EMCOR Group, Inc. Aktie

Good morning. My name is Dave, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the EMCOR Group Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now turn the call over to Lucas Sullivan, Director, Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Sullivan, you may begin.

Thanks, Dave. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to EMCOR's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you joining us by webcast, we are at the beginning of our slide presentation that will accompany our remarks today. This presentation will be archived in the Investor Relations section of our website at emcorgroup.com.

With me today are Tony Guzzi, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Nalbandian, Senior Vice President and EMCOR's Chief Financial Officer; and Maxine Mauricio, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel.

For today's call, Tony will provide comments on our third quarter 2026 and discuss our RPOs. Jason will then review the third quarter numbers and then turn it back to Tony to discuss our guidance before we open it up for Q&A. Before we begin, a quick reminder that this presentation and discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and may contain certain non-GAAP financial information.

Slide 2 of our presentation describes in detail these forward-looking statements and the non-GAAP financial information disclosures. I encourage everyone to review both disclosures in conjunction with our discussion and accompanying slides. And finally, as a reminder, all financial information discussed during this morning's call is included in our consolidated financial statements within both our earnings press release issued this morning and in our Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Tony.

Yes. Thanks, Lucas, and good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm going to begin here on Slide 4. EMCOR delivered another quarter of exceptional growth, margin performance, operating cash flow and capital allocation. Revenue increased 28.8%, or 25.5% organically. This growth, coupled with strong field execution, and improved SG&A leverage resulted in meaningful expansion of our operating margin. Operating cash flow in the quarter was $797 million, and remaining performance obligations reached a record $18.57 billion, up 47% year-over-year, 40% from year-end 2025 and 8.3% sequentially despite the strong revenue growth we had in the quarter.

Most of the RPO growth was organic reinforcing the depth of demand across multiple end markets. On an adjusted basis, our third quarter operating margin was 10.5%. The reflecting the strength of our execution and operating model. And we earned $9.60 in adjusted diluted earnings per share, a 46% increase versus the year ago period. Our construction segments continue to deliver outstanding performance. Both our Electrical and Mechanical segments grew revenues by more than 40%. With approximately 75% of such growth being generated organically.

Our Electrical Construction segment delivered a 13.3% operating margin. And Mechanical Construction delivered a 12.1% operating margin resulting in combined margin expansion, up 40 basis points. Demand remains broad-based with particular strength in the network and communications, which is data centers for the most part, health care, manufacturing and industrial, water and wastewater and institutional sectors.

We continue to outgrow the broader nonresidential construction markets. Building Services also posted a strong quarter. Revenue grew nearly 5%, operating income increased 11.5% and operating margin expanded 50 basis points driven by a favorable revenue mix and improved SG&A leverage.

Industrial Services performed as expected and relatively in line with the third quarter of 2025. Importantly, we saw expanding opportunities in LNG maintenance and petrochemical work, which supports our continued broadening of the markets that we will serve with this segment. As I previously mentioned, and this will be on Slide 5 now. As I previously mentioned, our RPO position strengthened considerably during the quarter, reaching a record $18.57 billion. This growth reflects strong demand across the majority of our market sectors led by network and communications or data centers as well as continued strength in health care, water and wastewater, institutional, manufacturing and industrial and I'm going to take a deeper look at each of these sectors.

Data center RPOs totaled a record $8.74 billion, more than double the year ago level and an increase of 13% sequentially. This growth demonstrates our broad capabilities in this sector, which includes electrical, mechanical and fire life safety construction and service. Healthcare RPOs totaled $1.71 billion, an increase of 31% year-over-year, reflecting the strength of this long-standing core market for EMCOR. Water and wastewater RPOs totaled $1.42 billion, an increase of 38% year-over-year as we continue to capitalize on opportunities throughout Florida.

Institutional RPOs totaled $1.72 billion, an increase of 25% year-over-year driven by strong demand for many of our education customers, especially at the higher level education.

And finally, Manufacturing and Industrial ARPUs totaled $1.18 billion, an increase of 10% year-over-year and nearly 27% sequentially as we are benefiting from a broad range of investments across this sector. The size, quality and diversity of our RPOs remains very strong.

Before I turn the call over to Jason, I want to underscore what these results demonstrate. Our field leaders continue to exhibit discipline and precision as they execute some of the industry's largest and most technically complex projects for our highly sophisticated and very demanding customers. At execution it is translating into strong margins, cash generation, record RPOs and growth well above the underlying market.

With that, I'll turn it over to Jason.

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. Starting on Slide 6, I will cover the results for each of our segments as well as some of the key financial data for the third quarter of 2026 as compared to the third quarter of 2025. Revenues of $5.54 billion established a new quarterly record for EMCOR increasing 28.8% or 25.5% on an organic basis. Revenues of Electrical Construction were $1.85 billion, increasing 44.3%. While the largest increase was driven by greater demand for data center construction projects within the network and communications market sector, where revenues increased by 68%. This segment also saw notable growth within institutional, which was up 78%; health care, which was up 31% and manufacturing and industrial, which increased by 28%.

Additionally, contributing to the growth of our Electrical segment was $140.1 million of incremental revenues resulting from the acquisitions we previously announced, including Connelly and Schmidt, which closed in early August. Mechanical Construction revenues were $2.55 billion, an increase of 43.1%. Greater demand for data center construction projects, including expanded scope associated with increased cooling requirements, led to significant growth within the network and communications market sector, where revenues increased by nearly 130%.

Beyond data centers, mechanical construction benefited from greater opportunities within several other sectors including institutional, which was up 56%; commercial, which increased by 23%, really driven by warehousing, distribution and logistics projects, Manufacturing and industrial, which includes food processing and was up 17%; Healthcare, which grew by 29% and Water and Wastewater, which increased by 32%.

Driven by the Danforth acquisition in Q4 of last year, this segment generated $173.2 million of incremental revenues within the quarter. On a combined basis, our construction segments had revenues of $4.4 billion, establishing new quarterly revenue records for both segments. We often discussed the diversity of demand that we have across our business and with double-digit revenue increases across a number of sectors, I think the performance of our construction segments this quarter really highlights that fact.

If we move to Building Services, revenues of $852.4 million increased by 4.7% and like our construction segments represents a quarterly record. We continue to see strength within Mechanical Services, which experienced growth across each of its service lines including service, repair and maintenance, building automation and controls and retrofit projects.

In addition, given greater project volume, the award of new facilities maintenance contracts and scope or site expansion with existing customers, this segment site-based business grew revenues by 6.5% continuing the trend we saw last quarter. Industrial Services revenues were $287.5 million, generally in line with the prior year. However, on a year-to-date basis, revenues of this segment are up 10.4% as a result of greater refinery turnaround activity, higher petrochemical project volume, new opportunities for LNG plant maintenance, and progress made on a large solar projects.

Let's turn to Slide 7 for operating income. On a GAAP basis, we generated operating income of $545.8 million, or 9.8% of revenues. Our third quarter results included a $34 million noncash intangible asset impairment charge associated with the prior acquisition within our Building Services segment. This business, which accounts for less than 1% of the segment's revenues, provides energy efficiency contracting outside of traditional mechanical services and our site-based offerings and has been affected by disruption in the performance contracting market. When excluding this impairment, our operating income was $579.8 million, and our operating margin was 10.5%. This represents a 43% increase in operating income and reflects 110 basis points of operating margin expansion.

Looking at each of our segments. Operating income of electrical construction increased by just over 70% to $247 million due to the revenue growth I previously mentioned, coupled with 200 basis points of operating margin expansion. While the segment did benefit from a 50 basis point reduction in SG&A margin, the overwhelming majority of the increase in operating margin was a result of greater gross profit margin, given an improved execution and a more favorable project mix.

Mechanical Construction had operating income of $308.2 million, which represents a 34.4% increase. Similar to the first half of the year and as we anticipated, the 80 basis point reduction in operating margin of this segment resulted from a change in mix that included a greater percentage of revenues from projects where we are acting as either the construction manager or prime contractor and which inherently carry a lower-than-average gross profit margin due to reduced markups on materials, equipment and subcontractor costs as well as an increase in the number of GMP and cost-plus contracts. Despite the year-over-year decrease, operating margin of 12.1% and continues to reflect strong execution by our operating companies across a vast number of projects, and we remain pleased with this performance.

Together, our construction segments grew operating income by nearly 50% establishing new quarterly operating income records for each segment and earning a combined operating margin of 12.6%, an increase of 40 basis points. Operating income of Building Services was $66.2 million, an increase of 11.5%, and operating margin was a quarterly record of 7.8%, a 50 basis point improvement over Q3 2025. A more favorable mix, coupled with better project execution, resulted in a 30 basis point improvement in gross margin and due in part to the restructuring we completed within our site-based business last year, SG&A margin decreased by 20 basis points.

Operating income for Industrial Services was $5.1 million, compared to $6.3 million a year ago. A 120 basis point improvement in gross profit margin was more than offset by an increase in SG&A of the segment. If we move to Slide 8, I'll cover a few additional items regarding the quarter. As you can see on this page, the increase in our operating margin reflects both outstanding execution by our field teams, as well as meaningful operating leverage resulting from the growth we've experienced.

Specifically, gross profit of $1.11 billion increased 32.7% while gross profit margin expanded by 60 basis points to 20%. And SG&A was $528.4 million, or 9.5% of revenues compared to $429.6 million, or 10% of revenues in last year's quarter.

Moving down our P&L. Diluted earnings per share was $9.04 but when you adjust for the intangible asset impairment charge, diluted earnings per share was $9.60, which represents an increase of 46.1% compared to the $6.57 earned in last year's third quarter.

If we briefly turn to Slide 9, you can see our performance year-to-date. Revenues have grown by 22.9% or 20.8% organically. Our gross profit margin has increased by 30 basis points, and we successfully leveraged our cost structure, reducing SG&A margin by 40 basis points.

In a few slides, Tony will provide our updated guidance for 2026. Underlying that guidance is strong fourth quarter performance and the expectation that our full year adjusted operating margin will at least be equivalent to the unprecedented 10% that we have earned through the first 9 months of the year.

I'm going to close on Slide 10, which is our balance sheet. With $775 million of cash on hand and $1.03 billion of working capital, we continue to have significant financial flexibility. This allows us to invest in organic growth execute on strategic M&A opportunities and return capital to our shareholders. Although not shown on the slide, we generated $796.7 million of operating cash flow in the quarter. And on a year-to-date basis, operating cash flow is now $1.1 billion.

We remain committed to our philosophy of balanced and disciplined capital allocation, which is demonstrated by our year-to-date activity as well as this morning's announcement that our Board of Directors has authorized an additional $500 million for the repurchase of our common stock. Through September 30, we have invested nearly $800 million in acquisitions and returned $510 million to our shareholders through both share repurchases and dividends. These actions reflect our confidence in the long-term prospects of our business.

And with that, I'll turn the call back over to Tony

Thanks, Jason. I'm going to finish on Slide 11 and 12 and going to the capital allocation point before I jump in. You can see all that on Slide 12. Given our year-to-date performance and the visibility of our record RPOs, we are again raising our full year 2026 guidance. We now expect earned revenue of between $20.6 billion and $21 billion and adjusted diluted earnings per share of between $34.50 and $35.50. This increase reflects the same demand across multiple sectors. Our continued success in winning and executing large-scale projects and our confidence in our operating teams.

Although our acquisitions enhance long-term earnings, near-term earnings per share and operating income contribution is moderated by acquisition-related backlog amortization. Our integrations remain on track, and we are pleased with the strategic fit, build capabilities and the teams we have added.

Our outlook assumes continued strong execution and demand across our core end markets. We will remain disciplined on pricing, contract terms, project selection and resource allocation. Now our performance rests on 4 durable operating fundamentals that support growth, margins and cash generation, and they really do serve as our long-term foundation for our compounding success.

First, we invest in training and innovation, workforce development, prefabrication, virtual design and construction or we refer to it as VDC, and enhanced project delivery methods to increase productivity, expand capacity which ultimately strengthens our execution. We are supporting these capabilities with investments in our recruitment, development, software enhancements, leadership rating and new and expanded facilities.

Second, we exercised disciplined contract and risk management. Our teams always balance customer service with rigorous project selection and execution, particularly on large and complex opportunities.

Third, we believe our field leadership is a structural competitive advantage. The expertise of our Forman, general Forman and super attendance, project managers and operating leaders drive safe, reliable execution and that supports repeat business with our customers.

And finally, our balanced capital allocation strategy has supported long-term value creation. We are investing in organic growth, pursuing strategic acquisitions and returning cash to shareholders while preserving the financial flexibility to act on attractive opportunities. During the quarter, we did close on our acquisition of Smith Electric headquartered in Austin, Texas, and Connely Electric serving the Chicago land area. We are very excited that they are part of our team. We do recognize the macro environment remains uncertain, including geopolitical conflict supply chain disruptions and policy and regulatory changes. Our approach is consistent, serve our customers well, protect our contractual rights, manage overall risk and execute through changing and challenging conditions. And we have done that very well over a very long period of time.

And I'm going to close, like I always do, by thanking my EMCOR teammates. Their commitment to our culture of mission first people always is the foundation of that success. With that, I will take questions and turn the call over to Dave to queue you.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis.

Great quarter. I wanted to start on the RPOs for Network & Communications. You said $8.74 billion based upon what you're seeing, the trends you're seeing, what are the expectations for growth there?

I mean we're going to keep growing. And you'll always remind you, and I know, Adam, you know this, and this is no particular comment. Growth can come in lumpy, but we see great opportunities across the country in all the markets we serve in the data center market. We're seeing it electrically, mechanically and through fire life safety. We've seen no abatement of that demand despite all the noise out in the market right now, preelection. And we continue to work for the right people. The people that have long-term prospects, the big hyperscalers and those that are serving the bigger hyperscaler is who we work for. We're not very much into the Neo cloud market and sort of the speculative building in data centers. So good market, will continue to be good. We are working off a larger number. So I think eventually, you run in the large law of large numbers. But I said that last year, too, and we doubled our growth.

Yes. And I think the acquisitions we made give us additional opportunities in additional geographies where maybe they weren't as exposed at the time of acquisition, and that gives us the play into the future. .

Okay. And just as we think about the margin performance in the quarter and how we should think about that going forward as a comp? Were there any headwinds from gasoline prices or diesel prices or other inflation in Q2?

At one time that -- with the size we were 5, 8 years ago, it would have mattered a lot more. I think the headwind from that is de minimis because we also are very good at going out and adjusting our bill rates, mainly in mechanical service, which is where the majority of the gasoline is used. So was it a headwind I would say marginally adjacent.

Yes. I think on an annual basis, round numbers, we use 20 million gallons of gasoline and diesel. So the way I think about it is every dollar increase is a $20 million impact to us. If we don't pass those costs along. But to Tony's point, we're doing a good job passing along. So I would say at least 50% of the increase is getting passed on to cost.

Yes. I mean the ones that don't are them being captured really and project pricing through the project managers and the form it back into the jobs or in some general condition on a job. So pretty good, like Jason said, 50% to 75% getting on. You never get it all back. But the flip side, you don't reduce your prices immediately. So it catches on the other side when prices come down for a little bit. .

And's then, Jason, just any quick thoughts on cash from ops in Q4. You've still got a lot of -- you still have a lot of accounts receivable that could flip in Q4?

I think for us, nothing's changed in terms of the way we view long-term cash generation, right? So somewhere between net income to 80% to 85% of operating income on a full year basis. So for this year, that puts you somewhere around $1.5 billion to $1.7 billion of operating cash flow for the full year.

The next question comes from Brent Thielman with Oppenheimer. .

Tony, this massive growth in data center, RPO, is it fair to say it's all happening still within your kind of your core markets? Is any of this kind of a product if you moving, maybe what we call it a little further from the home markets into traditional areas?

I think 75% of it is still in our core markets. But we are expanding. We are expanding in Texas, even free Smith acquisition mechanically. We've expanded in Texas. We are serving mechanically some of the more rural markets in Texas that's part of this. But in general, it's our core markets growing and building out and/or within 30 to 40 miles of our core markets.

Okay. And then look, as this gets towards data centers get toward it looks like 50% of your combined construction segment revenue here pretty quickly. I guess I want to get your view whether there's a balance in terms of mix of markets and customers you want to maintain? Or is it simply move the teams to go after the best returning opportunities for the business right now?

I think it's both, Brent, the reality, right? We have built in diversity of demand because not all our end markets, not our geographic markets have data center capability. We still have a fairly significant business in California. And really the data center business in California is de minimis. We have a fairly significant business across all New York State, New England, the data center business across New York State, none there right now because of the more but the data center business in New England, New York State and even New Jersey is de minimis. So we have built in diversity. But even within markets where we have strong data center demand, we are very cognizant that we still need to serve, especially our core health care customers and some of our institutional customers and our manufacturing customers. So we are very cognizant of having the ability to spread across all. And quite fortunately, we've been able to do very creative things with our workforce to make that happen to include things like the word on those sites, 4 or 5 days a week and if they want to pick up over time, they can come over on a scope of work and work on the data center side on the weekend to pick up extra hours.

But it's -- there is no magic number to any of this. I think it starts with -- we have long-term customers. We have built in diversity. We have long-term customers and markets that have data center demand. We're going to continue to serve but then on balance, we're going to make the right mix management opportunity because we are contractors over the next 1- to 3-year period about how we'll serve the market and how we'll maximize return for our shareholders.

And if you're asking about the data center, in particular, if we have a concentration risk there, I would say we're not tied to 1 or 2 customers. It's fairly diverse. And if you look year-to-date data centers are about 1/3 of our revenues, and that 1/3 of our revenues is split amongst numerous customs.

Yes. But even there, Brent, in the data center market, Jason makes a good point. One, we have diversity, not only of trade and geographies and end customers, but the other thing that we have also is we have more people who want to work with us. I do want to say people are just like we could do what we want. We have more data center construction that want to work with us, then we can serve. So we do have the ability to be selective about who will work for, what kind of work we'll do. It's always important when you think about data centers.

Still, the majority of our mix still tilt stores, cloud storage, data centers and cloud computing data centers. And I think it's going to be that way for at least the next year, 1.5 years.

Okay. Excellent. Maybe just last one. Tony, a lot of your peers talk about developing physical capacity in MEP, whether you call it prefab or whether you call it modular. You've been doing a lot of that for a long time. Maybe you could just talk about what your plans are within your business on that side? Are you doing expansions? Are you building that out? Maybe just to clarify what it is you do there as well?

Yes, 100% were expanding. The way we think about it is what demand do we have to support that, typically, we're building for ourselves. We are -- we do have the opportunity with a couple of the hyperscalers to build modules. And the difference between us and one of our peers, we're not building buildings and then putting them on tractor trailers and moving them out. We're building piping modules, piping racks, hack units, things like that. We typically have done it for ourselves. We have done it for them to have other people install. I think that's going to become more of what we do. There won't ever be a significant amount of our revenue but we will service that market. I think pragmatically, once we are doing that on a job, they will then ask us to expand and do the installation. So that will actually grow geographic areas, too. .

But no -- we're expanding some of our traditional locations. But we'll add over the next 2 quarters, a couple of fab shops that will be fab-only serving multiple EMCOR companies and of the external market. And then the other thing to always think about with us, one of the reasons people sell their companies to us is a lot of times they have good fab capability. Others don't have great fab capability. And as a result of that, we help them with best practice learning and build the right fab shop for them to grow in the future.

The next question comes from Justin Hauke with Baird.

Great. So yes, I wanted to -- I feel like this has been a question on kind of across the space. But on the cash flow, the net contract liabilities balance went up a pretty decent amount, I guess, on some of the advanced billings on some of these earlier stage projects. But I guess, Jason, maybe you could just talk about the sustainability of that given that you've had such rapid growth, and that's obviously a very favorable working capital dynamic. But to the extent that growth, I don't know, moderates or maybe just doesn't grow at the same pace, how that would potentially reverse itself?

Sure. Sure. So I mean, you're right. Some of the growth that we saw this quarter in contract liabilities is just both hand-in-hand with the growth we've seen in backlog or RPO. And that's typical. The flip side, though, is we still do have a significant investment in working capital in the form of unbilled and accounts receivable. And so if growth were to slow, you are going to see that start to liquidate and you're going to see that turn into cash flow. And to some extent, that's part of what drove this quarter's cash flow in industrial, right? We had fairly strong growth last quarter in Industrial. We were up nearly 30%. This quarter, revenues were relatively flat. You saw the flip of that favorably impacting cash flow. So in a period where growth slows for us, we've historically spent off a lot of cash, and I think that would happen again.

And it's always import to know billings in advance doesn't mean we're getting all cash in advance.

Some of that is offset by the increase in ARR. Some of it is just advanced billings that haven't been collected yet. Some of it is deposits. So it's a combination of both.

All right. No, that makes sense. And then I guess maybe my second one here would just -- obviously, margins were really good this quarter and the outlook is higher. On the mechanical side, you talked about the mix impacts. You think you guys have been talking about that for a while. But just curious if you could quantify how much maybe that's weighing on the margins. And also, to what extent does that continue? When do we get to a point I mean, I guess it can change all the time. But assuming the mix stays at the same level, when does that kind of anniversary .

I think the level we're running at today is where we're going to be running for probably the next 12 months or so, right? So there's been there's been a year-over-year decline in mechanical margin because of the mix shift. I think as we enter '27, that decline goes away. I think the margins are around this level. Again, if you look at a rolling 12- to 24-month average for mechanical, that puts you in the 12% to 12.5% margin range. I think that's where we're going to be for some time.

Yes, because I think the more AI data centers become part of the mechanical mix. The designs on those are so much more dynamic. And also that's sort of the contracting method of choice from one of the big customers we work with. And that's not going to change. We're not going to seek to change it because it is so dynamic. These are still really good gross margin job. They're really good jobs. And they contribute pretty significant margin dollars, which is really. You've heard me say this before, the margins we're operating in now. We're much more in the quest for margin dollars than margin percentages.

The next question comes from Brian Brophy with Stifel.

Great quarter. Just following up your answer to Brent's question, it sounds like you're leaning more into fab only capacity here relative to what you've talked about in the past. So I guess I'm just curious as to what changed. Is this a reflection of the demand environment, something else? And how you're thinking about managing risk given the incremental fixed costs.

The incremental -- so for us, think about fixed cost, we lease the facilities. We have the capital in it. And these are long-term, I would say, geographically advantaged locations we're going to. So if there is a fixed cost turnabout, we will get out of less productive facilities long term and go to these.

Secondarily, nothing's really changed in how we think about it. It's just -- we have 1 or 2 customers who like what we've done on the work that we do and see the fabrication that we do. And in places where we don't have installation capability that like us to support them on how they are going to build out longer term.

Like I said, we're not going to be looking to build buildings and put them on trailers with a bunch of other people's equipment and ship them to the job site, that's not what we do. What we do is take the capability we have whether it be on some of the substation packages we do or even things like that and also some of the work we do on piping packages and then serve the market more broadly, which allows us to absorb the fixed cost in the facilities we have. So not a shift on what we do, responding to our customers and being supportive of them.

And I think even if we made some larger investments in that space, CapEx for us is still going to be 1% or less of revenue, still in terms of investment, not significantly...

That is really tied to the revenue growth.

Understood. That's really helpful. And then you touched on some of the SG&A leverage you're seeing curious how much runway is left there? And part of the reason I'm curious is that it's been less of a margin driver for you guys in the past despite some of the really healthy top line growth we've seen over the past, call 5 years. I guess I'm just curious if something has structurally changed there and how you're managing costs on that line.

Not really. We are getting some efficiencies, right? With favorable mix, large projects and because we're shifting more to large project mix, we do absorb more SG&A doing that. Also, nothing structural. -- it'd be probably small into this. But the positive of GMP contracts is you can absorb more through general conditions of your SG&A overhead into those contracts, then you may get right on a fixed price contract. Nothing very much structurally. I just think it's the mix of large project work, coupled with us because as large projects, you don't have to hire 5 project managers, you can have 2 virtually you're doing the smaller work, you still need more people to do that. .

And then the other factor is just field incentive compensation is variable. A lot of that runs through SG&A. And so in the last few years where we've had a pretty sizable expansion of gross profit margins, you're going to have greater field incentive comp, which will drive SG&A margins up as well. This year where that incremental gross profit margin hasn't been as large going to see the benefit in SG&A because the field compensation doesn't increase to the same extent.

The next question comes from Ari Jaroslawicz with UBS. .

Just on the high-tech manufacturing vertical, still seeing that not really accelerating yet but it does look like it's nearing an inflection point. Just wondering how you're thinking about growth within that specific market sector.

We remain pretty excited about growth in that market sector. The first phase usually comes in a lump and then thereafter it gets awarded in smaller packages. But clearly, there's a couple of sites that we're pretty excited about, we are participating in. One of those companies is expanding to another geography that wants to be part of it. And we'll balance that specific market sector against other market opportunities in that market, specifically data centers at times and whether there's a big data center build, we'll balance between the 2 of them over a 2-year period. We have the capability. We're good at it. But it's not always the best use of our resources in a given 1- or 2-year period.

And I also think you can see it starting to flip in our favor now. If you look combined construction year-to-date, that sector is down $162 million, but in the quarter, the decrease was only $6 million. So I think this is the first quarter in a while where we actually saw the semiconductor revenues increase. It's just being offset by a bit of a decline in some of the EV work that we do. So for the second quarter, relatively flat, if you will, in high tech, we're starting to see semis come back.

The bottom line, it's another job in other sector, and we balance it against everything else.

Okay. That makes sense. And I guess touching your continuing on that thread and similar to what you mentioned before. I know not every operating unit that you guys have is working on data centers. So just if we were to see a broader reacceleration in non-res spending. How should we think about how that could impact your business? How much of the business has kind of more room to grow with better end markets?

I mean we've grown -- if you go look at RPOs and you look at the growth in those RPOs outside of data centers, it's pretty stunning, right? Health care RPO is up 31% year-over-year, water and wastewater up 38% year-over-year. institutional RPO is up 25% year-over-year. Manufacturing industrial RPO is up 10% year-over-year. Really, the only -- and I think commercial is down 1%, 2%.

We've had pretty good success with RPOs. And that is the precursor for growth in subsequent periods. I will serve those markets, especially in the nondata center markets. But a lot of times, when you look at -- especially at the health care, specifically and manufacturing and industrial, we're balanced in that in a lot of cases in some markets against data centers. And so I don't want to -- and we haven't really seen a deceleration for the most part in those markets that we serve. So what would benefit from it, I think if you're going to see nonres grow more broadly, based on what we've seen in our business, that will likely come in traditional commercial that will be more so in warehousing and then just more commercial outer market with building restacks, energy efficiency and things like that.

And the next question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair.

I know you highlighted some regions where you're doing a lot of work that has nothing to do with data centers. But I'm curious, with all the political rhetoric around data center moratoriums and other regulations around data center construction. I'm curious if you've seen any change in project schedules or pushouts to the pipelines in the regions where you are very large and dense in data center work.

No. But I think -- so no, because I think most of that's going to get built in the next 2 or 3 years aren't subject to that rhetoric. That rhetoric, they're permitting things and trying to develop things for 18 to 24 or 36 months out. But also, I think a lot of that rhetoric wasn't grounded in fact. And as facts become more aware and people -- the people wanting to build in permanent things become more engaged in the local communities and start talking about the benefits. I think rhetoric will die down, and there'll be -- I think there'll be a lot of rhetoric to die down magically between November 3 and November 30 post-election. I think it's just...

Got it. Okay. That's very clear for walking me through that. And then on the data center, sticking with that, you said -- I thought I heard you say in the prepared remarks, I want to make sure I heard that right, that the majority of work you're doing today is still on cloud-based data centers presumably contrasted with the large liquid cooled AI data centers. I just want to make sure I heard you correctly. And if so as you -- I did, okay. So as you look into the backlog what do you think that mix will look like a year or 2 from now? I still don't have a good sense for that.

It's hard for us to do because as they get bigger, I think the distinction starts to go away a little bit. We definitely know when we're building an AI training model data center. We know that. I mean we know what's going on there. We know what is connected to. When you get to the mixed-use ones, we're less clear. I think 2 things will be true. Even the cloud storage is getting bigger and more resource intensive and it's pretty clear when it's an AI training module one. The question is the sort of the ones that cope between both of them. But I think, look, because they're so much larger and the contracts are bigger, I would say today, we're probably 65% to 70% cloud and 30% AI, that will probably get to more 50-50 in the future. And where you really see that as mechanical. That's where we know the difference and see the difference.

Yes. The AI is definitely driving a bigger piece of the growth right now in the technical, hence, the 130% year-over-year increase in data center revenues or mechanical, but still on balance. More of our revenues are coming from the cloud. .

Yes. And that's even shifted more in electrical, I agree that comes from cloud.

One follow-up on as right -- you've noted the political discussion and all this stuff has been around AI data center is very targeted, right? And I'm not sure people really understand all the things we just talked about.

Yes. That's why I was asking, Tony, because I see the proposed moratoriums by some of these candidates are like for the large data centers, not the cloud-based one. So I was curious about that as well, but it sounds like broadly you expect a lot of those to die down after November 4.

Well, especially one of them, they can do all the moratoriums they want, but they're 1 over 100 what they. .

And the next question comes from Manish Somaiya with Cantor.

Hello, Tony, Jason and Lucas. Congrats on a strong quarter. I wanted to ask on the margins that are embedded in new awards, obviously, we see mechanical. And I think, Jason, you kind of went through the math that, that should improve with the current contract structure shifting. But more specifically, I wanted to know about the electrical if that 13% is sustainable and how we should sort of think about that going forward?

So to be very clear, we didn't say that we thought mechanical margins would very much from where they are today in the future because comps get easier. The comps get easier in a margins stay somewhere in this band. But the reality is the best way to start to see our margins is what we've always said look back 4 to 8 quarters and you get a pretty good view of what's happening in the market.

And so for electrical, that's somewhere between 12% and 13%, maybe skewing up to 12.5% to 13%. And for mechanical, that's $12 million to $12.5 million.

Any contractor that tells you with conviction that they know that this is a baseline for their margins going forward and they only improve from there must be running 1 project. It must be a 1 project or 2 project contractor. Because with 12,000 projects, we couldn't possibly do that. So over a long period of time, we've been very clear with all of our analytical community and our buy side.

Margins move in bands. We are in a very good band structurally. We continue to execute very well. We don't -- we are very much now focused on margin dollars. Could we expand from yes, we could get more SG&A leverage a little bit. Could we have a couple of quarters where we have close offs that are more favorable, sure, we could. We can also have quarters where we're starting up more difficult work, and they seem a little more depressed because we have a release contingency. So I think any responsible contractor talks about margins and bands and talks about growth the same way. And I think that's why we have so much credibility over a very long period of time when we address this subject.

That's helpful. And then, Tony, obviously, you gave really good color on the end markets and the diversity of growth coming from those markets. As we think about backlog and RPOs, I mean it sounds to me like it may not be the best indicator of all the work that you have ahead of you because obviously, orders tend to be lumpy, et cetera. So what are some of the other measures we should look at in understanding the true potential of import or any other company for that matter?

Yes. I think you always have to be careful, right? -- we've always been very rigorous in how we talk about forward-looking, right? We've always done RPOs. When it all converted about 7, 8 years ago, it was a very easy walk over to us from backlog RPOs. We don't make up backlog and say it's only contracted work. It's only the noncanceled portion of service agreements. It's only approved change orders. We don't say, well, we know we've done with this customer, this oil and gas customer. We know that we've done this work forever and the turnaround is projected at that. We also know it's all T&M work and that scope can change. We don't say, Hey, we're on 1 site, they promise us buildings 2 and 3. It has the same scope. So therefore, we're going to give you an RPO number, which is accounting based.

But here's what our real backlog of future opportunity looks like. I think backlog is a pretty good indicator of future awards. But it doesn't capture. And I think you correctly pointed out is what's the potential for us to grow on some of these sites? And I'm always just in been careful, right? We have very little work that's canceled. We actually have very little work that were promised that gets delayed. But I think we sort of had this construct for a while of how we communicate, and it's worked very well for us. because it's all in the known. And I think we'll keep it that way. I think when you think about future demand, the way I think about it is if these end markets continue to grow like they have, we expect to grow in excess of those end markets.

We are the largest specialty subcontractor doing data center work. Could it approach 50% of our construction revenue, sure, it could, for a period of time. That's not by design, that's not owning people up. That's literally mix managing over probably 17 or 20 different discrete and geographic markets. And looking for the best opportunities while continuing to serve our core customers that we've had for a long time.

So I think if you believe in the data center growth and you look at nonres, I think a great construct is what we've said before to the market. If nonres grows x, we're going to grow probably most times 600 basis points above that as a company overall and our construction business could be somewhere between 700 and 900 basis points above that. And that's, I think, the best contract to think about it because that captures everything.

And that's pretty healthy growth. And I think probably the last couple of years, we would even skew a little higher above the non-res growth that we're giving you a 5-year look at the world, not just you look at the world.

Okay. Super helpful, Tony. And then just lastly, obviously, you've had a number of acquisitions this year which will entail some purchase accounting, backlog amortization, et cetera, in '27. But I guess what I wanted to gather was, how should we think about EBITDA accretion becoming EPS accretion when it comes to these acquisitions. I mean what's the time frame? And I guess, what are the indicators, et cetera, that we should think about?

I guess the best thing to think about for the newly acquired businesses, particularly Schmidt and Connolly, is that the backlog that we acquired, that amortization period is roughly 16 to 17 months. So that's with us really through the end of '27. And so I think probably what's helpful for everyone on the call, just to give you a sense of what we expect for amortization, both in Q4 and then into '27. So you can obviously see what our amortization is year-to-date in our 10-Q. But if you look at Q4, our expectation is $35.3 million of amortization, it's about $20.1 million in electrical, $7.7 million in mechanical, $4.4 million in building and $3 million in industrial. And then in 2027, our estimate is about $128 million. It's about $76 million in Electrical, $25 million in mechanical $17 million in building and $10 million in industrial. And I think if you look at those numbers relative to the year-to-date plus the estimate I just gave you for fourth quarter, you'll be able to see what the impact in '27 is from the incremental amortization. That's just from acquisitions that we .

That's the one that we've announced and we have today, yes.

And I think Manish, you're right to think about EBITDA also. I mean, I think my perfect role, that would be a GAAP number. because there's no crop usually in that, but EBITDA and then we do GAAP earnings, we figure you're smart enough to figure out the benefit. Of course, everything always comes out in cash. And I think across the sector for a very long period of time, we've been the leading cash generator as a percentage of net income or over percentage of net income. And I think that's where the rubber really hits the road, right? .

The next question comes from Sangita Jain with KeyBanc Capital Markets. .

I just have one. And I know this was related to earlier on semi-fab. It looks like a lot of activity is upcoming in the in the quarters ahead. And I just want to see how you guys see allocating resources to that end market versus you did in the first cycle of the build-out because you're in a very different place now with all the data center-led demand.

We will participate. Where we will have -- we have real capability is broadly, we have real capability with Firelife safety. We will participate broadly with fire life safety. Electrical, really across it a little less so maybe a little bit in 1 of the states of Arizona, but outside and maybe Oregon a little bit. But outside of that, [indiscernible] . mechanically, Arizona, potentially upstate New York and potentially with one of the customers moving into Texas, we'll participate there. These are all right, your win or you don't. And we're positioned to continue winning well on a couple of these sites. And then we're putting together good estimates and good potential to maybe participate in the others or get us carve out of scope of the work we want to do. We'll sure know this time next year, we'll know how successful or whether we diverted resources in other places based on pricing. .

And the next question comes from Adam Bubes with Goldman Sachs.

I know we're only at Q3 here, but with backlog up [ 7% ]year-over-year. Can you just talk about visibility you have on growth in 2027, how you're thinking about range of outcomes? And what's your current assessment of your ability to grow head count over the next 12 months to meet the demand that's in your backlog? .

So I'll start there. we wouldn't have taken the job if we didn't think we could put the resources from fill supervision through craft labor on those jobs. We put a manpower plan together with our -- whenever we even estimate work to figure out how it will slide in with what we have available and what we're going to be able to recruit.

As far as '27, I mean, look, I think you go back to the long-term trends that Jason talked about, and I talked about today about our ability to outgrow nonres. I think that's the best we'll give you we've been pretty rigorous about not providing forward-looking guidance on the year ahead. You guys are pretty smart to figure it out.

And then I wanted to talk about your Virginia exposure. I think it's your top market. We we've seen some slowdown in announcements in that market in Loudon County recently enacted a pause in data centers. How are you thinking about the trajectory of incremental awards in Virginia? And just more broadly, how you think through your regional mix evolving over the next year or 2?

Look, we're bullish on Virginia, Loudon county, 1 county, and I fully expect by the middle of next year. We'll be continuing to see new awards in Loudon County. I think the reality of Loudon County was it's booked for the next 2 or 3 years anyway. And so I think it was probably a pause to say, "Okay, where else are we going to build in the county. They probably were waiting for some power to be provided anyway. Virginia will remain a great market for us. Texas will remain a great market for us. Ohio will remain a great market for us. Iowa remain a great market for us. I'm just -- Georgia will remain a great market for us. Oklahoma. I'm only providing a few. We're in many, many more markets than that.

But I'm just hitting some of the hot buttons where people have talked about this openly. Pennsylvania will be involved also. I think some of it actually made a lot of sense in the way I've talked about it to the team. And I think collectively, if you put our top 100 data center people in a room, they would agree. Some of it actually will elongate the cycle. And that will be a good thing. And some of it was -- I think some of the thought behind some of the executive orders have made a lot of sense. I think there was a fair amount of phantom demand in Texas. And it wasn't fandom demand with us because of who we serve. But there are other things that people want that gets involved with, it would be like that's not going to be real anytime soon or you really don't have a plan there. You're just trying to sort of put a stake in the ground. So I think some of it has been thoughtful. And of course, the whole thing has been full of misinformation. I venture to say this. I think if you put -- so the tax benefits that's happening as a result of these data centers and put 100 school superintendents in a market with the local people. I think when they understood what's available to them and how it can really allow them to build the schools, pay the teachers the comps and the firefighters and build out world-class facilities like they've done in Loudon County and like they've done in Louisiana, like they've done in other markets we serve.

I think you'll find that these things will get built. They won't get built everywhere. But I think we'll build the capacity in being EMCOR. We're well positioned anywhere that matters that they're going to build them.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tony Guzzi for any closing remarks.

Thank you all very much. Thanks for your interest. Thanks for the preparation. I guess we won't talk again until we see some of you when we're about talking to your buy-side people. In general, I don't see you, have a great holiday season, and hope we'll stay healthy, and we'll talk to you again in February collectively. Thanks, Bob. .

The conference has concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

All right. Good morning, everybody. My name is Stefan Diaz, machinery and construction analyst here at Morgan Stanley. We're really excited today to have EMCOR Group here. Tony Guzzi, Chairman, President and CEO; and Jason Nalbandian, SVP and CFO. But before we begin, I just have a quick disclosure to read. For important disclosures, please see Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative.

So great. Tony, maybe for the investors listening on the phone, the investors in the room who aren't quite familiar with EMCOR and what you all do, if you could just please give them a quick rundown of the company.

