Draegerwerk Aktienkurs
Insights zu Draegerwerk
Insights
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Ist Draegerwerk eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.930 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 1,44 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 3,51 Mrd. €
Marktkapitalisierung = 1,44 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 3,69 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 1,37 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 3,51 Mrd. €
Enterprise Value = 1,37 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 3,69 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
Draegerwerk Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
12 Analysten haben eine Draegerwerk Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
12 Analysten haben eine Draegerwerk Prognose abgegeben:
Beta Draegerwerk Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
APR
30
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor 2 Monaten
|
|
MÄR
24
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 3 Monaten
|
|
OKT
29
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
JUL
29
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 11 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
Draegerwerk — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Drägerwerk Q1 2026 Earnings Call. I am Sandra, the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] And the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it is my pleasure to hand over to Stefan Drager, CEO. Please go ahead, sir.
Hello. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our conference call on our financial results for the first 3 months of 2026. I have with me today Gert-Hartwig Lescow, CFO; as well as Tom Fischler and Nikolaus Hammerschmidt, both Investor Relations.
We would like to take you through the results of the presentation that we made available on our web page this morning. Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your questions.
Let's get started on Page 5 with the business highlights. With continued good demand, positive net sales development and significantly improved profitability, we delivered a strong business performance in the first 3 months of 2026. Order intake rose to around EUR 865 million, while net sales came back to growth at around EUR 756 million. Thanks to the good operating business, the improved gross margin and lower expenses, our EBIT increased significantly to roughly EUR 18 million, lifting our EBIT margin to 2.4% for the first quarter.
As a result of the good earnings performance, our free cash flow rose considerably to more than EUR 44 million. As communicated 2 weeks ago, we confirm our guidance. I will come back to this in our outlook at the end of the presentation. The next week, we are hosting our Annual Shareholders' Meeting and will propose a higher dividend to our shareholders, the third consecutive increase for 3 years. This shows the good progress we have achieved in our developing the business and improving our profitability.
With that, I turn over to Gert-Hartwig for a review of the financials. Gert-Hartwig, please.
Thank you, Stefan, and welcome, everyone. Please turn to Page 7 for a group overview. As usual, all growth rates are quoted on a currency-adjusted basis. As Stefan Drager said, we continue to see good demand for our technology for life. Thanks to the Medical division and Germany, in particular, our order intake rose by more than 3%. Net sales increased by around 7%, driven by both divisions. The slight decline in APAC was clearly overcompensated by the positive development in the other regions, particularly the Americas.
Our gross margin declined by 0.5 percentage points to 46.3%, supported by the improvement in the Medical division, which more than offset the slight decline in the Safety division. Nominally, functional expenses fell by 0.8% due to the strengthening of the euro. At constant currency, expenses would have increased by 1.7%.
The growth was also influenced by a onetime payment to employees in Germany under collective agreement in the prior year. If we exclude this base effect, expenses would have increased nominally by some 2.4%, still below the growth rate of net sales. Due to the good top line and the lower expenses, our EBIT rose significantly from EUR 0.4 million to EUR 17.9 million.
Consequently, our EBIT margin increased from 0.1% to 2.4%. Finally, our rolling 12 months DVA improved considerably by roughly EUR 68 million to around EUR 106 million. Let us now take a closer look at the development of the Medical division on Page 8.
Order intake grew by more than 5% to around EUR 480 million, thanks to a higher demand for nearly all product areas and services. In Germany, orders were significantly up, mainly due to stronger demand for therapy devices and hospital infrastructure systems. The other regions also developed favorably.
Looking forward, please keep in mind that there will be substantial base effects in order entry in Q2 since last year in April, we received a major order in the mid-double-digit million euro range from Mexico, which will not repeat. Net sales in the past quarter rose by more than 5% to around EUR 480 million, particularly driven by strong growth in the Americas, which was mainly attributable to higher revenues from anesthesia machines and services.
EMEA and Germany also contributed to growth, while APAC recorded a slight decline. Our gross margin expanded by around 2 percentage points from roughly 44% due to a good product mix and higher capacity utilization in production and despite the negative currency effect. Functional expenses rose by around 3%, mainly due to higher personnel expenses driven by a higher headcount in the sales region.
Our EBIT in the Medical division increased significantly from minus EUR 27.7 million to minus EUR 18.5 million, lifting the EBIT margin from minus 6.7% to minus 4.4%. Our rolling 12-month DVA improved significantly too by roughly EUR 53 million to around minus EUR 14 million.
I will now turn to our Safety division. We are on Page 9. Order intake rose by 1.2%, thanks to a high demand for occupational health and safety equipment, gas detection and services. In Germany, orders increased significantly, which, in addition to the reasons mentioned was primarily attributable to strong demand for engineered solutions, mainly orders from defense customers.
The Americas region also recorded growth, while volume in the EMEA and APAC regions declined. Net sales rose significantly by roughly 9%, driven by considerable growth in Germany, EMEA and the Americas. Net sales in the APAC region were below the prior year level. Our gross margin fell by 1.4 percentage points to around 49%.
The main reasons for this were the lower profitability due to the product mix and negative currency effects. Functional expenses were 0.2% below the prior year level, particularly due to lower R&D expenses. Our EBIT in the Safety division increased significantly from around EUR 28 million to around EUR 36 million, lifting margin from roughly 9% to around 11%. Rolling 12-months DVA improved by roughly EUR 15 million to around EUR 120 million.
Let's move on to the development of our cash flow and other key figures on to Slide 10. In the first 3 months, we significantly improved the operating cash flow by around EUR 6 million to roughly EUR 62 million. In addition to the increase in earnings, this was mainly due to effective working capital management, especially better development of trade receivables. Higher operating cash flow as well as lower investment outflow led to an improved free cash flow by around EUR 12 million.
Going forward, we expect free cash flow to continue to develop positively. Looking at our net financial debt, we had a significant reduction by around EUR 56 million to around EUR 85 million. The reason for this was the increase in cash and cash equivalents due to the strong free cash flow. As a result, the already healthy ratio of our net financial debt to EBITDA further improved to 0.2.
At the beginning of the first quarter, we repaid a maturing note loan in the amount of EUR 50 million with own liquidity. Our 12-month rolling return on capital employed rose from 11.5% to 15.2%. This was due to the higher EBIT in the past 3 quarters. At around EUR 745 million, net working capital was around 7% higher than in the prior year. Our equity ratio as of March 31 stood at around 52%, slightly above the year-end level of 2025.
Now I hand back to Stefan Drager for our outlook on Page 12.
Ladies and gentlemen, Q1 was a strong quarter for Dräger. Our good order development makes us optimistic about the further course of business this year. Regarding the U.S. tariffs and the war against Iran, we continue to expect similar impact from tariffs like in 2025, and we do not see any material impact on our business from the war so far.
Therefore, we continue to expect net sales growth of 1% to 5% and 2% to 6% net of currency effect and an EBIT margin of 5% to 7.5%.
With this, I would like to end the presentation and hand over to the operator to open the floor for your questions, please.
[Operator Instructions] It seems that we have no questions. Back over to you, Mr. Drager, for any closing remarks.
Well, let's wait just one more second if there is a question coming. Last chance, any questions? Please ask them either now or join us next week at our Annual General Meeting for the Shareholders.
There are still no questions, gentlemen.
Yes. Well, then thank you very much for joining us today, for your interest in Dräger, and have a pleasant afternoon and get in a good way into the next month into May this coming weekend. Thank you and bye-bye.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Draegerwerk — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Solides Q1: Umsatz- und Cash-Erholung, EBIT deutlich verbessert; Guidance bestätigt und Dividende vorgeschlagen.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: €756 Mio. (+~7% währungsbereinigt)
- Aufträge: €865 Mio. (+>3% währungsbereinigt)
- EBIT: €17,9 Mio.; EBIT (Ergebnis vor Zinsen und Steuern) deutlich verbessert (Vj. €0,4 Mio.)
- EBIT‑Marge: 2,4% (Vj. 0,1%)
- Free Cash Flow: >€44 Mio.; Nettofinanzverschuldung reduziert auf ~€85 Mio.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Guidance: Management bestätigt die Jahresprognose trotz guter Q1‑Performance.
- Kapitalpolitik: Vorschlag für eine dritte Dividendensteigerung in Folge als Signal für verbesserte Profitabilität und Cash‑Generierung.
- Operative Schwerpunkte: Fokus auf Profitabilitätssteigerung, Working‑Capital‑Verbesserung und weiteres Schuldenabbau; Medical‑Auftragseingang stark, Safety mit guter Margenentwicklung.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Umsatzprognose: Wachstum 1%–5% (2%–6% netto Währungseffekt).
- Margenziel: EBIT‑Marge 5%–7,5% für das Geschäftsjahr.
- Risiken: Keine wesentlichen Effekte aus dem Iran‑Konflikt; US‑Zölle wie 2025 erwartet; in Q2 wirkt ein hoher Vergleichsauftrag aus Mexiko dämpfend.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Q1 zeigt klare operative Erholung: Umsatzwachstum, spürbare Margenverbesserung und deutlich besserer Free Cash Flow. Die Bestätigung der Guidance und die Dividendenerhöhung signalisieren Managementvertrauen, aber die aktuelle EBIT‑Marge liegt noch unter dem Jahresziel — das Fortsetzen der Kosten‑ und Kapitaleffizienz bleibt entscheidend. Beobachten: Q2‑Basiseffekt, Währung und Zölle.
Draegerwerk — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Drägerwerk Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. I'm Moritz, your Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] The conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Stefan Drager, CEO. Please go ahead, sir.
Very good afternoon, and thank you for joining our conference call on our financial results for the fiscal year 2025. I have with me today Gert-Hartwig Lescow, CFO, as well as Tom Fischler and Nikolaus Hammerschmidt, both Investor Relations. We would like to take you through the results with the presentation that we made available on our web page this morning. Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your question.
Let's get started on Page 5 with the business highlights. In 2025, we continued our successful course and generated the highest net sales in our company's history. Both divisions and all regions contributed to this. At around EUR 3.5 billion, net sales were slightly above our last forecast and around EUR 25 million above the level of the exceptionally strong coronavirus year 2020. Unlike during the pandemic, this is a new record that we achieved entirely without a special economic situation. Thanks to the operating momentum, our earnings before interest and taxes also developed very well. EBIT rose by more than 20% to around EUR 233 million despite difficult conditions. The EBIT margin increased by roughly 1 percentage point to 6.7%, also exceeding our last forecast. This shows that we are making progress in improving our profitability.
Order intake also developed very well as with net sales, both divisions contributed to growth. This underlines the continuing demand for our Technology for Life and gives us a positive outlook for the future. Positive is also the key word with regard to our cash flow development, which Gert-Hartwig Lescow will explain later. We have also performed well on the stock market. Last year, our common shares rose by more than 1/3, while our preferred shares even increased by almost half and were included in the TecDAX. This means that we are once again one of the 30 largest listed technology companies in Germany. This listing increases our visibility on the capital market and could make us even more attractive to investors.
