Chimera Investment Corporation Aktie

Greetings. Welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation's Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.

I will now turn the conference over to Tyra Walton, Head of IR. Thank you, Tyra. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. I'm Tyra Walton, Head of Investor Relations. This morning, Chimera released its results for the third quarter of 2026. The earnings release and presentation for the quarter are both available on our website at chimerareit.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. Today's remarks may contain forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These events are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the Risk Factors section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimers in our earnings release and our quarterly and annual filings.

During the call, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Phil Kardis.

Thanks, Tyra. Good morning, and welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation's third quarter 2026 earnings call. Joining me on the call are Subramaniam Viswanathan, our Chief Financial Officer; Jack Macdowell, our Chief Investment Officer; and Kyle Walker, the President and CEO of HomeXpress Mortgage.

After my remarks, Subra will review the financial results. Jack will then review the investment portfolio, and then Kyle will review HomeXpress' results.

The third quarter was a challenging period for the mortgage markets, marked by a sharp increase in interest rates, significant volatility and a growing uncertainty about the direction of monetary policy. In fact, the 10-year treasury experienced the third largest quarterly increase in the past decade. But that doesn't fully capture what happened. By September, the selloff had become a rout and the 10-year treasury yield increased by more than 50 basis points in that month alone, its largest monthly increase since 2022. And in our Origination business, the speed at which rates move can matter just as much, if not more than the level of rates themselves. Kyle will discuss this in more detail, but the economics are straightforward. The secondary market reprices almost immediately when interest rates rise. Mortgage originators, however, cannot move nearly as quickly. They have a pipeline of loans locked at rates established weeks earlier. When the market yields rise sharply, those loans become less valuable. To provide investors with the returns they now require, originators must sell those loans at a lower price. That price adjustment comes directly out of the origination profitability, and that's precisely what happened at HomeXpress. Nevertheless, HomeXpress remained slightly profitable for the quarter. And I want to pause for a moment on this. We experienced the third largest rate move in the past 10 years and that HomeXpress was able to originate more than $1 billion of loans, a quarterly record and still make a profit. And they did all of that without sacrificing credit standards. While the origination-based business faced significant pressure, our investment portfolio performed well. Despite one of the most difficult interest rate environments in recent years, the portfolio generated $0.38 of EAD during the quarter. For the first 9 months of the year, EAD totaled $1.38 per share compared with $1.35 per share in dividends. That performance reflects the benefits of the diversified investment portfolio and the hedging strategy we put in place.

Now looking ahead, I want to be clear about the challenges we expect in the fourth quarter. While HomeXpress is currently locking and originating profitable loans, we expect their profitability to be roughly flat in the fourth quarter as they continue to dispose of the third quarter pipeline. We expect them to return to profitability in the first quarter of 2027. In addition, though our investment portfolio continues to perform well, we acquired or committed to acquire loans for our securitization program. While we held these loans ahead of securitization, they were exposed to higher rate and wider spread environment, which we expect to impact our fourth quarter financials. The extent of this impact will depend on market conditions through the end of the year, and yesterday's market move was a step in the right direction. We had several important accomplishments during the quarter that I don't want to get lost in the discussion of market volatility. First, we refinanced 2 maturing non-mark-to-market structured repurchase facilities. Jack will review the details, but we were able to reduce the rate and the haircut. These are meaningful improvements. They reduce our financing costs, improve our capital efficiency and provide greater funding stability. Second, our interest rate hedges worked as expected, covering the margin calls we received.

Third, following quarter end, we completed the first securitization of HomeXpress loans through our new conduit, Prism Capital. We priced Prism 2026-HX1 in a particularly difficult market, but we believe the execution was good given the market conditions. But the significance of this transaction goes beyond the pricing of a single securitization. It represents another step in bringing together 3 complementary capabilities within our platform: Mortgage origination; asset management; and securitization. HomeXpress originates the loans, Palisades serves as asset manager and our securitization capabilities provide a means of financing and distributing those assets to the capital market investors. Each of these businesses has value independently, but their real potential comes from how they work together. Over time, we expect this integrated platform to create efficiencies, improve our ability to respond to market opportunities and provide greater control over the economics of the loans we originate and invest in. This is an important part of our long-term strategy. As we look beyond the fourth quarter, we believe the fundamental outlook for our investment portfolio remains favorable. HomeXpress has restored the economics of new production, our financing position has improved and our integrated origination and securitization platform continues to develop. Those are the things that will matter long after the volatility of this particular quarter has passed.

I want to conclude by noting that we cannot control interest rates, market volatility or the timing of Federal Reserve decisions. What we can control is the quality of our assets, the discipline of our underwriting, the structure of our financing, adherence to prudent risk management and how we allocate your capital. That is where our attention remains. And I believe the decisions we're making today will position us to deliver attractive, sustainable returns for shareholders over the long term.

I'll now turn the call over to Subra to discuss our financial results.

Thanks, Phil. GAAP net loss for the third quarter was $193.6 million, with net loss of $191.2 million from our investment portfolio segment and $2.4 million from residential origination. We generated approximately $32 million of earnings available for distribution, or $0.38 per share. GAAP book value per share declined 16.5% to $14.82, primarily reflecting the impact of higher rates and wider spreads during the quarter.

Economic return on GAAP book value, defined as the change in book value plus dividends of $1.45 (sic) [ $0.45 ] for the quarter was negative 13.98% for the third quarter, while annualized EAD return on average common equity was 9.48%.

Segment performance for the quarter was as follows: For the investment portfolio, economic net interest income was $69.4 million, while annualized economic net interest income return on average equity was 13.91%. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.9%, our average cost of funds was 4.3% and the resulting net interest spread was 1.6%. For the residential origination segment, HomeXpress funded $1.12 billion in loans. EBITDA, defined as earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization, was $0.4 million and annualized EBITDA ROE was 0.6%.

With respect to leverage and liquidity, our total leverage was 6.5:1, while recourse leverage was 4.1:1. GAAP leverage and recourse leverage both increased during the quarter, reflecting higher loans held for sale in the investment portfolio as we accumulated assets for our Prism securitization.

We ended the quarter with $561 million in total cash and unencumbered assets compared to $656 million last quarter. Total consolidated secured financing outstanding was $8.6 billion. It was comprised of $801 million related to our residential origination warehouse loans and the remaining approximately $7.8 billion was for our investment portfolio. Within the investment portfolio, $5.5 billion of secured financing supported agency positions against which we maintained $3.4 billion in swaps, interest rate caps and other hedges with varying maturities in addition to a short position of $2.4 billion in TBAs during the quarter.

Excluding loans held for sale, $1.7 billion was secured by residential credit assets, of which $1.2 billion or 73% carried non- or limited mark-to-market features, and $716 million or 43% were fixed rate facilities.

Finally, on expenses. Relative to the prior quarter, compensation and servicing expenses as well as general and administrative expenses were relatively flat. Unlike the second quarter, we did not incur any transaction-related expense. As our business has expanded, we have begun identifying ways to improve efficiency and better align our cost structure with the scale and mix of our operations.

In summary, the third quarter was challenging with significant market volatility impacting our asset valuations. Despite this, our investment portfolio continued to generate EAD contribution greater than the second quarter, while our residential origination segment was slightly profitable. As we approach year-end, we are focused on maintaining strong liquidity, managing risk and driving total shareholder returns over the long term.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Jack.

Thanks, Subra, and good morning, everyone. The third quarter was defined by a sharp repricing of interest rates as persistent inflation, resilient economic activity and geopolitical developments shifted expectations for Federal Reserve policy. The Fed raised rates by 25 basis points in September, while concerns about fiscal sustainability and treasury supply added further pressure to longer-term yields. In this environment, Agency MBS underperformed as higher rates and volatility contributed to wider mortgage spreads. Residential credit markets proved more resilient, supported by investor demand and continued securitization activity, although rising financing costs and extension risk impacted whole loan prices and securitization economics with those pressures carrying into the fourth quarter.

Market dynamics drove a 16.5% decline in our book value during the quarter. Consolidated loans and securitizations accounted for roughly half of that adjustment, the agency portfolio approximately 40% and non-agencies representing the balance, partially offset by gains on our modest MSR investment. Importantly, these valuation adjustments were largely unrealized and primarily reflected the impact of higher interest rates, wider mortgage spreads and increased volatility rather than a deterioration in underlying credit fundamentals. Credit performance across our residential portfolio remained within expectations. We entered the quarter with a strong liquidity position and most of our non-agency portfolio benefits from conservative non-mark-to-market financing structures. In addition, cash received on our hedges during the quarter helped offset margin requirements on our repo financing. As a result, we did not need to sell assets to meet margin calls and our financing was uninterrupted. Toward the end of September, we tactically established a $2.4 billion short TBA position to reduce risk in response to heightened market volatility. We also increased liquidity to support the settlement of Prism-related whole loan purchases.

Turning to our investment portfolio. We actively managed our Agency MBS positions and advanced our Prism mortgage banking and securitization initiatives during the quarter. In agencies, we sold $226 million of CMOs and $1 billion of mostly lower coupon pass-throughs. We purchased approximately $1.9 billion of higher coupon securities, offering more attractive carry and shorter durations. As a result, our average bond coupon increased from approximately 5.28% to 5.67% at quarter end, shortening portfolio duration by approximately 9 months. Despite the challenges during the quarter, September's repricing has created a more attractive investment environment for Agency MBS. Higher yields and wider spreads have improved prospective returns, while mortgage duration extension has reduced negative convexity as borrowers have moved further out of the money from a refinancing perspective. Taken together, we believe these dynamics have improved our risk-adjusted return opportunity. As volatility moderated in October, we unwound the short TBA position and returned the agency portfolio toward a more normalized risk profile. This reflects our tactical approach to portfolio management, adjusting risk exposure as market conditions evolve while maintaining the flexibility to capitalize on attractive investment opportunities.

As part of our Prism conduit and mortgage banking activities, we committed to purchase approximately $330 million of loans from HomeXpress and $467 million from third parties in the third quarter. As of the related trade dates, these pools carried interest rates of approximately 7.2%, loan-to-value ratios of 71% and average borrower credit scores of 745, consistent with the credit quality objectives of our Prism program. We hedged the pipeline's duration exposure and ended the quarter with $1.2 billion of swaps against $1.2 billion of settled and unsettled loans.

With respect to the non-Agency portfolio, we refinanced approximately $280 million across 2 maturing non-mark-to-market structured repo facilities, extending maturities by 2 years and reducing our cost of funds. We also expanded the facilities to approximately $355 million, providing approximately $75 million of additional reinvestment capacity. Our capital allocation shifted during the quarter alongside the growth of our Prism conduit and mortgage banking activities. As a result, Agency MBS accounted for 21% of invested capital at quarter end, a decrease of 5 percentage points. Residential credit and MSRs were broadly unchanged at 60% and 2%, respectively. And the combined HomeXpress and Prism mortgage banking activities increased by 5% to 17%.

Turning to credit performance. Underlying fundamentals across our residential loan portfolio remained stable and generally in line with expectations. Delinquencies in our legacy reperforming loan portfolio remained within the narrow range seen over the past several years and prepayments were broadly consistent with historical levels.

Our investor DSCR portfolio experienced a modest increase in September delinquencies that has since largely reversed as early-stage delinquent borrowers brought their loans current. Importantly, this portfolio continues to outperform a comparable composite of 2022 and 2023 vintage non-QM loans from a credit perspective. Prepayments declined materially from the second quarter as higher mortgage rates reduced refinancing incentives in line with broader trends across the non-QM market.

As Phil mentioned, following quarter end, we priced and closed Prism 2026-HX1, our inaugural transaction under the Prism shelf backed by approximately $291 million of non-QM loans originated by HomeXpress. This was an important milestone, particularly given the challenging securitization market where higher interest rates, increased volatility and investor concerns around extension risk have placed pressure on new issue spreads and transaction structures. Despite our first issuance under the Prism shelf and Chimera's first securitization backed by HomeXpress-originated loans, we achieved competitive execution, pricing our AAA bonds at a spread of 160 basis points, in line with comparable non-QM transactions pricing in the 155 to 165 range during the same period. We believe this reflects the strength of Chimera's established presence and reputation in the residential securitization market. The transaction also demonstrates the value of our integrated platform with HomeXpress originating the loans, Palisades providing asset level diligence and ongoing asset management and servicing oversight and Chimera leading the structuring and capital markets execution.

While we are pleased to have successfully launched Prism, we recognize that the third quarter was a particularly challenging period to aggregate and finance loans. Nevertheless, we remain confident in the long-term potential of our integrated platform. HomeXpress' leading non-QM origination franchise, combined with the broader capabilities of Chimera and Palisades provides a differentiated platform and a strong foundation for sustainable earnings. As interest rates and market volatility stabilize, we expect its earnings potential to become increasingly evident. Subject to market conditions, we intend to establish Prism as a regular issuer in the non-QM securitization market.

The third quarter also reinforced the importance of maintaining a strong balance sheet and the flexibility to navigate rapidly changing market conditions. With geopolitical events, monetary policy and other external developments creating uncertainty, liquidity, disciplined risk management and capital preservation will remain central to our approach for the foreseeable future.

Looking ahead, we want to acknowledge the work that our team has done over the past 2 years to reposition the portfolio, build new capabilities and bring these various components of our platform together. While the current market presents challenges, we believe that work has meaningfully strengthened Chimera and positioned us to generate value in ways that were previously unavailable to us. Our priority now is to translate that progress into consistent financial performance and sustainable long-term earnings for our shareholders.

With that, I will turn it over to Kyle to discuss residential origination.

Thanks, Jack, and good morning, everyone. HomeXpress originated $1.12 billion in the third quarter, an increase of 27% from the third quarter of 2025 and 2% over the record second quarter. We achieved this result despite an increasingly challenging market, particularly in September with heightened interest rate volatility and wider bond spreads, pressured industry volumes and economics. Year-over-year growth was broad-based, including continued expansion in our correspondent channel, which accounted for 16.8% of quarterly production.