Sure. I mean when you think of EMCOR, we actually do the work. So we are a specialty trade contractor. We primarily put in mechanical and electrical systems and then we fix them and help maintain them. We do that across a variety of sectors. We are pretty well diversified from health care to the institutional sector, commercial, water and wastewater, transportation, of course, why 90% of the room is here today. We also are probably -- you never know that private companies doing this. We are probably the largest specialty trade contractor mechanically and electrically serving the data center market. And we do that in just about every major data center market there is. And we can get into specifics in the Q&A.

So when you think of us, we are a company of plumbers, pipe fitters, electricians, welders, HVAC technicians, sprinkler fitters and the people to fix that. When you go to our electrical business, we are primarily a medium voltage, we would say, inside the fence, inside the building electrician. That doesn't mean we don't connect to the substation and bring the wire in, but we're typically working inside the space. We also have a pretty significant low-voltage business. So that would be structured cabling and all the low voltage that supports an operation like this.

On the mechanical side, we do heavy piping, anything from a small pipe, which would be a plumber's job. Plumbing doesn't mean just bathrooms, plumbing means medical gas, all those things, high-purity piping to very large diameter pipe could be up to 64 inches. We also have a sheet metal business, right? Plumbing and pipe moves water and fluid, sheet metal moves air, right? The enclosures that move air.

On the aftermarket side, we serve -- have a fairly significant mechanical service business, which is 2/3 or more of our Building Services segment and the balance being, for lack of a better word, operating engineers, people that are either going to be [ ROV ] technicians servicing a branch network or in the building. And then we have oil and gas business is EMCOR Industrial Services, which does more than just oil and gas, but it primarily was a downstream refining business with a little bit of upstream with a very flexible workforce. We serve LNG and other things. Really good welders, really know how to work in mission-critical facilities.

Put all that together, you get to EMCOR, which when I think about it and how we've built the company, I guess, the popular world of the investment community, we would be your classic serial compounder. We invest for the long-term. And the other thing I think that is a little different than us, we have a very strong culture. We are a company led by a set of values. We train our leaders. And our core product, we do mechanical and electrical construction. We do it very well in service. But our core product is actually great field leadership. And that is what distinguishes us versus other companies.

Jason, you have anything to add to that?

I think that was a great opening summary, Tony.

Perfect. Thanks, Tony. And maybe just to start, if you could talk a little bit about data centers. I'm sure it hasn't been talked about enough here.

I figure I get when they do about 9 hours of meetings, what do you think about 6 hours and 20 seconds data centers today.

So your networking and communications revenue was up 45% in electrical last quarter and more than doubled in mechanical last quarter. Maybe if you could just give the audience some background, how has the work changed with the size progression of like 20-megawatt builds. Now we're going to hundreds of megawatt builds and multi-building campuses. And if you could talk a little bit about the content increase as these data centers get bigger.

Yes. So the multi-building campus is -- it's almost 3 to 5 years now. And that also happens -- and you can have cloud data centers in that multi-building campus and they may put an AI data center. And like let's be honest, as contractors, do we really know? We just know we're putting in something bigger. We know how to put the equipment in. We are not IT experts, right? We know to install stuff and fix it. The predominance of our business still is cloud infrastructure. That in itself was a great business. It was growing 9% a year. That those things are somewhere between 20 and 50, 75 megawatts. It's probably where we've gotten really good at doing fixed price work. But there definitely is a shift to more to AI and put a number on that. Is it growing 30% a year, Jason? Is it growing 40% in the market? Does anybody really know?

And so we are definitely participating in the expansion of the size of those data centers. And we're also -- our ongoing cloud business is a great business for us. We serve lots of markets. And so we used to come in and say, wow, we're serving 7 markets now mechanically and 16 electrically. I don't know how to do that anymore because there used to be 1 campus or 2 campuses in the state. And now that might be 5 or 6 campuses in the state. So that's irrelevant now.

I'd venture to say we're probably servicing in some way, fire protection, we're servicing everywhere in the country. Electrically, we're probably servicing 50% of the markets that matter, 60% mechanically, somewhere around 40%, 50%, a little less. The scope has definitely gone up. You know when you're doing a 200-megawatt data center and I always try to ground people on what 200 megawatts really means. The city of Pittsburgh runs on 300 megawatts. So this is the scope of one data center may use. We know we're doing more mechanical scope, probably 1.5 to 2x if that was just a cloud data center. It's the heat, right? The heat it needs to be cold. And electrically, that might be 1.25x to 1.5x. Jason, maybe...

I think the other thing I would add is the pace and timing of these projects, right? If you look at how fast these projects are moving today versus what they would just 3 years ago, I think that's another factor in terms of what's changed for us.

And it definitely informs our investment. So it's always important to remember who we are. We're contractors. And so by nature, we're opportunists, right? But we're strategic opportunist. So in a market, we're going to make sure we take care of our core customers. But we're also going to go to where the best margin opportunity is for us to deploy our labor over that 1- to 3-year period. That's sort of for a good contractor, your long-term investments are building your workforce, your training, building your leadership team, investing in the right software, investing in the right prefab or at least knowing how to expand that because you got to be ready for the moment. So we are -- we got to be where we are in these fast-growing markets. We just didn't fall in it. We had to be ready for the moment. And we were ready for the moment because we invested in all those things that I talked about over a long period of time.

Now the way you attack the market like data centers is a couple of different ways. One is you have people that were always great at it. They built some of the first data centers in the country, the EMCOR team did. We built the AOL data center in Virginia in 2000, '99 and 2000. We did the first Equinix jobs down there. And then we did the first big financial data centers. And that team is really what allowed us to expand into the number of markets we are today, and that happens 2 ways. It happens through -- you have great electrical and mechanical companies that you already own that do really health care and high-end institutional lab work, manufacturing work, and they can be trained to do data center work and their teammates do that with them. You do that through acquisition where someone might be just doing the day 2 work and because of our scale, training and capability, we can make them a major data center player. Some we acquired at a very reasonable cost many years ago, 8, 10 years ago, but we knew that was starting in that market.

And then it informs your capital allocation even today. So we announced 5 electrical deals and $600 million in revenue trailing $100 million, give or take, of EBITDA, the 2 biggest being Schmidt and Connelly. Schmidt in Central Texas, Connelly outside Chicago and there we already have a good presence in Chicago. And just for the record, both of those are now closed. We closed them...

In October.

Early August. And what will happen there? Well, they already have a great customer base. They did a little bit of data center work, but the market is there outside Chicago to do more, and they can team with where we have a great company there, Gibson and Lyons & Pinner, and those 3 companies will team together to do some other work. In the case of Central Texas, one of the companies we've expanded in the data center market was our Morley-Moss company. We bought it back in 2018. It's now 10x the size it was. Great data center builders that team. They will now bring Schmidt, who is a very sophisticated contractor and executes well in the field. They will now -- their growth will mainly come from more exposure to the data center market.

And Jason -- and so you think about markets, people thought about Texas, right? There's magic, but we think Texas is magic, too. That's why we do outside of the oil and gas business, over $1 billion of revenue in Texas without Schmidt. And that's -- and so we've spent a lot of time through capital allocation preparing ourselves for the moment. And that's not just data centers. That's high-tech manufacturing, it's health care, it's significant institutional work. And then we have the aftermarket business that we will do single-line service trade in any of those sophisticated business. Long-winded answer. Jason, you got anything to add?

I think I'm good.

No, I think, Tony, that's really helpful. And I think that's a pretty good segue. You mentioned your contractors. You go for the jobs that offer the highest returns. Let's say, in a hypothetical situation, if data centers were to slow for a few quarters, do you have the ability to move the workforce around into areas like semis, health care, more institutional work? And are you turning down jobs in other sectors to be able to service this data center end market?

The answer to the last question is, of course. I mean nobody can do everything in a market. I mean you can't. And so the critical bottleneck for us to grow, I'll come at it that way is actually supervision. We'll find the trades people, and we'll find the right ones because they'll want to work for us. But we have to train that foreman, that superintendent, that project manager to be able to expand. By nature, EMCOR is diverse. Maybe Jason talk a little bit about our diversity of demand, and that will get to the question. But you also have to be able to reposition your work, and that also means you have to cut it.

And so we, as a big part of EMCOR is -- and maybe it's -- we try to keep our cost structure as variable as it can be. That's the other thing good contractors do. We lease our prefabrication facilities. When we build them, we count on a 3-year or less payback. We're doing it with an eye towards that market that we're in today, clear eyed about what it is. But maybe go through some of the diversity of demand and how things would actually shift.

Yes. So I think to some extent, right, the work is the work, and we have a track record of being able to pivot from one sector to another, whether it was when we moved from warehousing and distribution coming out of COVID to the semiconductor space and then into the data center space. So we could do that in reverse as well. And the other thing is all the investments we've made in prefabrication and some of the construction tools we have, none of them are tied to a single market sector. So you can take those same fabrication shops today that are maybe serving data center customers and use them to serve a different sector.

But to Tony's point on diversity, if you just look at EMCOR, let's just take the first half of '26, we've grown organically about 18.3%. But if you strip out high-tech manufacturing, which is semiconductors, biotech and you strip out networking and communications, which is data centers, we're still growing organically around 9%. So there's strength in other markets, and those are things like institutional, which is heavily weighted towards some of the colleges and universities we're working for, manufacturing and industrial, which includes both the reshoring or near-shoring work we're doing as well as some of the food processing work we're doing.

And then we're starting to see a resumption in demand for warehousing and distribution. And for us, that's in commercial. But it also goes beyond that. If you look at the first half of this year, we saw some sizable growth in our Building Services business, which isn't tied to the data center market. And that's up about 5% organically. And then our oil and gas, our industrial services business is up 15% organically. So I think that just speaks to our diversity and how we are able to serve all of these markets.

And if you think about data centers, I mean, a lot of press out there, and I'm not a political prognosticator. I have my own opinions, which I don't necessarily need to share with you today. It's irrelevant as the CEO of EMCOR. You have to understand where we are in the -- where we are in a job cycle. So before we get engaged, someone usually has -- almost always has the power, the site. We're not talking -- usually in the EMCOR world, they may talk to us about something 5 years down the road, but we're not listening really. For us, there has to be a job. There has to be how they're going to prosecute or execute that site, what our role is going to be in it. And my view, and I think our constructive view is for the next 3 years, they pretty much know what they're going to build.

And that won't be affected unless we really go draconian, which I don't see happening by moratoriums or anything else. And I don't think the political thing is what's going to drive this, by the way. It might be an antecedent of it. All the power we said we need to put in, in these places that were sold off for gas turbines through 2031. I know everybody in the room probably knows that because you track things like that in the 3 or 4 major producers. And we're talking large combined cycle things. That's what's going to power this long term or eventually nuclear. That's what power is a baseload system. That will be the obstacle if we don't do that by 2030.

It won't be all this other stuff. Because when we talk to our customers, and we're talking both to the people that will actually occupy the colos or people that are building themselves, they're doing both. They can't keep up with their product developers. And for the most part, our customers aren't people like Anthropic and OpenAI. Our customers are who you would think they would be. And they can't -- for people like us in this room, they can't keep up with bandwidth you all want and what we need to run our business, we think, long-term. So -- and the cloud business is a pretty good business in its own right. And of course, my personal view is I always ask people and I pull out my phone, what are you willing to give up? And once we answer that question, we can have these other talks.

So the power question is the real question. And when you get to there behind the meter and in front of the meter, I don't think it matters because most of the behind-the-meter solutions will be dispatchable power eventually. The behind the meter means we're funding that solution. So you don't want a data center in your neighborhood. You certainly don't want a combined cycle power plant or the modular nuke, okay, we don't want the data center, but we're going to put a modular nuke at the end of the cul-de-sac, really. So I think the power will happen. It almost has to happen. But there will be people that win and lose in this. And I think the good news about who we are is we are very well positioned for where it's going to matter and that's intentional. That's not an accident.

That's really helpful, Tony. I do want to let the audience know, if you do have a question, feel free to raise your hand. We'll get a mic over to you and you could ask. But maybe just moving along here, outside of data centers, we've seen some recent announcements on the semi side, your high-tech manufacturing business. Where do you think we are in the semiconductor and the pharma build cycle? And where do you see demand progressing in high-tech manufacturing as we go into '27?

I'm going to hit it here. And Jason as we've done some interesting analysis that -- first of all, semiconductor work, there's about 6 geographic markets that matter. We're in 4 of them, and we're in all of them fire protection, sprinkler, life.

It's lumpy work. And the initial fab they build on a site comes in, in a big number as far as you get a contract. And then quite frankly, once you've been there, sometimes it comes in, in smaller numbers. And you necessarily don't see in backlog, which you may see in revenue eventually. Where do I think we are -- and look, we can participate. We -- in 3 of those places, maybe 3.5, we're very good mechanically, electrically, a couple of them and fire and sprinkler work everywhere. It's also very difficult work.

It doesn't mean you can't make good margins on that. It doesn't mean it is very difficult work. For the most part, pretty difficult customers. They're all difficult. The data center people are difficult too. But they're good customers because they value what we do. But sometimes we're making a trade-off. In one state, we made a trade-off because of bigger data center build happening. We're really good at it. We're going to sit out the next round of the fab and probably come back for the third one as we continue to build up our labor force.

Pharma is a little different. I think a chunk of what we're doing today is tied to GLP-1s. And there, you have to be positioned in the right place. And we are. We're in New Jersey. We're in North Carolina, we're in Indiana. Here -- we're here in Southern California, where they're doing sort of more of the bio research. So we're where we need to be. There, we're both mechanical and electrical, I'd say, probably general. Like New Jersey, we have more of an electrical presence to do that work in mechanical. North California, we have sort of both. Southern California here, probably more electrical. But all of them are really good markets for us. But again, go back to what my statement was earlier, we're contractors. We're going to look at that market. We're not going to exclude ourselves from something that matters. But over that 2-year period, we're going to try to get the mix right to maximize margin and our return to you. Jason?

Yes. I think to Tony's point, right, some of the growth we've seen recently in data centers did come at the expense of semiconductors. But if you just step back and you say the high-tech business, which is roughly 40% semi, 40% biotech and 20% some EV battery work that we're doing. If you just look at that sector overall and you say today versus 3 years ago, we're still operating at a base that's almost 1.5x what it was in 2023. And if you kind of did a 3-year CAGR from '23 to today, you'd see that we're growing there at almost 11%. So there's still a lot of opportunity. I still think to Tony's point, we're well positioned.

And we -- if you've done -- if you snap the line in '24, it's shown we were growing 30%, right, because we had a big job, right? And we like it. We've been working in Arizona in semiconductors. I've been here 23 years, so 1998, '97 something like that.

So that's the thing about our capabilities. We have deep capabilities in some of these markets and where we didn't, we acquired the right companies and we're able to take our folks, they were good teammates and they brought people along. We share knowledge probably better than any company in the industry. And we share resources. I mean what we can do on the VDC side to share resources across our company, we have 1,500, 1,600 BIM VDC people. Scale matters. And the type of work you're talking about, whether it be data centers or semiconductors or pharmaceutical or health care, especially, the virtual design construct VDC that then takes it through to prefab. That's a real skill. And that then informs our capital spending and what we do there.

Tony, I think that's a really good transition. You just mentioned VDC, prefab. I think on the last earnings call, you mentioned that a good portion of your CapEx is going towards prefab. Maybe what's the right way to think about your prefab capacity expansion? And then how should we think about CapEx as we go into '27, '28? Does this investment step down or...

I don't think it steps down because we're growing. The absolute dollars don't step down. About 20%, 25% of that CapEx is just maintenance CapEx. It's leases, it's building upgrades on office space, it's specialized vehicles that we can't lease. It's things like that. The rest the growth in that CapEx as we build out our modular and prefab capability, which we had and we just continue to grow it. Maybe go through the math on that, Jason.

Yes. I think if you look at -- I don't know, let's take a 5-year look, if you look, let's say, our revenue CAGR is about 14%, 15% over a 5-year period. Our CapEx CAGR is nearly twice that. It's about 28% to 30%. That delta is those investments that we're making in our shops. And I think it takes 2 forms. Sometimes it's the addition of new fabrication space, the expansion of existing shops. But the other element of it is us reinvesting in existing shops to make them more productive. How do we add more automation? How do we change that equipment to make sure that the layout is best so that we're getting the most productivity and the most efficiency. So I think we're not capital intensive. Our CapEx is like 0.6% to 0.65% of revenues. And I think that holds into '27 and '28. But the way I would think about it is any CapEx growth in excess of revenue growth are those investments into the future.

The rest is just maintenance capital.

Right.

Maybe if we could just take a moment to talk about our RPOs. They've been growing meaningfully faster than your revenue guidance. Maybe how should investors think about conversion versus history? And do you think revenue growth should begin to catch up the RPO growth in the next few years?

I think a big piece of the delta is just how much book work we've booked in the last 2 quarters. We had significant bookings in Q1 and Q2. And I think we're carrying today more revenue in RPO than we did historically. So we used to start a year and we used to say we need to go book and earn 60% of that year's revenue in that year. That number has steadily come down as project sizes have went up and our pipelines have kind of expanded. And so in recent years, it's come down to about 40% to 45%. And I think that's what's driving the disconnect between RPO growth and revenue growth.

The other thing I think it's always important when you think about us. Those numbers over time are all apples-to-apples to. Everything is consistent because our RPO definition is the accounting definition. We're not making guesses in RPOs. We have a contract that's executed. It's executed at a firm price or it's a change order that's been approved. We're not making guesses in those RPOs about what might happen. So we might be on a data center site, and we know we're building one, and they're going to build 5 buildings, and we're probably going to do 1, 3 and 5.

Maybe other people in this space would say, we're putting all that in there and guessing at it. We don't do that because one, you don't know. You still have to perform, right? It's sort of like working with you all, right? We build one building, we had to do it great. It's like you earn the right to go do the next one. And what I can say is we have a pretty good track record of doing that. A lot of people lead that way because we finished work for other people, no one's ever finished our work, especially in the data center space. And so we're on the conservative side with RPOs maybe versus other folks in our space.

Backlog.

Backlog -- but when people say backlog, there's people that will put in -- they're guessing what their T&M work is going to be in a year. They're guessing what the next couple of jobs on site. We don't do that. It is an accounting definition. Like we have a 3- or 5-year service agreement. It's the noncancelable portion of the service agreement, which is usually 90 to 120 days. So this all came out when, Jason, about 8 years ago.

17, 18 somewhere in there.

And we were so close to it anyway. We just went with the accounting definition. And that's true with our numbers, too, right? We report GAAP numbers. We figured you're all smart enough to add back the amortization and see what that number is.

Maybe we could spend a minute or 2 here on margins. So last quarter, you posted healthy operating margins. Close to 11%. But I think on the call, you noted that these levels aren't necessarily run rate going forward. Maybe you could just explain to the audience why margins move around maybe quarter-to-quarter? And what's the right band for investors to think about?

So for a long time, I've had one statement always. And I'm going to say it now, it's like you -- with that statement at the beginning.

Safe harbor.

This is our safe harbor statement. This is not a quarterly business. We also don't get to say we're not a manufacturer. We don't get to say we made 10.6% margins. Now we have all these standard costs in, and we know what they are and that widget is always going to be or that air conditioning is always going to be that for the next 3 quarters because we know what our costs are. Here's what we know is our operations for very -- our margins for a very long time and our RPOs for a very long time can bounce around quarter-to-quarter. And then they do settle into bands because that's the composition of the market right now, maybe...

Yes. I think Tony's point is very valid, right? It's a project-based business. So just mix or project timing, even execution can have an impact in a given quarter. But for us, we think if you want to look at a sustainable margin guidance for us and say, in the near-term, where do we think margins can settle, we really do believe a rolling 12- to 24-month average is pretty indicative of what our business can do. And so if you start at the consolidated level, it gets you right around where our margin guidance is today, 9.5% to 9.8%. That's operating margin. If you look at each of the segments, our Electrical business would be somewhere between 12% and 13%. Our mechanical business today would be somewhere between 12% and 12.5%. Our Building Services business would be 6% to 6.5% and Industrial would be right around the 3% margin.

And it has a pretty heavy amortization load part of what's going on there.

If we could just talk a little bit about contracts. Recently, we've seen maybe a little bit of a shift to guaranteed maximum price, more cost-plus contracts as opposed to fixed price. Why are we seeing this shift to these type of agreements? And do you think this is maybe more structural given these jobs might be more complex given the AI data center build-out?

Yes. So we're still predominantly a fixed price contractor and always will be. You get into a guaranteed maximum price area, sometimes in health care. And sometimes complex manufacturing jobs will take you there.

And the more complex data centers we take. We have one client that that's how they build. Now they're very rational and reasonable what they allow us to put in the cost. So their margins tend to be a little better and tend to look like a fixed price job from a margin standpoint sometimes. But what leads us and them there, right? You take risk and return. And we try not, quite frankly, to operate in a high-risk, high-return box. It's a dangerous box to be in when you're deploying highly skilled labor. And so what puts you in that box, you haven't built one before. You haven't built one in that location before. You haven't built one for that customer before. You haven't built one with that engineering team before.

Now it doesn't have to check all those boxes to put you in, right? That changes, one could be weighted more than the other. But 4 or 5 of those things together, if you're hitting 2 or 3 of them, you sit there and go, maybe we want to be in a GMP environment, and we got to convince the customer. What's happening today because, again, these are really smart customers. There's no surprises. We're putting each other into the decent return, good outcome box together. And what don't they want to do? One, they don't want us not to work for them, right? They want us to be on the team because we're good. And we want to be on the team because they're good.

And so on these more complex designs, these larger AI designs, it wouldn't be in either one of our interests probably to work in fixed price and especially in the mechanical world because they're figuring out how they're going to do this the most efficient way possible and what the cooling system needs to be and the piping system needs to be to do that. That may change mid-job or they want to share information openly with each other so they can get an idea as they are building the next design, what things really cost versus we just gave them a fixed price for the whole job. And in those guaranteed max price jobs also typically have a reasonable change order mechanism, and that allows the job to keep flowing because you don't want to get into -- we don't want to price an acceleration change order, and that change order could come either a little change in design or they may want it done faster.

And they don't really want to catch us, right? They want to have an open book about what that's actually costing. And for a lot of the jobs, they've been very fair on what cost looks like. Sometimes they'll help pay part of our fabrication costs to expand our facility if it's on site. General conditions tend to be fairly generous because they want to attract the workers. And part of what you're doing in some of these sites is you're trying to build a workforce. And to build that workforce, you need to know what you got to have to pay them. And some of these sites, they haven't had a project of this scale. So what are you going to need to do to attract labor there to build this over the next couple of years, knowing that you're not going to keep -- hopefully keep your supervision, but most of that labor will cycle in and out of there over time.

That's what takes you to that box. And that's going to be part of our mix, I think, for a while, Jason, because of that, both from our choice and theirs. We don't just get to dictate that. But if we think it's in that higher risk, higher return or even higher risk, moderate return, we will sit down with the customer and try to push it that way. You almost have to, right?

Great. Well, thank you, gentlemen. We're actually -- if we could sneak in one more question.

Yes.

You could just say we're almost out of time. The question is given all the debate in the U.S.

A question on especially the debate of increasing inflation and wages and people in your business are so busy that some of your people and also independent contractors can have jobs and increase salaries by 2, 3, 4x and work all over the place, especially more of the specialized workers.

I don't...

Given your 100 million kind of hours worked and to figure out how, let's say, the salary costs and...

You really can't do that by any mathematical.

The question is more like how you sort of manage the churn because -- and also whether -- because you're price fixed operator, how you sort of manage that because that's probably one of the more important thing to.

So on a fixed-price job, we would never take that unless we knew what our labor cost was going to be on that job on a dollar per hour basis or with that mix of labor between apprentices, helpers and everything to get us to a composite labor, we would never do that. One of the reasons you end up in a GMP world is because you may need -- you sometimes need to structure the package of wages, base wages, overtime and per diem to get the people there.

And to retain people, is that difficult? To retain people because there's a lot of demand of your...

We -- the trade worker themselves, about 40% of our workforce, 50% is actually -- they work for us all the time. and the supervision is usually ours. That's what we focus on. The trade people, a chunk of them will come in and out of the job, right? If it's a 2-year build, they may leave -- they work for 6 months, all that overtime, leave for 4 months, come back for 6 months and then leave again. Actually, the base wages have been very pragmatic of what folks have asked for in the union contract. That's not where they're focused.

The focus is what the package is going to look like on that job. And they want to stay competitive, too. As far as us or wages in the salary side, it really hasn't been a whole lot different. We have terrific retention at our CEO level and our direct reports. Why a great company to work, and we're very fair on how we pay people more people will have the opportunity at the salary level at EMCOR or the superintendent levels in the bonuses.

We're actually out of time, Tony, Jason.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Good morning. My name is Dave, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the EMCOR Group Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I will now turn the call over to Lucas Sullivan, Director, Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Sullivan, you may begin.

Thank you, Dave. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to EMCOR's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you joining us by webcast, we are at the beginning of our slide presentation that will accompany our remarks today. This presentation will be archived in the Investor Relations section of our website at emcorgroup.com.

With me today are Tony Guzzi, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Nalbandian, Senior Vice President and EMCOR's Chief Financial Officer; and Maxine Mauricio, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel.

For today's call, Tony will provide comments on our second quarter and discuss our RPOs. Jason will then review the second quarter numbers, then turn it back to Tony to discuss our guidance before we open it up for Q&A. Before we begin, a quick reminder that this presentation and discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and may contain certain non-GAAP financial information.

Slide 2 of our presentation describes in detail these forward-looking statements and the non-GAAP financial information disclosures. I encourage everyone to review both disclosures in conjunction with our discussion and accompanying slides. And finally, as a reminder, all financial information discussed during this morning's call is included in our consolidated financial statements within both our earnings press release issued this morning and in our Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And with that, let me turn the call over to Tony. Tony?

Yes. Thank you, Lucas, and good morning, and thanks for joining us today. I'm going to start my remarks on Slide 4. EMCOR delivered another outstanding quarter, highlighted by exceptional organic growth, strong conversion of revenue into operating income and cash flow, continued booking strength and record remaining pro forma obligations or RPOs. These results reflect the consistent execution, operational discipline and customer focus that have defined EMCOR success over many years.

Importantly, our strong performance during the first half of 2026, combined with the visibility provided by our record RPOs, supports a substantial increase to our full year 2026 earnings guidance. As we will discuss in more detail later in the call, we also continued to execute our balanced capital allocation strategy, returning significant cash to shareholders, while investing in strategic acquisitions that strengthen our capabilities and deepen our position in attractive end markets to better serve our customers.

So let's go to the second quarter. In the second quarter, revenues were $5.15 billion, an increase of 19.8% over the prior year. Excluding the impact of acquisitions and the divestiture of EMCOR U.K. Organic revenue growth was 19.6%. Operating income reached $547 million, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%, while diluted earnings per share increased by 35% year-over-year to $9.06 in the quarter. These results demonstrate the strength of our business model, the quality of our execution and the sustained demand that we continue to see across many of our core markets.

Electrical Construction generated revenue growth of 24% year-over-year, while delivering an impressive operating margin of 13.9%. Mechanical Construction achieved revenue growth of 31% year-over-year with a strong operating margin of 12.5% about 12.5%. These results reflect our ability to execute complex projects across multiple geographies and trades and expand our scope with existing customers and consistently delivered value to our customers on mission-critical projects.

Growth across our construction businesses continues to be supported by strength in several sectors. In the quarter, the largest revenue increases were generated in network and communications, which is where our data center business is, institutional, manufacturing and industrial and warehousing and distribution within commercial. Our teams are leveraging industry-leading free fabrication capabilities, virtual design and construction technology, which we refer to as VDC many times, disciplined labor management an advanced project laying to execute these projects safely, efficiently and productively for our customers.

Our U.S. Building Services segment also delivered solid performance. Revenues increased 5.6% from the second quarter of 2025, while operating income grew 26.6%. Our Mechanical Services division continues to perform exceptionally well, benefiting from an increased service base as well as customer investments in [ ATAC ] retrofits, control systems upgrades, indoor air quality improvements and energy efficiency initiatives.

In addition, the restructuring actions we implemented last year in our site-based services business are generating meaningful benefits through a leaner cost structure and a more profitable portfolio of contracts. Our Industrial Services segment generated revenue growth of 26% year-over-year, led by strong performance within field services, while also delivering year-over-year improvement in profitability.

Now I'll ask you to turn to Slide 5. One of the most significant indicators of future growth continues to remain our RPO position. At quarter end, total RPOs reached a record $17.14 billion, an increase of 44% from the prior year, 29% from December. And despite the record organic growth in the quarter, 10% sequential growth from March. Notably, 95% of this growth was organic. This record position provides visibility into future revenue and reflects the strength of customer demand across several sectors.

Demand within the network and communications sector led by data centers remains exceptionally strong. We continue to see expanding opportunities as customers invest in AI infrastructure and digital transformation initiatives. Equally important, our RP growth was broad-based with strong bookings in water and wastewater health care and the institutional sectors.

Customers continue to place trust in EMCOR as we successfully execute projects and we consistently meet our commitments. Many customers are expanding across geographies and scope in the facilities, geographies, trades and other technical disciplines like our preconstruction. This ability to deepen relationships and grow alongside our customers remains a significant competitive advantage for EMCOR. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Jason to go through the numbers.

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. Over the next 2 slides, I will cover the operating performance for each of our segments as well as some of the key financial data for the second quarter of 2026 as compared to the second quarter of 2025.

I'm going to start on Slide 6. Revenues of $5.15 billion established a quarterly record for EMCOR, increasing 19.8% or 19.6% on an organic basis when excluding acquisitions and adjusting for the sale of EMCOR U.K. Each of our segments experienced meaningful revenue growth contributing to our consolidated performance.

Revenues of electrical construction were $1.66 billion, increasing 24%. While this segment did experience increased activity across a number of the market sectors we serve, the majority of its growth in the quarter resulted from greater data center projects within the network and communications market sector, where revenues increased by 45%.

Mechanical Construction revenues of $2.3 billion grew by just over 31%. Similar to Electrical, this segment experienced the greatest growth from the network and communications market sector, where revenues more than doubled year-over-year. Increased cooling requirements for data centers, coupled with our expansion into new or adjacent geographies continue to drive more opportunities for this segment.

In addition to data centers, Mechanical Construction generated notable revenue growth from several other sectors in which we operate. Specifically, institutional revenues increased 77%, commercial increased by 26% due to a resumption in demand for warehousing, distribution and logistics projects, largely within fire protection, and manufacturing and industrial, including food processing, was up 18%. On a combined basis, our Construction segment generated revenues of $3.96 billion, an increase of 28% and establishing new quarterly revenue records for both segments.

Moving to Building Services. Revenues of $837.7 million increased by 5.6%. Revenues of our Mechanical Services division increased by $30 million or nearly 5% driven by broad-based strength across each of their service lines. In addition, the segment's commercial site-based services division returned to growth, experiencing a $14 million or roughly 11% increase in revenues due to the award of new facilities maintenance contracts as well as scope or site expansion with existing customers. Like our construction segments, the performance of Building Services represents a quarterly record for revenues.

Industrial Services revenues were $353.8 million, reflecting an increase of nearly 26% driven by our field services division, which benefited from greater turnaround activity higher petrochemical project volume and progress made on a large solar project.

Let's move to Slide 7 for operating income. We generated operating income of $547.3 million or 10.6% of revenues, both of which are records for EMCOR for our second quarter. Operating income increased nearly 32% and operating margin expanded by 100 basis points. Looking at each of our segments. Operating income of electrical construction increased by 46.8% and to a quarterly record of $231.4 million due to the revenue growth I previously mentioned, coupled with 210 basis points of operating margin expansion.

While the segment did benefit from a 20 basis point reduction in SG&A margin, the vast majority of the increase in operating margin was a result of greater gross profit margin given exceptional field execution and a more favorable project mix. Mechanical Construction had operating income of $286.6 million, which represents a 20.1% increase. As with electrical, operating income for this segment represents a quarterly record.

Although down 110 basis points, Mechanical Construction earned a solid 12.5% operating margin which is in line with the segment's average margin over both the last 12- and 24-month periods. Similar to the first quarter and very much as we anticipated, the reduction in operating margin of this segment resulted from a shift in mix that included a greater percentage of revenues from projects where we are acting as either the construction manager or prime contractor and which inherently carry lower-than-average gross profit margins due to reduced markups on materials, equipment and subcontractor costs as well as an increase in the number of GMP or cost-plus contracts.

Together, our construction segments grew operating income by over 30% and earned a combined operating margin of 13.1%, an increase of 30 basis points. Building Services generated operating income of $63.4 million, an increase of 26.6%. In addition to the impact of greater revenues, the segment achieved 130 basis points of margin expansion, with operating margin reaching an impressive 7.6%.

Given a more favorable project mix, coupled with improved execution, gross profit margin increased by 70 basis points. And due to the restructuring actions we completed within our site-based businesses, SG&A margin decreased by 60 basis points. Operating income for Industrial Services was $9.6 million, a significant improvement versus the year ago period, driven by the increased revenues I previously mentioned.

If we turn to Page 8, I'll quickly cover a few highlights not included on the previous slides. Gross profit of $1.02 billion increased by 22.6% and our gross profit margin of 19.8% increased by 40 basis points. While all of our operating segments contributed to the greater gross profit dollars the improvement in gross profit margin resulted from the performance of electrical construction and Building Services, as I just highlighted.

SG&A was $475 million or 9.2% of revenues compared to $48.6 million or 9.7% of revenues a year ago. While revenues grew nearly 20%, we obtained meaningful operating leverage during the quarter with SG&A increasing by only 13.5%, resulting in a 50 basis point reduction in quarterly SG&A margin. And lastly, on this page, diluted earnings per share was $9.06, which represents an increase of nearly 35% when compared to the $6.72 earned in last year's second quarter.

If we briefly look at Slide 9, you can see the strength of our performance for the first half of the year. Revenues have grown by 19.7% or 18.3% organically, our gross profit margin has improved by 30 basis points, and we successfully leveraged our overhead cost structure, reducing SG&A margin by 50 basis points. This resulted in operating income, which has grown by nearly 30%, along with a record operating margin of 9.7%.

Let's turn to Slide 10. Our balance sheet, including $924 million of cash on hand and $1.45 billion of working capital continues to provide us with a competitive advantage and enables us to fund organic growth, pursue strategic M&A and return capital to shareholders, all of which you'll see on the next 2 pages.

Although not shown on this slide, we did generate $289.4 million of operating cash flow in the quarter, and on a year-to-date basis, our operating cash flow is now relatively comparable to that of the year ago period despite our growth and the associated increase in working capital. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Tony.

Thanks, and I'm going to go to Page 11, and this is a great page by the way. And so before I get into the guidance, Jason and I are going to talk about the acquisitions and capital allocation. I want to briefly highlight on this page some of our business development activity.

We continue to execute our acquisition strategy with a focus on transactions that expand our capabilities and strengthen our core competencies. These acquisitions deepen our trade and technical expertise and broaden our geographic reach to better support our customers in our fastest-growing sectors. These acquisitions actually showcase our playbook and mindset with acquisitions. We look to create a cumulative and compounding impact with our acquisitions that provide durable performance.

Further, we know that we have both cost and revenue synergies in the acquisition. In these cases, in most of the cases over the last 5, 8 years, our revenue synergies that we create far outweigh the cost synergies over time. If you like each of these acquisitions in turn, B&B Electric provide us really good capability in Wisconsin. They are a good industrial contractor that can do highly complex work.

Sidney Electric in Sidney, Ohio complements the capability we have in Ohio that came through our [ Quibi ] acquisition over 5 years ago. We learned with things like Sidney, who are great industrial contractors that can do health care work that we can pivot them if the data center opportunities become available, and then we can grow them pretty significantly.

Giles was actually acquired with our Miller team and provides access to the Daytona Beach market and goes -- will allow us to go down through the growing space market in Florida. Schmidt Electric, market leader in Central Texas and Austin it opens up that market to us. They have the ability to do data center market, but that's where we're going to be able to bring some real capability. They can do the most complex work known, and we've learned that they can pivot into data center work to our customer relationships. So keep the base, grow that and put the data centers on top of it.

Likewise, Connelly Electric, we have great businesses in Chicago land area. This is purely complementary and the locals they operate. There are 2 great contracting ability. They bring a design build capability we don't necessarily have on some warehousing and logistics work. And we think we can pivot and we know we can pivot them also to the expanding data center market in the Southern and Western Chicago suburbs. We feel really good. I'm going to let Jason go through. And what's important about all this, you look at this page and they're just names on a page, right?

Each one of them have a story of a great operator or a great operating family that have owned the businesses for a long time. And now they've trusted us to take that with them. They're still going to be here. With them take these businesses to the next level with how we know to grow our customer relationships, and we're going to learn from them, too.

We talked about the design build capability, some of the prefabrication techniques that they have on specific products. So this is a 2-way street, but I know we feel the pressure to continue to build and make these companies successful is now up to 70 years, in some cases, family legacy and ownership legacy have now entrusted us to take it to the next level, and we don't take that lightly. With that, I'll turn it over to Jason.

Yes. As Tony noted, these businesses will all be included in our Electrical Construction segment, and we do anticipate funding the acquisitions through a combination of cash on hand and to the extent necessary, the borrowing capacity provided by our credit facility.

The slide shows here that these 5 businesses collectively generated $625 million of revenues and $105 million of EBITDA during the trailing 12 months ended June 30, and when considering the closing dates for Schmidt and Connelly, which collectively represent approximately 75% of the aggregate revenues and EBITDA presented. Our guidance, which Tony will discuss shortly assumes between $250 million and $275 million of revenue contribution from these 5 acquisitions in the back half of the year.

Given the anticipated intangible asset amortization, as well as a reduction in net interest income, the impact to diluted earnings per share will be limited for the remainder of the year. But as backlog amortization rolls off over the succeeding 12 to 18 months, these acquisitions will provide further accretion as supported by their margin profile.

If you look on Slide 12, we've provided a summary of our capital allocation both year-to-date as well as over the past 10 years. As that slide shows, we remain committed to our philosophy of balanced capital allocation. When you factor in these pending acquisitions, we expect the mix for full year 2026 to be comparable to that of full year 2025 as a percentage deployed towards M&A increases. I'll turn the call back over to Tony for updated guidance.

Thanks, Jason. And I'm going to be on Page 13 to close this out. Given our strong first half performance and the visibility provided by our record RPO position, we're going to raise full year 2026 guidance, which is outlined on Page 12.

Our updated guidance reflects continued demand across several key markets, our success in winning and executing large-scale projects and our confidence in the operational capabilities of our teams. As a reminder, while acquisitions strengthen our long-term earnings power, as Jason just said, the earnings contribution near term on a diluted EPS basis remains moderated by acquisition-related backlog amortization.

We now expect to earn revenue of between $20 million and $20.5 billion and diluted earnings per share of between $32 and $33.25. Our outlook assumes strong continued operating performance and margins, disciplined project execution and sustained demand across our core market sectors. We remain focused on maintaining pricing discipline, carefully selecting opportunities and delivering those opportunities to provide exceptional value to our customers.

I've said these things before, and I always think they are reiterating. We have 4 enduring fundamentals that we built our company on. First, our commitment to training, innovation and safety. We continue to invest in workforce development, prefabrication, virtual design and construction or VDC, project delivery methods that improve productivity and strengthen execution.

