the production isn't at the level we want it to be, we're profitable in that area. We're still adding and contributing net positive clients into the bank and the portfolio of the bank. And I would expect that second and third quarters of the coming year, 2026 are going to be seasonally stronger than the first and fourth.
So I think we have good outlook there. I think we're doing the right things. And then to add on to the wealth planning conversation, we have a lot of really strong momentum in that business line and feel really good about what we're doing there. We've also added a B2B offering that's really just now getting going, and we're seeing some early green shoots on that. So I think the outlook for us is strong, but the last year's production really hasn't shown that yet. So we're looking to that growth into 2026.
Good points there, Julie. And just to give some context to the eight people, that's a 45% increase from where we were a year ago. on MLOs at no direct expense. It's a variable cost that's commission-based.
Okay. That's really helpful. And then if I could ask one last one. You're almost a double-digit grower in '25 on loans and deposits. Does the outlook for you guys as you see it in your economies and markets, does that suggest another similar performance in '26? Or any thoughts on how you see the pipelines playing out for the year?
We are expecting growth in 2026 in line with what we saw in 2025. We continue, as you know, Brett, to have really small market share in all of our markets. We're in strong economies. I mean I think the big change that we've really seen in the past few months is this market disruption. And it continues and in fact, is accelerating and it's creating all this opportunity for talent and for new clients. We set up this disruption task force, when Julie? Was that in the third quarter?
Yes, late summer.
And we're working through that group on a series of very specific recruiting and sales and marketing initiatives. And we just had our big annual manager summit the last two days and the success stories coming out of that were remarkable. I mean there's just a lot of momentum in the field from prospects that don't want to be with these new organizations, and they want a stable local expert team and an expert stable local institution. And I think that's especially true in our niche with the private bank and trust focus. And with strong and healthy and diverse economies, I think all that's going to continue on into '26 and give us good opportunity for balance sheet growth.
Our next question comes from the line of Woody Lay of KBW.
I wanted to start on the expense outlook. If I adjust for that OREO adjustment, it was good to see sort of the core run rate flat. You talked about continuing to want to invest in the business, especially given the M&A disruption. So how should we think about the expense growth rate in 2026?
The way we've talked about it internally is we wanted to keep our expense below $20 million a quarter. And I think we've done that. Did you go back and look, David, I've been saying it's something like 12 quarters in a row. I don't know exactly. But certainly, over the last eight quarters, that's been true. And so I think that's kind of our base case is how do we drive more efficiency and more effective teamwork here without driving up expenses.
But having said that, and this was very much in your question, Woody, if we see opportunities, we have an internal business case process, and we told our people, if you can bring in some good people that are going to have a strong short-term and long-term impact, we want to hear about it and we want to look at it and support you with that.
So I think we're doing the best of both worlds here where we can manage expenses, grow revenues, get that operating leverage. And if we see opportunities for more revenue growth, go ahead and invest in that. That's the outlook we're taking for '26.
Got it. So if I pair that with the commentary of growth remaining strong, the NIM should continually grind higher. How should we think about the profitability improvement potential in 2026? Is there kind of an ROA range that you're hoping to be at by year-end?
Yes, there is, but I'm sworn to secrecy. I'll give my answer and let Julie and David do their rebuttal if they want.
If you look at our operating run rate, in the third quarter and again in the fourth quarter, we're doing something like $0.50 a quarter if you take out things like that OREO write-down, which, again, that was a decision we made. We had this last property up in Aspen in Basalt, actually near Aspen. And there were some unpermitted construction done by the former owner that we foreclosed on. And the city has just really taken it out on us and made it very difficult for us to sell that thing given the strong attributes, but the unpermitted construction that was done on it. And so we've been back and forth and back and forth with them. We had a buyer that was really interested and she worked with the city and she couldn't get them anywhere. And then we have a buyer now that put under contract and is taking it kind of as is, and he was supposed to close in December, and he hasn't finished his diligence yet. So we gave a 60-day extension. his request supposed to close in February. And the update from this week is he's on track.
So I think that's going to get sold. It's $1.4 million write-down from the discounted value that we had already put on it. So frankly, we're looking forward to having that off our books, not having OREO. So that is a onetime thing. We don't have other OREO. We had that marked below our appraised value. We worked hard to realize that value at some point, that's not really our highest and best use of our executives' time and efforts. So, hopefully, that will get sold here in Q1.
So if you take that out and you look at kind of the typical monthly expenses, and we always have puts and takes, and I'm not adjusting for that. I'm saying if you take out the big things and you kind of run through the net interest income, you look through the fee income, you look through the operating expenses, we're doing kind of a $2 run rate, and it improved actually a little bit from Q3 to Q4. So that's my starting point going forward is under a normal world, we ought to be starting the year at a 2% operating run rate, $2 that was wishful thinking a 2% thing, $2 a share operating run rate. And then I do think we can grow from there.
We have said our near-term objective here is to get to a 1% ROA, which would be 3.50-ish. And so we got people focused on that. Can we get there on a run rate basis this year? I think that's pretty stretchy. But I think we will get there. And I think we can get beyond that, but we have to get there first with the improvements in NIM and the operating growth and the impact of all these initiatives we've been talking about, we seem well on the way.
Is anything, David or Julie, you want to add? Yes.
No, not for me.
Well, that's really helpful color. And I guess just last for me, with a strong loan pipeline, how do you think about matching that with core deposits? The growth has been a little lumpy as you've optimized the balance sheet. But just curious on your thoughts on maybe the deposit competition in the next year.
Yes. The team is really focused on that. And one of the questions we asked folks while they were here for the summit was how do you feel about the loan pipeline and the deposit pipeline? And the feedback is that both are strong. I think the focus that we've put on the deposit side seems to be paying dividends in terms of that new business.
Historically, if you look back at the 22-year whatever history of First Western, we have found that at the margin, when we need deposits to fund the loan opportunities that we want to do, we can bring those in. And there was a period there. Actually, after our last call, it was interesting. One of our bigger holders texted or e-mailed Julie and me and said, hey, great quarter, good report on the third quarter. must feel good to get out of the slog of the last couple of years. And for me, that just really resonated. It was kind of a difficult period there with the bank failures and the darling of the private banking industry going out of business and all that.
So I think getting out of that slot, getting back on a growth track, getting off of defense, which I feel like we played well to get back on offense. And those are all things that I think are panning out in our deposit growth story, which your use of the term lumpy was kind. I mean that was obviously not what we would choose to see all that great growth in Q3, but it did let us run off some of the high-cost deposits in Q4 and in some way kind of proved what we've seen over the years, which is when we want deposits, we can bring them in. And when we don't need them, we can pay them off and those things help NIM. And I like the NIM slide this quarter, I'm not sure which page that's on. But if you look at kind of the full year trends for the last five quarters, it shows a nice upward trend that gets us -- is that Page 9, Julie? Yes. It gets us on this trajectory back to 3.10%, 3.15% that I've talked about before that historically we've seen in our banks.
And our next question comes from the line of Matthew Clark of Piper Sandler.
Just the first question on the deposit beta, 54% this quarter from an interest-bearing perspective. Do you feel like you can hold that kind of mid-50s beta this year? Or do you feel like that might come down a little bit?
No, I think we can hold that.
Okay. And then do you have the spot rate...
An unhedged response, I like it. I mean we have seen it come down, you know, Matt. And we do think that -- well, David said it.
