Citizens Financial Group Aktie

All right. Good afternoon to you all. I'm going to start off with a quick update. Last year on the stage, your colleague, Mr. Coughlin was here, and my trivia revealed that there were 215 banks operating in the United States with the word Citizens in their name. Given the slowdown in industry consolidation, it's no surprise that the number of Citizens banks fell by just 5 over the past year to 210.

So here with us, again, is the largest of that group, though, Citizens Financial, which has a $28 billion market cap, has $234 billion in assets, and is headquartered right here in New England. I will reiterate what I said last year in my intro, Citizens is a bank on the move. Since Royal Bank of Scotland fully sold out of the bank 11 years ago, Citizens has undergone significant operational improvement, added a lot of talent and launched a number of growth initiatives, one of the latest being the build-out of the Private Bank.

I think the leadership of this bank and the improved quality of the franchise remain underappreciated. Simply look at beta, the 1-year beta of Citizens stock is greater than all of the 25 largest banks ranked by market cap in the country, except for Citigroup and Capital One. Joining us here today is EVP and CFO, Aunoy Banerjee. Welcome.

Thank you. Thank you, John.

And just one note, we will leave time -- plenty of time for questions. And I will start off with the questions. Now, you've crossed the 1-year mark with Citizens last month. As you look at the competitive landscape today, how do you feel about Citizens' current positioning?

Yes. Thanks, John. Thanks for the invite, and thanks for having me here. Look, I had the good fortune of joining Citizens a year ago, and I was one of those new hires, which came in and been spending a lot of time with the team. So whether it's our commercial bankers, whether it's our private banking teams, our ops people, our tech folks, the branch colleagues. And what I am really impressed and optimistic about the franchise we have, and I'm really optimistic about where we are heading as well and about our position today. So as we think about our triangle strategy and what excites me is the vectors of growth that we have and the momentum that we are actually having in that.

So first on our transformed consumer bank, if you think of it, we bank a lot of affluent and mass affluent customers, and we have a long track record of growing low-cost deposits. And we are the #1 HELOC originator in the country, and that's an important relationship product as it brings attractive clients to Citizens. And we feel there is a great opportunity for us to cross-sell wealth products and services, and this helps in deeper penetration of our households. In the Consumer Bank, we are investing in digital. We are investing in client experience and data. And I'm sure you guys have heard about NEXT, and we'll talk a little bit about it. It's a very deliberate approach to accelerate deposit and household growth within our existing footprint. New York Metro is a great example of that, where you see that we have been growing. It's one of our fastest-growing regions of our household deposits. And we still see that there is a considerable opportunity for us to gain there.

I think the second leg of this stool is our Commercial Bank. And we have developed a strong super regional franchise with national reach and deep sector expertise and a product set that competes with the best of the industry. So we have built the capabilities in markets and treasury solutions, corporate advisory, private capital. And as transaction activity picks up, we should see those benefits flowing into our results.

And then the Private Bank, you spoke a little bit about it, John. I think last 3 years ago, we started the Private Bank. And today, it's a meaningful contributor to our bottom line. And we brought in an exceptional team, and we are attracting high-quality talents, and if you think about it, we are providing the white glove service, which can be compared to anyone in the industry. The business itself is now $18 billion of deposits, $12 billion of loans, $12.4 billion of client assets. So -- and it's a meaningful contributor to our bottom line at 11% of our EPS.

And then if you take a step back, I'm really excited about Reimagine the Bank program, and this is the program that is using technology. It's using agentic AI. And we are really rethinking about how work gets done at Citizens and how we can serve our clients even better. And if you take -- even zoom out a little bit more, even if you think about what many of these capabilities are bringing in is really about One Citizens. And that's just not just organizational constructs, et cetera. It's really a growth mindset for us, where we can really put the client in the center and bring all of our capabilities to bear. So my enthusiasm comes from like we are not just relying on one initiative or one business or one favorable market conditions. We have multiple growth vectors, and we are executing with precision.

If we could dig into the first subject you touched on the Private Bank and Wealth, leap of faith, launching that back in '23, and it appears to be working out very well. As you mentioned, the business contributed 11% of third quarter earnings. Can it continue to grow at this pace? And what does the future look like there?

Yes. As you said, it was a big leap of faith, but I would describe our Private Bank journey as both ambitious but also very measured and deliberate. So I think the fundamental premise, which started with 3 years ago work, like the clients followed their bankers as well as their wealth teams with the strength of the relationships, but also the quality of the experience that we were providing. So -- but at the same time, we are also focused in building the business, building the technology, building the control environment and creating the service model so that we make it a sustainable business. So not only it's contributing 11% of our bottom line, it also has an above 25% ROTCE in this business. So we are not only growing, but we are also growing sustainably and growing profitably.

So we have made excellent progress in California. If you think of it, that's where a lot of the teams came from. We are building out the footprint in Florida, in Northeast and including our offices in New York City, in Palm Beach and West Palm. And we have added highly regarded private wealth teams across the country in Florida, in California, in New York, New Jersey. We just announced another private wealth team in late October for Newport Beach in Southern California. We have 10 full-service Private Bank offices across the country. We call them PBOs, and we are opening 7 next year. And over time, that could grow up to 30 in very attractive markets across the company. And then if you think about our balance sheet around this business, $18 billion of deposits, good DDAs. It's 30 -- more than 30% of the deposits are noninterest generating. So we are winning the operating accounts with our clients.

On the lending side, we are seeing loan growth pick up, and we are seeing a variety of asset classes in those loan growth. But we are very disciplined. We want to ensure that the loan-to-deposit ratio in this business will not cross 70%, but that additional scale will give us additional NIM, additional NII as we grow.

And then on the Wealth side, we have a compelling opportunity with as clients bring their wealth products, their AUMs with us, and that's around $12.4 billion today. And we expect that in the medium term to be more than $30 billion in client assets. So look, it's a great business. We are on this journey, but strong growth that we talked about. We are not -- but we are not pursuing growth for growth's sake. We are very mindful in building a high-quality franchise with strong financial discipline and which will sustain over time.

Shifting over to Commercial Bank and associated capital markets. The company has done a lot since the IPO and investments and capabilities. What's the strategy to continue to grow that business? Are you missing -- do you have any missing pieces? And how much could capital markets contribute in a positive environment?

Yes. If I may say so, like I think we are probably one of the best positioned commercial bank in our asset class. And I think the foundation of the commercial bank still remains the middle market banking. So this is where you serve companies that have revenues between $25 million to $500 million. We have a strong regional coverage model I just spent a day with the team of bankers there. Our bankers really knows their clients well and understands the local markets. And we've also expanded into the mid-corporate segment, and this is where you serve companies with $500 million to $3 billion. They are more public. They have more needs, and it's just not about credit, giving balance sheet capacity. This is where you think about the expertise that you get in, whether you have the industry expertise or you have capital market expertise. And over the last few years, we have been building those expertise, and we are very clear on where we have the right to win.

So for example, in digital infrastructure, in '22, we bought DH Capital, which was one of the leading advisory business in this sector. And if you think about where compute and data centers have gone, I think if you -- we would say that was a timely acquisition. Similarly, there are other sectors like online gaming, defense, aerospace, we have very, very good vertical expertise.

The other thing we had done very early on, we had -- we recognized that sponsors are going to have an increasing share in the middle market complex. So we bank roughly 4,500 middle market companies. And if you think about a portion of them will always transact. So we've built the sponsor coverage, we built the products, and that has created a natural opportunity for us as for giving broader advice and facilitating transaction. We bought JMP a few years ago, and that gives us some equity capabilities and highly complementary to the Private Bank because of its West Coast heritage as well as the tech activities there. So as the IPO market improves, that should give us another growth lever. So we feel good about our products and capabilities.

And to your question on where it could go from now, if you think about the current environment, the momentum is encouraging. If you look at our performance this year, first quarter was a record quarter, second quarter was a record quarter. Third quarter, we had a very strong quarter, and we have a good outlook for the fourth quarter. And our M&A pipelines are strong. It's at record levels, and we have substantial backlog going into 2027. I think the debt activity, there was some timing between Q3 and Q4, but the equity backlog is also strong. So some large transactions need to clear the market.

There will be always seasonality in this business, if you think of it. But in a constructive environment, we would think that this business could generate roughly $125 million to $175 million a quarter and maybe potentially more in a good environment. So the point is that we have made the investments. We have been at it for the last few years. And as the environment improves, we think that this -- the revenues will show up in our results.

Right. In Consumer Banking, 3-plus months ago, you unveiled the Network Evolution and Experience Transformation initiative, which you've called NEXT. What are you trying to accomplish? And what are the near- and long-term implications of this?

Yes. We love our acronym. So NEXT is -- we are very excited about it. But if you think about -- if you take a step back, look, if you think about some banks are moving outside of their core regions, some banks are pursuing acquisitions to obtain those deposits. But we believe and we strongly believe that we can achieve at a lower cost and a substantially lower risk by investing in our core Northeast footprint. So there are 3 pillars to NEXT.

I think the first is about the physical presence that we have. So we have roughly 100 to 120 of remaining in-store branches, and we want to close them down and use those savings to really put up 50 to 60 traditional branches. And we have considerable experience doing this kind of repositioning. So these traditional locations will actually help better serve our clientele that we have some of the business banking and wealth clients, et cetera. We'll also selectively relocate or refresh some of the branches and create this more advisory-oriented and business-ready format for these branches. But the sequencing will be deliberate. We will protect the customer experience. We'll support our communities, and we'll continue to build the Citizens brand.

Second pillar is the people, more specialized banker in the branches, so they are at the front line. So we have approximately 450 wealth advisers in our branch network, and we are adding roughly 10 a quarter. So we are also expanding our private client teams as well as small business coverage teams. And in the regions that we have piloted this thing, we have seen very, very encouraging results.

And thirdly, part of it is about adding some de novo branches in the existing footprint, especially in the New York Metro area as a focus. But this is a long-term strategy. This is about 10 years, and it's about building an efficiently density in our network in the most attractive parts of our footprint. So we are not looking for an acquisition to create that density. We expect that our total branch count will remain the same until 2035.

And financially, as you have known from Citizens, we are very disciplined. So over the 18 to 24 months, you will see more of it come through our results. But the savings from the exit of the in-store branches will offset any expense of putting the new traditional branches. And the in-store exits are more front-loaded and while some of the de novo builds will be over a longer period. But over the long term, I would say this is -- this solidifies our long-term and medium-term performance, and it's not a hindrance to our 16% to 18% ROTCE target for '27.

All right. I mentioned before we started that, that sad Coldplay song that was on before is more fitting for NASDAQ than this bank conference today. But can you just talk about macro view a bit and how you think about the economy and interest rates?

Yes. Look, in our view, the underlying economic fundamentals are positive. And although there is a lot of uncertainty and volatility, and it will to start going to remain elevated, like that's the name of the game. I think GDP growth will be probably at least 2%, if not closer to 2.5% over the next 4, 5 quarters. The Fed decided to hold rates steady in the October meeting. We'll see what happens later on in the quarter. The third quarter GDP was strong at 3.4% and consumer spending remains quite resilient. So the economy is still growing. Unemployment remains range bound 4% and inflation is being affected by the higher energy prices and the tariffs and geopolitical conflicts.

And ultimately, I think the Federal Reserve should be able to bring down the inflation down, particularly if there is more progress towards some of the conflicts resolution around the world. We do expect a few additional rate increases. The question is how many, how many are required, how quickly they will occur and what's the economic conditions surrounding them. But if the economy remains healthy, the customer confidence holds up and the market has reasonable clarity around the Fed's intention, a couple of rate hikes should be okay for a business environment. I think the labor market is an important source of support for the consumer. So as long as the unemployment remains around the current levels, I think consumer spending should be resilient in that way.

From our clients' perspective, we see commercial clients are still investing. There is some -- they're still playing offense, but there is some uncertainty, but there is a little bit of conservatism, but they're borrowing, they're investing and they are still executing on their strategic plans. And on the consumer side, look, higher income households are continuing to benefit from the strong equity markets as well as resilient home values and a lot of our retail customers are actually homeowners. So -- and further down the income spectrum, you would see some people making some trade-offs on their spending, but we don't see any broad areas of concern. But -- so look, the environment remains constructive, but it's not without risk.

I mean the election, obviously, has just occurred, but -- so I don't know if how many -- how much discussion there has been internally, but do you think that could impact the growth outlook?

Yes. Look, I think with the change of control in the Congress and the Senate, I think there will be probably increased oversight over the executive branch. But if you think about the tax policy benefits are largely embedded, if you think about the regulatory environment and the pro-business agenda, they should be still supportive. So we feel that there's still a lot of growth to be garnered from here.

I mean I think we're halfway through. It would be good to open up for questions. I have a lot that way we make sure we get to as many people. And we just -- we're going to bring a mic up.

Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley. Given the volatility in the interest rate environment that we've seen over the last few weeks and volatility in specific sectors of the stock market, notably technology, are you seeing any risk to the capital markets pipeline in any pieces of your business, sponsor activity or equity capital markets? And any risk to the 4Q fee income guidance up 4% to 5%?

Look, I think volatility has been the name of the game the entire year. So if you go back to the first quarter, if you go back to March, if you go back to the second and third quarter, there has been always been volatility. But our clients are transacting. We have a very, very strong pipeline, and our pipeline has even grown from where we started the quarter, and we are seeing like -- we are getting hired each and every day across our capital markets franchise. Now the question will be like how will those deals get closed in certain times and that. So there might be some timing impact.

To your question on how are we seeing on the outlook, our overall outlook, we just started the quarter, 1 month in. We still have 2 months to go. October was -- there was definitely some rate volatility around, but we also had some -- some deals that got moved from Q3 to Q4. So we had those deals come in. So overall, we still feel good about the quarter for the guidance that we gave at during earnings.

While we wait for the next one. I guess along the lines of the rate volatility, we've seen that impact some banks share repurchase behavior or expectations. I guess, how do these -- how does that impact Citizens and capital management and what might occur?

Yes. Look, if you think about our primary ratio, our regulatory capital ratio, we are at CET1 and under the current regulatory framework, and we are running at 10.5%, which is at the higher end of our operating range. And we guided to a 10.6% to 10.7% at the end of the year, which is slightly higher than the operating range. Obviously, you saw the AOCI adjusted ratio, which was at 8.7% at the end of the quarter. But since then, if you think about rates have come back, especially the long-term rates. So that will move around.

And if you add from the Basel III framework, like from the RWA benefits that we would get, that roughly adds another 110 basis points. So that 8.7% on that basis is closer to 9.8% to 10%. So I think -- so if you think from that perspective, like -- so as we think of this looks all the -- and even the TCE ratios, as we think of all these things, we take into account all these things as we monitor this. We also look at where is RWA heading, what's the regulatory environment, what's the rates outlook and how much capital, organic capital that we are generating each and every quarter. So we evaluate all these things.

And for -- on repurchases, there's not a single mechanical trigger. We look at all these things and we take a holistic view and we look at -- we'll also look at the share price where there it is. So -- and the flexibility of the repurchase program actually lets us adjust to the pace and the capacity that we can do. So we do expect to continue to return capital through common dividends as well as share repurchases, while we'll maintain the capacity to deliver for our clients and invest in the company and preserve a strong capital position, which we have always done.

Any other questions?

Scott Siefers with TD Cowen. When do you start to worry about like rate-seeking behavior on the deposit side? I mean it's been like over the last decade or so, it's been such a favorable change in terms of, call it, like Citizens versus itself a decade ago. So the betas have been great. Overall, things have been pretty benign. When do you start worrying about what higher rates end up doing to you?

Yes. Scott, that's a great question. I would say, look, I think what we are trying to do at Citizens across the 3 businesses is really to get the operating accounts and really have the clients have multiple products, of which deposits is one. And how do we ensure that, that is the mainstay of our relationship. So if you look at our -- we put this chart in our earnings call always. If you think about our low-cost deposits as well as DDAs, that's roughly 42% of our deposit base. And that has remained pretty consistent over time, right, as you see that. You see the Private Bank like the $18 billion of deposits, which has been growing over quite nicely every quarter. We have maintained a DDA percentage over 30%. It was 33% at the end of 3Q. So that shows me that we are actually winning the operating mandates each and every.

And look, there's a lot which goes on to those relationships. There is lending, there is operating cash. There is always clients are trying to optimize this thing. There is wealth, there is like the other transaction fees, how can you provide the real services, payment services, et cetera. So what we want to be is truly be the operating bank for both our consumer clients as well as our commercial clients. So that's the aspect of it. Obviously, every day, every quarter, people will start to optimize for rates that they see. But if you can bring your holistic bank, if you bring the total value for that to that client, the client will see the value and then probably not always try to nitpick you on 5 basis points of rates. So -- but that's the purpose, and that's where we are heading as a bank.

Aunoy, Ryan here. When you think about the Reimagine the Bank initiative, just given how the pace of change from AI has accelerated outside of the financial change that you made at earnings, maybe just talk about how this is influencing your plans for the program? Are you accelerating any of it? And does it change the end goal at all?

Yes. Look, I'm really excited about Reimagine the Bank. And Ryan, this is a continuation of our technology journey that we have been on for several years. If you think about it, our -- we are one of the -- probably one of the few banks that are on the cloud fully. And that gives us a lot of flexibility about how we think about our processes, how we think about how to reimagine some of those processes that we work on both. So under Brendan's leadership and with Bruce's guidance, we have been at it for the last 1 year or so, right? And when we started this, we really thought about and looked at all our processes. So whether it's our compliance testing, whether it's our client onboarding, whether it's our fraud processes, even internal processes like finance and HR processes, et cetera. We looked at everything.

And the question that we asked is with the advent of the new technology, what can we do to really materially change the client experience and also have a material impact to our efficiency. And that's why there are like this -- like there are 50 initiatives that really came up, and we have been implementing them over the last month or so. And we are seeing some very good results. I'll give you a few examples, and we spent the last 3 days with our Reimagine the Bank team and roughly 500 people are actually involved in reimagining this field.

So one of the things I would say is like, look, if you think about our applications, we -- this year alone, we have rationalized 35 applications year-to-date. And it's just not about the applications, things about how much simplicity that you can create in the environment, your controls becomes better, your cost starts to come down. We are also going through and using AI and thinking about in our credit cards, how do you think about complaints and how can you put your complaints in a bunch and ensure that you can find out the recurring themes and you can actually serve our customers better. Similarly, in the commercial bank, we are looking at about our credit processes and how you can get your credit memos done faster. You can think about client prospecting. You can think about your annual reviews with your clients. So all of those things are really, really getting a lot more productive as we go through. And these are some of the things that has happened this year alone, right, I think so. So we are incredibly excited about it.

And if you think about -- just to make sure that we still have the financials, we are -- you know that we run these programs with a very, very tight discipline, and this is no different. So we upped the financials, as Ryan said, to -- a little -- by $25 million in '27. This year, we are exiting at $100 million exit run rate on the savings and the program is net neutral on an expense basis this year. So that is quite an accomplished, I would say, in the first year of a massive transformation program. And in 2028, we exit at $450 million run rate with 2/3 of those savings are in the expense line, which if you do the math, it's like 5% of our expense base of our 2025 expense base. So we are focused. We have -- we are running this with a lot of discipline, and we are quite excited about not only just the financial aspect of it, but how -- what it means for the bank and how we are really reinventing our processes.

Just shifting to asset quality, strong for you across the industry, given everything that's happening that we touched on before, but what areas are receiving the most attention right now and anything worrying the bank?

Yes. No, overall, John, we feel good about credit. We are not seeing any meaningful hotspot in C&I, if I start with commercial, not any signs of any stress in that book. In CRE, as you know, we continue to work through our office portfolio and a large part of that is behind us, and the portfolio is considerably smaller. And we probably have a few more quarters before it's fully behind us. But we don't see any broad-based changes within the C&I. But we obviously monitor companies with exposures to consumer discretionary spending or more towards any consumer end markets.

And on the consumer side, we don't see, again, anything broadly concerning. Our consumer base skews more towards mass affluent and affluent households. And most of our retail customers, as I said, are homeowners. So resilient home values and equity markets provide meaningful support on these households. But we are also watching the lower income cohorts closely, but there is -- it's not a large part of our portfolio, but there is no broad-based change that we are seeing. And as you see, our charge-off rates are coming down. It's in the high to mid-30s. And we expect that it will get lower as we finish working through their office portfolio. So we are not at all complacent. We are monitoring each and every day. But today, as issues appear, they are pretty boxed and manageable versus any widespread or system-wide issues.

What about the topic getting more attention is just the AI boom and beneficiaries and how much maybe that's propping up local areas. But I guess there's obviously the direct exposure, but the indirect exposure, electricians, HVAC suppliers, hotels, I guess, if the pace does slow, how do you assess and manage the credit risk amongst the indirect exposure?

Yes, that's a great question. I would say, look, the AI infrastructure is clearly creating a strong demand, right, and in the data center ecosystem and helping the U.S. GDP growth. But what gives me confidence is in our lending book, if you think about is the quality of the team. We have a tremendous amount of experience in CRE project finance or experience in evaluating and managing construction risk. I mentioned DH Capital, which we bought a few years ago. We have those expertise. We have expertise in DCM and ECM and ABS for that market. And we have very sector dedicated in-house credit underwriting teams. We have portfolio management teams. So we have built a very strong intellectual capital position in this sector, I would say. And of course, this is then combined with very disciplined risk management in the digital infrastructure ecosystem.

So our direct exposure to data centers is modest. It's roughly 1% of our loans, roughly around $1.5 billion as of the last quarter. And even on data centers, our focus is really on experienced operators with strong track records and diversified portfolios. So when we do the underwriting, we are looking for long-term leases, 12 to 15 years. We have power providers that are connected. The developers own the land. And we are -- our portfolio is largely geared towards the 5 largest hyper-grade, hyperscalers and development companies. So there's not much of speculation here. So our underwriting makes sure that we mitigate those risks.

On your question on the ancillary sectors, as you rightly said, there is a boom that is happening, and it is a net positive, I would say. With respect to those other sectors, we are seeing that in the benefit, but we believe that our exposure to those sectors are relatively modest. And if you think about nationally, yes, AI has got a lot of GDP growth and consumption, but it's not as dramatic in our core Northeast markets because data center builds are not happening in this area. But it is benefiting the companies. And obviously, when at some point of time, the AI wave will slow down. But I think those companies are pretty resilient and there shouldn't be a credit problem as such, but our exposures are not substantial.

Any other questions? Just -- I guess this is all related to the entire discussion. But when thinking about returns, ROTCE, 15.1% in the third quarter. The target is 16% to 18% by the end of next year. How do you bridge the gap? And what could returns look past that?

Yes. So look, we are quite confident of our 16% to 18% goal of at the end of '27. I'm not going to give out a new target today, but I think our -- the way Citizens has always operated is we definitely want to print the target. We want to reach it, and we'll talk about the next target after that. But the opportunity is increasingly visible. So if you start with the 15% of return that we did in the third quarter, roughly another 110 basis points comes from the NIM expansion. So part of it is our terminated swap, part of it is the front book, back book, but that gets you above 16% already.

And then from that, you see another 135 to 150 basis points of potential improvement through our business processes. As we said, we delivered 600 basis points of operating leverage this quarter. The Private Bank is growing nicely. It's at a 25% ROTCE. We see capital market fees growing. So all this business execution should add another 135 to 150 basis points.

And then as the credit, we talked a little bit about credit as the office portfolio rolls off, as the NCOs come down, the charge-off rates come down, that should add another 15 to 25 basis points. And if you take them all together, you are well within the range of this. And remember, this does not include Reimagine the Bank benefits, which are additive to this. Now obviously, rate volatility and AOCI will move sometime. It may get you towards the higher end of the ratio or may get you to the middle of the pack. But I think like -- but that's just more over time, that will dissipate. And I think what we have -- we also have share buybacks that should also get the TCE in the right place. So that doesn't impact the direction. I think it will probably impact marginally where we landed. But we are incredibly confident about the 16% to 18% and we have a clear bridge, and we have to just execute consistently as we go through the fourth quarter as well as the quarters of '27.

We have time for one more question. I think we're all set. That was [indiscernible]. I really appreciate your company, coming again this year and look forward to returning next year.

Thank you, John. Thanks very much. It's great to see all of you.

Good morning everyone, and welcome to the Citizens Financial Group Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Denise, and I'll be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this event is being recorded.

Now I'll turn the call over to Chris Emerson, Head of Investor Relations. Chris, you may begin.

Thank you, Denise. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. First, this morning, our Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun; and our CFO, Aunoy Banerjee will provide an overview of our third quarter results. Brendan Coughlin, our President; and Ted Swimmer, our Head of Commercial Banking, are also here to provide additional color. We will be referencing our third quarter presentation, which is located on our Investor Relations website. After the presentation, we'll be happy to take questions.

Our comments today will include forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to differ materially from expectations. These are outlined for your review in the presentation. We also reference non-GAAP financial measures. So it's important to review our GAAP results in the presentation and the reconciliations in the appendix.

And with that, I will hand over to Bruce.

Thanks, Chris, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call today. We delivered another good quarter in Q3 as our strong momentum continues. EPS growth was 8.5% sequential quarter, 34% year-on-year and ROTCE improved to 15.1%. We continue to deliver strong positive operating leverage, 1.8% sequential quarter and 5.3% year-on-year. Total revenues hit a record in Q3, paced by NII growth of 2.7% sequential quarter and up 13% year-on-year. Notwithstanding some interest rate movement and volatility during the quarter, we saw our NIM meet expectations with 2 basis point increase to 3.19%, which positions us for strong NIM expansion in Q4.

Loans and deposits were broadly flat as expected, given some loan pull forward into Q2 and seasonality on deposits, which will turn favorable in Q4. Fees were down slightly, given volatile capital markets conditions, which resulted in some deals pushing into Q4, we still believe that market conditions remain healthy as we enter Q4 and our pipelines are very strong, particularly in M&A, which is at record levels. We do not see the current level of rates introducing any real stress on our various loan portfolios. Credit metrics remain broadly positive.

Our capital, liquidity and funding positions remain strong. Given our consistent growth in earnings, the Board authorized an increase in our dividend of 13% to $0.52 per share. In addition, the board also increased the capacity of the company's common share repurchase program to $1.95 billion, an increase of $1.3 billion. Notwithstanding lower AOCI adjusted CET1 ratio in the quarter, we are comfortable operating with our gross CET1 a little above our 10% to 10.5% target range, which will still allow for at least $200 million in Q4 share repurchases.

We continue to progress our strategic initiatives with good consistent progress across the private bank and well build-out, reimagine the bank, our consumer next branch project, attracting talent to the commercial bank and growing our New York Metro presence. We have significant resources dedicated to leveraging AI and to driving a strong cybersecurity framework and capabilities. Overall, there's lots to do, but we feel we are prioritizing and executing well. We feel good about our outlook for Q4, and we feel we are positioned well for 2027 in the medium term. Our view of the macro fundamentals remains positive. So we expect uncertainty and volatility to remain high.

With that, I'll turn it over to Aunoy for the financial details. Aunoy?

Thanks, Bruce. Good morning, everyone. As Bruce mentioned, we delivered strong third quarter results. record revenue performance and expense discipline drove more than 500 basis points of positive operating leverage year-over-year. Referencing Slides 3 and 4, we delivered EPS of $1.41 for the third quarter and $0.11 or 8.5% improvement over the second quarter, and we saw solid improvement in ROTCE to 15.1%, up from 13.9% in the second quarter. PPNR was up 4.5% linked quarter and up about 19% year-over-year. Third quarter results reflect higher NII given continued net interest margin expansion, slightly lower fees and good expense discipline. With respect to our balance sheet, we continue to maintain robust capital, strong liquidity levels and a healthy credit reserve.

Turning to Slide 5. I will cover our third quarter results in more detail, starting with net interest income, which was up 2.7% linked quarter given a 1% increase in interest earning assets and a higher net interest margin. Our net interest margin continued to expand, increasing 2 basis points for a 19 basis point lift compared with the same quarter last year. In the third quarter, the time-based benefit from terminated swaps contributed 2 basis points. while the benefits of fixed rate asset repricing and improved asset yields were essentially offset by funding cost as rates moved higher during the quarter. Importantly, average demand deposits were up 2%, which helped mitigate the increase in overall deposit costs, which were up 3 basis points.

Moving to Slide 6. Fee income is down 1% linked quarter and up 3% year-over-year. Capital Markets had a very strong third quarter, with fees down slightly compared with the strong second quarter and lower than the exceptional third quarter last year, which benefited from deals being completed following market volatility earlier in the year. M&A fees were up significantly linked quarter. and our pipeline heading into the end of the year is very strong. Loans indications, bond and equity underwriting fees are slightly lower given market volatility. We continue to maintain strong market share, ranking as the #2 middle-market sponsor book runner for the last 12 months. Wealth delivered another red quarter, with fees up 7% linked quarter and 17% year-over-year, reflecting higher advisory fees driven by AUM growth in the private bank and in our retail network. Mortgage fees were lower primarily due to a negative net MSR valuation results of $13 million, given high volatility in mortgage rates, though servicing revenue provided a partial offset.

On Slide 7, expenses were well managed and stable linked quarter. and our efficiency ratio improved to 60%. We delivered positive operating leverage in the quarter of 5.3% with year-to-date at 6.3%.

Moving to loans on Slide 8. Average and period-end loans were both up slightly linked quarter, paid by growth in private bank and retail. Private Bank period-end loans were up $2 billion linked quarter, reflecting higher commercial line utilization and strong originations in high-quality residential mortgage and multifamily lending. Commercial period-end loans, excluding the private bank, were down $1.5 billion or 2% linked quarter given some loan pull forward into the second quarter. Third quarter results were driven by continued planned reductions in CRE, primarily given multifamily and general office paydowns as well as lower C&I line usage. Growth in period-end retail loans ex noncore was $565 million, led by real estate secured categories. This was partially offset by non-core portfolio runoff of roughly $300 million for the quarter.

Next, on Slides 9 and 10. We continue to do a good job on deposits despite some seasonality, which should reverse in the fourth quarter. Average deposits were stable linked quarter, primarily driven by growth in commercial largely offset by lower consumer. Spot deposits were also stable linked quarter, reflecting growth in the Private Bank, which reached $18.5 billion at the end of the quarter and growth in commercial partially offset by a decrease in consumer. Our consumer deposits represent 63% of our total deposits, which compares favorably to a peer average of about 57%. Additionally, our mix of total interest-bearing and low-cost deposits was stable at 42% of total deposits.

Moving to credit on Slides 11 and 12. Credit continues to be broadly favorable, with net charge-offs stable at 37 basis points compared with the prior quarter. On Slide 12, you will see that we had a modest reduction in the allowance along with the slight reduction in ACL coverage ratio to 1.47%. We continue to improve our portfolio mix with the reduction in general office and multifamily balances and strong originations of lower loss content C&I, residential real estate secured and high-quality private bank loans. The economic scenario we used was a little more conservative this quarter, reflecting the higher rate environment. As we look broadly across the portfolio, the credit outlook remains positive, though we continue to carefully monitor the macroeconomic environment.

Moving to Slide 13. We maintained excellent balance sheet strength, ending the quarter with CET1 at a healthy 10.5% at the top end of our medium-term target operating range. We returned about $322 million to shareholders in the third quarter with $197 million in common dividends and $125 million of share repurchases. Cumulatively, we have now returned $1.24 billion to shareholders in dividends and share repurchases through the first 9 months of the year. Our AOCI adjusted CET1 ratio and TCE ratio ended the quarter at 8.7% and 6.7%, respectively. Notwithstanding this AOCI impact we remain confident in our capital strength and capital generation capacity.

Moving to Slide 14. The Private Bank continues to make ebolent progress. The Private Bank again delivered strong deposit growth, ending the quarter at $18.5 billion. Importantly, the overall deposit mix and cost continues to be very attractive. The Private Bank also delivered solid loan growth in the quarter, adding $2 billion of loans to end the quarter at $11.7 billion. The loan portfolio maintains a healthy spread of approximately 4% over deposit costs. Client assets increased by $1.2 billion to end the quarter at $12.4 billion. We added another strong team in Tampa and additional bankers in Philadelphia this quarter, and we plan to continue to adding top-quality teams in key geographies.

Moving to Slide 15. We are making very good progress executing our rematch in the bank program as we continue to leverage a host of new innovative technologies across the bank to simplify our business model, reshape our customer experience and drive a meaningful improvement in productivity and efficiency. Our key work streams are well underway, and we expect to hit our financial targets for the program with minimal net cost this year. We expect to exit 2026 with about $100 million of annualized pretax benefit then more than double that to $225 million by the end of '27, a little ahead of our original plan and then target at least $450 million of benefit as we exit 2028.

Moving to Slide 16. We provide our outlook for the fourth quarter, which contemplates that the Fed raising its target rate by 25 basis points in December. We expect net interest income to be up about 2.5% to 3% driven by continued margin expansion to a range of 3.26%. Noninterest income is expected to be up approximately 4% to 5%, led by capital markets and wealth. We are projecting expenses to be up about 1%. This puts us on track to deliver over 600 basis points of positive operating leverage for the full year. The charge-off level is expected to be stable to down slightly, and we should end the year with CET1 at approximately 10.6% to 10.7%, including expected share repurchases of $200 million in the quarter. Looking out further, we continue to see a clear path to achieving our 16% to 18% ROTCE target by the end of '27.

Slide 17 provides incremental details on our net interest margin progression to the end of '27. We continue to improve our net interest margin, and we project to deliver a 4Q '26 NIM in the range of 3.23% to 3.26% and in the range of 3.30% to 3.50% in 4Q '27. This projected margin expansion, combined with the increasing contributions from the private bank, our diversified capital markets businesses and normalizing credit should drive our ROTCE into our target 16% to 18% range. To wrap up, we delivered strong third quarter results. highlighted by record revenue and a robust level of positive operating leverage. Notwithstanding the continuation of volatility and uncertainty in the macro environment, we have a positive outlook for the fourth quarter, with good momentum across our businesses, continuing to drive strong earnings growth and solid operating leverage. We will continue to focus on progressing our strategic initiatives and delivering for our stakeholders.

With that, I will hand it back to Bruce.

Okay. Thank you, Aunoy. Operator, let's open it up for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Scott Seifers with TD Cowen.

Let's see, so it was great to see you guys reiterate the $3.30 to $3.50 margin by year-end '27. I guess since the last time you all addressed it, there has been a remarkable amount of change in the rate backdrop. So maybe I was hoping you could spend just a moment or 2 sort of discussing what you see as getting sort of tougher and easier in median neck, whether it's deposit pricing pressures potentially or things that get moved one way or another with all the moving parts.

Sure. So I would say the outlook continues to be positive that we have a number of drivers that are going to work for us regardless of what happens in the rate environment, the so-called time-based benefits as we describe them with legacy swaps accounting drag kind of rolling off every quarter. We have a big slug of that in the fourth quarter, and that continues a bit into 2027. We also have the front book, back book dynamic that is we're pretty confident it's going to be there that the yield curve should continue to stay relatively steep and that provides further lift.

Beyond that, then a lot of the remaining kind of variability is what happens with how managing the balance sheet. I think we have a lot of confidence. You can see the level of noninterest-bearing deposits has held steady through kind of the last period with a lot of volatility. We really focused on growing low-cost and deep relationships across consumer and private bank in particular. So that's positive for the cost of funds. And I'd say more broadly, we're kind of have 3 basic segments that we can optimize in terms of where we're taking our interest-bearing deposit funds. And so I think we're doing a good job there as well. If you look at the quarter relative to others, the total deposit costs are only up 3%, which is kind of certainly on the good side of others. So I feel good about that.

And then on the loan side, we continue to focus on deeper relationships and using our balance sheet in places where we can really be relevant to the customer, whether it's in commercial, consumer or the private bank. And we see, I think, good opportunities there to grow our market share. We're focused on commercial and lead-left relationships and focusing in the right sectors where we think we can get decent spread and decent cross-sell. The Private Bank also continues to grow loans at a good clip, and the mix is pretty attractive from an overall yield standpoint, it's accretive to overall NIM. So those are the things I would say, Scott, that we feel good about our ability to drive upwards into that range. And we are -- lastly, I would say, we are asset sensitive. And so assuming that the Fed goes another hike or to that will be accretive to the NII outlook. So anyway, overall feeling quite confident. I don't know if any of my other colleagues now if you want to add anything to that?

No, Bruce, I think you covered it. The only thing I would say, Scott, is you have seen our past performance, and we have core NIM by 19 basis points since the last -- since 3Q of last year. So that augers well for this performance to continue.

Anything from you, Brendan, on deposit.

I just -- not a lot of 1 or 2 quick details to put some color on it, but the private bank, we're up $6 billion year-over-year, and it's remarkably consistent of $1.5 billion on average, with some quarters a little bit better, some quarters a little bit lower. But when you even look at an 8-quarter view, $1.5 billion growth with the mix being consistent of 33-ish percent DDA and 40 -- to 40s of low cost, and we see that continuing into the future. So that's idiosyncratic to us, and it's helping us keep DDA in a good position and outperform, which should help deposit costs. Consumer while spending is still high and the average consumer is still really, really healthy overall, we continue to see our metrics outperform peers. And that's been a trend for 7, 8, 9 years at this point, and we expect that to continue. So that's the majority of our deposit book. So I feel pretty good about I feel pretty good about that. And we're allocating loan capital, as Bruce mentioned, to the right places with yields that will drive NIM accretive activities on all sides of the business.

The next question comes from John Pancari with Evercore ISI.

Just on the deposit side, just wanted to get an updated thoughts post the spike in rates and what you're seeing around deposit pricing and the pressure there, both competitively and the rate backdrop, how would you characterize the trajectory of your deposit costs in coming quarters? Maybe give us an updated deposit beta expectation? And then any updated thoughts around that? I know, Bruce, you mentioned the noninterest-bearing balances and the favorable trajectory, how should we expect that, that trend in terms of the mix of noninterest versus interest-bearing, how that grosses in this type of rate environment.

Sure. I'll start and quickly hand it off to no. But I would say Scott, it's always -- it's any quarter we talk about. It's always going to be competitive for deposits. And so the question is really, where is your focus? And what are the areas that you think you can lean into and developed good deposit performance and trajectory. So I wouldn't call that out as something that we haven't seen before. It's intensifying. I think it's kind of level and steady with what we've seen before. And we've been kind of through an up cycle, and then we'd start going through a down cycle and now we've stopped, and we've gone flipped back to an up cycle. And so when I think about it, there's no reason why this up cycle, if it's 2 or 3 hikes shouldn't really retrace what we saw coming down or what we saw the last time it went through [ 3 75 ] to [ 4 25 ] or [ 4 50 ] and those were really kind of deposit betas in the high 40s. So I don't think I'd call out anything different than that. That would be our expectation. And then I'll let no and Brendan again talk more about some of the deposit trajectory, but the confidence in that noninterest ability to grow that, particularly in the private bank, but also in consumer. And then we have some strategies to grow it in commercial, but we're not counting on that as much, but I feel really good about that. So Aunoy?

John, I would say we are pleased with our deposit performance. As Bruce mentioned, like as when rates were coming down, we were roughly around in the high 40s beta. So as rates pace pick up. We expect to be in that level. And as you have seen, like our deposit cost performance, total deposit cost pro forma this quarter is only a 3 basis point increase. And even in the last quarter, we also had a very good deposit cost performance. So we are actually -- we are growing deposits with our clients and making sure that we get the operating balances that's there. I think Street has some seasonality in deposit losses, I think which will trace back in 4Q. So 4Q deposit growth across our 3 businesses should be quite solid. And then as Brendan mentioned earlier, the private bank with over 30% of DDA balances is growing nicely, and we have been growing nicely every quarter and that gives us a lot of confidence, and we have good pipeline against that. With that, I'll pass on to Brendan, to see if you have any comments.

Just competitively, just reiterate Bruce's point that while things are been better with time any more competitive than what we saw in the last 4 to 6 quarters. So we're seeing deposit yields come up in terms of lead offers from a lot of the banks, but in line with what you'd expect with rate forward outlook. I would just say we have, and I mentioned this on prior calls, a few times, but I think we have a more diverse set of levers to manage our deposit costs than our peers. Obviously, the private bank being idiosyncratic to us and the growth that we're seeing an outsized mix of DDA and low cost is one very big one for us in helping us manage deposits and I think giving us more flexibility than maybe we've seen in some other peers.

But when you unpack retail book, which is still the majority of our deposit business. We've got $8 billion or so in CD rollovers every quarter. We tend to get about 100 basis points of net benefit in deposit yields and we retain 85% to 90% of those balances in various different ways that should sustain into the future. That gives us a positive offset to increasing costs in other parts of the book. we have Citizens Access that is a lever that allows us to make smart in-quarter choices on how to best optimize our deposit yield, whether it's better to put some in Citizens Access or whether it's better to give it to kind of a core retail bank or commercial or private bank, we've got -- we've got that as a lever as well. And then our outsized performance on DDA obviously gives us some flexibility on when and how we put interest-bearing costs back into the system. So anyway, I feel really good about the diversity of our business model and the levers that we have, and I think you see that this quarter as Aunoy and Bruce pointed out, in our interest-bearing and total deposit costs being better than what you're seeing in other prints and I think that should continue.

Okay. Great. Brendan, maybe just quickly on the loan side, just given the other, could you maybe just comment on demand? And particularly on the commercial side, are you seeing any erosion in demand or CapEx plans or anything point to maybe some moderation amid the higher rate environment? .

Ted?

At this point, we haven't loan demand actually in the last couple of weeks started to pick up a little bit as we got into the fourth quarter. So it's certainly a lot of conversations we're having with our customers. But up to this point, our customers have really not changed their desire to borrow money.

And I would just add some color on that, too. This whole AI ecosystem build-out is kind of full on. So it's very strong dynamic, and that kind of cascades into a lot of the supply ecosystem that kind of gets those centers built. And even with higher rates, the kind of desire to get the compute power in place the players aren't really batting an eye last year, up [ 25 ] or the back end of the curve is moving up a bit. So I think that's relatively inelastic to pricing. There'll be kind of some other sectors, maybe you get another couple of hikes and then maybe some of the PE and leverage sector starts to become a little more circumspect, but we haven't seen that as of yet.

Your next question comes from Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley.

On the fee income guidance for the fourth quarter, it sounds like you're pretty optimistic on capital markets pipelines coming through. And so just wondering, what the conviction level is there and how sustainable the demand in middle market sponsor activity fuels?

Ted?

Sure. We feel very strongly about where we are in the capital market side right now. Our pipeline, especially on the M&A side, have never been higher than they are today. And not only that, the quality of the deals that we're looking at and executing now are just continue to get stronger. Our fees per average transaction continues to go up. And we have a really huge backlog as we think about fourth quarter and really into 2027. The DC or the debt capital market side of our business, we had a couple of deals slip from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. So we started off the fourth quarter on a really good start. And the pipeline continues to grow there. I think the only offset of that could be if each going up higher in the fourth quarter that you may see some of the opportunistic bond refinancing to push out. But at this point, we haven't seen that occur. And then the equity business, the backlog for all of us is pretty strong on the equity side. We're waiting to see some big transactions clear the market. If they do, I think that's going to be a very good quarter for equity. So all in all, we feel very, very strongly about where we are entering the fourth quarter.

Yes. And I would also point to -- it's not just a capital market story. We've had kind of nice growth, particularly in wealth. We usually get some seasonality in some of the consumer fee categories. So I feel good overall about that guide.

And then in terms of private credit competition on the loan side, any change there?

I would say no. There was obviously some drop-off in the second quarter when there was more noise around private credit. We saw private credit come down a little bit on leverage come down a little bit on the size of their commitments, but that's kind of stable off -- or leveled off in the third and fourth quarter. Private credit still anxiously still trying to put money to work and we're kind of indifferent to them from our side, whether they -- if they -- if private credit is more aggressive to help our CCS business or -- and if they do less, it helps our syndication business. So both ways, we feel relatively comfortable but we really haven't seen much of a difference in their behavior over the last 2 quarters.

Your next question comes from David Chiaverini with Jefferies.

Really strong growth in the Private Bank again this quarter. Can you talk about the drivers behind that strong growth and the outlook from here?

Sure. There's a number of them. I would say first is rand and is continuing to scale in the markets that we're in and both in terms of visibility, but also the number of boots on the ground. So when we started the build-out, we were -- we started with 150 people back in 2023. We're now up to almost 700 people. We're expanding markets, as you heard from us this week. We've built into Southern California. We'll continue to take density and Northern California or Boston and New York and Florida markets are expanding. We opened a new office in West Palm Beach. We just opened a small office in Philadelphia this week, which is the news we opened a small office in Tampa. And we're now up to 12 wealth teams that are both bringing assets under management, but also referring bang over. So -- and we expect that to continue. We have 10 PBOs. We expect more to open of 2027, and we continue to add relationship managers and wealth managers as we find high-quality folks that can join the platform and meet the bar that we hold for business.

The other point I would make is that the folks that we brought over early have a lot of client followership from their place. And while we've seen an enormous amount of their clients follow over, there's still a lot more to go. I'd say their books of business are at, call it, the 50% to 60% level on average on what they were prior at the old institution. And so we're seeing a slow steady drip of new client activity coming over that knew them in the past. And so the whole process of reassembling their book story is not complete.

And then lastly, the value that the commercial bank, in particular, is driving for the private bank in terms of referrals and our one citizens mantra ever been increasing as we put our capital markets business, our IPO capabilities, our M&A advisory capabilities, liquidity events that are happening in the partnership amongst the teams is driving a new source of business for the team that didn't have before. And so all of those factors are increasing and continuing to fire on all cylinders. So we expect the forward outlook of the business to be steady at the level of growth, and you've seen that from us. We haven't seen it deteriorated at all. And in fact, probably you see the loan book is actually accelerating with 2 quarters in a row at $2 billion in growth in linked quarter. If we were talking last year, we were probably at $1 billion linked quarter growth. So we're seeing some mentions of not only steady, but also accelerating momentum. And there's nothing that we see in the near to medium term that would suggest that would slow.

And I would just add one thing is not only are we getting the growth, we're sustaining the returns on the business, which is important. So it's kind of acting as a locomotive to pull the overall ROTCE hire for the company as it grows.

Very helpful. And Bruce, you mentioned about the AI build-out is going strong. To what extent is Citizens participating in financing this build-out?

Yes. So we have a good position in this space, partly because we went out sometimes it's better to be lucky than good. I'll just say. But our timing on acquiring DH Capital, which was a digital infrastructure lead adviser really got us a great position, understanding kind of what was happening and owning key relationships and having kind of that front row seat to really see that it was flipping from just a pure more advisory business to a financing business. And so under Ted's leadership. We've kind of brought a strong financing team to work with DH Capital and really participate in a lot of those financing transactions. We are disciplined on kind of what we want to hold ultimately on our balance sheet.

So the objective ultimately is to participate in some of that early construction lending opportunity, but then actually move it on into more permanent financing like the bond market, and there's a lot of fees that can be made through that whole process and also some spread income, but we have well-defined buckets as to how much we want to hold and we're also hedging some of those exposures as well because even though it seems like you can't miss right now in the data center space, you're kind of always wondering, does the pin go in the bubble someday. And so we have to think about those scenarios as well. But I think we played it exceptionally well. I'll turn it over to Ted for any more color.

The only thing I would add is the vast majority of our exposure to this space is in -- with companies that are lessees are, first of all, in the development companies of the data center build-out and the lessees are vast majority of them are investment grade per sale or so. We feel very good about what exposure we've taken there. and we're not relying a lot on speculative stuff. We're doing most of it with committed power, committed building and regulatory approval already. So we're not doing the more risky -- the vast majority of our stuff is not the more risky stuff that you're seeing being done out there.

The next question comes from Erika Najarian with UBS.

Just taking a step back, your net interest income guide for this year is 10% to 12%. As I think about Slide 17, in theory, just the time-based benefits would get you to [ 3 35 ] by 4Q, '27, you're asset sensitive your earning assets in the third quarter grew 5% year-over-year. You feel great about both the liability and asset side of your balance sheet. Again, like why should NII growth slow down from that 10% to 12% in '27 as what is it -- as what consensus is assuming consensus assuming 9% NII growth which is slower than the 10% to 12%. Given the NIM benefits plus it seems like earning asset growth is still pretty decent. Why would it down? .

Well, first off, Erika, we are not going to give 2017 guidance yet. We do that in the January call. So a nice try on that one.

I had to.

But I feel the one thing that you might not grow, and I'm not saying that that's where it's going to land, but why the consensus may be less because we were front loaded with our time-based benefits. And so that was very significant NIM expand. And so as the noise said, up 19 basis points year-to-date, a big fourth quarter, are we going to repeat that. We don't have as much time base when you look out into '27. And so I think we'll still have solid NIM expansion, but it won't be as much and the balance sheet dynamics, we feel really good about.

