Constellation Brands Aktie

Greetings. Welcome to the Constellation Brands' Fiscal Year '27 First Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. At this time, I'll turn the conference over to Blair Veenema, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may now begin, Blair.

Thank you, Ralph. Good morning, all, and welcome to Constellation Brands Q1 Fiscal '27 Conference Call. I'm joined this morning by Nick Fink, our CEO; and Garth Hankinson, our CFO.

Before we proceed, we trust you had the opportunity to review the news release and CEO, CFO commentary made available in the Investors section of our company's website, www.cbrands.com.

On that note, as a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measure and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in the news release and website. We also encourage you to refer to the news release and Constellation's SEC filings for risk factors that may impact forward-looking statements made on this call.

Before turning it over to Nick to kick things off, please keep in mind that as usual, answers provided today will be referencing comparable results unless otherwise specified.

Lastly, in line with prior quarters, I would ask that you limit yourselves to 1 question per person, which will help us to end our call on time. Thanks in advance. And now over to you, Nick.

Thanks, Blair. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Before we get into the Q&A, I'd like to share a few observations from my first 2.5 months as CEO of Constellation Brands. Having spent significant time in the market over the last several months, I am increasingly confident in the enduring strength of our brands and the role they continue to play in consumers' lives, even in periods when discretionary spending is more challenged. Over time, we have repeatedly shown an ability to create demand and scale brands through a combination of consumer insights, commercial execution and disciplined investment. That capability is reflected in the strength of our portfolio today, whether it's Modelo, Corona, Pacifico, Kim Crawford or Mi CAMPO, these are brands with strong identities, deep consumer connections and enduring relevance.

I also believe some of our greatest opportunities remain directly in front of us. As brands become larger and more established, it is important to find new ways to remain relevant in consumers' lives. That requires a deeper understanding of behavior, motivation and the moments that matter most to consumers. That's an area where I believe we have significant strengths and meaningful opportunity. Leveraging strong commercial capabilities, rich consumer insights and increasingly powerful data and technology tools that can help us move faster and make effective decisions.

My focus is on ensuring that we continue to build on those advantages. And lastly, I believe the most successful companies are willing to challenge their own assumptions about where future incremental growth will come from while still executing with excellence in the core. We have a strong portfolio in attractive positions today, but we also need to maintain a forward-looking perspective about where consumer demand is heading, and how we can leverage our capabilities to continue to create value through disciplined investment and execution. Across all 3 areas, one common theme is the importance of developing world-class insights. The better we understand consumers and emerging trends, the better position will be to allocate resources, execute effectively and create sustainable growth.

So while the quarter reflected a continuation of the dynamic consumer backdrop that we have been operating in of late, my confidence in the long-term opportunity for this business remains strong. We have exceptional brands, outstanding people and a set of capabilities that position us well for the future.

Now back over to you, operator, for any questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from the line of Nadine Sarwat with Bernstein.

Nick, your prepared remarks touched a lot on your refined strategy for Constellation. So perhaps a 2-part question from me on strategy. First, you intend to deploy a different playbook to sustain growth at scale versus scaling emerging brands. How could that different playbook look like in practice? And then second, you called out exploring white spaces where you have a right to win. Is this organically, through acquisitions? And what white spaces are you seeing as most attractive today?

Sure. And thank you for the question. I'd be happy to give some perspective, Nadine. So I think there's little doubt about our capability to scale brands. We've got this incredible track record. And as I've spent time much deeper into it with the teams as well as just getting out into the market with our distributors talking about it, there is an execution playbook, it's disciplined, and frankly, it's the best I've seen. It's thoughtful, it's considered and there is a way in which we build distribution, we build awareness. We do it in a sustainable fashion that we know is going to hold over the very long run. And you've seen us do that over many decades, brands like Corona now continuing the job of Modelo and some great rising stars in the portfolio, we'll continue to do that. So a little doubt, and I'd say best-in-class ability there.

You then go to some of the places where we've scaled a brand. And I look at a brand like Corona where the brand metrics are phenomenal, most loved beer brand. We've got the right distribution. We've got great awareness. Really, the brand health sort of green across the board. The way to continue to maintain and grow a brand like that will be different to the playbook in which we're driving awareness and driving distribution and there's still opportunities there. It becomes much more about saliency and relevance connecting with the consumer where they are, understanding RGM and price pack architecture, connecting into the right cultural moments, being visible in the places where they are in the way that they want to interact, connecting into the right types of occasions.

It is a different playbook, but it is one that many great consumer products companies do at scale and do very well. And I think it's a place where we'll continue to sharpen the capability and get after that. And if we can do both of those things, there is a ton of value creation to be had there. There's no question in my mind. And then you go to the third place you referenced, which is white spaces. And we have a consumer that's evolving quickly. We have a customer that's evolving quickly. We have shelves, right, that are evolving and look pretty different to the way they looked 5 years ago, 10 years ago, and there's a lot happening.

And so being open-minded to what is happening in those spaces, what are fads and what are trends, being able to know the difference between those things, knowing what's sustainable, what's not sustainable, seeing where momentum exists and then in a thoughtful and disciplined way being able to get after that. And so an example for -- already in our portfolio, you take Corona nonalcohol. Here's a brand that we have strong double-digit growth behind. We're now #4 in the category. That's a space we weren't playing in. Should we be putting more fuel on that fire because the fire is burning. And that's a great example of a white space didn't really exist for this company. Now we've got a toe in the water. Do we want to go double down on something that we've already got some real momentum behind and be willing to invest, again, in a disciplined way.

I'm not talking about going out and making huge bets and hoping it comes. But we and I think have done a much better job over the last couple of years of developing test and learn capabilities, ways to go, try one market versus a different market, see what works, see where we're going to accelerate, see where we want to be agile and change. And that would be an example of a place where we might go do something like that.

Our next question is from the line of Filippo Falorni with Citi.

You called out in the prepared remarks, it's been pretty volatile start of the year, strong March and then softer April and May. So I was hoping you can give us a little more color on what you're seeing in June given -- especially given the gas prices have moderated a bit more recently? Are you seeing improvement in consumption trends as gas prices come down? And then also, obviously, in June, we've had 3 weeks of World Cup. So maybe you can give us some perspective there on the consumption on your brands around World Cup, and whether we should see a further potential improvement in the on-premise business where a lot of those occasions potentially reside?

Sure. I'll be happy to jump in with some perspective and Garth can perhaps share some color as well. There is no question it was a volatile quarter. I mean you saw -- you see it in all the Circana and other data, right, a very strong March out of the gates. And I would say in a more normalized consumer environment a lot of great interaction with both us and the category but particularly our brands resonating very strongly. And then a massive spike in gas prices, and we did see the consumer respond by slowing down. And I think not to be unexpected and that's not just us. I mean, as we've talked to even other companies in the consumer field, traffic is down, a lot of choices being made.

And as we ended the quarter and got into the early part of this quarter and some of those headwinds have moderated, we've started to see a modest reacceleration, I wouldn't say back to where we were in March, but a healthy return to some growth rates and the Circana data just even for the last week was very encouraging, not just a category, but really around our brands, which are somewhat more premium positioned and very attractive to the consumer.

We saw some very strong numbers as consumers get to make the choices that they want to make and would like to make. And so encouraging in a somewhat more normalized environment that the portfolio is more than holding its own and responding really well.

And then certainly, it's been great to see both World Cup and some of the energy that we saw in one of our key markets like New York around the Knicks, which was, to me, I think, yes, some lift from that. But even just more importantly, consumers engaging in that beer occasion coming together in the on-premise, in the off-premise, the pictures from New York, I thought were remarkable, just to see young people being together, watching the game projected on the sides of buildings and those are beer occasions, right? It's just a great reminder to that consumer of the role that this category can play in their lives, and I think having these great events rolling through the summer could be quite meaningful in that regard. So I don't know if anything to add?

I think you hit it all, Nick.

Thank you.

The next question is from the line of Lauren Lieberman with Barclays.

Great. Just getting to the quarter itself, I was struck by the fixed cost leverage that looks like you enjoyed this quarter with the gross margins, the margins for beer at 39%. So I just wanted to talk a little bit about the drivers of that, the 1.8% shipment growth is certainly better than what was anticipated. But it's a high bar for the margin with volumes still sub 2%. So just kind of curious, as we think about that going forward, you're absorbing incremental depreciation, but again, the strength of the margin in the quarter was particularly strong. I just want to understand the building blocks better so we can think about the path forward.

Lauren, thanks for the question. And really, you hit on it. We had about 30 basis points of benefits this quarter versus last year really due to fixed overabsorption -- largely due to fixed overabsorption, as you say, related to the higher shipment. In addition to that, we also continue to make great progress on our cost savings agenda, and that was certainly a benefit. We also had 20 basis points of favorability due to pricing net of mix. And that was offset by about 30 basis points of currency headwinds and other small things that will flow through cost of goods. So that really is what drove the favorability on gross profit margins.

On operating margins, we declined 10 basis points. We had the 20 basis points of favorability on gross margin expansion, but we had a 20 basis point headwind on increased SG&A, similar to last year, as we've added employees to support Veracruz going live later this year. We've brought those folks online. And until those -- until Veracruz commissions, they will sit in SG&A rather than COGS. And then we had 10 basis points of headwinds related to incremental marketing, mostly to support the World Cup that is happening now, as we indicated at our April earnings call.

As we look forward into Q2 and Q3, we would still expect gross margins to be strong, but we will see some incremental headwinds as it relates to operating margins. Keeping in mind, we've increased our marketing spend expectations for the full year to drive incremental marketing investment, particularly around the World Cup and College Football and the NFL. So you'll see in Q2 and in Q3, a spike in marketing as a percent of net sales. As we said in our prepared remarks, that will be over 10% in those 2 quarters.

And then in Q2 and Q3, we will see SG&A increases. They're a bit more material in Q1. A big part of that is lapping last year's lower compensation benefits related to incentive income or incentive compensation.

Our next question is from the line of Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley.

You mentioned in the prepared remarks you're looking to extend participation across more occasions. Just high level, can you give us a bit more detail there on how you execute that? Is it more marketing on base brands and refining that? Is it more through innovation? Is it more through moving into new areas or the white spaces through M&A? And just wanted to get a bit more detail on how specifically you do that. And then obviously, moving into white spaces potentially is a piece of that. So how significant a focus do you expect the white space expansion to be just relative to driving base business brand trends?

Yes, I'll start with that. Look, I think the headline is there will be no greater way we can create value than nailing this with our core brands and core portfolio, period, right? And so when I talk about an understanding consumer occasions, it's really sort of taking the blinders off of not just thinking about our brands as they compete versus another beer or to be even more narrow Mexican beer, but actually, how do you look more broadly at what is the choice that your consumer is making in that moment, right? We -- and the team does some fantastic work. We have a whole wheel of identified different consumer occasions.

And so -- and then we make focused choices like here's where we want to compete and here's some moments where maybe we're happy if you take our product, but we're not spending to go win that moment in the same degree. But then understanding against other -- not just other beers for the beer brands that can apply to the wine and spirits brands as well, not just within your category, but what choices as consumers increasingly cross over, what choices are they making? And then how do you remain salient, and you win even with the core portfolio in that moment?

And if you can do that, then you can actually, even within the beer portfolio, start to create some differentiation amongst our brands, right? They have different brand personas. They appeal to -- they have a lot of similarities, but appeal to slightly different consumer groups, different age cohorts, maybe different moments, you see some of the work that we're doing behind Pacifico, which is more lifestyle-oriented, more around adventure, doesn't necessarily play in some of the same moments. And if we're able to do that, then you expand the aperture of what these brands can do and how they can play. And frankly, I think you can get after a larger addressable moment and compete in a greater way as a portfolio as opposed to duplicating some of the activities. And so that's first and foremost.

To the extent that within that as well, we identify other opportunities where the consumer is looking for something. And we think that is a space in which we can participate in a meaningful, but disciplined way. I think we should consider that as well and I gave the example earlier of Corona non-alc, right? That business is growing strong double digits. Our consumers are telling us they love the product. We haven't put a ton behind it yet, should we start to participate at that not just think of it as a product, but what is the occasion in which they're consuming that product. Is it an occasion where they don't want alcohol at all. There's an occasion where they're actually combining use of it with some of our alcoholic products and extending the occasion. And I think having that very strong consumer insight then definitely leads to an ability to execute in a much more targeted way and grow the addressable moment as well as our share at that moment.

Next question is from the line of Chris Carey with Wells Fargo.

I wanted to ask about, I guess, the complexity of -- or the complexion rather, of the portfolio. Modelo Especial remains sluggish, Corona Extra has obviously been a bit of a challenge, and you're seeing kind of tremendous growth in other parts of the portfolio that are lifting up the portfolio just a bit. I think the sustainability of some of those faster growth offerings feels quite durable, but there remains question marks around, most importantly, Corona Extra and then Modelo Especial just getting back to a bit of growth. Can you just give us a bit more context on how you see these 2 brands specifically and a bit more detail on what you're doing to reaccelerate? And maybe most specifically with Corona Extra, given the duration of the headwinds that the brand has seen?

Yes. Sure. Happy to do so. And I'll start off by vehemently agreeing with you on the sustainability of the things in the portfolio that are growing as strongly as they're growing. And I say that because the very disciplined way in which the team is going about achieving that growth, driving awareness, driving distribution, but doing those 2 things in concert with each other and making sure that we don't get ahead of ourselves so that we're building it in a very disciplined way. And I've been incredibly impressed as I've spent time with our team and our distributors how they do that. And I've seen it done differently with less discipline and less sustainability. And I think the way that we're doing it is best-in-class. So I really agree with you on that.

You're right to point out some of the challenges and the headwinds on Especial and Extra. And I think that's fair. And that goes to my earlier point of once things are scaled, the toolkit for continuing to both maintain and then grow those brands becomes different. Now in the case of Modelo Especial, there is still room to grow. We haven't finished the job scaling that, right. There is still a significant gap to distribution. Unaided awareness is remarkably low given that this is the #1 value -- brand by value in the marketplace, which is actually quite an incredible opportunity as we continue to drive awareness and that becomes more and more of a general population brand. So the job is yet to be finished on Modelo Especial. We will finish the job, but we need to develop the very sharp toolkit of what do you do as that becomes fully scaled, and how do you continue to drive saliency and relevance, which gets us to Corona and developing that playbook on Extra that, that would be a playbook that will then deploy for anything that is scaled and that becomes a bit of a different playbook.

You're not driving awareness and distribution anymore, you're driving saliency, relevance, connecting with consumers in the moment and really being both available to them, which is top of mind awareness and distribution. But activating in that moment being the thing that they choose. And that is a somewhat different skill, one that there are plenty of companies out there that have developed really, really well, and we need to demonstrate that we can bring.

Now I will tell you, and over the course of my career, I've worked on some tired brands. I've rebuilt some tired brands and rejuvenated tired brands. Our brands are not tired. They have some of the most, and I'm just saying this sincerely remarkable brand health of any brands I've ever seen. And you start with Corona Extra, you start with most loved beer, most loved beer, right? Still #1 in New York City, the cultural icons of this country, still #1 in Miami. So you're starting with this really powerful foundation. We need to dial up the everyday activation switch and I have absolute confidence that with the right focus there, that is something that we can do that will not just help Corona Extra, but then will allow us to continue to deploy those capabilities against anything else we scale over time.

The next question is from the line of Rob Ottenstein with Evercore ISI.

Great. And in a way, this is kind of a follow-on to the last question. As you said, and I think we'd all agree, you have some amazing brands. The performance has been tough. Obviously, there's a lot of macro factors that are out of your control. So let's just focus on things that are in your control, and I do know it's early days for you, but for over a year, you didn't have a Head of Sales, right? Bill Renspie, very well regarded, left, I think, in March of '25. And then now you've hired Jack Edwards from Diageo Beer who has a fantastic reputation, I think it started about a month or 2 ago. So you got the great brands. You're in a great category in many ways.

