CarMax Aktie

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call.

[Operator Instructions]

Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. David Lowenstein, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Bo. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our fiscal 2027 first quarter earnings conference call. I'm here today with Keith Barr, President and CEO; and Enrique Mayor-Mora, Executive Vice President and CFO; and Jon Daniels, Executive Vice President, CarMax Auto Finance. Let me remind you our statements today that are not statements of historical fact, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company's future business plans, prospects and financial performance are forward-looking statements we make pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These statements are based on our current knowledge expectations and assumptions, and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. In providing projections and other forward-looking statements, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update them. For additional information on important factors and risks that could affect these expectations, please see our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning and our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2026 previously filed with the SEC. Please note, in addition to our earnings release, we have also prepared our quarterly investor presentation, and both documents are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Should you have any follow-up questions after the call, please feel free to contact our Investor Relations department at (804) 747 0422 extension 7865. Lastly, let me thank you in advance for asking only one question and getting back in the queue for more follow-ups. Keith?

Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. Since our earnings call last quarter, I have continued spending my time across the entirety of our business, listening and learning while engaging with our associates, customers and investors. These conversations have reinforced my understanding of both the strengths that differentiate CarMax from our competition and the opportunities we have to execute better strengthen our performance and reach our full potential.

We have an award-winning people-first culture and iconic brand and irreplaceable national footprint and meaningful digital capabilities. No company can replicate these assets at scale. When fully harnessed this combination enhances our competitive advantage and will drive our market share growth and financial returns in one of the largest consumer markets in America, and one that remains highly fragmented. Our objective is clear: deliver strong unit and earnings growth that enables us to consistently reward our shareholders. However, it is also clear there are some areas that have impeded our ability to perform to our full potential. Our core operations are not yet fast and efficient enough. Retail prices and selection must continue to improve and our costs remain too high.

Further, our digital experience is too complex and not seamlessly connected to the in-person experience. When a customer arrives at one of our stores, we do not make it as easy for them as it should be, given all the steps they have taken online. This has put friction in the customer experience, ultimately impacting conversion and preventing us from fully leveraging our unmatched scale and store network. We know exactly what needs to change, and we're moving forward with urgency. Today, I'm introducing our strategy for growth built around 4 pillars that place the customer at the center of everything we do and are designed to meaningfully improve how we operate at scale and support consistently strong performance. The first pillar of our strategy is great offering. We will give customers every reason to choose CarMax. We will ensure our pricing remains competitive across demand cycles while we both grow our saleable inventory and provide customers faster access to our vehicles. For example, to further improve our price competitiveness, we are incorporating competitive market insights within our pricing algorithms more granularly with a stronger emphasis on local data points.

Additionally, we are expanding comparison points across a broader set of vehicles to sharpen our individual unit pricing. Our second pillar is easy experience. We will make it easy to do business with us through a seamless experience. Industry research as well as our own shows that customers want digital convenience combined with an in-store connection. Buying a car is one of the biggest financial decisions someone makes, and they have a strong desire to see, touch and test drive a vehicle that will be part of their daily lives for years to come. We see significant opportunities to better integrate our digital capabilities with our stores to improve conversion and the customer experience. Our near-term focus is to simplify communication with customers before they arrive in store. To enhance their readiness to progress upon arrival and to provide associates with the tools they need to drive conversion. Our stores reach 85% of the U.S. population, which gives us access to the largest total addressable market. As a result of this initiative, we expect more customers will visit our stores, and we will sell more cars.

Our third pillar is to add value on each transaction. This pillar focuses on growing profitability by maximizing value across all aspects of our business and incorporates our cap full spectrum ambitions as well as the extended protection plan redesign initiatives that are already underway. Regarding cash flow spectrum, progress will be measured by our ability to grow penetration and drive longer-term profitability. For EPP, progress will be measured by margin expansion over time. On both, we have shown progress this quarter, and I expect it to continue. Our final pillar is run lean. We will reimagine our cost structure to enable a great offering. Initiatives already in flight include reducing reconditioning costs through technology and operational efficiency while continuing to deliver the high-quality vehicles customers expect from CarMax. We are also working to enhance our logistics network and are continuing to reduce our SG&A. Our focus is to self-fund more competitive vehicle prices through more efficient operations, rather than a combination of lower GPUs and efficiency gains as we are doing this year. We continue to make progress in this area.

In terms of logistics, we are focused on reducing unproductive transfers, resetting our network design and optimizing fleet utilization across CarMax and third parties. We intend to reduce costs and improve our network for increased speed. Regarding SG&A, last quarter, we increased our fiscal year 2017 exit rate savings target from $150 million to $200 million. We remain on track to achieve this target and will continue to drive for expense efficiencies. We are moving at pace with this strategy. While this work will take time, we are encouraged that the progress our teams are making across the 4 pillars is already translating into improved trends that we expect will continue this year. In respect to our first quarter, retail unit sales reflect the near-term steps we have been taking across pricing, marketing and conversion to strengthen the business and drive performance. On a year-over-year basis, and against our strongest quarter from fiscal 2026 and we delivered slight growth.

Additionally, we levered SG&A on a total unit basis, expanded CarMax Auto Finance penetration and increased extended protection plan margin, all while improving our year-over-year EPS trends. Enrique and Jon will speak to our first quarter performance in detail in a few moments. As I previously stated, our objective is clear. delivered strong unit and earnings growth that enables us to consistently reward our shareholders. This begins with improving our unit growth by enhancing our customer value proposition through greater affordability and broader selection and higher conversion. At the same time, we will strengthen earnings power through an improved digital and in-store experience with our stores serving as a structural moat. We'll have a more efficient operating model, deeper customer relationships and better utilization of our differentiated scale advantages. Together, these outcomes will strengthen our market position and create long-term value for both our customers and shareholders.

We plan to hold a strategic update this fall, where we'll provide more detail on key initiatives and milestones. I'm excited about our strategic plan and I'm confident about the opportunity that lies ahead. Now I'd like to turn it over to Enrique to discuss our first quarter financial performance in more detail. Enrique?

Thanks, Keith, and good morning, everyone. We are encouraged by our performance trajectory as we are showing clear improvements in our year-over-year sales and earnings trends. As Keith noted, we also made progress on SG&A reductions, expansion of EPP margins and CAF. During the first quarter, we delivered total sales of $8 billion, up 6.2% compared to last year. Across our retail and wholesale channels, we sold approximately 392,000 vehicles combined, up 3.3% versus the first quarter last year.

In our retail business, total unit sales grew slightly, even as used unit comps were marginally down 0.8%. We delivered this sequential improvement in year-over-year sales despite comping over our strongest and tariff supported prior year period retail comp of 8.1%. Sales performance this quarter was supported by more competitive vehicle pricing, an increase in strong ROI acquisition marketing and by initial progress toward the 4 strategic pillars that Keith spoke to earlier. Average selling price was $27,288, a year-over-year increase of $1,168 per unit. Wholesale unit sales were up 8.4% versus last year's first quarter. Average wholesale selling price increased by $405 per unit to $8,364. First quarter net earnings per diluted share was $1.31 versus $1.38 in earnings in the first quarter of last year, a strong positive change in year-over-year trend relative to the preceding 3 quarters. Total gross profit was $854 million, down 4% from last year's first quarter. Used retail margin of $501 million decreased by 10% and driven primarily by lower profit per used unit of $2,177 which was down $230 per unit from last year's record high first quarter.

In managing margins more dynamically, we lowered GPUs by less than the $300 per retail unit guidance we provided last quarter as we balance demand, margins and efficiency gains in our reconditioning processes to support sales. Wholesale vehicle margin of $169 million increased by 8% from a year ago, with higher volume and relatively flat gross profit per unit of $1.46. Other gross profit was $184 million, flat to a year ago. As Jon noted, during our fourth quarter call, we began in the first quarter, our national rollout of our EPP product redesign, focused on providing our customers with more affordable options and also offering a new wheel, tire and dent product. EPP unit margins grew slightly in the first quarter, and our full national rollout is expected by the end of this quarter. We are on track to drive approximately $35 per unit in incremental EPP margin in FY '27.

CarMax Auto Finance income of $140 million was down 1% year-over-year. Jon will provide detail on CAF in a few moments. On the SG&A front, expenses for the first quarter were $635 million, down 4% from the prior year quarter. SG&A levered by $118 per unit or 7% to $1,619. SG&A dollars for the first quarter versus last year were mainly impacted by 2 factors. First, total compensation and benefits decreased by $25 million, driven by the actions we have taken to reduce SG&A. In the quarter, both lower CEC and corporate overhead payroll drove the year-over-year favorability. Second, advertising expense increased by $8 million, reflecting higher acquisition marketing spend in support of sales and buys. First quarter year-over-year SG&A reductions were in line with the related full year expectations we set out in the fourth quarter earnings call. As Keith noted, we are on track to deliver on our $200 million savings target and we continue to drive toward expense efficiencies. Regarding capital allocation, our priority remains funding the business to drive strong unit and earnings growth that enables us to consistently reward our shareholders. At the same time, we will continue to maintain a disciplined approach to our capital structure, including managing our net leverage to preserve efficient access to the capital markets for both CAF and CarMax overall.

Our leverage in the first quarter remained slightly above our targeted range. Returning capital to our shareholders remains a critical piece of our value creation plan, and our intent is to do so at the appropriate time. I will now turn the call over to Jon to provide more detail on CarMax Auto Finance and our continuing focus on full credit spectrum expansion. Jon?

Thanks, Enrique, and good morning, everyone. During the first quarter, CarMax Auto Finance originated $2.4 billion, resulting in sales penetration of 43.3% net of 3-day payoffs, an increase of 150 basis points versus last year. The weighted average contract rate charged to new customers was 11.3%, relatively in line with last year's Q1. Third-party Tier 2 penetration was 15.7% and versus 17.7% last year, and third-party Tier 3 was 9% versus 8% a year ago. This significant increase in CAF penetration has been signaled previously and is a direct result of our enhanced funding and underwriting efforts.

Of note, CAF was the largest Tier 2 lender during the quarter, further demonstrating the progress we are making in our full spectrum efforts. CAF income for the quarter was $140 million versus $142 million earned in the same period last year. The loan loss provision was $96 million as compared to $102 million in FY '26. The net interest margin on the portfolio was 6.7%, an increase of 20 basis points year-over-year. Once again, this quarter, credit losses were in line with our expectations. Our loan loss provision of $96 million largely reflects expected charge-offs on newly originated loans and results in a total reserve balance of $475 million or 2.95% of managed receivables, exclusive of auto loans held for sale. Note, there was a $25 million benefit to this quarter's provision stemming from loans booked prior to the first quarter that were classified as held for sale in Q1. We remain confident in CAF's ability to deliver significant added long-term value to the organization. Our full spectrum capabilities continue to strengthen and our evolving ability to deploy a diversified funding approach as needed, provides us with tremendous flexibility as we increase CAF's penetration.

Ultimately, this planned growth, coupled with our EPP efforts directly supports our focus on maximizing value on each transaction and will provide future income potential for both CAF and CarMax. Now I'd like to turn the call back over to Keith. Keith?

Thank you, Jon. I came to CarMax because I saw a strong foundation and a significant potential to unlock growth. Three months in, I am more convinced than ever that this is a business with everything it needs to thrive. The work ahead is about removing what has held us back. The strategy we lay out today is not aspirational and is already in motion. Our 4 strategic pillars set us up to better leverage our strengths and scale to drive strong profitable growth. We will provide a great offering, giving customers every reason to choose CarMax.

We'll provide customers an easy experience in their shopping journey. We will add value on each transaction by growing profitability across all aspects of our business, and we will run lean by reimagining our cost structure. While we are still early in this journey, we are encouraged by the progress we are already seeing. As I look ahead, I am confident that CarMax is uniquely positioned to build on its leadership position and create significant long-term value. We have a clear strategy, a strong foundation and a team that is committed to delivering for our customers and shareholders. Thank you for your time and continued interest in CarMax. I look forward to speaking with you next quarter and providing you with a more fulsome strategic update in the fall. With that, we will open the line for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]

We'll go first this morning to Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

Nice progress. Congratulations. And then the first one to ask, I want to focus on, I guess, the shorter term in nature, so I apologize. But just on the GPU and sales. So as you talked about in your script, we saw GPU down. Let is less than $300 a bit more than usual here in the fiscal first quarter. So in the quarter we further question is maybe 2 parts. I mean one, I mean, as you look at the business, how much by resetting this GPU, how much of a benefit do you think there was to use unit sales? And then secondarily, as we think about in GPU going forward. Have you found the sweet spot? Or should we expect further tweaks here to get to that sweet spot?

Yes. Thanks, Brian. I mean I think the work that the team kicked off late last year, focusing on pricing really started to build momentum in the business. And we've been further sharpening our focus on that aspect of it too. And so clearly, getting our pricing right on a competitive basis has had a positive impact, building momentum into sales. And we expect that momentum to continue throughout the year and continue to outperform the broader market, too. So definitely has a positive impact, having our -- the right car at the right price is definitely having a positive impact on our comp sales, and we expect that to continue throughout the remainder of the year. I'll let Enrique talk a little bit more detail about GPU.

Yes. So by GPU, look, if you recall last quarter, in the near term, we've guided that this year requires some margin concession to support sales growth. But beyond that near term, our goal is to self-fund strong competitive positioning through more efficient operations rather than lowering GPU, so we can sustain price competitiveness without hyper pricing profitability. And I'll tell you what, we're off to a strong start. We came in better than the guidance we gave you at the end of the fourth quarter and we're going to continue to track ahead. And this is really a benefit of managing our business more nimbly with more flexibility within the quarter. So rather than being anchored to certain and running the business around that. We're actually managing to the business and the demand that we see ahead of us within each quarter. So you can see the results here in the first quarter. Again, we're off to a really strong start for the year.

In terms of other sales drivers on the quarter, like I talked about in my prepared remarks, we did increase our spend on marketing, and that's another area, certainly, that as we manage the business more nimbly rather than being anchored to a certain marketing investment per quarter based on total units, reacting to what we're seeing in the market ahead of us. And so we saw an opportunity to invest in accretive marketing, acquisition marketing, and we did, and that supported our sales as well.

We go next now to Daniela Haigian with Morgan Stanley.

Similarly, more near term since we have the bigger strategic update this fall. Thinking about SG&A, it improved per unit quite nicely, but you have ad spend, as you cited, is up year-on-year, and you've also talked about investing in improving the digital experience. How do you think about balancing the increasing OpEx in those 2 items relative to those $200 million exit rate savings. And so when you think about, on an absolute basis, net-net, how does that compare year-on-year?

Yes. I'll tell you for the year, coming out of the first quarter, we're exactly where we thought we would be when it comes to SG&A savings, we knew the first quarter was going to see actually some year-to-year benefit largely driven by the cost reductions to our CTCs, to our corporate overhead reductions, and we saw that there. But in terms of the full year guidance that we provided last quarter, we're not moving off that for the time being. We do expect to see the full $200 million savings reductions by the end of fiscal year '27, but the guidance I provided last quarter still applies to this year, which means for the balance of the year, we could see a little bit of pressure when it comes to year-over-year SG&A. But again, we are on target for the $200 million exit rate. And Daniela, we continue to be focused on SG&A efficiency opportunities along the way.

We go next now to Craig Kennison of Baird.

Keith, I think you mentioned too many unproductive transfers. Can you shed more light on that issue?

Sure, I'd be happy to, Craig. When we think about kind of our growth strategy and kind of each one of the pillars, one of the key areas is making sure we have the right car at the right location. And transfers are a significant portion of our business. We transfer over 2 million cars a year. And so unproductive transfers are -- have 2 fronts in my mind. One is resetting our logistics network and how we become more efficient in taking costs out of our logistics network, but then also being crystal clear about how do those transfers then turn into sales and making sure we're not having unproductive transfers and holes. So really understanding because that impacts our saleable inventory.

So really, really focusing on, are we transferring the right cars to the right location for the right customer and making sure we turn more of those transfers directly into sales, thereby reducing our overall cost in logistics. By reason, our cost and logistics, it underpins our ability to then remain competitive in pricing. So they're all interconnected.

We go next now to Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan.

I just wanted to clarify a comment earlier along the GPU. It looks like first quarter came in ahead. Are you suggesting that the full year is probably going to track better than the original $200 decline guidance. Just wanted to clarify if that was what you had implied. And then just one more for Keith. Do you think the business has turned a corner in terms of market share recovery? And should we expect the business to -- given the actions you've taken on price and marketing, are we at a point where the business can -- as a company, CarMax can start to gain share for the rest of the year and moving forward?

Yes. Well, thanks, Raj. I think we've definitely turned the corner. When I joined CarMax, I saw the potential for growth in this company and how to become increasingly more competitive. I think the team is aligned behind that fact. And our ability to really understand deeply the key drivers of performance and how we can action against those and getting pricing correct to effectively drive increased comp sales and sustain that momentum year after year and again, outperformed the BARDA marketplace. So to answer your specific question, your question specifically, yes, I think we turned the corner, and we're very focused on the fact that this business should continue to grow market share on a sustainable basis going forward.

And regarding Rajat, regarding your question on like full year guidance for GPU. At this point in time, it's early in the year. We know we have a volatile business, right? We're not coming off the full year guidance at this point. But as we know, as we're managing within the quarter, if there are opportunities to give up less margin, we certainly will do so, as you saw in the first quarter here, while also balancing demand and reconditioning efficiencies which we are seeing in our operations, which is great support for margin management as well. But for the full year, right now, not coming off necessarily guidance. We'll give you an update next quarter, right, for the full year, but it's still early in the year.

We'll go next now to David Bellinger with Mizuho Securities.

I wanted to touch on GPU again. 2 specific comments you made in the prepared remarks about being price competitive across demand cycles and also managing margins more dynamically. So how should we interpret that? Is there the potential for more quarter-to-quarter variability in the GPU and maybe a strategic change where CarMax is much more proactive in moving up or down GPU targets quarter-to-quarter in order to match the used car cycle. Is there a way where we could see more variability going ahead in the GPU?

Yes. Great question. And again, pricing was our immediate priority, which started last year. And we've continued to be focused on that. And clearly, the input there is going to be how do we reduce our cost to make sure we have the flexibility to flex our pricing to be competitive in the marketplace to maximize sales, but also adding in changes to our pricing algorithm. So historically, we've had a lot of insight into demand for CarMax. But now our pricing algorithms are incorporating market demands and also unit demand specifically. So we're understanding kind of pricing by markets, pricing by vehicle types. So we can be more dynamic.

And so what we're going to be focused on is how do we flex GPU to maximize sales and profitability rather than being tied to a fixed GPU quarter-to-quarter-to-quarter. But again, we're standing behind our $200 reduction in GPU for the year, but we'll continue to focus on how we continue to improve upon that. But yes, there will be more dynamic movement in our pricing and how we maximize sales and profitability going forward. which happens in many, many other industries.

We'll go next now to Sharon Zackfia with William Blair.

I guess there were a lot of things underlying the strategic plan kind of going from becoming more fast and efficient to improving selection to decreasing friction and improving conversion. I guess when I think about all of those, do you have the right people and processes in place? Is there one area where there's going to be significant investment to get to the other side and which of these do you view as kind of the lowest hanging fruit as is that you can influence quickly and which kind of maybe is tougher and takes longer to get to the other side.

Yes. Well, great, Sharon. Thank you very much. I've been incredibly impressed with the team here. I'm 3 months and a day into the role. And I just continue to be impressed with the subject matter expertise and the passion that this team has. But in the corporate office, but actually probably even more importantly, our associates out in the field are just exceptional. So we've got the right people. There are a number of issues in the business that you've identified here when talking about pricing and selection and so forth, logistics. And we have real clarity and talk more about it in the fall about some of the core initiatives that underpin each one.

