Applied Materials Aktienkurs
Vergleich mit Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 Was ist das?
Die Peer Group sind die Unternehmen mit dem ähnlichsten Geschäftsmodell. Sie dienen als Vergleichsmaßstab, um eine Aktie einzuordnen.
🧮 Wie wird sie ausgewählt?
Nach Ähnlichkeit des Geschäftsmodells, also Unternehmen aus derselben Branche, mit vergleichbaren Produkten und einer ähnlichen Kundengruppe. Nur so vergleichst du Äpfel mit Äpfeln.
🏛️ Wofür ist sie wichtig?
Ob eine Aktie günstig oder teuer ist, lässt sich am ehesten im Vergleich beurteilen. Ein KGV von 18 oder ein EV/FCF von 20 wirkt je nach Maßstab günstig oder teuer. Die Peer Group liefert dabei den treffsichersten Maßstab: Unternehmen mit ähnlichem Geschäftsmodell, die denselben Bedingungen unterliegen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
Liegt eine Kennzahl unter dem Peer-Durchschnitt, ist die Aktie relativ günstiger bewertet, über dem Durchschnitt entsprechend teurer. Ein Abschlag zur Peer Group kann eine Chance sein, aber auch einen Grund haben (zum Beispiel geringeres Wachstum). Der Vergleich ist ein Startpunkt, kein Urteil.
Insights zu Applied Materials
Insights
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Jetzt kostenlos registrieren, um einen Alarm für die Applied Materials Aktie zu aktivieren.
Aktiviere Alarme zum Aktienkurs, zur Dividendenrendite, zur Bewertung (z. B. KGV oder EV/Sales) oder zu Strategie-Scores und lehne Dich entspannt zurück.
aktien.guide Basis
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 334,24 Mrd. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 30,84 Mrd. $
Marktkapitalisierung = 334,24 Mrd. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 35,01 Mrd. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 332,45 Mrd. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 30,84 Mrd. $
Enterprise Value = 332,45 Mrd. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 35,01 Mrd. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
Applied Materials Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
45 Analysten haben eine Applied Materials Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
45 Analysten haben eine Applied Materials Prognose abgegeben:
Applied Materials Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
SEP
9
Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2026
vor 7 Tagen
|
|
SEP
8
Citi’s 2026 Global TMT Conference
vor 8 Tagen
|
|
AUG
13
Q3 2026 Earnings Call
vor etwa einem Monat
|
|
JUN
25
Special Call - Applied Materials, Inc.
vor 3 Monaten
|
|
JUN
2
Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
MAI
28
Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
MAI
20
J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
MAI
14
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
MÄR
10
2026 Cantor Global Technology & Industrial Growth Conference
vor 6 Monaten
|
|
MÄR
2
Morgan Stanley Technology
vor 7 Monaten
|
|
FEB
12
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor 7 Monaten
|
|
DEZ
2
UBS Global Technology and AI Conference 2025
vor 10 Monaten
|
|
NOV
13
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 10 Monaten
|
|
SEP
9
Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
vor etwa einem Jahr
|
|
AUG
28
Deutsche Bank's 2025 Technology Conference
vor etwa einem Jahr
|
aktien.guide Basis
Applied Materials — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2026
1. Question Answer
Okay. Welcome. Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference. My name is Jim Schneider. I'm the semiconductor analyst here at Goldman Sachs. It's my pleasure to welcome Applied Materials and CEO, Gary Dickerson, to the stage today. Welcome, Gary.
Thank you, Jim. Glad to be here.
I think it's fair to say that the view of the market is pretty starkly different than we were on your stage last year at this time. Clearly, we see almost everything being constrained around AI. You commented on much stronger demand visibility that you're seeing from your customers. Can you maybe help frame the level of demand and visibility you're seeing right now, either in terms of duration of customer forecast or size of your backlog?
Yes. As you said, AI, especially data center, is an enormous driver for our business. One statistic I thought was interesting. If you look at leading-edge foundry, you go back a few years ago, smartphone wafer starts were 4x larger than data center. Today, they're 1:1. And in a couple of years, it will be 2:1 data center versus smartphone. So for sure, AI and data center are by far the biggest drivers. And relative to the technologies that are critical for AI data center, the fastest-growing segments, 80% of wafer fab equipment growth this year is leading foundry-logic, DRAM, including high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging. Again, that's 80% of the wafer fab equipment growth this year, and we see that same mix in '27 and going forward.
And then relative to our customers, we've been continually increasing our revenue forecast for '26. In February, we said greater than 20% revenue growth. In May, we said greater than 30% revenue growth. Now we're approaching 40% revenue growth and what we've communicated here recently. And both our near-term and longer-term outlook has been growing.
One of the big drivers this year is Agentic AI. So you have agents consuming tokens and compute. And that's driving increase in our longer-term WFE forecast, especially around CPUs and DRAM. So we've seen that continual increase. And then relative to all of our discussions with customers, Applied is in a great position because all of those fastest-growing segments of the market are areas where Applied has clear leadership, and we're gaining share through those inflections. So customers want to make sure that from an operations, supply chain capability standpoint, we're ready. Our trained service engineers are ready. So we do have this 8-quarter forecast, rolling 8-quarter forecast and longer-term commitments from our customers. And again, that has continually went up as we progress through the years. And we even have discussions with customers all the way through 2030.
My view is AI compute demand is going to remain very strong for many years going forward into the future. I look at Applied Materials and the way we're using AI in innovation, product development, operations supply chain. We have thousands of engineers in our field operations, service and process engineers. And it's just a game changer. And then for me, what is most important, we will drive tremendous productivity improvements inside Applied Materials, but way more important than that is our ability to bring multibillion-dollar products to market faster and also very valuable service innovations to market faster.
So I think, again, AI is the biggest technology inflection I've ever seen in my life. If you look going forward with Agentic, physical AI, again, you're going to see increased compute demand and the need for compute innovation, tokens per second per watt has also never been greater. The position for Applied enabling these inflections is also a great tailwind for the company.
Great. Gary, you've seen a lot of cycles over your career for this industry. How does the current demand environment compare with past circle cycles you've seen over your career? And then is there any sort of warning sign at all that rhymes with past sort of cycle peaks that you've seen?
Yes. So I think it's pervasiveness of demand. I mean I look through my career, I'm an engineer, been innovating at 3 different companies in the industry. I've never seen a driver that's as broad and pervasive as what we're seeing today. I mean, certainly, when we went to mobile social media, everybody has a computer and a camera in their pocket. That increased the demand but AI is a whole different level of demand driver.
So when we look out for a number of years, again, it's just so disruptive and fundamental to every single industry. My view is that companies that are not adopting this technology will be left behind. And so -- and the growth, Agentic is adding additional WFE growth going forward. Physical AI in the future will add more compute demand going forward. And I don't really spend time worrying about macro effects over a near term. Again, for me, it's very clear this compute demand is going to be strong secular growth over many years going forward.
Yes. Now your direct customers are incredibly profitable right now, as profitable as I've ever seen in my career, certainly. But some of your customers' customers who are driving ultimate spending on chips, they're spending well over $1 trillion run rate at this point. That appears to be moving higher. But many of those same companies are tapping capital markets just to sustain that low current level of CapEx.
So how do you think about the ultimate returns for the AI value chain as you see it big picture? And do you see any kind of systematic risk that could kind of cause a pullback in demand?
So I think the value creation to me is crystal clear, as I mentioned, for Applied. We're bringing to market products that are worth billions of dollars. So that time to market is extremely high ROI. Another area that I would say that we're getting tremendous pull higher than any point in my career is not just for performance innovation. Again, Applied is the leader in material innovation in all of these fastest-growing parts of the market being driven by AI, but the other -- and that's critical for our customers for design wins. So we're co-innovating with them on all those architectures for generations out in the future.
The other big driver larger than I've seen is in yield and output innovation. So our customers, as you can imagine, every incremental chip that they can ship is worth an enormous amount of money for those customers. So if we can innovate in our services, and that business is growing over 20% today year-over-year. Margins are up 180 basis points in that part of our business. And so innovations that we're driving there for predictive models for preventative maintenance for more output or chamber matching where I can get more good chips output per wafer. Those are enormously valuable for our customers.
So again, for me, what I -- what we're focused on are driving products to market faster that are worth billions of dollars, and we're doing that. It's very, very clear. Same thing with these very high-value services. That 20% growth in services over the last year, again, we see the opportunity to create more valuable services for our customers because the value of the yield and output is so high. In some cases, if we go to a different service contract, we can more than double revenue per tool for those innovations. So again, for me, that is a complete game changer in terms of Applied's position in the industry, the value that we create for our customers. And again, I have to believe that everybody else is looking at this in a similar way.
So as I said earlier, if you're not implementing these technologies, you will absolutely -- by the way, I hope our competitors are not doing this. They're going to be left behind. There's no question. And so relative to financing or any of those types of dynamics, what I look at more so are the fundamental value creation drivers. As you said, the profit pools in this industry are larger than they've ever been because this technology is more disruptive than any technology that we've delivered in the past. And so I think this industry, we create miracles, if you look at the technologies that we've been able to deliver in the past that have had enormous impact. This is a whole another level.
So frankly, I don't worry so much about what you just talked about. I think that this is so fundamental, the value creation is so significant that, that compute demand is going to increase significantly going forward. Now are there going to be periods of time where it's not growing as fast for whatever type of a macro effect? That could happen. But I think the trend over a number of years to me is crystal clear.
Yes. Now as you said, AI permeates everything we've talked about at this conference. One of the things I'd like to do is explore how companies are looking at AI internally. So you just raised that question. So maybe give us examples of how Applied is using AI internally. And are those mostly kind of cost efficiency and efficiency-led kind of applications or using it to drive higher revenue for the company in some cases?
By far and away. So if I look at doubling the size of Applied Materials over the next few years, we definitely -- we are incredibly clear in all of the swim lanes that we're driving relative to AI implementation in the categories I talked about earlier. By far and away, most important to me is top line growth, bringing products to market that are worth billions of dollars. One example is in coding. In some of our products, there's a high software and algorithm content. And we're driving tremendous productivity in that part of the product development. So 50% improvement in productivity has nothing to do really near term with headcount. It's all about bringing those multibillion-dollar products to market at a higher velocity. So we're using this technology in a number of different areas, hardware and software. There's no question that the value is tremendous. And I mentioned the value of yield and output innovation and services.
So when I'm meeting some of our top CEOs every month, they're racing for tokens per second per watt in their new chip and packaging architectures, that's really important. But they're also phenomenally focused on increasing output of good chips per wafer and wafers through the use of these kinds of technologies. In our services, we have over 37,000 chambers in the field today connected to AI-enabled servers, most of them connected remotely. And so again, our ability to -- there's a massive amount of data there. Our ability to use AI with predictive models to increase output and good chips per wafer is off the charts valuable. And as I said, that business is growing -- has grown in the last year over 20%. The value there is higher than ever. And in some cases, we're improving the hours per task in order of magnitude. But for me, what I care about is I can accelerate scaling these high-value yield and output services faster for top line growth. So we will add headcount, but we're going to grow revenue many times faster.
Understand. Okay. I want to ask just briefly about U.S. semiconductor capacity because obviously, the U.S. has lagged the world in the last 20 years plus. But it seems like that is starting to change a little bit with increased investments from TSMC in Arizona, Samsung, potentially Intel. So maybe speak to your market position, specifically in the U.S. market. Do you think it basically matches what you see globally? Or is it higher or lower? Maybe talk about why.
Yes. So I think relative to market share, the most important thing for us is how we're positioned in the technology inflections. So Applied is the leader in leading edge foundry. We're working across all of these different companies. We have the most valuable enabling portfolio, whether it's in transistor inflections, backside power, all of those different areas.
In DRAM, one of the big inflections there is in higher speed DRAM. So adding transistor innovations in the periphery to get the data on and off the chip, that's an area where Applied has extremely high market share. And again, that's another inflection that's important for our customers. And then packaging, multichip connectivity, that is also one of the fastest-growing segments of the market -- overall semiconductor market. That's growing over 70% this year for Applied Materials, kind of midpoint between $2.5 billion or $2 billion and $3 billion relative to the size of that business, extremely high growth rate.
So for us, it's really more of our positions and enabling those really important AI data center inflections than it is whether it's U.S.-based or Asia or any other location. Now the one thing I would also say, though, that is a very big positive for us, as customers are moving into new locations, that is a tailwind for our service business because that infrastructure is not set up in those new regions. And also the level of experience to ramp yield very quickly is less in some of those new regions. So I would say that we're well positioned in terms of those technology inflections. And the regionalization is a tailwind for us in our service business.
Yes. One specific I want to ask -- example I want to ask about is Elon Musk and who's being more vocal about building Terrafab in the U.S. Can you talk a little bit about the extent of your technical and commercial collaboration with Terrafab, sort of what you expect your market position to be with Terrafab as it ramps? And then maybe how big an opportunity this could be for you over time?
Yes. So I'm not going to talk about -- I have a lot of respect for Elon, very smart person. I'm not going to talk about any specific customer. What I would say is that we're engaged with every one of these companies. They're all in a race for AI compute leadership. So every technology node, whether it's 2-nanometer or A14, 1.4 or different DRAM technologies, I said, adding the transistor innovation in the periphery for higher speed memory, advanced packaging, multichip connectivity. We're engaged with every company. Applied has the broadest, most unique portfolio in enabling those technical innovations. Applied is by far the leader in deposition for all of those different segments and essential for customers in bringing those new innovations to market.
So we're in deep high velocities, co-innovation relationships, co-creating those architectures, whether it's a new customer or an existing customer, the depth of the relationships are very strong. When you have a new customer, the most important first thing is the R&D relationship to create competitive technology. So we -- every single company, we have those deep relationships in all of those different areas. And then how that transitions into high-volume manufacturing depends on how fast you can create a competitive technology.
And then it's not, as I said, just about performance. For design wins, you need performance and yield. And again, when you have new companies that are entering into these markets without that level of expertise, it creates an even much stronger pull, not just for our innovation teams, but also for our yield and output teams.
Great. And then maybe last regional question on China because this has been an area where there seems to be like a resurgence of CapEx on the part of those customers, but U.S. export controls have obviously put a damper on how much of that market you can address. You've talked about that market now being expected to be up for you in 2026. Maybe help profile for us how do you expect that level of structural growth in China for Applied and in light of all those kind of export controls you're subject to?
Yes. So China really for us is mostly an ICAPS, we call ICAPS market, IoT, communication, auto, power, sensors, more consumer electronics. And as I mentioned earlier, 80% of the WFE growth in '26, we think the profile is similar in '27 going forward is really driven by AI data center, leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM, high-bandwidth memory, advanced packaging, those segments.
For us, we're seeing growth this year in China and overall ICAPS. And gaining a little bit of share in the areas where we can compete inside of China. So we think longer term, if you think about the fastest-growing segments of WFE, again, it's still going to be driven by AI and data center, the segments I described earlier. We think ICAPS grows at kind of mid- to high single digits over time, but not as fast as some of those other segments. And what we're seeing near term, even in ICAPS, the growth there is being driven by power in data center, photonics, that's adding some incremental growth in ICAPS.
Next year, we see that business also growing a little bit faster than what we're seeing this year, but still growth rates are slower than what we see in data center. And again, one thing that I've seen over the last few years was that smartphone ratio to DRAM, 4:1 going to 1:1 and 2:1, the data center versus smartphone, that's going to be the driver for the next several years.
Yes. Okay. So maybe shifting to a discussion of your end markets for a moment. I don't -- I know you don't like to give quantitative market forecast for WFE growth, but I'd love to get your qualitative perspective on 2027, if I could. You've seen obviously very robust demand visibility as you talked about. One constraint you've mentioned on your conference call back in August was clean room space. That was a constraint this year, talk about being constrained next year. But this year, your customers kind of overcame that and accelerated that space completion. So directionally, how would you sort of handicap the chances of growth in 2027 for you being better than '26?
So growth in '27 will be strong. Again, compute demand is increasing. I mentioned Agentic on top of what we have been forecasting previously and physical AI going forward. So '27 is going to be strong and beyond '27, growth is going to be very strong. So I'm not going to give a specific number for '27 at this point, but '27 is going to be a great year for Applied.
Got it. But you see growth into 2028 as well?
Again, I just believe compute demand, this technology is going to transform every single industry. Compute consumption is going to keep going up. Again, you have a Agentic adoption where the compute is being -- compute demand is being driven by agents in addition to people and then physical AI on top of that going forward in the future. So I just think that compute demand is going to keep going higher.
Yes. Now specifically on memory, that really appears to be leading growth in the industry, at least short term. Do you see that relative strength continuing into next year? And or is there a point in time where you expect, say, leading-edge foundry or one of the other areas to sort of to grow faster?
So the 80% is in the areas I talked about, including both of those segments you just described. I think longer term, those are going to be 2 of the fastest-growing segments. I'm not going to give exact numbers here today, but both of those areas are -- if I thought about what are the areas that are going to grow the fastest, there's no question that leading-edge foundry is going to grow at a very high rate going forward. DRAM will also grow at a very high rate going forward. In advanced packaging, the multichip connectivity is one of the biggest areas of innovation in the entire industry. That's also going to grow very quickly.
So I don't know I want to handicap one versus the other. They're both going to be in that Top tier of growth, those segments. And again, I would say ICAPS, that is not as exposed to the AI data center growth. So that will be kind of mid- to high single digits. Those other markets will be growing at a faster pace.
Now advanced packaging, you just mentioned, that's an area outgrowing the industry as well. There's expanding range of competitive offerings from different vendors there. What's your revenue currently for that segment? And what are your expectations for the ramp? And sorry, has the expectations for your ramp in that revenue stream changed at all in the last few months?
So I think how you connect computing components is enormously important for the industry. So these system companies, they would love to have the package -- the body size as large as possible, as many computing components connected as possible at the highest I/O density. So I'm highly confident in the next 3 to 5 years, you'll see incredible inflections in this technology beyond where we're at right now. This is a really important race for AI computing leadership.
So for Applied, that business has grown -- is forecasted to grow over 70% this year, kind of midpoint between $2 billion, $3 billion in terms of the size for Applied Materials. And I would say going forward, again, I would put that in top tier relative to growth rates. Applied, that's one of our strongest segments from an overall market share standpoint. High-bandwidth memory and 3D IC are the fastest-growing segments this year. And that's, again, where you're stacking chips closer together for higher performance and lower power. And there will be tremendous innovations.
Applied has this broad, unique portfolio. We just acquired a company in panel-level plating. That will be a great return for us. We acquired another company with X-ray technology that's important for advanced packaging. Applied, our inspection measurement business is growing over 50% this calendar year. Packaging is an area where Applied has leadership in all of those process equipment technologies, but also we have unique technologies for yield innovation in advanced packaging. And that will be one of the fastest-growing segments for us going forward. There's no question.