Have you had a chance to sit down with Jack yet and talk about what is under your control in terms of driving execution with distributors, with retailers to make sure that you're best leveraging the remarkable brands that you actually do have. And again, I know it's early days on this, but are there a couple of things that maybe you can point out that are areas in which you're going to be working with Jack and look like reasonable wins and objectives over the next 6 months that can improve the trajectory in terms of what you can control?

I'm happy to share a few thoughts. I don't want to -- be overly graphic about some of the competitive ideas that we have, but rest assured that they're there. But firstly, I'll start by acknowledging your point. I think, yes, indeed, macro headwinds, we talked about both generally in the economy and some of the things we saw both in the quarter. And by the way, our consumer even more adversely impacted by that. And while that gap has improved, there is still a gap that we're seeing within the Hispanic ZIP codes relative to Genpop. So we're cycling through those headwinds. That said, you're right. We don't sit and make excuses. We think about what it is that we have that's under our control that we can go execute.

And so I talked about there are things like still distribution gaps in Modelo so awareness gaps. We can continue to drive those that is within our control. There is more, I think we can do on a brand like Corona Extra. We just talked about that, right? And that might be getting more tactical in the field, in the on-premise, in the places where our consumers live and breathe. I think that is within our control.

And then as Jack is coming on board and we're spending more time together, it's really some of that in-field execution, which has been really good, but we can always push ourselves to improve more. Thinking about our pack price architecture, thinking about revenue management, how do we meet the consumer where the consumer is in an increasingly K-shaped economy, right? We're seeing some really interesting activity across our pack sizes where we have, by far, the largest share of both the small pack size and the larger sharing pack size. I think that's a really interesting place to play, but you got to make it really available to your consumer and make sure they can find it and discover it.

And does that start to get our portfolio to a place where notwithstanding some of the headwinds, it is more accessible. So those are some of the ideas that we're working on. Again, I think it's early days. Jack has been out on the road nonstop since he started. And I think as he absorbs and digests everything he's seeing, we'll continue to generate new ideas, but we're very excited to have him on board. He's a real talent.

The next question is from the line of Bonnie Herzog with Goldman Sachs.

I had a question on your FY '27 guidance. You maintain your beer net sales guidance despite strong shipments in the quarter. And then comparisons do become pretty favorable in Q2 and Q3. So I guess I wanted to understand if the decision to maintain guidance reflects, I don't know, an abundance of caution regarding the dynamic consumer environment. And I guess maybe touch on that, especially with the Hispanic consumer. Or are there specific distribution or maybe shipment headwinds in the next few quarters that we should be thinking about?

Sure, Bonnie. Thanks for the question. I'll start and then Nick, you can weigh in too. I mean, look, we're off to a solid start to the year. There's no denying that. But as we look to the balance of the year and as we laid out in April, this continues to be a rather dynamic operating environment, right, with, in some instances, low visibility. Nick referenced earlier around how we started the quarter and then how we ended the quarter, and again, how things kind of moved around. Nick referenced the impact on gas prices in Q1, right? If you look at the end of our fiscal year and then at the peak of Q1, gas prices were up well over 50% across the U.S. on average. That was more than $1.60 a gallon if you look at it on that rate. In a market like California, gas prices at its peak were up 40%, Illinois 70%, New York, Florida, Texas, up over 50%. Inflation was up largely due to fuel prices, but there are other things that kept inflation a bit higher than anyone would like.

So that's a little bit long-winded to say there are a lot of things that are going around in the market that just give us uncertainty. And while we're off to a good start, we don't think that after one good quarter that we want to change what the outlook is for the full year just given some of the limited visibility we have on those macroeconomic metrics. Anything you want to add?

No, completely agree.

Your next question is from the line of Peter Grom with UBS.

I wanted to follow up on the response to Filippo's question earlier. And Nick, I think you mentioned thus far in June, you've kind of seen a return to healthy growth rates but not at March levels. And look, this may be a hard question to answer. But when you think about the improvement, is there a way to parse out how much of that is related to kind of World Cup or maybe some of these unique events that are ending here in a few weeks versus maybe signs that the consumer pressure is abating. And I guess what I am -- the premise of the question is really just trying to understand whether you think this improvement we've seen kind of quarter-to-date is durable as we look ahead?

Yes, look, it's a great question, and it's one that we're asking ourselves, and we're going to continue to do the work and analysis to really get our heads around as we see how the rest of the year develops and then how we can continue to drive the momentum where the momentum is sustainable. But I will tell you from the early reads and yet -- by the way, early, right? We're just like still a few weeks. I know we're a few weeks in, but we're just a few weeks in. It does seem to us to be pretty broad-based, right? I mean if we can get to some account data or some on-premise data where you do see big spikes around a game or in that particular geography, but it's not like you look to the rest of the country and you're seeing a vastly different result as an average, right? You could see a big spike here, but it's not moving the needle for everything. So it's fairly broad-based.

Texas and California continue to be -- sorry, Texas and Florida, I should say, continue to be challenged. California has been pretty good. And that hasn't necessarily changed as a result of the World Cup. We think that is more of a macroeconomically led headwind for our consumer, in particular, in those geographies. And we've seen that sort of continue notwithstanding the improved performance.

And so it does look like the return of health to us might be more to do with some of the headwinds abating than any kind of onetime tailwinds. But as I said earlier, it still doesn't hurt that you certainly have the World Cup event that you had the [ Knicks ] of major markets and that people are just getting together and enjoying that beer occasion, which we think is also just a key future unlock of people remembering how important it is to come together to socialize and the role that our products can play in that.

Our next question is from the line of Peter Galbo with Bank of America.

Maybe just to put a finer point on those last few questions around Q2. Garth, I was hoping just for maybe a little bit more clarity on the shipment side for Q2. There's a lot of, I think, moving pieces in the quarter. You kind of overshipped, I think, in Q1 ahead of where you normally seasonally would be. You have the lap versus last year where I think there was some destocking. So maybe you can just help us think through the relationship for Q2 between absolute shipments and depletions because I know that the growth rates between the 2 can be a bit wonky.

Yes. Just to start on that, let me just say that, on a full year basis, we would expect, as we always do, that shipments and depletions would align with one another -- very closely align with one another. In Q1, which is typical for us in every fiscal year, we ship ahead of depletions to support the key summer selling season so that's fairly typical. Then as we move through the year, we will see some of that become more in line with one another, again, supporting the fact that when we get to the end of the fiscal year, shipments and depletions will essentially equal one another.

Our final question is from the line of Michael Lavery with Piper Sandler.

Just as you think about the consumer and occasions, one of the things we've seen just as kind of a stepped-up level of innovation focus is higher ABV mostly in RTDs, but certainly in the consumer's mind, some of the lines get blurry and it's in the same consideration set very often. But in most situations, wouldn't seem like it has a different consumption effect on the consumer. It's more -- it looks like a volume headwind if they get more bang for the buck, but with maybe only a modest mix lift, it would seem at a high level to be category value dilutive. How do you think about just competing against that, participating in it? Kind of how do you weigh some of maybe the trade-offs and maybe risks or opportunities in terms of just how that innovation thread evolves?

It's an interesting question. And look, we talk a lot about K-shaped economy and you also see sort of K-shaped consumer behavior, right? So you've seen that behavior, which I think is a value-driven behavior. You're seeing other parts of the K where it's sort of, I want a great premium product, like think about what's happening in Corona non-alc where we've got very strong double-digit growth, no alcohol, right? It's about, I'm willing to pay more to have a very premium experience with a great tasting liquid. And so you've seen -- we continue to see that both ends of that K. And I think for us, we just need to be thoughtful about where we want to play and participate. So I'd say we have a toe in the water on the higher ABV stuff with a small RTD brand as well as some of the stuff that we're doing with our Chelada business, which now would be the third largest RTD business if we measured it that way. So a good example of this company's ability to innovate into something like RTDs, but do it in a way that is thoughtful and sustainable and true to our brands.

And as product plays there, we need to be thoughtful about what is that impact on the whole portfolio, are we meeting the consumer where they are with what they drink and what they would like. And then to the earlier question about controlling the controllables, then how do we go execute that in field because you've got to make sure if you want to play in something like that, that the consumer knows that you are there and can find you, which I think is probably some of the work to do.

So I think we need to be thoughtful about these emerging trends and be choiceful about which are the ones that we want to participate in or not, Garth, I'm going on a perspective whether it's more or less dilutive. I'm not sure, I think it's probably just a consumer occasion.

No, I agree with that.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. We'll also conclude today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.

Greetings, and welcome to Constellation Brands' Fiscal Year 2026 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Blair Veenema, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Donna. Good morning, all, and welcome to Constellation Brands' Q4 and Full Year Fiscal '26 Conference Call. I'm joined this morning by Bill Newlands, our CEO; and Garth Hankinson, our CFO. I'm also pleased to welcome our incoming CEO, Nicholas Fink, who is joining us at the start of today's call to share a few remarks. Following Nick, Bill will briefly review the fiscal year, after which we will turn it over to your questions for Bill and Garth.

Before we proceed, we trust you had the opportunity to review the news release and CEO, CFO commentary made available in the Investors section of our company's website, www.cbrands.com. On that note, as a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measure and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in the news release and website. And we encourage you to also refer to the news release and Constellation's SEC filings for risk factors that may impact forward-looking statements made on this call.

Before turning it over to Bill to kick things off, please keep in mind that, as usual, answers provided today will be referencing comparable results unless otherwise specified. Lastly, in line with prior quarters, I would ask that you limit yourself to one question per person, which will help us to end our call on time.

Thanks in advance. And for the final time, over to you, Bill.

Thanks, Blair, and good morning, everyone. I'm going to make a few opening comments before we get into Q&A. But first, I'd like to pass it over to Nick Fink, our President and CEO-elect, for a few brief comments. Nick, warm welcome. Nick will assume the role on April 13, and we are pleased to have him with us today to say a few words before we get started. Nick?

Thank you, Bill, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to start by recognizing Bill's leadership over the past 7 years as CEO and in total, his 11 years of contributions to Constellation Brands. He strengthened the foundation of the company in meaningful and lasting ways, and I valued our partnership during my time on the Board. I look forward to continuing to work closely with him over the coming months to ensure a seamless transition as he moves into his role as a strategic adviser. I'm honored to step into the CEO role next week at such an important time for our business. Constellation enters this chapter from a position of strength with a leading portfolio in high-end beer, a reshaped Wine and Spirits business, best-in-class marketing and sales capabilities and a proven playbook that continues to deliver consistent share gains year after year.

While the consumer landscape remains dynamic, I firmly believe that we are well positioned to continue delivering for our consumers, employees, distributors and shareholders over the long term. Having served on the Board for the past 5 years, I've been closely involved in our key strategic and operational priorities. That perspective gives me strong conviction in our strategy and in our ability to execute going forward. We will continue to be insights-driven and consumer obsessed, lean into our strengths in beer, allocate capital with discipline and generate strong cash flow while thoughtfully navigating an evolving consumer landscape.

As I formally assume the role on April 13, I look forward to spending time with our operators, distributors and many of you in the investment community to gain an even deeper understanding as we begin to shape the next phase of our growth journey ahead. I'll close by reiterating my confidence in this business, in our iconic brand portfolio, our route to market and consumer-led marketing, our best-in-class operations and most importantly, our talented people. These strengths underpin our differentiated capabilities as we seek to continue delivering sustainable long-term growth and attractive shareholder returns.

With that, I'll turn it back to Bill.

Thanks, Nick. Just a few additional comments from me before we start Q&A. As we stated in our published remarks, we ended the year with some solid momentum in our beer business despite operating in a challenging environment during our fiscal '26. It was a year that required agility and focus as consumers continue to navigate a tough economic backdrop with more selective shopping behavior, which weighed on overall category performance for much of the year. Our teams stayed tightly aligned on what we can control, growing points of distribution, supporting our core brands and executing with discipline. That approach allowed us to take share and strengthen our competitive position.

Our beer portfolio continued to lead the high-end segment with Modelo Especial maintaining its leadership as the #1 beer brand by dollars in the United States and momentum improved as the year progressed. In Wine & Spirits, our efforts to reshape the portfolio are gaining traction with strong contributions from brands like Kim Crawford and Mi CAMPO. Lastly, from a financial standpoint, the business delivered solid cash generation, giving us the flexibility to reinvest while also returning capital to shareholders. As we look ahead, we're encouraged by the improvement we saw exiting the year, but we remain realistic about the current operating environment, which remains fluid with limited visibility. That said, we feel good about where we're positioned with a strong portfolio, clear priorities and a disciplined approach to operating, we believe we're well equipped to continue building momentum and delivering long-term value.

Now back over to you, Donna, for the questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first question today is coming from Nick Modi of RBC Capital Markets.

Bill, best of luck going forward. Maybe you could just unpack the beer top line guidance for the upcoming fiscal year, the negative one to positive one. And I ask that in the context of what seemingly is a pretty good start to March or to the year. If you could just give us some context on kind of what you're thinking? Are there anything that we should be thinking about in terms of like why it would decelerate for the full year relative to what we're seeing in March right now? Any context would be helpful.

Sure, Nick. Obviously, the single biggest challenge that exists now is our limited visibility. Things have been very volatile in terms of what the consumer reaction has been and our continuing research suggests that the consumer is still cautious. With that said, as we noted in our overview, we exited last year in a very strong position. We saw sequential gains in the quarter, and we saw depletions up in the quarter, which had not been the case over the prior 3 quarters. March is off to a solid start, better than planned with continued increasing momentum. So certainly, we remain optimistic about the year that we have just begun. But we need to continue to recognize volatility has been high and visibility has been low.

The next question is coming from Bonnie Herzog of Goldman Sachs.

All right. Thank you and best of luck, Bill from me, too. It was great working with you. I have a question on beer operating margins. You're guiding margins of 37% to 38% for this year, which is a step down from your prior guidance of 39% to 40%. So can you help us understand the key drivers of the new margin delivery, I guess, especially around fixed cost absorption from the new Veracruz brewery coming online. Also, how should we think about the phasing of margins across 1H versus 2H? And then finally, I guess I'm curious to know if you believe you can get back to the 40% margin range? And if so, is that a possibility next fiscal year? Or is this going to take longer?

Thanks for the question, Bonnie. So you're right. We've guided to 37% to 38% margins. I'll tell you what the headwinds are and then what we're doing to offset those headwinds. You rightfully pointed out that the primary headwind as it relates to operating gross profit margins are expense-related, costs associated with our new brewery in Veracruz, which is expected to begin production around the middle of our fiscal year. With that, we were going to have some fixed cost absorption headwinds as we go through the year. And then further down the P&L, we have an increase in our SG&A expense related to lower incentive comp in FY '26 and incremental investments in marketing that we will make in this year to drive continued growth within the business, both in the short and in the long term.

Offsetting those headwinds will be 1% to 2% price delivery, which, as we've noted in the materials we uploaded overnight, we'll be at the lower end of the range this year. We will continue to deliver against our cost savings agenda, where we've been very successful in our migration from a builder to an operator. And then we -- additionally, as you saw in our materials, we'll have relief from aluminum tariffs this year. As it relates to beyond FY '27, we're not prepared to talk around any guidance beyond this year. So we'll cover that as we go through this year and into next.

The next question is coming from Dara Mohsenian of Morgan Stanley.

Best wishes from me also, Bill. I've enjoyed working with you. And Garth, maybe if I can just follow up on the beer margin side. Can you just break out what you're expecting from a key input cost standpoint in fiscal '27, aluminum freight and some of the other key buckets, just how hedged you are on the input cost side as well as FX side? And then as you think about beer margins, maybe the volatility there, what might be some of the upside drivers versus downside drivers? And then also just focus on wine and spirits as much, but the margin guidance is clearly a lot lower than maybe the ongoing business should support longer term. So just help us understand the Wine and Spirits margin guidance for '27. How much of that is depressed by factors specific to '27 versus extends longer term?

