BioArctic AB Aktienkurs
Ist BioArctic AB eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.921 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 29,46 Mrd. kr | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,15 Mrd. kr
Marktkapitalisierung = 29,46 Mrd. kr | Umsatz erwartet = 1,26 Mrd. kr
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 27,46 Mrd. kr | Umsatz (TTM) = 1,15 Mrd. kr
Enterprise Value = 27,46 Mrd. kr | Umsatz erwartet = 1,26 Mrd. kr
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
BioArctic AB Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
11 Analysten haben eine BioArctic AB Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
11 Analysten haben eine BioArctic AB Prognose abgegeben:
Beta BioArctic AB Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
MAI
20
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor etwa 2 Monaten
|
|
FEB
18
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 5 Monaten
|
|
NOV
13
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
AUG
28
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 10 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
BioArctic AB — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to BioArctic Q1 Report 2026. [Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Gunilla Osswald with colleagues. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and welcome to BioArctic's presentation for the first quarter of 2026. It has been a strong start of the year for BioArctic following a transformative year of 2025 with record financial results. It shows that the growth around in a great way for BioArctic. It's reassuring to see that more and more patients are getting access to Leqembi, and we had more than EUR 500 million of sales during our partner sites fiscal year. And that resulted in a commercial milestone to BioArctic.
Our projects and our range of technology are also progressing really well, and we had increased focus on business development, which is based on great interest in BrainTransporter and in our projects. I'll talk more about that in today's presentation.
Next slide, please. BioArctic is listed Nasdaq Stockholm LargeCap, this is our disclaimer. Next slide, please. So I'm Gunilla Osswald, and I'm the CEO of BioArctic, and I will share today's presentation with our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof, and our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Falting; and our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad.
Next slide, please. I will start our presentation by given some key highlights. Next slide, please. BioArctic is focusing on 2 different platforms in precision neurology, and we are among the world's leading innovators in both areas.
The first area is about creating highly selective antibodies, which is targeting aggregated misfolded forms of toxic proteins. The most advanced program here is lecanemab, Leqembi. And we also have projects targeting alpha-synuclein, TDP-43 and Huntington.
The second area is where we are utilizing our BrainTransporter platform in unique ways, deliver antibodies more efficient into the brain. But we have now also broadened our scope, and we are also working on other modalities like enzymes and also genetic medicine and small molecules to enable more efficient transportation of them also into the brain with innovative approaches. The innovations at BioArctic continue to impress me deeply. They are unique and very competitive.
Next slide, please. We are already delivering on our 2030 ambitions that we presented for our Capital Markets Day last year. And we have stated that we have 4 areas of focus. The first one is to establish Leqembi after disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease.
And here, we see a steady growth across geographies with sales that was more than EUR 500 million in the last 12 months. And we expect the subcutaneous auto vector called Iqlik, together with increasing use of blood-based timer, that together will contribute to continued strong growth.
The second aspect here is that has also indicated in the guidance for 2030 that we are expecting sales of more than USD 900 million. So I think that Leqembi is well on its way to become blockbuster with yearly sales more than USD 1 billion in not too long.
The second area is to have a broader time line and more advanced with projects in all stages of development. And I'm happy to see that our pipeline has expanded last year, and our projects are progressing really well.
I want to highlight our alpha-synuclein project, exidavnemab, where the Phase IIIa study is fully recruited with the results expected later this year. And also, the follow-up compound BAN2802 with our BrainTransporter alpha-synuclein in an antibody. And there, the ING activities are ongoing in order to take the compound into next year.
The third area is more partnerships. And last year, we initiated partnerships with Bristol Myers Squibb and normalities. And we're very pleased with both of those partnerships and really impressed with how the collaborations are progressing and delivering. We also see continued strong interest that we have in both our projects and in our BrainTransporter platform.
Partnership discussions are complex and takes time. We are in a very strong position with our high-quality projects and innovative technologies. The fourth aspect is strong financials. And our quarterly royalty revenue from the Leqembi sales grew 68% compared to first quarter last year. And we have now more than SEK 2 billion in cash, which means that we can continue to invest in our projects and our innovations, and we have also the possibility to start to pay some dividends.
Next slide, please. Our business model is built around partnerships, but is a key component behind. has been a long-term successful collaboration all the way back since 2005. And now we are getting 9% of royalties from global Leqembi sales, and we have just then passed our second commercial milestone and got another EUR 20 million from. And we have EUR 34 million still remaining in milestones. For Bristol Myers Squibb, we have received USD 100 million so far, and there is a substantial amount left.
And Novartis, we have so far received USD 30 million. And also here, it's a substantial amount still to receive if it also continues well. We are grateful for AbbVie, who has made us receiving USD 30 million, which helped us build the company and also progressing the project further. And it's a project I strongly believe in and looking forward to more results. And we expect more partners to come. That is our business model, and we are working on that, and we cannot say exactly when time is, but we will let you know when we Leqembi disclose.
Next slide, please. So by that, I hand over to our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Falting.
Thank you, Gunilla. Next slide, please. So as Gunilla talked to, our R&D portfolio is built on 2 platforms, antibodies and BrainTransporter, providing both depth and scalability in neurodegenerative diseases. We combine fully funded partnerships with leading pharma such as Eisai, BMS and Novartis with proprietary programs that offer further out-licensing potential.
Progress in the portfolio remains strong. All BrainTransporter collaborations are on track and key milestones have been reached for our Leqembi programs, including the start of IND-enabling activities for BAN2238 and BAN3014. Overall, we are advancing a diverse partner validated pipeline and growing scientific, strategic and commercial options.
Next slide, please. So our alpha-synuclein portfolio continues to advance and expand the offering will take opportunities across alpha-synuclein. Our lead program, exidavnemab, is progressing well. The Phase II EXIST study in Parkinson's disease and multiple systemic atrophy is now fully recruited, and we have held key regulatory and key opinion leader interactions to prepare for the next stage of development.
Next generation assets in the portfolio are progressing as well with BAN2238 in IND-enabling phase and in discovery. And together, this builds a strong expanding of alpha-synuclein pipeline from clinical stage to future innovation.
Next slide, please. So our BrainTransporter platform addresses one of the most fundamental challenges in neuroscience, efficient delivery across the blood-brain barrier of therapeutics. And this is enabled by active transport of biopharmaceuticals into the brain via the transpiring receptor. And this enhanced delivery can translate into higher foster and deep brain exposure with improved clinical outcomes, improved patient convenience, safety and lower cost for manufacturing.
So the BrainTransporter therefore plays a critical role in unlocking the full potential of CNS therapies. Next slide, please. So our next-generation alpha-synuclein antibody, the BAN2238 demonstrates strong preclinical performance, both with enhanced brain exposure and favorable safety profile.
So by combining the alpha-synuclein targeting with our BrainTransporter technology, BAN2238 achieved significant increase in brain exposure in preclinical models, and that is what you see in the middle picture here. And importantly, this enhanced delivery is achieved without compromising safety.
So we observed no signs of anemia or reduction of radicular sites while maintaining a full effector function of the protein, and that's the data shown you right. So otherwise, reduction in reticulocyte is a commonly reported side effect targeting a transparent receptor for brain delivery. So overall, the BAN2238 highlights how the brain transporter has the potential to both improve club engagement and reduce development risk, strengthening the value of our next-generation pipeline.
Next slide, please. So as Gunilla also mentioned, we are also now broadening our BrainTransporter platform beyond antibodies and enzymes can also include additional modalities such as genetic medicines and small molecules, significantly increasing the growth of the platform. So the data in the picture here clearly shows how the BrainTransporter copper modalities deliver superior brain resolution so compared to a standard therapy.
So in the top picture, you see a standard therapy and in the lower pictures in green, you see an antibody in yellow, you see an enzyme and in red, and you see a small modality and all of them have a very, very much higher brain exposure when coupled to the BrainTransporter platform.
So across the platform, delivery of antibodies are preclinically validated advancing. Enzymes are progressing with our first internal program, the GTS program for disease and small modalities represent a new important growth area for us.
So overall, the BrainTransporter is evolving in diversity platform with particular future and value drivers across CNS discovery disorders. Next slide, please. So then I will hand over to our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad.
Thank you, Johanna. So I will continue with an update on Leqembi and I'll start with stating that the cool sales of Leqembi amounted to around USD 180 million in Eisai fiscal year 2025. So that is almost doubling versus the previous fiscal year. And we can see a good growth across the line, and Leqembi continues to be the global market leader of anti-amyloid antibodies. .
A couple of the driving factors are that the market for blood biomarker continues to grow, and there has been approximately a twelvefold increase over the last 2 years with a number actually doubling over 6 months -- every 6 months since January 2024.
Last year, CMS also formally included the blood-based biomarkers as confirmatory diagnosis. And today, it is estimated that approximately 15% of the diagnoses were done by these blood-based biomarkers. And this will continue to increase as more tests are expected to be approved this year.
Another factor is that more and more patients receive continued treatment after the Leqembi maintenance dosing was approved. First, for the IV and then for the subcutaneous formulation, the auto-injector Iqlik, which was approved in August last year.
So according to Eisai, Iqlik also seems to have led to an increase in new patients initiating treatment with Leqembi IV. So going forward, we see even more expansion possibilities with the potential approval of the subcutaneous initiation treatment, both in the U.S. with the PDUFA in August 24th of August and with an expected approval also in plan in quarter 3 this year and in China in quarter 1 next year.
So this is a huge advantage for patients, the caregivers and less of a bottleneck for hospitals and obviously also a competitive edge for Leqembi. So in Europe, the IV maintenance dosing is under regulatory view at IRMA since February. And in parallel, the negotiations for pricing and reimbursement are ongoing in the EU. And so today, it's available in Germany and Austria as well as out-of-pocket in U.K., Finland and Portugal.
So next slide, please. So as the no countries are BioArctic's home market, I thought I would also comment on the recent negative recommendation for Leqembi the new therapies council in Sweden. As we have seen in other European countries, it is a challenge to get immediate access and we knew that the dialogue would be challenging, also in Sweden based on the assessment report issued in December last year by the DLB, the Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency.
So in some of the assumptions in the health economic modeling, we're extremely conservative in our opinion. Although Eisai was very solution-oriented in the negotiations, the expectations from the anticancer were impossible to meet at this point. But both Eisai and BioArctic we are very committed to securing patient acts in Sweden and across Nordics and the council has stated that there is a possibility to reopen the dialogue, for example, if and when we have the IV maintenance dosing approved by EMA.
And we could also try to find another innovative ways of securing structured introduction. We are also evaluating a resubmission in Denmark. And in the coming months, we are expecting to see assessment reports coming out of -- in Norway and Finland. But in the meantime, though, we see that there is a private market in Finland. For clinics have now started Leqembi treatment, and we are approached by other private clinics across the Nordics who are looking into this possibility as well.
So in parallel, our neuroscience account managers as well as our medical affairs team are working every day with education on that site readiness activities in preparation for a broader reimbursement across the Nordics. So next slide, please. So finally, I would like to conclude by showing a few highlights from the Congress in March in Copenhagen, where a 4-year follow-up data we have presented for the EU approved population, meaning the APOE4 noncarriers or. This data show that long-term continuation of treatment is essential and that 4 years treatment with Leqembi sails between 10 to 14 months of time in the mid stage of this -- of the disease if you compared to matched controls in 2 large data betas, the prespecified admecohort and the match cohort of the Swedish fire finder.
At the conference, it was also highlighted that starting treatment as early as possible as it seems. It is -- as it seems to result in even better results. Also, as usage increases across the world, more and more hospitals present real-world data from clinical practice in these congresses at ADPD specifically from countries such as the U.S., Japan, China and South Korea. And to the right, you can see, for example, the graph showing that there is also a high treatment persistent in initially 371 patients at a U.S. clinic starting in 2023.
It was 78% at 18 months. And after 2 years, it was 67% persistence of the treatment. So more and more data further strengthen the Leqembi efficacy safety profile, and we are already looking forward to be attending attending next congress coming up the AAIC in London in July.
So next slide, and I will there by hand over to our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof.
Thank you, Anna-Kaija. I'll start by commenting a little bit on the Leqembi sales. And as Gunilla already mentioned, we were really happy to see that the full year Leqembi sales exceeded EUR 500 million as that triggered the sales milestones to us to EUR 20 million. If we look at the quarter, the global Q1 sales were 26.2 billion, roughly $168 million. That's a 27% increase from the last quarter of 2025. And it meant that our royalties grew by 27% to SEK 160.8 million. There was quite a steep increase, as you can see in the graph, up from SEK 127 million in the fourth quarter. And this is -- this really big boost is due to the fact that the China sales are now back on normal levels. after very low sales in Q3 and Q4 due to big stockpiling during the second quarter of 2025.
So China sales were now 4.1 billion or $27 million, and that's almost a tenfold increase from the fourth quarter. Our largest market is the U.S. market. And there, the growth is largely driven by the simplified diagnosis with blood-based biomarkers and the introduction of Iqlik that I talked about. And there was a very healthy growth going up to 13.4 billion, i.e., $86 million, and that's a 13% increase from the fourth quarter.
And as Anna-Kaija also alluded to, the Eisai is expecting this growth to continue as the blood-based biomarkers are really starting to make an impact on the market. And of course, when Iqlik comes out later this year for induction therapy, that should mean a further boost.
Japan is the second largest market. And there, they have really built a strong network between the primary and specialty care sectors. There we saw solid growth, but it's still affected by a price reduction that was introduced in November of last year, but it's still chugging along really well, and we're also expecting the subcutaneous version to approved there later this year in the third quarter.
We also touched on the launch already. It's good to see that it's starting to happen, but that's still a very low share of our royalties. If we then turn to the full year figures. The -- I think the highlight here is that it was good to see that Eisai did their forecast, they had a forecast of 76.5 billion for 2025. And the EBITDA by 15%, reaching 88 billion or roughly $580 million. So they roughly doubled from '24 to '25.
Last week, we also issued a new forecast for 2026 of JPY 143.5 billion. That's roughly $910 million. So as Gunilla said, they are now approaching blockbuster status with Leqembi, which is really reassuring for us. Most of that growth -- or I would say, a big part of that growth is expected down from the U.S. market.
As you can see here, the Americas sector is expected to grow from 44.6 billion to 77.5 billion. So that's roughly a 74% increase, which is significantly higher than they are expecting for the global market. So a lot of growth is expected to come from U.S. with with Iqlik and the blood-based biomarker really making its flash from the second half of this year.
If this forecast holds true, we will receive roughly SEK 880 million royalties during the same period, i.e., from April '26 March 2027, which is, of course, a significant amount for us.
Turning to the next slide. We see on the left-hand side, our net revenues. Our Q1 revenues were SEK 438 million. That's quite a big decline from the first quarter last year. But you should remember that we recorded a $100 million upfront from Bristol Myers Squibb in the first quarter last year and that can repeat that every first quarter. But so we're still really happy about the revenues that we generated and that includes the SEK 290 million, that was a milestone payment from Eisai.
We're also really happy to see that the recurring revenue continues to increase. So the royalty was SEK 161 million, and the core promotional revenues, SEK 7 million. We also recorded SEK 51 million from the Novartis collaboration, where we received a $30 million upfront payment last year that is recognized over the entire collaboration.
Turning then to our expenses. It seems like they're fairly flat. Our operating expenses in the quarter were SEK 207 million compared to SEK 203 million in the first quarter of last year. However, last year, we had quite a big currency effect that was recorded as a cost. So if you look at underlying operating costs, they are actually increasing quite a lot to SEK 203 million this year versus SEK 131 million last year.
And we do expect to see a continued increase in the cost for this year compared to 2025. I have previously guided that we expect the cost for 2026 to be roughly 50% to 70% here than in 2025. We don't expect that high growth in the cost currently. So we would like to revise that to be roughly 40% to 60% higher in 2026 compared to 2025.
On the right-hand side, you see our operating profit. We're really happy to make a profit of SEK 211 million is still lower than last year, but that's still very, very solid, and we expect to be profitable for the full year in 2026.
Finally, on the last slide, you see our net result -- this was very much in line with our operating profit by the financial net that was positive and then tax of SEK 1 million that contracted that.
So all in all, very much in line with the operating profit Cash flow, then, of course, significantly lower than our operating profit. That's due to the fact that the sales milestone from Eisai not paid in what it will be received during the second quarter. But our cash balance was over SEK 2 billion. So again, very, very solid position and we can continue to invest for the long term in our portfolio. So we look forward to continued investment and continued growth of the company. With that, I hand back to Gunilla.
Thank you so much, Anders. So we are coming towards the end of today's presentation with some upcoming news flow and some closing remarks. So if we look at second quarter coming forward, we see more and more patients are getting access to the Leqembi around the globe, which is really reassuring. And we also see that in the Nordics so far through several private clinics in Finland, and we expect to see further progress in the Nordics initially on the private market. .
