Dynex Capital, Inc. Aktie

Good day, and welcome to the Dynex Capital, Inc. Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Kaitlyn Mauritz, Head of Capital Markets and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you to everyone joining us today for Dynex's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me on today's conference call are Smriti Popenoe, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President; Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Mike Sartori, Chief Financial Officer; and T.J. Connelly, Chief Investment Officer.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's discussion may include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. For additional information regarding these risks and factors, please refer to our filings with the SEC available on the Investors section of our website as well as on the SEC's website.

Dynex undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Our earnings press release was issued and filed with the SEC earlier today and is available on the Investors section of our website at dynexcapital.com as well as on the SEC's website. We may also reference our earnings presentation today, which is also available on our Investor page.

And with that, I'll turn the call over to Smriti for opening remarks.

Thank you, Kate. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. This was a pivotal quarter in the markets, and Dynex was prepared for this moment. We had a strong liquidity position. Our experienced team maintained our position in our highest conviction trade, and we have retained the capacity to invest as spreads have moved wider.

In the third quarter, book value declined 15.4% to $10.91 per share for a total economic return of negative 11.4% (sic) [ 11.5% ]. Our portfolio operated as designed. The liquidity position absorbed the book value movement. Our financing remained deep and reliable and our hedging limited our downside as 10-year Treasury Yields rose above 5%. During the quarter, we took another step in the evolution of our capital structure with the issuance of our Series D preferred stock, our first preferred equity offering in more than 6 years. The transaction added an accretive source of permanent capital and further diversified our capital base.

The quarter's results reflect higher volatility and higher yields in the overall bond markets and wider spreads in the Agency MBS markets. These moves were driven by fundamental shifts in the macroeconomic system. The U.S. economy is in the midst of a significant positive investment cycle driven by AI and the infrastructure required to support it. During the third quarter, we experienced a simultaneous and significant risk and price rerating of several crucial factors related to AI investment.

The significant demand for capital in this sector, the price of that capital, the impact of that capital investment on the price of commodities and the follow-on impact of all of this on inflation are all higher, pushing yields up. At the same time, geopolitical uncertainty and rising government borrowing needs, both in the U.S. and globally, have reinforced upward pressure on yields. Against this backdrop, Agency MBS have actually been a sideshow, not the main act. And while flows were choppy and illiquid at times, the sector has not been the origin of market stress. In fact, the fundamentals and technicals behind Agency MBS are highly constructive. After the significant and rapid repricing, we find ourselves once again facing a highly attractive investment opportunity.

Absolute real yields are compelling. At current levels, mortgage spreads are still historically wide and provide significant compensation at a time when the value of the borrower's prepayment option is substantially lower. Refinancing incentive is extremely limited and much of the mortgage universe has already extended substantially. As a result, the duration and expected cash flows of these assets are more stable, and most importantly, the convexity profile of the mortgage market has improved dramatically. As a result, and as long-term investors in Agency MBS, we are being paid a wide spread while assuming considerably less cash flow uncertainty than is typically associated with mortgages. This combination underpins our confidence around strong forward returns.

Yes, the cost of capital has temporarily adjusted higher, but prospective returns have adjusted materially higher. This is an important moment for Dynex and our shareholders. We have been building a more scaled and resilient Dynex with the liquidity and flexibility to navigate market and operating shocks. As we grow, our investment platform becomes increasingly durable with greater capacity to deploy capital and opportunistically capture attractive returns.

I'd now like to turn the call over to Mike and T.J. to discuss our financial results and portfolio positioning in greater detail.

Thank you, Smriti. I'll now review our financial results for the third quarter. We reported book value per common share of $10.91 at September 30 compared with $12.90 at June 30. Including the $0.51 common dividend, total economic return was negative 11.5%. Comprehensive loss was $1.49 per common share compared with comprehensive income of $0.80 per share in the second quarter. We raised $384 million of accretive capital during the third quarter, net of fees, including $268 million of common equity through our ATM program while maintaining an opportunistic approach to capital raising.

We also completed our first preferred equity offering since 2020, raising $116 million of net proceeds in late September. The transaction was an important step in creating strategic flexibility in our capital structure. The offering increased preferred equity as a percentage of our capital stack from approximately 3% to 7% of our total equity base, diversifying our sources of capital as we continue to grow the business. The transaction was accretive and priced at an attractive cost of capital, particularly relative to the current yield on our common equity.

Importantly, funding markets remain deep and supportive. We maintained more than $24 billion of repo financing across over 25 counterparties. The breadth of our counterparty relationships, combined with the high quality and liquidity of our agency collateral provides substantial capacity to support additional investment opportunities. Asset yields increased from 4.9% to 5%, outpacing the modest increase in our effective financing cost from 3.79% to 3.82%.

As a result, our economic net interest spread remained stable at approximately 1.18%. Liquidity remains a key strength with $1.3 billion of cash and unencumbered securities at quarter end, representing over 42% of total equity, down approximately 9% from the prior quarter. As designed, liquidity levels have buffered the book value declines. Maintaining ample liquidity remains a core element of our risk management framework and allows us to capitalize on market opportunities as they arise. We ended the quarter with a $3.1 billion equity capital base, an increase of 24% year-to-date.

Turning to operating expenses. G&A for the third quarter was 2% of total equity on an annualized basis, consistent with the run rate we discussed last quarter. As we have grown, we have continued to generate meaningful operating leverage across the platform. G&A expenses have declined as a percentage of equity over time and was approximately 40% lower than the same period in 2025. As we execute on our business plan, we have continued to invest in talent, technology and infrastructure to support a larger, more scalable platform. We remain committed to expense discipline and focused on further enhancing operating efficiency as we scale.

With that, I'll turn it over to T.J. to discuss our portfolio and outlook in greater detail.

Thanks, Mike. Current coupon mortgage yields moved nearly 100 basis points higher in the third quarter. The 10-year Treasury rose over 80 basis points, eclipsing 5% for the first time since 2007, and mortgage spreads widened nearly 20 basis points, much of it in the last 2 weeks of September. At quarter end, current coupon spreads to 7-year swaps were around 162 basis points, near the wide end of this year's range. We managed our portfolio actively and with discipline. As rates rose, we added to our hedges in lockstep. As a result, we limited the impact of the rate move.

Spread widening drove over 80% of the return in the quarter and our liquidity continued to do its job. It covered margin in the normal course of business, and we held our exposures and their return potential. We did not delever. As I turn to market dynamics, this quarter, I'm excited to announce the release of the Dynex Angle to accompany our earnings presentation. It gives you a deeper look into our market and macro perspectives. You can find it on our website under the Dynex Perspective heading.

I want to focus on what drove spreads wider, how orderly it was and why it leaves us with one of the most compelling risk profiles we've seen in this market. Realized rate volatility increased and implied volatilities in interest rate options markets jumped even more, causing cheapening of mortgages as expected. Floaters with interest rate caps were particularly exposed. Hedge funds were then forced to quickly exit or hedge their floater positions by selling Agency MBS. We also saw convexity selling from servicers and other mortgage hedgers as yields rose rapidly and durations extended.

Outside of the activity I just mentioned, the market functioned in an orderly fashion. Money managers continued buying Agency MBS into the wider spread, and that has continued into October. The GSEs also operated as we expected. As I said in July, they act as value-sensitive buyers, and there was anecdotal evidence of GSE buying in late September. They added just enough demand when spreads were wide to support a healthy mortgage market.

Funding markets remain very robust, and these conditions have continued in October with strong demand from money market funds intermediated well by the dealer community. Mortgage repo spreads to SOFR held near the tight of the last several years in the 12 to 15 basis point range. Moreover, for the first time in many years, quarter end came and went without any noticeable pressure. Looking ahead, we also see further structural support for financing from the expansion of central clearing and sponsored repo, potential changes to bank capital requirements and the Fed's standing liquidity facilities, all of which should contribute to the depth and resilience of funding markets over time.

Smriti described the improved mortgage convexity profile as an important part of today's opportunity. Let me put some numbers behind it and explain what it means for Dynex's portfolio today. Only about 1% of the outstanding mortgage universe has more than a 25 basis point refinance incentive and the vast majority of agency mortgages trade below par. The convexity selling that added to the push higher in yields has largely run its course, which means there's very little extension left even if rates move higher still.

You can see this in the interest rate sensitivity table at the top of Page 23 of our presentation, where the modeled impact of rate movements on book value is now much more limited. An instantaneous 50 basis point rise in rates as of September 30 is modeled to reduce common equity by only about 0.5% compared with 3.5% at June 30. That means our shareholders have the potential to capture the attractive carry I mentioned without relying on a particular path for interest rates.

Given this setup, we deliberately let our spread exposure grow. Our portfolio spread sensitivity increased from about 4.6% of common equity per 10 basis points of spread at June 30 to about 5.7% at quarter end. What this means is, if spreads tightened 20 basis points, which is roughly a retracement of the widening in the third quarter, you see the model shows approximately 11.5% of gains to book value, all else equal. Leverage ended the quarter at 9.0x shareholders' equity with the increase largely reflecting the decline in book value due to the spread widening and convexity. Our leverage reflects the opportunity set, the risk characteristics of the portfolio and the liquidity we want to maintain.

Our confidence in our current positioning is rooted in the market backdrop. The yield spread available, favorable supply and demand technicals, the convexity profile driven by more stable mortgage duration and a favorable financing environment. What matters is not simply that modeled ROEs are attractive. With more stable durations and less hedge rebalancing, the portfolio is positioned to retain more of the carry embedded in those returns. We believe we are being well compensated for the risk we are taking, which underscores our willingness to operate at the current level of leverage. We maintained our positions through the repricing, kept our financing and put new capital to work at wider spreads.

Today, we are earning attractive spreads on mortgages with more stable durations amid a funding market that remained resilient through the volatility. That is the opportunity in front of us, and we are positioned to capture it. At today's wider spreads, static ROEs on new investments hedged with interest rate swaps are around 20% in lower coupons and 25% in current coupons. And as you see in the interest rate sensitivity, a 10 bps spread tightening adds almost 6% of incremental return.

I'll now turn the call back over to Smriti for some closing remarks.

Thank you, T.J. Periodic repricing is a normal occurrence in the markets. And the mark-to-market impact of the third quarter's repricing is already reflected in our assets, our balance sheet, our book value and our share price. At this point, our focus, and we believe investors' focus should be on the 20-plus percent ROEs that the portfolio could generate in the future. We have a strong conviction in our ability to earn these forward returns. We continue to manage Dynex with a long-term shareholder perspective. That means staying disciplined through significant periods of repricing, managing risk while holding the positions where we have the greatest conviction and preserving our ability to invest as opportunities emerge.

Our focus extends beyond any single quarter. We are building Dynex to compound value across cycles with greater scale, a flexible capital structure and the capacity to invest when shareholders are well compensated for risk. As always, we remain invested alongside you in what we believe is a powerful long-term opportunity for our shareholders.

With that, I'd like to open up the call to questions.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Doug Harter with U.S. Bancorp.

T.J., I appreciate what you just said about kind of the risk of the market today and over kind of the longer term. Can you just talk about the risk positioning and the comfort with the ability to let leverage drift higher if markets continue to kind of be weak and spreads wider in the short term?

Yes. Doug, One of the most important factors in the market that I discussed a little bit, maybe need to even further emphasize is the favorable financing environment. Over the last 2 to 3 years, we've seen money market balances grow by some 60%. $8 trillion sits in money market funds. And at the end of the day, that drives a lot of our ability to carry positions through volatility in markets. It's really notable that while realized volatility jumped in the third quarter, the big jump was in implied volatility.

There's a lot of macro risk priced into these mortgages. And we are able to continue to hold the financing through these periods of volatility. So at the end of the day, it's all about the financing market for us, and that has been an extremely healthy part of the market and gives us a lot of confidence in carrying the leverage that we're currently carrying.

Great. And then you talked about the ability to generate 20% to 20-plus percent returns. Can you just kind of walk through the math as to kind of how you're getting to that level of returns?

Yes. That's a levered ROE that is based on our models and where we think -- where spreads are today and at the end of the third quarter, in particular. So we're getting on 5 through 6s around 20% static ROE and some of the higher coupons and 6.5s, for instance, are actually around 25% ROE based on the model. Leverage works out to be around 10% on that static ROE model.

[Operator Instructions] We'll move next to Bose George with KBW.

Can we get an update on book value quarter to date?

Yes, of course. As of Friday, our estimated book value net of the accrued dividend was $10.95.

Okay. Great. And then on expenses, you noted the 2%. I mean just when I do the math, it looks like it was down a decent amount, like closer to maybe 1.5%. So is there anything unusual or seasonal in that? And then just like thinking about it going forward, I guess, 2% should be kind of the number we use.

Yes. Bose, that's right. As we indicated, G&A is down about 40% since last year at this time. We remain focused on that 2% ratio. As we continue to grow, we will see operating leverage benefits from this. At the end of the day, it's about performance and returns and what creates shareholder value. And what -- that decrease really comes from compensation expense. It's aligned with the company's performance and shareholder value.

Okay.

Bose, one of my colleagues mentioned I may have cut out just slightly, as I said, the book value, $10.95.

$10.95, okay.

We go next to Marissa Lobo with UBS.

You characterized the current environment as a compelling forward opportunity. Could you speak to the demand side of that view, just where you see bank demand, GSE buying, foreign demand? And who do you see as the marginal buyer of Agency MBS at these spread levels?

Importantly, as I mentioned, GSEs were very likely in the market in September. They have been a backstop bid to mortgages. And I think that's something we've been talking about for several quarters now ever since the January tweet and their active purchases in the first quarter. So that remains an important backdrop. What's really notable here is given the supply dynamics at these rate levels, you don't actually need all that much marginal demand. We have seen foreign buyers in Europe.

For instance, there was the news of the Norges Bank and the possibility that they'd be selling global sovereigns to buy agency mortgages, and they specifically mentioned U.S. agency mortgages. That's notable. I think that's a long-term flow that will underpin and really shows the quality of these assets, right? It's a yield that you can -- at these real yield levels is very compelling to the global investors. So I do expect foreign investors to be active in the -- on the demand side of the equation. Of course, the mortgage REIT community remains increasingly important to this.