And we already have actions underway against almost all of them and have made great, great progress. I think the 2 areas that we're focused on the most right now has been really ensuring our pricing remains competitive. And so that's how do we lower our cost of goods sold. And the team have, again, a significant number of initiatives leveraging technology, leveraging processes and more to come on that they continue to make sure that our costs stay in control, so our pricing can be competitive. And then it's -- we're continuing to reduce friction in the digital experience and have it be better connected to our stores where the magic really happens at the end of the day. And just to give you a couple of tangible examples. And so reducing that friction in the digital journey, we basically improved the entry point for our customers arriving from online ads. We've made it easier to navigate our website to get towards prequalification and reserving a car.

We've effectively shifted away from sticker prices to monthly payments. We've integrated AI-assisted both in our digital experience and in our CEC. So all these things are happening right now to reduce friction and make it easier for our customers to do business with us. But most importantly, as Enrique said earlier, our focus is to run lean as an organization and making sure that we can self-fund these investments. So we're not coming out today saying there's significant increases in new investments in the company. We believe we have the capacity to do that today to move the business forward.

We go next now to Jeff Lick with Stephens.

Keith, I was wondering if we could drill down a little bit more on the concept of the dynamic pricing dynamic GPU management. This is obviously something that in your past life you have a lot of experience with, obviously, you can always get an extra hotel room reservation if you take the price down from $500 to 400, but the problem is, is that you've got to give the $400 rate to everybody that would have paid $500. I'm just wondering how you're thinking about that now in the context of the used car business, your business and the data that you're seeing now?

Yes. I found it, Jeff, to be probably the most fascinating thing to get into. I have a background in pricing and revenue management in my previous life and understanding the similarities and the differences between the 2 because, as you noted in the hotel business, we have an asset if we don't sell it today, we can't sell it tomorrow. In the case of the car business, we have an asset depreciating in value over time. And so really trying to understand how do you maximize the profitability of that asset and maximize the kind of the efficiency of our overall inventory.

And so historically, we had very, very complex pricing algorithms and a lot of demand, but it was really very margin-based pricing. And I think what we're shifting to more is kind of understanding how do we flex margin based upon maximizing demand for consumers by bringing in external data, like I mentioned earlier, bringing in that external market data into our pricing algorithms, understanding for individual types of vehicles into our pricing algorithms. So where do we have pricing flexibility where we can maximize sales and where should we actually hold firm in our pricing because we can maximize profitability. So that could lead to some variability in GPU, but maximize profit over time. And it's an area where we've got a fantastic data sciences team, and we're continuing to invest in that space and expand upon how we think about our algorithms and evolve them over time because there's definitely opportunity in this space that can sharpen up our pricing, but it has to be underpinned by getting our costs in the right place on a consistent basis.

If I could just ask a quick follow-up of Enrique. Enrique, there's that a good chunk of your other gross profit came from the servicing parts. Do you -- or service business, could you just explain the kind of the mechanics of how that works? Because, obviously, a lot of us aren't quite familiar here with how that actually flows through given you don't have a traditional service and parts business.

Yes. Service actually for the quarter was strong. Last year, we provided a fair bit of guidance and updates in terms of how we expected service to actually return to profitability and it did last year. We expect the same this year. I'd tell you, this quarter, there wasn't enough of a year-over-year increase to really have note and talk about. But I think the way to think about that is basically, it's the labor behind reconditioning and then we apply fees to that labor in order to cover the cost of reconditioning is how to think about it.

And so this quarter, it's a business that levers very strongly in the market and when sales are strong, it will lever very strongly. And then seasonally speaking, when sales get weaker, you deleverage on more of a fixed cost kind of basis. So that's how to think about the service line.

We'll go next now to Alex Perry of Bank of America.

I just wanted to follow up on the marketing and project actually and ask about the shift in the strategy. How much do you think the investments in acquisition marketing supported the sequential comp improvement. Will you continue to lean into this even more going forward? You expect sort of advertising as a percent of revenue to trend higher from here? And how should we be thinking about that?

Yes. Great. It's a great question. Look, we're -- as I mentioned earlier, we're running the business more nimbly than we have in the past. And in the case of marketing, that means we're less anchored to a specific dollar per unit and more tied to the opportunity to drive incremental sales that have a strong ROI in the period that we're managing. This period we saw with strong demand Again, we were comping over last year, which was a positive comp, and we still delivered overall flattish, slightly up used unit growth. We saw a strong demand, and we managed to that. And so the marketing team does an exceptional job of identifying where we can kind of invest in dollars.

We have strong processes around do we think that's going to drive incremental sales? And is it going to be profitable? And that's what we did this quarter. I would expect to continue to manage that way from quarter-to-quarter as we also take a look at GPUs and other factors driving sales. And if it's a lever we think we can pull and if it's accretive to the bottom line, then we'll -- that's what we're going to do.

I'll just add on to that a little bit, Alex. One of the things I was really impressed with when I came into CarMax was the caliber of the marketing talent we have from a data analytics perspective. and the way that they're focusing on high ROI marketing and being real time, talking week after week, we're sitting down as a team talking about what's happening in terms of sales, what's happening in terms of the broader marketplace, how are we positioned in terms of pricing what's happening just more broadly across the business and determining how we want to invest our marketing dollars to support both sales and also buys, which is an incredibly important part of our business model, too.

And so it's dynamic and it's real time. So as Enrique said, we're just not locking into saying we're going to spend this much money this quarter irrespective of what's happening. We're looking at it week-to-week, month-to-month and making sure we're maximizing profitability and sales.

We'll go next now to Scot Ciccarelli with Truist.

So you had a $230 drop in GPU on about a $1,200 increase in ASP was the ASP looked a driver of the better-than-expected GPU in the quarter? Or was that all from lower reconditioning cost? Just how do we reconcile those guide points and then secondly, for John, I guess, just a clarification. Can you provide any more color around the $25 million benefit to CAF this quarter?

Yes. Regarding our ASPs and use. I mean we were up there really 2 drivers. One was just overall acquisition costs were up in the marketplace that drove it. The second component was mix. We had a little less older cars in the quarter. Demand was strong around kind of the younger cars, kind of our core offering, if you will. And those are the 2 factors that drove kind of ASPs being up -- average is price being up year-over-year.

Great. Scot, I appreciate your question on the $25 million. Yes, just to clarify, that was a held-for-sale transaction we executed within the quarter. when we execute a hub for cell transaction, those are receivables that we no longer need to provision losses for if we originate them in the quarter or if we originate in prior to the quarter. This is prior to the quarter, we had receivables that were on our books, we had provisioned for losses and those receivables were then included in this '26 transaction to the tune of about $25 million of expected loss year in essence allowed to release that from your reserve that offsets the within quarter provision.

Got it. And then Enrique, my question was really on the GPU side, though, like what the ASP lift and impact driven by the -- what the -- excuse me, the GPU impact, was that partly driven by the ASP increase?

Yes. Those are run independently. I mean the ASPs are going to be run independently on how we run our margins. They're not related.

We'll go next now to Michael Montani with Evercore ISI.

Just a question for Jon. If you could talk a little bit about the underlying health of the consumer that you're seeing from a credit perspective on delinquencies and roll rates. And then if you could discuss how to think about provisioning and NIM really into fiscal 2Q?

Yes. Great. Appreciate the question, Michael. Yes, I think overall consumer -- I guess I'd have to lead with the fact that we feel really good about how we are viewing the consumer that's on our books that receive our receivable base, how we have reserved. I think that was captured in the prepared remarks. This is our third quarter in a row where we've really kind of hit the losses as expected. The consumer overall, I think you can see in the industry, certainly, they are -- continue to be pressured by overall inflation if you look at delinquency rates among credit cards, auto, all that, it is higher.

But again, we feel like we have an excellent handle on that, and that's captured. If I think about provision for us in the quarter in each successive quarter going forward, a very logical question. How do you model that? The guidance I would give you is to anchor on origination volume. The way I think about that is for every point of penetration that CAF takes, that's roughly $50 million to $60 million of receivables. If that's Tier 1 receivables, we're setting aside probably $1.5 million to $2 million of provision. If that's Tier 2 receivables, we're setting aside about $10 million to $12 million of provision. And to put that Tier 1 versus Tier 2 in perspective, right now, we're about a 1 to 9 ratio. Tier 2 is about 10% of what we're doing. Tier 1 is about 90% of what we're doing. So you kind of can do all the arithmetic there and say that's probably what I'm originating in the full total of the origination provision I'd have to set aside. Notwithstanding, obviously, we are executing hub for sale transactions that is -- really shows our flexibility from a funding perspective that fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter. But again, that's the flexibility that we love, and we're able to execute on that.

And then obviously, the last piece there is what is our view on the macro environment is our view on the adjustments on our existing book. Again, we feel really good the last few quarters on how we've provisioned and reserve for our existing book. But that's how I'd build it. I build it from overall origination provision make a perspective on held for sale and then the broader adjustments that you might need to make macro in existing book. That's how I build provision.

And just the NIM side, do you think that 67% is the right rate or a 20 bps improvement year-over-year? Or how should we look at that?

Yes. Obviously, we love the 67%. I would say there's a seasonality component to that. this quarter benefits from a lot of days in the quarter, just the 3 months that are included. So I'd probably gauge more to like a 6.5 would be the way I think about that in the future, the rest of the year.

We'll go next now to Chris Bottiglieri with BNP Paribas.

I actually have a similar question to Mike, I want to ask you anyway. Can you just talk about the drivers to the allowance? So that's set up pretty big despite like a big tax refund season. Just trying to get a sense, is that -- you also mentioned the benefit from transferring loans to held for sale. So trying to understand like the step-up in the allowance rate. Is that just mix because of you're pushing more to subprime? Or is there some level of underlying weakness just given like delinquency rates in subprime that you're provisioning for. Just trying to understand the buy.

I appreciate the question, Chris. Yes, that's a tough metric. We provide it, and I think it's important we provide it as we have over time, but it's absolutely not weakness in the book of business. Again, I think we've said our losses are within expectation, and we've reserved accordingly. I think you've got 2 main things going on this quarter. Number one, there's absolutely a seasonality component. It's tough to describe, but if you look at our traditional Q1, all things being equal, like that will be a step-up in overall reserve receivables.

Number two, absolutely you touched on it. We're adding Tier 2 volume. I mean very proud of what we've done, that growth and penetration coming from that Tier 2 space. I just referenced what do you have to add from a provision and ultimately in the reserve from a point of penetration in Tier 2. So that's absolutely going to take you up. And then the third component you also touched on that's going to cause it to fluctuate is what have you done from a held for sale perspective. So it can move around a fair amount, but this quarter, predominantly, again, seasonality and that Tier 2 growth.

That's really helpful. And then I just want to follow up on Keith's comment on the $2 million transfers. What do you think the biggest opportunities are there? My napkin math is probably like around $1 million in a quarter of transfers from like customer pay, wholesale transfer stores without recon centers like auction source vehicles. So it seems like there are some potentially extraneous transfers. Just kind of curious what you guys see the opportunity is and maybe just kind of explain under the current old would be helpful.

Yes, we'll do a deeper dive on that piece of work, and we do our strategic update in the fall. But just to give you a little bit of color now, we really need to look at the entirety of our logistics network and really understand what's the most efficient way for us to move vehicles and also how to leverage our own logistics network and also the third parties, too. So we're kicking off a significant piece of work around that through understanding of what should our logistics network be and making sure it's scalable as we continue to sell more cars year after year, buy more cars year after year?

How do we have a network that scales efficiently and keeps our cost in control and also making sure that we really understand why are we moving cars from point A to point B? And are those true -- again, is it enabling us to sell a car at the end of the day or are the unproductive transfers. And so just getting a lot sharper about that. We've already got some initial work being done, but some significant work is about to kick off, which I'm really, really excited about. And again, we'll give you more details in the fall. But again, we see it as an opportunity in 2 fronts. One is we can have more cars available to our customers. So increasing our saleable inventory and the time available on 1 day, 2 days and 4 days. So that increases our saleable inventory and also will lower our cost, which means kept our pricing competitive, too.

We'll go next now to John Babcock with Barclays.

I just want to ask, obviously, 2 parts of selling vehicles. I mean 1 is getting the price, right? The other is obviously having the right vehicle. From that standpoint, I just want to know what are you doing to ensure that you have the right mix? And also, how is this reflected in the pricing algorithm and how you plan to adjust that going forward?

Great. Yes. I mean it's almost a week 2, I was talking to the team. It's right price, right car, right location are the foundational things for us to have a successful business and really understanding that. And so we have really great customer insight in terms of what vehicles are in demand and how does that vary across the country. And that then directly feeds into our buying strategy and understanding these are the vehicles we have to buy and then get them into our reconditioning to make it in our saleable inventory.

So -- and that will change throughout the cycle. I mean, right now, for example, it's only a small part of our business. But clearly, there's a move towards hybrids and EVs from a number of consumers. And so our buy teams are out there focusing on making sure we're efficiently buying hybrids and EVs to get those into our saleable inventory more quickly. And again, that will change again where we are within the country and throughout the year. So making sure, again, that we're just really understanding that external input of what is consumer demand and how does that feed into overall, again, our acquisition strategy underpin our sales strategy.

Okay. And if you don't mind a quick follow-on. Are you able to talk about the impact of fuel prices on your results in the quarter?

Yes. The fuel prices will hit us in our COGS really, right, when you're looking at our operations. But the teams have done a phenomenal job of overcoming those cost pressures in our reconditioning processes. And again, actually preconditioning savings in COGS is one of the reasons this quarter, we were able to manage to a less of a margin give up, if you will, to support sales. So they were easy to very easy to overcome this quarter.

We go next now to Chris Pierce with Needham.

We've talked about pricing, getting the right car, et cetera. I guess can we just hit on pillar #4, run lean. I'd love to kind of hear what you found about the recon side of the business, how you can lower recon costs or speed up recon time, kind of what have you found as you've done a per [indiscernible] there?

Yes, I'm happy to. And then if I miss something, I'll let Enrique expand on it. It's a fascinating part of our business and an incredibly important part of our business because as you understand, right, buying the right car at the right price is critically important. But then the cost of reconditioning is fundamental to us being able to have great prices. And we have great, great service ops teams and reconditioning teams out there today.

But there's opportunity for us to further leverage technology to continuously improve our cost of goods sold through reconditioning. We've already got a few things out there right now. We've got our part selection tool, which they continue to improve upon, which enables our teams to effectively find the right part for the right car at the best price. We've got our tire selection tool out there now, which has now been integrated into that as well. Similarly, make sure that we're looking at the entirety of the marketplace to get the right tire at the best price possible and that's just 2 examples. But there's a lot more we can do with technology to leverage our efficiency in terms of labor and productivity and how we move our inventory from raw to WIP to being on the loss at the end of the day, too. We'll go definitely deeper that in the fall to explain specifically what we're doing. But again, it's going to be an investment in technology and leveraging new processes, but we'll be funding that out of our existing overhead base as our SG&A.

Yes, it will be self-funded. And what I'd tell you is that it's definitely the biggest opportunity that we have at CarMax is to really just digitize our reconditioning processes, update the processes as well within there. And we think that there's a fair bit of upside when it comes to cost and speed just by leveraging technology more strongly in our reconditioning.

I couldn't agree more Enrique. I think it's one of the areas where by focusing on it and investing appropriately in the technology behind it. It will give us a gain, a sustainable cost advantage and how we can keep our pricing where it needs to be.

Can you just touch on -- I know you opened another stand-alone center, you've got a couple of stand-alone centers that I think have been opened over a year now. Are there -- are you seeing a material benefit in terms of reconditioning at stand-alone centers in those regions? Or is it more about just -- I guess, I just want to understand as you open more of these, what benefit you're seeing now, what you can see in the future?

Yes. We have 7 of them open at this point. And I'd tell you, it's still kind of early to get reconditioning savings. They're still ramping. And really where we start to get leverage on those processes is when we hit kind of peak manufacturing, if you will and they're not there yet, just given that they're fairly new. Where we are seeing savings, though definitely is in logistics, right? So less of the kind of cost of shipping those vehicles because we're in market, we're in the right markets, right? So logistics savings, yes, preconditioning savings, you would not fully add where we want to be, but the team continues to improve kind of quarter-over-quarter. But I wouldn't say that that's the driver right now of reconditioning in [indiscernible] but it will be certain.

We'll go next now to Rajat Gupta with JP Morgan.

I just wanted to follow up on any preview around the Analyst Day. I know you've talked about like moving to full-spectrum financing. You had the 50% number out there. Is there any thought process around maybe taking that number higher and maybe in a more aggressive fashion? Is that something that you would consider as a strategic change? Just wanted to get your thoughts on that.

Well, I'll me start at a high level, and I'll let Jon talk about that. I mean what we're planning to do is a strategic update later on this fall where we're going to walk through in detail kind of each 1 of the pillars, so you really understand. First and foremost, how interconnected each one of these is because by themselves are each important but they are so connected, that's probably one of my biggest learnings here in the first 3 months is that everything is connected here. And so how do we go through each pillar and be focusing on the offering, the experience, how we're going to add value through cash and full spectrum and then how we focus on COGS and things like that.

So we'll go through a lot of detail there, both in terms of initiatives and also things that you can hold us accountable to. We'll be talking about kind of how we expect this to impact performance over time to sustainably grow our business and to outperform the broader market on a go-forward basis in terms of sales and do it in an efficient way so that we grow our profitability and reward our shareholders, too. So I'm really excited about it. The team has done a fantastic job of framing up what that strategy is. And again, we'll do a deeper dive in the fall on our strategic update. I'll let Jon talk specifically about what you just asked in CAF.

Yes, Rajat, I appreciate the question. Yes. With regard to the ad value pillar, I think obviously, capital spectrum is a key backbone there. We've signaled that for multiple years. I think we're really pleased with the capabilities we've put in place. The funding capabilities iterative underwriting capabilities and that really shows itself in this quarter's penetration. Your question of 50%, that's a number that we've offered as really a midterm objective for us. Certainly, we choose the word midterm very carefully. We think it could be larger than that. but we're really excited in our ability to grow to that level.

If you look at what we did from a Tier 2 perspective, we cited we -- a year ago, we were 10% of the Tier 2 volume. This quarter, we are upwards of 25% of that volume, and we think that will continue to methodically grow over the next couple of years as we hit that midterm objective. As far as how fast can we go, I think we've really set a good course there. We want to be very thoughtful really making sure we're getting the funding strategies right. We're underwriting it correctly. I don't want to get over our skis there. But yes, I think that's a great mid-term objective. And beyond that, absolutely, I think it's definitely on the table for us.

And ladies and gentlemen, that's all the time we have for questions this morning. Mr. Barr, I'd like to turn things back to you, sir, for any closing comments.

Great. Well, thanks. Thanks, everyone, for joining us and for your continued interest and support of CarMax. Hopefully, you can see the momentum we've built in the business and the strong performance in the quarter, and we expect that momentum to continue throughout the year as we will outperform the broader marketplace. Really excited about the strategy that we have developed as a team to, again, drive sustainable growth, improve profitability and reward our shareholders over time.

And again, we'll share more with you all in the fall, but also we'll be talking with you next quarter. So thanks, everyone, and have a great remainder of your week.

Thank you, Mr. Barr. Again, ladies and gentlemen, this will conclude the First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. We'd like to thank you all so much for joining us today and wish you all a great day. Goodbye.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, David Lowenstein, VP, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Angela. Good morning. Thank you for joining our fiscal 2026 fourth quarter earnings conference call. I'm here today with Tom Colillard, Interim Executive Chair of the Board; Keith Barr, President and CEO; Enrique Marmora, Executive Vice President and CFO; and John Daniels, Executive Vice President, CarMax Auto Finance. Let me remind you our statements today that are not statements of historical fact, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company's future business plans, prospects and financial performance are forward-looking statements we make pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current knowledge, expectations and assumptions and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. In providing projections and other forward-looking statements, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update them. For additional information on important factors and risks that could affect these expectations, please see our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning. Our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q previously filed with the SEC. Please note, in addition to our earnings release, we have also prepared our quarterly investor presentation, and both documents are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Should you have any follow-up questions after the call, please feel free to contact our Investor Relations department at (804) 747-0422, extension 7865. [Operator Instructions]. Tom?

Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. Today, I'm going to provide some brief commentary on our performance during the quarter. I'll also introduce our new President and Chief Executive Officer, Keith Barr, before turning the call over to him to say a few words. After that, Enrique and John will speak to our fourth quarter results in more detail as well as highlight a few key expectations for fiscal year '27 before we open the line for your questions.

During the fourth quarter, we made solid progress on the priorities outlined last call to strengthen the business. We improved sales trends by lowering our prices, investing in acquisition marketing and deploying an initial set of digital enhancements designed to drive conversion. We also continue streamlining our cost structure and lowering the cost to bring cars to market, helping us offer more affordable vehicles. Concurrently, we made meaningful progress on our SG&A reduction goals, CAF, full spectrum ambitions and extended protection plan redesigns.

Before I get to Keith, I'd like to thank David McCray for stepping into the role of Interim President and CEO over the past several months. As we search the right leader to guide CarMax through its next phase of growth, David's leadership was critical in strengthening the business in the near term and solidifying the foundation for growth ahead. David will continue to be a tremendous asset to the company serving as an independent Director of the Board.

Well, the Board and I are thrilled to welcome Keith to CarMax. In searching for a CEO, we were looking for several attributes. First and foremost, a people-first leader who will fit well with CarMax's award-winning culture, an established proven leader with experience leading a complex business, someone with a strong customer focus and a track record of driving growth and strengthening brands, experience maximizing the benefits of an integrated omnichannel model and finally, experience leading digital transformation.

Keith embodies each of these characteristics, making him the right choice to lead CarMax through a critical juncture and drive the company's next chapter of growth.

I'll now turn the call over to Keith to introduce himself and say a few words. Keith?

Thanks, Tom, and good morning, everyone. I want to thank the Board for their trust in me. I am honored to join CarMax and lead this iconic organization alongside our talented associates. For more than 30 years, CarMax has helped shape the way people buy and sell used cars. And in doing so, it earn something rare, the trust of its customers. A customer and associate-centric approach is central to how I lead and I recognized right away that it is essential to CarMax as well. This is one of the many things that attracted me to this team. CarMax has built something truly exceptional, a beloved brand. The combination of an unmatched physical footprint and strong digital infrastructure and an award-winning people-first culture.

I am confident that we can build on the strong foundation and better serve our customers. and unlock a significant opportunity ahead of us. Before joining CarMax, I expect my career in hospitality, holding numerous leadership roles in commercial, operations and technology and ultimately serving for 6 years as CEO of IHG Hotels & Resorts. I led a successful transformation that create value for shareholders through empowering associates and pioneering a better experience for customers that has become the industry standard. On the surface, hotels and used cars may seem different, but at their core, both businesses succeed delivering the right products at the right price and the right way for the customer.

My time and hospitality was defined by placing the customer at the center of every decision. The auto market is evolving quickly. I believe a fresh outside perspective can be a real advantage, especially when it's grounded in respect for the complexity of the industry, a deep understanding of the competitive landscape and a clear focus on changing customer expectations. Best population is a competitive advantage in this market. [ Paper ] with our brand and culture, we are well positioned for success. Our recent performance has not reflected our potential, and closing that gap is exactly what we are focusing on.

I have been spending my first few weeks deeply familiarizing myself with every aspect of the business. This has included meeting many talented associates across the organization in our corporate offices and in the field. Studying our customer and associate experience in both the buying and selling journeys, assessing our omnichannel capabilities and understanding our approach to recondition, inventory, pricing, marketing and cash.

In addition to the actions that Tom and David initiated during the fourth quarter, we're working hard to identify where we can improve. And when we have more detail, we will communicate our plans with you. What I can already say with absolute certainty is that we will put the customer at the heart of every decision we make to drive better performance. Through that lens, this is what we will prioritize. First, make CarMax the obvious and easy choice. That starts with consistently delivering 3 things that matter most to customers. A competitive price, the trust is fair. Access to a broad selection of high-quality vehicles, and an end-to-end experience that meets the needs of today's consumer.

Second, use technology to drive more differentiated experiences and efficiencies. We use software, data and AI in practical ways that that make even easier for customers to buy and sell cars and easier for our associates to serve them. That means reducing friction across the journey, personalizing the experience, improving how we match inventory and pricing to meet customer demand and ensuring a great experience both in our stores and online. [indiscernible] act with more urgency and intention while ensuring there is alignment across the organization. We will change what is not working to double down on what is and keep evaluating opportunities and risks as we move, will be bold, hold ourselves accountable and move it to speed as we build a durable long-term growth engine. These 3 priorities are where we will begin. And I expect our work to evolve as I continue to listen, learn, engage our teams and investors. We have a meaningful opportunity ahead of us as we strengthen the business and improve our execution to drive growth and returns. I look forward to sharing more about our strategy and long-term objectives in due time and I'm confident in what we can accomplish.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Enrique to discuss our fourth quarter financial performance in more detail. Enrique?

Thanks, Keith, and good morning, everyone. During the fourth quarter, we improved our sales trends and made progress toward our SG&A reduction goal, which we now expect to be greater than the FY '27 exit rate production targets we had previously said. Our EPS during the quarter was impacted by restructuring costs as well as by a noncash goodwill impairment, while our margins decreased from the prior year quarter as we continue our focus on targeted price reductions and driving sales. .

During the quarter, we delivered total sales of $5.9 billion, down 1% compared to last year. Across our retail and wholesale channels, we sold approximately 304,000 vehicles combined up 1% versus the fourth quarter last year. In our retail business, total unit sales declined 0.8% and used unit comps were down 1.9%. This marked a strong positive change in trend relative to the second and third quarters, which saw used unit comps of negative 6.3% and negative 9%, respectively. Sales performance in our fourth quarter was supported by the actions that Tom noted. Average selling price was [ $26,019, ] a year-over-year decrease of $114 per unit.

Wholesale unit sales were up 3% versus the fourth quarter last year. Average wholesale selling price declined by $268 per unit to $7,776. We bought approximately 270,000 vehicles during the quarter, up slightly from last year. The actions that we implemented also supported a strong positive change in trend as compared to the third quarter, which was down 12% year-over-year. We purchased approximately 229,000 vehicles from consumers, with approximately half of those buys coming through our online instant appraisal experience. With the support of our Edmond sales team, we sourced the remaining approximately 41,000 vehicles through dealers, which is down 9% from last year.

Fourth quarter net loss per diluted share was $0.85 versus $0.58 in earnings in the fourth quarter of last year. Adjusted earnings per diluted share, a non-GAAP measure, was $0.34 in the quarter compared to 60% a year ago. Our EPS this quarter was impacted by a few items. This includes a noncash goodwill impairment of $0.99, driven by a combination of a decline in our market capitalization which coincided with a prescriptive impairment measurement period and pressured financial performance; and restructuring charges of $0.20 related to corporate workforce reductions and the early abandonment of the underutilized space associated with our Edmonds office.

Altogether, these items reduced EPS by $1.19 this quarter. Total gross profit was $605 million, down 9% from last year's fourth quarter. Used retail margin of $383 million decreased by 10%, driven primarily by lower profit per used unit of $2,115 which was down $207 per unit from last year's record high fourth quarter. Wholesale vehicle margin of $115 million decreased by 7% from a year ago with lower wholesale gross profit per unit of $940, a decline of $105 per unit, partially offset by higher volume.

Other gross profit was $107 million, down 11% from a year ago. This was driven primarily by service. In line with the outlook we gave in the third quarter call, service was pressured by seasonal sales and the annualization of cost coverage levers taken last year.

For the full year, service returned to profitability despite sales headwinds. [indiscernible] auto finance income of $144 million was down 10% year-over-year. John will provide detail on CAF in a few moments. On the SG&A [indiscernible] expenses for the fourth quarter were $611 million. When excluding the previously noted restructuring costs, SG&A was $577 million, down 5% from the prior year. SG&A dollars for the fourth quarter versus last year were mainly impacted by 3 factors: First, total compensation and benefits increased by $31 million, driven by lower corporate bonus and stock-based compensation as well as lower CEC payroll following the actions taken last quarter, these savings were partially offset by $12 million in restructuring charges tied to our SG&A cost reduction efforts; second, occupancy costs increased by $27 million, including a $21 million charge related to the exit of our Edmond office lease, that action will support lower SG&A moving forward, the balance of the increase was primarily timing related; third, advertising expense increased by $6 million, reflecting higher acquisition marketing spend.

Turning to capital allocation. During the fourth quarter, we repurchased 1.3 million shares for a total expenditure of $50 million. As of the end of the quarter, we had $1.31 billion in repurch authorization remaining. As we look ahead into FY '27, I'll highlight a few key areas. We expect to take a more dynamic approach to margin management as we run the business. As a guidepost for FY '27, we currently expect used margins for the full year to decline at a rate broadly in line with our fourth quarter year-over-year trend, although actual results may vary as we continue to optimize performance.

We expect the first quarter to reflect the largest year-over-year decline at closer to $300 per unit as we lap record margins. This outlook reflects our pricing actions and our ongoing efforts to reduce logistics and reconditioning COGS in support of more competitive pricing and stronger sales. We have completed our EPP product redesign and testing and have begun our national rollout, which we expect will drive approximately $35 per unit in margins in FY '27. We will ramp throughout the year, driven by the rollout plan. Regarding SG&A, we expect FY '27 exit rate reductions of $200 million, an increase over the previous guidance of $150 million.

However, the year-over-year savings within FY '27 are expected to be offset primarily as we annualize over the materially reduced corporate bonus and share-based compensation in FY '26. which offsets approximately half of the FY '27 in-year savings, inflationary pressures and new location growth. With our focus on lowering vehicle pricing through lower GPUs and COGS efficiencies, we will be transitioning our SG&A efficiency metric to a per total unit ratio, which will consist of retail plus wholesale units.

We expect SG&A to lever in FY '27 when excluding the restructuring charges incurred in FY '26. Regarding capital expenditures, we anticipate approximately $400 million of spend in FY '27, down materially from the past 2 years. The large portion of our CapEx investment continues to be related to the land and build-out of facilities for long-term growth capacity in off-site reconditioning and auctions. In FY '27, we plan to open 4 new stores, 2 new offside reconditioning and auction locations and 2 new off-site auction locations. Regarding capital structure, our priority remains funding the business and maintaining financial flexibility. We continue to take a disciplined approach to our capital structure, including managing our net leverage to preserve efficient access to the capital markets for both CAP and CarMax overall, with leverage slightly above our targeted range and as we focus on improving the business during this transitional period, we have paused our share buybacks.

Our $1.1 billion authorization remains in place, and we remain committed to returning capital to shareholders over time.

At this time, I will now turn the call over to John to provide more detail on CarMax Auto Finance and our continuing focus on full credit spectrum expansion. John?

Thanks, Enrique, and good morning, everyone. During the fourth quarter, CarMax Auto Finance originated almost $1.9 billion, resulting in sales penetration of 42.8% net of free day payoffs versus 42.3% last year. The weighted average contract rate charged to new customers was in line with last year at 11.1%. Third-party Tier 2 and Tier 3 penetration in the quarter combined for 25.6% of sales, which was also in line with last year. The year-over-year increase in CAF penetration in the fourth quarter reflects our continued focus when expanding in Tier 2 supported by our flexible funding strategy and newest underwriting models.

We expect our penetration growth targeting the top half of Tier 2 will accelerate in FY '27. CAF income for the quarter was $144 million, down $16 million from the same period last year. The loan loss provision was $74 million as compared to $68 million last year. Net interest margin on the portfolio was up slightly both sequentially and year-over-year at 6.3%.

Consistent with the third quarter, credit losses in the fourth quarter were in line with our expectations. CAF's $74 million loan loss provision largely reflects expected charge-offs on newly originated loans including those tied to our credit spectrum expansion primarily into the top half of Tier 2. Total reserves ended the quarter at $453 million or 2.78% of auto loans held for investment. We also designated a $100 million pool of nonprime loans as held for sale during the quarter, which does not require a loss reserve. As signaled previously, we anticipate leveraging future off-balance sheet funding transactions strategically as it supports our full spectrum growth strategy by balancing income and future provision risk. While cap income was down year-over-year in the quarter, this is largely reflective of a reduced held-for-investment receivable base impacted by the $900 million 25B transaction executed in Q3, coupled with lower origination dollars over the last few years.

CAF realized approximately $5 million in servicing fees during both the third and fourth quarters. The third quarter also included a $27 million gain on sale as a result of the 25B transaction. As we grow our volume in Tier 2, we will continue refining our funding strategy and earnings model throughout the year. We believe a diversified funding approach gives us flexibility to optimize returns beyond traditional third-party lender fees while maintaining appropriate risk discipline. More broadly, we see CAF penetration growth as a contributor to the larger strategic goal of retaining a higher percentage of finance income. As always, we will carefully consider the current state of the economy and consumer as we shape our strategy. I also want to provide an update on our redesigned extended service plan MaxCare, which focuses on mechanical coverage and our new MaxCare Plus offering, which adds cosmetic protection. The redesign of these products is aimed at increasing penetration by improving affordability amid higher vehicle prices and has shown encouraging results across multiple markets to date.

As Enrique mentioned, we have completed our product enhancement testing, and expect to achieve nationwide rollout by Q2 of FY '27. Now I would like to turn the call back over to Keith. Keith?

Thank you, John. Before we open the line for questions, let me leave you with a few final thoughts. I want to thank Tom, David and all our CarMax associates with the foundation they have built. We made progress in the fourth quarter to improve affordability and streamline our cost structure. The time I expect with associates in our offices and in the field has only reinforced my confidence in the opportunity ahead. We have a strong foundation, a powerful brand, and our focus is clear. The CarMax the obvious choice for customers, use technology to create more differentiated experiences and efficiencies and operate with greater urgency and intention. If we do that well, we will build a stronger, more efficient business with the customer at the center of every decision we make take.

Before I close, I want to recognize a point of pride for CarMax. We were once again named by Fortune as 1 of the 100 best companies to work for, marking 22 consecutive years on that list. Even in my first few weeks here, I have seen the culture behind that recognition first hand. The trust Care and Support Associates show for one another every day are real strength of this company. I'm honored to be part of this team. I look forward to updating you on our progress in the quarters ahead. be sharing more about our strategy and long-term objectives in due time. Thank you for your continued trust and confidence in CarMax. With that, we will open the line for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Craig Kennison with Baird.

Congratulations on the new role. I guess I'd start with what are your general observations after the first few weeks in the role and then more specifically, as you draw upon your experiences in the hotel industry, what are your thoughts on how to streamline the click-through experience at CarMax? It feels like that's an area where you lag the best-in-class experience.

Thanks, Craig. And yes, I'm thrilled to be here, and it's a pleasure to meet you. I think it's been great to get to know the team in the first few weeks. And what really stood out to me so far has been the caliber of our associates, both in the corporate office and in the field and the culture that's really, really palpable. I mean there's an amazing culture here in the company. And right now, we're focusing on sharper execution on the fundamentals of the business about pricing, about selection, availability and experience. And so it's an amazing team. I think you're right on the hotel experience, one of my rallying cries in my old role was how do we reduce friction in the customer experience.

If it takes us 6 clicks to do something, how can we make it 3? What are the things that really matter most to customers and really understanding that end-to-end customer journey, both online and in-store and how we can streamline those processes. That's going to be one of my main focuses in the omnichannel experience is just streamlining the experience and really making it easier for our customers.

Our next question comes from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

Keith, welcome. Look forward to working with you.

So my question, just looking at this quarter, I think one of the big efforts here has been the price -- I guess, price investments, so to say, in the used car business. So maybe you can discuss further what you saw in terms of elasticity and demand as you adjusted prices?

How much of the -- while used car unit comps were still down, they did improve rather significantly from the prior couple of quarters. I mean how much of that could you attribute to these price investments? And I know you gave us the guidance for at least some guidance for the first quarter. But I mean, how should we think about these price investments going forward?

Yes, Brian, thanks for the question. The impact that we had on the quarter was really -- there were several things that we did, right? So we took our prices down. You can see that in the GPU. We increased our acquisition marketing spend as well. And we also made improvements to our online selling capabilities just through our website experience. I would tell you, out of those 3 things pricing, certainly, we believe had the biggest impact, although we think all of those levers impacted our trend positively. And I'd tell you the results that we saw this quarter were pretty much in line with what we had expected given the actions that we took.

And so we are really pleased with the change in direction. We are able to -- coming out of the third quarter, we made it very clear, like our objective right now is to get the sales yield going, and we're pulling these levers and that's exactly what we saw. And we have those levers in place here and moving forward as well.

So could I follow up quickly, David, on that topic. I mean just -- is there a way to quantify, again, looking at the improvement, so to say, that we saw in used car unit comps here in fiscal Q4 versus 3 and 2. Is there a way to quantify, I mean, how much of that was a direct result of these efforts you took?

Yes, [indiscernible] we haven't really talked externally about the pricing elasticity. We have a very deep understanding of price elasticity. It's not something we've necessarily communicated externally exactly what it is. Again, what I tell you is that change in the trend and that change -- a positive change in direction, those 3 items drove it, lower prices, increased marketing, better selling capabilities online.

But of those items, we do believe that our lower pricing had the biggest impact on the quarter.

[indiscernible] of last quarter, we kind of let our prices drift up where we weren't as competitive as we'd like to be. And so as Enrique mentioned, we took several actions immediately at the beginning of the fourth quarter. And as you noted, we saw a significant change. But Clearly, the biggest one was price. And now as you've heard the team talk about cost, if we could get sales moving in the right direction, and we can address some of the cost issues behind it, whether it's COGS or SG&A we're going to have a fantastic business, but price really managed to consumer.

Our next question comes from Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan.

I look forward to working with [indiscernible]. I have initial question just a follow-up on Enrique commentary on SG&A., how much of the $200 million you expect to hit this year's P&L? And just to double click a little bit more on some of the commentary around accruals and stock-based comp and how we should think about the magnitude there? And maybe on any of the [ grid ] rails around SG&A with respect to expense per year, that would be helpful.

Yes. No, absolutely. So a couple of things. I think one way to think about it is the exit rate dollars we have coming out [indiscernible]. And as we said, we have a line of sight to another [ $100 ] million exit rate FY '27. So some of those will be recognized within FY '27. But really, you're looking at a full realization in FY '28 for a full annualization. What I would though, and as I said in my prepared remarks, in FY '27, the in-year savings, we do expect to be offset as we annualized over the materially reduced corporate bonus and share-based compensation, and that's about half of the actual expectations we have for savings in FY '27.

Now in normal course of business, we don't expect those items to actually be around, right, have the same magnitude of impact. So that's really where you look at FY '28 and you say, okay, that would be a full annualization of the savings. So that's how to kind of think of FY '27 and the exit rate savings. Like look, we are laser-focused. And just to be absolutely clear, we are laser-focused on running as efficiently as we can.

I think us taking up our target from $150 million to $200 million is a sign of that intent. And so we're certainly following forward and excited about those savings. But again, the full impact will really be in FY '28. And the second part of your question, Rajat?

I just a quick follow-up for Keith. .

Sure.

Yes. So I was just curious like you've had a chance to look at the portfolio a little bit. Would you consider taking a look at just your store down as well? And maybe think about pruning the number of locations you need, the density you need. I'm curious like how that would fit into how you're thinking about rationalizing and just creating more efficiency.

It's Enrique, again. As we go through our strategic planning process here with he's new leadership, it's certainly something that we're going to be assessing look, we're going to go through a strategic plan outlook. We're going to come back.

And as Keith mentioned in his prepared remarks, we're going to come back at you appropriate time and communicate what those longer-term objectives or what the goals are and the key underpinnings of that strategy. So at the current moment, I think that a lot is on the table. And that's something that we'll be assessing as part of the strategy. Understood.

Our next question comes from Sharon Zackfia with William Blair.