Eisai is driving continued regulatory processes on Leqembi in a great way. And I click the subcutaneous sector is approved for maintenance dose in the U.S., and we're now awaiting the response at the latest by 24th August for induction treatment as well. And later this year, in the third quarter, we expect response from the Novartis in Japan for both initiation and maintenance dosing of the subcutaneous auto-injector and in China early next year.
We are, as Anna-Kaija said, also looking forward to more presentations on Leqembi at the next big Alzheimer Congress in July, in London at AAIC, and we are also looking forward to EXIST Phase III readout that talked about in both Parkinson's disease and patients later this year. And we're also looking forward to when we can disclose additional partnerships.
Next slide, please. So some key takeaways from today's presentation. I think BioArctic continues in the growth area in an excellent way, and we see great progress both on Leqembi as well as the rest of our portfolio and the BrainTransporter technology. We are already delivering on our 2030 ambitions. So I think Leqembi is well on track to become an established treatment for Alzheimer's disease, and sales continue to show increasing demand globally. And it's well on its way to become a blockbuster. Our second part is project portfolio, which is progressing really well together with our BrainTransporter technology with new innovations. The third area, strong insect from potential partners and the fourth one that we have a strong financial position.
And that next week is our AGM, where there it will be a decision around a dividend of Swedish crowns share. And we have a strong financial solid position with more than SEK 2 billion in cash.
So all in all, I think we are exceptionally well positioned for our continued growth journey. I think the future looks very bright for BioArctic, and we are bringing hope for many patients. Next slide, please. So by that, we say thank you so much for your attention, and we are happy to take some questions.
[Operator Instructions]
The next question comes from Joseph Hedden from Rx Securities.
2. Question Answer
Your Q1 R&D spend was substantially above any quarter that we saw last year and the pressure of the portfolio. Just wondering if you can give any color as to which individual projects are seeing the greatest increase in cost? And then if you could give us any idea of the phasing of R&D costs that you expect going through this year? And the second question, just on the exidavnemab Phase III EXIST study, can you confirm what the final number of Parkinson's disease and MSA patients were after the was set recruited?
Right. So if we start with R&D costs, basically, what happens is when we start IND-enabling activities in the program, we see -- invest a lot more in CMC. So there are a couple of programs where we're really happy to do that right now in the Parkinson program. We are spending more on both exidavnemab and the follow-up compound that is coupled with the BrainTransporter.
So I would say the alpha-synuclein areas where we have without going into specifics regarding what program. Then for the year, we expect the cost to be a little bit lumpy going up and down. So it's really good for the phasing of the costs during the year.
So maybe it was a little bit higher than it will be in the next quarter, but it's really, really hard to tell. So I would just stick to the full year guidance of 40% to 60% increase over last year in our total cost. That's sort of the only guidance I can give you that is more accurate. And then for the other question, I think it's up to Johanna to answer to the EXIST trial.
Yes. Thank you, Joseph, for those questions. And in terms of the portfolio and the cost for R&D, of course, programs that are closer to an IND is more positive because then we initiate CMC activities and manufacturing and also toxicology studies to enable the clinical trials. So the 2 programs that I talked about where we have initiated IND-enabling activities, the BAN2238 and 2014 are, of course, were costly in our R&D portfolio in the early pipeline. And then of course, exidavnemab, which is our clinical asset, is also a more positive program.
And in terms of the number of patients in the study, EXIST study for exidavnemab. I mean for Parkinson, we had 2 cohorts with 2 different doses, a low dose and a high dose with 12 patients per arm, and it actually it was 13 patients per arm. So we have dosed 26 patients for PD. And for MSA, we have only dosed higher dose. So that is 12 patients that have been dosed in the MSA. .
The next question comes from Suzanne van Voorthuizen from Kempen.
Maybe first on the BrainTransporter. Can you elaborate how your strategic discussions have been progressing over the recent few months and where the interest is geared more towards you at this moment? Is it in one of your existing programs or more on the use of technology for a pharma program? Or is it more tech-based like the use for different modalities? Some color will be nice. And then I have a follow-up on the Leqembi.
Yes. So I think what we can say is that we have a broad interest. We have interest both for our drug programs. We have also interest from our BrainTransporter with things that we have done before, and we also have interest in new stuffs that we're working on. So I would say a broad interest.
-- got it. And then on Leqembi, as for the Eisai guidance, how comfortable are you with the number that they would out? And can you also elaborate a bit more on the status and next steps in the launch in the Nordic countries where you have co-commercialization rights?
As for the full year forecast, we can't really comment on that. This is Eisai's forecast, and we believe that they are good and forecasting, and we can't really comment any more than that. As for the Nordics, I hand word to Anna-Kaija.
Yes. As I already alluded to in the presentation, we were obviously disappointed with them. Swedish negative recommendation as our ambition is really to help Alexis to these innovative treatments. But our Nordic launch strategy is really long term and evidence driven. So -- and as we know, I mean, the reimbursement decisions differs across countries and systems across Europe, actually, and we know that it takes time in Europe generally if you compare it to U.S. and Asia when it comes to speedy access and new innovation. So we continue our dialogue with the different stakeholders and authorities and as mentioned, I mean, there might be some other pathways going forward with discussing broader reimbursement in the different countries. So we continue to engage and prepare for broader reimbursement.
And as we know, I mean, neither Europe nor Sweden is kind of bigger chunk of our financial expectations of revenue. So we have time and will continue.
[Operator Instructions]
The next question comes from Rajan Sharma from Goldman Sachs.
So firstly, on exidavnemab. Could you just help us understand what your internal bar is for a positive readout? I guess, asked another way, what would you need to see to justify further development given that we've seen a reasonable amount of attrition with the mechanism previously? And then one on the commercial, I realize it's small, but could you just help us understand the size of the commercial opportunity for like in the private markets and the Nordic regions. Are there any sort of comps that you could point to where there have been some successful rollouts in that segment of the market.
So with regard to exidavnemab, what we're looking for here, we should remind ourselves what kind of study this is, it's a study where the primary endpoint is safety and tolerability and where we also will be looking at pharmacokinetics to see which dose is in Phase IIb. And we also have included some biomarkers, but they had more that in order to learn for and prepare for the next Phase IIb studies.
So I think a positive readout would be that it's well tolerated and looks safe and we can see what dose to use in the next study and that we have learned how to use the biomarkers. So that is what I would expect. And I think we will have like an interim analysis for safety at the other states. And then at the end of the year, we will have a full results from the study.
And if I may add to that in terms of recent attritions, there's also been recent progress with alpha-synuclein antibodies now in Phase III studies, the in PD corrosion and Ilmenite from MSA. So -- and I think that every antibody needs to stand on their own merits, and we have a very, very selective and the most selective antibody for what we believe are the toxic species, they aggregated alpha-synuclein. So we have a differentiated profile -- we also have an excellent human PK profile within half-life in human of 30 days.
So the combination of this high selectivity and the very attractive pharmacokinetic profile, I think, makes us really being able to test the concept of alpha-synuclein in excellent indexed. So I think it's very important to not mix the antibodies with each other, and the study design are also very, very different, I would say.
Yes. So on the question on the size of the private market in the Nordics, I would say it's not a huge private market for the Nordics. So you shouldn't have any major expectations on the sales. But I think it's -- and it's different from one country to another. And you have to remember also that, of course, the different authorities have set up some requirements when it comes to the risk minimization measures required by EMA and all the 4 major Nordic countries have different ways of adjusting that.
So it takes a little bit of time to to set the clinics up and see if they kind of meet the criteria to offer treatment of Leqembi to private patients. But we think it's a good experience. And of course, it's very reassuring to know that some patients do have the opportunity at least to get treatment. And it's also much appreciated by the health care professionals in the other Nordic countries to hear the experience that the Finnish clinics are now having now when they are treating more and more patients in Finland.
So I think it's reassuring to see that there is an interest to provide this treatment to patients. But of course, we are looking forward to a broader reimbursement
The next question comes from Joseph Hedden from Rx Securities..
Sorry about that. Just a couple of follow-ups. So BAN2238, is that the same antibody as exidavnemab just quantitated to the BrainTransporter technology or is a sick antibody? And then secondly, you talked about expanding use of the BrainTransporter platform. So when you're thinking about incorporating different modalities, how much do you need to modify the technology itself? Is it all still based on the transferrin receptor? Are we talking about sort tweaks or is it something larger?
Yes. If I start with the first question on BAN2238, it's not the same antibody as exidavnemab. It's a slightly modified antibody. And that's all I can say. And it's, of course, coupled to our BrainTransporter technology as well, but it's not exidavnemab. And for the second question, in terms of modifying the BrainTransporter platform. I mean, this is a very versatile platform, and we have different transferrin receptor binders with different affinity. So depending on what you want to achieve, if it's a large Cmax or an AUC in the brain, if you need a rapid uptick or what kind of pharmacokinetic profile you need, you might need different affinities for the transferrin receptor. So this is a family of different options that we have, and it's a very versatile platform that we can tailor made based on the target and the indication and the pharmacokinetic profile that you want to achieve with your specific modality and target of interest, I would say. So it is very versatile, and we have modified it in several ways in order to play it with different targets. .
There are no more phone questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions and closing comments.
Thank you so much. So we have one written question from Frederic at Red Eye and it reads any near-term effect on investments or costs in Sweden to be compensated for in the Leqembi co-promotion in the coming quarter due to the recent recommendation by the NT Council. Anything we can comment there?
No.
That's the short answer.
We continue to prepare and we really hope that we will be able also to help Swedish patients, even though it's not a financial impact, which is large, we still want to help also Swedish patients. .
The next question comes from the Natalia Webster from RBC.
Apologies for that. Can you hear me okay now?
Yes, perfectly.
So firstly, just a follow-up on Leqembi regarding the subcu induction producer delay. I appreciate we have Eisai's guidance for the full year, but how does a 3-month delay actual assumptions around the ramp through the year? And are there any read-throughs for the Japanese initiation time line as well?
Then second question is just on the BrainTransporter BAN2803. You previously had plans to go into Phase I in 2026. I appreciate it's up to BMS, but are you able to share any detail around time lines there?
So if we start with the Leqembi subcutaneous auto-injector, where the FDA has a new PDUFA date of 24th of August. And they are as for some more data on switching between IV and subcutaneous administration. And our partner, Eisai, are very confident that this will run through in a good way. And we have a priority review. And even if it is a 3-month delay, it's still shorter review time than if we had had a standard review of time. .
So -- and I would not be surprised if it comes before 24th of August, but that's the PDUFA date. And I don't think that we should see any read-through in this delay to Japan. On the other side, we see that Eisai Q3 is when they expect that response. So I think that's -- it looks very good. And I think that's, which in the U.S. is called Iqlik is a really important next step, which I think that will help patients a lot in making it more convenient.
Your other question, I think, was I didn't hear really, but I thought you asked about BAN2803, which is partnered with Bristol Myers Squibb. And it's really in their hands, and we're not commenting on exactly when that were going to, but it's progressing well according to ones we have.
Okay. We see there is another question -- written question here from Erik Hultgard at Carnegie. And that's regarding the recent data that came out from Biogen on their tau in their tau project and what the implications are, if any, for the field with that.
So I think what we have seen in the field so far is that we have 2 treatments and has shown positive clinical data and also got 2 full registration process. Leqembi can be 1 more. And then it is, of course, important to see if there can be other treatments coming through as well. And we saw that there are some interesting data coming out from the Phase II study from and I really look forward to seeing the results that I see. And I think it's good that we can have combination treatments in the future. We should remember that Leqembi, even though the target is amyloid, we also affect tau and phospho tau and so forth. I mean we -- but I think maybe in the future, that will be good with combination treatments as well. So I really look forward to seeing more data.
There doesn't seem to be any more questions lined up for us. So with that, I think we thank everybody for listening in today. And looking forward to seeing you soon again.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
BioArctic AB — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to BioArctic Q4 Report 2025. [Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Gunilla Osswald; and CFO, Anders Martin-Lof. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and welcome to BioArctic's presentation for the fourth quarter and for the full year of 2025. It has been a fantastic year for BioArctic. In 2025, we entered into a new era that we call the growth era. And we can conclude that we have a transformative year behind us with record financial results. We are making our science accessible to more and more patients than ever before. And I think it's great and reassuring to see that more and more patients are getting access to Leqembi.
We are accelerating our innovations. Our portfolio is progressing really well and has been further expanded, and our BrainTransporter technology is further evolving with new innovations. We have increased focus on business development. We are broadening our collaborations and utilizing our BrainTransporter technology, and we'll talk more about all this in today's presentation.
Next slide, please. BioArctic is listed at Nasdaq Stockholm Large Cap, and this is our disclaimer.
Next slide, please. I'm Gunilla Osswald, and I'm the CEO of BioArctic, and I will share today's presentation with our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof; and our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Falting; and our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad.
Next slide, please. I'll start our presentation by giving some key highlights. Next slide, please. I'm proud to state that BioArctic is among the world's leading innovators in precision neurology. We have 2 key platforms, where the first one is innovation and generation development of highly selective antibodies that are targeting aggregated misfolded forms of toxic proteins like lecanemab. And we also have then projects targeting alpha-synuclein, TDP-43 and Huntingtin.
The second area is the BrainTransporter platform, where we have an innovative way to deliver antibodies. And I want to highlight that we are broadening the platform to enable more efficient transportation of other modalities into the brain with new innovative approaches. We'll talk more about that in today's presentation.
Next slide, please. Last year, we held our first Capital Markets Day, where we presented our ambitions for 2030. And I'm so happy to see that we are already clearly delivering on our ambitions. If we start with the first one, LEQEMBI to be established treatment in Alzheimer's disease. LEQEMBI demand continues to grow to more and more patients, and we are now having global sales above USD 500 million. I think it looks bright with the blood-based biomarkers and the subcutaneous administration coming.
The second aspect is balanced and broader pipeline with projects in all stages of development. And the pipeline is already broader with new projects added last year for both Parkinson-related diseases as well as Huntington's disease.
The third one is additional successful global partnerships, and we are very pleased with Eisai and our 2 new collaborations since last year, Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. We are also really happy with the further discussions that are ongoing.
The fourth one is about our finances and our aim is to be profitable and have recurring dividends in the future. And we were highly profitable 2025, and our strong financial position allows us to continue to invest heavily in our business and at the same time, give something back to our shareholders. And there is a proposal by the Board of dividends of SEK 2 per share.
Next slide, please. So I just want to comment on some of the latest highlights towards delivering on our ambitions. So we start with Leqembi, and I would like to start by thanking -- thanks to our partner, Eisai's great work, Leqembi is now approved in 53 countries around the world. The subcutaneous auto-injector that is called Iqlik in the U.S. has been launched for maintenance dosing in the U.S.
The next important step is approvals of subcutaneous initiation dosing. And it was great to see that both the authorities in the U.S. and in China has granted priority review. And I think this points to how important the subcutaneous opportunity is for the patients. And we are very much looking forward to the PDUFA date that FDA has set by the 24th of May this year.
It's also reassuring to notice that all data being presented at congresses, including long-term data and real-world evidence data are very encouraging for Leqembi.
If we then turn to the pipeline, it's progressing really well, and we are growing the pipeline and they are advancing. If we look at our alpha-synuclein portfolio and start with exidavnemab, which is our antibody, which currently is in Phase IIa. The second part of the study with both Parkinson's disease and multiple systemic atrophy patients will be finalized this year, and we are actively preparing for Phase IIb.
We can also communicate that we have nominated 2 new candidate drugs, and we are preparing for INDs. And we have also further expanded our portfolio. And as you know, I'm very excited about our BrainTransporter technology platform, where we have further innovations for different modalities, including our BrainTransporter -- utilizing our BrainTransporter technology, and Johanna will talk more about this and show some nice new data.
The third one is about our partnerships. And as I've said, I'm really happy with all 3 partners: Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. All 3 programs looks great. And it's also happy to notice that we were very busy during JPMorgan in January this year. And it's great to see that we have continued strong interest for our projects and for our BrainTransporter technology, both for antibodies as well as other modalities.
The fourth aspect is about our financials, and they are strong, and we were highly profitable in 2025 with record full year results of SEK 1.2 billion. The royalties for Leqembi are steadily increasing. And during 2025, we received several milestones also, both from Eisai and upfront payments from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis, and that led to that we have a strong cash position of SEK 2.2 billion, and Anders will talk more about this.
Next slide, please. So by that, I will now hand over to our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Falting, for an update on R&D.
