CVC Capital Partners Aktienkurs
Vergleich mit Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 Was ist das?
Die Peer Group sind die Unternehmen mit dem ähnlichsten Geschäftsmodell. Sie dienen als Vergleichsmaßstab, um eine Aktie einzuordnen.
🧮 Wie wird sie ausgewählt?
Nach Ähnlichkeit des Geschäftsmodells, also Unternehmen aus derselben Branche, mit vergleichbaren Produkten und einer ähnlichen Kundengruppe. Nur so vergleichst du Äpfel mit Äpfeln.
🏛️ Wofür ist sie wichtig?
Ob eine Aktie günstig oder teuer ist, lässt sich am ehesten im Vergleich beurteilen. Ein KGV von 18 oder ein EV/FCF von 20 wirkt je nach Maßstab günstig oder teuer. Die Peer Group liefert dabei den treffsichersten Maßstab: Unternehmen mit ähnlichem Geschäftsmodell, die denselben Bedingungen unterliegen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
Liegt eine Kennzahl unter dem Peer-Durchschnitt, ist die Aktie relativ günstiger bewertet, über dem Durchschnitt entsprechend teurer. Ein Abschlag zur Peer Group kann eine Chance sein, aber auch einen Grund haben (zum Beispiel geringeres Wachstum). Der Vergleich ist ein Startpunkt, kein Urteil.
Ist CVC Capital Partners eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 9.109 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 12,58 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 2,01 Mrd. €
Marktkapitalisierung = 12,58 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 1,92 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 13,94 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 2,01 Mrd. €
Enterprise Value = 13,94 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 1,92 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF) | ex SBC
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF setzt den Unternehmenswert eines Unternehmens ins Verhältnis zu seinem Free Cashflow. Die Kennzahl zeigt damit, mit welchem Vielfachen des aktuellen Free Cashflows ein Unternehmen bewertet wird. EV/FCF ex SBC berücksichtigt zusätzlich aktienbasierte Vergütungen (Stock-Based Compensation, SBC). SBC verursacht zwar keinen direkten Cash-Abfluss, kann bestehende Aktionäre jedoch durch die Ausgabe zusätzlicher Aktien verwässern. Deshalb wird SBC bei dieser Variante vom Free Cashflow abgezogen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
EV/FCF ex SBC = Enterprise Value ÷ (Free Cashflow (TTM) − SBC)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EV/FCF ermöglicht eine Bewertung auf Basis des Free Cashflows und ergänzt damit gewinnbasierte Bewertungskennzahlen wie das KGV. Die Variante ex SBC berücksichtigt zusätzlich die wirtschaftliche Belastung durch aktienbasierte Vergütungen und ermöglicht dadurch eine konservativere Betrachtung aus Sicht der Aktionäre.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF bedeutet, dass der Unternehmenswert im Verhältnis zum aktuellen Free Cashflow niedrig ist. Die Ursachen dafür sollten jedoch immer im Unternehmens- und Branchenkontext betrachtet werden.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF bedeutet, dass der Unternehmenswert im Verhältnis zum aktuellen Free Cashflow hoch ist. Das kann beispielsweise auf hohe Wachstumserwartungen oder eine vorübergehend schwache Cash-Generierung zurückzuführen sein.
- Bei positiver SBC und positivem bereinigtem Free Cashflow fällt EV/FCF ex SBC in der Regel höher aus als das klassische EV/FCF.
- Besonders aussagekräftig ist die Kennzahl bei Unternehmen mit relativ stabilen und gut einschätzbaren Cashflows.
- Bei negativem oder sehr niedrigem Free Cashflow ist EV/FCF nur eingeschränkt aussagekräftig und sollte nicht wie ein gewöhnliches Bewertungsmultiple interpretiert werden.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF) | ex SBC
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt an, wie viel Bargeld tatsächlich übrig bleibt, nachdem ein Unternehmen seine Betriebsausgaben und Investitionsausgaben gedeckt hat. Der FCF ex SBC zieht zusätzlich die aktienbasierte Vergütung ab, um den Cashflow um den Effekt der nicht zahlungswirksamen SBC zu bereinigen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Free Cashflow ex SBC = Operativer Cashflow − SBC − Investitionen in Sachanlagen (CAPEX)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF spiegelt die tatsächliche Finanzkraft eines Unternehmens wider – unabhängig von den bilanziellen Gewinnen. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum ein Unternehmen für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder den Schuldenabbau hat. Der FCF ex SBC zieht zusätzlich die aktienbasierte Vergütung ab und zeigt, wie hoch die Cash-Generierung nach Abzug der SBC ausfällt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free-Cashflow-Marge | ex SBC
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel Free Cashflow ein Unternehmen im Verhältnis zu seinem Umsatz erwirtschaftet. Der Free Cashflow entspricht vereinfacht dem operativen Cashflow abzüglich der Investitionsausgaben. Die Free-Cashflow-Marge ex SBC berücksichtigt zusätzlich aktienbasierte Vergütungen (Stock-Based Compensation, SBC). SBC verursacht zwar keinen direkten Cash-Abfluss, kann bestehende Aktionäre jedoch durch die Ausgabe zusätzlicher Aktien verwässern. Daher wird SBC bei dieser Kennzahl vom Free Cashflow abgezogen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Free-Cashflow-Marge ex SBC = (Free Cashflow − SBC) ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen seinen Umsatz in Free Cashflow umwandelt. Ein hoher Free Cashflow kann dem Unternehmen finanziellen Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe, Schuldentilgung oder weitere Investitionen geben. Die Variante ex SBC berücksichtigt zusätzlich die wirtschaftliche Belastung durch aktienbasierte Vergütungen und ermöglicht dadurch eine konservativere Betrachtung der Cash-Generierung aus Sicht der Aktionäre.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen einen hohen Anteil seines Umsatzes in Free Cashflow umwandelt.
- Das kann dem Unternehmen mehr finanziellen Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe, Schuldentilgung oder Investitionen geben.
- Die Free-Cashflow-Marge ex SBC berücksichtigt zusätzlich die mögliche Verwässerung durch aktienbasierte Vergütungen.
- Besonders aussagekräftig ist die Entwicklung über mehrere Jahre. Sinkende Werte können beispielsweise auf höhere Investitionen, Veränderungen im Working Capital oder eine schwächere operative Entwicklung zurückzuführen sein.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 SBC | in % Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) bezeichnet die aktienbasierte Vergütung, die ein Unternehmen seinen Mitarbeitern und Führungskräften gewährt. Der Prozentanteil zeigt, wie hoch die SBC im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
SBC in % Umsatz = (SBC ÷ Umsatz) × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Aktienbasierte Vergütung ist für Aktionäre ein realer Kostenfaktor. Sie erhöht die Aktienanzahl und verwässert damit die bestehenden Anteile. Der Anteil am Umsatz zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen auf dieses Mittel setzt und wie viel der Wertschöpfung an Mitarbeiter statt an Aktionäre fließt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Wert ist grundsätzlich positiv: Die aktienbasierte Vergütung fällt im Verhältnis zum Umsatz gering aus.
- Ein hoher Wert kann dagegen auf eine stärkere Abhängigkeit von aktienbasierter Vergütung und ein höheres potenzielles Verwässerungsrisiko hindeuten. Entscheidend ist dabei auch, ob das Unternehmen die Verwässerung durch Aktienrückkäufe ausgleicht.
📘 SBC in % FCF
📈 Was ist das?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) bezeichnet die aktienbasierte Vergütung, die ein Unternehmen seinen Mitarbeitern und Führungskräften gewährt. Der Prozentanteil zeigt, wie hoch die SBC im Verhältnis zum Free Cashflow (FCF) ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
SBC in % FCF = (SBC ÷ Free Cashflow) × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Aktienbasierte Vergütung ist für Aktionäre ein realer Kostenfaktor. Sie erhöht die Aktienanzahl und verwässert damit die bestehenden Anteile. Der Anteil am freien Cashflow zeigt, wie groß die SBC im Verhältnis zur vom Unternehmen erwirtschafteten Cash-Generierung ist. Da SBC nicht zahlungswirksam ist, wird sie bei der Berechnung des FCF typischerweise nicht als Cash-Abfluss berücksichtigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Wert ist hier meist günstig. Die aktienbasierte Vergütung fällt im Verhältnis zur Cash-Erzeugung gering aus.
- Ein hoher Wert bedeutet, dass ein großer Teil des ausgewiesenen freien Cashflows durch nicht zahlungswirksame SBC gestützt wird.
- Je höher der Wert, desto stärker kann die SBC die tatsächliche wirtschaftliche Belastung für Aktionäre widerspiegeln.
📘 SBC-Wachstum 1J
📈 Was ist das?
Das SBC-Wachstum 1J zeigt, wie stark sich die aktienbasierte Vergütung (Stock-Based Compensation) eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das SBC-Wachstum zeigt, ob die aktienbasierte Vergütung für Aktionäre zunehmend oder abnehmend relevant wird. Steigt die SBC deutlich, kann dadurch langfristig auch die Verwässerung der Aktionäre zunehmen. Gleichzeitig handelt es sich um einen nicht zahlungswirksamen Aufwand, der in der Gewinn- und Verlustrechnung das Ergebnis mindert, in der Kapitalflussrechnung jedoch wieder hinzugerechnet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher positiver Wert ist meistens negativ, denn steigende SBC kann die Belastung für Aktionäre erhöhen, insbesondere durch mögliche Verwässerung.
- Entscheidend ist, ob die Entwicklung der SBC langfristig nachhaltig bleibt. Ein gewisses Maß an SBC ist bei vielen Wachstums- und Technologieunternehmen üblich.
📘 Aktienanzahl-Wachstum 1J
📈 Was ist das?
Das Wachstum der Aktienanzahl zeigt, wie stark sich die Zahl der ausstehenden Aktien innerhalb eines Jahres verändert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Aktienanzahl bestimmt, auf wie viele Anteile sich Gewinn und Vermögen des Unternehmens verteilen. Sinkt die Anzahl der Aktien, steigt der relative Anteil bestehender Aktionäre. Steigt sie, werden bestehende Aktionäre verwässert. Die Kennzahl macht damit Verwässerung und Aktienrückkäufe direkt sichtbar.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein negativer Wert ist meist positiv, da die Zahl der ausstehenden Aktien zurückgeht.