Yes. Marissa, I'd also jump in and just talk about the view on forward returns being really solid here in the low to mid-20s. One of the other pieces to keep in mind is how we've been able to preserve our earnings power even when book value has declined. So one of the key decisions that we made over the quarter was the decision to not delever. And by doing so, we've kept so much of the earnings power, in fact, all of it. And that's another big reason for having the level of confidence about the compelling opportunity and the forward returns.

That's helpful. And then just shifting to the capital structure. You talked about the benefits of diversifying with the preferred. How should we think about the preferred mix from here? Is there a level of preferred within the capital structure that you're thinking is appropriate?

Yes. I mean we're really happy with the issuance and the timing of that particular deal. It was really massively accretive to the common shareholder. We think of ourselves as having a significant amount of capital structure flexibility here at this point. The total, I think Mike mentioned preferred in the stack is about 7%. That number has room to go higher.

As with all of our capital structure decisions, right, and capital raising decisions, it's opportunistic. It's thinking through the things like how accretive it is to shareholders, where we can put the capital to work relative to the cost of that capital. But suffice to say, I think we're really happy with, one, reentering the market, the reception that we got and then the possibility that this could be something that we could continue to use in terms of a source of capital in the future.

We'll go next to Merrill Ross with Compass Point.

If we look at Slide 24 and look at the changes to your hedge position, it would be helpful if you described when you changed the positioning and what you were thinking at the time? And are you satisfied with where you were positioned at the end of the period?

Yes, thanks for the question. The hedges were put -- we added to the hedge book pretty much in lockstep as rates were moving. We came into the quarter with a very strategic mindset in terms of continuing to add to hedges as rates moved higher. So it was progressive over the course of the quarter.

As we broke through 5% there was a clear realization of the new profile that mortgages would offer in terms of the convexity that we discussed. So we had a very clear game plan to put in place there and continue to add the hedges. So you'll see a modest increase in some of the longer hedges, in particular, on Page 24, as you mentioned, in the -- on the swap side of the book as well as on the treasury futures side.

Yes. Okay. And then maybe, as Freddie Mac says that [indiscernible] mortgage rate is going to be 7.5% through 2027. So wondering where in that market, you would see more value. Clearly -- it seems not in TBAs, but you prefer a discounted lower coupon pools over the current coupon?

Yes. Let me first make a comment on the notion of a static mortgage rate over time is not something we spend a lot of time thinking about. We're thinking about a range of scenarios and preparing for a significant number of outcomes, both higher and lower than that 7.5% mortgage rate that they mentioned.

So yes, our portfolio is built accordingly, right? We're built for -- to generate solid cash flows throughout a range of environments. I do think that a lot of these -- that convexity profile we discussed and the stable duration profile that's so important to earning these ROEs is most compelling in coupons, say, 5.5% and lower at this point.

We go next to Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

It looks like your overall rate exposure came down this quarter. I'm curious if you guys could just kind of share your macro thoughts on how you think about the risk of rates moving significantly higher or lower from where they are today? And generally, how you think MBS would perform if there was to be a significant move in rates either way from here?

Yes. Trevor, I'd say overall, the most important thing to keep in mind is what's priced into swaptions markets, into the interest rate options markets that I mentioned and those implied volatilities being higher as high as they are, which is, again, notably higher than realized volatility. I think that's one of the most important constructs that will drive our ability to earn these ROEs and the returns that are available. So I do think the convexity profile in a higher rate environment for the overall mortgage market is very stable. Those durations just don't extend all that more.

Overall, you think from a very high-level macro perspective, overall housing turnover is around 4.5% per year. If you look at existing home sales, which are very depressed, and you could make a case are making a bottom formation over the last several years. So at these turnover rates that are implied in the mortgages, you've got very low turnover in the mortgages that drives the mortgage cash flows, creating that very stable cash flow. And then you have this wide spread that's there because the implied vols are so high on the macro side. It makes it very compelling for us to earn these ROEs that we're talking about.

So broadly, it's not an environment where taking significant macro exposures makes a ton of sense. We're being paid for it in the spread. So by design, very strategically, that's where our focus is on the spread and earning those ROEs without more or less agnostic to interest rate direction.

Yes. Trevor, I would say like the way the mortgage market is priced today, the level of extension on the margin for the next 25, 50, 100 basis points is very limited because we've extended 90% already, right? So any future extension from rates rising is limited. So if you're concerned about, again, rates up, those types of scenarios, what T.J. is mentioning is that it's all about the price of options in the implied vol markets and those -- that's -- the mortgage market today is already pricing significant risk premium in implied vols. So we feel like we're getting compensated for that incremental risk.

Yes. Okay. That makes sense. And when you guys were mentioning the incremental ROEs kind of in the 20-plus percent range, I think you said you had calculated that based on the 10x leverage number, which is a little bit higher than where you sit today. So I was just wondering if you could clarify if you think the existing portfolio as it sits today provides good dividend coverage. And just kind of curious overall how you're thinking about the dividend policy in light of all the changes in the third quarter perhaps?

I think you've got to go back to the idea of earnings power in the portfolio, Trevor, not having delevered in the quarter. That just means that we've taken the mark in book value, but the earnings power of the portfolio is preserved. And over the past several quarters, we've been pretty confident about our ability to cover the dividend even before we got to this point.

So from here on, I don't think that's really changed that much because we did not significantly adjust the portfolio, definitely not on the asset side, right? So that piece of it, I think, is relatively well preserved. In terms of the marginal ROEs, we use a range of numbers. T.J., you can clarify on the low 20s, et cetera, the numbers that we quoted.

Right. Yes, there's significant variables involved there, Trevor, but the numbers I was quoting were based on a 10 leverage number. And as you point out, we were sitting at 9 at quarter end. I will note, we have net purchased assets since quarter end as well.

We have no further questions. I'd like to turn the floor back to Smriti Popenoe for any additional or closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today, and we look forward to updating you on our performance in January.

This concludes today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at this time.

Good day, and welcome to the Dynex Capital Inc. Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Ms. Kaitlyn Mauritz, Head of Capital Markets and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and thank you to everyone joining us today for Dynex' second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Joining me on today's call are Smriti Popenoe, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President; Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Mike Sartori, Chief Financial Officer; and T.J. Connelly, Chief Investment Officer.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's discussion may include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. For additional information regarding these risks and factors, please refer to our filings with the SEC available on the Investors section of our website and on the SEC's website. Dynex undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Our earnings press release was issued and filed with the SEC earlier today and is available on the Investors section of our website at dynexcapital.com as well as on the SEC's website. We may also reference our earnings presentation during today's call, which is available on our Investors page.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Smriti for opening remarks.

Thank you, Kait. And good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to report a strong performance quarter for Dynex. Our total economic return of 6.4% was achieved alongside healthy capital issuance of nearly $400 million for the quarter. In the first 6 months of the year, the capital base increased to $3.1 billion from $2.4 billion at year-end, and we grew our portfolio of Agency MBS by over 40%. We are progressing well on our path, delivering consistent dividend income for our shareholders while building scale and resilience. Since 2022, we have expanded our capital base by 5 times and continue to see a significant opportunity to thoughtfully build the company from here. We are executing our strategy for a more durable mortgage investment platform with a valuation that is consistent with our strong track record, increasing relevance and scale.

I want to give some context for our strategic thing. First, why Agency MBS? Our conviction in Agency MBS as the core of our strategy is high. Agency MBS are among the most liquid and cycle-tested asset classes with a demonstrated ability to withstand periods of market stress over the past 40 years. In the last decade, our macro opinion led us to focus more on liquidity and flexibility. We therefore allocated most of our capital to the agency sector. The compelling return, liquidity and flexibility of this asset class are unmatched. It drove our outperformance in 2020 as well as in the Fed hiking cycle of 2022 to 2025. In our view, Agency MBS remains the best risk-reward across our investment universe for this macro environment. Hence, our approach is to invest in Agency MBS, while building the capital base and strengthening the operating platform.

Second, what is the imperative to grow in scale. The reasons are twofold. The most straightforward relevant reason is valuation. Larger companies often regardless of delivered performance typically earn a better valuation metrics. This is further bolstered by the popularity of passive investing as passive funds received more cash, they allocate based on size to larger companies and in our view, this provide a structural tailwind for the expansion of Dynex. By delivering both performance and size, we believe we can garner higher valuations for our business, and ultimately bring greater value to our shareholders. The other component driving our strategic thinking is risk management. As a macro-focused investor, we continuously evaluate global trends. We currently see increased risks related to both geopolitical conflict and technological change, reinforcing our focus on continuing to build resilience across our business and operations.

While we cannot predict the ultimate impact of AI, we are preparing by investing in people and technology and strengthening the processes that protect capital, sustain performance and create long-term shareholder value. The goal is to drive robust, reliable, repeatable and resilient processes that can withstand both market and operating shocks. So where we are now is that the conditions for us to execute on growing the company, building resilience and scale are very favorable. And they're creating a virtuous flywheel. By capitalizing on the investment opportunity in Agency MBS, we generate performance that attract investors and support valuations. This enables accretive capital raising, which in turn is invested in high-quality assets.

And as each turn goes through, the liquidity, visibility and valuation has improved. A reinforcing dynamic that we believe will continue. This is the pathway to scale, reliance and ultimately the premium valuation deserved by our track record and durable platform.

I'll now turn it over to Mike and T.J. to provide the details on the quarter and the outlook.

Thank you, Smriti. I'll now review our financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026. We reported book value per share of $12.90 at quarter end, representing a 2.4% increase from $12.60 as of March 31. The improvement was primarily driven by tighter spreads relative to the prior quarter and accretive capital deployment. Total economic return for the quarter was 6.4%, including $0.51 per share in common dividends and $0.30 per share from the increase in portfolio value during the quarter. Net interest income increased to $0.42 per share, up from $0.40 in the prior quarter, driven primarily by lower funding costs and capital deployment into investments with attractive yield profiles and the durable earnings contribution of our existing portfolio.

We ended the quarter with adjusted leverage at 8.1% versus total equity compared to 8.6% at the end of last quarter. The decrease was primarily driven by portfolio appreciation and the retention of capital to support future investment opportunities. Consistent with our positive view on full returns and the capital deployment opportunities that Smriti spoke to, we raised $391 million of capital in the second quarter at levels that were accretive to book value. Demand for our common stock and ATM issuance also reflects broadening investor interest in the Dynex story. The proceeds were deployed into Agency MBS opportunities as spreads remain supportive of risk-adjusted returns. We continue to evaluate further growth opportunities through our disciplined framework focused on market conditions, expected returns and short and long-term accretion to shareholder value.

Liquidity remains a key strength with $1.6 billion of cash and unencumbered securities at quarter end, representing over 51% of total equity, up approximately 5% from the prior quarter. Maintaining ample liquidity remains a core element of our risk management framework and provides flexibility to capitalize on market opportunities as they arise. Overall, the quarter reflected continued progress across our key financial objectives, including book value growth, disciplined capital deployment, strong liquidity and improving earnings power as we continue to execute our strategy.

With that, I'll turn it over to T.J. to discuss portfolio positioning and outlook.

Thanks, Mike. Our process worked as designed in the second quarter. We carried substantial liquidity, maintained a strong funding position and deployed new capital into the mortgage spread widening that occurred late in the first quarter and into the second quarter. Book value appreciated as spreads tightened, reflecting the incremental portfolio growth during the quarter. These results were generated through a repeatable process built around liquidity, risk management and disciplined capital deployment. That process is well suited for today's investment environment, where we are experiencing bouts of volatility followed by periods of calm. My initial comments today serve to tie our macroeconomic and mortgage market analysis to our portfolio construction. Our objective is to build a portfolio that can generate durable cash flows across a wide range of macroeconomic environments while preserving the flexibility to capitalize or preserve value during changing market conditions.

We observe two major trends that drive our overall risk posture. The first is the current AI investment boom, driving significant spending and changing expectations around growth, inflation and productivity. We see this as the capital intensive phase of a classic transformative cycle. Throughout history, these cycles have been shown to be prone to over-financing and eventual repricing with periods of uncertainty that can create volatility. For investors like Dynex with liquidity and flexibility, these periods can create compelling opportunities.

Second, policy remains an especially important driver. Federal Reserve policy, housing policy, fiscal policy and regulatory policy all influence the supply of and demand for agency mortgages. Under Chair Warsh, the Federal Reserve has launched a broad review of monetary policy, communications, economic data and balance sheet strategy. While market participants focus on the nominal size of the balance sheet in dollar terms, we think it is important for the task forces to focus on the interest rate duration of their aggregate portfolio. Any balance sheet reduction proposal should incorporate the potential impact on the duration profile of the Treasury market, marginal treasury yield and ultimately the cost of borrowing for the US Government.

In our view, this puts a significant constraint on the speed and magnitude of any MBS-related actions. These factors lead us towards high quality positions, which enable flexible management of exposures. Our criteria include assets that are regularly traded and transparently priced with readily available financing or easily converted to cash. Hence our focus on the Agency MBS market hedged with interest rate swaps and futures. This macro backdrop also reinforces why we are constructing a diversified Agency MBS portfolio designed to generate stable cash flows and durable income. In today's higher rate environment, more negatively convex mortgage assets offer meaningful current income, but they must be owned thoughtfully within a balanced portfolio that manages prepayment and extension risk. By diversifying across coupons and collateral characteristics, we can capture attractive income while maintaining the ability to preserve value and reposition capital as the macro environment evolves.

Looking forward, our outlook remains constructive. As we see in the presentation, Agency MBS spreads to swaps remain in an attractive range. Mortgage rates have been remarkably stable. Refinancing activity remains muted. Our assets are generating solid cash flow and income. Technical conditions are also constructive. Demand for fixed income remains strong as evidenced by bond fund and annuity inflows. Money managers continue to prefer Agency MBS over corporate credit. In our view, corporate credit has minimal potential for further price appreciation, while Agency MBS offer the potential for better carry and price appreciation.

Private credit investors are increasingly seeking higher quality fixed income with more transparency and liquidity. Net mortgage supply remains manageable. We have lowered our 2026 forecast for net supply to $165 billion from $200 billion even amid expectations for modestly higher Fed policy rates. Bank demand, especially for floating rate MBS assets has remained consistent. In addition, the GSEs have demonstrated a willingness to act as value sensitive buyers when mortgages become particularly attractive.