Thank you so much, Gunilla. Next slide, please. So this slide provides an overview of our R&D portfolio, featuring the 2 main platforms that Gunilla talked about, the antibodies and the BrainTransporter platform and also the highlighted cross-program synergies. So the portfolio includes fully funded projects, partnered with major global pharmaceutical companies such as Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. And we also have several in-house projects and technology platforms with substantial market and out-licensing opportunities.
All collaborations involving the BrainTransporter platform are advancing well and as planned. And since the last quarterly update, we have also achieved important milestones within the portfolio, including the nomination of 2 candidate drugs, BAN2238 for alpha-synuclein disease and BAN3014 for TDP-related proteinopathies such as ALS. Additionally, you will notice a new project in the BrainTransporter portfolio, the PD-BT2278, and this is targeting the alpha-synuclein disease.
So next slide, please. So both BAN2238 and BAN3014 were recently nominated as candidate drugs and have now advanced from research into preclinical development. BAN2238 is targeting toxic aggregated alpha-synuclein such as oligomers, protofibrils and aggregates, and this is combined with the BrainTransporter technology. And it offers opportunities in several different synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease, MSA and dementia with Lewy body.
And for BAN3014, this antibody targets toxic aggregated TDP-43 proteins, such as oligomers, protofibrils and aggregates, and it offers opportunity for several of the TDP-43 proteinopathies such as ALS and frontotemporal dementia. So both of these programs, we have now initiated IND-enabling activities, and they are being prepared for clinical studies.
So the next slide, please. So alpha-synuclein misfolding and aggregation is central to alpha-synuclein disease development. And our alpha-synuclein portfolio offers opportunity in several of these synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's dementia with Lewy body and multiple systemic atrophy. Exidavnemab is most advanced and is currently being tested in the EXIST study, a Phase IIa study for safety and tolerability. And in parallel to this, we are preparing for the next stage of development into Phase IIb.
2238, that I just talked about, is the newly nominated alpha-synuclein antibody combined with the BrainTransporter technology for better efficacy and better brain uptake. And BAN2238 is an alpha-synuclein antibody combined with the BrainTransporter, also representing an additional advancement in the BrainTransporter portfolio, for which further details will not be disclosed at this time.
Next slide, please. I'm very excited to share some new data today on our BrainTransporter platform. So we know that the blood-brain barrier that represents a significant challenge for neuroscience. And if we can improve the delivery to the brain of our drugs, that represents an enormous opportunity for increased, of course, exposure in the brain, enhanced clinical efficacy, greater patient convenience by lowering the dose and offering other routes of administration, potentially better safety and lower manufacturing costs.
So we are investing very heavily in the BrainTransporter technology to deliver different types of biopharmaceuticals beyond antibodies and enzymes that we talked about in the past. So we have developed this technology further now to enable delivery of small drug modalities to the brain. So this is a very innovative and flexible system that aims to transport various type of drugs such as genetic medicines and small molecules into the central nervous system.
Next slide, please. So here, I'm very happy to show you some new data. And this image here compares the brain distribution of a standard antibody up to your upper left corner in green with a BT-coupled antibody in green below. And you can appreciate, I hope, the great increase of the green, fluorescent color, which represent the antibody present in the brain. And this is the same dose and the same time frame and the same antibodies just with and without the BrainTransporter technology.
So antibodies we have worked with for quite some time, but we have also now here shown you data with the distribution in the brain of an enzyme and also a small modality. So this BT-coupled approach significantly improves the brain distribution of our -- of drug modalities. And for the BTA, the antibodies, this is a technology now that is fully implemented and validated both in mice and in nonhuman primates. And here, we have both internal and external candidates at various stage of development.
And then the BTE, the enzyme platform, we have our first internal program, the BTG case for Gaucher's disease, and this is progressing very well. It's an orphan indication that offers potential -- offered market potential for BioArctic and a project that we can drive longer into the clinic. And I think that this enzyme project, it really sets the foundation for future enzyme-based projects coming along in the portfolio.
And then what's new and presented here today is the BTS, the BT small modalities. And this is a novel and very flexible system that enables efficient brain delivery of genetic medicines such as ASOs or siRNA. It could be degraders. It could be small molecule approaches or anything that you want to deliver into the brain basically.
And here, some key data is now being generating, showing the utility of the system. And what is shown here is then the brain distribution. And I think that there's been a really strong interest in our BrainTransporter technology at the JPMorgan Health Conference in September -- or in January in San Francisco. And we are very excited about the future further development of this platform and hope that we will be able to show you some more data in the coming year.
So next slide, please. So with this, I will hand over to our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad, for a commercial update.
Thank you, Johanna, and I will go back to Leqembi for a while, and I will start by just reminding everyone on the many recent and upcoming regulatory and development steps for Leqembi that really increases the treatment options for patients, but also drives the sales growth around the world.
So as Gunilla mentioned, the IV formulation is now approved in 53 countries, of which the latest ones were Canada, Brazil and Malaysia. And the IV maintenance treatment once every 4 weeks is approved in 7 countries. And in the EU, the EMA accepted Eisai submission for the IV maintenance earlier this year.
When it comes to the subcutaneous auto-injector, the weekly maintenance treatment was launched, as Gunilla mentioned, in the U.S. in October last year and the sBLA for the weekly induction treatment was granted priority review by the FDA, and we're looking forward to the PDUFA date set for May 24.
In Japan, the application for the subcutaneous induction treatment was submitted in November last year, and Eisai expects to launch later in 2026. And then finally, Eisai also sent an application for the subcutaneous auto-injector also in China last month, where it was granted priority review and Eisai expects a launch in 2027.
So many advancements, and this will drive the Leqembi growth even further, the game-changer being really the subcutaneous auto-injector, where the induction treatment is given as 2 injections of 250 milligram each, where each injection only takes 15 seconds.
So next slide, please. So also with regards to the real-world evidence, Leqembi continues really to deliver more data. At the most recent Alzheimer's Congress, CTAD in December last year in San Diego, there was a lot of presentations on Leqembi. So real-world evidence coming from U.S. and Japan shows really consistent results in terms of efficacy and safety with findings from the clinical trials.
Additional data presented indicated that earlier initiation may be associated with greater benefit and that continued Leqembi treatment may provide a benefit compared with stopping therapy. So finally, data also presented at CTAD verified that the subcutaneous formulation offers a convenient option with comparable exposure and safety to IV. And this can really reduce treatment burden for patients and their care partners and health care, of course. So this was really, really encouraging to see all these data in December last year.
So next slide, please. So what are the trends on the key markets for Leqembi? Anders will soon show you the BioArctic royalty based on the Leqembi sales, but we can conclude that Leqembi sold for more than USD 500 million in the calendar year of 2025. That's a nice milestone. The global anti-amyloid market has more than doubled in 2025, and this is driven by mainly 3 things, I would say. First, the use of blood-based biomarkers, both for triaging and for confirmatory diagnosis is increasing. China has been really in the forefront. But also in the U.S., it is steadily increasing, and it is estimated that approximately 10% of confirmatory diagnosis in clinical practice in the U.S. are done by blood-based biomarkers.
Secondly, more physicians are prescribing Leqembi. In Japan, more than 800 facilities are now starting initial treatment and 1,700 centers are focusing on the follow-up after 6 months and onwards. And in the U.S., there is an enhanced coordination between the primary care physicians and neurologists.
On the slide, you can see the targeted direct-to-consumer information campaigns that Eisai has been rolling out in the U.S. and in Japan. And the second one is to address really the awareness of mild cognitive impairment. The fact that Leqembi was included in the commercial insurance innovative drug list in China in December will gradually give more physicians and patients access to Leqembi from the second half of the year, it is estimated.
Thirdly, the subcutaneous auto-injector that I mentioned was launched in the U.S. for maintenance in October also drives growth. It is estimated that 80% of the patients on Leqembi want to continue treatment after 18 months. The insurance coverage through the medical exception process is increasing, and the payer approval rate is estimated to be over 80% in the U.S.
And finally, in Europe, the launches in Austria and Germany are ongoing since September last year, whereas the reimbursement discussions are ongoing in other countries. And finally, the first private clinic in the Nordics started treating patients in Finland in October last year. And what we hear from the market is that there are several other private clinics that are about to start. And we also hear that there are private patients traveling to Finland also from Sweden, for example.
Also since April, our team in the Nordics has gradually been out visiting memory clinics every day, educating on the Leqembi data and on the infrastructure that needs to be in place. We are active at national and regional specialist meetings, visiting regional health care decision makers, and we're increasing our digital communication on Leqembi. There is really a big interest and willingness to learn more and to make sure that all relevant staff at the clinics are educated.
So next slide. So finally, this is my last slide, and I know it's a busy one, but there was a question sent to us before [ Harald ], on the progress with governments regarding Leqembi reimbursement in the Nordics. And as you probably know, Eisai is responsible for reimbursement and pricing. But this slide shows an overall picture of the different steps and the parties involved in the process and what the completed steps are for Leqembi in blue, which you can also find publicly available.
It is the ambition for both Eisai and us to secure patient access to Leqembi in all Nordic countries. And as you might know, in red there, you see that in Denmark, the Danish Medicines Council came out with a negative recommendation in December. So here, Eisai is considering the next steps and will be in dialogue with the authorities regarding potential next steps.
In Sweden, the TLV published their health economic evaluation in December, and the next step is to negotiate with the NT-council. And in Finland, the assessment report from Fimea has been recently published. And in Norway, the assessment is still ongoing in the Norwegian Medicines Agency. So it is -- there's no official set time lines on how long these processes are, but Eisai is working very closely in dialogue with the authorities to answer any potential questions or other requests. And clearly, the ambition is to finalize these different steps during the year.
So you can go to the next slide. And by that, I leave the word to our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof.
Thank you, Anna-Kaija. I will then start with the Leqembi numbers where we saw solid growth globally.
In Q4, the sales were JPY 20.7 billion or $134 million. That was a 15% increase from the last quarter or 55% increase year-over-year. And as Anna-Kaija mentioned, this now means that we are well above $500 million in annual sales, which is a significant milestone for a product like this.
Looking at our royalties, they grew by 31% year-over-year to SEK 127 million, and this is despite the Swedish krona getting significantly stronger during the period. So if with constant exchange rates from last year, we would have seen more than 50% royalty growth.
Looking then at the different markets, starting with China, the sales there are still a little bit distorted by the Q2 stockpiling effect. Sales came in at JPY 0.4 billion or roughly $3 million. That is a 100% increase from the third quarter. However, that's still on a very low level, and this is due to the fact that there was a big inventory buildup in the second quarter with sales of $53 million in the second quarter.
And we have estimated roughly what our royalty would have been like if the sales in China would have been roughly in line with demand. And you see that in the pink bars in the graph that our royalty would have been roughly SEK 125 million, SEK 135 million and SEK 145 million during the second to the fourth quarters. Right now, we believe there is no more inventory to sell off, so we expect sales to return to more normal numbers for the first quarter of 2026.
If we then turn to the U.S., their sales were roughly $78 million or JPY 11.9 billion. That's a 17% increase from the third quarter. And as Anna-Kaija mentioned, here, the solid growth is expected to continue, mainly driven by the introduction of Iqlik for induction and also by the introduction of blood-based biomarkers during the year.
In Japan, the volumes are growing steadily. However, there was a price reduction. So the sales were JPY 6.2 billion or $40 million. That means no change from the third quarter. So the volume increase was roughly 15%, so healthy growth, but there was a one-off 15% price reduction from the Japanese reimbursement system, which is expected when volumes grow for a product.
Furthermore, the EU launch has been initiated. We're well underway in Austria and Germany, but still the royalty from the European market is very, very limited and has a very small impact on our royalties. That should grow, but even in 2026, we expect the impact from Europe to be fairly small to our royalties.
If we then turn to the forecast for Leqembi, Eisai has a JPY 76.5 billion forecast for their fiscal year 2025 that ends on March 31. And right now, after 9 months of that full year period, we have already reached more than 80% of the target. And you see the numbers to the right of the graph that in the U.S., they reached 78%, Japan 75% and China 87%. So what this means is that Eisai will reach the forecast even if there will be no growth in any of the larger markets, and that is not what we're seeing. So we believe they have a very good shot at reaching their forecast for the full year.
If we then turn to our numbers, I think it's worth to emphasize how big of a transformation 2025 was for us when we saw an eightfold increase in revenues. I won't be able to say that often, but this time around, that actually happened. And you see our revenues on the left-hand side, you see they're very lumpy with the highest revenues in the first and second quarters, mainly driven by the agreement that we entered into with BMS in the first quarter.
But even so, if you look at the fourth quarter, our net revenues were SEK 184 million. And I think it's very reassuring to see that our recurring revenue base is continuing to increase. So we had a royalty of SEK 127 million and co-promotion revenue of SEK 6 million. So all in all, SEK 133 million in the fourth quarter. And that means that we had recurring revenue of roughly SEK 520 million in 2025, and that's really starting to become a solid base for us to fund our future R&D investments.
We also get some questions on the Novartis upfront. It's recognized over the initial collaboration, and we recognized SEK 51 million out of the $30 million during the fourth quarter.
If we turn to our operating expenses, they actually decreased to SEK 136 million from SEK 143 million a year earlier. And if we take away currency effects that are recorded as other operating costs, the underlying operating costs were SEK 134 million. And I think it's worth to highlight that that's very, very close to the recurring revenue that was SEK 133 million. So we are actually more or less at the breakeven with our recurring revenues funding our full operations in the fourth quarter.
Looking forward a little bit, our underlying costs are expected to increase in 2026, up from SEK 681 million in 2025. And this is, of course, then due to the progression of our project portfolio that Johanna mentioned. We're investing heavily into exidavnemab, where we're currently in Phase II, but we're also starting big CMC programs for our new candidate drugs, BAN2238 and BAN3014, which is really, really positive. So the higher R&D costs we have, the better it is because that means we're making progress in our portfolio.
So it's hard to make a proper forecast for the cost. But if I can give, I would like to give you some guidance, and I guess or estimate that the growth will be roughly 50% to 70% in 2026. That is the cost should increase by 50% to 70% in 2026 compared to 2025.
And then finally, if we turn to our operating profit on the right-hand side, it was SEK 33 million for the fourth quarter and the full year operating profit was roughly SEK 1.26 billion, more -- here, you saw a really big effect, of course, of the BMS deal that we entered into and recognized in the first quarter.
If we turn to the next slide, we're looking at the net result. It was then a loss for the period that is explained by a significant accrued tax of SEK 48 million due to the big profit for the full year. The operating cash flow was significantly stronger than the result, and that is explained by the fact that the SEK 30 million upfront payment from Novartis was received during the quarter. So SEK 313 million in positive cash flow during the fourth quarter.
And we ended the year with a cash balance of SEK 2.2 billion, a very solid position. And the Board decided based on that very, very solid position and our growing recurring revenues that we should pay a dividend of SEK 2 per share, which is, of course, a significant milestone for a biotech company like ours.
With that, I hand the word back to Gunilla.
Thank you so much, Anders. So we are coming towards the end of today's presentation with some upcoming news flow and some closing remarks.
Next slide, please. I think it's great to see that more and more patients are getting access to Leqembi around the globe and also that in the Nordics that we have a private clinic in Finland so far, and we hope to get more and more patients in the Nordics, too. Eisai is driving continued regulatory processes on Leqembi in a very good way, and we hope to get more approvals in the future now.
The Iqlik subcutaneous administration with auto-injector recently was approved for maintenance dosing in the U.S., and we are now awaiting the response for the induction treatment with a PDUFA date 24th of May. Later this year, we also expect response from Japan, and there it is both regarding initiation and maintenance dosing with the subcutaneous auto-injector.
We are very much looking forward to the next big Alzheimer's Congress and Parkinson's Congress, which is in Copenhagen in March, where we will see several presentations. And then we see more things happening with exidavnemab, for example, where we expect to have the Phase IIa study readout later this year, and we are preparing for Phase IIb. So a lot of exciting times ahead of us.
Next slide, please. So some key takeaways from today's presentation. I think that it's great to see how BioArctic has entered into the new era, the growth era, and we see great progress both of Leqembi as well as the rest of the portfolio, including the BrainTransporter technology.
We have started really well to deliver on our 2030 ambitions, where Leqembi is well on track to become an established treatment in Alzheimer's disease. Sales continue to show increasing demand globally. And we have now had global sales of more than USD 500 million, and we are then halfway to becoming a blockbuster.
Our portfolio has increased and progressed well and our BrainTransporter technology as well as our 2 CD nominations that Johanna spoke about have taken exciting development steps. Our brain -- our business development efforts continue to deliver, and we see continued strong interest. We have a strong financial position, and we can then both invest in our programs and projects, and we can also pay some dividends that the Board has recommended, SEK 2 per share.
So all in all, I think we are exceptionally well positioned for the next phase of our growth journey. The future looks very bright for BioArctic, and we are bringing hope for many patients.