I'd like to spend a few minutes discussing quarterly profitability and the factors that shaped it. We generated $430,000 in EBITDA, while our net origination margin was negative 7 basis points. We began the quarter strong, producing $3.1 million in EBITDA with a net origination margin of 74 basis points in July. As the quarter progressed, rising interest rates and significant rate volatility impacted our business. Competitors were slower to raise their rates while we remained disciplined, balancing competitive pricing with the true economics of each loan. At the same time, wider bond spreads and expectations for longer duration impacted the economics of loans already locked in our pipeline along with loans originated earlier in the quarter. It also affected pricing on new production. Tighter origination margins and less favorable secondary market execution more than offset the benefit of our higher volume levels weighing on quarterly profitability. It's important to distinguish between the level of interest rates and the speed at which they change. Loans can be priced effectively across a range of interest rates, durations and bond spread environments. The challenge arises when markets are extremely volatile and move so quickly that they create uncertainty around pricing and execution for both lenders and whole loan investors. Although we are quick to respond to such fluctuations by adjusting our lending rate sheets, the magnitude and pace of bond spread volatility and changing duration expectations made the transition difficult. Because we cannot dictate market conditions or competitors' pricing decisions, we concentrate on what we can influence, competing selectively, actively managing our operating cost base and maintaining disciplined credit standards. First, as competition intensified, some lenders held pricing steady despite changes in the interest rate environment to preserve their origination volume. We chose a different path. As I noted last quarter, we are not seeking to win every loan. We continue to compete where we saw opportunities to strengthen valuable broker relationships but remain selective about loan pricing and quality. That discipline limited our volume growth during the quarter. Second, we are strengthening the business' underlying economics by investing in our platform and supporting our origination network. We ended the quarter with more than 6,300 approved brokers supported by 145 account executives and related sales staff. Our broad network and trusted broker partnerships positioned us well to capture growth as market conditions improve.

Network size, however, is only one part of the equation. Brokers also need comprehensive and flexible loan products, reliable execution and excellent customer service. We continue to invest in these capabilities and in our correspondent channel with certain costs being incurred today ahead of the volume they are structured to support.

Finally, and most importantly, we did not compromise our underwriting standards even as the originations grew modestly in a more competitive market and margins tightened later in the quarter. The weighted-average FICO score for third quarter originations was 743 compared with 742 last quarter, while weighted-average LTV was 72.39% compared with 71.56%. Credit discipline remains fundamental to how we operate. We also continued working with our warehouse partners to improve financing economics at quarter end. We had $1.65 billion of warehouse capacity across 7 facilities, providing more than sufficient funding to support current production levels. For the remainder of the year, we will maintain credit discipline, compete selectively and improve our operating efficiency while continuing to build the scale we have developed into meaningful earnings over time.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Phil.

Thanks, Kyle, and we'll now open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Marissa Lobo with UBS.

Could you talk about your outlook for the Agency basis following September widening and how you're comparing incremental returns for Agency versus new residential credit opportunities today?

Yes, sure. Marissa, yes, I mean, obviously, especially after yesterday's move, it's been shifting around a little bit. But I mean, we see returns for Agency somewhere in that mid-teens, call it, 16%, 17% range as we sit here today. And from a portfolio allocation standpoint, I would say that the marginal dollar, if you will, as we talked about in the past, sort of goes to agencies with respect to our liquidity bucket, we see that as an opportunity to sort of generate a nice nominal cash flow yield while at the same time, enjoying the liquid nature of that and the optionality that allows us to draw down on it and allocate to other elements of the business as we see opportunities. And we actually -- as I think I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we did that in the third -- towards the end of the third quarter as we need to settle loans for our Prism conduit mortgage banking activities, we would draw down on the agencies. But as we sit here today from a relative value perspective, we certainly do look at agencies as sort of the benchmark as we look to deploy capital across other parts of the business. And right now, we see the agency ROEs on a nominal basis at least looking pretty attractive.

Okay. Great. And looking at liquidity and leverage with leverage higher, additional loans being accumulated for securitization, how are you thinking about the minimum liquidity buffer needed to operate the origination strategy through another period of volatility?

Yes. Well, I mean, the -- as you point out, the leverage did increase, and that was purely a function, I would say, of adding the loans in anticipation of securitizing them. So that number is going to go up and down as we aggregate loans and securitize them. If you think about it, though, even if you have, call it, $800 million of loans in the pipeline for securitization, let's just say, you're going to hold about 10% or so, 10% to 12% of capital against that. So you're not talking about huge amounts of capital required to sustain at least where we are today with respect to our Prism conduit activities. But when we think about the size of the Agency portfolio and the ability to draw down on that capital to support Prism, we feel like having 20% allocated to agencies, which is where we are today or 21%. And I think we were at 26%, 27% last quarter. So that gives us plenty of capacity to sort of draw down on the agencies to support Prism. And then when we do the securitization and extract capital, we can then put that back into agencies until we need it for another investment down the road.

Our next question comes from Trevor Cranston with Citizens.

I think you said in the prepared comments that you've lifted the TBA short position subsequent to quarter end. Looking at the Agency book on Slide 11, it looks like you had also taken the swap portfolio down significantly at some point in 3Q. So can you comment on kind of where the hedge portfolio has gone since quarter end if the TBA has been lifted?

Yes, yes. Trevor, the TBA was lifted incrementally over the course of October as volatility came down. So as we sit here today, the TBA short is off. And if you're referring to the other parts of the hedge complex, what we tend to do, we're not looking to take rate views in the agency portfolio. So we do try to manage to a pretty tight duration gap there. Keep in mind, we do have a combination of in-the-money caps as well as swaps. And over the course of the quarter, as we moved up in coupon, we did shorten the duration of the portfolio, and it did shift around our hedge complex a little bit as -- from swaps and caps and so forth. But at the end of the day, we're really not looking to take views and we're managing to a pretty tight gap.

Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then can you comment on how you guys are generally thinking about potential for doing share buybacks relative to continuing to deploy capital into the investment portfolio at this point?

Yes. So this is Phil. So as we've said in the past, I think right now, as we look at our investment opportunities, we continue to believe that investing is preferable to doing share buybacks is kind of what our view has been.

Our next question is from George Bose (sic) [ Bose George ] with KBW.

This is Franc Labetti on for Bose. I just want to get a little color on the non-QM market and the current trends you're seeing there across your portfolio, you have noticed some increases in delinquency rates. So what are you seeing there? And also maybe you can touch on execution across the non-QM securitization market.

Sure. I'm happy to take that. So just if you're looking at our investor deck on the non-QM delinquency chart, it did -- on our investor DSCR portfolio, you saw a small uptick there. As I mentioned in the prepared remarks, that's a 2022, 2023 vintage portfolio, and it is performing, I would say, meaningfully inside where sort of composite loans from that vintage are running from a delinquency standpoint. But I would say more broadly speaking, and this goes for the entire sort of non-QM market is that as you sort of see delinquencies in that mid-single-digit range, I think if you talk to just about anybody, nobody is commenting that losses are exceeding their expectations. Losses have been nominal at best across the non-QM space. So that's consistent with what we're seeing in our portfolio as well as the broader market.

In terms of just securitization execution, I'm sure you're probably aware that over the course of the quarter, as rates sold off, and deals came to market with lower interest rates on the underlying loans. Securitization structures shifted a little bit, and that has impacted securitization economics overall for some of those lower interest rate pools. I will say, and as we alluded to in our prepared remarks, we were exceptionally pleased with respect to the execution on our initial Prism transaction, the HX1 deal. If you just look at where AAAs were pricing the week before and the week after we did our deal sort of putting us right in the middle there. You saw issuers that were on their 12, 13 deal of the year, and they were pricing the AAAs in the 155 to 165 area, and we got our deal done at 160. So again, we're exceptionally pleased. And when we had originally sort of modeled this out, we were expecting some concession for it being our first-time deal. And we think that's a testament to sort of the historical presence that Chimera has had in the securitization market.

And last thing I would say about that is just the fact that it's a really important transaction for us just in the sense that it does bring together all the different components of the business together in a synergistic and complementary way. And we see this as being a pretty important component of our ongoing business strategy.

Great. That's very helpful. Then just -- I don't know if I missed this. Did you provide an update to book value quarter-to-date? And if so, can you just discuss the current -- what's moving if it's spreads or rates?

Yes, sure. So as of the third, I guess, we were up 5%, and that was really a function of rates have tightened and spreads have tightened quarter-to-date. So unlike the breakdown that we gave in the prepared remarks, the composition of that was probably more toward the agency piece just from a book value attribution component than it was over the course of the third quarter.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Doug Harter with BTIG.

It's actually Will Nasta on for Doug this morning. I know you cited macro volatility as a main driver of the lower HomeXpress margins in the quarter. But I was just hoping you could talk a little bit more about how you're thinking about margins there in the higher rate environment and I guess, how that evolves as volatility comes down?

Yes. This is Kyle. We had to go through a transition from a lower interest rate environment to a higher interest rate environment, which means most of our loans are locked on 30 days. So there was a transition of about 30 days where you had to deal with loans that weren't profitable. Today, our pipeline, we believe, is profitable. WAC is near 8%. And so we're still working through, I think, about one more pool that is maybe slightly profitable, and then we think we'll be back into a profitable margin business at the end of the fourth quarter into the first quarter.

We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Kardis for closing comments.

Thank you. I'd like to thank all of our shareholders for their support. And also like to thank all of our employees for the hard work that they went through given the volatility of the quarter. And we look forward to talking to you early next year. Thank you.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

Thank you. Greetings, and welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation Second Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.

I will now turn the conference over to Tyra Walton, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining us this morning. I'm Tyra Walton, Head of Investor Relations. This morning, Chimera released its results for the second quarter of 2026. The earnings release and presentation for the quarter are both available on our website at chimerareit.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. Today's remarks may contain forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections, or other statements about future events. These events are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the Risk Factors section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimers in our earnings release and our quarterly and annual filings.

During the call, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplements or reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the contents of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Phil Kardis.

Thanks, Tyra. Good morning and welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation's second quarter 2026 earnings call. Joining me on the call are Subramaniam Viswanathan, our Chief Financial Officer; Jack Macdowell, our Chief Investment Officer; and Kyle Walker, the President and CEO of HomeXpress Mortgage. After my remarks, Subra will review the financial results, Jack will review the investment portfolio, and then Kyle will review HomeXpress's results.

It's nearly 3,000 years old, but with a fresh translation by Emily Watson (sic) [ Emily Wilson ] and a blockbuster movie by Christopher Nolan, the new generation is discovering the Odyssey, and it has much to say that is relevant to us. During Odysseus' 10-year journey home, we learned that most threats are unpredictable and that risk management matters more than heroics. He doesn't know he'll face challenges like the Cyclops and the Sirens, just as we didn't know at the beginning of the year that we would see open conflict in the Gulf or that the rate cuts everyone had penciled in would give way to talks of hikes before year-end.

We also learned that Odysseus reaches home by planning for the downside. For example, by plugging his crew's ears and lashing himself to the mast to resist the Sirens rather than to rely on willpower. Likewise, as I noted in the first quarter, we don't try to predict where the market will be. We focus on being prepared for wherever it goes. And we do that by building resiliency through diversified income streams and liquidity. But most importantly, what the Odyssey teaches us is that we must have a fixed destination, but not a fixed route. Odysseus' objective never changes, return home.

His route, however, is not direct. He must be flexible, creative, know when to wait and when to preserve resources and when to take calculated risk to make it home. We've been clear about our destination to build a company that is not dependent on any single market environment and that benefits shareholders through tax-advantaged dividend and enterprise growth. And while we have model portfolio, targeted growth plans, like Odysseus, we're not locked into a particular path. We remain flexible and open to change as market conditions change.

The second quarter remained much like the first. Volatility and uncertainty persisted. We went about our business as we did in the first quarter. With respect to the investment portfolio, we continue to reduce our lower-yielding assets and sponsored 2 resecuritizations, redeploying the proceeds into more liquid and higher-yielding assets.

Turning to HomeXpress, in the second quarter, loan production grew by 30% compared to the second quarter of 2025 and 24% compared to the prior quarter. Earnings, however, grew only modestly quarter-over-quarter. This result, increased production with essentially flat earnings, was driven primarily by margin compression from increased competition. We'll look to increase HomeXpress's earnings by further scaling production while maintaining our strong credit discipline and by reducing our cost to originate. But increasing our allocation to Agency RMBS and third-party sales of HomeXpress loans are not the only ways to grow Chimera's earnings, especially given the current securitization market economics and compressed sale margins. Therefore, we are pivoting to acquire and securitize mortgage loans from both HomeXpress and third parties.

Currently, we're targeting two securitizations of HomeXpress loans and one of third-party loans by year-end. And depending on the relative value between loan sales and securitizations, we may increase the size or frequency of those securitizations. So how are we doing? Last quarter, we noted as we looked out over 2026, we believed we'd be able to generate $1.80 of EAD. We also noted that we expected some volatility in the EAD period-to-period given our operations and the market. We further pointed out that our fourth quarter and first quarter EAD contained several one-time items and that we believed our underlying run rate was closer to $0.47, plus or minus. EAD for the second quarter was $0.46, right on our projected underlying run rate and once again exceeding our dividend.

We have a dollar of EAD through the first half of the year and still believe EAD for the year will be at least $1.80. In short, we continue to perform as we expected, even though the market environment is significantly different than anticipated at the beginning of the year.

What's our outlook for the remainder of the year and how are we positioned? Just like we noted in the first quarter, we expect continued uncertainty, geopolitical and market-driven. But despite the uncertainty, we remain optimistic about the future. We will continue to grow and diversify the portfolio, expand originations, build fee-based income and opportunistically pursue acquisitions, staying flexible on the route and clear on our destination.

With that, I'll turn it over to Subra to walk you through the financials.