We remain vigilant on GSE policy changes as the midterm elections approach. Since last November we have viewed this dynamic as a meaningful governor on mortgage spread widening and an important part of the technical landscape. We expect to deploy capital in Agency RMBS securities, specified pools and seasoned securities that provide stable cash flows over time. The breadth of today's mortgage market allows us to construct a portfolio that balances current income, optionality, liquidity and long term return potential.

Our activity is opportunistic and timing of capital deployment is an important part of our calculus. Our approach remains straightforward, maintain liquidity, preserve balance sheet flexibility and deploy capital when market opportunities present themselves. That approach served us well during the second quarter, and we believe it positions us to continue generating durable dividend income and long term shareholder value.

I will now turn the call back over to Smriti.

You, T.J. and Mike. The long term tailwinds to our business model remain intact. The demographic need for income and housing support our company's capital and investment opportunity, where we can apply our expert ethical management of mortgage assets to generate solid returns for shareholders. The near term conditions for our business to continue to grow, invest and build resilience are favorable. The virtuous flywheel of performance investor demand, valuation benefit, accretive capital raising and opportunistic deployment is a powerful driver of shareholder value creation.

To our current and prospective shareholders, I'll say this, we're delivering a double digit dividend yield book value with upside as MBS spreads tighten and the potential for stronger valuation as the markets price the value of our track record and scale. For those of you who are shareholders today, thank you. We remain invested and aligned with you and are grateful for the trust and confidence you place in us every day. To our prospective shareholders, we invite you to come and be part of the Dynex story.

With that, I will turn it over to the operator for questions.

[Operator Instructions] We'll now take our first question from Bose George with KBW.

Can we get an update on book value quarter to date?

Sure, Bose. Good morning. Quarter to date through Friday, July 17, spreads were about 3 basis points wider on the quarter. Book value as of Friday was approximately $12.76.

Okay, great, thanks. And then can you just talk about your expectations for mortgage spreads say over the next 12 months? And you kind of alluded to this, but what do you think happens with the GSE mandate to purchase MBS after they finish that $200 million -- billion. Do you think that gets extended? Yeah, just color on that would be great. Thanks.

Yes, let me just correct it. I misspoke there, Bose, real quickly. The book value as of Friday was $12.67. My apologies. Spred outlook going forward, we think spreads -- with the GSE backstop, that's really important as a stabilizer for spreads. And we've seen them consistently come in when spreads widen over time. That insulates, I think, a lot of buyers and their willingness to hold agency mortgages. So we think spreads can move into, based on, if you look at the spread chart we use, which is current coupon versus seven year spreads, we can come into 100, 120 basis points.

I expect that to be the equilibrium over time.

We'll now take our next question from Melissa Lobo with UBS.

Just looking at portfolio asset growth over the quarter with the decline in leverage to 8.1. Can you talk to us about ultimately where you want leverage to run as spreads remain in the current range?

Yeah. In the current environment risk, good morning, I expect that leverage will be -- we've been running somewhere between 7.5% and 8.5%. I think that's a very comfortable range given the technical backdrop for mortgages and the opportunity that persists. And the spread outlook I just discussed with Bose. I think we can, we can carry that kind of leverage or potentially even more leaning into any bouts of liquidity. As I mentioned, we carry tremendous liquidity for exactly those sorts of situations like we saw in the second quarter.

So I think this recent activity is indicative of what we may see going forward.

And we're reading articles about AI-driven refinancing risk, potentially increasing negative convexity in the market. I mean, how are you beginning to incorporate that in your security selection and your hedge construction?

Yes, this is a critical concept we've talked a lot about over time. We think it is going -- there's no doubt, it is going to make it easier for originators to refinance borrowers very quickly. The algorithms are going to move more quickly. It's come down to -- I often like to say, it's come down to as quickly as the borrower is willing to answer the text message or phone call, whatever means they have. So that makes security selection absolutely paramount. The easiest to refinance will be very, very quick. Whereas those who are more insulated and have lower loan balances, for instance, other characteristics that offer protection to prepayments will be increasingly valued in the marketplace. I think that's a construct that just hasn't been fully priced into our markets at this point.

Our next question will come from Doug Harter with BTIG.

Can you guys talk about how you're thinking about investing in a market that's kind of very headline driven at the moment and kind of how that kind of bouts of volatility play into kind of how you think about that leverage range you just talked about, T.J.?

Yes. Hi, Doug. I'll just give you the big picture and T.J. can drive the rest of it. So it has been interesting for some time now we've been talking about this idea that surprises are highly probable. And the surprises just come from a lot of different places in that situation, just from the top down, right? That's one of the reasons we have the Agency MBS book that we have. We carry the levels of liquidity that we do, and it allows us to really get into these moments where there's capital raising that's happening at accretive levels, and we can choose to deploy that capital when the bouts of volatility actually hit.

And in those moments, obviously we always have the choice of taking up risk or taking down risk. We're being very thoughtful about that as we see these opportunities show up. But in general it just allows us to have more flexibility and add assets at wider levels of spread. So that's been sort of the tactical way in which we've been managing this past few months or maybe even just since the tantrum of '25. More tactically, I think T.J. can talk about how we're doing it in conjunction with the capital raising.

Yes, obviously, we start with a very top-down approach, Doug. One of the observations I make about overall macro markets is -- and we can go all the way back to the Ukraine war. How quickly commodity markets are able to rebalance. That has been quite striking. You can go back to the agricultural markets in 2022 and then right on through to crude oil markets in the last really four months or so. As we look at that, one of the important parts of the calculus that we're thinking a lot about are all the scenarios that are possible, what the surprises could do, gap risk, for instance, in rates, things of that nature.

That's why we carry the liquidity and tactically leaves us in a position of strength to be able to lean into things when it's pretty remarkable how realized volatility has come down in the last over the course, really the second quarter, even given the headlines. You come in on -- you hear the headlines from Friday night until Sunday evening, and then you look at the actual price action. It's been fairly modest. Markets are resilient. And I think it's really important to realize that the supply-and-demand profile for real assets in the global economy rebalances remarkably quickly. And that is definitely a part of the calculus when we're looking at tactical opportunities as spreads widen.

Great. Appreciate it. And then just one more on the operating expenses. Can you just talk about your outlook for the level there? There's been been bouncing around a little bit the past couple of quarters as you kind of build out but came down this quarter. Just how should we think about what is the kind of the rate going forward?

Yes, Doug, I'll take that. As we mentioned last quarter, we continue to track our expense ratio at 2% of total equity this year. So that's how you would think about it.

So 2% for the full year kind of...

Yes.

And we'll now take our next question from Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Looking at the chart of rate volatility, it's kind of moved down to the low end of where it's been over the last 5 years, which is obviously supportive of MBS spreads. Curious how you guys think about that going forward, if you think it's possible that volatility continues to move into a lower range, or do you think it will remain kind of somewhat elevated by the geopolitical and headline risk?

Yes. I think I assume you're looking at something like the Move Index, for instance, Trevor, and it has come down significantly this year. We have these bouts of spikes. So most importantly, we're constantly preparing the portfolio for these spikes in volatility and being able to be in a position of strength when we get those. Overall, though, if you overlay that, I will say you could move out the vol surface, say, look at 1-year expirations on 10-year swap rates, for instance, realized volatility on that point of the yield curve has been remarkably lower than implied volatility. So there is still scope for implied volatilities to move down significantly, and that has a very clear line to mortgage performance over time as implied volatility comes down, mortgages tend to perform better.

Got it. Okay. That makes sense. And then sort of a general question on how you guys thinking about leverage. You noted positive technicals in the MBS market as well as the funding markets. So I'm curious if the kind of broad backdrop of positive trends on both those sides has kind of changed how you guys think about your target range for the leverage for the portfolio at all?

Hi, Trevor. So I think, in general, like the big picture answer to that is our overall opinion hasn't changed, and it's really driven by the macro environment. T.J. talked about in his comments, the policy framework that's going on and then developments in technology, geopolitics. The overall level of macro risk is sort of really drives where that leverages conceptually. And then the secondary factor is where mortgage spreads are relative to interest rate swaps. So in this kind of environment, yes, mortgages remain attractive. Yes, we feel like we can earn a really good rate of return, but high levels of leverage are sort of out of the picture, out of the scope simply because of our deep respect for the macro environment. So we're able to adjust the leverage more tactically within a narrower range. And I think you'll see us do that, and that's what this last quarter's activity reflects, the ability to take that up or down within plus or minus 1x to be able to adjust to conditions in the mortgage market, but overall, really respecting the fact that there is this very different level of global macro risk that's out there, and we're at war, and those things really define sort of the bigger picture risk appetite.

We'll now take our next question from Jason Weaver with Jones Trading.

I'm just looking at Slide 26 in the deck, and it looks like you've lengthened the book by adding more long end exposure there. Is that an inherent curve view embedded in there? Or how should I think about that?

On Page 26, you see some more...

You added some 7-, 10-year and some 15, 20 years as well.

15, 20 years. Yes, interest rate swaps. So -- and those are paying positions. Those are paying fixed positions. So we are paying fixed rate further out the curve. So it is slightly more of a steepening bias relative to the previous quarter. But you all -- at the same time...

Sorry, just consistent with the adding specified pools, which tend to have longer durations [indiscernible].

Yes, that's fair. And it would seem to match some of the 5.0 and 5.5 , I get that. And then...

And just one clarification there. I'd also note that the -- you see the futures position, the 30-year U.S. futures position is slightly smaller short than it was. So effectively, there is some movement between those two positions.

Right, right. Okay. I see it. Fair enough. Okay. And then the follow-up on the book value increase, can you ballpark on how much of that was due to issuance above book versus tightening on the portfolio that was in place?

Yes. Trevor (sic) [ Jason, ] we typically don't break that out. We typically don't break that out.

We'll take our next question from Jason Stewart with Compass Point.

Thinking about the shape of the yield curve and forward. How are you thinking about positioning the portfolio in a potentially flatter environment? And do you disagree in terms of the path of where forwards are in terms of short rates?

Yes, it's -- good morning, Jason. The portfolio entered the quarter with probably less of a curve bias than at any time in the last 6 to 8 quarters. That's left us in a position of strength to potentially lean into some of this flattening that we've seen, to your point. So we're fairly well hedged across the curve and, at this point, are looking for opportunities to potentially put on a slightly more of a steepening bias. But at this point, we think that the portfolio is very well hedged across the curve.

Okay. Okay. And then just thinking about spec pools and premium net risk, including spec pool pay-ups, and how you hedge that, I understand the conceptual desire to have more cash flow certainty. But if we are in a directionally higher rate environment in terms of long rates, how do you think about how much premium that risk you're willing to accept? And how should we think about that number relative to the hedge book?

Yes. That's an interesting comment. Sorry, I think you're talking about -- so the pay-ups over TBAs for pools have been held up remarkably robustly. That market is becoming more and more liquid over the last -- we've been doing this since Byron and Smriti and I were at Freddie Mac over 25 years ago, where they effectively invented the spec pool market. And that market has become deeper and more liquid, more transparently priced than at any point in our careers. So I'm not sure the calculus is quite as simple as thinking about, oh, where will this pay up be relative to TBA. It's a very deep market. This is almost becoming -- security selection is becoming so paramount that every mortgage investor is looking at the individual characteristics of each pool much like you do in other segments of the bond market.

So we do think about those things, especially in terms of being prepared for all scenarios that are out there. But I think it's really important to note that specified pool market is becoming more and more liquid. And these pools that we are -- and more transparently priced. And these pools that we're buying will perform well in higher rates, especially as housing turnover evolves. I think there's a case to be made that housing turnover is at very, very low levels for clear reasons. We all know the demographics so supported starting to increase at some point. And I think these pools that we're buying will provide those durable cash flows that I spoke to.

Okay. Okay. Fair enough on that. And then one follow-up on Jason's question. I won't get the number. But in terms of 3Q book value quarter-to-date, was there any impact on book from share issuance?

There was no real impact to the share on that. So it's very minimal, if anything.

And that does conclude our question-and-answer session for today. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Smriti for any additional or closing comments.

We thank everyone for your attention this morning, and we look forward to updating you again for our third quarter results. Thank you very much, operator.

Thank you. And once again, that does today's conference. We thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Hello, and welcome to the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Dynex Capital, Inc. Please note that today's meeting is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]. It is now my pleasure to turn the meeting over to Byron Boston, Dynex's Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I will now call the meeting to order. I am Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Dynex Capital. I will serve as Chair of this meeting. On behalf of Board of Directors and the executive team of Dynex, I welcome you to our 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We appreciate your participation and your continued interest in the company. As in prior years, we are hosting this meeting in a virtual format, which we believe supports broad general access and participation.

I would now like to introduce the Dynex Directors attending today. In addition to me, the following members of the Board are also in attendance: Julia Coronado, our Lead Independent Director; Marie Chandoha; Alexander Crawford; Andrew Gray; Smriti Popenoe, our Co-CEO and President; and Joy Palmer. As previously disclosed, Ms. Palmer is not standing for reelection and will depart from the Board following this meeting. On behalf of the Board, I want to thank Joy for her dedicated service to Dynex and our Board of Directors. Also joining us from the management team are Michael Angelo, our Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary; Mike Sartori, our Chief Financial Officer; and Kait Mauritz and Alison Griffin from our Investor Relations team.

Representing Ernst & Young, our independent auditing firm, is Andrew Harvazinski. I will now turn the meeting over to Mr. Angelo to conduct the formal business of the meeting.

Thank you, Byron. Before we begin, I would like to direct everyone's attention to the rules of conduct available on the meeting website. Although this is a virtual-only meeting, we welcome questions from shareholders and will answer questions during the Q&A portion of the meeting. I have been appointed the Inspector of Election for this meeting to certify the results of the voting and I have taken the oath of office. I have received an affidavit of mailing from Computershare, our transfer agent, certifying that the requisite notices and accompanying materials commenced mailing on April 7, 2026, to each shareholder of record as of the close of business on March 25, 2026, the record date.

As Corporate Secretary of the company, I have the list of shareholders of record of the company as of the record date, which has been available for inspection at the company's principal officers during normal business hours. As of the record date, there were 206,947,054 shares of common stock of the company issued and outstanding and entitled to notice of and to vote at this meeting of shareholders. As the Inspector of Election, I report that at least 140,653,661 shares of common stock or approximately 68% of all common shares outstanding are present or represented by proxy at this meeting. Therefore, a quorum is present and the meeting may proceed.