Next slide, please. So by that, we say thank you for your attention, and we're happy to take some questions.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Viktor Sundberg from Nordea.
2. Question Answer
So one first here, maybe on your effort to launch lecanemab in the Nordics. I just wanted to get a feel for how much of your operating expenses are allocated to building up an organization around this launch? And what could potentially happen to those costs in 2026 if the rest of the Nordic countries follow Denmark and deem lecanemab not cost effective, at least for the IV administration in the Nordics? Yes, I think I'll start with that question.
So if you look at the cost, most of our organization is already there. So we're not seeing any significant increases or in costs or even if there wouldn't be any change in Denmark and that decision would stand. I don't think we'll see any significant decreases either. We expect to fight with Denmark, and we're not planning any layoffs anytime soon despite the initial response there. So a small increase, I would say, on the cost side for marketing and sales.
Okay. And maybe if you could speak a bit about what kind of indications outside of neurology that have sparked some interest at, for example, JPMorgan around your BrainTransporter technology? Is that mainly oncology indications? If you could elaborate on, yes, where you see interest outside of neurology for this platform?
No, I think we -- as you know, we are not commenting about details when we talk about business development. We can just notice that there is great interest. And we see it on a broad level, and we see it on antibodies, but we also see it on other modalities, which we also know, Johanna showed some really nice data on today. So I think that there is a lot of different utilizations.
But I think I also want to say with regard to business development, these things take time. It's not that it's quick things that you should expect from day to day. This is long processes. It takes time. It's really important for selecting a partner because it's a long-term commitment. So it looks really good. We are having a lot of fun, but it will take some time.
The next question comes from Suzanne van Voorthuizen from Kempen.
This is Suzanne. One on the BrainTransporter. Could you elaborate a bit more on the ALS and next-gen exidavnemab programs in particular? What preclinical activities are undertaken at this moment? And how does the road look and time line for these programs to be ready for the clinic? And perhaps still, you mentioned the interest in the platform is broad. Could you speak a bit to the relative focus of this interest between your existing programs versus interest to apply the technique to a pharma program? Just some extra color would be nice.
So would you like to start, Johanna?
Absolutely. So thank you for that question. So we have now nominated, as I said, our alpha-synuclein antibody coupled to the PD program, coupled to the BT platform. And the activities that we are now embarking on in terms of moving the project from a research arena to the preclinical arena is the CMC activities that takes a lot of time to manufacture drug to be able to do toxicology studies. So this is the IND-enabling activities. It's mainly CMC toxicology to prepare for the clinic.
And with regard to the BT-coupled ALS program, I mean, the one that we have nominated now is the standard antibody against TDP-43, but we, of course, also have a BT-coupled program going along, and there is no difference in the priority of these 2 antibodies. It's just that the BT-coupled antibody is a bit behind. So therefore, we have nominated now the antibody, the standard antibody. But we are definitely progressing both of these programs and have a lot of belief in them. And in terms of the time lines, I mean, depending on how everything is going, it takes approximately 2 years for us from a decision to first time in man.
And I will continue with your second question about business development. I think that it's great to see that we have interest in both our internal programs and the BrainTransporter technology like a platform company that I've said previously that we also are. So I think that we see both interest also in the BrainTransporter together with antibodies, but we also see interest in BrainTransporter together with, for example, the new things that Johanna showed with small modalities.
So I think it's -- that's what I mean with broad interest. But we are coming from a position of strength. As I've said before, we have fantastic, exciting own programs, and we have the luxury situation that we can invest in them. So we can drive things forward ourselves or we could partner if we find the right partner. So I think it's a really position of strength, and we have a great organization that are driving the programs further.
And then I think that it's also good to see that we can utilize the company as a platform company and do things like the Novartis deal, where they come with their antibody, we reengineer the antibody. We check it and to see that it works as it should with regard to the transferrin receptor and so forth and then hand it back. So I think you will see more deals like that in the future. But if we find the right partner also for internal programs, that could also happen. But we don't have to partner, but we will partner if we find the right proposal and collaborator.
The next question comes from the Natalia Webster from RBC.
First one is just on Leqembi in Europe. I appreciate that you expect a small contribution here. But are you able to talk a bit more about what you expect is required to improve the slow adoption and how important you see both the longer-term data and the less frequent maintenance dosing in Europe? And then if you see potential for subcutaneous treatment here in the future?
My second question is on the BrainTransporter platform. Just in terms of time lines around BAN2803. You previously had plans to go into Phase I in 2026. Appreciate this is now up to BMS, but are you able to share any details around expected time lines there?
Then just finally, on overall OpEx. It looks like Q4 OpEx was lower than consensus is expecting, both on R&D and SG&A. I see that you're expecting an increase in cost in 2026. But are you able to touch on any key considerations for the cost phasing there next year?
So Anna-Kaija, would you like to take the question about Europe?
Yes. I heard the question was on the IV maintenance and the subcutaneous formulation. Is that correct? Yes. So I mean, as we just said, I mean, Eisai had submitted the application for the IV maintenance, and hopefully, this will be an approval on this during the year. And obviously, this will help, I mean, also in the different reimbursement processes across Europe. I mean, each country has their own reimbursement processes, and they usually, unfortunately, take a little bit more time than in the U.S. and the rest of the world. So I mean, globally, it's proceeding very well, but Europe is a bit slower. And hopefully, we will also see subcutaneous also coming to Europe in the future.
And then continue with your next question, 2803. I mean it's now up to our partner, Bristol Myers Squibb, to comment about when and how that is progressing with more details. I can just say that I think Bristol Myers Squibb is a fantastic partner who are driving the program forward in a great way. But I will not comment about when it will go into man. And then the OpEx is an Anders' question.
Yes. So yes, you should not draw any trend conclusions based on the Q4 costs coming in lower than expected. It is a little bit lumpy in our R&D programs. As for the phasing in 2026, I think we will grow steadily as the year goes by. But then again, it's really hard to give you any sort of hard forecast for how much it will grow quarter-by-quarter. You should expect that it will be a growing trend. It will probably not be a huge impact in the first quarter and then will be larger and larger as the quarters go by. I think that's the right way to model it for 2026.
The next question comes from Max Da from Goldman Sachs. [Operator Instructions] There are no more phone questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions or closing comments.
Thank you so much. So we have a couple of written questions that we'll address now, I guess. The first one comes from Erik Hultgard, Carnegie. And he's wondering when the 2 drug candidates that we just nominated when we can expect those to be in the clinic? Maybe a question for Johanna.
Yes. As I mentioned on the question earlier is that we expect it to take approximately 2 years from our nomination to entering into clinic if everything goes according to plan, of course. That is the guidance I can give you.
Yes. Super. Thank you. Then we have a couple of questions from Joseph Hedden, Rx Securities. I guess the first one, Gunilla, is for you. Anything that you can say on the BAN2802 project that we are running with Eisai and the progression of that program?
I'm happy to see that BAN2802 program is progressing well and really nice data. Everything with the data looks really, really good. And we are now discussing with Eisai regarding potential next steps.
Great. I see that we have Max Da back online. We'll take the written question first, Max, and then we'll come back to you. So then second question for Anders maybe is a question on, is there a commercial milestone, can we expect that during the course of this year for Leqembi?
Yes, I think it's fair to assume that we will reach a commercial milestone during the year. I cannot really comment on the timing of that. The last one we received was EUR 10 million. And as sales grow, it's normal that milestones grow, too. So I think it's fair to assume that it would be bigger than the EUR 10 million. But as for more details, I cannot really provide that at this point.
We can remind everybody that we still have outstanding milestones from Eisai of EUR 54 million, I believe.
In total.
In total, yes. Okay. And I think the last one here from Joseph is, R&D costs in Q4 '25 were lower than model, that we already discussed. Considering the Phase IIa, what do you think is a phasing? That question we already had, sorry about that. It's the same question that Natalia had at the end, right...
Yes. So yes, we already commented on the R&D cost phasing, so I hope that answer was enough for Joseph as well.
Okay. And then I think we can go back to Max's question online in the telephone queue.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Max Da from Goldman Sachs.
So this is Max Da for Rajan Sharma. A couple of questions. What is your progress on finding a partner for exidavnemab? And do you require Parkinson's disease to be included in the deal or the partner has the option to license only the MSA indication? That's the first one. And could you speak to the difference between PD-BT2278 and 2238 because I couldn't tell the difference? Yes, I'll start with these 2.
Okay. So the first question was with regard to exidavnemab and partnering. And as I said before, I mean, exidavnemab continues to progress really, really well. We are expecting the Phase IIa results later this year, and we are preparing for Phase IIb. We have interest for potential partners, and we might partner or we might not partner right now. It depends on if we get the right kind of proposal from the right kind of partner. Otherwise, we are very strong and can drive programs like this ourselves. We have the competence and so forth.
And I will not comment upon details on this at all at this stage. I mean we're open. We have the open door philosophy like we do all the time. And if the right partner comes, then we will make a partnering. But we are coming from a position of strength, and we can drive things forward ourselves also a bit longer.
And then there are different opportunities. I mean we have opportunities for Parkinson's disease with dementia, for example, or Lewy body dementia or other parts of Parkinson's disease or multiple systemic atrophy. And we have now 3 different programs in our portfolio, where exidavnemab is the most advanced, and we have 2238, which was just nominated and got the BAN number. So BAN2238 is the one with BrainTransporter. It's not exidavnemab, it's a slightly different antibody and it's combined with our BrainTransporter.
And then as Johanna said, I will make it easy for you now, Johanna, I'll just answer that question, too. And that is 2278, which is slightly different from 2238, but we will not, at this stage, talk about what difference we have. But we have one further new invention that has been added to this program, but we are not revealing any more details at the moment.
Got it. Sorry, one more question, if you have time?
Yes.
Could you talk about the dividend payout going forward and how we should model that?
So yes, this is Anders here. So yes, the Board has now proposed a dividend for SEK 2 per year. We cannot give you a forecast for what it will be in the future. However, I think it's fair to assume that the Board is expecting us to be able to pay a dividend going forward for the foreseeable future. The size of that or how certain I am of that, I cannot really comment. But I think it's fair to assume that they are hoping to pay -- hoping to be able to pay a dividend in the forthcoming years.
There are no more phone questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions or closing comments.
And we have no additional written questions. So I'll hand it over to Gunilla to end the call.
So I'll just say, thank you very much for your attention and a lot of great questions, and I wish you all a great rest of the day. Thank you so much.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
BioArctic AB — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to BioArctic Q3 Report 2025. [Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Gunilla Osswald; CFO, Anders Martin-Lof; and colleagues. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to BioArctic's presentation for the third quarter of 2025. BioArctic is continuing a great way in our new era. With yet another quarter where we see more and more patients are getting access to Leqembi. And we are broadening our collaborations, utilizing our BrainTransporter technology and we are also broadening our portfolio with new projects and new modalities, and we will talk more about that in today's presentation.
Next slide, please. BioArctic is listed at nasdaq.com large cap, and this is our disclaimer.
Next slide, please. So I'm Gunilla Osswald, and I'm the CEO of BioArctic, and I will share today's presentation with our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof; and our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Fälting; and our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad.
Next slide, please. So I will start our presentation today by giving some key highlights. We go to next slide, please. So before I come into this quarter and the presentation, I just want to give a high-level introduction to BioArctic, if we have any new listeners today. BioArctic is among the world's leading innovators in precision neurology, and we have 2 key platforms: the first one is about innovation and generation and development of highly selective antibodies targeting aggregated misfolded forms of toxic proteins. And examples here are -- for example, lecanemab, Leqembi and exidavnemab. The second one is when we are utilizing our BrainTransporter platform in innovative ways to deliver antibodies and different modalities to come better into the brain.
In today's presentation, we will talk about both selective antibodies like Leqembi, exidavnemab and our new project for Huntington's disease with Huntington as well as our BrainTransporter Technology, which we have utilized now for all our internal targets, and we have also started to use it for external projects. And we now have 3 different partnerships utilizing the BrainTransporter technology, including the recently signed deal with Novartis.
Next slide, please. During the second quarter this year, we held our first Capital Markets Day, and then we presented our ambitions for 2030. And I'm really pleased to say that we are already delivering on our ambitions.
So if we start with the first one, Leqembi, to be an established treatment in Alzheimer's disease, I'm really happy to see how Leqembi's demand continues to grow. The second one is to have a balanced and broader pipeline with projects in all stages of development. And our pipeline is already broader and continue to increase and develop. The third one is additional successful global partnerships. And of course, we are very happy with the new collaboration with Novartis, and we have more positive discussions ongoing. The fourth one is our aim to be profitable and to have recurring dividends in the future. And we expect to be highly profitable this year, and these will come back to this.
Next slide, please. As I said, we are already delivering on our ambitions. And now I will go through a bit about how. We start with Leqembi. And I think now we are really well on our way to get Leqembi established as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease, a disease-modifying treatment affecting the underlying disease. Thanks to our partner Eisai. They're great work with Leqembi. It's now approved in 51 countries around the world, with Canada being the latest one. The Iqlik, the subcutaneous auto-injector, like a subcutaneous pen was called Iqlik was approved for maintenance dosing in the U.S. during the quarter. And Eisai has already initiated a rolling submission for initiation dosing as well and launch has already started for maintenance dosing in the U.S. after the quarter.
Next thing I want to say is about Europe, and there, the launch has been initiated in Germany and Austria. And we're really happy to see that Finland has got the first patients that have been treated in a private clinic. Of course, this is great news from us from a Nordic perspective since we are preparing for launch together with Eisai in the Nordic countries. And Anna-Kaija will come back and talk more about this.
Then there has been several presentations on Leqembi during the period and after the period. And those have shown that long-term data over 4 years treatment show continued increasing benefits over time. And these are really reassuring to follow the real data coming for Leqembi when it's being used in clinical practice. And we have heard presentations, both from the U.S., Japan and China. And the data have shown that the benefit and the safety profile are at least in line with the Phase III results, which I think is great and encouraging.
Subcutaneous administration data has also been started represented, and that supports this great further opportunity for patients, to, in a more easily way, get the injection, buy an auto injector and possible to do that at home in an easier way.
Then I also want to mention that we -- of course, we follow with great interest the fantastic progress with the blood-based biomarkers. And the guidance was launched earlier -- or during the quarter about how to utilize the blood-based biomarkers and they can now be used both for confirmation and for charging, and we'll come back to that.
If we then look at the second part of the pipeline, which is progressing really well and growing with new projects, I want to mention exidavnemab, our alpha-synuclein antibody currently in Phase IIa, with the second part of the study ongoing in both Parkinson's disease patients and in multiple systemic atrophy patients. And also really happy to be able to communicate that we are also now working on another misfolded protein target called Huntingtin for Huntington's disease. And here, we are working with antibodies, but we are also broadening it into other modalities, utilizing our BrainTransporter technology, and Johanna will talk more about this in today's call.
The third one is to have additional successful global partnerships. And as I said, we are very happy about the new collaboration with Novartis regarding an undisclosed target for neurodegenerative diseases. And we will reengineer their antibody to include our BrainTransporter technology and enabling them a better penetration into the brain.
I also want to mention the other BrainTransporter collaborations that we have so far is one with Eisai on BAN2802, where we're generating great data and BAN2803, which we are completing now the tech transfer to Bristol Myers Squibb.
It's also great to see that we have continued strong interest for our projects and for our BrainTransporter technology for antibodies as well as for other modalities.
The fourth part about the financials. We have strong financials, and we are highly profitable this year with increasing royalties as well as several milestones from Eisai and upfront payments from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis.
Next slide, please. If we think about the Alzheimer's field, it's evolving in a very nice way, and I want to highlight 5 different areas. The first one is that we see that we are getting easier and easier diagnosis by blood-based biomarkers. And I think this is important in helping to build the market in an easier way and to help to get the right patients to come to specialists to get a treatment initiated. The first tests are now available as confirmatory for specialists as well as for triaging for primary care.
If we then look at the second one, we see more and more data that shows that earlier initiation of treatment of Leqembi shows better effect. So when we are looking at the earlier patients in the Phase III Clarity AD open-label extension study, where now 48 months data are available. We see that the majority of aducanumab-related patients were stable or even improved after 48 months treatment. I think this is very encouraging. And I think it's also further supports the ongoing AHEAD 3-45 study in presymptomatic individuals with amyloid pathology, but yet without symptoms.
The third one is also really important, and that is the data that are being presented show the importance with maintenance treatment to maintain the treatment and the benefit of continued treatment with Leqembi, even after the plaques are cleared in order to continue to clear the toxic protofibrils and that's possible due to the mechanism of action and the low immunogenicity that we see with Leqembi.