Excellent. So I want to ask you a couple of product level questions for you, too. On the earnings call last month, you talked about process control. That segment for you growing over 50% this year. What is it about that segment that kind of gets you so excited and gives you confidence in growth?
I love that segment. So again, as I mentioned earlier, what's important for customers is winning inflections in computing performance and power. So that is something that every single customer, we have deep co-innovation relationships with their teams. But also yield innovation is absolutely critical for design win, you got to have both. You got to have performance at a certain level and yield at a certain level. Applied is the leader in the industry by a large amount in electron beam technology. That business is growing at a very high pace. We have very unique technology leadership in imaging, speed of imaging. And for material analysis, this is becoming more and more and more important.
So both our e-beam technology and our optical technology are growing at a very fast pace, over 50% this year. I have very high confidence, especially with the products that we have in the pipeline that this is going to be a very high-growth business for Applied for a number of years in the future.
And one thing I would say that's also unique for Applied Materials is the combination the materials innovation in chips and packaging, Applied has strong leadership. If you think about what is enabling power and performance in a chip and package, Applied is much larger than our nearest competitor. Then we are unique in that we have this leadership in e-beam technology so we can drive not only performance innovation, but also yield innovation. And that combination is incredibly important because that also gives us visibility in terms of how to drive innovations in our process equipment at a faster pace. So that combination certainly as a growth driver, 50% growth in revenue, great growth driver. It's going to be a great growth driver going forward, but that combination also is unique for our entire portfolio.
Okay. I want to ask a couple of financial questions. But before I do that, I want to get an update from you on EPIC because that's an area of customer collaboration. Obviously, you're trying to be close to your customer to drive ultimately revenue market share. How are investors going to know that it's working?
So EPIC, again, as I mentioned, every customer, they're in a race for AI compute leadership. And it's all about time to market in bringing those new technologies to market. Innovations in advanced foundry logic. Innovations, I mentioned the CMOS transistor innovation for high-speed memory or advanced packaging innovations. And with EPIC, this is where those architectures will be created. So bringing our top customers and other ecosystem partners together to innovate, to create these new architectures is incredibly important for our customers and for Applied Materials.
For us, it enables us to be designed in with our systems and our advanced services for yield innovation as those new architectures are created and adopted in high volume. It gives us great visibility. We're co-creating these architectures for generations out in the future. So we have tremendous visibility in terms of where to invest, what it's going to give us the highest returns. And for the customers, it's all about design wins. Their ability to bring these new architectures to market that give them an advantage in tokens per second per watt and then being able to ramp faster than their competitors. So that's really the value for them. And we have so deep relationships with every one of these leading customers, deep relationships to co-create those architectures going forward.
Got it. Okay. Then one investor debate that I hear a lot is pricing and the ability for you to price the value you're creating in the market. Historically, that's been difficult because you've got a concentrated customer base. Maybe talk to -- but I think some of your customers have publicly stated that they see tool costs rising. So maybe help us understand your ability to raise price, both in the short term and the long term, the impact of that on margins.
Yes. So I think that we're in a position where the value we're creating is higher than ever in performance, and I also mentioned in yield and output. So if you look over the last year, we've increased -- our semi systems gross margin is in the mid-50s. And we've increased our gross margin about 190 basis points. I have very high confidence we're going to continue to drive that higher because the value in winning the race for these inflections for our customers is very high. And those profit pools are larger than they've ever been.
So for us, for them, it's really about this co-innovation relationship, bringing those technologies to market, winning designs based on being first to market with the best performance and power. And then we also increased our services margins 180 basis points in the last year. And there, again, the value of yield and output innovation, as I mentioned, is higher by far than I've ever seen at any point in my career. And the good news is we have those over 37,000 chambers connected to AI servers. We're bringing to market many service innovations that are incredibly valuable. We're increasing revenue per tool, and we're increasing the margins.
But you can imagine the incremental profit for our customers for every wafer and chip increased is off the charts valuable. So that's pulling those service innovations. And again, it's all about the race for AI compute leadership, and we have tremendous value that we're creating there. So I have high confidence. We've been increasing margins, high confidence we'll do that going forward.
Excellent. Closing on M&A. This is something that's kind of come in and out of the aperture of Applied over time. How are you thinking about M&A as a strategic priority? Do you see opportunities? Is it more important or less important longer term than it was before?
Yes. I think that -- so in terms -- we're going to generate a lot of cash. We'll return 80% to 100% of cash to shareholders. I wish we could do more M&A. But in the current geopolitical environment, it's just not possible to do large M&A. We have done -- I mentioned in panel plating. I think that was a great acquisition, small acquisition we did recently. The return is going to be great for that. We did another acquisition with X-ray technology. Again, that's going to be a really great acquisition for us.
So we're doing those smaller types of M&A. We've also made some strategic investments where we've had really good returns that strengthen Applied's technology opportunities. Hybrid bonding is an area where that is going to be a really important technology for compute innovation, higher I/O density and synergistic where we're combining a partner technology with 5 technologies from Applied Materials on an Applied Materials platform. So we're doing some of those strategic investments. We're investing in small M&A, but really most of the cash will be returned to shareholders.
Great. Well, I think with that, we are out of time. Gary, thanks so much for doing this. Really appreciate it.
Yes. Thank you so much. Thank you, guys.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2026
Applied sieht AI-getriebene Rechenzentrumsnachfrage als langfristigen Wachstumstreiber; Fokus auf Services, Advanced Packaging und Prozesskontrolle.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Narrativ: Management sieht AI- und Data‑Center‑Nachfrage als strukturellen, mehrjährig anhaltenden Treiber und berichtet von steigender Kunden‑Vorhersagegenauigkeit bis hin zu 8‑Quartal‑Rollprognosen und Gesprächen bis 2030.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- Technologie: Applied betont Führerschaft in Material‑ und Depositionstechnologien sowie einzigartige Kombination aus Material‑ und e‑Beam‑Prozesskontrolle.
- Services: Yield‑ und Output‑Services wachsen >20% YoY; Management sieht erhebliches Upside in höherem Umsatz pro Tool und steigenden Margen.
- Packaging: Advanced Packaging und Multichip‑Connectivity wachsen stark (~+70% 2026; Segmentgröße für AMAT im Bereich $2–3 Mrd.).
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Guidance‑Update: Management nennt sukzessive höhere interne Umsatzprognosen für 2026 (Feb >20% → Mai >30% → aktuell nahe 40%).
- Produktkennzahlen: Prozesskontrolle wächst >50% dieses Jahr; >37.000 Feld‑Kammern sind an AI‑Server angebunden.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Nachfrage‑Haltbarkeit: Analysten fragten nach Zyklensignalen; Management bleibt überzeugt von multi‑jährigen, strukturellen AI‑Tailwinds und sieht derzeit keine systemischen Warnzeichen.
- Regionale Dynamik: Diskussion über US‑Re‑Shoring, China‑ICAPS‑Wachstum und mögliche New‑Entrants (keine kundenspezifischen Details; Applied betont Engagement mit allen großen Playern).
- Preis & Margen: Fragen zu Pricing-Power und Margenausweitung; Management weist auf gestiegene Bruttomargen in Semi‑Systemen (+~190bps) und Services (+~180bps) hin.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Relevanz: Conference‑Auftritt bestätigt erhöhte Umsatz‑ und Margen‑erwartungen getrieben von AI, Services und Packaging; kurzfristig wichtig sind Auftragspipeline, Kapazitätsengpässe (Clean‑Room) und geopolitische Exportbeschränkungen.
Applied Materials — Citi’s 2026 Global TMT Conference
1. Question Answer
All right. Good morning. Welcome to day 1 of Citi Global TMT Conference. My name is Atif Malik. I cover U.S. semiconductors and semiconductor equipment stocks. It's my pleasure to welcome Brice Hill, Senior Vice President and CFO from Applied Materials; also Mike Sullivan, Corporate VP and Investor Relations.
I'm going to kick it off with my questions first. If you have a question, save it for the end. I'll call the mic to come to you, and you can raise your hand and you can ask your question. Welcome, Brice.
Good morning.
Brice, let's start with the market outlook. A very exciting year. You've described customer visibility as the best you've had. Rolling 8-quarter forecast, tracking 10-plus new fabs, having conversations extending to 2030. You have been raising your semis revenue expectations to more than 30% now. Can you just talk about the confidence on this continued growth and how you're looking at your opportunity in the next few years?
Sure. Nice to see everyone. Thanks for hosting us at the conference, Atif. So the demand confidence that we have, we look at -- we have a lot of information coming in from our customers, especially the DRAM and leading logic companies. We have a rolling 8-quarter forecast we get from our largest customers, which has been increasing all year, and we attribute that to the AI, artificial intelligence systems demand that's happening across the market. So we've got that information coming in directly from our customers that's been rising. That gives us some confidence.
When we look beyond our customers to their customers, cloud service providers as an example, we see the CapEx forecast rising all year from the cloud service providers. I think it's over $700 billion this year for the U.S. companies, almost $1 trillion for the global companies. Those numbers continue to go up. When we look at the underlying trend dynamics of AI itself, we see token demand rising. We see the economics of token demand and the economics of the cloud service providers to be positive. And so this underlying trend seems very strong.
And when we think about it from a microeconomic perspective, what we see inside Applied Materials, we're, of course, using AI inside the company to accelerate software development, to accelerate product development, to accelerate schedules for our products. And our own utilization is increasing significantly, which gives us a lot of confidence that this trend, the AI data center investment trend is investable and is durable from an economic value perspective.
The last thing on this is we've seen across the whole ecosystem, we've seen utilizations increasing almost every different end market, including our mature technology nodes, which just says that the semi devices themselves are increasing in volume, which also gives us confidence. So really, all the indicators, all the arrows point up, our customers are investing, our customers' customers are investing and highly profitable, and we're investing. So we think we have a lot of confidence in the future.
Brice, one thing that we've started to do in terms of forecasting wafer fab equipment, I understand you guys really don't talk about that number is start using the hyperscaler forecast. And you guys have a good team to do this kind of bottoms-up. And kind of help us understand if you guys are doing anything differently in this spending environment, tracking like the hyperscalers' investments or any other metrics that is extending your visibility?
Well, for sure, we're monitoring actual system designs as an example. So we do look at the GPU content, the accelerator content, CPU content, memory content on systems. We're trying to understand what the shape of the demand by DRAM, by leading-edge logic and by advanced packaging will be for our forward-looking forecast. So that's probably at a deeper level than we've seen before.
The other thing, of course, that we track is all the factories announced across the world. So we have a fab tracker -- it's well over 100 factories that we're tracking at this point. There were 10 -- more than 10 added in each of the last 2 quarters. And that's another strong leading indicator for us is how much clean room is being put in place. We've said over the medium term, this ramp, there's more demand than there is supply. So we've said in the medium term, it's gated by clean room.
And so we're looking closely at the investments customers are making in clean room when those factories come on, and that gives us confidence also and then the triangulation of that system architecture and the amount of capacity that's being put in place across those different device types, we work hard on that.
Great. Let's talk about the growth drivers. You guys have talked about foundry-logic, advanced packaging and DRAM driving more than 80% of your growth this year and next year. Can you talk about the areas like NAND capacity and mature node our ICAPs business, power semiconductors, silicon photonics, -- like which one of these areas have the most potential for upside to your current already very strong expectations for DRAM and foundry-logic?
I think the -- so if we start with DRAM and foundry-logic, the end market that we would pair with that very closely is advanced packaging. And so the advanced packaging, that was a $1.4 billion business for Applied Materials last year. We've said this year, it's growing more than 70%. And we expect that advanced packaging will grow apace with leading-edge logic and DRAM going forward. And it goes back to what I just described with the system-level architecture for AI data centers.
You have a lot of leading-edge components, CPUs, GPUs and accelerators. You have stacks of DRAM and HBM on those systems, and they all have to be connected on a substrate with high-performance interconnects. And so that pulls the advanced packaging capability along with the demand for these systems. So we think that's a very strong grower. We put those 3 together and Applied has the #1 process equipment position in each of those end markets.
The other one that's a little bit different than in the past year is what we call ICAPS, our ICAPS market, the mature process technologies. ICAPS is IoT, communications, auto, power, sensors, those end markets. That's been a slow market for the last couple of years as a lot of capacity had been put in place in China. And we said the world has to digest that capacity and get utilizations back up. Well, now we see utilizations coming up. We actually expect some moderate growth in ICAPS this year in 2026. And next year, we think will be a more normal growth year for ICAPS.
Normal, meaning the end market, the devices themselves grow at mid- to high single digits, and we expect the equipment will eventually track that as we normalize from a utilization perspective. And so that's probably a change. If we have our ICAPS business working well along with DRAM leading logic and advanced packaging, then we can get the strong results that we're expecting.
On NAND, I'll just add a comment on NAND. The bit demand for NAND is very strong. So we say in the probably high 20% range. The issue is that the additional layers that are being added in the NAND process technology is so productive from adding bits per square centimeter on the wafer that you actually need fewer wafers to complete all of the demand or to make all of the demand. And so when you do that, basically, what you have is an upgrade cycle on the NAND side. So you have fewer new factories, you don't have more wafer starts, you have a lot of upgrades. So what that does from an equipment perspective is it makes that market smaller. And we expect that to continue for at least the next few years.
Great. Brice, at June, DRAM and advanced packaging masterclass, you highlighted panel-level packaging. It's something that you guys have been kind of working towards in the last few years. Could you talk about where the industry is today on panel adoption? And what are the key hurdles and opportunities for Applied Materials?
Sure. So panels, if you picture these data center systems, all of the large cloud service providers and system design companies, again, are looking at their mix of components, accelerators, GPUs, CPUs, stacks of memory. They're trying to figure out how can they get even more performance per watt, even more performance because there's such a concern about the amount of energy being needed to run those systems. And one of the most important ways of doing that is to expand the amount of chips with higher quality interconnects on a single system. And that requires larger substrates, panel being one of the options for larger substrates.
And Applied Materials is investing significantly in this trend to grow its capabilities. We just recently did a small acquisition. The company is called NEXX. And as an example, that does fine line interconnects on the on-panel levels. You ask where the industry is. The industry is currently in development on panels. We have revenue on our panel processing equipment, but I don't think there's any volume production at this point. So it's in development.
From -- what are the challenges? I think the challenges are typical of what you see in new package technologies. The engineering has to do with how do we solve the thermal issues on a panel in a different substrate, how do you maximize the density and just the form factors themselves, companies are experimenting with different form factors. Some are wafer size and some are larger than wafer size. And by the way, Applied's experience on the display business gives us the ability to experiment and drive equipment solutions in those larger form factor sizes.
So we've invested in litho capabilities. We have e-beam products that will help inspect on a panel or other package types. And as I mentioned, we're investing in other capabilities. So we think that will be a natural evolution in terms of larger compute systems over time.
Brice, one question we've been getting from clients is around the tightness in the DRAM market where some of the AI servers are going to be de-speccing memory content because of the availability of memory and the move down towards maybe 8-high or even lower stack that's up HBM. Can you talk about -- obviously, they have to do this to kind of adjust themselves to the availability of the memory market. But can you talk about any impact you see on the equipment demand?
Sure. I've heard this term de-speccing. And I think our view at Applied Materials is when customers are lowering the number of stacked HBM, high-bandwidth memory in a system, they're doing that to get more system output. And so from our perspective, they're going -- they're trying to be able to ship more AI data center systems in total, dealing with the memory constraint. And so they're adjusting the system throughput and orchestration in that system so that they can maximize the amount of compute with the hardware that they have.
What that means on the equipment side is you're actually shipping more GPUs, more CPUs, more accelerators per memory chip. So I think from an equipment perspective, we would view that overall as neutral. And we certainly haven't seen a reduction in demand in the business because of this phenomenon. So I would just look at it like any other situation where you're managing the amount of chips available, they're trying to maximize the amount of compute they're outputting with their systems. And so it's just an adjustment to figure out what's best, the most memory or the most systems, and they're leaning toward more systems in that de-speccing situation.
Great. Brice, when we talk to some of your customers like big foundries and ask them, how is this cycle any different from prior cycles? One thing to point out is that the prior cycles were all about Moore's Law, just making it smaller. But with this new age of AI, the performance and the time to get the latency and those improvements is far more stringent and they're really counting on the equipment makers to provide that extra boost in performance. And you guys have the most kind of broad co-optimized portfolio. You talked about integrated process tool set. Are customers increasingly awarding you more PTORs or process tool of records because of this ability to boost the device performance in a more integrated manner?
Great. Thank you. I think that's something that I want -- I was hoping to touch on. So that's a good way to think about Applied's portfolio. When we think about our portfolio of tools and investors know that we have a large number of solutions at Applied Materials. We have deposition, we have etch, we have treatments, we have films. We have thermals. We have inspection, we have planarization tools, et cetera. I've heard some investors say before, oh, if you invest in Applied Materials, you're just investing in the entire semi equipment stack, so the company should grow like the overall market. We certainly don't view it that way.
What we're trying to build is a complete set of processing equipment to be the most enabling set of tools for our customers. So the way we look at it as when our customers come into EPIC, our new development center that we're building into -- in California, when they come into EPIC and they want to work on nodes, process technologies that are 5 to 10 years out, next-generation technologies. And we need to invent the type of equipment, and we need to invent the technologies to build those new advanced architectures.
Applied wants to be able to do every step in that process, so they're not having to go back and forth with other process solutions. So if there's 16 steps in a particular formation of something in the architecture, we want to be able to do all 16 steps so that we can control the interaction of those materials and control the way the process is developed and optimize the tools for that solution. The benefit for our customers is they've got a one-stop shop to do that work. The benefit for Applied is when we're successful, hopefully, we win all of the designs for those applications.
So it's really a focus area for us. And so I would look at that portfolio less as a desire to be broad and more as a desire to be the most enabling technology company for our customers. And that's the way we think about recent acquisitions we've made. We've done an X-ray technology company that's going to help us inspect micro bumps between stacked chips. We did the NEXX acquisition that I mentioned that's fine layer interconnects for panels. And that's the way we think about our portfolio is what technologies will help us be the most enabling partner for the customers and be critical for our EPIC center where we're trying to invent those technologies that will be 5 to 10 years in the future.
Awesome. Now we've established the demand picture looks really strong. Let's talk about your ability to supply. You doubled your manufacturing space over the past several years, and now you're preparing 2x current systems output levels by 2028 and some planning going on to 2030. Can you just talk about when you look at your supply chain readiness to meet this demand, where you guys stand?