So if, in fact, it turned out to be kind of around 10% instead of over 12%, that's still pretty good. And that's still creates a very positive dynamic around overall revenue growth, positive operating leverage, strong EPS growth and ROTCE improvement and getting us to that 16% to 18%. So all of that is set up very well. That's what gives us a high degree of confidence that not only are we going to have a strong Q4, but we're going to have a good 2027.

And you -- and correct me if I'm wrong, but you had that ROTCE target, but before you introduced the concept of reimagined the bank it was reimagined the bank always sort of part of the plan in terms of getting you to 16% to 18%? Or could that be sort of accretive in terms of where you could land in the range?

Yes. So we always held that outside that wasn't built into getting the 16% to 18%. We're doing that kind of through the NII tailwinds through the business initiatives that we have like Private Bank and continued improvement in the credit as we burn off the drag from the office charge-offs and the capital buybacks, et cetera. So anyway, we can get there without that. It's incremental, and we'll have an opportunity to make some decisions. That's one of the things I think we'll focus on in January. You may have noticed, but we had initially when we unveiled reimagine the bank, we said we'd hit a [ 200 ] run rate by the end of '27 fourth quarter, we bumped that up a bit to [ 225 ]. Maybe there's a chance to do more, but whatever in-year benefits we have in '27. First, they have to cover onetime costs, but then there's something that will flow through the bottom line.

And the question is, do we let it flow all the way through? Or do we turn around and say, let's go a little faster with the private bank or let's go a little faster with our next initiative, let's let Ed go out and hire a few more commercial bankers who are beating the door down, by the way, to get on the platform, which is a good place for us to be. But typically, when you've seen us run things like top we just meld that into overall operating leverage. And so there is some flow through to the bottom line, but you also can look at what are the things that we really prioritize in terms of our investments. you're seeing across the industry, a lot of folks are growing expenses kind of high single digits at this point. And we're still kind of locked in around, let's keep it under [ 5 ], even with strong revenue performance that's going to put a little upward pressure on the [ 4.5 ] target at the beginning of the year. It's still managing it to under [ 5 ]. And I think having that discipline, results in that operating leverage, which results in the high EPS growth and getting to the ROTCE promised land. It's unlikely that we'll -- when we give you the guide that we'll be relaxing that discipline. I think it's still important to set priorities and to stretch some of that investment out over time so that we can land the plane in the 16% to 18% territory.

Bruce, the only thing I would add, Erika to that is Bruce's point around the onetime cost. So this year, and reimagine the bank was essentially breakeven. Next year, we will see some benefits flow to the bottom line, but there's still a meaningful amount of onetime costs. So when you start to think about the impact to ROTCE. And the reason why RTB was contemplated really in our guidance because we're talking about 2027. So when you think about the '28, '29 and beyond, when the onetime costs dramatically reduced, that's when you're really going to start to see the net impact of that, whether it's the fuel reinvestment on ROTCE accretive activities or whether we're going to drop some to the bottom line or likely a height of both. So anyway, that's -- that's one way to think about it as well is take a little bit further past the 2027 when you think about the long-term implications of reimagine the bank.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris McGratty with KBW.

Just a follow-up on the 16% to 18% for a moment. I think in the prior, you said get into the range by 4Q '27, which is a seasonally pretty strong quarter. given how the world has changed and reimagine the bank a little bit better than prior, do you have a bias within that as a jumping off point? I know it's kind of a nuanced question. But within the 4Q '27, it feels like it might have been letting the low end, but any color would be great.

Yes. I think the other wild card that you didn't mention is really the AOCI impact, which kind of hurts your tangible equity. But in terms of giving you a little tailwind in the ROTCE calculation. It certainly does that. So anyway, I wouldn't rates are going to move around and we'll see where we are in January when we give you the guide. It's possible that, that could pull in, and we don't have to wait all the way to the fourth quarter.

Okay. And then on that, the $200 million for the fourth quarter for the buybacks is a good number. Does the -- how are you feeling about just the movement in adjusted CET1 ratio, given how sharp the move in rates were I know it obviously dropped in the quarter and it can reverse. But I guess, internal debate about pace of buybacks given the move in the bond market, any color there?

Yes, we called out in the prepared remarks that we're monitoring those ratios, the adjusted ratios. But -- and so as a result, we may let the CET1 gross ratio move up a bit above the high end of our range, 10.5%. We had been operating kind of 10.6%, 10.7%. It's likely that's where we'll be at the moment. But there's a lot of cross currents taking place that would factor into our decision-making. One is when the Basel III comes into effect and we get RWA relief, that's about 110 basis points. And so the fully phased-in calc right now with AOCI from a regulatory standpoint, it actually would come in over time. But if you want to take the hit on AOCI, you should get the benefit of the RWA. And so what's a [ 8 7 ] ratio with the RWA overlay on that, it goes back up to [ 9 8 ]. So that's just one thing to think about there.

And then you look at what happened back in '23, the overall industry kind of adjusted ratios were much lower. And so we have kind of build capital over time. And so we feel we can certainly operate at these levels. And I think the latest kind of SCB indicative calculation that the Fed did show that we've done some really good work on the balance sheet in terms of running off auto and running down CRE and things like that. So anyway, we feel confident that we can operate at these levels and we take a little bit of precaution and let the gross ratio drift up a little bit. But I want to be in the market buying back the stock. I think the stock is cheap. I may sound like a broken record on that, but I think the stock below its fair value. So we're going to take advantage of that.

The only other thing I would add, Chris, is like, look, we are generating a lot of capital. Our capital capacity generation is quite high. So yes, maybe the AOCI pretty well and move in rates in the third quarter. So that lost 60 basis points, but we generate more than 30 basis points of capital every quarter through our net income generation. So if you think you put that into context of that.

Your next question comes from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America.

I guess maybe just Bruce, following up on what you talked about with AOCI. And just talk to us, like do you think about tangible common equity in the construct of wanting to be, over time, around 7% or above. We often hear that the rating agencies are sensitive to that. Just how do you -- it's not a binding consent, but how do you think about the TCE ratio in the context of managing capital?

Yes. I think it's another thing to look at. It's not a binding ratio. But I'd say the market stakeholders look at that. And I'd say 7% as kind of level that you'd like to be at or above would be a reasonable level that you point out. So we're a tad below that. But to [ Joy's ] point, we're building capital and we are going to retain some of that to get our capital position a little higher. So I don't think that's going to be a problem to get there and to operate there. And if we're a little bit below it. It's not -- there's plenty of banks that are kind of between 6.5% and 7%. So I don't see it as a relative issue compared to others.

Got it. And as we think through next year, you have so many initiatives going on, maybe if Bruce or Brendan, if you don't mind spending some time, in terms of Matt coming on to the bank, just the actions you've taken to sort of improve the consumer franchise over the last 5 years, if we can double-click on either next or even outside of next where is the opportunity within that consumer footprint as you think about the next couple of years?

Yes. So Matt's been an excellent add to the team, and you've seen us reload the entire leadership team in many ways over the last 12 to 18 months, and Matt certainly has been no exception to that, he had a huge impact. As you know, our history around the consumer bank transforming it from a makeup of a bunch of acquired thrifts to one that has a really well-fortified foundation with a strong deposit base was our principal objective over the last 10 years, and we did that and then we turn our attention to the other side of the balance sheet to make sure the loan book was relationship-oriented, higher-yielding and driving accretion across all the other products and services. And we've done that, too, as we run down all the non-core parts of consumer that were helpful in our early days, and now we're pivoting to more durable, sticky revenue streams.

And now when you look at the revenue streams coming in from consumer, you're seeing the quality of the deposit franchise and now you're starting to see incredible growth in wealth management. We talk a lot about the Private Bank for Wealth Management, what we probably don't talk enough about is still about 65% of our revenue streams in wealth management are coming from the part of the business that's connected to retail. And that business is sales are up 30% to 35% year-over-year, and that's directly as a result of the flight to quality and the focus on the consumer business on getting net primary banking households, the right mass affluent mix, which we skew 3% to 4% to 5% higher. So as Matt takes a look at the business, I think we've got an incredibly strong foundation, but one that still has a tremendous amount of opportunity in that's whee next really comes in. As we're thinking about -- we talked a little bit about this last quarter, but there's a couple of lenses to it. 3 real lenses.

One is adding specialty job families that drive revenue accretion for massive fluent and affluent customers. So we're adding business bankers to the platform. We're adding private client bankers to the platform, which is really our version of private banking light, if you will, for the mass affluent customer that sits in the retail business and adding wealth managers to the platform. We've continued to do that every quarter, adding 10 or so new wealth managers a quarter. And our sales force is up to approximately 450 wealth managers that sit in the retail branches. We're going to continue to do that and drive revenue accretion depth and share of wallet. And then on the physical side, really, there are 2 big things. And the goal here is to position us for long-term outperformance on deposit growth, particularly low cost and household market share capture. So we're going to really do some further surgery to put the business in a position to get that growth. We're going to take down some of our in-store franchises or physical points of presence to replace those with much more impressive stand-alone branches that are more oriented towards the massive fluid and affluent customer base that we have in retail.

And then in some of our markets, we think we have the ability to densify as a post-COVID world settles and you see us take the expense out of the in-stores and replace that with an investment in physical branches that will give us further operating leverage and outsized deposit growth down the road. So the mindset in the retail franchise is incredibly proud and confident in the foundation we've built, but that positions us for the next round of growth going forward, which we equally have confidence in, but you'll see us pull some different levers that should build a sticky durable set of revenues that we hope to have multiple accretion over time and allow us to do things in the commercial bank and the private bank to continue to have outsized growth in consumer with that granular deposit business.

And then Ebrahim, I would say you can already see it in some of our numbers, the wealth fees line that has been grown with the retail network in place. And similarly, on the deposit side, the structural deposit benefit that we get with the DDA percentages, that's really helpful. So you can see it already in our numbers coming through.

Your next question comes from the line of Ken Usdin with Autonomous Research.

I wanted to have a follow-up on the deposit side. You mentioned in the slides that there was some seasonality in consumer end of period deposits were kind of flattish on the interest-bearing side, and granted understanding the year-over-year growth, understanding the good DDA growth. Just wondering like what that seasonality is because you had more wholesale funding relative to deposits this quarter? And does that kind of reverse? Or just talk us through kind of the trajectory of just overall deposit growth from here, especially on the interest-bearing side and what that means for the wholesale funding on the flip?

Let's start, and I'll quickly turn to Aunoy. But the fourth quarter, Ken, has always been seasonally strong for us always in the commercial space. And so we think commercial will have very significant growth consistent with prior years. We also have -- the private bank, as Brendan mentioned, is growing at a good clip every quarter. That will be additive. And then consumer I think also has a nice seasonality in that. And so we would expect very strong spot deposit growth in Q4. And as I had said on a prior call, by the end of the year, we'll have that FHLB advanced number, I think, meaningfully reduced. And so I think that can come down into a kind of low to mid single-digit billion from 7-ish today. So that's kind of the overall headline is expect strong growth across all 3, quite confident in that. We have good visibility into that, but I'll let Aunoy to provide more color.

Yes. I think in your front, we have -- if you go back on the seasonality, you can see that in every last few years, you have seen the drop in seasonality in deposits in the third quarter in the consumer business, and it comes back. Obviously, as Bruce mentioned, commercial comes back very nicely as we have year-end deposit from our clients. The biggest thing I would say is both under all the 3 businesses, we are gathering more operating accounts. They are not really just a rate-driven exercise. So we are getting the actual operating and transactional accounts in our businesses. That actually helps to keep our deposit cost, right? It actually helps to grow our DDA and low-cost deposits. And as you have seen our low cost plus our DDA balances have been at 42%, very steady as we have gone through. And that's what we expect as we go through. And that keeps our deposit costs also in Czech as well.

Next question comes from Daniel Tamayo with Raymond James.

Maybe first just on the credit side. it looks like there was an increase in kind of the early stage commercial real estate delinquencies. Wondering if you could touch on that. And then just kind of bigger picture thoughts on the trends of overall credit and if you're expecting the allowance to continue to be able to trend down as it has for the last several quarters.

Yes. So let's take that Daniel. So on the overall credit, if you see our credit mix as the allowance is really driven by the mix shift that we have had in our book. So as we roll down CRE that has been coming down nicely. And what we have done is lower loss fund at C&I or residential secured draft. So if you go back to some of our credit pages, you will see underlying that our -- it's just really the mix that is driving the ACL coverage ratio. So there's nothing that is there and that we'll see how the mix evolves as we go through it, but that's how the driver be. .

On the early-stage delinquency on commercial, there are some probably some idiosyncratic issues on some model base, but there's nothing. We don't see any widespread or any broad-based credit issues. I don't know...

I would say on our real estate book, it's going just as we planned to. We're seeing some significant paydowns quarter-over-quarter as some of these deals mature and get refinanced out. But there's really no change in our real estate book versus where it was last quarter.

And on the retail side, there's not a lot of new news to share. delinquencies are flat, no signs of stress, NDOs continue to modestly tick down over a longer-term trend line, and there's no signs of anything emerging that would take us off that track.

Yes. So to your point about like where does this go, I think the -- we've seen a steady decline in charge-off rate as we work through the CRE office look that I'd like to say the pig is almost to the [indiscernible], but there's still a little more to go on that. So that will help drive the net charge-off rate lower than it is now. So we expect that in Q4 and into '27 even though I promised Erika, I'm not giving guidance on '27, but we anticipate that trend to happen. And then the allowance should follow that. There should be an ability for the allowance to continue to dip a bit with the kind of mix shifts that annoy described plus kind of the improvement in overall asset quality as we work through some of the remaining tail of that office book.

Terrific. And then maybe just shifting to the private bank. I know you've talked a lot about it here, but I guess my question is around the profitability. You talked about 25% plus ROE in that business. Clearly, the lending has been growing faster than the deposit side, but you're coming from a stronger base in the deposit. But how do you think about the -- any kind of shift in profitability over time as that continues to work through? Or do you have to start to match the loan growth to the deposit growth or deposit growth for the loan growth more as you get further along with this -- the growth of the private bank?

So one of the things that we're doing with the business is running it with a much lower loan-to-deposit ratio than kind of the way when it was set up First Republic. This is kind of more disciplined around credit and making sure it's the deep relationships. And that we've changed that the product we're selling more is white glove service as opposed to we're offering discounted credit. And so that, I think, has helped set the stage for a much higher kind of ROE business and what First Republic achieved overall in their ROE there is kind of catch-up growth now. So we brought over deposits initially, let's bring our D&I and then eventually some of the lending will pick up, and we've seen it pick up.

And so when you're using more capital, that can has the potential to lower the ROEs a little bit. And then also, we're making a lot of investments that follow J-curve. So when we're hiring all these people and bringing these teams in the outset, that's harmful to the return level. But then as the revenues come in, that creates the kind of overall positive dynamic in terms of those returns. And so just being kind of very measured in terms of looking at -- we don't want to have too many J-curve going because that can depress our profitability, but we're going to stage them very thoughtfully and prioritize things. While I think that's been the secret as to how we've been able to get off to a high start and then sustain those levels. But at this point, we don't see anything that would take us out of a 20% to 25% zone. But so it's possible that it drips down a little bit with kind of more -- a bigger lending book and a continued build-out, particularly markets like Florida and the Northeast, where we still have more building to do. But in any case, I think the discipline that we've had to run it with positive operating leverage; b, make tough choices, set the right priorities, states so that we keep the returns high that's been on full display. Brendan?

Only 2 points I would make is, in addition to Bruce's is that we expect through the medium term for the business to still be self-funding. And so while LDR is tightening a little bit, the business is still self-funding itself both from an LDR standpoint and an LCR standpoint. When we look at lendability of deposits. So to Bruce's point, perhaps the ROEs would tighten a tiny bit. It was a little maybe when we were outside the 25% range in the '26 and '27, and maybe it was a little artificially high, but there's even with that tightening dynamic, there's nothing we see that will take us out of that range of 20% to 25%.

The other point number 2 that I would make is as the wealth business catches up to scale, that is a low capital-intense business. And we -- when we built a private bank. We started with a heavier set of bankers, and now we're starting to see the wealth managers come on the platform. And that should only accelerate in the future as we put greater focus on building out the wealth business and catching up to the growth that we've had on the banking side. tightening you see on the balance sheet should get offset. Now we'll have some efficiency ratio tightening, right? Because the wealth business is going to be a 75% to 80% efficiency ratio business, but very capital light and will drive ROTCE accretion for the segment and for the company overall. -- good point.

Next question comes from the line of Gerard Cassidy with RBC Capital Markets.

Just following up on the private banks. Obviously, you guys are having really good growth you're bringing out the recurring to around 45% on capital. The question I have for you is that as you broaden serial franchise, do you think most of your are identified net interest income was really the driver of the revenue and earnings sorter you envision even more national, more fee or into businesses will contribute to the revenue mix.

Yes. Thanks, Gerard. It's Brendan. We expect wealth to grow in an outsized way. And that will be the primary driver of fee income coming through the private bank, as you would expect. We've got maybe a high-class problem to have here where the balance sheet and the attractiveness of the banking side of the business has been so attractive to these clients that we've grown that so fast. So you're seeing even though we're driving fee income up at a pretty healthy clip, it's been, from a mix standpoint, consumed by very, very strong balance sheet growth. So we're not going to be overly focused on managing to mix of revenue if it's a good business, we're going to do it.

But I do think over the medium to long term, you should expect the wealth business to play an even bigger role in there, and we should see the fee proportion start to improve modestly over time, which kind of back to the last question, has a positive improvement to ROTCE that will offset some of the tightening LDR dynamics. So I do expect it to improve, but the strength of the banking business is so strong over the next 12 to 24 months, I wouldn't expect radical improvements, but you should see steady growth in fee income in line or better than the banking balance sheet over time. So we're very focused on the wealth piece of that business. And there's a natural progression to here when you have a bank owned private bank that you typically earn the client's relationship first on the banking and credit side and then through earning that trust and starting to do financial planning, the wealth comes as a fast follower. And so that is a natural progression of client behavior and also our hiring practices as we built the wealth business. So it's a heavy focus, and we project to see steady progress there.

Wealth has a broader halo effect across the franchise. So we are also seeing that in our consumer business as well as through our retail network as well.

Very good. And then just as a follow-up to some of the commercial loan questions earlier in the call. Obviously, you guys are pointing out that financial real estate came down planned reductions there. But on the C&I side, you mentioned that demand is still there. Can you share with us, are you seeing more competition there, whether just adjusted returns may not meet your hurdles? Or what are you seeing inside the CMI portfolio where there was some softness in this quarter in terms of growth?

So to Bruce's point earlier, there's always stiff competition whenever we do a transaction. We are continuing to focus on being the left lead, the primacy of the account and where we can't get that business, we tend to shy away. In the third quarter in our corporate credit business, we moved out of $400 million of assets because we just couldn't make a good return and we're not building loans just for asset for a loan growth perspective. We're seeing plenty of opportunities now with what we developed throughout our entire commercial bank to have opportunities to not win on price but to run on advisory work and went on providing good, strong advice to our company. So competition is stiff, it will remain stiff, but I don't think it's going to have a material impact on what we're doing.

And Gerard, I would say spreads over the last couple of quarters have stabilized.

Yes, we do have more question that is from Matthew Breese with Stephens Inc.

I was hoping you could talk a little bit about how higher rates have impacted or yet to impact kind of prepay and payoff activity in the commercial real estate space. I would assume that it slows down, but I'm curious if expectations have met reality at this point.

To this point, it has not -- we've done an analysis of our real estate book of where we think the higher rates can impact us. I think long story short, we think somewhere in the neighborhood of $400 million after all the analysis we did maybe, but that's about as much as we see potentially being delayed because of higher rates at this point. we don't think it's going to have a material impact otherwise.

Okay. And then no one for you. Do you have handy what the period end cost of deposits were? And just curious what your expectations are for deposit cost increases over the next couple of quarters with one more Fed hike in your assumptions.

Yes. So as I said, like if you think of it, deposit costs with one more rate hike probably more in towards in the December range, if you think of the Fed rate hike. Some of the rate hikes will when you -- it depends on which part of the book of deposits get repriced. Commercial gets repriced almost immediately. It's contractual. So on the private bank as well as consumer gets over time. So there's a little bit of lag. We see. Now what happened is you also saw the rate hike in the third quarter happened in September. So that will catch up. You'll also see loans catching up. Most of our loan book is floating rate. The loans will catch up as well as we go through loans are generally on a lag. So all these things start to layer in so. So I think it's hard to pinpoint on period end. I would say like that.

I think we go back to the earlier answer where on the retracement up, if there's 3 hikes that was kind of a 49 -- kind of high 40s beta first on the way down on the way up and then on the way down. And so in that ballpark is something that we would manage to, I think, over the next, however, many hikes there are. But I did at a conference in September, I mentioned the timing of the hike would start to move deposit costs higher, but commercial loans would, as a noise said, reprice right away. But then some of the consumer loan categories are tied to rates and don't move until the fourth quarter. So given that we're asset sensitive, notwithstanding the fact that your deposit costs are going to go up, your loans aren't going to go up more, and I called that out at probably a 1 basis point tailwind to Q4, which I think is still kind of in the ballpark. So a lot will depend exactly kind of when the hikes happen, but being asset sensitive, we'll see that benefit from the upcoming moves.

All right. Thanks for dialing in today and asking some great questions. We appreciate your interest and support. Have a good day, everybody.

Thank you. That does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Very pleased to have Citizens Financial up next. From the company, Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun. Bruce has been a very big supporter of this event since Citizens' IPO.

And prior.

And even prior in his prior two jobs actually. But since the company went public in 2014, just maybe talk to, as you kind of look at the competitive landscape, how do you feel about the firm's current positioning? Where do you see the greatest opportunities? What are you most excited about?

I think we're positioned very well for the future. It's been kind of a long transformation journey to get here. But when I look at the strategy we have, we try to simplify the story and really talk about a triangle of businesses, and that would be the Consumer Bank, the Commercial Bank, and Private Bank and Wealth. And I think we have really strong positioning in each three, lots of things to focus on to both grow households, grow customer base, grow the balance sheet, grow our fee penetration.

So when I look at starting with the Consumer Bank, we're very strong in mass affluent and affluent households and have had a lot of growth in low-cost deposits. The acquisitions that we put together in New York to compete in this marketplace have gone exceptionally well. And I think it's our fastest-growing region in terms of households and deposits. And there's a lot more that we can do to get further growth.

We're #1 originator in HELOCs in the country. That's a lead product to bring people into the bank, especially mass affluent households. So I feel very positive about that. We're investing in our digital and our data capabilities to keep upping the game in terms of customer experience. And then lastly, I'd say we've started to tap into the great opportunity to cross-sell the wealth products and services. So you see that as something that will continue to drive deeper penetration in the households and our wealth fee revenue.

In the Commercial Bank, I'd like to modestly say, I think we're the best positioned super regional Commercial Bank when it comes to, in particular, capital markets capabilities. And so as the markets heat up and there's more deal activity, I think you see our revenues are flexing up and kind of it's a proof point as to what we have. We're going to, we're going to show, I think, faster revenue growth than most of our peers, given the investments that we've made over the years.

We've also made a lot of investments in the payment space, and I think there's some great opportunities there. Embedded finance is one that we're focused on. So we feel good about Commercial and then clearly, Private Bank and Wealth with what we did to start up the Private Bank by bringing over a lot of very talented bankers from First Republic after it failed and scaled that up and have roughly $18 billion in deposits and $10 billion or $11 billion in loans and client assets. It's now 12% of the bottom line and got a 25% ROE, and it's growing in a controlled but very strong fashion. That has kind of no roadblocks to continue to grow at a meaningful clip.

And then beyond just the businesses, Reimagine the bank, which I'm sure you'll ask me some questions about, so I won't steal your thunder on that, but I think the deployment of new technologies, AI, agentic AI, rethinking how we serve customers, all the functions that we do with the bank. That's going exceptionally well. I think the fact that we know how to put these things in a program to deliver results is differentiating. I feel good about that.

And then lastly, I think One Citizens, we have a culture of working well in a collaborative fashion across the enterprise and having the Private Bank with the Commercial Bank, working together to bank successful people across their business needs, their personal needs, their family needs for both banking and wealth products is pretty differentiating. A lot of the folks we compete against, they either don't have that full product set or they don't have that culture or they operate too much in silos. So I think that can really stand out and be differentiated for us as well.

So a lot in there, and I want to double click on a bunch of those points. Before we do that, just maybe pull back and maybe just talk about the macro environment different today than when we had you here last year. Just how you're thinking about the path of the U.S. economy and interest rates? And just maybe talk about the health of your customer base, any changes you've seen recently, et cetera?

Yes. I think the economic backdrop has been relatively good. The GDP growth for the year, I think, will be at least 2%. And I think we could end up ticking up a little bit. And when I look out the next 4 or 5 quarters, I think we could be at 2.5%. Some of that depends on geopolitical and other events. But if you look, the economy is growing, unemployment is holding in, in the low 4s. Inflation is being affected by the war and energy prices and tariffs. But those things get absorbed. And I think ultimately, we should be able to bring that inflation down, particularly if we can have a resolution to the Iran situation.

But I feel there's a lot of pent-up demand around the capital markets. They're open. Spreads remain relatively tight. And so -- we've got huge pipelines. And companies generally, our corporate customers are all having good years. They're kind of sticking to their game plans. It's a little more throttled and conservative than if we were completely without some of this uncertainty, but they are playing offense. They are investing. They're out borrowing money.

And then I think on the Consumer side, clearly, high-end folks are doing extremely well. And they're just getting the benefit of a really high value stock market and home values holding in really nicely.

But even as you go down into the lower spectrum, folks are managing okay. I think they've become adaptable and resilient and kind of make trade-offs in how they're spending their money. But we don't see a lot of stress. We don't see delinquency roll rates ticking up or anything like that.

Got it. And maybe we could talk a bit more on the Private Bank and Wealth opportunity. I think we're up to 11.5% of earnings in the second quarter, 25% ROE, deposits, loans, assets under management or client assets all growing as you add new offices, expand teams. First Republic, kind of built that business offering very low-yielding mortgages. I don't think you're taking that approach. Maybe talk to kind of how you're gathering customers and just what does the future hold?

Yes. I think First Republic initially offered some low mortgage rates, in particular, to bring customers to the bank. And then I think over time, there kind of pitch became more about the service levels that we offer, white glove service and we take the pain out of your banking experience, and we always have your back and we have a lot of expertise.

When they came over to us, that was the calling card. And so the reason a lot of their customers followed over to Citizens Private Bank is because they love their bankers and the experience they were getting, and they already had their mortgages and they were still kind of sold on to JPMorgan. And so -- and we were in a higher rate environment. So the demand for credit from us wasn't really that significant at the outset. And so we started out, we were running a loan-to-deposit ratio of 30% or 40%. That's now moving up towards 60%. Some of those mortgages were 7/1 ARMs and they're coming due. And so we're seeing a pickup in demand for things like mortgages or CRE, but I don't really see the business getting to a point where that LDR is north of 60% or 70%. So we'll -- I think we have a real focus on operating accounts for PE/VC and businesses and the two-legged customers is something where we're trying to manage that LDR to be in a reasonable place.

And so looking forward, even if that LDR goes up a bit, so we're using a little more capital in the business, we get scale benefits as it continues to go up.

And so I don't see that ROE dipping. I mean we said initially that we'd be between 20% and 25%, and we've sustained it at 25%, but it should certainly be in that ballpark and probably closer to the higher end.

Got it. And I guess while the Private Bank gets a lot of publicity, I feel like the Commercial Bank, what you've done there over the last several years has been maybe equally as exciting. I know you're now transitioning leadership of that business to Ted Swimmer.

Maybe talk any expected change in strategy? Maybe update us what's going on there? Maybe talk to the capital markets opportunity just given kind of a macro uncertainty out there?

Yes. I don't see any -- I mean, Ted and Don and I were the ones who made the strategic choices to build the business and do some acquisitions and build out product capabilities while we were building out some great coverage bankers.

But one of the things I think we made a really good call on early was how are we going to distribute coverage and middle market is something that generally, you need strong regional base of coverage bankers who know the customers and can kind of really lean in on those local relationships.

And then as we kind of migrated up, and those are generally companies $25 million to $500 million in revenues, and we wanted to grow that. That's a very attractive business, and you get a lot of deposits from that business as well.

Mid-corporate are bigger companies. They're usually multibank. A lot of them are public and their revenues are $500 million to $3 billion. But if you're really going to play in that space, you need to bring in some bankers with industry expertise. So we set up industry verticals and areas that we thought we'd see a lot of activity, and we already had some existing knowledge and expertise and relationships.

One of the ones that we saw early on was digital infrastructure as one of the verticals, and we bought an M&A boutique DH Capital, who was one of the best independent advisers in that space. And kind of timing was good on that one. We did that in '22. And now you see kind of the rush of demand for compute and data centers and things. And so we're right in the thick of it. But making good calls across aerospace and defense, online gaming. I think we've done that well.

And then the other one has been in sponsors. We kind of early on thought that PE sponsors would increasingly own more of middle market America. So we had to build out not only the covered bankers to cover that space, but then also the product capabilities and subscription lines and other things that they need. And kind of one of the things that makes us particularly relevant to sponsors is if we have 4,500 corporate clients, a certain percentage are going to sell themselves every year.

So we built out M&A capabilities so we can take them to market. We can either go to the strategic route. We know which PE firms, what's their swim lanes. And that makes you quite valuable because they're always looking for opportunities to put their money to work. So we've kind of, I think, really thought through how to build this the right way along the way in six M&A boutiques, but we bought JMP, which brought us some equities capabilities.

So as the IPO market heats up, we're also participating in that. So I just feel really good that we have really great talent and we can go toe to toe. When the mega banks come into our space, the JPMorgan, Wells Fargos, BofAs, we can win head-to-head contests with them, which feels really good.

Maybe to build on that. we've seen loan growth accelerate really across all major line items last quarter. Corporate Bank was a contributor to that. We saw higher utilization rates in both corporate banking and sponsor finance. Technology, energy were kind of key contributors in industries. Maybe talk about the outlook for here and just what role is AI-related investment spending playing? What's the runway there? And there's been some talk around loan spreads. How are those behaving?

Yes. I think we're tracking to where we thought the kind of loan growth would be on a spot basis for the year. I think some of that accelerated a bit into the second quarter. So we're running a bit ahead on the average or at the top end of the range on the average loan basis.

But I don't look at it as quarter-by-quarter, it's kind of -- you'll have ebbs and flows where you might have some pull forward in 1 quarter and then corresponding drop off a little bit in the next quarter, you might be anticipating a repayment of a CRE loan that doesn't happen, then it happens in the next quarter. But what I would say is for the full year, I think we're tracking where we expected and we'll have growth in the second half, but it won't be as significant as what we had in Q2.

I think there's certainly plenty of competition out there, but I wouldn't say spreads are compressing at this point.

Got it. And maybe on the Consumer Bank, last quarter, you unveiled this NEXT initiative, Network Evolution and Experience Transformation. Talk about optimizing your branch network. I think that was kind of -- a lot of your slides talked to, you looked at as I guess, a shift from in-store back to traditional branches. You also talked about adding specialist in select locations and focusing more on small business and wealth. Just maybe talk about the near-term and longer-term financial implications of that initiative.

Yes. I'm really excited by this. I think increasing the whole speed of our Consumer deposit growth rate is really important. If you're our stable deposit base is growing at a good clip. That creates a lot of optionality in terms of what kind of loan growth you can go fund. So that was important. And we see different banks taking different approaches on that, Jason. So some banks are moving outside of their region. They think they're saturated in their region or their doing acquisitions to acquire those deposits.

I think that we brought in a really strong leader for Consumer, Matt Boss, who came from TD and prior to that, BofA, he's got a lot of experience in the footprint about kind of how we can tilt the playing field a little bit, getting mostly out of the remaining in-stores, opening up in some great locations looking at each micro market to optimize those markets opening selective de novos in that and positioning ourselves to be attractive to the kind of Consumer customers we want to bring into the bank and serve and also small businesses. There's a huge opportunity, I think, to up our game with small business and get meaningful deposit growth and fee growth from that segment.

So part of this is in the short run, we'll front run some of the investment in the people. They have relatively quick paybacks. So we've piloted a number of regions where we put either wealth specialists or business banking specialists into the branch and tried to look at optimizing our sales capacity across a region and to very good results, both -- on both sides, both on Wealth results and Business Banking results. And so that gives us the confidence that we can start to thread that in and do that pretty aggressively, I think, over the next 18 or 24 months and still stay within our overall kind of expense guardrails that we'd like to set.

And then the repositioning we've done a lot of the work to know what's going to happen and what locations we want to move to, and we're working to secure that. That kind of stretches out over a longer period of time.

If you're moving just simply from an in-store to a nearby branch, you start with 40% to 50% of the number of customers you have in a stand-alone branch. If you have a pure de novo, you start with 0. So I think the de novos will be spaced out but some of these moves out of the in-stores is more actionable, be more front loaded and not have significant drag in the short term and actually start to, as you go from 40 to 50 up to 100 really start to pick up that deposit growth rate.

And you touched on Reimagine the Bank earlier, and you're in this kind of comprehensive modernization program.

Maybe expand on that a little bit, talk about how AI is impacting how you operate and serve customers today? What's driving some of these productivity enhancements you thought about? You talked about -- I think you talked about $100 million annualized pretax benefits this year, growing to $450 million as you exit 2028. Are those still the numbers and maybe the biggest near-term opportunities?

Yes. So basically, we've looked at everything the bank does from onboarding customers to servicing a complaint to dealing with a fraud issue and kind of worked with a blank chalkboard and said, "here's the technology, the people and the processes that support that function today and if we deploy these new tools, what could it look like in 2 or 3 years?" And the net result of that is you're going to have a much better customer experience, you're going to be more efficient in how you operate and you'll have better kind of risk and control environment as well. So there's a lot of benefits that come out of that. The trick is getting from here to there.

So I think we've gone through the architecting phase. And in various areas, we've got -- of the total program, there's like 50 initiatives and probably about 30 of those involve technology, maybe 20 are kind of rethinking vendor relationships and trying to consolidate vendors and things like that or facilities and kind of optimizing kind of where people work and how they show up at work.

So it's a mix, but the technology stuff is already starting to drive dividends. I mean, we have -- we're capturing complaints and being able to spot things that we can improve. We're dealing with more self-service in our kind of chat in Consumer. We're doing, I think, better efforts around Commercial for doing annualized reviews or prospecting. So we have a lot of things in flight.

Most of the benefit for this year would be kind of the tried and true in terms of -- we got a lot of benefits coming from vendor, a number of benefits from facilities consolidation. We got some early-stage wins in the technology driven, but that really starts to ramp in year 2 and year 3.

The interesting thing is the $450 million is not all expenses because if you do a better job with your customers, your attrition goes down, if you can get them using your products quicker, you're deepening and generating more revenues from those customers and reducing their attrition.

So by year 3. We have significant revenue benefits that I think are they're real. Like a lot of times, people will this revenues and say, "Just tell me what the expenses are going to be." If you do an M&A deal, that's how people look at it. But in this instance, we have some real science behind how that's going to play out, particularly in the Consumer Bank.

Maybe we could pull up for a second before we get into some more detail, but there is a lot of guidance out there for Q3 and the full year. I know there was always some puts and takes. Maybe give us any updates you provided. I know you gave us a little nugget earlier, average loans at the upper end of the range. I don't know if that was a total company or commercial.

That was for the year, for the full year.

The company overall?

For the company overall.

And then anything else you want to highlight?

Yes. No. Look, I think we're having a good quarter, and I think we're comfortable with our guide. I mean that would be the short story there.

You're going to get me. So now I just don't have to push you. Let's start with deposits. You got modest growth in the second quarter Private Bank contributed deposit costs did go up about 4 bps. On the call, you talked about stronger-than-expected loan demand maybe kind of drove more deposit competition. Maybe just talk about the kind of where we are in the quarter in terms of the competitive landscape, just near-term expectations for deposit levels, mix, pricing?

Yes. I think the backdrop on kind of deposit costs right now has been the anticipation of a Fed rate hike and some of your more price sensitive customers at the bigger end corporates, some of your higher wealth people anticipating things are going up and wanting to participate a little bit in that. So you do have a little bit of upward pressure from that.

If the Fed actually goes through and hikes later this week, which is the expectation then you'd start to reset on the asset side as well. And I think the net of the reset across C&I with SOFR, which plays out a little bit over time. It's usually 1 month SOFR. And then your HELOCs and some -- and your credit card plays out a little takes a little longer, but you're going to capture since we're on the asset-sensitive side, that would be net accretive net positive, which at the end of the day, could contributed a basis point, say, in the fourth quarter.

So that's kind of the dynamic, I'd say, more than at this point, it's always competitive. So there's no incremental competitive pressure. I think the loan growth isn't as significant in Q3 as it was in Q2. So there's things that would say you're in a pretty good spot, but then there's this anticipation of the hike, which just creates a little pressure.

Having said all that, again, I say I'm comfortable with our guide, and I'm comfortable that the NII and NIM outlook is still very solid. We have a lot of confidence.

I guess on NII, I guess on NIM, you talked to for the fourth quarter of this year, 3.22% to 3.27%. That's up 6 to 9 basis points of expansion in the back half of the year. We may get a hike on Wednesday, the ten-year, I'm told broke 5%. And today. And then you talked about next year, this 3.3% to 3.5% net interest margin for 4Q '27, a fairly wide range. I do like that cone chart you have in the slide deck. Just how does this current rate drop -- backdrop influence that? And just kind of what dictates where you kind of end up within those ranges?

Yes. Well, I'd say in the second half of this year, there's more weight, if you look at the time based on those charts, there's more benefit in Q4 than Q3, and I think that's embedded in most analyst guide. So that's -- we still have a lot of confidence in kind of the fourth quarter being a pretty big uptick that puts us into that range.

And then when we go forward into '27, there's a number of factors. You'll have fewer time-based benefits, but still some. You have a pretty good front back book dynamic as the curve stays steep, that can contribute even more. And then there's really just the overall balance sheet dynamics as to can you keep growing your low-cost deposits, our -- do we get the benefit of some of the actions we're taking in the Consumer Bank, does the Private Bank continue to grow at the same mix that they've had. And so the balance sheet dynamics and pricing dynamics in the market have an impact that could be positive to that or it could be a little bit of a challenge. But I think at this point, we're still pretty optimistic that, that ends up being net positive.

Got it. And then at the start of year talking about 10% to 12% interest income growth. You'll likely exceed that just based on the stuff you talked about on the earnings call, like the quote you had "objects in motion tend to stay in motion".

As we begin to think about 2027, it's really not hard to get to like a high single-digit NII growth rate. based on what you said, is that kind of the right way to think about it? And just in an increasingly competitive environment for lending and deposits. Just how are you thinking about balancing higher net interest margin with net interest income, that's something we're sorting to hear more about.

Well, you're not going to trick me into giving guidance on '27 yet. But yes, I mean, it is I think based on a full year effect of where we've come this year, there's going to be a lot of lift built into next year. So I feel good about the outlook for NII for next year. I'll say that.

And so I do think that the economy, if it's growing at 2.5%, there'll be a reasonable amount of loan demand. If loans are growing, deposits tend to grow, we have idiosyncratic things to Citizens around the Private Bank, getting loan growth, getting deposit growth that is differentiated versus our peer group.

So yes, I do feel that NII should be strong, and that's kind of a locomotive that pulls the rest of your PPNR forward.

I guess maybe shifting to -- on the fee income side, record second quarter for Capital Markets, Wealth Management was an all-time high. A lot of your payment businesses did well, aided by seasonality. But just as you look forward, I think you talked to kind of the upper end of the 6% to 8% growth base for this year. Just where do you see the biggest opportunities?

Yes. So clearly, cap markets, given what we've built, and we're -- we've been in a lackluster external environment for the better part of 3.5, 4 years, and that's changing, and you can start to see every quarter, we're having record quarters. We look at our pipelines and the kind of deals that we're working on, and it's very exciting.

I do think in that business, our ship is coming in and still has a lot of room to run as we look out into '27.

We've also been hitting record quarters in Wealth on a -- every next quarter is bigger than the last, which creates a new record. And that's a business that we're doing well in the branch-based business serving the mass affluent and affluent customers, and then we're kind of adding to that by investing in our Wealth capabilities in the Private Bank. We're getting good levels of cross-sell and -- but we're still bringing teams in and expanding our wingspan overall in the business. So Wealth would be another one that I feel quite positive about.

And payments is no slacker. They've been growing maybe 10% a year for the last 3 years. And so -- and kind of card fees. We've launched a new card complex, and that is gaining good traction. So it's not just a one-trick pony. It's not just capital markets. I think it's diversified, but I think the star of the show for the next 6 quarters is going to be capital markets.

Got it. And then maybe on the expense side, this year, you've pointed to more than 600 basis points of positive operating leverage for the full year. I imagine you started the budgeting process for next year. Just how are you thinking about expense growth in operating leverage? I know in the past, you talked about this 4.5% kind of expense growth number. I think right now, you're still 61% efficiency ratio, wanting to get to the mid-50s. Maybe talk to how can you get there and what role AI plays?

Yes. So I think, yes, we'll have 600 basis points or whatever this year, positive operating leverage. And that's the name of the game to drive your ROTCE higher, is to make sure that when you're getting that revenue growth, you don't just go out and spend it.

I do think investors want to see us get to the ROTCE destination before we do too much investing. We already have quite a bit on our plate investing in the Private Bank, and we've kind of set a constraint that we want to keep the overall expense growth, the 4.5%. I think, on the last guide, we said that could be a little higher just because of the compensation related to the higher revenues. But we're not going crazy. We're taking our discipline -- maintaining that discipline.

There are opportunities. There's a lot of people, for example, in Commercial Banking that are looking to jump platforms and would love to come to Citizens. They love our story. And we just have to say "Rome's not built in a day". We can't just bring them all on at once, and we have to pace ourselves and kind of target the sectors that we think are the bankers that can have the biggest impact here.

But anyway, between the continued build-out of Private Bank. Next program, Commercial with all these talent acquisition opportunities. We try to manage that kind of to a level that we think allows us to sustain high operating leverage, so we can really land the plane in that 16% to 18% ROTCE level.

I do think that RTB will start to contribute to lower expense levels and how much of that we flow through versus reinvest in some of these other opportunities is still TBD. I don't like to kind of stick a pin in it until we get there and we actually see the things come through, and then we'll be more transparent about how we're approaching that.

But clearly, in the past, when we always ran our top programs, a lot flowed through to benefit to shareholders. We have this mindset of continuous improvement if we're going to spend money, then we have to figure out ways to fund that.

Got it. Credit quality has been very benign. Are there any areas you're watching more closely than others? Anything you're paying particular attention?

I feel good across the board. So we don't see any real hotspots in C&I. I mentioned nothing in Consumer that's been concerning. And then in CRE, the reason that we still have higher charge-offs than we would kind of at this point in the cycle as we're still working off the backlog of the office portfolio, which is much smaller and much more under control, and a lot of it is behind us, but there's still probably a few more quarters to kind of get that completely behind us.

But now we're back in the mid- to high 30s in terms of charge-off rate. And I think that could ultimately settle down in the once that residue from the office portfolio gets behind us.

And then capital, very good stress test results. I know the SCB didn't count this year, but came down a lot. If we understand the Basel III endgame proposal, that's another kind of benefit to Citizens. So you have talked about slower buyback in the third quarter. Maybe talk to just how you think about capital return? And then ultimately, where do you kind of think CET1 ends up?

Yes. So we were pleased with the SCB. I think when the new models, I'll just put this little anecdote in there, when the new models are approved, I think we'll be even better. So we won't just be at the floor. We'll be below the floor. Everybody likes to publish that number. So stay tuned on that, but it's been a long time coming.

But look, we have kept the CET1 ratio a little higher than our stated range, which has been 10% to 10.5%. We've generally had it at 10.6% or 10.7%. It dipped a little last quarter, but with all this uncertainty to run with a little extra capital, I think, is sensible. We are committed to the strong dividend and then to do smart bolt-on M&A and then kind of return what's left to shareholders. And so we've been pretty aggressive for the last 3 or 4 years just in terms of the amount of stock that we bought back.

And I'm pleased that we were -- we kept a conservative capital profile so we could buy in our stock when it was washed out with everybody else's and no one else was buying back the stock. So anyway, that was a real benefit. But I think, over time, we can start to migrate back into that 10% to 10.5% range. And clearly, we'll take a lot of things into consideration on that regulator, rating agency, where our peer levels. But the business model, we focused over time in making sure that you want to own this stock because it's got good returns, but we've chopped off a lot of the tail risk. We've really tightened our risk appetite on credit. I think we're being really smart about how we're hedging interest rate risk and so I think we probably could run closer towards 10% over time.

Got it. And I guess same with that theme a little bit. M&A, you did Matrix Capital earlier this year. You've mentioned some other nonbank acquisitions earlier. Just what else in that segment interests you today?

And then you talked about in the past your success with Investors Bancorp and HSBC's branches, just why have you been more aggressive buying banks?

Well, I'd say on the bolt-ons to answer that part of the question, we selectively will look if there's we're trying to strengthen an industry vertical. Is there something we can buy to plug in to really give us more capabilities and presence. That's been one.

The lift outs kind of -- they're not technically acquisitions, but these teams that we're buying in the private wealth space. That will continue. I think those -- you should see a half a dozen of those this year and next year and there was half a dozen last year. So that activity continues.

And we like the payment space, whether we need to buy something or we can partner with people, that's the other kind of place. But that's not a huge shopping list. Those are not hugely expensive deals, but we continue to troll for things that are attractive in that space.

I think on the banking at this point, we have so much organic growth and what we've heard from investors is you've got the Private Bank that's like a juggernaut, just keep focused on that, on maturing that and hardening that. And you've got Reimagine the Bank, which is also another capital-light way to really boost your returns and your overall earnings level. So don't get distracted, don't go out and buy things.

And when I look around at what there is to buy, it's -- there's nothing that we feel that if we plug it in, it's going to make a dramatic difference. And so staying focused on the things that matter. There may be a time where we come back and look at stuff harder, but we're really not looking at this point.

Got it. We've got a minute left. So let me take you through some math. But you did 14% ROTCE in the second quarter. If I just take my model and just grow through terminated swaps and fixed rate asset repricing, you get to 16%, factor in organic growth, net of some AOCI impacts get to 17% ROTCE.

Reimagine the Bank kind of wasn't in your kind of ROTCE target. So you think you make the case for even higher returns over time. You don't have to endorse the math or not. But maybe how do you kind of think about returns? What do you think kind of underappreciate the earnings power of the franchise today?

Well, I think we've been really transparent in showing that ROTCE walk. What are the elements that are going to contribute to getting that ROTCE to a level. And then really, how sustainable is that, are we over-earning in any place like the spread coming off the balance sheet or on credit or anything?

And I don't think so. So I think that 16% to 18% is pretty solid. One of the things that makes a big difference for a bank like us with a big Consumer deposit base is getting off of ZIRP, in which for 15 years, you had 0 interest rates and getting the Fed funds back up as it kind of starts to show the true earnings power of the franchise.

But now with a business like the Private Bank that's ROEing 25%, it's now 12% of the bottom line and going to keep expanding. We have drivers that put kind of upward pressure when we get through time-based and we get through credit normalizing. There's things that should continue to deliver a positive push on that ROTCE.

So anyway, I'm not going to recast the 16% to 18% at this point. We got to get there. But anyway, we like our chances of getting there. I think we've been pretty transparent. I think the market fortunately, has come around to believe, yes, it's doable. They're good at execution. They just got to keep their head down and keep executing. And then we'll see where we are at that point.

Great. Perfect place to end it on that note, please join me in thanking Bruce for his time today.

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Citizens Financial Group Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Ivy and I will be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this event is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Kristin Silberberg, Head of Investor Relations. Kristin, you may begin.

Thank you, Ivy. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. First, this morning, our Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun; and CFO, Aunoy Banerjee will provide an overview of our second quarter results. Brendan Coughlin, our President; and Ted Swimmer, Head of Commercial Banking, are also here to provide additional color. We will be referencing our second quarter presentation located on our Investor Relations website. After the presentation, we will be happy to take your questions.

Our comments today will include forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to differ materially from expectations. These are outlined for your review in the presentation. We also reference non-GAAP financial measures, so it's important to review our GAAP results in the presentation and the reconciliations in the appendix.

And with that, I'll hand it over to Bruce.

Thanks, Kristin, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call today.

We announced outstanding results for the quarter as our strong momentum continues. EPS growth was 15% sequential quarter 41% year-on-year, and our ROTCE improved to 13.9%. Our performance was powered by significant revenue growth. NII was up 4.4% sequentially and 14% versus a year ago, which was paced by continued NIM expansion and accelerating loan growth across each of our businesses. Fee revenues were up 8% sequentially, 9% year-on-year as our capital markets hit a second quarter record, wealth hit an all-time high and various payment-related revenues had a nice seasonal bounce. We maintained strong expense discipline, which resulted in positive operating leverage of 4% sequentially and 6.4% year-on-year. Credit continues to trend favorably as we continue to shift originations into portfolios with deep relationships and lower credit risk while continuing to run down noncore and CRE portfolios.