Thanks, Phil. GAAP net loss for the second quarter was approximately $4 million. Net loss of $13 million from our investment portfolio segment was offset by net income of $9 million from residential origination. We generated approximately $39 million of earnings available for distribution or $0.46 per share. Our EAD was not materially impacted by onetime charges this quarter. As a reminder, our EAD per share of $0.54 in the first quarter included $0.07 of one-time benefits. These non-recurring favorable items resulted from the securitization unwind undertaken as part of our portfolio optimization efforts as well as MSR-related investments.

Excluding the impact of those items, EAD in the first quarter would have been $0.47. The quarterly dividend of $0.45 was covered by second quarter earnings. Book value per share declined 3.2% to $17.75. Economic return on GAAP book value was negative 0.8% based on the quarterly change in book value and second quarter dividend of $0.45 per common share. Annualized EAD return on average common equity was 10.35%. Segment performance for the first quarter (sic) [ second quarter ] was as follows. For the investment portfolio, economic net interest income was $66.3 million, while annualized economic net interest income return on average equity was 12.35%. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.9%, our average cost of funds was 4.3% and the resulting net interest spread was 1.6%.

For the residential Origination Segment, HomeXpress funded $1.1 billion in loans. EBITDA, defined as earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization, was $11.8 million and annualized EBITDA ROE was 17.3%. With respect to leverage and liquidity, our total leverage was 5.6:1, while recourse leverage was 3.3:1. GAAP leverage increased due to resecuritization activity and increasing allocation to Agency RMBS. Growing agency allocation also drove the increase in recourse leverage. We ended the quarter with $656 million in total cash and unencumbered assets compared to $675 million the last quarter. Total consolidated secured financing outstanding was $7.7 billion. It was comprised of $727 million related to our residential origination warehouse loans and the remaining approximately $7 billion was for our investment portfolio.

Within the investment portfolio, $5.1 billion of secured financing supported the agency positions against which we maintain $4.9 billion in swaps, interest rate caps and other hedges with varying maturities. $1.9 billion was secured by residential credit assets, of which $1.2 billion, or 61%, carried non- or limited mark-to-market features. And $1.1 billion, or 55% of this, were floating rate facilities. Finally, on expenses, compensation, G&A, and servicing expenses were lower in the quarter. The decrease were offset by higher transaction expenses related to our securitization activity during the second quarter. In summary, though the first quarter results included certain non-recurring benefits, our second quarter results provide a normalized EAD. Taken together, the first half demonstrates continued dividend support. And as we move into the second half, we remain focused on supporting dividend coverage over the full year and driving total shareholder returns over the long term.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Jack.

Thanks, Subra, and good morning, everyone. The second quarter was defined by a sharp repricing of the expected path of monetary policy as persistent inflation and resilient economic activity shifted markets from anticipating rate cuts for a higher-for-longer outlook.

Volatility increased materially in mid-May, pushing treasury yields higher and temporarily widening Agency MBS and residential credit spreads. Market conditions subsequently improved and spreads across both Agency MBS and structured residential credit, including new issue non-QM and RPL securities ended the quarter tighter, supported by strong investor demand. By quarter-end, Treasury yields were considerably higher, particularly at the front end, producing a pronounced bear flattening of the curve. While tighter spreads offset part of the increase in benchmark rates, all-in mortgage bond yields still finished the quarter at elevated levels.

With respect to our investment portfolio activities, we closed out $966 million short TBA positions and further streamlined our Agency portfolio by selling some of the noncore legacy CMBS interest-only and HECM positions in addition to trimming our CMO exposure. In total, these sales represented $575 million of notional and generated $19 million in capital for redeployment. Within the Agency portfolio, we purchased and settled $967 million of pass-throughs with a focus on coupons in the 5.5% to 6.5% range, leaving our specified pool portfolio with more than 75% allocated to 5% coupons and above and increasing our TBA adjusted average coupon by 14 basis points to 5.28%.

As Phil mentioned, we completed 2 resecuritizations backed by $487 million of loans. Of that collateral, $282 million consisted of loans retained from our first quarter loan sale activity, while $205 million came from a securitization we called during the quarter. Reallocating the loans sourced from the called securitization across the 2 new transactions enabled us to increase the advance rate and lower the original issue cost of funds related to the bonds. These deals improved overall financing efficiency and also released approximately $13 million of capital for reinvestment. Palisades Advisory Services was named Asset Manager on both deals.

We continue to shift our capital allocation mix during the quarter, increasing Agency MBS by 5 percentage points to 26% of our invested capital. Conversely, we reduced our allocation to legacy residential credit by 4 percentage points to 61%, while capital invested in MSRs and HomeXpress were roughly flat. We maintained a strong liquidity position with $656 million in cash and unencumbered assets. We also continue to manage our residential credit repo financing conservatively with 61%, or $1.2 billion comprised of limited or non-mark-to-market facilities whose average months to maturity at quarter-end was 8 months.

During the quarter, we adjusted our hedging strategy by replacing a portion of our payer swaps with in-the-money interest rate caps within our Agency portfolio and added similar caps to hedge the liabilities in our residential credit sleeve. The caps provide similar protection to swaps in a higher rate environment while also improving the convexity of our portfolio in a sustained rally.

Credit performance continued to track our expectations across product sectors in the second quarter. Delinquencies in the legacy reperforming book ended the quarter at 8.8%, down from 9.1% in Q1. We saw similar improvements in our investor DSCR loan portfolio, where delinquencies declined from 6.1% to 4.7%, driven in large part by early-stage delinquent loans becoming current. We continue to wind down the legacy RTL portfolio, which had 16 loans resolved during the quarter, including 13 payoffs and 3 workouts. The jumbo loan delinquencies remain stable, while prepays across the portfolio had a moderately to upward sloping trend typical for the spring season.

We made significant progress repositioning the investment portfolio. We still have work to do, but after multiple refinancings and divestitures over the last 18 months, culminating in the sale of $1.2 billion of loans in the first quarter, we've generated and redeployed nearly $700 million of capital from these portfolio management activities. Through 2025 and into the second quarter of 2026, we redeployed the majority of that capital into liquid Agency MBS. As noted, we view agencies as an important component to our portfolio construction strategy, providing both a relative value allocation and a liquidity bucket we can draw on to fund other accretive opportunities.

That work has laid the foundation for us to build on our expertise in residential whole loan credit. Between our HomeXpress origination platform, Palisades' technology and data infrastructure, our loan acquisition partnerships, and a track record spanning whole loan due diligence, credit underwriting, servicer oversight, asset management and securitization, we have a fully integrated residential credit platform, which we intend to grow. We believe the timing is favorable. Non-QM continues to show secular growth, evident in strong year-over-year increases in origination volume, despite elevated rates and subdued housing activity. The rise in self-employment and nontraditional income profiles is expanding the pool of borrowers that fall outside conventional government programs, while non-QM has become a key financing source for investors with rental properties. We expect this form of financing to account for a growing share of the overall origination market, and we expect it to be a key source of financing.

We intend to be a consistent value-add partner to our lender and seller network. We're already executing on this. We've identified and retained $301 million of loans to seed our first HomeXpress securitization that remains on track for the third quarter. Since quarter-end, we have retained additional loans for a second HomeXpress securitization and committed to purchase loans from third-party sellers for a separate non-QM transaction we intend to bring to market in the second half of the year. The first half was about continuing to reposition the portfolio. Despite a volatile backdrop, we exited lower-yielding legacy positions and redeployed capital into opportunities more closely aligned with our long-term strategic objectives and offering better prospective returns, all while maintaining our strong liquidity positions. Those actions leave us with a stronger portfolio and the flexibility to lean into our core focus areas, led by residential credit as opportunities emerge through the balance of the year.

With that, I will turn it over to Kyle to discuss residential origination.

Thank you, Jack, and good morning, everyone. HomeXpress delivered another strong quarter with record loan origination volume of $1.1 billion and $11.8 million in EBITDA. Our loan growth is up 30% from the prior year's second quarter and 24% over the first quarter of 2026. Growth in the second quarter was driven by broad-based demand across our core products, as well as increased production through our nondelegated correspondent channel, which now comprises 13% of our production.

As Jack noted, while there was market volatility in the second quarter, HomeXpress loan production is less dependent on interest rate levels. In fact, in June, our loan volume increased to reach a monthly record for HomeXpress of $420 million, which is an impressive accomplishment considering the competitiveness of our market. Looking ahead at the third quarter, while monthly production may fluctuate due to market and other macro environment volatility, we expect the underlying loan demand remains healthy, and we are focused on executing with discipline.

As to profitability, HomeXpress EBITDA climbed to $11.8 million in the second quarter, driven primarily by the higher loan volume and cost effectiveness. At the same time, net origination margin in the second quarter expanded to 124 basis points, up 10 basis points from the first quarter of 2026. The net origination margin for the second quarter of 2026 is slightly lower than the level of the second quarter of 2025 due to the increased market competition and tighter pricing. As such, we are focused on controlling the controllables by maintaining credit discipline, optimizing and enhancing our loan products and keeping a sharp focus on process efficiency as the HomeXpress platform grows.

In addition, while our loans already perform exceptionally well in the secondary market and are highly valued by investors, we continually seek new investor relationships to further enhance competition, broaden demand and maximize loan pricing execution. First, on credit, our underwriting standards have not changed. So even with a robust production volume growth, key metrics on our new loan originations, including weighted average FICO and LTV ratios for the quarter, remained in line with historic levels. That combination of higher volume with the same underwriting standards is what we're focused on preserving as we grow the business.

Second, we are not trying to win every loan. Instead, we're protecting economics where returns do not justify the risk and choosing to compete in products and channels where the borrowers' credit profile, the broker relationship, and our execution capabilities can support attractive returns. And third, we remain focused on driving higher efficiency as the platform scales. We recently equipped our brokers with the ability to order appraisals directly through our portal. We also now use smart fees to automatically populate the data they require to compare loan disclosures. These technology tools serve to shorten loan processing times and help us support higher volumes more efficiently while improving accuracy.

As I mentioned last quarter, we are expanding the share of consumer loans in our production mix. These loans, while typically having higher balances, enable us to generate more funded volume without a proportional increase in loan count and related fixed operating costs. Our average loan size grew to more than $455,000 during the quarter compared with $410,000 in the first quarter. We are actively engaged with our warehouse lenders to continue to improve the financing economics of our business, and we expect our efforts will enable us to increase our float spread. Importantly, we have ample funding to support our expected growth. Our warehouse capacity, which we expanded to $1.5 billion last quarter, has now been increased to $1.65 billion in July, and we are evaluating additional capacity. Our warehouse facilities are distributed across seven facilities with large financial institutions.

We're also growing our broker network. We now have more than 6,350 brokers serviced by 145 account executives and related sales staff. Our strong national network remains our driving force, providing us with broad access across our various consumer non-QM and investor lending products. Stepping back, the first half of 2026 reflected our ability to execute. It also demonstrates the strength and value of our platform. HomeXpress is firmly on track to exceed the $4 billion loan origination volume target for the year, barring market events. It is also contributing meaningful EBITDA while providing Chimera with direct access to quality residential mortgage collateral. As we look towards the second half of 2026 and beyond, our focus is clear. Continue scaling the business in a disciplined and efficient manner with high credit quality, which is the foundation for driving earnings growth over time.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Phil.

Thanks, Kyle. We'll now open the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Bose George with KBW.

Actually, first just on book value, can you just talk about the drivers of the change in book value during the second quarter? And where does mark-to-market book value stand quarter to date?

Yes, sure. This is Jack. Just on the, you know, second quarter book value move, one thing to keep in mind, the vast majority even still today of our GAAP portfolio is comprised of securitized loans. So we have about $8 billion of loans on balance sheet against, what, $5.5 billion of securitized loans. So those are in fixed rate non-mark-to-market term securitization. So we're not hedging the book value there, and that's the vast majority of the move in our book value. We had a pretty substantive sell-off in rates during the quarter, and that drove the value of the loans down, and also the sec debt of the loans move more than the sec debt during this quarter.

The one thing to also point out there, too, is as we continue to sort of reposition, diversify the portfolio, we now have a quarter of the portfolio in agencies. We've got about 10%, 11% of the capital allocated to HomeXpress, and both of those things contributed positively to book value. But it's just a function of our consolidated GAAP securitization that's driving that book value change. And just to reiterate, I think we've talked about this in the past. The one reason that we're not looking to hedge that is as the gyrations in interest rates change on both the liability side there. It really doesn't have any impact on our earnings power dividend paying ability. So on the residential credit side of the book, what we're hedging is our floating rate liabilities with respect to our repo to ensure that our earnings power remains intact. But we take that the book value volatility on that part of the book is going to fluctuate with interest rates.

Okay, yes, that makes sense. So, yes, just the mark-to-market book value part?

Yes, so quarter-to-date, there's been a bit of a sell-off in rates. So we're down about 1.5% quarter to date.

Okay. Great. And then just actually a follow-up on the book value just on the securitized portion. Since that doesn't impact your earnings out of that, I mean, essentially, does that your ROE on your remaining capital in that, does that just go up when those marks happen?

Yes. So I mean our GAAP book value will change certainly. So yes, I guess, from a GAAP ROE standpoint, as the loan value declines, then yes, we -- our earnings power remains intact and so our ROE would increase.

Okay, great. That makes sense. And then just on HomeXpress, just based on your guidance, it sounds like the higher rate outlook is not having a much -- at least a meaningfully negative impact. So can you just talk about what rates are doing to HomeXpress in the back half of the year? And also, is the -- just talk about the margins in the nondelegated correspondent versus the traditional wholesale.

So we're seeing continued increase in volume on a margin on a month-to-month basis. We think the third quarter is going to be an increase over the second quarter. There has been some margin compression. We're very focused on maintaining our underwriting standards, pricing deliberately and looking for operational efficiencies to try to drive down our cost. As far as the non-delegated correspondent, it is slightly less margin business than our wholesale business, I would say maybe 10 to 15 basis points less in margin. But it appears to be much more efficient in how we can process the loan. So I think our cost to originate on that business is slightly less.

Our next question will come from Trevor Cranston with JMP Securities.

Can you talk a little bit about your outlook for the Agency basis after the spread tightening that we saw during the second quarter and sort of how you compare incremental returns on investing in agency MBS versus new credit opportunities today?