Yes. Okay. And then do you have the spot rate on deposits at the end of the year?
Yes, it was 2.86%.
286%, okay. Got it. And then -- assuming that's the case and just thinking about the near-term margin kind of implies your beta steps up here actually in the first quarter. With the noninterest-bearing deposits down at the end of the year, I'm assuming they'll come back to some degree, but borrowings are up a little bit. You'll likely see some asset yield pressure from the December rate cut on the floating rate portfolio, which I think is 25% of the book. It appears like your NIM might come down a little bit here in the first quarter, but I'd love to hear your thoughts and tell me why I'm wrong.
Our NIM in the month of December was 2.72%.
Okay. Okay. But in terms of the end-of-period balance sheet, you don't think there's some incremental pressure there?
No, I don't.
All right. Fair enough. And then the other one I had -- actually, I think it was already asked and answered on expenses.
Our next question comes from the line of Bill Dezellem of Tieton Capital Management.
Two questions from the balance sheet. The first one is mortgage loans for sale jumped in the fourth quarter from, I think, $22 million or so in Q3 up to $40 million in Q4. Would you discuss the dynamics behind that, please?
You're asking about the mortgage held-for-sale balance.
That's right.
Yes. Yes. There are timing dynamics there, timing of when the sales occur relative to the end of period.
Can you explain what those are? Which are loans that we're originating and selling in the secondary markets that are on the balance sheet in the interim.
Yes. Yes. Those loans are originated for the purpose from the beginning of application and lock and everything, those are originated for the purpose of selling. So the balance typically will kind of trend up and then we'll package those and we'll do a sale and move those off the balance sheet. So it does get impacted simply just by the timing of when those sales occur relative to the end of the period.
Your question is a good one, though, Bill, because generally, when volumes are higher, that balance goes up, but then it's also offset by this timing thing that David was talking about. So, I wouldn't read too much into that.
And part of the, I guess, backdrop of the spirit of the question was wondering if there was some dynamic that you saw in the market, whether it was sale premiums or something else that led you to conclude you wanted to hold those a little bit longer or if it truly was simply timing and getting proper volume set up for your sale?
No, it's mechanical. We don't play that game.
So, it's truly just a timing phenomenon?
Correct.
Okay. And then the other question was relative to your construction and development loans. You had a pretty significant reduction in the amount of those loans. And the question is whether that was an intentional risk mitigation strategy or whether it was all part of the normal ebb and flow of bringing on new loans and loans paying off moving out of that C&D category.
I would say much more the former than the latter. We had a review of that portfolio 18 months ago, something like that, and felt like that was as high as we wanted to get, and we wanted to work it down. And so if you look on Page 5, you can see that's gone $315,000, $230,000, $189,000, and actually, a lot of the increase that we've seen in nonowner-occupied CRE is that those construction projects getting finished and then moving on to our investor real estate. And I don't think that those generally sit there very long because they get refinanced into permanent financing. So that's something that I think we'll continue to see there is less of an increase in that investor real estate line item, too.
And our next question comes from the line of Brett Rabatin of Hovde.
Just one follow-up around the tax rate. It's been jumping around a lot the last few quarters. Any thoughts on the tax rate from here? And then just any strategies that you guys are implementing on the tax side, whether it be municipals or other things?
Yes. Good question, Brett. The tax rate, I agree, it has been a bit lumpy over the quarters. And some of those dynamics at play just have to do with some of our LIHTC investments and the K-1 losses that flow through and the timing of when we actually receive that information of the actual losses versus the projected losses that we're kind of using to work that through the year for the effective tax rate as well as there are components of equity compensation and the differences that come with that, that come at play as well, and that had an impact in the fourth quarter. So that's -- that was one of the main drivers of why we saw the fluctuation in the effective tax rate in Q4. But going forward, I think we're more in that 23% to 24% range from an effective tax rate perspective.
We have added some tax-exempt interest income sources, I think, over the past 12 months, and we're working on another one now or looking at it. So I mean it's something that we do pay attention to, Brett. But I think for planning purposes and forecasting purposes, that 23%, 24% is a reasonable range.
Our next question comes from the line of Ross Haberman of Rlh Investments.
Scott, I got on a bit late. Could you just tell me -- did you touch upon your opinion of the mortgage market and what your expectations are for '26? Let's say, I don't know, rates stay about the same or maybe come down a little bit. What's your expectation on your mortgage operation?
Well, thanks for the question, Ross. We have been trying to build our production capability there, even though the market is slower, and Julie did talk on the call a little bit about our experience has been that when the market is really strong and you want to add more mortgage loan officers, which are commission-based the producers, they won't move because they have a big pipeline wherever they are. So building that team when times slow is pretty much how we've experienced that you have to do it if you want to get good ones. And so as we talked about on the call, we've increased -- that has been a focus for us, and we've deliberately gone out and increased our MLO team by 8 producers in 2025, which is a 45% increase year-over-year. So that's somewhere we are investing.
We do think -- well, investing, they're commission based, so it's not a cost. But we're investing effort for sure in building that team for future productivity. We do think that there just has to be a lot of pent-up demand out there for people that want to move. We know people aren't going to leave their 2% or 3% mortgages behind. But at some point, if you got another kid or you're moving, relocating, you need to do that. And we're seeing prices, I think, at least in the Denver market, moderate. And so at some point, that's going to create some mortgage opportunities for us, I think. And obviously, the decline we saw this year and this quarter, it's not us, it's the industry. And so I think that we are doing a good job of being -- playing the hand that we're dealt by this industry. But I also think we're well positioned that when that comes back and we see some growth, we're well positioned to take advantage of it.
Are you seeing any pickup in that division, either in Phoenix or Wyoming or I think you opened up -- was a lending office in Bozeman, was it? Are you seeing -- are those -- would those -- would you see a pickup there first? Or maybe the Denver area, if you saw any sort of pickup, it would show up there first.
We have actually brought in a few in the Lowes and Arizona. So we've seen some nice production out of that region. And then we've also brought in a few from the Wyoming region, which has really helped us there, too. And these are really high-quality producers that have really our type of clients. So some of that you'll see adding to the portfolio. Montana is a little bit trickier. We haven't been successful finding a pure-play MLO there, but we have a great lending team and they're capable of doing all of the lending needs.
So it's definitely a focus of ours is to make sure that all of the markets are seeing the growth that we want. So -- and we've been seeing production in all of the markets.
And to be clear, Bozeman is a full-service First Western profit center that is actually contribution positive. They've made really nice progress there.
Yes.
And just one other question. Have you been looking around for other operations to buy either money management or branches or other little banks? Are you actively looking at in either -- in any of those other three markets or any other -- now that you have a little bit of a currency this year than you had in the year or two past. Is that on your radar screen? Or that's a backseat and you would rather -- if you found some great relationship bankers, you would rather hire one or two and/or a lift out rather than a whole bank.
Yes. So, as you know, we have a long history of acquisitions and our currency really is not been in a place where that has made sense here for the last couple of years. Our focus is on organic growth. We talked on the call a little bit about all this market disruption. And the beauty of hiring the people you want is you get the business that you want, you have to take the stuff you don't want. And so definitely, there's a strong focus here with this disruption task force and with our internal focus on how do we take advantage in an organic way. And that's Front Range, that's resort markets, that's Arizona, Montana and Wyoming, all of them. So we do think there's a lot of opportunity right now for us to just do our jobs and get after this organic growth.