It is now 10:04 a.m. Eastern Time on May 21, 2026, and the polls for each matter to be voted upon at this meeting are open. As a reminder, shareholders may vote online at any time during this meeting before the polls close. If you are a shareholder entitled to vote and have not yet voted or if you would like to change your previously cast vote, please do so by clicking on the voting link on the meeting website. If you have already voted by proxy, it is not necessary to vote again. We will now review the proposals.

The first item of business is the election of directors. The 6 individuals nominated to serve until the 2027 annual meeting and until the election and qualification of their successors are: Byron Boston, Marie Chandoha, Julia Coronado, Alexander Crawford, Andrew Gray and Smriti Popenoe. There have been no other nominations received.

The second item of business is to approve on an advisory and nonbinding basis, the compensation of the company's named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.

The third item of business is to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as the company's independent auditors for the 2026 fiscal year.

The fourth item of business is to approve an amendment to the company's articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the company's common stock from 360 million shares to 720 million shares. A copy of the amendment was included as Appendix A to the proxy statement. The matters to be voted on have now been formally presented and the polls are about to close.

Since everyone has had an opportunity to vote, the polls are now closed at 10:06 a.m. Eastern Time. All proxies and votes should now have been submitted. As the Inspector of Election, I preliminarily report that for proposal 1, a majority of the common shares entitled to vote on the proposal have been in favor of election of each director nominee.

For proposal 2, a majority of the common shares entitled to vote on the proposal have been in favor of the named executive officer's compensation as disclosed in the proxy statement.

For proposal 3, a majority of the common shares entitled to vote on the proposal have been in favor of ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young as the company's independent auditors for 2026.

For proposal 4, a majority of the common shares entitled to vote on the proposal have been in favor of the amendment to the company's articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the company's common stock from $360 million to $720 million.

The final report of the Inspector of Election with the final vote count for the matters voted on today will be filed with the records of the company and reported on Form 8-K within 4 business days. I will now turn the meeting back over to Byron.

There is no other formal business to come before the meeting. We will now open the meeting to questions.

Seeing no questions relevant to these proceedings, the meeting is now adjourned. Thank you for joining us today and for your continued support of Dynex Capital.

This concludes the meeting. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Good day, and welcome to the Dynex Capital, Inc. First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded.

At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Ms. Alison Griffin, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. The press release associated with today's call was issued and filed with the SEC this morning, April 20, 2026. You may view the press release on the homepage of the Dynex website at dynexcapital.com as well as on the SEC's website at sec.gov.

Before we begin, we wish to remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words believe, expect, forecast, anticipate, estimate, project, plan and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified.

The company's actual results and timing of certain events could differ considerably from those projected and/or contemplated by those forward-looking statements as a result of unforeseen external factors or risks. For additional information on these factors or risks, please refer to our disclosures filed with the SEC, which may be found on the Dynex website under Investor as well as on the SEC's website.

This conference call is being broadcast live over the Internet with a streaming slide presentation, which can be found through the webcast link on the website. The slide presentation may also be referenced on the Investors page.

Joining me on the call today are Smriti Popenoe, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President; Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Mike Sartori, Chief Financial Officer; and T.J. Connolly, Chief Investment Officer.

I now have the pleasure to turn the call over to Smriti.

Thank you, Alison, and good morning, everyone. We continue to build our company at the intersection of 2 powerful demographic tailwinds, the need for income and the need for housing. Dynex continues to deliver differentiated top-tier performance. Our track record now combined with the significant growth in our capital base over the last 15 months, propels value creation by delivering scale and resilience to our shareholders.

The team is focused on methodically building durability across investments, finance, technology, risk and operations. Growing an enduring platform reinforces the value of our business meaningfully beyond the valuation of our balance sheet, further driving long-term shareholder returns.

Turning now to the global macroeconomic environment. Government policy is squarely in the driver seat, defining and driving outcomes. Scenario planning for us has evolved to mapping policy pathways. What policymakers could do next, how markets may transmit those decisions and how we position ourselves for those mods.

More than ever, mindset and preparedness are the key factors for successful decision-making because the policy pads aren't always foreseeable. Flexibility and openness in our team's mindset something we actively teach and practice are now essential parts of navigating the investment landscape.

In the first quarter, we added value by executing our plan. We managed the portfolio to a short burst of volatility, which we use to opportunistically raise and deploy capital. We grew the total capital base by 18%, deploying the funds during the quarter as MBS spreads widened. Since quarter end, MBS spreads have tightened and book value is higher.

Mike and TJ will now review the detailed quarterly results and our outlook.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone, joining us today. I'd like to begin by welcoming [ Calin More ] who joined Dynex Day to lead Capital Markets and Investor Relations. Kate brings deep industry experience across both functions, and our background will support the continued growth of our capital and investor base while deepening the engagement with our existing investors.

We are excited to add her capabilities to our strong and growing Dynex team. Turning now to our financial results for the quarter. Book value ended the quarter at $12.6 per share and economic return was negative 2.5% for the quarter, consisting of $0.51 per share of common dividends and an $0.85 per share decrease in book value. We ended the quarter with leverage at 8.6x versus total equity. The majority of the increase was attributable to the growth in our investment portfolio of $6 billion. reflecting the deployment of capital raise during the quarter of $442 million.

Our liquidity position remained very strong with $1.3 billion in cash and unencumbered securities at the end of the quarter, representing over 46% of total equity. We continue to evaluate growth through a lens of market opportunity, investment returns and long-term accretion to drive shareholder value. Net interest income for the quarter rose from $0.28 per share to $0.40 per share, primarily due to declining financing costs. which fell 33 basis points due to the impact of the Federal Reserve's rate cuts in the fourth quarter.

With respect to expenses, G&A increased quarter-over-quarter, driven primarily by onetime items. As we noted in the prior first quarter earnings, we expect overall expenses to normalize in the second quarter with full year expense ratio anticipated to be flat or modestly lower versus year-end as we grow our capital base. Importantly, we remain disciplined in managing costs in our expense structure.

With that, I'll turn it over to T.J. to provide additional detail on portfolio strategy and the outlook.

Thanks, Mike. SP999 We entered the quarter with policy attention focused squarely on housing affordability and the mortgage market. As the quarter progressed, global events, most notably the war in Iran, shifted market focus toward geopolitics and drove a sharp increase in volatility. As markets become more accustomed to that global backdrop, -- we expect both investors and policymakers to refocus on domestic priorities over the balance of the year, particularly housing and the availability of mortgage credit, a transition we believe could support tighter mortgage spreads over time.

Early in the quarter, mortgage markets benefited from a strong technical tailwind. Government policy long 1 of our most important inputs had turned supportive with policymakers emphasizing GSE mortgage buying to tighten spreads and improve affordability. As volatility rose later in the quarter, agency mortgages traded like much riskier assets, creating potential opportunities. Because we operate with strong liquidity, we navigated that volatility constructively and selectively added assets that spreads widen to more attractive levels.

Fundamentals and technicals remain highly supportive and we believe the long-term path toward tighter equilibrium spreads remains highly likely, boosted by policy, supply-demand dynamics and yield carry. Net supply is light and demand remains broad and robust across banks, REITs, money managers and foreign investors.

Last quarter, I noted that we expected net supply to be $200 billion this year. So far in 2026, it appears supply could come in even lower. Returning to the demand side, the potential bid from the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac retained portfolios improved downside liquidity and stabilizes spreads during periods of volatility and supports broader investor participation. The GSEs have been actively buying mortgages. They are selective on valuation -- they regularly retained pools. They have previously been selling to their cash window programs.

And there was some question about potential hedging. They are mostly hedging using interest rate swaps. In parallel, proposed changes tied to the Basel III end game could lower the capital cost banks face to hold mortgages, both in loan and securitized form and to intermediate financing more efficiently.

Financing costs are declining amid the light regulatory regime. Repo markets functioned smoothly, spreads were stable and funding was readily available even during periods of heightened volatility. MBS repo spread to SOFR remained in the 13 to 17 basis point range, 3 to 5 basis points below last year's averages.

Structural improvements in the short-term funding markets alongside elevated money market balances, standing Fed backstops and more efficient balance sheet intermediation continue to support financing for high-quality mortgage assets like those Dynex ones.

We have seen Agency MBS spreads to 7-year interest rate swaps begin to trend tighter again. After moving from the high 120s to nearly 170 basis points in March, spreads were in the low $160 at quarter end and move back toward the 150 area late last week. As geopolitical events evolve and policymakers refocus on domestic issues like housing, we believe spreads can trend towards 120 again with scope for long-term equilibrium spreads closer to 100 basis points.

Static ROEs for current coupon mortgages hedged with interest rate swaps were in the mid- to high teens, and the spread outlook I just outlined provides a further tailwind to forward returns. Moreover, the opportunity to add alpha through security selection is exceptional given the environment.

Borrower prepayment behavior is increasingly heterogeneous and technology-driven, creating meaningful dispersion across pools. Over the last year, we have strategically reduced our exposure to the most callable agency MBS, those in what we call the TBA market, and we continue to do that in the first quarter. TBAs declined from over 16% of our portfolio at year-end to approximately 7% at the end of the quarter.

The first quarter reflects the strength of the Dynex model along 2 dimensions. First, disciplined risk management, supported by significant financing liquidity, strategic security selection and a focus on market structure in the context of the macro headlines allowed us to manage through elevated volatility.

Second, that same volatility created the opportunity to raise and deploy capital at more attractive valuations, which we acted on during the quarter.

Thank you, T.J. We are now combining our demonstrated ability to earn solid returns with the benefits of scale. Growing our company in this attractive investment environment is an important element of value creation. It distributes fixed costs, deepens liquidity and strengthens the company, especially in periods of volatility like we saw last quarter.

Beyond the resilience that a bigger balance sheet provides larger companies have also typically enjoyed higher, more stable valuations. We have grown rapidly to be the third largest agency focused mortgage REIT. And we believe the market has not yet fully recognized the value we are establishing through scale. As we continue to execute our plan with discipline, -- we are excited about the potential for shareholders to benefit from a more scalable platform, creating meaningful upside over the medium and long term.

As we look ahead, we remain centered on opportunistic capital growth alongside disciplined management of our existing portfolio and building operating resilience. Our management team is invested alongside shareholders our interests are aligned with yours, and we are committed to stewarding your capital with integrity, transparency and care.

I will now open the call to questions.

[Operator Instructions] We will go first to Bose George with KBW.

Can we get an update on book value quarter-to-date?

Yes. As of Friday, Friday's close, the estimated book value was $13.31 per share, net of the accrued common dividend and that's up 5.6% versus quarter end.

Perfect. Great. And then you gave your outlook for spreads potentially going back down to 120 basis points. Is that across the curve or like on a specific point on the curve.

Yes, I'm quoting those spreads, both against the 7-year swap point, which is consistent with the chart we have in our presentation there.

We'll take our next question from Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Follow up on your commentary about spreads potentially tightening to 120 or even 100 basis points as a long-term equilibrium. Can you talk about kind of your thoughts on how high you'd be willing to take leverage given that kind of outlook for tightening and how much the potential for sort of short-term bouts of volatility sort of way against that?

Right. Yes. Thank you. There are several components to thinking about our leverage. Our leverage, as Mike mentioned, did increase to 8. roughly 2/3 of the increase was actively positioning to own more mortgages given that backdrop. Mortgages really were kind of the tail of the dog for several weeks in March. -- the yield spread or mortgage basis, as we referred to, it traded with risky assets, the basis was very correlated to things like the -- so we're doing a lot of scenario analysis around that to think about just how much leverage we can comfortably manage and it was a very comfortable position for us. coming into the quarter end period.

And looking ahead, I think we're going to remain very opportunistic. We're very resolute in our view on those spreads moving from down to as much as 100 basis points. Given the GSE backdrop, we think this is -- we are on the verge of a significant regime change. So we are going to actively be opportunistic in keeping our exposures. So investors can capitalize on this opportunity.

Got it. Okay. That's helpful. And then just looking at the portfolio this quarter, it looked like the allocation to TBAs went down some. Can you talk about how you're thinking about the values of spec pools versus TBAs with incremental dollars.

Yes. The TBA market, by definition, for those who don't know, the TBA is to be announced market -- that is the cheapest to deliver segment of the mortgage market. That is to say the pools that are -- or the loans that are most callable and potentially have the most duration uncertainty typically will get delivered into a TBA transaction. And we want to avoid those. We think those get cheaper and cheaper. They have tremendous amount of uncertainty around their cash flows. They're very, very refinanceable and callable on even the slightest move in in mortgage rates. So we're trying to avoid those.

We are very strategic and have been, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, positioning for owning significantly more pools I think we've got a long history of security selection. This is a tremendous source of alpha for us and it's unique to this model, right? It's very hard to -- for investors to go out and find mortgage pools and do the deep dive that we do, and you have to be in the institutional world. So it's a great opportunity for retail investors, for instance, to be able to access security selection like we can offer them.

We'll go next to Jason Weaver with Jones Trading.

I was wondering if you could speak to the phasing of capital deployment over the quarter and beyond.

Yes, absolutely. In terms of the capital, and I'll let Laxman to comment a little bit, but it is very opportunistic and methodical. We are thinking a lot about multiple components that go into that optimization for our shareholders. One of the things I think that the market often misses is total shareholder return is driven by the portfolio returns and the valuation.

And one thing is very clear, larger companies receive a larger valuation in this sector. And that's a very important part of our calculus as we think about phasing up the capital raising. And it was a significant quarter for us.

I'll turn it over to Smriti, who will comment a little bit more.

Jason, one of the things that we think about actively is what is the agency MBS market and what are the moves telling us about the inherent risk in that particular sector? one of the things that happened in the first quarter is that Agency MBS widened but it wasn't because there was something wrong with Agency MBS per se. It wasn't a fundamental reason. They widened because the risk assets in general were weaker.

And we view those types of opportunities to be really significant in terms of the ability to raise and deploy capital. So when we see that type of move, that's a signal to us to go put accretive capital that we're raising to work. So that's really the opportunistic nature of what we're talking about.