Sure. Well, on the capacity side, one of the most important things when you have long lead time capacity investments like clean room. Clean room typically takes 2, 3 or 4 years depending on what you're starting with. You never want to be short clean room when you're in a highly profitable business. And so when I made those comments, I wanted to make sure investors knew and our suppliers. Partially, those comments were also to be reinforcing to our suppliers who have to make the similar investments.
We have invested to -- and are investing to make sure that we can produce double the amount of systems each quarter that we're producing today. And it's a capacity statement. It's not necessarily a revenue forecast, but it tells you those are possible scenarios that we're considering. You have to have the clean room and space in place. So we're putting that in place. And when we think about our suppliers, those 8-quarter forecasts that we talk about from our large customers, we aggregate that information by component type, and we send that information to our suppliers so that they're getting 8-quarter advance notice on what type of demand that they -- that we will have of them so that they can make the investments.
Our suppliers, there's a lot of smaller suppliers. They're all different sizes. We typically reference 2,000-plus suppliers for Applied Materials. A lot of them have to make investments, hire people, add capacity just like we do. And so they need that signal. Now the only rub in the equation is we've had -- we have that 8-quarter forecast. And of course, every single quarter this year, it's risen even within the year. And so our suppliers are doing a great job keeping up with us and the customers understand the importance of sending those signals. And so we continue to work on optimizing that whole communication flow.
Great. Let's talk about gross margins, and I actually feel guilty asking you this question because you've done such a great job in expanding gross margins by 300 basis points the last few years. But you're guiding to kind of flat gross margins near term. And can you just talk about the drivers to expand these gross margins further, whether it's value-based pricing, product mix or manufacturing scale?
Sure. I think the most important thing to think about for Applied Materials gross margins and is the R&D function first. You mentioned pricing and cost and mix and those kinds of factors. What I would ask investors to think about is how we're focusing our R&D. The company, the projects that we pick with our customers, we're selecting what we think are the most enabling and the most valuable projects. And if we're successful in building those solutions with our customers, then the portfolio becomes more and more valuable every year as we introduce those new solutions and the complexity and value of those solutions becomes higher.
So pricing becomes just your mechanism to size up the value that you're delivering in that R&D function that you hoped you would capture when you were building those solutions. Pricing becomes a tool that you use to assign the right value and sell at the right value with the customers. We have been doing a better job at pricing. We have a much more sophisticated and robust process of pricing. But really, from our point of view, it's reflective of the value of the solutions that are being delivered.
So I would equate the growth in gross margin, approximately 300 basis points over the last 3 years. A lot of that has been on pricing, but it's not -- I don't look at it as we've raised the price. I look at it as the solutions are more valuable, and we're producing more valuable solutions. Also, as everybody knows, you can see that there's more value in the product because things cost more. So aluminum, steel, chips, labor, costs are going up. So we do have to adjust prices going forward, and we're improving our ability to do that.
Great. Let me stop here and see if there are any questions in the audience. If you have a question, please raise your hand.
Just wondering on the -- when you talk about your 8-quarter forecast, you said that they've been going up every time you've reported this year. Can you share what you're allowed to share on the shape of that forecast over time, right? Is it going up in a linear line? Is it tailing off? And to what extent is that just a reflection of lack of certainty from everybody involved in terms of their ability to project demand, say, 12, 18, 24 months out from now?
Okay. Good question. So on the 8 quarters, I wouldn't call it linear. And the reason is the way that, that comes into us, as you might imagine, is by factory. And so when factories open up, the size of the factory matters. Some -- one factory might be 30,000 wafer starts a month, another factory might be 50,000 wafer starts a month. There could be a mega factory that does even more than that. So as those factories become available to take tools and have tools installed, that translate into demand for us for those tools.
So I would say if you got right down to the smallest level of detail, it's very uneven in terms of its growth. It grows in spurts from that perspective. That said, our customers know that we don't produce in spurts. We produce relatively linearly from a tool perspective. So they try to schedule that demand with us as we grow. I would just say from a guidance perspective, we have said that we expect next year to be a strong growth year for the business, and it's really this AI investment cycle that we think is driving that. We don't see a change in that.
Generally speaking, we expect growth every year for semiconductors. We've looked in the past, we've talked about secular growth for semiconductors. We see capacity being added every year. We see the customers signaling that. When I talked about the fab tracker, the number of factory projects we're tracking globally, that's going up in each of the past few quarters, which gives you an indication that the amount of production capacity by wafer is expected to increase and customers are making those investments. So I guess the best I can say is it's not completely linear, and we don't see a place where it peaks, if you will, or changes from that perspective.
Brice, specifically about DRAM. There have actually been very few greenfield fabs that have come online over the last 5 years, and the industry is projecting 15, 16, 17 new fabs coming online out to 2030. Can you discuss the difference in the economics? And since they've been growing bits by primarily doing line enhancements and upgrades for the last 5 years. The next 5 years, we're going to be transitioning to greenfield. Can you talk about how the economics from your standpoint, specific to DRAM is different when you're going from line transition to greenfield fab space?
Sure. Thanks for the question. So on the DRAM side, I think a year ago, if I'm right, about 1.6 million DRAM wafers per month is a good number to think about. I think this year, the industry is adding 400,000 more wafer starts per month in capacity. And that's what we see going forward is that the next several years, you're going to get 300,000 to 400,000 additional wafer starts a month of DRAM capacity. And those are new factories, as you say.
The economics for Applied Materials and for any of the equipment companies is a lot different. I would say for an upgrade factory, just at a high level, about 25% of the equipment investment relative to what you see at a greenfield. So if the greenfield -- if the process equipment is more like $10 billion for 100,000 wafer starts of capacity for an upgrade, it's only 1/4 of that in that ZIP code. So this is a much larger investment cycle, which -- with many more wafer starts added per month in terms of production.
And that's a big difference you see in the DRAM cycle, so you can picture that, 1.6 million, 2 million, 2.4 million wafer starts per month. That's a completely different picture than what you see in NAND. NAND has been a smaller number of wafer starts and declining, even though the bit growth rate is the same, declining on a yearly basis. And that's because it's mostly an upgrade cycle for NAND and where you get those dynamics. It's less investment, less greenfield in that area. Thank you.
Brice, let's talk about your services business. It's growing 20% this year, a very strong year, above your mid-teens long-term model. Can you help us understand what's driving such strong services growth and why are you still expecting it to kind of come down to the low teens model?
Sure. So I guess the way I look at it, Atif, is the beginning of the year or the first half of this year, we talked about our services business growing in low double digits. So let's say, 11% or 12%. And we've raised that to mid-teens for a longer-term growth this year because the installed base is growing faster than we expected. It goes back to the semi business and what we were talking about with the semi business. Since the semi business has sped up, we're shipping more tools, the installed base for service is going up, and we have more opportunity there. So we raised our long-term forecast from low double digits to mid-teens.
This year, we're over 20%. And what's happening this year is that the utilization across the entire network has increased across every single end device. So leading-edge logic and DRAM, almost 100% utilization across the board. ICAPS is in a much more healthy spot and NAND has very high utilization. And so what that means is customers are buying more spares and more components to keep their systems working at full output. And so that's given us an unusual bump. Let's say we're at 100% utilization this year. We can't go to 110% next year. So you kind of next year go back to your more longer-term growth rate.
And just for the investors, the way I would think about the services business is there are 2 components to growth. One is that installed base growing every single year. 5%, 6%, 7% every single year. And then the second is the average revenue per tool rises each year as we introduce new products on those tools. Most of the new products or a large number of the new products are actually AI-based products. This is one of the benefits that we're getting from AI is we're able to provide tuning solutions to our customers that with the sensors that we have and with the data that we collect on the tools, we can quickly get those tools up to the highest yield and highest output.
Those are new services we offer to customers, and it helps with the revenue per tool even as that installed base grows. So that's the way to think about the service business. And obviously, mid-teens outlook is very positive for us.
Great. And then, Brice, when you talk about the value-based pricing approach, is that both on new products and existing products or mostly on the new products?
The way I would think about it is on every product, new or old from a -- maybe I shouldn't say we're old, but from an existing product perspective, your costs have gone up. So cost of labor, materials, components, aluminum, steel, gold, all the input costs have gone up, and that tells you that there's more value in that tool than there used to be. And so we have to make price adjustments on everything.
And I would just go back to kind of what we described a few minutes ago. We have a process to examine the value that the tool is providing. Each tool has a different level of solution capability and enabling capability for the customer. We look at that and we set the appropriate price. But I wouldn't distinguish between new products and existing products, we have to make an adjustment each period.
All right. And then on your process diagnostics and control, your outlook to grow more than 50% is actually far above WFE and also above some of your peer commentary in this market. Can you just talk about what you're seeing in that market?
Very exciting in process control. So if you can imagine, these are 3D architectures when you think about a Gate-All-Around transistor, many levels of semiconductor processing to build one of those processors and one of those transistors -- and you have -- you need the ability to look inside that construction. There's buried defects inside that construction, which optical sensors or optical microscopes don't allow you to see the e-beam microscopes where we have the -- or e-beam inspection where we have the top market share.
That is the tool that allows you to shoot electrons in there and see the shapes and see what's being constructed and find those buried defects and fix those buried defects. Our CEO says, you can't fix what you can't see. Well, that's one of our capabilities that we provide to customers. So as the architectures -- the actual device architectures themselves get more complex, you need more technology like the e-beam tool to look inside as you're building them, find the structural defects and be able to fix those in your process.
So the demand for e-beam is going up significantly, and we expect that to continue as DRAM goes to 3D DRAM, 4F squared and eventually as the leading-edge node goes from Gate-All-Around to CFET, you're going to need a lot more levels of inspection. That's been the #1 driver for us. We're also making several other investments. I mentioned the X-ray. I mentioned the package-level e-beam products that we have. So we think the inspection business will be significantly important for Applied Materials and its growth story.
Great. That's a wrap. We're almost out of time. Brice, thank you for coming to the Citi conference.
Thanks, everybody. Good to see you. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Citi’s 2026 Global TMT Conference
Applied sieht eine nachhaltige, AI-getriebene Investitionswelle; Nachfrage hoch, Ausbau der Fertigung läuft, Inspektion und Packaging als Hebel.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
Applied betont sehr hohe Kunden‑Sichtbarkeit dank einer rollierenden 8‑Quartals‑Prognose und zahlreichen angekündigten Fabriken; AI‑zentrische Rechenzentren treiben CapEx, was DRAM, führende Logik und Advanced Packaging zu den Hauptwachstumstreibern macht.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- Wachstumstreiber: DRAM, Foundry/Logic und Advanced Packaging sollen >80% des Wachstums tragen; Applied behauptet #1‑Position in diesen Märkten.
- Produktportfolio: Fokus auf ein integriertes Tool‑Set als "One‑Stop" für Kunden; EPIC Entwicklungszentrum, gezielte Akquisitionen (z.B. NEXX, Röntgen‑Inspektion) zur Stärkung von Packaging und Inspection.
- Kapazitätsaufbau: Fertigungskapazität wurde bereits verdoppelt; Planungen zielen auf doppelte Systemausbringung bis 2028, Supplier‑Signaling über 8‑Quartals‑Forecast aktiv.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Fab‑Tracker: >100 Fabriken im Monitoring, jeweils >10 neue Projekte in den letzten zwei Quartalen.
- Panel‑Packaging: Erste Umsätze auf Panel‑Equipment, aber noch keine Volumenversion; Entwicklung läuft.
- Wachstumsbereiche: Process Diagnostics (E‑Beam/Inspektion) prognostiziertes Wachstum >50%; Services >20% dieses Jahr (langfristig Mid‑Teens).
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- 8‑Quartals‑Form: Forecast wächst nicht linear, sondern in Sprüngen je nach Fabriköffnungen; Kunden planen, Werkzeuge linear zu beziehen.
- DRAM‑Economics: Greenfield‑Fabs verursachen ca. 4x mehr Equipment‑Investment als Upgrades; Industrie erwartet 300–400k zusätzliche DRAM‑Waferstarts/Monat in den nächsten Jahren.
- Memory‑De‑speccing: Reduzierter HBM‑Stack in Systemen wird als neutral für Equipment‑demand bewertet — mehr GPUs/CPUs pro Memory‑Chip kann Auslieferungen stabil halten.
⚡ Bottom Line
Für Aktionäre: Klarer, AI‑getriebener Nachfragezyklus mit mehrfachen Hebeln (DRAM, Logic, Advanced Packaging, Inspection, Services). Applied investiert massiv in Kapazität und Technologie, Risiken bleiben bei Clean‑Room‑Timing und Zulieferer‑Kapazität sowie bei der noch experimentellen Panel‑Adoption; Margenpotenzial besteht über wertbasierte Pricing‑ und hochmargige Inspektions‑/Serviceangebote, kurzfristig aber begrenzte Margenverbesserung.
Applied Materials — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to the Applied Materials Third Quarter of Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the call over to Mike Sullivan, Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. With me are Gary Dickerson, our President and CEO; and Brice Hill, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call includes forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ. Information concerning these risks and uncertainties is discussed in our most recent Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC.
Today's call also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to GAAP measures can be found in today's earnings press release and in our quarterly earnings materials, which are available on our website at ir.appliedmaterials.com.
In addition, any comments regarding calendar 2026 refer to Q2 of this fiscal year through Q1 of fiscal 2027, which will be a 14-week quarter.
Next, I'd like to remind you about our 2 special events during SemiConwest. On Monday afternoon, October 12, we will host an unveiling of the new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley, California. And on Tuesday morning, October 13, we hope you'll join Gary, Brice and our business unit leaders for our investor breakfast presentation at the Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco. You can join us in person or on a live webcast.
And with that introduction, I'd now like to turn the call over to Gary Dickerson.
Thank you, Mike. In our third fiscal quarter of 2026, Applied Materials delivered another set of record-breaking results, including the highest quarter-on-quarter revenue growth in the company's history. The rapid global build-out of AI infrastructure combined with Applied's leadership positions in the most enabling and highest value technologies for AI computing provides the company with an exceptionally strong foundation for multiyear revenue and profit growth. As 2026 has progressed, customers have found new ways to address clean room space constraints and significantly increased their demand for tool deliveries. In the past three months, we have again made upward revisions to our revenue growth forecast for the year, and we are confident we will grow faster than the overall market.
As AI computing drives unprecedented demand for semiconductors, there is a large gap between demand and supply for advanced chips. To ensure our supply chain and field teams can support their ramp, our largest customers are giving us longer-term commitments and rolling 8-quarter forecasts. This increased demand visibility gives us high confidence that 2027 will be another strong growth year for Applied Materials. As customers move quickly to bring new fab capacity online, while simultaneously optimizing yield and output of their existing production facilities, we also see strong incremental demand for our advanced service solutions.
In my prepared remarks, I will share my views on how AI is resizing and reshaping the semiconductor industry and its ability to realize the value of advanced technology. I will describe the increasing value applied to delivering to our customers by accelerating their technology road maps, optimizing existing production capacity and helping ramp new fabs faster. And I'll provide a brief update on our EPIC strategy as we prepare to start operations in our new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley.
As I have said before, I strongly believe that AI is the biggest and most consequential technology inflection of our lifetimes. While we are still in the early innings of deployment, AI is reshaping the global economy and becoming fundamental to the relative competitiveness of companies. What I am seeing at Applied Materials is a great case study in AI's real-world impact. Our investments in AI are on track to deliver compelling returns by accelerating our revenue growth and operating profit margins. In R&D and services, we are using AI to create highly differentiated products, significantly speed up product development time lines and create valuable new service solutions for customers. In operations, supply chain and our corporate functions, AI is helping us ramp faster, drive meaningful improvements in productivity and scale our revenue significantly faster than our head count.
Beyond Applied, we see similar trends playing out across a wide variety of industries. As the performance and cost of AI computing improves, many new applications will become technically viable and economically attractive. These expansive opportunities for value creation are fueling an intense global competition for AI leadership, which can be described as two concurrent races. The first race is for technology leadership. AI data center returns are determined by the number of tokens generated per second and the total cost of ownership, which is dominated by energy consumption. Improvements in token per second per watt are primarily driven by innovations in semiconductor devices and systems. This can be seen in the value of the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industries are generating from their most advanced technologies.
The second raise is for capacity as demand for advanced semiconductors to support AI infrastructure scaling far exceeds supply. As a result, chipmakers are intensely focused on increasing output and yields of their existing factories while rapidly building new ones. For Applied, the technology race and the capacity race are fueling new opportunities to create and capture value. In the race for technology leadership, leading edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging have the greatest impact on AI computing performance, power efficiency and cost. Together, we expect these areas to represent around 80% of wafer fab equipment growth in 2026 and 2027. These three areas are also where Applied has strong leadership positions, where we identified key AI inflections early, and where we've shifted our investments to build an innovative pipeline of next-generation solutions.
In the past quarter alone, we have announced six new products, including our Centura Prime Epitaxy system, designed specifically for high-performance DRAM, producer Avila that enables higher performance and higher layer count high-bandwidth memory, Nokota VMAX, our next-generation plating system and Opta Quad CMP for advanced packaging and two new e-beam systems also for advanced packaging that expand on our e-beam leadership in the front end.
Advanced packaging is one of the most important areas for AI compute innovation, and we see very strong multiyear growth for Applied. Applied as the overall leader in this market with strong positions in high bandwidth memory and 3D chiplet stacking, and we now expect our overall packaging revenues to grow more than 70% in calendar 2026. We are also well positioned for future packaging inflections as the industry moves to new architectures and larger-sized panel formats. We have built a broad portfolio of next-generation technologies for panel, including digital lithography, deposition, etch and e-beam review.
In the global race to add semiconductor manufacturing capacity, our customers' ability to increase yield and output in their existing production fabs is incredibly valuable. This creates expanded opportunities for Applied to deliver new innovations in three key areas: Services, process diagnostics and control, and new products that increase wafer output per area of fab space. Our advanced service solutions enable customers to better optimize performance of their high-volume manufacturing operations. We already have more than 37,000 chambers in the field connected to our proprietary AIX software capabilities and use AI-powered monitoring, diagnostics and predictive analytics. Our advanced services are delivering yield improvements for customers and helping us drive higher growth rates in applied global services. We now expect AGS to grow more than 20% in calendar 2026 and to deliver a sustainable long-term annual growth rate in the mid-teens.
Our metrology and inspection product portfolio is also enabling customers to accelerate fab yields and output improvements. The most advanced logic and DRAM devices require more e-beam steps that can provide sub-nanometer resolution for high aspect ratio structures. Applied has unique e-beam technology and is the leader in this growing market. In parallel, we are introducing new optical inspection products, which enable us to increase application share in these markets as well. As a result, we expect to grow our process diagnostics and control business more than 50% in calendar 2026, and we have a strong pipeline of new products that will fuel growth in 2027 and beyond.