Thanks a lot, and best of luck.
I'm showing no further questions at this time. I'll now turn it back to Scott Wylie for closing remarks.
Great. Thank you. So we said for several quarters that we had success playing defense through that slog of '22 and '23, and now we're shifting back on to offense. The headwinds out in the market have changed to tailwinds for 2026, and that's both in financial and economic and competitive terms. We feel like our 2025 shift to offense really worked, and we've leveraged our investments that we've been making in these five key areas I talked about last time, which is our tech infrastructure, our product teams, our local PC teams, profit center teams, our reset of our internal processes for more efficiency and more value add. And we've also now strengthened our credit and risk support and marketing teams to support the First Western of the future.
So with the positive trends that we saw from Q3 to Q4, where our net interest income was up 22% quarter-over-quarter annualized or it was also up year-over-year nicely. Our NIM was up 17 basis points quarter-over-quarter, 26 basis points year-over-year on a continued path back to where that should be. We -- if you adjust for the operating -- the OREO write-down, our pre-provision net revenues were up another 39% quarter-over-quarter annualized or double from a year ago. Our efficiency ratio when adjusted for that OREO continues to trend down nicely and our operating run rate in the last quarter was, as I said, $0.50 if you take out -- if you normalize it, and that's a little over $2 annualized.
So looking at our 2026 business plan, assuming a stable environment, we expect these positive trends to continue, as we've talked about. Market disruption continues and increases. The opportunity for talent and clients, I don't think has ever been better. Our disruption task force is we're focused on recruiting and sales marketing initiatives. Our prospects are telling us they want a stable local team of experts and a stable local institution, especially in our niche. This small market share that we have in each of our markets provides lots of upside in our strong and healthy and diverse economies that we are operating in.
Our PTIM restructuring is working. We'll see some results of that this year, both with the reemphasis on planning and our B2B initiative that we've launched. Our MLOs are up, and that's taking advantage of the slow market for building for the future. And our NIM, I think, is going to continue to trend up towards the 3.15% number we've talked about as the economy and our financial markets normalize. So those NIM gains and some modest balance sheet growth, they will generate some nice net interest income gains and they'll generate some nice earnings gains. So our intent is to get back to being a financial high performer. We see a clear path to 1% ROA and plenty of room beyond that.
So, thanks, everybody, for your support. We really appreciate you dialing in today, and we'll look forward to connecting in the future. Thank you.
Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Thank you for standing by, and welcome to First Western Financial's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call.
[Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the call over to Tony Rossi. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Latif. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for First Western Financial's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call.
Joining us from First Western's management team are Scott Wylie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Julie Courkamp, Chief Operating Officer; and David Weber, Chief Financial Officer.
We will use a slide presentation as part of our discussion this morning. If you've not done so already, please visit the Events and Presentations page of First Western's Investor Relations website to download a copy of the presentation.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of First Western Financial that involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website. I would also direct you to read the disclaimers in our earnings release and investor presentation. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call. Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today as well as the reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Scott. Scott?
Thanks, Tony, and good morning, everybody. Starting on Slide 3. We executed well in the third quarter and saw positive trends in many areas of loan deposit growth, growth in our net interest income, well-managed expenses and generally stable asset quality. This resulted in an increase in our level of profitability and positive operating leverage. Market remains very competitive in terms of pricing on loans and deposits. We continue to successfully generate new loans and deposits by offering superior level of service, expertise and responsiveness rather than winning business by offering the highest rates on deposits at the lowest rates on loans as other banks are doing.
We continued to maintain a conservative approach to new loan production with our disciplined underwriting and pricing criteria. However, as the result of additions we made to our banking team over the past few years, as well generally healthy economic conditions in our markets, we had a solid level of loan production, which was well diversified across our markets and industries and loan types. As a result of our financial performance and the balance sheet management strategies, we had a further increase in both book value and tangible book value per share, and we used our strong capital position to repurchase some of our shares during the third quarter, which was accretive to our tangible book value per share.
Moving to Slide 4. We generated net income of $3.2 million or $0.32 per diluted share in the third quarter which higher than the prior quarter and a 45% increase from our EPS in the third quarter of last year. With our prudent balance sheet management, our tangible book value per share increased by 1.2% this quarter.
I'll turn over the call to Julie for some additional discussion of our balance sheet and trust investment management trends. Julie?
Thanks, Scott. Turning to Slide 5. We'll look at the trends in our loan portfolio. Our loans held for investment increased $50 million from the end of the prior quarter. We continue to be conservative and highly selective in our new loan production. But with the higher level of productivity we are seeing from the addition to our banking team that we have made over the last several quarters, we are seeing a solid level of new loan production. While we are also seeing an increase in CRE loan demand that meet our underwriting and pricing criteria. New loan production was $146 million in the third quarter. The new loan production was well diversified with the largest increases coming in our residential and commercial real estate portfolios, and we are also getting deposit relationships with most of these new clients. We continue to be disciplined and are maintaining our pricing criteria which resulted in the average rate on new loan production being 6.38% in the quarter.
Moving to Slide 6. We can take a closer look at our deposit trends. Our total deposits increased $320 million from the end of the prior quarter. This was due to both new accounts and the buildup among existing client balances. We had an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits due to inflows we saw from title companies, driven by mortgage industry volume. Additionally, we had an increase in interest-bearing deposits as a result of the successful execution of our deposit gathering strategy.
Now turning to trust and investment management on Slide 7. We had a $64 million decrease in our assets under management in the third quarter. primarily attributed to net withdrawals on low fee product categories, partially offset by improved market conditions on investment agency accounts. This resulted in increased $43 million or $2.7 million during the quarter. Trust and investment management fees increased $100,000 from the prior quarter, primarily driven by the increase in investment agency AUM.
Now I'll turn the call over to David for further discussion of our financials. David?
Thank you, Julie. Turning to Slide 8, we'll look at our gross revenue. Our gross revenue increased 8.7% from the prior quarter due to increases in both net interest income and noninterest income. Year-over-year, our gross revenue increased 15.5%.
Now turning to Slide 9, we'll look at the trends in net interest income and margin. Our net interest income increased for the fourth consecutive quarter and increased 8.9% from the prior quarter primarily due to an increase in our average interest-earning assets with the strong deposit growth we had contributing to our higher level of cash on the balance sheet. Our net interest income increased 25% relative to the third quarter of 2024.
Our NIM decreased 13 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.54%. This was due to unfavorable mix shifts in both interest-earning assets and deposits as our deposit growth during the quarter was in higher-cost money market accounts. The strong deposit growth during the quarter contributed to higher cash held on the balance sheet as this liquidity is deployed into the loan portfolio during the fourth quarter, we expect to see NIM expansion.
Now turning to Slide 10. Our noninterest income increased by more than $500,000 or 8.5%, which is 34% annualized from the prior quarter. This was primarily due to increases in all major fee categories, including trusted investment management fees, insurance fees and gain on sale of mortgage loans. The increase in gain on sale of mortgage loans was driven by a higher level of mortgage production and the increase in trust and investment management fees was driven by an increase in investment agency AUM as a result of improving market conditions.
Now turning to Slide 11 and our expenses. Our noninterest expense increased by less than $1 million from the prior quarter. Most areas of noninterest expense were relatively consistent with the prior quarter as we continue to tightly manage expenses, while also making investments in the business that we believe will positively impact our long-term performance.