Our balance sheet remains robust across capital, liquidity, funding and credit allowance. We were pleased about the DFAST stress loss results, and we anticipate further improvement under the new Fed models. Our key initiatives are progressing well. The Private Bank continued its consistent growth with spot deposits of $17.8 billion, loans of $9.7 billion and client wealth assets of $11.2 billion. We continue to attract some really great talent and we continue to broaden out and strengthen our capabilities. The business now contributes 11.5% of Citizens pretax income while maintaining an ROE of around 25%.

Reimagine the Bank is moving along nicely. We are excited about how several of our early AI deployments are having real impact on how we operate and how we serve customers. We're also attracting some great talent into the commercial bank, given our strong position in the market, our focused strategy and our outstanding culture. We maintained strong deal pipelines and anticipate that higher activity levels can extend well beyond this year.

We are continuing to refine a branch optimization strategy in consumer, which we have named NEXT, our network evolution and experience transformation. The objective will be to add specialists in select branch locations and to enhance our branch locations to achieve faster retail household and deposit growth over time. We are quite excited by this. We've shared a page in the slide deck that provides more details. We feel good about our outlook for the remainder of 2026 and feel we are set up for strong performance over the medium term. We have a distinctive strategy focused on a growing consumer bank, the commercial bank of choice and the premier private bank and wealth platform. Our talented leadership team is focused on further building up these businesses, leaning into the areas where we have a right to win and driving strong execution.

With that, I'll turn it over to Aunoy for the financial details. Aunoy?

Thanks, Bruce. Good morning, everyone. As Bruce mentioned, we delivered strong second quarter results. record revenue performance and expense discipline drove more than 600 basis points of positive operating leverage year-over-year.

Referencing Slides 3 and 4, we delivered EPS of $1.30 for the second quarter, a $0.17 or 15% improvement over the first quarter, and we saw solid improvement in ROTCE to 13.9%, up from 12.2% in the first quarter. Results reflect strong NII performance with continued net interest margin expansion and loan growth picking up across all 3 businesses and exceeding expectations. We also delivered better-than-expected fee growth for the quarter with continued capital markets momentum and a seasonal pickup in payments-related revenues across card and treasury solutions being the main business drivers. Importantly, we are executing well against our strategic initiatives, including the build-out of our private bank and our Reimagine the Bank program, which is progressing well.

As Bruce said, the Private Bank delivered another standout performance, contributing $0.15, up $0.04 from the prior quarter, representing 11.5% of total EPS. We opened our tenth private bank office, adding West Palm Beach this quarter, and we continue to attract top quality wealth advisers to the platform. With respect to our balance sheet, we continue to maintain robust capital, strong liquidity levels and a healthy credit reserve. We ended the second quarter with CET1 at 10.4%, while executing $225 million in stock buybacks during the quarter.

Now turning to Slide 5. I will discuss the second quarter results in more detail, starting with net interest income, which was up 4.4% linked quarter given the increase in interest-earning assets and higher net interest margin. Our net interest margin continued to expand this quarter, increasing 3 basis points linked quarter for a combined 10 basis point lift through the first half of the year. The time-based benefits from terminated swaps and noncore runoff contributed 6 basis points this quarter and fixed rate asset repricing added another basis point.

Funding costs ticked up slightly as loan demand trended through the quarter across each of the 3 businesses. Importantly, though, we saw solid growth in DDA and other low-cost deposits, which helped mitigate the increase in overall deposit costs. We also had an increase in FHLB funding during the quarter to help support the stronger-than-expected loan growth. We continue to do a good job on optimizing deposits in a competitive environment. Our interest-bearing deposit costs were up 4 basis points and total deposit costs were up 3 basis points, reflecting the good DDA and low-cost deposit growth. And our cumulative interest-bearing deposit beta met our expectations at 48% as the Fed continue to hold rate steady.

Moving to Slide 6. Noninterest income is up 8% linked quarter and up 9% year-over-year. This was a strong fee result, notwithstanding the continued market volatility associated with heightened geopolitical tensions. The capital markets momentum continued to pick up, delivering our strongest second quarter ever with fees up 14% compared with the strong first quarter and up 46% year-over-year. Loans indications and bond underwriting drove the outperformance this quarter. Both equity underwriting and M&A delivered good results in the quarter with performance broadly stable linked quarter. M&A fees were up significantly year-over-year, and our pipeline is strong and continues to build. We continue to maintain strong market share, ranking as the second middle-market sponsored book runner by number of deals and volume. This is for both the second quarter and over the last 12 months.

Wealth delivered another record quarter with AUM growth in the private bank and in our retail network as well as a positive market impact. Wealth fees were up 2% linked quarter and 16% year-over-year. Service charges and fees were up $5 million, driven primarily by seasonality and new commercial clients driving growth in account and cash management fees. The Card business also delivered a strong quarter, up $6 million driven by a seasonal improvement in purchase volumes.

On Slide 7, expenses were managed tightly, up about 1% linked quarter, and we improved our efficiency ratio to 61%. Second quarter results include implementation costs of about $7 million for the reimagined the bank program.

Moving to loans on Slide 8. Average loans were up 2% linked quarter and period-end loans were up 3% with loan growth across each of the businesses. The Private Bank period-end loans were up $1.9 billion this quarter, reflecting higher commercial line utilization and strong originations in high-quality residential mortgage and multifamily lending. Spot commercial loans, excluding the Private Bank, were up $1.5 billion or 2% linked quarter. The commercial growth was driven by C&I with net new money originations in Corporate Banking and higher line utilization across both Corporate Banking and our sponsor business. This was partially offset by continued planned reductions in CRE, primarily more driven by multifamily and general office paydowns. Importantly, the C&I growth was fairly broad-based with the pickup in loan demand reflecting a positive backdrop for corporate clients with new investment and increased working capital needs. We are adding new clients and seeing new borrowings from existing clients, primarily across technology, health care, energy and the FIG sectors. Private credit funds are actively utilizing facilities as we grow our lead role in these relationships. We also saw some CRE paydowns push into Q3. Growth in retail loans ex noncore on a spot basis was about $800 million, led by real estate secured categories. This was partially offset by the noncore auto portfolio runoff of roughly $400 million for the quarter.

Next, on Slides 9 and 10. We continue to do a good job on deposits. with average deposits up 1% or $2.3 billion linked quarter, primarily driven by the growth in the private bank and retail. Spot deposits were up $1.6 billion, driven primarily by the Private Bank, which reached $17.8 billion in deposits at the end of the quarter. Commercial also contributed to the period-end growth. Our consumer deposits represent 64% of our total deposits, steady with prior quarter. This compares favorably to a peer average of about 56%. Total noninterest-bearing and low-cost deposit mix was broadly stable at 42% of total deposits.

Now moving to Slide 11. Credit continues to trend favorably with net charge-offs coming in at 37 basis points, down from 39 basis points in the prior quarter. Nonaccrual loans are down 4% linked quarter, driven by a decrease in commercial real estate as we continue to work out the general office portfolio. As Bruce mentioned, we are pleased with the results of this year's Fed stress test, which projected a credit loss rate that ranks third best amongst our regional bank peers. This is reflective of the work we have done to improve our balance sheet mix, running down the noncore portfolio and commercial real estate while growing higher-quality relationship-based lending across the private bank, commercial and residential retail.

Turning to Slide 12. The allowance was stable this quarter with ACL coverage ratio at 1.48%, reflecting the continued improvement in our portfolio mix with the continued noncore runoff, the reduction in the commercial real estate and strong originations of lower loss content C&I, residential real estate secured and private bank loans. As we look broadly across the portfolio, the credit outlook remains positive, though we continue to carefully monitor the macroeconomic environment.

Moving to Slide 13. We maintained excellent balance sheet strength, ending the quarter with CET1 at 10.4%. We dipped slightly below our 10.5% target as loan growth accelerated during the quarter and exceeded expectations. We returned about $422 million to shareholders in the second quarter with $197 million in common dividends and $225 million of share repurchases. This makes a total of $920 million returned to shareholders through the first half of the year.

Moving to Slide 14. The Private Bank continues to make excellent progress. The Private Bank delivered strong deposit growth again, ending the quarter at $17.8 billion. Importantly, the overall deposit mix and cost continues to be very attractive. We also delivered solid loan growth in the quarter, adding $1.9 billion of loans, driven by increased commercial line utilization and strong originations in residential mortgage and multifamily to end the quarter at $9.7 billion of loans. The portfolio maintains a healthy spread of approximately 4% over deposit costs.

Client assets increased by about $1 billion to end the quarter with $11.2 billion of total client assets. We added another strong wells team in Southern California this quarter and we plan to continue adding top quality teams in key geographies. We also opened a private bank office in West Palm Beach, our 10th.

Moving to Slide 15. Our reimagined the bank program is progressing well. The objective is to position Citizens for long-term success by embracing a host of new and innovative technologies across the bank and simplifying our business model. This will reshape our customer experience and drive a meaningful improvement in productivity and efficiency. Several key work streams are well underway, and we expect to hit our financial targets for the program with a minimal net cost for 2026 as we realize quick wins to cover implementation costs. We expect to exit 2026 with about $100 million of annualized pretax benefit, doubling that in '27 and reaching about $450 million as we exit '28.

On Slide 16, we have an overview of our Network Evolution and Experience Transformation or NEXT or short. This focuses on accelerating consumer household and deposit growth while increasing revenue opportunities across our branch network. After creating a more efficient retail branch network over the last 10 years, we are embarking on a long-term initiative to now further optimize our existing network. The focus will be on eliminating approximately 100 to 120 in-store branches. We will add some stand-alone advisory and business banking focused branches, including selective branch consolidation and upgrades. We also aim to gain more density in high-opportunity core markets through self-funded de novo branch expansion at a measured pace. A key element of NEXT will be to add specialist talent in select branches with a focus on small business and wealth. The financial impact of this program is expected to benefit the medium term while not impacting our path to achieving our 16% to 18% ROTCE target.

Moving to Slide 17. We we provide our outlook for the third quarter, which contemplates the Fed holding rates steady. We expect net interest income to be up in the range of 2.5% to 3.5%, driven by continued expansion in net interest margin and earning asset growth. Noninterest income is expected to be up approximately 1%, led by Capital Markets and Wealth. We are projecting expenses to be stable to up slightly. The charge-off level is expected to be stable to down slightly. And we should end the third quarter with CET1 at approximately 10.5%, including share repurchases of about $125 million. In addition, for our full year outlook, we are tracking favorably against the guidance provided in January. Revenue is trending above our initial guidance range which combined with expense discipline puts us on track to deliver over 600 basis points of positive operating leverage for the full year. Looking out further, we see a clear path to achieving our 16% to 18% ROTCE target by the end of 2017. We continue to improve our net interest margin, adding 10 basis points in the first half of and we project to deliver a 4Q '26 NIM in the range of 3.22% to 3.27% and in the range of 3.30% to 3.50% in 4Q '27.

Slide 18 provides incremental details on our net interest margin progression to the end of '27. The projected margin expansion, combined with the increased contributions from the Private Bank and the diversified Capital Markets business we have built as well as normalizing credit should drive our ROTCE to the target range of 16% to 18%.

To wrap up, we delivered a strong second quarter results, highlighted by record revenue and a robust level of positive operating leverage. We have a positive outlook for the rest of the year with good momentum across our businesses. We will continue to focus on driving forward our strategic initiatives and delivering for our shareholders.

With that, I will hand it back over to Bruce.

Okay. Aunoy, thank you. Operator, let's open it up for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Ryan Nash from Goldman Sachs.

First, just congrats to Brendan on the expanded responsibilities. And Bruce, I hope you are still celebrating the NEXT victory like I am.

Very enjoyable. It's got a lasting taste to it.

You are telling me. Maybe to kick it off, so deposit costs were up 4 bps in the quarter, and you highlighted that a portion was driven by the Private Bank given an influx of growth. So can you maybe just talk about your deposit cost expectations from here relative to the high 40s beta that you've been targeting? And what does all this mean for the trajectory of your margin and maybe where you're tracking relative to both year-end and the long-term ranges? And I have a follow-up.

Yes, sure. I would say the kind of deposit cost number and deposit growth is going to move around a little bit from quarter-to-quarter. There's going to be seasonal factors typically. Our strong quarter is Q4, particularly in commercial when we get a significant amount of deposit growth. If you look at the kind of year-over-year spot deposit growth is up 6%. And in the second quarter, it tends to be a little lighter. And I'd say there was a bit more loan growth than people expected coming into the quarter, which might have caused deposit competition to increase a little bit. I think that likely just evens out. I don't think it's a trend that we're all that concerned about, and we'd still kind of hold our view that the deposit betas will be likely to be stable from here. It could be that the cycle ends if the Fed goes to a hike. But at this point, I think we'll be on hold for a reasonable period of time. So in any case, I think we're managing that impact. We're still showing positive NIM progression. We do have time-based benefits that really helps kind of distinguish us versus others when we look out to the second half of the year. I think we have confidence in the outlook around DDA and low-cost deposit growth even accelerating a bit in the second half of the year. So we feel taking all things into account, we're not that concerned about a slight uptick in the deposit cost for Q2. Aunoy, do you want to add anything to that?

Yes. Ryan, it's Aunoy here. I would I say if you look at for the second half, as you saw in the first half, we did almost 10 basis points of NIM expansion. And in the second half, if you look at on Page 18, we've got 7 basis point of terminated swap impact and a couple of basis points of front book, back book, so we have got 9 basis points. That's a nice increase, and that could see you at the higher end of our 4Q range. And as Bruce said, we have good line of sight on good DDA growth, and we continue to rotate loans into higher earning assets. So we feel good about where we are. And also we have a very disciplined hedging program, and we continue to hedge our -- any downside risk. So we feel good about our NIM ranges from here.

Got it. No, that's great. And maybe just to build on that, 2 quick follow-ups. The slides referenced you thought you'd be above the high end of the 10% to 12% guide. Maybe -- can you put a finer point on that? And given the strength in NII growth, do you think you can -- and further margin expansion, do you think you can maintain these type of NII growth rates at least through '27?

Yes. We don't usually give specific guides on the full year outlook, just a kind of broad update. I think if you look at where consensus is and what we just posted in the second quarter plus the third quarter guidance, we would tend to move past consensus. So we'd be higher than where consensus is, which is already, I think, at 12.2% or 12.3% or something like that. So other than that, there's a lot to play out.

So I don't want to be too specific on it other than we feel good about the trajectory for NII coming from both NIM expansion and loan growth continuing into the second half of the year. We also feel good about the fee trajectory as well, where we think will come at the high end of the range there as well.

And then with respect to '27, I think it's a little early to call that. We'll give you, obviously, the full guidance in January. But at this point, objects in motion tend to stay in motion. We think the economic backdrop is going to be supportive for '27. So we should continue to see reasonable levels of loan growth. And then we just talked about the slide about the drivers that will continue to allow us to expand the net interest margin.

The only thing, Ryan, that I would add also is we also delivered 600 basis points of operating leverage, and you saw our ROTCE tick up to 13.9% this quarter. We expect the ROTCE just keep ticking up as we go through the year.

Next, we'll go to the line of Erika Najarian from UBS.

I'm actually now going to reframe my question because it seems like you're keen on what consensus movements could be. So obviously, all good guys in terms of the NII upgrade and fees expenses slightly higher given strong revenue performance obviously, the operating leverage is widening from the 500 to the 600. So Bruce and Aunoy, as you think about what the expectations are on the street, do you expect a PPNR upgrade relative to what you're expecting. I think if we do back of the envelope math, if you'd go conclude anywhere from no upside to PPNR to 3% upside to PPNR.

Yes. I mean I think the guide is very solid. So we wouldn't be surprised to see PPNR move up a bit. And I would say on expenses specifically, I don't really have any concern nor do I think investors should have any concern at all that we're viewing the positive operating leverage is an opportunity to go double down and start spending a lot of money. The slight -- and I emphasize the word slight increase in expense is really just additional incentive compensation for paying our people for delivering significantly higher revenues than at the high end of the range or higher, things like that, you got to pay people. So if that number moves up slightly, that's a good thing. It's tied to revenue production and it was still resulting in an increase in positive operating leverage for the year relative to the beginning of your guide.

And my follow-up question. Thank you for that, Bruce, is Aunoy, you mentioned that you did take on more FHLB given the gap between loan growth and deposit growth. Maybe talk to us about sort of your strategy at the end of the year, you mentioned holding the line on deposit costs. And so are you -- what is sort of the math that you're doing as you're thinking about the FHLB [indiscernible] draws versus having a more attractive deposit rate. And is the timing of the fourth quarter strength sort of a consideration in terms of the maybe temporary FHLB strategy? And sorry for the compound question, but Ryan started it, so I might as well follow through. if we do get a rate hike, which is not contemplated in your guide, what do you expect your asset sensitivity generally and for deposit beta specifically?

Wow, there's a lot of questions you take into that one, Erika. So I'm going to just finish off a little bit since it related to the Ryan question. But again, I mentioned there's kind of seasonal patterns in deposit growth. And so we borrowed a bit of money in the second quarter in FHLB. I think that ultimately drops out or drops to lower levels as we get into the second half of the year, and we would expect to see more robust deposit growth, particularly in Q4. So anyway, just to that specific question, that's how we see it. And we're still at very, very modest levels of FHLB advances. We're almost entirely and we have been for several quarters, entirely deposit-funded, which I think is a real strong suit and shows our incredible liquidity and funding position relative to our peers. But Anyway, I'll turn it back over to Aunoy.

Yes. I think, Erika, just to add to Bruce's point, I think we are seeing some good deposit trends underlying our businesses. If you think about the Private Bank, it has grown nicely. And as you know, the Private Bank comes with almost 30% DDA and over 50% as a DDA plus CV. So that's a nice growth that we are seeing that is quite, quite unique to us in a good way. And then also in the consumer bank, we are seeing a good DDA growth. We are seeing good checking account growth. We are seeing checking balances per household growing our affluent and mass affluent segment. So we are seeing nice, nice deposit trajectory. And as Bruce mentioned, with the Commercial Bank coming in seasonally higher in the fourth quarter, we expect deposit growth to continue for here.

To your point on asset sensitivity, look, I think we have always been slightly asset sensitive, and we continue to continue to do that, and we have hedged our downside risk as well, but we remain a little bit asset sensitive. So as rates go up, if they go up, it will be more of an impact in '27 as some of the hedges amortized. So it would be a good tailwind to have in the first half.

I would say on the slide where we show you that cone in the deck, Erika, the fact that the macro outlook seems pretty stable, and the rate outlook seems pretty stable for the next 18 months. I mean, you might see a hike or 2 up or eventually a cut -- 1 or 2. But not moving that far off of where it is. A lot of the kind of downside risk, in particular, if rates get cut a lot seems to be reduced. And so it basically means that the time-based fixed asset repricing and then our own balance sheet dynamics, how we're managing the low-cost growth, how we're rotating capital out of loan portfolios today into more attractive loan portfolios in the future. That helps determine that NIM trajectory more and more with less kind of a wildcard coming from the external rate environment.

Next, we'll go to the line of Matt O'Connor from Deutsche Bank.

Bruce, I was just hoping to ask about succession given some of the media articles out there that have been covering the topic of late.

Sure. So I have undertaken a kind of very considerate process to make sure that the -- the team that got us to this point, we've had a tremendous run, stocks up over 3x since the IPO. The bank has been transformed. Some of those folks on my team have hit retirement, and I brought 4 new folks on to ExCo last year, and we promoted Ted to run commercial and Don McCree retired. I think Brendan has demonstrated great leadership qualities, and we made him President last year and on a consistent basis, we're continuing to broaden his remit. So he sees more of the bank, and he can be tested, but also just gaining knowledge and I think he's doing a great job. And this new tuck-in commercial under is another chance to broaden kind of what he understands about the bank.

So I'm in no rush to go anywhere. I feel lots of energy and really have a spring in my step every day when I come to work. But you have to go about these things. It's an important duty for the Board and for me to make sure that we have a team that can take us to the next forward for the next 5 or 10 years. And I think we're doing that in a very thoughtful way.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just separately, as we think about the private bank build-out, I guess, specifically next year, some of the markets that you're targeting, there's obviously been just a lot of price increases on inflation and as I think about the competitive backdrop for private bankers, that's, I think, probably increased quite a bit to as everyone is trying to lead them there. So is it getting harder to do some of these build-outs for kind of those reasons? Or is that kind of being balanced by the momentum that you've had, you kind of have talked about how a beginning is a little bit harder because you hadn't really done it before, but as you built a mute is kind of set on itself. So how do those 2 kind of shake out on a net basis?

It's Brendan. We just crashed the 3-year anniversary of the Private Bank. So I guess I would start by saying incredibly pleased with where we're at with the foundation that we've built. And as the quarters have gone on, our confidence around us having a winning formula has improved remarkably. You see sort of the steady and very significant quarter-on-quarter growth married with the very strong profitability that has held in there. Every quarter, we still are maintaining the deposit quality of the book, even despite the growth, and you're starting to see loan growth pick up and the attraction of new talent and teams has not slowed.

As I've mentioned in past calls, the first maybe 2 years, we were held back intentionally on going really fast on growth to make sure we can demonstrate to ourselves that we can build this model and do it effectively and deliver effectively for our clients while maintaining a profitability profile that's accretive. We feel really good about that now. And so we are in the mode of expansion. As Aunoy mentioned, we opened 10 PBOs. We're projecting that to be in the 15%, 16% range by the end of 2027. So we will continue to open and densify in the markets that we're already in. And yes, we're looking and thinking about where else we can bring this model. And I think look no further than some of our core legacy Citizens markets where we have incredible retail and commercial presence and we want to round out the 3 legs of the stool in great markets that we already are operating in with great brand to connect our One Citizens model altogether.

So we will be looking further expansion. We, in particular, are interested in continuing to bring on top quality Wealth teams. We expect the pace of growth to broadly be consistent with where it is today. And that's what I think you can expect over the near-term and medium-term outlook. We're still going to do it in an incredibly disciplined and paced way as well. We've got to continue to validate that we've got this right. But the opportunity is still very much right in front of us. We believe the white space is still wide open, clients continue to give us that feedback that we've got a competitive edge and so we're going to continue to walk through that door.

I would just add to, Matt, that we're excited about the expanding PBO presence that we now have 10 up and running. We have 7 or so planned for next year. We've done a very thick build out in California, which you would expect given that was the NEXT's first republic's operations. But we see Florida as an area for growth that we'd like to keep investing there to get it caught up and scale somewhat to where California is. And then the Northeast, we have some satellite opportunities around New York, around Boston to kind of thicken in those regions. And then I think Philadelphia would be another location that would be on our drawing board. So really excited about kind of the pace and some of the things that are on the drawing board that will help continue and sustain our momentum. We have another question?

Yes. Our next question comes from John Pancari from Evercore ISI.

Just on the -- on your medium-term targets. I know you reiterated your 16% to 18% ROTCE by end of year 2027. Can you just update us on what efficiency ratio is assumed underneath that. I know you had previously cited a mid-50s efficiency ratio, I think the last time you put that in your slides. Maybe it was fourth quarter or so. I know you're at 61% for this quarter. How should we think about where that needs to head to in order to support the 16% to 18% ROTCE?

Yes. John, it's Aunoy here. Look, on the 16% to 18% draw see quite a good trajectory from here onwards. As you saw we delivered 13.9% ROTCE this quarter, up from the 12.2%. And to your point, efficiency ratio keeps coming down, and it's at 61%. So as we go through this year as well as through the quarters of next year, you will see that our efficiency ratio keeps coming down. And it would be probably in the mid-50s range. It's like we just update our -- the full medium-term guidance at the end of the fourth quarter when we look at the full year itself. So that's how we would look at.

So mid-50s is still the target, John. And just the walk itself gets clearer and clearer as you -- we were counting on a lot of time-based benefit to flow through and to ultimately get us close to the bottom end of the range before we had our own business performance kick in. And so, call it, 14% today, there's roughly another kind of, call it, 2% from time-based plus fixed asset repricing, which kind of gets you to 16% on its own. You have the business performance, which could be another $150 million to $200 million. You have credit improvement, which can be kind of a smidge higher, and then you have kind of reducing AOCI, which grows the equity base, which you'll still be repurchasing some shares, but that's about a 1% or so negative. So just that alone gets you to the midpoint roughly of the 16% to 18%. And then you haven't even factored in the benefits from RTB at that point. So anyway, just to kind of pull that walk forward, it's still very consistent, but we've already realized some of the big time-based benefits in pulling us up from kind of the 11%, high 11s up to where we are today at 14%.

Okay. Great. And then just separately, you've already commented a bit on what you're seeing around deposit pricing. What are you seeing around the lending side in terms of loan spreads. Maybe if you can give us a little bit of color by business? And maybe what are some of the new money loan yield that you're seeing either in commercial then also in the Private Bank just as you've been growing their book steadily. What type of new money yields are you seeing there?

Do you want to go first, Aunoy.

Yes, I think, John, it's Aunoy here. Look, I think we had -- we are very pleased with our loan performance this quarter. I think if you think about loan growth was up around 3%, $3.8 billion, and it came across all the businesses. So Private Bank grew nicely. There was growth in resi, mortgage and the utilization of our the commercial book there as well as the multifamily CRE group. And then on the commercial side, again, a very, very diverse growth set. So whether we have our sectors that we go in mid-corporate, we got new clients, new money and we also saw utilization going up. our clients are actually quite bullish about the economic environment and put money to work. We also saw sponsor utilization go up. So we are very pleased with many of the commercial line the utilization that's there.

And on the retail side, we also saw HELOC going up nicely. So obviously, on spreads, pricing is tight. There's a lot of demand, but there's also a lot of money but we are very disciplined. We look at our overall relationship-based view against the balance sheet that we lend out but spreads remained probably stable from last quarter.

Yes, I'm going to go to Ted. You can talk about Commercial. And then, Brendan, maybe a little more color on Consumer and Private Banks.

Yes. Just adding to what you said, no, we are seeing -- I'd say in the second quarter, we saw a stable spread. And with the increase in loan issuance out there, we did not see the incredible pricing pressure as we had seen earlier last year and early in the first quarter. So in the NDFI, pricing has kind of leveled off where we had seen more pressure on that earlier on the corporate side of the business, maybe a little more pressure, but relatively stable to where we've been. And as we enter into the third quarter, we have not seen increased pressure on this. I think banks with the increased amount of loans that have been out there have been able to be a little bit more choosy and not had the pressure on spreads that we've had in prior quarters. So I'll pass it over to you, Brendan to talk about Consumer.

Yes, sure. Starting on Private Bank, quickly, similar story, very stable spreads. Our yields on the loan book is just north of 6% and the deposit cost is about 2.10% all in. So you're getting at a net loan over deposit spread of just under 4%, which has been really consistent for the past bunch of quarters. So -- obviously, in the short term, that's very accretive to NII when you look at the net contribution from the private bank. The loan book is about 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 residential commercial real estate, multifamily, granular tied to high net worth individuals and then business banking and C&I. So no new news there, strong spreads accelerating originations and accelerating deposit growth, no deterioration in quality or margin.

On the retail side, we've been posting year-over-year growth around the 3% range the last few quarters, led by HELOC and mortgage with now some modest tick up in credit card given our new product investments. The yields are also in the low 6s, 6.15% or so as compared to a deposit cost in consumer in the 1.30%. So really healthy margin on the consumer bank. The HELOC yields are north of 7%. So the place we're getting the most growth is obviously a variable rate asset with very healthy yields. So we're able to take #1 in United States market share in the asset class with a very low risk profile and very significant outsized yields in that space. We've got a very large competitive advantage there. We're going to keep that going. We don't see that slowing anytime soon.

Next, we'll go to the line of Ken Usdin from Autonomous Research.

Just on the fee side, I heard your comments in the guide that you could be at the -- towards the high end of the fee guide for the year. But I want to know, specifically, this is a really good capital markets quarter. And I'm just wondering like where you think that is in terms of the potential of the business? Obviously, it's a great environment, and it certainly reflected that. But could that be the source of potentially some more juice? And I guess what other drivers would you expect if you end up doing better than that high end?

Well, let me start and flip it to Ted. I'll keep the bar high for Ted. But in any case, Ken, if you look at trailing 12-month revenue for cap markets, it's $595 million, so call it $600 million. And I think there's -- we've built out a lot. I mean we once had a high watermark quarter back in the fourth quarter of '21, which I think was $181 million, which annualizes to a number. If you could -- if you could replicate that, you'd be over $700 million. But since that time, that was like a perfect storm to the upside of everything trying to get done in a very narrow window in that fourth quarter. But if you look at kind of what we've continued to do is we've kind of built out industry verticals with really corporate finance expertise and M&A expertise. We've continued to grow the relationships with private credit. We've bought more boutiques. DH Capital gives us a great advisory group in the digital and data infrastructure space. We just bought another boutique Matrix Capital Partners. So we have continued to build out capabilities. We continue to add talent.

One of the things I'm really pleased about is there's lots of folks that are great bankers who are getting tired of the places they're operating, whether it's politics or change in direction and people are beating a path to our door to get on our platform, which is an enviable position to be in. So I think there's clearly continued upside to that number, how much is probably partly on our own execution, but also the market backdrop. But from where we sit today, the deal pipelines are very strong, and this could be kind of a secular multiyear trend that we'd be very well positioned and poised to capture that revenue upside probably better than most of our peers in my view. But Ted, with that, over to you.

Yes. And thanks, Bruce, and I agree with everything you said. We built a really, really good engine in our capital markets business. We feel like we have all of the products that we want covered now between what we've always had, which is DCM on the bank and bond side, adding the equities with JMP back 5 years ago. And then the number of boutiques that Bruce described with Matrix being the most recent one that we purchased earlier this year. I would say after all that, I don't still feel like we've seen the perfect deal market that would accentuate all of the efforts that we put into building this. We had a record second quarter this year in DCM, almost our best quarter ever. And I still feel like we did most of those from refinancing transactions versus new underwrites where we generally make more money on those deals.

As we look at our M&A business, we've had 2 good quarters as compared to last year. But as we see our pipelines, we feel like there's real upside. If the markets remain as strong as they are right now, we are continuing to win, I think, better and much more complex transactions than we had in the past. So with the same people, we think we can produce more. And as Bruce said, we're seeing a lot of opportunities to bring talent in from other places if we so choose, given changes in strategy that other banks have made and then what people feel like they can accomplish on our platform.

So we feel opportunistic that if we get into even a better M&A and leveraged underwriting market than we've had before, there's still upside. As far as our equities business goes, there's been great combinations now reached between the existing JMP platform and the existing Citizens platform, we're just beginning to see the benefits of that in the REIT space, in the FIG space where we feel like we can make more money on the equity side than we've made in the past. So again, Bruce has put a pretty high bar out there. I'm not going to commit to that. But I do feel like I do feel like we still have our better days to come on this market as long as the market stays and the geopolitical environment stays relatively calm. Thanks for the question.

Next, we'll go to the line of David Chiaverini from Jefferies.

You mentioned about how the Private Bank net interest spread is 4% very strong. Curious about how sustainable this could be as the build-out matures.

I think we've demonstrated that it's sustainable. We're 3 years in, and it's been right around the same range the entire time and every quarter, we're putting consistently up, $1 billion to $1.5 billion plus in net new deposits and the portfolio composition has not really moved at all. And in some cases, it's gone a little bit better. So we think the model is working and the balance of -- the secret sauce and the model of banking everything connected to the high net worth individual, including their business is driving a healthy portion of the deposit book being operating cash management for the entities that they're connected with. So if you were thinking about it just from the standpoint of individuals, you may hypothesize that there's a pinch there on deposits at some point. But because we're banking the entire ecosystem for the client, we feel good that it's sustainable going forward.

Great to hear. And then it was good to see the stress capital buffer improving to the 2.5% minimum. Does this change the way you manage the business at all?

The short answer is no. I'd say the thing we were waiting for to see was a more accurate print. It's been frustrating for various reasons that we ended up with an elevated stress loss result in prior DFAST. And so having that now get down to the minimum at 2.5%, to me is really step 1. I think we should be better than that. There's still some modeling issues that the Fed is addressing and those models are out for review. And then hopefully, once they get approved and finalized, we'll be even better than that. But to me, I like to refer to this as tearing the Scarlet letter off our jersey to get rid of that result and being an outlier, just getting back into the pack where we always should have been. One of the other things that Aunoy mentioned in his prepared remarks, we came in kind of #3 of 10 in our credit losses, which I have more confidence in the way credit is modeled than I did PPNR. So anyway, that's a positive as well.

I'd say in terms of where we are in the range, still focused on 10% to 10.5%. I think that's still where we're not moving those goal posts at this point. A lot has to play out. I think that there's RWA adjustments that are proposed, which could be favorable. And so we'll see how much additional capacity potentially that creates. But I tend to philosophically like to operate from a conservative capital position because there's things happen. And if you have that little extra capital cushion, then you can take advantage of things like we were invited to bid on First Republic and we were able to take the risk of hiring all the people to start the private bank. And so in any case, we might move down from kind of the current anchor at 10.5% over time. But I don't see in the near term that we'd be revising that 10% to 10.5% range.

Next, we'll go to the line of Gerard Cassidy from RBC Capital Markets.

Aunoy, you said in your prepared remarks, you gave us some color about the growth in the commercial loan portfolio areas like technology, health care, energy, FIG sectors. You also mentioned about the private credit funds are you actively utilizing your facilities. Can you share with us more about that? Where are you seeing that growth within the private credit funds.

And then as a second part to the question, you also mentioned about the commercial real estate paydowns. Do you expect that to bottom sometime this year, and we could actually see commercial real estate mortgage growth for Citizens, possibly going into '27?

Gerard, I'm going to flip that over to Ted. I think he's best positioned on that question.

So on the fund financing, Gerard, look, we've had this strategy for years, and we've been migrating our finance strategy from a participant role to a left lead role. We've been building this pipeline for years now. And in the second quarter, we actually closed on a number of transactions that increased our exposure by, I think, approximately $800 million on fund finance. Those were all left lead transactions and we're part of the strategy that we had put in place. We continue to -- the outstanding in those business continue to be stratified much similarly the way they have been in the past. We don't see a pickup in any one sector. We still feel very, very good about the underlying credits in those areas. We've seen really no deterioration in any way, shape or form from the underlying assets. So we continue to find it a very good asset class to be in.

We saw a more temporary increase, I think, more episodic on our subscription line finance business. I think we were up approximately $600 million in that business over the second quarter. I think that those outstandings, I would expect to get repaid over in the short order as the equity comes in and takes out the loans in those business -- in those deals. But on the fund finance side, we had a really good quarter. We've had a really good track record. We feel very good about what we're doing on that side of the business.

On the CRE side, we actually thought we were going to be coming down quicker in that than we did. We had a couple of payoffs that we expected to get done in the second quarter that got pushed out into the third quarter. We're going to continue to wind down -- not wind down, but we'll continue to be very selective on the office portfolio. So I don't know that that's going to that we'll see that bottom out in the near future on the repayment side. We are, though, continuing to look at digital infrastructure as an opportunity to put some capital to work in the real estate side and on the REIT side of the business where we see good opportunities, and we can cross-sell with both our equity business and our bond and bank business. We'll continue to look at those selectively. So office will continue to go down and maybe somewhat offset by some stuff in digital infrastructure and REITs.

So I would, at the top of the house, just say that we'll still have a bias to net shrink through commercial with the offsets that Ted mentioned not fully covering the downdraft in office and downdraft in some multifamily that we acquired through the Investors acquisition. When you look over to the private bank, though, we're creating some capacity for them to serve their and client investor base that a lot of folks that are wealthy made their wealth through investing in commercial real estate. So we have to have balance sheet available to do selective lending. A lot of that is multifamily, but very -- they never had a credit loss at First Republic. And they haven't had any here in 3 years, as Brendan mentioned. So really smart lending to great counterparties. So overall, we're kind of probably approaching the bottom across the enterprise and then eventually that may start to tick up modestly. But we certainly don't see that as a big overall driver of our loan growth going forward.

Very good. And then coming back to Ted, you commented about the M&A business. You've had 2 good quarters compared to last year. You see the pipelines -- the deal [indiscernible] data showing record levels of M&A activity. Of course, it's the very large deals with the very large investment banks. What do you think -- when you look at your prime customer in this space, what is it going to take for more deal activity to really kick in because the smaller deals just haven't really gained the momentum like some of these really large mega M&A deals that we've seen in the past 6 to 12 months?

Yes. It's a fair point, Gerard. What our pipelines would tell us is that these middle market customers are ready to get off the sidelines. If you looked at the last 2 marches where we've had a lot of volatility, we got off to a good start in '25, expected to have a good pipeline, and then they got delayed with all the concerns around tariffs and things of that nature, which means selling the company a little bit more challenging. Same things happened at the start of '26. But as we look at our pipeline, we're feeling -- we're seeing a fair amount of customers in the middle market getting ready to sell. As we talk to our financial sponsors, they are seeing levels of books coming in that they have not seen in the last 5 years. So it feels like that trend is beginning to pickup, and my expectation is into the fourth quarter and to next year, you'll start seeing those M&A transactions start to occur. So it feels like with some stability, we should have a good answer to that towards the end of this year.

Next, we'll go to the line of Brian Foran from Truist.

Actually, I have a little bit of a follow-up on that last question, but maybe more by industry and this kind of overall market debate about narrow economic strength versus broadening across sectors [indiscernible] and I guess, just to set the stage for a while, there's been this concern that the business economy is doing well, but the drivers by industry are fairly concentrated. And I'm looking at your Slide 24, where that are up single digits and 7 that are up double digits in the C&I categories you give. So I guess the question is, do you feel like as you look at your pipelines, as you talk to your customers, are we still on this kind of narrow concentrated growth path? Or do you feel like it's not just AI, it's not just everything related to it. We're really starting to see this broadening theme play out on the ground?

So that's a really good question. I would say, first, we are starting to see it start to widen out. AI made a -- was clearly a lot in the news and the businesses that surround AI like digital infrastructure and the stuff that goes into digital infrastructure has been a big piece of this first and second quarter. But as we look at our pipeline, it's not just digital infrastructure. We're seeing a lot of stuff within the industrial subsectors start to pick up with things that don't necessarily go into digital infrastructure, which is great. We're seeing some stuff in health care. We've seen a pickup in biotech. And then we're -- the only place we really haven't seen a big pickup yet is on the consumer side of the business, but our pipelines look pretty diversified as we look out over the next 6 to 9 months from what we can see. That was different than what we saw in the first and second quarter. And as Gerard picked up on the earlier, a lot of the deals were very large transactions. We're getting much more granular in the middle market which, by definition, is more granular is starting to show some real signs of life. And therefore, I expect we will continue to see more granularity in the industries that pick up over the foreseeable future.

Next, we'll go to the line of Manan Gosalia from Morgan Stanley.

Bruce, can you unpack the comment on the CET1 range a little bit? I think you said you're still targeting that 10% to 10.5% range, but do you think you can move down from that 10.5% number over time. I guess, what do you need to see to get to the lower end of that range? And is it finalization of Basel end game? Is it the 2027 stress test? Just trying to assess the trajectory of the capital ratio here.

I'd say a number of things go into the considerations there. But one is rating agency actually. And I think the rating agencies coming out of the downdraft in 2023 felt that profitability has weakened and commercial real estate portfolios are problematical to some degree. And until you kind of restore your profitability and until you work through some of your commercial real estate loans, you should hold more capital. And I don't take issue with that. I think the whole industry coming out of '23 actually built their CET1 ratios up to 10.5% or even more.

And so that's -- certainly, we're getting to a flex point where profitability is now restored and has momentum to be positive going forward. And a lot of the workout on commercial real estate has occurred and there's been no big surprises there. So you're kind of getting to the point where you can, I think, start to make some decisions as to do I still need to hold as much extra capital for things like this.

And then there'll be a whole other consideration around kind of the RWA adjustments that boost your capital in the short run phase in AOCI, but net-net potentially give you another base to us, it'd be 50 or 60 basis points, additional net CET1, I think by the time that AOCI is fully phased in. And then what do you do with that money? Did the CET1 ratios for the whole industry go up by an amount because people still focus on TCE to TA or do you just say, well, that the old calibration was off, and this is the new calibration. And so we can use that for loan growth or buying back stock and still manage within the same guide range that we had before. So I think just the nature of things mean that I think, over time, we'll be able to drift down within that range. We won't get out ahead of anybody. But I think there's opportunity to both support our customers with loan growth and be big buyers of our stock, which I never missed a beat on a call to say I think our stock is still good value here anyway.

I hear you. That's great context. Maybe just on the next program. You mentioned the financial impact is a benefit to the medium term and doesn't impact the 16% to 18% ROCE target. Can you just maybe expand on that a little bit? Is there any near-term expenses or anything else we should be thinking about? And how are you thinking about the revenue impact of that?

Yes. So I'll start and let Brendan pick up. But there, I would say it's crystal clear to us that we want to get to that 16% to 18% range. So this is really a 10-year program that we can phase accordingly. And so I think initially in the short run, we're doing a lot of planning about kind of extricating ourselves out of a lot of the supermarket branches that we have and how do we set up stand-alone branches, full service branches nearby that we can migrate the customers to that branch and not be a full de novo, but actually be in a much better position to grow and add customers. So there's some of that. That's probably more in the planning stage in the short run. And then adding people, adding specialists, adding looking at the branches where there's the biggest opportunities to grow small business, but small business specialists in place to penetrate the wealth opportunity, put wealth specialists in place we can, I think, make those investments in people and they'll have very quick paybacks. We've already piloted this in select branches, and we can see that those really aren't a drag and they're actually positive very quickly. And so anyway, that's kind of the frame.

What do we win, if we win, is kind of the big question over the 10-year period. I think what we're trying to accomplish is faster household growth and mainly faster deposit growth, attractive low-cost deposit growth, which if you kind of play out your retail small business, deposit franchise should grow roughly at GDP. If you can add 2% to that growth rate through this program, that's a meaningful amount of deposits over a 10-year period. That's $20 billion to $30 billion incremental attractive deposits. And so that's what this program is designed to do and kind of how we invest in it and the pace of investment will be informed by like let's get into the range and let's not start investing too heavily until we're in the range. And then we'll have RTB kicking in, which could allow us some to do that. But that's how we think about it. Brendan, anything to add?

Well, I'll put just a few quick points. So just grounding on where we're at today. If you looked at our branch network when we took the bank public and then added investors in ISBC to that, we would have had about 1,400 branches. And today, we have, call it, 1,000 squiggly line of thousand. We now have one of the more profitable and effective branch networks in the country where if you look at revenue to expense ratios, we're at 5:6:1. The industry is at 3:4:1. So we've got a really profitable and efficient network. If you look out 5 to 7 years, we actually don't imagine our branch count to net change by a tremendous amount. It should be sort of in that range of plus or minus 1,000 branches. So when you unpack the various different things that we're doing to accelerate long-term outsized retail deposit growth, our legacy markets ex Metro New York, really, this is about repositioning them for strength and even further growth, but it actually could mean slightly less branches because we have this lot of in-store branches that we could in over time and replace with even more powerful branches that you get sort of a 2-for-1 trade in terms of the strength and it better positions us for our target segments of massive fluent and affluent customers, which gear better to where the profitability of the retail business is over time, where you can get more wallet share, really where our strengths are home equity, wealth, so on and so forth. So that is there'll be some self-funding dynamics in our legacy markets that allow us to selectively inorganically slowly plant some de novos and densify some of our other markets that we're a little thin in. So the combination of those factors to drive a more powerful network, more equipped for the target customers we're going at with a number of self-funding mechanisms.

And then to Bruce's point, where we're adding people, they're high-quality advisory folks, wealth, private client bankers, business bankers, those have really quick paybacks or you're going to see the revenue growth coming soon, and that's something we've validated over a long period of time.

Next, we'll go to Dave Rochester from Cantor Fitzgerald.

Solid quarter. I wanted to go back to the Private Bank. You've seen some really good momentum in that segment and continues to exceed growth expectations I was wondering as you look out to next year, assuming your PBO build-outs are on time, you're able to source the good people that you want for those offices. Do you think if this higher growth trajectory continues, there's a better chance you're going to land closer to the upper end of that 16% to 18% ROTCE target by the end of the year '27 rather. Are you thinking that upper half of the range, maybe is more reasonable At this point?

Yes. I would not pin where we are in the range just to that. So I think there's a number of factors that go into where we land in the range, the kind of net interest income development is very significant there. But we already have pretty high ambition for Private Bank. And I think we've demonstrated what I'm most proud of here really is we're not just growing it, but we're growing it in a prudent, controlled fashion and getting excellent growth, but we're managing the returns in the business so that we're getting roughly a 25% return on equity in the business, which as that continues to grow, it's just pulling the ROE for the overall enterprise higher. So you're right to say that, that should be something that lifts. But I think it's a little early to say there's enough upside in our mindset and view on Private Bank that we can commit to that's going to pull us to the upper end of the range, David.

Okay. Fair enough. And then Bruce, you mentioned earlier, Florida is maybe the next market you selected for greater density. How would you compare the potential value out of that market fully built out with all the PBOs you plan versus the California market where you already have a lot of density and have a sense for the value you're expecting there. How meaningful could Florida be for you and what's the time line for getting that density you want up and run it?

Well, I'd say, and Brendan, you can add to this, but California was the natural place for the build-out because First Republic really dominated that market, Northern Cal and Southern Cal on. So we've kind of replicated that in a significant way. And not only that, we did it bringing in very strong commercial banking teams, which really First Republic didn't have. And then we have JMP based in San Francisco. So we have a whole investment bank focused on emerging tech and other kind of emerging growth areas of the economy. So we're quite strong and quite built out there.

I think Florida in comparison, what's really attractive to us is as principal East Coast Bank with our kind of retail and business bank footprint, we have -- there's a lot of migration kind of out of the Northeast or people who kind of live part of the time in the Northeast and part of the time in Florida, and it's a very fast-growing economy in Florida. So to participate in that, to serve existing customers and leverage our networks, it's a great opportunity. But again, staying focused with a similar playbook at the high end of the market, more PPOs, more private bankers. We have already hired a very strong commercial banking team in that market. And so kind of getting that one Citizens dynamic going in Florida the way we have it in California is very attractive to us. It's almost -- we feel like we can't miss as long as we get the right people in place, and I think it's going to take a while, though. To your point, I don't think we'll be California like for 5 to 7 years. I mean, Brendan, you can call me on that, but just off the top of my head, to gradually open the right private banking locations to hire the right people to get our name well known in Florida, I think, takes -- it's going to take a little while. But to me, the opportunity is really immense.

Yes. Not a ton out. So it would be the exact same playbook in Florida that we're doing in California. We're 1 or 2 steps behind in terms of pace in Florida than we are in California. It is just as strategic as California, but it will probably ultimately be a little bit smaller in the private banking space, at least in Florida than California long term. But you can imagine, right now, our presence in private banking in Florida is centered right around Palm Beach and West Palm Beach. You can imagine over the 5-year horizon that we're in, 5 or 6 of the affluent communities in Central and Southern Florida. So that's our aspiration. We're just getting situated in Palm Beach, and we'll start to put in the same playbook that we did in California into Florida over the next couple of years.

Next, we'll go to the line of Chris McGratty from KBW.

Great. First, on the Private Bank, you kind of medium term, are you more optimistic about growing the loans or the deposits for this business? And I ask it because your loan-to-deposit ratio is roughly been around 50%, anything magical about that number.

No, I'd say what's interesting is A lot of folks thought that First Republic built the business based on giving away cheap credit. And then and that's how they got people in the door. I think we turned that script upside down that eventually, the offering that First Republic had was kind of white glove service, unparalleled banking experience, and we can handle all your banking needs, deposits, investments and loans. But in a higher rate environment and with a lot of those mortgages now sitting on JPMorgan's books, there wasn't the same demand for lending. And what we're really pleased about is that the strength of the relationships of the private bankers is allowed customers to come over and they trust the bankers. They trust our platform. They find it attractive. And so we've led with deposits and investments, and we're only of late starting to see the loan demand pick up.

And so I would think that over time, we want to stay with that formula, deposits very attractive, investments off-balance sheet fee revenues, very attractive loans to attract capital. But you've got to have a balance sheet, you've got to support your customers for their needs. I think we could probably settle into a 60% to 70% kind of as kind of where the ultimate kind of framework will sit for the Private Bank. And so that means there's going to be some catch-up loan growth. And some of those some of those mortgages are going to need to be refinanced. And so there'll be more loan demand there. And as we really focus on the business sector and companies. I think those continued growth there. And as the deal flow cycle picks up, there'll be more line utilization and things like that. So I do think there's a little bit of momentum at this point behind loans, but I don't see it really getting to something that exceeds 70%.