The fourth one is about more convenient dosing with Leqembi Iqlik, the subcutaneous auto-injector. And I think this is a really important next step for Leqembi. And it's making dosing so much easier for the patients and care partners to handle the dosing at home. And we are also pleased to note that it was awarded as one of the top innovations for 2025 by Time Magazine.
And the fifth one is that in the future, we expect to see more combination treatments for even better outcomes. And there is currently an ongoing study with lecanemab, and Eisai's tower antibody. And I think in the future, we will see more and more combination treatments.
So to summarize, the key is to identify patients at an early stage. And here, we can use the blood-based biomarkers, and we can start Leqembi treatment early and continue treatment with convenient dosing with Leqembi Iqlik. So great progress in this field for Leqembi.
Next slide, please. So now we come to the R&D update, and I hand over to our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Fälting.
Thank you so much, Gunilla. Next slide, please. So as Gunilla mentioned, BioArctic is among the world's leading innovators in precision neurology, where we have 2 key platforms: the antibody platform with highly selective antibodies targeting aggregated forms of toxic proteins. And these are intended to treat severe neurodegenerative diseases with high unmet medical need, such as Leqembi in Alzheimer's disease, exidavnemab in synucleinopathies, Parkinson or MSA and also the TDP-43 project for ALS.
BioArtic is also developing a BrainTransporter technology that facilitates the passage of antibodies and other drugs across the blood-brain barrier. And the aim with this platform is to improve the brain exposure and distribution of the drug and thereby allow for lower dosing, improved convenience, reduced manufacturing costs and potentially also better efficacy. And in addition now, we are also further developing our BrainTransporter technology and expanding this into new modalities other than antibodies, such as enzyme proteins and even genetic medicines. And the development of the platform that will enable us to address different diseases by tailoring the modality target combination with the highest potential clinical benefit.
Next slide, please. So this is an overview of our R&D portfolio with the 2 platform antibodies and brain transporters and the cross program synergies. The portfolio is a combination of fully funded projects run in partnership with global pharmaceutical companies, innovative in-house projects and technology platforms with significant market and out-licensing potential.
So far, our BrainTransporter platform has generated 3 collaborations with Eisai, BMS and Novartis and all of these collaborations are progressing really well. They are all with different targets. But importantly, the BrainTransporter technology is BioArctic's own proprietary and has the potential to generate more collaborations in the future. You will also note a new BrainTransporter project in the portfolio, the [HD-BT 4801] for Huntington's disease, and I will come back to this specific project later in the presentations.
So to summarize, we are both advancing and broadening our R&D portfolio with new projects into new disease areas and with new collaborations.
Next slide, please. So exidavnemab is an antibody that selectively targets the pathological alpha-synuclein aggregates while sparing the physiological monomers and exist is a Phase IIa study, testing the safety and tolerability of exidavnemab. In this study, we are also exploring a wide range of biomarkers, both biochemical and digital and we have a quite unique approach in including the right patients in the study with a smell test that is an early sign of Parkinson if you have an impaired smell and also a CSF seeding amplification test to really make sure that we have the correctly diagnosed patients with the alpha-synuclein pathology in the study.
The high dose cohort is currently ongoing, both in Parkinson and multiple systemic atrophy and the results are expected mid-2026. So following this EXIST study, there are several potential possibilities for future development in different synucleinopathies such as Parkinson MSA and DLB, and we are currently preparing for the next stage of development.
Next slide, please. So this is very exciting to me that we are now expanding our portfolio into a new neurodegenerative disease, the Huntington's disease. And this is an inherited progressive neurological neuropsychiatric disorder that is caused by impaired function and degradation of nerve cells in specific areas of the brain. Huntington's disease is caused by a toxic mutant Huntingtin protein in the brain and the mutation in this gene results in a buildup of toxic aggregated Huntingtin protein causing Huntington's disease. The disease onset is between 30 and 50 years old of age, and it's fatal within 10 to 30 years. Current treatments are only symptomatic and there is a large unmet medical need for better treatments.
So next slide, please. Targeting the Huntingtin protein in the Huntington's disease is an excellent strategic fit into our portfolio at BioArctic and with our capabilities. So this project is built on BioArctic's extensive experience in developing antibodies against misfolded aggregated toxic proteins and also our BrainTransporter platform that will enable us to increase the brain delivery of the drug. In this project, several modalities is being explored in parallel, antibodies as well as genetic medicine approaches. And since this is a brain target we have, of course, also combined it with our BrainTransport technology. So we are excited that we now expand our portfolio with yet another neurodegenerative disease in addition to Alzheimer alpha-synucleinopathies ALS and Gaucher with the potential to bring hope for even more patients.
Next slide, please. So with that, I will hand over to our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad for a commercial update.
Thank you, Johanna, and you can go to the next slide, please. And I will go back to Leqembi again. And I'll start with the regulatory update for all of you. So since the last quarterly report, Leqembi IV has now been approved in 3 additional countries. That is in India, Australia and in end October also in Canada. So in total, Leqembi it can is approved in 51 countries and territories. And as of October, in addition to the U.S., the IV maintenance treatment, meaning once every 4 weeks is also approved in China, in Qatar, United Arab Emirates and India.
So Anders will soon present the sales numbers. But in short, I would say that the Leqembi growth really continues steadily. So in Q3 versus Q2, when you adjust to the China's actual demand, the growth was 14%. And we have seen recent launches in Mexico and Saudi Arabia. And as of August and September, as Gunilla mentioned, Leqembi was launched also in the EU, in Austria and Germany, where patients have started treatment. So -- and what we hear is that within the first 2 months, it's around 350 centers were registered in the system for the controlled access program. And as educational activities is being rolled out in the 2 countries, registrations and prescriptions continue to increase at major specialist clinics.
And finally, in the Nordics, of course, as Gunilla mentioned, there is a private clinic in Finland offering Leqembi treatment to patients willing to pay out of pocket and we know that a few patients have received treatment in October. So this is an important milestone for us in our ambition to also becoming a fully-fledged pharmaceutical company. So in the meantime, the price and reimbursement and the dialogue continues with all the Nordic countries, and we aim to launch gradually across -- throughout 2026.
So next slide, please. So additionally, I would like to spend a few minutes again on the Leqembi Iqlik, the subcutaneous auto-injector, which was approved in the U.S. in August and launched as of early October. And as Alzheimer's disease is a progressive disease where neurodegeneration and cognitive decline continues even after plaque removal, it is important to offer both health care professionals and patients the possibility to choose between continuing on once-monthly infusions in the hospitals or to switch to once weekly at home injections after the 18-month treatment. So this obviously could be a benefit for the patient who might want to travel and feel less bound to the hospital but also to health care providers in reducing the resources related to the infusions.
Reimbursement for the Iqlik is expected to be included on formulary in the beginning of 2027 but individuals can seek insurance coverage via the medical exception process, which is something that is quite common in the U.S. And Eisai staff is providing information on this process and nurse educators provide support on dosing and demonstration kits, et cetera. So this is truly a major step in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease patients. And recently, Leqembi Iqlik was selected by Time as one of the best inventions in the medical and health care category.
In addition, Eisai has also rolling SBLA ongoing also for the weekly initiation treatment in the U.S. since September, which is planned to be completed in the last quarter of this year. So potential approval maybe in Q2 or Q3 next year. And finally, submissions for the subcutaneous weekly initiation treatment is also planned for Japan before the end of this year.
Next slide, please. So moving on to my final slide. This is to highlight again the true advancements we are seeing with the Leqembi Iqlik and with the parallel development in the usage of diagnostic blood test. If you remember, U.S. clinical guidelines were presented at the AD/PD congress in July this summer, saying that blood-based biomarker test showing more than 90% sensitivity and specificity can be used for confirmatory diagnosis in patients with cognitive impairment. And the first blood-based confirmatory tests are available in several countries in U.S. and China, for instance. And Fujirebio's test, Lumipulse, for instance, has been granted IVD clearance and C2N is another company has submitted for regulatory filing in the U.S. for their confirmatory test.
And meanwhile, Roche phospho-tau 181 blood test was granted IVD clearance from the FDA for use in the primary care test as a triage test. So more tests will be done. 350,000 tests are expected to be used in 2025. And the new CMS payment rate is coming up from January next year. And of course, as more patients are being tested, more patients will receive a diagnosis. So as we see it, these advancements will contribute significantly to the Leqembi growth going forward, especially in the U.S., China and Japan.
So that's all for me. And with that, I will now hand over to our CFO, Anders Martin-Lof.
Thank you, Anna-Kaija. If you start to look at the Leqembi numbers, the global Q3 sales work came in at JPY 18 billion or roughly $121 million. And at first glance that looks quite negative since there was a 22% decrease from the second quarter of 2025, but that is all due to a large stockpiling effect in China in the second quarter. So Eisai calculated what the growth would have been from the second to the third quarter without the stockpiling effect and then the growth would have been 14%.
We recorded a royalty of SEK 117.2 million. That's also then down from SEK 162.5 million in the second quarter. But we have also estimated what the royalty would have been without the stockpiling effect. And then we would have been around SEK 125 million in the second quarter and SEK 135 million in this quarter. So I think that's a better reflection of the actual development of the Leqembi sales in the world.
Turning then to China. So actual recorded sales for JPY 0.2 billion or $0.6 million. So a 97% decrease from the second quarter. Basically, the clinics in China are receiving Leqembi from inventory right now in the third quarter. The actual demand was roughly $18 million, and that's a 10% increase from $16 million in the second quarter. But all in all, this means that there is still quite a significant inventory left in China. So we expect very low sales in China also during the fourth quarter, and that was reported by Eisai.
Turning to the U.S. There, the sales are increasing well. They were up to JPY 10.2 billion or roughly $69 million, representing a 12% increase from the second quarter. And here, Eisai is really trying to leverage the developments that Anna-Kaija was talking about with the blood-based biomarkers that are now being used more and more and acceptance of Iqlik for maintenance therapy this year and for induction next year.
But to really get the full effect of this, you have to target the primary care practitioners. So that is what they say it's doing now. They're targeting roughly 2,500 primary care practitioners. They're running very big educational programs and running large awareness campaigns straight to the patients. So they're really building momentum now to start to see an impact from Iqlik and blood-based biomarkers starting probably more from next year, but they're really starting to do the groundwork now.
And here, you can say that they're mimicking Japan a little bit. Japan is the market that has come the furthest along in the demand expansion phase. Sales here were $42 million, representing a 13% increase from the second quarter. And here, they have really succeeded in setting up a good treatment chain where roughly 4,200 doctors are referring to 800 initial treatment centers, and there the patients stay for a while, and then they are moved over to follow-up facilities. So that's a system that has worked incredibly well, and that is what they're trying to achieve now in the U.S. as well.
I think it's also really interesting to see that the disease awareness campaigns that they are running for mild cognitive impairment in Japan are significantly increasing the recognition rates because we all know that mild cognitive impairment, which is the earliest phase of the disease is really where you want to treat the patients with the disease-modifying therapy, you can have the most effect if you start as early as possible. But today, those patients aren't really diagnosed to a large extent. So these awareness campaigns can really start to build momentum for more patients getting the drug when they really should have it.
And then as Anna-Kaija mentioned, the EU launch has been initiated in Austria and Germany. It's really exciting to see that, that is starting well. However, it will take some time before you see any significant impact in our royalties from EU, which is slightly slower market than the U.S. and Japan.
If we then turn to the Leqembi Global sales forecast. They have a forecast of JPY 76.5 billion for their fiscal year 2025 for Leqembi. And if you look on the right-hand side of the graph, you see that they have already in the first 2 quarters of that fiscal year, achieved 48% of the forecast in the U.S. and 49% in Japan and already 83% in China. So all in all, if you also include the other countries, they have achieved roughly 52% of the overall annual forecast in the first 2 quarters of that period. And since they are growing, we have a very high confidence that they would reach the forecast for the year. So everything is looking really, really good for Leqembi, and it seems to reach their forecast with some margin.
If we then turn to our own numbers, you see that the Q3 net revenues were SEK 133 million. And this quarter, that was mainly based on the recurring revenues with royalties of SEK 117 million and co-promotion revenues of SEK 5 million. So it's exciting to see that we're becoming more and more like a normal company with recurring revenues that make up a larger share of our revenue base.
We also recorded some revenues from the new Novartis agreement. As you know, we got in a $30 million upfront when we started that collaboration. And now we recorded SEK 9 million out of that in the third quarter, and we will record the rest during the remainder of that collaboration.
Looking at our operating expenses, they increased to SEK 150 million this quarter compared to SEK 95 million a year ago. And this time around, that was basically just normal cost. We have had large currency effects in the previous 2 quarters, but not this quarter. So the underlying operating costs were SEK 146 million. And that's slightly over than our recurring revenues. So we have operating costs that are SEK 24 million higher than our recurring revenues, but we are approaching a point where we will have recurring revenues that are larger than our operating expenses. So we are getting closer and closer to long-term profitability.
If we then look at our cost for the remainder of the year, we expect them to keep increasing since we have a more mature project portfolio, and we have built up our commercial organization. I have previously stated that I expect our full year cost to be roughly 50% to 70% higher than the cost of last year. Now we think we will be in the lower range of that interval. So I would say roughly 50% to 60% higher than the cost of last year.
And then on the right-hand side, you see that operating loss was SEK 29 million for the third quarter. We expect something similar in the fourth quarter. So the operating profit for the year should be well above SEK 1 billion.
On the next slide, you see our net result on the left. It's then, of course, a lower loss or a bigger loss the operating loss, but -- and that's mainly explained by the accrued taxes of SEK 65 million that we also -- we have a positive financial net of SEK 8 million, so that ameliorate a little bit. And then the operating cash flow, you typically see one very big bar, and that's the payment of the $100 million upfront payment that we received from Bristol Mayer Squibb in the second quarter. The $30 million upfront payment, $30 million, I should say, from Novartis had not been received in the third quarter. It was received in October. So the bar you see on the left-hand side with our cash balance right now of SEK 1.9 billion does not include the Novartis payments. So our financial position will continue to be strengthened in the fourth quarter. So we are going to end the year with a very, very solid position.
I think that was all for me. And now I hand back to Gunilla for some closing remarks.
Thank you so much, Anders. So we are coming towards the end of today's presentation with some upcoming news flow and some closing remarks.
So next slide, please. So we are now in the fourth quarter of 2025. And I think it's great to see that more and more patients are getting access to Leqembi around the globe. And also really pleased to see that we're also starting even if it's small. So we are starting in the Nordics. We see continued regulatory processes on lecanemab, with the Canada approval. And I think it's great to see the Iqlik being approved for maintenance dosing in the U.S. and our partner, Eisai are working hard to conclude the supplementary BLA filing for Leqembi Iqlik in the U.S. for initiation dose. And also to file in Japan for both initiation and maintenance dosing with Iqlik.
We are, of course, looking forward to the next Alzheimer Congress its CTAD in San Diego in the beginning of December. And there, we note several presentations on lecanemab, including subcutaneous data and more real-world evidence data from, for example, U.S. registered. So this is something I'm really looking forward to.
So I'll come to next slide. So the key takeaways from today's presentation is that BioArtic is now in our new era, and we see great progress both on Leqembi as well as the rest of our portfolio and the BrainTransporter technology. We have already started to deliver on our 2030 ambitions. Leqembi is well on track to become an established treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Sales continue to show increasing demand on a global level, further regulatory approvals, launches reassuring data from long-term treatment and real-world evidence.
Our portfolio has increased, and we have initiated program for Huntington's disease with different modalities. Our brain -- or our business development efforts continue to deliver with a third BrainTransporter collaboration now having been initiated during the third quarter. And this was the first of its kind, and it shows that we are also expanding to becoming also a platform company.
And the last point is that we have strong financials, as Anders described, with great cash flow with milestones and record royalties during this year, growing more than 180% year-on-year. So I think the future looks very bright for BioArtic and is bringing hope for many patients.
Next slide, please. So by that, we say thank you so much for your attention, and we're happy to take some questions.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Joseph Hedden from Rx Securities.
2. Question Answer
Firstly, on the Leqembi Iqlik, do you have any visibility on when regulatory filings might be made in Europe or China or the strategy there is? And then secondly, it's great to see a Huntington project. Just on the BrainTransporter technology. I know that first program is an antibody and you've mentioned genetic medicines. Is BrainTransporter are capable of, for instance, using an AAV vector like, I mean, Huntington's, the uniQure therapy made a lot of noise recently. Does any significant modification need to happen with your current platform to be able to carry a vector such as AAV?
Thank you so much, Joseph. Excellent questions. So I think the first question on Leqembi Iqlik in Europe and China, we cannot comment on that. I mean right now, we are really happy about the progress in the U.S. and Japan. And then we know our partner is doing everything they can to help as many patients as possible around the world. So we'll come back to that. Then your question with regard to Huntington's disease and where we are also really happy to see the BrainTransporter. So I didn't understand any specific question.