- Ein positiver Wert deutet auf eine Verwässerung bestehender Aktionäre hin.
- Ein sinkender Wert ist nicht automatisch positiv: Entscheidend ist auch, zu welchem Preis und wie die Rückkäufe finanziert werden.
📘 Shareholder Yield
📈 Was ist das?
Der Shareholder Yield zeigt, wie viel Wert ein Unternehmen im Verhältnis zu seiner Marktkapitalisierung durch Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe und Schuldenabbau für seine Aktionäre schafft. Damit geht die Kennzahl über die klassische Dividendenrendite hinaus.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Dividendenrendite allein zeigt nur einen Teil davon, wie ein Unternehmen sein Kapital zugunsten der Aktionäre einsetzt. Neben Dividenden können auch Aktienrückkäufe den Anteil bestehender Aktionäre am Unternehmen erhöhen. Ein Abbau der Verschuldung stärkt zusätzlich die finanzielle Position des Unternehmens. Der Shareholder Yield fasst diese drei Komponenten in einer Kennzahl zusammen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein höherer Wert bedeutet mehr Kapitalrückgabe bzw. einen stärkeren Schuldenabbau zugunsten der Aktionäre.
- Die Zusammensetzung ist wichtig: Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Schuldenabbau haben unterschiedliche Auswirkungen.
- Rückkäufe schaffen nur dann Wert, wenn die Aktien zu attraktiven Preisen zurückgekauft werden.
- Entscheidend ist auch, ob die Kapitalrückgaben und der Schuldenabbau nachhaltig finanziert werden.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
CVC Capital Partners Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
14 Analysten haben eine CVC Capital Partners Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
14 Analysten haben eine CVC Capital Partners Prognose abgegeben:
CVC Capital Partners Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
JUL
30
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
vor 3 Monaten
|
|
MÄR
11
2025 Earnings Call
vor 7 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
CVC Capital Partners — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to the CVC Capital Partners plc 2026 Half Year Results Call. Please be aware that this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would like to hand over to Bruce Hamilton to begin the meeting. Bruce, please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Today, we'll update you on our performance for the first 6 months of the year. We have up to 60 minutes for the call. We'll begin with the presentation. And after that, we'll open the floor to questions. Presenting today are Rob Lucas, CEO; Rob Squire, Head of Client and Product Solutions; Peter Rutland, President; and Fred Watt, CFO. Rob, over to you.
Thanks, Bruce, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our half-year results call. Starting on Slide 2, you can see the first half of 2026 was a period of real momentum with strong performance across every part of our business. Once again, we've delivered record realizations at highly attractive returns, a track record that remains second to none. This is translating into fundraising momentum across all 4 platforms and each client channel, driving growth in fee-paying AUM, greater diversification and still stronger financial performance.
First, let me provide a bit more detail on our operating performance. Realizations continued at record levels, up 79% LTM, and these continue to be delivered at highly attractive returns. Value creation saw further increases to 11% over the last 12 months, reflecting the benefit of our sourcing and value creation engines. In the first half of this year alone, value creation for PE and Infra was 6%, with Europe, Americas delivering value creation of 8% Deployment continued at a consistent pace of EUR 26 billion over the last 12 months to June and with a strong pipeline going forward.
And we saw broad-based fundraising momentum right across the business with gross inflows of EUR 11 billion, again showing the strength of our diversified platform. That operating momentum translates directly into our financial performance. With group fee-paying AUM up 9% year-on-year, fee-related revenues followed that trend, growing 9% as well. Combined with strong performance-related earnings, first half EBITDA has increased by 12% and adjusted EPS is up 11% year-on-year. And our strong predictable cash generation supports a dividend per share up 12% year-on-year. And this is alongside our ongoing share buyback program. Fred will take us through the financials fully in a few minutes.
Looking in more detail at realizations, our record last 12 months really does mark us out as an industry leader and follows a record year in 2024 and again in 2025. Realizations in the first half of 2026 were up 19% compared to the first half of 2025, driven by exit strength right across our platform. These include notable exits from our Europe Americas Fund VII and II, such as Naturgy, the Spanish-based energy company; and Rayner, our MedTech eye care company as well as from Asia and infrastructure, as highlighted on the slide. For the full year, we expect realizations broadly similar to last year.
These record realizations feed directly into our track record of creating exceptional returns for our clients and delivering DPI that truly differentiates us. Over the past 4.5 years, we've returned 33% more capital than we have called from our private equity platform. And within that, 40% more than we have called from our Europe Americas franchise, something that is quite unique across our peer group. In an environment where our clients are ever more focused on DPI, this is central to our high confidence in our future fundraising, not least Fund X, which we'll be launching in 6 months' time.
Our returns over this period are equally strong, 3.6x gross multiple of money and 26% gross IRR across our private equity exits or 4x and 29% across Europe, Americas. But how are we able to consistently deliver these returns and realizations? For me, 3 factors stand out. First, the upper mid-market size of our investments gives us flexibility. We aren't reliant on the IPO markets to exit. Second, our prudent portfolio marks, which allow us to exit consistently at an uplift. And thirdly, and very importantly, our ability to drive strong outlook during our ownership, creating high-performing valuable businesses. On the topic of investment performance, we are seeing very positive operating momentum across our portfolio companies.
Over the last 12 months, we have delivered EBITDA growth of 13% across all of our private equity funds and 14% across Europe Americas Fund VIII. And importantly, this growth is broad-based as these funds are diversified with typically 30 to 40 investments in Europe-Americas funds. It's also worth noting this value creation includes the markdowns to our limited software exposure, in line with changes in public market valuations in the first quarter. With this value creation, a number of our funds have seen strong progress in gross MOIC over the last 6 months, with Europe Americas Fund III, for example, increasing to 1.5x from 1.3x 6 months ago.
As I've said previously, the importance of AI for portfolio companies can't be overemphasized, and we are putting material resources into preparing ours for this enormous technological change. AI will have disruptive effects, but can also be massively beneficial for those who really embrace it. This is why we are very much focused on accelerating the adoption of Agentic AI across our portfolio companies to drive further value creation, including by using partnerships with all the major providers. In our investment process, we are also leveraging AI platforms to enhance knowledge sharing and support investment decision-making, including for due diligence.
We were early adopters, taking our whole senior team out to Singularity University on the West Coast in early 2020 to better understand the significance of large language models. Since then, we have fully embedded the AI opportunity and risk lens into our investment committee decisions. More broadly, the strength of our network shows in the breadth of our capital deployment across the platform and the way our teams work together. In the first half of the year, we acquired the Animal Nutrition & Health business of DSM, an investment made possible by the combined efforts of our Benelux, DACH and Chemicals teams. In sports, media and entertainment, where we are a world leader, we acquired the world's largest online Chess platform, chess.com, and made an investment in Equine Network, which is a leading North American equestrian sports league.
Both investments combine the expertise of our SME sector team with our U.S. platform. In the first half, this led to a deployment pace that remained consistent with a 3- to 4-year investment cycle, running at a similar level to the prior year, and our healthy pipeline gives us real confidence as we look forward. We have built CVC into one of the world's broadest and most diversified private markets leaders. This breadth is a huge competitive advantage as clients consolidate relationships and are looking for partners who can serve them across multiple strategies, channels and geographies. As you can see on the left of this slide, our 4 platforms are all in sizable and very attractive markets, private equity, credit, secondaries and infrastructure.
Within each of those platforms, our unparalleled global network of 30 offices and our specialist teams provide the deepest origination funnel in our industry. This is complemented by a highly aligned, very distinctive compensation model and a business that is fully integrated as one CVC. As you can see on the other side of the slide, we are proud to have the highest quality client base and relationships. Our consistent track record of outperformance through the cycle has helped us create deep, long-standing relationships with the top LPs in the world. And at the same time, our fundraising capabilities continue to broaden and expand across the insurance and private wealth channels.
All this means we're extremely well positioned for growth, benefiting from the trends that work in our industry. We're gaining market share on the back of our consistent outperformance and investment appetite for Europe. We are demonstrating strong growth in credit, infrastructure and secondaries. In each case, we are using the power of the CVC network to keep scaling these platforms and broaden them further, including into adjacent products and client segments.
And in private equity, we are confident in future growth, driven by Fund X, which we expect to be the same size or larger than its predecessor, which is still the largest private equity fund ever raised. This all underpins our previously guided double-digit CAGR in fee-paying AUM to 2028 and a clear path to a substantial step-up in our earnings in 2028 as we activate Fund X. With that, I'll hand over to Rob to take you through fundraising. Thanks, Rob.
Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. I'll start my section with an update on our closed-end institutional capital raising. Slide 11 shows that our strong execution in this channel continued in the first half with momentum across our entire platform here at CVC. We held 2 highly successful final closings during the period. Firstly, our CLO Equity Fund IV with commitments of $1 billion, a 25% increase on the predecessor Vintage III and powering $15 billion of CLO issuance. Secondly, we closed our maiden European middle market buyout fund, CVC Catalyst, with aggregate commitments of $3.4 billion. This total is 70% above our initial $2 billion target and offers yet one more data point on the strong institutional demand for European private equity.
In our secondaries business, SOF VI closed $9.3 billion at the half year, and we'll hold a final close there in the coming weeks with more capital. On the back of this success, we feel well positioned to now broaden our secondary platform into new adjacencies, including the imminent launch of credit secondaries and over time, the launch of infrastructure secondaries. And on infrastructure, we've closed EUR 5.2 billion of aggregate commitments at the half year into our Value-add Fund IV and our DIF Fund VIII. Combining this capital with further closings already held in July and other IC approvals received, we're now over 75% complete on our combined EUR 8 billion target. When taken as a whole, we see this execution demonstrating CVC's capacity to raise institutional capital at scale as we broaden our platform.