In mid-January, we published our preliminary business figures for 2025 and our forecast for 2026. Our shares then rose significantly again and reached their highest level since July 2017. This shows that investor confidence in Dräger is higher than it has been for a long time. Our first goal remains to increase profitability such that our EBIT margin is the same as the last digit of the calendar year as we have more goals that are strategic to steer the company. We are strengthening our innovative power and expanding our competence in the systems business and further expanding our services and recurring business.
In our Medical division, we are particularly driving forward the marketing of network solutions. To this end, we launched a large marketing campaign in 2025. Our goal is to strengthen Dräger's position as the leading provider of connected solutions in the hospital sector. That said, we are also launching a big wave of SDC-based solutions. That is service oriented device connectivity, the new standard for interoperability of medical devices according to IEEE 11073. It creates new functionalities and therefore, added value. With our new Silent Care Package, for example, we contribute to solving one of the biggest problems in the ICU by reducing the alarm noises.
In the Safety division, connectivity is becoming more important, too. Our fire ground monitoring system, for example, helped us to win the Paris Fire Department as a new customer in 2025. Speaking of firefighting, we also received the important approval for our PSS AirBoss SCBA, in North America, reaching a milestone for strengthening our position in this key market. In addition to our core business, we are consistently investing in new business opportunities in areas such as clean tech and defense. Last year, our defense business grew significantly. We are well on track to triple our defense sales to more than EUR 300 million by 2028.
I will talk about the other highlights on the past fiscal year, the dividend and the outlook at the end of our presentation. I would first like to explain in more detail on Page 6, what challenges we had to overcome last year. So Page 6, headwind compensated. Ladies and gentlemen, 2025 was a very successful year, particularly in light of the difficult condition. In 2024, we have benefited from positive one-off effects from the sale of a nonstrategic business activity that was the smoke and fire alarm systems in the Netherlands and some real estate loss in the United States. This has boosted our EBIT by around EUR 22 million. In the past year, we missed these effects and also faced strong headwinds from tariffs and currency. The tariffs imposed by the U.S. government had a negative impact of roughly EUR 26 million on our EBIT. Around EUR 21 million out of this was attributable to the Medical division and around EUR 5 million to the Safety division.
In addition, EBIT was impacted by currency effects initiated from the White House and propagated over the world totaling to around EUR 45 million. Thereof, EUR 28 million were attributable to the Medical division and around EUR 16 million to the Safety division. So overall, we had to compensate opposing effects of more than EUR 90 million. The fact that we even overcompensated these effects is a clear proof of our resilience. We were, therefore, able to improve our profitability even under difficult conditions.
Let's take a look at the margin development of recent years on Page 7. Following the significant loss in '22, we have shifted our focus from net sales growth to earnings growth. We have thus set ourselves the goal of increasing our EBIT margin by an average of 1 percentage point per year from 2024. The focus on profitability in accordance with our corporate objective #1 has worked well so far. After the strong turnaround in '23, we were able to improve our EBIT margin by roughly 1 percentage point in both '24 and '25. While positive one-off effects, in particular, contributed to the improvement in '24, the improvement in '25 came mainly from the operating business. This is a development that we very much welcome. And we have our strategic, our corporate objective 2 is innovation and our corporate objective 3 is systems business and recurring business.
Now I would like to hand over to Gert-Hartwig to explain our business development further. I will then turn back with the dividend and the outlook. Gert-Hartwig?
Thank you, Stefan. I would also like to extend a warm welcome to everyone joining this conference call for our results for the fiscal year 2025. Please turn to Page 6 for a view on the Dräger Group. As usual, I will be stating currency-adjusted figures, and I will be referring to growth rates. As Stefan mentioned, demand for our Technology for Life remains strong. Overall, orders increased by 7.7% to around EUR 3.6 billion. In Q4, orders rose by 5.6%. Both divisions contributed to growth in both reporting periods. Net sales climbed by 5.3% in the full year and by 8.7% in the fourth quarter. This was due to good development in both divisions and all regions. Like for orders, the Americas region and the EMEA region were the biggest growth drivers. At around EUR 3.5 billion, net sales -- reached 2025, the highest level in the company's history. In addition to the high order intake, this was mainly due to the strong year-end business.
Benefiting from the record net sales in December and the margin improvement in the Medical division, our group's gross margin rose slightly by 0.3 percentage points to 45.2% in the full year. Functional expenses rose by 4.6% in 2025 after they had been positively impacted by one-off effects of around EUR 32 million in the prior year. These effects included the net sale of a nonstrategic business in the Netherlands and the sale of real estate in Spain and the U.S. Excluding these one-off effects, the increase in functional expenses in 2025 was only 2.5%. This increase is attributable to higher personnel expenses, which went up due to collective wage increases in Germany and higher number of employees, among other things. Despite the missing positive one-off effects in '24 and the negative currency and tariff effect in '25, our EBIT increased by more than 20% to around EUR 233 million.
Consequently, our EBIT margin rose from 5.8% to 6.7%. The mentioned headwinds were overcompensated by the high order intake, the strong net sales momentum and the improved gross margin. In addition, the strong year-end business contributed to the resilient development. Our EBIT improved by around 37% in the fourth quarter, while the EBIT margin declined to 13.7% from 10.6% in that period. The full year EBIT development is in line with our medium-term goal to increase the EBIT margin by 1 percentage point per annum on average. Guided 2026 EBIT margin includes an additional margin improvement on the higher end of the guidance range. The result of the strong increase in earnings, our DVA in 2025 improved by roughly EUR 36 million to around EUR 9 million.
Let us now take a closer look at the development of the 2 divisions, starting with the Medical division on Page 10. Following a slight increase in the prior year, our order intake in the Medical division rose by roughly 9% in 2025. This was primarily due to the high demand for our anesthesia machines, ventilator services and consumables. In addition, we received a major multiyear order for hospital infrastructure systems for Mexico, which significantly supported the above-average growth in the Americas region. Demand also developed positively in the other regions, particularly EMEA. In the fourth quarter, order intake rose by 2.2% as the decline in APAC and EMEA was overcompensated by significant growth in Americas and a high demand in Germany. Driven by growth in all regions, net sales in the Medical division increased by 7.4% in 2025 after decline in the prior year. In Q4, net sales rose by 13%, thanks to considerable growth in EMEA, Americas and Germany.
Net sales in the APAC region were around 3% below the prior year level. Our gross margin in the division rose by 0.6 percentage points to 43.6%. The negative currency and tariff effects were overcompensated by the favorable product and country mix. In Q4, on the other hand, the gross margin decreased by 0.6 percentage points due to higher inventory write-downs. Functional expenses climbed by 5.7% in 2025, having been positively impacted in the prior year by one-off effects of around EUR 15 million from the sale of real estate and the adjustment of the product. Without these effects, the increase in 2025 amounted to only 3.7% with higher personnel expenses being the main cause. The EBIT of the Medical division doubled to EUR 57 million after a decline in the prior year. Consequently, the EBIT margin rose from 1.5% to 2.9%. In Q4, the EBIT increased significantly to by around 40% to roughly EUR 80 million, thanks to the strong year-end business. As a result of the strong increase in earnings, our DVA in the Medical division improved considerably in 2025 from around minus EUR 50 million to minus EUR 23 million.
I will now turn to our Safety division, which delivered another good performance. We are now on Page 11. Our Safety business continues to grow. Order intake rose by more than 6% in 2025. This was primarily due to the high demand for engineered solutions and gas detection devices. In addition, respiratory and personal protection products as well as alcohol and drug testing devices contributed. The EMEA and Americas regions recorded a significant increase in orders, while the APAC region also developed positively. In Germany, demand declined after we had received a major order for NBC protection filters in the prior year. However, industrial demand in Germany is also generally restrained at present. Net sales increased by 2.6% in the fiscal year, driven by positive development in the EMEA and APAC regions. In Germany, net sales were roughly on par with the prior year, while the Americas recorded a decline. In Q4, net sales rose by just under 3% as the decline in the Americas and Germany was overcompensated by the growth in EMEA and APAC.
Our gross margin in the division remained stable at 47.3% in 2025 with the negative currency and tariff effects being offset by the more favorable product mix and price adjustments. In Q4, the gross margin slightly decreased by 0.2 percentage points. Functional expenses went up by roughly 3%, having been positively impacted from the prior year by one-off effects of around EUR 17 million from the sale of a nonstrategic business area and from the sale of real estate. Excluding these effects, functional expenses fell by 0.4%. The capitalization of development costs led to a reduction in functional expenses in the reporting year. The EBIT of the Safety division increased in 2025 by 6.4% to around EUR 176 million, while the EBIT margin rose from 11.3% to 11.9%. In Q4, the EBIT climbed by around 33% to roughly EUR 77 million as a result of the strong year-end business. The EBIT margin also improved significantly by 4 percentage points to 16.5%. Our DVA in Safety division increased by around EUR 9 million to around EUR 113 million, coming from around EUR 104 million in the prior year. All in all, a very positive development in our Safety business.
Let's move on to some key ratios on Page 12. Thanks to the strong growth in earnings, our cash flow from operating activities improved significantly by around EUR 71 million to around EUR 238 million in 2025. At the same time, outflow from investing activities rose from just under EUR 55 million to around EUR 98 million. Among other things, this was due to a supplier loan granted and the purchase of further shares in an investment. Moreover, the sale of our fire alarm systems business in the Netherlands and the sale of the property in the U.S. have led to a considerable inflow in 2024. All in all, our free cash flow amounted to around EUR 140 million, which is a considerable improvement of around EUR 60 million compared to the prior year. Since free cash flow was on par with net profit, the cash conversion rate amounted to 100%, the level we also expect for the current year. As a result of the decrease in free cash flow, cash and cash equivalents rose significantly by about EUR 22 million to EUR 282 million. This led to a considerable decline in net financial debt by around 25% to EUR 123 million.
That said, the ratio of net financial debt to EBITDA declined from 0.5 to 0.3, keeping our leverage at a very healthy level. With regard to net financial debt, we expect the figure to increase in the current year. A large distribution center is currently being built in Lübeck where we intend to consolidate various logistics warehouses in the future. Dräger will rent the property on a long-term basis, which under IFRS results in a higher lease liability. This, together with higher investments is in turn a key driver for the higher expected net debt in 2026 with an increase of around 4% to EUR 1.7 million capital employed -- EUR 1.7 billion capital employed rose much lower than our EBIT. Therefore, our 12 months return on capital employed went up from 12.1% to 14.2%. Net working capital was around 2% higher than in the prior year at around EUR 755 million. Due to the good business development, in particular, our equity ratio stood at around 52% as of December 31, coming from roughly 50% at the end of the prior year.
Let's take a closer look at our EPS on Page 13. With the increase in earnings since 2022 that Stefan Drager mentioned at the beginning of his presentation, our EPS has also improved continuously over the past years, coming from around minus EUR 3.50 per share in 2022, earnings per common share climbed to more than EUR 7.40 in 2025. At the same time, earnings per preferred share rose from around minus EUR 3.40 to roughly EUR 7.50 per share. Again, this clearly underlines the progress we are making in improving our profitability.
Now I hand back to Stefan Drager for the outlook, starting with our dividend proposal on Page 14.