I think I can take the question.
But if I just -- then I hand over to you, Johanna. And then for the BrainTransporter, I think it's really, really good to see that we can utilize that for several different modalities and definitely help to get different modalities better into the brain. And I think it's important to point out that BrainTransporter is not one thing, it's the platform with many different tailor-made ways to handle depending on if it's what kind of target and what kind of modality. So we have several different approaches that we utilize depending on if it's an extracellular target, intracellular target or what kind of modality we have. And then I hand over to Johanna, who understand the question I missed.
Thank you so much, Joseph, for that excellent question. And we are, of course, following the competitive landscape very well, and we understand and we have seen the uniQure data. I think it's excellent data. But that's a treatment that is not for everyone. It's a quite invasive treatment, and you actually need maybe a 15-hour surgery for one patient to administer that drug and you do it with intrathecal administration and injections in different sites in the brain right now. So our approach is a bit different, and I can't speak too much of it today before we have the patents in place and so -- but we have another approach, and we are not primarily targeting AAV with our BrainTransporter technology.
I hope that responded to your question. Thank you, Johanna.
Yes.
The next question comes from Suzanna Queckbörner from Handelsbanken.
I'd like to ask a question regarding the Leqembi subcu. So listening to the Eisai conference call, there was talk about the Iqlik being listed in formularies only by 2027. There seems to be a medical exemption program, which would address something like 80% of patients. To me, it sounds like there's likely to be more paperwork associated with that, which sounded like it was going to be limited or access was going to be limited at least until 2027. Maybe you can just sort of explain that to me? And then also, how does that impact your competitive advantage versus Elli Lilly's remternetug, which is also expected to read out data in 2026 and they have the subcu formulation as well.
Yes. So we start with your question on Iqlik and the process in the U.S. with the reimbursement agency or CMS is that it's certain times of the year that you need to submit in order to come into the next year. So that's the reason for why we expect Leqembi Iqlik to be on the formulary from January 2027. Right now, just as you said, Suzanna, there is a possibility to utilize the medical exemption program, where -- which I think many of these physicians are used to do for other treatments. And what we have understood from Eisai is that it's not overwhelming paperwork. It's a fairly easy process that can help the patients -- most patients to already be reimbursed right now.
And I'll also go on the differentiation part a little bit and then hand over to Anna-Kaija. So I think, I mean, we see then the Iqlik has a really good differentiator versus competitors. And then we will follow with great interest when also remternetug comes with some efficacy data. We haven't seen much yet. So I think each compound has to show itself before we can comment too much. And we haven't seen much of it yet. So -- but I think meanwhile, we're really happy for Leqembi Iqlik, which all the data we have seen so far looks really, really promising. And more data is expected to be shown at CTAD. I don't know, Anna-Kaija, if you want to add something.
No, not really. I think -- again, I think it's -- we haven't seen that much data on remternetug yet. So I think it's too early to say anything about it. But we, of course, understand that they also see the need of subcutaneous auto-injector because we think that this will be a key driver and for patients also being having an easier treatment. So we see -- so the need from the Elli Lilly as well. They see this as a competitive advantage.
If I can have a follow-up question. Also, I saw that Takeda discontinued their alpha-synuclein antibody, which they reported to had Phase II results on. Maybe you can talk about the differentiation to your alpha-synuclein antibody.
Yes. I think it's really important to understand that every antibody is different from each other. And we think that we have a clearly superior antibody, much more selective. The most selective antibody that we know for alpha-synuclein between the pathological forms and the physiological forms. So we have more than 100,000 fault electivity, which is a huge difference from competitors. And also, I think it's important to see the design of the clinical studies that we also think that we are designing better studies for the future. But I will hand over to Johanna.
Thank you, Gunilla. I totally agree, and thank you for the question. Of course, it's always sad when a clinical study that being sold to patient does not read out. But I think that we have a differentiated profile, both in terms of the selectivity for what we believe is the toxic species, the aggregated species and a very high affinity for those species. And we also have a superior human PK profile as compared to the AstraZeneca Takeda that recently read out. It was also fairly small, I would say, a Phase II clinical trial. And I think that we can have a clear differentiation versus both in terms of human PK study design and selectivity for the toxic species.
So not much read over, I would say.
Absolutely not.
The next question comes from Natalia Webster from RBC.
Firstly, I was wondering on Eisai's full year Leqembi guidance to March. This is implying a slowdown in growth for Leqembi sales for calendar Q4 into Q1 '26. So just curious to hear if you think this is conservative, appreciating that there may be some further impact from the China inventory adjustment in Q4.
And then my second question is on the European launch. I appreciate it's early days and it could take some time to see a more meaningful contribution here, but are you able to provide a bit more feedback on how this is progressing? And if you're counting any of the initial challenges that you saw in the U.S. around capacity or otherwise?
And then finally, just on profit. You've maintained your long-term ambition for sustainable profitability. I was wondering if you're able to touch on any key considerations for cost phasing in 2026? And if you're able to confirm that you still expect to reach sustainable profitability from 2026 as well?
So I think it's Anders, who should start this questions.
Right. So if you look at the Eisai's forecast, I think you're specifically asking whether they will reach for China. Well, all in all, they are already at 52% of the full year forecast after 2 quarters, 87% in China. I think it's correct that the Chinese sales will be very low in the next quarter as well. But then I think more or less the inventory should be used up, so they should have a strong first quarter of next year. So we remain very confident that they will reach their forecast for the full year, and so are they. That's what they communicated on their call. As for the profit for next year, we will not comment on our cost for next year until we finish the year. So you'll hear more about that in February when we communicate our year-end results.
And then there was a question for Anna-Kaija.
Yes, regarding the EU launches and what I can say is that, of course, I mean EU consists of 27 countries and all of these countries have their national market access processes on price and reimbursement. So I would say that after Germany and Austria, typically being the early launch countries, it takes quite some more time before each country has gone through this process. So I would say that we can be cautious when it comes to the sales coming from Europe next year.
I think we are, let's say, infrastructural wise in a better situation than in the U.S.A. But still, I mean, this is a new treatment paradigm also that is being implemented. So each clinic has to really go through and have a checklist on what to have in place in order to start treatments on patients. So I think we should be kind of cautious and understanding of the changes that needs to be in place in the clinic. So it will be rolled out gradually throughout Europe next year.
And I just want to remind also that we have said all the time that Europe is a small, small proportion out of the global sales especially, I mean, the coming 2 years, but also long term. It's really U.S., Japan, China and other parts of Asia and other parts of the world, that also contributes. Yes, a lot.
The next question comes from Viktor Sundberg from Nordea.
So yes, one first on the financials. So I just wondered how we should think about the Novartis upfront payment being recognized over 21 months. Will this be in a linear fashion? Or how should we think about the revenue contribution of that part going forward?
The short answer is, yes.
Linear.
So yes, linear. It's very hard to -- we are delivering as we have communicated, we are working on the Novartis compound that we are modifying and we will deliver back to them. And that will take some time, and it's really hard to estimate how large share of that work has been done. So you typically do that in a linear fashion over the expected time course of the collaboration, so linear.
Okay. And also I had a question on your competitive position or Eisai's competitive position versus Kisunla. Looking at the curve, it seems that they are accelerating sales, I guess, Eisai has done a lot of the groundwork already to prepare for that. But I just wonder on your discussions with Eisai, like why are some patients choosing Kisunla over Leqembi, or why some patients choosing Leqembi over Kisunla. What's your feedback here so far in the launch?
Would you like to take it, Anna-Kaija?
Yes. I mean, of course, we're still -- Leqembi still the #1 disease modifying treatment Alzheimer's in the U.S. as well. But as you say, I mean, of course, Kisunla is having some advantage to us being a front runner in establishing these kind of treatments on the market. So it's -- but what we can see is that at Eisai reports is that it's not kind of reducing the Leqembi market, but it's growing the kind of total market as such.
Of course, I mean, there is a difference in the -- they have once monthly today, and we have twice monthly in the 18-month treatment phase, and then you can choose to go to once monthly or Iqlik. So of course, every patient is an individual and has to kind of decide what is -- what works best for that patient. So -- but otherwise, I think Leqembi is still showing a strong growth, so -- and driving, and so in total, it's growing the total market.
The next question comes from Sebastiaan van der Schoot from Kempen.
Congrats on the progress. Just one from our side. Could you maybe give some color on what would be your goal or non-go discussion decision for further development of the Parkinson's program. What type of signals do you want to see against placebo to push the development forward? And what could next steps for the program look like?
Yes. So I will start and just say that exidavnemab, which is currently in a Phase IIa study. And the main task for this study is to look at safety tolerability and we have 2 doses. We have had first a lower dose where we have had a safety review that supported us to go into the higher dose part in exactly the way that we had planned and wanted. And then we have also broadened it not only for Parkinson's disease, but also for multiple systemic atrophy where we also have called orphan drug destination.
So I think -- I mean, we are doing a lot of biomarkers, but that's really in order to prepare also for the next step for Phase IIb. So I think it's really important to see that the expectation here is really to look at safety tolerability for this program. And so far, what we have seen, it looks really good. So I think that's -- but the readout there will be just after summer next year is what we expect. The study is ongoing and still recruiting. So it's a little hard to say exactly when it happened, but the best estimate is a little bit after summer next year.
And then there is a lot of opportunities for this asset. And as we have described before, it can be Parkinson's disease dementia, it can be Lewy body dementia. It can be different parts of Parkinson's disease. It can be MSA. So there's a lot of opportunities. And at the moment, we are evaluating different of those kind of indications and preparing for the next step. So I think this is a very interesting asset, very exciting with a lot of opportunities.
I don't know if you want to add something, Johanna?
No, I have nothing to add to that. Just to say -- to echo what Gunilla said, this is a quite small study and a short study. So not too much should be expected in terms of biomarker readouts. It's a safety and tolerability study, it's 3 months, and that's a bit too short to see efficacy on biomarkers related to disease modification.
That should be the next...
[Operator Instructions]
So there doesn't seem to be any people in the phone queue right now, but we have some written questions that have been posted during the call, so I'll read them out loud. And then Gunilla can direct who should take the question, although I think the first one is maybe Anders one. But it's from Peter, who wonders looking forward when we start to record sales in -- for Leqembi in the Nordic countries, how are we going to report that going forward?
So in our profit and loss statement, you have our total revenues. And then in the notes, we will have our different revenue split up by line, and we already do actually. So the revenues from the Nordics won't be seen straight away. They are part of what is called co-promotion revenue, which is the reimbursement we get from Eisai for profit sharing. But over time, yes, I think we will comment on how things are going in the Nordics. I hope that answers the question.
And then a follow-up question from Peter as well regarding OpEx and the difference in OpEx if you compare Q1 and Q2, it's down in Q3, and he wonders what were the reasons for this and then going forward also what is the level that we can expect? Anything you can say there?
Right. No. So our costs are quite lumpy. So if you deduct the other operating expenses, which is mostly currencies. Yes, our costs were down a little bit in the third quarter, but we expect them to go up again in the fourth quarter, and then we'll see what happens next year. Especially what happens with -- after the EXIST trial, if we enter into significant clinical trials with exidavnemab, you should expect increasing R&D spending next year. But it's too early to tell exactly what that will look like. But of course, with the maturing R&D portfolio, you incur larger costs, which is a great thing for a company like ours.
Then we had a question from Frederic, but I think we answered that because it came from somebody else as well. And then Eric from Carnegie has a question regarding the EVOKE trials that are coming up soon in just the next couple of weeks. Expectations on results for the EVOKE trial where semaglutide is tested in early AD in EVOKE and EVOKE+. What's our thoughts on that if that study is positive and how that could potentially impact or not impact Leqembi. Gunilla?
Yes. So I think I'm really looking forward to seeing the results, and it's quite imminent now. I think it's 2 well-designed clinical trials in Phase III. They did not have a proper Phase II. So it's very hard to say anything about what to expect here, I think. But if positive, then I think that it's a complement to Leqembi. I don't see this as a competitive treatment. I see it's a complementing treatment because it has a completely different mechanism of action and potentially then could help patients together with Leqembi.
Okay. Thank you. And I think the last one about the risk regarding China. You touched upon it, Anders, but maybe you want to clarify once again what we think about the stocking effect in China and how long that's going to last and when we can expect more new sales coming in, in China.
Yes. So the stockpile that was built up in Q2, I expect it to run out during the fourth quarter. So you should see an effect of that on the sales in the fourth quarter, but not beyond that, but that would be my estimate.
Yes. Thank you. Those were all questions in the queue. I don't believe, operator, that we have any more questions waiting in line either. And if so, I think that concludes today's call. Thank you so much for listening, and we'll see you back in a quarter from now. Thank you so much.
Thank you. Have a good day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
BioArctic AB — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to BioArctic Q2 Report 2025. [Operator Instructions] Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Gunilla Oswald; and CFO, Anders Martin-Lof. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to BioArctic's presentation for the second quarter of 2025. BioArctic is now entering a new era. It's an era of profitable growth. And I think it's signified by yet another strong quarter and a lot of activities throughout the different parts of the business. We see increasing Leqembi royalties, and we are very pleased with the new partnership with Novartis. It's the third partnership utilizing our BrainTransporter technology and it's the first of its kind. And I'll talk more about that in today's presentation.
Next slide, please. BioArctic is listed at Nasdaq Stockholm Large Cap, and this is our disclaimer.
Next slide, please. I'm Gunilla Osswald, and I'm the CEO of BioArctic. And today, I will share the presentation with our CFO, Andres Martin-Lof; and also with our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Fälting and our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad.
Next slide, please. I will start our presentation, and I will be giving some key highlights. Next slide, please. But before I do that, I just want to do a high-level introduction to BioArctic if we have any new listeners today. BioArctic is among world-leading innovators in precision neurology. We have 2 different platforms. The first one is innovation and generation and development of highly selective antibodies that are targeting aggregated misfolded forms of toxic proteins like lecanemab or Leqembi and exidavnemab.
The second part is utilizing our brain transporter platform in innovative ways in order to deliver antibodies and different modalities better into the brain. In today's presentation, we will talk more about both selective antibodies like Leqembi and exidavnemab as well as the BrainTransporter technology, which we have utilized now for all our internal targets and is also now being used for external projects. And an example of that is the just signed deal with Novartis.
Next slide, please. During the second quarter this year, we held our first Capital Markets Day. And there, I presented our ambitions for 2030, and we have already started to deliver on our ambitions. And I'll just go through them briefly. The first one is Leqembi to be established as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The second one is balanced and broader pipeline with projects in all stages of development. And the third one is additional successful global partnerships. And this is an area which I enjoy and engage heavily in. And the fourth one is, of course, also very important to be profitable with recurring dividends, and Anders will come back to this later during the presentation.
Next slide, please. So as I said, we have already started to deliver on our 2030 ambitions, and I will tell you how. If we start with Leqembi, it's well on its way to be an established treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Thanks our partner, Eisai and their great work, Leqembi is now approved in close to 50 countries and also in Europe since the 15th of April this year. The European launch has been initiated this week with Austria started this Monday, and Germany is preparing for initiation of launch on Monday next week, 1st of September. Our partner, Eisai, has submitted the HTA dossier in the 4 Nordic countries, Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway. And at the world's largest Alzheimer Congress, which was held in Toronto in July, more very encouraging data was presented. It was a great congress with about 10,000 participants with a lot of positive in the field.
There were many presentations of Leqembi, including long-term data over 4-year treatment increased over time. And real-world data for Leqembi being used in clinical practice was also presented, both from the U.S. and from China. And here, data showed that the benefits and the safety profile were in line with the Phase III results, which also is very encouraging. Eisai also presented data with the subcutaneous administration of Leqembi. And this supports a great opportunity for patients to administer Leqembi in an easier way by getting the injection by an auto-injector at home, for example. I think it was a very positive meeting with a lot of hope for patients. There was also reporting on blood-based biomarkers and the great progress and the launching of guidelines for them.
The second aspect I want to talk about is the pipeline and that we are growing with further projects in development and the projects are progressing well. An example of that is exidavnemab, our alpha-synuclein antibody, which is currently in Phase IIa. And during the second quarter, it passed its safety evaluation and has now progressed into the next part of the scope of the study with higher doses. And that is now both in Parkinson's patients and in MSA patients. So we are broadening indications for exidavnemab. We're also very happy that we got orphan designation in both the U.S. and in EU for exidavnemab with regard to the MSA indication. We have also broadened our portfolio linked to the new deal with Novartis with a new neurodegeneration project with BrainTransporter, which, of course, is their project, but we are supporting.