Turning to Slide 12. We'll look at our asset quality. As Scott indicated earlier, we saw generally stable trends in the loan portfolio in the third quarter with slight increases in NPLs and NPAs. This was primarily due to one loan that was downgraded during the quarter. And we had a minimal level of net charge-offs again this quarter. We had a slight increase in our allowance coverage from 75 basis points in the prior quarter to 81 basis points in the third quarter.
Now I'll turn it back to Scott. Scott?
Thanks, David. Turning to Slide 13, I'll wrap up with some comments about our outlook. Overall, we continue to see relatively healthy economic conditions in our markets, and we're seeing good opportunities to add both new clients and banking talent to the ongoing disruption from M&A activity here in the Colorado market. Our loan deposit pipelines remains strong and should continue to result in solid balance sheet growth in the fourth quarter. In addition to balance sheet growth, we also expect to see positive trends in net interest margin, fee income and more operating leverage resulting from our disciplined expense control.
Based on trends we're seeing in the portfolio and the feedback we're getting from our clients, we're not seeing anything to indicate that will experience any meaningful deterioration in asset quality. Deposit trends we're seeing in a number of key areas are expected to continue, which we believe should result in a steady improvement in our financial performance and further value being created for our shareholders going forward.
So with that, we're happy to take your questions. Latif, if you could please open up the call.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Brett Rabatin of Hovde Group. Please go ahead, Brett.
2. Question Answer
I wanted to start with the deposits and the strong MMDA growth. And if I heard you correct, it sounds like that's a mix of internal efforts as well as maybe the mortgage department. Just any -- can you maybe go into a little more color there? And then are those levels sticky, the growth in the level?
Well, I think we've talked about our efforts to grow deposits. And the fact that, that would happen a little bit in a lumpy fashion wouldn't be a big surprise given our history here, we do see large deposits coming in and out. And in this case, I think the things that we saw that happened in Q3 are deposits that are going to stay here and give us a higher deposit base to grow from into Q4.
Okay. That's helpful. And then the NPA that you added during the quarter, any color on that credit? And then just was there part of the provision related to a specific reserve for that MTA?
Yes. I think we have a number of credits that have performance issues over time, and this is one that is a C&I loan. We have been paying attention to it. We downgraded it in Q3, and we do have a specific provision for it. We expect it to be worked out and work through over time. The provision is more than adequate.
Okay. And then just maybe lastly, if I could ask on the margin, Julie, you indicated the margin would be up from here. any magnitude that you could share in terms of what you think 4Q might look like, presuming we get a rate cut or 2.
Yes. I think we do have opportunity to see NIM expansion. If you look at the amount of liquidity that's sitting on the balance sheet, if we redeploy that into the loan portfolio at something like plus 200, I think that, that should drive NIM expansion there. We also certainly have the ability to continue to improve earning asset yields and lower our deposit costs. So I think we've got a pretty nice path for NIM expansion in the fourth quarter.
Okay. David, any magnitude that you're thinking about in terms of basis points?
Yes. I'm thinking we can achieve something like 5 basis points of NIM expansion.
Okay. Okay. Great. Appreciate all the color.
Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Clark of Piper Sandler.
I wanted to start on the spot rate on deposits at the end of the quarter.
Yes. Matthew, it was 3.04%.
Okay. And then any updated thoughts on the beta you're looking to achieve with additional fed rate cuts through the cycle and whether or not that starts to decline over time?
Yes. It has been declining and it will certainly continue. We achieved somewhere around a 63% beta on money market accounts in the third quarter, and I think that's reasonable for the fourth quarter expectation as well.
Okay. And then the expense run rate going forward. I think some of the increase this quarter was really the incentive comp, but what are your thoughts on the run rate here in the fourth quarter?
Yes. The incentive comp can vary certainly with the financial performance. But I think something similar to third quarter as far as expenses is probably a reasonable estimate for fourth quarter.
Okay. Great. And then last 1 for me, just on the Wealth Management business, AUM down a little bit. It looked like it was in the lower fee products to may have been deliberate, not sure. But any update on the kind of the renewed growth and profitability improvement strategy there?
Yes. We've definitely been working on getting that going again, and we've replaced the team on the trust and in the planning side. We've got a new leader that joined us beginning of the second quarter. for our planning team and definitely seeing some nice progress from them. As David noted, we saw AUM go down, which is not really something we manage for. We're really more concerned about the fee income, and we saw fee income grow in the agency accounts in Q3, which is what we want to see. So definitely nice progress, from that new team, but I think a lot more to come.
And Matt, just a little bit more color on deposit pricing. With the increase in deposits, you're always going to see relatively expensive at first, and then it's going to moderate over time typically with these new relationships and additional deposits you bring in. Our average deposit costs last quarter peaked at $3.22 in August, and they were down about $3.15 in September, and as David said, ended the quarter at $3.04. So you're seeing a nice trend just within the quarter there. So hopefully, we can see that continue into Q4.
Our next question comes from the line of Will Jones of KBW.
I wanted to circle back to the deposit growth. Obviously, a fairly banner quarter there for deposits, and it sounds like you expect maybe to see a little bit more balance sheet growth. And the fourth quarter here. But should we, in any way, view this large influx of deposits as a way to prefund that your expected growth for 2026? And maybe '26 then becomes more about just remixing the balance sheet. And then just, I guess pairing within that, you obviously have a fair amount of liquidity from the deposit growth. How should we think about you guys being a little more opportunistic with securities purchases at this point?
Well, I think that was a 3-part question, so let me see if I can get them all here.
Yes, I'm sorry about that. Through [indiscernible].
Well, we appreciate the question. So I think you're right on with the idea that we were opportunistic in bringing deposits on. We have done a number of things over the last 12 months to get the team here focused on deposit growth, we know we can grow loans, and we wanted to see the loan-to-deposit ratio come more in line. And so the way you describe that is reasonable. Although I would say it's not like a one-off thing that prefunds 2026 or something like that. I mean I think this is an ongoing effort that goals throughout the product grew throughout the our PTM World Planning Trust Investment Management world goes definitely through each 1 of our 19 locations. We require relationships with each loan and that includes deposits. And so very much a focus of the company. I think that we're seeing a lot of market disruption out there.
So on one hand, you've got this competitive environment for deposits, but you've also got people that don't want to be with really large out-of-state banks, and that disruption is continuing. I would say increasing and that creates opportunity for talent for people that we can bring centrally to support our teams. We can bring new people into our teams and then we're bringing in new clients. And so I think that's going to continue. I don't really see any reason to think that's going to abate. And at the same time we've got this tiny low market share in most of our markets, we're kind of 1% or 2% in our bigger markets and less in the newer markets, so in strong and growing economy. So I think all those things set up for some nice continued asset growth into fourth quarter and next year.
Okay. Helpful response. And as I kind of like pare some of those comments just into how the margin looks for 2026, as I kind of look back how you've transformed the margin this year about 20 to 25 basis points of year-over-year expansion. Do you think that magnitude is repeatable again in 2026? Is the opportunity there from both a deposit pricing standpoint and a loan growth standpoint to see that kind of magnitude again in 2026?