Thank you, Gert-Hartwig. Well, in line with our dividend policy, we intend to distribute around 30% of our net profit to our shareholders. Since our net profit has increased significantly, we will also increase the dividend significantly again for the third time in a row since 2023. We intend to propose a dividend of EUR 2.21 per common share and EUR 2.27 per preferred share for our Annual Shareholders Meeting in May. Our equity ratio is clearly over 50%. Provided that the equity situation remains as positive as it is now, we will continue to distribute at least 30% of our net profit in the coming years.
That said, let's move on to our outlook for 2026 on Page 15. Ladies and gentlemen, with good demand, record sales and significantly improved earnings, 2025 was a very successful year. This is even more apparent when you consider the headwind from a difficult economic environment. Our operating business is showing good momentum. Both order intake and order backlog are at a high level. We, therefore, want to increase net sales again in the current fiscal year. In 2026, we expect an increase in net sales from 2% to 6% of net of currency effects at an EBIT margin between 5% and 7.5%. Both divisions are likely to contribute to net sales growth and a positive EBIT. We will continue to counter the U.S. import tariffs by raising prices. In the past fiscal year, we developed a package of measures to compensate for some of the customs duties.
We expect this compensation to be more effective during the course of the 2026 fiscal year than before. For '26, we expect the level of custom duties at group level to be similar to the prior year overall. The burns in the Medical division are likely to be significantly higher than in the Safety division where we have more possibilities to concentrate and forward with improved prices. The corporate planning, therefore, the net sales and EBIT forecast for '26 are based on the assumption that custom duties will remain at the level of the reporting date for the annual financial statements. However, when we recall the Greenland discussion over a certain weekend in this spring, this is not guaranteed and it motivates us to further pursue increased profitability to be able to live through the challenges and uncertainties.
When it comes to the war in Iran, we do not see any material impact on our business so far. We are present in the Middle East with our own Dräger people in Saudi Arabia and Dubai. Our local employees are doing well so far. In general, the region remains a growth market for us. Risks from the war depend heavily on its duration and regional extent and its impact on the global economy. We are able to mitigate this through our high level of diversification. We are very broadly positioned in terms of markets, products, geographies, business mechanics and customers. This strengthens our resilience and gives us a positive outlook to the future. With this, I would like to end the presentation and hand over to the operator to open the floor for your questions.
[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Oliver Reinberg from Kepler Cheuvreux.
2. Question Answer
Firstly, just on the Middle East situation as you just confirmed that you don't expect any kind of larger impact. Can you just confirm that there's also not any kind of expected impact from the developments basically in terms of supply chains and inflation? That would be question number one.
Secondly, can you just provide an update on the ventilation market? We have seen quite some changes basically with Mindray -- I am sorry, with Medtronic and Bayer actually exiting the market. And I think Mindray is now entering in the U.S. market. I mean it's also a high base. Do you continue to expect actually significant growth in this market segment? Any update on the developments here would be helpful?
And then thirdly, as you called out corporate objective #3 to increase the kind of recurring business at Dräger, can you just provide some kind of flavor where do you stand these days percentage-wise? And any kind of targets that you can share in that regard?
Well, on the Middle East, yes, I confirm that we do not see a material impact of the war on our business at the moment in the foreseeable future. Including the supply chain, there is no -- not to our knowledge, a significant impact on any specific component of production that we can see so far. We have taken some measures in the past to work with our suppliers more carefully with whom we work and have some reasonable stocking levels for our inventory for components. So we, of course, cannot compensate for all seasonal effects, and we will remain interdependent from the world and the supply chain. However, I confirm there is no impact that we can see from the current conflict in the Middle East. What I do see though is that the energy prices will remain worldwide on the current level and not return to the level they were like 6 weeks ago, including the electricity gas and fuel at the gas station. However, our sensitivity to energy in real is quite limited. So that has no material effect on our outlook and prognosis.
Your second question, Mr. Reinberg, on the ventilation. So yes, there are 2 major players have exited the market. And, yes, Mindray is there. We, on the other hand, we do not see a significant effect or even, I would say, threat from Mindray having a more comprehensive offer in the U.S. Where we see more and we see they are more active is in Africa in remote regions where they have also political -- Chinese government has political influence in financing some of the African governments or very obvious direct influence and control on government and purchasing decisions. There, we are out. On the more developed markets I won't say it is a significant new development or a threat. On a global scale, yes, it is a good copy of Dräger with similar offerings and a similar portfolio on both the geographical scale and portfolio. So it is a very viable market companion, not only on ventilation, but in many modalities to watch geographically mostly in Africa.
Your question on our corporate objective #3, which is developing the business model further from transaction-based device selling towards interoperability and systems business competence and actually doing, including recurring businesses, services based on contracts instead of transactions. Yes, we can say that last year, we crossed the EUR 1 billion threshold in services and some countries in Europe, our sales, the majority already is in services more than in devices, including our home market in Germany, but some other European countries as well, services sales is greater than devices.
And can you share any kind of targets like where you want to go with this kind of offering?
Yes, the goal is to grow this further as it is a good way to defend our business over a business that is purely on cost like some of the business mentioned from Mindray in Africa where the decision is not alone, they have a larger share of mind, they are more deeply entrenched with the customer in offering the service. It is -- we have a better understanding of the customer needs and it's more challenging to replace the assets on a pure device that is -- the trend is that it may become a commodity.
And the next question comes from Harald Hof from mwb research.
As we talked about the Iran conflict already, just 2 questions left from my side. The first one is talking about the tariffs. The situation has changed significantly. So what does this mean for Dräger? And will you apply for reimbursements? And the second question is how has the defense activities developed so far in 2026.
Happy to. So firstly, there is a couple of developments firstly, the court decided that the tariffs that the Trump administration has put in place is not legal. And we have, in fact, also filed for a reimbursement. As of today, it is open, how fast the courts will decide and when or if we will in fact be paid out. And secondly...
It's not part of the plan.
It's not part of the plan at this point. So if there was a significant payment that would be upside, so to speak and the signals have been mixed, how quickly that can happen. I think you've read the news, to courts as far as I remember, have decided they are not allowed to delay it, but so far, nothing has happened. So there is a chance that we can recollect some of our tariffs. Having said that, given that the previous tariffs have been declared illegal, the Trump administration has put in place another set of tariffs which are a little bit lower by 5 percentage points, but there are in fact for full year instead just 2/3 of the year.
And if that is -- when those run out after 150 days, there are other potential tariffs to be enacted the one that may run. The so-called Section 122 tariffs may be replaced by Section 301 and Section 222 and we would expect that, that will actually take place in the second half of the year. So when it comes to effective tariff burden, we still assume that they will remain in place. And as we have seen earlier this year, and as Stefan Drager pointed out, sometimes, there is even a discussion about additional Greenland tariffs or not. But so far, we expect actual tariff burn to be of the same magnitude as last year.
Okay. And your other question on the defense business. Well, in general, we benefit in both divisions. The medical also benefits if there is the need, for instance, to additionally serve 1,500 wounded soldiers that come per day from the Eastern front. They're currently preparing and planning for that needs capacity in the German hospital system or the field hospitals or hospital war ships. But that is regular medical equipment. But we say we would not directly classify that as defense business. What we do call such is part of the safety portfolio that can be specific products for personal protection like the classical gas mask for a soldier or gas detection equipment, filters for military vehicles to protect those who protect us in our freedom to operate our democracy. And last year, around the same time of the year, we predicted that would actually more than triple until the year 2028 to approximately EUR 300 million. Well, already last year, we saw a good development, and we crossed the EUR 100 million threshold with these elements of the portfolio. And we confirm that we think in 2028, it can be EUR 300 million because there are quite some opportunities out there.
Just a quick follow-up. When talking about tariff reimbursement, do you communicate volume? How much is the figure that could be reimbursed?
We communicated that we paid the EUR 26 million.
That's actually the net effect. So to the degree that it will be the net effect, it will be in that order. The gross effect is in turn higher runs around EUR 30 million, and that would be the impact if we get full reimbursement without the need to pass on anything to customers in that context. And as I said, at this point, we view that as perhaps not speculative, but we have not received a clear indication that we should account for that in the near future. But we'll keep you posted, obviously, when that situation changes.
And the next question comes from Pierre-Yves Gauthier from AlphaValue.
My question relates to your capital spending. You had quite a big surge in '25. Is that likely to last? Or is it some sort of a bump that we will not see in '26, '27?
The part of the higher investment are due to a loan, which actually has to be accounted for to one of our suppliers, which have to be accounted for under IFRS as an investment. I'm not sure whether that is -- that actually was one of the reasons for the bump. And that we do not expect in '26 nor later. We do, however, as I pointed out in the presentation, have to account for an investment for a rental agreement. Again, that's due to the statement. So all in, we expect an increase in the investment volume from around EUR 103 million to EUR 110 million to EUR 130 million. And the substantial portion is, in fact, the long-term rental agreement, which is as these things are not cash effective for the full amount in the period of '26, but over the course of the rental agreement.
And we do have a follow-up question from Oliver Reinberg from Kepler Cheuvreux.
Three, if I may. One on China. Can you just provide an update what you see there on the ground? I mean, it's not a huge market, but any kind of pickup would be helpful to just get the latest dynamics here. Secondly, I think Q1 nearly comes to an end. Any kind of light you can share how you started into the year? And then last question, just on currencies. I mean, if -- I think in the last call, we guided for quite a significant impact. If currencies stay where they currently are, can you just give us any kind of flavor what kind of isolated margin impact you have?
I can -- Stefan speaking. I can pick the start in '26, where we started with a good order backlog after the order intake at the fourth quarter was also very good. And so with this, we had a good start in '26 and the order intake and sales at this moment is according to our expectations and planning. So it's on the way to deliver on our forecast and prognosis.
And with regards to the FX development, in addition to the headwind that we had in '25, we overall see a further deterioration, but not by another similar amount. Our currency headwind when we look at net sales is around 1 percentage point. And when it comes to the EBIT margin, it's between 30 to 60 basis points.
I think Mr. Reinberg, this is important to figure in when you compare our actual '25 result, in particular, the EBIT margin and the prognosis for '26 because the prognosis for '26 and the whole planning for '26 is based on less favorable exchange rates. So if these develop and they would be the same as last year's actual exchange rates, then the outcome, of course, would be better than the current forecast and prognosis. But it's -- from our perspective, not safe to assume that it would be the same. So we have our best guess included into the planning. And that is the major reason if you wonder why our forecast does not show a stronger improvement because our goal is to improve our profitability by 1 percentage point per year. So on average, that is unchanged.
China?
Yes, China, we didn't touch China. There is no relevant news on that. That is relatively stable and continues to be on a much lower level than it used to.
[Operator Instructions] So it looks like there are no further questions. So I would like to turn the conference back over to Stefan Drager for any closing remarks.