Yes, Dara, there was a lot there, so I hope I got it all. So from a hedging perspective, we're fairly well hedged as we entered the year on both commodities and on currencies. For fuel, we're nearly 100% hedged. On aluminum, we're approximately 90% hedged; natural gas, about 80% hedged; in corn, about 75% hedged. Across all of our currencies, we're right around 80% hedged as we entered the year. So we're in a good spot. In terms of beer margins and what could lead to upside, I think volume. As Bill noted, we're cautiously optimistic around the start of the year. And if volumes were to increase from where we are, that would certainly benefit the margin profile.

As it relates to Wine & Spirits margins, there are a number of factors that are going into our -- the guided margin profile, including ongoing category pressures, channel headwinds, the timing of our cost deleveraging and distributor inventory rebalancing. Starting with category headwinds, we've seen a material downgrade in the outlook from where we were a year ago. U.S. high-end wine has shifted from expected low single-digit growth to low single-digit declines. U.S. high-end spirits are decelerating from plus mid-single-digit growth to flat to slightly down. And so while we're significantly outpacing the market, it's sort of on what I would call a little bit of a lower base.

Relating to channel headwinds, we've seen some tasting room softness in our Napa-based wineries. And then internationally, we've seen some weakness as it relates to U.S.-made or U.S.-sourced wines and spirits, particularly in Canada, which is our largest market, where ban on U.S. wine and spirits remains in place. And then as we outlined in our materials, we've agreed to some inventory rebalancing with our key distributors, reflective of the softness we're seeing in the Wine and Spirits category.

And then in terms of the timing of cost deleverage because the top line is softer, as you know, in wine, the length of time it takes for things to move from the balance sheet into the P&L, just -- it will take a bit longer than expected. That being said, structurally, we still believe that our target margins are achievable over the medium term as distributor inventories normalize, as the category declines moderate and as our cost savings agenda moves from the balance sheet and into the P&L.

The next question is coming from Filippo Falorni of Citi.

Just adding my best wishes to Bill and congrats to Nick on the new position. So maybe staying on beer margins, but on the marketing spend side, you mentioned in the prepared remarks that you're thinking about 9.5% of sales on marketing. How should we think about the cadence throughout the year? Obviously, you have a World Cup -- FIFA World Cup coming in the summer. Should we think maybe there's a little bit extra spending in the summer months? And longer term, how you guys think about the marketing levels? Is this 9.5% still a good place to think about longer term beyond fiscal '27?

You bet. We're going to very aggressively invest against our brands in the first half of this year for a number of reasons. One is the momentum that we saw coming out of the end of the year and the momentum that we've seen in March. Secondly, the World Cup is an outstanding event that provides an opportunity for many of our loyalist consumers to engage with our brands, and we're going to invest heavily against that. We always invest in the first half of the year. You will see additional investment this year. Part of that will be done against our high-end light beer strategy.

You've probably noticed we are seeing momentum in our Oro and premier brands, particularly coming out of our repositioning of our price points for those 2 sub-brands. And we're going to invest behind it. We think that remains a tremendous opportunity for our business, and we're going to invest behind that. We're going to continue to invest against Modelo. Modelo, we believe, still has a lot of runway and will be very appropriate in the time frame of the World Cup.

And lastly, I got to make a call out to both Pacifico and Victoria, which are both on a tear. You're going to see more investment against Pacifico than we have done historically as we see that momentum as one that we can continue to leverage going forward. And last but not least, Victoria. Victoria has done very well and brings in a younger consumer than our overall portfolio mix, which we find is very beneficial for the long run as well. So a lot to be excited about within our brands. That doesn't even begin to touch on things like Sunbrew, which obviously is another one that showed great momentum in its first full year.

So a lot of things for us to invest in, as Garth noted a moment ago, we are increasing our investment this year as we feel it's the perfect time to begin to take advantage of some of this momentum that we're seeing.

Our next question is coming from Chris Carey of Wells Fargo Securities.

I wanted to follow up. I think it was Dara's question just around some of the key drivers of margin and then I have another question. But are you expecting a step-up in depreciation this year with the capacity? And are you well hedged on FX. I think you've been talking about layering in some hedges over the past several years. So if you could just confirm those for me, please? And then just from a medium-term perspective, I think we saw that you had given some concrete targets for cases on Pacifico over the medium term. Can you just expand on that and how you see the portfolio evolving and some of the key drivers of your business kind of through fiscal '30? Is Pacifico going to be the new growth driver as Modelo normalizes? So I'd appreciate just some confirmation on the margins in the medium term.

Yes, Chris. So I'll take the first part of that. And as it relates to depreciation, we are expecting to step up in depreciation as Veracruz comes online in the middle or expected to be the middle of our fiscal year. And then as it relates to currency hedging across all of the currencies that we hedge, we're roughly hedged at about 80%, and that's inclusive of the Mexican peso.

And obviously, we don't get too far down the track on what we expect volumetrically for our brands. But I think your statement, do you expect Pacifico to be a continuing growth driver for our business? The answer is yes. I think you can see by the takeaway that's existing in Circana channels, Pacifico continues to explode. And it's done a very similar thing to what you saw initially with Modelo, which was the initial strength was on the West Coast, and you're starting to see that strength broadening across the country. You probably have noted, we have a new campaign that focuses on the tremendously exciting yellow color of our cans, which stand out both on the shelf and in the cold box.

The consumer continues to be excited about the product in the bottle or the can. And we think that Pacifico is going to be a critically important part of our growth profile going forward, not to diminish, by the way, the potential that still exists on Modelo as well. So lots of areas for growth drivers, but certainly, Pacifico is going to be a critically important one for us going forward.

The next question is coming from Lauren Lieberman of Barclays.

So Bill, as you just went through talking about the brands, one that was absent was Corona Extra. And so just I'd love to hear a little bit about like kind of what's next for that brand. But in particular, also expanding to think about Modelo, you shared that general market ZIP codes are continuing to outperform the higher in Hispanic population areas. But I want to talk about Corona Extra and Modelo Especial, particularly within Gen market and what you've been seeing? And then like I said at the outset, just kind of more broadly on Corona, any thoughts on kind of what's next for the brand given trends have remained pretty soft?

Yes. No problem. Obviously, Corona remains one of the best loved brands that we have in the entire category. And I think the -- our ability to do things like Corona Sunbrew and the strength of Familiar are really reflective of the strength of Corona Extra. With that said, we're going to continue to invest aggressively against Extra. While we don't see that necessarily as the growth driver of the business going forward, we believe it's important to maintain that with the kind of strength that exists today for that particular business, recognizing the overall family is very healthy for the Corona franchise because of some of those sub-brands like Familiar and Sunbrew and Premier.

Relative to Modelo, we have seen improvements, as most of you know, we assess ZIP code data on a quintile basis. What's the percentage of Hispanic consumers, less than 20%, 20% to 40% and so on as you go up the ladder. We were very pleased to see coming out of the fourth quarter that all of those quintiles showed a sequential improvement in the takeaway. It was probably most notable in the state of California, which is part of the reason you've seen very strong Circana data over the recent past, where we have gained over 1 share point in both dollars and volume over the last 4 weeks, which gets us back to a more traditional share gaining position.

As you probably saw, we came out of the fourth quarter gaining 0.6 share points. That has accelerated as we've started into the new year. A lot of that has been driven by Modelo as well. As you've seen Modelo begin to show continued strength, and we continue to invest not only with our core Hispanic consumer, but in the broader marketplace as well. You will expect to see, as you have been, if you've been watching any sports, that our focus against sports and that whole platform for Modelo will continue this year, and I think it will speak very well to Modelo's continued ability to grow.

Our next question is coming from Rob Ottenstein of Evercore ISI.

Just would love to understand your process in terms of thinking about capital expenditures given the uncertain and muted outlook of this year, the declines of last year, the lack of visibility going forward. And obviously, you have to invest ahead of actual results and visibility. So how have you adjusted your thinking on CapEx? What -- how do you think about what to spend today for growth tomorrow? And maybe update us in terms of your medium-term expectations for volume for the business?

So let me start, and then I'll turn it over to Garth for some more specifics about the operational footprint. I think it's important to recognize we've continued to do what we've said for a number of years now around capital allocation. which has involved continuing our spend at the levels that we think are important for the long run. It's continuing to do the dividend. And more importantly, we've continued to return dollars to shareholders, over $900 million last year despite some extra dark periods we had in preparation for the announcement of Nick joining our business. So that kind of financial discipline is one that I think you can expect to see continue as we go forward. Nick has been an important part of supporting our development of that strategy over the last 5 years that he's been on the Board. And I think broadly speaking, you're not going to see any real change in our approach to capital allocation.

Now specifically to the operational side of that, Garth, I'll pass that to you.

Yes, Robert. So first of all, we're not ready to give any guidance beyond FY '27 at this point in terms of growth. That being said, we do expect that we will return to growth and that the headwinds that we're facing today are more cyclical in nature than they are structural. So that being said, we'll continue to operate very modularly as it relates to bringing production capacity online. I think we've been very effective at this over the last several years. This past year, FY '26, we spent significantly less in CapEx than where we had started our expectations in the year. And that's going to continue, right? We'll manage that spend. Some of that spend will get delayed as we bring on capacity later than expected and some of it may get avoided altogether.

To your point on the timing of when you make those decisions, I mean, as we've spoken about before, a lot of what goes into a brewery are long lead items, and so you have to make those commitments ahead of time, sometimes years in advance. And so that's the process we go through is looking at what we have for expectations for growth and then backing that into when we think that capacity needs to come online. But again, very successful in managing the modularity of when capacity comes online and then managing the costs associated with it.

The next question is coming from Peter Galbo of Bank of America.

Garth, maybe just a clarification and then a question for Bill. I think off the back of Dara's question around just Wine and Spirits margins for the year. Maybe you can just help us a little bit with the phasing. I think that you talked about inventory distributor reductions. I don't know if that's mostly a Q1 event, and so that weighs on the margin. Just any help there? And then, Bill, just a question on beer. You mentioned Victoria actually being a nice bright spot for the portfolio. That's obviously a very Hispanic dominant brand. And so just I want to kind of reconcile the comments you have about the Hispanic consumer against one of the stronger brands in the portfolio, albeit small, growing at the rate that it is, given kind of the cautious view.

So on the first piece of that, I would say that there's nothing abnormal or unusual around the phasing of Wine and Spirits margins in FY '27. The inventory destocking with distributors will happen throughout the year and not sort of in one event, if you will.

So relative to Victoria, one of the things we've seen, and I alluded to it on one of the prior questions, is Victoria has been a much younger demographic, 21 to 25. We're bringing in new consumers. And while you're correct, it is heavily driven by Hispanic consumers, it's a Hispanic consumer that is recognizing the heritage of Victoria and the authenticity of Victoria and are adopting that as their brand. We've seen many times over the course of time that generations, new generations will find a brand that they would like to make their own. And it certainly appears at this point in time, recognizing it's early days, that a younger Hispanic consumer is focused on Victoria and is coming to that brand in very strong numbers and quantities. So we're very encouraged about that. It's always good within a portfolio of brands to have a different -- somewhat different demographic base. And we think Victoria is going to be a sleeper. It's more than doubled over the last few years, and we think it has a lot of potential going forward as well, partially because of that younger demographic profile.

Our final question today is coming from Nadine Sarwat of Bernstein.

Bill, it's been a pleasure working with you and best of luck in the next chapter. Maybe 2 for me, just one clarifying on an answer earlier than my actual question. Earlier on the call, you said that you feel that your target margins for Wine and Spirits are still achievable over the medium term. But I know you withdrew your fiscal '28 guidance. Could you help us understand, therefore, what that target you're referring to is? Is that north of 20%? And then my actual question, mix was a 50 basis point drag to the beer top line in this last quarter, you guys called out packaging type. Can you give a little bit more color? How much of this is you guys introducing new mix dilutive offerings? How much is that a behavioral change from the consumer end? And what are you assuming in your full year guidance for this year when it comes to mix?

So as it relates to our Wine and Spirits target margins, we still believe that structurally, we can get those margins in the low 20s. Again, given all the headwinds that we're facing, that's going to take us a bit longer than expected, but we still expect to achieve that over the medium term.

Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Newlands for closing comments.

All right. Thank you, Donna. In closing, literally, thank you all for joining the call today. As you can see, we are confident we're well positioned to achieve our objectives in fiscal '27 and continue driving long-term shareholder value. We have a strong foundation and a clear strategy, and this is the right moment for a seamless leadership transition. It has truly been an honor and privilege to serve as CEO of Constellation Brands over the last 7 years. Together as an organization, we've accomplished a great deal. We've grown our beer business from roughly 280 million cases to well over 400 million cases, nearly doubled the size of Modelo Especial and made it the #1 selling beer brand by dollars in America.

We reshaped our Wine & Spirits business to be focused on a portfolio of higher-end brands. We've established a capital allocation framework that we executed against with consistent discipline, and we invested behind our organization to develop best-in-class talent in a company culture and future truly worth reaching for. While the industry landscape remains dynamic, I firmly believe Constellation is best positioned in this space with advantaged brands, best-in-class marketing and sales capabilities and most importantly, an exceptional team.

Having worked closely with Nick on the Board for the past 5 years, I know he understands our business deeply and has the leadership, judgment and strategic perspective to lead this company into its next phase of profitable growth. So to our investors, partners, employees with gratitude, I thank you for your trust and support over the years. It's been a privilege to lead this remarkable organization.

And with that, Donna, back to you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's event. You may disconnect your lines or log off the webcast at this time, and enjoy the rest of your day.

Greetings, and welcome to the Constellation Brands Q3 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Blair Veenema, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Blair.

Thank you, Kevin. Good morning all, and welcome to Constellation Brands' Q3 Fiscal '26 Conference Call. I'm here this morning with Bill Newlands, our CEO; and Garth Hankinson, our CFO. We trust you had the opportunity to review the news release, CEO and CFO commentary and accompanying quarterly slides made available in the Investors section of our company's website, www.cbrands.com.

On that note, as a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measure and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in the news release and website. And we encourage you to also refer to the news release and Constellation's SEC filings for risk factors that may impact forward-looking statements made on this call.

Before turning the call over to Bill and Garth, please keep in mind that, as usual, answers provided today will be referencing comparable results unless otherwise specified. Lastly, in line with prior quarters, I would ask that you limit yourselves to 1 question per person, which will help us to end our call on time. Thanks in advance, and over to your questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from Bonnie Herzog from Goldman Sachs.

Hope you're doing well, and Happy New Year. I guess I had a question on your op margins. They came in a lot stronger than expected in the quarter despite the volume deleverage. So hoping you could talk further on some of the puts and takes behind this strength.

And then thinking about your full year guidance, which you maintain, it does imply much more modest beer op margins in the fourth quarter, which I know seasonally is a lower quarter. But is there anything else that is expected to weigh on margins in this next quarter? Maybe aluminum, or if you could just talk through that?

Thanks for the question, Bonnie, and happy New Year to you. So first, starting with Q3 margins. As you indicated, volume declines certainly were a headwind in the quarter. Additional headwinds in the quarter were tariffs, as you noted, logistics and then brewery maintenance. Offsetting those headwinds, we continue to make good progress against our cost savings initiatives. We had favorable pricing from the actions we've taken in both the spring and in the fall. And then there was a depreciation timing benefit that occurred in Q3, which was favorable on a year-over-year basis.

As we think about our move to Q4, just to underscore what you said, it is our lowest quarter from a seasonality perspective, makes up about 20% of our overall volume. So fixed overhead absorption will be most amplified in this quarter. The depreciation benefit that we saw in Q3 will actually turn into a little bit of a headwind into Q4 as additional assets come online or put into service.

And then tariffs will be a further headwind in Q4, really related to a couple of factors, one of which you mentioned, which was aluminum and the pricing of aluminum, which continues to be pretty strong. There is also the ongoing and as expected shift in product mix, so more to aluminum from glass, and we'll see that in Q4. And then there's also a timing element to tariffs as to when the tariff gets accrued and goes into inventory and then when it gets released in the P&L. And that will be a bit of a headwind in Q4 as well.

Next question is coming from Nadine Sarwat from Bernstein.