Finally, we are developing a new portfolio of output innovation products that increase the wafers that can be processed per square foot of clean room space. One example is our new Epitaxy system for DRAM that not only increases device performance, but also uses 20% less clean room space than our earlier products. We have multiple output innovation products in qualification at customer sites that will provide significant increases in output per unit area. With incredibly strong customer pull for next-generation technology and unprecedented demand for semiconductor manufacturing capacity, the value of time to market has never been greater.
Our EPIC strategy is designed to increase innovation and commercialization velocity by creating earlier and deeper engagements with our customers and partners and co-locating key innovators. For chip makers, EPIC provides much earlier access to Applied's new product innovations that are at the foundation of future AI compute architectures. The output from Epic will be more mature technology that can deliver high yields faster in volume manufacturing. For Applied, EPIC co-innovation programs will enable us to be designed in to new chip and packaging architecture inflections, increased R&D productivity and value sharing and provide better multi-node visibility to guide our investments and resource allocation.
Since our last earnings call, we announced that Broadcom will join EPIC as an innovation partner to accelerate the development of advanced chip packaging technologies for next-generation AI systems. We also signed EPIC partnership agreements with screen and UC Berkeley. This brings our total number of announced EPIC engagements to 11, spanning system companies, leading chip makers top research universities and innovation partners. The center pet of our EPIC platform is our brand-new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley. We will move the first R&D tool into the clean room next week and we are on track to start operations in the coming months.
Before I hand over to Bryce, let me briefly summarize. Demand for advanced semiconductors and semiconductor equipment continues to strengthen, and as customers find new ways to address clean room space constraints, we see higher demand for 2026 tool deliveries. With support from our supply chain, we have again increased our expectations for 2026 revenue, and we are confident we will grow faster than the overall market this calendar year.
In the race for AI technology leadership, leading-edge family logic, DRAM and advanced packaging have the greatest impact on AI computing performance, power efficiency and cost. These are areas where Applied has strong leadership positions and an innovative pipeline of next-generation solutions, supporting strong revenue and margin growth in 2027 and beyond. And we're working closely with our customers to optimize yield, outputs and fab ramp times with valuable new innovations in services, process diagnostics and control and output innovation products.
Brice, over to you.
Thanks, Gary. I'm pleased to share that Applied delivered another quarter of double-digit sequential and year-over-year growth in revenue, operating profit and non-GAAP earnings per share. Fiscal Q3 also marks our 13th consecutive quarter of year-over-year gross margin expansion, which demonstrates how we are benefiting from the tremendous value our products and services bring to our customers and the entire AI ecosystem.
Our fiscal Q4 guidance demonstrates continued strong year-over-year momentum. And in the second half of the calendar year, we expect particularly strong growth in DRAM as well as leading-edge foundry logic and the advanced packaging for both. On today's call, I'll update you on the [indiscernible] environment, discuss how we're scaling our operations for continued growth, demonstrate how value creation is expanding our gross margins, summarize our Q3 results and provide our Q4 guidance. Over the past quarter, the demand outlook has strengthened across all the leading indicators we track. Cloud service providers continue to increase their investments in AI infrastructure. Importantly, many of these companies are already generating positive returns on their investments. And so are their enterprise customers, including Applied.
As Gary described, we are accelerating the pace of new product development, increasing revenue and generating new efficiencies in our support functions. In fact, G&A as a percentage of operating expenses has declined to the lowest level in our history.
Turning to our direct customers. Most leading-edge logic and DRAM fabs are running at full capacity. Utilization levels are rising across the board, including an ICAP where we see strong demand in AI-related markets like power and optical chips. As a result, our customers have announced more than 10 new fab projects just this quarter. Customers continue to give us longer visibility than we've ever had with some conversations now extending to 2030. These communications are valuable to our company and our own supply chain partners who are scaling with us to support our customers' growth forecast. During the quarter, we officially opened our newest manufacturing center in Singapore and combined with other expansions worldwide have nearly doubled our manufacturing space over the past several years. Based on the longer-term demand signals from our customers, we are now taking this further hiring and training new manufacturing and customer support teams so that we have the capacity to double our quarterly system output from current levels by 2028.
In fact, we add more than 1,500 people this quarter in worldwide manufacturing and AGS customer support. We are also planning our next manufacturing capacity expansion, ensuring we have the option to support further increases in demand by 2030.
Next, I'll discuss value creation and sharing. Applied is delivering value to our customers in the AI ecosystem in more ways than ever before. We've increased R&D every year since Gary joined the company in 2012. And the investments have broadened from equipment innovations to materials engineering solutions that result in better chips. More recently, we've significantly increased R&D and advanced packaging innovations that enable better systems supplementing our R&D with two small acquisitions. And today, we're increasing investments in technologies that enable better fab economics as we accelerate ramps and boost output and yields. All of these technologies will be put to work at the EPIC center, where we will co-innovate with our customers and partners to accelerate the AI road map.
In short, we've broadened our focus from making better equipment to enabling better chips and systems for AI and better fab returns for our customers. These investments have made us a more valuable partner to our customers and enabled us to share in the value we create. Three years ago, we implemented a systematic approach to value-based pricing. And today, you can see the benefits reflected in our strong revenue growth and gross margins which have increased to over 50% for the company and over 55% in semiconductor systems. We have higher pricing and margins in both new and existing products. At the same time, we remain focused on cost improvements and use them aggressively to help offset higher input costs. As we look at the many opportunities we have to further increase the value of chips, systems and fabs, we are confident we will continue to expand gross margins.
Next, I'll summarize our Q3 results. We generated record revenue of $9.1 billion, up 15% sequentially and 25% year-over-year. Non-GAAP gross margin increased to 50.4%, up 40 basis points sequentially and 150 basis points year-over-year. Non-GAAP operating margin expanded to a record 34%, up 190 basis points sequentially and 330 basis points year-over-year. And we delivered record non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.50, which is up 22% sequentially and 41% year-over-year. Last quarter, I discussed our focus on increasing operating leverage. We grew revenue much faster than spending in Q3 on both a sequential and a year-over-year basis and drove OpEx as a percentage of revenue to the lowest level in nearly 4 years.
Turning to the segments. Semiconductor Systems delivered record revenue of $7 billion, which is up 18% sequentially and 27% year-over-year. The revenue mix was similar to last quarter as capacity additions and gate all around and FinFET, drove record foundry/logic revenue. DRAM revenue, which includes HBM packaging, grew by 52% year-over-year to record levels. As we look ahead to the second half of the calendar year, we expect a very significant increase in DRAM revenues as our customers begin to expand clean room capacity. Looking to our individual materials engineering business units, we had record revenues and deposition in Q3, including in PVD, CVD and epitaxy, which is one of our fastest-growing businesses this year. In materials modification, we had record sales in thermals and treatments. In materials removal, we had record revenue in both etch and CMP. We also had records in process diagnostics and control, which is growing faster than our overall systems business this year. Segment non-GAAP gross margin increased 190 basis points year-over-year to 55.4%. Non-GAAP operating profit increased 45% year-over-year to a record $2.7 billion.
Applied Global Services delivered record revenue of $1.8 billion, which was up 22% year-over-year reflecting both subscription services growth and high transactional parts demand. Ramp readiness is a major priority, and the team added more than 1,000 customer support engineers. AGS is using AI and warehouse automation to grow as efficiently as possible, which is reflected in strong gross margin of 35.6%, up 180 basis points year-over-year and operating margin of 30.1%, up 280 basis points year-over-year.
From a regional perspective, China represented 26% of our semiconductor systems plus AGS revenue. We now expect our China revenue to increase this calendar year, led by investments in 28-nanometer foundry logic, where Applied has strong technology differentiation and share. Other revenue of $294 million was in line with our expectations. We generated record operating cash flow of over $3 billion. Capital expenditures were $707 million, resulting in free cash flow of $2.3 billion. We distributed $860 million to shareholders, including $420 million in dividends and $440 million in stock repurchases. We have $12.8 billion remaining in our share buyback authorization and continue to expect to distribute 80% to 100% of free cash flow to shareholders.
Now I'll share our guidance for Q4. We expect company revenue of $10.25 billion, plus or minus $500 million, which is up 51% year-over-year. We expect non-GAAP EPS of $4.02 plus or minus $0.20, which is up 85% year-over-year. Within this outlook, we expect Semiconductor Systems revenue of around $7.9 billion, up 62% year-over-year, AGS revenue of about $1.84 billion, up 22% year-over-year and other revenue of around $510 million, composed primarily of display revenue. I've said previously that our display business includes new products that could help us drive higher quarterly revenue in future periods. For modeling purposes, we now expect other revenue to be approximately $400 million per quarter on average through 2027.
We expect non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately 50.4% in Q4, up 230 basis points year-over-year. And we expect non-GAAP operating expenses of around $1.58 billion. As a reminder, Q1 of fiscal 2027 will be a 14-week quarter which will result in a higher than average step-up in our Q1 operating expenses. Finally, we are modeling a non-GAAP tax rate of around 11% and and a tax rate of around 13% in 2027 as we absorb the effect of the global minimum tax.
In summary, the rapid adoption of AI that we've been investing for is driving strong growth and record revenue and profitability for Applied Materials. We are enabling better chips, systems and fab returns and systematically sharing in the value we create. We see continued record performance in the second half of the calendar year with a sizable increase in DRAM and leading-edge foundry logic revenue. Based on the unprecedented visibility we're receiving from our customers, we expect another strong record year in 2027 and are making substantial investments to be able to ramp to higher levels beyond next year.
Now Mike, let's begin the Q&A session.
Thanks, Brice. [Operator Instructions] Operator, let's please begin.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question for today comes from the line of C.J. Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.
2. Question Answer
Quarter ago, you quantified semi-systems growth of 30-plus percent. Curious if there's kind of a framework for thinking about what the growth outlook looks like now, given your positive commentary. And is there any sort of framework that we should be thinking about into calendar '27?
Hi, C.J., it's Brice. Thanks for the question. So our key comments there and the way that we're seeing the business is that demand strengthened again during the quarter. We see new projects being added by our customers on factory side. We see CapEx forecast going up by our customers, and we see strong CapEx from the cloud service providers all and out. So the mid -- the greater than 30% that we highlighted last quarter, we're saying now that it's greater than that at this point. We don't want to guide our out Q1 at this point. So that's as much information that we're providing. But when we look into 2027, we expect this whole demand function led by AI to continue. So we're saying '27 at this point, we expect another strong year.
Yes, C.J., this is Gary. I would add just that the fastest-growing parts of the market are the leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging. We said that's around 80% of the growth in wafer fab equipment spending this year, and then we'll see a similar profile in '27. Those are the fastest-growing parts of the market. Those are areas where we have clear leadership and really well positioned going forward. So as you said, we increased greater than 20% is what we said year-over-year in February, then greater than 30% in May. And now we think stronger than that, going forward. And so demand in all the conversations with the customers is very strong. And what we're hearing from customers with these 8-quarter rolling forecast is very strong multiyear demand. I really want to thank our supply chain teams and operations teams. They're doing a great job in responding. But again, customers are being very creative in how they're able to expand space and take tools earlier. Our teams are reacting very quickly, and we're in a strong position to outperform this year.
So strong environment, C.J., and we also highlighted that we expect to gain share during the year.
Very helpful. And I guess as a follow-up on gross margin, you talked about value-based pricing. And I think we've heard from most companies around anything expedited service new tools. But you talked about like-for-like pricing pushing higher. So could you speak maybe directly to that, and how we should be thinking about the implications to your overall gross margins as we proceed into fiscal '27 and beyond?
Sure. So over the last three years, approximately 300 basis points increase in our company level gross margins. One driver for that was our value-based pricing that we do for every single tool. So the issue C.J. was when we came through COVID, supply chain crisis, cost of inputs went up, we found ourselves needing to reprice every tool. So we put that value-based process in place. And that's what we do is examine the value of every single tool and put a new price on every single tool. And we think that's required in an environment where the input cost change constantly. And then looking forward, we expect to be able to continue to improve our gross margins. We're already over 55% for our -- at the semi systems level and value-based pricing will continue to be a part of that.
Yes. C.J., I would add that I think our ability to create value for customers has never been stronger. This race to bring new AI architectures to market is what every one of our single customers is focused on. Applied has the most enabling technologies, as I said, in the fastest-growing parts of the market. So we have a tremendous opportunity for creating value there. And I also talked about yield and output innovation. So all of our customers, they are racing to be first to market with these new architectures and then also ramping as fast as possible optimizing yield and output. So that puts us in a position where our products are extremely valuable. Our services are also more valuable. That's driving the greater than 20% service growth that we're seeing. We talked also about greater than 50% growth in our PDC business that also is related to yield optimization. And then our pipeline of new products is also very strong, and all of those have higher margins, and that will give us a tailwind going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Aria from Bank of America Securities.
So Gary, many of your memory customers are saying that they have 3- to 5-year long-term agreements with good visibility into units and pricing? I know you mentioned you have 8 quarters of visibility. But as you look at your customers who are signing up for a greater level of alignment with their end customers. How is that kind of translating into your longer-term visibility beyond these 8 quarters?
Yes. I can start on that, [indiscernible], it's Bryce. So what we have from customers, of course, the large customers, we actually have visibility to the road map. So we have a perspective on probably 5 years of visibility for our largest customers. we asked them for the detail at a detailed level for the 8 quarters that we've been speaking about, so we can aggregate that and get it to our supply chain. And other things that have changed, we get longer lead time POs from our customers so that the details are agreed from a longer lead time perspective. And then we also have some charges that have moved into this environment like cancellation charges and expedite charges that help will -- that help navigate the environment. So there's been a number of changes, and I think visibility is significantly increased from prior periods.
Yes, Vivek, this is Gary. Certainly, everybody can see that there is a gap between supply and demand, DRAM, especially with AI as we're expanding from training to inference to a genetic AI to physical memory demand continues to go higher, and I'd say especially DRAM. DRAM this is going to be a very strong growth year for Applied, more second half weighted in terms of our DRAM growth, but very strong growth in DRAM. And I think, as you know, we've expanded our DRAM share significantly over the last several years, and we continue to 'see strong growth in our DRAM business going into 27. And as you said, as we're in all of these conversations with customers, they're talking about multiyear growth and significant demand that we're increasing our capacity to meet -- and then for us, relative to our position in DRAM, we are the #1 process equipment provider in DRAM. We're the leader in the CMOS periphery logic to upgrade transistors for higher performance and power including, I talked earlier on the call about very strong epi growth, HBM packaging. We're the leader in materials deposition for wiring and patterning, conductor etch e-beam technologies, and we're in deep partnerships with customers also for future DRAM architectures, innovations in 6 F squared, 4 S squared, and we're very well positioned for 3D DRAM in the future. So I have high confidence that we're going to continue to drive significant growth and gain share in this segment.
Got it. Form a -- follow up, one more on gross margins. If I go back from calendar '21 to '25, your gross margins and those of your U.S. peer were about the same. In fact, Applied was slightly ahead. But in the near term, they are about 150 basis points higher. So I understand mix for every company is different. But I'm curious how come the gross margins were so aligned in those 5 years, yet they are kind of lagging a little bit. So just what's the prospect rise for expanding gross margins to more of this industry level going forward?
Yes, Vivek, I don't know if I have a great reason to think about comparisons. But from our perspective, we've made tremendous progress from a gross margin advancement. We talked about our value pricing and really it's the portfolio. The portfolio continues to strengthen as we target the R&D and the collaborations with our customers at the most valuable inflection solutions that need to be developed. And so the pricing really is just demonstrating the value of that portfolio. And yes, we expect to be able to continue that. Of course, we have some other elements in our portfolio like the display business that we've talked about when that grows faster, that has a different effect on the corporate gross margin. So the portfolios are different between the two companies, but we expect to be able to continue to improve our gross margin and grow the value over time.
Yes. again, I would also add, we have been driving margin growth, pretty significant margin growth. We talked about 13 consecutive quarters of year-over-year growth. 90 basis points in our semi business in the last year. And I have high confidence we're going to continue to drive margins higher, continuing the growth that we've seen over the last few years.
And our next question comes from the Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research.
I have one more on gross margins as well. And look, I feel a little bad harping on it because they're actually really good. They're well over 50%, and they are coming in higher than you had expected. But I'm just wondering, you are guiding them flat at these current levels, at least in the near term on a pretty sizable revenue increase in just given all the commentary around portfolio and pricing and everything, I was just a little surprised. Why is it? Is that just a function of the display business growing sequentially just mix between the businesses? Or is there something else going on in the near term?
Hi, Stacy, Brice. Yes, thanks for pointing out the growth in display is certainly a factor in the recipe. But really, it's just a ramp headwinds as with the growth, we're ramping a lot of customer service engineers. We have a lot of resources that we're adding in the semi business. And so yes, we get the benefit of strong segment mix with semi growing so strongly and we get the benefit of more volume. But we do have some ramp costs that are in the forecast. So we feel good about in our guided quarter, we feel good about having a flattish margin at the company level. And then like we said, as you look longer term, we'll expect to be able to continue to grow the margin.
Got it. So I guess to follow up on that then. So if there's ramp costs now, I guess how long do those last? Are you still ramping up more engineers and other costs like into subsequent quarters? Or are you all in this quarter? And then as we think about the pace of that expansion, like what does it look like? I think you talked about last quarter thinking about something like 10 bps or something sequentially kind of going forward. Is that still the trajectory or given some of the other drivers, do you think it can come in better than that?
No, I think the continued pace of improvement, we called that slow in the past. I think slow improvement is the right way to think about it. We do expect to improve it over the longer horizon. So I think we will continue to add employees over the next few quarters, but I think that headwind will recede as the revenues continue to grow.
our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.
Brice, I want to go back to the systems guidance for the year. So you said up more than 30 last call, things have gotten better since then. But even if you go 40%, that implies a pretty big decel, into December. So you go from 18% in July to 12% in October to then 6% in January, and that gets you to like 40%. And Lam was talking about WFE being up like 38%. So if you're going to outgrow you have to be at least 40%, if you believe their numbers. So would you commit to be to growing systems 40% or more?
Hi, Tim, thanks for the question. We are committing that we expect to outgrow. We think that's already happened so far this year, and we expect to have that happen. Wherever we land from a growth perspective as we get through the year. And I think you've got the dynamics right. We first guided greater than 20%. We raised that after customers added clean room projects. We raised it to greater than 30%, and we're saying it's even higher now. And so yes, we'll expect -- we're not giving that number because we're not guiding that out quarter, but those are the right dynamics. I guess in the last I guess the last thing I'll add there is we do expect sequential growth in our Q1, the calendar Q4, but not guiding that at this point.