The support and the partnership that we're seeing day in and day out from our long-standing client relationships provides all of us with real confidence in our pipeline for '27 and our Fund X raise specifically. Pre-marketing for that process is now well underway and is very much in line with expectations. CVC's outstanding investment and realization metrics, combined with our proven underwriting model for that specific process, underpin our confidence in delivering a fund at the same size or larger than its predecessor. Now turning to Slide 12. And as Rob referenced, we see CVC's platform continuing to gain share in each of our channels.
And I want to quickly detail the structural drivers that I'm seeing firsthand, which position CVC so strongly. First, as we've referenced on prior calls, we see the vast majority of our clients continuing to concentrate their capital with fewer and fewer GPs, focusing both their time and their energy on relationships that can span multiple asset classes. Secondly, we see an ever-growing emphasis on partnering with managers that can demonstrate a proven track record of generating alpha across economic and market cycles. And I see this focus point especially gathering even more momentum in the years to come.
Third, institutional clients are placing ever more weight on actual cash-on-cash returns and actual DPI metrics instead of mark-to-market paper gains. On this front, CVC's track record is second to none. And fourth, we continue to see a rebalancing of private market portfolios towards greater European exposure. Given CVC's leadership position in European private equity, credit, secondaries and infrastructure, we feel very well placed to be the partner of choice for our clients. Now Rob referenced several of these trends as emerging or indeed accelerating since the start of 2022.
And as we show on the right-hand side, during that time period, we've generated in excess of EUR 100 billion of gross inflows onto our platform. While the aggregate scale of that capital is pleasing and is set to jump again with our Fund X process, what's most encouraging is the acceleration in the year-on-year cadence of these flows as we broadened our platform, specifically the growth in flows to secondaries, infrastructure and to credit. And I fully expect this cadence will amplify further when we onboard the Marathon products in the coming months and years ahead.
So lastly from me, on Slide 13, we cover private wealth, and I'm pleased to report that we've continued to make good progress in the channel with around EUR 7 billion of aggregate value now in our evergreen structures. This total is more than 4x the level of just a year ago and is 90% up on the values which I provided at the full year results. During the first half, we accepted over EUR 2.6 billion in subscriptions, and we had gross redemptions of around EUR 80 million, implying net inflows to our evergreen products of around EUR 2.5 billion. As a reminder, we see these vehicles as an important long-term opportunity for CVC to accept different forms of capital alongside our long-established strength in the traditional closed-end format.
Aside from private wealth, we believe these structures will be the conduit for defined contribution retirement plans to gain exposure to private markets, including over time, the emerging 401(k) opportunity in the United States. I'm pleased to report that from a standing start just over 2 years ago, we now have active evergreen offerings in each of private equity, credit, secondaries and infrastructure with multiple vehicles tailored to the large U.S. market.
In conclusion, as is the case with our closed-end funds, provided that we maintain strong performance, I have every confidence that the long-term trajectory of these vehicles will be incredibly positive as clients in this maturing area increasingly seek to align their capital with high-performance managers. So with that, I'll now hand over to Peter to provide an update on the developments that we're seeing in credit and insurance.
Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everybody. We have significantly scaled our credit platform in recent years to build market-leading positions in both private and liquid credit. Today, we are a top 3 manager in European private credit and the #1 CLO manager in Europe. The quality of our underwriting is reflected in our outstanding performance track record with very low default and loss rates, an annualized default rate of just 0.2% since inception in European direct lending and 0.2% loss rate in CLOs, well below industry averages. In direct lending, this is partly because European private credit markets have a more favorable dynamic in terms of capital supply and demand than in the U.S.
But in addition, like in private equity, portfolio diversification in credit is a key driver of this outperformance with, for example, software exposure well below industry averages. This performance has driven strong growth, and we have scaled our European direct lending program from EUR 1 billion to over EUR 10 billion in only 2 vintages and a 30% CAGR in our credit fee-paying AUM since 2020. We also see substantial future growth potential. We have continued to invest in our product offering. Notably, the acquisition of Marathon, which closed on July 1, brings us market-leading performance in a number of attractive subsectors, especially in the U.S. market, including the fast-growing asset-based lending, structured credit and real estate credit with minimal exposure to the U.S. direct lending market.
This significantly expands CVC's addressable market opportunity across all our routes to market. Indeed, with this broadened product suite and our market-leading performance, we are confident that we can continue to scale in the institutional channel. In private wealth, as just touched upon by Rob, we see significant further growth potential from the EUR 3.5 billion we've reached in our CVC credit vehicle in just 2 years. And in insurance, the addition of Marathon's capabilities will allow us to further accelerate our growth in that segment.
Indeed, the size of the insurance opportunity is considerable, and we are well positioned to win. Insurers need to improve the risk-adjusted returns on the asset side of their balance sheets to meet the competition from insurers backed by alternative asset managers. We have already raised EUR 18 billion over the past 5 years. And given the focus on the insurance channel, we're now bringing together our insurance expertise more closely with our credit expertise into one credit and insurance organization.
Our credit investing capabilities, together with our experience in insurance private equity and technical experience from our global insurance solutions team means that we can create solutions that are highly attractive to insurers. This broadening of conversations we can have with insurance clients is illustrated by the $3.5 billion strategic partnership we entered into with AIG at the beginning of the year. And with that, I'll hand you over to Fred to take you through the financials.
Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everyone. Starting with Slide 17 and fee-paying AUM, which as we can see, grew 9% year-on-year to EUR 153 billion. As Rob noted earlier, that growth was led by credit, secondaries and infrastructure, which together were up 19% year-on-year. Private equity was in line with the June '25 levels, reflecting, on the one hand, strong realizations, but offset by fee-paying inflows with the completion of Catalyst and also the positive momentum we've seen in private wealth. Moving to Slide 18 and turning to the P&L.
Fee-related revenues were up 9% versus the first half of '25, in line with fee-paying AUM growth at EUR 771 million. As you can see on the slide, fee-related revenues included EUR 22 million of catch-up fees relating mainly to the capital close in H1 for Catalyst and SOF VI. Fee-related earnings up 11% to EUR 442 million and FRE margin of 57% also benefited to some extent from those catch-up fees. Performance-related earnings of EUR 110 million were up 15%, tracking in line with our expectations and also tracking our prior guidance for the year.
Taking both FRE and PRE together, EBITDA increased 12% to EUR 554 million. And finally, profit after tax was EUR 434 million, up 10% with the effective tax rate, excluding carried interest at around 20.5%, higher than last year, but within the range of 19% to 21% that we discussed at our full year results. Turning to Slide 19 and costs. Total operating expenses grew 7% year-on-year, reflecting our focus on cost discipline alongside investment in our growth areas such as private wealth and insurance. For the full year, we continue to expect total cost growth to be slightly below 10% with higher growth in the second half due to the phasing of hirings.
And consistent with what we said in March, we expect total cost growth to revert to mid- to high single-digit percentage from 2027 onwards. Turning to performance-related earnings on Slide 20. The basic message here is that we are reaffirming all guidance set out at the full year results in March. Firstly, the future carry potential embedded in funds already raised remains unchanged at EUR 5 billion, with carried interest recognized in the first half, offset by carry on new capital closed in the period. This will flow through the P&L over the coming years and is based on our key funds achieving the midpoint of their target ranges.
Secondly, on the outlook for PRE, we are also reaffirming the guidance that we set out at our full year results, including for 2026. The strong realizations we have delivered in the first half gives us increasing visibility and confidence in delivering this. Our unchanged expectation is for aggregate PRE of around EUR 600 million to EUR 700 million over 2026 and 2027, with the most likely path still being 2026 and around the 2025 level, followed by a first step-up in 2027 with expected initial carry recognition of Asia V. Finally, we continue to expect that a further substantial build will then follow across 2028 to 2029 as Fund VII recognizes its initial IFRS carry given the IPO perimeter and IFRS accounting effects we have discussed previously.
Lastly, turning to our balance sheet and cash generation on Slide 21. As of the 30th of June 2026, we had a healthy balance sheet position with gross cash of EUR 645 million and long-term debt of approximately EUR 1.9 billion. This reflects the issuance of $550 million of U.S. private placement notes and is adjusted for the cash used for the closing of the acquisition of Marathon, which took place on July 1. Strong operating cash flow in the first half supported the payment of the 2025 final dividend of EUR 250 million as well as EUR 194 million of share buyback completed out of the announced program of up to EUR 350 million.
The net debt leverage ratio as of June was 1.2x adjusted for the closing of the acquisition of Marathon, well within our maximum leverage guidance of 2x. The second half of the year will see continued strong operational cash flow, supporting the payment of a EUR 275 million interim dividend plus further progress in the share buyback program. With that, I will hand back to Rob for some concluding remarks.
Thanks, Fred. So to conclude, what excites me the most is not just the strength of the first half's performance. It's that every structural trend shaping private markets today, client consolidation, demand for alpha, insurance capital, private wealth, European allocations and product diversification. They all play directly to how we have positioned CVC and how we've built our strengths. Our market share gains continue.
The strong double-digit growth in EBITDA, EPS and dividends in the first half is underpinned by fundraising momentum, including the $3.4 billion raised for Catalyst and the $9.3 billion raised so far for SOF VI. You've heard today about our strong growth in private wealth and in insurance with Marathon materially expanding our offering. At the same time, we remain firmly focused on our core institutional clients. We see continued growth in private equity with increasing visibility and confidence in our ability to deliver Fund X at the same size or larger than Fund IX, alongside continued fast scaling in credit, secondaries and infrastructure.
This all underpins our previously guided top digit -- double-digit CAGR in fee-paying AUM to 2028 and a clear path to a substantial step-up in our earnings in 2028 as we activate Fund X. Thank you very much. Now just before I hand over to Bruce to start the Q&A, you'll have seen we announced in May that John Hourican will join CVC as CFO in September and succeed Fred, who will retire after almost 20 years with the firm. I'd just like to take a moment to recognize Fred for his exceptional contribution to CVC over nearly 2 decades.