Another one on beer margins, so perhaps with a longer-term perspective. So you called out a number of the factors in your prepared release in your answer just now about the pressures that beer margins will face in Q4. So with that in mind, how should we be thinking about the 39% to 40% beer margins for fiscal '27 and 28 that you guided to back in April of last year. Is that something you still believe you can achieve? Should we be thinking of margins closer to where we were this year? Any color would be helpful.

And then if I could just squeeze in one more on depletion. It's nice to see that come in, I think, ahead of some expectations. Any color on exit rate or what we're seeing in December? Is there any sequential improvement, or more of the same?

Thanks, Nadine. I'll take the first question, and then Bill will take the second. But as it relates to FY '27 [ beer margins ], as we said back in our Q2 earnings call, we'll provide more color on what our expectations are for FY '27 and beyond in our April earnings call. That's our normal cadence, if you will. It allows us to see how the rest of the year unfolds from a consumer perspective and from a macroeconomic perspective as well. So more to come on that.

That being said, the guidance that we provided last April was given under a different set of macroeconomic conditions, and the macroeconomic environment has worsened since that time. So that will all go into our planning process and will be reflected in the guidance that we gave in April.

And Nadine, relative to December, December came in roughly where we expected. It was fairly consistent with our expectations. For those of you who track the Circana IRI data, you saw there was a very strong result against our business around the Christmas holiday. Noting, of course, that that's a great reflection of the strength of our overall brands and the brand health that exists for our brands. And therefore, we were quite comfortable coming out of December as the first month of our last quarter of the year.

Your next question is coming from Lauren Lieberman from Barclays.

Want to talk for a second about capacity and CapEx. So in the slide deck, you reiterated the plans for 7 million [indiscernible] of capacity through fiscal '28. I think that implies sort of heavier CapEx in 4Q tied to Veracruz. I just wanted to maybe get an update on how you're thinking about the modular capacity build-out over the next couple of years, managing that against growth projections to support kind of what are really the optimal utilization levels. And particularly, when we think about the fiscal '26 volumetric pace, is going to be lower than what you kind of originally thought back in April, to your point, under a very different macro backdrop.

Yes. Lauren, thanks for the call. So the approach on the modularity of the breweries is we'll continue with that approach going forward. As we've said over the course of the last couple of quarters, the way we'll manage that really is when we bring assets online, and we'll manage to bring -- or we'll manage through the capacity in that manner. What we've also said though is that when you're building capacity in a manner which we've been building capacity with long lead items, you are making commitments to that spend. And our plan for this year is reflective of commitments that we've made on capacity expansion.

But again, we continue to monitor this and assess where the volume is expected to be. And again, we'll bring the assets online when we can. And to the extent we can delay or defer CapEx, we will. But there's a lot of long lead equipment that goes into a brewery, and those commitments have been made.

Your next question is coming from Rob Ottenstein from Evercore ISI.

Great. Moving more to over to the brand side. The Pacifico brand has been an extraordinary success. It's still relatively small, but you've been working on it very diligently for 10-plus years or so. Just wondering, how -- what you've learned about the brand over this time? How incremental is it? Any tweaks that you see in terms of the brand positioning and the pressure -- the marketing pressure, investment pressure behind the brand for it to kind of get to what you think is its full potential, which my understanding is to be a very strong #3 brand in your portfolio?

Yes, Robert, Pacifico, obviously, has been a tremendous success to date, much in the same way that Modelo initially developed in the West of the United States and then has progressively moved East to become the #1 player by dollars in the United States. Pacifico is doing a very similar approach. It's the #2 brand in the state of California today. It skews younger relative to our overall portfolio, and really has resonated well with consumers.

As you know, it's the #1 social -- #1 on social media in terms of share of voice, and it has gained 1.5 points in the on-premise. So you're seeing significant gains in that arena as well.

So we continue to invest behind this brand. As you point out, we think it's going to be a strong #3 in our portfolio as time goes forward. And you should expect to see us continue to put significant emphasis on this as it builds its way across the country, similar to what Modelo did several years ago.

Your next question is coming from Dara Mohsenian from Morgan Stanley.

So you mentioned mid-single-digit distribution growth for the beer portfolio in the quarter. Just as we look out to calendar 2026 post the spring resets, do you think it's realistic you can drive shelf space gains for your portfolio with macros where they are? Or is that less realistic just given the weaker velocity we've seen over the last year or so? And maybe also you can just touch on the beer category itself and what you're hearing from retailers as we think about shelf space for the category in the balance of 2026.

Sure. Let's start with the distribution side. We continue to see distribution as one of our strongest opportunities going forward. Given that our portfolio gained share in 49 of the 50 states, we continue to earn additional distribution capability and distribution positions across the country.

Now those will probably change some. You've seen a radical increase in distribution around Pacifico, going back to Robert's question a moment ago as well as Victoria, which also has grown double digits for the most recent past. So we continue to see distribution as a significant opportunity going forward.

Remember, Modelo itself, despite the fact that it's the #1 beer by dollars in the U.S., it still has 20% fewer pods than the broader domestic players who we compete against. So there remains plenty of opportunity for distribution to be an important part of the future. That has been reemphasized by our Shopper-First Shelf, which has allowed retailers to recognize the opportunity to build a stronger section. And that will be a significant part of your category question, is as more people do Shopper-First Shelf, it will be better for the category, and as you would expect, on brands that are growing their share like ours are, it will be good for us as well.

Relative to the beer category overall, it still remains challenged, and it's largely around the Hispanic consumer. 75% of the Hispanic consumers are very concerned about the socioeconomic environment and they're being much more careful about their spending patterns, spending much more on what you would call consumer essentials versus other categories. So I think that's going to continue to be volatile going forward. But this is where -- our focus remains on controlling the controllables, and that is distribution, that's price pack architecture, that's doing the right things to set ourselves up for a successful future.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from Drew Levine from JPMorgan.

I wanted to follow up again on the beer margins implied for fourth quarter given the low single-digit absolute COGS increase for the year. Implies gross margins, I think, something in the 47% range. I understand that it is lower volume, as Garth, you well mentioned. But I guess maybe if you could sort of provide a little bit more context on the expected headwind from aluminum and depreciation that you mentioned, any sort of quantification there?

I'm just asking because, I guess, last year in fourth quarter, volumes were down as well and, obviously, much stronger margin performance. So just on the margins, that would be great.

And then another follow-up just on the depletions in the off-premise, I think were down 2.9%, ran decently ahead of where we saw both Nielsen and Circana end up in the third quarter, the second quarter in a row that's happened. So wondering what you're seeing in the independent channels, if it's just sort of a function of easy comparisons, or are you seeing any sort of encouraging trends in that channel?

Yes. So just to reiterate on the margins, what the headwinds were. And again, you noted that it is our low seasonal quarter. Just for clarity, again, it's 20% of our overall volume for the fiscal year. As I mentioned, depreciation, which was a benefit for us in Q3, will be an incremental headwind in Q4 because incremental assets are being placed into service. So that will be a headwind in the quarter.

And then on tariff, as expected with tariffs, aluminum pricing has gone up, so the tariff has gone up. There's been an ongoing shift in our business and our portfolio towards aluminum. That's continued through the fiscal year, right? So we'll see the impact of that in Q4. And then there is a timing element around tariffs, which is you incur the tariff when you bring it into the U.S., but then it doesn't run through your P&L until you sell it on. And so given the way tariffs have layered in through the year, there's going to be a higher tariff impact as expected in Q4.

Another minor impact headwind in Q4 is there were some expenses that we expected to incur in Q3 that had pushed into Q4. That's just timing. So a bit of a benefit in Q3 versus headwind in Q4.

Relative to your question related to depletions. I think a couple of things to keep in mind that you don't always see. Some of the regions have less tracked channel coverage, and those have been stronger, on-premise. A year ago, Modelo was #5 on draft, today it's #2. I already mentioned when I was answering Robert's question on Pacifico, that we picked up significant share with Pacifico in the on-premise as well. So some of those areas that are not as easily tracked have gone in our favor, and that certainly has helped the depletion layout versus what some of the expectations were.

Next question is coming from Gerald Pascarelli from Needham & Company.

Question for Bill. Just despite the continued macro pressures, your depletions have remained relatively consistent this year, just kind of down 2.5% to 3%, so not getting materially worse. Your Beer Business continues to outperform the category. It looks like scanner showed a little bit of an improvement in December. So just curious how you're thinking about a potential recovery, if at all, in your Beer Business looking out over the next year when you just consider some of the obvious tailwinds, the easier compares, the benefit of the World Cup, those types of things? Any color there would be great.

Sure. Obviously, we're cautiously optimistic that we're on the sort of the plateau of where the business will be. But it's been really tough to judge. The volatility has been great. What -- so it's very hard to say that you've sort of hit the bottom. When you look at our Omnibus study, we continue to see Hispanic consumers being particularly concerned. There seems to have been a little bit of uptick with the broader market community. And as I alluded to earlier, Christmas week was particularly strong for our business. But I think that's more reflective of when consumers are coming out and they're buying. They continue to buy our brands because of the brand health of those brands.

There are some things, as you point out, next year, world Cup is a great example where there will be things that are beer moments. And certainly, we believe our beers will help to support those beer moments. But it's very difficult to project at this point how this is all going to go. A lot of it is going to relate to what the -- how the consumer is feeling and how they're feeling about the sort of macroeconomic issues that exist today.

Next question today is coming from Robert Moskow from TD Cowen.

Thanks for the question; unfortunately, it was also Gerald's question. But maybe if there's a way to think about it just quantitatively, your Hispanic consumer really started feeling the pressure in February of last year, you kind of see it in the data. And I guess what we're all kind of wrestling with is, once we lap that initial shock of restrictions on immigration policy, is it possible that it just gets a little bit less bad? So instead of mid-single-digit declines just theoretically with this cohort, since you're lapping the initial shock, it could be a little bit better than that?

Well, we hope -- we assume that -- we hope you are correct. That would be a lovely outcome. The thing that we consistently see, and as you know, and we've said this in prior quarters, we track it by ZIP code. And with ZIP codes that have greater than 20% Hispanic representation, it still remains very challenging. That has seen some improvement in ZIP codes with less than 20% Hispanic representation, and you see a lot of volatility state-by-state depending on what is going on with immigration policy in particular markets.

So all of those factors have been why it's been very difficult to predict, because you do have that volatility that goes on state by state, market by market. It's why we continue to talk about controlling the controllables. It's why we continue to talk about and put ourselves in a good position to win. It's why we have focused on the things that are working in our favor, things like Pacifico and Victoria, Modelo Draft, Corona Sunbrew, Corona Non-Alcoholic, all of which are working very well against our business and are positioning us not only to have near-term success, but for the long run as well.

Next question is coming from Filippo Falorni from Citi.

Happy new year. I wanted to ask on the beer pricing environment. You had 1.5% pricing in the quarter, but you have also some negative mix from package types. Can you discuss like how you're thinking that would evolve going forward? Should we still think this dynamic continues? And then maybe if you can touch on like some of the initiatives that you did with Modelo Oro and Corona Premier in terms of the price adjustments. Are you seeing a volume uptick as a result of the price adjustment there that could we see some more -- in some more other brands to try to respond to the macro environment?

Sure. We continue to project 1 to 2. We still think that's an appropriate level. As you know, it will vary higher or lower within that range depending on the market conditions that we face. But to your point, we are quite pleased with the initial work. As many of you know, during this past -- or this past calendar year, we adjusted Oro and Premier pricing to be more in line with the average price point the consumer was expecting for white beers. We're very pleased with what that looks like. Our trends on Oro and Premier have both improved, and we're pleased with that positioning.

It also points to price pack architecture, which is also an important part of what we have done. We have added 7-ounce in a number of forms and formats in different states, to again meet the needs of consumers who are concerned about price points because of their socioeconomic concerns and financial concerns that exist at the moment. Again, all of those things are trying to meet the consumer where they are today, and that process will continue going forward.

The next question is coming from Peter Galbo from Bank of America.

I maybe just wanted to ask a clarified comment from your prepared remarks about the fourth quarter specifically. You talked about an expectation of year-over-year volume declines in the Beer Business to improve, I think, in the first sentence. And I just -- I wanted to clarify whether that is a shipment comment, a depletion comment, both potentially, but you should still be expecting kind of a negative in the fourth quarter, and whether it applies to both ships and depletes in beer.

Garth will add on to what I'm about to say, but as we've made note -- we made note in our last quarter, we expect over the course of the last 2 quarters that ships and depletes will be basically equal. As you saw, there was some minor variation in this quarter. You would expect that to probably reverse itself next quarter. But over the course of the 2, third and fourth quarters, we expect depletes and ships to basically be exactly the same.

Bill, that's precisely right, and the comment was specific to billings, to your point. So that the second half of the year billings and depletions are largely aligned.

Next question is coming from Bill Kirk from ROTH Capital Partners.

So a different type of question. In December, President Trump signed the executive order pushing to reschedule cannabis. I guess if that happens, how would it impact how you think about your exposures to that segment?

And then on the ban on intoxicating hemp and intoxicating hemp beverages, in some states, those have become kind of a real market, do you think you'll benefit if those products go away, those intoxicating hemp beverages go away?

Obviously, we have shares in Canopy that we still have available to us. And I think that could ultimately be interesting as that market develops. But we don't engage on a day-to-day basis in the cannabis business today. I think we have not seen a significant issue related to our Beer Business related to hemp. It has mostly been around ready-to-drink and ready-to-serve scenarios where there seems to be interaction there, and that seems to be where most of the interaction has come.

But admittedly, consumers make choices around their disposable income and where they choose to spend money. And therefore, as this develops, that's certainly something that we're going to be quite aware of and keep our eye on closely.

Your next question is coming from Michael Lavery from Piper Sandler.

I was wondering if you could maybe just elaborate a little bit on how to think about World Cup. It's, as you pointed out, just a driver of occasions. But have you -- can you give a sense of maybe what you've seen in the past in terms of maybe a positive lift or any changes to your spending approach? I realize you're not a sponsor, so do you still plan some ways to kind of spend additionally around it or just kind of benefit from occasion momentum? How should we think about just what impact that might have both on the top line side and maybe your spending side?

Sure. As you would expect, this is a big sporting element for the coming year. Sporting elements tend to be big beer moments. It's also a sport that over-indexes in the Hispanic community. All of those things, therefore, over-index into our business. So we would expect as the consumer engages with that event and those -- and the various games that will attest to those, that will have some incremental benefits for us. We will remain as diligent as we always are to get the right promotions and to get the right shelf presence and floor presence around that particular time.

We'll also have in-game media, TV media. As you know, Modelo is the #1 share of voice and Corona is the #3 share of voice in traditional media. All of that will be done consistent with investing against sports, which has been the focus of our attention anyway. So we believe that has an -- that creates an opportunity for a strong window of time for beer generally and more specifically to us.

Thank you. We've reached end of our question-and-answer session. And that does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.

Greetings, and welcome to the Constellation Brands Q2 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Blair Veenema, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Blair.

Thank you, Kevin. Good morning all, and welcome to Constellation Brands Q2 Fiscal '26 Conference Call. I'm here this morning with Bill Newlands, our CEO; and Garth Hankinson, our CFO. We trust you had the opportunity to review the news release, CEO and CFO commentary and accompanying quarterly slides made available in the Investors section of our company's website, www.cbrands.com.

On that note, as a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measure and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in the news release and website. And we encourage you to also refer to the news release and Constellation's SEC filings for risk factors that may impact forward-looking statements made on this call.

Before turning the call over to Bill and Garth, please keep in mind that, as usual, answers provided today will be referencing comparable results unless otherwise specified. Lastly, in line with prior quarters, I would ask that you limit yourselves to one question per person, which will help us to end our call on time.

Thanks in advance and over to your questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from Nik Modi from RBC Capital Markets.

So I just had a big picture question on volume growth. So the debate across the industry has been primarily about structural versus cyclical. But for Constellation Brands, there's a bit of more of a nuance right within the cyclical bucket. So you're dealing with the overall macro consumer slowdown but also suppressed sentiment among Hispanic consumers.

So we did some work, and it shows like there was a rapid drop off in sales volume around March, April of this year for the brands and the pack sizes that really over-index the Hispanic consumers across your portfolio. And that's right when the ICE activity started to pick up.