Yes, that's a good question. And I would say on the Agency front, I mean, we've built up over $600 million of capital allocated to agencies. Spreads have been moving around, but we're still generating something in the low to mid-teens area with respect to the capital allocations allocated there. The one -- and there's still good demand coming in first half of the year, we obviously had the first quarter of demand coming from the GSE. So there's technical support with respect to spreads in the agency space. And we look at agencies as both a relative value bucket where we can generate returns, but also a source of liquidity that we can draw on for other opportunities. And right now, the bar to draw on that capital is relatively high just given where yields are in the Agency space.

With that being said, we do feel like we are at a bit of an inflection point with respect to the work that we've been putting in over the 1.5 years in repositioning the portfolio. I think what you heard from Phil's remarks as well as in my remarks is that the opportunity set for us as we see it on a go-forward basis is really to start leaning into one of our core competencies, which is what the vast majority of our infrastructure is built around, which is residential credit. So again, and that includes retaining more loans from HomeXpress, buying loans from third parties, securitizing those loans, and really creating optionality with respect to whether or not we want to retain the credit portion of the capital stack for our investment portfolio, where we would be targeting something in the mid-teens area or we want to distribute the entire structure and turn over that capital and generate gain on sale or capital markets revenue.

Moving next to Marissa Lobo with UBS.

For the inaugural HomeXpress securitization, will Chimera retain the residual equity piece? And if so, how should we expect that to be reflected in EAD going forward?

Yes, so like I was saying, whenever we're looking to do a securitization, whether it's HomeXpress or third-party loans, what our intent is to structure those deals and then up to the time of distribution, evaluate a variety of factors. One, our capital needs, our portfolio construction objectives, relative value in the market. And based on those factors, we make a determination as to whether or not we would retain the credit portion of the capital stack, which would essentially be investing for long-term earnings over the next several years or distribute the entire structure and booking the gain on sale, which would go through EAD and earnings and then turning over that capital and rinse and repeating it.

So right now, I mean, we're still working through those dynamics. We're looking to get that first deal done probably in the latter part of the third quarter. And as we approach the date of that deal, we'll start honing in on the decision to what we're going to retain.

And could you just update us on third-party advisory, you know? How much AUM are you managing? And how should we think about that revenue stream contributing to EAD going forward?

Yes, so I guess the way I would think about Palisades Advisory Services is they serve, you know, multiple functions. One, they serve third-party clients with respect to helping them with all their residential whole loan servicer oversight and data needs, and that generates revenue from third parties on a fee basis. And they're also very instrumental in overseeing the Chimera portfolio and our focus on buying loans from third parties, securitizing them. So it's really a function of external versus internal resource allocation.

I will say, just on the third-party business, there is competition in that space. And we've also seen somewhat of a reduction in transaction activity from -- in transaction activity from some of our clients. So we're seeing a little bit of dilution with respect to third-party fee revenue, but we're actively redeploying those resources to help focus on some of our whole loan needs at the REIT level.

And also with the HomeXpress securitization and the third-party conduit securitization, we'll expect to see some fees come in.

And our next question will come from Doug Harter with BTIG.

Can you talk about where you are in terms of redeploying the capital from the call deals in the first quarter and where we are in terms of seeing that earnings?

Thank you. Yes. Hey, Doug. So when we raised that $195 million from the calls and the sale in late first quarter, we actually had about a $900 million and close to a $1 billion TBA short just from a risk management perspective, that we held into April. So we actually closed out of that. So there was some degradation with respect to the negative carry of the short position in April. But after that, we were primarily fully deployed, and so we're realizing the benefits of that $195 million redeployment for today and for the better part of the second quarter.

The one thing just to highlight and point out, this kind of goes back to our consolidated securitizations. Of the -- we've got $8 billion of loans, $5.5 billion of securitized debt. The way that those deals are structured is that when principal comes in, it delevers the structures. And then over time, that's going to dilute our earnings power up until we call the deal, pull the capital out and then redeploy it once again. So, part of the earnings accretion, if you will, from the first quarter activities, we're definitely seeing that, but it's being offset by some of the deleveraging in other parts of the portfolio. But still, there's a net benefit to it, but we're seeing that today and in the back half of Q2.

All right. I guess where I'm just struggling is one of the logics of kind of the book value decline that you took from calling those deals was to see earnings accretion from that. And ex, the onetime items, the earnings seem relatively flat. So just -- and I understand your point there about replacing some of the degradation, but just was wondering if -- kind of where we were in seeing that accretion, but I appreciate the answer.

And this now concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Phil Kardis for closing comments.

Thank you. To our shareholders, thank you for your continued support. Over the past couple of years, we've made a lot of progress towards our destination, and we look forward to updating you again next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.

Greetings, and welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Tyra Walton, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. I'm Tyra Walton, Head of Investor Relations. This morning, Chimera released its results for the first quarter of 2026. The earnings release and presentation for the quarter are both available on our website at chimerareit.com.

Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. Today's remarks may contain forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These events are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the Risk Factors section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimers in our earnings release and our quarterly and annual filings. During the call, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Phil Kardis.

Thank you, Tyra. Good morning, and welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Joining me on the call are Subra Viswanathan, our Chief Financial Officer; Jack MacDowell, our Chief Investment Officer; and Kyle Walker, the President and CEO of HomeXpress Mortgage.

After my remarks, Subra will review the financial results. Jack will review the investment portfolio, and then Kyle will review HomeXpress results. We operate in a market where conditions change -- can change quickly. Rates move, spreads widen, liquidity tightens and then [rarely] in a straight line. This year has been a clear reminder of that reality. During the quarter, treasury yields moved higher across the curve, while the 2/10s spread flattened. Prior to the Iran conflict, mortgage rates briefly touched the 3.5-year low, going to reverse higher by 40 basis points as volatility returned. Mortgage basis widened relative to treasuries and swaps, equity volatility spiked at one point doubling before stabilizing. Oil prices moved sharply higher. And at the same time, rate markets alternated between periods of calm and episodes of rapid repricing.

Overlaying this, the market expectations for monetary policy shifted meaningfully. At the start of the year, the market anticipated two to three rate cuts in 2026. By quarter end, those expectations had largely dissipated. And in fact, there's now some discussion of the possibility of rate hikes. I highlight these dynamics to underscore a central point. We are operating in a market where uncertainty is not episodic. It's structural. We don't try to predict where the market will be. We focus on being prepared for wherever it goes.

Our objective is clear: to build a company that's not dependent on any single market environment. The question then is straightforward. How did we perform in this environment? And how are we positioned going forward? I'll give you a sneak peek. We think we did very well and believe we are well positioned to take advantage of opportunities throughout the rest of the year.

So let's start with HomeXpress. HomeXpress had another strong quarter. Despite volatility, origination volume increased 39% compared to the first quarter of 2025, reaching $884 million. Moreover, they were able to generate $11 million of earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization, representing an annualized return on equity of 16.8%. This is what we aim for, growth with discipline and returns that justify the capital employed.

Turning next to our investment portfolio. We continue to reposition the portfolio to unlock value and build more durable earnings. During the quarter, our allocation to loans decreased from 62% to 55% and our allocation to Agency RMBS increased from 15% to 21%. The primary driver for this shift was the redemption of eight securitizations backed by $1.5 billion of seasoned reperforming loans. We sold $1.2 billion of those loans, generating $195 million in net proceeds and retained $287 million for current income and future securitization.

With an estimated breakeven ROE of just under 8%, the reinvestment of these proceeds has the potential to generate an additional $15 million in annual earnings. The takeaway, we increased earnings power while improving portfolio flexibility. As we look at our portfolio repositioning over the past 15 months, our estimated investment levered returns, including the addition of HomeXpress, have increased by approximately 20%.

Also since the beginning of the year, we have been purchasing newly originated loans from HomeXpress. We plan to launch the new CIM HomeX securitization program later this quarter or early next. Overall, our portfolio had a very strong quarter. But as a REIT, the real test is our dividend. So how are we doing? First quarter earnings available for distribution EAD was $0.54 per share, which covered the $0.45 dividend by 120%. Over the past 10 quarters, our EAD has exceeded our dividend in nine, missing once by a single penny.

Over that same period, we increased the dividend from $0.33 to $0.45 per share, a 36% increase while maintaining EAD coverage of more than 1.1x. I want to let that sink in for a minute. We've grown and covered our dividend for the past 2.5 years. That consistency is not accidental. It reflects a focus on generating durable earnings. So what's our outlook for the remainder of the year and how are we positioned? Looking ahead, we expect continued uncertainty, political, geopolitical and market-driven.

But despite that uncertainty, we remain optimistic about the future. We have structured the platform to preserve optionality across origination, investment and asset management so that we can adapt as conditions evolve. And more than that, we have the capital and the liquidity to take advantage of that optionality. We ended the quarter with $476 million of cash, approximately $200 million of unencumbered assets and nearly $500 million of equity allocated to Agency RMBS.

So as we look over the rest of the year, we believe we have both the liquidity and the flexibility to continue to play offense and act when opportunities arise. Specifically, we will continue to grow and diversify the portfolio, expand originations, build fee-based income and pursue acquisitions. With that, I'll turn it over to Subra to walk you through the financials.

Thanks, Phil. GAAP net loss for the quarter was approximately $65 million. We generated approximately $46 million of earnings available for distribution or $0.54 per share compared with $34 million and $0.41 per share in Q1 of 2025. This improvement reflects higher net interest income from the portfolio and the addition of HomeXpress. Our quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share was covered by earnings at approximately 1.2x. GAAP book value per share declined by 6.9% to $18.34. Excluding the impact of redemption of eight securitization deals and related loan sales, book value was down by 2.5%.

Jack will provide additional details on the transaction and its impact on book value and earnings. In addition, the transaction released $195 million in equity, which was immediately redeployed into agency securities, increasing liquidity and supporting earnings accretion. Redeeming the securitized debt reduced net interest expense by $4 million, reflecting the exclusion of accrued carry interest on the payoff. In addition, income from our MSR-related investments benefited from early payout protection payments of $2 million. Together, these items contributed approximately $0.07 to earnings available for distribution per share and are not expected to recur.

With that, at the firm level for the quarter, economic return on GAAP book value was negative 4.6% based on the quarterly change in book value and the $0.45 first quarter dividend per common share. Annualized GAAP return on average equity was negative 6.97%, while annualized EAD return on average common equity was 11.53%.

Segment performance for the first quarter was as follows: -- for the investment portfolio, economic net interest income was $72.8 million, while annualized economic net interest income return on average equity was 13.03%. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 6%. Our average cost of funds was 4.2% and the resulting net interest spread was 1.8%. For the Residential Origination segment, HomeXpress funded $884 million of loans.

EBITDA defined as earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization was $11.4 million and annualized EBITDA ROE was 16.8%. With respect to leverage and liquidity, our total leverage was 5.2:1, while recourse leverage was 2.9:1. Recourse leverage rose this quarter as we continue to increase our capital allocation to Agency RMBS securities.

We ended the quarter with $675 million in total cash and unencumbered assets compared to $528 million at the end of the year. Total consolidated secured financing outstanding was $7 billion. It was comprised of $629 million related to our residential origination warehouse loans and the remaining approximately $6.4 billion was for our investment portfolio. Within the investment portfolio, $4.1 billion of secured financing supported Agency RMBS positions against which we maintained $3.7 billion in swaps and swaps futures across varying maturities and $966 million in TBAs.

$1.9 billion was secured by residential credit assets, of which $1.2 billion or 62% carried non or limited mark-to-market features and $1 billion or 54% of this were floating rate facilities. We also utilized $224 million of warehouse capacity during the quarter to finance retained loans post redemption of the eight deals I discussed earlier.

Finally, on expenses. Compensation expense increased by $8.5 million quarter-over-quarter, mainly driven by a return to a more normalized run rate and higher stock-based compensation. In the Investment Portfolio segment, the prior quarter reflected a lower accrual while the first quarter returned to a more normalized run rate. We also recognized higher stock-based compensation in the first quarter related to grants awarded to retirement-eligible employees. In the Residential Originations segment, expenses increased by approximately $1.4 million, driven by primarily by a higher headcount. In summary, the first quarter reflects the impact of a deliberate portfolio repositioning with capital released and deployed into higher return opportunities, while the underlying business continues to perform. We believe the steps taken this quarter position us well for improved earnings and returns for the future.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Jack.

Thank you, Subra, and good morning, everyone. As Phil mentioned, the quarter began on constructive footing, supported by GSE demand for Agency MBS and expectations for Fed easing. That tone shifted in early February as liquidity and credit concerns reemerged, particularly in private credit. Conditions deteriorated further with the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East that continued throughout the balance of March. Since quarter end, mortgage spreads have tightened from their wides and credit has firmed across products, though rates remain higher and markets continue to digest an evolving geopolitical environment.

Against this backdrop, our focus has remained consistent. Over the past year, we have been executing a deliberate strategy to optimize our portfolio, in particular, raising capital organically by economically relevering securitization structures, divesting fully valued assets and increasing our allocation to more liquid investments. That strategy positioned us well heading into the March volatility, enabling us to de-risk quickly when conditions deteriorated and deploy promptly upon raising capital. During the quarter, we completed a series of strategic transactions involving the redemption of eight securitizations collateralized by $1.5 billion of legacy re-performing loans.

We sold $1.2 billion of the loans and retained approximately $287 million that we plan to resecuritize in the near term. These transactions released approximately $195 million of capital at a breakeven ROE of just under 8%, and we estimate the redeployment of that capital has the potential to increase annual earnings power by $15 million. You can see additional details on Slide 10 of the accompanying presentation.

I want to take a moment to walk through how these transactions impacted our reported book value as the mechanics of calling legacy securitizations can create movements that do not fully reflect the economic outcomes. When we call these securitizations at par, we redeemed securities that were carried on our balance sheet at a discount. That discount, approximately $43 million flowed through as a reduction in book value. In total, these strategic transactions accounted for nearly two thirds of our change in book value during the quarter, and absent these actions, book value would have been down approximately 2.5%, reflecting the impact of spread movements and rate volatility during the quarter. As of last Friday, our estimated book value is up about 1%. So for context, the majority of our book value decline this quarter was a direct result of strategic actions that are designed to improve the quality of our portfolio and enhance our go-forward earnings potential.