We thank you very much for all of you being with us today during our annual results conference for '25. Thank you for your questions and the interaction. We look forward to meeting you again either online or preferably at some point in time in the not-too-distant future in person. Have a pleasant afternoon and evening.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now concluded, and you may disconnect. Thank you for joining, and have a pleasant day. Goodbye.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Draegerwerk — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Dräger schließt 2025 mit Rekordumsatz und spürbarer Margenverbesserung, gibt konservative 2026-Guidance bei anhaltenden Tarif‑ und Währungsrisiken.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: EUR 3,5 Mrd. (+5,3% YoY) – höchster Jahresumsatz der Firmengeschichte.
- Auftragseingang: EUR 3,6 Mrd. (+7,7% YoY), Q4 +5,6%.
- EBIT: EUR 233 Mio. (+>20% YoY) (Ergebnis vor Zinsen und Steuern).
- EBIT‑Marge: 6,7% (+≈1 Prozentpunkt YoY), Ziel: ~+1 PP p.a.
- Free Cash Flow: EUR ~140 Mio.; operative CF EUR ~238 Mio.; Nettofinanzverschuldung gesunken auf EUR 123 Mio. (‑25%).
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Profitabilität: Fokus auf Margensteigerung (+1 PP p.a. Ziel), Verbesserung v.a. operativ in 2025.
- Services & Systeme: Ausbau wiederkehrender Umsätze und Systemkompetenz – Services über EUR 1 Mrd.; in einigen Ländern Services > Geräte.
- Konnektivität & Produkte: Medical: SDC‑Lösungen (Service‑oriented Device Connectivity, IEEE 11073), Silent Care; Safety: NA‑Zulassung für PSS AirBoss SCBA und Paris‑Feuerwehr‑Gewinn.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Umsatzprognose 2026: +2% bis +6% (währungsbereinigt).
- Margenrahmen: EBIT‑Marge 5,0%–7,5% (Guidance konservativ wegen FX und Zöllen).
- Tarife & Währung: Erwartete Zolleffekte auf Vorjahresniveau; FX‑Headwind ≈ ‑1 PP Umsatz, EBIT ‑30–‑60 Basispunkte möglich.
- Investitionen: CapEx/Investitionen erwart. EUR 110–130 Mio.; neuer Logistikstandort erhöht bilanziell Leasingverpflichtungen → höherer Nettoschuldenstand 2026 erwartet.
- Dividende: Vorschlag EUR 2,21 (Inhaberaktien) / EUR 2,27 (Vorzugsaktien), Ausschüttungsquote ≈30%.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Mittlerer Osten & Supply Chain: Management sieht bislang keinen materiellen Versorgungseffekt; erhöhte Energierechnungen werden als nicht maßgeblich für Prognose eingestuft.
- Beatmungsmarkt/Konkurrenz: Wettbewerber wie Mindray aktiver in Schwellenmärkten (v.a. Afrika); in entwickelten Märkten kein akuter Marktanteils‑Schock erwartet.
- Zölle & Erstattungen: Antrag auf Zollrückerstattung gestellt; potenzieller Nettoeffekt ~EUR 26 Mio. wurde bisher nicht in Prognose berücksichtigt.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Schlussfolgerung: Solide operative Erholung: Rekordumsatz, deutliches EBIT‑Wachstum und höhere Dividende stärken das Aktienbild; Guidance bleibt bewusst konservativ wegen anhaltender Zölle, FX‑Risiken und geopolitischer Unsicherheiten. Strukturwachstum (Services, Systeme, Defense) reduziert mittelfristig Risiko und verbessert Ertragsqualität.
Draegerwerk — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Q3 2025 Earnings Conference Call. I am Mattilde, the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] The conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast.
At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Stefan Drager, CEO. Please go ahead.
Yes. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our conference call on our financial results for the first 9 months of 2025. I have with me today Gert-Hartwig, CFO; as well as Tom Fischler and Nikolaus Hammerschmidt, both Investor Relations.
I would like to take you through the results of the presentation that we made available on our web page this morning. Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your questions. Let's get started on Page 5 with the business highlights. With a significant increase in orders, noticeable growth in sales and very good earnings, we delivered a strong business performance in the first 9 months of 2025.
Despite difficult economic conditions, demand for our Technology for Life rose to around EUR 2.6 billion. The last time we had such a high order intake after 3 quarters was in our record year 2020. Growth was driven by both divisions and all. The same is true for net sales, which increased to around EUR 2.3 billion.
Earnings before interest and taxes almost reached the prior year level at around EUR 77 million despite the positive one-off effects mentioned above in the prior year. As a reminder, last year, we had divested a non-core business in the Netherlands and unused property in the United States and a building in Spain, totaling around EUR 30 million in one-off effects. Similar effects are missing this year.
In addition, this year, we need to compensate for some quite strong headwinds, currencies and tariffs had a substantial negative impact on our earnings. So without these headwinds, our EBIT would have been significantly above the prior year level.
Our business in the third quarter made a substantial contribution to the strong overall performance in the first 9 months. Net sales were significantly above the prior year level in Q3, while EBIT more than doubled.
In addition to our top line, we were able to improve our operating cash flow in the first 9 months with a considerable increase by more than EUR 35 million to around EUR 93 million. This development has also been recognized by investors. Until the publication of our preliminary figures, our preferred shares had already increased by around 44% year-to-date.
On the day after the publication, they rose by 12%, resulting in an increase of around 63% in the current year. Our common shares have shown strong performance as well with an increase of around 41% year-to-date.
Ladies and gentlemen, as communicated 2 weeks ago, we now expect the net sales growth and the EBIT margin in the upper half of our forecast range. I'll come back to our outlook at the end of our presentation.
With that, I turn over to Gert-Hartwig for a review of the financials. Gert-Hartwig, please.
Thank you, Stefan, and welcome, everyone.
Please turn to Page 7 for a group overview. As usual, all growth rates are quoted on a currency-adjusted basis. As Stefan Drager said, we continue to see strong demand for our Technology for Life in both divisions in all regions. Order intake rose by 9% to around EUR 2.6 billion in the first 9 months of '25.
The Americas led the growth with an increase of around 19%, followed by EMEA and APAC. In Germany, the order volume was slightly above the prior year level. In the third quarter, orders grew by roughly 7% as the slight decline in Germany and APAC was more than offset by an increase in the other regions.
Our net sales development has further accelerated in Q2. We are well on track to compensate for the slow start in the year caused by some supply chain disruptions. Net sales rose by more than 10% in the third quarter. In the first 9 months, they increased by roughly 4% to around EUR 2.3 billion.
All divisions and regions contributed to growth in the respective reporting periods. The positive development in the third quarter was driven in particular by a significant increase in the EMEA and Americas regions.
I'll comment on that when we get to the divisions. Our gross profit margin increased by 0.7 percentage points in the first 9 months to 45.1% despite currency headwinds and higher tariffs. The margin improvement was strong in the Medical division than in the Safety division.
Operating costs rose only moderately, reflecting disciplined expense management. Our functional expenses increased around 6% in the first 9 months, but mainly driven by the absence of last year's EUR 30 million one-off income.
Excluding the positive one-off effects mentioned above, the cost increase amounted to 2.4% in the first 9 months and to 1.5% in the third quarter.
In nominal terms, however, functional expenses were on a slight decline in Q3. Due to the only moderate increased costs and the significant growth in net sales, we more than doubled our EBIT to around EUR 57 million in Q3, coming from around EUR 24 million in the prior year quarter, which had been still supported by the positive one-time effects amounting to EUR 10 million in the quarter.
Our EBIT margin rose from 3.6% at 3.1% to 6.8%, strong earnings performance in the quarter. Over the first 9 months, EBIT came in at around 3% margin, slightly below last year's EUR 80 million and a 3.5% margin. Again, the positive one-off effects from the prior year are now missing.
In addition, headwinds from currencies and tariffs strained our EBIT as the euro appreciated sharply against key trading currencies. Carefully monitor the development of foreign currencies and manage risks proactively through hedging and price adjustments. Having said that, FX still had a negative impact of roughly EUR 22 million on EBIT. Our operating performance improved year-on-year, and that improvement nearly but not fully offset the absence of one-offs and the FX and tariff drag; thus, our EBIT declined slightly.
Finally, our rolling 12-month EBITDA improved significantly from roughly EUR 30 million to around EUR 49 million.
Let us now take a closer look at on Page 8. We grew order intake by almost 12% to around EUR 1.5 billion in the first 9 months of 2025, driven by high demand for ventilators, anesthesia machines, services, and consumables. In the second quarter, mid-double-digit million euro order for hospital infrastructure from hospital further powered our growth in the Americas. But even without this large order, demand in the Medical division rose year-on-year. In the third quarter, order intake in the Medical division increased by more than 5%.
The decline in APAC was compensated for by the significant growth in EMEA and by the positive development in the other regions. Thanks to EMEA and the Americas, in particular, net sales rose significantly by more than 10% in the third quarter after a slight decline in the prior year period.
Looking at the first 9 months, net sales increased by around 5% to EUR 1.3 billion, driven by all regions. In APAC, growth was driven mainly by EMEA and China, with business development somewhat uneven in China. After solid growth in the first 6 months, demand has cooled considerably in the third quarter. Although the resolution of our Q1 supply chain problems had a positive impact in Q3 as expected, these effects were offset by the overall weak business in China, resulting in a decline in net sales compared to the prior year quarter.
Our gross margin expanded by nearly 3 percentage points in Q3 and by 1.1 percentage points in the first 9 months, thanks to a favorable product and country mix and lower quality expenses from field actions.
Functional expenses rose by 6% in the first 9 months of 2025 and by roughly 8% in the third quarter. Excluding the proportionate positive one-off effects from the sale of real estate in the prior year, the increase amounted to roughly 4% in the first 9 months and also in the third quarter. Earnings in Medical returned to positive territory in Q3 as we are making progress in improving the profitability in the division.
Our EBIT grew considerably from minus EUR 4 million to plus EUR 11 million, lifting the EBIT margin from minus 0.9% to 0.3%. For the first 9 months, EBIT amounted to around minus EUR 23 million after around minus EUR 28 million in the prior year period. As mentioned before, one-off effects in the prior year's period played a role. Our rolling 12-month EBITDA improved significantly by around EUR 22 million to around minus EUR 45 million.
I will now turn to our Safety division on Page 9. In the first 9 months, order intake rose by roughly 6%, driven by gas detection, respiratory and personal protection products, and Engineered Solutions. Orders for occupational health and safety normalized after last year's large order for NBC Protective filters, leading to a lower demand in Germany. EMEA and the Americas delivered strong double-digit order growth, while APAC remained almost stable.
After a somewhat slower development in the second quarter, order intake accelerated in Q3 with orders rising by roughly 9%. In addition to the significant increase in EMEA and the Americas, growth in APAC also contributed to this development. Q3 net sales rose significantly by roughly 10%, driven by EMEA and the Americas in particular. The first 9 months, net sales increased by more than 2%, thanks to growth in all regions. That said, our safety business is back on track after slight weakness in Q2. Our gross margin expanded by 1 percentage point in Q3 and was stable in the first 9 months, thanks to a favorable product mix.