In general, when we see those types of opportunities, you'll see us probably raise bigger blocks of capital put those put the money to work. And then over time, I think that criterion that we've always abided by just making sure that the cost of capital is lower than the return on the capital that we're deploying, that remains sort of the gold standard in terms of our willingness to raise and deploy capital over time.

Got it. That's helpful. And just so I have this correct, obviously, forward ROE is going to be the genuine -- the biggest consideration here. But is there a downside sort of multiple on valuation that you would -- that you want to avoid or you would underwrite to price above there like on your book value multiple.

Look, we're always going to want the shares to trade at a premium to book value. I think as a business, we've now proven 2 things. One is the ability to deliver strong returns in some of the most challenging environments that the markets had in the last 10 years. So that's thing number one.

And then thing number two, I think it's this idea that as we grow, we are delivering significant benefits of scale to our shareholders. So at this point, we feel like the markets haven't necessarily taken that into account. I mean having now firmly placed ourselves as the third largest company that's doing what we're doing. I think that part is not yet fully reflected in the share price.

And for us to continue to tell that story, I think that's that's the goal here. But all else being equal, not only do we think the shares deserve to trade at book, I think we actually deserve to trade at a significant premium.

All right. Well, I appreciate that. Congrats on the quarter.

We'll go next to at Marissa Lobo with UBS.

Could you speak to swap spread dynamics over the quarter? How that impacted performance? And did you adjust the mix between treasury futures and swaps during the stress period.

The spot spreads, so the interest rate swap rate relative to treasuries is what most people are quoting there. And that does tend to correlate with risky assets, much as I mentioned, about the basis. So when stocks trade lower. For instance, the swap spread will trade more negative. And vice versa, when risky assets are doing well, the swap spread will trade less negative.

We think and we've said for several quarters now, we actually probably pushing up on 2 years now that we expect to be able to earn the additional yield spread that interest rate swap hedges offer relative to treasuries. So that is to say there is more yield spread available when hedging mortgages with interest rate swaps than there is when we hedge with treasuries.

As a result, mentioned on the last couple of calls, we expected things to be in the 60% to 80% of the portfolio hedged with interest rate swaps we were right around 70% on a DV01 basis at quarter end. And I expect that to be roughly -- that's roughly where we're comfortable in terms of the liquidity of hedges and being able to staying nimble with futures that trade practically 24/7, -- and I think there's a little bit of scope.

We could get closer if the opportunity presents itself to be closer to 80%. But again, I think that's a really compelling spread for us to continue to earn over time, and it has worked fairly well.

Appreciate that. And just moving to the GSEs, you talked about the purchase directive is resetting the spread regime tighter. How is the pace of their buying met your expectations? And did the March spread widening test that backstop thesis in a meaningful way?

Yes, it did, to some extent, test the backdrop in they have proven to be very value based. So I wouldn't say it's time-based so much. which that's really important for the understanding of the backstop, right? So at wider spreads, they will be more aggressive and all indications suggest they were more aggressive about wider spread. They are fairly methodical in terms of their pool selection.

So they are buying or retaining rather more pools than they have in the past relative to -- in the cash windows -- and I'd say overall, it is playing out roughly as we expected. There are periods of volatility. They wait, they put their hands up and say, "Okay, we'll see where value shakes out. and then they step in, much as they did when Smriti and Byron and I sat at the Freddie Mac portfolio 25 years ago. They're operating in a very similar manner at this point.

We'll take our next question from [ Mal Ross with Compass Post ].

Kind of follow-up on the previous question. but how your expectations for inflation have influenced a tenor of your interest rate swaps noting that you moved more into a 5 year? And does that reflect your expectations for a steeper to [indiscernible]?

Yes, great question. The market I'd say, in the course of the quarter, waffle lot, especially with the Warren and run the market narrates shifted very quickly at points from one focused on inflation to one focused on growth, right? And we don't know the answer. We don't predict, we prepare. So we're preparing and building this portfolio to be robust to both of those regimes potentially I think that's really important.

So you saw the swap book shorten up a little bit in that 3- to 5-year tenor. Most of that's just aging of the swap book. We're very comfortable with how this position because the view that we have here and the risk exposures that we think are the most compelling for our shareholders to earn over time is that mortgage spread relative to the interest rate curve.

So we are trying to position this to achieve the yield spread and hold our book value as steady as possible. And I think that is, given the way the portfolio is constructed currently, for this regime, it's appropriate. So I'd say, overall, our highest conviction is that mortgage yield spread is what we're here to earn, and we are hedging across the curve for that reason.

And then to follow up on the asset side, it seems like you added more in the current and lower coupons and avoided the higher coupons and assuming that it is following on with CPR expectations.

Yes. It's a great question because there were some really good opportunities in the initial days. It feels like a long time ago now. But in mid-January, after the Trump administration's announcement that the GSEs would be more active in buying certain coupons really outperform. So you'll see in our press release there that the 4% coupon is significantly lower than it was at year-end, and that was because we took advantage of that alpha, right? There was a significant outperformance in those coupons, and we moved away from those coupons as they outperformed to diversify the book up into -- we added some Fannie 2s even and then some of the higher coupons.

Again, it's all -- more and more of this market is about pool selection even than it is about coupon selection. So when you have these kind of real quick moves and things, we're watching very closely to say, "Hey, this is out of line, the Fannie Force, for instance, got significantly richer and we were able to sell into that and buy pools and other coupons that were much more compelling cash flows for us.

We'll take our next question from Eric Hagen with BTIG.

Maybe following up a little bit on this conversation around capital raising. Just looking at the timing of the capital raising, even just the broader philosophy around raising capital, I mean, is there anything fundamental that you'd identify in the current environment, which has maybe changed the level at which you're prepared to raise capital relative to where you've raised in the past. And by level, I mean, the level of your stock valuation?

Yes. I mean we disclosed already, Eric, that the bulk of the capital that was raised, was raised early in the quarter. When valuations were more supportive towards issuing capital versus investing. And then the investing environment kind of played itself out over the quarter, as everybody saw, with spreads wider as the war in Iran progressed.

So in general, I don't think the principles have changed. When it is a good idea for us to raise we raised when it's a good idea to invest -- we invest the raising and deploying don't necessarily have to be simultaneous in nature. Sometimes they are, and sometimes they're not. But the real principle, which I've said now, I think you can go back and check on earnings calls for 3-plus years, it's really this idea of -- is my cost of capital lower than the return that I can earn on that capital over time.

And I think that is what makes this investment environment so unique, a, that it's lasted as long as it has, b, that the forward returns in Agency MBS still continue to support active raising and deploying capital because over time, we believe the cost of capital is going to be lower than the return on that capital or vice versa, the return on the capital we're raising right now is actually going to be higher than the marginal cost.

So that has always been our operating principle. As we see the share price go up relative to book, we talked about price to book here, a fair amount today. I think we're more conscious about the idea of delivering total shareholder return to our shareholders.

T.J. talked about TSR being comprised of 2 things. One is the actual return on our portfolio; and secondly, the price to book. We know that those are 2 different components, and there's a trade-off between the 2, but that also is a factor in how much we raise and how much we deploy. So a lot of what we're thinking through right now is just, number one, performance is the beginning, ending and final arbiter of everything that we do. So that's always number one.

And then number two, delivering value through these other ways. But those are all factors in how we think about the pace of capital raising, deploying, et cetera.

That's really helpful. If I could sneak in 1 more here. I mean what's your perspective on the prepayment environment as community banks are given maybe more incentives to come back into the market? Do you see that driving a lot of competition among originators.

Certainly, competition drives the refinanceability right? That is a very important construct. I think more than anything, though, as we've talked about for many, many quarters now, it's all about the technology, right? That is making it easier and easier to refinance the marginal borrower. And I think that will be the dominant force over time. But to the extent you have certain incentives that you're bringing it back to something we've talked about for a long time as policy, right? So to the extent that policy shifts incentives for the players in the mortgage market. That's something we're watching very, very closely.

At this time, there are no further questions. I'd now like to turn the call back to Smriti Popenoe for any additional or closing remarks.

I thank you all for your attention, and we look forward to updating you on our quarterly results in the second quarter.

This does conclude today's conference. We thank you for your participation.

Good day, and welcome to the Dynex Capital, Inc. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Alison Griffin, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning. The press release associated with today's call was issued and filed with the SEC this morning, January 26, 2026. You may view the press release on the homepage of the Dynex website at dynexcapital.com as well as on the SEC's website at sec.gov.

Before we begin, we wish to remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words believe, expect, forecast, anticipate, estimate, project, plan and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified.

The company's actual results and timing of certain events could differ considerably from those projected and/or contemplated by those forward-looking statements as a result of unforeseen external factors or risks. For additional information on these factors or risks, please refer to our disclosures filed with the SEC, which may be found on the Dynex website under Investor as well as on the SEC's website.

This conference call is being broadcast live over the Internet with a streaming slide presentation, which can be found through the webcast link on the website. The slide presentation may also be referenced under quarterly reports on the Investor Center page.

Joining me on the call today are Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Smriti Popenoe, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President; Rob Colligan, Chief Financial Officer; T.J. Connelly, Chief Investment Officer; and Mike Sartori, Head of Capital Markets.

It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Byron and Smriti.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. As we start 2026, let me anchor where we are in our company's evolution. Since I joined Dynex in 2008, the team and I have always operated and competed with a performance-first mentality and with the ethical stewardship of our shareholders' capital at the core of our decision-making. This focus has created a repeatable and sustainable performance edge, delivering industry-beating returns for our shareholders.

All sensibles, risk management first, treating liquidity and reputation as a strategic asset and a culture grounded in learning, kindness, trust to curiosity continue to differentiate us. What sets our approach apart is not the ability to predict every environment, but the discipline to adapt in many environments. Resilience is what ultimately enables Dynex shareholders to enjoy compounding over decades. Our framework gives us the confidence to lean into the right moments of opportunity and endure turbulence without being forced to retreat.

We can even advance during periods of dislocation, while others pull back. Over time, those small behavioral advantages have compounded into meaningful performance differences, creating the foundation to propel us to this phase of Dynex at the start of this decade.

Our strong start in 2020 gave us the springboard to create a resilient company at the intersection of capital markets and real estate finance. The decisions we made early this decade to intentionally raise capital in smaller amounts, gradually building our equity base, while generating top-tier returns set the foundation for today's sustained value-creating growth. Our momentum continues to rise as we methodically execute our strategy, and the results speak clearly.

Over this decade, through December 31, 2025, and Dynex shareholders experienced a 67% total return or nearly 9% annualized with dividends reinvested, outperforming the REM ETF by over 8,000 basis points or 700 basis points annually. 2025 was an outstanding year. Dynex shareholders earned a 29.4% total shareholder return, driven by both dividend income and significant share price performance, in a year marked by policy complexity, shifting rate expectations and geopolitical cross currents.

As of the end of last week, our total equity market capitalization, including our preferred shares, was $3 billion. In just 13 months, we have almost tripled the size of our company, creating resilience, strategic flexibility and scale for our shareholders. Delivering these results required and accelerated significant evolution across the company. We added depth and breadth across the team, building our legal team, with a new Chief Legal Officer and our investments team with 2 senior investment professionals.

We planned, commissioned and delivered 2 new offices in Richmond and New York City, and we have successfully made a transition to T.J. Connelly as our Chief Investment Officer. To reflect the needs of our growing strategically focused enterprise, we separated the roles of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Rob Colligan, who held both titles will take on an expanded CFO function, including the building out of our corporate development capabilities. Today, we welcome Meakin Bennett as our new Chief Operating Officer, a seasoned operator with deep financial and operational expertise from Fannie Mae, Morgan Stanley and GE Capital and a U.S. Navy veteran Meakin brings leadership and discipline to strengthen our platform. She will lead the modernization of our operational backbone to enable scalable, efficient growth for the long term.

Looking ahead, we are operating our business in a rapidly changing global landscape. Human conflict remains the key factor, creating surprises that result in policy and market volatility. We have been prepared for the greater possibility of a wider range of outcomes and for some years now, we have called this a flat fat tail distribution. It has tilted our risk appetite towards liquidity and flexibility. Demographic trends in developed economies are reshaping growth, fiscal capacity and the cost of capital.

For years, low rates and central bank support masked the rising pressures. But in the end, fewer workers, savers and taxpayers make growth harder to generate and debt more expensive to carry. Policymakers face increasing temptation to use inflation or manage markets as a pressure release and this pattern is global. In such an environment, government policy can mean simultaneously increased risk and opportunity. This has been true for us since 2020. Our portfolio construction continues to reflect the reality of shifting policy across a variety of factors, including active government intervention in the housing market and monetary policy.

On the other hand, the global demand for income continues to rise, and that creates a powerful backdrop for our capital raising strategy. Investors across the world are searching for stable, repeatable cash flows, in an environment marked by demographic shifts, funding gaps and persistent volatility, platforms that can deliver high-quality income with stewardship, transparency, liquidity and disciplined risk management are increasingly scarce.

Dynex sits directly in that space and our ability to generate reliable dividends backed by a resilient portfolio naturally attracts capital that is seeking durable income. At the same time, the continued expansion of passive investing provides an additional structural tailwind. As passive vehicles grow, they are required to own larger positions in companies with scale and liquidity, raising capital at accretive levels, expands our equity base, improve trading liquidity and increases Dynex's relevance within these passive strategies.

The combination of rising global demand for income and the mechanical bid from passive capital strengthens our shareholder base, lowers our cost of capital and drive the long-term compounding that we aim to deliver. These factors support the building of Dynex for scale and strength growing the company in ways that embed resilience into the core of our model so we can navigate a wider set of outcomes and keep delivering long-term value.

We are evolving our business steadily, and we'll continue to fine-tune people, process, technology and structure to stay aligned with our strategy. The company is well positioned, and we are prepared for the next phase of our journey, grounded in our strategy, anchored by our core values and focused on long-term value creation.

I'll now turn it over to the team to detail more of how the strategy is being put to work and to share our results for the year. T.J.?

Thank you, Smriti. This decade, we have emphasized that government policy is one of the most powerful forces shaping asset returns, often more influential than traditional fundamentals alone. Government policy played a large role in driving returns last year and continued to do so in 2026. In a year that began with an unusual degree of macro uncertainty, our portfolio total economic return was 10.2% in the fourth quarter and 21.7% for 2025, the highest TER this decade.