We are committed to preserving capital and managing risk, and we assess value at risk based on the earnings-generating capacity of our capital, not short-term market movements in securitized liabilities. We continued our capital reallocation efforts, repositioning the portfolio toward a more balanced mix, enhancing our liquidity profile and the potential for more durable risk-adjusted earnings. Our allocation to residential credit decreased to 65% from 72% at year-end, with loan exposure coming down to 55% from 62%, driven mainly by asset sales during the quarter.

In turn, we added $1.9 billion of Agency MBS, bringing that allocation to 21%, up six percentage points quarter-over-quarter with our specified pool portfolio ending at $4.9 billion. In March, amidst the onset of the conflict in the Middle East, we added selectively to our agency portfolio in five and six coupons where spreads have widened most and we were under-allocated, reducing overall portfolio duration at a time when we wanted to maintain a more defensive posture.

We also actively managed risk through TBA positions, initially shorting $500 million as the conflict intensified before unwinding those positions after raising liquidity through loan sales. We subsequently reestablished shorts on a portion of our portfolio to maintain flexibility across the stack. We continue to hedge our agency portfolio with interest rate swaps, consistent with our SOFR-based funding and the carry advantage provided by current swap spread levels.

On the credit side, our hedge composition shifted during the quarter from pay fixed swaps and swaptions to interest rate caps, providing an asymmetric payoff in the event of a material decline in short-term rates. As Phil mentioned, we began retaining HomeXpress loans in the first quarter and anticipate launching our first securitization in late Q2 or early Q3. These loans are representative of HomeXpress's normal production with investor loans making up approximately 55% of the population, reporting a 70% average loan-to-value ratio, 735 average credit score and 7% average coupon.

We see securitization execution outpacing whole loan pricing in the current market. And given our flexibility to hold, securitize or sell, we are well positioned to capture that differential. Turning now to credit. Performance across our loan portfolio remains strong. Delinquencies in the legacy re-performing book ticked up, though this was largely due to the composition of loans we sold versus retained. On the RTL side, the dollar balance of delinquencies remained stable and losses nominal. And in our investor loan cohort, delinquencies driven by a natural seasoning of the 2023 vintage are in line with expectations and reverted back into the mid-5% range as of the April remittance reports. Stepping back, the first quarter demonstrated both the value and the necessity of the transformation we have been executing over the past year.

The loan sale activities released capital and materially improved our earnings capacity. Our growing agency portfolio gave us flexibility to redeploy and de-risk dynamically as conditions shifted. And HomeXpress continues to contribute to earnings while building a pipeline for our securitization program. We entered this year with a clear plan, diversify the portfolio, strengthen liquidity and grow durable sources of income. The actions we took this quarter advanced each of those objectives. We covered our dividend. We improved the composition of the portfolio, and we redeployed the capital freed up from the legacy transactions into higher returning opportunities. The strategy is delivering results, and we see continued growth in the earnings power of this platform.

With that, I will turn it over to Kyle to discuss residential origination.

Thank you, Jack, and good morning, everyone. HomeXpress delivered strong results in the first quarter, building on the momentum from the prior quarter. We originated $884 million in total loan volume, representing a 39% increase as compared to the first quarter of last year. Despite market volatility emerging late in the quarter, our origination volume, all of which is first lien residential mortgages was not meaningfully impacted due to two key reasons. First, the loan submission to close process has a natural lag of about 35 days. As a result, much of our first quarter's volume was already in the pipeline before market conditions shifted.

Our first quarter results, therefore, largely reflect the origination pipeline activity built earlier in the quarter.

Second, consumer non-QM and business purpose loan demand is less dependent on rate-driven refinancing activity, which also supported our pipeline stability through the late quarter disruption. Looking ahead, our pull-through rates and broker engagement have remained relatively consistent entering the second quarter. Submissions did moderate briefly during the disruption, but activity has begun to normalize. Demand continues to be driven less by rate-sensitive refinancing activity and more by borrowers with specific financing needs, including consumer home purchases, cash-out refinancings and investment property purchases.

As a result, despite elevated and ongoing interest rate volatility, the underlying demand for HomeXpress loan origination remains firm. Our experienced leadership team has successfully navigated many past market disruptions and cycles. That experience enables us to make strategic decisions and pivot effectively with changes in the market. One area we have been focusing on is increasing our percentage of consumer non-QM loans, which generally carry higher average loan balances.

Our average loan size increased from $424,000 in March to $451,000 in April. This compares with a $410,000 average for the first -- for the entire first quarter. By increasing the average loan size, we can generate more volume with the same number of loans, further improving our efficiency. HomeXpress delivered strong profitability in the quarter, generating an EBITDA of $11.4 million. Our net origination margin, which reflects both gain on sale as well as operating cost to produce our loans was 114 basis points. In this environment, we remain focused on driving efficiency while maintaining disciplined pricing and sound underwriting standards.

On the front end, we've integrated with ARIVE, so brokers can access our products and pricing directly in their workflow and submit loans without jumping between systems. That has helped reduce some of the back and forth and improve submission quality. We're also using AI to reduce manual work in underwriting, automating parts of income verification. Our efforts have helped us handle more volume and bring down cost per loan as we scale. We continue to assess other opportunities to incorporate AI into our systems. Credit quality on new originations remained consistent and key metrics, including weighted average FICO and LTV ratios were maintained in line with our historical loan production levels.

To support production, we increased our total warehouse funding capacity to $1.5 billion during the quarter. That, combined with our strong cash position provides ample liquidity to support our expected production levels. Our seven warehouse facilities are maintained with large and leading financial institutions. We also continue to deliver HomeXpress's high-touch service model that distinguishes our platform, maintaining relationships with our more than 6,000 approved broker sources, which are serviced by our 142 account executives and related sales staff.

As our first quarter results demonstrate, HomeXpress is contributing meaningfully to Chimera's earnings base. Going forward, we will continue to scale the platform responsibly, maintain credit discipline and originate loans with attractive economics.

With that, I'll turn the call back over to Phil.

Thank you, Kyle. To sum up, we're not optimizing for quarterly outcomes. We're allocating capital for long-term compounding. Our objective is straightforward, build a residential platform engineered to perform across interest rate cycles, credit cycles and capital market cycles. If we execute, intrinsic value per share will grow and the dividend will follow. That's how we run the business. And that's how we believe it should be evaluated. We'll now open the call to questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first question comes from the line of Marissa Lobo with UBS.

On the securitization call strategy, that unlocked capital, but it pressured book value a little bit. How much additional embedded optionality remains in the existing securitization stack? And how should we think about the trade-off between book value volatility and future earnings power?

Yes, Marissa, I appreciate the question. Just for context, I mean, as we're looking at these deals and as I think we've talked about on this call and prior calls, the securitization -- securitized debt impact, we're evaluating this very holistically. And we look at the opportunity cost of doing these deals versus the opportunity cost of just continuing to do nothing and letting the capital generate the existing returns.

I mean we have a pretty large portfolio of callable deals. And so we view our job is to constantly be evaluating the economics of calling those and resecuritizing them. But like we said in the prepared remarks, I mean, there's a difference between earnings generating capital and then the capital that is somewhat derived from valuation marks on our securitized debt.

And looking at the allocation, loans still represent the majority of capital, but agency is growing. So what risk-adjusted return threshold determines whether incremental capital goes to agency or credit assets from here?

Yes. I mean, so we are thinking about portfolio construction. And so the agency sleeve has been an important component of growth over the last year, one, for the liquidity and the optionality that we've been talking about and making sure that we maintain that. The loans, I mean, the credit element is a core competency of ours. So it's not that we necessarily are looking to decrease that allocation, so to speak, but we are looking to identify areas where we can extract underperforming capital and redeploy that into higher earning assets.

And maybe back to your original question, are there continuing to be opportunities in the portfolio to call deals, extract capital, redeploy it accretively? I think the answer to that is certainly yes. This was a very important quarter for us that culminated in the sale of $1.2 billion of loans. So that was obviously a milestone effort on the team's part. But I probably wouldn't expect in the near term something of that size, but I certainly think there's still opportunities to prune the portfolio and continue to drive earnings power.

Our next question comes from the line of Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Question on the agency portfolio. You mentioned establishing a short TBA position in March. It looks like it was about $1 billion at the end of the quarter. Can you say if you guys are continuing to hold that short TBA position or if there's been any other significant changes to the agency book since the end of the quarter?

No. I guess what I would say is we are using the TBA shorts for two different purposes. One, the one that we put on early in March was at the onset of the Middle East conflict. So that was purely a de-risking effort on the team's part that we were doing in preparation for the loan sales that were occurring and would raise liquidity later in the quarter. We did take that short off before quarter end. We had reestablished some other shorts, the 966 that you see in the prepared materials.

And we have continued to maintain that for all intents and purposes post quarter end. And we use that in part when we see interesting spec pools that -- where we think the payups are attractive or the stores or the call protection is interesting. Whenever we know that we're going to be raising capital at some point in the future, we don't necessarily want to be forced buyers of whatever is in the market at that time. So when we know capital is coming in, we may go ahead and purchase bonds, but we'll offset that risk by shorting TBAs. And that's what you see with that 966 for the most part at quarter end.

Okay, Got it. Makes sense. Then on the HomeXpress business, can you maybe give us a little bit of color on sort of early indications on the second quarter, how volumes are holding up with higher mortgage rates? And I guess I'd be curious if you've seen any sort of indication of changes in margin levels as well.

Volume in the second quarter should be very consistent with what we forecasted. So our volume has been increasing month-over-month. The margins appear to be holding. We did a couple of trades to an insurance investor throughout the kind of market dislocation, and that helped us keep the margins right. Now it seems like things are back to normal regarding margin activity.

Our next question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW.

This is Frankie Labetti on for Bose. To start, just kind of more of a macro question. Given the rate volatility, given some headline risks on unemployment, maybe can you talk about what you're seeing in the market there on credit, how have credit conditions held up?

Yes, sure. I mean if you look across our portfolio, and we put like our delinquency history in some charts in the prepared materials. But look, I think what you -- in some of the, call it, 2023 more seasoned vintage pools or, let's say, non-QM, we are starting to see delinquencies rise in what I would say is a normal course. There's certainly labor market conditions are starting to soften. So we would expect to see delinquencies reflect those conditions. With.

That being said, this is a much different underwriting than what we've seen like pre-financial crisis. These loans have significant equity in them, which opens up opportunities for much more constructive workout solutions for borrowers. And I think that's reflected in the very, very low levels of losses that we've seen in all these loans across non-QM and non-agencies. So I think you'll continue to see delinquencies rise in the normal course, but also losses continue to remain very muted just given the amount of equity in the loans.

Great. And then on the HomeXpress platform, like how does Chimera think about retaining servicing or MSR exposure going forward?

Yes. I mean that's a good question. And right now, everything has been sold on a servicing release basis. You know from prior calls and our remarks that building an MSR sleeve is a very important component of our longer-term strategy. So there's certainly discussions about retaining servicing longer term. I think we've still got some work to do on that front, but it's definitely on the drawing board and something that we would hope to do going forward at some point.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Mr. Kardis for any final comments.

Thank you. Thank you, everyone, for joining our first quarter 2026 earnings call, and we look forward to speaking to you next quarter.

Have a great day.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

Greetings, and welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Miyun Sung. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for participating in Chimera's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call.

Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These events are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the Risk Factors section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimers in our earnings release and our quarterly and annual filings.

During the call today, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Phil Kardis.

Thanks, Miyun. And good morning, and welcome to the Chimera Investment Corporation's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call.

Joining me on the call are Subra Viswanathan, our Chief Financial Officer; Jack Macdowell, our Chief Investment Officer; and Kyle Walker, the President and CEO of HomeXpress Mortgage.

After my remarks, Subra will review the financial results, Jack will review our portfolio, and then Kyle will review HomeXpress's results.

Last year, we provided a consistent message. We said we weren't playing defense. We were building a hybrid REIT designed to endure. Durable companies are built on clear thinking, long-term orientation and discipline. Early last year, we laid out a simple actionable plan, diversify our portfolio, strengthen liquidity and expand our fee-based income. And we were explicit about how, grow Agency RMBS, acquire MSRs, expand nondiscretionary investment management and advisory services and pursue growth, both organic and through acquisitions, all funded primarily by our own portfolio. We repeated these same commitments throughout the year. Consistency of strategy is not a slogan. It's the operating system of any company that wants to outlast cycles.

Now let's look at what we delivered. We began the year with a GAAP portfolio composed of 81% loans, 3% agency securities and 16% non-agency securities. We ended the year at 61% loans, 16% agency securities and 10% non-agency securities, 11% lending activities and 1% MSRs. We aren't yet where we intend to be, but the direction is unmistakable and the progress is significant.

We also increased third-party AUM from $22 billion to $26 billion, added advisory services to 3 of our securitizations and successfully integrated our loan data into the Palisades systems, which is already improving the performance of the legacy portfolio.

And we closed on HomeXpress Mortgage, one of the largest non-QM originators, an acquisition that expands both our capabilities and our reach.

Although we raised approximately $120 million in unsecured debt, the majority of the funding for this transformation came directly from our own portfolio exactly as planned. Through asset sales and collapsing select securitizations, we generated approximately $485 million for an aggregate total of more than $600 million to redeploy into higher-value activities. While our orientation is always long term, we're beginning to see near-term results.

Our earnings power has begun to increase, enabling us to raise our dividend by 22% quarter-over-quarter to $0.45 in the first quarter, and our Board expects to maintain that dividend level for the remainder of the year. That combination, earnings momentum, coupled with disciplined capital allocation is how sustainable value is built.