Second, our disciplined approach to contract management. Our teams consistently balanced customer service with prudent risk management, particularly on large and complex projects. Third, we do have exceptional field leadership. The dedication and expertise of our foremen, superintendents, project managers, project engineers and operating leaders at the subsidiary level and segment level remain an important differentiator for EMCOR and a major reason why customers continue to choose us.

And finally, disciplined capital allocation. We continue to [ fish ] in organic growth, execute strategic acquisitions and return capital to shareholders, creating long-term value while maintaining financial flexibility. Together, these strengths create a durable competitive advantage and position us for continued success. I put this line in here this paragraph in there all the time. I don't know when there hasn't been macroeconomic uncertainties that continue to exist, including geopolitical conflicts, commodity cost fluctuations, equipment lead time volatility.

However, our teams have always repeatedly demonstrated their ability to manage through complexity and deliver results. We entered the second half of 2026 with strong momentum and confidence in our ability to continue creating value for our customers and our shareholders.

And finally, and probably most importantly, I want to thank all my teammates for their commitment to safety, disciplined execution and customer service. Your dedication has continued to drive EMCOR's performance and our long-term success. Thank you for joining us today. And with that, I will turn the questions over to Dave to open the line so that you can ask Jason and I questions innumerable questions about data centers. With that, I'll turn it over to Dave.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis.

I'm going to try not to ask about data centers.

Okay. Great.

Good. I actually wanted to ask more in the semiconductor space, which maybe that's the high-tech manufacturing. But can you talk about the -- any bookings in the quarter or upcoming bids in that sector?

We continue to see opportunities there. Fire life safety has been particularly strong in the data center space. Mechanically, we're doing some important work in Arizona, on top of the fire, life safety work. And we're doing that in multiple locations. And we continue to see opportunities. We're very capable in that market. It's always balancing those opportunities versus other opportunities. For us, high-tech manufacturing also includes pharma and biotech and EV battery. Jason?

Yes. I think if you look at where we stand today versus both year-end and sequentially, so from March, we've had strong bookings. RPOs are up in that space, about 7%, both sequentially and from year-end. I think the compares get a little bit easier for us as the year goes on. So as we continue to book some of this work and the first phase -- the completion of the first phase of semiconductors is behind us in prior years. I think you'll see some growth here, either later this year or early next year.

We are fire life safety, I think, on just about every important site that's being built right now. And mechanically, we're on a couple of them and electrically on some of the low voltage work. We continue to do the work also. Like anything else in contracting, you're balancing that opportunity versus other opportunities in that geographic market. And in some places, the data center market might be stronger and provide us more near-term earnings power. We can always go back and do some of that semiconductor work in some of these markets.

Got it. Okay. Super helpful. And then with all the acquisitions, a lot of other contractors entering your end markets via acquisition. I thought maybe it would be helpful for you to just break down how your capacity, the machine that you guys have built over decades compares to some of the competitors out there?

Yes. I think for the most part, Page 11 -- Page 13, 11?

11.

11 is a great example of our machine in action and that machine will continue. First thing we look for is can they execute in the field. So we're not doing anything different today than we were doing 5 years ago or 8 years ago. Doing a little more a little larger, but can they execute in the field? If they can't execute in the field, whether they're a $5 million acquisition or a $400 million acquisition, we're not touching it.

Then the second part is, do they share our values? The smaller ones, that's hard to -- a $10 billion acquisition, maybe that's less important because we're going to hold that into one of our existing operations. But if we're going to do a significant acquisition, like some of the ones on Page 11, they got to look at the world the way we do. We're a value-driven company. We have a disciplined operating model. And they have to be willing to share learning and put learning and be willing to accept learning and best practices. And so that hasn't changed.

When you look at others in the space, I don't know how they do acquisition or whatever. But to buy into this space, cold and not know how it operates and think you're going to generate synergy. Here's some things I do know over a long period of time. Other than the relationships like that does help bundling mechanical and electrical together at a local site, we are plenty of sites where we're together. We don't very rarely combine a bid. That's not a thing, putting all the trades together typically.

The other thing I know I'm pretty sure about is no one's asking the contractor that's doing the utility work and now do the data center work because you're doing the utility work, and I'm pretty sure the site contractors are not the electrical contractor of choice because they did the site work. These trades are very distinct with strong expertise, and I would say that's going to remain that way for a long time.

So we're looking for people that are very good at what they do. And in some of them, we think we have substantial growth because what we've learned over time, some -- especially the sort of midsized $50 million to $100 million contractor. If they can do complex work, if they've been working in industrial plants, if they've been working at health care facilities. And let's say there's a data center adjacency with the relationship we have.

We're pretty sure we can put them in the data center market in addition to that. And our folks have been great about share of knowledge. And that knowledge starts all the way back or how you're going to estimate it, how you're going to bid it, what are the contractual negotiations look like? All the way through to how do you set up the VDC models, how does that work all the way through to means and methods in the field.

What we've learned through time we learn a lot from our acquisitions on means and methods and we learned a lot from them on basic project planning labor, and they learn a lot from us. Overdrawn, but just thought I'd give some highlights.

I also think quickly, if you look at that package of acquisitions we put together, the thing that sets this apart is they're fairly diverse, both in terms of geography when you look at them together and markets they can serve. So I think that diversity gives them the opportunity to grow similar to the way EMCOR has grown over the last several years.

The next question comes from Brent Thielman with Oppenheimer.

I guess first question, the mechanical margin comparisons, obviously reflects some mix effects, which always seems to be the case, Tony, but Jason, I think you mentioned performance as a prime, a higher proportion of cost plus contracts as some of the factors in the quarter. Is there any sort of change in philosophy here with that business or just something more nuanced in the quarter?

We talked about this in Q1 as well, Brent. And it's very much some of the water and wastewater work that we're doing, some of the food processing work that we're doing. So we had more bookings in that space. We have more revenue coming through some of those contracts. And so it's just a little bit dilutive to margin. It really is more of mix and project based than anything else.

Yes. I mean, 12.5% outstanding performance and we're executing really great across a number of end markets and a number of projects.

Yes. And I think that -- those dynamics remain throughout the rest of the year, but I don't think it's an indication of the philosophical change in terms of all -- we're [ running ] the business as we the way we always have.

Okay. And then you mentioned with a few of these transactions maybe some plans to pivot some or more of their business towards kind of the data center opportunities that might be within their kind of respective territories. Obviously, you bring the customer relationships to the table. But could you just talk about the capabilities of these operations to do that work? Is it going to require more resources for you to do that effectively, I guess, kind of what gets you comfortable with those businesses potentially pivoting toward that kind of business?

Because we've done it internally. Multiple times, we've taken existing EMCOR companies that have the same profile of these companies. And we've done it with acquisitions already in Ohio that's the best example. But existing EMCOR companies that have the exact capability, the exact kind of mentality these folks have, and we've been able to pivot them pretty successfully into both high-tech manufacturing into data centers.

But these are good businesses in their own right, serving the markets that they serve, like Jason said, that's what makes us exciting. Where there's an opportunity to add growth because of the things you identified, and we're pretty sure we can do that. Now what we do is do we implant a couple of our folks at the fill level to help them initially, sure.

Do we help them on the front end to make sure the numbers are right or do we help them with contract negotiations? All those things are true. But ultimately, they got to have great field execution, great field supervision to be able to pivot and grow their business with us in those markets.

And the next question comes from Justin Hauke with Baird.

I've got 2 here. I guess, first one, just clarifying I'm assuming it's probably the case, but the acquisitions, are these all still union contractors like your typical electrical construction markets or the mix?

Yes, they're all unions. [ IBW ] contractors.

Okay. I figured they were. And then I guess the other question I had was just I wanted to understand the dynamics on raising the margin guidance. Obviously, electric is really strong here. And I know you guys don't manage the margin, you manage gross profits and risk and everything else.

But with the mechanical drag and then the incremental amortization from these deals, I guess I'm just surprised that the guidance was raised, given and you've been relatively conservative on that. So just can you walk through what's different that drove that?

I think one of the biggest factors is you can see the acceleration we've had in revenue. And that revenue acceleration is really absorbing a lot of overhead, both some of our indirect within cost of sales and then just SG&A. And so with that revenue growth, we're getting better absorption, we're getting better SG&A leverage.

And so with the new revenue guidance, and we said all along, this is really going to be a revenue story for us if there was upside with that new revenue guidance, we feel better about the operating margins because we're going to continue to see that absorption.

And then to your point, we had really, really good execution from Electrical and then we saw greater contribution from Building and Industrial. And so when you kind of look at the first half of this year, we see no reason why the back half shouldn't look like the first half.

And the next question comes from Avi Jaroslawicz with UBS.

So yes, the really strong electrical margins here in Q2. Just wondering if there was anything kind of more unique that drove that strength? Or was it really more just everything going right?

Well, I don't know if everything went right, but -- what it is, is just the ebb and flow of the business. A good point in the business. We always talk about margins in bands, and we're in a pretty good place. We're at the midpoint of what that band would be right now. And we always say margins will fluctuate quarter-to-quarter. But in our guidance is pretty strong performance for Electrical for the remainder of the year.

Okay. Yes, I was wondering if -- I know last quarter, we spoke about how there was contract mix that was kind of restraining some of the margin percentages and so --

More mechanical. That's more mechanical.

Got you. Okay. And then just thinking about the second half of the year, and I know margins move in bands, and this was a nice quarter. But is there any potential that we could see them stay in kind of the 10% plus range or -- is that not realistic?

If you look at our guidance, right, the way we're looking at it is this was a phenomenal quarter. And so I think you really need to take the first half of the year together. And if you look at our guidance effectively if you take the low end, what we believe can happen so take low revenue, low EPS, the implication there on margins is that it's really comparable to the back half of last year.

If you take the midpoint, so midpoint revenues, midpoint EPS, the implication there is that the back half of this year looks like the first half of this year. And then the higher end of that guidance implies that we continue to see some better execution, we continue to get more SG&A leverage. But I wouldn't suspect that -- and certainly not baked into our guidance is that this 10.6% margin repeat. It's more like the first half of the year collectively.

There's some seasonal things that work against that, too. The second quarter is always a strong building services quarter. There was a stronger industrial services than we typically have. And look, I'm just going to -- I think when you look at Industrial Services, we talked about the geopolitical risks. It has nothing to do with the business, but the refiners can't shut down for the most part in any substantial way in the back half of the year.

So we had a pretty good turnaround season in February, March. I think the turnaround season will not be as strong as it normally can be because of what's happening in the Middle East because they have to keep open and keep producing oil and gas. Now that's a small impact on margins but it's likely to impact margins in the fourth quarter.

And the next question goes to Brian Brophy with Stifel.

Yes. Congrats on the great quarter. I'll ask a data center question. Obviously, public market investors seem concerned about something as it relates to data centers, but just curious, your discussion with your customers, have you seen any change at all in the demand profile from that end market?

Yes. Short answer, none. The demand profile remains the same. I do think there are some places we're going to build more, right? I think Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania is a burgeoning market. Arizona has been a strong market. Northern Virginia will continue to be strong. [indiscernible] less of a share of them because just the law of large numbers, other places are [ building ] them. Northwest Indiana and Chicago, Atlantic continue to be important markets, Arizona, and then Georgia and the Carolinas. And they all have one thing in common.

They have power and they're willing to build power and the sort of not in your backyard thing, that's going to get play. It's the same people that were against fracking. They really don't want data centers because they don't want natural gas to continue to expand and what has to expand its natural gas to keep this going. And if you look at -- we've done some work on power and where power is going to become available and all that, we are in really good shape to continue to serve those markets. It's sort of laughable that New York put a data center ban on because there's really nothing materially happening in New York with data centers anyway.

Yes. That's great. And then a question on the GMP mix. I know there's some attention. But in terms of your track mix, can you give us a sense of how much has actually shifted to GMP versus fixed price? Are we talking hundreds of basis points, thousands of base points. Can you just give us a sense the overall percent of mix?

[indiscernible] mechanical, probably shift to mechanical 9% to 10%, which could be meaningful because they're large contracts. And then go back to the point I make about careful contract negotiation, a lot of that's driven by the owners and a lot of that is driven on the mechanical side because these mechanical systems and a lot of times are being done for the first time are being done -- they're fairly complex.

And a lot of that GMP mix that shifted, there's always been an element of more GMP and mechanical, but the shift is really coming into the AI data centers. That's prudent both from the end customer, the owner, and that's prudent from us to be taking those contracts that way.

The next question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair.

Yes. I have 2 questions. My first one is kind of building on your last conversation around state moratoriums and data center bands. As we think about some of these proposals in place at the state and local level, and they're just mostly proposals at this point, but can you help us think about how flexible and transportable your labor is when it comes to these types of projects?

Like are there enough of these projects in the works where you can have people drive a few towns over? Or do you have to house these workers in new states, depending on where these projects are moving forward. Curious about your ability around labor capacity and flexibility.

That's one of the benefits of being a union contractor. Because of the demand in some of these states there's a capacity to bring in people from -- they will travel themselves. And then it's not us sort of housing them. They get paid per [indiscernible]. They find a place [indiscernible]. It could be as simple as the folks in Chicago, some of the labor moving up to Northwest Indiana to do the work. And then that local gets built up and they take more of the work.

That's one of the benefits they come in. They come in with a level of sophistication. We know what their capabilities are. They check into the local union all and we go to work. And we can help facilitate that in some cases. And so there's that. That's the more traditional way of doing it. And then you get to some of the rural markets which we're participating in, whether it be in some of the world Midwest markets is take Texas.

We're finding creative ways to serve Texas, whether it's through more prefabrication on the job and then subcontracting some of the installation or doing it ourselves. You can do it from -- if you're going to do union in some cases, you'll permit nonunion people to be union for a short period of time and use that capacity.

And then finally, there are opportunities for some nonunion operations that we may have to participate in very rural markets to look a lot more like how the oil and gas people work than how the traditional IBW or a commercial contractor will work. So you have to be flexible and do all of the above.

But mainly, it starts with the trades people themselves as being flexible and looking for the work. I think about these moratoriums and we've done some work on that. We're by far, we're not lobbyists. We don't have -- we're not experts. But when you start to see the level of tax revenues that come into some of these counties, like [ Latin ] County, Virginia, 5%, I think, of the property receipts are now from the data center people.

Pretty hard to take a step back when that's been driving your local tax base and your education systems. We think there's plenty of opportunities. And at the end of the day, when we talk to the owners, they're going to find the places that build them, and we are well positioned to do that in the places where they are going to build them.

I appreciate that extra color there, Tony, on the moratorium too. It's an interesting dynamic that's happening right now. Switching gears, wanted to ask about your backlog, your RPOs. As I look at this, I look at your 1-year RPOs to complete be completed within a year. It typically represents about 50% of your next 12 months revenue. That was true every year basically for the last 4 years, plus or minus a percentage point or 2. It's basically 50%. It's in a very tight range. Is there any practical reason, and I don't know, but is there any practical reason that you could think of for why that might not be the case anymore?

No, I can't think why the future doesn't look like the past. Jason?

Yes, I think the one thing we have to just way as well, right, is we've booked a lot of work in the last 2 quarters. And so I think some of it will be the timing of ramp-up and the timing of mobilization. So if you're looking at growth rates in RPO versus growth rates and guidance and then there's obviously a disconnect, right, our RPO is growing a little bit faster than we're saying our revenues are going to grow that is just the timing of mobilization. We did the level of work we've booked over the last 2 quarters.

Within a band, you're probably about right. I mean we think it's a little different when we come into the year, Jason, we usually think we have about 55% to 65% of enrolled ...

It used to be that we'd have to go and book and earn our annual revenue in that year. That percentage has dropped dramatically. It dropped to 50%, 45%. I think this year, it was 40% of the revenue we had to go book and earn. So I think that's the new norm right now. We do have some projects that are skewing out a little bit longer, right? Historically, we would say that 85% or so of our RPOs burn in 12 months. where we're sitting today, it's more like 75% or 76%. And some of that's the water and waste water mix. Some of it is just the volume of bookings we've had.

Could it also be project size, Jason?

Absolutely. Absolutely.

That's been increasing. And if you look at the last 2 years, there's really no big shift going on here.

The next question comes from Manish Somaiya with Cantor.

Congratulations, everybody. Tony, I wanted to go back to Slide 11 seems to be your favorite slide on M&A. If you can just help us get a better sense as to going forward, what the missing pockets of exposure might be by sector, by market, that would be helpful. And what does the pipeline look like as you look ahead?

The pipeline is strong. And so what we're looking for always is, can we augment existing capability to one of our larger subsidiaries? A great example of that or at a geographic market is Giles in the Miller and Sidney teaming up with [ Quibi ] in Ohio. Those are plastic examples of what we do. We will always do those and that's a big part of what we do.

And then there is the sort of stand-alone capability, which would be a B&B, Schmidt and Connelly. B&B, we were not in that part of Wisconsin. It's a good industrial part of Wisconsin. They have the ability to travel some and do some industrial work, and they did really, really good executors. Schmidt brings more Texas to us. We have a fairly strong business in Texas, mechanically and electrically. This just adds to it. And it's in sort of Austin, San Antonio and a little bit in Houston with a great operating team that's known for their technical sophistication. And just great values, right, like all these companies, they all have great values.

And then commonly, if you put a chessboard together of what's going on in Northwest Indiana, Illinois, we have 2 great companies, Gibson Electric, which is one of the founding EMCOR companies, [indiscernible] and now Connelly. And it's like a Mosaic chessboard around the city of Chicago, Northwest Indiana is Southern suburbs and it really allows us to serve our customers better. That's what drives most of this as our customers look for us to continue to expand capability.

I think when I think of acquisitions, we're going to continue to focus on what we do well which is Mechanical and Electrical Construction and adding on both companies like Sidney, Giles, B&B and also the bigger ones like Schmidt and Connelly. And then also mechanical services, Again, something we do very well. That's where some of the smaller acquisitions are as we build out a branch network.

Are we looking to invest in things that we don't know as well? Probably not. We see plenty of white space yet. Both to do the add-ons and also sort of the stand-alone ones. And what we've done over a long period of time, we grow these faster, quite frankly, a lot of times in the rest of the company. And we're looking -- there's a patent I put in there. We're looking for the cumulative and compounding impact.

But we want to pay a fair price. But we're very cautious when you think about some companies that are on market companies, exposure to 1 end market, 2 or 3 customers or 1 geography or just a couple of geographies. We found that we can do that as well by putting a mosaic of acquisitions together off of one of our bases and grow pretty strongly in some of those markets. And then we've been very successful at that.

And Tony, the $750 million upfront purchase price that you outlined, should we think of these acquisitions having any earn-outs?

There's another -- up to $90 million in earnouts for 2 of the deals. That's the maximum they can be. That's not our prediction of where those will land, but we hope they hit it.

And then, Jason, while I have you on the cash flow front, how should we think about cash conversion in second half? And I guess if you will kind of give some sense as to how we should think about '27 as well.

Yes. So obviously, we won't comment on '27 at this point. I think if we look at '26 and we just look at EMCOR as a whole, the philosophy or the algorithm we always have on cash flow is we should be able to have operating cash flow at least equivalent to net income, and that goes up to 80% to 85% of our operating income. So if you look back over the last several years, let's just take '24 and '25 as examples. We see no reason why the operating cash flow in '26 won't look like it did the last 2 years.

We obviously are back-half weighted. For us, Q1 is always the weakest and we start to see operating cash flow accelerate in Q3 and Q4. So I think that's going to continue to hold this year as well.

And the next question comes from Adam Bubes with Goldman Sachs.

Just wondering if you could touch on the size of the data center projects you're seeing in the pipeline, how does that compare to what's in backlog, what you're executing against today? And then to what extent do larger project sizes create opportunities for higher workforce utilization increased revenue per employee?

That actually depends on more the mix. So in general, we're going to get more revenue per employee in the mechanical side than we are on the electrical side. And also the mechanical side allows us to do more prefabrication on modules that have higher value content, especially in the AI data center.

When you look at trending up, that's been going on over time, right? You then back in 2019, a 20-megawatt data center was considered large. The way I think about it today, when we're doing cloud storage, we're now building somewhere between 40 and 75 megawatts, give or take. And when there's an AI component, and we have no idea how these things work together, anything. It's not our area of expertise.

You're starting to talk 100-plus megawatts, 200 megawatts, and people have all kinds of different things. When they get much above 200, 250, then I think most people are talking about campuses. So 2 things have happened. The size has gone up over the last 5 years. And on the mechanical side, especially, we get a multiplier of 1.5 to 2 on AI data center. And on the electrical side, for an AI data center is probably 1.5 and that's just driven by the size of the electrical coming in, that needed the power of the data center.

So they're getting bigger. They're getting more complex, especially when the AIs introduced. And they're usually always built with the idea toward the campus of 3 to 7 buildings that are going to fill out that campus.

And then you touched on it a little bit earlier, but could you just expand on the opportunity to move into maybe traditionally nonunion regions to serve data centers seem to be expanding into more rural markets? And then maybe Texas, in particular, you acquired the electrical contractor there, but what's the exposure to the state today? And how big could that exposure get over time?

Yes. So exposure to the state today is broad if you bring in the Industrial segment. It's very broad. If you talk about our exposure today as part of the Mechanical and Electrical segment, Mechanical Services has some exposure there. But I think what you're focused on, what's our exposure to the mechanical and electrical segment and what's our exposure broadly.

We have pretty good exposure in Central Texas through our Batchelor & Kimball subsidiary. They went out there had not been there. They went out there to build a semiconductor plant. They did a very good job on it. Excellent job for the owner. And that allowed us to build a workforce out there. We followed up with an add-on acquisition in Central Texas mechanically.

And we're pretty well positioned to serve both the more metro markets in Central Texas, but also some of the rural markets. Because on the data center market mechanically, could have a large prefabrication component, which allows us to have less labor on the job in those rural markets. When you go electrically, we have a range of options. We already were participating in the DFW market. I would say we're either 1 or 2 supporting the data center market and the Dallas Fort Worth area. That was from an acquisition we made about 7 years ago with an eye towards doing this.

They had been doing day 2 work in those data centers with our scale and the capability, I talked about our ability to come down and do that. The team really did a great job learning how to do that. We've expanded that capacity. And I would say we're a significant player in the Dallas-Fort Worth area market and the data center market.

Schmidt gives us the opportunity to expand that. Schmidt a terrific full line contractor run by just an exceptional team. We feel really good about our ability bring that capability into Texas. And then we have the ability to leverage some of our other assets in the market to support that in rural Texas where some of the oil and gas folks to maybe help us do that over time. So we're fairly well positioned now in Texas. We'll be, I think, better positioned after these acquisitions. And we'll look to continue to do add-on acquisitions in Texas to support this growth.

Just 2 facts to round that out. I mean if you look at our non-oil and gas business in Texas, we do $1 billion of revenue there today before Schmidt, before any acquisitions. And if you look at because you have data center specifically. If you look at data center RPOs, Virginia is the state where we have the most activity, but Texas is the second for us and followed closely by Georgia. So Texas is an important market for us. It's one where we have a lot of activity today, and I think that's going to continue to grow.

And I think it shows you our ability to pivot. And if you think about how we grew in Texas, they both were acquisitions that were made pre 2020. Batchelor & Kimball in 2019. We had [ Gallon ] down there, and we added on there in the Houston area, more traditional commercial and health care contractor. The Batchelor Kimball expanded. We acquired a company in Austin mechanically, which helped get us to know the electrical, quite frankly, on Schmidt, and we grew that. And so it's been a good story of acquisitions, great culture with those companies, then organic growth on top of the acquisitions.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tony Guzzi for any closing remarks.

First, again, I want to reiterate and thank my teammates for outstanding performance over a sustained period of time. I do want to welcome our new teammates in B&B Electric, Sidney, Giles, Schmidt and Connelly. We're thrilled to have you as part of our electric team, and we look forward to closing Schmidt and Connelly here in the third quarter. And then finally, everybody stays safe, and we look forward to continue to execute well for our customers. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Thank you, everyone, for joining. Thanks for your patience. My name is Tim Mulrooney. I'm the research analyst here who covers EMCOR at William Blair. And I'm required to inform you that for a complete list of research disclosures or potential conflicts of interest, please visit our website at williamblair.com.

This company probably requires -- I usually do a little intro for every company. This company probably requires no introduction. This is quite a full room. It seems like there's lots of interest here. The stock price is only indication of a lot of interest these days. But I was very excited. I've been following EMCOR for years. And we finally -- we started speaking with them about 2, 2.5 years ago, finally got coverage out the door because these things take forever last year. So we've only been covering EMCOR for a year, but I've been following you guys from afar with a lot of interest for a long, long time, and I'm very excited for you guys to be here.

So we have CEO, Tony Guzzi, who's been CEO now for how many years, Tony?

Long time.

Long time. Long time is the technical term. And then Jason Nalbandian, CFO. Thank you both for being here.

Glad to be here.

I'll pass it over to you guys for a couple of brief intro remarks, and then we'll dive into more of a fireside chat and maybe open it up for questions for those that have them.

Sure. So I'm Tony Guzzi, I'm the CEO; and Jason Nalbandian, CFO. We've both been with EMCOR a while. I joined in 2004 as the President and Chief Operating Officer, did a lot of the stuff then, officially became CEO in 2011. It has been a heck of a ride. Jason, CFO 2 years ago.

Yes, 2 years ago.

2 years ago. Before that, he was our Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. So we all -- we've had the privilege of working together a long time. I think this first slide is sort of we're mission ready, right? Things just don't happen. I'll give you a sort of an overview of the company. We're a company of people that actually do real work: plumbers, pipefitters, electricians, millwrights, HVAC technicians and we've been that same company this whole time. We -- I'd like to tell you, we're contractors at the end of the day. And by nature of being good at what we do over a long period of time, we also happen to be opportunistic. And we stay opportunistic to keep diversity of demand and get ahead of some of your questions.

We're not managing to any number on what percentage do we want to be data centers, what percentage do we want to be aftermarket. We're just trying to make as much money as we can every day in as many sectors as we can that makes sense, but then be able to deliver excellent results for our customers, by not outrunning what our capabilities are and the capabilities have to do with how much great field supervision and leadership we can build to be a force expander.

We've grown organically exceptionally well over the last long period of time, but especially the last 6 years. And we've done that by really 2 things, right? Project size has gotten bigger. And on some of the fastest-growing markets, we've added more geography either through organic growth, having our companies do some of that work in those fast-growing sectors when they were doing other things or acquisition and then growing those acquisitions.

As Jason, you'll hear us talk about, we're a balanced capital allocator. We tend to be pretty good acquirers. For me, that means we're a good BB+ student. No one is an A student in acquisitions. It's just hard, right? And you have to do them right and you have to have cultural alignment and great execution in the field. I think over time, we've been a compounder of success. We don't chase fads.We execute well and do what we say we're going to do for our customers. And I was telling somebody today, when you think of all these large jobs, we've never not finished a job. Sometimes it's not great at the end, but we've never not finished one, but we finished other people's work more than once. And I think that's a great sign of our customers' confidence.

I'll get into a couple of slides here. This will be real quick at least of time. So our new guidance is out there at $18.5 billion to $19.25 billion. That's up from what we started the year. And why is it up? Because we've surprised ourselves on the revenue side, we had the margins about right.

We had record RPO growth. These are record level RPOs, which means for us, remaining performance obligations, a measure of backlog. That is actually the accounting measure of backlog remaining performance obligations. This is work that's contracted in hand or the noncancellable portion of our service agreements, which means if we have a 5-year service agreement, they can cancel in 60 days, only 60 days' worth of RPOs are in there.

We're not taking guesses on what we're going to do for a customer or any of that. Our guidance has also increased to $28.25 to $29.75. We expect to do greater than 80% cash flow conversion this year. And we have about 47,000 employees, about 70% or so or a little more are in the field doing real work, turning wrenches or working for them and supervising. Look, we're mechanical, electrical, fire protection contractor and a maintenance contractor on top of that and we apply in different sectors, right? Mechanical, full range of piping from small bore piping to the biggest pipe you can imagine.

Air conditioning, we'll do the service on a 20-ton rooftop as well as a 5,000-ton chiller plant. We'll replace a 20-ton rooftop or we'll design, build, replace a chiller plant for a large hospital complex like down the street here. Fire protection for us typically means sprinkler for the majority of it. We also do alarm and detection. We do electrical work. We are mainly a medium voltage contractor, which means inside the wire outside the substation, we do substation work. And we have a small T&D business, and we have a nice size low-voltage business.

Security and power generation, we're not doing EPC power generation work. We're typically doing balance of plant work. We're a nonres construction company. We typically grow in our construction businesses. Jason will talk -- we can talk about it in the question and answer, 600, 700 basis points, 800 basis points above nonres. In our building services where the mechanical services business is 75% of what we do. In that business, we're doing 500 -- I mean, 300 or 400 basis points. And in that business, that's the best proxy for what's going on in the other market besides high-tech manufacturing and data centers.

We're getting 72% of our revenue in electrical mechanical construction, 21% building services. And again, 70% plus of that building services revenue is in mechanical services, which is a high single-digit ROS business. And then the balance is industrial services. Important here, we do a lot of industrial service work or construction work, up in construction services. This is the oil and gas business and a little bit of our renewable energy or intermittent energy business. That's 7% of what we do. You can see I talked about there in the interest of time, I'll move on.

And we're geographically diverse. We still have some white space we fill in. We also can do platform-enhancing acquisitions, which means build more mass in a market. We'll do everything on the acquisition side from a couple of million dollar asset deal to Miller, you saw us do last year at $865 million. We operate through 100 operating subsidiaries. We have some very large ones in there and then some smaller service companies. 450 locations in the U.S. Fire life safety, we can cover the whole country. The bottom line is representative of some of our subsidiaries, our larger subsidiaries.

With that, Jason, I'll turn it over to you.

Yes. Thanks, Tony. I think this page here really highlights what Tony just discussed about our diversity. And there's a number of ways you can look at it. You can look at it by just service line or service offering, which is really represented in the pie chart on this page or you can look at it from an end market exposure perspective, which you can see in the bar charts. And either way you look at it, EMCOR's demand does remain very broad-based. I think if we quickly look at service lines and Tony touched on some of this a little bit, at a high level and just using round numbers, we're about 40% mechanical construction, about 1/3 electrical construction, about 20% building services. And as Tony said, that's predominantly mechanical services and maintenance and then less than 10% Industrial Services, which again, as Tony mentioned, is really our exposure to the oil and gas sector.

If you look at the market sectors, so again, that right-hand side, those bar charts, you can really see how we're positioned across a number of markets in the broader nonresidential construction space. And it's our positioning in these markets that have really led to some of our growth over the last several years. I kind of bifurcate these sectors into 2 groups. So 1 is what I call the high-growth sector. So I think what we call network and communications, which is really data centers and then high-tech manufacturing, which is really led by semiconductor, biotech and life sciences.

Outside of those sectors, we have a number of core sectors that we've been in for decades, that are really staples of EMCOR, traditional manufacturing and industrial, health care, water and wastewater and even institutional. And like I said, it's really our positioning here that's allowed us to grow the way we have. If you take just a 5-year look at the business, our revenue CAGR is just over 14%, and that's really including acquisitions, really growing 2x the broader nonresidential construction market. And I do think that's just a testament to where we've positioned ourselves and where our operating companies are located, both geographically as well as in these sectors.

If you look at this next page here, supporting our growth really is our commitment to balanced capital allocation. And Tony touched on this as well. But if you look over time, we have a near 50-50 split between business reinvestment. So think M&A and CapEx as well as shareholder return. And for us, that's both through dividends and share repurchases. And we remain committed to this philosophy as we move forward. Our approach always starts with organic investment really how can we make sure that our existing or 100 operating companies can perform as best as they can and be as productive as they can, be as efficient as they can. It's making sure they have the right tools and the right resources.

And you can see that in some of the investments we've made recently in prefabrication, virtual design and construction tools and other digital technologies. Also in recent years, some of our organic growth has come from geographic expansion, looking at adjacent or new geographies and saying how can we position some of our best operators in those geographies to capitalize on demand.

Besides organic growth, we do look towards M&A. We're really looking to bolster our core capabilities and our existing trades. We're looking for geographic expansion. And for us, M&A can be stand-alone strategic acquisitions or they could be smaller tuck-in deals, which really bolster existing capability.

If you just look at 2025, for example, we did 10 acquisitions, 2 of those being Miller and Danforth were stand-alone businesses, while the other 8 were really tuck-ins that enhanced our existing presence in some of our geographies. Acquisitions will continue to be a part of our growth strategy. I think we have a fairly robust pipeline where we sit here today. But as Tony says, deals happen when they happen. And so our guidance today is really just based on organic growth.

Beyond M&A, if we have excess cash, our last priority or one of our priorities is to return capital to our shareholders. And as I mentioned, we're doing that through both dividends and share repurchases. We recently increased our dividend by 60%. It's now $0.40 per quarter. And on the share repurchase side, we've remained very active over the last several years. In the last 2 years alone, we repurchased $1.1 billion worth of our shares, and there's $593 million remaining on our current authorization on the program.

Okay. How we win? I think the top left people, talent and developing that talent. I think our core product is actually great field leadership. And I would take our development programs our sense of purpose, the way we run the company, our Mission First, People Always and the operating model that has, I think that's the one part we may be superior to everybody else.

I think technology differentiation. We're never on the bleeding edge of technology, but I would say we stay on the cutting edge, and that's the VDC tools, the engineering assist tools, the ability that flows out into our prefabrication/modular and the different centers, we're typically doing that for EMCOR in our companies. I've always been a believer in a strong balance sheet. It's one of the ways we compete. We have a fair amount of bonded work out there of about $2 billion. And think of the customers we're actually working for, they value that a great deal.

And finally, you got to hang in there. We've been doing this a long time with great success. We haven't become a data center builder in 2019. We became a data center builder in the early 2000s. We haven't become a semiconductor builder and a fab plant builder when the CHIPS Act and TSMC and other people came, we were doing that work well back in 2005, 2007. We have long track records. And because of the how we work together as a team, we can expand that track record across the country when we have the capability to do that. Tim, I'll turn it over to you.

All right. Thanks here. Let me -- actually I wanted to go back a slide. How do you go back? Looking at share repurchase year-to-date in 2026, you guys are -- I mean, you did that heavy share repurchase in 2022 right before the stock price shot up a lot. I mean, is it fair to say you think shares are undervalued here?

I wish we were that smart. Part of it is just balanced capital allocation. We're trying not to buy at peak. So there's some of that. But it's just a balanced way of doing it. You're only early in the year. We have a good pipeline of acquisitions. We'll see how the year turns out.

Okay. Yes. That's -- I'll get to that. I was going to ask -- maybe I'll ask about the M&A now. I mean you've got a lot of cash on the balance sheet. You've got no debt. Danforth closed. Miller is integrated. What is your appetite for M&A as we move further into 2026?

We've always had a strong appetite for M&A. But we're also very disciplined. We don't tend to just want to make deals to make deals. We have to believe it's compelling. Look, we do a lot of the tuck-in stuff, that's extraordinary value for all our shareholders. When you're doing something like a Miller or even a Danforth that's larger, big footprint, you really got to make sure that the culture and the values they run their company are the same as yours. You're taking a big thing into your company organization-wise. We always start with all our acquisitions. They got to be able to execute in the field. The reality is we can't fix that reputation. And we're not going to burden ourselves with somebody else's bad reputation. Our appetite is we used to say that we'd be willing to leverage up our balance sheet by 2.5x EBITDA to do a deal.

Good luck.

Yes. We're not going to -- there's not a $3 billion, $4 billion deal out there likely, but there could be a series of deals that are sort of $100 million to $500 million, give or take. And the reality of good companies, they sell in good markets. It's been my experience over a long period of time and bad companies or financially challenged companies sell in bad markets. Anybody that has a good company is not selling it into a bad market, they'll just wait.

So I expect there'll be a lot of activity, but we're very careful. We usually don't participate in the broad based. Every private equity firm can come with a staple and their main value enhancer is they can put debt on a company. We don't try to compete with that nor do we want to. We're usually or never, I should say, going to buy a company that's on a [ fifth ] PE buyer and now they want to find a strategic chump. We're not that guy either.

Do you see that in this market?

Of course, you do. And there's other people that are the strategic chump. And we're not going to be -- what we like to do is a Miller, great company, Danforth, great reputation. People we've talked to over a long period of time, the timing is right, either through something that's going on with their succession, their ownership structure or they want to get to the next level of growth and they're thinking about the capital structure and what it will take to do that, and they said, time to look for the right partner.

I think in those cases, both of them, we were the destination, and it's our job to get to a fair deal so that we can make us the destination. I think there's more than a few companies out there that that's true for. And really, the last 3 significant sized companies we've done, Batchelor & Kimball, Danforth and Miller and you can throw Quebe in there, too. They all had that criteria. We want to be with you. We got to make a fair deal. And look, I'm not looking for a bargain, to be honest with you. It may turn to look out like one because of how they perform when we team up. But we're not looking for them not to make a good deal for their current shareholder base because ultimately, that's not a good thing either.

You want them to feel great about the deal. And when we do a deal, what's interesting about us, a lot of people, all these great acquisition plans, you're going to come in there and you're going to get so excited to be part of EMCOR. I could do that until I'm blue in the face. Person who's going to get them excited to be part of EMCOR is Henry Brown, the guy that they worked for forever at Miller. It's going to be [ Robert Beck ], right? And the folks at Danforth, Pat McParlane. So that ownership team or that leadership team, in the case of an ESOP have to believe every bit of their fiber that this is the right thing for their organization. And then the integration becomes really successful.

If Jason or I are the one selling it still to the people that we just acquired, that's a lousy deal for us. We will come in and do that later. But the first initial tranche of that, and that just tells you how we think about things, is that management team has to be excited about what we can do together to grow the company.

Okay. Okay. That's helpful. Maybe now we'll pivot away from capital allocation and M&A, and we can go to organic growth, which I think is where there's a lot of questions. I mean, your guide -- what's your guide for this year, 12% to 13% -- what's your guidance?

It started about 9% to 10%.

Percentage increase, you're saying?

Yes. Percentage increase.

Round numbers, 9% to 13%.

9% to 13%. Okay. All right. I had, all right, 9% to 13% round numbers for organic growth. And if I'm going to break that down in between volume and price, I'm curious about that. And the reason I'm curious about that is because one of the big questions we get from a lot of people are the constraints on growth of the business. How many people you can add as I think about that as a proxy for like your volume. But I also know that there's a lot of -- I mean, maybe you have some more price inelastic customers right now that are just more focused on getting the infrastructure built. So would be curious on how to think about, yes, this year, but also like going forward, how we think about that breakdown between price and volume?

I think this year is very much volume driven. And then you see that when you look at our guidance, where our margins are relatively consistent year-over-year with what we did in '25 in terms of our guidance. And a lot of that is mix driven. And so when you say what is really driving then our growth, it's volume.

So that's interesting. I would have actually guessed it was a little bit more price.

Well, the reason it maybe not show up as much price. We're getting price in some markets. But it comes back to the mix of contract structure. And we're still heavily weighted towards fixed price. But in our construction business, specifically mechanically, we'll be more heavily structured in even some of the electrical markets because of the designs. We're more structured towards GMP, which by its nature has less margin upside because of a full cost disclosure.