We entered 2025 with mortgages at historically wide spreads to interest rate hedges and a high degree of policy uncertainty. This presented an excellent opportunity to raise and deploy capital at higher leverage and wider spreads, and the strength in our results reflects the effectiveness of this strategy. We raised capital methodically and consistently deployed it into assets at wider spreads, supporting compelling future dividends for our shareholders.

As we begin 2026, spreads have tightened further and policy direction in the MBS market has become far clearer. Recent actions and guidance now point toward a more stable and supportive framework for the mortgage market. creating a strong foundation for forward returns and greater confidence in the path ahead for MBS spreads. Our capital raising was led by Mike Sartori, our Head of Capital Markets, and he will give you more details.

Thanks, T.J. We pursue a distinctive strategic capital raising approach and partner closely with our brokerage counterparts to execute Dynex's disciplined strategy. In 2025, we executed our capital raising strategy with precision and intention. We raised capital accretively through the aftermarket program and worked hand-in-hand across the team to invest and hedge the capital on a real-time basis.

This approach allowed us to maintain tight alignment between stronger valuations on our stock and wide mortgage spreads. Over the course of the year, we raised and invested over $1 billion as our price-to-book valuation rose. As we move into 2026, we will continue to follow the same methodical disciplined playbook. We expect to issue when it is accretive, deploying the capital and investments, generating economic returns above our hurdle rate.

In the first few trading days of January, we raised nearly $350 million, and share count as of last Thursday, was 199.6 million. T.J. will further discuss the year ahead.

Thanks, Mike. While MBS spreads are tighter today than they were for much of last year, the overall return environment might be even better, driven by policy support for housing finance, higher liquidity and an environment with more opportunities to tactically create value. The Trump administration's recent announcement to increase the GSE retained portfolios by $200 billion marks a return to portfolio growth for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and provides a meaningful technical tailwind for spreads.

For Dynex, this is a positive. It supports valuations and it will likely reset the spread regime tighter, while limiting spread widening. The impact of the GSEs is unique. The backstop bid, especially focused on spreads allows a host of investors to reassess the amount of spread risk they are willing to take. We believe the impact will return us to a tighter range in spreads with limited spread widening, possibly like that seen before the financial crisis, as you will see on the left-hand side of the spread chart in our earnings presentation on Page 12.

We expect the return to this type of spread environment would enhance the risk return profile of the assets we own and provide attractive returns for our ongoing capital deployment. Even before the GSE buying announcement, we expected demand to overwhelm supply in 2026, led by bank demand of over $100 billion. While we expect the GSEs to be price-sensitive buyers and even for money managers to slowly reduce their MBS overweight as spreads tighten, the supply and demand balance in agency mortgages will likely lean towards higher net demand for many quarters.

As the GSE-retained portfolios grow, it is unclear how they will hedge. We are also mindful that in past periods of high portfolio growth, the GSEs had active hedging programs and swaps would be their most likely hedge if they chose to hedge duration. We also expect that GSE convexity hedging would impact technicals in the market for options. The administration appears clearly focused on reducing mortgage rates, and we remain focused on managing and mitigating convexity risk.

The fourth quarter prepayment environment reinforced one of the clearest lessons of the year. Security selection remains the most reliable and consistent source of alpha in agency MBS. In a market characterized by low, but uneven turnover and periodic spikes and refinancing, avoiding the most prepayment-sensitive collateral was essential for protecting carry and reducing reinvestment risk amid the periodic interest rate volatility. Prepayment dispersion is increasingly driven by micro level factors that reward granular pool work. Technology-enabled optimization at originators and servicers continues to make refinance and retention outreach more targeted and efficient.

The fourth quarter data reaffirms that generating alpha and Agency MBS is not simply about coupon exposure. It is about owning the right pools within those coupons. Our positioning reflects that lesson, avoiding prepayment-sensitive stories and emphasizing structurally more stable collateral. Relative value will also play a larger role in tactical asset allocation, not only within coupons, but within sectors. Of course, mortgage returns are driven not just by spread risk, but also interest rate volatility risk. Given the policy dynamics in today's markets, we expect and plan for periodic bouts of volatility.

Our yield curve exposure is more balanced as the greatest clarity on the policy front is for tighter mortgage spreads. As policy and economic data evolves, we will continually evaluate the curve exposures in our hedges. While longer maturity yields currently offer the potential for larger dispersion than shorter maturity yields, we are mindful that changes in Federal Reserve policy or personnel could shift even shorter maturity yields meaningfully. We strategically added options positions in 2025 to reduce the portfolio's exposure to rate volatility and expect that options will continue to be important in the coming quarters to manage risk.

While policy can evolve quickly, the Agency MBS market looks likely to be supported by a strong tailwind, and the leverage returns for earnings spread income in the best segments of this market remain compelling. Our team at Dynex has a long history of extracting equity-like returns from fixed income in this kind of market regime. We rely on the principle to prepare, not predict. We operate with a flexible mindset, resisting the kind of rigid thinking that could lead us to alter portfolios at exactly the wrong moments.

Our scenario planning gives us the confidence to hold exposures through stress and to stay open to opportunities when others are constrained. That flexibility gives us tremendous optionality and helps us avoid the behavioral traps that destroy value, which is why we've been able to deliver differentiated performance across cycles.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Rob, who will give you more details on our outstanding quarter.

Thank you, T.J. The total economic return in the fourth quarter was 10.2%, consisting of $0.51 of common dividends and a $0.78 increase in book value per share. For the year, our book value increased $0.75, and we declared $2 of dividends per common share which are paid on a monthly basis. Comprehensive income for the quarter was $190 million and was $354 million for the year. We ended the quarter with leverage of 7.3x total equity.

Our liquidity position remained very strong with $1.4 billion in cash and unencumbered securities at the end of the quarter, representing over 55% of total equity. As mentioned earlier, we've raised $1.5 billion over the last 13 months at the most accretive levels in the company's history. Beyond the resilience and stability that a larger capital base provides, we understand that a larger, more liquid company typically earns a better valuation metric. It's important to us as stewards of your capital to keep these factors in mind as we grow. The TBA and mortgage-backed securities portfolio started the year at $9.8 billion, grew to $15.8 billion at the end of September and ended the year at $19.4 billion. We continue to add to the portfolio after year-end and currently have approximately $22 billion in TBAs and mortgages.

Pools and TBAs we've held and added this year benefited from spread tightening in the second half of the year, which accelerated into year-end and continued into 2026. Our current book value, which has been in the range of $13.85 to $14.05 per share, net of the accrued dividend is up 3% to 4% from year-end. For our year-end tax disclosure, we're estimating that we earned $229 million of taxable earnings, covering all of our preferred dividend and 93% of our common dividend, which will be treated as ordinary income.

The remaining 7% is a nondividend distribution. Our dividend tax reporting will be posted to our company's website by the end of the month. Expenses for the fourth quarter were up as our accrual for performance-related compensation increased, lining up with the strong returns delivered in 2025. Our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of capital are down materially year-over-year from 2.9% of total equity at the close of last year to 2.1% at the close of 2025. We continue to make investments in people and technology to ensure Dynex is built for the future, and our expense ratio may stay at the year-end 2025 levels until additional growth is delivered and new breakpoints and levels of scale are achieved.

With that, I'll turn the call back to Smriti for her closing comments.

Thank you, Rob. As we look ahead, we remain focused on disciplined execution and delivering durable long-term value for our shareholders. We are deeply grateful for the trust you place in us. Trust is a core value at Dynex and ultimately, the product we work to deliver every day. And as a management team invested alongside shareholders, our interests are aligned with yours, and we are committed to stewarding your capital with integrity, transparency and care.

I will now open the call to questions.

[Operator Instructions]

And we'll take our first question from Doug Harter with UBS.

Hoping you could quantify where you see incremental investment returns today and how that compares to kind of year-end and 9/30, just given the spread tightening that we've seen.

Yes, absolutely. Today, we see hedged ROEs in the mid-teens with leverage around 7x and with targeted leverage in the low 8s, we see ROEs in the mid to high teens. So as we get even more clarity on the return environment with the return of these native GSE balance sheets, there's scope for modestly higher leverage, I think, in private portfolios.

And I guess just how that compares to, say, 3 months ago, just given the spread tightening, just kind of want to make sure I understand how the dynamics changed.

Yes. The dynamic is roughly it's -- depending on the coupon between 150 and 300 basis points tighter than it was, let's say, at the end of last quarter or the prior quarter, third quarter that is.

Yes. I think the biggest difference, Doug, is that before the GSE balance sheets were announced as being active participants you did have the risk of spreads widening significantly as we saw during periods of volatility in 2022, 2023, doing the tariff tantrum last year.

And what this does, it really takes a big part of that tail risk out. So yes, returns are lower, but also the ability for spreads to widen out a whole bunch because of the return on these balance sheets has also improved what I think of as the risk return profile going forward, right? The other thing that this does is once you have these native balance sheets back in business, other investors, other than ourselves, begin to reevaluate the risk reward.

And if you don't have that big downside risk from spread widening, this starts to be a really compelling space, right? These are agency guaranteed assets, you're still earning double-digit returns. So it ends up being actually a pretty good investment environment.

If I could just push back on the risk reward. I mean, I think clearly, what you had talked about in prior past couple of calls was given the wide spreads, just how attractive the risk/reward was and clearly correct given the spread tightening you've seen. So I guess just trying to square that given the amount of return that you've kind of already generated, given the spread tightening with those comments. So just want to make sure I understand that dynamic.

Yes. I mean risk rewarded by upside as well as downside right? One of the things that's been taken out of the picture here if this policy sticks and if this ends up being a situation where GSE balance sheets are here and they're here for the duration, what that does is it limits your downside risk. So the upside risk may not be as high as it was when they weren't around. But taking away downside risk is a meaningful difference in terms of your forward return profile.

So yes, the -- in 2022 to 2025, you did have an unusual situation. I mean, we call that a generational opportunity, right? So you had a generational opportunity to generate outsized returns. And with the return of these balance sheets, what happens is that your downside is much less than it was in the last 3 years. And that's when I say risk reward, it's really the risk goes down relative to the reward.

I'll just add to that, Doug. It's all about scenario planning. We are constantly planning for a range of scenarios, especially when it comes to the risk profile of the portfolio. And since the announcement that it's very clear that this administration is deeply concerned about mortgage spreads we have to talk about it as a team and say, look, the probability of going to that wide spread again is lower than it was before. And that changes the risk-reward profile that Smriti is talking about.

[Operator Instructions]

We go next to the line of Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Can you guys talk a little bit about how you're thinking about the probability of other sort of politically-motivated actions to attempt to improve housing affordability or lower mortgage rates potentially through things like lowering the g-fees that Fannie and Freddie are charging and kind of how that plays into how are you thinking about investments right now?

Trevor, so yes, I mean I think we are -- I'll just zoom back a little bit here in the '90s and the 2000s, the GSEs were very much an instrument of managing housing in the U.S., right? Like these are entities that have been around for a long time. They've been active participants in facilitating liquidity in the housing market. And they've also been directly or indirectly asked to change the way housing gets really implemented in the U.S., right?

So you can think about affordability goes back in the '90s and 2000s, those existed back then as well, right? So the history of government intervention or wanting to influence where capital actually gets put, that's not new. This has been around for some time. And these MDs have been around and they've been made to do exactly this, right? So when you have that in the back of your mind, is it possible that the government does use these entities to implement housing policy that they believe is better for Americans in terms of lowering homeownership costs and so on, absolutely, right?

So this is not new. So will they do lowering of GPs. We've heard that being talked about. We've heard about loan level pricing adjustments being taken away. All of that is very much real and possible. And I'll let T.J. talk about sort of the impact on mortgage rates and the convexity of mortgages. But we are very much anticipating and prepared for this type of intervention to happen. And what you want to do as an investor is prepare for the impacts of any and all of these potential levers that could be pulled.

So T.J. why don't you talk about just convexity impact and the mortgage rate.

Yes. And I'll just give you a quick sense of the day-to-day, Trevor. Byron and Smriti work -- and I work very closely with our partners in Washington folks at the Mortgage Bankers Association, for instance, hearing about these potential proposals that could impact the prepayment profile of the mortgages that we own and how we bid ongoing mortgages for the portfolio as we reinvest. And the day to day is that we're hearing about these things, and then we come back model them in our prepayment models, think about how the prepayment, both the turnover component and the prepayment component, refinance component that is will impact the prepays in our portfolio and what we'll do to the broader mortgage market. And we're taking that feedback, back to folks like the Mortgage Bankers Association, who are talking with the FHFA and places like that.

So it's very much a reflective relationship, and we're constantly modeling out how it might impact the mortgage market. To date, I think most of the -- it certainly impacts how we think about the most prepaid-sensitive mortgages that are out there. It continues to create more marginal demand and result in model valuing a lot of the prepayment protection that we already own, even higher than it did before.

So I would just -- as I look at the proposals, it's increasingly hard to find the kind of prepay-protected portfolio that you get with our portfolio.

Yes. I think the bottom line is there is going to be more negative convexity. And there's also the possibility that other instruments. Back in the day, we used to have prepayment-protected mortgages. Those are being talked about. We could see the ARM market come back in favor, especially in a steep deal curve environment. So we said this in the call, basically like government policy can create both risk and opportunity at the same time. And this is what we're ready to be investing in.

Yes. Okay. That's very helpful. And then can you give an update on kind of where you've deployed the capital raised in January sort of within the coupon stack and where you guys are finding the best value, post the movement that's happened since the GSE buying was announced?

We're finding that the belly of the coupon stack, primarily 5 has been the most interesting. But I will say it's been a very dynamic market, much more -- I've talked for a long time about the breadth of coupons in which we can invest. And we're finding pockets of opportunities on the specified pool side across coupon stacking and coupons that, frankly, we hadn't traded in several quarters.

So it's really across the board. If I had to point to a single coupon, I'd say it's 5.5 to some extent. But again, seeing opportunities across the stack for coupons that offer durable call protection on the specified pool side.

We go next to the line of Jason Weaver with JonesTrading.

Congrats on capping off a very solid 2025. I want to start with, effectively, you've grown the company by a huge leap, like you said in your prepared comments over the course of the last 13 months. What's your thinking today around the appropriate size of the portfolio in context with what the current opportunity set is out there.