As we transform Chimera into a long-term hybrid REIT, we've been clear that we're not changing who we are. We're expanding how we apply our capabilities. We remain at our core, focused on a set of competencies we know well, our hedgehog nature. But as every durable enterprise learns, evolution requires clarity of purpose.

Simon Sinek phrases it, it starts with why, and we know our why. We're here to give investors broad exposure to the entire residential real estate ecosystem through a diversified sets of assets, operations and income streams. That exposure shows up not only as dividends, but as enterprise growth. Our how is straightforward, manufacture and acquire a diversified portfolio of residential assets that generates net interest income, gains on sales and fees from operations or what is equally clear, consistent, reliable dividends across market environments while growing enterprise value over time.

Many REITs, including us, are viewed as a quasi bond, where book value is treated as principal and dividends as coupons. That's not who we're becoming. We're building an operating company with capacity to compound value while delivering a tax-advantaged dividend. As such, neither book value alone nor dividends alone tells the whole story. What matters is long-term intrinsic value per share supported by a consistent dividend.

As we look towards 2026, our priorities remain unchanged. We're focused on the long game on building a diversified residential platform capable of generating long-term value for both our customers and our investors across a wide range of economic environments. We will continue to diversify the portfolio, expand liquidity and grow our fee-based income, both organically and through thoughtful acquisitions. As we've said before, we're not merely building a bigger company, we're building a better one, one engineered for resiliency and longevity.

Now I'll turn it over to Subra to walk you through the financials.

Thank you, Phil. With the acquisition of HomeXpress, a material portion of our business is now operations in addition to our investment portfolio. As a result, we have reevaluated our financial reporting and beginning with the fourth quarter, we now have 2 reportable segments: our Investment Portfolio; and our Residential Origination platform.

The Investment Portfolio segment consists of our investments and third-party advisory business, for which Jack will provide more detail. Our Residential Origination segment consists of the stand-alone mortgage origination business for which both Jack and Kyle will provide more details.

And now I will review Chimera's financial highlights for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025. GAAP net income for the fourth quarter was $7 million or $0.08 per share, and GAAP net income for the full year was $144 million or $1.72 per share. GAAP book value at the end of fourth quarter was $19.70 per share. For the fourth quarter, our economic return on GAAP book value was negative 0.9% based on the quarterly change in book value and the $0.37 fourth quarter dividend per common share. And for the full year, our economic return was positive 7.4%, which includes $1.48 of dividends declared in 2025.

As Phil noted this morning, the company announced first quarter 2026 dividends of $0.45 per share, an increase of 22% from prior quarterly dividends, and our Board expects to continue that dividend for remaining 3 quarters of 2026. Our earnings available for distribution for the fourth quarter was $45 million or $0.53 per share, and our EAD for the full year was $141 million or $1.68 per share.

Turning now to our reportable segments. For the Investment Portfolio segment, during the fourth quarter, our economic net interest income was $65 million. The yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.9%, our average cost of funds was 4.5% and our net interest spread was 1.4%.

For the Residential Origination segment, during the fourth quarter, HomeXpress funded $1 billion in production with a gain on sale premium of, 358 basis points on loans sold and settled.

HomeXpress EBITDA, defined as earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization was $11 million for the quarter, and HomeXpress annualized EBITDA ROE was 16.2%.

With respect to leverage, our total leverage for the fourth quarter was 5.1:1, while recourse leverage ended the quarter at 2.4:1. Recourse leverage increased this quarter as we continue to increase our capital allocation to Agency RMBS securities and the addition of warehouse lines from Residential Origination segment.

For liquidity and strategic developments, the company ended the year with $528 million in total cash and unencumbered assets compared to $752 million at the end of third quarter. Cash decreased as we completed the acquisition of HomeXpress for cash consideration of $244 million and total consideration of $272 million.

On the Investment Portfolio side, for the fourth quarter, we added $606 million of Agency RMBS during the quarter net of sales.

We continue to rebalance our portfolio as we redeemed $70 million of securities from CIM 2022-I1 securitization and sold the underlying loans with a principal balance of $166 million, releasing approximately $28 million of equity. We also sold $33 million of non-Agency RMBS subordinate securities.

At year-end, we had $6 billion of total consolidated secured financing outstanding, $802 million related to our Residential Origination warehouse loans and $5.2 billion for our Investment Portfolio. Of this $5.2 billion relating to our Investment Portfolio, $3.3 billion was secured financing for Agency RMBS positions. We maintained $2.9 billion of hedges against this exposure with a combination of swaps and swaptions across varying maturities.

$1.9 billion of secured financing was for residential credit exposure. Of that, $1.3 billion or -- of that, $1.3 billion or 66% included either non or limited mark-to-market features. $1 billion or 51% of this were floating rate facilities. We also maintained $2.15 billion with a combination of swap, swaptions, interest rate caps across varying maturities to hedge our interest rate cap across varying maturities to hedge our interest-rate risk related to residential credit exposure.

For the fourth quarter of 2025, our economic net interest income return on average equity assigned to the investment portfolio was 10.8%. Our GAAP return on average equity was 4.4%. Our EAD return on average equity was 11%, and our EAD return on average tangible equity was 11.9%.

And lastly, compensation, general and administrative expenses increased by $22 million year-over-year, which was primarily driven by the inclusion of staffing costs and G&A expenses related to Palisades acquisition in December 2024 and HomeXpress acquisition in Q4 of 2025. Compensation expense of our -- for our investment portfolio was lower during the fourth quarter due to the absence of severance costs that were recorded in the third quarter and a lower incentive compensation accrual in Q4.

Together, these items contributed approximately $0.05 to EAD for the fourth quarter. We consider both these items to be nonrecurring and do not expect these compensation-related benefits to continue to EAD in future periods. Servicing expense decreased by $2 million year-over-year due to lower loan balances and loan counts related to our portfolio reallocation strategy. Our transaction expenses were higher by $10 million this year, reflecting the costs associated with HomeXpress acquisition.

To close, as Phil noted and our financials are beginning to show, we're building a diversified residential platform that is generating income from assets, gain on sale and fees from operations.

I will now turn the call over to Jack to review the portfolio and investment activity.

Thanks, Subra, and good morning, everyone. 2025 was a pivotal year for the business and our capital allocation strategy. As Phil mentioned in his remarks, we began the year with a clear objective to reposition the investment portfolio to be more balanced and liquid, while strengthening our earnings power. That plan included increasing our allocation to liquid Agency MBS, adding MSRs to help offset interest rate and prepayment risk in other parts of the portfolio and applying our asset level credit risk management capabilities to enhance performance across the loan book.

Over the course of the year, we generated more than $600 million of capital through portfolio and capital markets activity, including $291 million from refinancing select investments, approximately $195 million from divesting assets that no longer met our return thresholds and $116 million from our senior unsecured notes offering. These actions supported our portfolio allocation realignment and importantly, positioned us to pursue a broader business transformation through the acquisition of HomeXpress.

During 2025, we purchased over $3 billion of Agency MBS net of sales and launched our MSR strategy. As a result, our capital allocation shifted from approximately 97% residential credit at the start of the year to 72% at year-end, with the balance now allocated across Agency MBS at 16%, MSRs at 1% and 11% to our HomeXpress lending platform. This was all carried out alongside a relatively dynamic market backdrop.

Following the volatility spike in April, agency and non-agency spreads tightened throughout the remainder of the year. In the fourth quarter, agency swap OAS continued tightening by approximately 22 basis points, while generic non-QM AAAs were firmer by 5 basis points. Treasury yields had a tightening bias during the year as the front end was driven primarily by expectations for Federal Reserve easing, while longer-term yields reflected inflation and fiscal considerations.

The 2-year 10-year treasury spread ended the year at 69 basis points, approximately 37 wider than where it began with roughly 15 basis points of that occurring in the fourth quarter alongside the Fed rate cuts. Lower treasury yields helped guide mortgage rates down approximately 70 basis points for the year with 15 basis points coming in the fourth quarter to end at 6.15%.

Our book value is sensitive to yield curve dynamics, both because both our securitized loans and the related liabilities are recorded at fair value. As the curve steepened in recent quarters, loan values increased. However, those gains were more than offset by increases in the fair value of our securitized debt, resulting in lower reported book value.

In the fourth quarter, our Agency MBS portfolio contributed positively to book value as spreads tightened, while our aggregate loan portfolio was roughly flat. However, as Subra noted earlier, overall book value declined 2.7%, attributable in large part to the increase in value of our consolidated securitized debt and activities related to the HomeXpress acquisition. Our earnings power increased during 2025, reflecting deliberate portfolio repositioning, improvements in capital allocation and contributions derived from the HomeXpress acquisition. The Federal Reserve's easing provided some benefit through the asymmetry in our liability hedge structure related to the residential credit portfolio.

In the first full quarter with HomeXpress contributions, the business generated a distributable ROE as measured by EAD over average common equity of 11% annualized. This compares to 7.16% in the fourth quarter of 2024, representing an increase of nearly 400 basis points.

During the fourth quarter, we exited approximately $33 million of legacy non-Agency RMBS, releasing roughly $6.7 million of capital at a breakeven ROE of 7%. We also exercised our redemption rights on the CIM 2022-i1 investor loan securitization, sold $166 million of underlying loans and generated $28 million of net capital after satisfying debt obligations with a breakeven ROE of 3%.

We added approximately $606 million of Agency MBS in the fourth quarter and ended the year with over $3 billion, consisting primarily of specified pools selected for call protection characteristics. Performance in our seasoned reperforming loan portfolio remained stable. Prepayments were primarily driven by housing turnover, and we saw a seasonal 50 basis point increase in delinquencies during the fourth quarter. Otherwise, no other notable trends.

Looking ahead, we expect the first half of 2026 to focus on continuing to unlock capital and redeploy into investments that are earnings accretive and align with our portfolio repositioning objectives. This may include exercising additional securitization redemption rights and divesting of assets that no longer meet portfolio objectives or return thresholds. We expect our capital deployment efforts will remain focused on Agency MBS, MSRs, sponsored securitizations backed by HomeXpress production and other select credit investments while positioning ourselves to capitalize on potential platform acquisitions as they emerge.

Agency MBS continues to serve as the most liquid component of our portfolio, enabling efficient deployment following capital markets activity, asset sales or portfolio runoff while preserving liquidity for future investments and other strategic initiatives. At approximately 7.5x leverage, the agency portfolio continues to generate run rate ROEs in the low to mid-double digits. We are seeing strong demand for non-QM loans and related securitized products to start the year. Generic non-QM AAA spreads have tightened approximately 20 to 25 basis points year-to-date, surpassing 2025 levels. While we intend to retain portions of HomeXpress' production for our securitization program, we will continue to evaluate relative value between selling the loans in the secondary market and securitizing and retaining portions of the capital structure in our investment portfolio.

2025 represented a meaningful transition year for the portfolio and the broader business. We repositioned capital, diversified sources of earnings and expanded platform capabilities. As Phil mentioned in his remarks, while our core discipline remains unchanged, we believe these steps enhance our value proposition and improve the durability of our earnings profile.

With that, I will turn it over to Kyle to discuss residential origination.

Thank you, Jack, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to begin by noting that the transition into the Chimera organization has gone smoothly throughout our first quarter of ownership. Although the relationship is new, we are already seeing meaningful synergies between the Chimera, Palisades platform and HomeXpress.

HomeXpress currently has 332 employees and is licensed to originate mortgage loans in 46 states. We primarily focus on originating non-QM consumer and business purpose loans through a network of 6,000 mortgage brokers and bankers. These loans are sold in pools to investors who either aggregate and securitize the loans or hold them in their portfolios. HomeXpress originated $1.04 billion in loans during the fourth quarter, representing an 18% increase over the third quarter and marks a record for our company.

For the full year 2025, we originated $3.4 billion in loan volume. As Subra noted, HomeXpress's EBITDA was $11 million in the fourth quarter. Throughout 2025, we have been focused on expanding our lending capacity by further building our sales and operations teams. We believe this, combined with our continual technology enhancements will support the continuation of our origination growth into future quarters. We have always been very focused on our cost metrics, and we reached a new record low GAAP cost to originate in the fourth quarter of 201 basis points, which produced a net margin of 111 basis points.

In 2025, we launched a non-delegated correspondent program to serve a growing segment of mortgage bankers seeking to fund non-QM and business purpose loans. HomeXpress underwrites these loans to our guidelines with the bankers funding the loans in their names. We now have 55 mortgage bankers approved to deliver closed loans to HomeXpress. While volume in this channel was modest in the fourth quarter at $47 million, we expect it to represent a growing share of our origination volume going forward.

We increased our total warehouse funding capacity to $1.35 billion in the fourth quarter, which we expect will be sufficient to fund our anticipated growth in the near term. With the anticipated continued growth of the non-QM and business purpose market, we are optimistic that our business will continue to grow, and we look forward to realizing the benefits that our partnership with Chimera can deliver.

Thanks, Kyle. We're glad to have HomeXpress as part of the Chimera team. And as you said, we're already seeing the benefits of the partnership.

Now we'll open the call for questions.

Our first question comes from the line of Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

Looking at the HomeXpress numbers, obviously, fourth quarter was pretty strong, both in terms of production volume and gain on sale also saw a nice jump. Can you give us an update on kind of how you guys are seeing volume and gain on sale so far in the first quarter? I know you mentioned that AAA spreads have tightened quite a bit year-to-date.

We're seeing the typical seasonal reduction in volume after the holidays. But we think that 2026 is going to be a great year. We think the first quarter is going to be a pretty good quarter in comparison to last year. We're seeing the gain on sale premiums to be pretty good in comparison to the fourth quarter, and we're optimistic about the revenue for the first quarter.

Got it. Okay. That's helpful. And then as you go through the year and continue to free up capital in some cases and reposition the portfolio, can you talk about where you see the best relative value today between adding more agencies after the spread tightening that's occurred versus potentially doing securitizations of non-agency assets?

Yes. Trevor, this is Jack. One of the things that we continue to be really focused on is the portfolio construction. So there are certain objectives that we have that we've talked about in terms of what we're trying to do with the portfolio, namely creating more balance -- and part of that is having that liquid component with respect to agencies, which I think we've done a really good job in 2025 of building up.