I guess as you think about kind of improving affordability and clearly taking this GPU hit currently. Are you also kind of considering maybe relaxing some of CarMax standards, and I don't mean on the mechanical side, but on the cosmetic [ ablumishment ] side, is there an opportunity to sell a few cars with gain your modest scratches, where it might be more affordable to the consumer and could be clearly disclosed, given that most of the research is done online.

Yes, Sharon, thank you for the question. Certainly, if you look over the past year, we have taken what we internally call, but I think everyone kind of externally knows as well, like ValueMaxcars, so our older cars. We've taken the mix of our Value Max cars up pretty considerably this year, which is really a signed towards like we recognize, as Tom mentioned, pricing is key, affordability is key. And so that's one way of thinking of us meeting the customer where they want to be met on price is just increasing our mix of Value Max.

I think at the same time, taking a harder look at what -- how exactly can we even better do that is something that is part of our strategy, we're going to consider. Because clearly, over the past year, sales have not been where we want them to be. And so we need to consider all potential levers when it comes to to go into market. I think the one thing that we will not change though is absolutely the overall relevant quality standards that we have and that we're known for CarMax is known for a quality car and that will continue.

But there's probably items around the edges that we can take a hard to look at and make sure that we meet today's customers' demands today, right?

And Enrique, can I follow up? I know Keith's been there for like a minute, but is there any kind of time frame when we should expect kind of the strategic plan and then some maybe more concrete benchmarks on SG&A per car and things like that?

Yes. You're right. Keith has been here in a minute. And so we'll be -- we have our planning sessions that are underway here, and that will take we'll start doing those over the next quarter here. I think in June, you'll probably start to see some headlines maybe. I don't expect by June, there will be a full strategic path forward. But in June, you'll start to get a sense of where we're going. And then certainly after that -- shortly after that, I would expect that we'd have a strong point of view on where we're going and the key metrics that go along with that and our outlook for the future, which we're really excited about. .

Our next question comes from Scott Ciccarelli with Truist.

So 2 strategic questions, if I may. First, on sales. If price reductions in a $300 GPU drop were to accelerate comps to the positive range, would you expect it to push it even further because it's working? Or is there a floor on GPU levels that you're kind of thinking about -- and then secondly, on the SG&A side, it sounds like you have an expectation to improve the customer experience, especially with online transactions. But can you help us reconcile like you're also expecting OpEx pretty significantly and presumably some of those things cost money.

Yes. Maybe just to start with SG&A. And so we have increased our target, right, from $150 million to $160 million to $200 million. and we'll continue to assess this at the right number. I think the key point here is that it's critical that we balance our cost reduction goals with our ambitions to grow the business, right? And to your point, there's a little bit of tension between the 2. And I fully expect as part of our strategic planning deliberations, that's going to be a topic, right? We want to make sure we're running as efficiently as possible, but we also want to make sure that we're actually funding the business appropriately, and that may be reallocating certain resources at may be producing certain resources and in certain areas, perhaps increasing resources, right?

But that's going to be a key point of attention as we build out our strategy in moving forward. And then when it comes to price, I think the other lever to consider, right, that we're always focused on, but I think we'll take on heightened importance is COGS and reducing our box and logistics costs. Because when you do that, you actually then have multiple choices ahead of you. you can either just take it straight and give it to the customer. You can take it to margin to help offset some of that pressure or you can do a combination of the 2. And that's really something that we're laser focused on kind of moving forward. And that certainly will be a key tenet of our strategy moving forward as well.

Scott, I'm going to build on what Enrique that. In my past experience, becoming a more efficient business and lowering SG&A, it doesn't come at the expense of a great customer experience. You can actually improve quality, leverage technology and become a more efficient business at the same time. I think that's what we're going to be very focused on spending time with the team in the stores there's a number of opportunities for us to, again, make it easier for us to serve our customers and give a better experience for our customers to put in store online more efficiently. So we have done that before and looking forward to working with the team to do it again.

Our next question comes from Daniela Haigian with Morgan Stanley.

Keith, congratulations on the role. Looking forward to seeing what you and the team will accomplish here. So I appreciate the overview on goals and understand we'll have to wait until June for the full strategic update, but I guess in the first 90 to 100 days here, what are the specific changes or low-hanging fruit that you've prioritized to simplify that digital experience and improve conversion? And what are, I guess, areas or metrics that we can track against those goals.

Well, thanks for the question. Again, been here 4 weeks, which has been an amazing experience has been comment it in the stores in the office and with the teams. And so I'm really enjoying learning about the car industry and understanding our strengths. And I guess I'll start there because I think the company has made great long-term investments in the digital platform and the geographic footprint. And the thing that we're focusing on is how do you connect that digital innovation with physical retail to create something that's really powerful that we can leverage to drive growth.

The team right now is incredibly focused on the customer experience, particularly in digital, and understanding how we can more efficiently move customers through the funnel, produce friction. And to one of the earlier questions, like if it's taking us 10 clicks to do something, how can we do it in 7 or 5, really understanding what are the features and benefits that matter most. And so really making sure that we're driving customer acquisition, but then also more effectively moving customers through the experience, both online and in and stores. In regards to specific metrics, I think we're going to have to come back to you once we have a clearer view on the long-term strategy because the metrics that are going to be most important in this business has to be aligned to those outcomes. So I don't know if Enrique you want to add anything else?

No, I think that's absolutely correct. And again, in June, maybe some signals in terms of where we're going, due is really not that far away, but I think thereafter is when we'll come back with kind of point of view on our strategy, the metrics to hold this accountable by that we'll hold ourselves accountable to. And again, we're really, really excited about where we are and our path forward to you. .

Our next question comes from David Bellinger with Mizuho.

Keith, congrats on the new seat. Two areas where we were looking for a bit more detail. First one on conversion. I know you just talked about this a second ago, but how do you assess the level and quality of traffic that's coming into your site and your app and just how you benchmark against others in the sector on conversion? And then second piece on vehicle inventories.

Looking at your app, you've got 55,000 cars in there right now. that's been as high as 60,000 or 70,000. So as you implement some of these new tools, even some AI tools, is there an opportunity to operate the business with simply less inventory while still giving that core customer, the breadth and depth that they need.

Yes, I think on the inventory piece, I think, look, certainly is a key aspect that we need to consider and we need to balance what is the right amount of inventory kind of by market how quickly can we get it to customers. And I expect that will be a key component of our strategic deliberations as well, making sure we have the right amount of inventory. Is it less? Is it more?

We'll end up seeing what that looks like? And in regards to conversion, I think as well, that's going to be a key point of view. Like this past quarter, I would tell you, conversion was relatively flat. We're selling opportunities were actually relatively flat as well. Our web traffic was up like 14% this past quarter. And for the first time in 5 quarters, we saw selling opportunities actually relatively flat as opposed to being down year-over-year. So positive movement there. And again, conversion was relatively flat. But I think the items that Keith has pointed out in terms of getting the customer through our website to buy a car in an easier way in a faster way, undoubtedly is going to help our conversion rate when folks land on the website. And so pretty immediately, he's been here a hot minute, but already identifying, I think, the key areas of opportunity for us moving forward. And look, our goal is to drive selling opportunities and to also drive conversion as well.

Our next question comes from Jeff Link with Stephens Inc.

Question, Tom, this is probably going to be your last call, I would get the benefit of your wisdom. I was wondering if maybe you could just give a little -- any granularity or color on just as you drop prices, obviously, you didn't drop every price, $207, some you drop, some you might even have increased. Any color on where you do see more elasticity in terms of cohorts, age of car where you're getting more traction versus where you're getting less or where it's not worth it to try to play the price game.

I think Enrique talked earlier about kind of optimizing the first stage he talked earlier about optimizing the price and cost differences. As I mentioned, clearly, when we lowered price, it changed our -- changed the trajectory of our sales. And as you just rightly pointed out, when we say our margins are down $200, they're not down $200 on every car. You see all of our cars practically end to [ 998 ]. That means we're more likely to drop a car 1,000 -- like 20% of the cars $1,000 to achieve the $200 price drop. And we are very analytical about that and how we approach it and do it in a way that we think will maximize the the change in sales. The backdrop of that is we have to run a profitable business. And as Enrique mentioned, some of the things on cost we felt like lower the prices, get sales moving in the right direction and then pay for it by taking cost out of the business. And I think that will be a theme for this team going forward as well, which is figure out how to grow the company. There's no reason we shouldn't be able to grow the business with our current footprint and do it in a profitable way. And that's a combination of pricing, margins, CAF, all the ancillary products that we sell, but look, I think it was great to come out of the quarter with a change in sales trajectory and we believe that price was a factor there.

And then just a quick follow-up and maybe, Keith, if you could chime in on your thoughts. I mean, Tom, if I think back, call it, when the world was really all brick-and-mortar. I think the thought -- the strategy was you're trying to have a used car lot that was a little more customer-friendly than your typical use car [indiscernible] lend itself to selling newer cars. And it seems like there's less competition, relatively speaking, in the -- your Valumax. I wonder is culturally, would you -- are you more willing now to explore that 7-, 8-year-old 9-year-old sale and kind of mixed the person who's coming in, looking for that 3-year-old get versus the person that's coming in, looking for the 8-year-old Ford Explorer. .

Again, we're a demand-driven business, and Enrique mentioned earlier about internally, we call it ValuMax. It's really just an older car with higher miles, but we want to keep it at the same quality standard. I believe Enrique inventory is around 50%, Value Max, that was 15%, 20%, 10 or 15 years ago. So...

Yes. And again, this year, we have absolutely increased our sale -- inventory and sales of older cars to drive -- to meet the customer where they want to be met on affordability to help support sales. But at the same time, Jeff, clearly, overall, if you take a look at the entire year, we're not where we want to be, right?

And so I think it's -- we need to continue to assess from a sales standpoint. So we need to continue to assess what is the right level of inventory? What is the age of inventory and the price points, and that will be part of our deliberation certainly.

Yes. And Jeff, it's a double-edged sword. You buy older cars with higher miles, they cost more to recondition and they take longer to recondition. So it's not -- as Keith said it earlier, it's the right car in the right place they're at the right price. And so it's a combination of those variables. .

Our next question comes from Michael Montani with Evercore ISI.

I wanted to ask if I could, John, if you could unpack a bit more some of the trends that we're seeing on the credit side with respect to roll rates and both in terms of -- on a like-for-like basis of credit quality and applicants as well as given some of the mix changes that have occurred, maybe towards more [indiscernible] of year 2?

Sure. Yes, I appreciate it. The questions, Michael. With regard to roll rates and delinquencies, I think across the kind of the auto lending industry, lenders would say customers maybe absent exception of maybe the highest credit quality, the 800-plus FICO they certainly are feeling the stress of affordability, inflation, et cetera. So those customers from mid-Tier 1 all the way down to deep subprime our feeling distress.

Delinquencies are higher, roll rates are higher. And for us as a lender, our job is to support them, help to service them and then set accordingly in preparation for that. And I think we've done that over the last -- at the end of Q3, we've hit our losses right on the market in Q3 and Q4. So we feel good about where we sit. But there is a stressed customer out there, and we are thoughtful on that. That being said, again, it's a highly profitable business. We provide a fantastic car and a fantastic experience. So that's why we are willing to go into the Tier 2 space, and we are growing that space. you've got loans value of $3,000, $3,500 on top of the Tier 1 business.

So we look forward to growing that. So we have shifted our focus Obviously, we will always take all the Tier 1 volume, but we're growing in Tier 2. We signaled that. We're 43% penetration this quarter. We anticipate that accelerating over the course of FY '27. We've made market changes to grow that across the last year, including Q4. And so we will look forward to booking those -- that Tier 2 volume. We were approximately less than 10% of Tier 2 a year ago. We were closer to 20% in this quarter of Tier 2 and actually exiting the quarter were actually a little higher than 20%. So we look forward to taking on that volume, servicing that customer reserving accordingly, nailing that and obviously generating more income for CarMax.

Our next question comes from John Babcock with Barclays.

I just have two quick ones here. I guess just first of all, on capital spending, you talked about how that's going to be down over the last couple of years. Are you able to provide any color in terms of where you're reducing spending, whether that's on the maintenance side or the growth side?

Yes. It's actually a little bit of both. And so number one, on the growth side, we're taking new stores down as I talked about in my prepared remarks. So that's one of the drivers. At the same time, from an off-site reconditioning and action standpoint, we have spent the past several years buying the actual real estate when it comes to those sites. And so what you see this year is a little less on real estate spend as well.

And then overall, just for our stores as well, just a little bit more heightened focus just a little bit there, a little more having focused on prioritization of resources there. So you kind of see it across the board really.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then also, just given everything that's going on in the Middle East right now, I was wondering, I know you've talked about or in pricing and marketing spend and everything else you're doing to really try to drive more traffic, drive more consumer interest in CarMax. Just kind of curious though, I mean, how have the Middle East tensions impacted what you're seeing? And do you think that's going to have a notable impact on your overall year-over-year growth trends? Or do you think that you can grow through despite that?

That's a great question. What I know is what I point you to really is more of the industry. right, for the month of March. And in the month of March, the industry actually supported by a pretty strong tax season was pretty healthy. We're not going to talk about our intra-quarter performance. I'd tell you the industry is help is actually pretty healthy coming out of March or into March. And I'd tell you, moving forward, yes, I do think it's something that we need to watch between inflationary pressures between what has now been on record, the lowest consumer sentiment on record here. So it's something we're watching, right?

But at the same time, we are focused on what we can control and what we can control especially given now that we have a much more dynamic approach to margin management is we can react to what's happening in the market pretty quickly. And so we're excited to have that approach a little bit more dynamic, as I mentioned. And we'll control what we can control.

So just to add one more thing there. What I've been really impressed about is how the team has been talking about what's happening in the market. And so thinking about on the supply side as well, talking about face have more -- bring more EVs inventory, do we bring in more gas efficient vehicles as well, too. So constantly thinking about what does the customer want and how we make sure we can deliver that to them to drive sales.

Our next question comes from Chris Pierce with Needham.

If we just fast forward a year from now, and we were looking at would we -- I just want to sort of understand, is it lower prices, lower SG&A per unit and structurally lower retail GPU? Or are there levers you can pull on the retail GPU side of the world as well? And I'm just sort of asking because you've got a customer being aggressive on at a customer, a competitor being aggressive on financing rates to customers. Like what would happen if that competitor got aggressive on pricing as well? I'm just sort of curious how you can kind of could you pull this lever again and drive growth again? Or is this like a onetime lever and retail GPU needs to sort of move higher over time?

Yes, I don't think it's a onetime [indiscernible]. Look, I think a year from now, yes, we are laser-focused on affordability for customers that does move the needle. And so we need to now go back and figure out how to deliver on that. And as I mentioned earlier, certainly, a focus on COGS logistics cost is going to take a heightened focus in our strategic planning process because, again, that is a lever that you can either give to the customer you can either take the margin or you can do a combination of those 2 things.

That is a very powerful lever. And it's one where we think we have opportunity and 1 that we're laser-focused on. But what I think is nonnegotiable is having being more price competitive. And we've actually seen that. We do track our relative price competitiveness on pretty much on a weekly basis here. And what we have seen is that, that price competitiveness has gotten better, and pretty much in line with what we expected for the quarter. And so we've been pleased with that movement, and you saw the results.

And Chris, I'll just add to -- as Enrique mentioned about, you talk about the retail side and the retail margin, we've signaled and clearly have shown in what we're doing in the CAF side of it, there is a clear opportunity in the finance margin. and we're going to go after that. We're excited about the EPP product and the added margin there. So we look at it holistically, we're going to look at it dynamically, and I think we can really support in those 2 buckets as well.

Okay. And then just Enrique help me kind of if I think about logistics as part of retail GPU, what kind of like lever are we talking about? Is that a couple of hundred dollars or like just kind of bucket it a little bit. So if you did decide to take that back and pass some on how much of a lever is that on retail GPU to the extent you can say?

Yes. No, I mean our overall spend on logistics is north of that, right? So -- but in terms of like where the actual dollars were coming from, logistics is an opportunity we know just the actual labor that goes into reconditioning and all of the costs associated with that parts, everything is an area of opportunity.

But there -- we believe there's plenty of opportunity there to further increase and improve our price competitiveness.

Our last question comes from John Healy with North Coast Research.

Great. Keith, wanted to get a big picture question. I know we've talked a lot about the retail approach. But your view on the financing business? Are you fans of it? Are you liking the approach to kind of maybe reach down a little bit deeper in that category? And then secondly, just as you look at the capital structure of the business, I always felt that CarMax is unique in that it doesn't floor a lot of its inventory or much of it all.

Is that something that you'd consider to do to maybe take advantage of maybe raising some capital to maybe recapitalize or buying a lot of stock? Or how would you think about maybe even the the need to have CAF and maybe trying to be creative with that asset as maybe some other entities have recently done. So would just love to get your thoughts if that is something that's also on the table for you guys?

Thanks, John, and a pretty wide range of question. I'll take the first part, and then I'll let Enrique talk about kind of capital structure. I was with the cat team last week, and it was absolutely fantastic to spend time with John and his team to see just the caliber of talent we have there and how we're thinking about the business. And as we build our strategy moving forward, which we'll come back and talk more about in June, it's really understanding all the levers we can pull to make this a growth business and drive return for shareholders. And so CAF is going to play a key piece in that. That's going to be in the lending environment. It's also going to be in the other products that we can sell. And then how does that pair into our overall selling strategy for the business and giving the right price, right cars, improving logistics, too. And so CAF is going to be a critical lever for profit growth for this company moving forward, and we're kind of really kind of see how it fits into the broader strategy overall. But I'll let Enrique talk about capital structure. .

Yes, a couple of things. And certainly, the capital structure, reporting CAF funding and all that is very dynamic, and it's a very exciting area for us. I think, number one, on for floor plan the revolver that we have is the most efficient use of capital when it comes to funding the CAF business.

And so I would not expect that to change. What I'd tell you, though, is from an overall cap funding opportunity, we are looking at -- as we've talked about before, at alternative funding vehicles, right? So last year, we executed our first residual sale, which allowed us to have a gain on sale in the third quarter. So that's something that we intend on continuing to lever. We are really pleased with the execution of that deal and the recession that we had in the marketplace in that deal.

But alternatively, we're also looking at different levers, too, such as a [indiscernible] sales. Is that an opportunity, right? And there's multiple ways to access capital to support CAF and we're exploring them all. We have a strong portfolio of banks and capital providers that we've been dealing with for years and years that are supportive of us. We also had some new potential partners as well out there that we're exploring those options with as well. So I would expect as the year unfolds here, you'll see us kind of exploring new ways to find the gas business.

Great. I think operate last question. So thank you for joining the call today for your questions and for your support, and I look forward to getting to know all of you better in the quarters to come, and we will talk again next quarter.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. You may now disconnect.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, David Lowenstein, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Nicki. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our fiscal 2026 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. I'm here today with Tom Folliard, Interim Executive Chairman of the Board; David McCreight, Interim President and CEO; Enrique Mayor-Mora, Executive Vice President and CFO; and Jon Daniels, Executive Vice President, CarMax Auto Finance.

Let me remind you our statements today that are not statements of historical fact including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company's future business plans, prospects and financial performance are forward-looking statements we make pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current knowledge, expectations and assumptions and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations.

In providing projections and other forward-looking statements, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update them. For additional information on important factors and risks that could affect these expectations, please see our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning, our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q previously filed with the SEC.

Please note, in addition to our earnings release, we have also prepared a quarterly investor presentation, and both documents are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Should you have any follow-up questions after the call, please free to contact our Investor Relations department at (804) 747-0422, extension 7865.

Lastly, let me thank you in advance for asking only 1 question and getting back in the queue for more follow-ups. Tom?

Thank you, David, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Today, I'm going to provide some perspective on our leadership changes and CEO search. I'll then turn the call over to David, who will review our initial observations and the actions we are taking in response. After that, Enrique and Jon will speak to our third quarter results before we open the line for your questions.