As far as the opportunity set, I'll start there and Smriti can talk more about just the benefits of scale as a company. When I think about the opportunities that it's growing dramatically for us in terms of -- like I just said to Trevor's question, the market dynamics are such that there's more and more opportunities across the coupon stack. This team has operated -- we have a team that's actually -- many of us were actually at the agencies in the 1990s. We've operated in this environment for a long time. But it's pretty exciting, the amount of alpha that we can produce beyond just a classic spread trade, which is still compelling.

The amount of alpha that's available is significant. So when I think of this portfolio relative to the size of the market, we can be significantly bigger and still have tremendous opportunities to generate alpha. But I'll let Smriti talk to some of the benefits of the scale as well.

Yes. I mean one of the things that we've been able to do is go lean on the back of our performance track record, which came without the benefit of scale. And now investors are getting the larger equity base as something that's a real benefit coming straight down to the bottom line. I still think there's a lot of sense for the company to keep growing. In terms of resilience, in terms of being able to withstand the types of scenarios that we think are coming up in the future. It makes a lot of sense for us to keep growing.

The investment environment, again, it shifts all the time. we might be moving from what we think of as like a beta environment where it was just -- I'm not going to say easy, but you could own mortgages and spreads tighten, then you'd win. Now we're getting in an environment where, yes, you have tighter mortgage spreads. You have to be clever in your portfolio management skills to earn that return.

And having said that, look, our dividend yields are down, right? Like a year ago, you were being have to generate 17% return by the market, and we're down to close to 14%. So that also helps in this situation.

Got it. And then just one more maybe for Rob. We saw the G&A run rate bumped up in the fourth quarter. I'm assuming that has to do with incentive comp. What should we think about the forward run rate here?

Yes, good question. Thanks. You're exactly right. Good performance sometimes leads to increased incentive compensation accruals. And that's exactly what happened in the fourth quarter. As I mentioned in the prepared comments, we are building scale. So we're thinking of our expenses in the 2% of capital range for now. And obviously, as we go through the quarters, we'll give you some updates. We do plan on hiring some additional people, adding to the team and the timing of those hires could impact the run rate.

But that's what we're thinking at the current moment. And then as we grow, I do think we'll have opportunities to hit other layers or levels of scale and reduce a little bit further, but we're not thinking about that immediately in 2026.

Our next question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW.

Just going back to the earlier discussion with Doug on returns. In terms of returns going forward, do you see room for more upside from spread tightening? Or is it really more of a stable dividend, just given the volatility is -- should be more muted going forward?

Yes. I think that when we talk about the spread regime, I'd point you to Page 12, Bose. I think there's a really good case to be made that you can return to a tighter spread regime, much more like we saw throughout the late '90s and into the early 2000s. And it's not just because of the GSEs. It's really -- or they're buying that is, it's really about the backstop and the support from the government that you're potentially getting allows all investors to take more risk. So yes, I think there's -- on a stand-alone basis, the ROEs are compelling. The yield profile that we can garner from this portfolio remains compelling, and there's the potential for significant spread tightening back to that kind of regime.

And then just a follow-up on the GSEs. What do you think happens once the GSEs get closer to that $200 billion cap, do you think it gets extended? Or how do you see their longer-term role in the market?

It certainly seems to be -- I've never seen before tweets from someone like -- or a report from someone like the FHFA or anything like that in history that focused on mortgage spreads, not just mortgage rates but on mortgage spreads. That is a very different thing. And to me, indicates that we are in a unique environment. So to your question, it's hard for me to see how $200 billion is necessarily the cap. I think it could be significantly more. And we know that it can be changed quite easily by the FHFA and/or treasury pretty quickly.

We'll move next to Jason Stewart with Compass Point.

One more follow-up on levered returns. T.J., just so I'm clear, the mid-teens and high teens at 7 and 8x. That's a carry return. It doesn't incorporate this new spread regime moving tighter, correct? And then just a follow-up on that, if you could address when you're thinking about that context of ROEs, how are you thinking about hedging that book?

Great. Yes. To answer your question, yes, that is a carry ROE. It assumes no additional spread tightening. That's absolutely correct. Those numbers that I quoted. And then the second part of your question was thinking about the hedge book. 2 things. One, on the composition of the hedge book, swaps offer a significant amount of carry relative to treasuries by hedging and swaps that is, relative to treasuries.

So 2/3, 1/3 has been our mix roughly for quite some time. I expect. That will be the case to maybe be slightly biased more towards swaps at points, potentially in the 60% to 80% of range as a percent of our total hedge book on the interest rate swap side of things. Interest rate swaps do tend to be a very natural hedge for the portfolio. And when the environment we've talked in the past about the macro factors that impact swaps relative to treasuries. And I think those factors remain supportive of us hedging with interest rate swaps.

In terms of curve positioning, I'll note that our curve position is you'll see it in our scenario analysis, the risk profile slides that are in the deck much closer to home in terms of a little bit less of a steepening bias, Longer term, I do expect we will have a steepening bias in the portfolio. But as the yield curve has kind of found a new equilibrium around these levels, we've found it prudent to allow the portfolio to be more balanced.

Jason, can I just add something just because it seems like there's just a shock value component of this in terms of how much spreads have tightened in the last year, or over the last 2 or 3 years. One of the things I just want to remind everyone is that the environment that we just are coming from that we've just come from is the unusual environment. To see agency MBS spreads at those levels, 150, 160, 180 over treasuries. I mean those are unusual environments. And we have gone out and raise capital and put capital to work. And as I said, we call this a generational opportunity, right?

What we're coming back to is really how things have been for most of the time in the housing finance system. What we're coming back to is a more normal "normal world" where you have some type of native balance sheet that's owning these mortgage assets, acting as a buffer, right? Spreads are now in a much more "normalized" range. And you have the opportunity to earn returns not just from owning MBS versus a hedge, but you have opportunities from relative value.

You can do curve positioning and this idea -- so this is more normal, and we're coming from an unusual environment, okay? So that's a perspective, I think it's -- the unusual environment is "over". But we are just coming back to what we see as a very normalized environment. For the GSEs, a lot of people on this team were there when they were public. We understand and know this structure. To your question about what happens when the $200 million runs out, they can issue debt. They can do lots of things to grow the size of their balance sheet. We know very well how that process works. So for us to be -- to make money in that environment is actually -- there are opportunities for us to do that. So that's something I don't want people to miss out on is that we're just coming back from an unusual period to what is a more normal period.

Good color. I just had one other question. You mentioned corporate development capabilities in your prepared remarks. And I was just wondering if you could elaborate on that and whether that had anything to do with potential policy changes? Or maybe you could just take one more step on that comment.

Absolutely. Yes. Look, I think a big part of delivering scale to shareholders and strategic flexibility to shareholders, we have to have the capability to evaluate all types of opportunities. Dynex has been a company that, over time, we've delivered to shareholders a lot of different clever diversified strategies through the history of the company. And our job is to always have the ability to evaluate those options so that if such options exist and they should be exercised, we're ready to do that, right?

So that is -- that's a big part of thinking more strategically about the balance sheet, about the investment opportunities that we have versus others that come up. All of that is in the spirit of creating options for our shareholders, which I believe is one of the jobs that I have.

[Operator Instructions]

We turn to Eric Hagen with BTIG.

So this emphasis on lower interest rates and lower mortgage rates is very real. I mean do you think this pressure on the Fed to cut rates is good and supportive of the market right now? Do you think it will be effective? And do you think it eventually just creates maybe a situation where there's just more interest rate volatility and the volatility is more one directional anyway?

Sure, Eric. So one of the things we've been ready for, for some time is this idea that there's more and more government intervention in the market, right? And in my prepared remarks, I talked about when you have fewer savers, fewer taxpayers, it's harder to carry the amount of debt that we have in the U.S. and other places in the world. Debt to GDP, et cetera, et cetera.

So it's much -- it's not unusual in these types of situations for their IIb explicit efforts to influence monetary policy and other policy, including what mortgage rates are going to be. So that's not unusual for us. And that's what we've been expecting and that's what we planned for, right? Now how it actually comes to pass in terms of whether it's through personnel changes or whatever else that the actual rate gets pegged or lowered or whatever that is, I don't know.

I mean we can't predict that. But we are prepared for this idea that front-end rates could be influenced by something other than just fundamentals, right? And you guys have heard us talk about this, this idea of fundamentals, technicals, psychology. And now we talk about fundamentals, technicals, psychology and policy. And a lot of times, fundamentals and policy could be divergent. And when you're sitting in that environment, you have to really be ready for a lot of different things.

So just from the perspective of can it happen, we believe there's a high probability of that happening, and we are preparing for that. Will it happen? How it happens? Very hard to tell. And there are benefits, obviously, to the Agency MBS market to the extent that front-end rates are lower, I mean, that makes them more attractive to hold. But that's really not -- we're not counting on that happening for any of our strategies to work out.

I'll let T.J. talk about the mortgage piece because these guys have been really focused on how just having the mortgage rate move independently of other rates, that really creates an interesting dynamic in the portfolio, and these guys have been working on mitigating that risk for some time now.

Sure. Absolutely. Yes. As Smriti mentioned, we have 4 arrows in our analytics quiver: Policy; fundamentals; technicals and psychology. Those are the 4 lenses through which we look at the market. And as we look at each component of the yield curve, we're thinking a lot about, okay, the mortgage rate in isolation, the Fed funds policy rate, SOFR rates in isolation, those sorts of things. So as we isolate those and think about the volatility profile for each component of the yield curve as well as every coupon of the mortgage coupon stack, policy could impact any one of those components. So it's something we spend a lot of time thinking about in terms of our hedge book and the volatility profile of the portfolio.

One of the other pieces here, Eric, is that we've been in an environment where the market sometimes don't know how to price a lot of this uncertainty. And so it's a very -- it ends up looking calm, right? And then when there is some kind of announcement, you have about a volatility right? So it's a very different type of strategy. During the moments of calm, you're able to earn the OAS. You're able to earn sort of like the carry from shorting options. During the moments of volatility, you'd better have enough liquidity, right, to be able to manage yourself through that scenario. So that is another way to think about it.

Sorry, I was going to ask one more just really quickly here. I mean the move for your book value up 4% since year-end, I mean that's a good move, but maybe we expected it to be up a little bit more. I mean has your leverage been stable? And maybe just like the immediate reaction on the back of that 20 or 30 basis points of spread tightening on the back of the announcement. Like how was that -- how did that unfold for you guys?

Yes. Obviously, on an immediate reaction, when book value increases, leverage goes down mathematically, and I mentioned the 7% to 8% kind of range when I discuss the ROEs, and that's generally where we expect this portfolio will land for the better part of the next several quarters as the opportunities arise, we take it up and down from there. So our -- we feel very comfortable that we can earn the kind of spreads that we are seeking to earn and that our shareholders are expecting to support the dividend with these ROEs that leverage between 7% and 8%.

At this time, we have no further signals. I'd like to turn the floor back to our speakers for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you. Thanks, everyone, for joining us today, and we look forward to updating you on our First Quarter Results in April.

This concludes today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at this time.

Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Lacey, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Dynex Capital Inc. Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I would now like to turn the conference over to Alison Griffin, VP of Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. The press release associated with today's call was issued and filed with the SEC this morning, October 20, 2025. You may view the press release on the website, dynexcapital.com, as well as on the SEC's website at sec.gov.

Before we begin, we wish to remind you that this conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words believe, expect, forecast, anticipate, estimate, project, plan and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. The company's actual results and timing of certain events could differ considerably from those projected and/or contemplated by those forward-looking statements as a result of unforeseen external factors or risks.

For additional information on these factors or risks, please refer to our disclosures filed with the SEC, which may be found on the Dynex website under Investor as well as on the SEC's website. This conference call is being broadcast live over the Internet with a streaming slide presentation, which can be found through the webcast link on the website. The slide presentation may also be referenced under quarterly reports on the Investor Center page.

Joining me on the call today are Byron Boston, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer; Smriti Popenoe, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President; Rob Colligan, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer; and T.J. Connelly, Chief Investment Officer.

I now have the pleasure of turning the call over to Smriti.

Thank you, Alison. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We continue to execute our strategy to build a resilient company at the intersection of capital markets and housing finance. We believe in the long-term shareholder value creation potential of our differentiated platform, investing in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities managed with Dynex's through-the-cycle mindset, risk discipline, liquidity and capital management expertise. Our offering is unique, and our strategy continues to generate strong returns.

Year-to-date shareholder returns were 20% as of last Friday's close, 23% over the last year. In the last 3 years, our shareholders have seen returns of nearly 72% with dividends reinvested in Dynex. Our total economic return of 10.3% for the quarter and 11.5% year-to-date reflect the disciplined management of the generational opportunity in Agency RMBS we have been talking about since 2022. Keeping book value stable, we have paid out a substantial dividend.

Agency RMBS spreads continue to offer returns to support our growth and investment strategy. The strong investment environment fueled capital raising, and we crossed another milestone, our common equity market cap is now above $1.8 billion as we continue to broaden the scope of individuals who trust us with their savings and institutions who trust us with their capital.

The operating environment remains highly complex. The global economy is vulnerable to persistent inflation as geopolitics shape investment at the national level. In the U.S., we are still parsing through tariff-related price shocks, a labor market slowdown and a government shutdown. Risk assets, especially equities, have shrugged off most of these concerns. We are watching for quick shifts in market sentiment as trends in the fundamental economy become more clear. The Federal Reserve appears committed to bringing rates down to more neutral levels and even so the uncertainty in the rate path is significant. T.J. will go into more detail during his comments.

Our principles of holding liquidity and investing in liquid assets are highly appropriate for this environment. I'll say a word about private credit markets. At Dynex, we have always taken the view that total system risk is like a balloon. You squeeze it on one end, and it shows up somewhere else. The private credit market is a reflection of this. The U.S. economy is highly financialized and operates on a great deal of leverage being available. In the private credit sector, much of that leverage is hidden in funds that do not mark to market like Dynex. Sometimes it's not even possible to get a mark or sell those assets. Even as cracks in this market develops, we are prepared for surprises that could prove much more persistent than they have at similar points in other cycles in history.