The only thing I would add is if you think about it from a balance sheet strategy standpoint, the Private Bank right now is a net liquidity contributor to the top of the house. If you look at the lendability of the deposits, it's strong in between 60% and 70% and we're lending at 50%. So as that tightens a little bit to Bruce's point get into the LDR of 60% to 70%. I think that would be spot on the top of sort of a self-funding dynamic in the private bank where it's not drawing down liquidity from retail or anything else that's still self-funding and I expect that to continue into the medium term.

Perfect. And then more of a modeling question. The earning asset growth linked quarter, Q1 to Q2, any reason that would be about the same for next quarter?

Yes. It's Aunoy here. I would say think about it, it depends on how deposit growth goes, our loan growth comes in. So I don't think it should change that much. And if you look at our full year guide on lending or average lending asset growth, we are in the range on that side.

I would say that there was a bit of pull forward on loan growth for the reasons we've talked about earlier in the call that kind of kept it a bit higher. So if you can just look at the NII guide in Q3, and it's a little less, it's 2.5% to 3.5%, and we printed over 4% this quarter. So anyway, it will reflect that dynamic that I think loan growth is a little less, and that's for a number of reasons. Ted talked about the private capital, and we talked about CRE repayments coming in, in Q3. So those are some of the factors to consider.

And for our final question, we'll go to the line of Matthew Breese from Stephens.

Just a follow-up there. Should we infer from your comments, particularly around the NII guide that loan growth for the year will be above kind of your 2026 guide? And just curious to what extent, Bruce, I know you just discussed some offsets there, but I'm curious on the whole.

Yes. Go ahead, Aunoy.

Yes. I would say if you think about it, we had some good loan growth this quarter, and it was a pull forward, as Bruce mentioned. But if you take the average of the loan growth, that's what we -- for the full year, I think we will probably slightly be ahead of what we had guided in January. I think spot loan growth will depend on our fourth quarter ends, et cetera. But I would say on the average side, we would be slightly ahead versus our January guidance.

Yes. And that's a good point, Aunoy, is that the average was bolstered by having more loan growth earlier in the year. So I'm not sure the spot changes a huge amount. So when you think about how do we get to the high side and above the high side of the range, that volume is a big driver of that. I think we said that -- we thought that the NIM would approach 3.25%. That's still a check. And so really having more loan growth in the first half of the year is very helpful to drive NII hire.

Thinking about the margin longer term, Aunoy, when you model it out, how much longer might we see fixed asset group pricing benefits to the NIM? And I'm particularly focused on 2028, just given if you roll the clock back 5 years in 2023, we saw kind of loan yield spike for the industry. But thinking we start to roll out of some of those in 2028. I'm curious if you see that in your model as well and what the impacts might be?

Yes. I think if you look at it '27, as you put it in the guide page, like if you think of it, we still go it a basis point or so in the quarter, and it goes up and it obviously depends on the steepness of the curve. Generally, what we see is roughly $3 billion to $5 billion between securities and loans getting repriced in and it generally comes at a spread of 60 to 75 basis points. So I think that will continue in '27. In '28, as we go through it, obviously, some of those repricing starts to -- the volume starts to come down. But I would say it would still continue into '28 in the...

Probably at reduced levels...

Yes. At reduced levels.

Okay. I think that brings us to the Yes. I think that brings us to the end of the questions. I appreciate everybody dialing in today and your interest and support. And everybody, have a great day. Take care.

That concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

All right. Thanks, everyone, for joining. Up next, we have Citizens Financial Group, and we're delighted to have with us today, Brendan Coughlin, President of Citizens.

Thanks for having me. Happy to be here.

Thanks so much for being here. Let's -- Brendan, let's start with the consumer bank. It's undergone quite a transition and the transformation over the last 10 years. And I think you have the stats to drive a lot of this transformation. Tell us about that journey. What did it take? And how do you feel about the overall positioning of the consumer bank today?

Well, the consumer bank is really the bedrock of Citizens Financial Group. It's transformed in its own right, but it also is an enabler for a lot of the other things that we're doing, whether it be the private bank or some of the things in the commercial organization. But within the consumer bank itself, if you rewind all the way back to when we took the bank public in 2014, it was really a bank that was made up of a whole bunch of threads and it wasn't well integrated and the profile of it was pretty subpar, high-cost deposits, low-priced loans, pretty thin margin business. So we've taken on a transformation journey over the last decade to really position it to look more like peers and then have outsized momentum in some areas than peers.

So, kind of breaking it down a little bit, I'd start with our deposit franchise that in the last up cycle in 2015, we were literally dead last in our peer group in terms of interest-bearing beta cost, total cost of funds on an absolute basis. Transforming a deposit franchise takes a long time. We think we've done that well, and that's on center stage here right now in a relatively tricky deposit environment, and we're performing exceptionally well.

So going from worst-in-class juxtaposed to now, we have been in the top quartile for 10 straight years in low-cost deposit DDA growth, basically 250 basis points on average better than peers in benchmarks that we look at. I've shared that on our earnings call, and that's been a consistent train over the last 10 years. That's really the foundation that drives a lot of our total deposit portfolio transformation.

And then on the interest-bearing side, we've gone from worst-in-class betas to in line with peers. So when you marry those 2 up, the outsized low-cost performance with our interest-bearing beta performance, you get a deposit business that now went from worst-in-class on an absolute cost basis to now top third in the U.S. So we're very proud of that. That's one marker of the transformation.

I'd say the other thing is our loan book. When we took the bank public, we leveraged our consumer lending franchise very innovatively to grow in a ZIRP environment. It was driving a lot of the early days growth of Citizens. We continue to have differentiated products. We're now pivoting that franchise to be higher returning relationship-based durable loan growth. And so you're seeing us rotate out of some lower returning low relationship assets like auto, some of the asset purchases we're doing and it's getting replaced with higher relationship things like HELOC, where we're the #1 lender in the United States and credit card to get higher returning profile.

And then lastly, I'd just say on the wealth front, a lot to be made of the Citizens Financial Group story in our Private Bank, but not to be missed is inside of our retail bank, 70% of our wealth fees come from the retail bank and our retail customers. And that has gone exceptionally well. It's a bigger part of our franchise now, and we're really pleased to see 70% of our fees coming from the retail business, which is higher margin than the private bank in terms of wealth management.

So as you think about the next 3 to 5 years, this cross-sell from the wealth side, I guess, what else are you most excited about for the consumer bank?

Well, taking a step back and looking at consumer banking post great financial crisis, post-COVID, 70% of the economics in retail banking now come from the mass affluent and higher segments in retail banking. It's really tough to make a lot of money on mass market. The good news is we're very relevant there, and we do quite well with that segment. We over skew versus our peers in mass affluent customers. So we're doubling down on that. I'd describe our strategy is oriented around that type of customer base. Of course, we serve all customers in our community front to back, but that's our target segment, and we're building a business around that.

So starting with our distribution, a continued focus on our digital capabilities and transformation. In fact, we just launched a new mobile app just last month that's gone exceptionally well. We're continuing to invest heavily in digital. Our branch channel is an area that we're making major investments to position it for a world post-COVID now that there's a lot of knowns on how consumer behavior in the U.S. is going to operate, really repositioning that for outsized market share growth long term.

And then on the balance sheet, I'd say, continued focus on differentiated low-cost deposit growth through customer household acquisition and customer experience enhancements. We feel very confident on that. And then playing the story all the way through on our lending book that we want to continue to have outsized higher risk-adjusted returns with relationship orientation. All of that should drive a stickier, more durable revenue stream for the consumer bank that should drive valuation enhancement over time for the franchise.

So when you talk about the branch network, I think part of what you've spoken about before is driving growth by building density in your current footprint versus expanding to some of the newer markets. I guess, tell us why that approach is better for Citizens? And what are the plans to densify in the New York City metro area and over what time frame?

Yes. Well, I'd start by saying if you adjust our branch count for the 2 acquisitions that we did, HSBC's U.S. franchise and Investors Bank, we would have started at the point of our IPO with about 1,400 branches. We're now down to about 1,000. And our current state is when you look at revenue generated with cost, we have about the most efficient and effective branch network in the United States with the revenue that we get in the customer side and the deposits for the cost base. And we're pleased with that. We had a lot of fat around the fringes of the franchise when we took the bank public. So we've got through that story.

Now it's about positioning for long-term differentiated market share gains and growth. To your point, I'm not particularly a fan of a bank our size going in de novo entering a new market with retail. I think it is very hard. It takes a long time. I don't particularly believe some of the metrics being shared by others in terms of earnbacks. We look at it and say our model in new markets is going to be ex retail. So private banking, commercial, business banking, you've seen us do that in California and Florida. Paybacks are much faster.

So within retail, I'd say our plan is 3-pronged, and 2 are about the branches and one is about people. Our legacy core markets, everything ex New York City and New Jersey, we have about 120 supermarket branches still. Given that we're focused on mass affluent customers, they don't really fit our model long term anymore. So we have the ability to prune those and replenish with de novo branch builds in our core markets, which allow you to leverage your fixed marketing costs, leverage your brand and really get faster returns on those new branches, but position your network for outsized growth with the target customer that we want. So there's a whole plan around that to reposition the network in our legacy footprint for long-term growth with the target customer we want.

In New York City, in New Jersey, we have -- when you add New Jersey, we call it 4% branch density, a little over 2% deposit share growth. We've grown tremendously since we did those acquisitions and got a lot of revenue synergies out of those deals but we're still undersized and under scale. So our view is that putting in over a 10-year period, organically, slowly adding onesie-twosie branches into Metro New York and Northern New Jersey can get you the right density to get outsized operating leverage long term. And again, that levers to fixed marketing expense that we're already doing. So unlike going into the Southeast where we have a whole bunch of other expenses put around it, we think we can get outsized operating leverage growth by densifying New York City and New Jersey and leveraging the assets that we already have.

And then the third pillar is really around the people. So we're looking at our specialty job families, our business bankers, our wealth managers, our mortgage loan officers and thinking about how we add staff in some of our key more affluent areas to drive deeper wallet share from mass affluent and affluent. So we're putting this whole program together. It's all organic. It's all over a 10-year window on how we want to think about this but the path really is to drive long-term outsized deposit growth over kind of market normal norms.

So you brought up de novo growth and how that's hot in new markets, and maybe I'll ask my M&A question here. What are your views on bank M&A overall and trying to inorganically grow in outside your footprint?

Well, generally, obviously, the window is open from a political and regulatory standpoint. But unique to Citizens, I look at the momentum that we have as a franchise right now whether it be the private bank growth, whether it be what we've got going, where we're finally seeing the full capabilities of the commercial bank and the scale that we've built, the momentum I just talked about in the retail bank, the Reimagine The Bank program, which I'm sure we can hit on over the conversation here. The bar is really, really high for us to make an M&A acquisition make any sense for us. And we were at 12.5% ROTCE last quarter on the way to 16% to 18%, our NIM expanding rapidly. And I see all the great things happening in the franchise and I look at what realistically we would need to do if we ended up considering an acquisition is take people off the playing field on those things to redirect them to an integration.

And it just doesn't make any sense to me right now for us to be seriously considering doing that. We're going to keep our head down. We've got an incredible amount of momentum in the franchise. The organic opportunities we have are very differentiated versus our peers. And I just don't know why we would take our eye off the ball to redirect. And then candidly, if you look at anything that you possibly could buy, I put it through the test of if they traded away tomorrow morning in the paper, would I lose any sleep? And candidly, I don't see anything that gets me so excited that we should make that trade of all the organic momentum. So suffice it to say, the management team at Citizens is completely heads down right now on our organic strategy focused on the momentum that we have and the initiatives in play.

Great. Perfect. Let's talk about the Private Bank build-out. That's been an incredibly successful strategy for Citizens. And I think that started with hiring a series of bankers from First Republic in 2023. Can you talk a little bit about how Citizens has been building out the product set and capabilities of the Private Bank? And how comfortable are you with where that is now?

Yes. I'll start with being very pleased and excited about how this is going overall. And most folks know the story well, but just a quick refresher on it is 2023, we hired 150 folks from First Republic. We took a $0.12 hit or so to EPS in 2023. And now in 2025, it was 7% of our earnings. In Q1, it was 10% of our earnings, and it's a 25% ROE business for us at the high end of our range of 20% to 25% that we had set. So we've met or exceeded most all important metrics in the build. We're now up to 650 people on the platform from the 150 we started with in 2023. So very, very pleased with the progress, $16.6 billion in deposits, $7 billion and change in loans and over $10 billion in AUM.

So it's been an incredible story for us. Most importantly for me, it's also reshaping the brand image of the company, who we are, how we're competing with high net worth, ultra-high net worth, how it's plugging into our commercial bank into the sponsor community, so on and so forth. So we're very excited how it's going. We've made a lot of investments. We're 3 years in. We've made a lot of investments, really our aspiration is to be a preeminent private bank in the United States, bringing together banking, lending and wealth management, all together in the same value proposition. We believe that the mega banks are a little too big and bureaucratic to pull that off. The smaller banks don't have the sophisticated capabilities. So we're right in the sweet spot to be able to deliver this for the customer.

We had all the capabilities, but we didn't have all the plumbing, right, to connect all of our businesses. That's what we've been up to over the last 3 years. And we've made tremendous progress. We still have a lot of work to do. We just kicked off an effort to fully technology replatform our wealth business front to back over the next 2 to 3 years. We've got a big initiative called Digital North Star to create new capabilities for the more sophisticated client, integrating wealth and banking and business banking all in the same mobile app.

Having said all that, right now, our customers are voting with their feet and with their words, and we're at a 76 Net Promoter Score in the business. So despite the work left to go, 76 by all accounts is a world-class customer experience. So we aspire for it to be in the 80s. Right now, we're almost there. And so we're pleased. So capability building is a moving target for constant needs that are changing with your clients. We'll never get to the finish line. We'll always have more work to do. But I'm very pleased that the foundation is very strong. It's working, and we're attracting top talent and top clients as a result of where we're at today and independent of what's left to be done.

And how do you think about, I guess, growing organically from here versus lifting out wealth teams from other areas?

So if you think about it, the first 150 people we brought over were all bankers. They weren't wealth managers, and they worked very closely with wealth managers. So we were lopsided in our scale when we want to bring together banking and wealth management. We had all the right bankers and needed that higher scale in wealth. We've done that. We've now got 10 wealth -- private wealth teams. It's still a little bit heavier on the banking side than the wealth side. So we still need to round out our distribution. You can continue to expect us to attract top talent. We've set an incredibly high bar, by the way, we're looking at the top 1% of wealth talent in the United States, and we're going to be incredibly disciplined that the promise of this value proposition is truly exceptional world-class service by exceptional world-class talent, and we're not going to compromise on that.

We're getting wealth people that want to be at a bank, don't just want to plant their wealth flag and do their business on their own. They've got to be bought into this integrated model. We will continue to hire talent. These wealth managers, a lot like the bankers have tremendous client followership. So typically, 90% of their clients follow from the firm that they're leaving to join us. That has happened, which is great to see. But now the flywheel is starting to go. The bankers bringing in new clients with business development. You've got the wealth managers that we're building at scale. They're connecting in our referrals between those 2 groups are up materially year-over-year. So you're starting to see the kind of the wheels turn. And importantly, it's not just about the private bank, our wealth teams that we're bringing in are also partnering with the commercial bank for the first time ever to really drive cross partnership across the piece.

So as you get that flywheel going, I think part of what you've also done is you've opened about 9 private bank offices, and there's at least, I guess, 2 more planned by the end of this year. Can you talk about the client acquisition strategy once you've added a private bank office in a given market?

Yes, sure. So we've got 9 -- to your point, 9 private banking offices open. Our distribution for private banking and wealth is concentrated in a few markets, Boston, New York, Southern Florida, Northern California, Southern California. We aspire to keep broadening out our distribution over time. To your point, 9 private banking offices going to approximately 11 by the end of the year with a medium-term aspiration to get that into the 20s. When we think about our client acquisition strategy, it's not really rocket science, but there's a very specific playbook that we have.

First of all, you have a first floor and the second floor. I mean that sort of literally but also how you think about staff and quality that you've got a retail presence on the bottom. That's a high-end retail banker doing retail banking stuff but oriented for high net worth and ultra-high net worth individuals. And on the second floor, you have the senior team, the senior lenders, the senior relationship managers, the private wealth professionals, the financial planners. So these 2 teams work together to bring service to the market. They both have tremendous client followership. I'd say that the banking team we brought over has approximately 50% of their book of business brought over from their old place. As I mentioned earlier, the wealth teams tend to have 90% conversion. That's one of the main customer acquisition vehicles is just talent and attract client followership to that talent, which when you hold that bar at the top 1% of bankers and wealth managers, you do see that as your primary acquisition funnel.

We also have marketing. We're building the brand. We're spending money in the markets. We're doing lots of client events. That has been great. And then you have this network effect that is really starting to play in now and you get client testimonials. Some of this sounds like motherhood and apple pie, but it's actually very real. And when you talk to clients, the experience that we deliver is so differentiated, truly uniquely differentiated that is it is something that they unprompted tell their friends about and say, you got to go talk to X banker, they're the best I've ever worked with. And so that is a very real thing. So the combination of best talent, first floor, second floor distribution, building the brand, ultimately leading to word of mouth with clients, that's all part of the model.

So the other part of it is the One Citizens initiative, and you've been increasingly talking about that since you launched the private bank, and that drives more synergy opportunities, particularly between the commercial bank and in the private bank. I guess where is that today? And are there some examples of success that you can share?

Yes. I realize that -- One Citizens, maybe, again, could sound like motherhood and apple pie, everybody's got to one-something, whatever your franchise is, is very real and authentic inside of the 4 walls of Citizens. And candidly, in a micro way, it is actually the business model of the private bank that -- and I'll start there, but other private banks, if you have a mortgage need or you have a business banking need, you're getting referred over to somebody else. Their model is One Citizens bring everything to the client first. We've done that inside the Private Bank, and now we're broadening it out to make sure it works across lines of business.

So the momentum that we had early days was significant and very cultural where we have assets like the JMP team out on the West Coast now firing on all cylinders. If you think of what's going on in Silicon Valley with AI and the amount of on paper net worth some of these folks have, getting our JMP team in there to think about some of these firms want to go public, how do they think about selling themselves? What's their paper net worth, marrying up with a private banker to think about their banking needs, getting -- how do you get them into a mortgage when they've got paper net worth, but not liquidity and are you there for them when they monetize it and you can get them into your financial planning and wealth management.

All that is very real. It was happening explosively at scale. And now our mindset is how do you systematize this goodwill. So we've got a whole formal program around that from building infrastructure to facilitate referrals from building compensation changes to encourage folks to have it bidirectional. So it's very real. I think we had last year, 400 or 500 major clients coming from the corporate bank into the private bank and 100 or 200 major clients that the private bank had relationships with that then got cross-sold and deepened.

So look, the examples are many, and they range from the very simple and obvious of the private bank sitting down with our middle market companies and banking their C-suite and introducing that way and having our middle market corporate banking team getting motivated and incented and score carded on the basis of bringing the full bank to the client every single day to much more sophisticated examples like I was going down the path of us actually facilitating an IPO or facilitating a capital markets transaction and having the private banking team step in and help and really sort out how we think about who's doing the credit, who's doing the deposits, how do we bring financial planning and bring the full bank to the firm.

So we still are in early innings of it, but I would tell you, inside the bank, it is definitely a cultural movement. And from a cost standpoint, think about the leverage you get there when you already have that relationship instead of having all the groups hunt in the wild for their own customers, being able to get that multiplier effect and leverage is something we're after and it's working so far.

And it sounds like you have the full product set to go to the client. Is there anything you're still looking to build?

A lot of it is actually just facilitating the connection points. Honestly, we don't really believe we have a lot of capability holes at the highest level. It's back to the way we thought about architecting the private bank and de-siloing and building the plumbing to connect all the capabilities. We now need to take it to the next level and go outside the private bank and do it across the enterprise. So if you have a relationship with the corporate bank and cash management, the private banking folks can see that, and we can think about how we want to price that and do we recognize the value that we're getting on the other side of the bank on how we bring the full bank, so you don't get into the siloism of this is my P&L or your P&L. So it's less product and more kind of building that information sharing so we can run the bank with a broader perspective.

Got it. All right. Perfect. So let's talk about Reimagine The bank. And in the past, the bank has had an annual TOP program to drive efficiencies. How is Reimagine The Bank different from those prior initiatives? And how can the bank look different over the next 3 to 5 years through Reimagine The Bank?

Yes. As you point out, it's been a hallmark for Citizens that Bruce started when we brought the bank public and we -- to have an annual efficiency and continuous improvement mindset. We called it Project Top. We had one every year since we took the bank public. Three times now in our history, we have dramatically upsized it to a more transformational program versus an annual continuous improvement program. One was the IPO itself. Second was in 2019, which was catching the digital transformation movement. And that program actually morphed quite a bit because the second we launched that we ran into COVID and had to -- it's kind of turned into an all things COVID response. So it got a little twisted. But -- and now here we are with the AI revolution and insert Reimagine The Bank as our next big upsized program.

So it's very, very different. One is that we're taking a longer-term horizon, a 3-year view versus typically our Project Top has a 2-year view and also the benefits. Our Project Top program typically generated $100 million to $150 million in benefits. We're aiming for an exit rate of $450 million in income benefits for exit rate 2028. So the aspiration is quite broader. I'm very excited about this. Naturally, the company is at a phase. We've got through the IPO. We look more like our peers. We're on this financial trajectory to get ourselves into the 16% to 18% range. We got a lot of momentum, but yet there's so much going around in the market around us that it's the right moment to say, what's the next chapter for Citizens? How do we keep the momentum going? So it's the right time idiosyncratically with Citizens combined with the market movements.

The program is structured, I'd say, to oversimplify it into non-AI-based transformation and AI-fueled transformation. The non-AI elements are equally strategic, just not as technical. So things like starting with the company's culture and our facilities footprint, how do we get -- how do we be more innovative, move faster and drive better tech and ops growth. So let's take a step back and say, colocation matters. We want people in the office. Let's assess our corporate footprint and get folks oriented into the right geographies in the same buildings. That's great from an operating culture standpoint. It also is going to squeeze out some expense.

So we've got a decent amount of excess capacity in the footprint post return to office where seats aren't being utilized. It's a win-win that I can get the right people in the right locations and save a whole bunch of money and think about it over a long-term horizon versus over a 1- to 2-year horizon, you never quite can get that done on something like that. We already closed 21 buildings as an example, and booking that to the bottom line vendor savings as well. So it's not just about simple rate term restructures. We're actually going in and saying in an AI-fueled world, who are the right horses to bet on, which big tech providers, which big suppliers, which -- a couple of years ago, we consolidated to Mastercard versus having fragmented Mastercard and Visa, really upped our strategy, got a lot of economics in the deal. Where do we see opportunities like that.

When you turn to the AI front, that's where it gets really exciting. We've got a very strict ROI-based mindset on AI, no 1,000 flowers blooming, no pet projects. This is economic value creation for our customers and for the bank. We've got a framework around how we're assessing those opportunities. A couple of big ones would be a full engineering -- reengineering of our call center, Agentic AI LLM-based replatforming. So total redo of the technology architecture, leveraging AI. By the end of this year, this is not 3 years down the road. By the end of this year, we should have 25% of our phone calls answered by a nonhuman. And by mid next year, it potentially could be as high as 50%.

Another use case for AI would be in technology, where our engineers are using -- started to use Copilot, now they're using Claude Code and other tools to get leverage on how we think about our capital. And our early days testing, we maybe got a 30% or 40% efficiency rate for engineers. In certain instances, we're now up to 5 to 6x the productivity. for an engineer. That fundamentally changes not just the effectiveness of your tech capital dollar, but also the operating model. Now you have engineers that aren't actually writing code as much, they're actually inspecting code driven by AI and QA, QC-ing it before you put it into production. So for the money we spend on tech over time, can we get a multiple effect? And can it be a leveling dynamic for scale in a bank our size to say, now you can spend the same amount and get 3, 4x the output. That's really exciting.

So those are some of the things we're working on. The $450 million in net income exit rate for 2028 is matched with not having a J-curve. So we expect it to be broadly breakeven in 2026, but it's with a lot of investment. So call it, $50 million to $60 million in benefits offset by $50 million to $60 million in investment. So we're starting the train here of driving leverage in the back end of the program, but we've been able to engineer it in such a way that you're not going to see it as a hit to our short-term financials or take us off track.

So breakeven in '26 and then benefits accelerating in ' 27.

'27 and '28, yes.

Got it. Okay. And as you think about...

Sorry, by the way, it's not -- as you hear us talk about our 16% to 18% ROTCE and our medium-term guidance, the impact of Reimagine hasn't really been contemplated in some of the metrics we've given out in the past.

And I get why because there's also the areas where you can invest that also is growing as well and as you get more returns from those investments. When you think about some of the KPIs that you're thinking through like the 25% of phone calls being done by a nonhuman, 5 to 6x productivity for engineers. Like are there any broader KPIs you're looking at across the business?

Yes. Obviously, in forums like this, we're really focused on the financials as the output. And obviously, we have those. But you mentioned a couple that I just said. Really, at its core, this needs to be an operating transformation for the bank that the financials will be the outcome of that. But we've got the team really focused on those things. So our first year attrition in our new checking account customers, we've got a full program around restacking our join the bank journey that should dramatically drive our attrition rates down, which will lead to low-cost deposits, which leads to NIM, which leads to ROE. So you can kind of see it play through.

Our customer experience, we are good, but not great in a retail bank for customer experience. We have very tangible things we're working on that will drive customer experience, including AI-fueled chatbots inside the mobile app that will help get customers done front to back operationally and straight through process. Things like fraud losses, effectiveness of fraud controls, things like credit KPIs as we think about AI deployment of analytic tools there.

In commercial, we've got a program called AI-Powered Banker that is all about enablement of productivity. So take all this external data, sift it down, put it in the hands of our middle market bankers so they can be more effective when they sit down with clients that should drive revenue throughput, turn times on loans cutting down materially. Those are the types of operating metrics that teams are working on.

Got it. All right. Perfect. So maybe staying on AI. What do you think it means for deposit customers and cash optimization, that debate has been front and center recently. How do you think this plays out?

Yes. It's obviously a hot topic. And candidly, I'm not that worried about it at the moment. We're watching it closely, but I'm not that worried about it. And here's why. If you're thinking about it from a corporate standpoint, you have professional CFOs and treasurers that are managing money today, and that's their job is to optimize their flow of financials. And so a corporate needs a specific amount of money in their operating cash management to make payroll to do all these things. It's hard to optimize that out to AI to a yield-bearing instrument when you need it to run cash. And then the money that they have in interest-bearing deposits, they're already optimizing. And we have these conversations every day with our businesses.

So I'm not that worried. I think in corporate, they're already generally optimized. In the retail bank, it's the same dynamic really. If you think about our low-cost portfolio, our average customer has $3,500 in checking, right? That's your day-to-day operating cash to manage your payment, make your mortgage payment, pay your bills, pay your grocery bills. I don't think that's going to get optimized by yield seekers.

And then when you think about interest-bearing deposits, look, direct banks have been around for 30 years, and they've consistently paid at or higher than traditional regional banks and the percentage of the U.S. deposits that have gone to direct banks has been relatively muted. It's 12% or 13%, and it's kind of flatlining-ish there. And so the idea that there's going to be this mass exodus to these AI optimizers, I just don't think when you break it down practically, the low-cost balances need to be there for operating cash management and payments reasons. The interest-bearing balances naturally are optimized.

When you think about retail customers, the high net worth, ultra-high net worth operate a little bit more like a business where they're already optimizing. There's not a lot of just money sitting around not making any yield. So we're watching it. I don't see it as a big risk. But look, we're -- obviously, from a profitability standpoint, we're coming at AI to take out some costs, too. So should there be some squeeze somewhere on the deposit cost. I think we've got -- we're forward leaning to take cost extraction out, so we'll be able to neutralize any impact. But at this point, I'm not that worried about it of the deposit cannibalization.

Got it. Very clear. So as you think about just deposit competition overall, as we get the potential for rate hikes as we go into the back half of this year, like are you seeing anything on the deposit side?

Deposits are competitive. They are now. They always have been and they always will be. And so certainly, competition is high. Higher rates by itself should signal on the margin, especially for a bank like us that's modestly asset sensitive that we should see benefit to NIM. And look, I think what's happening now with uncertainty in the rate environment is that especially on the retail bank, there's sort of this 4% yield number out there that if you just looked at the yield curve, you'd argue that that's a little heavy, but a lot of banks have stuck there, and they're not breaking through the 4% floor. So that has some pressure on deposit competition, but that's not a new thing that we've been living in the same spot for the last 12 to 18 months.

So look, I guess I would describe it as highly competitive and nothing new than we haven't been otherwise dealing with for the last 24 months. And I don't see really any material competition dynamic playing out right now that we're already not working through that's going to have any deterioration to our track.

Got it. All right. Perfect. So maybe in the last minute or 2 here, are there any updates that you'd like to share for the second quarter and the full year?

Well, we're almost through the second quarter here. And I'd say we remain incredibly confident in the guide that we have put out for the quarter and believe the quarter is playing out exactly as planned, and we're optimistic about it. And despite the challenges in the macro backdrop, it has not translated to a lot of customer behavior or volatility in our financials. So we feel very confident about the guide that we put out.

And for that matter, same with the full year. We're on track. We feel a lot of conviction to get to our 16% to 18% ROTCE range by the end of next year. We feel very convicted that we're going to land in our NIM cone of 3.30% to 3.50% and we expect substantial progress on that between now and the end of the year. And if you looked at consensus, you all are kind of projecting us into the 14, mid-14s for ROE by the end of the year. We feel like that's where we're headed that with the structural burn-off of our swaps and the noncore and continued improvement to credit and business execution between now and the end of the year, we should make substantial progress to our medium-term targets. But all in line with our guidance, we're confident about how we guided and I think we'll have a strong quarter and don't see any reason to take ourselves off full year.

And maybe to wrap up, how do you get from that 14.5% or so to the 16% to 18% ROTCE target? What are the key drivers there?

Yes. The big drivers are the business execution. So when you think about the growth we're seeing in the Private Bank, as an example, the profile continues to be 20% to 25% ROE. So that's accretive continued growth in low-cost deposits, having outperformance to drive our NIM. Our NIM will make substantial progress between now and the end of the year, but there'll be more running room into 2027. So having that continue to bend up will drive us further into the range. And having the full strength of the commercial franchise that we built in a constructive environment play out the way we're seeing it right now and have it sustained into '27 should firmly get us into that range. We feel very, very strongly that pending any unexpected external happenings that that's the path we're on, and we'll deliver it.

All right. Got it. Brendan, thanks so much for joining us and you being here.

Thanks a lot. Appreciate it.

Okay. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the last day of the SDC. I'm Ken Usdin, the large-cap banks analyst at Autonomous. Really pleased to end our session on the bank side with Bruce Van Saun, the Chairman and CEO of Citizens Financial Group. And many of you will know that Bruce has led Citizens since 2013 on a journey of business expansion, improving growth and rising returns, which we'll talk through in our session. Before we go, you can input any questions you might have through the Pigeonhole app.

And with that, Bruce, thanks a lot for joining us today.

Sure. My pleasure, Ken.

So Bruce, we've been starting off in all these sessions just talking about the big picture because it's been 1.5 years and 5 months, what it feels like. So give us a state of just how you see it from a customer base, consumer, commercial, how is the economy holding up? And what are you seeing as you look ahead?

I guess I'm quite impressed with how resilient the economy really is. So if you said we'd have a war on and energy prices would spike and a bunch of other phenomena out there that posing challenges, that you wouldn't translate that into where the equity markets are trading, where credit spreads are trading, the unemployment rate hanging in where it is, everything, markets seem calm in light of external challenges.

And I think companies actually have -- if they've learned anything over the last 5 or 6 years, it's -- they need to be resilient and adaptable, and think through all the twists and turns that can affect their performance and make sure that they're prepared. So just like banks have had to do stress testing and identify risks in the external environment and be prepared to make sure we're hedging those rich and cognizance of those risks. I think individual companies with their supply chains, whatever, access to talent, they've actually developed strategies, coping strategies to get through.

And so most companies that we bank are having really strong performance. They've had a good year last year, notwithstanding all the Liberation Day challenges, they're notwithstanding the war, they're having good years this year. I think everybody's kind of still a little kind of circumspect about going fully on offense. They want to play offense. They're making the right investments, but they're not fully leaning in, I think, until some of the uncertainty subsides. But we don't see any credit risks on the corporate side.

And same thing with individuals. We have the more well-off people are thriving with stock markets high and real estate values high. The people kind of lower earners still, I think, are doing okay. The major support is the job market. They're employed, which is the most important thing. And they're just rejiggering what they spend money on, but still spending, which is important to the economy. So I'd say it's a pretty solid backdrop, a bit surprisingly so to operate within.

And the deal activity, too, is surprisingly resilient as well. So you're just seeing folks continuing to want to put money to work if they're pooled funds and vehicles, whether it's on the equity side or the debt side. And you're seeing strategics. There's a lot of M&A taking place. We have a relatively permissive regulatory environment around approving deals. So all of the deal pipelines are kind of at really, really strong levels.

Yes. Yes. So as I mentioned, you've -- Citizens has been on a long-term journey on every aspect of the bank, transforming the Consumer Bank, building out a better positioned Commercial Bank, the new Private Bank and the upcoming and ongoing Reimagine the Bank initiatives. And these are all going to expect to boost profitability over the course of time.

So as we kind of break those down, let's start on the consumer side. Can you talk about what are your key priorities right now, especially on the consumer side in terms of gathering deposits and building scale, as you've talked about in the past, whether it's the New York City market and repositioning the branch network?

Sure. So we have this triangle of businesses, Consumer, Commercial and then Private Bank and Wealth. And the consumers' real value in building a strong financial institution is access to secure, stable funding, low-cost funding. And so that's really the name of the game is how do we create the right approach to go to market. We've moved over time more upmarket from kind of serving the whole market to really targeting mass affluent households and affluent households, which really dominate our footprint and making sure we have a good value proposition for them.

Part of that is leading with products like HELOCs because a lot of those customers own their own homes. They have a lot of tappable equity in their home. They need advice. How do I pay for sending my kid to college, how do I start saving for my retirement. And so I think we've really done a nice job there, and we've grown the mass affluent households faster than anybody in our peer group over the last 3 years, 5 years, pick a time period. So that's been important.

Part of that is upskilling the folks that meet the customers in the branches. And so investing in what we call private client relationship managers, PCRMs, small business specialists. And so the branch has become more of an advice center with specialists there and really leaning into that trend has been important.

I think another thing that we're looking to do is take a hard look at the physical layout of the branch system. So we have about 1,000 branches. And we still have a relatively high percentage. I think it's over 100 are still in supermarkets, in stores. And so you don't get the full power of market presence with an in-store. You get efficiency, but you don't kind of generate the same deposits. And so one of the things we're looking at is in each micro market, how do we optimize that if we want to pull out of the supermarkets, where do we put the de novos, where do we convert those into traditional branches. And so we have an effort that's going on. I teased that on the first quarter call. We'll reveal a little more about that.

One of the -- I'm not sure we'll change materially the points of presence, and this will happen over a long period of time. But I do think it will accelerate our deposit gathering rate to be in the right locations with the right type of branches. I think New York is one area that we've done phenomenally well. So for those of you who don't follow the story back in '22, we bought HSBC's East Coast branches and then Investors Bank, the so-called one-two punch to get into this market, and it's been very successful. So we bring our style of banking into a heavily competed market. It's our fastest-growing market in terms of household growth and deposit growth.

But there's even more opportunity. I think, once we've proven that we can -- if you can make it here, you can make it anywhere being in New York today, that we can start to scale that a little more gradually over time and continue to really get some nice attractive deposit growth in this region. So to me, it's really for consumer about the deposit growth trajectory and then also the wealth cross-sell would be the 2 things. And then really, I think, leaning into small business where I think that's a typically underserved market, and there's a lot of opportunity there.

My real-life proof point is my daughters even noticed the Citizens' green offices in the city park here and there.

There we go.

On the lending side of consumer, can you touch on the strategy across the different lending products, HELOC, mortgage, et cetera?

Yes. So I think consistently, we'll always have growth led by HELOC just because that's a bellwether product for the strategy overall. And we're really good at it, by the way. We originated more HELOCs in the whole country than any other bank, even though we only originate in our footprint in 14 states. We've taken all the pain out of that origination process. And so we can start to finish, originate on average in 14 days and the industry average is like 45 days. So we really, I think, dominate that product.

Mortgages is always going to be an important product to offer to your customers. And so we'll get continued growth. We don't need to see big growth there. We've got to make sure we're focused on using the balance sheet for deep relationship customers. And then the other thing I'd call out is probably cards, where we launched a new card family last year, and kind of gaining more primacy with our customers. We actually have pretty good distribution, but people may be using other cards ahead of our cards. And so how do we change that equation. So we have a number of strategies to do that, and we're starting to see some green shoots on that.

Okay. Got it. So on the commercial side, where you've built out a real full-service commercial operation, where do you see the biggest opportunities, both for the lending side, but also as importantly, on the fee side? You've built this capital markets business. And where do you see that really, the potential of that over time?

Yes. So we like to kind of immodestly say we're the best positioned super-regional commercial bank. And I think that's really on the strength of the capital markets capabilities that we put in place. And so it's a combination of coverage. So where do you focus? And we have coverage of middle market in certain geographies and then mid-corporate, which are companies bigger with $500 million in revenues to $3 billion, where you have to have industry verticals and industry specialists and expertise.

And then the sponsor community, which owns increasingly probably half the middle market companies in the country are owned by sponsors. And so we got on that really early and built strong capabilities to serve the sponsor community and built relationships with the leading sponsors. And so I think we've been really astute in how we've built out the coverage and leaned into the verticals where we think there's going to be a lot of opportunity.

And then kind of brick by brick over many years, we've built out all of the product sets. So not just traditional syndicated loans and other products that banks sell to treasurers, but the debt capital markets capabilities, securitization, equities capabilities with the JMP acquisition, bought 7 M&A boutiques. So we have pretty widespread M&A capabilities across all important industries.

So anyway, I do think that we haven't seen the full relative differentiation of what we've built relative to others in the last 4, 5 years because we've been in a subdued market. So now that things are ticking up, I think we're just going to capture a lot more opportunities, and we should have faster revenue growth acceleration because our peers have quite a ways to catch up to us.

And beyond that, I think the whole payments space has been really, really interesting. And there's a lot of opportunities there. We've consistently been investing in our, what we call Treasury Solutions business. And I think our growth rate has been kind of high single digits as a result. And then I think there's more to go there. So like embedded finance, interesting, a lot of these fintechs who had partners with partnerships with smaller banks, they're outgrowing them. And then they look around and they say, where do I go to get broader capabilities and kind of the super regionals is a sweet spot, I think, for them because going to the very biggest banks, it's just take a number, we'll get to you when we get to you, but they can get a lot of attention from banks our size.

Got them. So the third piece of the triangle, the Private Bank where you aspire for it to be a teens contributor to earnings over time. And you've got a big ROE target on that, 20%, 25%. Where are you still looking to add talent and expand? And what do you think is going to be the incremental driver of the growth as you go forward?

Yes. So again, this is -- it was a big bold bet to do this in '23 and hire 150 of the top talent from First Republic to be the foundation block for getting into the business. That number now, we're over 600 people in the business. We now have 9 PBO locations. We really are pretty full in California in terms of investment in Northern Cal and Southern Cal has been pretty much built out, a few more PBOs to go and a couple more wealth teams that we'll likely add there. But that was the region that was First Republic's home region. So we had access to the talent and good name recognition out there. So that's gone very well.

Florida is another really important state for us. And given we're a bank in the Northeast and a lot of migration down to Florida or second homes down to Florida. We started there with one location in Palm Beach. We just opened a second in West Palm Beach. We have Boca geared up for next year. And so you'll start to see us, I think, emulate what we've done in California and thicken Florida over the next 3, 4 years is in the plan.

And then in our current footprint, we have a flag planted in Boston, and we have one here, which is right across the street. So if you want to look at our nice signage there, street-level PBO flagship here in New York, 52nd and 6th. But we'll continue to, I think, open some satellite offices. We have a plan to open in Greenwich, which was a very good location for First Republic. And then in Boston, we're right on Boylston Street, but we're looking at do we open straight PBOs or do we maybe convert some of our high-end retail in places like Wellesley or Chestnut Hill? Do you have both style retail and private bank or do you do a conversion? So those are some of the things we're thinking about. And then I'd say we also need to get into Philadelphia because that's also a very big market for us. So we're looking at how to do that.

Got it. Reimagine the Bank, aiming to get $450 million of efficiencies by the end of '28. How is this new plan going to change the way that Citizens operates differently organizationally? And how do you think about that balancing act between reinvestment and driving efficiencies to the bottom line?

Yes. So I would say we've had a good long track record, Project TOP, Tapping Our Potential, where, for like, we had 10 TOP programs that generated between $100 million and $200 million, generally, of benefits, but they were kind of probably a little more on the tactical side than on the strategic side. And so last year, when we thought about are we going to do a TOP 11 or are we going to do something grander. We said, let's look at all the massive technology innovation that's occurring and let's like take advantage of that to put just a more strategic program in place.

And so we took maybe 25 of our top leaders to the side in the summer of last year and said, let's look at all the things the bank does. So how do we onboard a customer, how do we service a complaint, how we deal with the fraud issue and draw the picture about people, process, underlying technology, how does it work today? And then to kind of draw like what could it be? If we start with a white canvas, how would you introduce these new tools, introduce AI agents, change the composition of the workforce. So you have human and agents working side by side and basically kind of pull that all together in a program, which has probably 50 initiatives today, kind of built around 5 or 6 main blocks.

But I think it's exceptionally exciting. And we're immersing our people. We just had an off-site for the top 130 people up in Rhode Island the last 3 days, and we spent a good 3 hours immersing everybody in kind of vibe coding and programming agents and stuff. So I want that people on the top of the house to really roll up their sleeves and know how this works so they can drive it throughout the company.

So anyway, I think the nice thing that we're offering relative maybe to some others, everybody's doing this and experimenting with it, but we have this mindset that we are good at setting up programs and executing programs and setting financial targets and delivering against those targets. And so I think that's why Reimagine the Bank stands out a little bit is that we're kind of putting the numbers out there. And when we put numbers out there, we make sure that we can deliver those numbers.

It's not -- to me, it's not just the financial benefits that come from it. I think it's a huge uplift in customer experience. And to me, with all the competition and rising levels of competition, you really have to deliver for your customers and make it a great banking experience. And so to me, that's as much of the prize as the efficiency, although finding money that flows through the bottom line is also really valuable.

So we haven't -- we have a trajectory where we get to 16% to 18% ROTCE without incorporating the benefits of Reimagine the Bank. So it's tantalizing like, well, how much is going to flow through? And could you actually move 16% to 18% if you'd say half of it flows through or 3/4 of it flows through. I'm trying to demur from answering that, just say, let us get this thing rolling and let us think it through, and let us see like what the other investment opportunities are, and kind of what overall expense growth rate we manage to. But it's nice to be in that position where we have that flexibility.

Yes. And on the AI point specifically, as you do integrate that into the efficiency improvements, productivity improvements, do you see that as also a potential add to the like long-term financial performance of the bank? There's a big conversation about like is it a net add? Is it net neutral? Does it just allow more reinvestment? Where do you stand on that?

Well, I think it's additive. I definitely think it'll make us a better competitor. It'll allow us to operate more efficiently. I'm not sure all that gets competed away at the end of the day. I think it is a boost to industry ROE.

Yes. And so on the competitive point then, more competition coming from more arenas than we've ever seen. So a couple of different pieces about that. On the banking side, from the deposit perspective, how do you see Citizens and even the industry defending against all these new deposit evolutionary products, whether it's tokenization, stablecoins, agentic AI, et cetera?

Yes. I think banks offer kind of full service. So they focus on providing balance sheet. If you need loans, we can give you loans. We take your money, we take your deposits, we offer you advice. And so being a trusted financial partner and adviser is pretty high ground that we're occupying. And so the disruptors coming in are trying to like, I'll focus on the loan origination experience or I'll focus on an alternative way to handle your deposits. But it's very hard for them to migrate more broadly and occupy that kind of higher ground that banks occupy.

So we're watching all of those developments and making sure that if stablecoins are going to take off and there's good use cases for our clients, that we'll be in a position to do that. If tokenized deposit is an industry response to stablecoins, that we'll be in the consortiums that allow us to do that. And so -- and when you talk about agents and are they going to make it sharper in terms of pressure on deposit costs because they'll look for better opportunities. I'd say we're already at the -- if you look at corporates, if you look at high-end wealth customers, you look even at the high end of retail and digital offerings like Citizens Access, there's plenty of that already where people are trying to optimize.

And then there's other players who value the total relationship and are just not going to maybe go through the effort to optimize a little bit if their balances are lower, is it really worth it to me. So I'm not sure that changes a huge amount. If it does, over the next 10 years, put a little upward pressure on deposit costs, it's one of the reasons that we have to use the benefit of AI and agents to lower our cost structure to keep our profitability in the same zone. So I'm not that worried about it. I just want to be kind of always on the front foot leading in assessing what's going on and how are we going to play it.

Yes. And speaking of other things to potentially worry about or banks are worried about, the cyber threat rising ever, costs going up to just defend against it. Do you just have to keep up with whatever is needed on that front?

Yes, you do.

Is there anything different you can do?

I mean I think those kind of things are existential potentially for any individual institution or for the industry. And so making sure that we have access to the latest tools and that we get really, really good at deploying those tools to search out vulnerabilities, to be able to automate the patching and do that in a rapid way is really, really important.

So you've got to start at the top by having really top talent in your organization. Your CISO has to be grade A. I think we have that. And the team is really strong. So it starts with people, but then the people are going to want to have all the latest tools and you just have to put that right at the top of the budget list for your CapEx every year. So that may cost a little money over time. But I actually think that these tools, people worry about them getting in the hands of the bad guys. But if the good guys get it first or kind of really are thoughtful about how they're implementing and protecting data and assets, et cetera, it should be helpful to the cyber picture in the long term, is my view.

Yes. One of the points you touched on earlier is getting into that 16%, 18% ROTCE target by the end of '27, a long way from the low single digits when the company IPO-ed. Can you remind us just the main drivers of getting there? And then what would be those different sides of the range outcomes that should be the final mile?

Well, so we're -- we just printed, I think, slightly over 12%. And if you look at consensus, we get to kind of high 14s, I think, by the end of the year. And the kind of what we refer to as time-based benefits, we have these legacy swaps, which were terminated, and therefore, they have just an accounting drag that eventually burns off. They're being amortized over the life of those swaps. And we had noncore was running down, and that was kind of at a negative yield, and that was providing a lift. So those 2 things, if you chart them out, actually continue to drive NIM higher. And so if you overlay that and pro forma that, let's say, we could all do that tomorrow, then you're already close to 15% just on the basis of that.

And then you kind of look at the business momentum that we have, the Private Bank growing, its ROE is 25%. It's already 10% of our bottom line going to mid-teens. And so at the margin, that's helpful to the ROTCE progression. I think Commercial having come out of a period of low activity levels into higher activity levels is going to throw off kind of more earnings and the strategies we talked about in Consumer to keep growing low-cost deposits. All that adds potentially another couple of percentage points.

We have credit still a little bit elevated due to CRE office, but we have that coming down from kind of where it was last year in the high 40s down towards the mid-30s, which also helps that. And then the thing going the other way a little bit is AOCI is creating a depressive effect on kind of capital, and so it's boosting returns and that kind of pulls to par over time. So that goes a little bit the other way. But in any case, the -- I think the net of all those things gives us a lot of visibility and a lot of confidence that we can get into that range.

And I would say the thing that -- the economic backdrop is always the thing that you have to think about. So do we end up in a stagflation scenario? That hasn't historically been good for banks. So if you have kind of high inflation and GDP is sluggish. And so it doesn't allow you to pull your credit cost down as much or it doesn't necessarily create the dynamism in the economy where there's a lot of deal flow, there can just be, I'd say, macro scenarios that may pull you down.

But one of the things we've been very focused on is making sure that we're chopping off tail risk because when we get into that return zone, if the macro turns against us, we want to be one of the ones who goes down the least in terms of our return. We don't want to -- I think we've been disciplined on credit. We have very strong credit risk appetite and discipline, I think on how we're thinking about hedging interest rate risk. So the things that can be more volatile, building up our fee-based businesses, trying to just make sure that we're solid and we can try to hug that range through time.

Yes. And I think as you mentioned previously, like getting to 16% to 18% doesn't necessarily mean it's the end game, but you want to kind of make sure you get there before you then see the other things...

Well, you know back from the IPO, like we said we're going to get to 10%, and you got to walk before you run. And we got to 9% and everybody said, Bruce, aren't you going to raise this 10%, how does 10% to 12% sound? I said just let me get to 10% and then I'll tell you where I'm going next, so.