And the reason -- there are certain owners that only go that way, especially on the mechanical side, coupled with -- I think the reason that's driving part of that is the AI build-out. There's a little more unknowns there on how that construction is going to play out and what changes are going to come versus the cloud, which for us is very much a fixed price market. But even there, one of the big builders still does the mechanical systems, GMP.

The other mix element we have this year, and we talked about this a little bit on our first quarter earnings call is some of our other sectors are starting to grow stronger than they have in the last several years. Water and wastewater is a great example. The food processing work we do within the manufacturing and industrial sector is another example. Both of those opportunities for us are a little bit unique in that there's more equipment content. There's a little bit more subcontract components to it. So our markups are just inherently less on some of that work. So that mix as well is driving demand, but it's diluting margins a little bit.

And I think it's always important to remember who we work for in all those cases. So we're in the water and wastewater market, it's public bid. We either got it right or we didn't. And other than capability requirement which may narrow the competitive field, we're not in there negotiating price.

In the food processing, we are, but we're going against the capital budget over a number of years. Some of these facilities, we've done all the -- some of these owners, we've done all their build for 5, 6 years. And so we really don't want to let them think that we're not treating them the right way and we sort of know what we have to hit based on what their capital budget is.

When you get to the high tech and the semiconductor and the data center space or even pharma space, these are really sophisticated buyers. And I sometimes chuckle when I hear some of my competitors CEOs talk about this great price leverage they have. I'm not sure that's 100% accurate because in contracting, it's very difficult to separate price. Price is maybe not as important as good contract terms. Prices maybe not important as being able to release your contingency at the end of the job. But when you release your contingency at the end of the job, it comes back and looks like price. The contingency was there for a reason. You thought that job was going to be fairly tough. And at the end, you did a little better. Maybe your prefab plan was better, maybe your labor productivity was much better, but it cuts the other way, too.

Sometimes you're on a fixed price job, you don't have enough contingency. We certainly saw that on a job we had last year. So it's our job to figure out the mix between contract structure with the owner, which is the more risk you take, fixed price, the more you have the margin opportunity versus what we're building versus the scope of that work versus the change order mechanisms that we think it's going to change a lot versus our ability to get in early and help complete the design through design-assist. And so the reason Jason says a volume game here for us this year is -- and also within that, it allows us to grow in new markets and with new customers, if we're willing to sort of do a little more GMP work this year.

And I think we're at the point now where margin dollars are more important than margin percentages. And going back to the growth point, the organic growth point, I guess I've been using this example and some of you have heard it, stick with me here for a minute. Miller Electric, a hugely successful company, one of the flagship electrical companies in the country. We bought it, let's say, give or take, it was on track to do $1 billion. It took them 77 years to do that. Great contractor.

Danforth, leader, upstate New York goes down to Ohio a little bit, done some of the biggest work from sort of Albany down over and even into the Northern Tier, Pennsylvania. 133 years to get to $410 million. We're on a 9% to 13% organic growth. Let's just take the -- give or take the midpoint on that versus last year. We're going to grow in excess of what took them 210 years to do. And so every year, we're doing that, we're creating another ENR top 10 contractor. And so you get to the resources on that. Our constraint really is not skilled labor in the field. We do a pretty good job finding that where, I think, of course, everybody up and down the hall, I'm a destination employer, whatever that means.

What we have to be is the destination employer or the destination for people that want careers, that we can develop the best foremen, project managers, superintendents, estimating chiefs. And I think if we can do that, which I think we have a pretty good track record and we can get retention there, which we have great retention there, then that allows us -- because the amount of work we're doing in the larger jobs, it allows us to expand that workforce which allows us to take more work, which allows us to make sure we are the contractor that's going to finish the work we started and do repeat work with them versus be the contractor that also finishes that work for other people.

So that supervision is what we're trying to grow because if that's supervision is as good as I know it is, they will attract the best trades people in the market, and there'll be more people that want to build a career for us versus come and do a project for us. And we'll always have both. It's like a meaningless number is what's your turnover for your field labor. It's high. Everybody's is high. What we're trying to do is build that core workforce under that turnover that allows us to build that supervision, the journeymen and all the things we need to do to be successful for the long term.

I hear you guys talk about how the bottleneck is more on the field leadership, which is interesting because if you listen to almost all of your other competitors, the bottleneck is on the workers themselves, the electricians, plumbers, HVAC folk, welders, like it's the core trades people. Why is that not a bottleneck for you? Why do you think it's less of a bottleneck for you than others?

We [ don't ] have self-directed workforces. So if you can't get the right leadership in place, if you can hire all the trades people that you want, it doesn't matter. You have to have people that actually know the means and methods and can keep them safe. And we have good competitors. They're good publicly traded competitors. It's on the union side, right? Our job is to work with the union to grow that local workforce and then have the classifications we need to be able to convert nonunion to union and be able to take people from other trades and upskill to our trade, right? If it's a nonunion business, we run a little bit of one, we don't -- we're not in the labor broker business. We're not hiring somebody else to hire people for us. We're hiring people to work for us.

I just think long term, like most things, right, I can have an idea how I can develop the leadership. Developing that workforce under the leadership becomes a much more difficult thing if I don't have the right leadership.

And I think that leadership of that supervision is where you get your productivity, your efficiency and some of the margin gains...

It's also how we can share across the company. It's how we can take our great industrial contractor here that we had in Gary, Indiana, and get them to move the South Bend to a new data center and have the guys from Chicago train them because the leadership trust each other that they're going to execute for our core customer base.

So you could say it's a chicken or an egg thing. The reason I don't talk about finding the skilled trades is difficult because if I don't have the skilled leadership, I will have people out there that are clueless on how to get productivity means and methods and everything else and keep them safe. So we are much more focused on the foremen and up.

Got you. Okay. Just in the last minute or so here, I did want to ask about data center. I mean, it's an important growth market for you. I'm just curious how that has changed. I know you're still entering new markets, but is the way that you are going to market, is the way that your contractors are interacting with the customers or the way that you're interacting with the customers, is that changing? Has it changed?

I think it's changed a lot in the last 5 years. The owners have always been very evolved in any hospital data center project, high-tech manufacturing and manufacturing job. The difference is the breadth that they know our people, right? These big builders and 20 or 30 people in each one of those big builders really know the depth of our leadership at the lower level, the hyperscalers, and that's different. And what they want from us is different.

Now we're very careful not to overcommit or tell them, hey, we're exclusively with you because at the end of the day, who are we? We're contractors. We have to manage our capacity with the best opportunity for margin long term and the best ability to get the job done so that we can keep doing it for other people. I mean, how you really make money in contracting is not to lose money or disappoint your customers. That's how you really make money in contracting long term.

A perfect way to end. I hope to see you all at the Maher breakout room. Thank you, Tony and Jason.

Good morning. My name is Cindy, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the EMCOR Group First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now turn the call over to Lucas Sullivan, Director, Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Sullivan, you may begin.

Thank you, Cindy. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to EMCOR'S First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you joining us by webcast, we are at the beginning of our slide presentation that will accompany our remarks today. This presentation will be archived in the Investor Relations section of our website at emcorgroup.com.

With me today are Tony Guzzi, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Nalbandian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Maxine Mauricio, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel. For today's call, Tony will provide comments on our first quarter 2026 and discuss our RPOs. Jason will then review the first quarter numbers, then turn it back to Tony to discuss our guidance before we open it up for Q&A.

Before we begin, a quick reminder that this presentation and discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and may contain certain non-GAAP financial information. Slide 2 of our presentation describes in detail these forward-looking statements and the non-GAAP financial information disclosures. I encourage everyone to review both disclosures in conjunction with our discussion and accompanying slides.

And finally, as a reminder, all financial information discussed during this morning's call is included in our consolidated financial statements within both our earnings press release issued this morning and in our Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And with that, let me turn the call over to Tony. Tony?

Yes. Thanks, Lucas, and I'm going to start my discussion on Pages 3 and 4. Good morning, and thanks for joining us today. I'm pleased to report another outstanding quarter for EMCOR. Our first quarter 2026 results demonstrate the sustained momentum we have built over many years with strong execution across our business segments, and continued growth in our core market sectors and geographies.

In the first quarter, we generated revenues of $4.63 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 19.7% and organic growth of 16.8% when adjusting for incremental acquisition contribution and the sale of EMCOR U.K. Operating income reached $404 million, with 8.7% operating margin, while diluted earnings per share of $6.84 represents an increase of 30% versus the first quarter of 2025. This reflects our strategic positioning in high-growth markets and operational excellence across our construction and services platforms.

These results demonstrate our customers' continued confidence in EMCOR as one of their partners of choice for complex mission-critical projects. Our Construction segment once again performed extremely well in the quarter. The Electrical Construction segment generated year-over-year revenue growth of 33.1% with a 12.1% operating margin, while the Mechanical Construction segment achieved 28.9% revenue growth with a 10.9% operating margin. This performance reflects the range of our capabilities across both trade and geographies.

It also takes into account increased customer scope and our reputation as one of the premier specialty contractors for complex, fast-paced projects. Our Construction segment's growth was driven primarily by increased activity in network and communications, which is where our data center business rests. Institutional, manufacturing and industrial, health care and water and wastewater market sectors.

Within our Mechanical Construction segment, we also benefited from increased commercial market sector revenues, driven primarily by the resumption of demand for warehousing, distribution and logistics projects. Our teams continue to leverage our prefabrication and our virtual design and construction capabilities, excellence in labor management and planning, large project coordination and execution and a disciplined focus on contract negotiation, administration and the adherence to those terms.

The U.S. Building Services segment delivered solid results, led by impressive performance in our Mechanical Services division. While we still face slight revenue headwinds within our site-based business, we've begun to see the benefits of the restructuring on the cost side, which reduced overhead costs, and we have a more profitable contract portfolio mix.

Our Industrial Services segment generated revenue growth of 6.4%, and that was driven by our Field Services division. Now I'm going to turn to Page 5. Our remaining performance obligation positions strengthened significantly during the quarter, providing excellent visibility for sustained growth. Our RPOs totaled $15.62 billion at the end of the quarter versus $11.75 billion in the year ago period and $13.25 billion as of December 31, 2025. This represents year-over-year growth of 32.9% and sequential growth of 17.9%. These diverse RPOs reflect continued strong demand across many market sectors, with particularly robust activity in Network & Communications or data centers, where we continue to expand our geographic footprint and scope of services to better serve our customers.

We see no sign of slowing demand in this vertical, where customer investments in AI infrastructure, cloud infrastructure and overall digital transformation are driving unprecedented levels of activity. We are pleased with the quality and diversity of our work booked outside of the data center space, including the notable awards within water and wastewater as we continue to win new projects in Florida; institutional, driven by demand for upgraded live space by certain colleges, universities; and health care as our customers continue to modernize their facilities while seeking to make them more flexible and responsive.

The strong operational and financial performance I've outlined demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategic initiatives and the depth of our execution capabilities. Our teams continue to deliver exceptional results for our customers while maintaining disciplined financial management and operational excellence and continued good contract negotiation and adherence to the contract terms we negotiate.

With that context, I will turn it over to Jason, who will provide a detailed review of our first quarter financial results.

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. Starting with Slide 6, which shows revenues. I'm going to cover the operating performance for each of our segments as well as some of the key financial data for the first quarter of 2026 as compared to the first quarter of 2025.

As Tony mentioned, revenues of $4.63 billion established a quarterly record for EMCOR, increasing 19.7% or 16.8% on an organic basis when excluding acquisitions and adjusting for the sale of EMCOR U.K. Revenues of Electrical Construction were $1.45 billion, increasing just over 33%. This segment generated increased revenues from the majority of the market sectors we serve, with the most significant growth coming from Network & Communications, where revenues increased by nearly 50%, driven by strong demand for data centers.

While this accounted for 2/3 of the segment's growth, we did experience notable revenue increases across a number of other sectors, including hospitality and entertainment due in part to progress made on a stadium project and institutional as a result of certain public sector projects. In the quarter, our Electrical Construction segment also benefited from greater levels of short duration projects and service work.

Mechanical Construction revenues of $2.03 billion are up nearly 29%. Similar to Electrical, this segment once again experienced the greatest growth from the network and communications market sector where revenues increased by 86%. Increased cooling requirements and advancements in liquid cooling, particularly for AI data centers continue to drive opportunities for this segment.

Beyond data centers, Mechanical generated quarterly revenue growth from the majority of the other sectors in which we operate. Notably, institutional revenues doubled year-over-year manufacturing and industrial, including food processing, was up 34% and commercial increased by 33%, driven by warehousing, distribution and logistics projects, largely within fire protection.

During the quarter, this segment also benefited from increased service revenues as we continue to expand our maintenance and inspection base, both within traditional mechanical services as well as our fire life safety offerings. On a combined basis, our construction segments generated revenues of $3.47 billion, an increase of 30.6%. I should note that this performance established new quarterly revenue records for each of these segments.

Moving to Building Services. Revenues of $772.6 million grew by 4%, driven by our Mechanical Services division, which generated a 6% increase in revenues. From a service line perspective, the most significant growth was seen in repair service, service maintenance and building automation and controls.

Revenues of our Industrial Services segment were $381.8 million, an increase of 6.4%. The greater contribution from our field services operations due primarily to progress made on a large solar project was partially offset by a reduction in revenues with our shop services division due to lower heat exchanger sales and related services.

I'll turn to Slide 7 for operating income. We generated operating income of $403.8 million or 8.7% of revenues both of which are records for EMCOR for a first quarter. This represents an increase in operating income of 26.7% and operating margin expansion of 50 basis points versus the prior year. When adjusting for the acquisition transaction costs, which were incurred in Q1 of 2025, operating income grew by 23.1%, and operating margin increased by 25 basis points.

Once again, if we look at each of our segments, due to the growth in revenues, operating income for Electrical Construction increased by 28.2% to a quarterly record of $174.5 million. Operating margin of 12.1% compares to 12.5% a year ago. With consistent gross profit margins, this segment continues to execute well across its project portfolio with the year-over-year decrease in operating margin, primarily resulting from an increase in intangible asset amortization given the 1 month of incremental expense from the Miller acquisition.

Mechanical Construction had operating income of $221.6 million, an 18.7% increase. From an end market standpoint, this segment generated greater gross profit across many of the sectors in which we operate with the largest increases generally tracking in line with the growth in its revenues. Operating margin of 10.9% compares to 11.9% in last year's first quarter.

As we anticipated when we exited 2025, operating margin in this segment decreased due to a shift in mix that included a greater percentage of revenues from projects where we're acting as either a construction manager or a prime contractor and which inherently carry lower-than-average gross profit margins due to reduced markups on materials, equipment and subcontractor costs.

In addition, we had an increase in the number of GMP or cost-plus projects, particularly in newer geographies or on projects where scope or design are still evolving. Together, our construction segments grew operating income by nearly 23% and earned a combined operating margin of 11.4%. Building Services generated operating income of $40.4 million, which represents an 11.1% increase and operating margin of 5.2% expanded by 30 basis points.

This segment benefited from strong performance within its Mechanical Services division, which experienced a favorable mix, given the greater volume of higher-margin service and controls projects. Also, as Tony mentioned, while we do face some headwinds within our site-based business, the restructuring we did last year has proven to be successful, resulting in both reduced overhead costs and a more profitable contract portfolio. And lastly, operating income for Industrial Services was $12.8 million, an increase of 89.1% and operating margin of 3.3% expanded by 140 basis points.

As a reminder, and contributing to the favorable year-over-year comparison, the results for this segment in last year's first quarter were negatively impacted by a $4 million increase in the allowance for credit losses which negatively impacted operating margin for Q1 of '25 by 110 basis points. Excluding this impact, the remaining increase in operating income and operating margin was primarily a result of greater gross profit and greater gross profit margin within its Field Services division.

If we quickly turn to Page 8. I'll cover a few items not included on the previous slides. Gross profit of $864 million increased by 19.5% and our gross profit margin of 18.7% remained consistent with that of the prior year, which represents a record level of performance for a first quarter. SG&A was $60.1 million or 9.9% of revenues compared to $404 million or 10.4% of revenues a year ago. With the top line growth we experienced during the quarter, we are pleased with the operating leverage we attained as evidenced by the decrease in our SG&A margin.

And finally, on this page, diluted earnings per share was $6.84, which represents an increase of 30% or 26.4% when excluding the transaction costs in last year's first quarter. And finally for me, let's turn to Slide 9, which covers our balance sheet.

Our balance sheet, including $916 million of cash on hand and $1.25 billion of working capital remains strong and liquid and enables us to continue to fund organic growth, pursue strategic M&A and return capital to shareholders. During the quarter, we returned $105 million of cash to our shareholders through stock repurchases and our quarterly dividend. Although not shown on this page, due to an increase in accounts receivable, given our strong organic revenue growth and coupled with the payment of the prior year's incentive compensation awards, cash flows from operations in the first quarter were essentially neutral. However, for the full year, we remain confident in our ability to generate operating cash flow at least equivalent to net income or up to 80% to 85% of operating income consistent with previous years.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Tony.

Yes. Thanks, Jason, and I'm going to be on Pages 10 and 11. Given our strong start to the year and the strength of our remaining performance obligations, we are raising our full year 2026 guidance. We are increasing our revenue and diluted earnings per share guidance to a range that reflects our confidence in the sustained operational excellence that we have exhibited and strong market momentum. .

Such guidance reflects the demand that we are seeing and our success of winning and executing large-scale projects across many geographies and market sectors. We now expect to earn revenues between $18.5 billion and $19.25 billion and diluted earnings per share of between $28.25 and $29.75. As a reminder, EMCOR's business is characterized by project cycles and timing that can create quarterly variability. However, our guidance reflects our current expectation of continued strong operating margins throughout 2026, supported by disciplined project selection and execution.

We are focused on maintaining pricing discipline while delivering exceptional value to our customers. Our sustained success is built on focused execution across a number of key priorities that differentiate EMCOR and position us for continued growth. I'm now going to highlight 4 of them. The first one is our training, peer learning and our productivity initiatives. We continue to leverage our training programs, our virtual design and construction capabilities, prefabrication facilities and capabilities and advanced project planning and delivery methodologies.

We are committed to improving our means and methods every day, sharing knowledge across our organization and investing in workforce training, retention and expansion. Second item is a contract management discipline and negotiation. We deliver exceptional results for our customers. However, we do protect our rights and interests through careful contract management, negotiation, particularly on complex fast-paced projects. Third, we're known for field service -- field leadership excellence. One can argue that is our core product.

Our field leadership excellence from frontline [ foreman ] and superintendents to project managers and executives and subsidiary and segment leaders make EMCOR an employer of choice in our industry. And finally, supporting all of that is our commitment to invest with discipline and for the long term. We maintain a disciplined approach for how we grow organically and through acquisition. This, coupled with a return of cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases has provided the foundation for our compounding record of success over the past decade and provides balance to our approach to capital allocation.

These interconnected priorities create a sustainable competitive advantage that drives superior, durable performance across many diverse geographies and market sectors. The fundamentals of our business remains strong with sustained demand across several key market sectors, we will continue to always face macroeconomic challenges. In fact, I can't remember a time when we haven't had them, such as geopolitical events, rising commodity prices, but our team has consistently demonstrated the ability to navigate complexity and continue to deliver results.

Our success is a direct result of their dedication, their resilience expertise, which results in executional excellence from our teammates across the organization. I want to thank every member of the EMCOR team for their contributions to our outstanding first quarter performance and over the long term. And for everything you do to serve our customers, keep each other safe, and drive our success every day. Thank you for your time this morning. We will now open the line for questions. And Cindy, I will turn the call over to you.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Adam Thalhimer of Thompson, Davis.

Congrats on the strong Q1 and the record orders. I guess I wanted to start on the book-to-bill and orders. I mean, I think at 1.5x that was a record book-to-bill for you guys. And Tony, you broadly talked about the pipeline, but I'm just curious if you can give more detail on the pipeline and what the expectation should be for orders for the rest of the year?

Well, I think I'd go back to something I said in our book, right? Orders come when they come, projects come when they come. There's variability quarter-to-quarter both on bookings. And when projects start, when they close, and what the pace of contracts are. So you know I'm not going to tell you what I see for orders for the rest of the year other than to say this.

We continue to see, and I said it in my script, we continue to see no slowing of demand, especially in data centers and really across other key market sectors. I don't think we surprised by the demand we're seeing in water and wastewater in Florida, and we're winning a little more maybe than we thought we would. I don't think we're surprised by the demand -- continued demand over multiyears in health care. We continue to see a strong manufacturing and industrial business.

I mean projects can come in there a little lumpy. And then it can also come in smaller task orders thereafter. I think the market has surprised us the most over the last 6 to 9 months or 2 to 3 quarters has been the institutional market. That has shown more resiliency than we would have thought. But I think that's a result of the market positioning we have in some key markets with some universities that are spending money.

I also think that we weren't surprised by the resumption in warehousing and logistics and the transportation network work that we're seeing and return in the commercial market sector of that because we could foresee that based on the customer spending patterns. I would say right now, we will continue to grow in excess of nonres like we have historically pretty significantly. And we will continue to win important new projects and penetrating current geographies we are and investing in new geographies, even if they may seem adjacent across the data center space.

One area I'd always remind people, because I know the question is coming about high-tech manufacturing. I think that's a market of choice for us. We are well positioned in several key markets, especially in the Mountain West and in Arizona, and we're positioned there specifically across the trades of fire life safety and mechanical and some electrical. And we have the ability in other markets to serve specialty fire life safety in just about every high-tech market that exists.

We look at that as a flex market. They can be very difficult customers to work for, in some cases, especially in the semi market. And sometimes, we're making a mix management issue within the geographic market to maybe serve a larger data center campus that maybe go after the next semiconductor fab.

But again, we feel good about demand right now. Spending patterns remain and things are pretty much unraveling for the year, much like we expected. We're not chasing margin percentages right now. We're much more focused on growing margin dollars, which is what you actually spend and invest for the long term.

That doesn't set me up well for my next question, which is on margin percentages. But so high level -- that was great color. But high level, I did want to see if I can get at the margin potential in the back half? And maybe a way to do it is just Jason, I mean, you ran through a bunch of issues that impacted you in Q1 in terms of markups and mix? And maybe you can just talk about how those issues play out as the year unfolds.

Yes. I think we said this exiting last year, and I think it still holds today. But if you look at that guidance range we provided, we do have some lower margin scenarios in there, which anticipate a changing mix. I think we believe execution is going to remain strong throughout the back half of the year, which gives us the opportunity to replicate last year's record margins at 9.4%. So I think some of these mix dynamics will remain with us throughout the rest of the year.

I also believe what we've said kind of over the last several quarters and looking at kind of a rolling 12- to 24-month average, I think that holds true. Just understanding it's going to fluctuate quarter to quarter just based on that mix as you kind of saw in mechanical this quarter. But I think the fundamentals to hold, and I think really no significant change from what we said year end.

Yes. And I think I'm always careful of false precision. We give a range for a reason. Could we be on top of that range a little bit, but it's not going to -- we don't think substantially at this point. They would take something an execution that we're not seeing right now or we take a booking that happened in year that had to be done very fast at superior margins. So we have a pretty good handle on what our mix looks like.

And I think that's one of the things that's a little bit different than us and some other folks. Some of these companies are becoming one market companies. We are diverse by nature because of the geographies we serve and some of the companies we have that are earning very good returns that have nothing to do with data centers. And we do a little better in the data center market. We do on a margin percentage, but we should.

These are fast-paced jobs. They require a very strong dedication of our resources. And look, they come with risk, right? I mean at the end of the day, we're always balancing contract risk versus execution versus type. And sometimes that leads us to take a contract structure that may have inherently lower gross margins, but on a risk-adjusted basis and then it could lead to follow-on work that comes in a fixed-price way, which will then allow us the opportunity to grow margins over time. But we feel good about where the margins are on a year-to-date basis. I think the year started out pretty much like we thought, which quite frankly, just stronger revenue than we expected. And we're winning in markets right now and that feels really good.

The next question comes from Brian Brophy of Stifel.

Yes. Nice quarter. Tony, you touched on my question at the end of -- end of your last answer in terms of potentially shifting some of this mix away from GMP to cost plus -- excuse me GMP and cost plus to fixed price over time. I guess help me understand, is that kind of a deliberate decision on your guys' part to start off with maybe some lower risk structures in these new geographies? And I guess, what is the -- what's the needle mover. What needs to happen for you guys to potentially move these to more fixed price and increased opportunity for higher margin over time. Is it just you guys need to get comfortable in the new geography? Or is there something else?

No, look, first of all, it's not only our decision, right? Some of our customers prefer to operate in a GMP mode because they anticipate they're going to have a fair number of change orders and they want to get started on the job. So it's not only our decision. When it is our decision, I think you outlined it right. We have to get comfortable that we know the pace of build and the cost. I mean I'll just remind folks of last year, right?

We had a -- I hate to always bring up bad news, but this is why we're in the -- how we have to think about the business we're in. We were in a market that checked 3 of the 4 blocks other than it was relatively new for the size we were trying to build. And at the end of the day, we took a fixed price. We didn't get the acceleration change order quite what we thought we should price it right and therefore [indiscernible] So that didn't make us shy away from fixed-price work. But it shows you when you don't get it right, you own it.

And so contract structure is not only our decision, it also comes from our owners. And we typically work together. Now I think most owners if we think we have a good handle on what it looks like, and they can get a fixed price that looks like it can fit their budget, and it takes away all the auditing and contract stuff that goes with a GMP contract they're more than happy to move away.

The other variation on that is we can get 50% into or 60% into a GMP job, we both feel comfortable with we've locked in cost and scope and therefore, we will change it to a fixed price contract. So I'd like to tell you there's 4 or 5 variables here that variables could be up to 6 to 12 of contract administration and structure. And ours is always towards the best outcome for us and our owner and also the best risk-adjusted outcome. Jason, you got anything to add on that?

Yes. I don't think anything has changed overall in terms of our appetite for fixed price work or what we see in terms of the market and our customers. I think it's very much specific geographies, specific opportunities and specific customers in the quarter, which drove the revenue mix to skew more towards GMP...

Especially in mechanical, which makes sense because you're doing more of these AI data centers now. And unless we're doing fabricated structures for those AI data centers, you can argue modular structures that have really as part of our build or somebody else's build, they do start those things up more GMP, and we would prefer they do that as they work out their designs.

Yes. And that's the comment I tried to make about the designs evolving and the scope still evolving.

Understood. That's very helpful. And then just as a follow-up. Any update on access to craft labor, labor tightness? Any notable changes you guys have seen there over the last few months?

No, no notable changes. We're continuing to recruit heavily with the unions, especially in the Southeast, Texas, Oklahoma through the Midwest. We're working in a very cooperative fashion. One of the things that have benefited us is some of the programs, and that's one of the appeals of Miller. They are excellent at this. They have a pro trade program that allows a quick training program of 2 to 4 weeks, gets people functional, allows us to bring them in at the right classification and get them functioning safely and productively on a job site and that's something we're continuing to expand and grow across other EMCOR subsidiaries to grow our craft labor force.

I will say that our -- and I've talked about this before, our real bottleneck, and it really hasn't been a bottleneck because we have this great amount of work to work on its supervision. We have to create more foreman. We have to create more general foreman, we have to get project engineers to be able to move to project managers, project managers to be able to move to project executives. That's how we really grow.

Our constraint -- yes, we have to build fabrication shops, whether they're on-site in tents or whether they're offsite in our fixed facilities, we always have to be thinking about that curve. We don't like to get too far ahead of that curve because there may be other ways to skin that cap on fabrication, like on-site fabrication and other things.

But we always have an eye towards developing that supervision level. I said it in my remarks, our core product is really [ field ] labor supervision and leadership, and we just apply in these trades, and we do that very well. And therefore, if you're doing that well, you become an employer of choice because trade craft people typically like 4 or 5 things, right? First, they like to know they're going to get paid every week, and their benefits are going to get paid and in no particular order that you're going to give them the safety equipment and tools that they need to be safe, that you have a good safety program.

That the supervision they're working for actually knows what they're doing and can really share means and methods and are plugged into our network to gain more knowledge on means and methods that they're working for people up through the chain of command and understand the work they're doing. And finally, that if they do a good job and so choose they want to be part of one of our core teams, that we have ongoing work and that they want promoted that they have an opportunity to be promoted. EMCOR emphatically checks all those blocks in our subsidiary companies. And I think that's why you have -- it's difficult. Our guys are slogging away at it every day on mix management. I think we've been able to meet the moment as far as recruitment and retention of trade excellent [indiscernible]

The next question comes from Justin Hauke of Robert W. Baird.

Great. I guess -- so we already talked about, obviously, the first quarter, really strong revenue trend. The RPO is up 18% quarter-over-quarter. I think that's an organic record for you. But the revenue guidance only tweaked a little bit higher. You're looking for kind of 9% to 13% growth for the year and you just did [ 20% ]. So I guess I'm just trying to understand -- I know you've got some tough comps, but what's the conservatism in that outlook that would have the trends decelerate to kind of the more mid-single digits from what you put up at the start of the year bookings. .

I think you just said it in your last sentence, we just started the year. We're sitting here in the first quarter. We have 3 quarters in front of us. I think we'll know a heck of a lot more on the revenue trend as we exit second quarter and based on what we see at the end of the year. And it's still -- I mean even sitting here with these RPOs, Jason and I still think we have to book 40% of our work.

For the remainder of the year. If you're taking -- let's just use the midpoint of our revenue guidance range, if you take into consideration what's in RPO that we believe will burn through the rest of the year and what we earned in the first quarter, we still need to book about [ 30% ] of our work.

And we think we can do that and if we can book more of that and execute it within the year, that's how the revenue guidance will creep up, and we'll have much better visibility as going -- said simply, we feel good about the revenue trend in the business. We feel good about our RPO bookings. We feel good about the margin in those -- in the RPOs. But we're sitting here in first quarter, April and we'll have a much better view of that when we talk to you again in late July.

I think in the quarter, we made significant progress on a few jobs. Some of that accelerated maybe a little bit more than we expected. When we look at the rest of the year, I think where we land in that guidance is really going to depend on how quickly we mobilize on some of the new work we just booked, right? We had a lot -- we had strong bookings in the first quarter. So how quickly do those jobs mobilize, how quickly do we assemble a labor force and how quickly do they start burning. That's what's really going to dictate where we land.

All right. And just so previously, it was 40% to 45% of kind of new work you had to book and you're saying it's 30%. I just want to make sure...

you're right, Jason, given we have 1 quarter behind our belt and the strong bookings we had in the year. .

Yes. Okay. And then I guess going back to the GMP contracts versus fixed price, can you give us -- I just would be curious to know kind of what's the mix in the RPOs today of what your contracts look like today versus a year ago or maybe 5 years ago in terms of [indiscernible] more fixed price .

I don't think we could do that analysis from 5 years ago with any precision because things change halfway through a lot of times, and it ends up something different. I think versus a year ago, I think incrementally, it's moved a little more to GMP, and I would say this is not analytically for size. But I think that's mainly a mechanical and it's mainly driven by, I think, the larger scope of work which we're guessing, I mean, do we know that emphatically, we have a pretty good idea because of the power requirements and rack cooling we're doing, which is driven primarily, which we think by AI data centers. .

These are some of the large language model data centers. And we think that's the case because of where some of them are being built. And a lot of this -- we can tie all that together because of access to power and proximity and all that. So I think that's really the difference. Where that will and later, we'll see and not all GMP contracts are built the same way. But at the end of the day, there has been a little bit of a mix shift to there. And it only takes a couple of points to change 10 bps or 15 bps or 20 bps of margin. I would offer, though, that we wouldn't take these things if we weren't driving more margin dollars by doing it versus other opportunities. .

The next question comes from Avi Jaroslawicz from UBS.

So I just want to discuss this acceleration in organic growth that we saw here in Q1. It sounds like -- some of it was due to increased mix of prime contracting pass-through revenues that you called out. Just when we think of that relative to the high single-digit to low double-digit organic growth that you've discussed previously within the construction business, is that kind of upper single to low double-digit framing around your self-perform work? Or was that including the prime contracting...

It was all in -- I mean I think the preponderance of what we do is self-perform. But there's 2 places where it's more pass-through. One is, I think we don't even call it pass-through. We don't pass anything without a markup in the construction business. But it'd be primarily in our water and wastewater business, which we have a great team executing very well down in Florida. And it would be in our -- the 1 thing we do at EMCOR on an EPC basis at scale. Yes, we do chiller plants that way. We do other things. But the one place we do it at scale is in the food processing business.

It's a very good business. It's a multi-trade package. But we have more of that revenue passing through right now in our manufacturing and industrial market sector and comes at a little over margin. But if you look at it on a return on capital basis, it's very, very good work. And when we look at projects, Avi, we look at it both ways. We look at a project like that, almost the way we look at an acquisition. With the cash flows look on that project versus what we've invested to do it, what does it allow us to do from a further with the customer, both from an aftermarket basis and also follow-on work. We have customers that we've been on site doing large projects every 3 to 5 years, we made continuous presence at those sites, doing small fixed-price projects and maintenance projects.

I don't want to say for nothing's ever forever, but we've been there 20 years almost now. So that's a part of the business. Those are the 2 places where that pass-through revenue is the most significant. And that can affect margins 10 or 15 bps in a quarter to the negative. But again, I'll go back they generate really good margin dollars and a really good return on capital on those projects.

And in this quarter, it was the food processing, right? We still have the water and waste water in our backlog. I think that's what you could see as the year progresses, and this quarter was very much coming from food processing though.

Okay. Got it. Makes sense. Yes, I was in part, looking at the water and wastewater growth in the quarter. And so just trying to piece it all together.

I'll get ahead of one of the other questions and somebody can maybe drop out of the queue. We're not forgoing any data center work to do this work. It's either a different team that does this kind of work or a different market sector -- I mean different geography. We're not forego different skills and capabilities. We're not forgoing any projects in the data center or high-tech world because we're doing water and wastewater or food processing.

so Really Incremental growth at the end of the day. .

Okay. That makes sense. And then just also, when we last spoke, you framed productivity and pricing together contributing about 5 percentage points to construction revenue growth this year. What do you have embedded for that in the updated guidance? Is it still about 5%? Or has that picked up?

I think the way we termed it is less than half, right, at the lower end. So about 30% to 40% of our growth comes from pricing and productivity. But then now you have to tie that also into mix, right, Jason, to get to that answer. I don't think there's anything different than what we've done historically.

The next question comes from Sangita Jain of KeyBanc Capital Markets.

So if I can ask a follow-up on the mechanical margin discussion. Were these projects later on have incremental phases that you will then take on a fixed price? Or is the nature of these projects such that even the follow-on phases will be GMP?

Well, the margin headwind in mechanical, some of it's GMP, others mix because of the food processing work, we hope to have fall on phases over a number of years. They won't be as large.

I think it's true we determined what that contracting mechanism is, right? They could be fixed price in the future, on some of these jobs, if we get more comfortable with our labor force, we get more comfortable with the design. They may stay GMP because we do have a couple of customers who just prefer GMP work. So I think it's going to be dependent on the individual jobs, and I think we'll know more as the year progress. .

I think we're beating this a little too hard right now collectively on the phone. We contract lots of different ways. And sometimes, our fixed price work on something like food processing because we're servicing more as a prime is a fixed-price contract. It doesn't have the same market characteristics and margin opportunity, the fixed-price contract can be on a single trade contract doing a data center or a manufacturing plant or a hospital. .

Other parts, we're doing GMP work on data centers because a customer can't nail down a scope or a new geography or that's their preferred way of doing the business. And they do that, that way across their whole portfolio. I think we always think about operating in bands of margins. And as long as we're sort of within that 12- to 24-month look on bands of margins, we're performing pretty well. And then we take it a separate step further, At the part we're in a business, I think anybody that knows us, EMCOR is a return on invested capital type mentality.

And if we can generate more margin dollars and balance that against the margins, we're happy. I know we're all trying to nail down this number of whatever percent for the year. A, we're not that good. That's why you have a range. And b, we have 12,000 projects going on right now, all kind of different contract structures. Is it a little bit incremental towards GMP, I look at that as a positive because maybe [indiscernible] off the table where we shouldn't have been taking the risk on a fixed-price contract and allows us to penetrate a customer further. So I think we're trying to put too fine a point or something that you can't put a fine point on.

Yes. And I just go back to those 12 to 24 month averages to Tony's point, if you look at mechanical prior to this quarter and you look at those 8 quarters, margin for mechanical was as low as 10.6% and as high as 13.6%. So we're still right -- we're bouncing around those 8 quarter averages. And so I don't see anything here that's fundamentally different.

Yes. We grew mechanical operating income, 18.7% and we grew electrical operating income 28.2%. I'd say on any given day, sign me up for that. .

Understood. That's very helpful. Can I follow up on the 1.5 book-to-bill? And can you give us a little bit of a look as to -- are you being able to book the onward dated backlog? I know this space has traditionally been more of a book -- a short-term booking cadence business, but can you tell us at least some of these large projects give you a longer look into your performance maybe next year.

Don't think in a significant way. I mean, I think if you look at the end of last year, we would have said at the end of '25, 82% of that RPO is going to burn within 12 months. Where we sit today, we say 78% is going to burn within 12 months. So a little bit longer, a little bit more extending beyond the 12 months, but not in a significant way. If you look at our total RPO, I'd be surprised if $6 billion to $6.5 billion goes even into '27...

And that will [indiscernible]

Yes, of course.

The next question comes from Tim Mulrooney of William Blair.

Jason. Just a couple of quick ones here. So I heard you say that productivity and pricing is contributing, I don't know, which said like 30% to 40% of total growth this year and you're growing, call it, 10% to 12% organically, if you exclude contribution from acquisitions. So this implies pricing is maybe adding 3 to 4 points to growth, which I'm just wanting to confirm is directionally correct. And the reason I want to is because that surprises me a little bit, like we're hearing about pricing being very strong, particularly around AI infrastructure, EMCOR are critical to the whole process, but you're not the largest cost bucket for a long shot. So it seems to me that pricing would be a lot higher than 3 to 4 points, but maybe I'm missing something.

I think -- look, I think in general, when contractors talk about strong pricing, a lot of times, they got to execute the work. And so we're saying our expectation going into the year on pricing is we're working with really smart customers. We never assume our customers don't have alternatives. I've never assumed at any time in my career and that we want to be with these contractors, these customers long term.

I think when you look at our gross margins, and you look at our execution over a long period of time, and our ability to retain customers and at times we replace other contractors on site, but I don't remember us ever being replaced on a site. I think we get the price productivity execution just about right. I've never been the guy that's going to sit here. There's people throwing work at us, and we just get it in buckets. And some of my peers that say that I'm not sure they have the long-term view of the market that we have with pricing really means in contracting.

Price in our business comes in a lot of different ways. If the assumptions you're making on the productivity of your labor, especially as you move further down the labor curve and there's more of a mix of people who are less familiars or more untrained, pricing also can cover what you expect on unforeseen job conditions, you don't get an adversarial relationship with customers who are going to work with a long time. if there are small changes on a job. So maybe you're giving up some of that in the execution of the job to retain the customer.

I think the pricing environment is good, and I think we're almost getting paid for what we're worth. But I would take probably better contract terms, better change order administration and give up some price any day as we execute these large, fast-paced jobs for what are some of the most sophisticated customers in the world.