So the question, I guess, is this. Do you think volumes would have grown in absence of the ICE activities based on everything that you've seen and all the data that you have? And I guess, in other words, will volume growth resume when we start lapping these activities next year?

Yes. Thanks, Nik. The key thing, I think, around that whole question is exactly what you put your finger on, which is what is the consumer sentiment. And as you know, we are doing a monthly study of all consumers, both Hispanic and non-Hispanic. And the thing that has stood out for us is that 80% of surveyed Hispanic and non-Hispanic consumers continue to express concern about the socioeconomic environment we face. And 70% of those are specifically concerned about their personal finances, which goes right back to your point about cyclical versus noncyclical. We've got a consumer base that's pulling in a bit and they are not engaging.

At the same time, you're seeing increased loyalty. Our loyalty is up with Corona in the general market. Our loyalty is up with Hispanic consumers for Modelo. A lot of people ask the question about Gen Z often. We have twice the share of Gen Z as part of our overall mix versus the industry average. So we're sitting in a good spot as the consumer turns around and gets more comfortable with where they are. But at the moment, there's just a tremendous amount of concern about socioeconomic issues really across the board, and our view is that's the significant thing that's been challenging both for us and for the category in general.

Next question is coming from Nadine Sarwat from Bernstein.

I'd like to touch on, on CapEx. So you cut your top line guidance last month. You have not cut your GAAP CapEx guidance. Can you comment on the rationale behind that? And is there scope to cut CapEx for years beyond this fiscal year given the weaker top line?

Nadine, thanks for the question. And let me try to answer that, and there is a little bit of a near-term and a long-term answer there. So first of all, consistent with our capital allocation priorities, we're going to continue to invest in the long-term growth in our business. And despite the near-term headwinds that Bill just highlighted, which we see as being primarily cyclical in nature, we're confident in the longer-term growth trajectory of the portfolio. So we still believe that we need to invest in incremental capacity.

Again, the answer is a bit nuanced. As we look at FY '26, we didn't adjust CapEx for FY '26 because, as we discussed last month, much of what you incur from a CapEx perspective in a fiscal year is related to longer lead items. And so those are sort of committed dollars, if you will. As we look beyond FY '26, however, even though we do have confidence in the longer-term trajectory of the portfolio, we are being very mindful in looking at ways that we could slow down or avoid CapEx if possible. I don't have anything to share with you on that. As we said last month. As it relates to anything beyond FY '26, we'll cover off on that later this year as we give guidance for FY '27.

Next question today is coming from Rob Ottenstein from Evercore.

Great. I just want to get a little bit more sense about what you mean by seeing more loyalty for Corona and Modelo. And particularly Corona, if we just -- from the outside, without your data, Corona Extra is down more than Coors Light or Miller Lite, never seen that before. And Corona is more general population, I think it's, what, 20% or 30% Hispanic. So just like to understand what you're seeing in terms of loyalty.

And perhaps connected to that, very interesting movement within the Corona portfolio, right, with Corona Familiar doing actually extremely well and maybe actually a larger brand than we may think. So maybe give us a little bit of sense of how big Corona Familiar is, what you're seeing within the Corona portfolio, and what's the data that's telling you about increased loyalty for Corona.

Sure, Robert. As you would expect, we measure our brand health metrics consistently over time and analyze what the intent to buy is, what the purchase intentions are for all of our brands and businesses. That's where we begin to talk about brand loyalty, what first choice consumers would have in buying within our franchise. Now as you point out, while Corona Extra has been somewhat challenged recently, the broader family has done very well.

Corona Extra provides an exceptional halo for the overall brand family. Familiar is doing extraordinarily well and one of the top share gainers in the category. And Sunbrew, as you probably know, is the #1 new brand in dollars and the #4 share gainer overall in the category this year. So Corona Extra continues to provide the kind of halo for us for the broader market that has been very valuable for the overall franchise of Corona.

You'll also notice as an example, Corona has been the focus on Major League Baseball. If you watch any of the playoffs, you probably would have noticed that Corona has been all over the baseball playoffs as the official import beer of Major League Baseball. So we continue to feel that Corona Extra is going to be an important part of our business going forward. But it also, as you note, really is a tremendous halo for other SKUs within the franchise.

Next question is coming from Dara Mohsenian from Morgan Stanley Investment Management.

So Bill, I just want to return to the first question. In your response to the question and prepared remarks, you continue to emphasize that the recent beer depletion weakness you think is caused more by macro factors. Certainly understand there's a big macro component, but you don't seem to attribute much of it to other more secular factors on the beer category, including health and wellness particularly with GLPs, cannabis substitution, lower consumption from younger consumers than past generations.

Just how much impact do you think you're seeing from factors beyond the macro component? And I know you emphasized your strong brand equity and your share gains, but these factors do seem to be impacting the beer category more broadly. So just wanted to understand your thought process there. Has your thinking changed at all on those nonmacro sort of drivers as you look at the trends in recent months?

And then if I can slip it in part B, just the corporate response to the weaker top line growth we're seeing. Can you talk about strategy tweaks to drive top line growth within a tougher environment? And any opportunities on further productivity beyond what you've already done as you think going forward here?

Sure. We continue to feel that the structural element is relatively minor in the scheme of things versus the cyclical element. As we've covered numerous times now, there just isn't a lot of evidence that GLP is having much impact whatsoever. I think cannabis could be as you go forward, to be frank, because as consumers are constrained about their spending patterns, they make choices as to where they spend their discretionary funds. But again, today, that's also relatively minor in the scheme of things.

Part of what you're seeing with our work in -- Corona Sunbrew is a great example, is going after a younger legal drinking age Gen Z consumer. Part of what we observed is consumers, particularly around spring break, were mixing orange juice and Corona. Our view was we could do something much better than that in real time, which we did. And it's part of the reason why that is the #1 dollar SKU this year and the #4 share gainer in the category.

Relative to your question about the top line, one of the things that you historically have seen in other downturns within categories is that some organizations pull back on their marketing spend. We have no intention whatsoever to do that. In fact, in many respects, we're spending more than we ever have. You've probably seen, as I mentioned on the prior question, Corona's presence in Major League Baseball. Modelo with the NFL and with College Football has been very aggressively positioned. And Pacifico is the #1 voice in digital.

So I think the important point to all of that is we're continuing to invest in the long-term success of our business because we recognize, at some point, some of these socioeconomic elements will ease and we'll be in a great position to return to more traditional growth profiles that we've seen in the past. Even in this tough environment, we continue to gain share in the market and have been the #1 share gainer. So hopefully, that answers -- that was a complex set of questions, but hopefully that answers them.

Next question is coming from Bonnie Herzog from Goldman Sachs.

So I had a question on margins. I'd love to hear more color on the beer op margin expansion in the quarter, I guess, as well as key headwinds to margins in the back half considering your guidance implies a decent step down versus 1H.

Yes. Thanks, Bonnie. Look, I mean, I'd say we feel pretty good about the margin profile that we laid out last month in terms of what our expectation is for the year. If I think about all the elements to your question there, let me just start by talking about headwinds for the second half.

First of all, the second half of the year, as you know, is always kind of our lower volume year. And even though we changed guidance for the full year, that doesn't change our expectations for how the first half of the year comes in versus the second half of the year from a volumetric standpoint. And as you know, in the second half of the year, that's, as I say, the lower volume half. It's also when we do some of our maintenance. So just traditionally, that's going to be when we have our lowest margins of the fiscal year.

As I think about, again, sticking on margin, the headwinds that we noted last month still remain. We have about 100 basis points of margin headwinds related to fixed costs and incremental tariffs. We have about 60 basis points related to, as Bill just mentioned, keeping our marketing investment in line. Oh, by the way, I misspoke just now. There's 100 basis points with fixed overhead and then there's another 60 points on incremental margins. So those are some pretty big headwinds. They get offset a little bit by some lower comp and benefits in the second half of the year, but that really is the margin profile for the full year.

Next question today is coming from Chris Carey from Wells Fargo Securities.

Garth, just a follow-up. Are you seeing a pickup in inflation in the back half? Or is that specifically around the seasonal volume assumptions? Just to clarify something on Bonnie's question.

But then the question that I had today was actually around the Wine and Spirits margins. I think going to the second half of the year, you need to believe that these margins are going to turn positive, more than a little positive to get to the full year guidance. So what do we have to believe in improvement from the first half into the back half to see that level of improvement to get to that full year outlook, maybe some of the key drivers?

And then as you think about going into fiscal '27, there was an expectation that this business could return to a low 20s operating margin, which seems to be embedded in consensus expectations. Is that still the right way to think about it? And again I would ask it in a similar vein as the back half of this year. What do we have to believe that, that outcome of substantial margin improvement in fiscal '27 is achieved?

Sure. So just on the first question related to the beer margins as a follow-up to Bonnie's question, we're not really seeing any tick up in inflation in the second half of the year. So really it's just the drivers that I outlined.

As it relates to Wine and Spirits for this fiscal year and the improvement that you'll see in the second half of the year, a couple of things that are going on there which make the full year and certainly the first half of the year a bit messy, if you will. So first of all, the converse of what I laid out for beer is true for Wine and Spirits, which is the bulk of our volume and sales occur in the second half of the year. So we will see benefits from additional volume in the second half. And that also tends to be when you see vintage releases related to our DTC business, which tend to lead to higher sales and higher margins.

And then back to the messiness of the first half of the year, as we laid out at the beginning of this fiscal year, there are a number of factors driving performance this year specific to the first half related to distributor payments as well as some post-transaction inventory trips between ourselves and with our distributor partners. And therefore, that's what's made the first half of the year sort of look like it is and why we feel confident that we can turn that in the second half of the year and achieve the operating profit that we laid out in April.

And just to add on to that. We made clear at the beginning of the year that the focus in the Wine and Spirits business this year was to get the top line in line and to beat the market. We have now beaten in the market for 6 straight months. Our business in Q2, very similar to Q1 on an apples-to-apples basis, was up 2% driven by Kim and Mi CAMPO. Mi CAMPO, you may remember, was a brand we started from scratch several years ago.

And the 12-week numbers in Circana show Ruffino up 2 points, The Prisoner up 4, Unshackled up 11 and Harvey & Harriet, up roughly 23. So while we're not going to give any specific guidance yet for fiscal '27, I think we're very pleased with the development of the top line in the Wine and Spirits business. And we've returned that business to a strong share gaining position and have been presenting those results for the last several months. So we feel pretty comfortable with how that is developing and how the team has executed against that strategy.

Next question today is coming from Andrea Teixeira from JPMorgan.

This is Drew Levine on for Andrea. I wanted to ask on the beer inventory rebalance, maybe if you could provide some context on inventory on hand to distributors now versus before the rebalance and what gives you confidence that this was sort of more of a onetime event, I guess, rather than something that we should be more concerned about going forward.

And with that visibility that ships and depletes, I think the guidance is to largely track in second half. I think typically there's a bit more depletes second half versus first half. So just any comments on visibility to that.

So look, I can start and then Bill can weigh in. So first of all, the ship/dep true-up that happened in Q2 related to our beer business was a result of a couple of things. One was that, as typical with every year, we tend to ship in more in Q1, Q2 ahead of the key summer selling season. So that's just normal operating procedure. This year, as we went through the summer selling season, the takeaway wasn't in line with expectations. Therefore, distributors had a little bit more than expected as we exited this summer.

Now the second thing that drove it is, the ship/dep true-up, is that again we typically overship in the first half of the year to ensure that there's product on the shelves. And then there's a little bit of rebalancing that occurs in the second half of the year, usually in Q3. And so we pulled that rebalancing into Q2 versus Q3. So that's really what drove it. As we sit there and look at inventory levels with distributors, they're at a good spot right now. We feel good about where our inventory levels are relative to where they are historically.

And I think it's important for us to note that the rebalancing of inventories really occurred strictly with distributors. There's been no retailer destocking. We continue to gain PODs in shelf space. We have very good confidence in our ability to continue to generate significant shelf share gains as one would expect for a portfolio that's growing, as Bill highlighted before, in 49 out of 50 states and with the #1 beer brand by dollar sales. So we feel good about where we are for our inventory levels, and that's why we have confidence that for the balance of the year, shipments and depletions will be aligned with one another.

Next question is coming from Bill Kirk from ROTH Capital Partners.

So price pack architecture was a big focus before this recent deceleration. So I guess how has the deceleration impacted the plans for different pack sizes and price points? And maybe if you had been further along in those price pack architecture plans, do you think depletions performance would have been better?

Well, price pack architecture is something that we've said we're going to spend a fair amount of time on. If we had known all the socioeconomic issues, would we have gotten that out sooner? I hope the answer would have been yes. But the reality is this is a good long-term play for the business. Many of you have heard us talk before, we think there are some exceptionally good businesses at putting that together, meaning when you go in a store, you have an opportunity. No matter how much money you have to spend, you have a product available to you.

Our focus on price pack architecture and smaller sizes and things of that ilk make sure that we would have something that our consumer would be able to buy depending on what they have available to them. So we're working aggressively on that in a number of fronts and with a number of brands. And that process is going to continue because we think that's not only important now, but that's also important for the long run as well.

Next question is coming from Filippo Falorni from Citigroup.

So I wanted to ask first on the beer margin and beer cost savings. Particularly, you realized $65 million in cost savings in Q2, $105 million in year-to-date. Any sense of what's the target for the year? And if you can give a little bit more color on the opportunities there on the beer cost saving front.

And then just a follow-up on the prior question. On tariffs, can you give us a sense of how much you realized in the first half in terms of tariff headwinds and how much to expect for the balance of the year?

Yes. So just on the cost savings. First of all, I'd say that this is just -- we continue to reap the benefits of this evolution from being a builder to an operator. As you highlighted, since our Investor Day a couple of years ago, we've delivered over $500 million worth of cost savings. And again as you noted, so far this year, we've delivered over $100 million in savings.

We continue to find ways to make our operations more efficient. A lot of that so far is focused on supplier and sourcing optimization and material and cost innovation. Included in that would be our move to 60-foot railcars and our double stacking within railcars as well as a big initiative around suppliers and terms, if you will. So this is going to continue to be a focus for us over time. We continue to think that there will be opportunities for us in logistics and manufacturing optimization.

We don't provide quarterly or annual guidance related to our cost savings initiatives, but we will continue to provide updates on a quarterly basis once we achieve those savings.

Next question is coming from Carlos Laboy from HSBC.

Bill, maybe you can go back a little bit and talk to us about the brand positioning of Corona itself. How might you be refreshing or tweaking it? And the reason I'm asking the question is because we've had over 40 years of beach rest and relaxation.

And I'm wondering, has that become too sedentary an interpretation of beach for a premium beer consumer that's turning to more active lifestyle positioning, so for example, Michelob ULTRA, right? And even in other countries where the Corona brand is doing very well, it's sort of been reinterpreting beach more as an active lifestyle and as a regeneration concept. What are your thoughts on how you tweak that brand if it needs to be?

So we're going to start -- we didn't answer the last half of the last question. Garth is going to cover the tariff, and then I'll come back and answer your question, Carlos.

Yes. So just on the tariffs, just to be clear on that, right? So in our beer business, we're expecting the tariff impact to be about $70 million this year and on the wine business for that to be about $20 million. I would say in terms of how that occurs throughout the year, I mean, that will largely track volume. So that's the way to think about the impact on a half year-to-half year basis.

So progressing to the current question relative to Corona. You may have most of the evolution this year of the Corona advertising proposition to really return to the focus being on the beer. I would argue that we probably got a little too celebrity heavy for a window of time. And we brought that Corona essence right back to where its iconic value has been, which is the beach.

Now the beach lifestyle, I would argue, fits into many things that consumers are looking for today. They're looking for refreshment, That's, first and foremost, what Corona is known for. They are looking for things that are different in experimentation, particularly younger consumer. I'd say Sunbrew is a great example of us playing right into that speech and attitude. And that goes right to a more active lifestyle that Corona Sunbrew has been presented against.