Well, what I've been seeing is that we really got heavily impacted by that rapid run-up in short-term rates and the inverted yield curve and that we thought that, that would turn around and we'd see nice deposit betas as rates declined, which we have. And the fact that we've seen 22 basis point improvement from Q3 of last year to Q3 of this year, I think it's a nice start in that. We moved out of the 230s into the 250s. And I continue to think that in normal environments, my banks, including this one, have produced 3.50, 3.20, 3.25% NIM for the way we do business. And that's where I think we're going. I don't think we're going to get there next quarter. I don't know if we can get there next year. But that, I think, is going to continue and the fact we've seen that amount of improvement here over the last 12 months in spite of the growth that we've seen on the balance sheet. I think it's really promising and bodes well for continued operating leverage into 2026.
Yes. Okay. Very helpful there. And then lastly for me. You touched a little bit on in some of your comments, just the organic opportunity that's arisen from some of the M&A disruption. But there has been a lot of deal announcements. There's been a lot of price discovery. So just curious how you think about your own scarcity value within that? And then maybe how you view yourself as a downstream buyer of potentially banks?
Well, we believe that our path to -- we believe our job is to drive shareholder value. And we believe our path to creating shareholder value is creating operating leverage in our business here by growing revenues a lot faster than expenses. And that turns into improved efficiency ratio improve bottom line and we're not happy where the profitability is. We're not happy where the efficiency ratio is. But we've made a bunch of investments here over the last couple of years and changes that are now paying off, and we're seeing the green shoots of that, and that's going to drive continued organic growth and operating leverage for us. And now I talked a couple of times about why we think that continues into '26 and beyond.
So specifically, in terms of scarcity value, clearly, First Western is a unique franchise that both is becoming more unique in Colorado. But I would say also more unique as a successful wealth management business on a national basis. I mean I think the bank, in a lot of ways, most similar to us in terms of their balance sheet and AUM was fine mark in Florida, and the fact that they sold for 6.5x revenue and 92x trailing earnings to a really good buyer I think, is an interesting data point for us. And I know others use other metrics on that, but I mean, I think that's what the data is.
So yes, I think there's good scarcity value here. I think our clients, frankly, see that and they find us to be a desirable place to do business. I think other bankers around the country are seeing that, too. In terms of acquisitions, we would love to be buyers. We've done that over the years, a lot 13x, and we just have to get our stock price back to something reasonable. And definitely, there's a lot of activity out there that we could benefit from if we can get our stock price back in line or when get our stock price back in line.
I appreciate that. Appreciate that response. That's all for me.
Our next question comes from the line of Bill Dezellem of Tieton Capital Management. Please go ahead, Bill.
Scott, it sounded like you may have had some additional comments that you were going to share to the last question, I'll let you do that if there's something more you want to add.
I'll add a few comments at the end. Thank you, Bill.
All right. So continuing down the deconsolidation route, would you talk about what transactions have been most disruptive and possibly favorably impactful for First Western.
Yes. I don't entirely understand it, Bill. So I can't really give you a really solid prediction of what's going to happen with all this. But I would tell you that when Guaranty Bank [indiscernible]. I thought that was going to create a lot of opportunity because our type of clients definitely were at those 2 banks. And I thought with them being acquired by out-of-state banks, that was going to create a lot of opportunity for us. As it turned out, it didn't. And I think a lot of the reason for that is the banker stayed in place for a while. And then when they did move, they were really a bit up by other players. And so it got to be really expensive to bring those folks over.
Now with the second-tier acquisitions that we're seeing, for example, with Citywide, which was a really great local family-owned and family run bank, they sold the Heartland, I don't know when, 5, 7 years ago, something like that. And then I think Heartland really had a strategy of trying to run these local banks as the way they had run historically. UMB buys Heartland, UMB is going to drive a UMB culture into what used to be citywide. And so we're seeing some good people and good opportunities come out of that. And so I think Interestingly, it's sort of the second-tier acquisitions that really create more opportunities in some way. And then the First Bank one in this market is really interesting. Like First Bank is a great retail bank and does really love by Colorado. So there's this emotional tie that I don't entirely understand, but definitely local people here, local business leaders, local entrepreneurs have strong relationships with that company. And it's just going to be a challenge for a big national player to keep that passion and we'll see.
I mean, we've had lots of calls. We have clients that bank here and bank there. And you can be pretty sure that those folks are calling us to saying what additional capacity you guys have for us to stay with you guys. So I don't know how all that plays out, Bill. I do feel like we're seeing more benefits of the disruption in today's market than what we saw 5 or 7 years ago. And again, I'm not sure all the reasons why, but it's been really good for us so far.
So let me take that 1 step further, do you sense that you have the opportunity to become the new bank that Colorado's love that others look at year ago, we don't even know why, but there they sit on this pedestal?
Well, I do know our clients love us. we're never going to be a retail bank the way First Bank was. Like First Bank, one of their strengths was they did one thing. And over the years, I've talked to people like John Ikard and other CEOs over there. And they're like, well, what do you think about the trust investment management business. And I would tell them, and they would say, "Well, that's fine. But we're never going to do that at FirstBank. So I mean, they're just very focused being a retail bank. And I think they did that better than anybody. And we're not ever going to do that. We're not going to open branches on every corner like data and stuff like that.
So I think we'll continue to be in First Western. I know that our folks are very committed to their markets and their communities. We talk here about taking care of our 4 key stakeholders, which our shareholders, associates, clients and communities. And so we try and do those things that are right for our people and create that emotional connection that you're talking about. And certainly went on our niche, that's something we would hope to expand and build on.
That's helpful. And then relative to Arizona specifically are you seeing anything from a transaction standpoint that you see is benefiting your opportunity for bringing on new people there?
Well, I don't think we've announced it yet, we have Julie is telling me. So I was thinking I was going to make some news here, Julie, you're at me. But -- we actually recruited 1 of the top folks out of First Republic to build our franchise in Arizona for us, and he had a garden leave period and all that stuff, but he's now joined us -- and we are really optimistic about what we think the team there can do in the years to come. I think that, that Arizona market for us -- if we had the same tiny market share that we had in Arizona that we have in Colorado, we would be what's the number, Julie, $4 billion, $6 billion, bigger or something like that. And so that's what we've charged the team there to come up with. I think we've got a leader in place that can do it.
Great. Congratulations on that. one additional question, please. The excess cash that you have on the balance sheet, how long are you thinking that it will take to redeploy that cash?
Yes. Actually, that was 1 of the 3-part question that I missed on, David. And do you want to talk about what we've done already with investments and then what our thoughts are.
Yes. I mean, Bill, if you kind of look back at the history of our balance sheet, we certainly have our liquidity and capital really more earmarked towards the loan portfolio. And I think that continues. Now that being said, when there are opportunities from a bond perspective that we like, we will take advantage of them. So we did add about $50 million in the third quarter to the bond portfolio, and those were primarily floaters that got us a nice spread over interest-bearing cash, which still really remains highly liquid assets, government guaranteed bonds, agency, GSEs, things like that.
So I think the focus is still to deploy that liquidity into the loan portfolio. But as we see opportunities in the bond portfolio, we'll certainly assess those as they come up.
So 2 follow-on questions to that. Number one, is that the $49 million available for sale, that's now on the balance sheet this year referencing.. -- and then that redeploying of that. I mean is this something that is a 2-, 3-quarter phenomenon given what you see with economic activity? Is it something you think by the end of Q4? Is it more like the full year next year? I guess I'm looking for a bit more solid view of how you see loan demand relating to that excess cash. excess liquidity I should say.