Fred joined in 2007 and has played a central role in helping us build CVC into the global business we are today, including, of course, our IPO in 2024. On a personal basis, Fred has been a trusted partner and colleague to me and to many others over the years and externally as a trusted contact for many of you on this call. On behalf of us all, thank you, Fred, for everything you've done and best wishes for a happy retirement. Bruce, over to you.
Thank you, Rob, Peter and Fred. Now let's open it up for questions. Please try to keep to 2 questions per person. Operator.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Hubert Lam with Bank of America.
2. Question Answer
First, I'd like to thanks Fred, for all the help since the IPO and all the best in the future. My 2 questions. Firstly, on wealth. Any indications of slowing demand near term for your wealth products? Or do you see any change in terms of your goals or launches because of the more challenging backdrop within the evergreen sector? That's the first question. Second question is on credit. How do you see deployment opportunities now? Do you see more now just given the sector dislocation? Or is the lack of sponsor activity slowing your deployment activity?
Thanks, Hubert. Rob, would you like to take the first question there? And Peter, would you like to speak to the second?
Sure. Hubert, Obviously, I don't have a crystal ball. And so what I can tell you is that we're really pleased with the momentum that we're seeing. We had net inflows into all of our evergreen products in Q1 and in Q2. And so we feel incredibly well positioned. And I've said on prior calls, we're really seeing that differentiation in terms of that European nexus play through in terms of the reception that we're getting, not just sort of in the rest of the world space, but also specifically within the U.S. wealth space. So that's how I'd answer that. Peter?
Thanks, Rob. Yes, Hubert. As noted by some of our peers, there has been a muted level of activity in the first half, partly driven by overall industry new deal activity being lower. We see this more as a temporary phenomenon. And from our point of view, our underwriting remains extremely disciplined, and we are really focused on making sure we're picking the very best opportunities ahead of us.
Our next question comes from Nicholas Herman with Citi.
Okay. I think I -- two for me as well, please. Firstly, on insurance, outside of the U.S. players, I'm not really aware of such high integration between the insurance and credit team. So it feels like that's quite relatively unique. And I guess from a competitive standpoint, outside of your global U.S. competitors, can you just talk about the competitive environment to win these insurance mandates, which are clearly -- there's clearly a significant opportunity there.
And I guess -- and then finally just bring that all together, it feels like the AIG partnership and SMA was not really a one-off. Is that fair? That's the first one. And then the second one, just a quick one on Fund X. Just trying to conceptualize the guidance on Fund X to be at least as big as the next -- as the last fund, given the clearly very strong DPI were Fund X to be the same size as Fund IX. What level of re-up rate would that broadly equate to?
Brilliant. Thanks very much, Nick. Peter, maybe you could just take the first question, and Rob Sure.
Thanks, Nicholas, for the question. And I'm not sure whether others have integrated quite as closely as we have. But certainly, we think that to be successful with insurance clients, you do need this combination of the right products that we talked about in the presentation as well as bringing an overlay of the expertise of the specifics that insurance balance sheets need to have. And absolutely, we do have big ambitions for the insurance route to market, and we hope and expect that the AIG partnership will not be the only strategic one that we will have in a few years' time.
Great. And in terms of Fund X, Nicholas, look, we will announce the target size, the cover amount at our Annual Investor Meeting in London in the second week of September. And then in terms of your question around sort of re-uprates, as you know, we have a very proven underwriting process for that fund family where we re-underwrite every single line item over the course of the preceding 18 months.
And so we're very confident that we will achieve industry-leading, quite frankly, re-up rates there. And I think that with this renewed appetite for Europe, I do actually think that the existing clients will probably contribute more into Fund X relative they were in Fund IX. So we feel quite positive again at this stage.
That's very helpful. Could you just remind us how much the existing clients contributed to Fund IX in that case, please?
I'm not sure we disclose that, Nicholas.
Our next question comes from Arnaud Giblat with BNP Paribas.
Best wishes to Fred. Two questions, please. First, could we -- could I ask about Fund IX, it's currently deployed at 65%. Could you talk about the investment pipeline that's currently active for deals that you have in the pipeline for that fund? And specifically at what level -- can you remind us what level of investment level does that need to be for Fund X to be activated? The second question is on SMAs. So you've done really well in developing rapidly a wealth channel.
I suppose perhaps the next step is to take the secondaries and the broad-based full platform approach to small institutions globally to try and sell diversified investment to small institutions. I'm just wondering if that's something in the plan and what sort of development should we expect there?
Thanks, Arnaud. Let me talk to Fund IX and the investment pipeline and also sort of activation levels. So the pipeline is good at the moment, but the world out there is quite volatile. And so the flow rate can be quite variable. I mean we're just very fortunate to have the people on the ground in the local markets to have the local network, and we generally see opportunities and can secure those opportunities ahead of others in the market, particularly within, of course, the European context. So we will see how that pipeline flows through.
We're being very selective is the point here. And so although we are currently 65% deployed, I think we still are looking at that sort of 3- to 4-years investment cadence in terms of the amount of time. And so hence, why in terms of activation, we're still looking at the first half of 2028 to do that. In terms of the activation level, we'd normally do that generally around 95% level of deployment out of the prior fund. In terms of the SMAs, I don't know whether, Rob, you're happy to talk to that?
Very happy to. Look, I think as I said to Hubert's question, we're very, very happy with the momentum that we're experiencing with the reception that we're getting within the wealth channel more broadly defined. I think if your question was around smaller institutions, I think at this stage, we've got plenty of runway in front of us within the private wealth channel.
And many of those smaller institutions do invest in our closed-end structures already. I think over time, as I referenced, I really see these vehicles as being the linchpin to the DC, the defined contribution retirement space. We're already seeing that to a certain degree in Europe with LTIF and LTAF. And so if that broadens the aperture and part of that is smaller institutions, then that's great.
[Operator Instructions] We will take our next question from Oliver Carruthers with Goldman Sachs.
Oliver Carruthers from Goldman Sachs. I've got 2 questions, please. The first question on EU DL5, your next direct lending fund. So on Slide 11, you're showing a EUR 5 billion target for this fund. I think this is the first time you disclosed this. Obviously, that excludes leverage, co-invest and SMAs. I think you previously presented a target on a slightly different basis, inclusive of these numbers back at your credit CMD back in October last year.
But could you maybe give this EUR 5 billion, I guess, fee-paying AUM kind of context in the, I guess, the momentum you're seeing with LPs and also the deployment landscape for European direct lending. We've just seen quite a few kind of pretty strong peer raises in this space. And I'm just interested on your views on how your franchise is going there. And then the second question, per your press releases in the last few months, we've seen quite a few exit announcements, particularly in Fund VII in Europe, Americas.
Could you help us just understand how they will mechanically flow through to your performance fees as we think about the second half of this year? And -- or maybe how much of that has already come through in the first half numbers that you printed today?
Great. Thanks very much indeed, Oliver. Rob, do you want to just take the first part, then Fred perhaps second part.
Sure. Oliver, so yes, the DL5 number that we've got on Slide 11, that is an unlevered equity target. Obviously, a reasonable proportion of that total is levered 1:1. And then on top of that, again, as you rightly point out, you have a series of large SMAs that sit alongside that. And so if you recall, our EU DL4 was very successful at north of EUR 10 billion. And again, I think on this raise, we'd certainly hope that we can conclude it larger than the predecessor.
Oliver, on the performance fees and realizations, yes, there's 1 or 2 that we did announce that are still to go through regulatory approval, for example, so -- which is why we're really guiding to unchanged in total, but more second half weighted in terms of PRE. That's really in line with what we're expecting. So nothing material either way, but in line with expectations.
And in terms of the mechanics, Fred, you -- Oliver was just asking about the mechanics around the treatment within Fund VII.
Yes. So it's pretty much the same as any fund in itself. So there are some announcements we make where we make -- we sign the realization, but then, of course, it's waiting for regulatory approval, in which case under IFRS, we're not able to recognize that from a PRE perspective. So that's pretty consistent with prior periods. But we're still -- we're not changing our view in terms of timing here or total for 2026.
And of course, it's a 50% allocation through to the PLC within Fund VII, nothing within Fund VI, 50% within Fund VII, i.e., 15% through to the PC. And then once we get to Fund VIII, 100% or 30%. So good.
Our next question comes from Julian Dobrovolschi with ABN AMRO.
Fred, first of all, I wish you a really happy retirement. Indeed. Two questions. First on the management fee rate. We've seen record fee realizations, which have been shrinking the PE-fee paying AUM in the mix, while the credit secondaries and infra now exceeding 50% of the asset base. And we also know that the strategies carry lower fee rate than the PE, especially the credit and secondaries.
So my question is, how should we think about the blended management fee rate margin over the next 2, 3 years in the -- as the mix shifts away from the PE strategy? And the other one really quick. Just wondering how sustainable do you think is the 57% FRE margin in H1? So how much of that do you think we can actually sustain in the second half given the fact that the OpEx is going to accelerate?
Yes. Let me take both of these, Julian. Thank you. So in terms of fee rate, I think the blended rate we're still seeing as we look forward, is still at around 1% of fee-paying AUM. You're right, credit is lower fees, but equally, secondaries and infra are higher than the group average of 1%. So we're still seeing that overall blend moving in a consistent path towards that maintaining 1% on average fee rate. In terms of your margin point, it's really partly around -- I get your point on expenses, but it's also partly around the catch-up fees that we saw in the first half. And I think if we spread that EUR 22 million of catch-up fees across the full year, I mean, first half would have been at 56%, and that's probably in line with where we're headed for the second half as well.
Our next question comes from Michael Sanderson with Barclays.
Just a couple of quick ones, please. First of all, you mentioned the progress in MOIC. I was just interested if you were able to break that down at all between sort of the earnings growth, the realizations you've seen and whether sort of multiples you've applied because clearly, where we are at end of H1 '26 is nicely higher than where we were at the end of FY '25. So just interested if there was any more granularity you're willing to share on that.
Second thing was Europe, Americas, obviously, by its name, there are the opportunity to invest in 2 major areas. Are you having any sort of -- in the early conversations you're having around re-ups, is there any sort of discussion about how the allocation of Fund X might change or not versus prior vintages? Or are you I mean I know it's all a long way off, but just interested to know whether there's a demand from investors that you're going to spend more in any -- in either of the individual geographies? And thank you, Fred, for your help.