As many of you know, I've been part of CarMax for more than 30 years. Over that time, we we've developed a beloved brand with national scale, unmatched physical and digital infrastructure and an award-winning culture. However, recent results have been unacceptable and did not reflect the company's potential. As a result, even though the Board was already working on a succession plan, we determined that more immediate change was required and that direct involvement from David and myself was the best approach to strengthen the business in the near term. The Board has been searching for a permanent CEO with urgency. We are seeking a proven leader who can drive sales, maximize the benefits of our omnichannel experience, strengthen our brand, improve operations and champion our culture. Conversations are underway, and we have some promising candidates.

What is most important is that the next CEO captures the tremendous opportunity that we have in front of us. As Interim Executive Chair of the Board, I'm focused on supporting David and the leadership team. David is in Richmond 5 days a week, and I'm spending a significant amount of time here myself. We are operating with a new sense of urgency to drive the business forward. I want to thank David for stepping into the interim President and CEO role. As you know, he has served on our Board since 2018. David has more than 20 years of executive leadership experience at prominent retail brands in highly competitive and fast-paced markets. He has led several successful brand transformations new omnichannel strategies and growth initiatives for digitally native brands. What made him a great addition to our Board has also been a tremendous asset in this transition.

And before I turn it over to David, I also want to thank Bill Nash for his more than 30 years of service with CarMax. David?

Thanks, Tom, and good morning, everyone. I'm honored to serve as the Interim President and CEO at this important juncture in CarMax's history. While our top priority is to find a terrific next leader, in the interim, Tom and I are committed to lead and take the steps needed to set up the next CEO for success.

After 3 decades in the retail industry and having led multiple companies through turnarounds, I am familiar with the rigor and critical thinking required to succeed. The good news is CarMax already possesses many of the vital attributes needed to turn the business and regain momentum for growth including a well-known and trusted brand, a strong culture, supported by a base of 28,000 talented associates and an expansive digital and physical infrastructure, including over 250 premium locations that put us near 85% of the U.S. population. Despite these advantages and after decades of industry leadership, based on recent results, it is clear CarMax needs change.

And while it has been only a few weeks in our interim roles, here are some of our observations. Prices. Our average selling prices have drifted upward and appear to be less attractive to customers. To ensure that CarMax is a preferred choice, we will work to shrink the gap between our offering and the marketplace. We are lowering margins and supporting this action with marketing spend while also building out more effective ways to communicate our value to the consumer. We are also comprehensively reviewing all the costs associated with bringing a car to market. We're going to find ways to eliminate the unproductive while maintaining our reputation for having a high-quality fleet.

Around the consumer, we need to bring an even sharper focus on the customer throughout the organization. In guiding decisions, we will reawaken our intellectual curiosity and challenge long-held institutional beliefs as we work to discover the most important elements to the customer in closing the sale. We will emphasize customer inside decision-making rooted in fact-based consumer research.

Digital. We have the opportunity to incorporate a clear and more effective selling voice in our digital experience. While we have spent several years building out capabilities for customers to shop, how they want and where they want, we must now focus our energies on making the digital shopping experience easier and shift our digital voice from one that earnestly delivers abundant information to one that focuses on delivering sales. This will drive conversion and further improve customer satisfaction, just as we do so successfully in our stores.

SG&A. Similar to our approach in tackling the cost of bringing our cars to market, we believe our expense structure is too high. It is clear that we have the opportunity to leverage our technological platforms and process enhancements to reduce our spend. We are committed to sharpening our business model and eliminating unproductive costs. And in just a moment, Enrique will provide a progress update on the decisive actions we are taking to reduce at least $150 million in SG&A.

Profitability. We will more aggressively tap into opportunities in the selling experience to enhance our profitability. We're excited about the outstanding growth potential we have across CAF and our ancillary products. You will hear more from John today about our progress in full spectrum lending as well as the steps we are taking to capture incremental flow-through in our extended protection plan business.

Culture. We've always been a company intensely focused on operations. But with the advent of disruptive technologies, we now need to reignite the entrepreneurial spirit that made CarMax the industry leader for decades. Simply put, we will move faster and operate leaner while taking smart risks. We are optimistic that our immediate pricing and marketing actions will improve our sales performance, but pressure earnings in the near term. As we consider the business model more holistically moving forward, we anticipate that earnings pressure will be offset by unit growth, expanded profitability in CAF and ancillary products and through [indiscernible] reductions in SG&A and COGS.

Tom, the board and I believe that CarMax has many of the requisite attributes for a successful turnaround. We are confident the actions we're taking will begin to strengthen performance while the Board identifies the right permanent CEO to lead CarMax for the future. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Enrique to discuss our third quarter financial performance in more detail. Enrique?

Thank you, David. During the quarter, we delivered total sales of $5.8 billion, down 6.9% compared to last year, reflecting lower volume. In our retail business, total unit sales declined 8% and used unit comps were down 9%. Pressure performance across our age 0 to 5 inventory was partially offset by increased sales of older, higher-mileage vehicles, which represented over 40% of our sales for the quarter, an increase of approximately 5 percentage points compared to the second quarter and last year's third quarter.

Average selling price was $26,400 a year-over-year increase of $230 per unit. The increase was due to higher acquisition costs driven by year-over-year increase in market prices, partially offset by the increase in -- toward older, higher-mileage vehicles. Wholesale unit sales were down 6.2% versus the third quarter last year. Average wholesale selling price declined by $40 per unit to $8,100. We bought approximately 238,000 vehicles during the quarter, down 12% from last year. We purchased approximately 208,000 vehicles from our consumers with more than half of those buys coming through our online instant appraisal experience.

With the support of our Edmunds sales team, we sourced the remaining approximately 30,000 vehicles through dealers, which is down 9% from last year. Third quarter net earnings per diluted share was $0.43 versus $0.81 a year ago. This quarter was impacted by $0.08 of restructuring expenses related primarily to our CEO change and the workforce reductions in our customer experience centers. Total gross profit was $590 million, down 13% from last year's third quarter. Used retail margin of $379 million decreased by 11%, driven by lower volume and profit per used unit of $2,235 in line with historical averages, though down approximately $70 per unit from last year's record high. Wholesale vehicle margin of $115 million decreased by 17% from a year ago, with lower volume and wholesale gross product per unit of $899, a decline of approximately $120 year-over-year. Both wholesale volume and margin were impacted by steep depreciation.

Other gross profit was $96 million, down 16% from a year ago. This was driven primarily by the impact of lower retail unit volume on EPP. CarMax Auto Finance income was $175 million, up 9% over last year. Jon will provide detail on CAF's growth in a few moments. On the SG&A front, expenses for the third quarter were $581 million, up 1% from the prior year, driven by our previously communicated investment in marketing as we supported our new brand positioning launch and the restructuring expenses that I previously noted. These were partially offset by a reduction in the corporate bonus of growth.

As David noted, we are on track to achieve at least $150 million in exit rate savings by the end of fiscal year '27. We took our first significant step toward these savings this quarter with an approximately 30% reduction in our CEC workforce. This reduction was supported by our continued process and technology enhancements which are making our associates more efficient as well as empowering our customers to perform more of their shopping activities themselves.

Turning to capital allocation. During the third quarter, we continued our share repurchases, buying back 4.6 million shares for a total expenditure of $202 million. As of the end of the quarter, we had approximately $1.36 billion of our repurchase authorization remaining. Looking forward, I'll cover 2 items. We are optimistic the actions of lowering margins and increasing marketing will improve our sales performance trends, but may pressure near-term earnings. We expect marketing spend on a total unit basis to be up year-over-year in the fourth quarter, though to a lesser degree than during the third quarter, with a focus on investing acquisition to drive buys and sales.

Secondly, we expect pressure on our service margins in the fourth quarter due to seasonal sales and as we annualized over cost coverage leverage taken last year.

At this time, I will now turn the call over to Jon to provide more detail on CarMax Auto Finance and our continuing focus on full credit spectrum expansion. Jon?

Thanks, Enrique, and good morning, everyone. During the third quarter, CarMax Auto Finance originated $1.8 billion, resulting in sales penetration of 42.6% net of 3-day payoffs versus 43.1% last year. Weighted average contract rate charged to new customers was 11% versus 11.2% last quarter, as we continue to adjust consumer rates in reaction to the broader interest rate environment. Third-party Tier 2 volume for which we collect a fee and Tier 3 volume for which we pay a fee combined for 24.9% of sales versus 24.4% last year. Weakness in Tier 2 application volume, along with the impact from CAF's expansion in the Tier 2 space was more than offset by growth from our Tier 3 partners.

CAF penetration continues to benefit from underwriting and pricing adjustments implemented since the beginning of the fiscal year, estimated to be 100 to 150 basis points in the quarter. However, this volume has been offset primarily by lower application volume in the prime credit segment, along with the aforementioned Tier 3 partner lender overperformance. CAF income for the quarter was $175 million, up $15 million from the same period last year. Included in the quarter is a $27 million gain on sale, along with an additional $5 million of servicing fees attributed to the closing of the 25-B deal in September. Note that while the gain on sale is fully recognized at the time of sale, servicing fee income will continue over the remaining life of the deal and will be proportional to the receivable volume remaining.

Net interest margin on the portfolio was flat year-over-year and down to 6.2% from 6.6% last quarter and largely reflects the higher margin receivables removed from the balance sheet as a part of 25-B. CAF had a loan loss provision of $73 million resulting in a total reserve balance of $475 million or 2.87% of auto loans held for investment. Losses observed during the quarter were in line with our expectations upon which we based our reserve at the end of Q2. With regard to growing the CAF business, I'm immensely proud of our accomplishments today. Over the last 18 months, we have greatly expanded our funding options, including this quarter's off-balance sheet transaction, which have been critical prerequisites to this growth. In addition, we continue to add underwriting capabilities and modeling refinements that will support profitable expansion.

Separately, I am also excited about the significant future earnings potential from both our redesigned MaxCare plan which focuses on mechanical coverage and our new MaxCare Plus plan, which focuses on cosmetic protection. These products have already migrated from test phase to pilot in multiple markets, we expect to achieve near nationwide rollout during Q1 of FY '27.

Now I'd like to turn the call back over to David. David?

Thank you, Enrique. Thank you, Jon. Today, we outlined our initial observations and near-term priorities to drive improvement, shrinking the price gap between our offering in the marketplace with a stronger focus on customer experience, increasing digital monetization capabilities, reducing costs, enhancing profitable growth drivers and improving the speed of decision making. And while we are realistic about the near-term challenges, CarMax's competitive foundation remains strong.

We have a trusted brand, national scale that is difficult to replicate leading omnichannel capabilities and growing digital infrastructure, a strong financing platform in CAF and an award-winning culture. Our execution has not matched the potential of these assets, but that's what's changing. Tom, the board and I are focused on strengthening performance and creating a solid foundation for the permanent CEO to build upon. We appreciate your continued confidence in CarMax and are committed to being transparent about our progress.

With that, we'll open the line for questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Sharon Zackfia with William Blair.

Good to hear you again, Tom, on a conference call, and welcome David to the world of CarMax conference calls. Yes. I guess maybe if you could give some color on the magnitude of the GPU reset that you're looking to see here in the February quarter? And then as you look at the business kind of, I guess, with a fresher perspective, are there any customer cohorts that you can delve into where you think somehow CarMax has become a bit less competitive or a bit less attractive? And what's the game plan to win those customers back?

Yes. Sharon, it's Enrique. Let me jump in. The margin reductions which are going to be supported with acquisition spend on marketing will be meaningful in our design just to narrow the gap that we talked about with the broader marketplace, and we're optimistic that those can actually improve our retail sales trends into the quarter. But they're big enough for us to talk about. And we're going to see how they roll out. We're going to see the impact within this quarter. And then when we have our year-end call in April, we'll provide insight and an outlook on what those margin reductions and marketing spend increase mean to us.

Yes. Sharon, this is Jon. I'll jump into your customer cohort question. Yes, I think there's obviously a places across the spectrum that we're looking to improve and grow sales. One in particular that stands out for me is if you look at maybe the higher FICO segments, we mentioned in the prepared remarks sort of in CAF and the Tier 2 section that maybe 650 to 750 space feels like we've lost volume there. We can track that through application volume coming through the door and then progression further on. So a lot of speculation around what that could be. Certainly, we're going to look at all things.

David mentioned a number of things pricing. Obviously, we try and keep our rates competitive. Just overall, the offering that we provide the consumer. But I think that's one spot in particular that I think there's a lot of chance to recapture and fuel our growth.

Can I ask a follow-up? You have a competitor who will be kind of lowering finance rates proactively in the current quarter to reinvest some of the -- their GPU to the customer. I think historically, you followed the market on finance rates. Would there be something you're willing to do on interest rates to be -- to kind of weaponize that a bit more to get a more conversion?

Sure. I appreciate that question. Yes, I think we're always keeping the pulse on the markets, looking at how we compare to, obviously, credit unions and banks and what have you and certainly competitors as well. So the degree we can measure that. Yes, I'm not going to speak to what they're going to do. But we think our APRs are quite competitive with the Fed making the moves that they've had to make, we will adjust accordingly. We always have a test-and-learn methodology there. I'm not going to say we're going to try and get further ahead of the market. But I still think in maybe the space, there is a gap in interest rates that still exist, although it might be closing, but I think it's the broader offering question.

How do we compare from an interest rate standpoint, certainly, it may be term but obviously couple that with what's the price of the car and all the other fees associated with that. So I think the bigger offering picture is the one that's really going to be the focus here.

And Sharon, what I'd say, looking at it a bit more broadly as well is that the reductions in SG&A. So these levers that we've talked about, the reductions in SG&A, the focus on COGS, growth opportunities and CAF full spectrum as well as EPP products that Jon talked about and we're happy to elaborate on. Those are all levers that bring to bear and ability to be more competitive in the marketplace. At the same time, we're reevaluating, as David talked about, reevaluating how we go to market, right?

And how we go to market, as Jon mentioned, it's the kind of cars, the price of the cars. It's how we communicate on our website. It's all those items. And so we do think we have levers at this point that are lining up to be materially more competitive and to go to market with.

Our next question comes from Scot Ciccarelli with Truist.

So historically, I'm going to take another shot at this GPU question. Historically, I believe the management teams have talked about needing to lower prices by about $500 per unit to see a real inflection in the sales pace. So that would obviously be meaningful to use Enrique's words. So is that in the range of how you guys are thinking about reducing your GPU?

Yes. What I'd say is I don't think we've said $500 is a meaningful or a needed amount to drive sales. We do price elasticity testing. We're always in the market doing price elasticity testing. I'd tell you the number to move sales is well south of that.

And in terms of what we're doing this quarter, look, we're trying different things. We are going out. It was again, sizable for us to talk about on this call. We're going to test the impact on sales, again, in combination with an increase in marketing to kind of get a boost there overall. And we're going to report out in the fourth quarter call in April and communicate what we saw in the market. We're optimistic it's going to change the trend in sales. But I wouldn't say that $500 is what we need to move sales, if that's what you're saying.

Got it. And then just a follow-up, if I can. I guess it's a bigger picture question for Tom and David. What do you think CarMax represents to consumers today like in late 2025, given some of the alternatives that are out there? And where do you think you would like to end up in, call it, 2 to 3 years?

Hey there, nice to talk to you, David here. We think many of the things that CarMax has meant to the customers in the past can continue to be. We believe we're a leading used car destination for customers. We've invested a lot of money and time and effort in building and broadening those capabilities to be able to let them shop where they want and how they want. And ultimately, we believe we're the most trusted brand out there. The difference is in where we've been and the performance we need to adjust to and adjust our model towards getting to and have confidence we're going to be able to get there in the near term.

Scot, it's Tom. Good to talk to you again. From my perspective, and I'm a little biased. Over the last 30 years, we've built an iconic brand, and I don't think that's changed at all. I think the consumer knows what we represent. They know the quality that we represent. I think our associates in our stores and in our CECs and across the board are completely engaged and ready to serve the customer. We've spent a lot of money investing so that we could serve the customer however they want to be served, whether it's online or in our stores.

And I just think we need to activate that. We need to do a better job of presenting that to the customer upfront. But in terms of the brand and the strength and the quality of our vehicles, all that stuff is fully intact, and I think it's the basis for us moving forward and a basis from which we can grow again.

We will move next with Craig Kennison with Baird.

On the SG&A topic, what is the baseline SG&A from which you expect to cut $150 million? Just curious so that we can track your performance against that goal?

Yes. No, absolutely. And so when we talked about our SG&A goal of $150 million reduction, it's a reduction of SG&A opportunities. That's really comparing it to last year, if you will. So if you want to use -- our base was $2.5 billion, right, roughly. And so that's what we're using as a baseline, and those are the reductions that we're going after.

And that is an exit run rate as of Q4 of fiscal '27?

Exactly.

Our next question comes from Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan.

Thanks for the candid assessment on the prepared remarks. I had a follow-up on just the margin versus same-store expectation. Can you give us like any sort of quarterly read because we've got the sense that last quarter also, there was some effort to become more competitive. Anything you can give us in terms of like early reads in December and how those actions have already started to show some results? Or is it still very early? Or have you not implemented them yet? And what kind of like equation are we looking at in terms of dollar versus same-store volume trade-off, dollar GPU versus same for volume trade-off. Any more insights you can give us on how you see this equation playing out? And I have a very quick follow-up.

Rajat. So we just rolled out the price changes. So it is too early to provide any kind of insight into that. And again, we will provide a view into that in our Q4 call, but we literally just rolled out those changes.

They're underway.

Yes, they're underway. Actually, they're not, that's a good point. They're not fully rolled out. They're underway, but we just started this week. So...

Is there hope to go back to share gains or positive unit growth and what kind of the expected outcome in the near term?

Yes. Look, like we are optimistic that this lever that we're pulling. And again, it's really the combination, right, of having lower margins, lower prices out there, being more price competitive, supporting it with acquisition marketing right? So think of like paid search, other direct levers like that, like directly to support sales is going to change the trend of our performance. So we just reported a negative 9% comp. Last quarter was a little better than that, but not great. And our goal is to change the trend and to get the sales flywheel going, and that's what we're looking to do.

And at the same time, we're working really hard on getting other profitability metrics or levers, I should say, in place. And again, those things are SG&A reductions, COG reductions, ETP growth, capital spectrum, so CAF income growth over time. These are all levers that we're pulling because our goal is to drive sales over time, absolutely, and to drive earnings power over time as well.

Understood. Just a quick follow-up on CAF. It looks like, as you mentioned, like third-party Tier 3 penetration went up. Is this -- is there anything like any meaningful like tightening effort going on right now? I'm curious how those reserves will change. going forward once you go back to having more in-house Tier 3, Tier 2 type penetration? Or maybe like any color you can give us on this CAF provisions in the fourth quarter would be helpful as well.

Sure. Yes, I appreciate the question, Rajat. Yes, I don't think there's a tremendous story in the Tier 2, Tier 3. We always just provide the numbers and provide a little guidance at the delta there. But there's always swapping between maybe a Tier 2 lender that is choosing to be a little more aggressive or doing tightening. Again, they're going to make their own individual decisions versus the Tier 3 partner that, again, may be the recipient of that tightening higher upstream again, being a little looser on their side. So I don't think there's a meaningful story there, just to clarify, just really providing the numbers.

And ultimately, to your second question, I don't think that -- I wouldn't read much into that in terms of CAF provision. Again, we are, as we stated, very, very excited about our opportunity as we go down into the Tier 2 spectrum, just for a point to note, this is -- we were over 10% of the Tier 2 volume came to CAF this quarter we went after. And so we're really excited about that.

And as we continue to go further spectrum, we're generally operating in that higher 50% of Tier 2 but we think we can get the entirety of that credit spectrum as we methodically roll out refinements to our model. We're excited about the funding solutions we have in place. And so we will reserve for it accordingly, and we will enjoy the income and we will get there.