So I think the important part for this is one of the things that both Corona and Modelo and currently Pacifico is developing is we haven't flip-flopped our positioning over time. Many organizations have a tendency to flip-flop their positioning every couple of years whenever there's a change of brand management. Our approach has not been that. Our approach is to stay focused on what we feel are the strong essences of those brands with some minor evolution as part of the marketing development.

And I would argue Sunbrew is a great example of where we can leverage that sort of beach lifestyle and refreshment value of Corona Extra into a new and exciting piece of business for us in the form of Sunbrew.

Next question today is coming from Kaumil Gajrawala from Jefferies.

I'd like to follow up on two questions. The first is you have these obvious economic challenges in addition with Hispanic consumer. If you're twice the share with Gen Z, Gen Z also has twice the amount of unemployment. It sounds like your responses to what to do is to keep up on marketing and such.

But is there anything you're looking to do to make it more affordable, get them to go back out? Just not necessarily on the marketing and the branding side, I think it sounds fine there, but rather what can you do about it if they don't have as much money, they're not as willing to go out?

And then the second question on margins. I get the 160 bps of sort of natural drag, which you talked about. But the split between depletes and shipments isn't expected to be nearly as substantial. So I'm just curious why the margin guidance is still maybe a bit lower than we would have guessed given the beat this quarter.

Sure. Why don't I take the first half. Garth, you can take the second. Relative to the whole question of affordability with where -- when consumers are somewhat constrained, you probably all are quite aware, we have repositioned Oro, Modelo Oro because our belief is the light beer comes is looking for a bit of a different value proposition than it would be for core Modelo as an example. We've done the same now with Premier, and we're positioning that again at a somewhat lower price point from where those have been historically.

We believe those are going to be valuable. First of all, it speaks to where the consumer of high-end light beers want to spend and at the price point they want to spend. And I think that's going to position us well. Early days on Oro, which started earlier, have been quite positive. And we're pleased to see that development both in terms of consumer takeaway as well as in terms of our ability to get more features and displays against that business.

The last thing I would say, and it relates to one of the prior questions, is the price pack architecture. We briefly touched on that. But having the opportunity for the consumer who is financially constrained to find one of our iconic brands at a price point which they can afford at the current time is an important part of why price pack architecture is one of our key focuses now and will be going forward.

Yes. And as it relates to the margin profile, just you've reiterated what we talked about earlier just around the first half versus the second half, second half always being a lower margin profile as it relates to lower volume through our breweries as well as that's when we do our normal maintenance CapEx.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question today is coming from Kevin Grundy BNP Paribas.

I wanted to ask about the suitability of the 39% to 40% beer operating margin target. I think there's a lot of questions among investors about that and the sustainability of it. Very clear, I guess, in terms of positioning of management in terms of it's cyclical and volumes are going to come back. But what if they don't? Like what if volumes stay down low single digits?

And a couple of important points of context here. I think for a really long time, as you guys are well aware, volumes are outstanding, up high single digits. There's a certain degree of operating leverage in the business that you're able to sustain the 39% to 40%. But now it's down and potentially it could stay down. And I think there was a worry over a long period of time, also as you guys are well aware, it was a constraint on the multiple. And that is the weak volume trends in the category, which had been in decline for the better part of 15 years.

And there was always a worry that you're going to get this mean reversion for Constellation, how long can they continue to gain share. So that's all kind of a big wind up for where we are. Category volumes are down mid-single. You guys are doing better than that and the pace of share gains have slowed. But what is the -- how plausible is it that you can sustain that level of margin if you're going to be facing year-after-year operating deleverage of volumes down sort of low single digits? So sorry for all of that, but I appreciate your thoughts.

No, thanks for the question. Right. So look, 39% to 40% operating margins have been best-in-class. And even where we're going to be this year with some deleveraging, we'll still have best-in-class operating margins in all beverage alcohol, certainly within beer. As we think about the impact going beyond FY '26, I mean, I think we've been really clear is that we're not in a position where we want to give guidance beyond FY '26 at this point. We want to see how the macroeconomic and socioeconomic conditions play out and then see how the consumer responds to that.

And then we'll have a better sense for where margins go from here. Obviously, there are multiple things that will go into our margin profile, inclusive of depreciation that comes online with some of the investments that we've made and we'll make. As I mentioned earlier, we're looking at ways to -- or we're reviewing our footprint, both our current footprint and our expected footprint, to see what the opportunities are there. We have a robust savings agenda every year that help margins and certainly offset things like inflation.

Again, we do think that we'll return to growth and that will be beneficial for margins going forward. So there are a lot of things. The normal headwinds and the normal tailwinds should be available to us going forward. But we'll provide more color on where we think margins are as we go through this year and, again, see how the environment plays out and how the consumer responds.

Next question is coming from Chris Pitcher from Rothschild & Co Redburn.

Can I ask a question about the Wine and Spirits in the second half? I mean, it's obviously quite difficult trying to compare against the base that's disrupted by the divestments. But Q3 last year was a big destocking quarter. And based on the positive depletions in the current quarter, is it a fair assumption to assume that inventories are at a good level at your wholesalers, and therefore, you could see quite a benefit in the third quarter just from a normalization of that destocking?

Yes. Our inventory levels in our Wine and Spirits business are in a quite a good spot. Part of what you heard Garth speak of earlier, which was some of the distributor alignment after the divestiture, part of what we focused our attention on is to getting and making sure that our inventory levels of our ongoing business were in the right spot. And they are. Again, our focus at this point -- so I don't think inventory is going to be an issue going forward in the least.

But we're very focused on continuing to win in the market, as we have for the last several months, based on the strong performance of some of our critical brands like the Prisoner and Kim Crawford and Ruffino and Mi CAMPO in particular. And that's really going to be the continuing focus of that business as we said it would be at the beginning of this fiscal year.

Next question is coming from Robert Moskow from TD Cowen.

This is Victor on for Rob Moskow. I want to ask about the feasibility of the 1% to 2% pricing algo. Given the macro pressures around the Hispanic consumer, are these price increases more in low Hispanic markets? And also on the negative mix impact from the prepared remarks, could you give us some more color on what this was from? Could this be from Corona Familiar's strong demand and the brand's larger bottle size?

So our expectation around pricing is what we have always done, which is we look at it SKU by SKU, market by market. And we still expect 1% to 2% to be what our overall delivery will be over the course of this fiscal year. Again, a lot of that goes right back to what we've said before, which is there are pockets of opportunity and we go after those pockets of opportunity.

I think a great example, and I'd be remiss if I didn't point this out, that as Garth mentioned earlier, Modelo Especial remains the #1 top-selling beer by dollars in the United States by tracked channels. It's at a roughly 10% share, and that's 2 full share points ahead of the next largest brand. Some of that also translates over into the on-premise. And the on-premise has gone from #5 to #2 in terms of draft.

So again, those kinds of things where you have that strong brand equity allows you to look specifically on a market-by-market basis and get to that 1% to 2% algorithm that we've consistently talked about. As you would expect, we always look at, is the market available to us? And we will do the right thing on a market-by-market basis no matter what. But we still believe that 1% to 2% is sort of the algorithm that we expect to remain within.

Next question is coming from Chris Barnes from Deutsche Bank.

I just wanted to follow up on your depletions expectations for the second half. I appreciate the 1% to 2% comment on pricing and your expectation for shipments and depletions in absolute cases to track closely. But that seems to imply a pretty material step-down in the second half in depletions growth. So could you maybe unpack the drivers there?

Yes. We don't give forward expectations on a quarter-by-quarter basis, but here's what we'd say. We've seen unprecedented volatility and there's very mixed results.

One of the things that we track very carefully is ZIP code data. And the results that you are seeing in high Hispanic ZIP code areas is significantly worse than what you see in the general market. We've seen some positive uptick in some of our top 5 states within the general market, where the general market ZIP codes are a higher proportion of the overall consumer base.

So we're cautiously, and I would stress that word again, cautiously optimistic that we've hit the bottom here. But the volatility, as I said, is unprecedented and the results are very mixed. The state of California has been the single biggest problem as some of those 4,000 calorie jobs, as we often talk of, haven't materialized to the rate that we would have expected.

So part of that question is going to be, will some of that construction opportunities reinvigorate? Because that's good for the beer business and that's particularly good for us given our strength in that particular market.

But all in, we don't expect a radical change nor have we projected, based on our overall guidance, a radical change in the back half of the year.

But we're going to watch that very closely and see if there's any improvement in the volatility that's been going on in the overall marketplace over the last several months.

Thank you. We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session, and that does conclude today's question-and-answer session and our telecast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.

Thanks, everyone, for being here. Really happy to have President and CEO, Bill Newlands; and Executive Vice President and CFO, Garth Hankinson of Constellation with us today. Bill and Garth, great to have you guys.

A lot has and hasn't changed, let's call it, in the U.S. beer industry since we were last here together. And alongside that, company issued updated fiscal '26 guidance this morning, lowering your top and bottom line outlook for the year. You had some materials along with it, some slides. And in there, you highlighted ongoing U.S. consumer demand headwinds, especially impacting Hispanic consumers. Can you talk a bit about the puts and takes that drove these updates?

So let's break it down a bit. As Lauren points out, we reissued guidance this morning. And many of the materials that we put out gives an overview of many of the things that we were talking about. What's very clear at the moment, Lauren, is there's a lot of concern at a consumer level, and that cuts multiple ways. If you think about the broader consumer, a lot of volatility. People are concerned about making ends meet, making -- concerned about filling their basket. So it's a challenging time broadly.

If you think about 4,000 calorie jobs that we often like to talk about, those are down. Construction is a great example. That's down year-on-year. Those things tend to be positive for the beer industry. That's especially true and even more true when you think about California. California's construction is down further. And then you think about the Hispanic consumer. The Hispanic consumer is very concerned at the moment. 80% are concerned about socioeconomic factors, 75% are concerned about their personal finances. It means that their shopping behavior has changed. There's less occasions, whether you look at on-premise or off-premise, any channel, their behavior is down versus what it had been in prior years. So it's a very challenging broad environment.

But what are we doing about that? And I think this is an important one to keep in focus. We have done 30,000 Shopper-First Shelf initiatives this year. Our distribution gains are up in the mid-single digits. Corona Sunbrew is the #1 new SKU in the beer business, and it has been the #6 share gainer in the beer business. We're continuing to invest. Modelo is the #1 share of voice in the category. Corona is the #3, and Pacifico is the #1 digital share of voice in the industry. So we're continuing to do the things that we think are critical for the long-term success of the business, and it's showing up. We have gained share this fiscal year in 49 of the 50 states. So we're continuing to win in a market. But admittedly, the market is a lot more challenging and a lot more volatile than it's been.

Okay.

Yes. If I can just add in a little bit there, right? So as Bill said, it's a challenging consumer environment. And as a result, we had to change the guidance, as you referenced earlier, and I'll just kind of walk you through that guidance a little bit. Before I do that, I do have to make my typical legal disclaimer for this conference given the timing when it falls. Other than all of the information we updated through our press release and online today, we can't speak specifically around our results for the quarter as we get into the breakout session after this. And all of the guidance updates are available on our website, which we uploaded this morning. But if we think about that change in guidance, we start with the enterprise top line, and we now have an outlook for growth to be down 4% to down 6% and for our beer business to be down 2% to down 4%. If we move further down the P&L, the impact is a bit more pronounced, it's the beer volume -- the reduction in beer volume obviously has had an impact on overhead absorption and operational efficiencies.

Additionally, we have another tariff headwind that we -- I'll get into here in a second. But as a result of those headwinds, our operating income expectations for the full year now are for an enterprise to be down 9% to 11% and for our beer business to be down 7% to 9%. Again, specific to our beer business, those volume declines are driving about 100 basis point headwind to our overall margin for our beer business. And then we are expecting a 60 basis point headwind related to new tariffs. And so what do I mean by new tariffs are -- you'll recall that at the end of June, when we gave our guidance or provided our results for the first quarter, we had identified a $20 million incremental headwind that was a result of tariffs going from 25% to 50%.

Over the last several weeks, we've been working with our can suppliers, and we've now determined we have another approximately $20 million to $25 million exposure, taking the total new tariff, if you will, to about 45 -- roughly $45 million or 60 basis points. So 160 basis points of margin impact from deleveraging, volume-related deleveraging and incremental tariffs. Just on the tariff front, I think it's important for us to note that if you think about that now on a full year basis, in the beer business alone, the impact of tariffs is about $70 million if you take into account what we disclosed at the beginning of the year. And on our wine business, it's about $20 million. So a total of $90 million across the enterprise for the full fiscal year.

Now with those updates to our beer business and then with changes we've made to the corporate and interest expense as well as a change in our comparable tax rate, we're now expecting comparable EPS to be in the $11.30 to $11.60 range. I think it's important to note that we've not changed any of our capital allocation priorities or our commitment to return capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. And on that last point, we've now through the first half of the fiscal year, returned approximately $600 million to shareholders through share repurchases.

The last point I'd like to make is just that as we think about Q2, and we mentioned this in the press release, there will be about a 600 to 700 basis point differential between depletions and billings for the quarter as what we typically see happening in Q3 as distributors start to balance the year from the first half of the year to the second half of the year, that's going to happen earlier than it normally does and be a bit more pronounced just given the consumer dynamics that we've seen. So I think those are some of the key takeaways from the guidance we provided earlier today.

Okay. Great. In April, you guys had talked about expecting the medium term the beer category to get to a more normalized historical growth profile of kind of down 2% to flat for the industry. I guess, how confident are you in that view today? And I ask that in the context of the update to guidance, but also when we were seeing scanner data down 4.5% for the industry year-to-date, so softer than at this time last year. So just curious what that view on the long-term growth of the industry and the path to getting back to that rate.

Our view is that eventually that will happen. We look at lots and lots and lots of data to give ourselves comfort. And we see, for example, that Hispanic consumers actually have increased their loyalty to our brands, even if they are buying less today. We are seeing an increase in loyalty to our brands with Gen Z, the 21- to 25-year-olds are a disproportionate amount of our business versus the category. So we are fairly comfortable being unable to predict exactly when, but we are fairly comfortable that as the socioeconomic environment gets back to something resembling normalcy, that you'll see a category that does the same.

Okay. I guess maybe to hone in a little bit on the near term, again, to keep with this. Just when we spoke in July after results, early July, right, there was a high degree of conviction in sequential improvement and that happening pretty quickly actually. So for the guidance to be what it is now, and roughly speaking, if I account for typical pricing, in my mind, it feels like the first time that you've offered guidance for your beer business, it's very similar to what the category is doing, right, rather than gaining share. Just what changed so significantly from July to now? And also just notwithstanding your point, we're gaining share in 49 out of 50 states, right, 30,000 shelf resets, but your guidance is in line with the category effectively performance this year, which is very different.

Well, if you look at the top 5 states for us that represent roughly 50% of the volume, you saw declining buy rates across all ZIP codes with additional challenge on those ZIP codes that were heavily Hispanic. So we've seen a denigration of the buy rates that we had expected over the nearer term. Now with that said, 3 of those states, Texas, New York, Florida, second quarter sequentially looks better than the prior. But it's been very, very hard to predict, and we're seeing a lot of volatility in the marketplace. But you've seen the consumer basket shrink. That's been a big factor. The percentage of alcohol in the basket hasn't changed any, which again gives us some comfort that as time goes on and consumer behavior hopefully returns to something normalcy that you'll see a return to more normal category dynamics as well.

Okay. And I guess when we think about normal, there's also this element you guys have had an elegant way of articulating some of the political dynamics, frankly, that are impacting your core consumer base. I mean, is it reasonable to think that in the next several years with the administration as it stands today, right, and is currently elected in the office, I mean, don't we have to worry about that consumer base having constrained behavior for the next several years, not knowing what happens 3.5 years from now?

Well, it's very tough to predict how the consumer is going to behave. I think the thing that we're spending our time on is controlling the controllables. And that's execution, that's working in the marketplace and doing the shelf sets that we just talked about. It's winning distribution. It's continuing to invest in the category. I think it would be very important for all players in the category to continue to invest in the category to be prepared for whenever that occurs, that the consumer gets more comfortable that we're prepared to win in that environment. And that's where we're spending our time, controlling the controllables.