Thanks, Michael. Let me just take the second of your questions there. And then maybe, Fred, you could just give a little bit of the breakdown in terms of the MOIC. Just in terms of Europe, Americas, I mean, we -- as you know, we invest very bottom up. And so it all depends on where we see the very best opportunities, Michael, in terms of how we approach it. Having said that, -- we are putting 35 to 40 investments into a Europe-Americas fund. And generally speaking, the exposure to the Americas within that has been in the sort of 15% to 20% region, something like that. And I think we probably see that as a sort of similar level.
There's no doubt that there has been increased investor appetite for Europe that we've seen over the recent months. And that's really, really come through. And so -- and certainly, we see the ability to drive alpha within the European environment as particularly compelling at the moment. But it all depends on where we see the very best opportunities, and that's what will dictate. But I would have thought generally around that sort of 15%, 20% level as it's historically been something similar.
And on your MOIC point, Michael, so yes, most of the uplift is coming from real earnings growth. So you see that on Slide 7, where we set out the EBITDA and revenue growth by -- in Europe and Americas in particular. So the vast majority is coming from that. But we're also seeing some uplift from realizations as well. I mean we are realizing at above the mark that we were holding assets in December. And so that continues. And so that's a contributor to it. But the biggest element of the growth in MOIC is from underlying real earnings growth at the portfolio level.
Great. I think -- though we're now -- there are no further questions. So thank you all for your participation, and we look forward to speaking again soon. Thank you.
Thanks very much indeed, everybody.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
CVC Capital Partners — 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
CVC Capital Partners Plc 2025 Full Year Results Call. Please be aware that this call is being recorded [Operator Instructions]. I would like to hand over to Bruce Hamilton to begin the meeting. Bruce, please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Today, we'll update you on our performance for 2025. We have around 60 minutes for the call. We'll begin with the presentation. And after that, we'll open the floor to questions. Presenting today are Rob Lucas, CEO; Fred Watt, CFO; Peter Rutland, President; and Rob Squire, Head of Client and Product Solutions. Rob, over to you.
Thanks, Bruce, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our 2025 full year results, and thanks for joining the call. 2025 was another really strong year of delivery for CVC. We achieved further great fundraising success with EUR 23 billion of gross inflows and powerful contributions from Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure. Importantly, the premarketing of our latest private equity vehicle, Europe/Americas X, is progressing well. We're seeing strong -- very strong growth across the Private Wealth and Insurance channels, the aggregate value of our Private Wealth vehicles increased to approximately EUR 800 million as of December 2024 to EUR 3.6 billion as of December 2025, and our recently announced $3.5 billion strategic partnership with AIG illustrates our compelling capabilities in the insurance channel.
Our fee-paying AUM increased to EUR 148 billion. More than 50% of that now comes from Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure. These 3 platforms grew by 12% in 2025 demonstrating the benefits of our diversification of the group. And we achieved record realizations of EUR 21.9 billion in 2025 at highly attractive returns. Over the past 4 years, we have now returned 30% more capital to our clients than we've deployed. This is a key differentiator compared with our private market peers, which positions us extremely well as we look towards Fund X.
Our strong operating performance translated into record financial performance. Management fees increased by 9% to EUR 1.45 billion Performance-related earnings increased by 39% to EUR 254 million, and EBITDA increased by 13% to EUR 1.1 billion. But what is it that enables us to deliver such strong operational and financial performance with such an unstable macro, not just this year, but consistently over time. Well, as I say on this slide, it's the power of our platform, which underpins our consistent performance.
Firstly, the CVC network. This is the most powerful origination engine within our industry. Secondly, our disciplined focus on running highly diversified portfolios, meaning we're never overly exposed to any one sector, region, vintage year or single investment. Thirdly, our focus on active ownership and value creation over the life of each investment. And then if you look to the right of the slide, you can see the results over 30 years all the way from Fund I, consistently outperforming across multiple economic cycles. And the outperformance over time is not just restricted to PE. You can see the exceptionally low loss and default rates in our credit business since inception and the strength of return in secondaries and infra strategies. So it's across the whole business. It's this consistent investment track record that underpins our clients' trust and support for CVC and our confidence in continuing to deliver strong returns and to grow.
Despite current events, looking out over the years ahead, we see a very exciting market opportunity, and it's one CVC is extremely well positioned to take advantage of. Let me explain. Firstly, we see clients allocating ever more capital to field managers. Given current market volatility, we expect this trend to accelerate with clients allocating their capital to managers they trust and CVC is and always has been a major beneficiary of this flight to quality. Secondly, we see clients continuing to rebalance their portfolios towards Europe. Our leading position in Europe across Private Equity, Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure means we're extremely well placed to benefit from this ongoing shift. Thirdly, we continue to see significant traction in the Private Wealth channel, where we believe we are at the early stages of a multiyear growth opportunity. Private Wealth clients are looking to increase their private market allocations and we saw this trend in the very strong Private Wealth growth we delivered in 2025. CVC's track record, brand differentiated positioning place us very well in this channel.
Finally, we also see very strong growth in the insurance channel as part of a long-term structural reallocation of capital towards private markets. Our partnership with AIG is a powerful endorsement of our ability to serve this channel at scale and our capabilities will be further enhanced by the acquisition of Marathon. We see all these 4 trends supporting a long-term and durable growth in our MFR. We've been very clear about our strategic objectives, and we continue to deliver on these strongly. With EUR 148 billion of fee-paying AUM across Private Equity, Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure, our business is stronger and more diversified than ever.
Over the past 24 months, we have grown our fee paying AUM by more than 50%, driving strong growth in our management fees. We have significantly scaled our Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure platforms, which now represent over 50% of our fee paying AUM. We've broadened our distribution and client channels across insurance and Private Wealth, complementing our well-established institutional client base. And as a result of this growth and our focus on cost discipline, we've grown management fee earnings by 50% and earnings per share by 43%.
Turning now to the operating highlights for 2025. In fundraising, we saw EUR 23 billion in gross inflows with Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure accounting for 80% of the total. We delivered another year of record realizations, up 67% year-on-year, led by Private Equity with exits achieving 3.2x gross MOIC and 23% gross IRR underpinning our confidence in fundraising, including Fund X. Deployment rates remained strong, led by Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure with Private Equity deployment consistent with our stated 3- to 4-year fund cycle. We also continue to see strong investment performance across each of our strategies. Across our Private Equity and Infrastructure portfolios, we continue to deliver strong value creation of 11% pre-FX.
Let's move to our financial highlights. We saw strong fee paying AUM growth of 6% in the second half. And in aggregate, fee-paying AUM across Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure grew 12% in 2025. You'll see the private equity fee paying AUM declined slightly in the year. As Fred will discuss later, this is mainly a function of our record year in realizations. Importantly, those distributions back to our clients reinforce our confidence in our private equity fundraising over the next 24 months. In financial terms, management fees grew 9%. We delivered a 39% increase in performance fee earnings and overall EBITDA increased 13% to EUR 1.1 billion. Given the highly cash-generative nature of our operating model, we are announcing an aggregate dividend of 2025 of EUR 500 million and in addition, a share buyback program of up to EUR 350 million. Fred will cover both of these in more detail later. Everything I've been talking about means we are highly confident in growing our fee-paying AUM at a compound annual growth rate over the next 3 years of 10% or more. This delivers EUR 200 billion of fee-paying AUM by the end of 2028.
Given our highly diversified model, this growth will come from multiple drivers. The EUR 50 billion increase in fee paying AUM will be split roughly 1/3 from Private Equity, 1/3 from Credit and 1/3 from Secondaries and Infrastructure. Over the next 36 months, Fund X and Asia VII will help deliver a step change in our private equity fee-paying AUM. We see significant continued growth from our existing Credit platform and growth across Secondaries and Infrastructure will come from existing funds in market on which we have good visibility. These fundraisings are progressing well.
And I'll now pass to Rob Squire for a more detailed update on fundraising and the strong momentum we take into 2026. Rob?
Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to start my section with an overview of the progress that we've made in scaling and diversifying our closed-end funds across private equity, across credit, across secondaries and across infrastructure over the last 3 vintages. Against a challenging market backdrop, Slide 9 demonstrates that we have delivered on our growth objectives. As Rob referenced, fee-paying AUM grew 50%, that's 50% in the 2 years from year-end '23 to year-end '25. Specific to full year '25, we achieved a record year of capital raising volumes for an off-cycle year away from our Europe and Americas Private Equity Fund. Throughout the year, we also saw a real acceleration in clients' repositioning portfolios with a greater weighting towards Europe and this was especially the case in the second half of the year.
Personally, I expect this trend to continue and in fact, like we gain further momentum throughout '26 and into 2027, something that bodes well for CVC. The right-hand side of Page 9 sets out our forward pipeline of closed-end funds for '26 and 2027. These strategies provide our clients with a series of well-established offerings with proven multi-vintage track records alongside newer offerings in some of the more nascent growth areas of private markets, many of which are crossover strategies say between credit and secondaries or insurance segments. Lastly on the institutional capital side of things, just a few remarks on key areas of progress from our last call 6 months ago. Our Secondary raise of Fund VI continues to progress well. with north of $8.5 billion now aggregated for that program and a strong pipeline through to a final close by the end of the summer.
CVC Catalyst, our newly launched European middle market private equity strategy has been very well received and is significantly oversubscribed for its $2 billion target. That fund will also hit a final close later this summer. And on Catalyst, the reception that we've had there for that offering, combined with this general increase in appetite for Europe, provides me with confidence on our Fund X process which I'll now cover. So if we turn to Slide 10, as shown in this high-level overview, we have a very well-established process at CVC for raising our Europe and Americas funds. And many of you will have seen a more detailed version of this process ahead of us launching our Fund IX capital raising.