Our next question comes from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

Tom, welcome back to the calls. Look, this is going to be a potentially repetitive -- I want to make -- get this point out. So we're talking about pricing and be more aggressive in pricing here. For as long as I can remember, I [indiscernible] come back for some time now when you've done these pricing tests. And the message from CarMax has always been the same is that they really lower prices, that the net result has not been favorable. So I guess the long asked is we're talking about, once again, either testing or moving forward with lower prices, I think, lower GPUs. What's different this time? Why do you think this will -- this time around going to differ than in the past, which is actually going to drive better unit volume.

Yes, I think in the past, look, when we've lowered our prices, and we do price elasticity all the time, right, Brian we talked about that. I think the equation in the past has been you lower your prices and then when you're flowing through to the business, do you make enough money to offset the lower margin with increased sales, it absolutely drives sales, right?

The equation as well, it didn't always drive enough profit. I think the difference, absolutely right now, there's a clear difference. The clear difference is that we have strong levers that are now supporting to look at the business more holistically.

So again, think of the reduction in SG&A that aggressive test that we're going after. You think of COGS and the -- how aggressive we're going after cons, you think of EPP growth, you think of CAF full spectrum income, these are all levers that are going to offset that pressure we had seen when we looked solely at the impact of lowering prices. So there's absolutely a difference. And we're just looking at the business a bit more holistically, and we have those levers at hand here.

Yes. And Brian, I would just add that as Enrique mentioned, we've always talked about it in terms of total profitability. But when we do price changes, we definitely see some sales movement. And then we've always had kind of the guardrails around what total profitability is I would just tell you that our focus in the near term, given our current performance is to drive sales and to get things with in the other direction. The other thing to remember is when we say we're at lower prices of $100 or $200, it doesn't mean we're taking $100 across the board on cars. It's more like if we say $100, think of it as 10% of our cars are $1,000 or 5% of our car is $500. So it meaningfully impacts the trajectory of sales because of the way we execute price changes. But back to our near-term priority is to get things turned around and get sales moving in the other direction.

And then just a follow-up, sorry, David. But with regard to marketing, so you talked about, if I understand correctly, you stepped up marketing now, so to say, [indiscernible] on the gas, a little bit more. Is it -- when you think about it, is it more of the same? Or is CarMax really working on coming to market with a new marketing message?

Yes, good question. Thank you. So what we're doing is taking -- the new campaign was launched recently as the team took you through. And what we're focusing on now in the near term is sort of optimizing the campaign we have with the results and tests we have. So shifting things that are going into driving more conversion, messaging, perhaps some of the -- and dialing back perhaps some of the brand longer-term spend on it. But ultimately, we think the review and positioning of the campaign is really something for the new CEO who's going to align it with the new strategy, and we're working with the existing campaign and resources we have right now. But the team has been working to optimize the results based on media, based on geographies and based on messaging.

Our next question comes from Daniela Haigian with Morgan Stanley.

My first question is on that digital -- redefining the digital platform. what specifically within that needs to change to drive more of a selling experience? And how does that impact the operating cost structure with your store base? What would be early indicators of progress in that redefinition?

Yes. So I'll take the first part of the question first. We have worked very diligently and over the years to build the capability set. But we have not been as focused yet on the next stage, which is to make it easier.

Look, shopping online with us is not easy. We have ways to streamline it, and we have ways to make the digital selling voice really, just like our sales associates in the stores, make it easier to bring to get them to the ultimate sale and the ultimate satisfaction is finding a car they like that they can afford. And we recognize that with all the good work that's been done, it's still not an easy experience. And so in our earnest efforts to provide information and countless options, we still have opportunity to streamline and bring it there.

And then in terms of the impact to downstream, we'll work in lockstep with the organization in the field. to figure out what those best options are, as both Jon mentioned and Enrique mentioned earlier, we have an opportunity to look holistically at our business model from our COGS, our SG&A, our messaging and all those components, and that includes how we make decisions, not necessarily individually, but more holistically and what that means for an offer for the customer. So we don't lose sight of what's most important to them. But I would expect you're going to see some of the changes. Tom and I would expect you'll see some of the changes. And it will be iterative in the next month or 2, you'll see it, and we'll continue after that. But you should see the efforts are underway and the team is very excited about this next step in that digital journey and how important it is in linking with the field team, very symbiotic.

Got it. Got it. That's helpful. And I appreciate your transparency there. My follow-up is on COGS, right? You and Enrique, you keep calling out COGS as a key lever. What's the strategy with reducing that line item? And are you still progressing towards that regional reconditioning center approach?

Yes. I would tell you, look, we have been focused on COGS for -- I mean, we're always focused on COGS, what we've done is, so we've called it out over the past couple of years. Like last year, we communicated a goal of $125 per unit. We hit that goal this year. We had communicated again another goal of $125 per unit.

I would tell you, given where sales have been for the past few quarters, we're probably a little bit behind that goal, not because the initiatives aren't there and the teams aren't doing great work is just because you delever in tough sales environment. But we will continue to put even more accelerated goals internally to go after COGS opportunities. Some of that is through the reconditioning centers, right?

Some of that -- I'll give you a real example. We just rolled out a parts selection tool in our stores. We're already seeing benefits from that, right, really kind of forcing our associates in the stores to take balance speed with quality, with cost and making it really easy for our associates to do that. and we're seeing results fairly immediately. And that's just an example of items we're focused on in COGS.

In terms of the reconditioning centers, yes, we've rolled out at this point in time, 5. Only 2 of them have been open for about a year. So it's still kind of early to tell what the goals are. I mean the ultimate goal is absolutely to get them more efficient. We're already seeing logistics savings in the system because we've rolled these things out and we expect that those will perform in line with some of our larger reconditioning units that we have in stores like Marietta in L.A. that we've seen there, highly efficient store because of the volume that we come through. We have the same expectations with these more regional reconditioning centers. But again, we've only rolled out a few at this point in time.

Our next question comes from David Bellinger with Mizuho Securities.

Tom, nice to talk to you again. In the prepared remarks, you guys mentioned reassessing the cost of bringing a car to market. What about the time to turn vehicles? Because CarMax has been a leader in that area for a long time. Looks like some competitors have increased their speed to market pretty dramatically. Is there anything you guys can do around AI implementation to cut down that time line, use your 30-plus years of data and potentially avoid some of those sharper depreciation swings that have disrupted the business over the last few quarters. How should we think about that opportunity?

Yes. I think look, we're always focused on reconditioning, on speed, on lowering our WIP. For example, this quarter, we increased our sellable inventory and decreased our overall inventory, right? So that's really a strong focus on WIP that actually this quarter helped returns relative to last year despite comps being down 9%. So you can see the organizational focus on just getting better in terms of turning vehicles. I think our offsite reconditioning locations will help as well because it will be even more efficient. So just a couple of examples there in terms of the focus moving forward.

And then Enrique, maybe a second question. Just can you update us on the real estate strategy? Anything that's changing there? You guys own a lot of your real estate. Is that a potential area where you can monetize and use that to fund more investment in the business if you need to?

Yes. Look, I think it always is a potential. We own a lot of our sites out there for our store locations. I tell you, we have better sources of capital versus doing like a sale leaseback or something. So we have great banking relationships, great partners out there, capital providers and we have a revolver, a $2 billion revolver, we can dip in there and just more efficient ways to get capital for us rather than kind of monetize our stores or the land under our stores.

Our next question comes from Chris Bottiglieri with BNP Paribas.

First one more clerical, I suppose, and just a bigger question. Did you give the service profit. I think it was $4 million last quarter. Just curious what that was for Q3? Is that a good run rate for Q4 given volumes are pretty similar in Q4 versus Q3? And then my actual -- can you just elaborate on what's happening with the credit penetration. It sounds like the prime side, I suppose, you're seeing less appraisal traffic or less traffic coming in? Is there -- I would think that with a K-shaped economy, that's probably the healthier side of the market? Just kind of curious what's causing that what you're seeing there.

Yes, that's fine. Chris, this is Jon. I'll take your -- the credit side. Yes, as we've noted in the remarks and even reflecting on Sharon's question, when we look across the credit spectrum, we really can gauge who's coming and shopping with us through our pre-qual product is a great place to do it. Customers love it, they take full advantage of it, 80-plus percent of our customers start with credit online. I think we see definitely an opportunity in that sort of 650 to 750 credit space. As I mentioned earlier, hard to speculate what's driving that is that we think our rates are quite competitive there. But it's always a question of inventory price availability, all of that.

I think as we mentioned on this call, holistically, all of that is up for discussion, and we're going to look at improving our overall offering there. So while you would say K-shaped economy, ultimately, we do see the other folks probably are less stressed by affordability. We want to make sure we have the right product at the right price at the right time for them when they're in to purchase. So I think there's improvement there. That's really what the comments, I think, are in that space are.

Yes. And regarding the service in the quarter, there definitely was pressure in services, as you know, and as we've talked about, it is a line item service margin that deleverages when sales are more challenged.

But look, like over the past couple of years, the teams have made material strides service margin over the past couple of years. And we had even talked at the beginning of this year that we expect it to be, I think, slightly positive for the year in service margins. Certainly, our sales expectations at that point in time. We're not where we are currently actualizing. But I'll tell you, for the full year, our outlook right now is maybe a little unprofitable or a little profitable depending on sales performance in the fourth quarter. And that just tells you the incredible work the teams are doing in for service margin there. But we did have a negative margin in the third quarter.

And we do expect, as I talked about in my prepared remarks, some pressure in the fourth quarter. We'll be comping over some cost coverage that we took last year. But again, if I take a step back and I look more holistically at it, the teams have done tremendous work. It's going to be borderline whether or not we hit the margin for the full year. But again, sales have been definitely more pressured than what we had anticipated versus the beginning of the year.

We will move next with John Babcock with Barclays.

I guess just first of all, I was wondering if you could talk a bit more about what the Board is looking for in its next CEO and also how we should think about timing in terms of when something might be announced there, recognizing that might be variable.

Yes. I would just tell you it's the Board's highest priority right now. It's my personal single highest priority as I'm leading the search along with the rest of the search committee. We're looking for somebody that has led a complex business with a diverse set of assets. We're hoping to find somebody that's also led some type of a digital transformation doesn't have to come from automotive necessarily. It doesn't necessarily have to come from retail. But one of the most important things is that somebody who understands our culture and can lead this team onto the next phase of our success. In terms of timing, we're moving as quickly as we can, but I don't really have an update on timing.

Totally fair. And then next, at least based on the work that you've been doing over the last couple of months and even knowing the business. I was just wondering, how are you thinking about the omnichannel business? I mean do you think this is kind of a setup that you want to keep longer term? Do you think you want to shift more towards digital over time? What's the benefit of omnichannel versus digital or pursuing more of a brick-and-mortar strategy?

I think for us, it's really -- it's all of the above. Over the last several years, as the team has been communicating, we've spent hundreds of millions of dollars in our infrastructure and giving us the capabilities to meet the customer wherever they want to be. I think having a national physical footprint is an advantage for us. Over 250 locations, as David mentioned in the beginning of the call, near 85% of the U.S. population.

So I think it's more of an all of the above strategy. I think some of the comments you've heard today is that we're not happy with how we present to the customer from a digital standpoint. And I think we're going to -- you'll see us make some significant improvements there. But we think our stores are extremely valuable and our store team is doing a great job meeting doing -- converting customers once we get them in the store. But we clearly need to get better on the digital side.

Yes. And just to add a little color to Tom's comments on that. We, again, CarMax has built out so many capabilities. And now when we are talking about holistically looking at our business model, we've built out so many potential capabilities, and many of them are helpful, but some of them probably are adding clearly, decisions we've made, things we're trying to do and our best efforts to please everything for every customer. We have an opportunity to streamline, make some decisions, prioritize some things based on real quantified insight from the consumer in ways that we can streamline and optimize the advantages that omni should provide versus getting caught in some of the complexities that omni also provide.

So we think you'll see that in the near term as team sort of finishes that infrastructure buildout, but then get to really sharpen it and hone it into a competitive advantage.

We will move next with Jeff Lick with Stephens Inc.

So listen, David, a question for you. You've been a senior leader at retail organizations that were digitally native and also retail organizations that are kind of a hybrid physical business and a digital business. I was wondering if you could speak to the challenges of CarMax as a hybrid business where there are people that are went into the physical part of the business and there's some natural tension, which makes it more difficult to have an ideal digital business.

Yes, Jeff, great insight, and thank you for that question. Yes, there are examples of that. And that's a little bit of what I was alluding to.

Now I recognize Tom and I have been in the chair for 2.5 weeks or so. But what the most important things I see is that it's a really -- team is very excited about breaking through and it's an incredibly talented and dedicated group. We just need to work across those channels to make sure we're putting the customer at front of those decisions and not having the operational biases or legacy approaches come through. So there is not a battle between one version versus another. But what we need to do is provide some leadership and focus to the team so we can start executing more with that. what's most important to the customer, streamline, make sure it's a competitive offer because we know we own the brand, and we know we own the trust in a great part of the American consumer.

But you're absolutely right. Many organizations, omni causes them to trip up. I would say we're just going through finishing sort of like an awkward adolescence and we'll be moving into a much more refined effort in the coming time. Now that being said, you want to confirm that answer with the new CEO when they come in. But in the interim, we -- that's why we're so optimistic about the improvement because we have so many of the components already in place.

And I was just wondering if we could quickly double back to Sharon's first question about potential cohorts that you might have lost or been be less effective with. I don't think she was thinking about necessarily the by FICO score. It kind of gets into the advertising strategy. And Tom, just wondering back in the day, it always seems like you over-indexed with that young professional likely a female that didn't want to go into the franchise dealer and to battle you provided a more easy professional experience. Do you think that your prime competitor has maybe cut you off at the past and has even done a better job of providing an experience for that person, where it's like, look, now it's super easy? Is that what...

Your question about cohorts, the second quarter, we were down 6%. Last quarter, we were down 9%. So we need to improve across the board. I would just go back to the comments we've already made. We're not as easy as we need to be for the consumer. We need to simplify our processes. We need -- it's so easy to buy stuff online. It doesn't matter what it is these days. And it's true for automotive. It's not just true for 1 or 2 competitors, it's across the board. And again, we've invested the money to put ourselves in a position to be the best at this, and we've got some work to do to get there. But we need to simplify for the consumer, how they go through the process with us, whether it's on our website or in our app or in our stores.

We will move next with Chris Pierce with Needham.

Sort of following up on Jeff's thought there. I guess -- do you think you have the customer base that wants to do more of the work online to sort of drive an OpEx offset in GPUs? Or do you need to reposition the brand to get younger? Or would you sort of reject that framing?

Can you say that again, sorry?

Sorry, we missed that.

Yes. I'm just curious, do you think you have the customer base that wants to do more of the work online? Like do you think you need to get younger with this new ad campaign? Or do you think it's just about pricing and the experience you're offering?

I absolutely think we have the customer base that wants to do more of the process online. By the way, the younger you go, the less money you have and the less likely you are to have the credit required to buy a car that's $26,000. So -- but yes, I think we have plenty of customer flow and we need to take better advantage of it.

And as David and Tom talked about, look, we have enviable assets, right? We have an awareness level that's off the charts. We have consumers that are extremely loyal and that love our brand. We have associates that are outstanding. We have more than 250 stores across the country that operate extremely well. We have a strong -- we've invested in the digital capabilities. We just need to kind of fine-tune how those things mesh together.

But in terms of whether or not we have customers out there that want to buy us, I would tell you, absolutely, that's not the concern that we have the opportunity that we have is to make our offering based on the consumer, the most compelling that we can make it, and that's what we're focused on.

We will move next with Michael Montani with Evercore.

Just wanted to dig into, I guess, it's a 3 parter, but it's kind of all related, which was depreciation trends, just some incremental color about what you're seeing in the competitive backdrop is the intensity ratcheting up? And then lastly was on the reinvestment into GPU. Just how much of a reinvestment we ought to be thinking about moving ahead?

Yes. For depreciation, my comments were really in the wholesale area, right? We did see very sharp depreciation within the quarter, a greater than 10% depreciation within the quarter, so very sharp and that impacted performance within the quarter as that abates, then we would expect that performance would have been run.

In terms of GPU, we did talk about that. Look, it's material in that for us to talk about it on the call. But at the same time, we've just rolled out different levels of pricing changes, we're going to see kind of how it performs within the quarter. And then in our Q4 call, we'll come back and we'll talk about what we saw and also what that means for our plan moving forward. I say that, but we're also optimistic that it's going to change the sales trend that we've had either negative 6%, negative 9% comps sequentially, and that's what we're looking to change. We're looking to change that trend. And we'll come back with that. I forget your number 2 question, but then...

Just the competitive intensity.

Let me add to the pricing part, which is our pricing is not -- it's not like we have a static pricing model where we just lower all of our prices and leave them there. This is going to be very dynamic throughout the quarter. I think one of the things David and I and the rest of the team here assessed in a short period of time is if you want to get things moving in the other direction, there's some significant levers that you can push, but the 2 biggest are clearly pricing and marketing.

So we're making moves there to try to get the trend moving in the other direction, but it will be very dynamic throughout the quarter. It's why -- we're not trying to be evasive with what we think the margin impact will be, but we're trying to be as impactful as we can. And again, we're 18 days into the quarter. So this will be a dynamic process throughout the next 3 months.

We don't have any further questions at this time. I will hand the call back to David for any closing remarks.

Thank you. We'd like to thank the thousands of CarMax associates who helped build the business that we have today and will be part of our next leg of growth in the future. Thank you all for joining our call today. And then before we sign off, Tom has some closing remarks.

Yes. I just thank all of you guys for your support. Many of you I know and have heard your voice in the past. And although it's good to be back, I wish it was under slightly different circumstances. But what I would tell you is from the Board perspective, we are absolutely committed to getting this right. David is the perfect person to sit in this role while we search for our next CEO. I'm happy to spend more time on the business.

What I've been most enthusiastic about over the last 2 weeks is how engaged all of our employees are and how excited they are to win. And as we've mentioned multiple times and Enrique just kind of covered in total, we have incredible assets in this company. We have a great balance sheet. We have an iconic brand. We have 250 locations. And most importantly, what has always separated us from everybody else is the engagement of our more than 28,000 associates. And none of that has wavered.

So I just wanted to close by saying the Board is absolutely committed to getting this right. And I wanted to also thank David for the role that he is playing while we're in the middle of this search. And lastly, I wish everybody a happy holiday season. Thank you for joining us, and we'll talk to you next time.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. You may now disconnect.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, David Lowenstein, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Nikki. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our fiscal 2026 second quarter earnings conference call. I'm here today with Bill Nash, our President and CEO; Enrique Mayor-Mora, our Executive Vice President and CFO; and Jon Daniels, our Executive Vice President, CarMax Auto Finance.

Let me remind you our statements today that are not statements of historical fact including, but not limited to, statements regarding the company's future business plans, prospects and financial performance, are forward-looking statements we make pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current knowledge, expectations and assumptions and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations.

In providing projections and other forward-looking statements, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update them. For additional information on important factors and risks that could affect these expectations, please see our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning, our annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q previously filed with the SEC.

Please note, in addition to our earnings release, we have also prepared our quarterly investor presentation, and both documents are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Should you have any follow-up questions after the call, please feel free to contact our Investor Relations department at (804) 747-0422 extension 7865.

Lastly, let me thank you in advance for asking only 1 question and getting back in the queue for more follow-ups. Bill?

Great. Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us. Today, I want to start with our priorities.

While our second quarter results fell short of our expectations, we remain focused on driving sales, gaining market share and delivering significant year-over-year earnings growth for years to come. We have a differentiated and best-in-class omnichannel customer experience and are focused on maximizing that advantage by driving operational efficiency and sharpening our go-to-market approach.

With this mindset, our key priorities include: First, focusing on price and selection. This includes maintaining competitive prices while minimizing macro factor impact and having the cars consumers are looking for at CarMax's high-quality standards. Second, driving consumer awareness of our differentiated experience. This includes not only our new brand campaign Wanna Drive? but also enhancing the conversion waterfall from web traffic all the way to the ultimate buy and/or sell decision.