Okay. So just staying for a moment with the broad category, still debate or discussion on structural cyclical, right, outside of the Hispanic dynamics, which you've touched on already. I guess how do you actually assess the industry's broad response to how sluggish the market has been? Like what can companies do in this industry to sort of instill confidence in the viability of the beer [indiscernible] say alcohol.

Sure. Well, if you look at what's been sort of positive, you see Spirit RTDs have been positive. You see things that are high flavor that have been relatively positive. You see non-alc is positive. It's why exactly why we've done Corona non-alc, which has done extraordinarily well. It's why Sunbrew is the #1 new SKU in the category and has done extremely well. So you're still seeing things that are catching the consumer's eye and are interesting to the consumer. Relative to this whole question of structural versus not, this is one that I really enjoy talking about.

The pundits love to talk, for example, about GLP-1. There are no facts to back that up. 50% of all GLP-1 users stopped using it within 3 months. There is some denigration of consumption of alcohol during that 3 months, but it's primarily AAB and Wine, interestingly enough, not beer. And after those 3 months, behavior goes right back to where it had been historically. So again, negligible to no impact that we can see on our business. Cannabis beverages have been on the uptick. But interestingly enough, those consumers that consume cannabis beverages actually index higher than the beer industry average. So that consumer doesn't seem to be ignoring beer as an example, while they're involved with it.

And the third is the whole Gen Z question, are they drinking less? As I alluded to earlier, our portfolio has done very well at bringing new, younger consumers into the category. We index 2x in that 21- to 25-year-old. So we are bringing new people into the category. So we really don't see this as a long-term structural thing. Although as Garth always points out to me time after time, we watch it very carefully because you never know whether that answer could change. But today, we don't see it as a structural issue.

And Laura, you asked what can the category do, right, which is -- well, I'll tell you what we're doing to try to engage with consumers and keep consumers interested in the category, and that's we continue to invest behind our brands. You know that we've more or less kept our marketing spend intact, particularly as you think about that as a percent of net sales. We think that, that's incredibly important to not only build our brand equity, but to build excitement in the category. We've honed that as a capability over the last several years. We have very sophisticated models that help us understand the efficacy of the spend that we have so that we can make sure that we're being both effective and efficient in our use of dollars and focus on those initiatives that have a high return on that.

Part of what that looks like is that we've continued to n Modelo as the #1 share of voice brand in the category. And Corona continues to be the #1 loved brand or a brand that I love and a brand that everybody likes. And we've seen good improvement in terms of things like unaided awareness for Modelo. We've seen intentions around Pacifico to be -- to increase in literally every metric or almost every metric that we measure, we've seen an improvement in Victoria. So we think that it's critically important to continue to invest behind the brands, build that brand equity and build excitement in the category.

Okay. Let's dig a little bit more into the medium-term growth outlook, if we can. So at the Investor Day in 2023, you talked about demographics contributing 20% to 30% of beer growth over the medium term. And in light of the nonstructural socioeconomic factors that are now embedded in your algorithm, should we think about that assumed demographic piece contribution being lower in the medium term?

I don't think so in the medium term, Lauren. When you look at the growth of the Hispanic population in the United States, it's an annual 2% to 3% growth of legal drinking age consumers, which means there are more people who are going to be interested in our brands. It's a culture that is beer skewed, which works to our advantage. And we have the strongest loyalty within that marketplace for our brands given the Mexican heritage of those brands. So we really believe in the medium term, that's going to continue to be a tailwind for us.

Okay. And then just talking about the Hispanic consumer, just curious what the latest from your latest omnibus survey. And how do trends you're seeing on Hispanic consumers compared to general population?

It's weaker. 80% are concerned about the socioeconomic factors, 75% are concerned about their personal finances. And what's that translated to is people are not going out. So you've seen a decrease in the on-premise arena. People are not having events in their homes. So the issue is not the desire for our brands or the desire for the category, but the occasions in which products are consumed are pretty radically down, and that's been the biggest challenge.

Okay. And then innovation in this growth algorithm, I know we talked a bit about Sunbrew, but was expected to be 20% to 40% of your growth. So how do you feel about the efficacy of the innovation pipeline? When you think about Sunbrew, is there more you can do or should be doing to even accelerate further?

Well, yes, there is. I mean innovation to us is a core competency that we feel is critically important to keeping interest in the category. You've touched on Sunbrew. I'll throw a few more facts about Sunbrew. Not only is it the #1 new SKU, but 60% of it's incremental to Corona. 2/3 of the people who have consumed Sunbrew have not bought consumer, have not bought Corona Extra in the last year. So you've got people who are coming new into our brand and new into our category and the reaction to the liquid in the bottle has been superb. So the repeat purchase rates are very strong. So that's a perfect example of where you look at broader trends, high flavor, convenience, refreshment, all those things are important more broadly than just beer and Corona Sunbrew is a great example. But we also have talked a lot and we've talked with you about betterment. The same with non-alc. Non-alc has been a strong play for us as well under that Corona brand halo.

Yes. Corona NA is excellent.

We should have brought you a one.

You probably be the real winner, not today. So where do you stand on the rollout? I'm just curious about kind of ACV distribution and how -- kind of maybe a little bit more of the marketing strategy on Corona NA. I don't know where or what you've measured the awareness of the brand. And also, as you're talking about that, I'd be curious how big you think NA beer share can be within the total industry or your portfolio you want to approach?

Well, let's start with the big picture. It's roughly 3% of the business today, which when you think about it, that's relatively small. But it was 1% 5 years ago. So it's tripled in the last 5 years. The question is sort of where can it go? We introduced originally a 6-pack bottle. That was it. It's way outperformed what we expected. And we now introduced a 12-pack can this year. Both of those SKUs are in the top 15 of all SKUs involved, and we continue to gain share with both of those businesses. They're up -- the original SKU is up over 20% this year and is doing extremely well. And when you add in the additional SKU, and we barely have spent any money against it. It's really benefited from the halo of what Corona Extra is.

And as Garth pointed out a couple of minutes ago, the fact that it's such a loved brand. But it also matches up with some of that consumer behavior. There's audience out there that's looking for betterment or they're looking to intersperse non-alc and alc over the course of an evening. And it's unlike what used to be, we won't say how long ago, where non-alc didn't taste very good, you'd be hard-pressed to tell the difference between a non-alc and a Corona Extra today, which I think speaks very well to those consumers who are looking for that experience.

Yes. Okay. And I know that the NA and Sunbrew are helping build confidence in the Corona brand family and you spoke to them it's still a loved and like brand. But trends for Corona Extra have been pretty soft. So how much of that do you think is macro driven that this brand, in particular, has hit harder or more brand specific? And anything you're doing to reinvigorate the brand changes in marketing beyond these 2 innovations?

Well, we've done a number of things. You've seen -- we've -- I'll call it, go back to the beach with our creative. I think you could argue we got a little carried away with celebrities for a period of time. And we have driven Corona Extra right back to the beach, which is -- which was the essence of what it was all about. It was about the beach mentality and about the refreshment value related to the beach. And the current creative that we're running is some of the best we've ever had for the brand based on our testing. So -- and it also provides a great halo. When you think about Corona Familiar, you mentioned Sunbrew, you mentioned nonalcoholic. The family of Corona is doing very well, especially given, as Garth pointed out a couple of minutes ago, it is still the best loved brand in the United States. So we believe it's going to continue to be an important part. We're investing as we have. It's the #3 share of voice. We're putting more dollars against live sporting activity with this great new creative that we have. So Corona is going to continue to be an important part of the overall halo of brand Corona.

Okay. On Modelo, you've often used stronghold states like California and Nevada as a reference point for the growth runway, still go for the brand. I've done that work, too. Just what have been some of the more emerging or nontraditional markets where you've had some good momentum of late and kind of what has been driving that success?

You start to look at where we've seen some significant growth and there are places where you wouldn't expect it. North and South Dakota, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Arkansas, Oklahoma. These are places that arguably you wouldn't expect to be strongholds for Modelo. But when we suggested 500,000 points of distribution back at our Investor Day, part of the whole logic was we have a lot of runway outside of, say, California and Nevada, where we're very well distributed to broaden our reach. We're backing that up with some of what we're doing, things like putting emphasis on the SEC, football, as an example, a lot of live sports, very important in many of those communities that I just mentioned. And you're seeing it play out in terms of the growth profile for that brand. In some of those markets, you probably wouldn't have expected off the top of your head.

Yes. Okay. And then sticking with Modelo for a moment, the strategy of balancing the premium positioning and competitive pricing with Oro evolving and Corona Premier entering the mix now with more competitive pricing. How are you maintaining brand equity kind of competing more directly on price? The market has gotten more price competitive in the premium tier. So protecting brand equity while still investing in price...

I'll take the Oro, you take the brand equity.

Okay. You go first.

Well, just on Oro, right? I mean, so first of all, you referenced the price change on Oro. And that was very much an intentional deliberate decision, a strategic decision, not necessarily just a tactical one to match a competitor's price point. We took a step back from the high-end light beer category and said, hey, let's do a deeper dive on that consumer and what makes that consumer tick. And the truth of the matter is the consumer that's buying light beer writ large, but also high-end light beer has very much a quantity and a price component to their value proposition. So you have to hit both of those sort of metrics for them. And if we looked at what our prior approach was is we kept both Oro and Premier sort of line priced with the rest of the portfolio. And if you think about the pricing ladders within the beer category and if sort of mainstream beer is at 100% index, our portfolio has always been priced at 155 index. And where we've seen brands be successful as a high-end light beer has been more in that 120 index. So we made the decision we want to take Oro first, and now we're doing it with Premier, down from that 155 to the 120, as I just referenced. We really believe that in the strength of those brands and the strength of the liquid, we get those brands in consumers' hands at the right price point, we can really take advantage of what is a big segment within the beer category. I mean it's -- light beer is a very, very big segment. So we're excited about that. And we think that with the brand -- with the pricing stratification that we can minimize any impact that the Modelo Oro price moves has on Modelo Especial or the Corona Premier has on Corona Extra. So we feel good about the approach we've taken.

The only thing I'd add to that relating to the equities, we measure our brand health constantly, as you would expect. And our brand health measures remain as strong as they have ever been, which is really important. That fundamentally goes back to the whole underlying thing we've been talking about the whole time. If you do not have strong brand health and strong brand equities, over time, that's a bad answer. And that's going to be detrimental to the category and detrimental to your business. We're very fortunate that, that remains very strong, and we have seen increasing loyalty, as I mentioned earlier, with both Hispanic consumers and Gen Z consumers. So we're very comfortable that as we continue to be the loud share of voice in the category and invest behind our brands, we're going to be positioned very well as the consumer comes back out of the current trough that they're in.

Okay. And then just quickly on more up and comers in the portfolio. Pacifico has been pretty incremental, and that's continued, especially you compare to the typical cannibalization of the industry. Are there learnings from the Pacifico strategy that you can apply to Victoria as well?

Yes, for sure. As you know, Pacifico is now the #2 beer in L.A. It's been amazing and sort of everywhere we take it, it does extremely well. And so big surprise, we're up nicely in double digits. Victoria is an interesting brand as well. It's doubled in size in the last 3 years, still relatively small even compared to Pacifico. But it skews heavily Hispanic. It's roughly 75% Hispanic, but it has really resonated with that consumer base. And part of what we have seen is we're going to do in the same way that we did way back when with Modelo and the same way we have done with Pacifico, we'll be very judicious as to where we put the product, so it has a good chance to stay. The worst thing you can do with new products is put it somewhere where it's not going to sell. And we're very pleased that, that brand is not only developing with the Hispanic consumer, but it also skews somewhat younger. So again, it broadens our audience versus the overall portfolio quite nicely.

We ask one kind of wrap-up question on beer. Big change in the outlook today. You've incorporated what you spoke to the difference between shipments and depletions with distributors because it seems like that's a big part of the adjustment. Degree of confidence that what you've now factored into your outlook for this year, I know we can't next year, right, is this current malaise in the category, the current malaise in your consumer base, the inventory adjustment that needs to happen with distributors and that from here, at least over the next however many months we have left, you're feeling pretty confident in the adjusted outlook from here and assuming beer industry volumes continue to decline at a kind of like 4-ish percent rate for the balance of the year?

The short answer is we have not assumed any improvement in the current fiscal year.

Short answer to a long question.

Yes.

Which is fine. So just anything you're seeing in terms of substitution that people are using THC, whether it's gummies or beverages versus drinking beer, and that's one of the issues to the category.

Yes. No, actually, if you look at consumers that consume THC, they actually over-index in beer consumption versus the sector, meaning beer sector average. So we haven't seen that, that's a big factor of people sort of trading around, if you will.

I think a couple of other data points on that, Tim, we've seen -- if you look at this over several years, household penetration for beverage alcohol has been very stable, right? So we know that households continue to purchase beverage alcohol. And if we look at the number of occasions, right, we're not seeing that that's relatively stable as well. We touched on earlier that within an occasion, there can be some deliberateness around maybe interspersing some non-alchol with some alcohol. But in terms of the number of occasions in terms of household penetration, very, very stable.

Okay. I'm going to switch to Wine and Spirits now. So continue to make portfolio changes in Wine and Spirits, right, trimmed down the portfolio significantly now much more firmly in Premium plus. The industry, though has continued to really struggle with recruitment. Why do you think that is? And what do your retained Wine brands need to do differently to resonate better with consumers?

Well, let's start with how they're doing because it's always nice when you actually have some good news to talk about. Our wine business, the RemainCo portfolio has beaten the category for 6 straight months. And I realize we haven't been able to say that in a long time, so I figured I'd better say it since it's the case finally. It's taken us a long time to get the portfolio where we wanted it to be, which is up the price ladder where there's much more opportunity. And you're seeing brands like Kim Crawford, which is now our biggest brand, continues for 8 straight years to be the #1 Sauvignon Blanc.

Ruffino is playing very well in Prosecco, which is a hot sector of the category. The Prisoner continues to be the #1 super premium red blend, and we've added cabernet into the mix. And we've got a lot of smaller brands like Harvey & Harriet and Meade bourbon that are both growing extraordinarily well and some limited supply products like Schrader or Sea Smoke that obviously demand is outstripping supply. The question that I think that you're getting at is how can you bring more people into the category. You have to create interest in the category. One of the challenge, many consumers come in at a lower price point. And I think that's a critically important thing that the industry needs to do is how do you create interest in the same way I've talked earlier about Corona Sunbrew leveraging flavor and interest and putting some juice with beer, which is what we saw consumers doing. That hasn't happened as much in the wine space. And I think it's going to be important to make that socially relevant going forward if you want some sections of the wine business to show some resilience.

What about price pack architecture? I mean, is that.

Yes, possibly. The TTV has just recently opened up some additional supply options. We've done a fair amount with [ 3.75 ]. It's a convenience size. Let's say, you and your significant other want 2 different things in an evening. Well, you can both have a [ 3.75 ] and it's very convenient. But that has been, I would say, less developed in Wine than some other sectors like Spirits or beer even.

Okay. I have time, I think, for one more question. I want to talk about capital allocation. So right around your 3x leverage target, $3.4 billion in buybacks remaining in the authorization, I should say. And you've made clear the regular role that you see buybacks playing in the medium-term algorithm. To what degree do you have an appetite for smaller strategic M&A at this point?

We've said pretty consistently for the last several years, that Garth and I have been answering these questions that we're focused on maintaining investment grade. We're going to return money to shareholders in dividends and share buybacks. We're going to invest behind our business to make sure that we are getting the absolute max that we can out of our business. It's sort of the last priority, which is smaller tuck-in M&A scenarios as they present themselves. We've done that with our venture arm, where we've had some smaller things that actually have come into the fold. I mentioned Harvey & Harriet and the Wine business. That started as a venture investment. So that's definitely not the focus of our attention. Our focus of our attention is the top 3 things, as we've said for the last several years.

Okay. You said so well. I don't have anything to add, Phil.

Jeez, that's not like you.