Okay, Brice. And then maybe asked a different way. So the comment about manufacturing capacity doubling. So should I just take that kind of face value and so you're shipping roughly your revenue in roughly $7 billion in the July quarter. So at a value does that mean that sometime during calendar '28, you'd be revenue at $14 billion, or is it more newer than that?
It is more nuanced. I think you should take it explicitly. It's capacity. So it's not a revenue forecast for 2028. What we have to do with long lead investments like clean room is make sure we have the clean room in place with a profitable business or any demand forecast demand reality in that environment. And so we're just communicating because partially we're communicating to our suppliers also we're putting the capacity in place to be able to support a wide range of output requirements in 2028. And as far as that goes the years after also. So no, it's not a revenue forecast, but yes, it's giving you an indication of what we will be prepared for.
And our next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar from TD Cowen.
I just want to follow up on Tim's question. Gary, or Brice, it seems like your customer conversation seems to have shifted from annual price discussions to basically delivering and meeting requirements basically time to market with a two-year visibility. I'm just wondering, does you give you some freedom on pricing? Or does it add more burden on expenses on prepping up your capacity underspend the supply chains at the upcoming ramp. And if a visibility of 2 years, why not give a Jan quarter [indiscernible] the outlook? And then I have a follow-up.
Hi, Krish, yes. The customers definitely -- especially the large customers, we've got very strong visibility. And you're right, they are becoming more and more interested in scheduled delivery and hitting the schedules, which is why they're collaborating, cooperating on specificity of the orders and the 8-quarter visibility that we're also sharing with our suppliers. So I think that dynamic has improved the situation for us in the planning environment dramatically from the prior year. So I think all those things are true. I guess that's our perspective at this point.
Got you. Got you. And then maybe, Brice, think in your prepared comments, you kind of spoke about certain customers giving you visibility into 2030. I'm just curious, are those connotations about technology, or is that still about capacity to scale up and meet that demand?
Well, yes, it's definitely about technology. So especially with the large customers for mature customers. We know the fab projects that are on the road map. We know the technology that's planned and even if it's a new technology, we have a perspective of our positions in those technology. So we do have the ability to plan in a detailed manner for 5 years. And then what happens at the 8 quarter out is we get very specific about the node and the tool types that need to be built so that we can pass that information along to the suppliers. And we do have...
Yes, Krish, we are -- I mean many of those conversations with the CEOs of our largest customers. And for sure, they're giving us visibly detailed visibility for the 8 quarters, but even beyond that, I think they have communicated they see strong multiyear demand in their business. And so they're wanting us to be ready to support that demand. And as you know, it takes time for us to get the supply chain ready to support those levels. So we are getting the visibility relative to capacity needs beyond the 8 quarters. On the technology, I would say that those discussions go out maybe 10 years in the future because Applied is the most enabling for those key architecture inflections. We have the most broad, the most connected, the most unique portfolio to enable the new transistors, the wiring, the DRAM architectures, new packaging architectures and it takes time to bring those innovations to market. So Applied is unique in the portfolio we have. We have the most enabling technologies. If you looked at the top or technologies you need to enable these new architectures. Applied has, by far, the majority of those technologies. And so very deep co-innovation relationships with customers where we're cocreating those architectures. So that technology visibility goes beyond 5 years in these deep co-innovation relationships with the customers.
And our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan.
The team previously guided your global ICAP business to be flat to slightly this year. Outside of China, I mean, we are seeing a strong cyclical recovery in automotive, industrial, for your analog power microcontroller customers right? They are also articulating an environment of tight supply as well. Utilizations are rising meaningfully, Brice, as you articulated. But are these global customers also starting to pick up their spending? And do you see your total ICAP's business growing this year?
Harlan, thanks for the question. So I'll start here. Yes, in pointing this out, we do see a change in the ICAP dynamic. So you called out the increasing utilization across those customers. That's a positive. Our view of China is that it will grow this year, and it will grow next year. That's a big part of our ICAP portfolio. And we do think that ICAPs overall will grow this year and will grow next year. So the digestion we're hopeful that the digestion that we've talked about on the equipment side in the past is expiring, and we can return to growth. And then specifically, for our non-China customers as we look into next year, we think there'll be positive growth for those customers. We see bright spots in power and photonics in other areas. So it's looking much more positive than it has the last couple of years.
I appreciate the color there. And another quarter of strong revenue growth and growth in operating margin profitability in AGS, right? 30% operating margins, I think that's the highest level, I think, in two years. Plus your incremental gross margins, I think for the last couple of quarters have been low above 40%. So strong and also have been delivering strong incremental operating margins as well. I know the team has historically thought that they could drive AGS operating margins longer term into the low 30% range. But on your strong incremental margin profile, could we see gross margins approaching the 40% range and operating margins in the mid-30s as AGS revenues continue to scale higher advanced services becomes a bigger part of the mix kind of over the long term?
Yes. Thanks, Harlan. So I think not different from the semi business. We do expect that we have the opportunity to improve gross margins over time in the services business. And what's happening there is that solutions like the information solutions that come from AI are allowing us to develop new products and be more efficient in the services that we're providing. That combined with the growing installed base gives us good growth there. And then this year, we had the benefit of significant increase in utilization, which grows the spares business more quickly than in prior years. So that helps us from a gross margin perspective. That -- from that point, you can only grow to 100% utilization once. So that sort of slows down. But we do expect we'll be able to improve gross margins over time in the services business.
Yes, Harlan, I would add that I would add that for customers right now, optimizing output and yield is incredibly important in a supply-constrained environment, and that's going to go on for some period of time. So the value of services that optimize yield is incredibly valuable. And the good news is we have a lot of new innovations there. We talked about over 37,000 chambers connected to our AX servers. We have AI-enabled applications for preventative maintenance or chamber matching. Those are incredibly valuable services that will drive our top line growth, our service contract growth faster and also enable us to capture value more quickly. So actually, I am more positive on growth in the AGS business, both top line and bottom line than I've ever been.
And our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis from Jefferies.
I want to ask on NAND. It doubled in the quarter, obviously, off a small base. Just curious what you're seeing in that market. And then you did mention it in October. I'm assuming maybe that's a small dollar that's why you didn't call it out, but is it continuing to grow?
Hi, Blayne. Yes, good growth in NAND this year from a percentage perspective, small base, like you say, but we think this year is a strong year of growth for NAND. As we look forward, into our next year, we think the dynamic is that really that AI dynamic that we've called out before and Gary mentioned earlier, leading-edge logic and DRAM and advanced packaging will be the fast growers. ICAP should return to growth for us, NAND to grow but will be the slower grower in the out year.
And then, Brice, maybe on CapEx. You talked about the expansion of spending for 2030. I don't know if that's going to hit now. I'm just kind of curious if you can comment on what you expect OpEx to be in October? And then just any perspective next year? I think EPIC rolls off. So I think the prior was that it would go down. But now with the strength in the business, I'm just curious how you're thinking about that spend.
Yes, that's a great question because you're right, on the strength of the business, of course, we have more additions that we want to do. This is a CapEx comment. We want to -- we will be putting equipment inside EPIC as well as other investments. So what I would say about CapEx, it will still be a year that's higher than normal, but it will decline as a percentage of revenue as we go into 2017. So that's our perspective at this point.
And our next question comes from the line of Jim Schneider from Goldman Sachs.
I was wondering if you can maybe comment, given the strength you're seeing across your focus areas. As you look into fiscal '27 or calendar '27, when you care to rank order where you see the incremental strength between foundry/logic, DRAM spending in advanced packaging?
Yes. Jim, this is Brice, I'll start. We actually don't distinguish between them. We think the system-level pull that AI provides is similar across those different end markets. So I wouldn't call the difference enough to distinguish between them. So it will be strong for leading logic. It will be strong for DRAM. It will be strong for advanced packaging. And what's new for us now is that we also think that ICAP will grow next year. So that's another difference from our previous 90 days.
Yes, Jim, thanks for the question. Yes, I think we talked earlier about 80% of WFE growth in those three segments in '26. And we see a similar profile, maybe even a better profile. But right now, we'd say similar profile in '27. Those three segments, as Brice talked about, we see those as the fastest-growing segments in '26 and '27 and frankly, over the next several years.
That's helpful. And then just given the first half versus second half dynamic we're seeing in calendar '26. Is there any reason why in calendar '27, you wouldn't see an accelerating growth rate for overall revenue. Is there anything you see on the horizon that would give you pause?
I think a lot of people asked Jim about what is governing growth. I think as you move into the longer term, what governs growth is clean room from our perspective. So customers continue to add clean room projects. That's why we raised our forecast this year. Some of those will add incremental clean room space next year. And of course, it gets larger as the out years come into into focus because those projects usually take a number of years. But anyway, I think it will be the availability of clean room at a high level that will determine what we can all ship next year.
And our next question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini from Susquehanna International.
Yes. I just have a couple of follow-up for Gary. Forget about the near-term trend, but I want to better understand how you're thinking about your targeted revenue, gross and operating margin for a scenario where WFE will be $150 billion to $175 billion. Any color would be great.
Hi, Mehdi, thanks for the question. Yes, I think when we have the October investor event, we'll give more color relative to growth rates. What I would say is that if I look at the setup relative to compute demand going forward. We see this as a strong multiyear growth driver and the fastest-growing segments market, what we talked about earlier, the most valuable parts of the market leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM, advanced packaging. We're #1, and we're positioned to gain share going forward in those segments. So I think top line growth, we have a number of really great drivers that will enable us to outperform in '26, and we look at very strong growth going forward. And I also believe that really across the board, the value that we're delivering is also increasing. We are -- we do have the most unique connected portfolio that's creating tremendous value for our customers, for new chip and packaging architectures, that puts us in a good position to continue to drive our margins higher going forward. And I mentioned earlier about the innovations and yield and output. And as you can imagine, Mehdi, every single customer, they're focused on getting as many chips out per square meter as they possibly can. So that increases the value of our service business, and we're bringing innovation that really directly address those areas of focus for our customers. So I think relative to the top line growth, bottom line growth, I'm very optimistic. But we'll give more color, Mehdi, when we have our October investor meeting.
I'll add -- I'll just do one add, Mehdi. You're really describing this year and scenarios that people are talking about for this year. So I think we're giving you the ingredients for that with a greater than 20% services business for the calendar year, something higher than greater than 30% for the semi business. We talked about our gross margin outlook. We give you the display item. And then whatever that WFE number is, we've said we expect to gain share. So I think you have the ingredients needed to have a perspective on that.
Got it. Just a quick follow-up. I think your NAND has been relatively the smallest part of your semi and I think it's a reflection of more of an upgrade going on within the NAND than wafer capacity add. When do you think the industry would actually start adding some with the capacity to offset some of these losses due to increased migration to a [ 300-layer ] account.
Hi, Mehdi. Yes, so for the dynamic here, I think we've described in the past is wafer starts continue to decline in NAND. So the projects you see are for upgrades, as you described, to get more layers. We expect the environment to continue the same dynamic for the next few years. The one place that will be different is new projects in China, I believe. But for the larger customers, it's mostly increased space to afford those upgrades in layers that you described.
Yes. Thanks, Mehdi. And operator, we have time for one more question, please.
Then our final question for today comes from the line of Srini Pajjuri from Royal Bank of Canada.
Gary, a couple of questions on the technology front. You talked about panel-level packaging. And just curious as to when do you see panel-level packaging becoming mainstream. And compared to your current position in advanced packaging, what sort of opportunities do you see in that market? And then also, if you can touch on hybrid bonding. It seems like that's finally happening and what sort of opportunities you're seeing in the market?
Yes. Thanks for the question. So as I talked about earlier on the call, packaging is one of the most important areas in the industry relative to improving AI compute performance and power, multichip connectivity value the data, huge focus for all of our existing customers and new customers that are innovating with new architecture. So over 70% growth this year. We have, by far and away, the strongest portfolio of technologies. We've also talked about acquisitions that we've done here recently that add to our strength in packaging. So I have very high confidence that we will continue to drive significant growth over many years in packaging. Relative to new substrates, all of our customers are really focused on connecting as many logic and memory chips together at the highest performance and power as they can. And so we're in deep co-innovation relationships with companies, and there is a race for all of these companies to drive these new architectures to market because there's so much value in performance and power. So I look at that as a great opportunity when we model our share of those new architectures, we have a great opportunity to grow our share. We have new capabilities that will expand our available market as those new architectures are adopted. And I don't want to give a specific forecast relative to timing. But what I would say is that we will see a pretty significant growth in next year. in our panel revenue. And certainly, it's going to ramp a fair amount after that going forward. But our position there are stronger. And then relative to hybrid bonding, hybrid bonding is a way that every every customer, whether it's leading edge, [ oundrylogic ] or DRAM or high bandwidth memory, they're all wanting to shorten the wiring length to improve the performance and power. So it's a very important inflection for all of our customers. Again, Applied has strong technology in hybrid bonding. We have also very big business in the adjacent steps around the hybrid bonding, we have the only integrated R&D facility, working with our customers to enable those new architectures for packaging. So this will be a meaningful growth driver over time in addition to all the other technologies that we have in advanced paging. So I'm very optimistic over 70% growth this year and very strong growth in '27 and going forward.
Then one quick follow-up for Brice. Brice, I understand you don't want to give us F Q1 guidance, but you did call out that it's a 14-week quarter. I'm just wondering what sort of impact, if any, that will have on your revenue sequentially.
Sure. What we've seen in prior years when we had a 14th week in the quarter was you get close to a ratable performance on the services side of the business and not so much on the equipment side, most of the planning is done at a quarterly basis on the equipment side. So yes. And then from a spending perspective, as you might imagine, everybody wants to be paid. And so most of the spending will occur in the quarter. Thanks, Srini.
So thank you, Srini, for your questions. And Brice, would you like to get a little summary before we close the call.
Thanks, Mike. We're excited that Applied's unique portfolio and strategy are enabling us to grow faster than the market and increase margins. We look forward to an even stronger second half and to seeing many of you at our upcoming events. I'll be attending Citi conference in New York, and Gary will be at the Goldman Conference in San Francisco. The whole team looks forward to seeing you at the EPIC Center in October and giving you our longer-term outlook at our investor breakfast at SEMICON West. Mike, please go ahead and close the call.
All right. Well, thank you, Brice, and we'd like to thank everybody for joining us today. A replay of today's call is going to be available on the IR page of our website by 5:00 Pacific Time, and we'd really like to thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
Applied Materials — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
Applied meldet Rekordquartal mit kräftigem Umsatz‑ und Margenwachstum, starke KI‑getriebene Nachfrage und erhöhtes Ausblicksvertrauen.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: $9,10 Mrd. (+25% YoY, +15% QoQ)
- Non‑GAAP‑Bruttomarge: 50,4% (+150 Basispunkte YoY)
- Non‑GAAP EPS: $3,50 (+41% YoY, +22% QoQ)
- Q4‑Guidance: $10,25 Mrd. ±$0,5 Mrd.; EPS $4,02 ±$0,20 (≈+51% bzw. +85% YoY)
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Dauerhafte KI‑Nachfrage: Kunden verlängern Planungshorizonte (Rolling 8‑Quarter Forecasts) und geben längere Zusagen, was Sichtbarkeit und Investitionssicherheit erhöht.
- Fokussegmente: Führungspositionen in führender Logik, DRAM und Advanced Packaging; Produktpipeline (u.a. Epitaxy, e‑beam, CMP) soll Marktanteile sichern.
- EPIC & Skalierung: EPIC‑Co‑Innovation (neues Zentrum in Silicon Valley) plus Ausbau Fertigungs‑/Servicekapazitäten (Ziel: Verdopplung Vierteljahres‑Outputoption bis 2028).
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Kurzfristig: Q4‑Revenue $10,25 Mrd. ±$0,5 Mrd., Bruttomarge ~50,4%, opex ≈ $1,58 Mrd., Non‑GAAP Steuer ≈11%.
- Mittelfristig: Erwartetes Kalender‑2026‑Wachstum: Packaging >70%, AGS >20%, Process Diagnostics & Control >50%; Management erwartet Markt‑Outperformance und weiteres Wachstum 2027.
- Risiken: Ramp‑/Einarbeitungskosten, Abhängigkeit von Clean‑Room‑Kapazität und Supply‑Chain‑Timing; Q1 FY27 ist 14‑Wochen‑Quartal (operativer Schritt).
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Wachstumsrate: Analysten forderten konkrete ’27‑Prognosen; Management bestätigt Outperformance, gibt aber kein detailliertes Jahreswachstum an.
- Margenausblick: Diskussion um Value‑Based‑Pricing als Treiber für höhere Margen; Management sieht weiteren Spielraum, erwartet in Q4 aber flache Konzernmarge wegen Ramp‑Kosten und Mix.
- Kapazität & CapEx: Fragen zur Verdopplung der Fertigungskapazität; Firma betont Ausbauoptionen bis 2030, vermeidet aber konkrete Umsatzprognose für 2028.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Implikation: Starke operative Kennzahlen, erhöhter Ausblick und langfristige Kundenbindung durch KI‑Projekte stützen Wachstumserwartung; Anleger profitieren von Free Cash Flow, Dividenden und großem Buyback‑Rest. Short‑term bleiben Ramp‑kosten und Clean‑Room‑Engpässe Beobachtungspunkte.
Applied Materials — Special Call - Applied Materials, Inc.
1. Management Discussion
Hello, and welcome back to the Applied Materials Master Class series. Several years ago, we anticipated that the AI wave would drive the semiconductor industry to $1 trillion in annual sales by 2030. And through that time, we modeled the wafer fab equipment market composition to be around 1/3 leading-edge, foundry-logic, 1/3 ICAPS and 1/3 memory, with memory evenly divided between DRAM and NAND.
Today, we see AI driving the semiconductor industry to around $1 trillion this year and new incremental applications like agentic, edge and physical AI growing the industry to much higher levels over the next several years. These AI waves are fueling demand for faster, more energy-efficient chips and systems, and this is creating a new WFE spending mix.
We now expect leading-edge, foundry-logic to outgrow ICAPS and drive well over 50% of foundry-logic in the years ahead. And in memory, we expect DRAM WFE spending to be well over 2x NAND spending. Applied is well positioned for this new mix with the highest process equipment market share in leading-edge, foundry-logic, which we covered in our April master class as well as both DRAM and advanced packaging, which we're covering today.