Then we come to partnership. And here, we said we should do additional successful global partnerships. And as I said, I'm very happy with the new collaboration with Novartis regarding an undisclosed target for neurodegenerative diseases. We will reengineer our antibody to include our BrainTransporter technology, enabling a better penetration into the brain. Our BrainTransporter collaboration that we had previously and which is ongoing with Eisai on BAN2802 is progressing according to plan and the tech transfer of BAN2803 to Bristol Myers Squibb is on track. It's also great to see that we have continued strong interest for our BrainTransporter technology.
Our financials are strong, and we are highly profitable with record royalties as well as the European regulatory milestone from Eisai during the second quarter. And the new agreement with Novartis will bring further on an upfront of USD 30 million to BioArctic.
Next slide, please. I'll just talk a little bit also about the agreement with Novartis, which is our third agreement to include our BrainTransporter technology. And it is the first one where another company brings naked cargo antibody for us to reengineer into a new antibody to introduce our BrainTransporter technology. I think this agreement shows that BioArctic now is also a platform company. Importantly, the BrainTransporter platform is BioArctic's proprietary technology. And in our business model, we are making these linked to different targets while keeping the platform to ourselves.
Novartis agreement encompass one undisclosed target for neurodegenerative disorders, and it is distinctly different from our other collaborations and targets. The Novartis agreement starts with the generation and evaluation phase, after which Novartis has the option for a full license. BioArctic is entitled to USD 30 million upfront, and the total deal value of this agreement is up to USD 802 million plus mid-single-digit royalties if the product reaches the market.
The 3 agreements we have so far with the BrainTransporter technology platform are all with antibodies. But I also want to mention that we are investing and expanding our efforts into other modalities as well, where we also would like to see better brain penetration in order to have a better efficacy.
We have further business development discussions ongoing, and we aim to establish more collaborations in the future, but we have to realize that these kind of discussions take time.
Next slide, please. So by that, I will now hand over to our Chief R&D Officer, Johanna Fälting, for an update on the R&D. Thank you so much, Gunilla.
Thank you so much, Gunilla. Next slide, please. So starting with an overview of our R&D portfolio, we have 2 world-leading platforms, as Gunilla described, in precision neurology with cross-program synergies. First, we have our antibody projects with highly selective antibodies targeting aggregated forms of toxic proteins intended for the treatment of severe neurodegenerative diseases with high unmet medical need. And then we have projects based on our BrainTransporter platform that delivers biopharmaceuticals better into the brain.
And for those of you familiar with our portfolio, you will now note a new project in the portfolio, the ND-BT8825, and that is the Novartis collaboration on an undisclosed target in neurogeneration, combining the Novartis antibody with the BioArctic BrainTransporter technology. We're very happy now to have 3 BT collaborations in the portfolio with distinct and different targets. And importantly, like Gunilla said, the BrainTransporter technology is BioArctic's proprietary, and it will have possibility to generate more collaborations in the future.
So to summarize the portfolio, our R&D portfolio is a combination of fully funded projects run in partnership with global pharmaceutical companies and innovative in-house projects and technology platforms with significant market and out-licensing opportunity.
Next slide, please. So a major challenge working with brain disorders is that only a small fraction of the antibody or the biopharmaceutical administered via the blood enter into the brain. So the aim with our BrainTransporter technology is to improve the brain exposure, allowing for lower doses, improved dosing convenience, reduced manufacturing and cost of goods and potentially also improved efficacy and better brain distribution. So we have a unique approach targeting active brain transport via the transferrin receptor. And this platform has been preclinically validated in nonhuman primates, showing an improved brain exposure up to 70-fold without affecting reticulocytes, which is a safety concern with this approach.
And what we now are doing is that we are currently working with different modalities, as Gunilla described, such as antibodies and enzymes, but we are evolving the technology also to other modalities such as proteins, peptides or even antisense. And this will also bring new modes of actions and expand the target space in the brain. So the brain transporter technology platform unlocks an enormous potential, not only for internal projects, but external opportunities. And as Gunilla mentioned, we see a high external interest in our platform.
Next slide, please. So exidavnemab is an antibody that selectively targets pathological alpha-synuclein aggregates while sparing the physiological monomers. Exidavnemab is in Phase IIa in the EXIST study, and this is a study with the primary endpoint safety and tolerability of exidavnemab, but we are, of course, also exploring a wide range of biomarkers, both biochemical, digital and imaging biomarkers. And this is a very innovative study, I would say, and unique in its approach of including the right patients into the study, and we do this by a smell test and also a CSF seeding amplification assay to ensure that the patients included in the study have the correct diagnosis and have the alpha-synuclein pathology that we are targeting.
And in June, we had a safety review after Cohort 1 with Parkinson's patients supporting progression into the higher dose and Cohort 2 is now intended initiated both in Parkinson's and multiple systemic atrophy. So exidavnemab is progressing well in Phase IIa and the study report -- study results are expected mid-'26.
As Gunilla mentioned, exidavnemab has reached orphan designation for MSA, which is a rare progressive neurodegenerative disorder, both in the U.S. and in EU. And following the EXIST study, we see several possibilities for further development in different synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's, MSA or DLB, and we are currently evaluating and preparing for the next phase of development.
Next slide, please. And as Gunilla mentioned, everything that we have seen coming out from the AAIC meeting in Toronto this summer has been very positive, especially when looking at the Leqembi data. Eisai presented new data from the Phase III open-label extension study and new data from patients treated with Leqembi for up to 48 months as shown on this slide.
And to start with efficacy, treatment effects continue to expand compared to the natural course of disease shown by ADNI or BioFINDER data. And another way of describing the efficacy is to talk about time saved or time that you stay in an earlier stage of disease. And in this analysis, time saved is up to 13 months after 48 months of treatment. And also in terms of safety, long-term safety profile continues to be in line with previous data.
So next slide, please. So in the full CAD study results subgroup analysis has already begun, and I'd like to highlight this in patients treated with lecanemab and patients that have a low tau. So this subgroup is likely to have an earlier stage of the disease and they seem to benefit even more from treatment looking at the CDR Sum of Boxes and a large percentage of patients being on stable -- being stable or even improving after 48 months. And this is, of course, very, very exciting data, but it's also smaller studies. We have to be mindful that this is a small population, but it shows the importance of starting treatment early on, and we are really looking forward to the AHEAD study results testing Leqembi in earlier AD patients.
So next slide, please. So in addition to the presented long-term efficacy and safety data of lecanemab, important presentations during the Congress covered real-world evidence data on Leqembi being used in clinical practice. And these data confirm the Clarity AD Phase III data, and it's very reassuring that the real-world evidence data is in line with the clinical study, both with regard to safety and efficacy.
Also, Eisai presented encouraging data on the subcu auto-injector maintenance treatment. And of course, the more convenient subcu dosing will allow patients to easily be treated at home, enabling continued treatment without visiting infusion centers, and Anna-Kaija will talk more about this. And also in addition to the Eisai presentations at AAC, new guidelines for blood biomarkers were presented, and Anna-Kaija will talk more about this as well. So taken together, all of the data presented would help to expand Leqembi usage.
Next slide, please. And I now will hand over to our Chief Commercial Officer, Anna-Kaija Gronblad, for a commercial update.
Well, thank you, Johanna. Well, as Gunilla mentioned earlier, Leqembi, as you can see, has now been approved by 17 health authorities globally covering 49 countries, of which the latest approvals since the last quarterly report were in Thailand, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain. Meanwhile, in the U.S., we are eagerly awaiting the FDA decision any day now on the subcutaneous auto-injector for the maintenance dosing. And Eisai is also planning to shortly thereafter submit the application also for the initiation treatment for the same auto-injector.
Anders will soon comment more on the actual sales. But in short, Leqembi is growing steadily in the different regions and markets. And in the U.S., we can see that the usage of both blood biomarker tests and PET and CSF testing is increasing, indicating that more patients are being investigated for Alzheimer's disease.
As for the European Union, after the European Commission approval in mid-April, it's really exciting news now that Austria launched earlier this week on Monday and that Germany is planning to launch next week, Monday. These are usually the early launch countries where there will be a gradual rollout of the expected launches in the European Union throughout 2026 and into '27, following the regulatory requirements and their national pricing and reimbursement processes.
In France and Spain, on the other hand, there is an opportunity to provide Leqembi sooner through an early access program, and this will probably be in place in the last quarter of this year. As Gunilla mentioned, in the Nordics, Eisai has submitted the dossiers to the authorities in 4 of the Nordic countries for the health technology assessment, which is the start of the whole pricing and reimbursement process. There are no fixed time lines for these processes, but we are aiming to launch in the Nordics later in 2026.
Next slide, please. So I would like to come back to what Johanna referred to earlier regarding the development in this field presented at AAIC in July, both in regards to blood-based biomarkers and also Leqembi's competitive edge and growth opportunities, thanks to the subcutaneous auto-injector. Firstly, I think that the fact that we now have both clinical practice guidelines from the Alzheimer's Association in place in the U.S. and the first blood test approved by the FDA in May, which was the Fujirebio test, and there are probably more to come soon. This clearly offers a simplified diagnosis pathway. In the future, the usage of PET and CSF will probably decrease, which also means less cost and infrastructure needs for the health care.
As an example, also here in Sweden, the Sahlgrenska University Hospital also offers clinics the possibility to analyze blood samples in phospho-tau 217 since July this year. This will clearly simplify, as I said, the diagnostic flow since it will be easier to evaluate which patients need to be investigated further, while other patients can have the results much quicker if their cognitive issues are not due to Alzheimer's disease. In the future, it can also be used in the primary care as a triaging tool, detecting patients earlier, improving the referrals, i.e., making sure that the right patients are referred to the specialist clinics.
Secondly, I already mentioned the subcutaneous autoinjector. This also offers a choice for both the patients and the health care professional to choose which treatment option is best suited for that specific patient. Not only could it be a freedom for the individual to self-inject at home, but the usage of the autoinjector will also free up infusion capacity at the hospital and mean less cost for payers. Eisai expects that the potential approval of the subcut initiation treatment could come in the first half of 2026.
And finally, the 4-year study mentioned AHEAD 3-45 with more than 1,400 people with presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease was fully recruited in October last year and offers new opportunities both for the science to evolve, but also for the potential growth for Leqembi. So it's really exciting times ahead.
Next slide. So -- and then just a few words on the Nordics, where we have been gradually building a team of very experienced and knowledgeable and I would say, very motivated pharma professionals. We are about 20 people in the commercial operations team at BioArctic, working very closely with our colleagues at Eisai. And since the European Commission approval, we have onboarded some additional field-based people that can help prepare the health care for the coming launch. We have supported Eisai in the FDA submissions and we will continue to do so in the upcoming price negotiations.
Our objective is to help optimize the early AD patient journey and the infrastructure and educate on the value that Leqembi brings. We have engaged in several collaborations with health care, mentioning only a couple here, such as the EU prominent project and the Real AD study in Sweden. We can now also promote Leqembi proactively in 3 of the 4 Nordic countries, and we experienced a big interest from the health care professionals in learning more about the field and Leqembi.
And next slide. So just in my final slide, I have just selected a couple of additional examples of initiatives that we have prepared to roll out in the Nordics to support our launch. On the left-hand side, you can see the HCP web portal called Campus Alzheimer, which will be launched in Sweden in the coming week and in the coming months in the rest of the Nordics. The education need is big, and so we have strived to create a hub where Nordic health care professionals can find all the relevant and updated information about the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's, new research findings, training opportunities, upcoming events, et cetera.
Also on the right-hand side, you can see the invitation to what is expected to be an annual high-quality Nordic educational event in Stockholm, happening only in 1 weeks' time. This has been organized together with an external scientific steering committee who has put together an excellent program. So all in all, we are very excited to enter this new chapter in Alzheimer's disease with the expansion of Leqembi globally and with the launch of Leqembi in the Nordics.
And with that, I hand over to Anders for a financial.
Thank you, Anna-Kaija. If I start with the Leqembi development, we see very strong growth during the second quarter. The sales -- global sales increased to JPY 23.1 billion or $160 million, which represents a 57% increase quarter-over-quarter or roughly a fourfold increase from the same quarter last year. This is partly due to a stocking effect in China, where sales were JPY 7.7 billion or $52 million, which is a 300% increase from the first quarter. And this is due then to the threat of tariffs, which meant that the large inventories were being built up in China during the quarter. But Eisai calculated that if you remove the stocking effect that the growth in China would still have been 24% or global growth would have been 20% if you remove the onetime effect.
So all in all, the underlying growth is really very strong, and it was further boosted by this onetime effect in China. And if you look at the different markets, Japan, I would say, is still the strongest market that has come farthest along in the implementation of Leqembi treatment. They are now well into the demand expansion phase with sales of JPY 5.5 billion or $38 million. That's a 23% increase from the first quarter.
And here, they're already starting the second disease awareness campaign for mild cognitive impairment, which is the earliest phase where you can use Leqembi and is the largest area where we believe growth can be seen in the future. And they have also been very successful in setting up a big network of 1,500 follow-up facilities that are collaborating with the sites where the patients get their initial treatment, so they can be moved over to these follow-up facilities after roughly 6 months of treatment.
And this is a pattern that Eisai is now replicating in the U.S., where we're also seeing solid growth even though there is more competition in the U.S. where Eli Lilly is very active. Sales of Leqembi in the U.S. were JPY 9.1 billion or $63 million in the quarter. That's a 14% increase from the first quarter. And there were some currency headwinds. So at constant currency rates that increase would have been 20%. And here, the market is growing fast. There is competition from Lilly, but Lilly is also helping to build the market. And the market growth is now expected to continue and it will be further boosted by the initiation of usage for blood-based biomarkers for diagnosis and not just for triaging.
So we do expect to see a continued market growth boosted by this. And here, Eisai has now launched a targeted direct-to-consumer campaign, and they will spend more efforts on involving primary care in the second half of this year, roughly what they have been doing in Japan quite successfully. And this will, of course, be supported by the approval of the subcutaneous version, which makes it much easier for the patients to take the treatment at home. And all in all, this means that the primary care segment will be much more active in the whole treatment chain.
It will also be interesting to see what will happen in the EU. As Anna kind of mentioned, Leqembi now launched in EU for the first time. However, it will take some time. We see a significant impact of this takes a couple of quarters to establish the treatment as we have seen in the U.S. and Japan. But it's, of course, very encouraging that we're now finally on the way in EU as well.
If we now turn to the forecast, we think that this very positive development that we see now means that Leqembi is fully on track to reach the forecast of JPY 76.5 billion in the fiscal year of 2025. And this is Eisai's forecast that they have issued and covers the second quarter 2025 until the first quarter of 2026. And what we can see now is that they are above plan in several markets.
For example, if we look at China, as you can see here, they expect to sell JPY 9.5 billion in total in the fiscal year. And in the first quarter of the fiscal year -- sorry, JPY 7.7 billion. So they just need an additional JPY 1.8 billion in the coming 3 quarters to reach the forecast. And the same, if you look at Japan and the U.S., calculate what growth do they need to reach the forecast, it's roughly 6% in both markets, and they're currently growing at roughly 23% in both markets. And there is really nothing that says that growth is going down significantly.
As stated that July, which is well, the first month of this quarter that we are in right now, was the strongest month that they've ever seen. So all in all, we think there's a very high likelihood that Leqembi will be forecast when we close the year.
If we then turn to our own numbers, our second quarter revenues were SEK 392 million, which is quite a big increase from SEK 50 million same quarter last year. And this is then, of course, due to the milestone payment that we received of EUR 20 million. But the recurring revenues are increasing and will continue to increase. As you see now, the royalty was SEK 162 million in the second quarter. Co-promotion still that big, but as Anna-Kaija going next year, we expect to see an increase in co-promotion revenues as well.
The Novartis upfront payment that we talked about earlier of $30 million will not be recorded fully this year. It will be recorded over the old research collaboration phase of that project. And I would estimate that roughly 20% of the upfront payment will be recorded during this year.
If we then turn to our expenses, you see that our operating expenses increased to SEK 193 million from SEK 121 million a year ago. But roughly $32 million of that is currency effect. So the underlying operating costs were roughly SEK 161 million compared to SEK 120 million 1 year ago. And we spend heavily on R&D and so 70% of our operating expenses are spent on R&D.
For the remainder of the year, we do expect to see an increase compared to last year. I have previously stated that we expect operating costs of 2025 to be roughly 60% to 80% higher than 2024. We now see that it's going to be lower than that. So now we estimate that it's going to be roughly 50% to 70% higher than it was last year.
If we then turn to the operating profit on the right-hand side, you see that was SEK 179 million for the second quarter. It's a steep decline from the first quarter, but that was then heavily impacted by the $100 million upfront payment that was fully reported in the first quarter. I should remind you that the second half of the year will most likely be less profitable than the first half of the year, but we do expect that the operating profit for the full year will be above SEK 1 billion for the year.