Jason, you have something to add on that?

No, I just think when you look at the number of jobs we're executing today versus the number of jobs a year ago, and you kind of back into the growth rate in jobs or even average contract values, I think it supports what we're saying, which is that really volume demand and productivity are the core drivers of our revenue growth.

Our next question comes from Manish Somaiya of Cantor.

Congrats again to the team. A couple of questions. Maybe, Tony, for you first. When I think about the contracts that you're being awarded, especially the mission-critical projects, are you seeing both electrical and mechanical scopes or is that...

I mean we don't -- I think underneath your question, are we combining electrical and mechanical scopes and bidding the jobs that way? Absolutely not. But are we on some sites, both electrically and mechanically, Yes. But do we make decisions contingent on that? Absolutely not. These are separate scopes of work. These are separate themes. Now if we're fortunate enough that we have 2 EMCOR companies on that site, or even 3 when you include fire life safety, does the job tend to go better for the owner in those cases? .

Probably, Yes. Our guys know each other how to work together. They work with the same VDC tools, the integration becomes better on the drawings. They can talk to each other and get coordination better on the job sites ot prevent [indiscernible] stacking. But do we specifically bundle the 2 things together and bid it as a package. No, we don't do that, almost never. I don't want to say never. Nothing's never, but we almost try not to do that.

But if you look at our bookings and you say, okay, there's a significant increase in data center bookings or networking communications RPOs. That's coming from both mechanical and electrical...

Electrical.

When you look at the revenue growth within each segment, let's just, again, look at Network & Communications, round numbers, electrical is up $240 million and mechanical is up $280 million. So we're seeing that growth in both, and we're seeing the bookings from both.

Okay. That's super helpful. And then, Jason, on the cash flow aspect, how should we think about the cash flow use reversing over the course of the year? Is that second half weighted typically or some of that comes...

Yes. I think if you look at the pattern we've had over the last 2 years or so, we think that pattern will hold true through the remainder of the year. Q4 tends to be the strongest for us from a cash flow generation perspective. Q1 tends to be the weakest. But if you look really over '24 and '25, we expect those patterns to be about the same. .

Okay. And then just, Tony, back to you. Maybe if you can just talk about the M&A pipeline, what you're seeing out there, what are still the missing pieces within EMCOR geographically or product-wise? And then maybe if you can also just give us a sense as to what you're seeing so far in the second quarter.

I won't answer that...

In terms of demand.

I won't answer that question. We're reporting on the first quarter today. Look, our acquisition pipeline is good. Deals happen when they happen. Our primary area of interest is electrical construction. We're a medium-voltage company or line voltage company. We're not really looking to grow our -- the high-voltage market or the T&D market, we do have a position there, but it's mainly in the Mountain West and it's a very good company, but we're not looking to become [ Quanta ] in the T&D business.

We're going to continue to do low to mid-voltage acquisitions in Electrical. We still have places where we can expand geography or strengthen geography in a lot of cases now. I think what we've had great success with is either buying an acquisition of scale, which is a Miller. That's a great example of that. But we also have many examples in EMCOR, which is, I think, where you create the most value is when we take an electrical contractor that was just a good industrial or health care contractor could do really sophisticated work.

We know that there's customers that want us to do data centers in that market. We were able to come in and take that group of folks and take their core business, to have them continue to do that through our peer learning and health. We can then have them expand into data centers. And that comes at a much better valuation than the folks that are doing 80% of their work in data centers that everybody is frothy over and want to spend 12x or 15x earnings. We're not going to do that for one market company and a one sector company.

Secondarily, we buy construction. We've tended to do that more buy and then take a larger platform like Batchelor & Kimball, and grow organically. And the reason that sets up they could do that well is because the amount of prefabrication on a mechanical job, they can take more labor hours off the job, and therefore, they feel much more comfortable. And then that's sort of the fire protection story too, which is the other part of mechanical that we would grow through acquisition inorganically. And with the fire protection, we're both growing the construction capability and the aftermarket capability.

The other area of interest for us is, of course, the mechanical service space. We do both. They're not large compared to the construction acquisitions, but we'll do larger acquisitions there. There, we're buying footprint. We're buying technician capability and sometimes those acquisitions are small as a couple of million dollar asset deal to open up a market or strengthen our market, whether it's a certain type of equipment, a certain kind of capability. And then we also love to continue to support our customers through building controls and automation and mechanical services acquisitions, where we're one of the more significant independent building controls, and we have a number of different brands we're dealer for, and we have good capability, and that's both on the front end of the business and the design, the development of the user interfaces and of course, the installation and the commissioning to make sure it works.

Those are our primary interests as we grow through acquisition. I would also argue that we also are not immune to doing the right kind of fabrication acquisition. We haven't done a lot of that to date, but we would do that if we thought we could add -- we have ongoing work that we could take some of that capacity and then also kit up some call it modular more than we're doing today. It's not something we've done, but it's something we look at all the time. Jason, I miss anything?

I think that's a good summary.

Our next question comes from Adam Bubes of Goldman Sachs.

This is Anuj on behalf of Adam. So wanted to understand what is your prefabrication capacity today? And how much capacity do you plan to add this year? And additionally, if you can discuss the puts and takes of internalizing fabrication versus leveraging fabrication for third-party sales?

Look, I think the best way to think about how we think about it is to look at our CapEx spending. We don't necessarily look at it as -- we're destined to add this much square footage and I think you got to take the fabrication that we do and break it into 2 or 3 pieces. One is the traditional fab we do just about every contract that we have, which they're doing some pipe fabrication, a little bit of fittings on the sheet metal side and they do that to support the aftermarket and the smaller projects in our market.

We do a lot of that. The second fabrication is more dedicated fabrication, especially in our larger mechanical and electrical contractors. And that breaks into 2 pieces, too. There's -- especially electrically, there's almost a catalog we can do. That said, we're taking all these different parts from distributors and OEMs, put them together, so it almost kits out to the site. And then there's job specific where we're making conduit racks and different bands that we're doing specific to that job.

It looks more like what we do on the mechanical side. Where there, we can have pretty significant pipe shops, pipe rack shops that do a variety of sizes from small board to large board. And then we also have sheet metal shops where we're hoping to generate off those coil lines, somewhere between 800,000 and 1.2 million pounds a year. Now again -- and then there's the third part of that is part of that fabrication if we can do on job site in a tent and bring equipment in and not have to move it as much, we do that, too.

So we're much more adaptable maybe than some others of fabrication. And I think that distinguishes us from other people is, for the most part, you never say everything is ever, but for the most part, EMCOR is fabricating for EMCOR and doing it as part of our job design. We do have cases where people want us to build than other people installed, but that's a small minority of our fabrication versus others. And I think part of that is because we tend to have our trades focus on it. We're not a multi-craft workforce, maybe like a nonunion workforce can be in some markets.

And my discussion about if we did fabrication and looked at it that way, that would be a fabricator would buy that we think we can bring more value to by looking at more multi-trade work. Jason?

I'd just say, if you look -- Tony made the point about our CapEx over the last several years, and we've said it before, if you take even just a 3-year look, our CapEx, if you look at a CAGR is growing twice what our revenue is, and that's those investments we're making in prefab. If you look at '26, I think we'll spend somewhere between $115 million and $125 million on CapEx. And I think a significant part of that will be fitting out fabrication facilities or upgrading the ones we have today.

That helps. And just 1 more follow-up. So demand remains particularly in your data center business. So what if anything, sets the ceiling on level of growth you can achieve from a capacity standpoint? Is it labor equipment procurement, et cetera?

Well, it's emphatically not equipment procurement because on data centers, most of the major equipment is being bought by the owners. For the owners through the GCs because they're deciding what size they want to do it. So we really have nothing to do with what they're doing on the major end product equipment in data centers. In small cases, we still do, but for the most part, the owners buying the equipment. I think I've addressed where the bottleneck could be. We've been great at producing leaders. Our bottleneck is fill leadership and it gets to the frontline leaders, foreman, general foreman and project manager project executives. .

No one can grow without that constraint. We feel pretty good about being our growth targets we have out there, we wouldn't have taken the work. And so therefore, we feel pretty good that in this quarter, that year-over-year, it's up plus 30%, up plus 17% sequentially. We feel we can fill the teams either through increased scope or the teams that we've built to service that demand. And law of large numbers eventually tells you that your growth rate is going to slow, but the dollars stay up. And I'd say the same thing about -- that's my whole margin point. We're in the search for margin dollars right now more than margin percentages.

All right. Thank you all. We'll see you again at the end of July, and thanks for your interest in EMCOR. Bye.

Good afternoon, everyone. We're just going to get started. So a quick introduction on my part. I'm Manish Somaiya. I cover Power, Tech, and Infrastructure for Cantor. Super excited to have Tony Guzzi and Jason Nalbandian, CFO. Tony, of course, as you probably know, is the CEO of EMCOR. We initiated on EMCOR yesterday, a price target of $848. So if you haven't had a chance, check out the piece. But of course, super excited to have the conversation with the team this afternoon. So maybe I'll kick it off with you, Tony. Obviously, you had a great 2025.

What is one aspect of your business that investors still underestimate in terms of the potential and in terms of market standing?

Yes. I think we've been at this a long time with a long record of success. And I think -- and look, we don't take that for granted either, right? In the kind of business we're in, you keep your humility over that period of time. But we've been, I think, a very good compounder, right? We -- I guess if you were comparing us, we don't chase fads. We execute well. We -- you can argue we're a very broadly diversified portfolio of projects and service base. With the data -- like everybody wants to talk about with the data center option today. We -- it's not like we turn away data center work to do other work.

I think part of it is if they actually looked at the numbers and realize our penetration in the data center space, they realize they're getting great exposure to data centers. But because of our size and breadth, you don't necessarily just see data centers, even though the business is up 100% in the mechanical and 70%, 80% electrical year-over-year and the RPOs have climbed.

So I think that's one aspect of it. I think the other aspect of it is we are very disciplined capital allocators. I've never been the kind of person that says, well, my multiple is here. And so anything that comes up to that multiple, I can just go buy. That's never been our schtick. We've been very disciplined about where we buy, which is mechanical and electrical construction for the most part, mechanical services, which is really HVAC services, building controls, and fire life safety within mechanical. And you have to be patient.

And the other thing -- just because a market is hot or you see concentration -- the old rules of investing still stand, right? Watch for concentration, watch for customer concentration on an acquisition target, watch for sector concentration, watch for geographic concentration, a little less relevant in our business because almost everything we buy is geographically concentrated because that's one of the reasons we're buying is to get into a market like we did Batchelor & Kimball years ago in 2019 and like we did with Miller this past year, a great franchise across the Southeast and that helps us fill out our portfolio.

And then we can learn from each other and build a business broader than that. And I think if you look at us over a long time -- and you looked at the last investor deck, I would say, go to Page 7. Our RPOs are about $13.2 billion at the end of the year. If you look at the end of '19, they were about $4.1 billion. Today, our RPOs are $4.4 billion in data centers today.

So -- and underlying that's been a lot of growth in institutional, industrial, hard industrial, manufacturing, institutional. And these are all compound annual growth, water and wastewater, north of 10% or 15%, some as high as 25% or 30% markets. In any other world, you'd say, you've done a heck of a job growing out those markets and we're going to continue doing all that. So the diversification, data center option, disciplined operators, pretty darn good capital allocators.

Maybe I'll go to Jason. You gave your margin guidance for '26. I'm sure everybody wants to know what kind of gets you to the upper end versus the lower end. Maybe if you can just talk about that.

Yes. So to me, a lot of it comes down to mix and execution. And so if you look at where we are or where we were rather for 2025, we finished the year with a record margin for EMCOR at 9.35%. Our guidance for 2026 is 9% to 9.4% on the operating margin side. And essentially, what we're saying there is if you look at that high end of that guidance, that 9.4%, we believe that we can continue to execute at the levels we're executing at today. Our mix should remain strong, and our market position and the mix we have in our RPOs should also remain strong.

And so when you consider all those factors, what we believe is we have the potential to execute just as well as we did in 2025 when we move into 2026. The lower end of that range, the 9% to 9.3%, let's say, really just reflects what we think could happen if there's a shift in mix. Not to say that any of the underlying factors or fundamentals of our business are changing. But if we have more GMP work or more T&M work or more work in some of the other sectors where the margin profiles are just inherently different because some of the jobs are -- carry a different risk profile. That just shows what margins could do if mix shifts a little bit. So for us, it really comes down to mix, timing, and execution.

Yes. And the way we think about guidance, I think if you listen to our call, we think of the low end of our range, which is where the 9% sort of encapsulates. We're pretty confident about that. And I think that's how you should give guidance. And the midpoint, fairly confident. And as you get to the higher end of the range, some mix needs to work our way. We got to execute well. You're always going to have some jobs that turn out less than you expected in contracting. So keep those to a minimum and maybe we'll get there to the top end.

So maybe just related to that, what do you think the sell-side investors get wrong about how your business works and how margins work? Maybe if you can just talk about it.

I'll do it sort of like at an operating level. I think just go macro level. This is not a manufacturing company. So I've been a manufacturer, right? You lock in standards at the beginning of the year, you know your market position. You have a pretty good idea of project pricing unless there's a dislocation, and you execute in the market you're in for that year. That's -- and if you have a new product, maybe get a little bit of organic from there, maybe get a little more price in markets because your commodity costs are up. In our business, we very rarely get to repeat something exactly. And even if we're doing the same kind of facility or building like we're building the next building on a data center campus, well, what might have changed? The project team might have changed on their side, probably not on our side, but on their side. The design might have been tweaked just a little bit.

The mechanical contractor on the job, if it's not us, maybe not as good, and therefore, we get held up electrically. There might be a stacking of trades. These are lots of people with lots of variables, right? And so you're running a portfolio approach to that. So we've always thought of our margins in bands quarter-to-quarter. And Jason will go through that in a minute. But the point is this is not a quarter-to-quarter business. And if you look backwards over 12 to 18 months, it gives you a pretty good idea on average how the business is operating.

And unless there's a big mix shift or you get some big volume upside that you didn't expect, you sort of know within relative -- and anybody thinks we're that accurate, like one investor asked me, we thought it would be 10 or 20 bps higher on the top end. I'm looking at him like, wow, if you've got that level of precision, then you should come and join us, and I'll go do what you're doing, because we absolutely don't have that level of precision.

Yes. I think Tony's point -- that we're not a quarter-to-quarter business -- is key. We always say take a look at a rolling 12- to 24-month average. And I'll just give an example. Our Electrical segment -- for them, that average would be 12% to 12.6%. But in those 8 quarters, margins have been as low as 11.1%, 11.3% and as high as 15.8%. So they'll vary quarter-to-quarter just based on mix, timing and execution, but you really have to look over a period of time. And I think that's the thing that maybe gets lost from time to time.

Or the same thing can happen with bookings, RPOs, book-to-bill ratio. Literally, a week could change a lot, book-to-bill. What I do know, if you think about today, whether it be margins, bookings or anything like that, that's quarter-to-quarter, the fundamentals of our business haven't changed over the last couple of years. In fact, they've gotten more positive. And as we gave our guidance for 2026, we didn't anticipate a big change in fundamentals. But with our revenue guidance that we have out there, we obviously believe we're still in a growth market in the most important sectors that we play in.

Interesting. And I just want to kind of stick to the topic of margins because obviously, it is prominent, and I want you to have the opportunity to explain yourselves -- the other question I have gotten is -- which is I think a fair one. Tony, as you are looking at all the different projects that are going on, what are some of the things that you look at to make sure that a program is on track versus, a, something is flaring up and it needs to be addressed.

Yes. So it starts back here when we actually decide that's something we really want to do. And these are things like our guys are running the sort of less than $5 million business every day. And unless there's a term or condition that's crazy in there. And even they will raise their hand and say, look, we don't like the terms here, and our lawyers will come in and try to negotiate that. But if you think macro level, right, how do you manage risk in a business like this? And then how does that manifest itself in the things we watch both numerically and on the soft side.

There's -- whether it's a data center project, a semiconductor project, a health care project or we're building a school, right? And on the aftermarket side, it's all about access and customer relationship and everything else because there we're just trying to stay out of the way and do a great job and get them the savings or get the facility back up and running. Let's focus on the new construction side for a minute. If you're thinking about the business, and this is sort of EMCOR Operating Discipline 101. The first part of it is -- what do we know about the owner? What do we know about the general contractor, CM we're going to be dealing with.

Ultimately, in most cases on the construction side, even if the owner is directing it, we're working for a general contractor or construction manager and in our case, to a lesser extent, an EPC. Do we know who's going to be on their team? Do we know the owner? Have we had good success with that combination? And if it's new, has someone else that does benefit EMCOR has, has someone else at EMCOR had success. A great example of that is it's happening every day in the data center world. But when Wynn was bringing their casino to Boston -- we had built quite a bit for Wynn in Las Vegas.

So actually, our Las Vegas team, we hadn't built a casino in a while, but we still had the people. We actually flew to Boston and sat down, went through the numbers, brought the Boston team out to Las Vegas. So let's think about how we did some of these things that are peculiar to Wynn, how they build, and how the owner behaves. And then we actually coached up the general contractor because, quite frankly, the Boston-based guys -- those East Coast guys weren't Vegas contractors. So okay, that's one thing.

Next thing we look at the engineer and the architect. Have we worked with them before? In most cases, we've worked with everybody in both those cases -- GC/CMs, engineer. What are their designs like? Are they good designs? Are they designs where we're going to have to do a lot of design-assist to get it the constructability. Are they responsive to request for information as we validate the design? Are they responsive to value engineering that we may recommend as time goes on? If there's a change in the job or they click on the turn with the drawings back to us, so we can get back to work and not have a lot of dead time.

Then we get to the simple question: Have we built one before? Take those first 2, try to get as much intelligence as we can. These are bigger jobs like $10 million plus. Have we built one before? And if we haven't built one in that geography or with that subsidiary, have we built one somewhere in EMCOR? And can we take that learning and bring it to bear? Or have we built something similar? So, is there similar lessons we can apply. A lot of the learning that comes today in the data center world came from our manufacturing jobs.

And in -- from our data center, we did, but that was only 2 or 3 subsidiaries versus 17, with manufacturing jobs or health care, hospitals. What are the economics of this project? If it's a big enough project, it almost looks like an acquisition to us. What's the cash flow going to look like on it? What are the terms and conditions? What are we actually signing up for on liquidated damages or consequential damages? Are we going to be able to cap them? So how do we frame that? Then it gets to the final stage of, okay, once we build this, if you're a construction guy, the first thing you want to do is get off the job, right? I mean you want to be gone.

And if we have an aftermarket team, they'll come in -- and they're very different people. How do you commission this building? How hard is it going to be commissioning? Did we -- if we're on the mechanical side, did we do the building controls as a part of our contract? Or did we hire the sub there? And then how we -- because these are the kinds of things. If you're doing a data center, what's the flushing look like? Are we going to be able to get the system flushed, especially on the AI data centers and get it up and running.

So we take a full-scale view of it, make sure we protect ourselves as best we can in the contract. And then we go into planning if we get the job. And if we're going to do all that work on a large job, we have an idea that we have a pretty good chance of winning the job. Nothing is 100% but we're not wasting our time on something significant to ask all those questions. And then Jason has some very hard metrics that tells them once this gets going, whether the job is going well versus the WIP and whether it's not.

Yes. And there's a number of ways you can do that. But I think the most simplistic is looking at the cash position of the projects, right? Jobs that are overbilled tend to be performing well. The jobs that are underbilled, we tend to say have risk. And sometimes the risk could just be on timing. Other times, it ends up being potential overruns in the estimates. But if you look at EMCOR overall, we are in a significant net overbilled position, and I think that is a testament to our execution.

So over the next year then, where do you see the greatest margin benefit potential? And where do you see margin dilution...

Yes. I think that's a hard question to answer -- everybody gets excited and says, data center work is driving the margin. I'd say that's fair because it's a big part of what people are doing. But it's only driving the margins in some ways because you're executing well and they're really demanding jobs. And you really have to know what you're doing to sign up and do it, and you really have to be able to scale up and get there. And you better have a great prefab. So, maybe there's margin opportunity there. But we do well in other sectors, right? We do well in basically replacing the chiller room, design-build. We do very well there. So it really does go back to answering those first 6 questions well, 7 questions well.

And then once you answer those questions -- well, the one I forgot that is: Who are we going to put on the job? And do we have the resources to be successful from a leadership and supervision standpoint. We start there. That's why I probably haven't mentioned it. That's a given. But if we get those right, it almost doesn't matter where we're working. We have a good chance. I always tell people, one of the ways you do well in our kind of business is the absence of badness. So it means we pegged the margin right with the right contingency, didn't have a lot of write-downs and didn't have a lost job that was significant. And Jason's point about the cash is important, right? Sometimes there's an image in people when we are net overbilled like that, a, we're collecting all the cash that could, a portion of it, we are.

But also, you just don't send someone a bill in our business. You've negotiated that you're going to send them the bill, and here's what the bill is going to say. And you've hit pre-arranged milestones. So, you don't get net overbilled unless you're performing well on the job in most cases. And that's why it's such an important one. I think the other thing they watch very carefully, like these guys have great analytics that they've developed and this is probably one of the areas that AI will be.

I think we're doing a fair amount of quasi-AI now on our WIP is the one thing we manage and control is labor. So, we spend a lot of time focusing on what the manpower loading looked like on a job versus what we expected, how do the hours track versus where we thought it would be, how we're doing against the labor contingency we built into the job. We don't miss materials very often, right, unless there's a big change in commodity prices. Even then we don't miss it very often.

So you talked about -- maybe just shifting to backlog. You talked about record backlog, RPOs which, of course, is very supportive for visibility. But then how do you assess quality of the backlog?

Yes. I think some of it goes to what Tony was talking about when we're assessing projects, right? It's asking ourselves those same questions about the nature of the job, our ability to execute on that job, and that will give us a sense of where we think those projects can perform. Then I think some of it is just looking at the margin and the backlog at bid, the amount of contingency in projects when we're beginning projects. And all of those things paint a picture for us about the potential of those jobs and how they compare to similar jobs that we started a year ago or 2 years ago. So it's very much a benchmarking exercise when we're looking at our backlog to see how does this stack up against historical periods. And I think what we believe right now is our backlog at the end of 2025 going into 2026, is just as good as our backlog was a year ago. So we still think we have some really good quality projects ahead of us, and I think it gives us an opportunity.

And it supports our guidance range with as much visibility as we've had in a long time. And we had pretty good visibility over the last 2 or 3 years. What I think people don't appreciate what's happening is how actively we're managing the mix, maybe less so on the upside, because go back to the way we think about qualifying things. That's agnostic, no matter what sector it is in. But then we, as a management team down through the segment level, we make sector calls sometimes and geography calls. Now, you don't see it, but there's -- we've done a fair amount of restructuring in our portfolio. Where you do see it -- if you look at Page 7 is we've taken transportation work down quite significantly.

Now some of that is because the work can be lumpy, but most of it is because we basically have got out of -- we have one more year to do in one place. We basically have exited the road transportation lighting market. And we were pretty good at it at one time. Dynamics change in local markets, contracts change, and we -- the risk change, it's not worth it anymore. And so we've moved away from that. And these are from the guys who did the Tappan Zee Bridge electrically and did quite well. The dynamics here, especially in New York and some other big cities, just not worth it anymore on some of that work.

And so we've decided to de-emphasize that part of our business. It's not that we weren't executing well is the -- it's that when you do an analysis of the mission and what you're going to do in the terrain and everything you're dealing with, you sit there and say, not where we should be putting our capital right now. So if you think about that, we probably over a couple of years, growing like we are organically, if you were to take snapshot, think of '21, and we've got out of some commercial markets in some of a place like San Francisco, we're no longer there in a significant way mechanically.

And if you snap that line and look at it today, we probably take $300 million, $400 million out of this business on a run rate that wasn't very profitable. And that's the other way you help build up margins. But also, it's not like we made a short-term decision when we did that. We took a 5-, 7-year look at the market and said, fundamentals aren't going to change here. The risk is -- the risk reward ratio for that line of work puts us in the wrong box, much like we look at acquisitions, right? We're very disciplined acquirers, and that hasn't changed because there's a couple of hot markets right now.

And I guess maybe just a last one on backlog. How should we think about shadow backlog that you might have? And what is one sector that you're most bullish about over the next 12, 18 months?

That's pretty straightforward. That's like making a 2-inch putt, right? Obviously, we're all excited about what's happening in the data center market and some of the re-shoring opportunities we see. And really, semiconductors is both a growth story and a re-shoring story. So -- and it's beyond semiconductor, anything high-tech manufacturing and data centers, I think you'd have to be excited about if you're a highly skilled specialty contractor right now.

Right. So we keep hearing about the power availability, which is a big gating factor for everybody. How do you sort of adjust the sequencing and timing in terms of the workflow because of that challenge? And geographically, how do you position yourselves?

That's very rarely a challenge for us because of where we are in the food chain. Most times, before we come on a job or they let us loose with a contract, we've -- they've already done all that. And it might be a little slower getting the substation hooked up, but they know they're going to happen within a very short period of time. We're not -- now, we may know they want to build in a year or 2 years, and they haven't figured all that out yet. But to be honest, we haven't committed any resources other than some pricing upfront to just get them in the ballpark. Fair statement...

I think that's fair. And the other thing for us, too, is by the time we're -- as Tony said, by the time we have a contract in hand, we know that contract is going to go. And for us, we're usually on-site within 1 to 3 months, and that work begins and the majority of our work is done in 12 months.

So go back to one of the things you asked earlier, I think what you just said that's important for people to understand. Our RPOs are -- the accounting definition of RPOs, Remaining Performance Obligations. Other people report backlog, which then piles a bunch of other stuff on top of that. So we may know that we're going to do other work on a site or we may know that it's going to happen. They haven't committed to us yet formally. You could look at our RPOs as there's a formal commitment, a contract that we're going to do the work.

And the only portion that's in that RPO is, if it's a service agreement, even if it's a 5-year service agreement is the non-cancelable portion, which could be anywhere from 90 to 120 days. And usually, on the service agreement, those go both ways. We can cancel them too. So I think that's a really distinct difference with us. And I think the reason I'm building off of that is that's the reason our work usually doesn't get canceled.

Yes. Our RPOs are firm and cancellations have historically not had an impact on us. The exact reason.

I can count on less than 2 hands over 15 years any project of size that's got canceled. And you could guess when they got canceled, 2008, '09, and 2020.

So just going back, maybe turning to capital allocation because we have about 5 minutes. You've said that you've been fairly balanced. What is your framework for allocating the next dollar between organic, inorganic or returning it to shareholders? How do you guys think about that?

So we have a dividend, right? $0.40 a quarter.

$0.60.

$0.60 a quarter, now screw that up $0.40.

It's $0.40, Tony...

So $0.40 a quarter, that's a given, right, put that aside. And then clearly, our priority is organic growth. And with the amount of cash we generate, we can't invest enough in organic growth because we're a capital-light business. Even though we doubled and Jason will go through these in a little bit, the amount of capital expenditure we have, mainly because we've increased our fabrication space and we've increased our software spend. We still can't spend enough, right? And we try to keep our cost structure as variable as we can. So we tend to lease buildings even when we build a fab shop. And outfitting them and we're pretty good buyers of equipment and products. So then you get to the next one, which given our druthers, right now, we would love to be able to repeat 2025 and 2026.

Are we going to be able to do that? Deals happen when they happen. We talk to people over long periods of time because the people that are selling us their business typically, even like last year, we did a bunch of small ones, Jason will go through that. The bigger ones, they're selling us their family's life work and their reputation. So these aren't simple decisions. These aren't people that are looking to multiple up with the private equity firm. Typically, if PEs involved. And then we go to share buyback. I don't think we're trying to be hedge fund managers, typically, although we've been pretty good buyers of our stock. But that is there where we end up with excess cash. And we don't try to buy when the thing is rapidly accelerating. The flip side is after that, it pretty much looks like dollar cost averaging, I think, unless there's a big dislocation like there was last year after DeepSeek panic.

We tend to do share repurchases, both programmatically and then opportunistically, depending on the market. But yes, when you look at -- to Tony's point, when you look at the organic growth, it's how do we make our existing operating companies as productive and efficient as possible. So for us in recent years, it's been looking at ways to expand our prefab capabilities or use of VDC and BIM. And I think Tony referenced some numbers before. And really, what we've seen is still a capital-light business for us. Our CapEx is like 0.6%, 0.7% of revenues.

But we've expanded our CapEx in recent years to the point that if revenue is growing, let's say, over a 3-year period at a 15% CAGR, CapEx is growing at a 30% CAGR. And that's those investments. And then you look to the acquisitions, and there's a number of different ways we look to acquire. Some of it is looking to buy a platform like we did with Miller in 2025. Some of it is looking to fill in a geography like we did with Danforth in 2025. And then we did 8 other acquisitions, which were all really bolt-ons or tuck-ins to existing operating companies to enhance their capabilities and further their position.

Maybe over to you, Tony, as to maybe recap everything that we've talked about. If you have to sum up EMCOR's strategy for the next 2, 3 years, how would you do that?

We're going to continue to grind it out, take it up, take advantage of great growth opportunities. Play the best team that I think is in the industry in the field because that is our core product, right? Our core product is the best field leadership in the industry. We just happen to be in this industry. We have the best field leaders. We spent a lot of time training. We spend a lot of time learning from each other, and we're committed to the things we talked about, disciplined capital allocation, Mission First, People Always. With our people, transparency, a lot of respect for each other. And that's been a long-term recipe for success. And we're not going to alter out of that one bit. We're not going to be someone we're not. We're not going to chase fads. Data centers are not a fad to us. It's a great sector to operate and build projects and do great things for our customers. So that's what it is for us.

Well, thank you so much. Just in time. Thank you, Tony. Thank you, Jason. We appreciate your participation and enjoy the conference. Thank you.

Good morning. My name is Jamie, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the EMCOR Group Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions].

At this time, I'd like to turn the floor over to Lucas Sullivan, Director, Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Sullivan, you may begin.

Thanks, Jamie. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to EMCORE's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you joining us by webcast, we are at the beginning of our slide presentation that will accompany our remarks today. This presentation will be archived in the Investor Relations section of our website at emcorgroup.com.

With me today are Tony Guzzi, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Nalbandian, Senior Vice President and EMCOR's Chief Financial Officer; and Maxine Mauricio, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel. For today's call, Tony will provide comments on our fourth quarter and full year and discuss our RPOs. Jason will then review the fourth quarter and full year numbers, then turn it back to Tony to discuss our guidance before we open it up for Q&A.

Before we begin, a quick reminder that this presentation and discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and may contain certain non-GAAP financial information. Slide 2 of our presentation describes in detail these forward-looking statements and the non-GAAP financial information disclosures. I encourage everyone to review both the disclosures in conjunction with our discussion and accompanying slides.

And finally, as a reminder, all financial information discussed during this morning's call is included in our consolidated financial statements within both our earnings press release issued this morning and in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

And with that, let me turn the call over to Tony. Tony?

Yes. Thanks, Lucas. Good morning, and welcome to our fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. I'm going to speak briefly to the fourth quarter in my opening comments, but we'll focus my introductory remarks on what drove our continued success in 2025.

So I'm going to start on Pages 4 through 5 of our earnings presentation. We had an excellent close to the year with our fourth quarter results. In the fourth quarter, we generated revenues of $4.5 billion, which represents 19.7% growth. We earned adjusted earnings per share of $7.19 per diluted share, a 13.8% increase from 2024 and delivered adjusted operating income of $440 million, a 13.1% increase from 2024. We did this while achieving strong adjusted operating margins of 9.7%.

Our adjusted results for the fourth quarter exclude the gain on the sale of our U.K. business and the transaction costs related to sub sell. For the full year, our adjusted results exclude these items as well as the transaction costs incurred in the first quarter due to the acquisition of the Miller Electric Company.

By any measure, 2025 was a tremendous year for us. We had record revenues of nearly $17 billion and record adjusted full year operating margin of 9.4% and at the high end of our guidance range. We also had record adjusted diluted earnings per share of $25.87 per share, an increase of 20% from 2024. With operating cash flow of $1.3 billion, we continued our exceptional record of cash conversion.

Our success once again demonstrates our ability to execute with discipline across our business as we drive innovation and efficiency to achieve exceptional outcomes for our customers. We have delivered sustained strong results despite the fact that we are working on the most technically sophisticated fast-paced and demanding projects in our history. We had a great year, and we enjoyed delivering for our customers and our shareholders.

Notably, we earned full year mechanical and electrical construction operating margins of 12.8% and 12.1%, respectively, demonstrating excellent execution across a diverse range of projects by size, end market and geography. We did this while growing revenues of these segments by 10.1% and 51.8%, respectively. We achieved a 6% operating margin in our Building Services segment, driven by the underlying strength of our Mechanical Services business, which achieved high single-digit operating margins and 6% growth. Virtually all that growth was organic.

Demand for this business remains strong with a primary focus on aftermarket projects and retrofits. HVAC service and repair, building automation and controls upgrades and services and indoor air quality and energy efficiency projects. We remain well positioned with our Industrial Services segment to serve a rebounding oil and gas industry. We divested our U.K. business to focus on our U.S. operations.

We found EMCOR U.K. a great strategic home achieved a very strong result for our sell-in the sale for our shareholders. We acquired Miller Electric, which is the largest acquisition in EMCOR history. The integration is on track, our leadership and values are aligned, and Miller will serve as a great platform for growth in the Southeast and Texas.

In addition to Miller, we acquired 9 other companies across our Mechanical Construction and Building Services segments. Collectively, these platform-enhancing acquisitions will help us to better serve our customers. We repurchased almost $600 million in shares and increased our quarterly dividend to $0.40 per share. This return of cash to shareholders, coupled with our organic investment and acquisitions, affirms our successful balanced capital allocation strategy. We maintained our sterling balance sheet that allows for continued organic and acquisition growth.

We maintained our industry-leading safety record in this demanding and complex environment with a TRIR under 1 for the second year in a row, we earned inclusion into the S&P 500, and we were recognized by Fortune as the #1 most admired company in the engineering and construction industry. And we built our RPOs to $13.25 billion from $10.1 billion despite our record revenues. That's quite a year, right? Congratulations to our team, and thank you for a great 2025.

I'm now going to go to Page 6. These are PRs, which I will now highlight, [indiscernible] 1.2% year-over-year and 17.6% organically. On a sequential basis, RPOs have increased 5.1% since September or 3.6% organically, driven by demand in our data center business, RPOs within the network and communications totaled a record $4.46 billion, at the end of December, an increase of $1.65 billion or normally nearly 60% year-over-year. We see no change in the momentum of the CapEx plans from our customers in this sector, and we have good visibility for the next 2 to 3 years as we work to support their buildout.

Institutional RPOs have increased by just under $440 million or 40% to $1.55 billion, largely as we continue to see demand for our services within the education sector, including from a number of colleges and universities. Manufacturing and industrial RPOs have increased by $201 million or 23% and to $1.1 billion.

As I mentioned last quarter, in addition to project awards driven by customers onshoring or reshoring initiatives. Growth in this sector has also benefited from certain food processing projects within our Mechanical Construction segment as well as a renewable energy project in our Industrial Services segment. Led by our Mechanical Construction segment, water and wastewater RPOs have increased by $408.5 million or nearly 60% to $1.1 billion as we continue to win projects throughout Florida. And due to select project opportunities, RPOs within the hospitality and entertainment have more than doubled year-over-year.

I'm now going to turn to Page 7 because I think it's important to look at some of the longer-term trends and what's really growing -- driving our growth over a sustained period of time and also to highlight our diversity of demand. So now go to Page 7, let's take a minute. I want you to focus your eyes on the middle of this page. And in this middle of this page, you'll see where we were on the left-hand bar at 12/30/19, right before COVID. We were about $4.036 billion in RPOs, and I'll actually focus your eyes on that royal blue bar or dark blue bar, and that's our network and communications business. And I want you to look over at 12/31/25, those network and communications RPOs are about $4.4 billion today, which is greater than our total RPOs at the end of 12/31/19.

But let me look at the total number of $13.254 billion. And realize that we have grown everything else by over $8.5 billion. And now I want you to come over to the left side of the page, and I want you to look at some of these long-term growth trends. I'm going to spend a little bit of time, and we've already done that with the near-term commentary. High-tech manufacturing on a compound annual growth rate that's an in and out of a major project. But from where we started in 12/31/19, which had some semiconductor work in it and pharma work in it, to where we are today has grown by a compound annual growth rate of 48%, and we remain very bullish on this market with the demand for semiconductor chips, the reshoring of for pharma the growth in GLP-1 drugs and what's going to happen there.

And just in general, what has been reached short in high tech and what's going to continue to grow. 48% compound annual growth. Right above that is network and communications. We thought we had a great data business center business in 2019. We went from having a very strong data center business to a terrific data center business. Now I'm not going to say we're the only ones that can do data center work at scale. We're the only ones that can operate in about 17 markets electorally. And we're doing about 7 markets now mechanically and we're one of the only ones that could cover the whole country on fire life safety projects in the data center business.

Look at health care, 23%. That is a stable market for EMCOR. It's been one of our long-term markets, and it is complex to build a high-rise hospital as it is a data center, and that's why our electricians and our pipe fitters can move between those sectors so easily between high-tech manufacturing, network and communication and really industrial work, they can move between those, and we do that.

Institutional is up 20%. That was actually a surprise to us. When we went back and looked at the compound annual growth rate in institutional across that sector. Water and wastewater is a great market for us, mainly in Florida, 24% compound driven by consent decrees from the EPA, driven by just growth in Florida and driven by updating technology in these large wastewater plants.

Transportation, as you talk about mix management, we have decided to deemphasize the transportation market, especially the electrical roadway market. It takes a while to get out, but that will continue to drop unless a big airport or a project like that comes in, and that would be then balancing against these other markets. I love the bottom. And commercial was a GDP grower. It's pretty good considering the engine analysis happened over this period.

But look at the short duration projects. To me, that's a sign of what's going on across all the markets, especially in the built space. And that contains some commercial work that contains some institutional work that can save some manufacturing work. And these are projects that are going to last less than 5 months and typically have a ticket size of somewhere between $50,000 and $500,000. And that's -- and then put on top of that, the big service space we have in EMCOR across our fire-life safety projects across our mechanical service business and across even our day 2 electrical work.

So what allows you to have that kind of compound annual growth across that sustained period of time. And these are in no particular order. First of all, you got to be where your customers are. You have to be able to meet them where they are. You have to have national reach. You have to have the geographic footprint, but that's not enough. You can have a geographic footprint that can execute. You have to have opportunistically travel. You don't just travel to travel. We're not going to be the contractor that uses a labor broker and places labor around the country.

For the most part, when we travel, we're traveling in our construction business with very strong union journeymen and commercial environment and others that can move around the country and check into the union and we draw from that. And we're an employer of choice. And that is driven by the strong field leadership we have at the local level.

We've got the technical expertise -- we have great prefabrication capability, BDC capability that we use to work across these sectors. And really, the BDC we use today in our data center business and the BDC we use today in our high-tech manufacturing was really honed in the health care sector over 20 years ago. We have a great reputation and safety record. It's really a hallmark of who we are and why we continue to attract the best trade labor. Our customers want us to do the work for them.