Yes. Good question, Bill. We expect our loan and trends to continue. We had a really strong second quarter in loan growth. We had a good quarter again in the third quarter as far as loan growth. And we -- given our loan pipelines and what we're seeing in our markets, we do expect those trends to continue. So I don't think it's year down the road type of things with those trends continuing as far as redeploying that liquidity.
I would just add, Bill, that we have seen a modest growth rate in the balance sheet, right? Like I think that our expectation is that we can grow single digits, mid-single digits, maybe low double digits. We're not interested, particularly in growing faster than that. And I think that you're going to see this growth continue at a moderate pace here into 2026 from everything we know. Not expecting a lend all this money out next week. That is not in our game plan.
I would now like to turn the conference back to Scott Wylie for closing remarks. Sir?
Great. Thank you. We said for several quarters that we had success playing defense and that we were going to shift back on to offense in 2025. We had some pretty stiff headwinds there for a while with short the rapid run-up 525 basis points in short-term rates. We had that inverted yield curve for an extended period. We have 3 of the 4 largest bank failures in U.S. history, including First Republic, which very much was seen as a successful player in our net. But we said we got through the defense, let's shift over to offense and really leverage the investments that we've made over the past couple of years. in funky areas. We've replaced our technology infrastructure.
We've moved to a completely cloud-based environment. We've installed middleware. We've rolled out a new digital platform we're adding all kinds of new services and tools onto that tech platform that really, I think, help us be a leader from the tech standpoint. We've reorganized, number 2, our product teams, our loan, deposit, investment management, planning, trust, mortgage teams have all been strengthened and reorganized. We've expanded our PC local office teams. We've given them a new proprietary toolbox for growth and rolled that out here in the last quarter. We reset and standardized our internal control processes for more efficiency and value add so that we're competing on value and not on price.
And number five, we've rebuilt our credit and risk and support and marketing teams to support the First Western that we envision for the future. And that's all paid for and in our current expense structure. So we were hoping to see some green shoots of progress in this year, and that showed up in Q3. Our net interest income was up Q-over-Q quarter-over-quarter annualized. Our fees were up 31.6% quarter-over-quarter annualized. Each of our key areas, David pointed that out, which I thought was a really great pointing in PTAM in insurance, in banking and mortgages, we saw a nice growth. Our pre-provision net revenues were up almost 35% quarter-over-quarter annualized and our efficiency ratio is trending down with operating leverage up.
So thinking about 2026, we do our business planning in the fourth quarter. And so that's a big project that we're doing now with each department head in each office. And so we'll see how all that plays out. But if you just look at Q3 year-over-year trend lines, -- then our net interest income is up 25% year-over-year, and that was done with modest growth in the balance sheet plus NIM improvement, which drives nice operating leverage, which we saw our fees were up 21% from September of last year to September this year. And our operating expenses were only up 4%, and that was mainly due to incentive comp that is driven off of revenue growth.
So if we had a higher expenses in Q4 because we're making incentive because we're seeing good -- some conference, we're seeing good growth, and that's a good problem to have. So looking at this quarter, our intention is to get back to be a high financial performance like we were earlier in this decade. And we have a clear path to 1% ROAA and plenty of room beyond that. we were honored to be named one of just 16 KBW Bank Honorary members in 2025 for our performance over last year. We were just I think made as of Q3 now, Piper Sandler list of the top 200 U.S. listed banks in size. And then we just saw our schedule for the HUD conference down in Florida in a couple of weeks. And the organizers, they asked us to add some time slots because of high demand.
So I think there's good momentum here. We're really optimistic about how we can finish the year and continue to deliver shareholder value in 2026. Thanks, everybody, for your support, and thanks for dialing in today. We really appreciate it.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Western Financial Q2 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Tony Rossi.
Thank you, Josh. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for First Western Financial's Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Joining us from First Western's management team are Scott Wylie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Julie Courkamp, Chief Operating Officer; and David Weber, Chief Financial Officer. .
We'll use a slide presentation as part of our discussion this morning. If you've not done so already, please visit the Events and Presentations page of First Western's Investor Relations website to download a copy of the presentation. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of First Western Financial that involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website.
I would also direct you to read the disclaimers in our earnings release and investor presentation. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call. Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today as well as a reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
And with that, I'd like to turn the call over to Scott.
Thanks, Tony, and good morning, everybody. We executed well in the second quarter and saw positive trends in many areas, including loan and deposit growth, expansion in our net interest margin, well managed expenses and stable to improving asset quality. The market remains very competitive in terms of pricing on loans and deposits, but we continue to successfully generate new loans and deposits by offering a superior level of service, expertise and responsiveness rather than winning business by offering the highest rates on deposits at the lowest rates on loans as other banks are doing.
We continue to maintain a conservative approach to new loan production, with our disciplined underwriting and pricing criteria. However, as a result of the additions we made to our banking team over the past few quarters as well as generally healthy economic conditions in our markets, we had a solid level of loan production, which was well diversified across our markets and industries and loan types.
We were also able to successfully lower deposit costs as well as redeploy the cash we generated from the sale of 2 OREO properties into new loan production and securities purchases, which contributed to the expansion we're seeing in our net interest margin. And we continue to maintain disciplined expense control despite the inflationary environment as we capitalize on the previous investments we made in both banking talent and technology that have enhanced our business development efforts and overall level of efficiency, including a higher level of mortgage banking income.
We also had generally stable asset quality during the second quarter. As a result of our financial performance and balance sheet management strategies, we had a further increase in our tangible book value per share and we used our strong capital position to repurchase some of our shares during the second quarter, which was accretive to our tangible book value per share.
Moving to Slide 4. We generated net income of $2.5 million or $0.26 diluted share in the quarter. This was lower than the prior quarter due to a number of onetime gains that positively impacted our financial performance in the first quarter as well as the higher level of provision that we recorded due to the strong loan growth that we had late in the second quarter.
On pre-provision net revenue basis, once the onetime items from last quarter are excluded, we had an increase during the quarter. In addition, it was about $5.1 million in Q2 down slightly from Q1, including those onetime revenue adds in Q1, but up about 36% year-over-year. With our prudent balance sheet management, our tangible book value per share increased by about 1% this quarter.
Now I'll turn the call over to Julie for some additional discussion of our balance sheet and trust and investment management trends. Julie?
Thank you, Scott. Turning to Slide 5. We'll look at the trends in our loan portfolio. Our loans held for investment increased $114 million from the end of the prior quarter. We continue to be conservative and highly selective in our new loan section but with the higher level of productivity we are seeing from the additions to our banking team that we have made over the last several quarters, we are seeing a solid level of new loan production. That new loan production was $167 million in the second quarter.
This new loan production was well diversified and resulted in an increase in most of our portfolios and we are also getting deposit relationships with most of these new clients. We continue to be disciplined, and we are maintaining our pricing criteria. This resulted in the average rate on new loan production being 6.35% in the quarter or 6.7% excluding loans secured by trust and investment management assets originated in the quarter.
Moving to Slide 6. We'll take a closer look at our deposit trends. Our total deposits were slightly up from the end of the prior quarter. We had a decline in noninterest-bearing deposits due to typical seasonal outflows we see in the second quarter related to tax payments. This was offset by an increase in interest-bearing deposits as a result of the successful execution in our deposit gathering strategies. Given the nature of our client base, following the seasonal outflow that related to tax payments in the second quarter, we typically see that these balances tend to build back up over the second half of the year.