Third, delivering incremental SG&A reductions of at least $150 million over the next 18 months. This will be broad-based, and it includes leveraging technology to drive efficiencies and our Net Promoter Score to new heights. And finally, generating additional profit through components of our diversified business. This includes increasing CAF penetration and profitability in a responsible and thoughtful way. It also includes pursuing other opportunities across our business to drive incremental flow-through to our bottom line.

We are already making progress across these fronts and are confident in our strategy and our earnings model, which will produce high teen EPS growth with mid-single-digit retail unit growth.

During our first quarter call, I mentioned that we saw an uptick in sales volume in March and April due to the tariff speculation. This impacted our performance in the second quarter in 2 ways. First, we ramped our inventory ahead of the second quarter to support this growth. Across the back half of May through the end of June, we saw about $1,000 in depreciation, which natively impacted our price competitiveness and our sales.

Second, while hard to quantify, we believe there was a pull forward of demand into the first quarter. In the second quarter, we responded by lowering retail margin to drive sell-through, and we intentionally slowed buys to balance our inventory with sales. This strategy has worked as both price competitiveness and inventory position have improved since that time and have put us in a better position for the third quarter.

During the quarter, we delivered total sales of $6.6 billion, down 6% compared to last year, reflecting lower volume. In our retail business, total unit sales declined 5.4% and used unit comps were down 6.3%. Pressured performance across our age 0 to 5 inventory was partially offset by increased sales in older, higher mileage vehicles. Average selling price was $26,000, a year-over-year decrease of approximately $250 per unit.

Second quarter retail gross profit per used unit was similar to last year but down approximately $200 from the first quarter. The sequential decline was more than twice our historical average, reflecting the actions that I mentioned earlier. We will continue to focus on maintaining our price competitiveness, and we remain disciplined yet nimble in leveraging selection and margins to drive sales.

Wholesale unit sales were down 2.2% versus the second quarter last year. Average wholesale selling price increased approximately $125 per unit to $7,900 and wholesale gross profit per unit was historically strong and similar to last year.

We bought approximately 293,000 vehicles during the quarter, down 2% from last year. We purchased approximately 262,000 vehicles from consumers, with more than half of those buys coming through our online instant appraisal experience. With the support of our Edmond sales team, we sourced the remaining approximately 31,000 vehicles through dealers, which is slightly up from last year. This quarter's buy performance is a direct result of a decision to pull back offers to rightsize inventory. We are no longer intentionally slowing buy and expect to see year-over-year improvement in the third quarter.

At the end of August, we launched our new Wanna Drive? brand position campaign that brings to light our unique omnichannel experience. Our Net Promoter Score is the highest it's been since we rolled out our digital capabilities nationwide, driven by record high satisfaction among customers purchasing online as well as those using our omnichannel experience. Wanna Drive? spotlights this unique offering, empowering customers to buy their way, with the clarity, confidence and control to navigate the journey on their terms. Wanna Drive? appears across TV, streaming social, digital and audio and represents the first phase of a sustained multiphase strategy. This approach, which we will complement with increased advertising spend, demonstrates our commitment to long-term brand investment that supports our growth objectives.

As previously discussed, we've been focused on driving SG&A efficiencies. We're pleased with our progress so far and have line of sight to at least an incremental $150 million in SG&A reductions over the next 18 months. This does not impact our growth strategy as we will continue to invest in initiatives that position us for the future. Later, Enrique will comment on the anticipated scope of our efforts and the likely timing.

At this time, I will now turn the call over to Jon to provide more detail on CarMax Auto Financing and our continuing focus on full credit spectrum expansion. Jon?

Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everyone. During the second quarter, CarMax Auto Finance originated over $2 billion, resulting in sales penetration of 42.6% net of 3-day payoffs, which was 60 basis points above last year. The weighted average contract rate charged to new customers was 11.2% versus 11.4% last quarter and reflects downward rate testing executed within the quarter.

While CAF's full quarter increase in penetration appears modest, we believe the tariff pull forward in Q1 negatively impacted CAF share during the early part of the quarter. Since the beginning of the fiscal year, we have made underwriting adjustments that translate to 100 to 200 basis points of growth, but the full realization of this growth can be impacted by noncontrollable factors such as customer credit mix and partner lender behavior. It is important to note that more than half of the impact from these adjustments comes from recaptured Tier 1 segments but with additional criteria overlay to reduce risk, while the remainder comes from within the top half of the Tier 2 space, which we have been testing over the past year.

Third-party Tier 2 and Tier 3 penetration in the quarter combined for 23.8% of sales versus 24.4% last year as cash growth had an impact on partner volume.

CAF income for the quarter was $103 million, down $13 million from FY '25. Net interest margin on the portfolio was 6.6%, up over 50 basis points from last year and relatively in line with last quarter. CAF's loan loss provision of $142 million results in a total reserve balance of $507 million for 3.02% of managed receivables exclusive of auto loans held for sale. Of the $142 million, $71 million is attributed to new originations within the quarter, while the remaining $71 million is an adjustment to the loss expectation of the existing portfolio. Also of note, as was seen in the first quarter, there was a reduction on the required provision stemming from $16 million in the reserve allocated to loans booked prior to Q2 now classified as held for sale.

The primary driver of the $71 million adjustment on the existing portfolio comes from additional losses anticipated within the 2022 and 2023 vintages. Recall, these customers have been the most impacted by the convergence of rapidly increasing vehicle prices and broader inflation. Despite the observed worsening, these vintages still remain highly profitable at an estimated lifetime profit of $1,500 per unit versus $1,800 contemplated at origination. Additionally, they continue to shrink in size and contribution to the overall portfolio as they are replaced with more recently originated Tier 1 receivables at significantly lower loss rates. Note that 2024 and 2025 post-contraction vintages continue to be right in line with our original loss expectations.

Regarding the funding aspect of our full spectrum efforts, yesterday we closed our '25-B transaction, our second nonprime securitization of the year. This was upsized to $900 million in total notes and, for the first time, included the sale of most of the residual financial interest in the transaction to third-party investors, thus resulting in off-balance sheet treatment. We expect the gain on sale to be approximately $25 million to $30 million in third quarter income.

We also expect to receive approximately $40 million to $45 million in additional CAF income related to servicing fees and the retained beneficial interest over the life of the transaction. As a reminder, going forward, there will be no loss allowance or provision for this pool of loans.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Enrique to discuss our second quarter financial performance in more detail. Enrique?

Thanks, Jon, and good morning, everyone. Second quarter net earnings per diluted share was $0.64 versus $0.85 a year ago. The decrease was driven primarily by lower volume and the CAF loss provision adjustment.

Total gross profit was $718 million, down 6% from last year's second quarter. Used retail margin of $443 million decreased by 8%, with lower volume and relatively stable per unit margins. Retail gross profit per used unit was $2,216, in line with historical average. Wholesale vehicle margin of $137 million decreased by less than 1% from a year ago, with lower volume partially offset by a slight increase in per unit margins. Wholesale gross profit per unit was $993.

Other gross profit was $138 million, down 4% from a year ago. This was driven primarily by EPP, which decreased by $6 million driven by lower retail unit volume.

Service recorded a $4 million margin, reflecting a small improvement over last year's second quarter. Continued efficiency and cost coverage improvements were partially offset by the deleverage inherent in the lower year-over-year second quarter sales.

On the SG&A front, expenses for the second quarter were $601 million, down 2% from the prior year driven primarily by lower stock-based compensation. We continue to realize expense savings, but they were offset by cost pressures in the quarter. SG&A to gross profit deleveraged 350 basis points to 84% as lower volume more than offset lower costs.

The continued deployment of AI technology remains a key driver of efficiency gains and experience enhancements across our operations. For example, this quarter, Skye, our AI-powered virtual assistant continue to deliver year-over-year double-digit percent improvements in containment rate, customer experience consultants productivity and web and phone response rate SLAs. We recently fully rolled out Skye 2.0, which leverages agentic AI and expect this release will drive even more efficiency and experience improvements.

As Bill noted, we are committed to further reducing our SG&A by continuing to deliver efficiency gains across the business. The investments in technology, systems and processes that we have made as part of our omni transformation will allow us to substantially reduce spend through several key initiatives: modernizing and consolidating our technology infrastructure, automating manual processes, renegotiating and reducing third-party contracts and eliminating redundancies across the organization.

The goal of at least $150 million in SG&A reductions over the next 18 months represents a material improvement in our cost profile and reflects the execution on the plan that we have been developing with outside support. While we expect to realize some of these savings this fiscal year, we expect the vast majority will materialize in our exit rate by the end of fiscal 2027.

In addition to offsetting inflationary pressures, these ongoing savings will provide additional flexibility to reinvest in areas that directly drive sales, while also serving as a tailwind to our already robust earnings model of a high-teens EPS growth CAGR when retail unit growth is in the mid-single digits. We will continue to provide updates on this initiative during future earnings calls.

Looking forward, I'll cover a few items. Regarding marketing, we expect an increase in per total unit spend in the back half of the year, particularly in the third quarter as we appropriately support our new brand positioning launch. We expect service margin to face pressure in the back half of the year due to seasonal sales volumes. For the full year, we still expect to deliver positive margin, which is a direct result of our efficiency improvements and cost coverage measures.

Turning to capital allocation. During the second quarter, we continued our share repurchases at an accelerated pace, buying back approximately 2.9 million shares for a total expenditure of $180 million. As of the end of the quarter, we had approximately $1.56 billion of our repurchase authorization remaining.

Now I'll turn the call back over to Bill.

Thank you, Enrique and Jon. Our customer-centric car buying and selling experience is a key differentiator in a very large and fragmented market and positions us well for the future. We are intently focused on driving this differentiated and best-in-class experience and doing so with greater efficiency.

As you heard from us today, we're actively executing on our key priorities, which include driving sales, advancing innovations to improve customer and associate experiences, bolstering our marketing efforts, increasing company-wide efficiencies and expanding CAF participation across the credit spectrum. All of these priorities will give us added flexibility and strengthen us for the future.

With that, we will be happy to take your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

So the first question I want to ask, just with regard to used unit sales. So Bill, if I heard you correctly, it seemed like the most disruptive factor here in fiscal Q2 was -- now was it clearer, a pull forward in demand into the fiscal first quarter. So the question I have is, could you -- are there numbers you can give us to size that better, that disruption? And then as we look -- as you look through the quarter, I know you typically don't discuss sales trends in the quarter, but following that pull forward impact, I mean, has the business -- or have sales got back to a more normal run rate, and what is that?

Yes. So Brian, first of all, like I said, it's actually, we think, 2 factors. And I would put the -- I put the other factor probably first, because it is hard to quantify exactly how much each one is. But my commentary around buying inventory up and then seeing that depreciation happen. I would say that is probably the most impactful. And then the pull forward. But again, it's hard to quantify exactly how much each of those are.

For the quarter, each month was down year-over-year, and each month got a little weaker throughout the quarter. Now what I'll tell you for September and month-to-date is that it is stronger than the quarter and any of the months in the second quarter. But when I look at it from a year-over-year, it's still a little soft from a year-over-year standpoint. But certainly, we put ourselves in a better position with the start of this quarter, both on an inventory position as well as from a pricing standpoint.

That's helpful. If I -- could I ask a follow-up?

Sure.

Just with regard to pricing, so CarMax has for a long time talked about having an attractive pricing within the market. It seems to me, just listening to your comments say that you're focusing on this more now, so I guess, is that the case? And then the question I have is, are you seeing something in the marketplace or other competitors are getting more price aggressive that CarMax may have to change some of its stance there?

Yes. I think the pricing commentary, first of all, is you're right, we're always focused on pricing, we want to be competitive. I think in the quarter, we fell into a spot where we weren't as competitive. Again, I feel better about where we are now.

And then the only other thing I would add to that is I think we just need to continue to be as nimble as possible when it comes to pricing. And you saw in the quarter, we saw that $1,000 depreciation over a month period, and we started acting on it very quickly. And there's a lot that goes into that decision as far as what do you do with your prices when you see depreciation, that kind of thing. But I think the takeaway for -- that I want you to hear is that we're always focused on competitive pricing. And certainly, the focus as we go forward is to continue to be as nimble as possible because it's an aggressive environment out there.

Our next question comes from Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan.

I've got a couple. First one on CAF. Last quarter, you had mentioned that you expect CAF income to be up year-over-year for the full year. Could you give us an update on that? And if it has changed? I'm just surprised by just the magnitude of the provision pickup because we had your last earnings call just 2 months ago, so curious like how could it have changed so dramatically for the short period of time? And any color there would be helpful. And I have a quick follow-up on SG&A.

Sure, Rajat. Appreciate your question. First, let's touch on the CAF income. Obviously, as mentioned, there's a larger provision impact this quarter. Also we mentioned we're excited about the '25-B transaction, which will yield gain during Q3. You put all that together yes, we did highlight that we thought there would be increase year-over-year in CAF income. I think we're going to be flat to down, obviously 2 more quarters to go, but flat to slightly down. But I think there's some nice trade-offs that are occurring there. Obviously, all disclaimers with how does the consumer perform, how sales come in, because that would yield provision originations for us. But I believe that gives you a little flavor on the income cadence.

Regarding provision, it's certainly a fair question. I'll give a little color on what we saw for the quarter beyond what I did in my prepared remarks. So let's highlight the '22 and '23 vintages. That customer, as I mentioned, high ASP, certainly a higher APR environment, higher overall payment they were seeing. They come into the purchasing cycle with excess cash from COVID and they hadn't fully experienced inflation yet. So we had a lot to learn about that customer. Initially, we saw some -- again, we're coming off of incredibly low trough loss rates of '19, '20, '21 vintages, so hard to gauge how there's '22 and '23 vintages were going to perform. We saw an increase in losses initially, but that's not surprising because it's coming off of trough lower vintages of those previous years.

So as we watched that customer perform, we saw it and thought maybe it was a pull forward in losses. Ultimately, as we saw a little increase, so maybe a timing curve adjustment, and then we watch that customer begin to struggle and continue to struggle a little bit. We made some adjustments that we thought were very smart for the consumer and smart for us, and that has proven to be the case. And that was we adjusted our extension policy in the fall. We saw more payments come in, had we otherwise not done that, so we were pleased to see that, but we had to watch that play through. We saw some of those customers coming back into delinquency and loss during Q1. It's obviously a tax time season as well so it's a little muddied.

So we did make an adjustment in Q1. And we wanted to watch it all play through. We saw some good performance initially with, again, those extensions, we wanted to see how much was going to come back in delinquency. And unfortunately, during the quarter, we saw more revert back to delinquency and loss. That being said, we've made a significant adjustment this quarter, as you see. We made what we would say a sizable adjustment last quarter. I think we have a much better handle on where these guys are going to land because we've watched these extensions play through almost completely at this point.

Also, if you look at the totality of those vintages, you're about 2/3 of the way through those vintages. So there's about 1/3 left. So it's really going to ultimately play through. There's more to come, but it really has played through.

And then if you look at these '24 and '25 vintages, we are extremely pleased with those. So we're watching those losses early on. We're now 12, 15 months through there, and that stuff is right on the mark from what we expected.

So yes, I hate to have to make an additional adjustment. I think there are a lot of confounding factors that had to play out. We feel like we have a much better understanding of them.

And then I'll end with, and again, just as a reminder, these things are incredibly so profitable. $1,800 was maybe what we anticipated, $1,500 because of these loss adjustments, roughly $0.5 billion we're going to achieve in lifetime value across the '22 and '23 vintages. So a lot to say there because I wanted to explain what was going on there, but hopefully, that answers your question.

That's helpful color. And just on the SG&A., could you elaborate a little bit more on the areas of cost reduction? I'm curious because it seems to me that a lot of these might be tied to the omnichannel support function because you've already gained good productivity on your in-store salespeople. I'm curious like should investors be worried that these actions might hurt your ability to recover some of the share loss that you've seen? I'm curious like how do you balance those 2. And also like what's the offset from the pickup in advertising?

Yes. No, absolutely, Rajat, I'll jump into it. We do not think it's going to impact our growth strategy. As I noted in my prepared remarks, our investments in technology, systems and processes are really going to allow us to rationalize our costs.

So very specifically, I'll give you some examples. So we have a stronger ability to retire legacy systems. We have an ability to lower licensing usage as we either need less of them, or we can eliminate certain functionality as well given our investments in technologies such as chat due to investments in Skye. We've become even more efficient in our call centers, and have been talking about that for quite a few quarters at this point in time, able to automate manual processes and leverage AI to even more frequently review third-party contracts that will help us take out that $150 million. And if you'll note, those examples don't really impact our growth strategy.

And part of our thinking as well is that there is a portion of these savings, and again, it's $150 million, at least $150 million, that we do expect to direct back to investments that have a direct tie with sales, such as an example this quarter would be marketing. We are going heavier up in marketing, appropriately so, to support our new brand positioning, and that would be an example of something that we're going to go invest in.

I do think it's important to remember, right, that we had been in investment mode as we transformed our company into an omni retailer. But once you're done with that, the next step really is to optimize and then rationalize that spend, and that's where we are.

It's not a net $150 million reduction. Is that a net number that you can give us?

Yes. So it's going to be net of any ongoing SG&A expenses to accomplish that number, but it's not net of any kind of onetime charges that we may end up having to incur. But it is net of ongoing expenses to realize those savings.

No, I meant like net of like investment in other areas like advertising and other sales initiatives...

Like I said, there will be part of those dollars that will be reinvested back into the business to drive top line sales. However, that being said, we do expect just the SG&A savings to be a material tailwind to our already robust earnings model.

Our next question comes from Sharon Zackfia with William Blair.

I wanted to go back to Brian's question on price. And as you think about -- and I know you're talking about reinvesting some of the SG&A savings, and back in 2019, which seems like forever ago, you had talked about kind of maybe targeting some lower GPU to drive incremental sales. So kind of putting that all together, is there a thought process or a strategy about taking kind of the bulk of the $150 million and really reinvesting it to the consumer and price or selection to drive the top line? Because it does feel like the consistent market share story that we had had in the past has kind of become much more volatile post pandemic.

Yes, Sharon, I think you're thinking about it the right way, but I would expand on it a little bit. I mean the $150 million in SG&A reductions, as Enrique pointed out, some of that we will reinvest directly back into things of driving sales.

The other piece I would tell you, which is another reason why we're focused on key priorities, just being able to generate additional profit from other parts of the business because that also gives you flexibility and allows you to reinvest some of that in pricing. So again, I think it goes back to Brian's initial question that we want to be as nimble as possible, make sure that we're as competitive as possible, and we feel like we're going to have several levers to be able to do that.

Bill, can I just follow up? Do you think there's price elasticity of demand that if you were more aggressive on price, you could stimulate sales in a profit accretive way?

Yes. Look, there's always elasticity when it comes in -- we've talked about this before. We know pretty much because we're constantly testing, when you take prices down a certain dollar amount, we know what you get for that. So what you have to think -- the way we think about it is that when you look at the price elasticity, there's a lot of things that go into that equation. So for example, your variable expenses. So the better that you're doing in your variable expenses, it makes that equation easier. The capacity of your operational workforce. Are they add to capacity? Are they not to capacity? Are you having to pay people for unproductive time? Your ancillary profit attachment, how well we're doing on things like ESP or finance. So there's a lot of things that we look at to decide, okay, does this make sense?

And that equation changes depending on the market factors. I mean even without taking some of those things, the elasticity will change just given what competitors are doing. So we will continue to be nimble. We will continue to make improvements in some of these other factors because, again, that makes the elasticity pay off.

Our next question comes from Chris Bottiglieri with BNP Paribas.

Two questions on credit for me. So the first one is, can you elaborate on the servicing fee of $40 million, $45 million? I would think there's probably some servicing costs to achieve that servicing revenue. Just wondering if you could help us think through the cost since receivables won't be on the balance sheet but the expenses will be.