A key point to emphasize here is the highly iterative nature of our process. Our team is regularly assessing demand levels on a bottom-up, line-by-line basis from our clients around the world for the 18 months ahead than expected closing. This process ensures greater visibility and confidence in our final outcome on what is an incredibly complex and scaled process. It's also important to note that this process is delivered for CVC repeatedly at times of significant market disruption and dislocation. For example, our Fund VIII was raised during the initial outbreak of the COVID pandemic in the first half of 2020, and our most recent raise Fund IX was executed in the first half of 2023 with markets recalling from both the Ukraine war and the spike in interest rates that we experienced in '22.
In terms of Fund X specifically, we're now just under a year away from our expected launch in early 2027, and sitting here today, I can confirm that we're pleased with the initial feedback that we're receiving from our client base. We would expect to have the target fund set post the summer of this year and our current expectation is that Fund X will be the same size or larger than its predecessor.
And lastly from me, on Page 11, we cover Private Wealth. As a reminder, we have been consistent in the Private Wealth as a long-term structural growth opportunity for CVC as individual investors and savers allocated increased share of their portfolios to private markets. We see these evergreen structures as part of a diversified funding base for CVC. And importantly, as a complement to our long-standing strength with pension, sovereign wealth fund and other institutional investments. In just over 18 months since the launch of CVC-CRED in Q2 '24 we reached EUR 3.6 billion of aggregate value at year-end '25 across our Credit and Private Equity evergreen products, approaching 5x what it was just 12 months ago.
Now given some of the events over the last few weeks, I'm also pleased to report that these two vehicles have both had a very encouraging start to '26. Aggregate value now stands at EUR 4.2 billion through the end of February, experiencing one of our largest ever monthly inflows. Q1 redemptions amounted to around EUR 15 million. That's 1, 5 or approximately 0.6% of net asset value. In terms of future Private Wealth offerings, there are two major updates to provide.
Firstly, earlier in Q1, we commenced formal fundraising for CVC PAT, our U.S.-based private equity evergreen structure dedicated to U.S. domicile individuals. Secondly, we're now well on track to launch our first evergreen secondary offering, CVC PSEC in the coming weeks, and Peter will cover this shortly as part of the broader AIG partnership.
So in summary, despite some recent headlines, we continue to see substantial scaling potential as we roll out additional CVC offerings to individual investors and savers alongside a growing roster of distribution partners around the world. The CVC brand, the CVC investment performance and the CVC European heritage are each key differentiators to our larger and more established U.S. peers within the Private Wealth channel. So with that, thank you, and I'll hand over to my colleague, Peter now to cover the building momentum that we're seeing in the insurance channel.
Thank you, Robert. As we discussed earlier, we see significant growth potential with our Insurance clients. This is not a new area for us. In fact, we have raised over EUR 15 billion from insurers over the past 5 years mostly through our regular LP dialogue. But in 2025, we established a dedicated insurance solutions team, and we've seen significant progress on multiple fronts. Our strategic partnership with AIG announced in January is a powerful endorsement of our ability to serve the evolving needs of global insurance institutions at scale. Our initial agreement with AIG sees us manage a $2 billion credit SMA. And as Rob Squire just mentioned, AIG will also act as a cornerstone investor in our soon-to-launch secondaries Evergreen product. contributing up to $1.5 billion from their existing private equity portfolio as a seed investor for that fund.
We see this partnership evolving and we're also engaged in discussions regarding SMAs and partnerships with other insurance clients. We have also seen increased engagement from insurers in our fundraising. For example, approximately 25% of our commitments to the EUDL direct lending fund have come from insurance companies. This is complemented with growing interest in dedicated structures from insurance clients such as the $1 billion collateralized fund obligation structure raised in the U.S. for CVC Secondaries in the third quarter. In each case, our breadth of credit capabilities and investment track record are key points of differentiation. The recently announced acquisition of Marathon Asset Management will further broaden our offering for insurance clients. including adding capabilities in U.S. asset-backed finance, real estate, structured credit and public credit to complement the existing strengths of our European credit platform.
On the Marathon acquisition, U.S. credit has been a key area of focus for expansion, but we have set a very high bar for any acquisition. Marathon ticks all the boxes. We look to partner with businesses that have a culture focused on investment performance. Marathon has a market-leading track record in each of their business lines and a culture that aligns closely to CVC. Secondly, we look for a business that is scalable within our platform. Marathon has complementary investment and geographical focus and with limited client overlap. This creates the basis for us to significantly accelerate their growth as part of CVC.
And finally, Marathon size means that it is meaningful to CVC, but still has substantial growth potential ahead of it. And approximately 30% of the size of our existing Credit business, the integration will be very manageable. As such, pro forma for the transaction, which we expect to close in the third quarter, our fee-paying AUM in credit would have increased to over EUR 60 billion as at December 2025. Marathon's strength across U.S. credit and in particular, in asset-backed lending and structured credit is highly complementary to our existing European platform.
Therefore, Marathon enhances CVC's ability to service institutional, Private Wealth and Insurance clients globally. Its stand-alone growth outlook was already strong, thanks to its high standards of underwriting discipline and investment performance. But combined with CVC's client relationships, we expect growth to accelerate. To give some additional data regarding the combination with Marathon, you will recall that we indicated we expect the transaction to be broadly neutral to EPS in 2027 and low single-digit accretive for 2028.
In terms of Marathon's capabilities, this slide shows the breakdown of the approximately $20 billion of fee-paying AUM. Given Marathon's business mix, we expect fee margins to be somewhere between CVC's existing credit business and the rest of CVC Group. So approximately 75 basis points. Given Marathon's current scale, run rate MFE margin is approximately 20% to 25% with high single-digit euro million PRE contribution to CVC. We expect management fee revenue growth to 2028 to be slightly ahead of CVC as a group at low to mid-teens with substantial operating leverage driving much faster operating and EBITDA growth.
The transaction consideration is net partly with cash of $400 million upfront as part of the $1.2 billion initial consideration, but there is significant performance criteria embedded in the transaction structure to ensure strong alignment. With that, I'll hand back to Rob Lucas.
Thanks very much, indeed, Peter. Now let's turn to deployment. As you can see on the left-hand side of this slide, deployment remains strong across Credit, Infrastructure and Secondaries. In Private Equity, as with the rest of the market, we see deployment impacted by the uncertainty following Liberation Day. But despite that, we remain on track for our normal 3- to 4-year fund cycle. We continue to deploy across a wide range of sectors and geographies with a clear focus on building portfolios that are highly diversified by asset, sector, region and vintage year. For example, within our Europe Americas funds, we typically make 35 to 40 investments. This is more than double most of the market. This has enabled us to deliver consistent investment performance across 3 decades and across multiple economic cycles.
As we set out on the right-hand side, we continue to invest on a highly diversified basis by sector and by region. This ability to invest across a range of sectors and regions underpins our ability to continue delivering great investment performance across economic and secular cycles. Let me talk a little bit about AI. Whilst this has attracted a lot of attention recently, we've taken a cautious and highly selective approach towards investing in software for many years. As a consequence, software only comprises 7% of our total fee-paying AUM well below industry averages, reflecting our disciplined approach to constructing broadly diversified portfolios. In private equity, most of these investments were made after the 2021 peak and at average entry EBITDA multiples of 15x to 16x well below industry comparables. A good early example of when we started using AI is in Zabka, our Polish convenience store investment, which we acquired in 2017.
Shortly after our investment, we began embedding AI into our value creation program to help generate dynamic pricing and to improve the targeting of new stores. Within CVC operations, we've created a dedicated AI team to support our portfolio companies as they look to mitigate AI risk and embrace the significant opportunity provided by AI. Impact of all of this work is illustrated by our recent Pulse survey. This survey was conducted across each of our Private Equity, Credit, Secondaries and Infrastructure portfolios and covered almost 1,600 investments. More than 90% of the companies surveyed said they expected the impact of AI to be positive or neutral over the next 2 years. However, there's no complacency and our teams remain highly focused on embedding AI across everything we do to ensure our portfolio remains well positioned as we go through the next few years of substantial change. Moving on to value creation. I have already mentioned the healthy performance we delivered this year across our Private Equity and Infrastructure portfolios, which is shown again on the left-hand side of this page.
Turning to the right-hand side, momentum is even more pronounced when we look at LTM EBITDA growth across the private equity portfolio, 14% as at December 2025, up from 10% as of June. Specifically, Fund VIII continues to follow a similar evolution to Fund VI and we have seen an even stronger acceleration in operating performance with LTM EBITDA growth more than doubling during 2025 from 6% as of Q1 to 13% as of Q4. I touched on realizations earlier, but I want to reemphasize our proven ability to return capital at scale. In a market where LPs remain highly focused on liquidity and DPI, this is a huge competitive advantage in fundraising and underpins our confidence in near-term fundraises such as Fund X. As I mentioned, realizations were up 67% in 2025 with private equity realizations up 77%. As you can see on the right-hand side of the page, we have now returned more than 1.3x the capital we've deployed over the past 4 years in Private Equity.
In Europe, we have delivered a much larger number of private equity exits than any other firm in 2025. Importantly, we remain highly flexible in our approach to realizations. This is the result of the number of investments we typically include in a fund and therefore, their upper mid-market equity check sizes. Not being slaves to the mega market provides us with multiple exit pathways. As a result, we are not reliant on IPOs, which accounted for only 5% of proceeds in 2025, and we are instead far more focused on cash exits through sales to strategic buyers, which accounted for 35% and sponsors, which accounted for 46% of total gross proceeds in 2025. This is another reason why we are able to deliver DPI at times when others are struggling.
With that, I'll hand to Fred to go through the financials in more detail. Fred?
Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. First, looking at fee paying AUM evolution. And a reminder that the first half of '25 was affected by FX, strong exits that Rob referenced and step-down impacts, which more than offset strong gross inflows in that half. However, the second half showed broad-based positive momentum with fee paying AUM increasing from EUR 140 billion at June '25 to EUR 148 billion at December, up 6% in the half.