In a moment, Kevin Moraes will summarize our strategy and explain why DRAM and advanced packaging are growing with AI. Next, Sony Varghese will share the road map for both standard DRAMs and high-bandwidth memories. Then Jinho An will discuss how advanced packaging is enabling faster and more energy-efficient AI chips and systems. Next, Lior Engel will explain how we are bringing eBeam process control to advanced packaging. Finally, Kevin will give examples of how inflection-focused innovation is growing our business, and then the 5 of us will address your questions.
Now, Kevin, it's over to you.
Thank you, Mike. Applied's strategy is inflection-focused innovation. We collaborate with our customers to predict road map inflections and develop solutions to the highest value technology challenges. We do this using a broad portfolio of unit process systems, co-optimized solutions and integrated solutions. In our previous Master Class on logic, we showed you how our strategy has given Applied the #1 materials engineering share position in gate-all-around in both transistors and wiring with a combined share of around 50%.
I'll next share 3 examples of how we used our strategy to become #1 in DRAM and advanced packaging as well. Back in 2013, Applied's DRAM process equipment share was below 15%, and we've since gained around 10 points of share and become #1. In our first Master Class 5 years ago, we explained 2 DRAM inflections. The first was patterning, where we co-optimized our Draco CVD hard mask patterning film, our Sym3 etch and PROVision eBeam metrology to help customers scale DRAM capacitors. Today, these products are used by all our customers and generate over $0.5 billion in annual sales.
Another inflection was transitioning the DRAM periphery logic transistors from polysilicon to high-k metal gate and incorporating more advanced wiring technologies to increase DRAM performance and energy efficiency. This change has increased our DRAM revenue by more than $1 billion per year.
A third inflection was high-bandwidth memory. We formed the packaging group that combined our materials deposition and removal technologies to enable through silicon vias and microbumps. High bandwidth memory took off, and we've become #1 in HBM packaging and equipment sales. In fact, HBM is growing rapidly this year and helping expand our overall advanced packaging business by over 50%.
In today's Master Class, you'll learn about 5 emerging DRAM inflections and 2 advanced packaging inflections. In 6F2 DRAM, we see customers increasing the use of EUV patterning to further scale DRAM memory cells and peripheral logic. Next, we see DRAM customers following the foundry-logic road map adopting more advanced transistors and wiring in the peripheral logic to improve performance and power. In addition, we see a new CMOS-bonded array architecture in which memory and peripheral logic are built on separate wafers that are later bonded together.
Next, we see a new 4F2 DRAM architecture based on vertical cell transistors. And finally, we see 3D DRAM built using the same deposition and etch technologies that Applied leads in today. In advanced packaging, we see the industry moving from silicon wafer interposer substrates to panels, which enable larger body AI accelerators. We also see the eBeam technologies used in the leading-edge logic foundry and DRAM being adopted in advanced packaging.
Now before Sony, Jinho and Lior discuss these inflections, I'll provide a nontechnical overview of some of the key ingredients inside the computer to help explain the unique and critical role DRAM and advanced packaging play in the AI era. Regardless of the workload, computers need processors to execute software instructions and manipulate data. CPUs, GPUs and TPUs can process extraordinary amounts of data each second. Keeping them fueled with data to avoid idle states is imperative to performance and performance per watt. Since processors have limited space for memory, we prefer to keep data that is not actively being processed nearby rather than on chip.
The perfect memory would have low latency, high bandwidth, random accessibility, unlimited endurance and nonvolatility as well as low cost. But the perfect memory doesn't exist. And over the decades, a number of memories with different characteristics have been invented and refined.
Let's take a closer look at 3 key memories. SRAM is built using logic processor technology and can be integrated onto the processors, enabling cache memories with 0 wait state performance. SRAM is extremely fast. The downside is SRAM is typically requires 6 transistors for every bit of data stored which makes it particularly expensive. And after decades of optimization, designers are finding it increasingly difficult to scale SRAM more than marginally with every new node. SRAM caches can also easily take up 1/3 or more of the processor's die area and using advanced packaging to relocate these caches without sacrificing performance is a major focus of the industry today.
Next comes DRAM. DRAM processor technology is mostly incompatible with logic technology and resides off chip. It shares the random access capability of SRAM, but needs only one transistor per bit of storage, making it much more space efficient and cost effective. Each DRAM cell has a transistor that controls the binary state of the bit and a capacitor that holds a charge level that represents 0s and 1s. Each cell is connected to a word line and a bit line, which together enable a random access, read and write. Zooming out, each DRAM chip has gigabytes of memory cells along with the periphery logic regions that route data to and from the memory cell and to the rest of the computer system.
Finally, NAND. Each NAND cell includes a transistor that traps electrons and the resulting threshold voltage represents 0s and 1s. NAND memory cells do not have the space overhead of unique bit line and word line connections. Instead, they are arranged in long, narrow strings that offer higher density and lower cost versus DRAM. A special attribute of NAND is that the transistors can be programmed as a multilevel cell, whereby 4, 8 or 16 distinct voltage levels are used logically to represent 2, 3 or 4 bits of data in each cell.
The transition from single-level cell NAND to these multilevel cell variants has dramatically increased NAND storage density relative to DRAM. In fact, it can take nearly 200 HBM wafers to hold the data stored on a single QLC NAND wafer. But density and cost benefits of NAND come at the expense of performance and endurance. Strings of NAND cells are organized into large pages and blocks. Individual bits are not randomly accessible. Instead, an entire page of data, typically several kilobytes must be read to access any particular bit. Write operations occur at the page level, and erased operations can only be done at the block level, wherein millions of NAND cells are erased at the same time.
NAND chips constantly move fresh data to empty cells, so blocks of stale data can be erased. Erasing NAND requires more than 20 volts, and the operation degrades NAND reliability, leading to endurance limits. All of this helps explain why NAND is not a perfect substitute for DRAM and why designers instead use NAND more like a fast hard disk drive for data that seldom changes.
This table summarizes memory performance as measured in access time and energy per bit transferred. If you normalize accessing a bit of data from SRAM to 1 second, then accessing the same bit from HBM takes around 10 seconds and from DRAM module about 1 to 2 minutes. And from a NAND SSD, tens of hours. The energy consumption per bit transfer also multiplies substantially as data moves further away from the processor, from on-chip SRAM to high-bandwidth memory to DRAM modules and NAND SSD.
Returning to the overall system architecture, a key challenge today is what we call the memory wall. It describes the performance gap between increasingly fast processors and memory, which struggles to keep the processors busy. In AI inferencing, memory access and data movement can account for a vast majority of the overall system activity and energy use.
Next, I'll relate what we've discussed about memory to AI and what's called KV cache. In AI workloads, items to be processed such as language are divided into small segments called tokens that can be manipulated by AI models. Key value pairs are mathematical representations of tokens that are stored as the model works to understand context.
In Agentic AI, context windows grow longer and sessions persist across increasing numbers of steps, causing KV cache data to expand. DRAM is extremely fungible and preferred for performance-critical KV cache data that is frequently updated.
NAND provides a cost-effective repository for overflow KV cache data that seldom changes. Bringing together everything we've discussed, a key insight is that the closer we put memory of all kinds to the processor, the faster the system and lower the power. And this explains the opportunity to scale the entire system using advanced packaging techniques we'll describe today.
I hope my presentation helps you understand why we believe leading edge, foundry-logic, DRAM and advanced packaging will be an attractive area of the WFE market for as long as AI continues to proliferate and grow. It should also help you understand why we now expect DRAM WFE market to be over twice the size of NAND market for the foreseeable future.
And now I'd like to turn the meeting over to Sony Varghese, who will discuss the DRAM road map. Sony?
Thank you, Kevin. I've spent over 20 years in the DRAM industry, working at one of our customers for over a decade. There has never been a more exciting time for DRAM, both in the value DRAM brings to AI and in the innovations that's happening from the memory cells to the periphery transistors and wiring, and to the advanced packaging. I'll discuss 5 DRAM inflections that combine to improve DRAM density, performance and power consumption.
Let's start by defining the key DRAM structures. As Kevin mentioned, every DRAM cell needs a transistor and a capacitor. To hold a one in storage, the capacitor's charge needs to be refreshed around 15 times every second. You've heard about 6F2, which was preceded by 8F2 and will be followed by 4F2. F2 refers to the square of the smallest wire width in the DRAM cell, and the coefficient refers to the multiple of that area needed to construct a complete memory cell.
Within the memory cell, the capacitor acts like a tiny storage container and the transistor acts as a switch. The switch turns on to read or write data, and off to hold it in a place. Cells are organized in rows called word lines and columns called bit lines. When a word line is activated, all the cells in that row are turned on. Bit lines connect the cells to the surrounding control circuitry, which manages all key operations, reading, writing and refreshing the data so it's not lost. It also measures the electrical charges to determine whether each cell holds a 0 or 1.
As the memory cells shrink, they store less charge, making it harder to reliably distinguish zeros from ones. In NAND, sensing reliability challenges drove the industry from 2D shrinking to 3D stacking of large, more reliable storage elements. In DRAM, we still have opportunities to drive 2D scaling even further before we need 3D stacking. We see several more inflections in 6F2 DRAM in the coming years.
The first DRAM inflection is the greater use of EUV to increase DRAM density and capacity by scaling DRAM capacitor arrays, word lines, bit lines and shallow trench isolation. The EUV inflection is positive for Applied because our Sym3 Y Magnum system is the most widely adopted etch technology for EUV patterning in DRAM. The system acts on EUV photoresist, cyclically etching and redepositing the material in the same chamber to straighten lines that are uneven due to EUV stochastic errors. By making EUV line patterns smoother before they are etched into the wafer, we help increase yields and decrease line resistance to improve chip performance and power.
The second DRAM inflection is that the transistor and wiring technologies pioneered in leading-edge foundry-logic are now being used in DRAM. I'll share 3 examples. First, our customers are adding a new epitaxy step. Applied today introduced a Centura Prime Epitaxy system that has been specially designed for DRAM fabs. We selectively grow boron-doped, embedded silicon germanium in the source drain regions of DRAM periphery transistors. The resulting channel strain improves DRAM performance and power consumption.
A unique feature of the new system is a 20% smaller footprint, which helps DRAM makers generate more output per square meter of clean room. Second, as continued DRAM scaling with EUV packs more DRAM bits and periphery transistors on each chip, designers are adding more copper interconnect layers. Just as in foundry-logic, these additional layers increase the market for Applied's leadership products in wiring, including PVD and CMP. Third, DRAM makers are preparing to transition from high-k metal gate periphery logic transistors to FinFETs.
Just as in foundry-logic, FinFET transistors offer better control of the silicon channel, which increases performance and reduces power consumption. FinFETs also increase DRAM scaling in 2 ways. First, FinFET transistors are more space efficient than high-k metal gate transistors. Second, FinFETs have lower transistor to transistor variability. I described how the periphery logic senses the capacitor charges that represent zeros and ones and how the sensing margins are becoming narrower with scaling.
FinFETs allow us to continue to scale density and maintain reliability. The third DRAM inflection is the CMOS-bonded array. DRAM makers can build memory arrays on one wafer, periphery logic on the second wafer and bond them together. The approach lends itself to 6F2, 4F2 and 3D DRAM as well.
There are several benefits to decoupling logic from memory. One is density, placing memory and logic on different wafers allows each to be scaled more aggressively. A second benefit is transistor performance. The high temperatures needed for DRAM capacitor fabrication deteriorate FinFET transistor performance, which is maximized as the array steps move to a different wafer. A third benefit is interconnect performance.
In wafer-to-wafer bonding, the connections between memory cells and peripheral logic are shorter and more vertical. Designers can eliminate many of the long, horizontal connections that reduce speeds and increase capacitance, power and heat.
From a business perspective, the wafer bonding also adds new wiring steps that Applied can serve. The fourth DRAM inflection is a space-efficient 4F2 architecture in which vertical transistors are deployed in the memory cells to further scale both the transistors and the capacitors. I'll describe significant 4F2 materials engineering challenges and the products Applied is delivering to solve them.
The first is etching the vertical cell transistor's narrow, high aspect ratio silicon channels. The shapes need to be exactly as intended and the billions of channels across the chip on the wafer need to be uniform. Applied's Sym3 Z conductor etch system has been optimized for this application. A second challenge is managing the materials interface between the channel and gate oxide to reduce electron leakage, improve data retention, support capacitor refresh operations and minimize standby power.
Applied delivers 3 helpful steps. First, Applied's Centura DPX solution uses plasma to densify the gate oxide to improve its quality. Next, our Centura RPO2 Radiance system engineers the gate oxide interface to reduce the defects that trap electrons and holes. Finally, Centura DPX builds a thin nitride film barrier that promotes the adhesion of the subsequent transistor metal gate layers and prevents metal impurities from diffusing into the gate oxide. A third challenge is creating the transistor's multilayer metal gate stack.
The Trillium ALD system launched during our Logic Master Class in April is also being used in vertical cell DRAM to enable uniform metal gate stack deposition. A fourth challenge is reducing the area occupied by the metal gate stack to maintain the tight 4F2 design parameters. Etching is used to resist or bury the metal gate within a preformed trench in the silicon substrate. Applied's selective etch technology tightly controls the recess shapes, depth and uniformity. A fifth and particularly important challenge is forming the bit line junction to the cell transistor. A region of the silicon channel is doped with phosphorus ions, creating an electrical connection between the 2. This step is the first to require low-temperature selective epitaxy in DRAM.
In 6F2 DRAM, the cell transistors are U-shaped. The word line is placed within the U, and the bit line connections are made at the top of the structure where both ends of the transistor channel are accessible. But the 4F2 transistors are I-shaped, making it difficult to dope the lower end of the silicon channel. The junctions are deep and narrow and reliability depends on keeping the dopants contained to the target regions of the transistor and applied uniformly across all the transistors on the wafer.
In 4F2 DRAM, traditional high-temperature anneal processes are not viable because they damage the delicate capacitor structures. To solve this, Applied has developed a low-temperature selective epitaxy that grows doped crystalline silicon only on the targeted region of the transistor channel.
From a road map perspective, we see multiple nodes of 6F2 innovation before the arrival of 4F2 and 3D DRAM. However, R&D path finding in 3D DRAM is happening today. The work includes identifying the ideal materials and structures and learning how to deposit, modify and remove them to create reliable high-performance DRAMs that are scalable to much greater heights over time.
A key insight from the earlier portion of today's class is that 3D DRAM will be very different from 3D NAND, demanding a unique set of materials and materials engineering capabilities that are already leadership areas for Applied today. Earlier, we noted that DRAM is a random access, read-write memory that is heavily used in computing to deliver high-performance, low power and high endurance. In contrast, NAND is better suited to reading and writing blocks of data that rarely changes.
3D NAND is built by depositing alternating layers of insulating dielectric material and the memory holes are formed using dielectric etch. In contrast, 3D DRAM stacks will rely heavily on conductor and metal stack deposition and lateral conductor etching. Applied's leadership in epitaxy, conductor etch, eBeam metrology and inspection and other technologies give us a head start in collaborating with customers to develop 3D DRAM prototypes. In fact, 3D DRAM is one of the technology inflections targeted for customer co-innovation at the EPIC Center in Silicon Valley. Because we are doing pathfinding work today, we already have line of sight to many of the key process steps and high-value problems we can address with our products.
I'll discuss some of the major 3D DRAM materials engineering challenges and the solutions that Applied is providing. 3D DRAM requires building an ultra-tall stack of more than 100 alternating layers of silicon, silicon germanium. The superlattice is formed using advanced epitaxy. Maintaining tier-to-tier uniformity across hundreds of horizontal layers is essential, since variations impact electrical performance.
A major materials engineering challenge is managing interfacial stress within the silicon germanium lattice, which has a higher lattice constant than silicon. Without control, lattice mismatches can generate defects that increase DRAM cell transistor leakage and variability.
Applied is using its epitaxy leadership to tune surface chemistries and process conditions that help customers achieve high film quality and uniformity. Another challenge is structural integrity and uniformity of tall and complex 3D DRAM material stacks. The technology we use to treat silicon nanosheets in gate-all-around transistors can help strengthen the silicon channels in 3D DRAM as well. The 3D DRAM layers will be highly sensitive to impurities and particles.
Applied's integrated material systems can be used to maintain an ultra-high vacuum clean deposition environment. Once the 3D DRAM stack is formed, it must be etched at an ultra-high aspect ratio of more than 200:1. The etch pattern is defined from above. A CVD hard mask is deposited on top of the stack, patterned and opened with a hard mask etch step to create a stencil for a second etch step that will transfer the pattern through the stack below.
Next, Applied's Sym3 conductor etch system is well suited to etching the tall materials stack, providing excellent uniformity and depth control through hardware innovations like high-voltage bias pulsing and ion directionality. After the deep etch, a high-quality dielectric gap fill is needed to provide electrical isolation and structural integrity. ALD oxide is a good candidate for void-free gap fill.
Next, precise lateral recess etching is required to selectively remove sacrificial silicon germanium layers and define where subsequent structures like the metal word line will be formed. Even nanometer scale variations in lateral recess etch can degrade transistor performance and cause leakage.
A highly selective recess etch is needed to remove all the silicon germanium while leaving the adjacent materials and structures undisturbed, and Applied has industry-leading selective etch technology. The recess step sets the geometry of the word line that will be deposited within the tall 3D DRAM stack. A metal such as moly will be used for the word line. And as stacks grow to 200 layers or more, managing word line sheet resistance will be critical for performance, power consumption and switching uniformity across layers. One way to reduce resistance is by growing large, well-formed grains of moly that reduce electron scattering.
Applied's Viva High Power solution uses a radical and thermal treatment to precisely control grain growth. Next, selective epitaxy is used to form the lateral transistor junctions and storage node contacts. This epitaxy step is especially challenging because it is non-line of sight and must be uniform across hundreds of layers. Applied's Centura Prime Epi system is tuned for highly selective deposition and leaves no unwanted metal that could create shorts in buried structures that cannot be accessed or repaired.
Finally, selective ALD deposition of a metal such as molybdenum silicide forms low resistance contacts across all the layers. Lateral selective deposition is challenging and plasma energy cannot be used because ions travel directionally. So thermal processes must be used instead. And the selective ALD moly technology we developed for foundry-logic market can be used in this 3D DRAM application. I'll conclude my section with an overview of high-bandwidth memory.
HBM DRAMs are like standard DRAMs in most areas of wafer processing technology. The most significant design difference is the TSV channel holes that are large and consuming as much die area as 2,000 memory bits. As a result, HBM dies can be twice the size of standard DRAM dies, and the industry needs to produce 3 or 4 HBM DRAM wafers to deliver the same number of bits. Comparing HBM4 to HBM3, major differences include a much wider 2048-bit interface, a doubling in channel count and a tighter TSV pitch.