Functional expenses rose about 5% in the first 9 months. This was mainly due to other operating income in the prior year period from the sale of our fire alarm systems business in the Netherlands and the sale of real estate. Higher marketing expenses also had a negative impact on function costs. Excluding the other operating income of the prior year period, functional expenses decreased slightly by 0.3% in the first 9 months of the year and by 2.4% in the third quarter. So good expense management and safety.
Q3 EBIT improved significantly to roughly EUR 46 million after EUR 28 million in the prior year quarter. The EBIT margin increased to 12.6%. After the first 9 months, the EBIT came to just under EUR 100 million, down from EUR 108 million. The EBIT margin was just below 10%. Rolling 12-month EBITDA decreased slightly by roughly EUR 3 million to around EUR 94 million, coming from EUR 97 million in the prior year. That concludes the Safety division revenue.
Let's move on to the development of our cash flow and other key figures on to Slide 10. In the first 9 months, we significantly improved operating cash flow by around EUR 35 million to roughly EUR 93 million. This was mainly due to effective working capital management, especially better development of trade receivables, trade payables and other liabilities. Outflows from investing activities more than tripled from EUR 2 million to about EUR 76 million, resulting in a free cash flow of around EUR 17 million after around EUR 35 million.
Among other things, the significant increase in outflow was due to a base effect in the prior year, the sale of our fire alarm systems business in the Netherlands and the sale of the property in the U.S. led to a considerable inflow, which is now missing. On the other hand, Drager added an investment to one of its holdings in the first quarter of 2025, which has contributed to a higher outflow year-to-date.
Looking at our net financial debt, we had modest reduction, keeping our leverage at a healthy 0.7 net financial debt to EBITDA. Our 12-month return on capital employed rose from 10.9% to 12%. This was due to the significant increase in our rolling 12-month EBIT, which was much stronger than the increase in capital employed.
The considerable growth of our rolling 12-month EBIT resulted from the good performance in the fourth quarter of '24, which had delivered much higher earnings compared to Q4 '23. Net working capital was around 3% higher than in the prior year at around EUR 21 million. Our equity ratio as of September 30 stood at nearly 50%, remaining at the year-end level of 2024. Now I hand back to Stefan Dr ger for our outlook on Page 12.
Ladies and gentlemen, Q3 was a strong quarter for Drager. Our excellent order development and the increasing sales momentum make us optimistic about the further growth of the business for this year. Therefore, we now expect the upper half of our previous guidance. We now expect net sales growth of 3.0% to 5.0% net of currency effects and an EBIT margin of 4.5% to 6.5%.
EBIT is now expected to be in the range of EUR 10 million to EUR 18 million so far, business development during the year has given us a good basis to reach our targets. We start in the most important quarter of this year with our typical seasonality. In the next coming weeks, we will remain focused on execution to deliver on our promises. With this, I would like to end the presentation and hand over to the operator to open the line for your questions, please.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Oliver Reinberg from Kepler Cheuvreux.
2. Question Answer
I would have 3 and probably take them one by one, if possible. The first one would be on the ventilation market, if you just can discuss the dynamics there. I mean I assume the whole industry has benefited from the exit of Bayer, GE and Medtronic. There have been some kind of voices who claim that Tania and Hamilton have gained most from these kind of changes and Dr gerwerk somewhat less. I mean I assume everyone has seen significant growth.
I was just trying to get a kind of feeling, do you feel that's fair? Or do you believe you have captured your kind of fair share in this kind of market development? And also to what extent if we move into next year, is that kind of challenging base effect? Or will this kind of market consolidation support further growth next year? That would be question number one, please.
Yes. This is Stefan answering your question, Mr. So, I believe all the market participants that are still there, they get a fair share, including ourselves of the opportunities that come from the withdrawal of the 3 players. And so, for me, I couldn't understand why they made this withdrawal these 3 players and I see that for the times to come, very beneficial to be in the market.
As you know, we have the longest tradition and experience and the greatest production capacity for all players as we invented the ventilator in 1907, my great, great grandfather this. And I still see it for the future as very beneficial to be in there. And I see that both Mr. Hammerschmidt and myself, we address our customers personally the video message to let them know that we will be there at their side in the future.
So, it's not a secret. For Hamilton, it's a challenge because although it's a U.S.-owned company, operations are based in [Biel/Bienne] in Switzerland, the tariffs for the U.S. are 39%. So that led to some extra effort to cope with that, that we don't have. So, it's beneficial for other European ventilator manufacturers, including the one in Sweden.
That makes sense. And do you believe you can still grow from this kind of base next year? Or is that a kind of demanding base, of which we would expect to kind of decline?
No, I would not expect a decline. I think the overall market has still opportunities and room for growth, as the medical technology and environment, the general positive trends they are still there and continue. So, despite maybe some single countries drop out, the global trend is still there.
Super. That's helpful. The second question is just on supply chain. I mean, there's obviously the kind of discussion on Nexperia, the kind of Dutch company where the conflict with China, I think, largely people focus on the automotive industry, but I think they're also a major supplier for chips for the Medtech industry. I'm just wondering, is there any kind of risk factor that you face here in particular as we move into the kind of Q4 now?
Not a big effect. We do use some of these chips, but only to a small extent. And we have larger inventory that we keep on stock as the automotive people do. And from what we can see, luckily, these are used for applications that are not so regulatory dependent. So it's easier to replace and there are alternative suppliers. So we may see some smaller effect, but not in Q4, maybe in the next year.
That's super. That's reassuring. And then the last question, obviously, it's a bit too early for next year. But just to get any kind of flavor, we are making nice margin progress in 2025. At the midpoint, we would probably run 50 basis points ahead of the kind of normalized run rates toward a 10% EBIT margin in 2030. I'm just wondering, looking at the pulls and pushes for next year, I mean, is there any reason why you should be below the kind of 6% EBIT margin, which would be implied by this run rate for next year? And in particular, can you provide any kind of color what incremental margin headwinds you expect from currency next year, please?
So I'll give you the first part we keep reiterating. So the business cannot be judged by the quarter. So it can always be a bad quarter that does not mean that the worst is bad. And the same holds true if we have a very good quarter like. So if we look at the figures and analyze where we are, then we see we had an exceptionally good margin in the Q3. And so in addition, we had an exceptionally good margin in Q4 last year. So if we go back on an average margin for this coming Q4, then there is a reason to assume that it is not so extraordinary, then you might probably speak at the first glance.
And going back to the margin to normal, that's partially fueled because there are some large tender businesses that start delivering in this current quarter. So it's better to be a little bit cautious with the forecast and development of the future. The effect of the currency, I hand over to Gert-Hartwig.
Yes, there will be given current average rates, there will be an additional FX headwind. We are in the final steps of finalizing planning and currency adjustments, but it's possibly in the range of another percentage point margin. We will provide more clarity on that with the publication of our guidance for '26.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Virendra Chauhan from AlphaValue.
So for now, just one question around your margins. So Q3 was fairly strong margin. And like you pointed out in your notes as well as presentation that it came from the strong net sales growth that you saw in this quarter. Now, of course, the sales growth guidance as well being upgraded, is there a chance that we see a similar year-on-year margin expansion in Q4 as well, because Q4 of last year was also very strong, I think close to 12%, if I remember correctly. So that's my question around your EBIT margin, please.
As I just explained on the question from [Indiscernible] Q3 was a very good margin that resulted from a favorable mix of the products in the portfolio. And it is safe to assume that will normalize and decline slightly for the Q4 and for the future. And also keep in mind that Q4 in 2024 was also a very good margin if you compare the quarters.
So keep that in mind and think about this so should not be overoptimistic for the good margin to persist. As I said in, we do not think in quarters because in single quarter can always be a little bit up or down versus the others. So we, as much as we appreciate the current good result and the general outlook on the single quarter and the margin, I expect that for the Q4, there could be a slight decline.
The EBIT margin overall that is more the focus that is as we said in our guidance, the upper end of the previous guidance. And it is in line with what we said earlier that we strive for a continuous improvement of the EBIT margin that should be about the same figure as the calendar year. So for this year, it's 25 that we said that already a couple of years ago, then it should be plus/minus 5%. And again, 2026, you can think about the ballpark figure of 6%.
Sorry, maybe can I just ask one more question. So on your connected care launch, the silent ICU that you had talked about on the previous call, and it was scheduled to be launched in H2 '25. So I had 2 bits on that. One is what is your early customer feedback? What is that? And then secondly, when do you expect in terms of a time line that this entire project or focus could translate into meaningful revenue generation for the firm?
The customer feedback from the ICU projects, it's very excited. So we are very happy to observe that, and we look very much forward to taking off. We just this we started our marketing campaign where we took the horn more explicitly for this approach. And so I expect that from the next year on, that can be effect to the business from these kind of projects.
We now have a question from the line of Jean-Marc Mueller from JMS Invest.
First, I would like to congratulate you on a very good Q3 results. Quickly on Q4. I mean, you spent quite some time when we spoke about the numbers adjusting them for one-offs. And it's fair to say that in Q4 last year, albeit the numbers was good, it was actually worse by roughly EUR 10 million than what it should have been because you had an impairment charge last year in Q4, right? The underlying number would have been EUR 124 million, not EUR 114 million.
Yes, that is correct.
So when you're now saying that Q4 might be maybe a little weaker than last year, are we talking about adjusted numbers or reported numbers?
There is a range and what we try to emphasize is, and I think you're iterating that, Q4 last year was also operationally a strong quarter. And depending on the delivery and given that it is just by the total number of net sales, there is a higher, if you will, sensitivity to variations in net sales variations. There is a chance that we also get at the lower end when it comes to reported figures even. Not that we are striving for that, but the discussion was just wanted to point out that the Q4 was operationally and also nominally in spite of the charge, a relatively strong quarter.
Yes. Okay. I understand. I understand. And maybe ask a little differently. I mean, it's the most important quarter, I understand that, and it's typically a big number when it comes to full year results. But the range of the guidance is still very wide. I mean we're talking from the lower end to the upper end, we're talking about roughly EUR 70 million EBIT range.
Maybe you can help us a little bit what would need to happen that we really hit the lower end of the range and what has to happen that we get to the upper end of the range?
There is a couple of factors. And obviously, firstly, I mean, let me just, that's not what we're planning forward. I think you're asking what risks, we have seen FX turning against us, and this could certainly be a risk going forward. We do see that in spite of the good development overall, we do see some areas where our business is developing not as nicely, if you will. We talked about China, in particular in the Q3, where we saw a bit of like up. We also see that our safety business, while very robust overall is in Germany, for example, being put under pressure due to the general market trends for the industry.
For the industry. And that s the customer to a chemical industry.
We also see that in the U.S. for different reasons, many customers are reluctant to fully engage in investments. And to the degree that we see some of these risks to materialize over proportionally and perhaps not see the support or a bit of a slowdown in the support, we see a risk that we also get to the low end. But let me also reiterate, we would be disappointed if our margin falls below the 5%. But at this point, we wouldn't rule that out either.
Okay. And the upper end would just be flawless execution of all the projects?
Exactly. Exactly. The flawless execution will clearly lead to the upper end.
But this is what you're good at, no, flawless execution?
Well, you can keep the fingers, the thumbs pressed and I'm sure it will help us.
Say you will get an FX development that for change is not running against us, but in our favor happen.