One of the benefits of scale to us is we can train, we can share means and methods and we can share best practices across our country. And that allows us to have very strong acquisition pipelines over a sustained period of time. And allows us to make the right smart growth organic investments.

I think this page is something that really is a hallmark of our company. And I think this page is really what we have built together with that, our capital allocation strategy, which is on Page 14, coupled with what is on Page 7 is what we get paid for to do to build a company that has great diversity of demand to take advantage of the end markets, in many cases, and then build a sustainable compounding record of success.

With that, Jason, I'll turn it over to you.

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. Before we dive into our results for the fourth quarter, I thought it made sense to step back and take a look at how we performed for the full year, which is summarized on Slide 8.

In 2025, we earned revenues of $16.99 billion operating income of $1.71 billion and operating margin of 10.1% and diluted earnings per share of $28.19. When excluding the transaction costs incurred in connection with both the acquisition of Miller Electric and the sale of EMCOR U.K. as well as the gain on sale of EMCOR U.K., we are non-GAAP operating income of $1.59 billion operating margin of 9.4% and diluted earnings per share of $25.87. All of which were records for EMCOR.

We performed extremely well in 2025, benefiting from some of the best execution in our history and a favorable mix of work, both of which allowed us to deliver a full year operating margin at the high end of the guidance we previously provided and in excess of our expectations when we began the year.

If we turn to Slide 9, I will now review the operating performance for each of our segments during the quarter, starting with revenues. 4.5 billion represents a quarterly record for EMCOR, with revenues increasing 19.7% or 9.5% organically. Revenues of U.S. Electrical Construction were a quarterly record of $1.36 billion, increasing 45.8% due to a combination of strong organic growth and the acquisition of Miller.

Similar to recent quarters, the most significant growth in this segment was generated from our data center projects within the network and communications market sector, where revenues increased nearly 50% year-over-year. While this represents the greatest increase during the quarter, almost all other sectors experienced growth. Health care, institutional and hospitality and entertainment represent the next 3 largest increases in addition to greater small project volumes.

I think the best way to summarize this segment's performance in the quarter is that half of its growth came from data centers and half of its growth came from strength in the underlying or more traditional business. Once again, this highlights our diversity of demand.

Moving to U.S. Mechanical Construction revenues of $1.94 billion increased 17%, establishing a new quarterly record for this segment. Similar to electrical due to greater demand for data center construction projects, this segment saw the largest increase from the network and communications market sector, where quarterly revenues grew nearly 80% year-over-year.

Sticking with my earlier comment regarding broad-based demand, mechanical construction experienced quarterly revenue increases in 8 out of the 11 sectors that we track with the only meaningful decrease coming from high-tech manufacturing.

Notably, manufacturing and industrial, including food processing, was up just over 50%. Institutional was up 55% and commercial increased 17% as we are starting to see resumption in warehousing demand. As we've discussed throughout the year, although we are still executing on a higher base, the decrease in high-tech manufacturing is a result of the completion of certain semiconductor projects.

On a combined basis, our construction segments generated revenues of $3.3 billion, an increase of 27.4%. Looking next at U.S. Building Services, revenues of $772.5 million reflect a 2.2% increase, all of which was organic. This marks the third quarter of revenue growth since the loss of site-based contracts that we've previously referenced and this performance was driven by our Mechanical Services division, which increased revenues by nearly 5% due to strength across each of their service lines, including projects and retrofits, repair service service maintenance and building automation and controls.

Turning to our Industrial Services segment. Revenues of $341.1 million have increased 9.1%. In the quarter, we experienced a more robust turnaround schedule, including the execution of certain projects that were delayed from Q3 to Q4, which led to increased revenues from both our field and shop services operations. In addition, this segment benefited from progress made on a large solar project, which is currently in process.

And lastly, for the 2 months prior to the sale on December 1, and U.K. Building Services generated fourth quarter revenues of $95.3 million.

Let's turn to Slide 10 for operating income. For the fourth quarter, we generated operating income of $573.8 million or 12.7% of revenues. When adjusting for the transaction expenses and the gain on sale of EMCOR U.K. We are a non-GAAP operating income of $439.6 million, a quarterly record for EMCOR. This performance resulted in an exceptional 9.7% non-GAAP operating margin the highest we achieved in any quarter this year.

Looking at each of our segments, Electrical Construction had operating income of $173.1 million, a 17% increase. As a result of its revenue growth, the segment experienced greater gross profit across the majority of the market sectors in which we operate, resulting in an increase in operating income to a record level. While down from the record 15.8% earned in last year's fourth quarter, this segment's operating margin of 12.7% remained well above its historical average and was in line with our expectations particularly when compared against a rolling 12- to 24-month average, which would imply a range of 12% to 12.6% for the segment.

When adjusting for the impact of incremental intangible asset amortization, gross profit margin of the segment remained relatively consistent year-over-year, reflecting the overall strength of our execution and project portfolio. Contributing to the unfavorable comparison in operating margin was an unusually low SG&A margin in last year's fourth quarter due to the timing of recognition of certain expenses in the prior year.

Operating income for U.S. mechanical construction increased by 13.6% to a quarterly record of $250.5 million, while slightly below that of the prior year's quarter, operating margin of 12.9% was equivalent to the third quarter of this year as we continue to execute well.

From an end market standpoint, we saw greater gross profit across many of the sectors in which we operate with the largest increases generally tracking in line with the revenue fluctuations I previously mentioned.

Together, our construction segments grew operating income by nearly 15% and earned a combined operating margin of 12.8%. U.S. Building Services generated operating income of $41.3 million, a modest increase over the prior year, and operating margin was a consistent 5.4%.

Moving to Industrial Services. This segment's revenue growth coupled with 30 basis points of operating margin expansion due to better absorption resulted in a 21.1% increase in operating income.

And lastly, U.K. Building Services delivered breakeven performance during the quarter as $3.7 million of underlying operating income was entirely offset by transaction-related costs, which were expensed within the U.K.

Let's move to Slide 11, and I'll cover a few quarterly highlights that were not included on the previous pages. Gross profit of $891.2 million has increased by 17.7% and our gross profit margin for the quarter was an outstanding 19.7%. SG&A was $462.3 million or 10.2% of revenues. Included in SG&A for the quarter were $10.7 million of transaction expenses related to the sale of EMCOR U.K., which impacted SG&A margin by 20 basis points.

Accounting for half of the remaining increase in SG&A was $35.2 million of incremental expenses from acquired companies and $6.2 million of additional amortization expense. Excluding these items, SG&A grew by $41.8 million, almost entirely due to employment costs, given both greater headcount to support our organic growth as well as increased incentive compensation expense in certain of our segments given the higher annual operating results.

And finally, on this page, diluted earnings per share were $9.68 or $7.19 on an adjusted basis, which represents an increase of 13.8% and year-over-year.

If we quickly turn to Slide 12. With $1.1 billion of cash on hand, our balance sheet positions us well to continue to deliver on our philosophy of balanced capital allocation which includes organic investment, strategic acquisitions and returning cash to shareholders. Our commitment to this model is further demonstrated by the recent increase in our dividend of 60% and the incremental $500 million of authorization under our share repurchase program.

During the quarter, we repurchased approximately $155 million worth of our shares bringing our year-to-date repurchases to roughly $580 million. And we executed against our M&A pipeline, utilizing over $1 billion on acquisitions during the year, including an additional $122 million in Q4.

And finally, on this page, we had operating cash flow of $524.4 million during the quarter or $1.3 billion for the full year, representing conversion in excess of 80% of operating income when adjusting for the gain on sale of EMCOR U.K.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Tony.

Thanks, Jason. And I'm going to close on Pages 13 and 14. As discussed, we are well positioned to continue to deliver excellent results in 2026. We expect to earn revenues of $17.75 billion to $18.5 billion and achieve diluted earnings per share from $27.25 to $29.25 with a full year operating margin of between 9% and 9.4%.

As we set guidance, and I have stated this many times over the years, we have always thought about it the following way. From the low end to the midpoint, we have a high degree of confidence that we will deliver that outcome absent a major economic event. From the midpoint to the high end of our range, we need to execute very well from a margin standpoint, and we need to book 40% to 45% of new work to allow us to hit the mid to high point of our revenue range. easily said, the better our margins, the higher revenue, the more we move to the higher end of our range.

As we look at the composition of our RPOs, we began the year with a strong mix of work, with estimated gross margins in line with those experienced over the last few years. We have a strong foundation across diverse geographies and sectors. At this time, we see no slowing of demand for most of our end markets and continue to see exceptional prospects in our data center markets.

As we move into 2026, we need to keep leveraging our training BDC, fabrication and project planning and delivery capabilities. We must not only continue to incrementally improve, but also innovate in our internal processes and delivery. We must also continue to protect ourselves through careful contract negotiation execution and compliance. We deliver for our customers, and we will continue to do so, but we also strive to protect our rights as we deliver these complex projects.

We will always face some macroeconomic challenge of some kind and some headwinds, but our team has excelled over the challenge -- overcoming these challenges over a very long period of time. I do believe that we are an employer of choice because of our excellence in field leadership. From our frontline foremen, superintendents, project managers and executives to our subsidiary and segment leadership.

We will continue to execute a balanced capital allocation strategy, focused on organic investment strategic acquisitions and returning cash to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends, which we show on Page 14. Our balanced capital allocation strategy has provided the foundation for our compounding record of success over the last 10 to 15 years.

As I close, I want to thank my teammates. I appreciate all you do for EMCOR every day and for our customers and appreciate the safe and productive way you execute our work.

With that, Jamie, I'll turn the call over to you for questions.

[Operator Instructions]. And our first question today comes from Brett Thielman from D.A. Davidson.

Tony or Jason, if you could comment just on some of the initiatives that compressed margins a bit last quarter, 3Q. I think you moved into some new territories that caused a little pressure there. Like what lingering impact that had in the fourth quarter, if any? And are you sort of beyond that at this stage here in 2026?

You always have to be careful to say we're beyond that because we're starting projects all the time and we execute really well, and we write projects up, we write them down. But on balance, I think the headwinds we've experienced in that particular market are behind us sell. And we had a little bit of that spillover into the fourth quarter. Some of it also is just mix of work.

We didn't finish as much fixed price work in our Electrical segment as we did the year before. And we started some work that was more target price or GMP, and hopefully, we'll convert some of that to fixed price, but we don't know that. But the underlying margins in the business, which you can see from our gross margins is pretty strong.

Yes. And I would echo what Tony said. The only thing I would add to that, right, is I tried to say this in my prepared remarks. If you look at the gross profit margin for electrical and you adjust for the amortization impact, it performed relatively consistent year-over-year. So any impacts that we did have from those project start-ups was offset by just execution within the segment.

Yes. Brent, and you could see it in our numbers, right? Are we a little disappointed we coughed up 50 or 60 basis points this year in electrical operationally? Sure, we are. Some of the headwind was from amortization. That's not a cash expense. But when you look over a 12- to 24-month period, that's a pretty good snapshot of our margins. We expect to operate somewhere mid- to low 12s to 14-or-so percent electrically. And mid- to low 12s. So a 13.5% or so mechanically, and it's going to bounce around there. But if we can operate this business between 12 and 5 and 13.5% on a sustained basis across our construction segments, I think we'd be pretty pleased with that.

Tony, maybe just to follow up, I mean, an interesting chart there on Slide 7. So on the network communications, data center side, you talked about good visibility here for the next 2 to 3 years. I think it would be hard to dispute that maybe one of the questions that oftentimes comes up is just like your regional exposure do you see yourself having to move into different regions to get more of this work? Or maybe you could just talk about what's happening, where you're already at, where you -- where you're positioned today that is going to continue to spend.

I don't have to [indiscernible] markets electrically. But the way I look at it is we have a strong -- we have a solid position in the Midwest. -- we'd like to make that a little bit stronger in some of the markets. We think we can do that either through acquisition investment or organic growth. Arizona, we continue to build that out.

We've just built a better position mechanically in Arizona that we look to take advantage of it. And electrically, we moved into that market 2 years ago, and we're starting to hit full ramp right now. Texas, we're pretty strong. Mechanically, we'll take some of our first significant jobs in Texas. And there's a mixed management decision, right? We had that capability there doing semiconductor work.

We'll continue to do some of that. But quite frankly, we think some of the rural data center work is better for us to do and it allows us to sort of get more productivity in our prefab shops also by doing that. And we've invested ahead of that. The semiconductor work we did there in a lot of ways with the beachhead to participate more broadly in the market and especially in the data center market. Mechanically, electrically, we have a very good position in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. We'll look to expand out of that. Atlanta, we have a very strong position mechanically and we have a secondary position electrically, and we'll look to continue to strengthen that.

The Carolinas were pretty strong, both mechanically and electrically, more so mechanically, but still pretty strong electrically. Northern Virginia, quite frankly, were terrific, both mechanically and electrically. And then as you get to Oregon, we're very strong electrically. So we will continue in Iowa very strong electrically. We will continue to round that capability. You can tell we're in more markets electrically than mechanically.

Some of that is -- we found it advantageous to be able to take our electricians that we're very skilled in our management teams and doing something that still don't work at one time, and they've proven to be very good data center builders also. And we've been able to take that scale from our -- some of our companies and move it to others. And it takes about 18 months to ramp them up to get to full production where they can hit the kind of margins, our traditional data center company then mechanically.

And there's no real reason some that we haven't expanded as much as just the footprint of where we are and what it takes mechanically to build the capability because of the prefab and all the other things are a little more extensive. And in fire life safety, we can cover the entire market, and we do.

Got it. I appreciate that, Tony. And just last one. I mean, your balance sheet, you sort of have a war chest here. How do you think about like total excess liquidity here, assuming you want to keep some level of cash on the balance sheet, also understand your revolvers untapped -- just thoughts there. It seems like you can do a lot.

I'll hit a macro level on that. And then Jason will get into some specifics about like cash we'd probably like to have on hand. I think in general, we're never going to have a highly leveraged balance sheet on a sustained basis to think of who we're working for.

One of our competitive differentiators, especially on this large project work is we're not a leverage company. And think about the hyperscalers, they're not looking to do business with leverage companies. And it's also when you look to the bonding line, it's a nice ability to be able to have a surety bond without question when you need it, and we've had that luxury. But we also would be willing to lever up for the right acquisitions or series of acquisitions to go to 1 to 1.5x, maybe 2x and the leverage back down to 1x.

What I wouldn't do is borrow a bunch of money to buy back stock. We like to do the buyback through excess liquidity. And if we're going to borrow money, it's because we're building a -- we're buying into an asset that's going to return cash to us over an extended period of time. That sort of macro levitation maybe get to the specifics.

I would say if you go to that Slide 14 that Tony referenced earlier and you look at what we've done this year, last year and even over the last 10 years, I think that's what our playbook looks like going forward, right? It continues to be a balanced approach towards capital allocation. We think we have a strong M&A pipeline as we move into next year. We'll continue to return capital to shareholders, and you saw that in the repurchases this year, and you saw that in the increase in dividend.

In terms of minimal cash balance for our balance sheet, it's probably somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 million to $400 million. So obviously, our balance sheet positions us to continue to deploy cash strategically as we move into 2026.

Yes. I think if you ask any of our management team down through the segment level, we would love to replicate 2025 here in '26 and '27. However, you've heard me say many times, deals happen when they happen. And what we are going to do is maintain discipline. We're not going to -- I think people on the line know me well enough to know this management team well enough that we don't buy in the hype and we don't buy into frenzy.

We have to believe there's a long sustained business case for why we would do something and we have to believe that we can add value. And our acquisition record is pretty darn good. I always say I never give anybody an A, but I'd give us a strong B+ over an extended period of time. And we're going to continue to do that. We're not private equity guys. We're not averaging multiples down.

We're looking to buy and build for the long term and build sustainable positions. And how we got from some of these places to serve 17 electrical data center markets is we bought companies who were in the business, we're able to strengthen it through peer learning, transferring people for short periods of time to help it and really doing a great job of taking our best practices and means and methods and sharing it across the company, especially as it comes to virtual design construct, VDC, BIM and prefabrication.

Our next question comes from Adam Thalhimer from Thompson, Davis.

Congrats on the strong quarter and the year. Tony, I wanted to ask you first about RPO the 33% in network and communications, obviously, some others in your space are even higher than that. And I'm just curious if that was a conscious decision on your part to stay more diversified? Or if that reflects something else like geographic mix?

It's funny. I'll go to the second thing. You said it's geographic and sector mix. we're not passing up great data center opportunities because we're doing the other work. However, we're not going to go away from our existing customers.

We have very strong companies in markets that have limited and no data center exposure. We have one of the best electrical contractors in the country in San Diego that generates great returns, serves our customers well, does it through a mix of pharma and high-tech manufacturing work some defense work and health care work.

There's not a data center opportunity there for them to do, but they earn returns that are as good or better than our segment averages. And we have a chunk of our business that exists just like that in places like California, some of the Intermountain states, some of the Midwestern towns. And as you go to like something as specific as water and wastewater, we're not walking away from opportunities in Florida to do data centers, although the first ones are going to get built, and we will participate in that. But the teams that do that water and wastewater work are very specialized. Could they do chiller plant work and things like that? Sure. But they're very specialized on that customer base and in that product offering.

So yes, some of it is intentional. It's been intentional, Adam, beyond the last 4 or 5 years. It's been intentional over a very long period of time to build diversity of demand. But that being said, I'll give you a great example. We had a very good industrial electrical contractor in the Midwest that are in middling returns for years, but very technically capable.

When the opportunity presented itself in Northwest Indiana to do data center work, we were able to take some of our skill base on the supervision side and our estimating side, train the people there to do the work, estimate the work, and now they're one of the best data center builders we have. And so we have the ability to do that when the opportunity and we create the opportunity presents ourselves and our customers need us to do that.

So I'd say, yes, part of it has been intentional as a long-term strategy. But are we shooting to say we're only going to do 33% data center work in RPOs, could be 40% for a part of a period of time, could be 45%, could go down to 30%. It's just the overall demand and the mix of work and margin we have out there.

Yes. The only other thing I would add, too, is just remember that for us, what we show as RPOs are the funded phases of a contract.

So we're working on a data center campus where there's multiple buildings and we have even a verbal for the Phase II. We're only showing that first phase in our RPO. So others may be doing it differently, which could skew percentages. But for us, this is funded, contracted work that we have in hand and 82% of this will burn over the next 12 months.

Yes.

Got it. Okay. So -- but you're saying if the outlook for data centers is strong, -- those don't be surprised if it goes to 40%, 45%.

Yes, it could. If you look at our Electrical segment, where we've been able to get into 17 markets, it's 40% to 50% on a -- I think it will stay there for a while. It may even go up a little bit. because we have found that that scale is the most -- we have the most ability to take that electrical skill and translate that into other markets from other work that they have done.

Okay. Last one for me. I was curious on semiconductors when the next wave of awards might be in that space.

We're seeing some of it now. They're just getting awarded into smaller chunks. We're very ingrained in for 1 of the customers, 2 of the customers in Arizona. And we're also there in Arizona and the Mountain States Fire life safety. I don't know if -- because you're already on site, I'm not sure you'll see the magnitude of the awards that we saw initially because they can leave it up to us some pieces.

And I think that's an important delineation with us. We have a pretty good idea of the work we're going to be doing there. which is some of that 40% to 45% we have to book a year. But Jason made a really important point, right? Everything we do goes back to GAAP, right? So our RPOs are funded contracts, signed purchase orders noncashable portion of a service agreement. I mean that is different than some of our peers do things. I mean we know that we may be at a data center site for 2 or 3 years. We're pretty sure the buildings we're going to get. But a, the work isn't contracted to us yet.

And so therefore, we'll plan for it. But we certainly -- and on a semiconductor site, we know that maybe 2 years ago, we might have got $150 million award and it's going to look like that $150 million award again, but they're letting it out to us to $30 million, $50 million at a time because they know that that's how their funding is going to work, and that's how they did the actual contract for that piece of the work. So we've been that way forever. It's a little different when you have these huge projects.

And we just have chosen to stay very consistent and not guess on what the future holds and keep it to that kind of convention. And as to say the same thing about our operating margin performance. The only thing to get added back here are hard things like transaction costs like the sale of the U.K. or a significant impairment. We have restructuring going on in the business all the time where we're restructuring subsidiaries. We don't do that. We don't try to add back amortization.

We figure our investors are smart enough to do that themselves. It's a noncash expense. We figure once we go down a rabbit hole, we become adjusted on adjusted, unadjusted. And we just chose to stay pure to the GAAP numbers. both for RPOs and operating income and revenue recognition, Jason.

Agreed.

Yes, I think it's just easier.

The numbers are very clean. We appreciate that.

You appreciate it sometimes because you salivate over other people that have 5%.

I can't speak for everybody else. I appreciate it.

Our next question comes from Brian Brophy from Stifel.

So your data center work has been growing a bit faster on the mechanical side than on the electrical side for a few quarters now. Can you talk about what are the drivers behind that? And do you expect that to sustain itself in the next year or this year?

It could. It could because we -- first was the basis right in comparison to the segment. And so we've opened up a couple of new markets on the data center side. And also, I think one of the growth areas in that is it's a little different than the scope we're benefiting more from the AI data center, even though we're building the AI data centers electrically, but the scope doesn't increase as much going from a 100-megawatt cloud storage data center to a 200-megawatt AI data center on the electrical side.

But on the mechanical side, it can be a 1.5 to 2x multiplier on the mechanical systems that will go in. And what's interesting about that, that in either cases that usually include the major end equipment.

Yes. I think Tony's point on the base is very important as well, right? Mechanical is up more on a percentage basis. But on a dollars basis, Electrical grew $1 billion this year mechanical grew $850 million. So Electrical is still growing more in terms of dollars. It's just off a larger base, gives you a smaller perceptive.

I think 1 way to look at it, too, electrically, we, about 2 years ago, established ourselves as more of a national player in data centers.

Mechanically, I would still would say we're still a super regional player in data centers. So you may see that growth because of the base and how we're continuing to penetrate new markets mechanically. And it takes a little longer to penetrate mechanically, and we're starting to see some of the investments return to us now from what we made 2 or 3 years ago mechanically.

That's helpful. And then related, I think you mentioned 17 electrical markets on the data center side, you're up to now 7 mechanical and it's grown nicely over time. Where can that go over time?

I actually don't know. I think we'll stop counting soon because they're now becoming you start counting the state of Ohio versus the 4 submarkets in Ohio and things like that, do you take the state of Indiana versus the 2 or 3 submarkets.

I think the way I think about it is we are now starting to build scale in some critical infrastructure places. So if you think about how this has happened and why it's happened, it's because it's been this quest for power as for stranded power. And -- that's how we -- that's how our great industrial electrical got into the data center business in Indiana because they went and chase the stranded power from the steel mills and auto plants that had been there before.

And so you think about that over time, there's still stranded power out there, and that should keep -- that's why we say 2- to 3-year pretty good outlook because our customers are telling us that, and they may even be a little bit beyond that. they feel pretty good, maybe a little longer that but we're contractors, we always discount that back a little bit.

And -- but I will say this, the markets are now dependent on where they can get power in place. My gut is there'll be a couple more markets added -- and then in the markets they're in, they're going to start to build even more density, just like they did in Northern Virginia right outside of Columbus, Ohio, what they've done in Chicago, what they've done in Arizona. They built in Atlanta, they're building density in those markets. And they do that for a reason in Dallas. They do that for a reason because they think there's a good view on power in the long term and also the connections there are really, really good. And the latency becomes important in some of those major metro areas for the knowledge workers long time.

Now do I understand how the latency works everything, not really, but that's how it all works when you put it all together. So it will go up, it's not going to grow like it did because now they're starting to build critical mass in those markets.

Our next question comes from Justin Hauke from Baird.

Yes. Great. I guess, first one, I mean you talked about the fire, life safety projects. being strong for a while. I think you made some comments here about kind of the uniqueness of what you're doing on the data center specifically. But can you just elaborate a little bit more on your capabilities there? And how you're different in that market?

Yes, are we different, yes, because I think we have some of the best fire -- we have critical mass on design. And we have a very strong position with the Road Local in the UA for sprinklitters. So if you take the business first and you take a step back and those that have been with us for, I'll be patient for a second, as I answer this question, it's one off the few trades that we do, that the actual implementation of that part of the specification is a design build product.

The way the specification is written, it says provide a fire-life safety system in accordance with the code at both the national standard and then their state and local standards. And our guys are experts at that. And what they do then is we design it. And then fire life safety has a fairly significant prefabrication component.

And we have some pretty at-scale fabrication shops. -- to support our fire life safety business. And then it's for the union other than 16 close lows, it's a road local that will travel. And so our people can travel across the country. And it also tends to get connected to think of in other word, like LEGOs or [indiscernible], it's a connected system, and we prefab most of it in the shops.

And then finally, it has a nice aftermarket component, and we have a nice aftermarket business. And that is one of the places where if we build it, we have a pretty good shot at getting the long-term service agreement post building. So it's a national business and scope. It's a design build business and scope on that specific trade.

We have a great workforce, and we're at scale in that business and probably as good as anybody else in the business never say we're the only ones, but 1 of the few that can operate on a national basis.

Okay. I appreciate more of the history lesson on that. I guess my second one is, I guess, for Jason here, and it's just more of a model question. But the Danforth acquisition, obviously much smaller than the Miller was, but I know it's going to have an intangible component with it as well. Now that it's closed, I think Miller, that was like $40 million for the year, that was kind of a drag. What's kind of the similar magnitude for Danforth, just so we can kind of think about what's running through.

So I'll hit a couple of things on amortization first. So if we look just at Danforth, in 2025, round numbers, it's about $2.7 million of amortization. In 2026, it's going to be around $14.2 million. So you got about $115 million of incremental amortization from Danforth in -- just a refresher on Miller, we said in year 1, so 2025, it'd be about $40.5 million of amortization.

In 2026, it's going to be about $33 million. So you should see about 7.5% drop off. So if you just look across EMCORE, while we may have a little bit of amortization benefit in electrical, it's going to be offset in mechanical. So if you really net the 2, it's near neutral.

And our next question comes from Avi Jaroslawicz from UBS.

So you've noted in the past how much more of your revenue has grown than your headcount. Is that something that you expect is going to be able to continue this year? Or are some of those productivity gains maybe slowing down and requiring some more headcount to support revenue.

I think we'll keep the trend going.

Yes. I think over time, we've said revenue is growing 2 to 3x faster than the headcount -- we saw that again for the full year of '25 or revenue outpaced headcount by 2x, and I think that model holds for the future.

Yes. And we'll continue to get the productivity gains, and we'll continue to due to the means and method sharing across the country allow more productivity gains.

Okay. That is helpful. And then just as we think about the margin guidance for this year, I appreciate that you give that color on the intangible amortization. But just without the U.K. business and with large projects continuing to grow and productivity continue to grow, would have expected maybe a starting point of around flat for the year for operating margins. So maybe if you could just help us think through that...

Yes, at the high end of our range, it is flat. And so then it becomes a revenue. If we do come in flat. So on the size business we have with 12,000 projects, we're giving you a 40 basis point range. It's pretty tight. And could we come in at the time that range sure. But if we don't hit the midpoint of the guidance, that allow us -- it's a revenue margin thing, and it's really -- contract mix is probably the biggest thing in there. We think will maybe pick up a little better on project write-downs year-over-year. And so all that comes together, that's how we get to the range. It's a pretty tight range.

And I think the bottom is pretty safe. Could there be upside on the top. A lot of things would go right, sure. But we gave you the 9.4, we think we have a probability of hitting the 9.4%.

Yes. The way I used the range is at the high end, we're essentially saying we could replicate the record margins that we achieved in 2024. That midpoint of that range somewhere around our rolling 12- to 24-month average, more or less, that is equivalent to that midpoint. And at the low end, we're saying, this is what margins could look like if we have a different mix.

So we talked about the water and wastewater work that we have ahead of us. It's great work. we're not turning down data center work to do it. It's a different margin profile. We're acting as a prime contractor. There's more subcontract component, there's more material and equipment component, so lower margins. So what we're saying is as we do some of that work and potentially revenue skews upward, it could have an impact on margins, but we still think in a fairly high band and a band that is at record levels for EMCOR over the last 2 years.

Our next question comes from Tim Mulrooney from William Blair.

I'm looking at the time here, I'm just going to ask one question. And I really just want to build on that last question, you guys because maybe the Tony, from like a more -- a higher level, a more conceptual standpoint. So bear with me. Because as I step back and I think about the situation that we're in, like this really is a renaissance for blue collar trade labor, American unionized labor in this country. So as I look at your guide for '26, I wonder what is the fair value? What is a fair burden for the critical services that you provide? Is it 12% to 13% margin in the Construction business? Like why can't that go higher?

I think it's a mixed question. And I think this whole thing is about risk and return for us, too, Tim. Clearly, where we make our most margin is where we take the most risk on a contracting basis, which is where we take fixed price risk.

And the more mixed use to that, especially on these large projects, and we do well, the more money we can make. However, there are certain operating conditions on the ground that doesn't allow us to do that. And a classic example would have been the job that happened last year, we went a new market. We felt pretty sure of ourselves on the fixed price. We reevaluate that now today.

We probably sort of went into that market on that project with that design -- and with the schedule they gave us, we probably should have pushed harder for a GMP contract, which would have maybe not taken some of the upside away from us if we've executed the way we thought we could, but would have protected us on the downside.

I think the other thing that -- I think you're right. But remember, part of that renaissance actually goes back to labor, too. I think they've been very good with us on labor increases. But the packages you put together on a job here puts pressure on the budgets of our end customers, and that's how you get into some of these target price GMP type projects because they're saying, okay, we're not exactly how you're going to put this labor force together in this remote market. in this section of IO or this section of Texas.

So there's some underlying things going on here. But generally, I agree with you. I don't think our customers pay us enough for what we do, and we're going to continue to ask us to pay more. I don't disagree. We have the best skilled labor in the country, I don't disagree with you.

Our next question comes from Adam Bubes from Goldman Sachs.

One more on the outlook, and sorry if I missed this, but can you help us break out the revenue growth outlook between organic and acquisition? I know there's a few moving pieces with divestitures, and the acquisitions you did last year?

Yes. I guess my first comment there, right, is you have to remember, the U.K. basically gives us a 3% headwind on the revenue growth. So if you look at our guidance, and let's say, at the low end, it's 4.5% and at the high end, it's 9%. It's really equivalent to 7.5% and 12%. When you consider the 1 month of incremental contribution we have from Miller and the the 10 months from Danforth, and you put that together, it really offsets the U.K. impact, the lost revenues from the U.K. So if you look at it and you say, what's the guidance? How much of that is organic? How much of that is acquisition. I would say really all of it is organic because the lost revenue from the U.K. is just offset by the acquisitions.

Got it. Understood. Helpful. And then can you update us on the M&A pipeline today? I know it's hard to predict timing of M&A. But can you talk about how active your M&A pipeline is maybe compared to this time last year? And any way to characterize the pipeline of opportunities in terms of size of businesses, region or technical exposure?

Sure. First of all, we have as good or better pipeline sitting here today. than we did at the end of 2020 because we knew we were already going to do Miller, right? We were in negotiation. So if you look at the pipeline beyond Miller, our pipeline today is broader and more diverse than it was at the end -- and the universe of them is where we like to buy, right? Mechanical and Electrical segments, building service, focus on mechanical service and building controls companies. That's where we're going to buy for the most part.

And there's some battering around mill right work and maybe some of the handling work we do in our mechanical business to supplement what else we do there. But that's what we'll do. Deals happen when they happen. I know we're landing -- here's who are landing site. We're landing site for someone that's selling their life's work or their family's life work. That's proven very good for us.

They typically it might be a broker, but it's not a brokered sale. Very much like Miller, very much like Quibi, very much like Batchelor & Kimball, very much a year ago. These are sort of landmark businesses that we're going to hopefully get to a deal. In other places, ESOP, that was Danforth. We're a great place for ESOPs long term, and part of Miller was a ESOP because we have an operational culture that's focused on the trades. And that's really how that ESOP started at one time when that family moved that business into an ESOP.

What we don't do particularly well in is auctions against private equity. We're not I don't have enough on my team with the vest that can go in and rip a company apart and tell me what it's worth. So we're not as good there, and we're not playing the average multiple game down. We're actually buying companies for the long term. And our deal size could be everything from $2 million, where we by some HVAC technicians, and it augments a smaller branch we have, all the way up to Miller at $865 million. We'll do anything along those lines.

Could we do a couple, $500 million acquisitions this year, $300 million to $500 million? Sure, we could. And we could do $400 million, $500 -- I mean, $100 million acquisitions -- just don't know sitting here today, but I feel as good about our pipeline today at this point in the year as I have at any time in the last 3 or 4 years.

And with that, everyone, we will be ending today's question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Tony for any closing remarks.

Thanks, Jamie. Thanks to all the analysts. I thought this was a great question-and-answer session today. I think you got to the heart of what we wrestle with every day. I want to thank my colleagues from EMCOR and my teammates for what was a great '25. Reality is most of us already forgot about 25%. We're here in the third week of February. We've all been focused on '26 really since probably the fourth quarter of '25. We have a great outlook. We're in all the right sectors. We're playing with the right team, and we have a terrific capital allocation strategy. Thanks for your interest in EMCOR. And thank you to all my teammates.

And with that, everyone, we'll be concluding today's conference call and presentation. We do thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on day 3 of Baird's 55th Industrial Conference. So today, we have the pleasure of hosting EMCOR. I'm Justin Hauke, I'm the senior associate covering specialty contractors and engineering construction companies along with Andrew Wittmann.

So from EMCOR today, we have Tony Guzzi, the company's CEO and Chairman. We have Jason Nalbandian, the company's CFO and many other roles, I guess. And then Lucas Sullivan, who's leading Investor Relations. So we'll do this as a fireside. I'll let Tony give his little commercial on it, and then we'll just run through some questions. And if you have anything that you want to e-mail, [email protected].

Okay. We're going to get going here. We're going to show you a little video. Wake everybody up.

[Presentation]

All right. How lucky are we, right, to be able to be in a company like EMCOR. So what is really EMCOR is we actually do real work, right? We're not a general contractor construction manager that manages a bunch of other contractors. We are a company of skilled trades people, plumbers, pipe fitters, electricians, welders, sprinkler fitters, millwrights, HVAC technicians. Venture to say, maybe other 1 or 2 other people, one other person here, we're the largest employer of trade labor in the country.

And these are highly skilled people. Most of them are great not only in building things, but they understand how systems work and a part of our business, we know how to make sure you fix it and keep the building running. If you take EMCOR at its highest level, we are a project-oriented company that also has a maintenance element to it. If you think just macro level, the projects we're doing anywhere from 12,000-plus projects a year. And they really fall into 3 buckets size-wise. Still 1/3 of our projects today are still less than $1 million. The next 1/3 falls somewhere between $1 million and $10 million and the third above that are $10 million plus. The ones that have grown most rapidly are those projects that have grown more than $10 million. And there's major trends driving that. The major trends that are driving that are the things most of you are here to talk about today. It's data centers, it's high-tech manufacturing. It's high-tech manufacturing, not only to semiconductors, but pharma bioLife. It's health care. is hospital construction. It's water and wastewater. EMCOR is a very diverse company, right? We have diversity of demand, which probably sets us apart from some of the people you've been talking to over the last couple of days. Yes, we are a major data center builder. I would venture to say we have more penetration, especially on the electrical side and the fire protection side than any contractor in the country. We also, though, do a lot more than just data centers, and you'll see that in our RPOs.

Our RPOs are up more than almost 30% year-over-year. And we also have great capital allocation. We're a company that acquires very well, as shown by our acquisition of Miller Electric. That would be the largest acquisition we've ever done. and we're very pleased with it. But also bread and butter acquisitions, which for us are somewhere between $50 million and $300-plus million, somewhere in that range. And we do a lot of bolt-in acquisitions that go into our existing subsidiaries where we're buying a small company that gives us either more technical capability, more technicians or it puts us in an adjacent geographic market that we weren't in before. And if -- so you think about EMCOR and you go by our segments, we basically are going to -- by the end of this year, we'll be going to market through 4 segments, but they all work together, especially the Mechanical and Electrical Construction segments, they're serving the same customer base. If you go to the Electrical segment of which we had, which has been growing mid-teens for a while organically, if you go to that Electrical segment, that is 100% union IBEW. And we go to work there through about 25 subsidiaries. Those 25 subsidiaries for the most part, are people that started their careers and they run our subsidiaries that started their careers as apprentice electricians. And some of them today are running a $0.5 billion business. Suffice it to say, they know the work.

The mechanical segment has plumbers, pipe fitters, HVAC technicians and millwrights. It's about an 80% union delivery. And on the construction side, especially the core piping is near 100%. Those are run by also people from the field, but also engineers, people that started their careers being project engineers and project managers. If you go to Building Services, 3/4 of the Building Services segment today is our Mechanical Services business. You ask what's the difference between the mechanical services company and the mechanical and construction. At the highest level, it's probably a distinction without a difference because they're skilled pipe fitters However, our mechanical service companies for the most part, are doing smaller projects. They work in the aftermarket for the most part, where the owner is either directing the general contractor uses or we're working directly for the owners.

And we have about 2,000 HVAC technicians in that business. That business is a high single-digit EBITDA or operating income business and has been growing GDP plus 200 or 300 points for a long time. It's mid-teens -- mid-single-digit growth rate. And I think it's probably the best representative of what's happening in the general economy outside of those major sectors that are going on.

And the balance of that segment is our site-based business, which we're doing route technicians are putting people in buildings, and we get some spillover effect into our mechanical service business. And then we have the Industrial Services segment, which is for us, mainly an oil and gas business. We do some intermittent energy work there/renewable work there. We do -- we can EPC and build solar farms at utility scale. That is generally EMCOR. With that, we'll flip it over to you to take questions.

Yes. No, that was a great overview. It kind of touches on a lot of things that I want to maybe elaborate on. But I guess maybe starting with one of the things that's really clear, I think, from this conference, but just in general, is one of the critical bottlenecks is people, right, particularly craft labor. And I guess how does EMCOR -- there's other companies that are in the market that are also contractors. How do you guys differentiate? How do you recruit people?

I think the biggest differentiation for us is the value system that our leadership works under. And EMCOR, at -- again, go at its core. I talked about that our product is not electrical and mechanical construction or even mechanical services. That's not the core product of this leadership team. I'd venture to say we build the best field leaders in the industry from forming them up. If you do that right and you're a values-driven company, which we are, people want to work there. And the people that are recruiting that trade labor to come and work for us are people that are like them. I talked about on the electrical side, how a lot of our companies are run by folks that came for the field and the 2 or 3 that aren't have been in the business their entire lives. And so you're getting recruited by somebody that knows the work, have deep respect for what we do. We're going to train you. And you think about why trades people would come to work for us, right, versus other people, whether it's union or nonunion, start with, I'm going to get paid every week.