As I've emphasized, our growth is deliberate, it's anchored and strategy, opportunistic investing and focused value creation. The team is operating with preparedness, discipline and tactical agility, our results are a direct outcome of that approach. I remain focused on strengthening our market position and expanding our ability to capture future opportunities.

Rob and T.J. will now give you further details on the quarter and the outlook. I'll turn it over to Rob.

Thank you, Smriti. Good morning, and welcome to everyone joining us today. To start, our net interest income continues to trend upward as we add new investments with attractive yields to our portfolio and in the current market, swaps add to the carry value of our investments.

It's important to note that this quarter's net interest income does not include the impact of the FOMC rate cut in September, and we expect the rate cut will add a tailwind to net interest margin in the fourth quarter.

Second, we have been discussing a raise-and-deploy strategy all year. Pools and TBAs we've held and added this year have greatly benefited from the spread tightening experienced in the third quarter. We had over $130 million of gains on our portfolio in the third quarter alone. T.J. will go into more detail on our portfolio during his comments.

Third, this year, we've raised new capital, $254 million in the quarter and $776 million year-to-date. Our stock has performed well, allowing us to continue to raise capital at a premium to book value, which is accretive to our shareholders.

Growing our capital base is an important part of our long-term strategy to build a strong and resilient company, structured to deliver compelling returns for shareholders over all economic cycles. Our portfolio is larger, 10% larger since the end of the second quarter, and has grown over 50% larger since the beginning of the year. While our portfolio has grown, we continue to focus on disciplined risk management and liquidity to weather future volatility. Our liquidity at quarter end was over $1 billion and was over 50% of total equity.

Lastly, we are opening up an office in New York City. This new location will allow us to attract important talent in trading and portfolio management positions as well as being physically closer to many of our business partners for an important part of our current and future success. We look forward to being in New York while maintaining Glen Allen, Virginia as the company's headquarters. Both locations will be strategically important to us as we build a solid foundation for the future of Dynex Capital.

With that, I'll turn the call over to T.J. for his comments.

Thank you, Rob. Entering the quarter, Agency mortgages offered wide spreads to treasuries and interest rate swaps. We maintained one of our highest exposure levels in recent years to capitalize on these high-quality yields. Implied volatility started to decline early in the quarter as markets got more comfortable with the policy outlook. Nominal spreads remain wide though, and we continue to raise and deploy more capital.

As Rob noted, we raised $254 million in new common equity capital in the third quarter, bringing the year-to-date new capital growth to $776 million. We've raised and deployed capital at levels well above the average share price and price-to-book ratios during the quarter.

As I noted last quarter, we carried a deliberate bias towards lower coupons, which we believe are poised to outperform, especially when mortgage rates declined even just modestly. By mid-September, mortgage rates hit the lowest levels of the last year. The Agency current coupon yield declined from nearly 5.75% to nearly 5%. That was enough to generate a sharp increase in the refinance index as many high-quality borrowers briefly saw 6.25% or lower [ note ] point 30-year fixed rate mortgages, and mortgage bankers started to issue adjustable rate mortgages with even lower note rates.

We've discussed in previous calls that prepayment speeds could be very responsive given the technological investments many mortgage bankers had made. And indeed, the latest report may only mark the beginning of this trend. Security selection in the specified pool market remains a source of potential alpha and the dislocations created by this latest prepay wave are proving to offer opportunities for us. September's prepayment report, released just over a week ago, showed fast prepayments for higher-coupon mortgages. And we expect that most of the increase in speeds won't be seen until the October report due in early November.

Of course, with faster prepayments comes an acceleration in gross supply as borrowers take out new lower-loan-rate mortgages. Markets ultimately clear based on net supply of new mortgage production, which we expect to remain muted with the housing market flow for at least the next few quarters. But gross supply matters in the short term, as investors react differently with respect to the timing of prepayments. Moreover, prepayments shift the composition of the market across coupons.

Late in the quarter, as refis increased, we saw more supply in coupons like 4.5% and 5%. And with many segments of 5.5% and even 6% pools notably cheaper, we had a slight bias to move back up in coupon to take advantage of the dislocation.

Longer term, we expect there will be growing opportunities across the mortgage market as the policy environment evolves. While specific policies are likely still to be developed, the regulatory tone from Washington is towards policy that supports housing and a liquid market for mortgages, both residential and commercial.

Longer term, the supply outlook for Agency RMBS could evolve more favorably. The volume of loans that are guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac has fallen slightly in 2025. Production of Ginnie Mae and non-QM MBS backed by loans ineligible for Agency MBS securitization have grown relative to that of Fannie and Freddie. And while policy directives from the Federal Housing Finance Agency have been fluid, the initial policy shifts under the current administration tilted towards reducing the GSE footprint with actions like the elimination of special credit programs.

Overall, the longer-term outlook favors tighter agency mortgage spreads, and the potential for developing opportunities outside of Agency RMBS looks increasingly interesting. For now, credit spreads remain tight, while Agency spreads remain notably wide relative to their own history and most credit products. We are watching for more potential cracks in consumer credit. Auto loan delinquencies, for instance, are starting to creep higher. And with labor markets showing hints of weakness, we are watching the consumer closely.

We observed that most private and public credit markets offer very little, if any, margin of safety for weaker credit performance. That makes Agency paper look very attractive for many traditional fixed income investors and new investors that may realize the value in liquid assets after carrying too much exposure to private credit. Agency securities continue to offer strong risk-adjusted returns. As investors realize the potential returns in Agency RMBS, we expect that spreads will compress.

We also increased our exposure to Agency CMBS, modestly in the last quarter as that sector lagged the performance of RMBS. Over time, we expect to increase our exposure to Agency CMBS relative to RMBS as RMBS spreads tighten.

Today's portfolio remains extremely attractive. Our shareholders gain exposure to a cheap asset class and a unique platform in which to leverage these assets.

Thank you for your focus on our work. I will now turn the call over to Byron Boston.

Thank you, T.J., and good morning to all. I want to make just one very important point. As significant shareholders, the executive team stays focused on durable shareholder-first decisions. Dependable yield is front and center, and Dynex's disciplined approach supports a competitive dividend.

And on that note, I'm going to turn it back over to Smriti for final comments.

Thanks, Byron. As the quarter came to a close, Rob and I increased our personal investments in the company, strengthening our alignment with shareholders through the purchase of additional shares. I'm genuinely excited about what the future holds for Dynex and look forward to updating you all again on our progress in January.

That ends our prepared remarks, and I'll turn it over to the operator to build the Q&A pipeline.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Bose George.

Actually, first question, I just wanted to ask about where you see incremental spreads and current ROEs? And how that compares to the ROE that's implied in your current dividend?

Bose, it's T.J. The ROEs in Agency RMBS remain in the high teens, net of hedging costs. And really, you can get to growth in the mid-20s on a large percentage of the coupon stack.

And that -- in terms of leverage, does that kind of imply your current leverage? Or yes, is that kind of the implied leverage in that number?

Yes. At the current levels, it would be right around the mid-teens -- mid- to high-teens numbers.

Okay. Great. And then can we get an update on book value quarter-to-date?

Yes. Estimated $12.71, net of the dividend accrual as of Friday's close.

Your next question comes from the line of Doug Harter with UBS.

T.J., in your prepared remarks, you talked about still seeing mortgage spreads as wide relative to their history. I guess when we look at it, spreads are kind of closer to or slightly tighter than their long-run average. So just hoping you could kind of flesh out that comment and kind of what measure you're looking at to come to that conclusion?

Yes. The spread -- if you look at them just versus certain components of the treasury curve, I could certainly see what you're talking about there, Bose. However -- sorry, Doug. I'd say, versus interest rate swaps, though, if you look at them versus interest rate swaps, mortgage spreads are still in that top quartile of the widest levels we've seen over the long term.

Got it. And then I guess just on that, how are you thinking about swap spreads here? What could be any catalyst to get them to change and risk of kind of moving against you?

Yes. We continue to see the federal deficit as a major factor. We've talked a lot about that in the past. Certainly, as treasury supply increases relative to expectations, and that's an important construct that we think about it relative to expectations, which are obviously very high for treasury supply at this point. To the extent that you were to outperform those expectations, you were to see treasury supply come in more than expected, then spreads could certainly go more negative.

It's important to note, though, that at today's spread levels, you have a nice buffer there, right? So we can withstand some more negative swap spreads and still earn that carry over time. And that's really the beauty of this model with permanent capital and holding the kind of liquidity that we do that we're able to hold on to these positions and ultimately capture that spread is -- I think it's really the best vehicle in which to do that.

Your next question comes from the line of Trevor Cranston with JMP Securities.

You guys talked a little bit about the supply side of the equation for Agencies over the next year or so. Can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing on the demand side of things? And in particular, I'm curious, it looks like the GSEs grew their balance sheets or retained portfolios a bit in the third quarter. I'm curious what you think about the potential for the GSEs as a player on the demand side of things going forward?

Yes. Absolutely, that is a source of potential marginal demand that we have not seen in a long time. Their monthly reports show that things have been kind of status quo for the last, let's say, well, several years.

I think GSE holdings of Agency MBS could certainly increase. So far, their activity looks much like it has for the last several years, but they have the capacity to add as much as $450 billion under the current stock purchase agreements with treasury, and they only hold about $194 billion. So it's a massive amount of potential. I see it as -- I don't think it's a very high probability, we see them use all of that capacity, but it's certainly one of the levers that this administration can pull to impact housing markets.

Got it. Okay. And then on the...

Your other point -- I'm sorry, I didn't get to all of your -- I just focused on the GSEs there. I'll just touch on the supply-and-demand outlook broadly, on the demand side, in particular, from the other major institutions. Bank deposit growth should continue to support demand. We're continuing to see solid deposit growth. The banks have been relatively quiet since the first quarter. I suspect that they'll be back in a reasonably big way, especially in the first quarter of 2026. Institutional investors, foreign governments, I continue to see them as net sellers of a small amount of mortgages.

And then domestic bond funds and annuities have continued to see very strong performance. Last week, it was actually one of the strongest weeks of inflows that we've seen in domestic bond funds in some time. So those are solid marginal source of demand.

And lastly, the mortgage REIT community. We continue to be a preferred method at least of some of the top mortgage REITs out there. I think we are the preferred manager of mortgages on a levered basis in the marketplace, and we are a marginal source of demand, too.

So overall, I think there's plenty of moving parts. It's created some nice opportunities for us on the demand front as the sort different sources of demand just kind of ebb and flow and create a little bit more volatility in spreads.

Yes. Okay. That's helpful. And on the hedging side of things, with the implied volatility coming down, it looks like your option position increased a little bit this quarter. But is there any real sort of impact on how you guys are thinking about the hedging strategy overall with the lower volatility priced in right now?

Yes. When vol is lower, that is what we spend a lot of time thinking about where should we look to repurchase some of the options that were inherently short in a levered mortgage position. And there are pockets of cheap volatility, we continue to look at those, and you can see the positions that we've added modestly in the third quarter. So I think it's -- that remains a deep and liquid market. It's a great way for us to continue to stabilize the duration of our portfolio.

I think also I'd add there, Trevor, just the macro thought process, looking at what the distribution of outcomes could be and the market seems to be cutting some tails out of the process. And when that type of opportunity exists, we really think long and hard about protecting our shareholders in these outsized tail events. And when that protection looks cheap, we tend to jump in and make those types of decisions.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Hagen with BTIG.

Just following up on this volatility market kind of theme. I mean, why do you think the market has shrugged off all these themes, which would maybe ordinarily kind of drive more volatility, especially over these last few weeks? I mean, does that change the way that you think about the range for MBS spreads more holistically right now?

So at a big picture, I think there have been events that have narrowed sort of the market's opinion of what the outcomes could be, right? So there's more certainty, and even the passage of time gives us more certainty. So policy-wise, we're sitting here with the Fed looking like they're firmly committed to some level of eases over the next two to three meetings. You've also seen a lot of policy outcomes from the administration, becoming more clear, right? So I think the market has reacted to that.

But one of the things that does happen is there's a short-term focus for the markets. And in our long-term way of thinking and just recognizing everything that we talk about in the global environment, demographics, migration, geopolitics, all of that, that doesn't take away the probability for tail events, right? There's also like massive amounts of liquidity still available in the markets that are driving asset flows that are affecting options prices, right?

So as we look at the fundamentals, the technicals, the psychology, we're evaluating the whole picture, we like the idea of buying out-of-the-money protection here because there's some -- the environment isn't as calm as it looks. That's kind of our opinion. So that's the thought process.

I mean, the market has shrugged off a lot. I think there's one particular sector in the market that's driving a lot of the thought process, and that's the advent of AI. But the rest of the economy still exists. They're still vulnerable to shocks. And that part -- that is really what we -- how we think about.

And as you know, the big money in this sector gets lost or made during periods of extreme volatility, and so we have to think about those scenarios. And even if they're a low probability, we have to be ready. And we think about when protection is cheap, we're doing that thought process.

T.J., did you have anything else to add on that?

No, I think that's -- the critical part there is that you're constantly preparing for the unexpected when you run this kind of portfolio. That is what we do. In some ways, I don't know the answer to your question, why has the market shrugged things off. We're preparing for the day when the markets start to react in a big way.

And you're seeing some little things that are pointing in that direction, right? Like you're seeing a few things that aren't going potentially as well. So these are just indicators of the vulnerability. Yes.

Totally. Always appreciate your thoughtful responses. You guys noted the expectation for faster speeds. And so as you guys do reinvest that, do you feel like there's opportunities to pick up alpha like within the coupon stack? Or are you pretty much driven into the current coupon in order to support your return on capital? Or is there really like more flexibility to pick spots?

Great question. I think, that has been something we've identified as a potential source of alpha for several quarters now, not just taking what the current coupon gives you, not acting like the largest index kind of player. And we had that deliberate lower coupon bias, and that was very, very strategic and intentional for the last several quarters. I think it's really starting to pay off.

So yes, you're right. As we reinvest some of the paydowns on the book, the opportunities across the capital -- across the coupon stack are tremendous. And that's the great part about our size. We are at a great scale and can continue to grow while not being so large that we can't move outside the current coupon and remain very nimble.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, there are no further questions. I would like to turn the call over to Smriti Popenoe, Co-CEO and President, for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for your time and attention. I look forward to updating you all again in January. We'll now close the call.

This concludes today's call. You may disconnect.