No, no. I understood. And an add-on question quickly on the cash flow. I mean also Q4 last year, the cash flow was pretty solid despite that the working capital movement in Q4 was actually negative. What should we expect this year? I mean, we obviously, we should still expect a positive free cash flow, I would assume. But the magnitude, I mean, you lowered your investment guidelines. So I would assume that also cash flows in Q4 should be fairly strong. Is this a fair assessment? Or do you see things which will go against the strong cash flow in Q4?
By and large, I would support that, and that leads is in our range of possible net financial debt, we expect in the normal course to be at the lower end, so more positively for us. There is no underlying risk for our Q4 cash flow situation.
[Operator Instructions] We have a follow-up question from the line of Oliver Reinberg from Kepler Cheuvreux.
Probably also two or three. I mean the first question would be on anesthesia. There was some kind of news flow in the industry. Obviously, Jetting now has lined up with Philips. And in fact, also GE has introduced and called out the kind of launch of a new workstation, which is more meaningful apparently. I'm not sure if this is kind of normal industry development? Or is there a certain risk that may provide a kind of headwind for Anesthesia going forward? That would be the first question, please.
I would say that's a normal industry development. There are discussions, say, all the time. And we're also having discussions and that's a normal thing. So we're not afraid of this development.
Right. So when you're also having discussion, that means you also are generally open to more different new ways of distribution. Is that the way to understand that?
That's very correct. And so there are obviously the companies like that do not have certain modalities and they are seeking and contacting the ones that have, because they want to become a full service suppliers. So that's a long development. And that has its pros and cons. And as I said, we are not afraid of this setup.
Okay. Perfect. Understand. And on China, I mean, we've seen an improvement in the first half. Q3 looks like a kind of a larger change to the opposite again. I mean this is larger volatility? Or because you're calling that out, is there any kind of specifics that happened here? And why has it happened if you have any visibility here?
Basically I would say there's nothing new. It's very fragile from where we ended last year. And so far, it's say, stable, but at a modest level. And it's not likely that it comes back to where it was. So, for various reasons.
Understood. And last question, any update on the defense-related demand in Germany in terms of what have you seen so far? Is there any kind of acceleration being seen at the moment?
Please keep in mind that last year in Q1, we received a large order for this last Mask 2000 for the Army of roughly EUR 15 million. And so that obviously did not repeat this year. And despite this not repeating a single order effect from last year, our orders are currently having a double-digit growth of around 25% year-over-year for the defense business. So, it is eventually picking up, and we do expect to receive more than EUR 100 million in orders in the current year.
[Operator Instructions] Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Stefan Drager for any closing remarks.
Thank you very much to all of you that with us today for your time and your interest in here, and we look very much forward to meet you again, hopefully, sometime in person in the future. Have a pleasant afternoon and evening. Goodbye.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call and thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Draegerwerk — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Starkes Q3‑Momentum: Auftragswachstum und deutlich bessere Q3-Margen führen zu Upgrade der Jahresprognose, Währungs- und China-Risiken bleiben.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Auftragseingang: ≈ EUR 2,6 Mrd. (+9% 1–9M 2025, Rekordniveau seit 2020)
- Umsatz: ≈ EUR 2,3 Mrd. (+≈4% 1–9M; Q3: +>10%)
- EBIT (Ergebnis vor Zinsen und Steuern): ≈ EUR 77 Mio. 1–9M; Q3 ≈ EUR 57 Mio., EBIT‑Marge Q3 6,8%
- Cashflow: Operativer Cashflow ≈ EUR 93 Mio. (+≈EUR 35 Mio.) → Free Cashflow ≈ EUR 17 Mio.
- FX‑Einfluss: Negativer Effekt auf EBIT ≈ EUR 22 Mio.; Aktie bevorzugt:+63% YTD (preferred), Stamm:+41% YTD
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Prognoseanpassung: Management erwartet nun Netto‑Umsatzwachstum und EBIT‑Marge in der oberen Hälfte der bestehenden Guidance.
- Marktposition Ventilatoren: Management sieht Vorteile durch Exit einiger Wettbewerber; Dräger fordert, Marktanteile zu sichern und betont Produktionskapazitäten.
- Operationaler Fokus: Disziplin bei Kosten, Hedging/Preismaßnahmen gegen Währungsrisiken und gezielte Investitionen (z. B. Connected Care, ICU‑Projekte).
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Guidance: Netto‑Umsatzwachstum 3,0–5,0% (währungsbereinigt); EBIT‑Marge 4,5–6,5%; absolutes EBIT jetzt erwartbar ≈ EUR 10–18 Mio.
- Risiken: Währungseinfluss könnte 2026 zu ≈1 Prozentpunkt zusätzlichem Margendruck führen; China‑Nachfrage volatil.
- Saisonalität: Q4 ist das wichtigste Quartal; Management warnt vor Normalisierung der außergewöhnlich starken Q3/Q4‑Margen.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Ventilatorenmarkt: Analysten fragten, ob Dräger den Marktanteilsgewinn nach Wettbewerber‑Exits voll realisiert; Management erwartet nachhaltige Chancen, sieht aber Wettbewerbs- und Tarifunterschiede.
- Margen‑Nachhaltigkeit: Kritische Nachfrage zur Persistenz der Q3‑Spitze; Management nennt günstige Mixeffekte, erwartet aber teils Normalisierung und nennt FX als wesentlichen Unsicherheitsfaktor.
- Produktstarts & Supply Chain: Nachfrage nach dem Connected‑Care/„silent ICU“‑Launch (H2‑25) und Chip‑Risiken (z. B. Nexperia) – erstes Kundenfeedback positiv, Chiprisiken derzeit begrenzt dank Lagerhaltung und Alternativlieferanten.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Dräger zeigt in Q3 deutliches operatives Momentum, verbessert Cashflow und hebt Guidance an; positive Marktdynamik (u. a. Ventilatoren) trifft auf spürbare Währungs- und China‑Risiken. Für Aktionäre: kurzfristig positives Signal, mittelfristig hängt die Erfüllung der oberen Guidance‑Spanne von FX‑Entwicklung, Q4‑Execution und Stabilität in China ab.
Draegerwerk — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Q2 2025 Earnings Call. I am George, the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] The conference is being recorded. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Stefan Drager, CEO. Please go ahead.
Yes. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our conference call on our financial results for the first half of 2025. And thank you all for your flexibility for rescheduling the call for 1 hour due to organizational reasons. Thank you for being with us. I have with me today Gert-Hartwig Lescow, CFO; as well as Tom Fischler and Nikolaus Hammerschmidt, both Investor Relations. We would like to take you through the results with the presentation that we made available on our web page this morning. Following the presentation, we will open the floor to your questions.
So let's get started on Page 5 with the business highlights. With stable net results -- stable net sales, and a positive operating results, we achieved a solid business performance in the first half of 2025. At around EUR 1.5 million, net sales were nominally slightly below the prior year level. But adjusted for currency effects, they slightly increased. On the other -- other than in the first half of 2024, growth was driven by the medical division instead of the safety division. Earnings before interest and taxes could not keep up with net sales as our EBIT fell short of the prior year figure at just over EUR 20 million. This was due in particular to the positive one-off effects in the prior year, which are now not repeating. As a reminder, last year, we had divested a noncore business in the Netherlands and an unused lot of land totaling at around EUR 20 million in one-off effects.
Next to these base effects, currency effects and custom duties had a negative impact on earnings. Considering the missing base effects and the substantial headwind from currencies and tariffs, the earnings performance is actually quite good for our typical seasonality. In addition, the order intake makes us confident about the further course of our business for the remainder of the year.
In the first 6 months, demand for our technology for life increased significantly to around EUR 1.7 billion. Despite the difficult economic conditions caused by the U.S. customs policy, we were able to grow order intake in both divisions and all regions and even achieved the highest order intake in its first half year since the record half of 2020. This gives us a good foundation for accelerated net sales growth in the coming months.
In addition to the good demand, we were able to improve our operating cash flow, which came back into positive territory at around EUR 18 million after minus EUR 5 million in the prior year period. The performance of the [indiscernible] shares was successful as well. The price of our common shares rose by more than 1/3 and the price of our preferred shares by more than 40% in the first half of the year. In May, the preferred shares, which are listed in the SDAX were also included in the tech TecDAX. This makes us even more visible to tech investors.
Our goal remains improving profitability. In some cases, this might include the reduction of complexity. Therefore, I would like to share some news regarding our U.S. site in Telford, Pennsylvania and our new Neonatal care business. Neo care is the smallest care area within the business unit therapy and it operates with a rather complex setup since operations divided over 2 sites, Lübeck in Germany and Telford in Pennsylvania in the U.S. due to the reasons of the acquisition of the business from [indiscernible] originally in Hatboro, which is nearby Telford.
So to ensure the long-term success, we have now decided to consolidate the 2 existing sites into 1. This means all related activities will be consolidated in Lübeck by the end of 2026. By bringing both units together into one optimized location, we will improve efficiency, reduce fixed costs and enable stronger platform development while continuing to deliver high-quality solutions to its customers. The U.S. property will be divested.
Ladies and gentlemen, as communicated 2 weeks ago, we confirmed our annual guidance. I will come back to this in our outlook at the end of the presentation.
With that, I turn now over to Gert-Hartwig for a review of the financials. Gert-Hartwig, please.
Thank you, Stefan, and welcome, everyone, to our H1 results call. Let's turn to Page 7 for a group overview. As usual, I would quote all growth rates on a currency-adjusted basis. We continue to see strong demand for our technology for life in both segments and all regions. Order intake rose by more than 10% to over EUR 1.7 billion in the first half of '25. The Americas led the growth with an increase of around 25%, followed by EMEA and APAC. In Germany, the order volume was slightly above the prior year. In the second quarter alone, orders grew by more than 14%, fueled by broad-based momentum in the Americas, EMEA and Germany. Net sales rose by 1.8% in the second quarter after a slight decline in the first quarter.
In the first half of the year, net sales increased by 0.4% to around EUR 1.5 billion. APAC's strong performance and the noticeable increase in Germany offset the declines in EMEA and the Americas. We maintained a 44.8% gross margin as the slight dip in the safety division was fully offset by an increase in the medical division.
Our functional expenses rose around 6% in H1, driven by the absence of last year's EUR 20 million one-off income and a one-off wage agreement payment for employees in Germany. Excluding the positive one-off effects mentioned above, the cost increase amounted to 2.9% in the first half of the year and 1.2% in the second quarter. Our operating result and profitability improved over the course of the year of first half after modest Q1 EBIT -- Q2 EBIT reached EUR 20 million, lifting our EBIT margin from 0.1% in Q1 to 2.6% in Q2.
In the prior year second quarter, however, both figures have been much higher at around EUR 41 million and 5.2%. For the 6-month period, EBIT totaled EUR 20.4 million with a 1.3% EBIT margin, below last year's EBIT of EUR 55.8 million and 3.7% EBIT margin, respectively. Main reason for this decline were the positive one-off effects from the prior year, which are now missing. In addition to these base effects, headwinds from currencies and customs strained as the euro appreciated sharply against key trading currencies. We carefully monitor the development of foreign currencies and manage these risks proactively through hedging and price adjustments. Having said that, FX had a negative impact of roughly EUR 20 million. Finally, our rolling 12-month DVA be treated to around EUR 17 million.