And then bigger picture question on credit, like you guys are normally really conservative, really prudent guys historically. You're kind of pushing into deep subprime now. The market's, I think beyond your control, is getting a little bit weaker. Just wanted to kind of like test to resolve, like how committed are you to pushing into subprime right now just given the macro backdrop? Is it something that you're going to pull forward into regardless? Or if macro keeps worsening, are you going to maybe hit the breaks though a little bit?

Yes. I'll start off and then I'll pass it over to Jon. I just wanted to clarify something on deep subprime. Jon in his comments talked about going into really the top half of what we call the Tier 2. So we're not talking about deep subprime. I just want to have some clarification there. And then, Jon, I'll let you add just to that end, to the first part of the question.

Yes, Bill is kicking me under the table because we wanted that one. Yes, I mean we want to make that very clear. I mean it is not the subprime at all. Again, we have been in Tier 3 space, and we have experience there and all that. But again, we're trying to be very prudent, to your point, Chris, of how we go down when we go down.

Now make no mistake, there is money to be made there. We have partners that make tremendous profit there. You need to price it right. provision correctly, service correctly. We believe we're learning how to do that. So -- but yes, I wouldn't characterize it as deep subprime. There's a lot of penetration to be gained as we inch our way down there, no doubt about it.

To your first question on the expenses, just to step back, I'll speak to the overall program. Again, we are super excited because it ties to the first question. the full spectrum nature. We have laid out a plan, and I think we have gone after that plan. First, it was, hey, we're going to bifurcate our securitization program. We've done that. We've executed multiple deals now there. We said we were going to recapture volume in Tier 1 and expand into Tier 2. Again, we're being very prudent about that. Then we announced that we plan to do a deal where we're actually going to sell the future residual interest in that deal, and we've done that very, very successfully.

So we are super pleased. This was supposed to give us flexibility, obviously, give us insight into what a deal like this looks like, and we've, I think, hit on all of those. That being said, we've enjoyed the gain -- we'll enjoy the gain that we're going to see a $25 million to $30 million, and you highlight -- we also referenced the additional value to be gained on the servicing side and, again, future interest there.

On the expense there, yes, there is a little additional volume to be gained from the servicing side. There was a cost to us, but yes, we will make additional value there. Enrique, anything you want to add?

Yes. And Chris, you'll see the servicing income. It will be broken out in the CAF contribution line, so you'll get a good view of that kind of on a go-forward reporting, while the servicing costs will be embedded in kind of your cost to do business, right? And so that's how it will be reported, and you'll see that moving forward.

And the $40 million to $45 million also includes retained...

Also the income from the 5% retention as well, the 5.5%. So we expect that will continue as well. So all in all, like Jon mentioned, we're really pleased with the deal and the execution of the deal out there and really proud of the teams in getting that done. And as Jon mentioned, this just fits our overall strategy, and we are executing on that strategy.

Got you. Okay. Is most of the income coming from the beneficial interest or from the servicing fees? I mean, do we like to mention that a bit at all? .

Yes. It's coming from kind of a mix.

Yes, it is.

Okay. Okay. Thanks for clarifying, you probably did say that in the prepared remarks, I probably can misspoke there. So thanks for clarifying that.

Our next question comes from David Bellinger with Mizuho.

Can you help us walk down the path back to positive unit comps and what the time line could be there? And Bill, you mentioned the aggressive environment. So maybe if we take this up to the industry level, is the used car market just getting materially worse in your view? Are there some macro cracks forming with these CAF adjustments? Or any other signals of a more strained consumer? Or do you think this is more of a competitive element here in Q2 versus other players in that sector and something that you guys have to invest against going forward? Just help us piece all that together.

Yes. So when I say aggressive environment, I wouldn't say it's necessarily more aggressive than last quarter. It's been aggressive for a while. I think the strained consumer, look, I think we are seeing where consumers, especially your mid to high FICO customers, they seem to be sitting on the sidelines a little bit. And we just measure that by just pure app volume. I think we're seeing that with -- it's a little bit of a headwind in September, but that's not unique to us. We've talked with our finance partners and they're seeing something similar.

So again, I think -- and even that, consumer has been distressed for a little while. I think there's some angst, the consumer sentiment isn't great. But again, I think we've put ourselves in good shape and I think the priorities that we're focused on will continue to pay dividends.

As I think about the full year, we set out this year to gain market share. And look, through the first half of the year, we feel good about it, through the calendar June, which is where we have data through. I would just caution people when you're looking at June, July and August, it's tough on a year-over-year comparison just because of the CDK outage last year. But we're not backing off of our stance, like we started this year going after market share. And at this point, I don't see a reason why we would back off that. We expect to gain market share for the full year. So hopefully, that adds a little color.

Yes. David, I'd love to just jump in on the consumer just to highlight a few things, again, the cracks as you said. Look, I think there's something incredibly unique about the 2022 to '23 consumer, and it is an industry issue. You look at other lenders out there, they would tell you, those are some tough vintages. It's kind of the perfect storm of high ASP and probably an overconfident consumer coming in with they think they have plenty of cash, they get hit with inflation. If you look at the '24 and '25 consumer, they're just more eyes wide open walking in the door, prices have come down a little bit, the interest rates have come down a little bit. Typically, people that buy in a more stressed environment, perform usually better. Now again, we think we have reserved. We watch very carefully how those guys are performing. And we know they might perform worse than maybe pre-COVID, but I think that '24, '25 consumer is going to just be a better one.

Yes. So I think to your point, David, the second quarter kind of event, that would be a second quarter event, truing that up and we feel good about where we stand on that. We know that that's getting to be less and less of a population. As Jon said, the extensions are kind of back in, and that's really what this was to clean up on. So we feel good about where we are there.

Our next question comes from Scot Ciccarelli with Truist.

This is Josh Young on for Scot. So as we think about the slowdown in sales here, is this a function of you just aren't getting people into the top of the funnel? Or is it more you get them in there, but then they're kind of falling out of the bottom? Just any color on how you guys are thinking about that would be helpful.

Yes. No, look, our web traffic is up year-over-year. Our conversion, as you go down the funnel, is actually improving. I would say the biggest opportunity -- and some of it I think we can control and some of it we can't control. And that's really kind of web traffic to what we call a selling opportunity. Does the customer do something that we can then kind of start the process versus just folks that have come to the website that are just viewing cars? Some of it is going to be that we can't control because there's going to be some folks who are just -- they're window shopping. Others, I think we can control, and just how well we do in the presentation on that first initial glance, how we make the website stickier at that top of the funnel. So I think it's a little bit kind of macro, but I think there's absolutely some improvements we can make.

We will move next with David Whiston with Morningstar.

Kind of staying on that question, I mean, maybe help me fill in some blanks here because, I mean, it sounds like at the beginning of the quarter you wanted to -- the tariff -- the juicing of demand didn't really happen in the quarter, so you were trying to clear to get rid of that depreciation. But you're saying web traffic was up year-over-year and conversion is improving, yet your unit volumes were still down over 5%. And used prices have been elevated for a long time now. Is the consumer just staying away or is it that they're still having sticker shock despite this many quarters of elevated pricing?

Yes, David, so just for a clarification, the web traffic is up. What's down for us would be what I would call selling opportunities. Once we have a selling opportunity, the conversion, we're actually seeing some good improvement in conversion just down through the rest of the funnel. So the opportunity really is when a customer hits our website, actually getting them to do something on the website. And again, some of that, I think, is in our control, some of it is not in our control. You're just going to have folks that are coming in there and really, well, either they're just looking or they just -- they're not ready to buy. So that's kind of the clarification of your question between, well, your traffic is up, your conversion is up, why aren't you seeing more sales? That's why.

And again, I would say not all traffic is considered the same. A 780 comes through the door versus 580 comes through the door, they convert at tremendously different rates.

And high quality is down even at the very high end of premium, right?

Well, yes. What we're seeing is that the higher FICO customers, the app volume is down. And that's a core customer of ours. And really, you're seeing that kind of -- and Jon, keep me honest on that, you're probably seeing it probably 600 and above is probably down. Certainly, at the high end, I think the one area that's maybe not down is probably low FICO, 550 and below.

Right. And I think, again, I don't think we're alone there. We can talk to other lenders, other dealers, you can see it in the credit bureaus, it's apparent.

Our next question comes from Jeff Lick with Stephens Inc.

I was wondering if you could talk about the concept of the reserve inventory that you guys do. My understanding is it's -- it's at the most 7 days. It's usually around 7, but not always 7. But our records or just our analysis shows that roughly about 40% of your inventory at any given time online is reserved. It appears that this just takes a unit that is probably attractive because someone's reserving it, so someone else who wants it doesn't see it or it's at the back of the queue. I'm wondering your thoughts there in terms of how that's affecting sales and if that's a policy you're looking at changing.

Yes. No, look, I think there's both reserve inventory and there's inventory that can't be transferred. I think the reserve inventory generally is inventory that has a customer that's basically interested in that inventory. And that's obviously when you've got a customer enrichment that's interested in a car in Pennsylvania, we think that's a huge benefit that that customer can actually get that car. So that plays into our transfers.

I think the only thing that we'd be looking at there from a reserve inventory standpoint is just making sure that we're being active on how long a consumer can actually hold the car or reserve the car, and that the transaction is progressing.

On the vehicles that our label is not transferred, the only reason they're not transferred at that time is because it's generally related to title issues. In some states, you can sell them. So you'll see it on our website, "Hey, this can be transferred," because you can sell that car without a title in that state. But there's other states you cannot sell a car without the title. So we're not going to transfer that car in that case. And then once the title becomes available, it certainly can be open for transfer if it's still around. So those are the 2 buckets we think about that would bring just kind of your overall available inventory down.

And do you, I'm assuming you won't disclose this, but in terms of the amount of sales -- of the percentage of people that are reserving, I'm wondering what percent actually buy versus it goes back in? So how much of the inventory actually kind of sits out of view of the next potential buyer for 7 days?

Yes. I mean we haven't gone in to the specifics. But obviously, there's -- we look at the economics of that. The other thing I'd let you know is even on the reserved inventory, consumers can still express interest for it and say, "Hey, please let me know if this does not actually pan out with that customer."

Keep in mind, when you think about the reserve inventory, 1/3 of our sales are through transfers and they go through the reserve inventory process. So you're absolutely right, we go through an economic decision. And where we are with that is we feel really good about it. Can we add a little extra friction just to make sure that cars aren't held for reserve over 3 days? Sure. But that's a small enhancement.

Our next question comes from Michael Montani with Evercore ISI.

I just had 2 questions. The first question was really around the credit trends. Can you just give us some more color in terms of the progression that you saw playing out throughout the quarter when you think about kind of delinquency rates, and then how we should be thinking for provisions into the third quarter?

And then the other question -- let's do that and hopefully get to the other one.

Sure. Yes, I appreciate the question. Yes. If you look at delinquency rates for the quarter, there's definitely a seasonality trend that you're always going to have to observe there. So you're coming off of tax time into Q2. It ramps up delinquency, will ramp up through the rest of the calendar year and then back down through delinquency time typically. But all in all, if you look at overall delinquency rates, we're really looking at it by vintage. We're looking at it. Are they as expected? They're often not the best indicator of ultimate loss, timing of loss, what have you. But if I think broadly through the quarter, aside from again, those vintages that we adjusted on, as you can imagine, the delinquency trends on the newer stuff, and even the older stuff that's more seasoned, continued to be in line. So again, we feel very positive as we're going to -- as we continue to put on that, again, lower risk tightened stuff that will perform well. So hopefully, that addresses your question.

And Mike, I think part of your question too was just on the kind of provision as we go forward. And I think the way to think about that, I mean, you saw what our provision was for originations this quarter, you saw what the -- what we're calling the true-up is. I think the way you should think about it is the provision this quarter for the new originations, I think that's pretty representative. We'll -- just with the stuff that we're going into, it might be a little bit higher, but we feel good about the true-up. So for provisions, Jon, you can certainly speak up, but we would expect it to be more...

Yes. You saw the $71 million this quarter. Again, you can go back and look at where we didn't have outside strips where it was. Probably lean a little higher considering that we are, again, going after a little bit lower in the credit spectrum. So that's going to require a higher upfront provision. But yes, hopefully, the true-ups are going to be minimal. That is our goal through this. We feel like that older stuff is rolling off. So yes, I would think you'd see more in that $70 million, $80 million, certainly south of $100 million range from a provision standpoint.

And like Jon said, right, what we're seeing in the '24 and '25 vintages is they are meeting our expectations in terms of what the loss trends are. So what we're really talking about here, and we've taken a material hit to our provision this quarter, so what you're really talking about is the provision for new originations that Jon and Bill just spoke to.

Okay. And then the follow-up question, that's helpful, was just around some of the cost savings. So you had called out $150 million which could work out to somewhere around $200 a car here potentially as reinvestment fuel, if you decided to do it. And then on the COGS front, I believe you've said in the past that there could be another $100 or $200 there as well. So I just wanted to understand, is that separate and distinct? Am I kind of in the ballpark there in terms of some of the COGS opportunity?

And then kind of bottom line, if it does require several hundred dollars of reinvestment into sharper pricing, is that something that you all are committed to doing in order to kind of reinvigorate the top line?

Yes. So okay, a lot in that question. Let me tackle the COGS and the SG&A. You're thinking about that the right way. They're separate, separate initiatives. So on the COGS side, if you recall last year, we were going after -- over a couple of years, we were going after $200 in COGS savings. Last year, we actually got $125. At the beginning of this year, we actually talked about going after another $125 for this year. So we're ahead of where we thought we'd be from a $200 goal. I will tell you, we're still on track for that $125 for this year partway through the year. And that is a separate and distinct initiative versus the SG&A savings. So we don't want to get those 2 mudded up.

To your question about, hey, would you be willing to reinvest all of that back in to be -- to make sure that you're competitive, what I would tell you is yes. But I would also tell you, I don't think that's necessary. I think that we'll be able to take some to the bottom line, absolutely, but we'll invest some of them back an appropriate amount. And as I'd tell you right now, I don't -- I can't see a scenario where you'd have to take all that savings and put it back into price. But again, I also want you to know that we're going to continue to be price competitive.

Our next question comes from Chris Pierce with Needham.

Just kind of following up on that question, I guess, we talked a lot about pricing in the quarter, pricing going forward, is this something that should we reset our -- because you guys have sort of reset GP expectations kind of higher with your performance. Does this conversation around pricing mean that investors should maybe reach that GPU expectations modestly lower? Or is it too soon to tell? Or how kind of intertwined would those be?

Yes. No, Chris, it's a great question. And what I had said at the beginning of the year is from a modeling standpoint, you can kind of think about year-over-year on a retail GPU will be similar. I also said, hey, any given quarter, there's going to be some puts and takes. And I think that's what you're seeing here. I think we still feel comfortable for the year as a whole to use that kind of retail GPU target.

But what I will tell you is, if you think about the third quarter, if you look at last year's third quarter, it was a record high. So I would expect us to certainly come off of that from last year and be more kind of in the historical range. And I think you didn't ask it, but I think you can think about wholesale being the same way on a year-over-year, I think you can keep that target that we talked about being very similar. But similar to retail, last year's third quarter, wholesale was one of the strongest, probably the top 2 or 3 GPUs that we had in wholesale for a third quarter. So I would expect to come down and be more in line with kind of historical averages on that one for the quarter.

Okay. And then just I might get my years wrong here, but at the end of '22, I believe it was calendar 2022 when you guys had too much inventory at that period in time and dealers were being more aggressive on price and it kind of took you longer to work through because you wanted to hold margin versus pricing and there was sort of a longer reset to your inventory level. I just want to confirm that's sort of not what we're talking about here because of kind of your commentary about September and this being more onetime. Or I guess I'd just love to hear you kind of talk through that, and apologies if I got the dates wrong, given your -- in terms of kind of quarters.

You actually did get the dates wrong. Really I think what you're referring to is the big depreciation event, which we saw in calendar '23 and '24. I believe there was one in -- end of '23 and there were 2 in '24, that we worked through. And just to remind everyone, on those events, it was about, for each of them, it was about $3,000 in each of the event over a few months. So the degree of it was different back then than it is here.

And this event, a couple of different things. One, it was $1,000 over about a month period, and then you saw some stabilization. And then we're also going into a period where you're going to see generally seasonal depreciation. So we wanted to make sure we get -- we got through that.

But yes, those events that you're talking about, basically at those times, you look at the elasticity with all the things that we talked about earlier that go into that equation, and we held our margins a little bit more because at the time that made sense. This one actually, it made sense, let's get this stuff through. And so again, we'll tackle these things as they come up.

[Operator Instructions] We have a follow-up from Rajat Gupta with JPMorgan.

Just want to follow-up on CAF, just going back to the commentary on still expecting flat to slightly down. Could you help us a little bit more on the third quarter? You're going to get the gain on sale from the $900 million, but you're also going to lose like a quarter of net interest income on that $900 million, so almost like a wash. Is that the right way to think about it? Just if you could give us a little more color on how you'd get to still flat income? Even if you have like $80 million provisions in the third quarter and maybe the fourth quarter, just hard to bridge that.

Sure. Yes. I think you've got a couple of things going on there. First, yes, you've got the income, but you're going to realize that all upfront, whereas again the receivables you're going to no longer have there. You were going to gain that income over time. So that's a bit of a pull forward. Your overall NIM will be impacted. There's no doubt about that, Rajat, you're correct.

But yes, obviously, when we look at the provision going out, that's a key piece of it. But again, you're bringing on higher NIM receivables as well. So I think that's helping benefit you to bring that NIM back up in the -- probably by the fourth quarter off of where you are in the third quarter. So I think all that's playing together.

Yes, I think you got servicing income, you have the 5% retention. So there are things that should provide a tailwind.

Yes. And again, I'd probably say it's more slightly down. Again, a lot plays into what's the origination provision, where is the NIM, where the losses go ultimately. But yes, I'd say probably slightly down more than flat.

For the full year, not for third quarter.

No. For the full year. So take last fiscal year, this fiscal year, that's what I'm referring to.

We do have another follow-up from Brian Nagel with Oppenheimer.

So my follow-up question, I think we've discussed this in the past, but did you notice anything with regard to -- I'm looking at used car unit demand, anything notable with regard to kind of the different type of vehicles? I mean was there a stronger trend, high end, low end, that type -- and does anything shift as we push here through the fiscal year?

Yes. I think a couple of observations. I mean I still -- just the industry as a total, you're seeing older vehicles, like if you look at older vehicle registration, older vehicles being older than 10-year-old -- 10 years old, that market segment is doing better than the 0 to 10. In the first quarter, I think we kind of had a barbell effect where your under $25,000 cars were up year-over-year, but so were like your $40,000 plus. This quarter, pretty much everything was down. The under $25,000 was, as a percent of sales, was up a little bit over last year. But as far as the other ones, they were either down or a little bit flat. So you still picked up some more as a percent of sale in the under $25,000 car.

And then, Bill, to that end, I know you've been merchandising different, so to say, to reflect the consumer preferences. But so as you look forward, is there -- are you pushing further into that older inventory within the system?

Yes. Look, we've obviously, Brian, been focused on this. I think if we look at the -- what we call that value max sale, let's call it 6 years and older or more than 60,000 miles, we had a bump-up in sales in that. We're up -- if you look year-over-year, we had a nice little tick up, which means we had more of that available. I think our goal will be to continue to have more of that available.

But I also think that we have to make sure that there's also a good selection of later-model used cars as well because that appeals to a lot of CarMax customers also. So you can't go to -- at some point, you have the benefit that you get of having older, higher mileage will be offset because you don't have some of the vehicles that the core CarMax customer is looking for. So we'll walk that -- we'll walk that line.

Thank you. And we don't have any further questions at this time. I will hand the call back to Bill for any closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, Nikki. Well, listen, thank you for joining the call today and for your questions and your support. As always, I just want to thank our associates for everything they do to take care of each other and the customers and our communities, and we will talk again next quarter.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That concludes the Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 CarMax Earnings Release Conference Call. You may now disconnect.