Okay. You've get Harvey & Harriet, right here.

I don't want to ask who's Harriet, I'll just move on.

Okay. So that, we're going to go to breakout. But thank you so much for being here. Please join me in thanking Constellation.

Greetings, and welcome to the Constellation Brands Q1 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It's now my pleasure to introduce your host, Joseph Suarez, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Kevin. Good morning all, and welcome to Constellation Brands Q1 Fiscal '26 Conference Call. I'm here this morning with Bill Newlands, our CEO; Garth Hankinson, our CFO, and Blair Veenema, our new Vice President of Investor Relations, who will assume leadership of the function after today. Blair brings great expertise to the role. He began his career as a buy-side equity analyst and has worked across our corporate development, treasury and beer commercial finance teams for the last 10 years. I will work closely with Blair over the coming weeks to ensure a seamless transition of the function.

We trust you had the opportunity to review the news release, CEO and CFO commentary, accompanying quarterly slides and a recently updated annual brand appendix slides made available in the Investors section of our company's website, www.cbrands.com.

On that note, as a reminder, reconciliations between the most directly comparable GAAP measures and any non-GAAP financial measures discussed on today's call are included in the news release and website and we encourage you to also refer to the news release and Constellation's SEC filings for risk factors that may impact forward-looking statements made on this call.

Before turning the call over to Bill and Garth, please keep in mind that as usual, answers provided today will be referencing comparable results unless otherwise specified. Lastly, in line with prior quarters, I would ask that you limit yourselves to one question per person, which will help us end our call on time.

Thanks in advance, and over to you for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from Dara Mohsenian from Morgan Stanley.

So just wanted to discuss your confidence in the unchanged full year beer revenue growth outlook as well as margin guidance. So we've obviously seen some industry weakness ramp up in May and June. Your depletion decline in fiscal Q1 was similar to Q4. If you strip out one less day, I understand that. But presumably, some of this industry pressure ramped up towards the end of the quarter in June, at least in the tracked channel data. So can you just discuss confidence in your beer volume growth outlook? And at some point, it implies you move back to depletion growth. Maybe just give us some more context on a quarterly basis when we should start to see that. And then also just on the margin side, with incremental aluminum pressure with the higher tariffs, can you talk about what sort of the offset is to allow you to still deliver profitability on a full year basis on the beer side in line with what you were expecting previously?

Sure. Dara, why don't I start and Garth will come in with the margin question. I think it's important to point out that the quarter was as we expected. We saw a significant amount of consumer concern that has continued from the past quarters into this quarter. But this quarter was as we expected. Recall, this is going against the strongest quarter that we had last year. Q1 was what I would describe as a normal quarter for us. And as you pointed out, there was one less selling day in the quarter.

I think the important thing to point out is sequential improvement is required for us to accomplish our guidance, but it's not, not predicated on significant consumer change. We're going against much easier comps as we head into the summer and scanner data. You may recall that in July of last year was when all things started to decelerate both for us and for the overall industry. So we're going against easier comps as we progress into the summer months.

Garth, do you want to touch on the margin point?

Yes. I'll touch on the margin point. Before I touch on the margin point, again, as Bill said, we feel confident with our outlook for the year, which is why we affirm guidance, and we haven't seen any changes in consumer behavior. That being said, there are still some macroeconomic factors, if you will, that we continue to monitor, and there continues to be some uncertainty in the macro backdrop. We've seen from our banking partners and from the Fed, some reductions in expectations around GDP growth as well as some softening in expectations with inflation, unemployment, and interest rates. That being said, there's a lot of guesswork I think, more so in this year's forecast as it relates to things like the impact of potential tariffs or the potential impact of tariffs and the potential impact of unemployment of government-related layoffs. So again, just a fair amount of uncertainty as we go through the year.

On the margin front, we feel good about our ability to deliver margins in line with what we laid out in April, specifically to the incremental tariff that went into effect in June. To be clear, that did not impact our Q1. Going forward, we think that the impact of that is going to be roughly $20 million. As a reminder, what was announced earlier in the year with an impact of about $30 million. It's obviously less for us given that it's one quarter into the year or the incremental is less those because we're one quarter into the year. And from a seasonality perspective, it's the first quarter is the highest quarter. Volume-wise, we don't expect that we're going to be able to fully offset this incremental tariff. So that will be about a 20 basis point hit, but we still believe that we can deliver margins in line with what we outlined in April.

Our next question today is coming from Nik Modi from RBC.

Bill, I know this might be a hard question to answer, but -- just I know you guys are doing a lot of work regarding the Hispanic consumer. It almost feels like it's getting a bit worse in terms of just at least from the headlines of the rates and kind of where they're targeting consumers in normal places of shopping. I'm just curious like, there's got to be a breaking point at some point. And obviously, this is a big driver that is weighing on your business. I'm curious if you have any perspective on like -- how long do you think this might go on? And again, I know this is a hard question to answer. Do you have any perspective from the administration in terms of when some of these rates will start to calm down? Like any perspective around that, I think, would be helpful.

Sure. Thanks, Nik. As you know, you're right, this is very hard to call as to what the consumer reaction is going to be going forward. I think the important part that we continue to look at is, first of all, our loyalty is very strong and remains very strong with the Hispanic consumer base. Our loyalty is increasing in the general market. and we are continuing to invest against our business to support the consumer as they progress down this path. Importantly, our brand health measures remain as strong as they ever have. We'd be -- we'd be hard pressed to tell you when you see a fair amount of change. Both Hispanic and non-Hispanic consumers are concerned about inflation and about cost structure. But I also would point out that the percentage of alcohol in the basket has remained constant even though the basket has gotten smaller relative to what consumers are doing with consumer goods. So our focus has been on control the controllables.

We have seen high single-digit share gains in the shelf, our buy rates. While visits are down, spend is up when people visit and when they actually go to the stores. NPD continues to be an important part of what we do. We're pleased with the development of Sunbrew. It's ahead of what we had expected. And as I said earlier, we continue to invest against the business. So our focus continues to be monitored carefully where the consumer is and control the controllables. Do everything we can possibly do, so as the consumer hopefully returns in the near term to more normal behavior, we're there and ready to take advantage of just that.

Our next question is coming from Lauren Lieberman from Barclays.

I just to talk a little bit about marketing. It was interesting to see stronger marketing in the quarter. So I was curious if you could talk a little bit about marketing cadence this year versus last. And then also in that standpoint, it feels like not so much from a pricing standpoint, but from a marketing standpoint, the competitive landscape has picked up, and you've got Mick Ultra that's been a fast-growing brand for some time, the only other fast-growing brands alongside Modelo has really picked up its activity. And I think picked up, it seems sort of the target market they're going after. So I just was curious if you could talk a little bit about kind of brand competitiveness, your marketing efforts, not just quantum and timing, but also kind of thoughts around any changes or differences in targeting and what you're seeing in the competitive landscape?

Yes, you bet. So I think it's important to point out that because of seasonality heading into the summer, Q1 is always slightly higher in terms of our marketing investment versus the rest of the quarters. But I think it's also important to point out, Modelo and Corona are the #1 and the #2 share of voice within the beer sector for marketing. We continue to invest against our brands to build long-term success for those brands. And we're investing in places that we think are high impact. Football, soccer, Major League Baseball, things that are live, things that are action-oriented and things that tend to be beer occasions. So we're going to continue to invest against our business. Our fundamental belief is, as I said on the prior question, our brand health metrics are very strong. Our intent is to keep those metrics as strong as they are, if not to improve those. And part of the way we will do that is to continue to invest against the consumer. So as the consumer begins to revert to more normal behavior, whenever that occurs, we're going to be in a position to win.

Our next question today is coming from Chris Carey from Wells Fargo Securities.

So I was thinking about the investor presentation, at the Investor Day, and there's a lot of pride in the fact that the portfolio is so focused and you're gaining share in the category behind such a focused portfolio. And I think when you look across some of your peer set, there's actually been an attempt to continue to diversify the portfolio to perhaps hedge against some of these situations, if the floor the slowing growth or market share loss, it's offset by something else, right? You've seen that with some of your competitors. Does this moment in time, give you a bit more credence to think about maybe investing or diversifying the portfolio, however significant that may be in the coming years to give yourself a bit more diversification against such events? And then within that, can you just talk about how elevated maybe Pacifico will become now because it's been such a reliable growth driver, can you accelerate that growth even more? So just some thoughts there would be helpful.

Yes, you bet. Well, first of all, I think it's important, if you think about what has changed versus the Investor Day, a lot of things happen. Non-alcohol didn't exist back at that point in time. Today, it's the #2 share gainer in a growth category in the non-Alcohol sector. Oral didn't exist. You probably heard that we are adjusting our oral pricing to go after high-end light beer, where we see competitive opportunity for us to succeed. We introduced Sunbrew this year, which is ahead of our plan, goes after a consumer who's interested in flavor. I've said on prior calls, we're very pleased with the fact that our share of sales in LDA 21- to 25-year-old consumers is twice the average of the sector. So we're continuing to bring in new, younger consumers into the equation.

La Mante Sell, one of the best -- single best chelates that we have did not exist when we had Investor Day. So all of those things, I would argue, are part of our innovation agenda. As we've said, we can see between 20% and 40% of our growth profile in any year, reflecting from new products, and we would expect this year not to be any different along that line, but we're continuing to be focused on how we can win more consumers on more occasions.

Relative to your question on Pacifico, obviously, Pacifico continues to be very, very strong. But what's exciting to us is, despite the fact that Pacifico is the #2 brand now in L.A., where it's obviously a huge brand, 50% of the growth profile that's occurring on Pacifico is coming from outside of California. So you're starting to see significant increase and growth of that brand around the country, and we expect to put some fuel on the fire, if you will, around that brand. We think it's a great opportunity. It's demographic profile is somewhat different from our other brands. And we think that's going to be an important growth driver and an important share gainer in terms of shelf positions for us as we move forward.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from Kaumil Gajrawala from Jeffries.

I guess I'm going to follow Nick's lead with a tough question, which is -- let's just assume things get better from a socioeconomic perspective. How do we know that behavior will go back to where it was. And I kind of asked in the context of it does seem we're learning now and that COVID really changed the way the consumer is behaving in general across a series of things, but especially across beer. And could this be sort of the equivalent of a COVID moment that even if things start to open up a bit that maybe the behavior doesn't go back to where it was?

Yes, that's an interesting question. I think the important part of that for us to all keep in mind is, especially with our Hispanic consumer, which reflects roughly half our business, that consumer is very interested in beer. What has occurred is that occasions on which beer is consumed have decreased because of concerns of the socioeconomic area that you mentioned. So when you look at the fact that consumers are not going out to eat as much as they had, they're having less social occasions at home. It doesn't change their interest in consumption of beer. It simply has been that those occasions have been decreased of when that occurs. So I think you're going to easily see it revert to a more normal scenario as the macroeconomic scenario comes back to a more normal environment.

Your next question today is coming from Pete Galbo from Bank of America.

I wanted to go back to maybe Dara's question on just the beer gross margins. And actually, there was probably some favorability or upside to what we thought in the quarter. Garth, I think in your prepared remarks, you talked about kind of a $40 million tailwind on kind of operational improvements. I'm just wondering how much of that as well is maybe some favorability on the peso that you guys locked in kind of at a more favorable value? And maybe how we should think about that on the go forward in the back half of this year or even into early next year as the dollar has weakened and peso has gotten stronger relative. Any context there would be helpful.

No. No, thanks for the question, right? So just -- I mean, as you know, we have a pretty robust hedging policy. It's a hedging policy that starts sort of 3 years in advance of any one fiscal year. So we're pretty good at this point to be able to manage the impact and smooth the impact of any currency and for that matter, commodity risk from year-to-year. As we entered this year, on the peso front, we were hedged in the low 70% range, which is a little bit higher than what we normally target to start the fiscal year. As we saw some favorability earlier in the year with the peso, we did layer in incremental hedges for this year. And for this year, now we're up hedged for the peso over 80-ish percent. And then we laid incremental hedges for that matter for FY '27 and FY '28 to take advantage of that favorability. So as we sit here looking at the balance of the year, there's still potentially a little bit of opportunity across the whole basket of currency and commodities. But specific to the peso, we feel the peso is probably a little bit overvalued right now due to the dedollarization. We'll continue to look for opportunities to take advantage of any changes that go in our favor there, but the impact is certainly not as material as it was earlier in the year, largely due to the hedging -- the incremental hedging we did through the quarter.

Next question is coming from Andrea Teixeira from JPMorgan.

I was hoping to see -- I mean, I think the important questions were asked. But just in terms of like your new distribution, I believe you quoted a good amount of high single digits into the summer. So I was hoping to see if there is any -- obviously, with the conditions that the industry is in right now, but just to understand how the velocity has been so far and the level of incrementality you're seeing within a baseline. Of course, we know what the industry has been facing and the depletions on the negative front. But just thinking how you're positioning as we go into the summer season? And how does that velocity is behaving from now?

Sure. So distribution is going to continue to be a critical part for us. And fortunately, as the #1 share gainer in the category, we are in position to continue to gain distribution and shelf positions. I think that's important for us as you see strong growth profiles for things like Pacifico, which we talked about a moment ago and Sunbrew. And things that really are demanding more shelf positioned because of their strong start in the marketplace. So we believe that that's going to continue to be an important part of our growth profile as we go forward is broadening that distribution and our team is very focused on that. It goes right back to what I said before, which is control the controllables.

Our loyalty remains strong. We are seeing continuing improvement in the loyalty that we see with our Hispanic consumer, and it's growing in the general market. That speaks to the long-term benefit against your velocity question. And I think that will be an important part. Another thing that I would point out where we're spending a lot of time is in price pack architecture. It's an area where, as the consumer may be more concerned about inflationary trends, it would be important to have the right pack set at the right price points so that no matter what the consumer has available to them to spend, we have a product available to them for that quantum that they have available to them. So that -- all of those things are critical elements about what we call the controllables that we're going to be focusing on as the year progresses.

Next question is coming from Filippo Falorni from Citi.

I wanted to get your perspective on the pricing environment in beer. Obviously, the categories under a lot of pressure across the board. Are you seeing -- how are you seeing the pricing implemented this year being taken in the market? And are you seeing any competitors maybe relying a little bit more on promotions to try to accelerate the volume in the category?

I think there is some additional price promotion that's gone on in the marketplace. I'll use our example. We have addressed our oral pricing starting this past month going after the high-end life beer consumer, where we feel there's a great opportunity. So we have made that adjustment in our own business in the interest of building additional share in the high-end light sector of the business. So I think you're always going to see a bit more promotional activity at a time when there's economic concerns. So that doesn't surprise us. But again, this goes right back to what we started with, which is our brands are strong and the loyalty is strong, and that at the end of the day, is going to win the day.

Next question today is coming from Bonnie Herzog from Goldman Sachs.

So I actually wanted to ask about the California wildfires that happened last year. And I guess the expected rebuild. Could you give us some color on what is happening with the rebuild? And what type of growth or upside you might be expecting from this considering how important this market is for you? And then maybe clarify for us that the rebuild potential upside is factored into your guidance?

Sure. As many people know, and we've seen this at various what I will call, external factors, hurricanes in the East or fires in the West. Any time you see that sort of thing, there's a short-term hit and a somewhat long-term upside because as you clean up and then rebuild, you're creating great job opportunities that tend to include interesting beer moments. So I think as we are starting into that process, and as you know, it takes a while to start the process of rebuilding with permits and so forth, that will likely be a bit of a tailwind. The amount of that tailwind remains to be seen as a lot of it depends on permits and development and how much construction capability exists in the marketplace. But you are correct, that ultimately will be a bit of a tailwind. And yes, that is built into our expectations of our guidance going forward.

That being said, Bonnie, I think it's important to point out that California has experienced some consumer challenges from the macro environment as it relates to things like unemployment, particularly for the Hispanic consumer and even construction here where we expect that there will be some benefits, as Bill just noted before, construction plan remains down year-over-year in California. So again, should be some benefit longer term, but short term, still some macro headwinds in the state.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. And ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.