As Rob mentioned, Credit Secondaries and Infrastructure together saw strong growth year-on-year, up 12% and now represent just over 50% of fee-paying AUM demonstrating the benefits of our efforts to diversify and broaden the group. In terms of P&L evolution, management fees increased by 9%. This included revenues from our evergreen products for the first time of around EUR 10 million. Fee margins were stable at approximately 1% overall and MFE margin remained strong at 58%. I will discuss costs and cost discipline shortly. Strong growth in PRE, which was up 39% year-on-year and in line with previous guidance drove EBITDA growth of 13%. Profit after tax of EUR 873 million also reflects the impact of a slightly higher tax rate following the first year of implementation of Pillar 2 rules in addition to the impact of tax on carry from the credit vehicles. This year, the effective tax rate on profit before carried interest was approximately 20%, and we see the go-forward rate also being in the range of 19% to 21%.
Turning to operating expenses. Cost evolution was impacted by year-on-year FX translation. And as we indicated at the midyear, the growth investments linked to Private Wealth which amounted to around EUR 14 million or around 3% of our cost growth. As I said, this investment is already generating revenue, and I will talk more about the rapid payback on the investment in Private Wealth in a second. Core cost growth, excluding those effects, was 7% and we remain consistent with our guidance from mid- to high single-digit percentage growth. Looking forward, we expect to deliver core cost growth at a similar level in 2026 and total cost growth below 10%, even including the full year effect of cost investments for Private Wealth. As a result, we're getting back to our mid- to high single-digit percentage growth a year earlier than we previously indicated. Beyond 2026, we continue to expect total cost growth to limit to high single-digit percentage range.
Moreover, the payback on these new investments is rapid. As we show on the right-hand chart, we expect that revenues from our fast-growing Private Wealth business will cover the related cost base in 2026 and will deliver significant operating leverage thereafter as we scale the Private Wealth channel. Turning to PRE. The first point to make is the substantial future carry value potential embedded in funds already raised. And that this is unchanged versus previous expectations at EUR 5 billion. This will flow through our P&L over the coming years and is based on achieving the midpoint of our target ranges. Given our consistent and repeatable value creation process, we have high confidence in delivering this carry over time. There's EUR 300 million left to come from funds currently in carry and with the funds mix to come into carry, including Asia V and Europe/Americas Fund VIII and further EUR 1.9 billion. The remainder of the EUR 5 billion comes from funds more recently activated such as Europe/Americas Fund IX and Asia VI.
The second point to make is that we will always run the business to deliver the best return outcomes for our fund investors. And while there's a high degree of alignment PRE is more of an output and something we can closely control year-by-year, given multiple input factors. And I would like to spend some more time on this.
The first of these is what we call the perimeter effect. Whilst realizations have been strong, there is one technical factor, which means that this hasn't yet fed into higher PRE numbers. This is the effect of the perimeter set at the time of the IPO where no carry from Fund VI was contributed to the Plc perimeter and only half of the ongoing rate from Fund VII. Indeed, if Fund VI and VII had delivered 30% of carry the IPO perimeter, as opposed to 0 and 15%, respectively. Reported PRE would have been at over $400 million for each of the last 3 years, given the strong exit activity being driven by those funds. The key here is that achieving the medium-term target range is not dependent on a material setup in the realization phase, but requires the next generation of funds special harvesting to move into carry mode.
The second technical factor to consider is around the IFRS accounting rules and how these impact recognition of PRE. To remind you, under IFRS, we apply a 40% haircut to unrealized positions in determining whether carry is receivable. Furthermore, no carry in a fund is recognized until the preferred return to fund holders has been delivered. Therefore, carry recognition is materially delayed versus a more accrual-based approach like U.K. or U.S. GAAP. Exits are therefore important because it's only at the point of exit, that this 40% discount is released. In practice, this means carry recognition under IFRS will not typically occur until MOIC is approaching approximately 2x and DPI approximately 1x at the fund level. Then when you reach this point of recognition you effectively see close to half of the lifetime carryover fund come in a single year, well into the life of a fund rather than accruing over time as it would under U.K. or U.S. GAAP.
This slide shows that unlike a more linear accrual-based carrier condition approach like the dark blue bars on the slide, under IFRS, no carrier is recognized in this example until year 7, and almost half of the carry or in this example, EUR 250 million in that single year. Typically, we expect a range of 5 to 8 years to reach this IFRS recognition point. Although relative to what we thought at IPO and similar to our peers, macro uncertainty, particularly around tariffs, has generated some slippage in the time frame for carry condition for some funds. Therefore, PRE under IFRS is likely to be lumpy, not linear, some years being above the guidance range, some years below with single year outcomes being inherently difficult to predict.
So how to think about the coming years. A first step up from current PRE levels is dependent on Asia V and therefore, Asia exits. We are confident in delivering significant exits at strong returns in Asia V in 2026, and initial carrier condition could happen this year. However, on balance, we think guiding towards 2027 is more prudent given the current macro conditions and the IFRS effects. The initial contribution of Asia V is expected to be approximately EUR 100 million. With that, this being recognized until 2027, PRE in 2026 is likely to be at a similar level to 2025, but growing to around EUR 400 million in 2027 based on best estimates of exit timings as we sit here today. With, therefore, a total of between EUR 600 million and EUR 700 million across these 2 years, as shown on the slide. Our current assumption is the initial carry recognition for Europe Americas Fund VIII will not happen until after 2027 leading to an expectation of PRE of between EUR 1.2 billion and EUR 1.5 billion across the 2 years of 2028 and 2029.
As we move through perimeter effects, achieving these numbers would represent an aggregate of between EUR 1.8 billion and EUR 2.2 billion or an average of between EUR 450 million and EUR 550 million per year over the next 4 years. We also show on this slide what we think PRE would have looked like if we were operating under U.S. GAAP. Across 2026 and 2027, a more accruals based approach would double the level of PRE we would be disclosing. We recognize that U.S. peers who report on an adjusted basis would likely sit somewhere between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Lastly, talking to our balance sheet and cash generation. As of 31 December 2025, we had a healthy balance sheet position with gross cash of around EUR 700 million and long-term low-cost debt of EUR 1.45 billion. Our first capital allocation priorities will always be to invest in the organic growth opportunities we see ahead of us and to deliver progressive growth in dividends, which are cash-generative model clearly supports.
Given this cash generation, we will also consider ongoing capital returns, including via buybacks, as we announced today unless we see compelling inorganic growth opportunities that match our strict financial criteria. As we have previously said, we're comfortable operating at up to 2x net debt-to-EBITDA leverage and we expect to be well within this at the end of 2026 at approximately 1.5x. This is after taking into consideration EUR 350 million of buyback and $400 million of upfront cash consideration for Marathon. In summary, the confidence of our growth prospects and our cash generation allows to return up to EUR 850 million back to shareholders through our dividend program for 2025 and the buyback that we announced today. With that, I'll hand back to Rob for concluding remarks.
In summary, 2025 was another strong year of delivery for CVC. We've grown our fee-paying AUM to EUR 148 billion, and we're highly confident in 10% plus compound growth to EUR 200 billion over the next 3 years. This will deliver substantial earnings growth by the end of 2028. We started 2026 with strong positive momentum. We remain absolutely focused on continuing to deliver our performance for our clients, and we are very excited about the opportunities that lie ahead. Thank you very much indeed for listening. Thank you.
Thank you, Rob, Fred, and Peter and Rob. Now let's open it up for questions. If I could ask people to limit themselves to 2 questions, please that would be great. Over to you, operator.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Hubert Lam with Bank of America.
2. Question Answer
I've got 2 of them. Firstly, on performance fees, just a follow-up. So I know it's delayed now our expectations of when it gets back to EUR 400 million. So I just wanted to just go over this again. So what's changed now? Is it your expectations that exits are just taking longer because on the accounting side, we would have obviously known that would be lumpy. And also, you showed strong exits last year. So I probably would have thought that there'd be a bit more of a recovery this year? That's the first question.
And the second question is on evergreens just recently reading that you are possibly incentivizing some of your distributors for your wealth product with performance fees to incentivize them to sell your product. Can you talk about this and also the margins you're receiving on these new products?
Great. Thanks very much, indeed. Let me -- Fred, I don't know whether you'd like to just to take the first part of that. And Rob, the second.
Sure, it's Fred. Yes, on this performance fee timing point, if you like. As we highlighted back in September last year, this first step up from current level of PRE was heavily dependent on the first recognition of carry under the accounting rules. As we sit here today, we just think it's prudent given market conditions that it's all dependent on timing of exits. Nothing more than that. We still see the absolute value there that we saw before, but timing of exit is critical, as I hopefully outlined in the slides about how it all works. And it may happen this year, but we're just sitting here thinking, with everything we're on and the number of exits that will happen this year is probably prudent to assume that some could slip into next year. They may not, but we're assuming that they might. And that's the only cause of the delay.
And it's Rob. On your second question, look, I'm not going to comment on any specific contractual relationship. What I'd tell you is that every single bank has got a different arrangement based on where in the world they operate and other factors. What really matters here is the performance. And if you look at it, CVC PE is taking a 20% north and CVC Credit is a 10% compound return. We've got over 15 distributors on the platform, and we feel very, very good about the sector that we're on within the Private Wealth.
Our next question comes from Arnaud Giblat with BNP Paribas.
I've got 2 questions, please. First, can I start with Fund X and the confidence you have there. I mean, you outlined that quite well in the presentation and I understood that you've been in front of LPs and they'v'e giving you a provisional commitments. I'm just wondering what LPs are looking at here for those provisional commitments to do something more are they looking at DPIs? Are they looking at your delivering on performance? What is it the day that you feel will convert that provision to a national commitment?
My second question is on Marathon. You outlined that ABF is a part of the logic there. I'm wondering if the plan here with Marathon is to really turn out a bigger ABF business in insurance as some of the American peers have been doing.
Thanks, Arnaud. Well, let me just talk just high level about Fund X, and then Rob can just sort of give some precise input regarding the feedback we've had. But we're following very much the same program with Fund X that we followed with previous funds, particularly Fund IX. And what we're doing at this stage is, of course, we have very, very close ongoing contact with our investors all the time. And we flagged very long way in advance that fundraising such as Fund X is coming up so that they can factor it all into their allocations well, well ahead of time.