Let's now take a closer look at the development of the medical division on Page 8. We grew order intake by almost 15% to more than EUR 1 billion in the first half of '25, driven by strong demand for ventilators, anesthesia machines, work services and consumers. In Q2, a mid-double-digit million euro multiyear order for hospital infrastructure for Mexico further powered our growth in the Americas. Even without this large order, demand in the medical division rose year-on-year. In the second quarter, order intake in the medical division decreased by around 25%, thanks to significant growth in all regions. Net sales rose by 5% in the second quarter after a significant decline in the first quarter.
Looking at the first 6 months, net sales increased by around 2% to EUR 851 million, mainly driven by APAC and Germany. In APAC, mainly India and China drove our growth. However, growth in the People's Republic cooled down considerably in the second quarter, underscoring market volatility in China. We resolved Q1 supply chain disruption and production is up and running again. We expect sales to accelerate as soon as the current quarter. Despite currency headwinds and higher custom duties, our gross margin expanded by 1.2 percentage points in Q1 and 0.2 percentage points in H1, thanks to a favorable country mix and lower quality expenses from field.
Functional expenses rose by around 5% in the first half of '25 and by around 4% in the second quarter. Excluding the proportionate positive one-off effects from the sale of the property in the U.S., the increase amounted to 4.4% in the first half of the year and 3% in the second quarter. Our Q2 EBIT improved considerably from minus EUR 12.9 million to minus EUR 5.9 million, lifting the EBIT margin from minus 3% to minus 1.4%. For H1, EBIT amounted to around minus EUR 34 million and was therefore significantly below the prior year figure of around minus EUR 24 million. The EBIT margin decreased from minus 2.9% to minus 4%. Our rolling 12-month DVA improved by around EUR 5 million to minus EUR 60 million.
I will now turn to our safety division on Page 9. In H1, order intake rose by more than 4%, driven by engineered solutions, respiratory and personal protection products and gas detection. Orders for occupational health and safety normalized after last year's large order from the German Armed Forces for protective filters. EMEA and the Americas delivered strong double-digit order growth. APAC saw a pull down. In the second quarter, order intake was just under the prior year level with robust single-digit growth in Germany and EMEA, balanced by a decline in the Americas and APAC.
Q2 net sales declined 2% and H1 fell 1.4% as the decline in EMEA and the Americas was not fully offset by growth in Germany and APAC. Our business often has fluctuations of order intake and net sales from one quarter to the next without too much need to read across for the longer-term development. These ups and downs are normal in our business.
For the full year '25, we expect net sales growth in safety over a strong prior year. This requires a further acceleration of order intake in the coming months. Lower net sales and currency headwinds drove a gross margin drop of 1.4 percentage points in the second quarter and 0.2 percentage points in the first 6 months. Functional expenses rose down 8% in H1, mainly reflecting the absence of last year's income from the sale of our fire alarm system business in the Netherlands and higher marketing spend. The strong relative increase in functional expenses in the second quarter is due to the aforementioned base effect. Excluding the extraordinary [indiscernible], the increase in the first half of the year amounted to 0.8% in the second quarter. Functional expenses would have decreased by 1.5%.
Q2 EBIT reached EUR 26 million in the second quarter after roughly EUR 54 million in the prior year quarter. The EBIT margin fell from 15.1% to 7.6%. After the first 6 months, the EBIT came to EUR 54 million, down from EUR 80 million. The EBIT margin was 8.2% after 11.9% in the prior year period. Rolling 12-months DVA decreased significantly by around EUR 21 million to around EUR 77 million, coming from EUR 98 million in the prior year period. That concludes the safety division review. Let's move on to the development of our cash flow and our capital structure on Slide 10.
In H1, we delivered a significant improvement in operating cash flow despite the lower earnings of roughly EUR 18 million coming from an outflow of around minus EUR 5 million in the prior year period. This was mainly due to effective working capital management, especially better development of trade receivables and other liabilities like the cash inflow from FX derivatives. Investing activities used about EUR 60 million in H1 versus [ EUR 11 million ] a year ago, resulting in a free cash flow of around minus EUR 42 million after minus EUR 16 million in the prior year period. We modestly reduced net financial debt, keeping our leverage at a healthy 0.9 net financial debt to EBITDA. Net working capital also remained at the prior year level at around EUR 739 million. Lower rolling 12-month EBIT paired with stable capital employed brought our 12-month return on capital employed to around 9.9%, down from 10.9%. Our equity ratio as of June 30 stood at 49.1%, just slightly below year-end '24 level.
Now I would like to hand back to Stefan Drager for our outlook on Page 12.
Thank you, Gert-Hartwig. Ladies and gentlemen, the good order development and the seasonality of our business give us confidence that we will make up for the shortfall in net sales in the second half of the year. Therefore, we confirm our forecast with net sales growth in the range of 1% to 5% and an EBIT margin between 3.5% and 6.5%. DVA is expected to be in the range of minus EUR 30 million to plus EUR 80 million.
With this, I would like to end the presentation and hand over to the operator to open the line for your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Oliver Reinberg with Kepler Cheuvreux.
2. Question Answer
Oliver Reinberg from Kepler Cheuvreux. First question would be threefold on tariffs. Can you just give us a flavor what kind of impact on earnings you have seen from tariffs in the first half of the year? And also what kind of impact do you expect for the full year? And then the third element to this kind of discussion, can you just update us what you're doing currently in terms of countermeasures? I guess there could be potential surcharges or any kind of discussions with GPOs in the U.S. Any kind of color you could provide on this kind of process would be helpful.
So I'll take the first question. The impact from duties in the first half, which essentially is the second quarter is around EUR 6 million, so in the mid-single digits, if you will. And for the full year, we expect at the now announced 15% tariff as of August 15, we expect an impact of around EUR 25 million.
And can I just ask, is it a kind of gross impact? Or is it net of any kind of potential countermeasures?
That's the gross impact for the tariff. We do have some mitigation -- sorry, that's actually after -- that's the net-net impact after some price increases. And we have see a good ability for price increases on the safety side of our business, where we have already introduced adjustments of prices, and we see very limited potential to increase prices on the medical side due, among other reasons, the fact that we have long-term contracts with GPOs, which are not changeable easily and also a general environment where price increases on the industrial side, on the safety side are quite common, whereas they are less common on the medical side of our business.
Okay. And if I think about then basically 2026, when you cannot offset much of this and mostly, I guess, is related to the medical division. Does it mean we are going to expect a kind of incremental EUR 20 million headwind next year?
Basically, yes, it has to be figured into our planning. We still keep the target of improving our margin 1 percent point we calendar on average. So on average, it is the same as the calendar year, the last -- so for next year, there's not something -- this is Stefan speaking, of course, Mr. Reinberg. There's not something we can do directly. We can cancel discounts and so do less promotions. But on a structural level, there is nothing that makes sense we could do for next year.
Okay. So just to confirm, the 1 percentage point margin improvement, you expect that to deliver on average even including basically the headwinds from tariffs, correct?
That is correct. That is still the goal. And we expect the headwind to continue for next year coming from both from tariffs and with somewhat related currency fluctuations from a strong euro. It's not so much the dollar-euro relation directly. We are quite well naturally hedged as a lot of our cost is also based in U.S. dollar. And so we have also considerable expenses with 1,000 employees in the U.S. and some of them being R&D people. And we have purchased a lot of our procurement with contracts all over the world in U.S. dollar. However, there are third-party currencies like the Mexican peso or the Indonesian, whatever the currency that are devaluated and all the sales that we achieved in these countries is less in euro.
Understood. Makes sense. And can I also just confirm the margin guidance you provided for this year, that is after any potential headwinds from currency and tariffs. Is that correct?
Yes, that's correct.
From all what we know until today -- so that affects...
Super. Perfect. And then last question from my side. Can you just provide a bit of more color on the performance of medical? I mean it's different directions. I mean, I guess the order intake is quite impressive, in particular, even if we strip out Mexico, I think there was a quite healthy growth. I'm not sure if you can point to any kind of specific theme here or any kind of changes on the competitive landscape that supported this kind of demand. And then secondly, when I look at the profitability, minus 4% in the first half still coming down. It may be partly down to tariff, but if you can just provide any kind of update how you feel about the kind of margin progress in medical, please?
For the medical, the outlook firstly remains unchanged in the margin outlook. Obviously, we'll get also benefit from the large order entries and that's clearly on the upper hand -- on the upper side of our previous expectation, and that's also positive on the margin. Then again, to your earlier question, we also see that we have headwind from customs and from FX. And so that balances each other. I think overall, the margin outlook remains largely unchanged.
Unchanged. And I think that's the key to understand this development, Mr. Reinberg, is despite the headwinds from the currency devaluation of the euro increase in value despite the headwind from currency and from tariffs, we keep the full range of the guidance because the margin in medical is stable or even slightly improved because of the favorable product mix and country mix. And that eventually all our efforts for bringing new products to market and the approvals, they pay off and the key products for [indiscernible] and the machine is selling very well in the United States despite the tariffs as this is a relatively high-margin product, and it is a country with reasonable good prices that helps to offset the headwind.
Super. And anything that drives a particular strength in terms of demand? I mean, have you benefited from competitive changes in ventilation?
Some extent, yes, that some players left the market. That is also clearly not to our disadvantage. There is no real short-term boost. We do some marketing campaign. I personally address the customers that the video campaign that we have no intention to leave the market, and we will be there tomorrow other than some other players. So I think that takes a long press.
Our next question comes from Alexander Galitsa with HAIB.
Really a couple of topics. Maybe starting with the safety division. I wonder what explains the weakness you see in North America in safety division in Q2 in particular? Is it more or less normalization from rather strong performance in previous quarter, Q1 in particular? Or is there something else happening that's worth mentioning? That's the first question.
Then I have a question regarding the divestment of a facility you alluded to, if you would be able to quantify as of today roughly what kind of magnitude we're talking about in terms of proceeds for the facility? Then another question is on FX headwind of EUR 20 million. if you would be able to roughly quantify how much is in safety and how much is in medical? That's number three. And the very last one is just coming back on tariff headwind, which is quite material, it seems. Just wondering what makes you confident you can pick up the slack of EUR 25 million and still reach your sort of projection of 1 percentage point guidance -- 1 percentage point margin improvement if this EUR 25 million on its own almost explain 1 percentage point. So what areas should take -- pick up this slag?
So let me start and on your first question, the safety weakness in the Americas is mainly related to lower investment spending on behalf of our customers that also operate in an environment of uncertainty somewhat. So we expect that, that will normalize to the degree or if the general environment will also stabilize. But there is no, if you will, extraordinary other factor at play at this point.
To your second question, the divestment for the property in the U.S. that will be in the order of magnitude between EUR 10 million and EUR 20 million. That is, of course, not settled yet. And we expect it to materialize if things go quickly by the end of this year or some more -- sometimes in the second half of next year that will -- sorry, first half of next year that will -- can depend on several factors, including also the type of buyer and the use of the land he or she wants to make because that has to go through some authorities. And last time we sold some land that actually has delayed the process considerably.