Yes. Fair, fair, fair point. So as a checkpoint on progress, before we get to the rest of the topics that will flesh this out a little bit more. Any updates at all to either your second quarter or your full year '26 outlook that you've made in April?

Yes. No, I feel good about the guide that we made for the full year. I said that on the call. I still feel really good about that, and I feel good about the quarter. So the quarter is progressing the way we thought it would.

Okay. Coming back to deposits, you mentioned about growing low-cost deposits and also you've proven the ability to take deposits down with rates coming down. And so now that we might be holding here a little bit longer at either current rates maybe even going higher, competition is not getting any easier out there. What levers do you have to either hold the line or continue to ratchet down in places of whether you back book support or whatever, that you can kind of just make sure that you're hanging in there and don't have any changes to your expectations?

Yes. I'd say loan growth across the industry is a little more than people expected coming into the year. And so that means you have to fund it. So you need deposit growth. And so I do think there's a little bit more pricing competition as a result. We anticipated that. So we had, I think, a relatively robust loan growth forecast coming into the year. And so our deposit betas, we have kind of in the kind of high 40s, which we were 50%, I think, in the first quarter on the cumulative beta. So I think a little of that is built into our outlook that we anticipate a little more competition.

But there's some fundamental drivers that we have, like the Private Bank growth. We're now at over $16 billion in deposits and kind of at least consistently, we've had about 1/3 being in noninterest-bearing and low cost being in the low 40s. And so just continuing to grow that deposit base with attractive mix is more idiosyncratic to us than the things that you would see across peers.

And then I think we're quite sharp in terms of our algorithms and pricing in the Consumer Bank. I think we've gotten quite good at that. And in the Commercial Bank, we've been building out kind of new places to go fishing for deposits. And so kind of escrow services, bankruptcy services, there's things that I think allow us to expand where we gather deposits, which can also be helpful.

Yes. So with the caveat that net interest margin, NIM, is an output, you guys do have an expectation of expanding the NIM from 3.14% in the first quarter and getting it to 3.30%, 3.50% by the end of '27. And just -- what is higher for longer do to that expectation set? Does it change it at all, make it better, make it worse? Given the points you made about deposit cost, loan growth and just obviously, where the economy is headed.

Yes. Well, that forecast was predicated kind of on 2 things. One was the external rate environment. So where is the Fed funds rate, what's the shape of the yield curve. And the other thing was our own balance sheet movement or the dynamics around our balance sheet. And so I would say on the macro side, the kind of higher rates and steeper yield curve is generally a positive. We've maintained a relatively modest but still asset-sensitive position on the balance sheet. So that's positive to that.

And then the balance sheet dynamic, I think, is kind of -- within the context, it's still hugging the context of the projections that we had. And so we'll just have to see if that changes at all. But if, in fact, loan growth were higher and deposit competition were greater, that could be kind of slightly negative to NIM over time, but you would make up for it with volume. And so you'd probably take that trade. But I don't think any of those movements take you out of the cone. So I still anything that you could foresee, I still think the cone looks like the place it will end up.

Yes. Understood. I want to come back on the point you made about taking out the tail risk from credit and naturally lowering the kind of risk profile of the loan book over time. We've seen it for the last couple of quarters. Are you confident that even with what we're seeing in the macro, whether it's oil and gas or just other uncertainties, that the trend over time towards a lower natural net charge-off rate for the company can be achieved?

Yes, I do. And I'd say, again, the risk appetite around the corporate book has been very stringent. And as we do more NDFI lending, which everybody is doing, that's really investment-grade lending. And so your kind of risk of loss goes down. We've been running down CRE after we bought Investors Bank, we were bigger than we wanted to be. And so again, CRE, I think, can have higher credit losses depending on where you're playing. And so having less of that, having higher investment-grade corporate exposure is positive to risk appetite.

And then where we're playing on the consumer side is really kind of high prime and super prime is where most of our exposure is. Over 70% of our consumer exposure is real estate backed. So it's collateralized. And where it's not collateralized, it's typically to people who are homeowners and have kind of very good credit scores. So I think that over time, we've just continued to refine that. We got out of businesses like Auto that have relatively higher charge-off rates. And so the mix has really improved over time.

Yes. And even some of the challenges you had over the last couple of years post pandemic with office CRE, you guys had put up a huge reserve on it and even that...

We're just working that out, and there's really no surprises on that. So again, I don't see real trouble spots at this point that would be worth calling out in kind of certain industries or things like that. I think, as I said earlier, the companies have figured out how to cope with different shocks and they're resilient. And so nothing really to call out.

Yes. You mentioned NDFI and all the banks, including you guys put out some really good disclosure and confidence in your quality of your book. Just that, you mentioned also that you're building out the sponsor business and it's a piece of the ecosystem that you guys have been facing for a good while in the investment bank. What's your just view of how Citizens will face that in the future? And any evolutions in how the banking system faces the private markets and how that push and pull will go?

Well, I'd say, again, because of our early focus on sponsors as the sponsors, equity sponsors grew more into broader asset management complexes and they got into private capital, we were there as their partner to help them think through like how to go to market, what structures they should set up, what leverage we can introduce to help them get to their return targets. And so I think it's been a good journey for us to solidify those relationships and be selective about kind of where we want to play and who the partners are that we want to be in bed with.

And so I feel really good about kind of that strategy that we set out on, and that these are very big successful firms that have a lot of needs across their equity arms, their credit arms. They have partners who need wealth advice. They want to have lending to their partners so they can invest in their fund vehicles. There's so many touch points across what we do in the Commercial Bank, what we do in the Private Bank, that this is a real focal point for us and a huge opportunity to get that right.

We have something we call One Citizens, where we're sharing our books of relationships, and corporate bankers are bringing in private bankers and vice versa. Like last year, we had roughly 400 sources of referral back and forth. About 300 were the corporate bank bringing in private bankers and 100 went the other way, then the Private Bank and Private Wealth brought in the corporates. But if you can do that well, if you really have these deep relationships, the clients really like that and respect it that you know them so well and that you're bringing total solutions to help them be successful.

Yes. So in terms of capital, you noted on the recent call that we've seen the Basel III proposals. Looks to be a nice benefit potentially to Citizens and other regional banks. You guys mentioned potentially 10% RWA reduction. First of all, I guess, are you comfortable with the proposal as is? And do you expect any potential changes to it as we get through the comment period and finalization?

Yes. I'm comfortable the way it is. I think there's one thing that if you're not in the advanced approach, then you don't get the same risk weights on corporate credit. And so that's a comment that if you would suspect that the regionals would like to see that more equivalence there. So we'll see how that plays out.

But generally, the kind of old framework was very blunt and conservative blunt. So to actually have it more precise and really kind of be appropriate in terms of risk weights, in terms of this extra conservatism, will allow for, I think, better capital allocation for the economy. And banks will follow the lead because their economic models would tell them something different than what the regulatory model said. And now with these changes, it's bringing it more back in line. So I think fundamentally, it's a good thing.

Yes. And for Citizens specifically, it will add even more to what's an already strong capital base. Does it change anything you think about either usage or managing the company?

Well, we'll have to see. So I think we picked up 110 basis points or something of CET1 and -- but we have the same balance sheet today as we will the day that we implement it. And then you have kind of the AOCI is now going to be counted in capital. And then over time, that could wash out a portion of that, maybe half. And so you end up -- it's a good problem to have because you end up with more capital, but like, how does the market look at it is -- if you said I'm 10% to 10.5% is now your 10.5% to 11% is where the market goes because it's looking at TCE to TA ratio or the rating agencies, like, don't kind of get with the program. So I think you just have to see where it goes. But I'm happy to be in that position. I do think the bias is eventually you should be able to utilize that capital and bring it down, so.

Yes. And you guys have been doing a combination of being able to grow the balance sheet and you've also increased your buyback activity recently. You kind of have enough room right now. So that would just be gravy on top.

I mean the one thing that we're looking forward to is the CCAR stress test results because I think we haven't had much joy in that process, and we've made our vocal displeasure known. But I'm pretty optimistic that it's going to be a much better result.

Yes. On that point, because this year won't result in any formal changes to your SCB, which still remains above the 2.5% minimum by more than other regionals, this year is more just like a take it in stride assessment.

Take that scarlet letter off. But it then is indicative. But what we've said in the past is that having a higher SCB hasn't changed our -- how we're managing the capital. So now having the purported SCB be a decent amount lower shouldn't really have that change. But it does signal to the market that we're a lot more peer-like in terms of the business risk that we have on our balance sheet.

Yes. And I think the longer-term question that comes out of that is the combination of getting this Basel III benefit and over time, with the aspiration that the SCB does go back more to peer like, if you're still at 10%, 10.5% or even more, and the reg requirement goes back to 7%, isn't that a ton of capital for a bank like Citizens to hold to?

Well, there's an opportunity, I think, to bring it down. But what I would caution is that -- and investors have a hand in this, too, and say, like, you need to get more leverage in the capital structure. But then you look when the tide goes out and something happens. So when the West Coast banks failed and Signature failed, a lot of people who had levered that capital structure spent years in the penalty box kind of rebuilding their capital.

We had a conservative view on our capital. And so we were able to take advantage of that situation. We were invited in to go look at the failed banks. We were able to take a bet and do the start-up of the Private Bank. So maintaining a bit of conservatism in capital to me is always a good thing.

Yes. And other potential uses of capital would include inorganic growth or acquisitions. You guys have been on this long organic journey with the recent adds that you mentioned in the New York City area. As you've built both local scale and add it to national businesses, do you have what you need to grow? And would acquisitions be a part of any requirement or necessity to get the company to another stage?

I think we have what we need, and I've consistently said that kind of we did our big acquisition, which was the start-up of the Private Bank. And the nice thing about it is it's capital light. So we risked $100 million in start-up losses for something that's now 10% of the bottom line going, say, to 15%. And you look at these bank deals that people are printing and they're spending $3 billion, $5 billion, and they're getting 6% accretion or 7% accretion. So making sure that, that stays on the trajectory that, that business is durable, sustainable, hardens that we capture that kind of white space that First Republic used to occupy.

That's job one. And I think Reimagine the Bank and the potential benefits of that is job two, and just kind of executing our game plan. So at least in the near term, I don't really want to get distracted from that agenda. But you never say never. You're looking constantly at your footprint. Is there something that falls in your lap that could strengthen a particular geography. I'd probably say that, that's kind of potentially higher on a list if we eventually get to a list than going completely to new regions like some of our peers are doing.

Yes. Understood. Okay. Well, with that, I think we're through the topics. We covered a lot of ground. So with that, Bruce, thanks so much for joining us. Please join me in thanking Bruce Van Saun.

Financial, which has been a pretty big supporter of this event ever since they've gone public, maybe now.

2014.

2014, a little bit ways ago. From the company, very pleased to have Bruce Van Saun, who's Chairman and CEO. Bruce, welcome back.

Thanks, Jason.

Bruce, and maybe the best place to start, I just thinking back to 2014 until today and just how far Citizens has come since it's gone public. Maybe just as you look at the competitive landscape today, how are you feeling about Citizens' current positioning? And maybe what opportunities are you most excited about?

Yes. I mean I look back over that whole transformation journey since 2014 and just feel really good about how we went about it, putting the right foundation in place with a strong Board and leadership team, getting the right talent in, getting the right culture, investing in our people programs, our risk management, our technology.

We basically built things brick by brick and then really focused on getting our businesses oriented around where areas in the market where we could be distinctive and where we had a right to win. So what I really like about where we are today is we like to describe our strategy around a triangle of businesses, but the consumer bank is really a foundation block because well-run banks need to have stable, low-cost deposits, and that's what the consumer bank provides for us.

And we've done a lot of work over the years to segment the marketplace and try to move more upmarket and serve mass affluent and affluent customers, and that brings bigger noninterest-bearing deposit balances and more needs on the part of the customer for wealth advice and other services. And so Consumer Bank still has a lot of opportunity, I think, to grow.

And one of the big moves that we made about 4, 5 years ago was to recognize we -- as a strong Northeastern bank, we were going to have to get into the New York Metro region. We bought HSBC's East Coast branches. We bought Investors Bank. We paired that together into about a 200 branch system. across New York and New Jersey. And it's been our fastest-growing region in terms of households and deposits, and there's still, I think, a lot of juice left to squeeze out of the lemon there.

So anyway, that's consumer. And then commercial bank is something that we basically built up from being more of a regional player focused on traditional bank products that are sold to treasurers to actually having the full range of capital markets capabilities, M&A, equities capability, debt markets capabilities, securitizations, et cetera.

So through either acquisition or hiring teams, we've built up a full set of product capabilities. And then we focused the sales force, the coverage bankers on both middle market and we went upmarket into mid-corporates who have more needs and require us to be very strong in terms of industry knowledge. So we've set up industry verticals. We also saw that the sponsors were going to increasingly own more and more of middle market America. So we've built out capabilities to serve private equity, private capital more broadly.

And so I think we're exceptionally well positioned. I'd like to say we're the best positioned super regional bank in the U.S. in the commercial space. And then the third kind of leg of the triangle was more recent. We always had a desire to get into kind of high-end private banking and wealth management.

We had made an acquisition 5 years ago of a company called Clarfeld, which was a very respected registered investment adviser. It really wasn't at the scale to kind of balance out the triangle. So when First Republic failed, we made the bold move to try to buy it and JPM ended up buying it, but a lot of the talent didn't want to go on to that platform. And so we signed up 150 people one day in June, which was a big bet in a turbulent time to take on all the expenses before the revenues were going to show up. But we had confidence that we could scale it up and kind of even recreate a model that was better than how First Republic was running it.

And we had ability to surround that and work as One Citizens with our corporate bank working with the private bankers, and that's been very effective. So we look at it today, and we're filling that void in the market that demise of First Republic created. We have over $16 billion in deposits, about $7.5 billion in loans. $10 billion-plus in wealth client assets.

And so -- and the nice thing is it's growing very nicely, and it's growing at a very good ROE. So we're making over 25% ROE on the business. So anyway, those are the things at our -- we're a good size. So we like to say we're big enough to matter, but small enough to care. We can go toe to toe with the big guys in certain spaces, but we can't spread across the waterfront. So we have to really focus on those areas where we have a right to win.

A lot in there. I'd love to unpack that a little bit, maybe delve more into each one of those 3 legs of the stool. I guess maybe just following up on the Private Bank. Now it's 10% of pretax income, up from a very little number not that long ago?

Just broke even for the first time in the third quarter of '25, right, '24. And so then we said it would be 5% accretive last year, it was 7%. It's already 10% in the first quarter.

I guess maybe just looking further out, it's on a nice trajectory. How much more hiring do you plan on doing? How big do you think this could get?

Yes. Well, right now, we're calling kind of medium term that we get into the mid-teens. And so we still see very strong growth. We've kind of started out with 6 major markets. Boston, New York, Florida and then Northern California, a concentration, 3 big teams in Northern California. We've since moved into SoCal. So we have L.A. presence, San Diego, Orange County.

And we're continuing to reinvest and bring in complementary people like private wealth teams. We're doing a bunch of lift-outs so we can have the bankers situated in a co-location format with these wealth managers. And then the other thing that we're doing is we're opening up PBOs, private bank locations at kind of ground level retail, which has great billboard value, but it also is good for brand visibility in general and ability to provide services to customers.

So I would say California is running fast. That was the epicenter for First Republic. So we've got a significant set of new PBOs and talent there. The next market that I want to keep building out is Florida. So we have a flag planted in Palm Beach, which is a really critical market. We're opening this month in West Palm Beach, which sounds like what's the difference between Palm Beach and West Palm Beach, but they're actually different markets.

And so we want to thicken in Florida, doing it in a controlled way, but there's other cities we want to get to in Florida. And then just kind of continuing to leverage the opportunities in core markets like New York and Boston. We're going to open a PBO in Greenwich. We're looking at converting one of our high-end retail branches in the Boston suburb to a PBO. And then we're looking at Philly eventually is another market, where we could see a lot of opportunity.

Sounds good. I guess on the commercial side, you mentioned private capital, a space you've been in for a while, but now is all of a sudden receiving a lot of attention. Clearly, there's some concerns in the marketplace around certain segments. Just maybe talk about what you're seeing there? And can that continue to be a driver of growth?

Sure. So again, I think we're very well positioned with the private equity side of private capital. And there hasn't been the kind of velocity of exits and investing over the last 3 or 4 years that we would have expected to see. We started to see that logjam break a little bit in the second half of last year. And we have the war and some uncertainty. But I still think there's pent-up demand there and pipelines are looking pretty good.

And so I feel good about how we're positioned there. A lot of those firms broadened out to be more considered like asset managers or alt managers. And so since we had an in on the private equity side as they opened up their private credit arms, we were there to help facilitate the build-out and the growth and do it with the kind of clients that we know really well. And we kind of aren't taking marginal opportunities. We're staying with the riding the horses that we already know very well, which is important in banking.

So I think the distribution of what we have in terms of private credit looks fine. Most of it is investment-grade lending. It's very well structured. We have people with deep expertise. And so I know there's noise around it and the funds that took exposure to retail investors that now have these semi-liquid products and people heading for the exits. There's some challenges to work through there, and there's -- maybe some funds went a little long on software industry paper. But when we look about the portfolio that we have, the discipline that we have, I don't feel there's credit issues there.

And I think it's sometimes good when a segment of the market grows really rapidly to have a bit of a challenge period or a little stumble forces you to go back and rethink the business model and tighten things up a little bit. So I think private credit is here to stay, but I think it will go through a kind of consolidation phase for a little while.

Makes sense. And then on the consumer side, you highlighted New York City Metro expansion. In the recent earnings call, you made a comment that caught my attention. Basically you said you're in the process of analyzing existing branch footprint for net new investments and optimization within New York City. Can you maybe talk to what you kind of meant by that and what we can expect?

Yes. So what I mentioned a moment ago that like having strong retail deposit funding is very important. You're seeing different regionals in the U.S. go about that in different ways. Some are deciding to open branches in other geographies than their natural core geography or they're doing acquisitions to try to go to those other regions with a jump start.

I sit down with our team and we say, actually, we have very good brand recognition inside our footprint, and we should think about optimizing the network to get more growth from it because when you go out of region, you have to elevate your top-of-funnel brand image. People don't know who you are. And so you're spending a lot of money on those marketing dollars. If we do a better job of kind of assessing market by market, do we have to optimize branch footprint.

For example, we used to have a high percentage like maybe 30% of our branches were in-store with supermarket branches. And we've been whittling that down over time. That's become kind of less effective as a way to grow and capture that deposit share. So should we look and tighten up those relationships even further and then open more de novos. We're doing that in certain markets already in the footprint to good results.

So that's what we're looking at. And I just wanted to mention that I do think since we're doing so well in New York, that was kind of proof of concept. Could we go in there and challenge all the big competitors there and gain market share and be effective. And I think the answer we got is yes, that's happening. So you then start to think, well, how much more branch presence do we need and kind of where would it be? Would it be right in the center of New York City or would it be in outer boroughs? Would it be in Long Island or New Jersey?

And so we're just going through that work, thinking that through. Obviously, we have -- we're already investing a lot in the private bank, and we have to kind of maintain expense discipline. So I think this plays out over time. But I do -- I would love to see an acceleration of our deposit growth in retail. That's really valuable. And part of that isn't just the configuration of the branches, it's investing in the people.

So do you put another 2 people in a branch that has a lot of potential, but you're underpunching your weight in small business or you're not getting enough wealth cross-sell. And so part of the analysis is looking at the staffing models to try to optimize and squeeze more out of the footprint.

Makes sense. One area I had questions about is what you've, I guess, termined or Reimagine the Bank kind of AI initiative, you talked about $450 million of P&L benefit. by 2028. Just maybe delve into kind of what you're doing there, any early wins and just how we see that playing out?

Sure. So some of you may not know our story, but I think we got quite good since the IPO of having an annual top program. It's called tapping our potential, where we tried to figure out ways to deploy some new approaches to how we're running the bank and serving customers, and some of that was technology oriented. Some of it was organizational redesign or kind of consolidation of vendors and things like that. So we were typically getting about $100 million a year of benefit from these programs.

When we got to the middle of the year and we were looking at 2026 and beyond, it really became apparent that we needed something more than just a top program that had some quick wins to it that we needed to take advantage of some of all of the technology innovation that we're seeing and lever these tools and step back and look at everything the bank does.

How do we onboard a new customer? How do we service a complaint or handle a fraud matter on someone's card, lay that out the way it happens today and then reimagine the future, go 3 years out and say if I had a whiteboard and I could create human bot forces or I could change my technology around to make it a much better customer experience, have less human interaction, more self-service, et cetera, how would I do that?

So we took probably 25 people offline in the summer, and we mapped out all those processes and basically constructed a program that has kind of 11 major building blocks, and it has about 50 initiatives in it. And we've mapped that out, and we have owners for that. And some of this because it involves reconfiguring your technology and introducing these new tools, it takes longer than what a typical top payback program would look like. That's why it's a 3-year program.

What we didn't want to do was kind of -- I think the market might have been a little nervous that we would incur all this onetime cost to get the program off the ground. And so we've front-loaded some of the 2026 initiatives that will have quicker paybacks, things like vendor reconfiguration and consolidation. We have a bunch of that. We have some scattered offices that opened up during COVID that we're going to kind of refocus and consolidate.

So there's a number of things in the short run that will get us, I think, to about $100 million run rate by the end of the year. But keeping those bigger initiatives on track. There's things like the call center investments that we have is introducing more AI and more bots into the call center, that should already make a lot of progress this year and starting to be paying some dividends by late in the year.

I guess maybe before we kind of shift gears to the financials because you know I'm going to do that. Despite kind of geopolitical tensions, uncertainty in the macro, results have actually been pretty solid, particularly in the first quarter, which is seasonally soft. Maybe just talk to kind of what you're hearing and seeing from your customers?

Yes. It's kind of surprising that you look at the headlines and all the worry beats that people have. They had the kind of noise around tariffs and I have a war going on. It really hasn't weakened the economy to a material degree. So I think we're still -- we thought coming into the year, we'd had 2% to 2.5% GDP growth in the U.S.

I think we might head a little to the lower side of that,0 but still be in the range. We'll see how long the higher energy prices last and if that has a further impact. But consumers generally are still getting on with their lives and spending money. There's kind of a 2-tiered economy, where the more well-off people are benefiting from still strong stock markets, strong housing values and not even batting an eye what they're seeing in the headlines.

And then I'd say the folks that are less fortunate are still catching up to the inflation that we had. So their kind of real wages took a dip. And now salary increases are catching up, but they're not all the way caught up. So I think they're being a little more cautious still at this point. But we look at the credit stats on the consumer even in that kind of lower-end customer, and they look okay. We don't see increases in delinquencies and things at this point.

So just probably a little more discipline and cautioned. And then when I look at the corporate book, we've had, I think, very clean performance. Most of our companies got -- they basically had to do 2 things. They've had to be resilient and adaptable given everything that's happened over the last 5 years. So they got through COVID. They got through the high inflation and high rates. They got through liberation Day.

And basically, they're good at kind of scenario analysis and trying to figure out if this happens and kind of what am I going to do? So they're still investing. They still want to grow their businesses. They're still kind of maybe one foot on the brake and one foot on the gas. But anyway, it still feels good, and we have no credit issues there either really on the corporate side.

And CRE feels like the office sector that basically suffered the most from the pandemic, those problem credits across the industry and for us are being worked out and multifamily has stayed strong. And you're seeing in some markets like New York City, new construction for office is in high demand. They're getting record rents. So I think there, again, we're going to be very cautious in kind of what we do in CRE. I'd rather be growing the C&I book and growing some quality private bank and consumer assets. But I feel from a credit standpoint, we like where we're at on CRE.

I guess maybe following up, I guess, just thinking -- obviously, you talked about asset quality being very stable. I guess any areas, 1 or 2 or 3 that you're maybe paying particular attention to?

Nothing really pops up, Jason.

All right. And then you kind of touched on loan growth. We've actually seen 4 consecutive quarters of sequential growth. Maybe just talk to kind of what have been the drivers there and kind of as we look out to the end of the year, loan growth...

Sure. So one of the idiosyncratic drivers that's unique to us is the private bank. And so as the private bankers bring on businesses -- business and previous relationships and they start lending money, that's just kind of market share gains for us that is kind of separate from what's going on in our traditional consumer growth and our traditional commercial growth.

So we have that kind of driver that I think should generate maybe $1 billion a quarter of loan growth, which is very positive. And then we're seeing good healthy demand on the corporate side. So C&I and then NDFI, another one of the latest kind of handwringing phrases that we feel very, very good about. But there's opportunities there to either see corporates getting a little more aggressive, pulling down their lines a little bit.

I think there'll be more new money deal flow as the M&A cycle heats up once we get through this war uncertainty. And that will also benefit on kind of subscription lines, more line utilization. So I feel quite confident that we're going to get very good commercial growth this year. And then in consumer, we have kind of 2 very Steady Eddies. One is mortgage that we're continuing to grow in mortgage and then HELOCs, like we are the biggest HELOC originator last year in 2025 in the whole U.S. for a bank our size. We only originate in 14 states. We originated more than any other bank, including the mega banks.

So we've kind of mastered the art of making a complex process to originate and close one of these HELOCs, a very powerful positive experience for the customer. So something that usually takes 45 days and has a lot of document gathering. We have that down to like 14 to 20 days. And as a result, people refer their friends, if you want to get a home equity line of credit, go to Citizens Bank, they do a great job.

So anyway so we have growth there. We'd like to see a little pickup in card growth. But anyway, what's nice is that all 3 of those segments are contributing to the growth. And for the last 3 years, as we were running down noncore our indirect auto book, that was masking the underlying book, but that's small enough now that the drag of what's left to run down in noncore is not offsetting the combined growth in the other 3 segments.

Got it. And maybe just shift gears to the other side of the balance sheet. I guess deposit trends for the industry is kind of mixed in the first quarter. Maybe just talk to as the environment where loan growth is getting better, the Fed is probably on hold, just your outlook for both deposits and kind of what happens to deposit pricing?

Yes. So there, again, a little frog here, sorry. There, again, the -- having the unique private bank that's growing rapidly, the impact from the Private Bank is very positive to our deposit funding. So as I said, $16 billion that we have delivered, we've only had the thing up for maybe 10 quarters. And so -- and the composition of that is very attractive. So about 1/3 of that is noninterest-bearing, which is accretive to our overall noninterest-bearing mix.

So again, that's an idiosyncratic driver for Citizens to see that nice consistent deposit growth coming in from the Private Bank. And then I'd say in consumer, we're still expecting to see growth overall as New York is contributing to the growth. And then in commercial, we have some initiatives like expansion into middle market in California and Florida. And so that's contributing to some of our deposit growth on the commercial side.

So I think realistically, if the Fed holds for the rest of the year, the ability to drive down your deposit cost is not going to be as high as you thought coming into the year. But there's also the flip side of that is then the yield compression on the loans will be less, and we're slightly asset sensitive. So anyway, I think I feel really, really good about the NIM trajectory that we laid out and our ability to achieve that and deliver that.

I guess on that NIM trajectory, it's probably one of the more or the higher rate of expansions among peers. Part of that is kind of some of these hedges are the drag of hedges rolling off. I guess just how confident are you in the outlook? And obviously, the interest rate environment has been somewhat fluid. Are there any kind of backdrops that kind of make you more nervous?

Well, a high percentage of the NIM expansion is, we like to call it time-based benefits. So when we tore up the swaps, we saw rates were going higher a few years back, you [ cauterize ] your loss, but then you have to, from an accounting standpoint, amortize that loss over the remaining life of the swap. So we don't even have to get out of bed and a certain amount of that is going to drop off every quarter. So we've, I think, shown that very transparently. So that's a positive.

And then the noncore, when we got the cash in from selling a noncore asset, we were paying off our higher cost funding. A lot of that's already flowed in, but there's still a little more for that as well. So -- so you have that underpinning of time-based benefits that's really powerful. And then the rest comes down to how we're growing our balance sheet, how we're managing deposits, keeping the mix consistent, et cetera, which we feel good about. We feel good about our ability to deliver that.

I guess maybe shifting to the fee income side. I guess kind of down sequentially in the first quarter as capital markets revenues came down, albeit still a high level.

Record first quarter.

Record for a first quarter. Just maybe talk to maybe just the outlook for the key drivers, let me start with cap markets, just given your success there.

I feel really, really positive about the capital markets outlook for the year. So the folks who lead that business, say pipelines are excellent and conversations are really strong and consistent. And so people may pull back on timing a little bit based on some of the external events, but there's a confidence that things will get done over the course of the year. So we feel good.

And as I mentioned, I think we're the best positioned super regional commercial bank to benefit on the capital markets line. As activity levels pick up, I think the power of what we've built will manifest itself more and we'll start to gap maybe versus some of our peers in terms of the revenue capture there.

And in wealth, we've been putting record quarter after record quarter for probably the last 6 or 7 quarters. So I think we've found a way to unlock the cross-sell opportunity in the branches, which has taken years to get the right people and the right approach in place and have the data to go after the best opportunities. And now that's been really nice to see that we're getting consistent growth and improving the penetration of the deposit customers who also have wealth accounts and consider us their wealth adviser, not just their bank.

And then these lift-outs on the private wealth side, they bring teams that have assets and then we can feed the growth from referrals coming in from the private bank and the corporate bank. And we're really staying at the tippy top end of quality. We want to make sure that we really have great people. They do -- they fit our culture and they work well with other people around the bank. And so far, we're very pleased with what we've been able to attract.

And I guess maybe on the expense side, I think 4.5%-ish growth last year, targeting 4.5% growth this year. Is that how to think about the company longer term and just how you're weighing that?

I mean, I know the market likes stories where I'm grinding down on my expenses and I'm keeping it to 2%, and I can get 4% revenue growth. You, I think, have pointed this out in your research, like a bank that had 8% revenue growth and 6% expense growth is going to have far more positive operating leverage. Just the way the math works.

So we're not going crazy. Don't think I just was opening the door to a 6% expense growth. But I think at 4.5%, we basically are running the core bank at 3%. And then the investing that we're doing in the Private Bank adds another 1.5% to 2% to that 2.5% to 3% for the core bank. So we're still maintaining that discipline in the core bank and looking for efficiencies.

And these numbers are before any benefits from RTB. So anyway, but when the growth opportunity is there to invest in, when you can really invest in the private bank and capture that white space that [ void ] that First Republic left, when you can have -- we have people beating on our doors to get on to the capital markets platform, when you can select really good people and keep building out that business, you got to go for it.

And then the technology needs that we have to -- so we're the first super regional bank to migrate all of our infrastructure to the cloud. And now we have things in Reimagine the Bank around deploying AI, deploying agents. There's a lot of things to spend money on, and you have to stay disciplined to try to find ways to self-fund that. And I think we've demonstrated over the years that we're pretty good at that.

The only other thing I'd say there, too, is like if you look at Street estimates for our revenue growth this year, it's like 10%. So you grow your expenses 4.5%, your revenue growth is 10%, 550 basis points positive operating leverage. There's no wonder that the consensus EPS estimates for up or up 30% for the year.

So anyway, I think having a guardrail that forces us to set priorities and pace things out is good, but you could easily spend more. And I think it would probably be productive spend. But anyway, we're going to keep kind of for now at that limit.

Makes sense. I guess maybe on capital reform, the revised standardized approach is a 10% reduction in RWA. The new [ BAA ] model is maybe even more than that. Your SCB should certainly come down next year. So maybe just talk about how you're thinking about capital deployment and kind of overall capital targets?

Yes. So the regulatory reforms are very positive. They're more accurate and they'll, I think, drive bank participation in different asset categories that maybe were held back a little bit by the blunt kind of weight of how the risk rates were assigned before. So I think it's a good thing for the banking industry. I think it's a good thing for the economy.

We said that if we look at the proposal that we gained maybe 110 basis points of RWA relief. And then if you have the AOCI, if you took that off today, that's about 110 basis point drag. So you're kind of net neutral. But if you go out, if it's phased in over 5 years, a lot of that AOCI is burning off because those securities are maturing, the swaps are maturing. So you probably end up with still a 30 to 50 basis point net after the AOCI impacts.

So that's something to think about what to do with that. And I think a smart person on the analyst call said, do you think you have kind of the same risk on your balance sheet, what will the rating agencies look at? And will the TCE to TA ratio come back into vogue even though it's not a regulatory ratio.

So there's a lot of things to play out on that, but you're in a position of strength because now you have a higher CET1 ratio coming down the pike. Our SCB has been a frustratingly high number, which has no basis and accurate methodology. But I think that's going to change. I think we're very hopeful that we go through this round. And even if they don't change the SCB by the way they set it up this year, everybody will see that the SCB is a lot lower, and it's more back in line with peers. So that's another positive.

So anyway, I -- we'll wait and see. I like to run with a little bit of a conservative mindset around our capital position. I think the strong banks operate that way. And then when you get into choppy waters, you can be opportunistic just like we had a chance to bid on Silicon Valley and on First Republic because people knew we had strong balance sheet positioning, strong funding, strong capital, et cetera, et cetera. So we'll kind of work that all through, Jason, but it's a good problem to have. It's a good situation to be in.

All right. We got 2 minutes left -- 4 minutes left in 2 questions.

So these are the same [indiscernible].

So first obviously, you got to cover M&A. There's a window here that banks seem to be able to consolidate. Maybe just talk to your thoughts on scaling the industry, Citizens -- thoughts on Citizens expanding further through acquisition, both on the banking side and then maybe on the nonbank side?

Yes. I've been pretty consistent that with the amount of organic growth that we have and the initiatives that we have in motion that the bank M&A right now is a lower priority. It's not something that we're actively focused on because in effect, we did our M&A was the start-up of the Private Bank. And you look at 10% accretion to your bottom line within 2.5 years. You can't really find a deal that delivers that, and you'd have to spend a huge amount of capital to deliver that.

So we found a capital-light way to get into a new business and have huge benefit to the bottom line. And making sure that, that is sustainable and maturing on the right trajectory has to be our highest priority. And then RTB is also another initiative that is capital light. You take some onetime costs. But if you can deliver $450 million improvement to PPNR, that's also really, really big.

So making sure that gets off the ground and we manage that and execute that well is important. So I'm less concerned about scale. If you -- some of the folks in our peer group are buying banks at $30 billion to $75 billion. I don't think that game changes your scale a whole lot. You got to do what I said in the beginning is build out your business strategy and focus on areas where you have a right to win and you have real strength and distinctiveness, and that's what we're doing.

Makes sense. And maybe just bringing it all together, you talked about getting the 16% to 18% ROTCE target by the end of next year, kind of everything you said so far feels like you're on track. But when you made that target, ROTCE wasn't something you had talked about. We didn't know about this Basel III Endgame reduction in risk-weighted assets. I guess how should we still think about -- is that still the right way...

I remember when we did the IPO, and people made me promise that I could get to 10% within 3 years when we were starting at 5%. And then when we got to 9%, people were saying, well, you should raise it. I said, I'm not even there yet, but let me get there first. So that's my mindset now is don't keep stretching, don't overpromise, just kind of get the returns into that level and then make sure that it's something that we think is pretty sustainable. And when markets go through inevitable cycles, we want to have much lower tail risk.

I think we have that the way we have more diversification in our revenue streams, and we have tightened up our lending criteria to have kind of, I think, a much better -- it was always good, but I think it's much better now in terms of our credit risk profile. So anyway, I think we can deliver that, manage to deliver returns, and then we'll see how much growth we want to achieve. Any growth should be accretive to that if we can continue to grow the Private Bank and continue to execute on our strategy. I do think down the road, there could be upside to the 16% to 18% for sure.

Perfect. That's a good place to leave it. Please join me in thanking Bruce for his time today.

[indiscernible] everyone, and welcome to the Citizens Financial Group First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Ivy and I will be your operator today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this event is being recorded. Now I will turn the call over to Kristin Silberberg, Head of Investor Relations. Kristin, you may begin.

Thanks, Ivy. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. First, this morning, our Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun; and CFO, Aunoy Banerjee, will provide an overview of our first quarter results. Brendan Coughlin, President; and Ted Swimmer, Head of Commercial Banking, are also here to provide additional color.

We will be referencing our first quarter presentation located on our Investor Relations website. After the presentation, we will be happy to take questions. Our comments today will include forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to differ materially from expectations. These are outlined for your review in the presentation. We also reference non-GAAP financial measures, so it's important to review our GAAP results in the presentation and the reconciliations in the appendix.

And with that, I will hand it over to Bruce.

Okay. Thanks, Kristin, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call today. We're pleased to start the year off strong, notwithstanding geopolitical tensions and uncertainty in the macro environment. We delivered good financial performance in a seasonally soft quarter with year-over-year EPS growth of 47%, positive operating leverage of 7% and NIM expansion of 24 basis points.

Our balance sheet position continues to be robust with CET1 at 10.5% and our allowance for loan losses at 1.52%. Credit trends continue to be favorable across our portfolios, and we continue our loan mix shift towards deeper relationships with lower credit risk. Execution on our strategic initiatives continues to track well. The Private Bank and Wealth business showed further growth in customers, balance sheet and profitability, now accounting for roughly 10% of our pretax income while delivering an ROE in excess of 25%.

During the quarter, we opened 3 more PBOs, bringing the total to 9. Reimagine the bank is off to a solid start, and we reaffirm our $450 million P&L target by the end of 2028. We estimate about $100 million in 2026 exit run rate benefits at this point. Our positioning with private capital continues to be excellent.

We anticipate a strong year for private equity sponsor activity, which should provide a balance sheet and fee opportunities for us. We've reviewed all of our lending to private credit vehicles at a granular level and we feel good about our credit exposure. The New York City Metro initiative also continues to show further progress. We are growing across retail, small business and middle market. We are in the process of analyzing Citizens' existing branch footprint for net new investment and optimization with New York City likely to see growth in branches in coming years. We should have more details to share with you on this midyear.

We're also focused on an initiative we call One Citizens, which is systematically finding ways to work across the enterprise to deliver valuable solutions to our customers. Now that we have stood up the private bank and continued the build-out of our corporate bank, we have the capacity to provide both personal and corporate services to successful business owners investors and entrepreneurs. We will report more on this as the year progresses, but we're already gaining real traction.

As we look ahead to the second quarter and the full year, we remain cautiously optimistic that we'll be able to navigate through external challenges and still deliver the strong results we projected coming into this year. So far, markets have behaved rationally despite the war with equity markets holding in and credit spreads only slightly wider. We intend to stay on our investment plan for the year unless the macro takes a meaningful turn for the worst.

We're pleased with the regulatory changes we see coming from Washington, D.C., and we look forward to the upcoming CCAR stress test results, which we're hopeful will give a more accurate result for citizens than what we've seen in the past. So to sum up, a good start, well positioned with a great strategy and a great team and optimistic for a strong 2026.

With that, I'll turn it over to Aunoy for the financial details. Aunoy?

Thanks, Bruce. Good morning, everyone. As Bruce mentioned, Citizens has started the year well. Referencing Slides 3 and 4, we delivered EPS of $1.13 for the first quarter with ROTCE of 12.2%. Results were paced by strong NII, reflecting both continued net interest margin expansion and solid loan growth. We also deferred our best-ever first quarter fee result, led by strong performance in our commercial bank. With solid revenue performance and expense discipline drove more than 700 basis points of positive operating leverage year-over-year notwithstanding continued investment in the private bank and our other strategic priorities, along with ramping up our [indiscernible] bank program. The Private Bank continued to grow its profitability, contributing $0.11 to EPS, up from $0.10 in the prior quarter as the business delivered another very strong quarter of deposit growth.

Now let me walk through the first quarter results in more detail, starting with net interest income on Slide 5. Net interest income was up 1.6% linked quarter, driven by the benefit of an expanded net interest margin and higher interest-earning assets, including strong loan growth which more than offset the day count impact of about $22 million.

As you see from the NIM back at the bottom of the slide, our margin improved 7 basis points to 3.14%, driven primarily by the benefits of the reduced drag from terminated swaps and noncore runoff with a 5 basis point of combined impact. The fixed rate asset repricing benefit of 1 basis point. And lastly, the net impact of 1 basis point related to improved funding cost and mix, largely offset by lower acetyls.

We continue to do a good job optimizing deposits in a competitive environment. Our interest-bearing deposit costs were down 16 basis points and total deposit costs were down 12 basis points. The cumulative interest-bearing deposit beta improved to 50% as we benefited from the repricing after the last rate cut. Even with the Fed now expected to hold steady in '26, we are still projecting a high 40s beta for the cycle.

Moving to Slide 6. Noninterest income is up 11% year-over-year but down 2% linked quarter. As I mentioned, this was our strongest first quarter fee result ever, notwithstanding heightened geopolitical tensions and an increase in market volatility. Capital markets performance demonstrated the strength and diversity of the franchise with fees up 34% year-over-year and down 4% compared with the strong fourth quarter.

M&A delivered a good result in the quarter with our pipeline is strong and continues to build. Bond underwriting was up nicely from the prior quarter. Our equity underwriting performance was stable linked quarter and up significantly year-over-year. Loan syndications were lower given the market volatility. We continue to maintain strong market share ranking fourth in the middle market sponsors book runner deals by volume. This is for both the first quarter and over the last 12 months.

Our deal pipelines across M&A, debt and equity capital markets continue to build notwithstanding the unsettled environment. Our Global Markets business was up $10 million linked quarter with increased client hedging activity in interest rate products and energy-related commodities. Our wealth business continues to build with progress in the private bank and strength in our retail network. Wealth fees are up 2% linked quarter and 23% year-over-year. These results reflect higher advisory fees with continued positive momentum in fee-based AUM growth year-over-year.

The fourth quarter results reflect positive net inflows partially offset by market impacts on AUM. Mortgage was down 19% linked quarter given a lower MSR valuation, partially offset by slightly higher production and servicing fees.

On Slide 7, Expenses were managed tightly, up 2.6% linked quarter, largely reflecting the usual seasonality in salaries and benefits as well as about $6 million of implementation costs to ramp up the reimagined the bank program.

On Slide 8, average and period-end loans were up 1% linked quarter. We saw solid loan growth across each of the businesses. Commercial loans, excluding the private bank, were up 1% on a spot basis. This was driven by net new money originations at higher commercial line utilization. This was partially offset by CRE paydowns. We continue to reduce commercial banking CRE balances, which were down about 4% this quarter and 16% year-over-year.

The Private Bank delivered good loan growth again this quarter with period-end lows up about $600 million, driven by growth in multifamily and residential mortgage. Growth in retail loans ex noncore on a spot basis was about $300 million, led by real estate secured categories. This was offset by noncore auto portfolio run-up of roughly $500 million for the quarter.

Next, on Slides 9 and 10, we continue to do a good job on deposits. with average deposits up 1% or $1.5 billion quarter-on-quarter, primarily driven by the growth in the Private Bank, which reached $16.6 billion at the end of the quarter. This was partially offset by seasonal impacts in commercial. Year-over-year, average balances are up $8.6 billion or 5%, reflecting combined growth in the private bank and commercial of $11.2 billion, partially offset by roughly $2 billion of reduction in higher-cost treasury brokered deposits. On a spot basis, noninterest-bearing balances are up $1.3 billion or 3% quarter-on-quarter and up $4.1 billion or 11% year-over-year, improving the overall mix to 23% of the book. Our total noninterest-bearing and low-cost deposit mix was steady at 43%, and our consumer deposits are 64% of our total deposits. This compares to a peer average of about 56%.

Moving to Slide 11. Credit continues to trend favorably with net charge-offs coming in at 39 basis points, down from 43 basis points in the prior quarter. Nonaccrual loans are down modestly linked quarter, reflecting a decrease in commercial, largely driven by C&I, which was partially offset by an increase in market.

Turning to Slide 12. The allowance was essentially stable this quarter with ACL coverage ratios of 1.52%. This reflects the continued improvement in our portfolio mix with noncore runoff, the reduction in CRE and strong originations of lower loss content C&I, residential real estate secured and private loans. The economic forecast supporting the allowance contemplates a mild recession with a slight deterioration compared with the last quarter, reflecting the potential impact of higher energy prices. As we look broadly across the portfolio, the credit outlook remains positive though we continue to carefully monitor the macroeconomic environment.

Moving to Slide 13. We maintained excellent balance sheet strength, ending the quarter with CET1 at 10.5%. We returned about $500 million to shareholders in the first quarter with $198 million in common dividends and $300 million of share repurchases.

Moving to Slide 14. The private bank continues to make excellent progress. The Private Bank delivered strong deposit growth again, ending the quarter at $16.6 billion. Importantly, the overall deposit mix and cost continues to be very attractive. We also delivered solid loan growth in the quarter, adding about $600 million of loan at a healthy spread of 4% over deposit costs to end the quarter at $7.7 billion of loans.

We ended the quarter with $10.1 billion of total client assets with modest net inflows partially offset by market impacts. We have more runway here as we plan to continue adding top quality teams in key geographies. We opened offices in Malmo Park and Laurel Village in the first quarter, and we expect to open at least 2 more offices this year in Weston Beach, Florida and Greenwich, Connecticut.

Moving to Slide 15. Our reimagined the bank program is off to a great start. The objective is to position Citizens for long-term success by embracing a host of new innovative technologies across the bank and simplifying our business model. which will reshape our customer experience and drive a meaningful improvement in productivity and efficiency. The program is well underway with work commencing on several key work streams.

For example, on the technology front, we are leveraging AI to assist in writing code and expect to have material productivity improvements in software development, cutting down cycle times. We are also using AI to improve our interactions with customers, which we expect will materially cut call volumes and improve the overall customer experience. We expect to exist 2026 with an annualized run rate of about $100 million of pretax benefit.

Now moving to Slide 16. We provide our outlook for the second quarter. We expect net interest income to be up in the range of 3% to 4%, driven by continued expansion in net interest margin and earning asset growth. Noninterest income is expected to be up 3% to 5%, led by capital markets with some risk if market volatility moves higher. Other fee categories such as FX and derivatives, wealth and card should also provide lift for the quarter.

We are projecting expenses to be stable to up 1% and incorporating a step-up in implementation costs associated with reimagine the Bank and continued investment in other key business initiatives. We expect expense saves from reimagine the bank to benefit second half expenses. The charge-off level is expected to be stable to down slightly. And we should end the second quarter with CET1 in the range of 10.5% to 10.6%, including share repurchases of about $225 million.

In addition, our full year outlook remains broadly in line with the guide we provided in January, which contemplated a pickup in business activity over the course of the year. Looking out further, we see a clear path to achieving our 16% to 18% ROTCE target by the end of pending our net interest margin is an important driver, and we continue to project NIM to be in the range of [ 322% to 328% ] in 4Q '26. And in the range of [ 330% to 350% ] in 4Q '27.

Slide 17 provides incremental details on our net interest margin progression to the end of '27. This combined with the impact of successful execution of our strategic initiatives and normalizing credit should drive ROI to our target range. To wrap up, we're off to a good start to with results highlighted by strong growth, net interest income and good fee results in a seasonally soft quarter.

Our balance sheet is strong and continue to drive forward our strategic initiatives with strong momentum in growing the private bank and in our reimagine the bank program. With that, I will hand it back over to Bruce.

Okay. Thank you, Aunoy. Operator, let's open it up for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Scott Siefers from Piper Sandler.

Maybe I was hoping you could maybe start by speaking to kind of the capital markets dynamics. Obviously, I see the numbers in the first quarter, but curious how you thought the first quarter actually performed given that you had sort of the interplay between one, the environment played out a lot differently than we all figured it might. But two, I know you all had some deals that were pushed from the fourth quarter into the first quarter. So maybe just sort of results versus expectations then if you could speak to the forward look, things like pipelines, confidence and pull-through, et cetera.

Yes. Scott, let me -- it's Bruce. I'll take it first and then hand over to Ted to provide more color. But I would say all things considered. We're pleased with the performance of the capital markets franchise in an environment that had increased volatility and lots of uncertainty, particularly in March once the war kicked in. But we have good diversification across our different services in capital markets. So we have M&A, we have bond underwriting, equity underwriting and syndicated loans. I think that diversity helped us print a good quarter. There was some leakage, I would say, from March that's geared up to go in April, which now that we have more optimistic tone to the market. We're actually starting to see that come through. So we may be in a situation where our pipelines are very well. We're very optimistic given kind of the strength of the franchise the likelihood that people want to transact. But if there's this external volatility ebbs and flows, you could see people pull to the sidelines, wait for the opportune time, for example, to go to market. And hopefully that cleans up. We're certainly not taking our numbers down for the year. In fact, we feel quite good about that given the level of activity that we see and the pipeline strength that we have. So Ted, over to you.