The other [ bookends ] there would be to have somewhat of a hedge vis-a-vis our MSR allocation, which at 1% continues to be well below what our otherwise target would be. And then in between those 2 [ bookends ] is the credit piece of the portfolio where we think that having the HomeXpress production in-house and being able to securitize that and retain certain parts of the capital structure in our investment portfolio can certainly be accretive.

As you point out, agency spreads have come in, where we're holding leverage right now. We still see that as relatively attractive or at least meeting our return threshold, somewhere in that low to mid-double digits. But I would say where we are from an allocation perspective today, we're pretty comfortable with plus or minus another 5%, I would say. So really, for the balance of the year, that will continue to serve as our liquidity bucket. MSRs continues to be a focus of ours. And right now, as Kyle mentioned, we're seeing pretty strong demand in the secondary market for loans. So we're constantly evaluating the cost benefit analysis of selling loans in the secondary market versus retaining them for our investment portfolio.

Our next question comes from the line of Doug Harter with UBS.

I was hoping you could put the dividend increase in context, kind of how you thought about the sizing that increase and how you think about kind of retaining some capital for book value growth/being able to grow the investment portfolio, operating businesses versus kind of maximizing the dividend?

This is Phil. Thanks for the question. I think as we look at that issue, what we looked at is we look at it over the period of -- over a year. We recognize as we become more of an operating company, we expect EAD to potentially be variable from short period to short period. But -- so how we look at it as we look at over the course of the year. And we feel like that dividend is one that we'll have sufficient EAD coverage on and will provide us sufficient coverage for us to have the proper allocations to help grow the operating aspects of our business. So that's the kind of the balance we struck and to give the market some feel for where we think we'll be throughout the year.

And I guess just on that point, would you expect going forward to kind of give guidance for the full year in the first quarter dividend? Or is that kind of unique to this year since it's kind of the first?

Yes. I think -- I mean, that's hard to say. As we looked at it for this year, we did think it would be helpful to the market to address the questions that you asked, which were like how much do you expect to have in a dividend? How much do you expect to retain? And we thought rather it would be helpful to the market to go ahead and try to lay out what our expectations were. Whether we proceed -- continue to do that a year from now, we'll just have to wait and see.

Our next question comes from the line of Bose George with KBW.

On the residential segment, are you guys originating second liens at the moment? Or is that an incremental opportunity? And then where do you see industry non-QM volume in '26 versus '25?

We currently are not originating second mortgages. We originate through a wholesale broker network, and it's difficult with small loan amounts like second mortgages to originate those in a profitable manner. So we haven't got into the second mortgage market. We -- all the statistics and analytics that we see for non-QM and business purpose loans in '26 is growing -- increasing over 2025. So we're seeing numbers as large as 20% to 25% growth in the market. So we are anticipating that the market is going to grow and that we will get our share of the increased market going forward.

Yes. And the other thing, Bose, I would just say on the second lien side, I mean, when you have a servicing business, as you know, that's a very good mechanism for sourcing second lien borrowers in a way to kind of address some of the prepayment activity associated with your MSRs. So perhaps at some point down the road, that could be more of a strategy for us. But at this as Kyle said, it's not something that we're originating.

And then just in terms of the non-QM volume outlook, this was a major thesis for us early last year as we were sort of thinking about the acquisition of HomeXpress and the viability of doing that. And I think 2025 sort of supported our case. But going into 2026, I mean, we saw a considerable increase in both origination volume in non-QM in 2025 plus issuance volume.

And looking out into 2026, I mean, we're projecting just on the -- not issuance volume, but on the origination volume side, that could be anywhere from $110 billion to $130 billion, which is based on modest growth in overall mortgage originations, including conventional and agencies, plus having non-QM capture another 100 basis points or so of wallet share.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. And then actually, just switching over to the change in book value this quarter and the reduction in the value related to your securitized debt. Is that happening mainly because that's more liquid than the loans on the other side? And should we just kind of see that as a timing issue?

Yes. I mean it's a good question. So maybe we'll just address book value quarter-to-date. I assume somebody is going to ask that. So we're basically flat to down, call it, 30 basis points quarter-to-date. And the one thing -- and maybe it's a good time just to talk about our views of capital at risk and value at risk. There's been a pretty heavy steepening in the yield curve during 2025.

And I think in the prior quarters, we've talked about the impact on our loans as well as on our securitized debt. And basically, our loan values have increased, but the value of our securitized debt has increased at a faster pace, having the effect of reducing reported book value, okay? And while that's an important accounting outcome, it doesn't really change how we view our economic risk or capital at risk. And that's because a core part of our strategy is exercising the call rights that we own on our securitizations where we redeem the bonds at par.

And basically, the mark-to-market fluctuations in our securitized debt, it doesn't affect the economics of our call option nor does it affect the earnings power of our capital. So I just want to give you kind of how we think about that. We're focused squarely on managing capital at risk. And the way that we think about that is we evaluate based on the cash flow generating capital that we have, not on the short-term valuation movements of our securitized liabilities.

Our next question comes from the line of Eric Hagen with BTIG.

Maybe following up on this bullish non-QM outlook. I mean, do you think there's any room for credit enhancement levels to come down in the securitization trust? And to the extent that we ever saw more flexibility for credit enhancement levels, how do you think that would drive your appetite to take leverage on the subordinate pieces that you retain from securitization?

Yes. Good question. I mean, look, on some deals, we see some quite a bit of differentiation among, call it, AAA enhancement levels across various deals. And we see the rating agencies consistently reviewing their models as more data comes in. And you're as aware as anybody that losses have been de minimis in the non-QM sector, but we are seeing like in the 2022, 2023 cohorts where delinquencies are creeping up.

So I guess our expectation isn't that there's a material decline in credit enhancement levels. And for us, Eric, I mean, we actually look at securitization in 2 different components. One, horizontal risk retention and vertical risk retention.

So the horizontal, obviously, we have certain types of requirements with respect to how much we must retain if we're holding horizontal.

And then on the vertical side, we're holding -- most of that would be AAAs. So for us, it's really just an economic consideration. But nice thing about securitizing and retaining the horizontal piece is that you're basically funding your investment with fixed rate term financing. So you're not taking liquidity risk. And so certainly, from that perspective, we're more comfortable taking the leverage than if it was like mark-to-market repo.

That's really helpful color. I appreciate that. All right here. As you guys know, the administration is focused on reducing mortgage rates by buying Agency MBS, but the GSEs, of course, still hold a huge portfolio of mortgage loans, which they usually target for loss mitigation. Do you guys think the GSEs could ever look to sell more of the loan portfolio, mainly in an effort to like create more room for MBS purchases? And do you think there's a deep enough market for them to potentially pursue that opportunity?

Are you talking about like the NPL sales?

Yes, pretty exactly.

Yes. Yes, for sure, for sure. I mean, I would hope that they would. I mean they've certainly been sellers in the past. So I think that could certainly be an avenue that they've used historically, and they could certainly use again to the extent that the economics made sense for them to do so.

Our next question comes from the line of Kenneth Lee with RBC Capital Markets.

Just one on third-party assets under management and the growth around there. How do you think about potential contribution of fee revenues or fee-related earnings over time? And to see a meaningful pickup, would there have to be a pickup in under loans under management? Or is there any other avenues that you're looking at there?

Yes. I mean that's certainly a focus of ours to diversify our earnings and grow our fee earning capabilities. I mean that group is really bifurcated into 2 different pieces. One, the majority of which is managing loans on a third-party basis, and that creates a couple of different fee revenue streams. So we're constantly working to grow that business, both sort of with external loans, and there's also synergies with respect to HomeXpress production to the extent that we sell loans and we can retain the asset management function on a go-forward basis. So we're certainly looking to exploit some of those synergies as well.

And then on the more discretionary credit fund side, we certainly remain focused on looking at building -- separately managed accounts and growing fees through that channel as well.

Got you. And then relatedly, what are you seeing in terms of client demand or interest for loans? Is there any kind of color around mix of either institutional investors, what types? It sounds like from the prepared remarks, you're seeing stronger demand there, but I just want to get a little bit more color on that.

Yes. If you're talking about the demand in the secondary market for HomeXpress' loan sales, I mean, it's a consortium of different buyers from insurance companies to dealers, to asset managers who oftentimes are crossover between securities crossing over into the loan space. So yes, I mean, just like we've seen spreads tighten on AAA non-QM 25 basis points at the start of the year, we're seeing very strong demand for non-QM loans in the secondary market from a whole host of investors.

And maybe just to follow up on that question, the types of investors. I mean, you continue to see insurance companies looking to cross over and get exposure to the whole loans. So that is an area, I think, that we continue to be focused on to the extent that we can provide somewhat of a one-stop shop for folks who are looking to get exposure to non-QM loans, but perhaps don't have the infrastructure to manage those loans. We have the in-house capability, and we can provide that one-stop shop.

And we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back to CEO, Phil Kardis, for closing remarks.

I'd like to thank everybody for participating in our 2025 fourth quarter earnings call, and we look forward to speaking with you again for our 2026 first quarter earnings call. Thanks again.

Thank you. And this concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.

Greetings. Welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation Third Quarter Earnings Call.

[Operator Instructions]

Please note, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Miyun Sung, Chief Legal Officer. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for participating in Chimera's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Before we begin, I'd like to review the safe harbor statement. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These events are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in the Risk Factors section in our most recent annual and quarterly SEC filings. Actual events and results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to read the forward-looking statement disclaimers in our earnings release and our quarterly and annual filings.

During the call today, we may also discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings supplement for reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. Additionally, the content of this conference call may contain time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this earnings call. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise this information.

I will now turn the conference over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Phil Kardis.

Thanks, Miyun. Good morning, and welcome to Chimera Investment Corporation's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. It's great to have you with us today. Joining me are Jack MacDowell, our Chief Investment Officer; and Subra Viswanathan, our Chief Financial Officer. After my remarks, Subra will review our results, and then Jack will discuss the portfolio before we open it up for questions.

This quarter's story doesn't start in ancient Greece. It doesn't involve hedgehogs or foxes, so we remain proud to be a hedgehog. It began this past spring when we learned that HomeXpress mortgage was for sale. At that point, we weren't looking for an originator. We had just completed our strategic analysis, sharpened our focus and executed on that clarity with the acquisition of Palisades. That integration went smoothly, proved that discipline and culture matter.

Because Palisades manages assets for third parties who own HomeXpress loans, we knew the high quality of their production. So when HomeXpress came to market, we reached out. We had an introductory call with Kyle Walker, as CEO and members of the senior team. That conversation was the first of many over the ensuing months. They confirmed we weren't just buying a platform, we were partnering with a team that shares our values and vision. We saw 7 key reasons why this acquisition made sense. First, it met our high standard.

When we look at a potential acquisition, we asked 3 questions. Does the management team share our values and vision? Is it profitable and well run? Can it make the whole greater than the sum of the parts? HomeXpress passed each test. I'll discuss profitability, operations and synergies shortly, but what are our values and visions. Our values are simple, long-term orientation, high ethical standards and an insistence on operational excellence. Our vision is to build a company that endures, one where our team members are proud to work, clients receive tangible value and shareholders are rewarded for their partnership. That's the standard and HomeXpress met it.

Second, the size and growth of the non-QM market. While there's not a lot of data on non-QM originations, we believe such originations have grown every year since 2021 from about 1.1% of total residential mortgage originations in 2021 to an expected 5.1% or more than $100 billion in 2025. That's a roughly fivefold increase in the sector's market share in the last 4 years. Forecast for the size of the 2026 non-QM market range between $110 billion and $150 billion. We like markets with durable tailwinds.

Third, the management team. HomeXpress has an experienced management team that knows how to grow in a disciplined manner, placing quality of production over volume. Fourth, the synergies. The synergies with Palisades and Chimera, we believe, are obvious. Palisades already manages assets for some of the buyers of HomeXpress' loans. By connecting origination and asset management, we can widen that reach to others and support the performance of HomeXpress' loans. While HomeXpress has not had its own securitization program, Chimera is a leader in securitizing residential mortgage loans. We believe that the ability to securitize some of their production at the cost to originate while still satisfying their customer base will provide an additional longer-term source of income.

Fifth, expansion runway. Today, HomeXpress originates business purpose loans in 46 states and consumer loans in 42 states. We plan on adding additional states, including New York and accelerate the correspondent channel growth alongside the already successful wholesale channel. Sixth, the MSR opportunity. HomeXpress currently sells all loans servicing-released. They plan to obtain the servicing license they don't have, which will enable us to grow our own MSR book, both from our production and from purchases from third parties, which will create a hedge for our loan portfolio and reoccurring income engine. Seventh, agency originations, a small but promising business that adds optionality and balance.

Turning to the transaction. We closed the acquisition on October 1 for $267 million. That's the sum of the 6/30 (sic) [ 8/30 ] book value of nearly $120 million, $120 million premium and about $28 million in stock. The price will be adjusted based on the 9/30 book value and some other true-ups, which we expect will result in an increase in the purchase price of around $5 million. Importantly, the HomeXpress leadership team remains in place, and we granted retention stock to HomeXpress' employees that vest in 3 years because ownership builds alignment and alignment builds results.

Let's talk about the numbers. Through September 30, HomeXpress originated $2.4 billion by UPB, up 36% year-over-year, about 40% consumer, just under 60% business purpose and the rest agency. For Q4, we expect around $1 billion in originations, yielding expected pretax earnings of $15 million to $18 million and after-tax earnings of $13 million to $15 million. That's after the application of our net operating losses, and annualized return on equity of 19% to 23%.

For 2026, we project $4 billion to $4.4 billion in originations, pretax earnings of $62 million to $80 million and after-tax earnings of $53 million to $68 million, again, after the application of our NOLs. That's a 20% to 25% return on equity.

So looking ahead, what does it all mean? It means we believe HomeXpress is accretive to our earnings. It gives us a new revenue stream, greater diversification and more recurring income. It accelerates our strategy, growing our assets and fee generation, which we believe will lead to an increase in our dividend paying ability and total economic return over the long term. We're not just building a bigger company, we're building a better one, one designed for the long term.