And so as we sort of move through the first quarter of this year, Rob and his team are having those direct conversations with all of our key investors pretty much every single one, just to understand exactly how they're sitting and how they're looking. And indeed, to your question, exactly what they will be focusing on and looking at. And that feedback has been very encouraging indeed, very much in line with what we saw as we approached Fund IX, which, of course, as we all know, is the largest private equity fund in the world. And the fact that we're looking in this current market at the same or larger, I think, is a real testament to the underlying strength and the relationships we have. But Rob, to just take us through just a little bit more of the detail of what -- just to answer the question.
Happy to be, I'll be concise. Look, I think a few additional points here, please. I mean the first is that our average relationship with our largest clients in that strategy is now approaching 2 decades. And so we have to look at this as a very, very deep, very, very long-standing base of dialogue and a relationship with the clients. And that also spans to the cross-sell ratios that we've achieved over the last few years, which have really accelerated as well. I think in terms of sort of key metrics that I would suggest, there is no one single individual point Again, people would look at it over a much longer time horizon. CVC's lowest-ever performance over 40 years, approaching 40 years is a 2.1x net, 2.1x net is the worst performer for the flagship fund.
And so really, in terms of sort of economic market geopolitical cycles, this firm has proven it's been able to deliver. The last few points that I would suggest it would be the cash returns to answer your question directly on DPI has been exceptional. Over the last 5 years, the flagship fund has delivered over 4x money multiple on over EUR 44 billion of cash distributions to clients in the Europe and Americas fund. And then the final point that I would suggest is very noteworthy is our relative position, and this will be my fifth fund raise here on the Europe and American side. Our relative position in the European context has never been stronger. Both relative to peers, but also relative to appetite in the market. And so those would be the key additional factors in addition to what Rob referenced, it gives me confidence sitting here today.
Great. Thanks very much, indeed, Rob. And Peter, I don't know whether you'd just like to talk about Marathon and the asset-based investments.
Sure, very happy to do so. And Arnaud, you're absolutely right to pull out the asset-backed funding part of the Marathon capabilities is 1 of the areas that insurance clients, particularly find attractive. We expect that business to grow substantially. And indeed, the asset-backed area is one area which emphasizes the importance of both being able to raise money through traditional fundraising as well as through SMA and strategic partnerships. And we think that, combined with Marathon's excellent track record and CVC's leading position as an asset-light alternatives manager, puts them in a position to grow this area substantially.
Our next question comes from Oliver Carruthers with Goldman Sachs.
Apologies. Our next comes from Nicholas Herman with Citi.
Thanks for the presentation, two from me as well, please. On costs, I just -- why the need to scale back the cost growth cost growth given really such strong momentum on the growth initiatives and the clear significant payback from those investments. And then the second question on wealth. I appreciate there is the increasing, I say, negative sentiment on the outlook of private markets, both private credit and on the outlook on equity on tech and software. I appreciate that you guys are relatively better positioned in this context, but what are distributors telling you about their appetite for industry content in the wealth channel?
Fred, would you like to just to take the costs?
Yes. Let me just clarify what we're saying on costs and Nicholas, we're not scaling back. We're operating effectively and efficiently within our core, the kind of low to high single digits, and we're absolutely in line with plan for investing to support the wealth product. I think the only change that we're signaling here is that we're being more effective and efficient within the core. We're certainly not investing less for the growth in the growth area. And you can see that even with the investment we're putting into that wealth channel, we're very confident in that being covered by revenue this year and more than covered by revenue in the years ahead. So apologies if I signaled differently, but we're certainly not scaling back on the investment in the opportunities.
Thanks, Fred. Rob, would you just take the wealth question.
Absolutely. Nicholas, yes, look, it's obviously very relevant. It's something that we are tracking incredibly closely, particularly in the media in terms of CVC specifically, though, as I said, over the first 2 months of this year, we've had record flows, and I think that's representative in my view, of a differentiated offering. What we believe we have is a real strength in terms of our European narrative. We think that many of the alternatives that are out there, both globally and specifically within the large U.S. wealth market are very U.S. focused and are managed by U.S. managers. And so we continue to sort of double down on our European heritage alongside the brand and the investment performance.
The second aspect that I think is really important, and you've been on many of these calls, so you'll understand this, is that we have got a very clear road map laid out in terms of product development -- and that is an acknowledgment that having a diversified offering is going to be important. There will be some market conditions that appeal to strategies and others that appeal to different ones. And that's why we started with CRED, we've then gone into private equity.
And as I said, within the next few weeks, now we'll have a secondary evergreen fund up and running with infrastructure later in '26. And so we're really trying to build out a balanced portfolio where there is CVC products on the shelves of our distributors, whatever the prevailing market sentiment may be.
Our next question comes from Oliver Carruthers with Goldman Sachs.
Oliver Carruthers, can you hear me okay?
Yes, we can hear you fine.
Great. Apologies for the technical difficulties. So I've got two questions, please. So on Slide 18, you show some operating KPIs for Europe VIII. It appears to be accelerating in terms of revenue and EBITDA growth. Could you talk to the breadth of the acceleration here? I think it's just a little bit of a market perception that this fund is not doing well. So any kind of commentary around that, I think, would be very, very helpful. And then my second question, so I guess you talked to a slippage in the time frame of carry being recognized, but you kept the gross MOIC midpoint constant. To me, that suggests that, that's dilutive to gross and net IRR over time?
So I wonder if you could frame that slippage in the time frame in the context of what you're seeing kind of more broadly among your private equity competitors. And then I think you made a comment as well that this slippage in the time frame was relevant to IFRS carry because it was -- you made a comment about the pref return but my understanding of IFRS carrier was the pref return only becomes relevant for this calculation. If the ongoing return of these funds is tracking at or below the pref return. So could you just confirm what those levels are. And if you're able to talk to which funds this is relevant for, that would be very helpful.
Great. Thanks, Oliver. Let me take your first question, and then Fred can talk about the IFRS point. On Page 18, I mean, I think this is really powerful information here. And as you say, we have seen, particularly in relation to Fund VIII a strong acceleration in the -- most of all the EBITDA performance of that fund. And so what we feel very comfortable with where Fund VIII is. We take a very long-term perspective. We are prudent, we're cautious and with our marks. And you'll see that relative to some of our peers, our funds tend, therefore, to develop over a slightly longer period. But they deliver very strong performance through the end.
And what we are doing here with Fund VIII is we're very much tracking it alongside our other previous funds. And this is very much in the pack. And so Fund VIII is the 2021 sort of vintage is always going to be a more challenged vintage. That's a more challenged vintage across the whole of the market. But we have a very diversified portfolio. And this is where that diversification really comes into play. So I think seeing that performance in terms of the acceleration in EBITDA and in revenue across that fund is both encouraging but not unexpected. Fred?
I'll pick up the other two questions, two parts of the IFRS question, if you like. So the -- you're correct in some respects in terms of delays of exits. And I think this is a market phenomenon, not CVC phenomenon, will result in this vintage, I think being a lower IRR vintage than others, but we're very confident in our multiples of money that we will be generating for the clients. But I think that's just a general theme, and we're not an outlier at all in that regard. In terms of how IFRS works, in terms of the hurdle, and if you recall, the whole is on debt with IFRS is that you don't ever see a reversal of revenue that you accrue in the form of performance fees, such that if I explain the hurdle point as brief as I can take Fund VIII, for example, our hurdle rate there with our LPs is 6%.
But for the next roughly 2%, we're in catch-up carry phase, which means that even under IFRS, you've got to get through about an 8% IRR hurdle to be clear of any reversal or potential reversal of revenue you recognized as performance fees. So it is that, that delays the carry recognition under IFRS. Certainly, that's our interpretation of it. So it's not so much, you've got to be below or above a hurdle point. It's just that you've got to get through all of that to avoid any risk of reversing the accrual for revenue in the first place. So until you're through all of that, there is 0 carrier recognized. And as I said on the earlier part of the call, a lot comes through in one go and then the rest thereafter.
I think we are nearly out of time. So operator time for one more call, please. Thank you.
Your final question comes from Haley Tam with UBS.
I'll give you just one then, if I can. Can I ask you about the evergreen funds. Thank you very much for giving us that EUR 15 million redemption figure. Could you clarify for us what proportion of your funds may be are still subject to soften and hard lockups and how that might change over the coming year? And is there any comment you can give us in terms of Marathon's experience given some of the headlines we're seeing on credit evergreen fund redemptions in the U.S.
Rob, would you like just to take the first part of that. Peter, maybe talk to the second part.
Yes, sure. Hey, it's very easy. A very, very small part of our total now of EUR 4.2 billion is subject to any form of soft log whatsoever. So we're really through a lot of that. And so that's not something that I would that certainly would be on my radar screen.
And with regard to Marathon Haley, Marathon doesn't have any evergreen products at this stage and its overall fundraising momentum remains extremely strong across these various different fund raises that are going on currently.
Great. Well, thanks for the questions. Thank you, operator.
Thank you. This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Finanzdaten von CVC Capital Partners
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 2.009 2.009 |
13 %
13 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | - - |
-
-
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 795 795 |
48 %
48 %
40 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 1.209 1.209 |
2 %
2 %
60 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 180 180 |
2 %
2 %
9 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 1.029 1.029 |
2 %
2 %
51 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 966 966 |
28 %
28 %
48 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen EUR.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur CVC Capital Partners-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
CVC Capital Partners Aktie News
Firmenprofil
CVC Capital Partners Plc bietet Anlagestrategien in den Bereichen Private Equity, Secondaries, Kreditfonds und Infrastruktur an. Das Unternehmen betreibt eine Vielzahl von Fonds auf den amerikanischen, europäischen und asiatischen Märkten. Es ist in den folgenden geografischen Segmenten tätig: Jersey, Luxemburg, Kaimaninseln und Vereinigtes Königreich. Das Unternehmen wurde 1993 von Rolly van Rappard gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in St. Helier, Vereinigtes Königreich.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Jersey |
| CEO | Mr. Lucas |
| Mitarbeiter | 1.482 |
| Webseite | www.cvc.com |