At the base of every HBM stack sits a logic die that helps transfer data between the HBM chips and the processor memory controller. In earlier HBM generations, the base die performed relatively simple control functions and was built on non-leading-edge logic. In HBM4, the base die has more transistors to deliver higher data bandwidth, improve signal integrity and enable power management. The HBM4 base die is moving to more advanced logic nodes with FinFET transistors and advanced wiring, which are better suited to running these more complex functions at a lower power. As a result, the growth in HBM demand increases Applied's foundry-logic business as well.
My colleague, Jinho will explain how TSV DRAM wafers are later processed to create and connect the through-silicon vias. Thank you for listening. And now Jinho, it's over to you.
Thanks, Sony. I worked at the world's largest memory company on technologies, including HBM before joining Applied 5 years ago to develop new advanced packaging platforms. At that time, we held our first advanced packaging master class and proposed that the future of chiplets that Gordon Moore predicted back in '65 was going to be a key driver of the industry's progress in the AI era. Today, no one doubts that packaging has become as strategic to the computing industry as on-chip scaling of transistors and wiring.
Let's take a moment to revisit how chip design was done when Moore's Law was working well, in the system-on-a-chip era. On the left is a server chip with a variety of functional blocks. With each new node, designers added more performance-enhancing transistors and on-chip SRAM memory. They also integrated more system functions that were previously handled off-chip on application-specific ICs.
Looking at the chip in cross-section, the tiny transistors were connected to successive layers of wiring as we saw in our previous Master Class. The more the transistors, the more layers of wiring. And the farther from the transistors, the thicker the wires and fewer the connections.
Looking at a modern AI super chip, you can see that as the pace of Moore's Law slowed, designers adopted a system-in-a-package strategy. Each processor approaches the reticle limit or the roughly 860 square millimeter size that an EUV litho scanner can print. And to keep up with growing AI performance and data needs, there are now multiple processors in the design. Some system functions have moved from on-chip to off-chip.
Looking at the system in a package in cross-section, we see many layers of wiring like in the system on a chip, but significantly more complex. I'll next aim to make all of these easy to recognize and understand.
To define the elements, let's begin with a look back at packaging and system integration during the system-on-a-chip era. This is a server chip and printed circuit board from 2016. Looking at a cross-section, we see that the CPU die sat on a chip substrate and the chip substrate was connected to an epoxy printed circuit board. This motherboard had wiring traces that connected the processor to DRAM modules, which each had a number of similarly mounted DRAM chips.
Even in today's most advanced packages, we still combine these 3 ingredients: dies, substrates and motherboards. But we had a fourth element, the interposer, which sits between the dies and the package substrate. The interposer is where much of today's advanced packaging innovation is focused. To understand the need for the interposer, recall that in on-chip wiring, the closer to the transistors, the thinner the wires and the more the connections.
In the system-in-a-package design, there are now far too many transistors and connections for any normal chip substrate to handle. The interposer has multiple layers of wiring called redistribution layers or RDLs. It acts like a miniature circuit board within the advanced package, enabling thousands of short, high-density connections between the multiple dies above and the substrate below. Compared to die-to-substrate packaging, interposers dramatically reduce interconnect length, which reduces resistance and power consumption while increasing bandwidth and performance. In short, the interposer marks the transition from packaging as a protector and connector to packaging as a critical enabler of energy-efficient performance.
The first interposers were made of silicon because the industry had decades of experience building layers of fine wiring on silicon wafers. Another approach is building layers of wiring into epoxy as an interposer material and embedding silicon bridges into the epoxy right beneath the dies. The bridge connects the dies to one another and the substrate below. The key benefit is cost as the epoxy substrates and silicon bridges cost less than silicon wafers.
This is a good time to define a few packaging terms. 2D refers to connecting package chips side by side on a circuit board, as in the older server example. 2.5D packaging is using interposers to connect multiple dies to one another on an intermediate substrate as we just discussed. 3D packaging is stacking dies on top of dies using through silicon vias and microbumps or hybrid bonds, which I'll soon describe. High-bandwidth memory is a great example of 3D stacking and 3.5D packaging is connecting 3D chip stacks on interposers or substrates.
Next, let's talk about packaging interconnects beginning with traditional 2D packaging. I/O and power circuits are often placed along the edges of chip designs. In simple chips, wires are bonded to these pads and the circuit board, so power can be brought to the chip and data can be routed between the chip and the rest of the system.
One of the original interconnect technologies is wire bonding, which has around 10 connections per square millimeter. In the '90s, as transistor counts increased, the industry brought RDLs to chip designs, thereby rearranging the chip's I/O connections as a rectangular grid pattern that covers the entire bottom of the chip surface with evenly spaced connection points. This change supports the use of flip chip packaging, which offers hundreds of I/O connections to the chip's substrate. Round solder bumps connect the substrate to the motherboard, and there are well under 100 bumps per square millimeter.
2.5D and 3D packaging use microbumps with I/O densities below 1,000 per square millimeter. 3D packaging typically relies on through silicon vias or TSVs, the outlines of which are defined during wafer fab production. After wafer processing and TSV fabrication, small copper pillars and microbumps can be used to connect the chips using a technique called thermal compression bonding or TCB with I/O density approaching 10,000 per square millimeter.
Hybrid bonding is the ultimate interconnect technology. It completely eliminates bumps and pillars. Instead, we align the on-chip copper wiring of 2 chips and use heat to fuse the copper of both chips. I/O densities now approaching 1 million per square millimeter are possible. An important observation is that the smaller the packaging interconnect, the lower the energy needed to transfer data, which is measured in picojoules per bit transfer.
In advanced packaging, bringing chips closer together and decreasing the interconnect pitch increases performance and reduces power consumption. Finally, co-packaged optics puts tiny fiber optic interconnections right next to the chip, so data moves as light instead of electricity, further increasing I/O bandwidth and energy efficiency.
I'll talk more about this later. Next, I'll take a moment to describe substrates, which holds a single chip or an interposer full of chips. A key function of the substrate is to support chips, remaining flat and rigid even as temperatures fluctuate. The substrate includes large RDLs that route power and signals from chips above to the circuit board below.
The RDLs are built one layer at a time, beginning with the first layer that is built on a sacrificial substrate that is later removed. Smaller bumps are added to the top of the substrates to connect the chips and the interposers, and larger bumps are connected to the back of the substrate to connect to the circuit board. There can be large differences in how the silicon chips, substrate materials and substrate wiring react physically to changes in heat.
Soft organic substrates are often infused with glass that adds structural integrity. The larger the substrate, the higher the risk of warpage, which is a key source of alignment and connection errors that can impact performance, yield and reliability. Lior will discuss the growing need for packaging process control.
Now I'll discuss a major emerging trend called panel, which will give the industry a larger interposer form factor that enables bigger AI superchips and higher manufacturing output. AI accelerator designers commonly describe the size of their products using reticle-equivalent area, which I defined earlier, and they hope to deliver 14x reticle size products within a few years. But silicon interposers are limited to the size of a 300-millimeter wafer minus the edge loss that comes from packing rectangular interposers on a round host. Only around 4 to 5 interposers of this 14x size can be made from a silicon wafer.
Fortunately, the packaging industry has long used much larger form factors for chip substrates. And today, we aim to enable panel interposers as large as 310x310 millimeters, 510x515 millimeters or even 600x600 millimeters. The bigger the panel, the more interposers that can be built at a time, increasing output and reducing cost.
Panels can be made of epoxy, advanced laminates or glass. Glass is an interesting material because silicon chips and certain types of glass expand at similar rates in the presence of heat. In addition, glass is exceptionally flat and rigid. It also has electrical insulation properties, which enables high signal integrity at high RDL wiring speeds.
Kevin described how Applied's pioneering work in TSV technology helped Applied become the #1 high-bandwidth memory equipment provider. Today, we are working years ahead of the panel inflection to build a comprehensive portfolio and help our customers and the AI ecosystem accelerate the panel inflection. Our portfolio includes digital lithography used to pattern RDL circuitry that exceeds reticle dimensions.
Our unique litho technology dynamically compensates for the topographical variations in large multilayer substrates. Around 5 years ago, we acquired panel PVD technology, and we've since expanded the platform to include CVD and etch. Our long heritage in the display industry helped us refine our large area CVD capability for panel, and we've ported our display eBeam review technology to panel as well.
Just recently, we acquired large area copper electroplating with the acquisition of NEXX. Applied's broad panel portfolio enables us to pioneer co-optimized solutions for panel manufacturing challenges. One example is through glass vias, which are challenging because copper and glass expand and contract at different rates, which can cause panel cracking and failure. Applied addresses this by tightly co-optimizing through glass via etch, CVD liner deposition, PVD seed layer deposition, plating, anneal and CMP steps. No other equipment company can do this.
Next, I'll explain how HBM memories are packaged. Earlier, I described that the spaces for the TSVs are patterned when the wafer is processed. Around 19 materials engineering steps are used to complete the TSVs and add metal pillars and microbumps that allow the HBM chips to be connected to one another in a thermo-compression bonding machine. Applied offers products for 15 of the steps, which occur on both sides of the wafer. Focusing on the front side, the first step is etch, which opens the spaces used for the vias.
Next, an Applied CVD system deposits a highly conformal dielectric barrier film that will electrically isolate the copper TSV from the silicon. Then an Applied CVD system deposits a tantalum nitride barrier that promotes better adhesion of the subsequent liner to the CVD dielectric, a tantalum liner that prevents copper from diffusing into silicon and a copper seed layer that enables good copper fill.
Next, an electroplating step deposits copper into the vias. Finally, an Applied CMP system removes excess copper and creates a perfectly flat surface for the next process steps. Once the TSVs are completed, microbump pillars are formed on the top of the wafer, which is then bonded to a temporary carrier and flipped upside down. The backside of the wafer is ground to remove bulk silicon and CMP is used to thin the wafer to just above the backside of the TSV. A highly selective recess etch exposes the TSVs without damaging adjacent structures.
Next, an Applied CVD system deposits a passivation film that electrically isolates the exposed TSVs and protects the bottom side of the chip from copper migration. We use a special low-temperature CVD film because high temperatures would damage the delicate TSV and DRAM features. Our CMP system is again used to make all the structures level and ensure a flat surface for the backside metal pad formation steps.
Applied's leadership in the most critical of these TSV formation and interconnect steps has given us the #1 market position in HBM packaging. Applied today introduced a new product that helps our customers work with thinner HBM DRAMs to squeeze more of them into a given stack height. HBM dies are thinned to around 1/25th of the height of a standard DRAM wafer, which makes them susceptible to bowing. The higher the stack, the higher the risk of alignment errors, bonding failures and yield issues.
Our new Avila 2 CVD system uses a multistep sequence to increase the rigidity and reliability of HBM dies. It first deposits a thin silicon nitride layer that electrically isolates exposed TSVs on the backside of the wafer. The step balances front side film stress to help prevent bowing.
Next, the system deposits a thicker oxide film that further stabilizes the chip, creating a robust, uniform surface for the subsequent CMP polishing step. Avila 2 enables reliable stacking of 12, 16 or even more thin HBM dies.
Next, I'll discuss 3D chip stacking with hybrid bonding. Hybrid refers to the fact that both the copper wires and the dielectrics surrounding the wires of 2 chips are connected in the same operation. The first process step is CVD dielectric film deposition, which electrically isolates the copper wires of the 2 chips. Next, etch defines spaces for copper bond pads, which are aligned with each chip's copper wiring.
Next, we use an integrated system that uses PVD to deposit a thin barrier liner that prevents copper from diffusing into the dielectric material and promotes good adhesion to the CVD film. Next, PVD deposits a thin copper seed layer that promotes high-quality copper film. An electroplating step fills the lined bond pad trenches with copper.
Next comes one of the most important steps in hybrid bonding. CMP removes excess copper and makes the copper wires and surrounding dielectrics perfectly flat and uniform. Applied's Opta CMP system dishes the copper wires, creating nanoscale divots in the wiring, so it is recessed when the 2 chips are later bonded together.
Next, a plasma preparation step activates the dielectric films for chemical adhesion and also cleans the 2 surfaces. Next, the chips are perfectly aligned and pressed together in a hybrid bonding machine. An anneal step strengthens the dielectric film bonds and expands the copper wiring so it fuses together.
Applied has introduced Kinex, the industry's first integrated die-to-wafer hybrid bonding system. Kinex integrates plasma surface activation and cleaning, bonding and metrology in one controlled flow. Integrated hybrid bonding reduces the queue time between the critical activation and bonding steps, which preserves bonding integrity and improves bond strength and yield. The enclosed system minimizes particle contamination, which is critical because hybrid bonding uses known good dies and needs to be nearly 100% defect-free.
Our integrated metrology makes sure the chips are perfectly aligned. Kinex is designed to help expand die-to-wafer hybrid bonding from a high-end niche application to the mainstream. I mentioned how hybrid bonding consists of several CMP steps. Compared to wafer processing CMP, advanced packaging applications introduce new challenges, including thicker films, longer polish times and tighter tolerances. Longer polishing times can cause variations from the perfectly level and smooth surfaces chip makers need in applications like hybrid bonding, where even tiny variations in wafer center-to-edge planarization can cause expensive yield losses.
Opta Quad has a unique, real-time process control system that actively monitors and dynamically adjusts the planarization process on these long-duration, multistep advanced packaging CMP flows. Today, Applied introduced Nokota VMax 2, which is a next-generation electrochemical deposition system purpose-built for advanced packaging applications like HBM.
Plating is a foundational step across interconnect schemes, from TSVs within dies to microbumps that connect stacked dies. As TSV dimensions shrink, it becomes increasingly difficult to deliver chemistry deep into the narrow futures while maintaining high-quality fill. Nokota VMax 2 is optimized for void-free, defect-free metal fill even below 3 microns.
HBM stacking also raises the bar for plating tools, requiring tighter bump coplanarity and higher throughput. A key challenge is pattern density variation across the wafer, which distorts current distribution and leads to nonuniform metal deposition. Nokota VMax 2 addresses this with Adaptive Pattern Tuning, dynamically shaping the electric field to correct for layout-driven variation and improve uniformity and coplanarity. This control extends to both sides of each HBM layer, which is critical in multipass plating flows.
My final topic today is co-packaged optics or CPO. Optical fibers have long been used to transmit digital data at high speeds over longer distances, such as between racks and even between data centers. In co-packaged optics, electrical signals are converted to light waves that are transmitted through optical fibers. Co-packaged optics is enabled by advanced packaging technologies, including hybrid bonding that brings electronic and photonic chips close together so they can operate as a single, tightly integrated system.
Optical modulators convert electron signals to light signals. Light generating devices such as lasers are integrated close to or even on silicon chips. Photonic waveguides can guide light across the chips, and they are fabricated by depositing a silicon or silicon nitride layer that is etched to form narrow features that light can travel along. Fiber couplers transfer light between photonic chips to external optical fibers.
To help develop the optical I/O ecosystem, Applied Ventures is partnering with optics and photonic start-ups along with manufacturers, including GlobalFoundries. We also have R&D programs in the materials, process technologies and equipment needed to produce and integrate optical components. Our equipment opportunities include epitaxy, CVD, PVD, etch, CMP and process control.
Now I'll summarize by revisiting what I said at the beginning that the future of chiplets that Gordon Moore predicted will be a key driver of AI today. If we had stayed with system on a chip and Moore's Law scaling, then today's server chips would have around 200 billion transistors. Thanks to advanced packaging, today's AI server chips have over 1.6 trillion transistors and pack 4x the silicon content in every socket. By going beyond Moore's Law, we're enabling new applications like training, inferencing and agentic AI that depend on advanced packaging for performance, power and cost.
Now I'll hand the meeting over to Lior Engel to discuss packaging process control. Lior?
Thank you, Jinho. The packaging market has long been served by low-cost optical and physical process control tools, but particles that were acceptable when large interconnects and bumps were used are turning into yield killers in hybrid bonding applications. Structures that could be easily measured by using optical tools are becoming so small that eBeam resolution is needed and delicate wiring can be damaged by wafer probers. So as packaging advanced from 2D to 2.5D and 3D integration of known-good dies, packaging fabs increasingly need the same advanced process control technologies found in wafer fabs.
I will briefly describe 4 key benefits of eBeam in advanced packaging. One, eBeam columns produce a finer beam than optical tools. While optical systems struggle to image tiny defects and submicron features, eBeam can image single-digit nanometer features and measure them with sub-nanometer precision. Second, eBeam can be tilted to profile sidewall and measure high aspect ratio structures. Third, eBeam enables materials identification, which is critical to deciding the corrective actions to take when yield issues arise. And fourth, eBeam can test the electrical functionality of delicate circuitry without making physical contact. These attributes make eBeam valuable in advanced packaging where proper manufacturing of features like TSV, microbumps and hybrid bonding pads is critical to chip performance, power and yield.
Applied has been in the eBeam business since the 1980s. And today, we have the #1 market position. We are now transferring our eBeam expertise to the advanced packaging market with new products that will help our customers solve critical challenges. Jinho's presentation has given us insight into how eBeam technology can help. For example, in stacking SRAM cache memory chips on top of processors, also in stacking HBM chips, transitioning from 12-high design to 16 and beyond, and in TSV critical dimension metrology to ensure full HBM stack connectivity.
Another challenge in advanced packaging is handling the wide range of substrate Jinho described. This includes new materials like glass as well as geometric consideration, including thickness and warpage. Today, we are introducing 2 new eBeam products for our advanced packaging customers. Both were developed to bring the full benefit of eBeam technology to a wide variety of substrates, geometries and materials from silicon to organic and glass.
Applied VeritySEM eBeam system is used in wafer fabs to measure critical dimensions such as height, width and slope of gate-all-around transistor structures. Our new VeritySEM 7AP is designed for advanced packaging applications, including measuring hybrid bonding pads, TSV dimensions and microbump geometries. The system automatically configure itself to work with different substrates, materials and geometries. It works in line, delivering precise 2D, 3D and high aspect ratio measurements, including a unique tilted view of height and sidewall angle measurements.
Next, Applied SEMVision is the #1 eBeam defect review system in wafer fabs with over 70% share of the global market. Our new SEMVision G7AP is designed for advanced packaging fabs, automatically handle the full variety of substrates. Customers use optical tools to quickly scan for potential yield-killing defects, which are often too small for the optical technology to identify clearly. Our new SEMVision G7AP uses the superior resolution of eBeam to clearly identify and automatically classify those defects, enabling customers to rapidly address the root cause of advanced packaging yield issues.
VeritySEM 7AP and SEMVision G7AP are already in production at multiple leading advanced packaging customers in both memory and logic. Applied has additional advanced packaging process control systems in development, including optical and X-ray products that we will discuss in the months ahead.