Now I'll turn it over to Subra to walk you through the financials.

Thank you, Phil. I will review Chimera's financial highlights for the third quarter of 2025. GAAP net loss for the third quarter was $22 million or $0.27 per share. GAAP book value at the end of third quarter was $20.24 per share. For the third quarter, our economic return on GAAP book value was negative 1.4% based on the quarterly change in book value and the $0.37 third quarter dividend per common share. And year-to-date 2025, our economic return on GAAP book value was 8.3%. On an earnings available for distribution basis, net income for the third quarter was $30 million or $0.37 per share. Our economic net interest income for the third quarter was $69 million. For the third quarter, the yield on average interest-earning assets was 5.9%. Our average cost of funds was 4.5%, and our net interest spread was 1.4%.

Total leverage for the third quarter was 4.8:1, while recourse leverage ended the quarter at 2:1. Recourse leverage increased this quarter as we continue to increase our capital allocation to Agency RMBS securities. For liquidity and strategic developments, the company ended the quarter -- ended the third quarter with $752 million in total cash and unencumbered assets compared to $561 million at the end of second quarter. During the quarter, we strategically raised liquidity through staggered sales of select assets. We sold $617 million of retained bonds, non-Agency RMBS and Agency CMBS IO positions, releasing $116 million of capital. In addition, we issued $120 million of 8.875% senior unsecured notes due 2030. Net of the underwriting discount and other debt issuance costs, we raised $116 million in capital.

The increase in cash balance prepared us with anticipated funds required to close the HomeXpress acquisition, which was finalized on October 1. We closed on our acquisition of HomeXpress for $240 million in cash comprised of an estimated adjusted book value of $120 million. This is subject to certain post-closing adjustments and a cash premium of $120 million plus the issuance of 2,077,151 shares of common stock.

Okay. So I just wanted to update one remark from Phil's earlier prepared remarks. The -- Phil mentioned that the adjusted book value was as of 6/30, but it is actually the adjusted book value as of 8/30, make a correction. The purchase price that we paid. And for liquidity, continuing on, separately during the quarter, we added $275 million of Agency RMBS securities and closed on our initial $38 million MSR investment. For repo and hedging, we had $2.1 billion outstanding repo liabilities secured by the residential credit portfolio. 53% of the outstanding residential credit repo or $1.1 billion had a floating rate sensitivity, and we maintained $2.2 billion in notional value of various interest rate hedges protecting the repo liabilities.

We had $1.3 billion of either non or limited mark-to-market features on our outstanding repo agreements, representing 64% of our secured recourse funding for the residential credit portfolio. On the Agency RMBS side, we had $2.4 billion notional value of interest rate swap, swap futures and cancelable swaps with varying tenors protecting against $2.4 billion of outstanding repo liabilities. For the third quarter of 2025, our economic net interest income return on average equity was 10.6%. Our GAAP return on average equity was negative 0.1%, and our EAD return on average equity was 7.3%.

And lastly, compensation, general, administrative and servicing expenses were higher by $2 million, primarily driven by onetime severance payments. Our transaction expenses were higher by $10 million this quarter, reflecting the costs associated with HomeXpress acquisitions.

I will now turn the call over to Jack to review our portfolio and investment activity.

Thanks, Subra, and good morning, everyone. We had a busy third quarter as the team remained focused on repositioning the portfolio while maintaining elevated levels of cash in preparation for the HomeXpress acquisition. Against this backdrop, the U.S. economy remained mixed but generally resilient. Growth was supported by continued strength in nonresidential investment, particularly in artificial intelligence-related infrastructure, equipment and software, while labor conditions show gradual signs of cooling. Policy and regulatory developments once again shaped the tone of financial markets. The Federal Reserve shifted from holding the line on restrictive policy to actively easing, cutting the target Fed funds rate by 25 basis points in September. Importantly, the Fed acknowledged that risks have begun to tilt toward labor market conditions rather than inflation alone, reinforcing a market narrative that policy is now oriented towards sustaining growth and employment rather than focusing solely on price stability.

In rates, the curve steepened as front-end yields led the rally. The 2-year treasury declined 11 basis points during the quarter, while the 10-year fell 8, widening the 2s 10 spread to 54 basis points. Agency MBS continued to offer attractive carry even as OAS tightened amid lower volatility and strong demand. Current coupon nominal spreads tightened by 24 basis points versus swaps and 21 basis points versus treasuries. Primary mortgage rates declined roughly 35 basis points to 6.32%, spurring a rise in refinance activity as the refinance share of applications climbed from 40% in early July to more than 60% in late September. Housing activity improved modestly, though existing home sales at a $4.1 million annual pace remains well below the 27-year average of $5.2 million.

Credit markets remained firm. Investment-grade and high-yield corporate spreads tightened 9 and 23 basis points, respectively. Non-Agency RMBS saw strong demand and healthy absorption of supply with the non-QM credit curve flattening as AAA spreads tightened in the context of 15 basis points and BBB spreads held steady. In the legacy reperforming loan sector, which represents the majority of our portfolio, AAA and senior unrated bonds tightened by approximately 10 and 25 basis points. Overall, mortgage credit fundamentals remain solid, supported by high homeowner equity, low incidence of default and near historic low unemployment. Even so, rising defaults and isolated idiosyncratic events in non-mortgage sectors have prompted heightened investor awareness.

Turning to our portfolio. Book value declined approximately 3.2% during the quarter, largely driven by the combined effects of tighter non-Agency RMBS spreads and the rally in short-term rates, each of which lifted the valuation of our securitized debt more significantly than the corresponding gains in our loan portfolio. We made substantial progress in repositioning the portfolio during the quarter. while also preparing for the HomeXpress acquisition.

To put that in context, excluding the Palisades acquisition, we began the year with more than 90% of our economic capital allocated to residential credit, just 4% in Agency MBS and the remainder in cash. As of October 1, we are beginning to see a more balanced and diversified portfolio with robust sources of income. The residential credit allocation is now below 70%. Agency MBS has increased to about 17%. MSRs are small but growing at just over 1%. And importantly, we deployed roughly $267 million or about 13% of our economic portfolio into the HomeXpress investment. The issuance of $120 million in senior unsecured debt during the quarter allowed us to retain a larger portion of the Agency MBS portfolio in advance of that acquisition.

Our investment strategy remains centered on rotating out of fully valued assets and redeploying capital across opportunities that align with our long-term portfolio construction goals and enhance earnings power. During the quarter, we exited $453 million of retained and non-agency bonds, including senior and subordinate positions, along with the $164 million notional Agency CMBS IO position. These sales released approximately $116 million of net liquidity at a breakeven GAAP ROE of just over 7%. We purchased a net $275 million of Agency MBS, settled our previously announced MSR transaction and increased our cash balance ahead of the HomeXpress closing. This elevated cash balance was a temporary drag on earnings, but we believe that drag will be more than offset by the near-term contributions from HomeXpress as illustrated on Slide 9 of the presentation.

Our agency pass-through portfolio now stands at just over $2.5 billion across the coupon stack. Leverage on the agency pass-through book increased modestly to 7.3x from 6.6x during the quarter, with rate and spread sensitivities remaining within risk parameters. We continue to hedge with swaps to maintain tight duration alignment, match our SOFR-based funding and capture additional carry. These positions continue to deliver high-quality income with levered ROEs in the low to mid-teens.

On the credit side, the majority of our portfolio is made up of reperforming loans that exhibit high levels of borrower home equity and over 17 years of seasoning. Loan performance remained stable with these loans reporting a modest increase in delinquencies of 20 basis points during the quarter. Recourse leverage on the residential credit portfolio declined by approximately $329 million to $2.1 billion, reflecting asset sales and normal course paydowns. 64% of this financing was structured as non-mark-to-market or limited mark-to-market, up from 58% in the second quarter, while the floating rate component declined from 58% to 53%.

As discussed last quarter, our interest rate hedging strategy for the residential credit portfolio remains designed to protect earnings power in a rising rate environment while maintaining upside in the declining rate scenario. During the quarter, we added $600 million in 1.5x 2-year swaptions to further hedge our floating rate liability exposure further out the curve.

We continue to evaluate opportunities to unlock value and reinvestment capital by exercising call rights on our legacy securitizations. The scope of our review currently includes 18 transactions collateralized by approximately $5.9 billion of loans. At times, we may call these deals and either sell or resecuritize the loans. These activities can allow us to unlock capital to reinvest in higher return opportunities that drive earnings growth and support our portfolio repositioning efforts. While redeeming debt at par can reduce book value when the debt is valued at a discount, we balance those near-term effects against the benefits of our long-term portfolio objectives. These activities are designed to enhance earnings durability and reinforce the portfolio's resilience across economic, interest rate and credit environments.

Turning to HomeXpress. We're excited to welcome the team as this transaction further diversifies our earnings base, creates synergies with our third-party asset management activities and supports our long-term portfolio goals by enabling us to retain loans for our own investment and securitization programs. Overall, the third quarter was another transitional period for both the portfolio and the broader business. We continue to unlock value organically through strategic divestitures, redeployed capital into accretive investments, most notably HomeXpress, diversified our portfolio and sources of income and enhanced our platform capabilities.

We remain focused on executing our strategy. And with the HomeXpress acquisition now closed, we are well positioned to capture earnings tailwinds heading into the fourth quarter and into 2026.

That concludes our prepared remarks. We'll now turn the line back to the operator for questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first questions come from the line of Bose George with KBW.

This is Frankie Labetti on for Bose. Congrats on the deal closing as well. And first question is on book value. You noted that the change was due to like the steeper yield curve and the increase in value of the securitized debt more than the value of the loans. Can you just walk through that and why the loans don't get a similar mark? Is it due to like liquidity or -- yes.

Yes. No, it's a good question. And part of it is a lag in just the timing with respect to when we're seeing spreads change in the securitization markets versus when we actually see that propagate down into the loan market. So that has one effect. The other piece is the shape of the yield curve. So as we saw the 2-year rallied 11 basis points, the 5-year, only 6 basis points, so that steepening caused the yields in our securitized debt to increase -- to decrease more than on the loan side. So that has the effect while our loans actually increased in value, the increase in the value of our liabilities increased more.

The other piece I would highlight there, we saw spreads tighten across non-Agency RMBS during the quarter. But when you think about what our portfolio is comprised of, it's really reperforming loans. So there's a rated and a non-rated component there. And the unrated portion of the RPL market is where we saw the tightest spreads that came in somewhere between 20 and 25 basis points. So that represents somewhere between 55%, 60% of our securitized debt. And again, that's what caused the increase in value of our debt more so than what we saw on the loan side.

Great. That's very helpful. And do we have an update of book for the quarter?

Yes, yes. And actually, we've seen some of that reverse. Some of that has to do with the timing and seeing some loan activity during the course of October, but we're up about 2.4% through October 31.

Awesome. And just one last one on the deal, is goodwill $120 million? You noted that the deal was -- that was a premium to book. Is that -- I just want to confirm that.

Yes. This is Subra. Thanks for the question. Well, the total premium was -- well, all the payments above the $120 million book value. Obviously, we haven't closed, and there will be an adjustment, meaning there is some final adjustments to the book value that will come through as we true up September.

Now as far as everything is going to be goodwill, that all depends on the purchase accounting. We're going through these numbers right now. And a portion of the purchase accounting, that will -- we are still evaluating how much of that premium is related to intangibles versus goodwill.

[Operator Instructions]

Our next questions come from the line of Trevor Cranston with Citizens JMP.

A couple of questions on HomeXpress. First of all, thank you for the projections for Q4 and 2026. That's very helpful. I guess when you guys think about the earnings contribution that you're going to get from HomeXpress, can you talk about how you guys are going to approach that with the dividend? Would you expect to pay out the majority of HomeXpress' earnings as part of the dividend? Or do you think a lot of that will be retained to sort of finance future growth in that business?

Yes, sir, this is Phil. So that's a question and we started to address last time. It's -- first, as you know, it's a final determination by the Board. But we'll look at a variety of factors, which are related to how much HomeXpress would need to retain to continue to grow and as we want to be able to grow our own asset base even through securitizations, for example, versus current dividend needs. I mean we recognize the benefits for both, and we're just going to have to look at the timing and make assessments at that time where we think the split is appropriate between current dividend needs and future growth. it's a little bit wishy, but it's hard to predict right now for that.

Sure. Okay. And then as you look at the origination volume that they're producing, can you talk about kind of your near-term expectations as to how much of that you might retain and securitize for an ongoing investment on the balance sheet and how you sort of view returns on retaining that production as investment relative to some of the other areas you've been deploying capital?

Yes, sure. This is Jack. I guess what we would say, first and foremost, is our intent is not to disrupt any of the partnerships that they have with their existing investor base. That's a very important component of their business. We continue to believe that our job is in part to support that effort. With that being said, given just the predictions for the growth in overall mortgage originations in 2026, and the fact that the non-QM share of total mortgage originations has increased every single year since 2020. We believe that their volume is going to be such that our retention of loans will not disrupt any of those partnerships.

So I think a fair assessment of that is we'll look to do something in the context of 4 to 5 securitizations a year, maybe 1 per quarter. When that starts will be a function of market conditions. And it's also a balance between they are generating some healthy gain on sale income. And when we retain those loans for our portfolio, that's a long-term investment decision, but we're also giving up some of those near-term gains. So there's an economic assessment that we go through as well. But I think it's a fair assessment to assume something along the lines of 1 deal per quarter.

And the other piece of your question, I think, is with respect to economics. I mean it depends on the structure of the deal, how far we sell down in the capital structure and what we ultimately retain. But we're looking at returns on our retained pieces of those deals somewhere in the context of mid- to high teens.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Phil Kardis for closing comments.

Thanks for participating in our third quarter earnings call. We look forward to speaking to you in February about the fourth quarter and 2025 end of the year. So look forward to seeing you. Thanks for joining.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. Please disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.