That's not a given in a smaller contractor. Second thing, in no particular order, you're going to keep me safe. This is inherently dangerous work we do. We have industry-leading safety and recordables, right? We are Six Sigma, and I always think about it, I take a deep breath, right, because we're doing dangerous things today. We are Six Sigma versus the industry in safety. We have never turned on a safety investment. Our people know that. You're going to work for people that know the work, right? We've all worked, right? And there's nothing more frustrating than having someone you work for that has no idea what you actually do. At EMCOR, all the way up to me, people know that we know what they do. And at the field level, they are great contributors to means and methods. If you do a good job, you have a chance to be part of our core team. In contracting, in our contracting, we have those 35,000 depending on the day, skilled trades people, about 20,000, 25,000 of those always work for us. That's their career. The rest are coming in and out depending on the peaks in the business. They're either out of the union or where we're nonunion, they're in or out nonunion.

Again, most of the construction is done union. And so if you do a good job, I can build a career with you. If I want to, I can be the foreman, the general foreman. I can be the superintendent. And you're going to give me the training to do that. And again, go back to this building great field leaders. We have a stair-step training program that's pretty well known in the industry and that I think is fairly unique to us because by the time you get tough, we're not talking to you about project management. We're talking about how you should lead people in the field to do all those things I talked about so they can build a career.

Maybe one more on the labor side. You mentioned union a couple of times. And just because I get the question all the time, and I know we had the pleasure of having dinner last night, and it came up a lot. But maybe you could just talk a little bit because sometimes I don't think people don't really understand what union means. So maybe talk about the benefits, disadvantages, whatever of union versus nonunion, how you can move across the 2.

I think, again, go to the big project work we're doing, go to the most part for our core construction markets. We are a union contractor. I personally look at that on those large projects, and I think our whole team does as a real source of strength. You can always recruit somebody to go from nonunion to union. But unless it's a horrible recession, a union tradesperson isn't going union to nonunion. And the great thing about this expansion we're in right now is we're replenishing the union rates and building a whole new generation of leaders. And the other -- if you just think about economically, it makes all the sense in the world that most construction would be done union. The benefits are with the union. They can go back to the hall and be redeployed to a contractor that has work. It's a better working situation for the individual tradesperson. It's actually a much easier company to work in for the recruitment and development of labor than a nonunion contractor. We do both. On the mechanical side, we have some prime contractors in the Southeast and in our industrial service business. The other thing, union, you very rarely get stuck with excess labor. In the nonunion world, a lot of times, you can get stuck with excess supervision labor because you're always afraid to let them go.

They typically are better trained. And then there's this image that they're completely inflexible. Yes, there are markets, New York, San Francisco, that if you had to use that model and grow it across the country of working with the union, you probably wouldn't be very successful. But the IBEW, the UA, especially with respect to how we build out these mega projects have been fantastic partners. And it's allowed us to build a workforce. Jason, if any -- we look at this a lot.

Yes. I mean I think that flexibility aspect of -- to be able to release workers that get back to the union, all you almost like a stable that you can always kind of go to.

That's right, you could be -- look, I -- I see both, right? We have both. On average, a union journey and electrician is far better than his nonunion counterpart. And I feel very comfortable saying that in any crowd anywhere. The union foreman and superintendents are great athletes. They're great player coaches, and they really know means and methods.

Yes. Okay. Maybe the next thing to kind of go to. I mean, we can talk about the end markets. So I think it's really clear what's strong and everything else. But one thing financially, I guess, is your margins have really improved over the last several years. And when I think about contractors, typically, they have like mid-single-digit margins.

On a good day, sometimes.

On a good day, Fine. You guys are kind of doubled that, they've trended closer to 10. Maybe just talk about, is that a dynamic of how good demand has been, some of the things that you guys have done internally technology-wise that have changed that? I don't know if this is a good question for you...

I'll start and I'm going to kick it to Jason relatively quickly. I mean, clearly, if you're not in a durable demand market, you're not going to make the margin that we're making because you're not going to get the absorption on your overhead. And you're not going to be looking for ways to take labor out of the business and to be innovative. You go back to the search for labor. Because of that, it forces you to be innovative with prefabrication, VDC and BIM, which then enhances your margins. And then we do other things to enhance the margins. Go to safety. Safety is a big deal on margin.

And just [indiscernible] what is VDC and BIM?

Virtual design construct and Building Information Model. BIM fits underneath there, which then leads to prefabrication. A lot of people talk modular. We talk prefab same thing, maybe modular, there's -- they tend to sell to other people. For the most part, we only do fabrication for EMCOR. There are some exceptions, but you never say 100% the company is bigger. But Jason, you've done a lot of work on margins.

I think for us right now, when you look at margins, it's a combination of factors. So some of it is demand environment. A lot of it is execution and some of it is, as Tony just said, the investments we've made in prefabrication and virtual design construction and BIM.

If you just look over time, right, EMCOR is not a capital-intensive company. I think our CapEx is something like 0.5% or 0.6% of revenues. But if you look over the last three years, we've made several investments in CapEx. And so if you look kind of at a 3-year CAGR, revenue is growing 14%, 15%, CapEx has grown 28% to 30%, it's almost 2x that of revenue. And that's the investments we're making in the BIM, VDC, prefab, the things that are making us productive, the things that are making us more efficient, the things that are helping drive margins.

And so you say, what's the outcome of that, right? You look at revenue and you look at headcount, and you see a spread between the two, where we're actually we've been successful at growing revenue really 3x the rate we're growing our head count just because of these investments we're making which are making us more productive on the jobs.

And then you think about something, which BIM's has been around for a while. If you think about what we're doing now, especially on these larger jobs. The reality, engineers are taking jobs, engineering firms are taking jobs that may be 40%, 50% complete. We're actually completing it with our BIM -- our internal engineering. And that allows us to design for constructability. So we're finding the mistakes in 3D and even beyond before we ever go to the job. And if you go to a job site today, you see these monitors, a lot of gang boxes will have something a little smaller than this, where they're going to look at what they're going to build today. 10 years ago, that would have never happened. It was just starting to. And you think about -- I go back to when I talked about workforce development, that's part of the margins. Because we have a whole new generation of folks that are taking leadership roles, they're much more friendly and familiar with technology, which allows them to bring that to the job site and allows us to push more work back into our shops because they're not adverse to it. it's something they understand.

Yes. I mean -- and I guess -- and especially -- I mean, this probably doesn't apply as much to that 1/3 that's $1 million or less. But the bigger jobs, this is almost like table stakes. You're taking a lot of labor out by being able to kind of control the environment.

Jason, go through the numbers on revenue growth versus labor growth, and that's where you see it.

Yes. So if you -- as I said, we've been growing revenue like 3x -- the growth rate has been 3x our labor growth or our headcount growth rate. So if you just look, let's say, 5-year period CAGR on revenue is probably 10% and the headcount CAGR is probably 3%.

If we were trying to do what we're doing today with the same means and methods we were doing 10 or 15 years ago, our growth would be stunned because we wouldn't be able to find the labor we need to complete that job.

I've got a couple of questions that have come in here that I'm going to get to. I want to maybe do 2 more things to just orient everyone. But maybe the next question would just be on kind of portfolio allocations because you guys do a lot of different things and the building services is not construction, but it's more of the maintenance stuff. You recently exited the U.K. business. So maybe just talk about from a high level, how you think about the portfolio, where you want to do M&A because you guys have been an acquisitive company and just kind of where that focus is.

Yes. So if you take a 5-year look or actually a 6-year look, if you go back to 2019, it's almost perfect balance on capital allocation. High level, where Jason?

We're near 50-50. If you look at business reinvestment, so call it organic growth, M&A versus shareholder returns. So our share repurchases and dividends. We're near 50-50 balance on capital allocation.

And I think that's what the future looks like. To me, that's -- and we're a low leverage company, and we're going to stay a low leverage company. We actually compete on our balance sheet. It's -- because our customers, you think who they are, who's actually funding this growth right now, their balance sheets look a lot like ours. And that's an expectation. And then it allows us to have where bonding is needed to never have to go hustle for a bond like a lot of these PE-owned contractors do now. I think the U.K. exit, home run. home run, it will close by the end of the year. Great team. Most people in the room don't know our long history in the U.K. It was part of the original predecessor company at EMCOR. It used to be a big construction company that lost money, lots of money. We shugged down, reformatted. It had great management teams, and we got it to be a very successful facilities management company that was a highly desired asset to other people in the U.K. We weren't going to invest to the level we needed to. The next move is probably -- was to take it into Europe and it had -- that play has been out there for a while. We weren't going to do that.

We have other places we can spend our capital. People would ask, was it a distraction? Not with the management teams we had. It really wasn't a distraction. 10 -- 15 years ago, it was. So for me, it was the culmination of a 15-year effort. And I think the new owners will be served well. It's a great team. And I think it's a great outcome for EMCOR and its shareholders. If you look at the rest of the portfolio, we're looking at stuff all the time, right? Every day is a resource allocation game as a contractor if you run the business, right? You're thinking about how to maximize margin. Building Services, 2/3 of it is mechanical services. 1/3 of it is site-based services. Site services takes a little to no capital. Mechanical services is probably the most steady business we have at EMCOR. It's a high single-digit EBITDA ROS business, near 100% return on that asset business and we are a market leader. And the site-based business is an important part for some customers for us to know how to do. Industrial Services is challenged. Great team, by the way. You gotta do under the distraction point, no distraction, great team, very difficult customer base right now. They think 0 is a good number for people to earn sometimes.

And Justin, you asked about M&A. I think for us, it's really core markets. So definitely U.S.-based electrical construction, mechanical construction and mechanical services. Those are the areas where we want to invest in building automation and controls.

Yes. This is not a global business. It's emphatically not a global business. People have tried to get us to do that. Think about it. What is our advantage? It starts with great skilled labor, knowing the local market conditions, be able to deploy it and attract it. There's a whole swath of this world where they don't value skilled labor, they just throw more people at it and they don't do it necessarily in a safe and productive manner. So this is emphatically a U.S. business, and we've done very well. We have plenty of opportunity to grow it as a U.S. business.

You mentioned the return on assets being really good, and obviously, you're capital light. I mean I think one of the things if you just look at it from a high level, you're a GAAP reporter, your ROIC has been consistently 20% plus so can you just quickly run through kind of the growth algorithm that you see as -- obviously, there's puts and takes all that time, margins can move around. But just kind of where you see margins holding kind of top line growth, free cash flow consumption?

So I think -- and Jason jump in if I get over my skis here. I think our construction businesses for the foreseeable future organically can grow high single digits. And that will be driven by things like data centers, health care, high tech will come in and out on the semiconductor side. And in core markets like traditional manufacturing, water and wastewater and just small projects that still exists in our construction business. Again, that's our Electrical and Mechanical segment. I think our Building Services segment is a GDP-plus grower, so maybe 200 or 300 points above GDP. And our Industrial Services segment is going to bounce around depending on the turnaround schedule. Maybe go through some interesting stats when you think of -- and then margins, margins as a contractor are going to move in band. And Jason will give you how we look at the business here in a minute. They move in band. You're not going to be -- we don't get to keep -- we don't do the same thing twice. We do sort of the same thing sometimes. But...

The next turnover is just...

Yes. We get to keep our ideas, but this isn't a manufacturing plant where we did these productivity initiatives a year before. And then we get to lock it into our standard costs as we sort of know what our margins are going to be. We close out jobs. We start jobs. We invest in new markets. They have lower margins inherently initially. We have GMP contracts versus fixed price that we do [indiscernible]. We have target price contracts versus this. Sometimes we're doing more T&M. And the same thing with RPOs. Sometimes the contract gets little out, will be at $200 million -- and we are a GAAP reporter, not only on our numbers, we are a GAAP reporter on our RPOs. So it's real contracts, noncancelable portions. So sometimes we look a little different. we're pretty sure you're all smart enough to add back amortization and depreciation by segment where we give it to you.

But I think the key thing on the margins though, is that they will bounce around, right? It's a project-based business. And we've gotten a lot of questions on our Electrical segment margins in the quarter and for overall EMCOR and for each of our segments, what we've said is if you look at a rolling 12- to 24-month average, that's about where margin should be for each segment for consolidated EMCOR, but they'll bounce around quarter-to-quarter.

So if we just take electrical, for example, over that 8 quarters that make up that 24-month average, they've been as low as 10%, as high as 15.8%. So they'll bounce around. But on average, they'll come back to rolling 12 to month period.

.

And with the growth, we've done a lot of analysis on that.

If you look at growth, let's take our construction segments, for example, when you look at broader nonres. If you look over a 5-year period, we have a history of growing 500 to 600 basis points above the broader non-res market, and we think that ratio should hold true into the future. If you look at consolidated EMCOR, that's probably 200 to 300 points above the nonres market.

And these are over long periods of time. So the other thing that I think people get confused about, and I'll hear this, they talk about market share. That is the most meaningless -- first of all, define the market for me. I've been doing it combined in my time at carrier, and I grew up on it. People -- there is no definition that would allow you to get to a real market share number. define the market. That's not how we think, right? We think opportunity and we think about building out a business in a geographic or end market. And as contractors, we typically take a 2- to 5-year view of the world. We're not building products with IP in it that you have to have a 10- or 15-year view of the world. And we can move our resources between. So I'll give you a great example. So we've gone from servicing 3 or 4 data center markets in 2019 to today '17. How do you do that? Well, you take some of your existing assets, your companies that have great electricians and supervision that did a lot of either hospital work or industrial work.

And you take other people from other parts of the company that are willing to do it and you train them up how to do that. Great success doing that. How you acquire you take someone that maybe can't take the next step to do hyperscale work but only do a piece of it. And again, you have people that are expert at it. The 2 gentlemen that run our Electrical and Mechanical segments, venture to say, Brian and Dan are probably know more about how to build a data center or a high-tech manufacturing plant than anybody in the country mechanically and electrically. And so they know how to move our resources to get someone started into that business, whether through organic growth or acquisition or it's not our preferred method. We'll go start up an operation in a new market where our customer ask us to come in, and they want to write part of that risk with the right contracting mechanism when we go in. So we do all 3 ways. We've gone from 2 markets mechanically to over 7 today. Fire protection, we can serve every market in the country. which is sprinkler and fire alarm.

And just because we're getting close to the end of time, there will be a breakout down the hallway. But just because you mentioned the data center so much. One of the questions from the audience was just how do you manage if and when there is a downturn on that given how the projects have gotten so much bigger and -- I don't know, I guess your variable cost and...

Yes. I mean, clearly, what's it 25% of our business today?

24%, 25% of our revenue.

Yes. That gets cut half 12.5 of business has gone. It wouldn't be the first time we went through that. So what do you do? What's the playbook? First, we look for other opportunities. But my guess, the data center market takes a big correction. We got a lot of manufacturers in trouble. They've been to a site and see all the switchgear, chillers, air handlers, crack units and a lot of stuff on those sites, right? We know how to cut costs. We're really good at it. The real sort of underlying principle of EMCOR metrics-wise is return on net assets for -- that's how our people get paid.

When we go through that -- look, we have parts of our business in geographies that are in downturn today, right? We're a big company. What do they do? Again, we have a flexible workforce, especially on the union side or even the nonunion side, the trades people. There's little or no severance costs. We revert back to our core people. Some of our foreman become working foreman or a journeyman again, and we live to fight another day. That's why we don't make huge fixed cost investments as a contractor. We try to stay as flexible and as nimble as we can. It's why we don't buy all our lifts. It's why we don't buy all our vehicles and we lease them. It's why we're one of United Rentals' biggest customers for rental companies. It's why we carefully add prefabrication space. We're going to add 450,000 space this year. The way we look at that space is it has a 3-year payback. And we have pretty good 3-year visibility right now. I'll leave you with this one thought, and I did this on our earnings call. Some of you heard that. So we recently had 80 of our data center team, our team together at Miller Electric about a month ago, maybe 6 weeks ago. Great interaction of ideas, all that. [indiscernible] came, I won't give you their names, but 4 of the big hyperscalers, the owner.

They wanted to make sure we were on the journey. They showed us their building plan. until 2031, it looks like we're going to be pretty busy. And it also looks like they can't keep up with demand from the people that are building their product. And it also looks like they have power through that. But with the gas -- and the only way out of this is gas turbines in the short term, the next 5, 8 years. And the gas turbine companies are all sold out until 2031. So I think there's a lot of things that will be good. We can catch you in the breakout if you have more questions. Thank you all for your interest in EMCOR, and we're pretty proud of the company we've built over a long time.

Thank you very much.

All right. Good afternoon, everybody, and thanks for joining our fireside chat today with the executive management team of EMCOR, which includes CEO, Tony Guzzi; and CFO, Jason Nalbandian. We picked up coverage right after Labor Day this year and came out with an outperform rating, right around $600 per share, which was up sixfold from about $100 per share only 3 short years ago, driven by the incredible momentum that we've seen in the business. And shares continue to move higher with every incremental headline about industrial reshoring and AI infrastructure.

So with that as a backdrop, I'm excited to have the team with us today to talk more about the growth drivers and industry dynamics. So Tony and Jason, thanks for joining us today as well as sorry, Lucas, I should have you as well. Lucas Sullivan, IR. But yes, thanks for joining me, guys.

You bet. Thanks for having us.

You bet. So I want to start out with just a quick recap, state of the union. You reported your third quarter results last week. A few of the items that really stuck with us is, one, you're continuing to see broad-based revenue growth. I think 10 out of your 11 construction end markets grew this quarter almost at a double-digit clip, I'll add. The backlog is continuing to grow #2, strongly, and that's particularly true for data centers. I think the backlog there doubled from last year, which leads me to point number three. You shared that you believe you can maintain a high single-digit to low double-digit organic growth rate over the near term. So maybe with that, can you just spend a little time, share your perspective on the current state of affairs, how you're thinking about things stepping back, like how are things playing out this year relative to your initial expectations? Anything surprising you one way or another, just at a higher level?

Yes. So look, I think you captured a lot of the high points well, Tim. And thank you for setting this up today. And everybody on the line, thanks for joining us. It's an exciting time to be the CEO of EMCOR, and I've been the CEO for a long time. But I think you captured it fairly well. RPO is up 29% year-over-year, about to $12.61 billion. 80% of that growth has been organic. I think you captured it well. You see good diversity of demand because our -- it's not only our revenue growth, we also had RPO growth in almost all of our sectors. I think diversity of demand is something that's important. Yes, we are growing well in data centers and some of the other things focused on nearshoring and reshoring and all those things.

But we also have good diversity of demand at EMCOR, which I think sets us apart from some of our peers. We're growing our revenues. And Jason, when we hit this later, we'll hit this later when you ask about labor, but just to get it upfront, we're growing our revenues 2 to 3x the rate of our headcount growth in our Mechanical and Electrical Construction segments. And that's important because it ties into a point you make later. We are also seeing opportunities to grow, which to us is one of the key capacity increases is we're having the ability to -- because of our growth to grow more foremen, superintendents, project managers and other folks that help us expand and be able to do more projects and larger projects. We continue to see good aftermarket growth. That gets lost in all this, right? We continue to have good aftermarket growth, especially in our mechanical services business.

And we've had really, I think, we have a record of really good capital allocation, but we continue to have really good capital allocation. We're in the process of divesting our U.K. business, which we have built into a pretty good business. We'll be selling that this year, pending U.K. regulatory approval.

We've made over $900 million worth of acquisition, the latest being our John W. Danforth acquisition, which we actually signed -- will close here in the fourth quarter. We actually signed in the night before earnings when we want to announce it. And we also have done $400 million plus in share repurchases. And we've done all that by having cash flow generation that continues to be best-in-class. We expect to be at least equal to net income when we do that and we have a long track record of doing that or a little bit better. And we leave 2025 as we exit out of the year, feeling pretty good about as we go into 2026. And we're doing all that by earning the best margins we've ever earned between 9% and 9.5% on a consolidated basis, operating income.

Remember, we do operating income. A lot of people do this sort of EBITDA accounting and EBITDA accounting. We're operating income. We figure everybody on the phone smart enough to add back amortization. And we continue to invest for the future and development of our people. Jason, you got anything to add there on the highlights upfront?

I think Tim hit it, right? 10 out of 11 of our market sectors grew when you combine electrical and mechanical. I think the thing for me that's always interesting is if you look at the business overall, you strip out what we've seen as high-growth sectors over the last several years. So you strip out networking and communications, which for us is predominantly data centers, you strip out high-tech manufacturing and you look, how did we grow the rest of the business in '24 and for the year-to-date period of '25, and we're still growing it at mid- to high single digits. I think in '24, it was roughly 4% to 5%. And year-to-date, we've seen the rest of our business grow at roughly 7%. And so I think that's a testament to really the diversity of our business.

And Tim, you mentioned kind of our near-term growth rates, and we've said this before. I think for us, if you look at how we've grown historically against non-res, I think that's a good predictor to how we'll grow into the future. And for us, on a consolidated basis, we typically grow 200 to 250 basis points above non-res. And in our Construction segments or our Mechanical Services group, we're typically growing, let's say, 500 to 600 basis points above non-res.

And that's where we get to the 9%, high single digits, low double digits. in our Electrical and Mechanical segments that you mentioned when we kicked off the call, Tim.

Okay. That's a good level set. Thanks for providing that overview of the business. It sounds like you guys are largely thinking about it the way we are. Although I will say we raised our estimates on the most recent quarter for 2026. So although that's a good growth algorithm on how to think about it, you do kind of continue to surprise to the...

Yes, we continue to outpace it a little bit. [indiscernible] talking about, doesn't have any acquisitions in it, next year.

Good point. That's a good point that -- yes, that's right. Although my model doesn't include the most recent acquisition because you announced it, but you haven't closed it yet, correct?

Yes. And then we have the U.K. coming out. So, we have a month of Miller coming back. We've done some other small ones. We're pretty good about breaking that out when we give guidance in February.

Perfect. So I'll move on here because, Tony, I was laughing in a recent fireside chat, I think you made a joke that no one wants to talk about anything with you except data center these days, which I understand. But actually, I do actually want to start this off by talking about some of your other markets. Cool. So I mean we've seen strong growth in a lot of these areas and something we've all come to appreciate more and more is just how long and coming the push and need to reshore has been and the potential for this to be a multi-decade theme. So maybe I could start with these high-tech manufacturing opportunities, semiconductor fabs, a lot of MEP work goes into those, I think. But obviously, these are large projects. A ton. Okay. All right. That's what I thought. At the same time, it seems like the U.S. may be in just this initial push of what might be, I don't know, 10-plus, 10, 15-year surge in CapEx to get the critical mass of chips here in the U.S.

How much has your team already been involved in this area? Because I don't know. I'm new to the story. And I know you guys have talked about semi, but like how much have you already been involved in this area? And how do you think about the opportunity over the next few years? Is it less about as much? Or more than you have been? I just don't, I guess, have a good level set for.

Well, I'll give you some historical perspective. I've been at EMCOR 21 years. We've been working on semiconductor plants on and off for 21 years. Now what's different this time, that was for 1 or 2 particular customers, one in Arizona, one in Salt Lake City, a little bit in Boise, Idaho. That's the historical perspective prior to this recent expansion. The recent expansion, we picked up a couple of new customers, one in Arizona that's pretty well known. We're doing the mechanical work there. We've done some of the fire life safety work there. We've done some low-voltage electrical work there. We did a lot of work on the first fab mechanically, fire life safety. We're doing some of the work on the second fab, the same scope going forward on the mechanical side.

As you go to one of the other big fabs built in Texas, and we don't give customer name, they don't want us to give customer name. Another big fab built in Texas, we did the CUB, Central Utility Building. So just put -- is it a bigger mechanical project? It's a huge mechanical project. It's 70,000 tons of cooling. So just to put that in perspective for you, 70,000 tons of cooling, take a major medical center that may span 2 or 3 city blocks. 12.5x as much cooling power goes into that semiconductor fab at a place they're planning on building 5 that would be in that 1 location. So that just gives you an idea.

How many times?

12x of a major medical center. So go down to Northwestern Medical Center, you're in Chicago, looking at vast medical center, the cooling capacity that they will use at that one semiconductor fab that we built in Texas, just the central utility building, 12x the size of what they'll use at Northwestern Medical.

So 70x when it's all said and done, if this is...

70,000 tons is 12x. So it's about 5,000 to 6,000 tons at Northwestern Medical Center. This is 12x that. I'm just trying to size it for people. And there's other phases to that, right? We did that there. places, we'll do the tooling install, which is more of a unit price job. In other places, we'll do what's in between the tooling install, which actually moves the air and moves the liquids, and we do that. That's actually what we're doing out in the desert. You pick which part you're going to do, you really can't do it all, no contractor really. And they don't want one contractor to do it all.

And so we think that's a 5- to 10-year opportunity, too. We're well entrenched in Arizona. We'll have the opportunity to potentially do the Texas job when they do the next phase. And then we have to balance that against other opportunities we may see in the same geographic market in Texas because there might be something better to do that we'll go do there, maybe a more remote data center that's going to take 7 years to do, and there'll be more quick-term projects to do that. And you say, why don't you have the capacity to do both? Well, we could have the capacity to do both, but we'll see if that's what we want to do.

To the central question, though, do we believe this is a good long-term market for EMCOR? The answer to that is absolutely. Is it going to be a big drop into our RPOs like it was when we did started the first plant in Texas? It might not be. They might let it out in phases, and that's more what we're seeing in Arizona, and that's what we've seen through time as we became more entrenched with the customers. Jason, you had some good data on this, I'll flip it over to you to add.

Tim, I think the key here when you look at the data is the point you made about this being a little bit lumpy for us relative to some of the other sectors, right? You finish the first phase. There's an inherent lag before that second phase starts up as our customers try to get these facilities up and running. But if you just step back and you look at the work we're doing today in this space relative to what we were doing just a few years ago, let's say, 2021, for example, our revenue today is 5 to 6x in high-tech manufacturing, what it was just a couple of years ago. So we're down maybe year-to-date. But long term, we're certainly seeing elevated demand, and we think we can continue to grow off this space.

And it's really all trades. It will be everything from sprinkler fitters, fire alarm techs, low-voltage techs, traditional electrical, mechanical, and we won't get every job, every phase, every trade. And then millwright actually because one of the semiconductor equipment providers have actually hired one of our companies to be the national person that goes around and sets all the semiconductor equipment regardless of whose plant is going into. So this is a broad-based opportunity for us. It's something we will participate in. It can be a little lumpy or it will be steadily coming into things. We like the work. It's tough work. There's less people that can do this tough work.

But again, when you're working in a sector like this, you're working for some of the most sophisticated customers in the world. And some of these folks came over and either hadn't built a semiconductor plant in a long time in the U.S. and one of them had never built one in the U.S. So you go through those growing pains. But to be fair, we did quite well on that first one with a new entrant in the market for the U.S.

Got you. That was a lot of good color. And when you say it's tough work, not everyone can do it, Tony. Is it your technical capabilities? Or is it the fact that you have the manpower? Which one is the bigger one at the moment that...

I think it's the intersection of both. The manpower are pretty highly skilled. I mean this is a lot of high-end welding, high-end fitting, electrical, this is pretty high-end work, right? These are very experienced people. In our case, we try to have at least a percentage of that 20% to 30% of those people have done this work before. We're not like cycling.

The second thing that I think is the amount of interaction you have to do with the person building it. The amount of BIM, Building Information Modeling, virtual design construct, design assist we're doing here before we ever build anything, coupled with the amount of the precision on the prefabrication. And then if we move -- if we're doing the middle phase, the middle work or the tool installation, the middle phase is all clean room work. So we actually have basically the chambers to do clean room work like a pharmaceutical or anywhere else to do the welding and everything around that.

So it's very specialized. The further you go into the fab. Central Utility Building, maybe not as much, but as we're more into the fab, it becomes very specialized, very -- you need some facilities to do it. You need training around those facilities, that kind of welding. You're doing a lot of high alloy welding, a lot of stainless steel welding, the further you move away from the central utility building.

Got you. Okay. If I stick on the other one that everyone thinks of when they think of high-tech manufacturing is battery plants. Is that also -- I can't remember exactly what you said about them in the past, but I think that it's something that you've mentioned in the past as being you playing in the EV value chain in the battery plants as being a growth area. Is that something that you're seeing steady growth in? Or is it pulling back at this point like we're seeing in some areas of the EV value chain? Or where are we at?

Let me tell you how we thought about the EV value chain. So maybe the cynic of me was proven right. So like we're doing -- at the macro level, we're doing both capital allocation and resource allocation all the time. And one could argue the resource allocation is actually harder than the capital allocation right now. They both take a lot of thought. The capital allocation is about money. The resource allocation is about people and fabrication facilities. It's about our -- and it's people all the way from the BIM designers all the way through the tradesmen on the ground installing the installation.

So when the -- all these opportunities were coming out 3 years ago, data centers were starting to grow more, and we're going to talk more about that later. You had reshoring, you have our traditional markets like health care and institutional, you have EV chain. Now we were involved in some of the first electrical EV projects with Tesla in Reno, Nevada, especially on the millwright side and the fire life safety. And so we had some experience around that.

We also have a lot of experience with the auto companies. And they can be very difficult customers and they can change their mind in an instant. So as we were looking at all these opportunities, we said, okay, how do we want to think about how we're going to participate in the EV value chain? Well, first of all, we always are thinking about how do we maximize margin and how do we maximize the opportunity for our people to have long term. And then is that going to be a customer that we're going to have multiple opportunities. So quite frankly, we did make decisions in some case to not be the go-to contractor with some of the Big 3 and some of the locations where they were going to build them out from nothing, and they wanted a commitment on dedicated resources over a 3- to 5-year period.

Quite frankly, in some of those cases, we were not the guy, and that was by design. But we did participate broadly with fire life safety. We did participate probably on specific scopes. And we did okay in EV value chain of all the places that we're growing and continue to grow. This was the one we emphasized the least, but it's still a substantial part of what we did. What we see today is I personally believe there's going to be a lot of battery plants in the U.S. because I think a lot of people are going to follow the Toyota model.

I mean, remember, we're one of the biggest fleet operators, too. So we never understood sort of that we're going to be all electric, can't carry the way. We did a lot of work around that. But we do know hybrids work. And we know that, that could be the solution for the future. And so we think there will be a lot of batteries built, and we are participating in that. And especially both fire life safety, mechanical and electrically, we've been involved in quite a few of those projects, and we'll continue to be involved. Is there as much demand today in the EV space as there was 2 years ago? No. But is there a steady demand in the battery space? The answer to that. Jason, maybe give some numbers around that.

I think Tony hit it. We participated in a very select way. What we're starting to see now though is a shift away from full EVs and towards more battery. But when you look at it on a combined basis, there's still growth there. I think right now, battery is the demand driver, but we're still up 10% year-to-date in the EV and battery space overall.

Yes, it could be interesting in the future, too. And I actually want to ask you about the power infrastructure later on, but maybe batteries are going to be used for more than just EVs and...

Yes, we've done -- Tim, we get to talk about, we've done big battery, like not where they're producing them, but where they're using them for power infrastructure. I think that has a place, but that's not going to power -- with the amount of power we're talking about here. That's -- if you did a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle, that might be 3 of the pieces.

Got you. Got you. Well, maybe we could just move to that. I'm going to skip a few of these. Well, I did want to ask you about life sciences and if you think it's that whole thing. And if you think it's important, please skip back to that. But I'm going to skip that so that we have enough time.

Yes, I think I can answer that really quickly for you 2 seconds. Long-term market for EMCOR, actually a long-term player in the aftermarket for EMCOR. We have people at these facilities all the time, electricians, pipe fitters doing [indiscernible] moves and changes. We also are there when they put in major lines, and that's across all trains. Good long-term market has a lot of the same characteristics of other good long-term manufacturing markets. Sometimes they grow 1% or 2%, sometimes they grow 12%.

Got you. And this is like GLP-1 manufacturing stuff.

Yes, we're doing -- supporting that. Yes, in a couple of places. Yes. And also life sciences and some of the BioMed and we're you're supposed to be. We're in Southern California, we're in Indiana doing it. We're a Research Triangle Park, and we're in New Jersey doing it and some of the primary research we're doing supporting the facilities up in Boston.

Got you. Okay. That's helpful. And yes, so lastly, on the reshoring theme before we get to more of the AI infrastructure. Well, this kind of is AI infrastructure with the power because I've always wanted to ask you this, and I did it during my due diligence on your company, is that I really wanted to talk to you about was the power infrastructure build-out that needs to happen in the U.S. And there's 2 conversations to have here with you. And one is about the potential bottleneck that's coming to AI infrastructure from it. I'm going to set that aside for a second.

And I want to actually ask about do you play here? Like do you -- does EMCOR build power plants? Do you build export terminals? Is there an opportunity for you to participate in this "unleashing America's energy independence" that we see happening right now?

So some of the investors that are on the call now, I'm sure, have heard me cynically talk about over a period of time have heard me cynically talk about the way we were actually approaching this problem in the last 4 years, right? Because you're not going to do this with intermittent power. I mean this is -- it was a fallacy. All of the above was silly. I mean it's not -- yes, it could be part of the solution. Go to your battery point earlier, it's not the solution. But EMCOR does play. I mean we have built utility-scale solar farms. We're contractors, right? We're going to go to where we think we can mix the labor the best, get the best opportunity, build capability if we think it's a long-term market. We do have utility scale solar experience.

Secondarily, we also participate in the aftermarket in power plants. We have a business that's called PPM. It's part of our -- it's part of -- it's in the mechanical business. It's part of our industrial platform in the Southeast, not oil and gas platform, but industrial, that PPM stand for power plant maintenance. That's what they did. They can do coal plants, gas plant they used to do nuclear, we sort of moved away from that. But -- and so we do the aftermarket.

We also participate upstream. We are emphatically not an EPC power plant producer. We're not going to guarantee someone output. We're not going to design build a large-scale power plant. We may do a combined life cycle cogen plant at a hospital where they're going to take the waste heat off of a turbine and turn it into cooling through a chiller. We will be involved in that. But -- and we may design build that with a partner. So any large-scale utility scale power combined cycle plant, that's not us. However, we do participate in the balance of plant work, both mechanically and electrically. We will do some prefabrication around it if we're going to install it. When the last power with the IPPs happened in the sort of the '05 to '08 in California, we had some pretty good success on balance of plant work mechanically and electrically. We do substation work selectively around the country.

So we will be part of that. But is it going to be the major driver like some of these other things? Probably not. But we do participate. And it's like any other job a contractor thinks about, is this the best opportunity I have to execute in the next 12 to 24 months? And where that's the case, we will execute for our customers. Now, linking back to this AI infrastructure, we're going to have to build, right? Combined cycle plants are sold out from the big 3 to 2031. So a lot of gas plants are going to go into the next 5, 6 years. And so what they've done to fill that gap in between the time, and again, if you listen to me over a long period of time, I said 5, 4 years ago, we were going to go on a quest for stranded power. And they are now on their quest for stranded power. We could talk a lot more about that when we talk about data centers.

Yes, I would love to dig into that because that's been a big theme here with my partner, Jed Dorsheimer, who covers a lot of that stuff and talks about the power infrastructure bottleneck a lot and the mistake that we made going after intermittent power versus baseload power. I think you guys were friends actually. So yes, I would love to dig into that more. But now that we're kind of on the data center theme, maybe we could just dive in.

I think you've actually communicated really well about this market over the last few years. So we don't have to spend a ton of time here. But for those on the call that aren't as familiar, and that kind of includes me. Again, I'm newer to the story. Could you provide a brief history of EMCOR's footprint in the data center market, how you -- and I'm thinking about this like how your capabilities have evolved over time, but also how you've expanded geographically over time because you asked novice, right? And I'm like an electrician as an electrician, as an electrician. I know that's not true, but I don't know what the differences are. Can you pull someone up over here, put them in a data center. When you say I have a data center market or data center capabilities or we're establishing that, I don't know what that entails. I was curious to find out.

So we have a long history in data centers, going back to the first data centers that were built. I'm here 21 years. I was with Carrier before that. The first data centers that really mattered were built in the late '90s, early 2000s. We actually -- I helped sell the job as an air conditioning guy to an EMCOR company called Poole & Kent down in D.C. that did the original Equinix data centers and the original AOL data centers. So that's all. And then the electrical contractor on that job, I wasn't part of EMCOR was actually Dyna Electric DC. And they were sort of some of the first data centers that were at scale, and those data centers were between 5 and 10 megawatts. So today, a hyperscaler doing AI is doing 200 megawatts. They're 20x the power need to do an AI data center is the first AOL data centers and a cloud storage is about 5x that size.

So just we're sizing these right now, 200 megawatts, give or take, could run a 15,000 to 20,000 person city, depending on the city or 5,000 households, you figure 2 to 4 people per household. And it would take -- go back to the PowerPoint, it take about 1,500 acres to get the same output solar wise in 600,000 panels, unless it's the new ones, it will be about 400,000 to get what combined cycle plant can get at 250 megawatts, 1 turbine and usually put for.

So it just sort of sizes it for you. So EMCOR has got lots of capability here. So we went from there. Then we went to started building when I first got here, just the big data centers that people like the Bank One before it got acquired by JPMorgan built the 2 biggest financial institution data centers in Chicago and in New Jersey. We built those. And then sort of we were just building them for owners, right? Bank of America, we're building them, mainly financial institutions, some utilities, some REITs were building data centers. And that sort of happened for about 10 years, and we were building them then.

Things started to change around 2017 and '18. Cloud storage became a thing. Amazon started building data centers. Google started building data centers. They all started -- and they were mainly building them in either -- for us, they were building in Chicago, where we had the first data center builders, and they were building in Portland where we built capability, and it all started with our group in D.C., in New Jersey, and they taught these guys in Chicago and these guys in Portland how to do data centers. So we were maybe doing until about 2020, 2019, 4 data center markets, data center sites. [indiscernible] market as sort of a big city region or a state. And then we flip to now today, we're doing 17, Lucas, electrically?

Yes, 17.

We're servicing 17 different distinct data center markets today and versus 4 in 2020, 2019 and versus 2 or 3 mechanically, we're now servicing 7. And fire life safety, we can service every data center market. And so what does it take to go and get into a data center market if you're EMCOR.

Yes, what's it take?

So how did we do this? And I'm going to give you 3 distinct examples. okay? One is get bigger, right? You had great capability in D.C., you had it in Chicago. They're the founders of the EMCOR in New Jersey. They're the founders of the EMCOR data center business, take those people, teach other people in those places, just get bigger, get more capable, serve your customers better, attract more customers because these are big data center markets. The reason for that is they have great connectivity, they got power, right?

So just build scale, right? So the D.C. business is 4x the size it was 5 years ago. And they did that also by growing their traditional business and then growing their data center business quite more than our traditional business. And did those first 3 or 4 markets, did that in D.C., did that in Chicago, did that in Portland, Oregon, out through Southern Washington, okay? Then, [indiscernible] how are you going to serve more customers want you to do more, you want to do more. You're talking to your customers. So okay, now we got to figure out how to go to Columbus, Ohio. We have no capability in Columbus, Ohio mechanically and had no capability really electrically. We do an acquisition electrically of a traditional electrical contractor, bought a smaller one that had some day 2 work in data centers. Now we're in the data center business with great industrial electricians that maybe we can teach to do data center deforming versus just traditional electrical work. So now we're growing in Columbus, Ohio.

Mechanically, what we did is we took 2 of our best companies, one through acquisition, Bachelor and Kimball, who had big data center experience. That will be the second way we do it. And Poole & Kent, they formed an internal joint venture, went up and formed a company up the mechanical the service at the request of one of our customers on a GMP contract, which gave us both some protection to go up and do mechanical scope in Columbus, Ohio region, to Albany, Columbus all the way up.