Building on what Bruce just said, we've seen -- we took a couple of transactions in March that we would have launched into the market and pushed them into April, just given the volatility in the overall markets. But during that whole period of time, we continue to sign up new transactions. And I think what's really exciting about the transactions that we're signing up based on the investments we made in Corporate Finance and industry specialization we now are doing more complex transactions and getting signed up on more complex transactions than we ever had before and feel very good about what that pipe -- what those transactions are and how the pipeline is building. And to more to what Bruce just said, the deals that got postponed in March, especially this week, we've seen them back into the market. We are launching several transactions and part of several transactions that were postponed in March that are getting very good [indiscernible] now in April. So we continue to feel very optimistic about the pipeline, especially on the M&A side. And during this whole period of turmoil, we really actually saw a pickup in new mandates, especially on the M&A side of the business.

Yes. And I'd just close by saying it was a record first quarter for us in capital markets fees, that shouldn't go unnoted.

Okay. Perfect. That's very helpful. And then I was hoping you all would maybe speak to the private credit portfolio as well. I know there's a lot of good detail in the appendix. Just curious sort of not only for an update on credit quality dynamics, but also given your build-out of the team over many years, I know it's been a focus area and just sort of your appetite to continue to grow the portfolio given sort of certain current sort of industry circumstances?

Yes, I'll start again and flip to Ted. But I would say we've been very disciplined in terms of the kind of counterparties that we select usually they're often a private equity sponsor that's migrated to a broader kind of business model that picks up private credit, and they're moving to be more of an alternative asset manager. And so we've helped them grow and get into this business and provide leverage to many of those names. So client selection is always key and then making sure we have the right structures in place so that we're structurally protected from any issues that could arise in the portfolios. And so we've gone through and looked at kind of our exposure and kind of the broad portfolio, looking at all the underlying factors who has liquidity gates for retail investors who's got software exposure at the end of the day, feel very, very confident that we're structurally well protected from a credit loss standpoint. And I think even though this is in the headlines and there's concerns about private credit, the asset class, if you want to call it that, is here to stay, and they provide a certain amount of leverage and deal structures that exceeds what banks have historically been willing to play, and there's certainly a lot of institutional demand folks or private credit managers are continuing to raise new money. So I think we'll just grow selectively with the market. as we have in the past, but we don't see this turning around and being something that starts to shrink. It's just going to grow. And I think every player in the market will be more selective, and we'll continue to be selective, but we would expect this to be an area that we stay committed to. Ted?

Just adding on to what Bruce said in a number of conversations we've had with private credit since this -- the noise has really started. We really haven't seen a decrease in appetite. In fact, in a lot of the conversations and the deals we're getting ready to launch. We're getting inbound calls from the private credit side of the business. So technology and software is certainly something that they're not all that interested in investing in right now. But for the most part, the majority of their portfolio, they're still very hungry and there's a lot of demand out there.

We'll go to the line of Manan Gosalia from Morgan Stanley.

Maybe to start on NII. I know you broadly reiterated the guide for the year, including the NII guide and the exit NIM. But you have noted that Citizens SKU is slightly asset sensitive. In a scenario where rates stay higher for longer, we don't get any rate cuts until the end of the year. Where do you think the NII and NIM is trending? And what's the most likely outcome here?

Yes. So we feel really good about our ability to deliver the kind of NII and the NIM that we gave in the beginning of the year guide. So -- but as you say, the environment is going to have an impact to some degree and a bit of a pause by the Fed. So a little higher rate scenario that we came into the year given asset sensitivity is modestly positive for us. And then a little slightly steeper yield curve, we had assumed 425 to 450 is the 10-year, and we're kind of in that zone. But -- to the extent there's -- that moves up and there's a little more steepening, that's also potentially positive to the outlook. But I wouldn't say it's a game changer. These are kind of marginal benefits that give us even more conviction that we can deliver to the numbers or slightly ahead of the numbers. With that, Aunoy, I'll turn it over to you if you want to add any color?

Yes. I think Manan, to Bruce's point, we are very confident on getting to the NIM and the NII outlook that we gave I think on the NIM side of it, as you saw from our walk in 1Q, a lot of the benefit is coming from the terminated swaps and the noncore runoffs, which is which is not rate dependent, and that's another 12 basis points for the rest of the year. The front bank -- bank book book dynamic as Bruce strategies would be helpful in this environment. So we remain confident on getting there. And as you saw, we have some good loan, but we have good correction and pipeline on that. So we feel confident of getting there.

Perfect. And then maybe to pivot over to capital given the new proposals that we got a few weeks ago, if you could give us your initial thoughts on what the magnitude of the benefit is for risk-weighted assets given your specific business mix? And maybe if you have any thoughts on whether citizens would adopt the ERPA.

Okay. Sure. So it's still early days, and we're going through a comment period. But based on what we see now, this could deliver kind of a 10%-ish reduction in risk-weighted assets, which would translate to in excess of 100 basis points, call it, 110 basis points or so of CET1 improvement. -- the AOCI phase-in, if it happened right today, it would basically mitigate that. But as it phases in over time, some of that drag will dissipate. And so we would expect to be kind of at least 30 basis points to the good net-net, even with AOCI, maybe as much as 50. So we'll just have to see how the rate curve plays out from here. But anyway, it's a good problem to have, and it's probably early days to say kind of what we'll plan to do with that. There'll be a lot of considerations what is stakeholders' expectations, the market, the rating agencies, the regulators, et cetera. But anyway, it's a good issue for us to think about. The other thing is on this ERBA. There's a modest improvement even over the revised standard approach but there's a lot of work that goes into that. So you'd have to step back and decide do you want to do it? One of the things that sticks out as a difference between the 2 approaches is kind of the lesser risk weights under [indiscernible] for investment-grade credit. And we'll have to see if that gets imported into the revised standard approach, so there's no difference or whether there is a difference that might pull you towards wanting to move over and do ERPA approach. So Aunoy, anything to add?

Yes. I think as Bruce said, Manan, we are going through all the advocacy on some of these things that Bruce mentioned. We are also looking at all the work that needs to be done on ERBA, which says versus standardized for what's there and now with a lot of new technology, things could be really different in some ways. So there's a lot to do here still. But we are -- as Bruce said, we are -- it's in the right direction, and we feel good about it.

We'll go to the line of Ryan Nash from Goldman Sachs.

So Bruce, you've had 4 straight quarters of sequential loan growth. If I look at the drivers of growth, clearly, private capital call, private credit have all been contributors. So maybe you could just talk about your confidence in loan growth here and what you see as the key drivers. And then second, I know you referenced higher utilization. What's driving that? I know you're expecting to see more of this.

Yes, I'd say that the really impressive thing, Ryan, is that we're getting the growth in each of the 3 main business areas. So private bank being kind of that start-up phase is growing their book nicely and consistently. And I think that leans a little bit more on the consumer side and multifamily side, that should continue. We had actually low line utilization with their client base, which should bounce back. And so we see private bank contributing. I think in commercial as well, we have the growth in NBFI, but also starting to see a little deal activity pick up across the corporate book, and we have our expansion [indiscernible] don't forget. So we brought banking teams into Florida and California and beefed up our New York Metro team. So that's contributing a bit. And then in the consumer bank, we've been kind of a rock star and HELOCs and also consistent growth in mortgage. So it's nice to see it's pretty broad-based. And then some of the drags of the things that we've had in the past, such as kind of the rundown of noncore, some of the commercial BSO thin relationship exits and things like that, the CRE kind of getting back to par where we want to be on commercial CRE after the investors acquisition all that is starting to abate a little bit, which allows the inherent growth to shine through. I think I'll ask maybe go to Brendan first for some color on Consumer and Private Bank. And then Ted, I'll ask you for some color on commercial.

Yes. Thanks, Bruce. Thanks, Ryan. Adding on Bruce, just give you a little more color and data on the retail side of the business. We're up about 4% year-on-year on core loans, heavily driven by HELOC and mortgage Bruce mentioned, you just got the league tables in from 2025. We're the #1 originator in the United States at home equity lending with an incredibly strong risk profile, low LTVs, strong FICO scores, all depository relationship customers. So we're very proud about that, and we expect that to continue. Mortgage originations in this rate environment has obviously been challenged, but prepay speeds slowed too. So we're seeing net positive growth in mortgage and the balance sheet rotating into higher relationship-based lending fueled by the private bank and the retail bank. With our launch of a new credit card products, we're seeing a 50%-plus growth in new credit card originations. It takes a little bit of time for that to translate into the balance sheet as pain activity gets through, but we should see some modest script in credit card as we hit the back half of the year, too. So broadly in retail, we expect the the growth rate that we're seeing to project forward with a lot of confidence and the mixing of the balance is to get strong with higher return and deeper relationships. The private banking side, we've generally been in the range of about $1 billion in net growth each quarter. We were a little bit lighter than that this quarter with some lower utilization rates on the private equity side. But we that to be temporal. And the underlying originations activity is quite strong. We're very confident we'll end the year in the range that we gave of $11 billion to $13 billion, which projects back to about that $1 billion in that growth per quarter returning in the private bank. So both retail and private banking, I would just broadly describe as continued steady momentum with what you've seen over the last few quarters. Ted?

Yes. Thanks, Brendan and Bruce. On the middle market side, we have seen a pickup in utilization over the last 3 months. I think customers are getting -- our customers are getting more comfortable in the economy and overall spending money on CapEx, which has led to a slight increase there on the mid-corporate -- adding on that, what we built out in Florida, New York and California, we're starting to see some real success there with increased loan demand and some increased customer count, which has resulted in higher growth there. On the mid-corporate side, we've reorganized the division a little bit to be more industry focused, less geographic focus. That has resulted in a nice pickup of new opportunities for us on the mid-corporate side of the business, and that was really [indiscernible] in the first quarter for us with significant growth there. NDFI continues to grow somewhere in the range of 5% a year. There's still good opportunities both on the capital call line, the securitization business and on the lending to the direct funds, and we expect that to continue to go around 5%. And then finally, we have really not seen much pickup in the private equity side of the business. The sponsor business has still been, I would say, flattish year-over-year. So most of our growth has been the traditional mid-corporate and middle market space.

Got it. And maybe just as my follow-up, Bruce. In the slides, you highlighted some of the things that you're doing with reimagine the bank, including corporate and the LLMs and a handful of things. I guess, given the pace of change we're seeing in the markets in areas like AI, are there opportunities to accelerate any of these initiatives or adjust the timing given, again, just the rapid pace of change that we're seeing?

Yes. I'll start and put it to Brendan who's sponsoring and leading that program. But I think that's a really good call out, Ryan, is that the adoption curve, the innovation curve that we're seeing in AI is really -- it's almost mind boggling. It's very significant. And so I think what we did when we set up the program was we took a very systematic approach to say like here's how we do things today, how would we like to do them in the future, embracing the technology as we have it today, recognizing though that over a 2- to 3-year time frame, there's going to be a lot more innovation and a lot of chance to embrace even better tools. And so maybe that creates a higher level of benefit, maybe that creates an acceleration and maybe it just creates new work streams that we haven't even thought or possible. So it's really a living, breathing program it's dynamic. It will incorporate. We'll have our telescope out looking at all the new things that are coming down the pike and figuring out how we can incorporate those in. But I'd say one thing to leave you with, though, is that we've been -- we've demonstrated over the years an ability to take innovation and take new approaches to how we're running the bank and put them into a program and deliver real financial benefits. So we won't create a lot of science fair projects and kind of use some of this new technology in ways that actually don't deliver real benefits. That's kind of our mindset as we go through this. So Brendan?

Yes. Thanks, Ryan. Your question is principally AI, but one point on the non-AI front, you saw from us in the quarter. the remain the bank initiative was principally self-funded by quick wins that were non-AI based. And so we've already got over $30 million in projected vendor saves for the year in the box with an expectation that, that number goes up. We've closed corporate facilities, smaller facilities that's driving savings. So that has offset the investment already. So you're seeing real tangible impact in the program already this early in the year. On the AI front, to say two things. One is, you're right to point out the risk of speed of execution also is the speed of obsolescence as we put these in place, the idea that the best answer could be different in a quarter is very much front of our mind. So we're architecting all the things that we're building to be even more nimble than you might expect from a tech standpoint in the past. So as new models come up, we can easily plug and play and make sure we're taking advantage of the latest and greatest. So that's very much front of our mind. We very much have real AI use cases in market today. in the call center, as an example, we've told you we expect to get 50% of the calls out by the end of the period. It's already in pilot. In fact, we expect inside of this calendar year, by the end of the year, we should have 25% of our calls answered by non-humans with the expectation that will ramp in 27% to 50%. That really should hit in the summer and into the early fall. So this is very real. This isn't a back-loaded program all coming in 2028. And the tech space, as an example, we've deployed [indiscernible] to our engineers. We're already seeing a very material productivity improvement and leverage we're getting on our capital investment and deployment ranging from 30% improvement in productivity that in some tests we've done, it's been a 5 to 10x improvement in productivity. So now we're working on scaling it and engineering it for real scale. So we are moving very, very fast. We're keeping up with the pace and it's live and in production and our confidence is building.

[indiscernible] UBS.

Just a few follow-up questions for me, please. So given everything that you've said about a record first quarter in cap markets and very full pipelines, picking up new mandates while some of these deals were pushed into closing in the second quarter or launching in the second quarter, it sounds like we should still subscribe to the 6% to 8% fee outlook growth for '26?

Yes. We're not coming off any of those ranges the full year guide at this point, Erika.

Perfect. And then my follow-up question is, thank you for the expansive answer on NIM and NII relative to the current forward curve. I guess this is a 2-part question. First is, I think, Aunoy, you talked about the noninterest-bearing growth in a seasonally tough quarter for that, maybe where that noninterest-bearing growth is coming from? And to that end, if we do have a scenario where we have no rate cuts can Citizens, keep deposit costs stable in light of more robust growth from you guys on both the consumer and corporate.

Erika, it's Aunoy here. We were quite pleased with our deposit performance this quarter. And as we saw actually good noninterest-bearing deposit growth Obviously, we have a couple of strategic initiatives. One is being the private bank where you saw the good DDA growth that the DDA percentage in the private bank is 30%. So we continue to see that coming. And as you saw the balanced growth we are seeing the DDAs grow along with it. So that's the, that's 1 thing that's really driving the DDA growth. But even as Brendan mentioned, even on the consumer side, there is a lot of growth that we are seeing in the low-cost NTT as we really build the relationships with our clients. So we are seeing a lot of good traction there. And to your second question about where we go deposits from here. Obviously, deposit volume is going to depend on the overall economy, how the GDP goes, how the loan formation goes in the economy. But with some of the strategic initiatives, we believe that we can maintain in the competitive range about where deposits are going to go from here. And as you saw, our deposit betas our 50% this quarter and we have -- we expect it to be in the high 40s, which is in line with the competition. With that, maybe, Brendan, I'll pass it on to you to see if you have any comments.

I'll add a little color on each consumer and private, but out of the $118 billion or so of deposits that sit in the consumer bank, 52% of them are what we call low cost, which is either DDA or checking with interest. And in the retail bank checking with interest is sort of a sub-10 basis point type of cost. So for all intents and purposes, it's very similar to DDA. The COVID period of all those operating balances reducing is firmly behind us, and we're now seeing net growth. So we're up 130 basis points year-over-year and our low-cost deposit categories. That's versus a peer average of about 50 basis points. So we are very firmly in the top quartile in terms of low-cost growth. for the consumer bank, and we project that to continue with confidence in the outlook, which will really help control interest-bearing. Total cost of deposits when you include the interest-bearing side. And then no pointed this up. But in the private bank, we ended the quarter with very strong spot numbers. It's actually 40% DDA over 50% when you add in the checking with interest in the private bank itself as well. So we're expecting that to be in that sort of range in the same range that we've seen in the past. So we're getting this really strong growth in the private bank without breaking the quality metrics and this far in, that's a real positive to see. And broadly, we expect that to continue looking forward.

We'll go to the line of John Pancari from Evercore ISI.

Just on the private bank side, just what -- see if you can give us just a bit more color in terms of what are you seeing in terms of the mix of loan growth? How much momentum are you seeing on the mortgage side versus the commercial capital call type of loan generation. And then if you could maybe give us breakout of like where new money yields are that you're bringing on loans in the private bank, maybe on the mortgage side as well as on the other type of lending capital calls included.

Yes. On the loan side, it has -- the longer-term trend line, it's been pretty evenly mixed between mortgage, multifamily, commercial real estate and private equity capital call lines the utilization rates this quarter on the PE lines were down a little bit, so it sort of artificially suppressed the linked quarter growth was more driven by mortgage and multifamily CRE, which is pretty evenly split between those categories. both of those asset classes where we use the balance sheet comes with deep, deep relationship-based banking. And so the net returns on the customers are actually quite high. When you look at our overall loan yields versus our deposit costs, we remain in the range of north of 400, 425 basis points of net spread between our loan yields and our deposit costs, and that has been consistent since we launched. And so the growth that we're seeing is actually deep relationship based, but even just asset asset yields minus deposit costs, it's net accretive to our NIM position. So the return profile of the business overall remains in the mid-20s because of that with high profitability on the balance sheet, and we see nothing that will take us off that trajectory.

Got it. And then on the capital front, Bruce, maybe if you could kind of I think you talked about your capital allocation priorities from organic versus buyback and then maybe on the M&A interest side.[indiscernible] I know you've been historically uninterested in whole bank M&A. Just curious if that's changed for any reason at this point.

Yes. Thanks. I would say the capital and priorities are really unchanged. They've been stable. So we always look to make sure that we have a good dividend on the stock and that we can raise our dividend as earnings grow, which be an objective for this year. The second place objective is to make sure we have capital supporting our clients and supporting the growth of the bank. So organic growth is kind of next up. And then the residual, you can look to do potentially some selective acquisitions. For example, in the first quarter, we bought very small but high-quality M&A boutique to, as Ted indicated, we go deeper into these industry verticals. Do we have everything we need to really serve those clients well. And in some instances, rather than hire people. It's faster just to go out and buy an M&A boutique that doesn't use a lot of capital, but we'll certainly look for things like that or maybe some things in the payment space that can accelerate our growth a little bit, but these are generally going to be small. And then whatever we have as the residual, really goes to buying back our stock. And I still think the stock is very attractive here, as you would expect me to say. But in any case, we're -- we bought a lot of stock in, in the first quarter, $300 million. And we gave in our guide that we're looking to buy $225 million here in the second quarter. So we'll have -- if we keep growing our overall results and our earnings will have lots of flexibility to both grow the bank organically plus buyback stock.

We'll go [indiscernible] from [indiscernible]

Back on capital, you mentioned the stress tests coming up and the potential to get some relief there. your buffer is 4.5%, it seems like you could see some pretty significant relief this time around. And if you do, does that at all come into play with how you think about the 10.5% level for CET1, especially in the context of seeing some of the larger banks moving their CET1 ratios lower recently?

Yes. So what I would say on that is that we've managed the capital kind of where we think it's appropriate given the environment and stakeholder expectations. And so we've been at the high side of our range of 10% to 10.5% or slightly over the 10.5% for the last several quarters. the SCB has not really been a binding constraint. And I've said in the past, it's to me, more of a scarlet letter I can't believe that we're getting that high of an SCB, which is completely outsized relative to peers. I do think that the Fed is now kind of taking a hard look at why are there some of these inaccuracies that take place. And so we'll see the models aren't really going into this round, but there's other things that I think the progression coming out of where we were in '23 to the strong balance sheet and jump-off point we have today, higher revenue levels. And then the scenario was particularly severe in the last cycle that is better this cycle. So we would expect to see the notional equivalent SCB even though it won't go into effect, we would expect to see that hopefully quite a bit lower and more in line with peers even before we see some of the model changes like the model changes of not picking up this benefit of swaps was really a big miss. But even without fixing things like that, I think we'll see improvement. So I would say we'll wait and see like how the environment shapes up. Right now, we're in a war with a lot of uncertainty and profitability is still increasing. So I think carrying a little extra capital through the course of 2026 makes sense. But certainly, there'll be opportunities to reassess that if we get a positive outcome to the war and the market conditions improve, and we continue to deliver a higher level of earnings it might be possible to start to ratchet that down, but probably that would be a '27 event and not something that you'd see us do in '26.

Okay. And then just switching to the Private Bank. You had some great deposit growth this quarter, and you mentioned some of the spread details on that incremental business, which sounded great [indiscernible] 400 to 425 spread. I was just curious what what the rough cost of those deposits were in terms of the growth coming in this quarter? And if you could just give an update on the talent pipeline in that business, that would be great.

Yes. The deposit cost, looking at now to carts 220-ish basis points. the total deposit cost when you blend in the interest-bearing plus [indiscernible] that.

Yes. So it's going to be somewhere is going to be lower than our commercial deposit funding costs but higher than pure retail is one way to think about that.

And remember, the interest-bearing side is mostly still front book. So you've got a heavy piece of DDA and then the interest-bearing side is front book. So the poly is somewhat barbelled. Over time, we can smooth that out as the business builds.

Yes. And the other thing that I would say is we opened 3 PBO offices this quarter, and we have 2 more geared up on this quarter and 1 later in the year. that will bring us up. I think we're at 9%. That brings us to 11 by the end of the year. So that's an important part of the deposit gathering strategy to have an ability to go out to successful people and walk [indiscernible] we call them 2-legged customers in addition to some of the corporate relationships that we have and we get billboard value from having those new locations opened. I would say over the next 3, 4 years, we could see that PBO count get up to 25% to 30%, if you recall, I think First Republic had maybe 80%. I don't think we're going to go near there. But I think we can get into the key markets and kind of have 25 to 30, which will also kind of keep that deposit machine cranking along. In terms of talent, the main needs we've taken the business from about 150 people at launch up to close to 600 today, including all the support dedicated support people. I think the plan for this year is to kind of continue to build out Florida is one of the things on the PB side, but then continue with the wealth lift-outs. And so we have a pretty good pipeline on private wealth lift-outs. None of them hit in the first quarter. We hopefully will catch up here where we want to be in the second quarter, but that's also a real focal point to make sure that we have the wealth professionals co-located with our private bankers so we can deliver kind of total solutions to the customer.

The only thing I would add is our talent pipeline is really robust and attracting talent to this platform. It's not been a problem we -- over the course of the last few years. held ourselves back candidly a little bit for 2 reasons. One is our commitment to the market to deliver the profitability and the results we committed and then just making sure the platform is ready. We've had a lot of investment we had to make to connect all of our products and deliver the service. Our NPS has gone up from 70 to 76. And growth is obviously really, really strong [indiscernible] we're feeling good about the foundation of the platform. So we're starting to think about how we play some more offense on bringing talent in selectively. We want to maintain a really high bar that's really important to us the banking side, we're searching for a talent and a talent only. And so that's what we're bringing in.

I would have said it [indiscernible]

I'll give you the rounding.

On the deposit side, I would just add that we are also bringing good quality deposits, the lendability of these deposits are good. So just so that we can use it in the broader franchise

[indiscernible] Bank of America.

Just 2 quick follow-ups. Maybe, Bruce, in your prepared in your remarks, you talked about looking at New York brand strategy, I guess you plan to open more branches in New York. Just talk to us, is that more private bank related? Or do you see an opportunity to just open more branches in New York and just the size of kind of what you're thinking there?

Yes, sure. I'll start and flip it to Brendan. But I think I referenced this on a prior call is that we see a real opportunity to kind of double down on our footprint. Some of our peer banks are okay, taking the view that our footprint is pretty saturated and we need to go outside footprint to different regions of the country to get more growth. That's not our strategy that we're arriving at its where we're already well known, we can make some investment in the branch system to really optimize locations, optimize the mix between in-store and stand-alone branches and try to pick up the growth rate of deposits just in our footprint. And then we don't -- we avoid all that top of funnel spend advertising in a different region where nobody knows who we are. People already know who we are. So we think that makes sense. My hope is that when we get to the end and we kind of unveil this program that we'll be spending some incremental dollars on the branch network but we'll pick up that growth rate in deposits maybe by 200, 300 basis points over what the normal GDP growth rate was -- and if you look at that over a 10-year period, that's another $20 billion to $30 billion of deposits and deposits, obviously the lifeblood of a strong bank. So this is really important to us. Stay tuned for more details probably at the middle of the year. but New York is clearly an area where proof of concept, we got in on the back of combining 2 franchises that, frankly, were from a retail standpoint in need of some TLC. We put our best people down there and brought our version of banking into a highly competitive market, and we're having great success. It is our fastest-growing region in terms of households and deposits. But we're still not at the full scale with where we would need to be to really penetrate that opportunity. So as part of that broader effort, you would expect us to open more retail branches in Manhattan in surrounding environments, and we're pretty excited by that opportunity. we probably will open another 1 or 2 PB locations in Manhattan, for example. But the focus here really is to optimize what we're going to do on the retail side. Brendan, anything to add.

I guess a sign of an incredibly aligned leadership team you took almost every word out of my mouth. The only thing I would add is just give you a [indiscernible] in New York and then on the rest of the markets. But in a world post-COVID, it's -- there are a lot of questions on the future of retail branches and the importance of them, but it's still very much truth, if you want outsized operating leverage in retail banking, you need 4% plus share of branch density and despite all of our incredible successes in New York, we're still at sort of, call it, 2.25%, 2.5% branch density. So we do think we can build on our momentum by densifying a little bit. And we'll do that thoughtfully over time. As Bruce mentioned, we'll give you more details as we get towards the middle part of the year. We also have some self-funding dynamics that still exist in the rest of the franchise. We still have lot of in-store branches that we'll be able to reposition a bit to traditional branches in the non-New York parts of the footprint that will free up some expense and capital to densify in New York. So we'll bring everybody through the plan here in short order. But really, as Bruce pointed out, the goal really is to drive sustainable market share gains and outsized deposit growth in retail to fund the rest of the franchise.

That's good color. And just a quick follow-up, Bruce, for you on the capital plans, like [indiscernible] should benefit Citizens once that gets mark-to-market. When we look at the benefit from the capital proposals, it's something we've begun to think about do you think the tangible common equity ratio then becomes something that you're more mindful for in a world where the RWA density is coming down?

Yes. That's a really thoughtful question. So I do think while that's not a regulatory ratio, it is something that bank investors have focused on over time. And so as I said, we're going to have to triage when this good news comes in, you have the triage as to what our market expectations, what are regulatory expectations, what are rating agencies' expectations. But yes, I think that could happen. I think that TCE ratio could be something that analysts and investors move up in prominence.

We'll go to Gerard Cassidy from RBC Capital Markets.

You guys have done a good job of expanding the commercial banking business. You talked about it on the call already. Can you share with us when you go into a new market like Florida or California, now clearly, you're building your national brand, but it's I don't think it's yet at Bank of America level in terms of recognition. So how do you balance when you go into these markets that could provide growth on the commercial side, how do you balance the risk with growth? And then second, are you leading your balance sheet? Or are you building out treasury products first and then lending to those customers? How do you guys approach that?

Let me start and I'll flip right to Ted. But I would say we have tried to lever an expanded presence in these new markets where we brought a private banking operation or private wealth operations and then kind of magnify that by also bringing in kind of the corporate banking teams. And what we aspire to is to bring very experienced, high-quality bankers onto the platform who kind of have a growth ambition and who are good team players. And so one of the reasons that we're successful overall in the corporate bank is we worked very collaboratively with a coverage banker who has product partners that they work together to come up with good ideas. We call it thought leadership. But at every touch point with the client, we're showing up. We understand your business. We want to get to know you. We have some ideas about how you can be more successful. And that really resonates with customers. So I think there's always room for market participants who do that well. So it's really a combination of the visibility of already being in the market. And now we have like 400 people in California over 400 people. And that kind of works together to raise our visibility and our presence and then staying committed to really high-quality people and staying committed to that 1 citizens collaborative model where we can deliver solutions to the customer. Ted?

Yes. Bruce, the one Citizens model that we've implemented throughout our bank has really gone to differentiate ourselves as we expand into these new regions. So to your question, [indiscernible] we don't necessarily lead with treasury, don't necessarily lead with credit, but we try to lead with his ideas to our customers and where we differentiate ourselves is as we pick what customers we're going to attract we really look at where do we differentiate ourselves versus our competitors. So is it an industry that we have a specialization sponsor, a private equity group that we know better. We are trying to -- and then how do we bring all the parts of the bank together to give the customer an experience that they wouldn't necessarily get from somebody else. And when you have the private bank and all the great people and all the relationships that they have and the ability to interact with people that we normally, if we were just showing up with a balance sheet, we wouldn't have the ability to address those customers, bringing the private banking and combining all those together has really been what we try to achieve as we've been building out in these markets.

And I would say that, look, kind of companies in the regions we're targeting or the industries we're targeting are very receptive to have a new player with a really strong approach that they're not exactly -- some of the bigger players aren't covering themselves in glory when it comes to how they cover middle market and mid-corporate companies. And so it feels like we're pushing on an open door to some extent when we go into these markets.

Very helpful. I appreciate it. And then pivoting over to AI, Brendan touched on it a moment ago, Bruce, and maybe it's for Brendan as well. When do you think we get to the point where you folks and your peers probably as well, are able to go out and tell investors, we just spent x millions of dollars on AI, and this is bottom line impact. Earnings per share improved 2% or the ROTCE number went up 50 basis points because of the x millions of dollars we just spent on AI. Do you think we can never get to something like that down the road? Or is that just too optimistic?

Yes. I think it's going to be hard. It's going to be a very dynamic process, and there's a lot of cross currents that go through the P&L. I think we'll try to do that with reimagine the bank. We're not kind of detailing any notable items for what the cost is of restructuring and investment and consultants and all of that. But I think will certainly delineate it so that you understand what we're expanding. And so just within that program when we get to the $450 million run rate, that's going to be a very good return on what it took to stand that up. So that might be one way that you can kind of get a sniff of how much are they spending and what benefits are resulting. But I do think it's a dynamic process and a lot of things, there'll be a lot of cross currents in the economy and other things. And so you might not have the cleanliness of connection that you're talking about that you're aspiring to.

[indiscernible] the line of [indiscernible] from Autonomous Research.

Just one here on expenses. So the first quarter and then the second quarter guide kind of get us to that 4.5-ish, 5% year-over-year cost growth I know a lot of the reimagined the bank benefit comes in the second half as long -- as well as some of the spending. So can you just help us just understand the cadence of expense growth as we kind of see that benefit. And as you balance performance related and investments against that as we move through the second half? And should we just be kind of thinking about that 4.5% overall guide that you gave us in January.

Yes. Ken, so we're not coming off the 4.5%, and there is a seasonal pattern of expense recognition that the first quarter has the FICA and associated payroll items that go with the bonus, paying the bonus. And then the second quarter tends to be where we would bring in people. And after they get bonus. And so any net adds that we want to have, it's a big period for the net adds. So overlay some reimagine the bank onetime costs in the first half of the year, you're going to kind of peak, I would say, in the upward pressures and your merit happens in the second quarter early -- second quarter. So you're kind of peaking in the first half of the year and then it wouldn't be as much net investment spending on ads in the second half of the year and then some of the benefits coming in from reimagine the bank will flow through in the second half of the year. So you could actually see expenses start to dip a bit in the second half. So we'll obviously give you that guidance as we get to the second quarter, we'll tell you what we think in the third quarter. But just to preview it we're still holding to the 4.5% for the year, and it's kind of -- the build is more front-loaded and then kind of levels off or even declines a little Yes. And Ken, I would just add, we are pleased with the expense discipline that we had in the first quarter. Really the growth quarter-on-quarter was all of our -- the seasonality that Bruce mentioned. And as Brendan mentioned, we have good line of sight to some of the savings that are coming. So we mentioned the vendor sales as well as some of the property closures. And so we feel very good about some of the some of the downtick that we will see and the benefit that's come there. And we have very disciplined returns objective on the private bank, et cetera. And I would just add, like if you should remember the 500 basis points of positive operating leverage for the year and we delivered 700 basis points this quarter. So that still remains very much true for this.

[indiscernible] go to Chris McGratty from KBW.

Bruce, you expressed confidence getting into the the 16% to 18% range for the ROTCE by the end of next year. I guess, number one, what could make it perhaps a little sooner get into the range and maybe the factors that might push it out a little bit?

Yes. I think it's hard to pull it forward a whole lot. We have some of the time-based benefits of those legacy swaps running off, which is a driver of kind of moving higher in NII and overall kind of revenue. But if we got into kind of piece dividend from the resolution of the Apron war. And then there's a lot of activity in the capital markets. I think we're as well positioned as anyone certainly amongst our peers, maybe better positioned to really capture that upside if that happens. So I think that's one driver that can maybe hope to get us there a little faster. And I'd say, in the private bank, they're on a steady as she goes by design kind of trajectory. If we did start to see more revenues, maybe we could force feed a little more investment there. And we talked a little bit about the potential for pull forward of RTB benefits if some of the new technologies kick in. So there is a case to make that potentially in a perfect scenario, you can pull it in a little bit, but I'm not promising that. And I'm really just focused on making sure we hit that by kind of the end of '27. And then I guess the converse is true, too. If the kind of environment stays volatile and the war doesn't get resolved quickly and energy prices go up and the economy slows down a bit, there's possibilities that, that could extend a little bit. But A lot of this is actually baked in. So to get kind of from 12 to 15 is really these time-based benefits and some of the trajectory we see on the NIM and then kind of getting all the way there is execution of kind of some of the rest of the initiatives, the normalization of credit cost back to the mid-30s. We had a 39 basis point this quarter. I think we're firmly on that trajectory, again, absent something happening in the economy. And then we'll just continue to buy back our stock fairly aggressively as well.

[indiscernible] question will go to David Chiaverini from Jefferies.

So I wanted to ask about loan pricing, commercial loan growth has been increasing nicely across the industry. So I was curious about how loan spreads are holding up in a competitive environment.

Yes. Let me start, David, and then I'll pass it on to Ted. As you saw that we had a diversified loan growth and even in the commercial bank, we had in the mid-corporate space, we were little bit on the subscription lines as well. And we expect -- as you think about the spreads, like it definitely came down as the rates came down. But but we are well within the pack. And the one thing I would talk about loan growth is -- and Ted mentioned this, this is not only just a credit relationships. It's a more holistic relationship. So we look at the returns of this loan on a holistic basis to think about what else are we getting, whether it's the deposit relationship or the business, other business activities, fees, et cetera, that we are getting. So there's a very disciplined process in Ted's business that we go through to ensure that we are just not looking at the spreads.

Just to build on what Aunoy Banerjee said. Overall, in the markets in the beginning of the first quarter, we saw more on the institutional side. And on the bond side, we saw some tightening of spreads that obviously widen back out with what's going on in March. As we get specific to Citizens, we are now -- we look at the relationship holistically. So we try to figure out when we make a loan, what are the ancillary business, and this was all part of our BSO that we really completed through the end of last year. We now feel like we have a very good discipline in place that we do not stretch on loans where we do not get an overall suitable return for our customers. As such, we really haven't seen much of a decline in spreads in the last couple of -- in the last quarter.

And then shifting over to private credit and NDFI. To what extent are you contemplating leaning in as other banks pull back? Or are you comfortable with your existing exposure?

Yes. I would say -- it's Bruce, and I'll let Ted add color. But we've grown that, as I mentioned earlier, that book by very -- in a very disciplined manner, call it, 5% a year, being very selective about who we want to bank and the type of vehicles that we bank and making sure we have the right structure. So I don't really see us veering off of that. That served us well to where we're positioned today. And I think that's the strategy that we'll have going forward, even if some people step back and there's opportunities to do more we'll see. But our baseline assumption is that we kind of keep to that mid-single-digit growth rate. Ted?

Yes. We're going to continue to support our customers. We look at these relationships, not just on the DFI side, but on the private equity side, on the subscription side and then what their portfolio companies are doing. So -- and if some of our customers are the winners and the survivors, we think that they're not survivors, but the winners and make acquisitions, maybe grow with them, sure. ut we're not going to specifically grow NDF. We're going to just continue to go with where our customers go.

Okay. All right. I think that gets to the end of the question queue. So I really appreciate your interest in citizens. Thanks for dialing in today. Have a great day.

That concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.

Today, we have Citizens Financial Group with us, $25 billion market cap company. Total assets of about $226 billion, over 960 branches in the United States here, predominantly on the East Coast, Northeast in particular. And I'm very pleased to have 2 folks from Citizens with us. To my immediate left is Brendan Coughlin. He's the President of Citizens Financial Group. Brendan has been there for over 20 years and has been responsible for a lot of the Consumer Banking businesses as well as now the private banking and wealth management areas.

And then Aunoy Banerjee. He joined as Chief Financial Officer 5 months ago. And prior to that, he was the CFO of Barclays Bank PLC. And so thank you, gentlemen, for joining us today for the discussion about what's going on for Citizens.

Thanks for having us.

Maybe, Brendan, we'll start with you. What's your take on the current environment? When you look at the economy, we hear a lot of cross currents on what's going on with the consumer. Obviously, we have the geopolitical risks now and tariffs. So maybe from your vantage point, the K-shaped recovery and what you guys are seeing generally?

Yes. Obviously, here recently bias in the last 2 weeks, all eyes are on the Middle East and implications there, how quickly that gets resolved. Notwithstanding that, we see the economy still as broadly resilient. There's some mixed signals that you have to really pay attention to, but broadly resilient.

When you look at on the consumer side and that translates to some other -- some macroeconomic kind of worry beads, you'd look at consumer confidence still bouncing around at lows over the last couple of years. Inflation worries, that are still on folks' mind. Unemployment has ticked up a little bit. But I'd sort of describe all those as relatively range-bound, which is leading us to a level of still confidence and resiliency, presuming a Middle East resolution.

On the consumer side, yes, that's a tale of 2 cities here with the different types of customers. So we've got -- if you look at it through a deposit lens, the top 30% of the U.S. still has a material amount of excess liquidity from pre-COVID, even adjusted for inflation, call it 30%, 40% more liquidity. And when you look at the bottom 20% or 30% of the economy, they're sort of back to where they were pre-COVID where you could argue a post-inflation adjustment. They're actually in a worse spot than pre-COVID. So you're seeing some economic pressure on the bottom.

Having said all that, we don't view that has any sizable long-term economic worry for us at the moment. Number one, our business model isn't oriented that way. Just in general, it's not presenting itself in material credit risk, material liquidity risk for banks. So we're pretty relaxed about it, even though there's -- we're acknowledging some stress, and we're working with our clients that we do have down there.

And on the corporate side, obviously, they're looking overseas for the next couple of weeks, but notwithstanding that, again, we think the economy is pretty constructive. There's positive sentiment with our middle market companies. They're investing in their business. We see strong loan demand. And so we're not seeing any signs of material pullback. So assuming we get a Middle East resolution here soon, it feels like despite some mixed signals, we're still broadly set up for a couple of year run of positive business conditions.

Yes. What's interesting with Citizens is, obviously, you've got the 3-pronged strategy, the transformed consumer bank, the private wealth area, the private bank and then, of course, the regional -- super regional commercial bank. Can you kind of share with us for a moment and take us back to the IPO in 2014 and just what you guys have been able to accomplish? And many folks may not realize, but when the Citizens was hold by the Royal Bank of Scotland for years, it was primarily a savings bank. So the transformation has been pretty remarkable compared to what it looked like 20 years ago.

It's really been quite remarkable. And Aunoy and I here sit next to each other with opposite levels of tenure with us kicked off. So I've been around for the journey. And it's been remarkable what Bruce has led for this company. And we took over a bank that was 4.5%, 5% ROTCE and now have built it back to look peer like, but I would argue with outsized and differentiated momentum long term. And I won't go too far into the history books, but we invested a lot in technology. We invested a lot in bringing the capabilities of the franchise up integration of our customer experiences. We've done some smart acquisitions, whether it was HSBC and ISBC to build out the Metro New York market, whether it was a bunch of bolt-ons that we did in commercial capital markets to build what we think is the best positioned Commercial Bank and best positioned capital markets business in the super regional space and done a tremendous deposit transformation, which we can unpack a little bit here over the last decade.

But as we sit here today, I'd say, we've got a transformed foundation, well positioned for the future. We've got a restocked and reloaded management team, and we've got our strategy that has positioned us to have outsized forward-looking EPS growth, outsized forward-looking return improvement for the franchise and outsized organic growth. So when you can get strong growth, high quality that's also driving high return improvement, that's kind of where you want to be and we see that and we've got real confidence on it.

And at a high level, I'll mention each of the 3 legs of the businesses that you said, and we can unpack them as we get through the conversation. But really, the bedrock of the franchise is the Consumer business. It's 65% to 70% of our deposits. It's really the rocket fuel that allows us to make our offensive bets in other parts of the franchise. We've gone through a tremendous profitability overhaul in that business, going from the thrift roll-up that you described post RBS now to a thriving franchise that's relationship-oriented, durable, sticky revenues. We were worst-in-class in the last rate up cycle in 2014 and '15 in our deposit betas. And now we've positioned ourselves in the top third of the U.S. That's pretty remarkable for less than a decade. It takes a long time for deposit transformation. So that's a positive.

Our lending book has been totally repositioned as we repatriate capital from the rundown of the noncore business into the private bank and into things like HELOC and otherwise. So we feel great about the foundation of the Consumer business and then expansionary measures in Metro New York, which is our fastest-growing market.

The private bank and private wealth story is equally remarkable for us, and we're very excited about that. As you probably know, that business was sort of birthed in 2023 with the West Coast bank failures. We had the fortune of attracting at the time 150 of First Republic's top talent. And we really believe that while there were flaws in some of those business models that failed, there was real white space for us to enter in and create long-term profitable growth really oriented around the high net worth customer and wealth management.

And so since that time, we took a $0.11 hit in EPS in 2023. Here we are fast forward to 2025, and it was 7% of our EPS for 2025 and running between a 20% and 25% ROE profile of the business. We concluded the year with $14.5 billion in deposits. So it's been growing quite well. We see it as tremendous white space that's still open and fuel for long-term organic growth. It's really our version of M&A.

And then when you turn to the Commercial Bank, it's been a real transformation towards middle market banking. We look at our growth coming from great bankers serving the middle market. We've got outsized capabilities in private credit, which we've taken advantage of. And then we've built really a tremendous capital markets business and seeing that in some of our results, but I would argue that the full potential of that part of the franchise still hasn't totally been realized because the market has been fairly choppy. And as that settles out and hopefully, we get the positive conditions that we think will happen. You'll start to really see the full strength of that franchise pulling forward. So look, we feel great about the history of the bank, but I feel even better about how we're positioned going forward.

Great. Aunoy, you've been there again in about 5 months. Maybe you could share with us your first impressions of what you've seen and how you've been spending your time? And I know you're probably saying you get the best boss in the world now.

Yes, I'll start with that, the best boss in the world. But look, yes, 5 months in, it's been fascinating. It's been busy, but it has been extremely rewarding, I would say. The areas where I'm focused on, I would say are 4 of them following. First is really spending time with our client-facing organizations, so whether Brendan talked about the branches, our commercial teams, our capital markets teams, our contact centers, really thinking about what we do for our clients day-to-day and really thinking about why so many people have us as the #1 choice, so really understanding that.

Second, with our business and our functional heads, really understanding how capital is allocated, how resources are managed and how we, as a finance team can do better in that as well. So I think that's there.

Third, I have the great privilege of talking to our various stakeholders, so whether our investors, whether our regulators, our community advocates, our Board of Directors. I think over the last 10 years, as Brendan mentioned, how we have grown and getting their perspectives has been invaluable in many sense.

And lastly, we'll talk about transformation, like transformation is close to both our hearts here. And we believe we are absolutely committed in delivering the financial goals of our transformation, which we have done over the last 10 years. But with the advent of new technology, et cetera, how do we set the bank up for the future is really important to us.

And then on first impressions, I would offer 3. I would say, first, the strength of our culture, really like our ability to get things done for our clients, for our investors as well as for all of us together, I think all kudos to the management team led by Bruce and Brendan and Don and Ted and Susan. And it's really fascinating to see that in action.

Second, I think Brendan talked about our strategy. It's well articulated, but it's also well understood by pretty much everyone in the bank, and we are all rowing in the same direction, and we have a shared mission.

And third is the opportunity set. We definitely have fantastic businesses. We are in attractive markets. And on top of that, we have some unique growth vectors like the private bank, growing in the Metro New York area, reimagine the bank. So look, it's exciting times. I'm humbled to be part of the team and really looking forward to move the ball forward here.

Great. No, that's very helpful. Moving over to returns for a moment. Obviously, you guys put up just over a 12% ROTCE number in the fourth quarter. You've got a target of 16% to 18% in the medium term. Can you talk to us about the path to get there, the timing? How are you going to do revenue growth versus net interest margin expansion, expense leverage? And then how important to reach those numbers is the execution of the business strategies that Brendan outlined in those 3 groups?

Well, look, we are very committed. This is one -- the ROTCE growth is one thing that as a management team, we talk a lot about. And definitely, we are committing to get into 16% to 18% ROTCE by the second half of '27. I would say there are 4 vectors that we are focused on. The first is our NIM expansion. So as you know, Gerard, we -- our NIM was 3.07% last quarter, and we expect the NIM to be in the range of 3.30% to 3.50%. A lot of the benefits are coming from the time-based benefits that we have, also from the front book, back book dynamics as well as the active hedges that we have on. So these are not rate sensitive. They are not rate related, macroeconomic related, and we expect that this NIM expansion will flow to our bottom line. So that's roughly around 300 to 350 basis points of ROTCE improvement. So if you take 12.2% plus, you add around 350, you are at closing distance to 16% at that point of time.

Post that, if you think about the business execution, the private bank is a fantastic growth area for us. It's -- probably will be in mid-teens in the near future as a contribution of Citizens. And that business runs at a 20% to 25% of ROTCE. So that's really ROTCE accretive to the overall franchise.

The consumer bank, the transformed consumer bank and the low-cost deposits that we are gathering is definitely ROTCE accretive. And the capital markets franchise, we are just starting, we have built an amazing capital markets franchise. And as the environment becomes more constructive, that will be ROTCE accretive as well. That should add around 100 to 200 basis points, I would say. And obviously, positive operating leverage. We're committed to positive operating leverage that would help as well.

On top of that, I think credit, more and more as credit costs come down, and we have been over accruing for credit, and I think credit costs will come down over the near future. We have some AOCI goes the other way as that drag goes on TCE, but we'll offset with share buyback. But we are absolutely committed and confident in getting to the 16% to 18% ROTCE by second half of '27.

Can you remind us because it's so important to the ROTCE goals, the 3.30% to 3.50% margin, remind us when do you think you can get there again?

We expect to be there by 4Q of '27 again. So that's -- these are all consistent in that.

Yes. Got it. Brendan, coming back to the private bank, it was already mentioned that it's 7% of earnings, as you mentioned. Can you walk us through the strategy of building it out the priorities that you have from here? But also, how do you define your core private bank client? Is there a net worth threshold that they have to be over? Or is it business owner focused? Professionals? What are some of those characteristics?

Well, let's start there. Our target client is $5 million in net worth with $2 million or more in investable liquid assets. That's not a hard threshold. That's just our target. That's who we're marketing to. And we believe -- so when you look at how that stacks in the industry, clearly, traditional retail banks don't serve that client well.

Traditional private banks tend to have their cutoff a bit higher. And so we believe there's tremendous white space and opportunity left behind by the West Coast Bank failures to go into that market and really provide high-end white glove service to that customer base. Many of those folks are crossover business owners and personal banking relationships. So it will be a distinctive part of this model is to have a single point of contact approach to bring that all together. And that seems straightforward, almost seems motherhood and apple pie. But when you think about the money center banks, they tend to be too big and too bureaucratic to pull that off. And when you think about the smaller firms, they tend to not have the sophisticated capabilities. So there's very few banks that are actually in that sweet spot to deliver the full bank in a distinctive way.

And there honestly are very few things that are truly, truly, truly distinctive in financial services. This is one. When done right, it is a very distinctive feel and a very distinctive experience. So we're very committed and convicted that there's white space here for us to go after. But when you look at the profitability model of it, I'd say a couple of things. We were very interested to copycat pieces of Old First Republic, principally their service, culture and intensity. They are very distinct set of criteria that we'd like to change about the model. So we went in saying, look, there's a few principles here. We are going to run this at an ROE accretive profile for the bank. That's number one.

Number two, we're going to create high-quality liquidity profile that's self-funding for this franchise. That's lendable deposits, that's sticky and is not going to drag the rest of the franchise down. Number three, pristine credit profile. And number four, market-based asset pricing and more expense discipline. So when you add all that up, I get the question a lot. Well, FRB was 11% or 12% ROE, how are you guys possibly at 20% and 25%. That's the principles that we're running the business, and we've been able to drive the growth and keep returns at the same time with that target segment because of the client experience.

So as we look forward, we spent the last 2 years really building out the model, proving to ourselves and to the market that we could do that. We've been able to thread the needle of getting growth and returns and fill the space from an experience standpoint. So now we're in expansion mode. So we're opening up new private banking offices. We've got 7. We're going to go to 12 by the end of the year. We've hired new teams. We've bolted on teams in Southern California, a couple of teams in Southern California, Northern California, Boston, New York, Palm Beach, going to West Palm Beach. We've hired 10 private wealth teams so far and have aspirations to hire at least 5 or 6 more through the end of the year.