Your second -- your third question was with regards to the impact on the FX on the medical and safety division. And very roughly, they are of the same order of magnitude. There's a tad higher on the medical. But given the size of the division, proportionately, it's actually higher on the safety side. And the reason is, as we point or Stefan Drager has pointed out, there is somewhat of a smaller impact, but still negative due to the fact that we are U.S. dollar short by a small margin on the medical side. So by and large, you can cut the 2 almost in half with slightly higher than that.
For the tariff headwind, which was your fourth question, of course, this will be a challenge. We are in the process of planning out what works, we believe in the long term also as a mitigating effect that at least some of the pricing measures that we implement on the safety side, they also will deliver a full year effect when we come into '26. Of course, this will not be sufficient for the large part, but that will help us.
Secondly, when we talk about the medical side, part of the reason that we are not able to enforce price changes on the short term are, of course, the long-term contracts. But even longer running contracts will come to an end. So there is more potential to adjust prices in the normal course of business. What is not easily possible is to introduce short-term bottom surcharges in the medical. But to the degree that long-term contracts running out, we will be able to also implement regular price increases on the medical side.
Also what is not possibly -- but does not make sense is to make structural changes to transfer production into the U.S. at this point in time, it's either it's not possible -- simply not possible in a shorter term or from an entrepreneurial standpoint, it does not make sense to invest in such an environment given such uncertainty. So what is possible, of course, and that will be an important factor to compensate for the headwind is to be even more cautious in the planning for our spending and for the expenses. That does not mean that we will introduce a cost-cutting program as say, is repeatedly asked for, but we will scrutinize each and every euro that we spend.
Understood. May I just slip in one additional question on -- you have announced that you will be launching in the second half of the year, Silent Care Package, which you call the world's first interoperable multimodel system based on the standard. Can you just maybe add some more context to this launch? Who will be able to use this? How is this being implemented? Does it require an add-on purchase of software? Or what's the context to that?
Yes, it is -- the key is the interoperability standard STCs, so that service-oriented device connectivity that yes, it has been developed from a nucleus in Germany, and we were part of that. However, it has become an international standard. It's IEEE 11073 and also an ISO standard. And basically, what we can see all manufacturers try to hop on that train now, but we are the first ones that can offer it together with some other partners like Braun and Ascom. We have a joint offering that combines devices from several manufacturers into one seamless operating environment. That's, of course, most applicable to the higher standard Western style university, but also in some developing countries and including Mexico, we see great interest.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Virendra Chauhan with AlphaValue.
So the first one is on safety, the order weakness particularly. So would you like to kind of call out any trends because safety order growth has been relatively strong all through the last few quarters. And hence, weakness in this Q2 was a little bit unexpected. Would you like to call out any kind of trends or divergences between this performance and order book development? That would be the first one.
Second question is on China. So recently, we have had this back and forth between EU and China regarding the participation of companies from either geography in tenders. So given that even China has kind of blocked European firms in participating in some tenders, do you think that would kind of be a drag for you on growth in China?
And lastly, coming to your margin guidance. So the H1 margin is pretty low and significantly below the lower end of your 3.5% to 6.5% range. So what would you expect should go really well that you end up at least at the midpoint? I assume that you're really forecasting some strong growth in the back end, but what exactly is driving that kind of confidence? Or do you think maybe 3.5% to the midpoint, the lower half of that is more realistic at this point?
I think your first question with safety, what you call weakness in order intake, it is the same, breathing behind as we included in the answer to the very first question from Oliver Reinberg. I think was the second question on the U.S., it is the same for the global business that the business in general has some fluctuations in order intake and net sales from one quarter to the next. And you shouldn't read too much across for the longer-term development. So it is a phasing issue. And in general, the market is intact and our offering is good and shouldn't be too concerned with this single quarter that we report now. So for the overall for the year, we will see further development. That is -- I hand over now to Gert-Hartwig why we are confident that the full range of the guidance is still intact.
Yes. Perhaps I jump to your second question also because I think it feeds into your guidance question, and that was, do we expect negative impact from the recent announcement in China to lock out European competitors from certain tenders. In fact, the tender volume that has been implemented in that measure of roughly EUR 5 million. That's actually above the usual tender volume that we have seen in recent years in China for our type of products. I do know that, that's different for other offerings and perhaps affects other companies differently. But for the type of business that we have seen in the past and that we expect in the future, that is actually a rare situation to have a tender that exceeds that. As a consequence, we do not expect a material impact for the type of business that we do in China.
Having said that, we currently see a stabilization of the Chinese business, and we expect further stabilization and perhaps even pickup in growth, but it leads to -- to your third question regarding the guidance and how does that stand in the light of our current trading. We -- of course, we have commented on the very large order backlog, in particular, on the medical and there on the therapeutic device that delivers above group margins. And at the back of our typical seasonality, where even in the recent years, we always see a significant portion of our profit on the medical, in particular, in the second half of the year. We expect this year to be not any different.
And in fact, based on the above in comparison to the prior year's higher order backlog, we see -- we expect a higher back-end loading of profitability. And with that, we see clearly the lower end of the margin on that background. But given the mix and the order momentum also the mid- and if we see a good development with the momentum could be turning with, for example, also an acceleration not only in the U.S., but also in China, also the mid- to higher end of the margin guidance to be clearly a possibility for our full year expectation.
Our last question is a follow-up from Oliver Reinberg.
The first one would be on Neonatal Care. I think you talked about the consolidation of the plant there. So a twofold question. One, is it right to assume that this is roughly 10% of medical sales? And can you provide any flavor in terms of what potential cost savings we could expect from that? And then secondly, just can you provide an update on what kind of demand you see for all kind of potential defense orders, how that is tracking?
Let me jump in and Stefan Drager will also comment on the business rationale. But as you are aware, we refrain from disclosing any individual sizes of our product areas for a couple of reasons, not least because we don't see similar figures from our market companion. So we are very reluctant to disclose that. But as Stefan Drager has pointed out, within our therapy devices, Neonatal Care is the smallest one of the different areas. So I'm not going to -- if you will counter your estimate. But bear in mind that that's just a rough order of magnitude, not a specific figure as I don't -- we don't like to specify that any further.
For the impact of the consolidation, it gives you a rough idea for this current year where the actual transition takes place, it's an extra expense of a single million-digit figure. And the years to come, it will be a saving of a single million digit figure. So the payback is approximately a little over a year. And from then on, it's safe every day.
And for your second question...
Regarding the defense business. Well, we expect and I'm glad you asked the question, that the defense business can be in the magnitude of EUR 100 million for Dräger. So there is definitely potential. And that is a, say, sizable number for the defense business altogether. That's worth to keep an eye on.
Ladies and gentlemen, this was our last question. I hand back over to the management for any closing remarks.
Well, thank you all for being with us today for your interest and for your questions. And again, for your flexibility for the rescheduling of this meeting by 1 hour. And for now, have a pleasant afternoon and a fine summer. Thank you very much. Bye.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Draegerwerk — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
Starke Auftragseingänge stützen die H2-Erwartung; H1-Margen bleiben wegen Einmaleffekten, Währung und Zöllen schwach.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz H1: ~EUR 1,5 Mrd. (+0,4% währungsbereinigt)
- Auftragseingang: ~EUR 1,7 Mrd. (>+10% YoY; höchster H1 seit 2020)
- EBIT H1: EUR 20,4 Mio. (EBIT‑Marge 1,3% vs. 3,7% Vorjahr; Vorjahr enthielt ~EUR 20 Mio. Einmaleffekt)
- Cashflow: Operativer CF +EUR 18 Mio. (Vorjahr -EUR 5 Mio.); Free Cash Flow ~-EUR 42 Mio.
- Headwinds: FX‑Effekt rund EUR 20 Mio.; Zölle 2025 geschätzt ~EUR 25 Mio.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Profitabilität: Ziel bleibt ein jährlicher durchschnittlicher Margenanstieg von +1 Prozentpunkt; Maßnahmen: Komplexitätsreduktion und Standortkonsolidierung Neonatal (Telford → Lübeck).
- Wachstum: Management betont starkes Orderbuch, medizinische Geräte (Beatmung, Anästhesie, Krankenhaus‑Infrastruktur) sollen H2‑Wachstum und Margen tragen.
- Kapital & Sichtbarkeit: Verkauf US‑Grundstück geplant (erwartet EUR 10–20 Mio.); bevorzugte Aktien jetzt im TecDAX für mehr Tech‑Investor‑Sichtbarkeit.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Guidance: Bestätigt: Nettoumsatz +1–5%; EBIT‑Marge 3,5–6,5%; DVA (Rolling) -30 Mio. bis +80 Mio.
- Risiken: Zölle (15% ab 15.08.) und starker Euro sowie China‑Volatilität können Druck erzeugen.
- Gegenmaßnahmen: Preisweitergaben in Safety, Vertragsneuverhandlungen/Erneuerungen in Medical, FX‑Hedging und striktere Kostenplanung; keine kurzfristige Produktionsverlagerung geplant.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Zölle: H1‑Effekt im Q2 ~EUR 6 Mio.; Full‑Year‑Impact ~EUR 25 Mio. (netto nach bereits eingeplanten Preismaßnahmen in Safety).
- FX & China: FX‑Headwind ~EUR 20 Mio., verteilt auf beide Divisionen (relativ stärker auf Safety); China‑Deckelung bei Tenders wird als begrenzt relevant eingeschätzt (~EUR 5 Mio. betroffen).
- Neonatal & Immobilie: Konsolidierung verursacht einmalige Ausgaben im einstelligen Mio.-Bereich, später jährliche Einsparungen im einstelligen Mio.-Bereich; Grundstückserlös geschätzt EUR 10–20 Mio.; Management verweigerte präzise Segmentgrößen.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Auftragspipeline und Saisonalität rechtfertigen die bestätigte Guidance, H1 war jedoch durch fehlende Einmaleffekte, FX und Zollkosten belastet. Entscheidend für Aktionäre ist die H2‑Realisierung hochmargiger Medical‑Aufträge, die Durchsetzung von Preismaßnahmen in Safety und die Entwicklung von Euro sowie Zollpolitik.
Finanzdaten von Draegerwerk
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Mär '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 3.508 3.508 |
4 %
4 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 1.918 1.918 |
4 %
4 %
55 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 1.590 1.590 |
5 %
5 %
45 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 1.015 1.015 |
0 %
0 %
29 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | 330 330 |
2 %
2 %
9 %
|
|
| EBITDA | 386 386 |
13 %
13 %
11 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 135 135 |
8 %
8 %
4 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 250 250 |
29 %
29 %
7 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 153 153 |
32 %
32 %
4 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen EUR.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur Draegerwerk-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
Draegerwerk Aktie News
Firmenprofil
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Deutschland |
| CEO | Stefan Dräger |
| Mitarbeiter | 16.033 |
| Gegründet | 1889 |
| Webseite | www.draeger.com |