Turning to trust and investment management on Slide 7. We had a $320 million increase in our assets under management in the second quarter, driven largely by favorable market performance. Over the past year, our AUM has increased nearly 7%.
I'll turn the call over to David for further discussion of our financial results. David?
Thanks, Julie. Turning to Slide 8, we'll look at our gross revenue. Our gross revenue was slightly down from the prior quarter due to some onetime gains we had in the first quarter that positively impacted our net interest -- our noninterest income, which was partially offset by an increase in net interest income.
Now turning to Slide 9. We'll look at the trends in net interest income and margin. Our net interest income increased 2.3% from the prior quarter due to an expansion in our net interest margin. Our NIM increased 6 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.67%. This was due to a reduction in our cost of deposits as well as the payoff of high-cost subordinated debt along with the deployment of the cash we generated from the sale of 2 OREO properties into new loan production and securities purchases, which increased our average yield on interest-earning assets.
Based on recent deposit inflow trends over the past few weeks, we expect NIM to be relatively flat in the short term, but it should expand later in the year, which, along with our balance sheet growth, should result in strong NII growth in the third and fourth quarters.
Turning to Slide 10. Our noninterest income decreased by approximately $1 million from the prior quarter. This was due to onetime gains we recorded in the first quarter, which were partially offset by an increase in gain on sale of mortgage loans. PTIM fees, has been trending down as our clients have shifted to lower-margin services. Reversing this trend is a management priority.
Now turning to Slide 11 and our expenses. Our noninterest expense decreased approximately $300,000 from the prior quarter, which was primarily due to lower salaries and benefits. All other areas of noninterest expense were relatively consistent with the prior quarter as we continue to tightly manage expenses while also making investments in the business that we believe will positively impact our long-term performance.
Now turning to Slide 12. We'll look at our asset quality. As Scott indicated earlier, we saw generally stable trends in the loan portfolio in the second quarter with slight increases in NPLs and NPAs. However, we had a meaningful decline of $10 million in our classified loans. We had one loan charge-off in the quarter, which had unique issues and is not reflective of broader trends we are seeing in the portfolio. We had a slight increase in our allowance coverage, which was primarily driven by the significant loan growth we had in the quarter.
Now I'll turn it back to Scott. Scott?
Thanks, David. Turning to Slide 13, I'll wrap up with some comments about our outlook. Overall, we continue to see relatively healthy economic conditions in our markets. Our loan and deposit pipelines remained strong and should continue to result in solid balance sheet growth for the second half of the year.
In addition to the balance sheet growth, we expect to see continued positive trends in our net interest margin, net interest income, fee income and more operating leverage resulting from our disciplined expense control. Based on the trends that we're seeing in the portfolio, and the feedback we're getting from clients, we're not seeing anything to indicate that we'll experience any meaningful deterioration in asset quality. The positive trends we're seeing in a number of key areas are expected to continue which we believe will result in steady improvement in our financial performance and further value being created for our shareholders as we move through the year.
With that, we're happy to take your questions. Josh, please open up the call.
[Operator Instructions] One moment for questions. Our first question comes from Matthew Clark with Piper Sandler.
2. Question Answer
First question, just on the -- it looked like you added some borrowings towards the end of the quarter. Just want to get a sense for the rate on those, whether or not those are overnight or term borrowings and I guess the plan to maybe pay those off as deposit growth comes through in the second half?
Yes, Matt. Yes, they were overnight. And yes, the plan is to pay them off as our deposits come in, in the third quarter. It was in the mid-4s as far as the rate, but like I said, we do plan to those off.
Okay. Great. And then your cost of interest-bearing in total deposits, both down 2 basis points just curious what the spot rate was at the end of June and kind of what your expectations are for more relief in the back half?
Yes. The spot rate at the end of June was 307, and that's total deposits. And we do still have opportunity to continue to reprice down on the CD portfolio. As far as NIM expectations, we're thinking relatively flat in the third quarter due to strong deposit pipelines in the third quarter. And then as we deploy that into loan production, we still are expecting NIM to expand in the fourth quarter back to really that exit NIM that we talked about last quarter kind of in the low to mid-270s.
Okay. Great. And then just last one for me on expenses. Good cost control here this quarter better than the guide. I think that was $19.5 million to $20 million. What are your updated thoughts on the run rate here in the back half?
Yes. We're still thinking same range, $19.5 million to $20 million. We continue to think, Matt, that our path to success is not in cost cutting, right? It's an operating leverage from growing revenues with our current expense base and our focus has really been on just trying to make sure we're not seeing excessive growth in that expense base. .
Our next question comes from Woody Lay with KBW.
I had a quick follow-up on the NIM outlook and I believe you said that you still expect to hit a low to mid 270s NIM by year-end. And just wanted to get a sense of how sensitive that could be to how rate cuts play out in the back half of the year?
Yes. Woody, I think our guidance that we previously spoken to as far as how rate cuts impact NII in that $1 million range is still relatively fair. We took a little bit of sensitivity off the balance sheet in the second quarter. So maybe it's $100,000 or so below that, but I think that's still a fair assumption as far as how a 25 basis point reduction would impact NII. .
Got it. And then maybe shifting over to expenses and profitability, and you mentioned that you continue to invest in the franchiship longer-term focus. But I was hoping that you all could just kind of sort of peel back the curtain and just walk through sort of how you toggle between investing and seeing the profitability ramp actually play out.
Well, I think if you look at the history over the past several quarters, we've had pretty stable expenses. So I think our focus has been how do we take our current spend, make sure we're getting the maximum value out of that and how do we take advantage of opportunities we see in the marketplace. We brought in significant new hires from other local banks from First Republic, from Goldman Sachs, from UMB here. And those folks have been really helpful to the growth numbers that we started seeing in Q2 here. So I mean, we do continue to invest. We continue to upgrade when vacancies come up.
And hopefully, we'll continue to do that in the back half of the year, that's our expectation. I don't think we need to increase our expenses significantly to achieve significantly higher revenues that are going to drive the operating leverage that we've seen since our IPO, where the expense is steady, you grow your revenues, that's going to have a really nice impact for our bottom line.
Got it. And then last for me, I believe in the opening comments you called out building up trust fees is a top priority at this point. I know they were down a little bit quarter-on-quarter. Could you just give some additional color on thoughts on that business line and how you could increase fees from here?
Yes. So we have now replaced most of our PTIM leadership here to put in a more of a growth mentality than what we've had since the IPO, we've been pretty flat in PTIM, while we've tripled the size of the balance sheet and dramatically improved our net interest income. So our feeling is that this is an area of opportunity for us.
We talk about that area as PTIM, which stands for planning, trust and investment management, PTIM. Historically, we've put a lot of emphasis on the investment management and the trust side, and the trust has certainly grown nicely over the years. But we think there's a big opportunity on the planning side as well. And so we have brought in new leadership there. The Head of Planning joined us right at the beginning of the second quarter. Historically, I would tell you, we find it takes some time for these folks to get traction and not with him. I mean there's really good stuff going on in terms of product development, in new channel distribution.
Historically, we focused here on the B2C channel with our 19 offices. And now we're launching a new B2B initiative that fits really nicely into some of the other capabilities of the organization beyond planning, like our focus on C&I and our focus on treasury management and our focus on retirement services business. So you don't see any of that in the numbers in Q2, either on the expense or the revenue side. But as I think David mentioned in his comments with the deck, that is something we're focused on, and we do expect to see results going forward.