So now that we're on a foundation that we have even firmer conviction on, we're going to start to leverage our positive operating leverage and put some money back into this franchise to drive long-term growth. And as Aunoy mentioned briefly a second ago, we do believe over the medium term that our 7% EPS accretion will wind up into the mid-teens inside of our ROE kind of 16% to 18% window through 2027 and into early 2028.

Very good. And coming back to -- so you got this sweet spot that you mentioned about the $5 million, $2 million liquidity. How do you -- because, obviously, you're not the only one in that space. But how do you differentiate yourself now that you have that targeted space? Is it pricing, service, what do you bring that make you more attractive than maybe one of your direct competitors?

It's really service is the simple answer. And I know that sounds squishy, but it's actually not. And I've got lots of stories I could share with you. We launched the business, I met hundreds and hundreds of clients. And I was expecting them to come up and ask about low-price mortgages as maybe something that might be on your minds. I didn't hear that once. It was all about the talent we brought on, the absolute obsession with experience that they deliver, making banking frictionless. And then it's the integration. These folks don't want to have a banker for their business relationship and a separate banker for their financial planning and wealth and then go deal with the retail branch for their personal banking.

So having one person that knows all of that and is an expert and has the expert team, but it's the generalist manager to bring the bank. And as it relates to pricing, we look at pricing, but it's in the context of understanding the full relationship and where we can give pricing back because it's getting offset by wealth AUM, we'll do that, but it's within our profitability guardrails. And anyway, some of that sounds like motherhood and apple pie. I would very much tell you with real-lived experience, it is not. There are very, very few banks that actually are getting that done.

Yes. Aunoy will come back to Commercial Banking in a second. But Brendan, on the Consumer Banking and wealth side, when you look at that, what's the competitive advantages that you guys have in that line of business? And when you look out over the next couple of years, how are you going to drive those returns to meet that overall corporate goal of 16% to 18%?

Yes. As goes the consumer franchise, sort of as goes CFG overall, it's really the confidence, as I mentioned, the bedrock of our confidence to go larger in capital markets, go larger in private banking. So we've got a lot of focus on this. The foundation has been fully transformed. I mentioned the deposit transformation and the profitability transformation that we've undertaken. Really now, it's continued to solidify us as a bank for mass affluent. As I look at our right to win, across all of our businesses, you've got to have real clarity.

And in consumer, it's around our mass affluent business. We're going to have mass market customers, but we're likely or unlikely to outbank JPMorgan and Bank of America at scale with digital capabilities and so on and so forth in mass market. So our mass affluent customer, it's also where the profit pools are in retail banking. So with deposit fees getting regulated or competed away, mass affluent is the place to be and we've got distinct capabilities there. So we're growing our household base. We're repositioning our capital book. We're running down the noncore book, auto loans, purchased assets, replacing them with private banking loans. We're #1 in the U.S. in HELOC lending in the retail franchise. We're replacing a high-return relationship-based banking.

We've had double the growth in our wealth management franchise in retail. Much has been made about Citizens and our private wealth growth. In the retail franchise, 75% of our wealth revenues actually come from our retail franchise and the 3 million retail customers that we have, and that's growing at 2x the market. So between all of those levers and then a steady continuation of deposit growth, that's really where we see it. And the capabilities that we're looking at, we're making big investments in digital. We're about to launch a new digital app here in the coming weeks. And we've kicked off a body of work post-COVID on what's the future of retail branch banking. And I'm here to say, it's still very viable. And you're seeing our competitors invest in branch banking. We will begin doing the same thing and smartly adding branches in core locations to densify and create long-term outsized deposit growth for the retail franchise.

Aunoy, talking about the Commercial Banking side of the house. It looks like we might be on the start of the strong business cycle, C&I lending, when you look at the H.8 data is really picked up in the last 3 to 4 months. Can you walk us through and share with us how the Commercial Bank is positioned? How are they going to maximize returns? And then recently, Citizens closed on another commercial advisory acquisition. Can you share with us how that's going to play into the strategy? And could it be a meaningful contributor to the business this year?

Yes. Look, as Brendan mentioned, I think we have one of the best positioned Commercial Bank in our space. And I would say over the last 10 years under Don and Ted, we have built an amazing franchise. First of all, on the product suite, if you think of it, our product suite is second to none. We have great ECM capabilities. We have great DCM capabilities, M&A, hedging around FX rates, et cetera. So it's fantastic to see that.

Second is our coverage models, right, whether it's the middle market that was the bread and butter of the business. And then we have expanded into mid-corporate. We are also expanding geographically into Florida, into Southern California, into New York City here. So that's actually giving us some more boost in the Commercial Bank as we think through.

We're also investing in technology. We are investing in the platforms around treasury, around cash management, around payments. Those actually comes with very good deposits, gets with fees. So those actually have been ROTCE accretive in many ways. And so it's a great platform. And then obviously, we have the private credit. We have been there for a long time in private credit. It's not we just hired yesterday, and we saw this trend a long time ago. So not only we have the relationships with the sponsor community, we also have the relationships with the corporates, but we also know how to structure risk, how to price risk. So that's also important. And that has been attracting a lot of talent to our platform as we go through.

So the Matrix acquisition that as we just mentioned, it's just -- it's a small boutique advisory firm that we bought. It's in downstream energy and some retail convenience. And it's -- we are closing it this quarter. So it will be part of our contribution this year, but it was always in the guide, and it's very small compared to overall CFG space.

Yes. Brendan, coming back to you on the reimagining of the bank, can you give us some examples of what you've done there, but also how is AI playing into the reimagining of the bank? And using the baseball vernacular, are we in the first, second, third innings of this AI transformation that it will be tied, not just to yours bank, but others as well?

Right. I'll start by just from Citizens standpoint, we've had this top program going on for well over a decade. And this is the third time we've taken a step back and had it be a significantly upsized program to reposition the bank. One was our IPO. Second was right before COVID with the digital transformation that was underway. And now here with the AI potentially revolution, that's underway across the globe. But it's not all AI, just pulling back about 50% of the program, I would call AI-fueled front-to-back zero-based transformation for the franchise. The other 50% is good old fashioned. What got us here won't get us to the next level. Let's simplify the business model, reflect on the next phase of our journey and reposition the bank that way.

So from a financial standpoint, we've shared that we think this will contribute, exit rate $450 million in net income at the end of 2028. And while we do that and build that impact in 2026, it will be negligible in terms of its impact, positive or negative, won't take us off our guide. And this is really not contemplated in our long-term guidance on -- or medium-term guidance on 16% to 18% ROE. So that's kind of how I think about the framing financially.

Your point around examples. In the non-tech space, I'll give you 3 quick ones. So we're front to back simplifying our vendor lineup, but more importantly, looking at it much more strategically, which horses do we think will be the right ones for us to bet on long term and consolidate. Our facilities, we've got a decent amount of vacancy after return to office, and we've built the bank product by product. So taking a step back, reshaping our culture, getting rid of excess space, consolidating will be good for expenses, but also good for culture and innovation and speed to market long term, that will be able to fuel a lot of our investments.

And then lastly, we're making a big investment in our branch network to drive long-term sustainable low-cost deposit growth and household growth. That's embedded in the non-AI piece. Where most of the conversation and action is on the AI front, so I'll give you a couple of examples, our call center. We've got aspiration to take out 50% plus of our phone calls and have them be served by an agentic AI agent. That is already in pilot. We're working through it, preparing to scale it. It's going quite well. And we've got strong conviction that by the end of the year, we'll have made a meaningful dent in that 50% goal.

Point number two is engineering. We believe that the role of an engineer will radically change in the future. Instead of an engineer coding on their keyboard, they're going to be overseeing 10 agentic bots that's doing 80% of the code development, and they'll take it the last mile. That's going to give tremendous leverage to our CapEx. So we think our developers will be 10x -- 5 to 10x more productive in a future world. That is also in the process of being developed.

And lastly -- not lastly, we have 47 initiatives. The last one I'll highlight is just analytics. A big investment in fraud and credit analytics to leverage AI to enhance loss rates, less false positives, better credit underwriting. So those are just a few examples. But I would say, look, despite every 6 months, I feel differently about the progress and maturity of AI. It's moving so fast. I still think we're in the second or third inning. We're starting to see real use cases. It's not vaporware, but it's still really nascent. And so we want to be on the forward leaning edge here.

Sure. Maybe we could move over to credit. And outside the general downtown office, everybody knows what's going on there. But when you guys -- Aunoy and Brendan, when you look at credit, are you seeing any trends that concern you? Or is it all still very manageable and...

Yes. Let me start and obviously, Brendan can jump in. But I think we feel good about credit where we are. You mentioned the general office, that's being worked out at pace, and I think those costs will come down. We also have the noncore book running down. We also have CRE coming down. Most of our originations, as you mentioned, in C&I or on the retail side are secured, lower loss content originations. So we feel that our credit costs are in the right shape. On the retail side, most of our -- 75% of our book is secured lending. So that's really helpful. And the loan-to-book value ratios, it has gone up over time. So I think we feel good about credit as we sit here today.

I just would accentuate that. Every last detail I look in the consumer business, there's nothing I'm losing sleep on at all. We're watching it closely just given what's going on in the macro backdrop. But there's nothing we see that's of any cause for concern. And on the private bank side, we've yet to have a delinquent loan or a charge-off.

No, that's very good. Aunoy, maybe we're 2 months into the quarter, maybe you could tell us how things are shaping up relative to your guidance and share us with those kinds of thoughts.

Absolutely. Look, we are very confident about meeting the overall guidance that we gave at earnings. The first 2 months have actually been quite constructive. We have seen good balance growth. We have seen clients engaged with us. We are seeing the capital markets flywheel going. Obviously, the last couple of weeks with the Middle East conflict, there has been some uncertainty. If it's short-lived, it probably won't matter. If it drags on, we will see if it has got any impact to our -- over the long term. But we feel very confident in meeting the guide that we set out at earnings for the quarter.

Great. We're running out of time, but I do want to -- last question for both of you. Just what do you want the investors to take away? What's the core message about Citizens' future outlook? And what is that message that you're starting with?

Sure. Look, as I have commented on, as you said, 5 months, I would say we have a lot of opportunity. We are executing in a very disciplined and a targeted manner, and we have the team in place, and we are confident of meeting our medium-term goals that we set out.

I would just add, many times, the investor community will look at most of the regional banks in a bucket and have a hard time finding differentiation. I feel really confident that there is significant differentiation in the Citizens' story. And I see that both in financial outcomes and the forward outlook of 500-plus basis points of operating leverage and the return profile improvement that we're seeing. But more importantly, durable, long-standing improving right to win in all of our customer segments. We've got distinctive growth with a distinctive right to win, which even when you get past the medium-term outlook, I feel really good that we're on a path to truly be a distinctive story in regional banking. And as we've mentioned, Bruce has helped lead a reload of the leadership team. We've got reimagine the bank going. We're really pulling out all the stops here to take a real run and have this be one of the strong stories in super regional banking over the next 1 to 3 years.

Great. Please join me in a round of applause thanking Brendan and Aunoy for coming.

All right, everybody. Hello again to all of you in the room and on the webcast. So continuing on a very upbeat morning for banks, we have with us Citizens Financial Group. And with us, we have Don McCree. You all know him as the Chair of Commercial Banking; and Ted Swimmer, our new Head of Commercial Banking. Welcome, you guys.

Thanks.

Thank you.

So we usually kick off these firesides with a macro-related question. But I think your breadth and depth of the commercial bank is still a little bit underrated by investors, I do want to start there.

So Ted, as I alluded to, you're transitioning into some pretty big shoes to fill right over there as you take over the business. And for those in the audience who haven't had a chance to meet you, could you give us a sense of how you and Don have evolved the business since the IPO and how more national the scope is of your middle market-focused banking business? I do want you to touch on the private equity and capital specialty that you built out and how your acquisitions of boutique M&A firms really rounded out your offering? I know it's a lot, no pressure.

So let's start with -- I think under Don's leadership, we've built the best commercial bank in the super regional set. We have spent the last really 10 years since Don's been here, building out our products, building out our relationships and building out industry verticals that make us a dominant force in the super regional market set.

We started originally as basically just 10 years ago, 11 years ago around the time of the IPO, we basically had the ability to lend and to take in deposits and really didn't have an ability to transition with our customers. Since that time, we've built out -- we started with leveraged finance, building out leveraged finance, being able to do syndications, do bonds, things of that nature in the leveraged area and then follow that up with bringing on more and more industry talent in sectors and then had a series of M&A acquisitions buying boutiques that have made us in certain industries, the leading force in whether it be gaming, whether it be digital infrastructure, things of that nature, we've built that out.

We have also continued to really focus on building out our client relationships. So we used to be really a middle market bank focused in Mid-Atlantic, focused in New England and the Midwest. Over the last 11, 12 years, what we have done is we have hired a number of bankers to cover larger customers, and we've recently changed that from being more geographically focused to being more industry focused. We have taken our franchise in the middle market and have expanded now into Florida, California and New York City.

We were resistant to do that for a fair amount of time because we never wanted to be just a middle market bank, which didn't have a retail presence or a different reason to be than just the middle market. We've always found that if we were in a region where we didn't have other things that go with it, you inherently wind up doing the more difficult deals, you do it at the lowest prices to try to gain market share.

But since we bought, we started to take on all the First Republic bankers in California and Florida, we had a reason to exist in these places, and we've been able to build out those areas very well. And in New York City, with the investors and the HSBC branch acquisitions, we've built out a fair -- a really good coverage effort in the middle market in New York City also. So we've been able to build all of that out, expand our geographies in the middle market.

I think we were one of the earlier regional banks to accept the private capital universe as something that's growing. And starting in really 2014, 2015, we started to invest a lot of time and resources into the private equity universe, starting with just doing the natural LBOs and things of that nature and now have been involved after our acquisition of JMP in 2021' be able to cover them from an equity perspective. We've linked our subscription line businesses, our lending to the direct lending funds, investing in the BDCs. And now we're doing the equity, the bonds and financing the private capital community, which has been a very good area of growth, and it's still a large area of growth for us into the future.

We take all of that and we combine it with what we have spent a lot of time and effort doing, which is investing in our treasury solution set. So every middle market company we bank, we push very hard on getting their treasury solutions business. That has -- we've been doing that at a really good clip and continue to build out. We've been able to get to the merchant services business with the nonbank merchant services. We're, I think, the dominant bank in doing that. And we continue now to figure out how to embed our treasury solutions into the private capital community. So it's all kind of working well.

And since we bought the -- or since we inherited the Private Bank or invested into the Private Bank, we have taken on this mantra of One Citizens, which means with every middle market company, every M&A transaction we do, we're introducing our private bankers in private wealth to make sure we're getting the other ancillary business and in reverse there and introducing us to a number of customers we never had access to.

So all in all, it's working very well. The flywheel is working. We've been very successful on buying a series of M&A boutiques, whether it be DH Capital, Trinity, Western Reserve, Boostring. They've been very -- we've had a great growth and industry dominance because of them. And then JMP has introduced us to the equity market and biotech and health care. So I think we're in a really, really good position to take advantage of what we see as a very positive market over the next couple of years.

So what do you think are the big factors that will hit in 2026? But also looking forward, what are the sort of the 3- to 5-year accomplishments that you want to check off?

So most importantly, I have inherited a wonderful business through Don. And what we really want to do is step on the accelerator now. We've done all this in the last -- really since the end of 2021, we've been in a kind of sluggish to weak overall banking environment. There's been very little in the way of M&A. There's been very little new funding from banks to provide. We are starting to see a series of signs out there that will indicate that we are now on a much better trajectory than we thought -- that we've been on in the past 3 years.

So we're going to continue to invest into our industry specialties. We're going to continue to make sure that we are -- have the best corporate finance M&A bankers in the industries we choose to cover. We're going to continue to expand into Florida and California into New York, make sure we have a very good product offering in those areas. We're going to spend time on further deepening our product set. So we've -- we feel very good about what we're doing on the loan side. I think we're going to continue to spend more time investing in the bond side of our business, continuing to build out private equity coverage as that market continues to be stronger.

And then a couple of other things. We are going to be investing more into our treasury solutions product set. Although I think we've done a really good job over the last 10 years, there are so many different areas you can invest in that business, add customers that we had never seen before.

We are -- we've also spent -- and I should have said this earlier, we spent a fair amount of time reenvisioning our balance sheet. So we have continue to pivot away from our less profitable opportunities and put more money into where we can make higher returns. We had called it balance sheet optimization in the last 2 years. I think it's now more BA use business where we're going to continue to exit customers that are -- no fault of theirs or no fault of ours, we're not achieving the revenues that we'd like to achieve. but we're going to redeploy that capital into areas where we think we can have much better growth based on our industry expertise now.

And finally, as a bank, we're going to continue to leverage our AI expertise. We've been very public talking about reimagining the bank and how we think there's a lot of opportunity and a lot of cost saves by continuing to invest and leverage AI and also leverage all the processes that we've developed and simplify them. And we're going to continue to use that and focus on that in the commercial bank.

So lots to unpack there. Perhaps let's start with the private markets, which has been a big theme in general and over the past 1.5 days at this conference. So sponsors are sitting on both levels of elevated value and dry powder. So maybe question number one, where are we on the timing versus valuation sort of discussion with the sponsors?

So I would say, as last year kicked off, we felt really good about 2025 being the year, and then we all had Liberation Day, which had -- although Liberation Day and that whole trauma around that was probably 6 to 7 weeks, the impact of that went for far longer because companies, as they were getting ready to sell, there still wasn't clarity on tariffs. There wasn't clarity on what their projections were going to be, which made companies more uncomfortable about putting their companies up to sale at this point.

I think we've -- as we enter '26, we feel much better. We still -- there's always volatility in our markets, but we feel much better that companies and buyers and sellers have more consistency around where they think their earnings are going. And as such, we think that we will -- I know -- I mean our pipelines are showing and I think all the banks pipeline are showing a number of companies who are putting their -- want to now private equity and middle market companies who are ready to put their companies up to sale.

The valuation -- for top companies, for A, A- companies, the valuations have been -- we've been able to find buyers or sellers where it got more difficult was on the second level down where there was a -- the seller was like, no, this company is worth so much more, just wait and the buyer was like, well, I'll wait till see. So we had trouble transacting. I feel like that bid-ask spread is narrowing relatively significantly, and we will start seeing those transactions occur in '26.

We have to keep in mind that these processes are kicking off now. So although I think this will be a very, very good year. I don't know that it will be the best start-off point. But I think with the pipelines we're all seeing, we feel really good about what the year is going to look like by the end of it.

So Ted, you elegantly took us through the evolution of Citizens from financing LBOs to being a more complete partner. So maybe as we think about the potential monetization of these investments, how will Citizens benefit, whether it's through a continuation vehicle, a merger like you mentioned or an IPO?

So with private capital, with private equity, we have -- we look at these relationships as holistic relationships. We have moved from covering these customers on a product-by-product basis -- and we now -- we're trying to mirror what the private equity -- the private capital firms do with us. They look at us as one bank servicing them. We're trying to look at them as one fund and how do we best service that one fund.

So we have -- from the simple part of financing and trying to do the sponsor's LBOs, we also layer that with doing subscription line business. We're providing that capital will provide an ability for the sponsor to leverage their returns a little bit. And if that's important to them, we'll provide private capital. We're lending to their direct lending funds, we'll provide that kind of business to them. We will continue to look at lending to BDCs, if that capital is important.

So we're looking at the overall relationship from a holistic perspective. And we think by doing that, we're having enough this dialogue, whereas if they do a continuation vehicle and they need an underwrite on a bank deal to move from one fund to the other, we'll be able to provide that for them. We'll be able to provide the expertise on that transition. We've done it several times now in the digital infrastructure space where we can provide the expertise to a customer on transitioning.

But most importantly, continuing to give the company and the financial sponsor the right advice on what to do, when the right time to sell is. And because we have all these different avenues into that financial sponsor, we can have a fair amount of seamless dialogue with them and make sure that they're getting to hear our advice, which definitely positions us to get the revenues when they do choose to transact.

And Erica, let me just amplify something on that point is one of the things we've tried to do is be completely agnostic about executions. So if you think about what we tried to build, we can distribute and underwrite into private credit, into CLOs, into BDCs, into bank markets based on what market conditions look like and what the underlying transaction kind of dictates in terms of transaction structure. And then you broaden that out and say, you can go senior debt, you can go securities, you can go private equity, you can go family offices.

And it's really -- as we engage with clients, particularly in highly transactional clients. I mean if you think about our industry efforts, they're very transactional industries. So I think gaming and digital infrastructure, it's where the action is, and it's always changing in terms of where market appetite is. So we view our responsibility to our clients is kind of talk to them about the right execution as opposed to having a bond guy go in and a syndicated loan guy go in and an asset-based finance person go in, but really talk about given where market conditions are, what the calendar looks like away from us and on us, here's the best execution for what you're trying to accomplish. And I think we're pretty unique in the regional space of having all of that and being able to move execution to execution.

So just double-clicking on one way to execute, obviously, through M&A. It's just been such a bullish morning on advisory revenues. So maybe remind us about how your capital markets revenues break down and how you expect to contribute to the 6% to 8% total firm fee growth.

So building on what Don just said, we look at capital markets as an overall -- if a company chooses to go to the bank market versus going to the bond market, if a company chooses to do an M&A transaction or hold off on an M&A transaction 1 year and take a dividend another year, we look at the -- just being able to serve the customer in whatever they do. So we don't necessarily look at or I don't necessarily focus on each individual product as a whole.

What I do -- what we do focus on is are we providing the right advice? Are we in front of the customer when we need to be in front of them. And what I think we both feel very good about is that by the level of activity we're seeing and the discussions we're having and the mandates we're getting signed up for, we feel good about where we see capital markets revenue go in 2026.

It just feels like a very different tone in the market. We were on a transaction last week for VSE which was a great equity transaction for us, something that we would not have been able to do 4 years ago that we were able to be very much involved with this time. So as companies are looking at different things to do, whether it's going to the equity markets, going to the bank market, whether it's just, hey, we need a bigger subscription line because we want to move this from one vehicle to another. We feel like we can -- we're there, and those conversations are definitely rising in 2026.

And I think what we said on the earnings call was 6% to 8% fee growth for the company with over-indexing towards wealth and capital markets. So we would expect to do higher levels in the capital markets business.

So Don, let's sort of switch to the Private Bank and how it's contributed. Obviously, the folks that you hired have had previous experience in terms of subscription finance, very niche specific multifamily and obviously, banking and managing the wealth of the owners of these businesses. How additive have they been? And do you expect that ramp to continue?

Yes. It's been actually incredible because -- I mean, there was a little bit of consternation at the beginning because it's, oh, wow, we're going to hire these fantastic bankers from the old First Republic, and they do what we do. They do subscription lines and we do subscription lines. Once we got through about the first month, their client base is completely different than our client base. They've tended to do venture and smaller funds. We tend to do larger funds in the big complexes. So I can't remember the number, but there's probably 10 crossover clients once you cut through it.

And I would say from the digestion of these teams -- and it was several hundred people. So it was a big, big set of acquisition of talent by the company. But we digested it pretty quickly, and it was probably 3 to 4 months where we really began to work together. And as Ted said, the key on these things is you start to get some wins on the board and you start to trust each other and you start to actually -- the private bankers begin to say -- and remember, First Republic didn't have a capital markets business. They really didn't have a lending business. They didn't have M&A capabilities. They didn't have equity capabilities. So they didn't have a lot of things that we can bring to bear for their clients. So it's a whole new opportunity for them to engage with their client base.

And we had Clarfeld and a little bit of a wealth business and a little bit of a private banking business, but we had nothing to speak of. So the complementarity of the 2 units and then you add -- Kristin, I can't remember 5, 6, 10 wealth acquisitions that we put on top of it buying wealth companies. the ability to go to market with a full complement of capabilities is just extraordinary from a standing start 2 years ago. And as you know, we're generating good returns. We're growing faster than we thought we were going to own the private bank and the wealth business. We've got decent LDRs. All the metrics look as good or better than we thought they were going to. But I think the key is the way the teams are working together.

Ted and I just got off a call this morning with a private banking client who runs -- they're on their fifth fund. We've never banked them. And they wanted to talk to us about how can we do more business with them, and they've been at First Republic or we don't use that word anymore. They were banked by the First Republic bankers for years. And it was just -- the bankers weren't even on the call. They trusted Ted and I to have that conversation, and that's happening all over the place. So I think the growth trajectories across all of these businesses are going to be quite significant.

And then the question is, how quickly do we let everything grow while making sure we maintain profitability. So I think one of the things we have done well is calibrated investments with revenue generation. So we haven't gone out and gotten way ahead of us from an expense standpoint, and we've been able to bring the revenue and the returns in pretty quickly underneath. So we talk about it all the time around do we do another wealth acquisition? Do we hire 10 more capital markets bankers, but we're definitely investing across the overall platform, and I think we're just beginning to get going. I think it's going to be quite exciting.

So you built something exciting. Now is the macro exciting. So Don, you said in June that the trade movie is behind us. So do you still feel that way? And specific to U.S. middle market corporates, how are they feeling about where they are on the investment side?

Remember the football movie, any given Sunday, I feel like it's any given Monday now.

And [indiscernible] over the weekend.

Yes, exactly. So I think that a couple of -- so if I go to the real macro and you say, we got a pretty good economy. We've got a pretty good regulatory environment. We've got a pretty good trajectory on interest rates. The long end is going to stay a little bit high, but the short end is going to come down a little bit more, I think. You've got a client base, which has confidence building within it. And so when we talked about the trade, the problem was early in a lot of these announcements and you can extrapolate that into the government shutdown.

The uncertainty -- and Ted said this, the uncertainty that it presented to the client base was just -- it froze them for a while. And they just -- and if you think about a year ago, when this all began to start, it was like, oh my God. But then now the pattern is very much there's a negotiation rhythm, I think, that's going on of the administration where things get announced and then it's generally okay. So I think a lot of the client base has gotten relatively numb to some of the headlines. Whether that's right or not, we will see.

But what has happened in the client base is -- and remember, Erika, if you go back to '25 and '24, we had really robust capital markets activity. It was like 95% refinancing. So there was no new money content and new money content is where the exciting things really happen. There's been a real pivot starting probably in December to new money transactions, and that's both in private equity and in the corporate side.

So you had a lot of people -- and I think this goes all the way back to COVID, who had pulled in their range and said, I'm going to run my business very conservatively. I'm not going to over-hire. I'm not going to leverage. I'm not going to invest -- that's definitely shifted. And people see an opportunity. And I don't know if it's because they want to try to get in before the midterms, they want to try to get in before the general elections, but they want to move.

And so I think there's quite a bit of stability in the markets, notwithstanding the software and AI rotation that's going on and a lot of that. But I think the macros feel really good to me right now in terms of the backdrop that we're sailing into. So if you combine what we think we've built from a client service and a product standpoint with a pretty good environment, and we look out into '26 and '27, I just think it's a phenomenal kind of opportunity for us.

And then you're going to get bumps in the road and things get volatile and things might slow down from quarter-to-quarter. But as Ted said, our pipelines look great across all products, and we just feel like there's a real opportunity to really get to where we think potential was. And I'm not going to tell you what we think potential is, but it's higher than we are today.

I was about to get more excited. So to that end, you have participated well in the indirect lending growth. Given your comments about net new money investments and your -- the diversity of your pipeline, do you think direct lending is something that -- to the companies, right, to the middle market companies is something that they grow in '26?

It's interesting. I -- and I don't want to say this firmly, but I can't think of many places where we've lost significant business in the middle market to a direct lender, where we see them is in leveraged buyout land. And what they do -- so go back to the real macro around how we think about leveraged finance. We are a diversification institution. So I hold an average of $12 million in a leveraged buyout. So I'm not counting on leveraged lending to drive NII. That's an origination to distribution business. And so whether we're distributing to, as I said before, banks, CLOs or private credit, we still make the same kind of distribution fees.

And Ted's hired a couple of people on our syndicate desk, which do nothing but give syndicate services to private credit funds. It's a specialty kind of acquisition. And for them, it jumps off of our industry expertise because you've got to know which private credit funds like, which industries and where they want to play in size and what their metrics are. So building that distribution acronym.

So if I kind of think about the math, and we've moved from lending to a leverage buyout to lending to an underlying private credit fund and financing those portfolios, we make just about as much in terms of fees as doing a leverage buyout as we do arranging a transaction for a private credit fund, and you're trading idiosyncratic credit risk for diversified borrowing base credit risk at an entry point of $0.60 on the dollar or thereabouts where we have substitution rights. So this is kind of an investment-grade quality where we're participating in leveraged finance through an intermediary vehicle as opposed to direct. So I'll do that trade all day long.

And I think the one thing that I'm proud of is we've stayed ahead of a lot of these trends, and we could see it coming. And part of that is -- and we've never really talked about this, the level of expertise that have been through multiple set of market disruptions that are sitting on our platform is extraordinary. So they have -- they've been doing this for 10, 20, 30 years, and you can kind of see the movie as it unfolds, and I think we've positioned the company really well. So we haven't lost a beat. And in fact, we probably have achieved slightly higher loan growth than we otherwise would have by participating in the private credit complex. I don't know if you want to add anything.

Yes. The thing I would add is the acquisition of JMP in 2021, where they had such expertise in providing equity research on these type of companies has positioned us as the direct lenders have grown to be able to find fee opportunities with these lenders that we never had the ability to do prior to JMP. So when they go to the equity markets, when they go to the bond markets, now when they go -- when they want to consolidate, we now have the expertise to do any of those type of transactions for them.

So as this complex continues to grow, I think we feel really in a great position to take advantage of the growth with a whole series of different fee opportunities and balance sheet opportunities that we never had in the past. So to Don's point, we've embraced this community. We stayed ahead of where the rest of the market is, and I think we're going to see the fruits of our labor really in the next couple of years.

Are we just at the beginning of the Big Beautiful Bill impact to the CapEx cycle?

Yes, we're at the beginning. We're seeing some minor impacts on that. We're seeing slightly elevated usage of our balance sheet of our utilization on our revolver lines are slightly higher than they were. I don't know how deep it's going to go, but we are definitely seeing some impact with that with companies who for 5 years, to Don's point earlier, the concern after COVID is do I invest? Do I want to take this risk? We are starting to see some of that impact.

Hard to say whether it's a Big Beautiful Bill, hard to say whether it's just we've been 5, 6 years and we haven't made CapEx investments. It's finally start doing it. But yes, we're starting to see some pickup there, which is part of our loan growth that we expect to see in '26.

So Don, Ted earlier talked about expansion markets, Florida, California, New York City. If I missed something, please be additive. I think it's very clear what the answer is after talking to you guys for 20 minutes, but you see -- you're distinguishing yourself by being a complete solution, right? So maybe unpack that a little bit in terms of when you enter those expansion markets, how you end up winning?

Yes. So I think it's different by market. So one of the things that Ted didn't mention that is important about these expansions is we now have brand. It was very hard for Citizens to roll into Florida because it was like who's Citizens. And there's 43 different citizens that we compete with. So it's very confusing to people. So the fact that we're in these markets with the Private Bank that we're in California with -- and New York with an investment bank in the form of the old JMP, which we rebranded as Citizens, you're starting to get that Citizens brand out there, which is -- the conversation doesn't start with who are you? It starts with, oh, yes, we've seen the kind of things that you're doing.

So I'd say we're playing the different markets, and we're seeing that dynamic slightly differently. So New York, we did investors. We did HSBC, which gave us a big branch network, very big business banking growth, very big middle market growth in New York. And we were already in New York in size, not banking corporates per se, but banking the whole sponsor communities in New York. So we were all over New York, and we were in the capital markets. And so we were reasonably well known in New York.

And I think the way we've done New York City on our side of the business, we've hired outstanding bankers from the money centers, both JPMorgan and Wells and I saw all my friends from JPMorgan and Wells. So it was just they were ready to move, and we're hiring teams in Long Island and New Jersey and New York City, and the transaction is quite strong. So that's kind of a regular way middle market. And the way we play all of these markets is not only are we full service, but we pay attention to you. we really are all over these companies. And our service model and our service bundle, and that's been even more reinforced with the private bank. If you think about what First Republic was, it was all service service, service service and one-stop shop. So that's the way we play in New York.

Florida has been interesting. We have all of that. But what we're finding in Florida is there are a lot of middle market companies, which are with smaller banks who don't really want to be with the gigantic mega banks. So a lot of our wins have been companies that are outgrowing their original relationships and need a fuller service platform, whether it be trade or treasury services or capital markets access or whatever it might be. And then California, it's really a new economy play. And we're trying -- there's been a real void created in the California market with Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic and a little bit of Union Bank, not as present as they once were. So there's really a dearth of provision.

We're not going into the pre-cash flow financing arena, but we do have some partners on the private credit side that are working with it will provide some of those facilities. So working -- that's back to the private credit complex, working with those people to provide financing into some of these situations, while we can come in and provide early-stage research versus JMP, provide good tech banking, provide biotech banking, provide fintech banking. It just seems that that's the angle that we're playing in California.

And I would say that the strength of our private banking capabilities in California are unbelievable. The reach they have into the Silicon Valley, San Francisco community and the network effect that gives us in terms of just people that they know where doors open and we can have -- and I'll go back to one of the things that Ted threw out is this whole One Citizens thing. It sounds cliche and a lot of banks talk about it. It's really powerful.

And so -- and again, it comes back to do you have excellence of client interaction and excellence of execution in every touch. So if we were coming in with a mediocre set of capital markets or advisory capabilities, the private bank wouldn't swing open the doors. If they were coming in with a mediocre private banking opportunity, we wouldn't swing open the doors. But the quality of the capability set that we've put together, I think, is allowing us to leverage one another, and that's probably happening most powerfully in the private sponsor community and in the California market. So each one is a little different.

And one of the things we are really careful about is one size does not fit all, one strategy does not fit all. As Ted said, we're doing a much better job, I would say, probably 95% of the clients that we've added in the expansion markets have been full wallet treasury services clients. So we're in there saying, this is a quid pro quo that has to be part of the move of the relationship. We want everything. We want the deposits, we want the treasury services. And now that those businesses are really up to snuff against any of the competition, which they weren't 10 years ago, there's a much higher degree of likelihood that we'll win all that business is what we're seeing. So it's exciting.

And then I would just say one more thing, and Ted has driven this. We've taken everything that we're learning in the expansion markets and asking ourselves the questions, do we have an incremental opportunity in our core markets? I mean our talk track in our core markets has always been we have #2 share or #3 share. We're kind of saturated, but we actually don't think that's true anymore. So you should expect us to see some new growth in some of our core markets also.

So to wrap this in a boat, Ted, underneath the spot loan growth guide of 3% to 5% for the firm, what is the contribution from your business for this year?

We are seeing good opportunities. Again, I think I mentioned earlier, we're starting to see the middle market companies start utilizing their revolvers, which is a good sign for loan growth. On the mid-corporate side, we've been involved already with a couple of acquisitions that have required us to use our balance sheet, which we like to do to fund those acquisitions. That is going well on the sponsor side of the business, we -- with the pickup in acquisitions, we see our subscription line business going up. We see our lending to the directs, that business starting to go up, too. So we feel like the utilization in all of those businesses are doing well.

Overall, if we continue to see this M&A pickup, that will fuel a lot of our loan growth just by the natural ability to go off of our balance sheet. That, combined with, as Don just talked about, the expansion markets, we think there's plenty of opportunities to see balance sheet growth in Florida, California and New York, which we are patient -- we're not -- we -- are small percentages to our overall loan growth, but incrementally, we can see some pretty decent sized jumps in those areas. So we feel like the commercial bank is going to be a healthy part to what's going on in our overall guide.

So before I leave it to you for a key takeaway, Don, since you mentioned that there was clearly some volatility last week surrounding software valuations. I think we're way past the cockroach conversation. But generally speaking, I think that the investors are right. They're looking at sectors, right, rather than just credit overall. Are there any sectors where maybe it's flashing yellow in your minds?

No. We don't have much in the software arena. So we're watching that. And when we look through into our private credit exposures. And again, we see what they have and we see what's going on in the portfolios. We don't see anything in that, that's particularly worrisome. I mean it's low single-digit percentages of our portfolio. So it's just not a significant business for us. I'd say we're watching retail. And again, we don't have that much retail, but anything linked to the lower-end consumer with this K recovery that's going on, you got to have a little bit of an eye on.

We've had some eyes on biotech, although that seems to be coming back again. We -- our exposure there is we have a reasonably modest kind of bio real estate portfolio, labs and things like that, but those seem to be being fed and kept alive. We haven't had any losses or distress in there of any significance. Health care in general, again, it's -- we'd like to be bigger in health care. We're not. And with all the changes going on in reimbursement and what's going to go on with the restructuring of health care, you got to be focused a little bit on that sector.

And then, of course, the whole data center space where we do have exposures, but we think we've been really prudent with the way we've structured our activities there. And there's some structural degradation that's going on in certain parts of data center lending, which we haven't gone there yet. But there's going to be a lot of volatility around -- I think the macro is intact, but I think there'll be a lot of questions, whether it be across power, across water, across data center. But I think the way we've structured what we've done so far feels pretty good. So if I look out at the C&I books and the like, we've got an idiosyncratic thing here or there, but there's no major, major themes as it relates to the portfolios that we're running that worry us.

And then I think there's a little bit of a -- you just have to always keep an eye on regulatory shifts and changes that are coming out of Washington and what does it mean from -- and it's really not necessarily an industry thing per se, but it's a company-by-company kind of event. And then the leverage portfolios are holding up pretty well. So we don't see a lot that really worries us right now. So I think that just feeds that whole narrative that we think it's going to be a good backdrop to be -- not going to have -- and I think that's true of the industry. So you're not going to have a lot of banks kind of inwardly focused on problems. They're going to be focused on how do we actually get business done.

Growth has been a big theme this morning.

Yes. That's good.

So Ted, before we sign off, what is the key takeaway you'd like to leave the investor community about your business and how you could really help the firm accelerate towards that 16% to 18% ROTCE target?

Well, it's exciting, and I couldn't be happier about where we are right now. I think as we started this conversation, we positioned this bank to be -- we position our commercial bank to be in great position to take advantage of the market we are in today, which is, I think, will be dominated by larger -- more M&A, more transactional business versus the market we've been in the last 3 years, which has been -- or 4 years, which has basically been a refinancing market. So we've been investing and we've been spending our time so that when this market comes, we will be in a great position to win our fair share of transactions.

Based on our pipelines right now, I feel like we're in a great, great spot to -- and I think our strategy has gotten us to where our pipelines are. Now the most important thing we have to do this year and next year is execute as well as I think we can to prove that we belong to and we deserve to get the businesses we're getting, whether that be the best price for a company on a bank deal, the best valuation for a company on an M&A deal, the best execution in putting our treasury solutions to a company.

We have to, one, first and foremost, execute. I think with that, we'll have the ability to continue to invest in more and more industry verticals that we can distinguish ourselves into, put more resources into our expansion markets on the middle market, continue to build out our mid-corporate industry coverage, which has -- again, we've just changed that and hopefully continue to invest in the private capital community as we continue to still see that as a growth vehicle going forward.

So if we can execute, if we can make the revenues that I think we're well positioned to make, I think taking and putting our foot on the accelerator and staying ahead of where our competitors are is what our real goals are going forward.

Great. Ted and Don, thank you so much for joining us here in one of your expansion markets, Florida.

Thank you, Erika.

Thanks, Erika.

Thank you.

Welcome, and thank you for standing by. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Kristin Silberberg. Thank you. You may begin.

Thanks, Julie. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. First, this morning, our Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun; and CFO, Aunoy Banerjee will provide an overview of our fourth quarter and full year results. Brendan Coughlin, our President; and Don McCree, our Chair of Commercial Banking, are also here to provide additional color. We will be referencing our fourth quarter and full year presentation located on our Investor Relations website. After the presentation, we will be happy to take questions.

Our comments today will include forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to differ materially from expectations. These are outlined for your review in the presentation. We also reference non-GAAP financial measures, so it's important to review our GAAP results in the presentation and the reconciliations in the appendix.

And with that, I will hand it over to Bruce.

Thanks, Kristin, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call today. We were pleased to finish the year with another strong quarter. Our financial results were paced by net interest margin expansion of 7 basis points, strong wealth and capital markets fees, positive operating leverage of 1.3% sequential and 5.2% year-on-year, favorable credit trends, and a robust balance sheet across capital, liquidity and funding.

We are executing well on our strategic initiatives. Our Private Bank finished the year with $14.5 billion in deposits, $10 billion in client assets, and $7.2 billion in loans. The business was 7% accretive to pretax income in 2025, ahead of our 5% target. Importantly, we manage this business to a 25% ROE for the year. We continue to grow nicely in New York City Metro and our corporate banking expansion into new geographies, verticals and sponsors is delivering good results. We made significant progress in running down noncore assets from $6.9 billion at the beginning of the year to $2.5 billion at the end, which included a sale of a student loan portfolio. Our top 10 programs hit the mark with $100 million plus run rate benefits in Q4.

For the quarter, our EPS was up 8% sequentially and 36% year-over-year. NII is up 9% year-on-year as net interest margin is up 20 basis points and spot loans grew 3%. Fees are up 8% year-on-year, paced by Capital Markets and Wealth. Provision is down $25 million year-on-year as losses reduced on CRE office and credit in general looks good. We retired 3% of our shares in 2025 and delivered an 80% return of capital to shareholders. For the full year, our EPS of $3.86 was up 19% relative to 2024. We hit most of our line items in the beginning of year guide, which is included on Slide 31.

Our expenses were up 4.6% versus the guide of 4%, given the fee performance beat and associated incentive compensation and our desire to keep building out private bank and wealth. We delivered positive operating leverage of around 1.25% for the year. We think -- as we think about 2026 our focus will continue to be strong execution of our strategic initiatives. The biggest new addition will be Reimagine The Bank, which has been launched and is creating real excitement at Citizens. We've included a couple of slides in our presentation on this program.

What I'd like to call out is that the deployment of new technologies and approaches under Reimagine The Bank will deliver meaningful enhancements to customer experience. This will drive some real revenue benefits in addition to the targeted expense efficiency improvements from the program. This program has around 50 initiatives at the outset but we will add to this over time, providing further upside.

Looking ahead, the macro environment for 2026 should be favorable. We see solid GDP growth, stable unemployment and inflation falling by the end of the year. We project two more Fed rate cuts with the yield curve steepening as the 10-year stays anchored around 4.25%. We anticipate the regulatory environment to stay positive. We will look to take some basic steps on stable coins, but we do not see a big lift off and impact in 2026. Notwithstanding several of our peers engaging on acquisitions, our focus for the foreseeable future remains on our attractive organic growth agenda.

With respect to the 2026 outlook, we expect very strong revenue performance, controlled expenses, significant positive operating leverage and lower credit costs. NII growth of 10% to 12% will be paced by strong continuing NIM expansion and solid loan growth, led by Private Bank and C&I. Fees will continue to grow off a strong year in 2025. The capital markets backdrop is highly favorable and Citizens is well positioned. Our wealth business is in a great position to grow, both with private bank customers as well as branch-based customers.

Expense growth is projected to be comparable to this year as we seek to maintain the growth rate of the private bank. We have been disciplined in ensuring that the Private Bank achieved sustainable growth with attractive returns. To reimagine the bank impact in 2026, we'll deliver onetime costs of around $50 million versus benefits of $45 million, which are incorporated in this guidance. We do not intend to break out the onetime costs as notable as we've done in the past.

Credit costs will continue to improve as the CRE office portfolio continues to be worked out. We continue to see mix improvements delivering benefits to the charge-off and provision rates over time. We will manage our CET1 ratio to 10.5% to 10.6% throughout 2026. We envision share repurchases of approximately $700 million to $850 million. We also are hopeful that the Fed modeling improvements will meaningfully lower our SCB. We've included some slides on our medium-term outlook and how the drag from our legacy swap portfolio will dissipate with time. We remain confident in our ability to achieve our medium-term 16% to 18% ROTCE target.

To sum up, we are feeling very good about our positioning for the future. Our strategy rests on a transformed consumer bank, the best positioned super regional commercial bank and the aspiration to have the premier bank-owned private bank. We continue to make steady progress, and we'll continue to execute with the financial and operating discipline that you've come to expect from us.

I'd like to end my remarks by thanking our colleagues for rising to the occasion and delivering a great effort in 2025. We know we can count on you again this year. And with that, let me turn it over to Aunoy for his debut performance. Aunoy?

Thanks, Bruce. Good morning, everyone. I am excited to be part of team Citizens and to help execute our [ well planned ] strategy. Now turning to our performance.

As Bruce indicated, we delivered strong results in 2025 that were in line with our expectations at the beginning of the year. The fourth quarter delivered continued good performance, and we are well positioned for 2026. Referencing Slides 3 to 7, I will provide some highlights for the full year and the fourth quarter.

First, spending a moment on the full year results. We delivered EPS of $3.86 for 2025, up 19% on an underlying basis and that includes a $0.28, or just over 7% contribution from the private bank. Importantly, we also achieved full year positive operating leverage of approximately 125 basis points on an underlying basis. Net interest income was up 4% as we delivered 13 basis points of margin expansion. Fees were up a strong 11% on an underlying basis, led by record results in both Wealth, up 22%, and Capital Markets, which had a nice pickup in the second half, up 9% year-over-year.

Expenses were managed well, up 4.6% on an underlying basis, reflecting the continued investment in the build-out of the Private Bank and Wealth. We also managed credit well, maintaining strong reserve coverage levels with credit losses coming in line with our expectations at the start of the year. We ended the year in a very strong balance sheet position maintaining robust capital, strong liquidity levels and a healthy credit reserve. For the fourth quarter, we generated EPS of $1.13, up 8% linked quarter and 36% year-on-year, and delivered a 12.2% proxy. The Private Bank continues to steadily grow its earnings contribution, adding $0.10 to EPS in Q4, up $0.02 linked quarter.

Now I will talk to the fourth quarter results in more detail, starting with net interest income on Slide 8. Net interest income increased 3% linked quarters, driven by a strong expansion of our net interest margin and a 1% increase in average interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin continues to steadily expand, up 7 basis points this quarter to 3.07%. 3 basis points of the margin expansion was driven by the benefits of noncore runoff and reduced impact from the terminated swaps, what we refer to as time-based benefits. The rest was a combination of fixed rate asset repricing and lower funding costs, which was partially offset by lower asset yields. We continue to do a good job optimizing deposits in a competitive environment. Interest-bearing deposit costs were down 15 basis points, while total deposit costs were down 12 basis points. Our cumulative interest-bearing deposit [ beta ] is about 48% through the end of the year.

Moving to Slide 9. Fees are down 2% linked quarter but up 10% year-over-year on an underlying basis. Our Wealth business delivered another record quarter driven by continued progress in the Private Bank and strength in the retail network, up 5% linked quarter and 31% year-over-year. These results reflected higher advisory fees with continued positive momentum in fee-based AUM growth, including strong inflow from the conversion of Private Wealth lift outs as well as market appreciation.

Capital Markets delivered its third best quarter ever, up 16% year-over-year, though down 16% compared with the exceptionally strong third quarter. Several M&A and equity deals were pushed into '26 given the impacts associated with the government shutdown. As a result, we expect roughly $20 million of related fees to be recognized in the first quarter. Despite deals pushing into '26, our equity underwriting performance was still up nicely linked quarter and up significantly year-over-year. Loan syndication fees were very strong this quarter, driven by refinance activity and bond underwriting fees were solid, although lower than the very strong third quarter. We continue to perform well in the league tables, ranking second in the fourth quarter, and fourth for the full year on both volume and number of deals for middle market sponsored loan syndications. And our deal pipeline across M&A, debt and equity Capital Markets remains strong.

On Slide 10, expenses are up 0.6% on a sequential basis, largely reflecting continued investment in the build-out of the Private Bank and Private Wealth, and higher incentive compensation. Disciplined expense management and strong revenues resulted in approximately 79 basis points of improvement in our efficiency ratio to 62%. Our TOP 10 program achieved $100 million of pretax run rate benefit exiting the year, and we have launched our Reimagine The Bank initiative, which I will discuss in more detail shortly.

On Slide 11, average and period-end loans were up 1%, or up 2% excluding the noncore portfolio run-up of roughly $500 million in the quarter. We saw solid loan growth across each of the businesses as noncore runoff and balance sheet optimization impacts lessen. The private bank delivered solid loan growth again this quarter with period-end loans up about $1.2 billion, driven by a pickup in sponsor line utilization, along with growth in multifamily and residential [indiscernible]. Commercial loans were up slightly on a spot basis driven by net new money originations in corporate banking and higher commercial line utilization, partially offset by CR pay-downs. We continued to reduce CRE balances which were down about 4% this quarter and 10% for the year, and retail loans saw some nice growth driven by home equity and mortgage.