The second way we do it is take one of our existing companies like we did with Portland at one time and teach them how to do it, right, is we take one of our existing companies in Indiana, 2 places in Indiana and say, you guys are great electrical companies. You've got great capability. You do automotive work, you do steel mill work. We're going to teach you how to do data center work. So how do you do that? Well, you bring some folks over from Chicago, you bring people from all over the country to help them estimate the job. You're going to be working for a customer you already know. You can bring the means and methods. You take them out to a site you built. We got like, okay, we can do that. This is what the prefab plan looks like. Here's what the learning curve looks like.

So instead of the learning curve being like this slow linear growth, the learning curve looks like this, right? Because we take some experienced people, intermix them with some of their just great foreman and superintendents and project managers after half of a build, they know what to do. And then, of course, this peer group we have is sharing all the time.

The third way we do it is acquisition. And it might be of a small company that's sort of in the data center business, mainly doing scope for somebody else and we say, "Hey, you have some resume, you now have our resume, and we're going to basically treat them just like we treat one of our other companies that we've owned for a long time and say, we're going to put you in a data center business in a major way." And it's going to take us a year or 2 to do that because now we got to know -- unlike our current company that we've owned, we know what their capabilities are. We bought this. We think we know what their capabilities are. We're going to be a little more careful when we do that and then to ramp them up.

How do you do that if they -- if you're not sure, is it just you make sure that there's protections for you and the customer in the contract?

Well, we're going to be sure because we're going to put the right supervision on the job.

That's how it is, yes.

But we're going to be sure. The customers buy -- no, the customer is not going to give us a pass. We're going to take the right contract structure, but the customer is not going to give us a pass because no, I hired EMCOR, an EMCOR company. You guys know what you're doing. And then you buy people that are the best in the business like Batchelor & Kimball and knew how to -- we bought in 2019. And they then helped our mechanical business grow quite a bit in the data center business because they were known in the Southeast and in Oklahoma as one of the best data center builders in the country.

And then on the wrap around all that, that's electrically and mechanically and fire life safety between the assets we have at Shambaugh and Comunale, they can service any data center market in the country, and we've built those through acquisition and mainly organic growth.

Got you. Okay. Sticking on this data center idea, sorry, I'm not distracted. I just -- there are people on the call that are e-mailing me left and right saying, "Hey, could you just squeeze this question in," and it was distracting me. They're all related to data center, by the way. But I'm assuming you don't comment on competitors. So I'm not going to ask half of them.

No, I don't comment on competitors.

So they all want to know how you think you compare relative to...

I saw in some of the notes or somebody's note that Comfort did X and we did Y and Comfort is a good company. Because they grew faster, doesn't mean they took share from us, right? These markets are growing in different markets. I don't -- like we've never thought of our business in terms of market share. It's just a general comment.

All the time in other markets as well, and it doesn't make -- especially when you're...

It's an irrelevant metric.

Yes. Yes, you guys both are performing at a high level on the data center front. I mean, I think people do think about you, too, as the leaders in the space with robust capabilities to serve these markets.

Yes. And we're very rarely in the same market, by the way.

Right. I mean the way I think about EMCOR, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is you guys are in a lot of Tier 1 cities and you have a unionized labor force and Comfort Systems thinks about themselves as in Tier 2 cities with a nonunionized labor force, you're not going to cross paths, but how would you correct with that?

I think for general work, that's true. But the more you go to some of these data center markets and the more you're in -- some of this manufacturing work that no longer holds true. But very rarely are we overlapping on a job. I mean we're competing for the same work. I think it just happens that way. I don't I think it's a big market. And different customers.

How about this liquid versus air? We have -- we've read that AI data centers with liquid cooling requires even more MEP content for data center for cloud. So that's true.

That's true.

Okay. I wasn't -- I mean it makes sense to...

Very much -- a lot more tonnage, more megawatts, drives more tonnage to cool, drives -- and the chips are more hot. So therefore, they're trying to -- they're still blowing air across the servers, Sure, right? That's where the Vertiv products and all those people come in, right? And there's custom air handlers, and that's all the chillers are lined up, and these are massive chiller plants, either air cooled or water cooled. And then what liquid cooling really means. So a guy like me thinks water cooled versus air cooled. Water cooled means that's just the loop that you're using to cool. What this actually means is you're taking the server, you're putting it in a jacket and you're doing heat exchange from either some liquid medium, you're going to either run a pipe assembly down and run it through there and cool that water that way that the server jackets in or you're going to do it through other medium.

I mean that's what liquid cooling means here. And it's usually a fabricated product that you're putting cool water through -- or some combination of cold water or glycol or something in to extract the heat transfer out of the liquid medium that the server jackets are in.

Oh, really. So it's [indiscernible] liquid.

Just think about like a tea bag. And think about the server being the tea bag. You're dipping the server in and maybe it's not just water all around it, but there's a jacket and then there is some kind of piping system around that jacket to extract the heat out and then take it out and expel it through the loop usually through a cooling tower outside. That's what it means.

That's what that means. So that's part A is, is it more content? And the answer is yes. And part B is, well, where are we on that journey? Because I think about it like probably inning 1 on the liquid cooled side. And please, again, I don't know if I'm talking about, Tony. Correct me when I'm wrong.

I think we're on inning 1 or 2 at best in building out the AI infrastructure based on the work I know we're doing. And the mix in our thing. I think we probably look at the same industry studies, you guys probably even created a couple of them. What we've seen is sort of cloud storage is going to grow CAGR over the next 5 years, 9% to 11% and AI is going to grow north of 20%, which gets you to a mid-teens growth rate, right? I still think the majority of our backlog today is still cloud storage. Jason, you got -- you have some facts and figures around that.

Part of the growth you're seeing, if you look at our Mechanical segment versus our Electrical segment. electrically, we're still doing more data center work. Our revenues are still greater on the data center side in our Electrical segment than it is mechanical. Even dollar-wise, electrical is still growing faster and some of that's just a larger base. But if you look at growth rate, you're seeing a stronger growth rate in mechanical. Just for example, year-to-date, electrical is up 80%, mechanical is up almost 120%. Some of that is this increased cooling content. Some of it's just a lower base in mechanical. But we're starting to see that in the numbers.

Okay. So it's starting to show up in the numbers. That's interesting. Do the AI-dedicated data centers require additional capabilities on your end? Like does it require more prefab, more EDC?

It will -- yes, there's more prefab. There's more fire life safety content. There's more voltage coming in, right? So there's more megawatts coming in, so there's going to be more electrical feeds, bigger switchgears. All those things are true. I think about it simply, an AI multiplier right now is about 1.2 on electrical versus traditional cloud storage and maybe 1.4 to 1.8 mechanically depending on design. But go back to your PowerPoint, I'm going to give you an interesting figure here. So we're doing a very large data center campus for somebody down in Georgia. And we'll probably do the whole campus mechanically. We're not there electrically.

But the data center campus will be 3 gigawatts. That's 3,000 megawatts. So think about the nuclear power plant they just built in Georgia. I think it was 3,500 to 4,000 megawatts or 3.5 to 4 gig. That one data center requires the power -- 75% of the power of that first nuclear plant we've built in the country in the last 25 years. So...

That's ridiculous.

In perspective, that's one data center campus in Georgia that's being built today.

Well, okay. So let's talk about this, the energy wall, as we call it, the energy bottleneck. We just don't have enough electrons for these things to run on. I'm curious about your thoughts on this dynamic and when something like that may occur. And people think about this. I actually don't think about a DeepSeek moment as being a risk to your data center backlog because if we look historically, there's this thing called Jevons Paradox, where if you increase like the miles per gallon of a car, it doesn't mean we're going to use less gasoline. We're actually going to use more gasoline because it's more efficient, right?

So like we just drive more when we get those efficiencies. And if we get efficiencies in data center, we'll probably just build out more data center stuff.

Here's all I know, right? I think you heard me talk about this on the earnings call.

Please.

Here's what I know, okay? About 7 weeks ago -- and look, we follow this closely, and I read everything I can. And I think these are some of the best planners, the best they can be. And they have some of the most technical people in the world on both sides, both on the utility side, thinking about how they're going to supply and on the data center, how they're going to use, right, and how this all works plays out and where they're going for it.

So the big picture, what I personally don't believe is data center operators are going to put on-site power to power their data centers as a major part of what they're going to do. You never say they're not going to do it. Is it going to be 10% of the market? Is it going to be 15% of the market? My view, and I could be deadly wrong on this, I don't think it's the majority of the market. I think because the minute you do that, you absolve the utility of any responsibility of supplying you power when you need it. So I think that's a leverage point. I think they will do it in some cases, in very remote areas. But in general, they'd much rather the utility be on the hook to supply them the electron from other places and guarantee them power.

So then you get to -- I also think that because they went to these stranded power places, there's no reason -- there's a reason why they're working up on in Indiana on the shore of Lake Michigan because what used to be there, steel mills, car plants, big industrial infrastructure. There was a lot of power there. And in places like Indiana and Ohio, they're going to extend the life of coal plants and they can build gas plants and they're going to extend the life of the nuclear plants that they have, right?

So they're going Iowa, right? Iowa has wind power, but they also have a big fossil infrastructure. Oklahoma, Texas. I mean, intermittents make more sense in Oklahoma and Texas than they do in most places because they got wind. And then they have to put the fossil with it, right? So all that stuff fits together. So what we've learned from our customers is they feel really good for the next 5 years, 2025 to 2031, 2030. Yes, is there interconnect problems? Can the utility keep up? All that's going to be true, but they're not putting these major projects ahead where they don't think they can get power.

I mean there'll be maybe little blips, but they -- if we don't have the ability to put the next round of power in with all these orders for the gas turbines, then we're going to have a problem. And as far as nuclear, I mean, again, I have the ability to talk to more utility executives than not, right? And I have a couple I know very well. That is a -- they're looking at it. And modular nuclear maybe is the future. But the reality is that's still 5 to 10 years out, and we're not putting one in your neighborhood. They're going to be built in centralized plants, maybe modular in nature, and they're still going to be going out over the same -- they're going to put -- it's going to be easier to put T&D lines along existing T&D lines than all the stuff we're doing with intermittent energy.

So we're going to have to figure out -- and all that's going to play a role. But I think most of what's going to get the next increment from 2030 to 2033 is going to be gas turbines, right? And that's a known technology that works and we have lots of natural gas. And people in states that aren't going to use natural gas are going to be left behind in this AI race because they're not going to have the latency in the data centers they need to be able to use the models where the knowledge workers are. And there are some major places that could have an issue with that.

So I think that, that is going to happen. Now I will tell you, though, a couple of -- about a month ago, we had our 80 or so top data center builders, ours, EMCOR together in one place, down actually Miller Electric, our new acquisition. We had us all together there. And we were talking about means and methods and projections. And our customers found out we were all going to be together. And they invited themselves or 4 of the big people that you would think would be there, can we come and present to you our plans because we want you to know how important you are. We are -- you are to us and our ability to get things done. So through the general contractor to us to make sure -- and their plans were quite remarkable of what they plan to build. And...

Does that ever happened before where you have the end customer like that asking to come in? Or is that quite rare?

Well, I've not seen it happen too often. I mean that's pretty rare. It happens all the time at the local level where they'll say, okay, we got this job. We're going to work on it. We want you to be our team. We want you guys to think about this. But to happen on a collective basis like that. And to me, the thing is to watch these major capital spenders and the person in charge of their capital spending, knowing 50 of my 80 guys in that room by their first name. That's a little bit rare.

So the next [indiscernible] well, then you guys should be able to get more margin. Well, that's not how it works either. I mean, because sometimes there's contracting mechanisms might not be fixed price initially. We may ask for a GMP contract. They may want to do everything GMP, which is a target type price we work to because it makes change orders easier and they do change or they want to have transparency of cost. And so when you think about this data center space, there's 3 or 4 different contracting mechanisms. There's 10 or 12 at least major customers, maybe more once you bring the colos in.

There's, at least in our case, 17 to 24 geographies mechanically and electrically are working in, even more than that. And so they're balancing risk reward, certainty, we've got a fixed price. We may not want to give them that in certain markets because the labor force is going to be. They may not want to give us in certain markets because they don't want to get in a contentious relationship on a new build as they get ready to build out the site because they want us to be part of the team. Other places, we've had to come in and finish someone else's job, and that has a whole other thing to it.

I mean -- so this is a very -- it's like 4D chess, but yes, it is very rare when they'll come in and share their plans with you. They may share the next 2 jobs with you, but for them to talk about, hey, this is what it looks like for the next 5 years, and we didn't have all in there together. We came one after another. But -- and it's respectful. I mean it's sort of like, hey, we're sort of in this together now folks and how are we going to build this infrastructure because we right now can't keep up with the demand from the people that are selling our product on the supply -- we're the factory. We can't build the factories fast enough to keep up with the supply side. I mean, with the demand side.

That's why they're doing it. They need to know that you're going to be there for them or they want to know that you're going to be there for them. That's why they're coming. They're breaking through the general contractor and they're coming direct to you. They just need to know it. It's too important. not to risk it. Yes. That's really interesting.

Look, we got 5 or so minutes left, and I got through about 10% of the things I wanted to talk to you about, but this was an awesome conversation. And I'm glad that we did this instead because I learned a ton just focusing on some of your main markets. But if I wasn't to spend the last 5 minutes, I'd probably move to labor because it's a question I often get.

And the reasoning it goes as follows. My question, the way I set it up here because I prewrote it, it says, where would you characterize labor shortages as being most acute? I've heard you say in the past that it's the leadership roles, the foreman and the superintendents and the project managers, and I get that, and there's a time component to developing that, that you can't rush.

But if you Google electrician shortage or plumber shortage or welder shortage. I mean you'll get a dozen articles from the trade associations representing those folks arguing that there is a major shortage. So are you really not seeing a shortage there across those skilled trades folks?

Of course, there's a shortage, right, if you take the macro level overall. I think it's purely a tribute to our teams in the field. So you think about EMCOR and our operating model, right? The people that run our companies know trade labor. In fact, over half of them are run by people that started as apprentice electricians or pipe fitters.

That's Right. It's like 60% of mechanical...

The other half of project engineers and spent their time around it. And that's both -- and if you think about on this big work we're talking about, for the most part, we're doing most of this big work union, which I look at as a real strength. The unions, the IBW and the UA have been partners with us in this and helping us develop our workforce. And that goes all the way from training, which we play a big role in, all the way through the workforce development. And we're usually one of the biggest employers in whatever geographic region we're in. So we're partners in the development of that workforce.

We also have -- because of who our people are and it's a trades-based company. It's not, for lack of a better word, it's not a bunch of suits running the companies at the local level. They're less like me and more like the highly skilled people that do the work instead of the overhead like me, right? And so they know where to find it. They know where to develop it. They know how to work with the union to get the different classifications to get their blended skill mix on a job. And in most of these fast-growth markets, we have that ability to work with the unions to get the right classification.

So we're not all just bringing in apprentices on the way to Journeyman. We have wiremen, we have CWs, we have CEs, we have all those things. And then we put capital to work to think about how, think about that 2.5 to 3:1 ratio of revenue growth versus labor, and Jason can talk about that in a minute. And we're attacking it with capital. This year, over an 18-month period, we're going to add more than 400,000 feet of fabrication space to get more work out of the field, prefab, modular, whatever you want to call it.

And if you think about -- if you just boil it down what a trade guy cares about, and people have heard me say this repetitively for 15, 20 years. First thing they care about is there no particular order. Am I going to get paid every week? And if I'm a union trade guy, is my benefit fund going to get funded, too? That's the health care, the pension, the annuity, whatever it is.

And with EMCOR, that's a check. The second thing is, are you going to keep me safe? And again, these aren't in any order. In the 21 years I've been either the President or CEO of this company, I've never turned down one request for safety equipment, safety capital spending, anything. Guys in it, we have the attitude, the folks in the field know best what they need to get productive and keep their work for. We're not trying to buy the cheapest helmets. We don't have Accenture coming in here and doing a supply chain management study on. You can have everybody wear the same helmet and look, you can buy them and they're cheaper. That is not where the leverage is in this organization. It's buying the best stuff for that region, what they need to be successful. That could be something as simple as the right gloves to do the task.

I think you have pretty low incidents.

We have a Six Sigma type safety record versus the industry. The third one is, am I working for people to know what the hell they're doing. And they know what I have to do to get that job done, and they're going to keep me productive. Fourth one is, if I do a good job, can I become part of your permanent team and continue to grow my career with you? And if I want to grow my career, can I become a foreman and maybe someday I can even be the CEO of this company at the local level. Because you know what, they have an example sitting right there that started with -- started the same place they did. Jason, maybe you can real quick before we end the capital spending we've done, it's different versus historically. Still tiny, but...

How do we attract labor and then what we're doing to become more productive, more efficient to help with that tight labor market. And so Tony said it, right? We're not a capital-intensive company. For us, CapEx is somewhere between 0.5% or 0.6% of revenues. But if you look over time, we've made a ton of investment in prefabrication and construction technologies. And if you just look at our CapEx, let's say, take a 3-year window, right? Our revenue CAGR over that 3-year window is something like 14%, but our CapEx CAGR is 2x that at roughly 28%. And those are those investments that we're making in prefab, BDC, BIM, things that make us more efficient, things that allow us to do more with less and the investments that have allowed us to grow revenue at 3x our headcount growth over time.

Yes. Okay. So maybe it was a little bit of a dumb question. Of course, there's a labor shortage. That's not the issue. It's -- these are the reasons that you guys aren't struggling to find labor because of the investments that you made, because of your union relationships, because of your safety record, because of the promotional opportunities, because of all the things is the reason where you're able to still grow your headcount, not nearly as fast as your revenue, but you're growing your headcount every...

And I'll leave the other point, right? No good specialty trade contractor in a good market chases every opportunity that's out there.

Right.

So the second point is we're pretty good about thinking on labor planning on what we need -- we're not going to outrun our headlights. We're not going to commit to a customer and say, we can do that unless we thought through what that labor plan looks like. So like they said, we've been growing revenue CAGR of 14% probably, what, 2/3 of that is organic or more, Jason? Yes.

Yes. Probably slightly more, Tony.

And so slightly more, right, maybe 75%. And then we're able to -- that's all organic headcount that comes with that and everything else. Our guys are thinking about workforce development every day. And then we reinforce that with our leadership training programs all the way from frontline supervision to CEO. And we've been doing that a long time.

I think that's probably a perfect place to end it. I wish that we had another hour to dig into more of these topics, but I can't thank you enough for the time today.

Thank you.

This was a great conversation. I'm very excited to be covering the company and excited to learn more along the way and look forward to talking to you guys when you report your fourth quarter here in a couple of months.

Yes. And we very much appreciate. We like that you guys are covering us. And anybody that's on the call, thanks for your interest in EMCOR today. We're pretty proud of the company and the folks we have working at it.

That's perfect. Thanks so much, Tony. Thanks, Jason. Thanks, Lucas, and everybody else. Have a good day.

Good morning. My name is Chris, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the EMCOR Group Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Lucas Sullivan, Director of Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Sullivan, you may proceed.

Thank you, Chris. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to EMCOR's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. For those of you joining us by webcast, we are at the beginning of our slide presentation that will accompany our remarks today. This presentation will be archived in the Investor Relations section of our website at emcorgroup.com.

With me today are Tony Guzzi, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Nalbandian, Senior Vice President and EMCOR's Chief Financial Officer; and Maxine Mauricio, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel.

For today's call, Tony will provide comments on our third quarter and discuss our RPOs. Jason will then review the third quarter in numbers, then turn it back to Tony to discuss our guidance before we open it up for Q&A.

Before we begin, a quick reminder that this presentation and discussion contains certain forward-looking statements and may contain certain non-GAAP financial information. Slide 2 of our presentation describes in detail these forward-looking statements and the non-GAAP financial information disclosures. I encourage everyone to review both disclosures in conjunction with our discussion and accompanying slides.

And finally, as a reminder, all financial information discussed during this morning's call is included in our consolidated financial statements within both our earnings press release issued this morning and in our Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And with that, let me turn the call over to Tony. Tony? .

Thanks, Lucas, and welcome to the call. And I'm going to be on Pages 4 through 5 of our presentation. Good morning, and welcome to our third quarter 2025 earnings call. I'm going to cover the financial highlights for the third quarter and then provide commentary on what has gone well through the first 3 quarters of this year which has been a lot. Jason will cover the quarterly financial results in detail.

We had another strong quarter at EMCOR. We earned $6.57 in diluted earnings per share and generated revenues of $4.3 billion, which represents a 16.4% increase from the prior year period. We achieved an exceptional operating margin of 9.4% and had strong operating cash flow of $475.5 million.

For the third quarter, we had a book-to-bill of 1.16 with remaining performance obligations at a record $12.6 billion, which represents an increase of $2.8 billion year-over-year and $2.5 million from December of 2004. We continue to allocate capital with discipline. For the first 9 months of 2025, we allocated just over $430 million on share repurchases and utilized $900 million for acquisitions.

Our balance sheet remains strong and liquid providing the fuel to support our growth and capital allocation strategy. So what's driving this outstanding performance in the first 3 quarters of 2025. Our Electrical and Mechanical Construction segments continue to earn impressive operating margins and generate growth in the base of business as demonstrated by increases in both revenue and RPOs across a number of key sectors.

We execute well for our customers in these segments by using BDC BIM and prefabrication, coupled with strong planning, excellent labor sourcing and management and disciplined contract negotiation and oversight. We have managed our project mix well and continue to gain the confidence of our customers across geographies and diverse market sectors.

With respect to data centers, we continue to improve our capabilities to serve an increasing number of data center sites with multiple trades and across a diverse set of customers. As I've said before, we are known for having the best field leadership in the business and they operate with focus, discipline, humility and grit.

Our Mechanical Services business and our U.S. Building Services segment continues to execute well with revenue growth of nearly 6% in the quarter and 7% year-to-date and an operating margin in the high single digits. The impact of the successful restructuring in our site-based businesses is reflected in this segment's third quarter operating margin expansion.

Our Industrial Services segment had some demand headwinds during the year as some large turnarounds were moved into the fourth quarter or further into 2026. And lastly, we had a successful third quarter in our U.K. Building Services segment. In September, we announced the sale of our U.K. business and believe that we will complete this transaction by year-end as we await U.K. regulatory approval.

EMCOR U.K. has a very talented management team. and they will serve their new owners well, and we will miss them. Overall, we had another strong quarter and a robust performance year-to-date in 2025.

Now I'm going to turn to the RPO section. As I previously mentioned, we leave the quarter with a diverse and strong set of RPOs at $12.6 billion. Due to the growth in the majority of the sectors we serve, our RPOs have increased 29% year-over-year and 25% when compared to December of 2024. On a sequential basis, RPOs have increased 6% from June to September.

Long-term secular trends across key sectors continue to support this growth. Driven by robust data center demand, RPOs within network and communications totaled a record $4.3 billion at the end of September, almost double that of the year ago period. While acquisitions have added to our data center capabilities and allow us to serve our customers in additional geographies, over 80% of our RPO growth we have seen in this space during 2025 has been organic.

Health core RPOs totaled $1.3 billion. While the health care sector has always been core to EMCOR, the acquisition of Miller Electric has expanded our opportunities in this sector contributing to the nearly 7% RPO growth we experienced year-over-year.

Manufacturing and Industrial RPOs totaled $1.1 billion. In addition to demand driven by customers' onshoring and reshoring initiatives recent growth in this sector has also benefited from the award of certain food process projects within our Mechanical Construction segment as well as a renewable energy project within our Industrial Services segment and led by our Mechanical Construction segment, water and wastewater RPOs increased by over $300 million during the quarter and now total $1 billion as we continue to win projects throughout Florida.

Although RPOs within high-tech manufacturing have decreased from September of last year, we continue to believe in the long-term fundamentals of the sector while acknowledging that award of these projects can be episodic in nature or impacted by our resource allocation decisions as we seek to deploy our workforce in a manner that achieves optimal outcomes for EMCOR and our shareholders.

With that, I will gladly turn the presentation over to Jason to cover our financial results in detail.

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. As Tony mentioned, over the next several slides, I will review the operating performance for each of our segments as well as some of the key financial data for the third quarter of 2025 as compared to the third quarter of 2024.

I'll start on Slide 6, which is revenues. With growth of 16.4%, revenues of $4.3 billion set a new company record for a third quarter. Acquisitions contributed $306.6 million, with the largest incremental revenue coming from Miller Electric. On an organic basis, revenues grew by 8.1%. We experienced growth within all of our reportable segments and demand for our services continues to be strong across most of the sectors that we serve.

If we look at each of our segments, revenues of U.S. Electrical Construction were $1.29 billion, increasing 52.1% due to a combination of strong organic growth and the acquisition of Miller. Consistent with our commentary over the last several quarters, while we continue to experience greater data center demand, growth within this segment remains broad based as increased revenues were generated from nearly all market sectors.

In addition to networking communications, where revenues grew by nearly 70% year-over-year Electrical Construction saw notable growth in commercial, health care, institutional and transportation. This once again demonstrates the broad offerings of this segment.

Revenues in Electrical Construction also benefited from higher levels of short duration projects and service work due in part to the capabilities we've added through the Miller acquisition. Revenues of U.S. Mechanical Construction were a record $1.78 billion, up 7% almost entirely through organic growth. Due to greater demand for data center construction projects, this segment saw the largest increase from the network and communications market sector where quarterly revenues nearly doubled year-over-year.

Beyond data centers, greater revenues were generated from several other market sectors with the most notable increase within manufacturing and industrial, led by food processing construction projects. Partially offsetting the revenue growth of the mechanical construction were decreases within the high-tech manufacturing as we completed certain semiconductor construction projects and commercial due to less warehousing and distribution project revenue.

While we are starting to see some resumption in demand from our e-commerce customers, we are just beginning to ramp up on these projects. On a combined basis, our Construction segment generated revenues of $3.1 billion an increase of 22.2%. Looking next at U.S. Building Services revenues of $813.9 million reflect a 2.1% increase year-over-year. This marks the second quarter of revenue growth since the loss of site-based contracts that we've previously referenced.

Similar to the second quarter, the growth in Mechanical Services exceeded the revenue decline within site-based and driven by each of its service lines, our Mechanical Services division generated revenue growth of 5.8% in the quarter, all of which was organic.

Turning to our Industrial Services segment, revenues of $286.9 million are in line with that of the year ago period. Decreased field services revenues as a result of the completion of a large renewable fuel project were offset by an increase in shop service revenues primarily due to greater new build heat exchanger sales. And lastly, U.K. Building Services generated revenues of $136.2 million, which represents an increase of $29.8 million or 28.1%.

While favorable exchange rate movements did positively impact the segment's revenues by $4.8 million, growth was largely driven by the award of recent facilities maintenance contracts by new customers and increased project activity with existing customers.

If we turn to Slide 7 for operating income. We generated a record third quarter operating of $405.7 million and earned a very impressive 9.4% operating margin. Looking at each of our segments. U.S. Electrical Construction had operating income of $145.2 million, which represents a nearly 22% increase.

As a result of the revenue growth I referenced, this segment experienced greater gross profit across the majority of the market sectors in which we operate, resulting in the increase in operating income. While down from the unprecedented 14.1% earned in last year's third quarter, the segment's operating margin of 11.3% remains strong, reflecting the overall performance and execution by our companies.

In addition to incremental intangible asset amortization, which reduced operating margin by 90 basis points, operating margin in the quarter was impacted by lower profitability on certain projects in new geographies where we encountered reduced labor productivity while investing in the development of a workforce.

Operating income from U.S. mechanical construction of $229.3 million increased by 6.7%, in line with the growth in segment revenues, while operating margin of 12.9% is comparable year-over-year as we continue to execute well across our project portfolio. Together, our construction segments grew operating income by 12.1% and earned a combined operating margin of 12.2%.

U.S. Building Services generated operating income of $59.4 million an increase of 6.9% and expanded operating margin by 30 basis points to 7.3%. In addition to the increase in revenue, the operating performance of this segment benefited from a reduction in SG&A margin as we are beginning to see the impact of the restructuring we recently completed within our site-based business.

Moving to Industrial Services. Despite revenues which were relatively consistent year-over-year, operating income of this segment nearly doubled due in part to a more favorable mix, given a greater percentage of higher-margin shop services work.

And lastly, U.K. Building Services had operating income of $7.6 million or 5.6% of revenues. The increased profitability of the U.K. business was due to greater gross profit stemming from increased revenues, a more favorable project mix, and effective cost management, which resulted from the leveraging of their overhead during a period of growth.

If we move to Slide 8, I'll cover a few highlights not included on the previous slides. Gross profit of $835.3 million has increased by 13.7%, and our gross profit margin for the quarter was 19.4%. SG&A of $429.6 million increased by $58.4 million, while our SG&A margin remained consistent year-over-year at 10% of revenues, accounting for nearly 2/3 of the increase in SG&A was $32.2 million of incremental expenses from acquired companies and $5.7 million of incremental intangible asset amortization expense.

Excluding these items, SG&A grew by $2.5 million, largely due to employment costs as we continue to invest in headcount to support our organic growth and we experienced some increased incentive compensation within certain of our segments given higher projected operating results.

And finally, on this page, diluted earnings per share was $6.57 compared to $5.80, an increase of 13.3%. If we look briefly at Slide 9, this slide summarizes our results for the first 9 months of 2025. With year-to-date revenue growth of 15.5% and operating margin expansion of 20 basis points, or 30 basis points when you exclude the impact of the transaction costs incurred earlier this year, our performance for the first 3 quarters set a number of new company records.

In a later slide, Tony will outline our updated earnings guidance for 2025. As I've done in the past, I mentioned that now as this guidance reflects continued strength in our margins. Specifically, at the low end, we have assumed a full year operating margin, which is equal to what we have earned year-to-date. While the high end reflects what we could achieve if we produce an operating margin in the fourth quarter, equivalent to the record margin we earned in Q4 of last year.

Let's move to Slide 10, which is our balance sheet. With cash on hand of $655 million and working capital of $878 million, our balance sheet as of September 30 remains strong and liquid, positioning us well to continue to deliver for our customers and shareholders. Although not shown on the slide, during the quarter, we had operating cash flow of $475.5 million and have generated $778 million year-to-date.

For the full year, we continue to estimate that operating cash flow will be at least equal to net income and approximately up to 80% of operating income. Given our strong operating cash flow during the quarter, we repaid the $250 million that was previously outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

And before I turn the call back over to Tony, I just want to quickly look at Slide 11, which summarizes the pending divestiture of our U.K. business. As Tony mentioned and we previously announced, we have entered into an agreement to sell EMCOR U.K. for approximately $255 million. This transaction, which we anticipate will close prior to the end of the year, sharpens our focus on core end markets throughout the United States while supporting our balanced capital allocation strategy. Proceeds will be used to pursue further organic growth and strategic M&A with a focus on electrical and mechanical construction as well as mechanical services while also returning capital to our shareholders.

Due to the size of the U.K. business, this transaction will not be treated as discontinued operations and as a result, we will retain the revenue and earnings that have been generated by the business due to the close of the transaction. Therefore, while EMCOR U.K. currently provides us with approximately $500 million of annual revenue and $0.45 of diluted EPS the impact in the current year will be limited to the portion of 2025 that we no longer own the business. This has been reflected in the updated earnings guidance, which Tony will share with you. And when providing our Q4 results we will adjust for transaction expenses and any gain from sale as those items are excluded from our guidance.

With that, I will turn the call back over to Tony.

Thanks, Jason. We've been executing very well. And as a result, we will tighten our 2025 revenue and earnings per share guidance. Specifically, we're updating our full year 2025 revenue guidance to a range of $16.7 million to $16.8 billion from a previous range of $16.4 billion to $16.9 billion. This reflects the momentum we have seen in the business while adjusting for the anticipated sale of the U.K. segment.

We are also narrowing our guidance for non-GAAP diluted earnings per share to a rate of $25 to $25.75 reflecting an increase of $0.50 at the low end and $0.25 at the midpoint. In order to continue to earn strong operating margins, we will need to continue to execute with discipline and efficiency for our customers. I always remind our investors that this is not a quarter-to-quarter business with respect to operating margins and the past 4 to 8 quarters, on average, reflect the underlying margins in our business.

There remains momentum and demand in key sectors, especially in data centers, traditional and high-tech manufacturing, health care, water and wastewater, HVAC service, building controls and retrofit projects.

Macroeconomic uncertainty always exists, especially around tariffs, trade and now we have the government shutdown again. But we believe our guidance reflects the potential impact of such uncertainty as we view it today.

We will remain disciplined capital and resource allocators. Our strong balance sheet bolsters our ability to execute a healthy pipeline of acquisitions and also robust opportunities to invest in our organic growth and return of cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

When we talk about resource allocation, we work to maximize our opportunities across the right sectors, customers, contracts and geographies. Our resources, that is our supervision, our virtual design and construct or VDC capability, prefab, and as important as anything, our subsidiary and segment leaderships time, attention and focus as they are ultimately the quarterback to direct this allocation, we think about that across all those sectors customers, contracts and geographies.

Last night, we signed an agreement to acquire the John W. Danforth company based in Buffalo, New York, with operations across Upstate New York and Ohio. Danforth is a mechanical construction company with expertise in data centers, health care, industrial, manufacturing and commercial. They also have excellent BDC and prefab capabilities. Danforth should add about $350 million to $400 million in revenues with solid steady-state margins. However, in the first year, that those margins will be reduced to backlog amortization. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter, subject to customary closing conditions. They are a great team. They have a great cultural fit with us, and we have worked together successfully in the past. We do look forward to much success together, and we look forward to soon welcoming the Danforth team to our EMCOR team.

And I'm going to close with what's probably the most important statement that I make at our recall. I want to thank my EMCOR teammates. Thank you for your dedication to EMCOR and our customers. Thank you for living our values every day. Thank you for taking care of one another and keeping each other safe, and thank you for the outstanding results we continue to produce for our shareholders. And with that, I will take questions.

[Operator Instructions]

And today's first question comes from Brent Thielman with D.A. Davidson.

Tony, maybe just to build upon some of your comments in the concluding statement there. Obviously, I think maybe somewhat -- folks somewhat surprised by the margin profile this quarter. I think to your point, this is -- it's a construction business. You have impacts from mix and other factors in any quarter. And maybe, Tony, if you could build on the margins that you're seeing on new work? Are they attractive relative to what we see reported here? Just an opportunity to address those concerns here?

This is some of the strongest overall operating margins we've had in a quarter. We knew we were going to have amortization headwind in the Electrical segment. And without the amortization headwind for the investment in new markets, reality is we're 14% plus in electrical, mechanical margins are very strong. Building Services margins are strong. .

Jason, I think year-to-date, these are the best margins we've ever had on a year-to-date basis.

And I think the thing that I go back to Tony, is we've said over time, right, a rolling 12- to 24-month average is where we expect our margins to be those margins would be somewhere between 9.1% and 9.4% and on a consolidated basis, we delivered 9.4% in the quarter. And when you look at where we were as we exited Q2, we said for full year, our margins would be between 9% and 9.4%, and we delivered at 9.25%.

So I think we're delivering the margins that we anticipated.

Yes, and what the business does. I mean yes, it bounces around a little bit but you don't buy something the size of Miller with the amount of backlog amortization. We're going to go through RPO or amortizati,n, we're going to go through and be able to keep margins at the levels they were. I mean it's just -- it's not and we did that when we gave our guidance for the year. So I'm a little befuddled about some of the margin reaction to be straight with you.

Yes. Understood. I guess, a separate question. Nearly double, if not more, in data center RPOs, I think folks understand that's a pretty good market. Maybe if you could just touch on maybe some of the other sectors and I mean what areas are surprising you in terms of relative strength or maybe even getting stronger that you'd point out outside of the data centers?

Yes. I think you hit on a really important question, Brent. I mean we have a broad base of business outside of data centers that's pretty successful. And I think a really good marker, and I always think about this in our business broadly, is what goes on in the mechanical service business, which grew mid-single digits as strong operating margins and almost has no data center exposure.

I think I have this right, 7 of our 10 mechanical segments had growth and 10 of our electrical market sectors and 10 of our 11 electrical market sectors had growth. We're seeing strong growth on the mechanical side in water and wastewater. We continue to see strong demand in health care in both sectors, really. And the addition of Miller really bolsters our health care exposure on the electrical side in some of the fastest-growing health care markets in the country, of which they're exposed to.

We continue to see good opportunities in traditional manufacturing, especially for us in food processing. It's one of the few things we do on a large scale and we do it very well, our Shaba subsidiary in Fort Wayne, Indiana. We continue to see pretty good demand in traditional retrofit commercial. It's a strong market for us, especially with an eye towards energy efficiency and the restacking of buildings that continues to go on.

I think high-tech manufacturing, that's a choice. We have very strong demand in parts of the country, and we're executing very well. And other parts of the country, it's a little lumpier or we may rededicate those resources, quite frankly, to more data center work versus slog through another a semiconductor plant in parts of the country.

We did very well on it. It's just a very difficult customer set and application in one particular case. So when you put it all together, demand is broad-based. It's strong, we like having diverse demand. We're going to continue to pursue diverse demand, and I think that's good news for our shareholders for the long term, and we're not giving up anything on the data center side by doing that, as you said, with the size and good .

Next question from Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis.

The organic expansion you talked about that impacted the Electrical segment, Tony, can you just talk about the investments you're making, how long that headwind might persist and what the benefit?

I think typically, Adam, it's a 1- or 2-quarter headwind as we start up the job and it's a margin investment is what it is. It's not really a capital investment upfront. It's a margin investment as we have to go through the learning curve of building a labor force and sometimes that takes a little longer. Sometimes we get it right at the beginning of a new market. And sometimes, it takes us further into the job to get it right. And we do that all the time. And we only call that out, I think, to make investors aware that it's not a linear line when you expand from what was 3 or 4 data center markets in 2019, serving to over 60 today electrically and from 1 or 2 mechanically to over 6 today mechanically. That's not a linear straight line.

We have yet to not do it successfully. And it's just more of a pointing out that, hey, that's part of how we grow the business and as part of what we almost look at it as R&D to go into a new market. .

Yes. And I think there's a combination of things that we expect to happen as we move forward, right? We'll build that labor force. We'll get that efficiency. We'll inherently become more productive as we do the next phases of these contracts, and we'll learn some lessons here, and we'll price our jobs to that market. So it's a number of things that we think kind of improve as you go from the first set of jobs to those next .

It's an ongoing headwind always in the numbers. This was a little more because it was a little bigger site. .

Okay. Well, I think -- I mean, you left the prospect of flat Q4 margins in the guidance, which I thought was interesting. Just curious how you might get to the high end of the Q4 margin guide.

I think it's just project timing I mean, at this point, I mean, there's really nothing new. And then we'll have -- depending on when Danforth is closed, it's not going to really add anything. But we'll have revenue coming in without a lot of margin because of the headwind of the backlog amortization. We're still running off the Miller backlog amortization. I think those are the kind of things. Operating-wise, we expect to operate pretty well in the field. .

And the next question comes from Brian Brophy with Stifel.

Just wanted to -- following up on the geographic investments. Just wanted to see if you could help us quantify, I guess, the impact. I think some of the numbers you gave, my back of envelope math suggests 200, maybe 250 basis point impact to margin in the quarter. Am I in the ballpark there? .