On the next slide, you see our net profit on the left-hand side. The net profit was SEK 97 million, which is roughly SEK 82 million less than the operating profit and that then explained by negative financial net due to currency effects and accrued tax of SEK 75 million. And in the mid graph, you see our walking cash flow, more than SEK 1.1 billion plus in one quarter that will be hard to beat for the coming quarter.
But that's, of course, explained by the SEK 100 million received from BMS and the SEK 20 million received from Eisai during the quarter. So very, very strong cash position, SEK 1.9 billion at the end of the second quarter, and that's the equivalent of roughly 3 years of underlying costs currently. So we have a very, very strong financial position and it will continue to strengthen during the last quarters of the year since we will receive the $30 million from Novartis during the fourth quarter. So I expect to end the quarter with more than SEK 2 billion in cash and cash equivalents.
With that, I hand back to Gunilla for some closing remarks.
Thank you, Anders. So we are coming towards the end of today's presentation after some look at the news flow and some closing remarks. So next slide, please. So we just informed about the initiation of Leqembi launch in Europe, which started in Austria this week and planning for Germany beginning of next week. We're eagerly waiting for the response from the FDA regarding the subcutaneous autoinjector for maintenance dosing in the U.S., where the PDUFA date is 31st of August.
Our partner, Eisai, is preparing for U.S. filing for induction dosing with the subcutaneous autoinjector thereafter. And we are hoping for an approval first half of next year. I think the subcutaneous autoinjector will be an important further treatment option, making the administration much more convenient for patients [Technical Difficulty]. We're also expecting further regulatory responses on lecanemab.
The next countries for commercialization with early access in the EU is expected to be France and Spain. And we are looking forward to further European launches next year, including the Nordics, which, of course, is very exciting for us at BioArctic.
During the first half of next year, we also expect the exidavnemab Phase IIa study to be concluded and a decision on next steps for development. And there, we see several different opportunities [indiscernible]. So in summary, we have a lot of exciting things ahead of us.
And next slide, please. So some key takeaways from today's presentation is that BioArctic has now entered a new era, an era of profitable growth, and that is signified by yet another strong quarter. We see increasing Leqembi royalties, and we are very pleased with the new partnership with Novartis. We are starting to deliver on our 2030 ambitions, both with regard to Leqembi, which is well on track to become an established treatment in Alzheimer's disease, where we also have seen now further regulatory approvals, further launches, reassuring data both on long-term treatment and real-world data and continuously increasing revenues and number of patients that we are helping on a global level.
The second part is exidavnemab, which is progressing very well with the high dose part of the Phase III study being initiated in both Parkinson's disease and MSA patients.
Our business development efforts continue to deliver with a third BrainTransporter partnership agreement signed. And this is, as I said, the first of its kind, which is expanding BioArctic also to being a platform company now. And the fourth part that we have strong financials with yet another highly profitable quarter with record royalties and cash flow. So I think that the future looks very bright for BioArctic with great hopes for many patients.
So next slide, please. So by that, I say thank you so much for your attention, and we're happy to take some questions.
[Operator Instructions]
Viktor from Nordea. Go ahead, your line is open.
2. Question Answer
I have 3 from my side, please. So maybe first on the Novartis deal. I just wanted to see if you could elaborate how long you expect the evaluation of your BrainTransporter technology together with the antibody from Novartis to take before we could reach a stage when Novartis could exercise its option and perhaps what kind of data they would be looking at if it's preclinical or if they need kind of more advanced data?
Secondly, also with this onetime stocking in China that was announced for Leqembi in quarter 2. I just wonder if you heard from your partners that this could lead to lower sales in China in Q3 or Q4 or any other information on this?
And just finally, I have noticed on your pipeline that I didn't see BAN2401 in Down syndrome. Just wanted to understand if this has been dropped from your development program or yes, if it was in any kind of evaluation or if it was driven by any data you generated?
Together with Novartis. And I think that period is preclinical and it's about 2 years.
Your second question with regard to Leqembi in China, I think Anders want to comment on that one.
Sure. So no, we don't have any specific details, but I think it is to be expected that sales will be lower in the coming at least 2 quarters than it would have been without the destocking effect. So at least that's a fair assumption, even though I don't have any details to share.
And then we also have a question with regard to lecanemab or BAN2401, lecanemab in Down syndrome. And it's definitely not dropped. It's just not on the slide anymore because we don't do so much work right now. But of course, Down syndrome is an important patient population that potentially also could benefit from Leqembi. So it's definitely still on the radar.
Okay. And just a quick follow-up on Novartis. When they do exercise -- or if they would exercise the option when data has been generated, could that trigger an additional upfront payment? Or would it just enable Novartis to take over the rights of the program and then pay you milestones further out?
So we are not disclosing details about the rest of the milestones, but I can say that there is a next milestone linked to if they exercise the full license fee. So that is also a milestone at that stage. But I'm not disclosing how big one is. And then, of course, it's a normal approach to the rest of the milestones, development and commercial.
The next question comes from Joseph Hedden from Rx Securities.
Congratulations on the Novartis deal. Just wanted to dig a little deeper into the deal. Is the target that Novartis is pursuing is a target that's related to one indication? Or is it perhaps something that could span several neurodegeneration indications? And then could you say whether these are rare diseases or broader indications like Alzheimer's disease?
Yes. I really can't disclose much about that program, but I can say I think it's a very interesting target that can help many patients potentially. And it can be several different indications, but I'm not going to reveal any details.
Okay. And then just on the research collaboration agreement with Eisai, where they have an option on a BrainTransporter candidate. Is that still progressing well and perhaps on track for a decision from them in 2026, I think was the initial target.
So our collaboration with Eisai is progressing really well according to plan, and that is with BAN2802 that you're talking about. And I cannot comment exactly on the time lines there, but it's progressing according to the plan and it looks good.
Okay. And then just a quick question on the rare diseases portfolio where you're using BrainTransporter vector to look at candidates in ALS and Gaucher preclinically. Just a question on the overarching strategy when considering these rare diseases. Is it -- will you take these candidates into the clinic to kind of progress them a bit further down the line before looking for a licensing deal? Or are these available for licensing straightaway has kind of been your historical model apart from exidavnemab at the moment?
Thank you so much. Another good question, Joseph. So I think based on that, we now have a strong financial situation. We have all possibilities. So I mean, we could try programs much longer, potentially all the way to the market when we talk about rare diseases. But we still have an open door policy. But if we get a good deal proposal, we might partner. So it's -- I think it's a great strength for BioArctic that we could partner. We don't have to partner. So we can do what we think is the best for the projects. And both of those, I think, are very, very exciting and rare disease indications with huge opportunities for us to potentially drive them ourselves longer.
The next question comes from [indiscernible] from Van Lanschot and Kempen.
I'm calling in for Luisa from Van Kempen. First, congrats on the Novartis deal. I had a few questions. Considering the Novartis deal, do you expect from here onwards to establish more deals using the BrainTransporter tech also as an option deal or more similar to the deal with BMS? Secondly, could you remind me what are the next steps for exidavnemab? And could you provide more color on what difference BioArctic BrainTransporter from other shuttle technologies using the same transporter?
Thank you for 3 great questions. So the first one with regard to the brain transporter. I mean this is our proprietary technology. And I think that we can foresee several different opportunities in the future. We could foresee more deals like the one we did with Novartis, whether another company comes with their assets and want them to be reengineered into a new asset, which has better brain penetration. So I think that's one possibility in our business model.
We are also working on other modalities, and we're open to discussions for collaborating with others on other modalities as well. And we have then combined the BrainTransporter with all our internal targets. And that could potentially be deals more like the one with Bristol Myers Squibb, where it was combined with one of our internal programs.
So I think the beauty with BioArctic's portfolio and the approach that we're working is that we can drive ourselves or partner with our own assets. We can also now since we are a platform company, work with other companies' assets and improve them or we can do own further development of the BrainTransporter technology ourselves or together with others. So we have a lot of opportunities and great possibilities, I think, for the future, both with our own therapeutic targets and with our BrainTransporter technology.
And maybe, Johanna, do you want to allude a little bit to what's different with our technology versus others?
Yes, absolutely. Thank you, Gunilla. So I think that, I mean, yes, we are working with the transferrin receptor and many companies are pursuing the same target for transport -- active transport into the brain. And I think that's great because this target actually has clinical validation from the Trontinemab Roche Brainshuttle program. What is unique with our approach is that we have done extensive screening, and we have a lot of structural data that has made us identify unique epitope on the transferrin receptor that is different from the other companies as far as we understand it.
And this epitope and the binding site then enable us not to interfere with the normal function and the normal transport function of the transferrin receptor and also its positioning our antibody very -- our therapeutic antibody close to the cell membrane, and that is something that is very important, we believe, from a safety perspective and interacting and not interacting with reticulocyte that has been a reported potential side effect with these kind of approaches.
So I think that we have a unique way of interacting with the transferrin receptor, enabling us to have a better safety profile. And we have seen great data in the nonhuman primate study with an almost 70-fold increase in brain exposure. So we think that we have a really unique approach in that sense.
Thank you, Johanna. And maybe you want to talk also about the exidavnemab question?
Yes. So where we are heading -- yes. So the exidavnemab, of course, I mean, we are now eager to think about what's going to be the next step for exidavnemab. There are several different opportunities there in terms of MSA, Parkinson's or DLB, and we are, of course, looking into how the competitive world is evolving. And we know we are, of course, encouraged also for the target that Roche has now pursued prasinezumab into Phase III and Lundbeck has pursued their amlenetug compound into the Phase III in MSA, whereas Roche is going for Parkinson's. So we see many opportunities there for further development.
The next question comes from Natalia Webster from RBC.
I have 3, please. The first 2, just on Leqembi. The first one is fairly broad. Just curious to hear a bit more color on the progress you're seeing in infusion capacity in the U.S. and the impact you've seen from recently approved blood-based biomarkers and also how quickly you expect the subcu maintenance and initiation potential approvals to have an impact on adoption going forward?
Secondly, if you're just able to comment a bit more about your expectations for the European launch. I appreciate it's early days, and you said it will take a couple of quarters to see impact. But curious if you're expecting to account for some of the challenges that you saw in the U.S. around capacity and if there's anything you're doing at the moment that can help mitigate that?
Thirdly, just on profitability, you've maintained your long-term ambitions of sustainable profitability and recurring dividends. This year should be helped by milestones, but just wanted to check that you're still confident on reaching sustainable profitability from 2026 onwards. And also, if you're able to comment at what point you may expect to start paying dividends?
Yes. Thank you so much. I think we start with Anna-Kaija on Leqembi question, please.
Yes. If I remember the question right, it was about the U.S. and the kind of development of the growth and related also to the subcutaneous. And what Eisai has communicated is that we can expect maybe a kind of increase of Leqembi starting beginning of next year, thanks to a potential approval of the subcutaneous auto-injector for the maintenance treatment. So it will take some time, I guess, through the system before that we can see that growth coming.
And I think also mentioning the different data we see from lab companies, it's encouraging to see that, as I mentioned, the use of different blood-based biomarkers, but also CSF testing increasing, which would indicate that the growth is really starting to expand for the use of Leqembi. And we haven't seen any, let's say, signs of decreasing growth also after [indiscernible] launching. So it seems to be that we have 2 companies driving this need of changing the infrastructure and the patient journey through in a smoother way. So I think it's encouraging to see that growth to continue and we expect it to continue even more beginning of next year.
And the blood-based biomarker?
Yes. And of course, the blood-based biomarkers mentioned many times during the call already today. I mean this -- I mean, it's been talked about many years, but now it's really happening. So this is really encouraging. But it will take -- if I then go to the European launches. As I mentioned, there is this regulatory requirement to implement this cap controlled access program, so which need to be done by a national level and also that the different pricing and reimbursement process are different in the European countries.
So I think you will see the launches roll out gradually during next year mainly. But we know that there are a lot of quite a few centers already in France, for instance, ready to initiate Leqembi usage through this early access program. So it will take some time. We will probably see the same kind of infrastructure challenges as in the U.S.
And we've heard from our Eisai colleagues in Austria, how they have worked on this. And what is a key takeaway is that you really have to be close to each hospital clinic because the challenges might be different from one hospital to another. And that's what we're doing also in the Nordics now, really visiting the main hospitals that we think will start to see what kind of challenges they have and how we can support that.
And then we continue to the profitability, Anders, those questions.
Sure. Yes. So we have mentioned earlier that we expect to be profitable from this year and onwards based on the royalty revenues, especially then from next year. And no, we haven't changed anything there. We do still expect to be profitable from 2026 and onwards.
As for dividends, I can't really answer to that. It's a Board call. I said at the Capital Markets Day that I think it's likely to happen within 1 or 2 years, but it really depends on what happens with Leqembi. And I do expect that our Board would like to see that we are profitable on a sustainable level with -- based on Leqembi...
The next question comes from Rajan Sharma from Goldman Sachs.
I also had one on the Novartis deal, also collaborating with Sironax on a Brain Delivery Platform. And I just wanted to understand how your technology compares to Sironax and whether the target that you're working on is different to that being explored by Novartis with Sironax?
And then just a couple on Leqembi. So firstly, just on the Nordic launch. Could you provide just a little bit more color on that? Is that going to be in the first quarter of next year? Or is it more likely at some point during the first half?
And then the other one was just on subcutaneous Leqembi, what's your expectation for approval in Europe? And do you expect that to move the needle on some of the reimbursement decisions and discussions that you're having?
Great questions. The first one we have a very short answer, and I will not comment anything on Novartis. That's for them to comment on their other collaborations. And then we turn to Leqembi in the Nordics.
Yes. I mean, as I mentioned, there are no fixed time lines for these kind of processes. So we are expecting launches throughout 2026. So it's -- I can't kind of be guessing from my side exactly when this will happen. So 2026 -- throughout 2026.
And subcutaneous in Europe?
Yes. So I mean, we're hoping that this will be a decision from Eisai to also launch subcutaneous in Europe, but we haven't heard anything yet on that.
And for the authorities to review to, of course.
Yes. So not much more we can say there. So next question, please.
If we do not have any more questions, we have a few that have been written sent in. So I'll read them and then maybe we'll help direct who should take them. So a couple of ones from Fredrik at Redeye. And he's asking on -- in relation to the deal with Novartis, I guess, should we expect more option or valuation agreements for the brain transporter platform when it comes to using external drug candidates. I think you touched on that already, Gunilla.
Yes. And the answer is yes. But we cannot say anything about timing. I mean you should be aware, I mean, these kind of discussions take time. So -- but definitely, we have a lot of possibilities for the BrainTransporter in the future, in different...
Yes. Then maybe a couple for Anders. The stockpiling effect that we saw in China, have we had any indications of anything similar happening again? Or is it likely just a Q2 thing? And then secondly, if you can talk a bit about the tax cost in more detail.
Well, if nothing extreme happens, I don't expect any similar effect in the future. However, there may be new initiatives coming from the U.S. government that will have an impact. So if that happens, of course, I can't promise that there won't have an effect on this. As for the tax recorded, what is based on an estimate of the full year, not a very exact estimate, but we have to do that according to the tax regulations in Sweden, and we are just following what we have to do.
Good. Thank you. And then there was a question here from Peter, but I think we've already answered that. That was about the time line for the evaluation of BAN2802, and I think you already made a statement there, Gunilla. So those were the questions we had online. And I don't think there are any more questions in the telephone queue either.
So with that, I guess we can conclude today's call. Thank you, everybody, for joining, and see you next quarter.
Thank you so much.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Finanzdaten von BioArctic AB
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Mär '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 1.147 1.147 |
24 %
24 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 67 67 |
86 %
86 %
6 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 1.080 1.080 |
27 %
27 %
94 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 201 201 |
29 %
29 %
18 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | 444 444 |
33 %
33 %
39 %
|
|
| EBITDA | 407 407 |
56 %
56 %
35 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 13 13 |
307 %
307 %
1 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 394 394 |
57 %
57 %
34 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 213 213 |
76 %
76 %
19 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen SEK.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur BioArctic AB-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
BioArctic AB Aktie News
Firmenprofil
BioArctic AB beschäftigt sich mit der Erforschung und Entwicklung modifizierender Behandlungen und Diagnostika für neurodegenerative Krankheiten. Ihre Forschungsgebiete sind die Alzheimer- und die Parkinson-Krankheit, bei denen es einen großen ungedeckten medizinischen Bedarf gibt. Das Unternehmen wurde am 24. Januar 2003 von Lars Gunnar Lannfelt und Pär Lars Gellerfors gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in Stockholm, Schweden.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Schweden |
| CEO | Ms. Osswald |
| Mitarbeiter | 141 |
| Gegründet | 2000 |
| Webseite | www.bioarctic.se |