Our next question comes from Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital Management.
I had a couple of questions. First of all, what, if any, structural factors are holding you back from returning to a 3% or greater NIM.
I think the past is a time, Bill, we've talked about that now on the past several calls that we thought that we would see a nice steady improvement in NIM, which is what we've seen. I think I don't have the exact page in front of me here. But I think in the deck, that's pretty evident. And what we've looked at internally is that we believe that our historic number of some number like 315, 320 is what our business model should produce in a normal interest environment where you don't see inverted yield curve, and you don't see rapid run up in short-term rates like we saw there a couple of years ago.
So we do think we're going to trend back there, and that's what we've been saying and that's what we've been seeing. So as David said, we expect that to continue. I think with the growth we saw at the end of second quarter and the funding and the fact that our deposits typically decrease, especially operating deposits in Q2 because of tax payments with our type of client. We'll see that continue to come back in the second half of the year. We'll see the improved NIM from that I don't think we're going to get to 315 here in the next couple of quarters. I'm not sure whether it takes to the end of next year or beyond that, but we do think we're going to see continued progress there.
And every quarter, every month where we see some nice organic growth, some improvement in fee income, some good cost control, NIM expansion and organic growth, all of those things compound each other to drive the top line growth that goes straight to the bottom line if we're not increasing expenses.
That's helpful, Scott. And just to be clear, there aren't any factors that are required to achieve that $350 million, $320 million, other than a continuation of growing assets and essentially seeing that net interest income growing more quickly than expense growth. It's just a matter of moving the business forward. Is that the correct interpretation?
I think that's safe to say. I don't -- David, do you feel comfortable with that?
Yes, I think that's fair, Bill. .
Great. And then additionally, you have hired MLOs over the course of the last year. And I think you inferred in the press release that your mortgage volume was down. And I realized that the mortgage market is a bit, maybe this is an appropriate time to say wonky now, but help us understand why you think your volumes are down when your MLOs have increased.
Yes, Bill, I can take this one. You're right. We have been working to increase our MLOs, which helps us with this general production and geographic spread of that production. They're in different locations. And we have more in the pipeline to continue to grow those. Industry-wide, I think the general mortgage industry has still not really rebounded. We have not seen seed production that we typically see in the summer months, which are typically are higher seasonality months. .
I think we're seeing impact from the economic uncertainty, but also the interest rate uncertainty, I think people are just not in the buying and/or selling part of life right now. And it appears that everybody is kind of staying on the sidelines. We are hearing that buyers believe that the home prices will start to decline at some point and in the near future, I think that the interest rate certainty will help with that as well. I think that we might see a little bit more. But our general belief is that if we can continue to add individuals that aren't fixed cost to us that bring in more production that we will see the increase in revenues with that as well as economic conditions continue to improve.
I would note, however, that we are a contribution positive on mortgage for the year and were last year as well. And so this is a contributing business. You'll see a lot of our production in the second quarter was through mortgages as well -- any residential mortgage increase in our mix. So very much a contributing part of the business and from an earnings perspective as doing nice -- paying nice dividends to us as well.
And so Julie, to be clear, the decline in the mortgage volumes, you all see entirely as market related as opposed to some internal challenge that you will need to be working on internally?
That's correct, yes.
That's helpful. And then one last question. Relative to your customers' mindset on the, I guess, I'll call it the cautious or not spectrum. What are you seeing and hearing from them today, I think you referenced that you had good loan growth in the late in the second quarter. Has the mindset shifted over the course of the last few months as the macro environment has shifted share as much insight on all those factors as you can, please?
Yes. That's actually a great question and I think really interesting build to try and understand what you know isn't easy, right? So we do a midyear review where we bring in all of our senior people for a couple of days. And earlier this week, we had all of the leadership and the managers here Monday and then Tuesday, all the PC presidents from the 19 locations state, and we had a PC President Summit, and then we also had Tuesday, a PTIM Summit working on some of the changes we have going on there. .
And so at the PC Presidents Summit, I asked the PC presidents that very question. I said, what are you seeing in terms of competitive environment, what you see in terms of client demand? And each one of them said, as they always do, that it's a very competitive environment, and they're still seeing cost pressure on the deposit side and cost pressure on the loan side. But the facts are that we're seeing more bigger pipelines, we're seeing more demand and I think the feeling is among those guys that are really close -- that are closest to our market, that the caution that we saw early in the year has shifted and people are coming back to doing business.
So I think your question is spot on. I think we're still in a competitive environment. I think we're still seeing some market disruption that's good for us. In fact, I think that's probably accelerating. And I think we're seeing confidence with our clients is making the move on things that they're thinking about.
Thank you. I would now like to turn the call back over to the management team for any closing remarks.
Great. Thanks, Josh. So I just want to thank everybody for joining us on the call today. we have targeted improvements in asset quality and NIM, net interest margin and organic growth. We've talked about that now for several quarters. And we feel that with the progress we're making there, we're going to return to our historic strong numbers, and we're seeing that over the past few quarters, and we see continued progress going into the second half of the year.
This is driving more operating leverage, which is going to restore our strong earnings growth story and our internal and external trends that we see across our products and services and across our geographical footprint are all positive. We expect to benefit from these trends in the second half of the year and into 2026, all else being equal. We really appreciate the support, and thanks for taking the time today to listen to our earnings call. Thanks, everybody.
This concludes the conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
First Western Financial, Inc. — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
Finanzdaten von First Western Financial, Inc.
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Mär '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 105 105 |
12 %
12 %
100 %
|
|
| - Zinsertrag | 79 79 |
20 %
20 %
75 %
|
|
| - Zinsunabhängige Erträge | 26 26 |
7 %
7 %
25 %
|
|
| Zinsaufwand | 85 85 |
1 %
1 %
81 %
|
|
| Nichtzinsaufwand | -81 -81 |
3 %
3 %
-77 %
|
|
| Risikovorsorge für Kredite | 4,22 4,22 |
118 %
118 %
4 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 15 15 |
50 %
50 %
15 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen USD.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur First Western Financial, Inc.-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
First Western Financial, Inc. Aktie News
Firmenprofil
First Western Financial, Inc. fungiert als Holdinggesellschaft, die Dienstleistungen im Bereich der Vermögensverwaltung anbietet. Sie ist in den folgenden Geschäftssegmenten tätig: Vermögensverwaltung, Kapitalverwaltung und Hypotheken. Das Segment Wealth Management besteht aus Tätigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit seinem voll integrierten Vermögensverwaltungsgeschäft. Das Segment Kapitalbewirtschaftung umfasst Operationen im Zusammenhang mit seinen institutionellen Vermögensverwaltungsdienstleistungen in Bezug auf firmeneigene Festzins-, Hochzins- und Aktienstrategien, einschließlich der Beratung von drei firmeneigenen Investmentfonds, die sich in seinem Besitz befinden, verwaltet und bewertet werden. Das Segment Hypotheken umfasst Operationen im Zusammenhang mit der Vergabe und dem Verkauf von Hypothekendarlehen für Wohnimmobilien. Das Unternehmen wurde 2002 von Scott C. Wylie und Warren Joseph Olsen gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in Denver, CO.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | USA |
| CEO | Mr. Wylie |
| Mitarbeiter | 320 |
| Gegründet | 2002 |
| Webseite | myfw.gcs-web.com |