Next, on Slides 12 and 13. We continue to do a good job on deposits with noninterest-bearing balances up 2%, maintaining a steady mix at 22% of the book, even as our total spot deposits increased approximately 2% to $183 billion. Average deposits were also up 2%, or $3.9 billion, driven by growth in the Private Bank, Commercial and Retail. Private bank deposits reached $14.5 billion at the end of the year, including some larger flows towards the end of the quarter. We continue to focus on optimizing our deposit funding costs, reducing the average rate trade across all businesses, driving interest-bearing deposit costs down 15 basis points linked quarter. This, combined with the growth in noninterest-bearing deposits helped to drive our total deposit cost down 12 basis points. And importantly, our noninterest-bearing and low-cost deposit mix increased to 43%, and our stable retail deposits are 65% of our total deposits, which compares to a peer average of about 55%.

Moving to credit on Slide 14. Credit continues to trend favorably with net charge-offs coming in at 43 basis points, down from 46 basis points in the prior quarter. Nonaccrual loans were down slightly linked quarter driven by a decrease in commercial real estate. Criticized balances also continued to decline.

Turning to the allowance for credit losses on Slide 15. The allowance was down slightly to 1.53% this quarter as the portfolio mix continues to improve due to noncore runoff, the reduction in the CRE portfolio, and lower loss content front book originations across C&I and retail real estate [ secured ]. The economic forecast supporting the allowance is relatively stable with the prior quarter. And as we look broadly across the portfolio, the credit outlook looks good. The general office portfolio continues to work out as expected, and we maintain a robust allowance of 10.8% coverage. Importantly, the cumulative charge-off, plus the current reserve, translates to a total expected lifetime loss rate of about 20% against the [ March 23 ] loan balance, and that level has been consistent with our view for the past year.

Moving to Slide 16. We maintained excellent balance sheet strength. Our CET1 ratio is 10.6%, and adjusting for the AOCI optout removal our CET1 ratio increased to 9.5%. We returned a total of $326 million to shareholders in the fourth quarter, with $201 million in common dividends, and $125 million of share repurchases. For 2025, we returned $1.4 billion, or 80% of our 2025 earnings to shareholders. We repurchased $600 million of common stock at an average price of $44.55, representing about 3% of outstanding shares at the beginning of the year. Our tangible book value per share increased to $38.07, up $1.34, or 4% sequentially, with full year growth of $5.73 per share, or 18% year-over-year.

Moving to Slide 17 through 20. We are well positioned to drive strong performance over the medium term with our overall focused strategy. A transformed consumer bank, the best positioned super regional commercial bank, and our aspiration to build the premier bank owned Private Bank and Private Wealth franchise. The Private Bank continues to make excellent progress, as you see on Slides 19 and 20. We exceeded our balance sheet targets and delivered full year earnings of $0.28, contributing a little over 7% to EPS in 2025, well ahead of our original projection of 5%.

The Private Bank delivered strong deposit growth again this quarter, ending the year at $14.5 billion. Importantly, the overall deposit mix continues to be very attractive, with about 36% in noninterest bearing at the end of the year. We also delivered strong loan growth in the quarter, adding roughly $1 billion of loans to end the year at $7.2 billion. Since the launch of the Private Bank in '23, we have added 10 wealth teams to our platform with more in the pipeline. We ended the year with $10 billion of total client assets, reflecting the continued strong conversion rates of the wealth hires. We have more runway here, and we plan to continue adding top quality teams in key geographies.

Given the investments we have made and our plans to further expand the private bank in '26, we think deposits can grow to $18 billion to $20 billion, loans in the range of $11 billion to $13 billion, and client assets, $16 billion to $20 billion. We expect this growth will help drive an increase in Private Bank's earnings contribution to mid-teens in the medium term, while maintaining a 20% to 25% ROE profile.

Moving to Slides 21 and 22. We have launched our firm-wide Reimagine The Bank initiative. The objective is to position Citizens for long-term success by embracing a host of new innovative technologies across the bank, and simplifying our business model which will reshape our customer experience and drive a meaningful improvement in productivity and efficiency.

Slide 21 will give you a sense for the scope of the effort which spans nearly every part of the bank. Slide 22 lays out our financial targets for the program. For 2026, we expect to minimize the EPS impact of onetime cost and capital investments by prioritizing initiatives with faster paybacks. There will be about $50 million of front-loaded onetime costs that will be effectively offset by $45 million of benefits to be realized later in the year. The program will drive positive net benefits in '27 that we expect will accelerate in '28, and we are targeting fully phased-in pretax run rate benefits of approximately $450 million as we exit 2028. Roughly 2/3 of these benefits are [indiscernible] to expense efficiencies, which equate to about 5% of our full year 2025 expense base. Importantly, we are confident that the financial benefits of Reimagine The Bank will be additive to the 16% to 18% ROTCE targets we expect to achieve in the second half of '27.

Moving to Slide 23. I will take you through our full year '26 outlook, which contemplates a forward curve with two 25 basis point Fed cuts, one in June and another in September, ending the year with Fed funds approaching 3% to 3.25%, and a 10-year treasury rate anchored around 4.25%. We expect NII to be up 10% to 12% with NIM expanding about 4 to 5 basis points a quarter towards 3.25% in 4Q '26. Loan growth is expected to pick up this year, with spot loans up 3% to 5%, average loans up 2.5% to 3.5%, and overall earning assets up 4% to 5%.

Noninterest income is expected to be up 6% to 8%, driven primarily by Wealth and Capital Markets. We are projecting expenses to be up 4.5% as we are confident in our revenue outlook, and we plan to maintain our investments in growth initiatives. This translates to our 2026 full year operating leverage in excess of 500 basis points.

We have provided a walk showing the key components of our '26 expense growth on Slide 24. Credit is projected to continue to improve through the year with our outlook for net charge-offs in the mid- to high 30s basis points. Along with these credit trends, the improving credit trends, the portfolio mix will also continue to improve. And finally, we expect to end the year with strong CET1 ratio of 10.5% to 10.6%. We expect to generate a substantial amount of capital, which will put us in an excellent position to push forward with our strategic priorities, while returning a substantial amount of capital to shareholders. Notwithstanding anticipated strong loan growth, we expect to repurchase $700 million to $850 million in shares this year.

Full year 2026 earnings incorporates, a nice lift from the continued growth of the Private Bank. On Slide 25, we provide the guide for the first quarter. Note that the first quarter has seasonal impacts on revenue with lower day count impacting net interest income. Taxes on the FICA reset and compensation payouts impacting expenses. Fees are normally softer in the first quarter, but we are expecting a strong performance from capital markets after incorporating the deals that were pushed from the fourth quarter.

Moving to Slides 26 to 28. Looking out over the medium term, we see a clear path to achieving our 16% to 18% ROTCE target in the second half of '27, with further momentum in 2028. Reimagine The Bank benefits will be additive to returns. Expanding our net interest margin is a key driver, which we project to be in the range of 3.30% to 3.50% in 2027. Along with the impact of successful execution of our strategic initiatives, improving credit performance and delivering a strong capital return to shareholders.

To wrap up, we delivered a good performance in 2025, in line with our expectations. We have a strong outlook for 2026 with significant margin expansion. Good momentum in Wealth as we continue to grow the Private Bank. And we see our ship coming in on Capital Markets given the capabilities that we have built over the years. All of this puts us in a very good position to hit our medium-term 16% to 18% ROTCE target in the second half of '27.

With that, I will hand it back over to Bruce.

Okay. Thanks, Aunoy. And I think, operator, we're ready to open it up for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Ryan Nash with Goldman Sachs.

Bruce, I appreciate all the details on the reimagining the bank. I think you noted in the slides that this should add 2% on ROTCE. First, maybe just talk about how much of this hits the bottom line versus gets reinvested? And if it is reinvested, what are the areas that you will invest in?

And then second, the Slide 28 says that you're not incorporating any of these benefits. Does this increase your confidence in getting to the high end? Or do you think this serves more as a hedge in case other parts of the business don't perform? And I have a follow-up.

Yes. Okay. [ Garner ] the space for that follow-up, nice move. So I would say that at this point, the program has taken shape, and we have about 50 work streams, and it's all signed out into a transformation office and people that are running with the ball on those streams, and Brendan is kind of leading the overall effort, he can comment as well. So I think at this point, we have kind of quarter-by-quarter visibility into each of those work streams and how the, kind of, implementation costs flow and then how the benefits start to flow.

One thing you'll notice there is that over time, the kind of revenue benefit start to pick up as we'll see improved customer experience, resulting in less customer attrition, better usage of our products by the customer base. And we think that's really solid in terms of our ability to forecast that. So anyway, the program has taken shape. We're executing it well.

As to the question of what do we expect to flow through. I think the first thing is you got to look at the gross number, excluding the implementation cost because implementation costs really are just kind of onetime capital costs in our view. So the run rate will benefit by the full amount. And then I think it's still a bit of an open question as to how much of that flows through. And it kind of depends on kind of where we are at that point in time, and what our investment needs and priorities could be? So do we keep investing at the same pace in the Private Bank? And is it worth investing to keep on that trajectory and to generate more medium-term revenue growth?

I think that's a TBD. So at this point, we're kind of just flagging, here's the numbers. Here's what we think is possible. We have a lot of wood to chop to actually execute this program, but we'll be reporting on it all along. And then we'll have, I think, more visibility into the flow through as time goes by. If you look historically at all of our top programs, Ryan, we've had a significant flow-through. And so we tend to be very disciplined on the remaining expense base. We have this mindset of continuous improvement. If we want to invest new dollars, try to figure out where to pinch the expense base to self-fund that. So I would expect that the flow-through should be high, but we're not going to make that call at this point. We're just going to give you the contours of what the program could deliver.

Got it. And then if I look on Slide 27, your prior NIM walk had deposit [ betas ] in the low to [ mid-50s ]. I think now you're saying high [ 40s ]. Maybe just talk about what is driving the change? Is it competition or a change in your strategy? And what are some of the offsets that are allowing the NIM to still reach slightly higher levels versus the prior expectations?

Yes. So what I would say is that when the rates first started to fall, the market was very aggressive in trying to recoup some of what happened on the way up. And what's happened since then, I think, is that the market is kind of less aggressive in its pricing actions at this point. And so you could call that maybe a little more competition, or you could just say kind of a decision to share kind of some of those benefits with the customer and not be as aggressive. And so that high [ 40s ] to us is really the market. So we're not -- if we move down from mid low to [ mid-50s ] to high [ 40s ], I think that's consistent with what we're seeing in the market.

And the reason that I still think we're in a very good position to deliver on that NIM walk are several factors contributing to that. But one is our confidence in our net interest -- our noninterest-bearing balance growth. which has stayed robust in the private bank and in the Consumer Bank, in particular, and stable in the Commercial Bank. And so we, I think, score well on that dimension. You know that we're also slightly asset sensitive. And I view is that rates will come down but maybe not as much as feared initially. So I think that is a helpful fact for us as well.

And then over time, we've continued to, I think, be very disciplined in our hedging actions. And so we've been adding in hedges at attractive rates. So I think it's a combination of those three things, the kind of noninterest balances, the higher -- a little bit of asset sensitivity and a higher rate outlook, and then these attractive hedging actions that we've taken would offset that beta dropping from where it was to the [ high 40s ].

Our next question comes from Erika Najarian with UBS.

Just wanted to ask about the puts and takes on the loan growth guide. It feels like a bit of a, sort of, best-in-class relative to peers. Maybe remind us, Bruce, in terms of where you are in your balance sheet optimization journey? And as we come to a point where rates may come down, talk to us about the push pull in terms of optimizing CRE versus taking advantage of potential refinancing opportunities?

Yes. So I'd say our confidence in that loan outlook stems from actually what we're seeing and what we delivered in the second half of the year. So we had -- we have an idiosyncratic growth driver in the Private Bank as they scale up their business. That's something our peer banks don't have. And so that continues at a good clip. And then I think the focus of the Commercial Bank in terms of the middle market and our expansion markets, plus some of the, kind of, private capital and sponsor lines also has been an area of opportunity for us.

And then kind of in the consumer bank, we have the market-leading [ HELOC ] products and also mortgage. And so we've seen growth across all 3 of those areas in Q3 and in Q4, and we think that will continue. In kind of prior years, that growth was offset by the accelerated rundown of non-core. But now we have non-core, kind of, at a, kind of, almost at a stub at this point from $14 billion down to like $2.5 billion. And then we've done a lot of work already on the commercial DSO and on the commercial real estate kind of run down after the Investors acquisition. And so there's a slide in the back, Erika, which you may have seen, or may not have seen, but kind of lays down some of the reductions in the drag from those efforts, which also contributes to positive sentiment on loan growth. So those are the kind of big things.

I'll just maybe flip it over first to Don to talk a little bit about commercial, and then Brendan to talk about the Private Banking consumer.

Yes. I'll start, Erika, by just talking about the environment. I mean across the board, we're seeing positive sentiment from the client base. So Bruce mentioned the expansion markets, they're growing. So I think New York, California, Florida, they're growing extremely quickly. Those are core middle market relationships with full wallet realization. So not only is loan growth materializing, but we're also seeing it from an ROE standpoint, being a very attractive business.

We're seeing, and remember, for most of the last 2 or 3 years, the market has been really a refinancing market. I think Aunoy mentioned that. We're seeing new money demand both in our core client base, which is translating into utilization growth. And we're seeing it powerfully in the sponsor business where the sponsors finally seem to be coming alive, and that will impact not only our capital markets businesses, but also our [ NBFI ] lending as we engage with the Private Capital community, both on the [ PE ] capital call lines and private capital leveraging line. So across the board, pretty strong environment to be operating in. And that should drive higher levels of loan growth.

As we look into '26 and beyond, we were probably running close to $1 billion of C&I DSO over the last few years. That really is down to BAU. We're pretty much done with that. If it was going to be $0.5 billion, I'd be surprised. But it will be just a continuous kind of rhythm of cleaning out under returning relationships and replacing of new relationships. And then the change in real estate, we're going to continue to trim the real estate exposures. But we're beginning to turn on the origination engine, and that's both Private Bank and Commercial Bank. And we will be replacing some of the BSO that's happening with some attractive opportunities as we see them in the marketplace. So what was a pure drag in the past will be a little bit less of a drag in the future, although we'll continue to kind of trend that down. But BSO will become less of a drag in the overall loan growth.

On my side, maybe 3 points here. One, similar to Don, the headwind on non-core is reducing. So just give you some numbers around it. Yes, 6, 7 quarters ago, we were dealing with $1 billion, $1.1 billion in quarter-on-quarter rundown of non-core that exited Q4 at $0.5 billion, and that's going to continue to minimize as we look forward into 2026. So that's a real positive to see that wrap. It's through the cycle.

And we've seen really strong growth in Private Banking, point number two. And it's been really balanced across private equity, residential lending and multifamily granular, high-quality commercial real estate where we have access to full relationships with Wealth Management. One of the dynamics we were facing early in 2025 is with rates high. There was a lot of cash out in the system with this client base, and they were hesitant to go in and finance things with debt with rates as high as they were. That is starting to change. And as the rates ease a bit, we expect loan growth to pick up in the Private Bank and our run rate to improve further. So we've got confidence the pace of growth in the Private Bank will continue to accelerate as we look into 2026.

And then in consumer, as Bruce mentioned, we're getting $700 million to $800 million in quarter-on-quarter growth in [ HELOC ]. We're number 1 in net balance sheet growth in the United States, #1 in originations in the United States and HELOC and a very high credit quality book, with 95% plus of the customers coming with [ DDA ] and deep relationship-based banking. We expect that to continue. And candidly, with rates pulling back, but not so far to create through a 5% mortgage rate, at least in the forward outlook, it's really a perfect time period for HELOC, where there's not going to be a ton of mortgage refinancing activity, but huge amounts of equity built up with consumers. So very well positioned to continue to monetize the HELOC capability we've put in place.

And of course, in the second half of last year, we launched the credit card portfolio, which we expect will start to pay some dividends as we get into the 2026, first half and second half with higher yielding, higher-quality balances. So for all those reasons, I feel really good about continued pickup in net loan growth.

The other thing I'd just mention wrapping up here is, it's important to look at the net loan growth number. But under the covers, there's a quality story that you need to pay attention to of the balance sheet remixing to deep relationship-based customer lending, higher yielding, higher profitability, both on the balance sheet but also the net customers we're bringing in, moving away from single service to a really, really deep relationship-based bank. So I think we've got confidence on winning on both dimensions, quantity plus quality.

Our next question comes from Manan Gosalia with Morgan Stanley.

I wanted to start on the fee side. Can you expand a little bit on the underlying assumptions in the fees? I mean it feels like the private bank is doing well. Capital markets are doing well. Pipelines are strong. You had a survey out recently talking about M&A expanding on the middle market side. There's also been some push out from the fourth quarter into 2026.

Just given all of that, it feels like the fee guide is a little conservative. So can you help us with some of the underlying assumptions there?

Yes. So I'll start and others can chime in. But we had a very strong fee year in 2025. So we'll start with that. We were up 11%. And then to guide up next year, 6% to 8% is still kind of good growth on top of very strong growth that we had in '25.

I'd say the outlook for '26 is led by the Capital Markets where not only do we have strong pipelines, we have several things going for us. One is the carryover. So we have about $20 million of fees that carries over, that will close in the first quarter. And then in the first half of 2025, we had kind of [ soft cut ] comparisons, I would say, because of the uncertainty in Liberation Day tariffs, there's a lot of pent-up demand to do deals that started to flow again in the second half of the year. So again, I think capital markets should have a strong relative year.

And again, who knows about the uncertainty in the tariffs. And it seems like [ Groundhog Day ]. We might be in that same movie replaying but I think that's one of the reasons why overall, it's good to have a little bit of caution in that guide of 6% to 8%. You just don't know. But at this point, Capital Markets look like it will have an extremely strong year. Wealth has been having record quarter after record quarter. And that's a twofold benefit. It's not only kind of getting the teams in place of recruiting these lift-outs and then connecting them to the Private Bank relationships, and the Corporate Bank relationships, which creates its own growth dynamic. But then also in the branch-based system, we've got great leadership there, great product set. We're really hitting our stride. So I think Wealth would be other shining star.

Across the rest of the patch, we don't see significant growth in many of the other areas like service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage. Our other income was flattered. We had -- like a moon and the stars aligned for a couple of quarters that might not repeat in 2026. So I think just having a level of conservatism there seems like the way to play it.

Very helpful. And then maybe pivoting over to the capital side. It looks like your buyback guide is a little more front-end loaded. And then you spoke about the fact that you're hopeful that the SCB will come down this year. I guess the question is, how important is the stress test in terms of your comfort level in bringing the CET1 ratio closer to your medium-term targets of like 10% to 10.5%? How quickly can you do that? And where would getting into that range put you in terms of buybacks as you get into the back half of the year?

Sure. again, I'll take this one. I've been living it on this SCB frustration for years. But we are reasonably optimistic that there's some changes [ of foot ] down in Washington with the Fed. And so based on what we know, we think we'll get a better outcome. It remains to be seen, the timing of that implementation. But to me, it's less an impact directly on where we set our capital targets. It's just been, to almost a scarlet letter, that we have this outsized SCB when our business model is the same as most of our peers, and it just has been mismodeled, and I won't get into all of it, but we've made those points clear to the new folks that are going to be in charge of the stress test.

So in any case, just falling back into the pack is good for us reputationally even if it doesn't affect exactly how we're going to manage the capital. I would say the reason that we're still on the high end of that 10% to 10.5% range is just still the amount of uncertainty that's in the environment. We have an upsurge in our profitability projected but making sure that we get there and that we get the CRE worked out when we feel the environment is in a better place, and we've accomplished some of those aspects, then I think we could be in a position to start to migrate down within that range. But anyway, that's how we think about it.

Our next question comes from John Pancari with Evercore ISI.

This is [ George ] [indiscernible] on for John. Just wanted to revisit the Private Bank [indiscernible] specifically. In that $11 billion to $13 billion Private Bank related loans in 2026, can you break down what loan categories within the Private Bank, you're seeing growth? Any puts and takes there? And then longer term, how should we think about the loan-to-deposit ratio trending in the Private Bank?

Yes, it's Brendan. I can take that. It's pretty balanced growth. So about 1/3 of it, I would say, is coming from C&I private equity-based lending. We have -- about half of the balance sheet is, I'd say, residential and real estate, so mortgage and granular multifamily commercial real estate, as I mentioned before, tied into deep Wealth Management base clients. And then there's a smaller portion in sort of other consumers. So our HELOC capabilities are making their way over to these clients, some small credit cards, some specialty unsecured lending loans in the Private Banking portfolio. The [ PLP ] partner loans that we're leveraging to convert. Our private equity community into personal private banking relationships.

So it's pretty broad based, but the largest categories are C&I, granular multifamily, [ CRE ] and residential lending mortgage. We expect that to continue as rates to pull back. The traditional personal Private Banking should pick up. That would -- again, going to -- the portfolio will benefit from HELOC and continued residential lending, and as our card portfolio picks up, we have optimism that, that can be a more meaningful player in the private bank over time.

Yes, I would just add to that, that we've been in business now for a couple of years. We haven't had one -- I'm going to touch wood here when I say this, we haven't had $1 of credit losses, and that historically was the track record of these bankers when they operated on the First Republic platform. So very strong credit discipline, very deep relationships, lending to people that we know well. and getting good credit results.

You asked about the LDR too. Sorry, I didn't answer that. Our 25% ROE is certainly benefiting from a little bit wider loan-to-deposit ratio than we probably would expect in a steady state. And so -- but you can also see in our guide, we don't expect dramatic meaningful changes in the short term. We're going to expect pretty balanced growth across deposits and lending. So we expect a self-funding mechanism here where not only is the LDR [ led ] with deposits, but the lendable deposits also fully self-fund the loan growth that we're getting.

Having said that, over the medium-term outlook, I would expect the LDR to tighten maybe from in the [ 60s ] where we are today into the 80% range potentially. But that's -- if rates pull back. Right now, we still think it's -- it will be in this range of 60% to 70% for the next year to 6 quarters.

Our next question comes from Matt O'Connor with Deutsche Bank.

A bit of a follow-up to some comments you just made. I wanted to ask about the deposit growth assumption. I found it interesting. I think what's driving the higher net [indiscernible] outlook, but your earning asset growth is actually a bit above the loan growth on Slide 23. So just trying to get a sense of deposit growth assumptions. And obviously, [indiscernible] a Private Bank, which is the one piece, but just the overall assumptions there and the confidence in that level?

Yes. Well, we don't have a deposit guide here, but I think the expectation, Matt, is that the LDR will stay relatively stable over the course of the year. So we brought it down. You may recall we were operating back in '23 kind of in the high 80s. We brought it down in '24 into the low 80s. We now have it down into the high 70s, which is a place that I think we can sustain that and feel good about kind of the liquidity position there. And so that's kind of the overall forecast.

I don't know, Aunoy, if you want to add anything to that?

Yes. I think it was the only other thing to add would be probably our noninterest-bearing deposit growth has been very steady as well, both coming from the Private Bank and as well as the Consumer Bank. We expect that 22% to be in the zone as we go through.

The two points I'd add on the noninterest-bearing would be -- we've gone through a period post COVID, 3 years of consistent headwinds on spending out the excess surplus. 2025 was a year of that kind of running its course and flattening out. We started to see some very modest [ DDA ] growth and most benchmarks in the consumer bank. We were #1 in our peer set on relative DDA performance versus peer banks. We expect that relative position to continue and move from a flattening to starting to see some very modest DDA growth.

And then the private bank you can see our DDA percentage in the high 30s, but it's important to also look at checking with interest, the entirety of the personal banking deposits in the private bank are in checking with interest, which is de minimis interest. When you add that in, our actual low-cost mix is in the mid-40s, and we expect that range to continue the combination of DDA plus checking with interest. So healthy, healthy growth in the private bank and noninterest-bearing, or low interest-bearing, and continued #1 performance or top quartile performance in the consumer bank on relative DDA.

And then just on the interest earning asset growth, it's kind of 1% to 2% both loan growth and maybe deposit growth. Anything else driving that? I think we've seen more banks point to, kind of, less earning asset growth [indiscernible] loan growth and yours is the opposite. So I was just wondering if there's something else kind of driving that? I think you've expanded your [ swap ] business for customers. So I don't know if there's something with trading assets, or a rethinking of how you hedge the balance...

I would say the spot loans is 3% to 5%, and earning assets kind of 4% to 5%. So there may be a little build in liquidity, we may be adding to the securities book. Part of that is looking at the [indiscernible] deposits and the, kind of what we see as growth in the private bank deposits, which have a little lower lendability than the consumer deposits do. And so it's really probably just a little mix in where we're building a bit of our liquidity to go match what we're doing in terms of the deposit composition growth.

Our next question comes from Ebrahim Poonawala with Bank of America.

I guess just a couple of quick follow-ups. As we think about the 16% to 18% return ROTCE exiting '27, it implies the margin probably being somewhere between around that [ 340 to 350 ]. Am I thinking about that correctly?

Yes, I would say -- think of that, Ebrahim in that zone, yes.

And then -- and beyond that, as we think about the new growth that's coming on the balance sheet. On Slide 19 for Private Bank, you called out the 4.1% spread on that growth. I'm just wondering if you had to have a similar number for the entire balance sheet in terms of growth, where would you say that your growth is coming? Is it close to 4%, close to 3%? I would love any color there?

Yes. That's an interesting question. I guess I would say the spread in the Private Bank and the Consumer Bank are relatively higher, the spread in Commercial is relatively lower. Commercial, you're extending credit to build relationships and do the cross-sell to your fee-based complex. So that's a little bit of the dynamics there.

Got it. And just one more, Bruce on the private bank. 7 offices, 4 more to go. Why is that number not larger? Like is it -- is there only so much that you can do from a management bandwidth standpoint? Or do you think once you have these 10 to 15 Private Bank offices you've [indiscernible] the opportunity?

Well, I'll start and flip it to Brendan. But I'd say from a bandwidth standpoint, you want to make sure that these offices are really premium locations and premium fit out and premium high-quality people is staffing them. And so we've done a lot. And we have another big agenda for this year, but we're certainly not done when you get to exhaust the list that we have in front of us for '27. We have a couple more in the pipeline that are straddling between '26 and '27. And then we have densification of some of our East Coast locations in Florida still in front of us when we look out into '27.

So I think ultimately, you could see this number get up to something like 25 or 30, and when we've kind of reached maturity with the private banking locations that we have before we would think about potentially other geographic expansion. But Brendan, I'll flip it to you.

Yes. Our confidence is clearly increasing every quarter that gets behind us on our ability to drive sustainable growth and high quality. But if you kind of rewind the clock back to 4 quarters ago, we were very committed to make sure we deliver the profitability profile that we shared with you all before we got too far out over our [ skis ]. So we've been very thoughtful in terms of where to put these locations. It's very connected business model, I call it first floor, second floor. First floor being, kind of, retail banking for Private Banking customers. Second floor being senior RMs and Wealth teams that are not necessarily working the retail branch, but they're bringing in clients. We've got to grow that in a connected way. So and we're keeping a very, very high bar on quality. We don't want to grow so fast that we compromise on having best-in-market team.

So we've got aspirations for more sites. We'll continue to add them as we get the right teams, as we get the right locations. We're starting to think about geographic expansion. We also have to think about filling in the rest of our Citizens footprint. You've got plenty of markets that we have high net worth individuals in today where we don't yet offer the full Private Banking package. And so in addition to adding more sites, you may see a handful of very targeted either conversions or dual branded sites with retail and private banking coming online where we can offer the full service of the bank, the full [ one Citizens ] in the same market. So -- with commercial partnering as well. So a lot to do. We expect a steady [ diet ] of continued openings and opportunistically, we find talent in good locations, we'll upsize our ambition.

Our next question comes from David Chiaverini with Jefferies.

So I wanted to ask about the efficiency ratio outlook. It looks very strong. Mid-50s, medium term versus the 62% in the fourth quarter. Can you talk about what could drive the high end versus the low end of the mid-50s outlook?

Yes. Well, there's a couple of dynamics here that right off the bat, if you overlay the, kind of, termination of these swaps and look at some of the built-in kind of active swaps and fixed asset repricing that we think is pretty assured, you can get from 62% into the high 50s. And if you overlay the [ RTB ] that can further take you down into the mid-50s. And then all along, we're trying to run with positive operating leverage even if you strip out the benefit of the NIM expansion. So those are really the 3 things that are kind of driving you back down to something in the mid-50s. So I think it's a very realistic target.

And my follow-up is on AI. You've been front-footed on AI versus some of your peers. Can you talk about your AI spend and some of the use cases you're seeing?

Yes. Our AI spend has -- I would call it backwards looking in 2025, has been a combination of very small targeted pilots and learnings and building the right control infrastructure to get ourselves ready for this, including moving completely to the cloud in 2025 and big investments in data. So to actually take the AI capabilities and commercialize it, a lot of foundational things need to be true. So some of this happened in 2025. Candidly, some of this started back in 2020, 2021, where we're really getting some bigger investments in broadening our data capabilities, modernizing the tech stack to put us in a position for this.

So enabling investments has been high. Very specific kind of last mile [ AI ] investments, I think, have been very relatively modest. But as we turn the page to 2026, the dial turns a little bit. So a couple of the use cases, of course, we highlight them on Page -- I guess, it's 21 in the deck, and you can look at that, but I'll maybe highlight 2 or 3 of them.

The call center, as an example, we think that the combination of modernizing the tech stack for the call center front to back, plus introducing voice AI and other mechanisms, we can get in the range over the medium-term outlook, 50% of our call center calls out of a human answering them. That is something we're very excited about. It's not hopes and dreams. We've seen this in development and an action in smaller firms, [indiscernible] banks and otherwise. So we're leaning in heavily there.

Technology development, accelerating productivity of an engineer is a use case that we also have high confidence in that through leveraging AI, we can have a 5 to 10x of productivity with our engineers, that the AI is taking the first crack at writing the code, where developers are now [indiscernible] seeing the code, adding the last mile and then ultimately having the AI also work on the first round of testing and quality assurement of the code.

And then maybe lastly on just analytics. Fraud, credit risk. These are tried and true AI use cases that with, particularly in the consumer bank relative to fraud and credit analytics where you're underwriting and decisioning on a cohort basis. Leveraging AI to reengineer front tobacco, we think about credit analytics, portfolio monitoring, fraud detection, model enhancement. These are all very real use cases that are practical in our sites, and we've got reasonable confidence that we can go at them.

So you'll start to see in the Reimagine The Bank effort there's an overlay of tech spend in addition to our run rate tech spend we're spending on the franchise that will be principally pointed at AI deployment for reimagine the bank. So we're carving out a meaningful chunk of overlay for tech spend that will wind up in our depreciation line over time, which is incorporated in our guide relative to the net benefits of Reimagine The Bank.

Our next question comes from Gerard Cassidy with RBC.

Bruce, since going public, you've done a very good job of delivering on growing this organization that you head up and clearly, you've done it in this Wealth Management area most recently, the Private Bank. Can you guys share with us the growth that you're planning for this year, the $16 billion to $20 billion of client assets. How much is that coming existing customers of their portfolios, versus just new customers coming in with you're going to maybe hire more teams? And then I don't know if you can parse, how much of a benefit has this 3-year bull market been on this business?

Yes. I'm going to flip this to Brendan quickly. But what I would say is that what you're seeing on that Private Bank slide is simply the growth of $6 billion to $10 billion in kind of this kind of lift-out venue that's serving their Private Bank partners. And some of that comes from the continued acquisition of new teams, but the majority is going to come from just the, kind of, people that are on the platform, kind of, getting their full book converted in and then growing as they start to serve the Private Bank and private wealth. So that's part of the story.

Beyond that, not shown on this page, we have our branch-based business that is going exceptionally well. And then we have [indiscernible], which was a legacy RIA that we acquired, which is working closely with the Private Bank at this point. But when you add that all together, the kind of AUM, kind of, assets that we have in -- what we refer to as client assets, which concludes transactional balances is about $60 billion. And kind of core AUM on that is about half of that. And so that now is a number that's growing very nicely across kind of all those 3 sectors.

So we have the private bank growing. We're finding an ability to rejuvenate [ Clarfeld ] growth and then the branch business is running very, very nicely and achieving strong growth. So we're excited that, that wealth fee line can continue to hit new records kind of quarter after quarter as it did in 2025.

Brendan, you can provide more color?

Yes. Sounds good. On the privates, I'll unpack both of them very quickly. On the Private Banking side, just one strategic point to make. It's hard to totally separate the adding of new talent from the referrals coming from the banking teams that we hired, because you need them both in place for either of them to happen. And once you get the new talent in, it is true that 80% to 90% of their previous book will follow them over, and we have seen that, and we've actually seen better performance than that on most of our teams that we've lifted out. But they also have new productivity. They're bringing in their own clients on the Wealth side, but then they're referring them back to the bank. So this is a bidirectional referral model.

On the banking side, we have seen an acceleration of referrals as we've got high-quality wealth teams on through 2025. We expect that to continue into 2026 at a healthy clip. So as the business gets more granular, as we convert some of the business banking clients into personal banking, have the right wealth teams, we expect a continued acceleration of new business flow coming from that into these new Wealth teams. And we expect -- we've been doing 1 to 2 teams a quarter of new lift-outs. I would expect us to be in that range over the course of 2026 as well. So a supplement of accelerating referrals, adding new teams, new teams bringing their back books plus new teams, bringing new business and hitting the market hard.

On the mass [indiscernible] front, about 55% of our fee income, or our AUM I should say, is actually in the branch-based business. And about 60% of our fee income is from the mass [ employment ] business. So that business grew in 2025 by 15% on the AUM side, and 25% on the fee income side. And the effective rate of revenue on the mass [indiscernible] business is roughly twice that of the private bank. So you're getting significant profitability jaws by growing that business as well.

We had record referrals coming from our retail bank. We've got an overhaul of talent and our advisers that sit in the branches. We've grown that adviser base by about 50 advisers in 2025. We expect that to continue. So we're seeing sort of all boats rise with the rising tide, the wealth brand that we're building and the capabilities that we're building are coming through in all the client segments. We're getting a real strong uptick from Don's business as the commercial team has more confidence in the teams that we bring on.

Your comment about the bull market, it is true. Bull market helps. Market betas helped. About 1/3 of our Private Banking revenue uplift was driven by market betas. But you can't capture that market beta unless you acquire the customers to begin with. So there's a bit of a virtuous circle here that's happening here as we're getting outsized new customer growth, outsized talent growth, and catching the market beta as it moves from whatever firm they exited over to Citizens. So we feel really pleased with where we're at, and we expect continued positive momentum across all segments.

You have another question, Gerard?

As a follow-up, taking a step back, Bruce for a second. Obviously, you've grown the company and you've painted a very strong organic growth picture for this year, but you've grown in successfully through timely acquisitions, whether it was investors in 2022 with the HSBC branches, as well as JMP. When you kind of -- with the regulatory environment being very supportive of consolidation, can you give us your big picture view of how you think shaping up in opportunities for Citizens over the next couple of years?

Yes. I'd say -- and I said this in my opening prepared remarks that right now, we have such great organic growth opportunities that that's our focus. And so we're not going to run out a knee jerk the windows open, it might close, we should try to hunt around and find a deal to do. I think the better course of action here is make sure that the Private Bank stays on its trajectory, and we really make that a sustainable, great business. That, in effect, was our acquisition. When you look at the accretion that's coming from it. We took a risk and took -- spend some start-up capital and it's working out spectacularly well.

And then Reimagine The Bank is another big effort that is involving many of our top talent across the bank to make that work. And so just from a pure bandwidth standpoint, we want to make sure that these things are hardening and maturing and on their way to success before we kind of step back and think about anything that would be inorganic. There might still be opportunities to do. Kind of some of the little -- kind of business line adds that we've done in the past, such as an M&A boutique. We have these lift-outs that we're doing, but that's pretty much where our focus will be this year.

Our next question comes from Chris McGratty with KBW.

The 16% to 18% back half of next year ROE guide, looking at our numbers and consensus for, you call it, a little bit closer to [ 15 ]. I hear you on the SEB that maybe gets you to [ 50 ] basis points. And the combination of revenues, credit expenses probably gets you to the low end. Interested in kind of a gut check on our math and also to get firmly into the range, is it about the expense growth rate from Reimagine The Bank moderating? Or is it something else?

No. I'd say, again, we think we can get into that low end of that range kind of by the end of the year. It's not a full year forecast for '27, just to be clear. And then when we look out to the next year in '28, that's when we can fully deliver that. So -- so we're on the journey. We think we made some strides this year. I think the acceleration, again, do the math on what the EPS growth is and is very significant based on this guide. That will make another big step forward in '26 in that ROTCE performance. And then we tend to peak in the fourth quarter of every year. It tends to be a very seasonally high year. So our -- like just like this year, we were above the year average with a [ 12.2% ] exit rate in '26. We'll end up -- the fourth quarter will be a higher number than our year average, and then '27, kind of the same thing.

So we see a path to getting there. And I think it's really just driving these initiatives, having the NIM continue to expand everything that we put in our guide.

Great. And then just a quick follow-up on reserves. I hear you on the moderating credit costs. If you compare the reserves adjusted for the balance sheet optimization, I guess, where are we relative to CECL day 1?

Yes. There's a number of things. We had the noncore rundown. We had some loan sales within student. And then we did the investors acquisition. So like there's a whole series and then a lot of BSO. But I think -- no, you correct me if I'm wrong, I think it's about [ 110-ish ] would be the CECL day 1. So it actually was [ mid-40s, 45 ] or so the original CECL day 1. But the things that we talk about is really having a very disciplined risk appetite and continuing to improve the overall credit risk profile. We brought that [ 145 ] back down to about [ 110 ]. And so to have to be in the low [ 150s ] at this point, still shows a fair amount of conservatism and a very healthy level of reserves.

Our last question comes from Ken [indiscernible] with Autonomous Research.

Just one quick one. Just bringing everything together on the Private Bank, you guys continue to point out Slide 24, the impact of the Private Bank on overall expense growth. So 1.8% of the 4.5-ish this year. To your point about where growth is and where growth comes from, do we get this year and get to kind of a lower natural growth incremental rate from the Private Bank? Or do you just kind of see what the opportunity set is as you look further out and potentially then move that to other potential investments?

I think there's still more build for the private bank. And the other thing I would say, Ken, is not only do we have a very robust total revenue growth outlook for '26. We have a similarly robust outlook for '27. So when you think about -- if you're growing your top line around 10% and you grow your expenses at [ 4.5% ], you're delivering massive positive operating leverage. And the good news there is these are very prudent targeted investments in terms of building a great Private Banking franchise, continuing to strengthen and invest in the Commercial Bank in these expansion markets and how we're covering private capital. And so -- that seems appropriate to us that we can, kind of, have our cake and eat it too.

As long as this really strong revenue outlook continues, and you can deliver big positive operating leverage, big growth in EPS every year, big improvement in ROTCE and you're not shorting the pot and playing small ball, you're actually continuing to think about ways to grow your business and grow your franchises so that you have a medium term that continues to have a very positive outlook. So that's how we think about it.

Okay. All right. I think that's all the questions that we have in the queue. So thanks for dialing in today. We really appreciate your interest and your support. Go out and have a great day. Thank you.

Thank you for your participation participants. You may disconnect at this time.

All right. Great. We're going to get started here. Up next joining us for the 11th straight year, we are once again excited to have Citizens. Citizens had another outstanding year posting margin expansion, operating efficiency gains, while succeeding and building out its fast-growing Private Bank, which I'm sure we will touch upon here. All these items have made it the best-performing regional bank in our coverage that was not acquired, by over 1,000 basis points, I'm sure that makes you happy to hear, Bruce. Here to tell us more about how he's going to repeat that in 2026 is Chairman and CEO, Bruce Van Saun. Welcome, Bruce.

Good to see you.

Good to see you, too. We won't talk about football today, given the state of our team. But maybe just to kick it off. It's been a busy year for the bank. Lots of different initiatives going on. I talked about success of the Private Bank, Metro New York Private Capital and more recently, which we'll get into reimagining the bank. Maybe just talk about the bank strategy and how you feel it's positioned to succeed as we move into 2026.

So I think we've really honed our strategy around -- we'd like to refer to it as a triangle or a 3-legged stool. But ultimately, having a good source of low-cost deposits and running a -- have a well-run consumer bank that offers advice to different segments of the market and can grow and grow with attractively priced deposits and then offer advice to those customers and penetrate the wealth opportunity more. We've made big inroads in that. And I think if you look at our deposit performance, through the up cycle and now the down cycle, you can see how much progress we've really made in the consumer bank.

So I feel good about that, and I think there's more opportunity to reposition some of the branch network so that we can get even more growth and tick up that growth rate over the next -- over the medium term. The second leg of the strategy is really around the commercial bank, which we like to say, is the best positioned super regional commercial bank. We're not impartial in that, of course. But -- or we want to become the commercial bank of choice is another way we like to state it. But over time, we've invested in really great coverage bankers, and we've aligned them against the opportunities in the middle market. And then as we go into the mid-corporate space, we have industry vertical specialties that where we think there'll be a lot of activity.

So been smart about how we've deployed the human resources. And we've also been -- had a big focus on private capital. So private equity firms that have morphed broader into private credit. We've covered them for a long time. We've built out the product set. So we add a lot of value to those relationships. So what is heartening to me is when you start to see the flywheel get going and you start to see more deal activity, we can capture that. And then what we've built, the quality of what we've built you can see how much upside we had in Q3, for example, in our revenues relative to what our peers caught in terms of that upside. So you haven't really seen the full power of that model. The market has been in the doldrums for 3 years and pretty much the first half of this year. But I think increasingly, what we've built will manifest itself and be distinctive, seen as being distinctive. And then the third leg of the stool, which is somewhat opportunistic and most recent was the attempt to go after all of First Republic and not be successful.

JPMorgan got the whole business, but we got the talent, the Grade A people who put First Republic on the map and made them kind of noteworthy as the strongest premier private bank in the banking space. And so you win with great people. We took a big swing. We brought 150 people in 1 day in June of '23 which wasn't for the faint hearted because the environment was pretty choppy at that point. And basically, we said, look, we're going to start this up. We think we can leverage the platforms we have, and we can get the service levels up to white glove, which is what First Republic was offering. And it's been a great success. I'm really pleased how that's going. So we're over $12 billion in deposits and tracking well towards kind of $7 billion in loans and $10 billion in AUM. And we've expanded to now a head count of roughly 500.

We've got teams now in Southern Cal. We started out just in Northern Cal and eyeing some more expansion in Florida. So things are going very well there. And the other thing I'd say is we're running this business profitably. So there's always tension between growth and profitability, but we've achieved a 24% year-to-date return on equity in the business, while it's growing leaps and bounds, which is not an easy thing to do. The upshot of that is we thought this year, we set some markers out and we'd be 5% accretive to the bottom line. It's gone so well that this is going to be 7% accretive to our bottom line. It's not because the rest of the bank grew less. It's just because this has outperformed and grown faster. And so it's pretty rare that like M&A is now the rage in the banking space and people are spending huge amounts of capital to find 7% accretion, we basically risked about $100 million in start-up cost capital to get it off the ground. And now we're -- I think that 7% is on its way to double digits easily by next year and could double in the not-so-distant future.

Got it. A lot of great stuff in there, and then I'm sure we'll touch on a lot of them. So maybe to dig in a couple of things, Bruce. I guess, as you go out and meet with clients, what does sentiment look like out there and out there on both commercial and corporate side and how is it impacting your thinking into 2026?

I'd say most of our corporate clients have had pretty good years, pretty solid performance. And the first half of the year had an incredible uncertainty in the rollout of tariffs and things, which I think gave people pause. But if the last 5 years has proven anything, it's that companies have to be resilient and adaptable. And so their expense bases are pretty lean, their business models are more digital, their supply chain has if they're a goods business, not a service business, they've got diversification in the supply chain. So anyway, people have hung in there. And then I think as we got to the second half of the year and then the worst-case outcomes on tariffs were off the table, the big beautiful bill passed, the deregulation push passed -- is moving ahead, pro-energy policies are moving ahead, being beneficial. I think it's a new normal.

We're going to have some choppiness and some uncertainty, but there's starting to be a sense that the economy is strengthening and the outlook for '26 is pretty positive. So I would expect to see more investment. Right now, the whole investment is carried on the backs of the hyperscalers and the AI investment that's taking place, which is probably adding 0.5% to GDP, but I think that you can start to see that broaden out and companies have to figure out how much investment are they going to make in utilizing AI and the use cases. And so we would expect to see that pick up over the course of the year. And then on the consumer side, certainly, people at the higher end of the wealth spectrum are benefiting from seeing the stock price -- stock market going up consistently and housing prices very firm and strong. And so they're spending and buying second homes.

There's a lot of momentum at the high end of the market. And I'd say even though there's some concern at the lower end, people have exhausted some of the liquidity they built up through the pandemic. And they're feeling the pinch a little bit of inflation still being persistent and the labor market softening a little bit. Generally, people are in good shape. So we don't really see anything in the credit books on the consumer side that gives us pause. Now we pitch a little higher than kind of the subprime and the very bottom end. But anyway, we think the consumer is holding in, making some choices about I used to spend some money on this discretionary, I better hunker down and spend it over here and be a little more watchful about kind of what kind of groceries you buy, where we shop and things like that. So anyway, but people are adapting. I think it's okay.

Got it. So it sounds like a pretty upbeat outlook into next year. So maybe as we're looking ahead, you've obviously been targeting a 16% to 18% return. Bank posted greater than a 12% return in the most recent quarter. Maybe just talk about the path to getting from where you are today to that to 16% to 18% over time? What are the key drivers? And how do you get there over the medium term?

Sure. I think the pretty unique aspect to our story is we've put a spotlight on what we call time-based benefits, which has been the combination of terminated swaps rolling off as well and the drag from that, which just goes away with time, plus noncore rundown. We've achieved a lot of the noncore rundown. So it kind of falls more on just the swaps benefit. But that's still from where the ROE is today, at least 300 basis points positive. So we don't have to go out and execute, but we can see ourselves go from the 12% towards 15%. I think we have other positive dynamics around NII that supplement that such as front book, back book and the like.

So there's a little more to squeeze out of that. And then I look at the initiatives around the triangle that I just mentioned what we're doing in consumer and commercial and continued maturation and growth in the private bank, and that adds, you pick a number, 200 to 300 basis points, normalization of credit as the kind of losses are tied to the CRE office space come down, then we get kind of from high 40s charge-off rate down to low to mid-30s. And so there's a lot of things there that kind of you just add them up and do a waterfall and you can easily see yourself getting to the 16% to 18%. The AOCI benefit, which is a perverse benefit that kind of impact to capital will shrink over time. So that works as a bit of a counterweight, but you're offsetting to some extent with share repurchase. So anyway, we think it's quite visible. We've laid out the chart. I think investors see it and believe it.

So maybe to dig into some things on the operational side. So loan growth obviously showing signs of improvement. You guys were shrinking for a while. You've had 2 straight quarters of growth, including 3 in a row on the commercial side. I guess based on your comments from earlier, I guess, what are your expectations for loan demand on both the commercial and the consumer side? And do you think we can continue to see it improve from here? .

Yes. So you left out private bank. So there's 1 thing that we have kind of that's unique to us is that as they kind of pull over their books of business and really start to grow that, that I think there's a built-in driver of private bank loan growth, unique to us, which I think we've been able to count on every quarter this year, which will continue into next year. With respect to consumer, I think the bright spot that we've seen this year has been HELOCs where it may surprise people, but we're the biggest HELOC originator in the country, and we only originate in 14 states, but we've really carved out a niche for ourselves. It's a great product for mass affluent households, which is where we target the consumer bank and we've made huge investments in the overall experience. And we've got origination times down to like 10 to 14 days, and the industry average is like 45 days.

So anyway, if you need a HELOC, talk to Citizens. But any case, we do -- we do a great job with that. And there's other things like mortgage continues to grow a little bit, and we've launched a new card family of products, and we think we'll get some more growth out of that. But I would expect consumer to be a steady grower, but not a dramatic grower. I think where there's more upside, ultimately is in commercial, both in the traditional middle market and mid-corporate business plus the way we serve the private capital complex. I think it has picked up a bad connotation NDFI lending, but is very safe lending, and it's investment grade. And so we have subscription line demand. We have securitization demand from private credit and asset-backed finance demand. And so that should continue to grow. So you really have kind of 2 cylinders. One is the direct lending from corporate C&I borrowers. And then the other is this category of serving the sponsor community and private credit.

So last quarter, you started talking about reimagining the bank, which will get further details, I believe, in January. And it's supposed to deliver run rate benefits of more than $400 million with the benefits in '27 and I guess, accelerating in '28. And you've also talked about minimizing some of the onetime costs and the capital investment upfront. So can you maybe just expand on these thoughts, talk about what the goals initiative is? How do you foresee this making Citizens a better bank over time?