And now I will turn the meeting back over to Kevin Moraes. Kevin?
Thank you, Lior. In a few minutes, we'll begin the Q&A. But first, I'd like to share a few examples of how our inflection-focused innovation strategy is driving growth for Applied in both DRAM and advanced packaging. Back in our 2021 Memory Master Class, we projected that co-optimizing our Draco CVD patterning films, Sym3 etch and PROVision eBeam technology could give us $1 billion of cumulative revenue opportunity between 2020 and 2024. In fact, we delivered more than $1 billion in sales from these products over that time. And today, we believe we can generate more than 4x that over the next 5 years.
We also projected that improving DRAM periphery transistors and wiring with foundry-logic technologies could give us $2 billion of cumulative opportunity from 2020 through 2024. We delivered more than $2 billion from these applications over that period, and we believe we can generate more than 3x that over the next 5 years.
Turning to advanced packaging. We projected in 2021 that our business would more than double between 2020 and 2024 to over $1 billion. In fact, it more than tripled. And this year, we expect our advanced packaging revenue to increase by more than 50% to more than $2 billion. We continue to use our inflection-focused innovation strategy to predict road map inflections and deliver new products that enable our customers to accelerate their road maps.
We hope to see many of you at the unveiling of the new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley in October. At EPIC, we will take inflection-focused innovations to a new level by co-innovating with our customers in the industry's largest collaborative research facility. Many of our leading customers and partners have already announced plans to join us at EPIC, and there will be more announcements in the months ahead. In addition, we are completing the construction of a new EPIC advanced packaging center in Singapore. Now it's time for me to join the rest of our team for our Q&A session.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Special Call - Applied Materials, Inc.
Applied Materials — Special Call - Applied Materials, Inc.
Applied legt technische Roadmaps und zahlreiche Produktneueinführungen für DRAM und Advanced Packaging vor; AI-getriebene WFE-Nachfrage als Treiber.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
AI schafft anhaltend hohe Nachfrage nach Wafer Fab Equipment (WFE). Applied positioniert sich als Technologie- und Marktführer in führender Foundry-Logic, DRAM und High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) Packaging. Die Strategie: "inflection-focused innovation" — frühzeitig Schlüsselinflektionen adressieren, mit Produkten und Co‑Innovation (EPIC-Zentren) Kundenteams unterstützen und so Umsatzwachstum bei Advanced Packaging und DRAM erzielen.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- Marktposition: #1-Claims in Leading‑Edge Foundry‑Logic, bei DRAM‑Prozessanlagen und im HBM‑Packaging, plus deutliche Sharegewinne seit 2013.
- Produkte & Plattformen: Neue/erweiterte Tools: Centura Prime Epitaxy, Sym3 Z, Trillium ALD, Avila 2 CVD, Kinex (integrierte Hybrid‑Bonding), VeritySEM 7AP und SEMVision G7AP (eBeam für Packaging), Nokota VMax 2 (Plating) sowie Opta CMP/Opta Quad für Packaging‑CMP.
- Skalierung & Ökosystem: Panel‑Strategie (große Interposerformate), NEXX‑Akquisition für großflächiges Kupfer‑Plating, EPIC‑Co‑Innovationseinrichtungen in Silicon Valley und Singapur zur Beschleunigung der Kundenadoption.
🆕 Neue Informationen
Konkrete kommerzielle Aussagen: Advanced Packaging Revenue wird dieses Jahr >$2 Mrd. erwartet (+>50% YoY). Applied sieht DRAM‑WFE dauerhaft deutlich über dem NAND‑Volumen (DRAM >2× NAND). Mehrere neue Tools sind bereits in Produktion bei führenden Kunden; Kinex soll Die‑to‑Wafer Hybrid‑Bonding skalieren. Es gab keine umfassende neue Gesamtfinanz‑Guidance außerhalb dieser Produkt‑/Segment‑Hinweise.
⚡ Bottom Line
Kurzfristig liefert das Master Class viele technische und produktseitige Fortschritte, die Applied für AI‑getriebene WFE‑Wachstumssegmente besser positionieren. Wichtig ist die Frage der Kundenausroll‑ und Investitionszyklen: Viele Lösungen sind marktreif, aber Umsatzeffekte folgen der Fertigungstaktung der Kunden. Für Aktionäre bedeutet das erhöhtes mittelfristiges Upside‑Potenzial, bei weiter bestehenden Zyklus‑ und Auslieferungsrisiken.
Applied Materials — Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference
1. Question Answer
Welcome to the Bank of America Global Technology Conference, Vivek Arya from Bank of America, Semiconductor and Semicap equipment team. I'm really delighted to kick off the semiconductor part of our Global Tech Conference with the team from Applied Materials. I'm really delighted to have Brice Hill, the Chief Financial Officer. Warm welcome, Brice.
Good morning. Thank you for having us, Vivek. Glad to be here.
Yes. Thank you so much for joining us again. And I'll go through my questions, but please feel free to raise your hand if you would like to bring up something on your own. So, Brice, I guess, understatement that very exciting times in semiconductors. Every day you wake up, there's like some more news about demand growing. Maybe just walk us through your state of the union, right, at the start of the year, Applied was looking at a growth rate of 20% in your semi systems business, you upped it to 30%. Where have been kind of the incremental growth drivers in the near term, and then we'll talk about what you're seeing on -- over the horizon?
Sounds good, Vivek. So state of the union, the union is strong. We increased demand, and we increased our forecast, as you highlighted there to over 30% growth for our semiconductor systems business and that was an increase over prior quarter, as you saw new orders coming in from customers. And no surprise, at least relative to the news flow, we were just chatting about incremental investments that are being announced across the ecosystem. I think what's different about what's happening today is people can really connect the dots between the demand function of AI.
Our companies are using AI. We're deploying it in multiple ways. People are using it personally. So when they hear the cloud service providers talk about hundreds of billions of dollars of capacity adds to drive the compute behind AI, nobody is surprised. They can connect the dots to the demand. And that's certainly what we're seeing in our business. We talked about how leading-edge logic is growing very strongly. We talked about how DRAM is growing very strongly, and we talked about how advanced packaging, which is used to build the connected systems of all these components and drive the AI usage models, that's also growing very strongly in our business.
And those things, we received new orders in the last quarter. Customers are being more and more creative about finding clean room space and options to expand their output. That translates into new orders from us, and then translated into a higher growth expectation for this year. I know we'll talk about this, but we're -- the customers are working closely with us to give us a good perspective of what their growth plans are over the coming years.
Then in our services business, we had previously said, our services business would grow in the low double-digit growth range. I think the easy way to think about this is there's 2 drivers of growth in the services business. One is the installed base of equipment, and the other is the new products that we announced and create each year, which grows the value of each tool in your installed base. Because the systems business is shipping more and more tools, the demand we just talked about, the installed base for the services business grows and so we see that happening. We increased our expectation for growth in the services business to mid-teens. And we said actually this year will be a little bit higher than mid-teens because this year gets a plus also from the increasing utilization across the entire ecosystem.
So as the DRAM fabs went from whatever utilization they were at to 100% utilized. And as leading-edge logic goes to 100% utilized and even the ICAPS, the mature nodes, utilizations improve, that helps drive some uplift for the services business. So really a strong signal across all of our businesses as we look at the demand type today.
Got it. If we were to try and dissect this upgrade of the growth rate, does any specific areas stand out, Brice, like whether it was foundry logic or DRAM, NAND or advanced packaging, like did something really start to grow much faster than what you had thought before?
Well, I think in the short term, it's hard to separate leading-edge logic and DRAM. I think both of those are a very strong signal. And we didn't call one higher than the other. I guess as we look at factory projects that have been added over the last quarter, this is more longer-term signal. I think there's more DRAM adds than there are logic adds, but at least the way I think about it, and everybody can start to dissect the architectures of newly announced server systems and system platforms, but these things are traveling together. You've got a significant amount of leading-edge logic between GPUs, CPUs and accelerators paired with different memory types in a system. And so those things are being driven together.
Yes. Got it. And what are the main areas of constraints that you see? So theoretically, what can make this X percent growth rate more than X right now, why can't it be 35% or 40%? Are you limited just by clean rooms? Are you limited by your ability to produce new tools, the ability for the customers? Like, what are the main areas of constraints right now?
Yes. I think the primary -- we said that demand right now is metered by clean room space. And I think that is the right way to think about it. We've been talking about getting an 8-quarter rolling forecast from our customers, which we consolidate and give to our suppliers. And we've talked about, Vivek, how we added capacity, our own manufacturing capacity. So I think with the right signal, we can increase our output, and we're not the limiter from that perspective.
We certainly have manufacturing capacity available. And if we give our supply chain to lead, we think. So what's really the governor here, the governor here is it takes 3 or 4 years to build a fab. And so you need a pipeline of fab projects, which there is a pipeline of fab projects, but if you want that to go even faster, it takes some time to increase that pipeline. And I think that's what all the customers are working on. So in the short term, it's really clean room, making more clean room available and that's what -- in this year, that's what we saw some of the customers doing is even optimizing the clean room they do have available.
Got it. Yes. Actually, I wanted to pick up on that. When you say optimizing the clean room, are they upgrading to tools sooner than they would have otherwise? Like what does optimization mean to Applied?
Yes. I think we saw a number of different example types of literally just optimizing clean room floor space, so you might change layout, upgrading tools that were underperforming, upgrading process technologies from one node to another node. Those are some of the examples we saw as well as even some utilization of 200-millimeter space for 300-millimeter purposes. We see all of these things going on in the ecosystem.
Got you. And then you mentioned there is a 8-quarter kind of rolling visibility, what is your normal visibility? Like how should we put this 8 quarter in context of what Applied has seen historically?
Yes. It's great because first, I want to say that we have -- we always actually have a little bit longer than that. So we know just like people here know, because you see public announcements, we know all the fabs that are being built by our customers, although it's more precise for the largest customers than it is, for example, of some of the smaller customers in China, right? But you have an indication of what is out there 4 years from now, 5 years from now, 3 years from now, that goes into the fab tracker that we talk about and the like.
But when we start talking about 8 quarters, what we get from our customer when you go to 8 quarters is you get the precise process technology, the actual tool recipe that they're going to deploy, which tells us the types of tools, the number of tools and the specs of those tools that will be needed for that particular project as well as when they need to land, and we install those tools also, so we have to have install tools -- teams available to do that work. So it's really connecting the dots at a much more precise level.
And then when we get that from our customers, we consolidate that forecast, turn it into a forecast that we can provide to our suppliers, our 2,000 suppliers. So adding up all of -- if you think about adding up TSMC and Intel and Samsung, all of our large customers, and they all might need power supplies and you're aggregating that and saying, these are how many power supplies we need for the company, specific types and translating that to your supply chain so that they can put the capacity in place to deliver that product. That's really the purpose of getting that type of visibility. And I think it's working very well for us at this point.
Got it. So historically, the semi cap industry, and then CapEx has kind of grown 8% to 10% a year. And now the industry is at a place where you could have multiple years, conceptually, up 20%, right, 25% plus type of growth rate. What are you doing differently from an operational perspective to make sure that you're able to support customers for that kind of growth?
Yes. I think since COVID, Applied Materials, and I'm sure a lot of companies in the ecosystem, has been strengthening its manufacturing from a regional diversity perspective and also the supply chain from the same perspective. So we have more suppliers, we have more regional diversity. We have more regional diversity in our manufacturing and more raw capacity in our manufacturing. Those are definitely some of the things that we've been doing as well as working more closely with the customers than ever before on what their plans are, and what the scenarios are for the business.
So -- but I think, too, that since these are long lead investments when we were evaluating our own capacity additions over the past few years, since the business is profitable, you are sort of looking at what would be the max output required. And you don't want to miss capacity solutions if that max demand signal occurs. So you have to balance that in your planning, which comes to scenarios. Now did anyone forecast what's happening today exactly? No, but from a capacity planning perspective, you want to make those things possible.
Got it. Now specific to the growth rate for this year, how much of that do you think is share gains? How much of that is just kind of broader industry growth? Last year, there was a share shift, right? And just the same kind of moved against Applied. This year, do you think kind of the addressable opportunities moved towards you? So how much of this is share gain versus just broader industry?
Yes. This year, the mix -- I think, there's two things going on. This year, the mix is certainly friendly to Applied, as you said, having leading edges and DRAM and advanced packaging, where we have leading positions as process equipment suppliers, that's going into our wheelhouse, as you might say, but at the same time, even if that mix wasn't there, we expect to grow share in leading-edge logic, and we've talked for several years about how the transition to the gate-all-around transistor and to the newest wiring techniques will add share for Applied Materials since we've got solutions in those spaces.
We have been effective at growing share in DRAM over the last decade, and we expect to continue to grow share in DRAM. Some of the construction techniques used in leading-edge logic are being deployed in DRAM, and that's helping us add share there. And then in advanced packaging, we have a leadership position in advanced packaging, a lot of investment in advanced packaging. As we move from 2.5D, which is sort of lateral connection of chips to 3D when you're stacking chips, Applied has been investing in a lot of different packaging technologies that will be used in that roadmap as well as different substrates that may be used in that roadmap like panel, like glass, different substrates.
We've invested in hybrid bonding. We recently did an acquisition of an x-ray technology that will help us with evaluating the quality of those interconnects. We're in the process of another acquisition that helps us on the advanced packaging with fine-line interconnects between devices. So we're really focused on that portfolio as a huge opportunity for the industry and a big opportunity for Applied.
Got it. One last question on kind of the broader market, and then we'll go to the individual areas. Historically, when we just look at the ratio of wafer fab equipment to semiconductor industry sales, that's kind of varied between, say, 12%, 13% to as high as 17%, 18%, right? So the assumption has been that somewhere in the middle, right, 15% is a decent long-term number. But this year, a lot of semi industry growth is coming from ASPs rather than units. So do you think over the next 2, 3, 4 years that this will mix more towards units rather than ASPs is because units is really what will drive WFE, right? How do you kind of conceptually think about the density?
You're right. It's a great question because at least for me, I don't use that equation to think about it. But to your point, I think it was 14-ish percent last year, if you used last year's numbers. And it is subject to movement because of the different ASP trajectories that we see. But I like thinking about, as you're sort of suggesting actually that what's happening is more units are being required and more important for Applied Materials, more wafer starts are being required. So if you think about, for example, DRAM, there's 2.3, approximately 1 million wafer starts of DRAM every month. And when we look at the roadmap, we expect to see 300,000 or 400,000 wafer starts of added capacity every single year in DRAM.
So I think you sort of led in this direction, Vivek. The way we think about it is the actual wafer start output, the capacity of wafer starts is growing at the strongest rate it ever had -- has for DRAM, for leading-edge logic. And then the good news also is you have to connect those devices, so that will lead to packaging factories and packaging equipment that supports that.
So that indicator may or may not be the easy way of calculating equipment. It might be look at the amount of factories that are being built, look at the amount of wafer start increases that will go out, and that will give you an indication of the equipment business.
Got you. You mentioned DRAM, as many investors are very happy to see, right, the strong performance of DRAM and a lot of memory stocks, but there's also kind of this lingering concern that how much of this is right cyclical and -- so just theoretically, let's say if DRAM prices go down next year, do you think customers will be as motivated to add capacity? Or will they want to protect pricing? What has happened historically?
First, it's hard to picture that, but I'm open to scenario planning, so we can scenario plan. I think that one benefit the equipment side of the business has, is back to our discussion of what is metering the industry and what is currently the gate for the industry. I think it'd be very difficult to argue that we're in a position where we have too much capacity, and we've overbuilt capacity in almost a good way since it is metered, you're sort of behind the demand curve from a capacity perspective.
Certainly, if prices go down in the end devices that will -- all the customers will recalculate their ambitions and their interest in how much capacity to add. But right now, the profitability is so significant that I think there -- I think they're really trying to figure out how can they maximize output over the next 5 years.
Right. And I would assume that as many of them are signing long-term agreements with their customers, right? They're also on the hook to make sure that there is some capacity, right, to support all those?
Absolutely.
Right? Agreements. Staying on the topic of memory, how is your content evolved, right, from the various versions of HBM3, 4, and I saw last night, Samsung is now starting to talk about HBM5 as well. So how is your kind of opportunity and content involved in these different HBM generations?
Yes, I think the way to think about it for Applied Materials is, as you move forward on these HBM technologies. We talk about -- it increases the overall demand for DRAM. And it also -- there's a trade ratio on the HBM DRAM where it was around 3:1. So it takes 3x the wafer die area to make a DRAM device, if it's going to be stacked. And that trade ratio is moving to 4:1 now with the newer generations of HBM.
And so DRAM is already operating at full utilization. We're only adding more requirements on to DRAM. So I think this just ups that demand signal even more strongly than where it was before. And our customers, we expect, will be adding factories. Like we saw in the last quarter, they'll be adding factories and telling us shortly with our 8-quarter forecast that they'll need more equipment for those factories. And so it's just a -- since it's a great solution for the AI data center servers, and the best memory for those, then it's an added demand signal for us.
Got it. So I think Applied has mentioned many times that you gained 10 points of DRAM, WFE share, right, over the last decade or so. What do you think help to drive those share gains? And as you look at the next 3 to 5 years, what can help maintain or expand that market share?
Yes. I think it's -- what we've discussed is some of the same capabilities that we built in leading-edge logic on the transistor side are being deployed in DRAM from an equipment capability perspective. And that's really what's helped the share gain over the years, and I think that roadmap continues.
So we talk about periphery, IO, logic and other elements of the architecture that require those techniques. I think that's what is helping us win positions in the forward DRAM. And we've said that if companies move to 4F squared, that will be a share increase for Applied Materials, as we have a stronger position in the 4F squared than even in 6F squared. And when they go to 3D DRAM, same thing, we expect an uplift in our share position in those because of the long lead work we've been doing with the companies on the architecture and the equipment solutions.
Do you have some sense of timing of when we move to 4F squared or 3D DRAM?
For that, we just say we should -- you should talk to customers. So I think our customers, the roadmaps have been changing. They've been adding more 6F squared process upgrades in the recent. So I think each customer has a different expectation for when they would deploy those.
Got it. Okay. On advanced packaging expected to grow over 50%, right, even faster than the overall. So if you look over the next 2, 3 years, are there certain new emerging areas in advanced packaging, where you think Applied might be better positioned too to participate?
Well, definitely. So on the 3D stacking in general, Applied has technologies that we -- that will be deployed by customers, and then I mentioned a few of them a little bit before in highlighting that we're building a portfolio of solutions for packaging. So one acquisition that we're underway on right now, for example, is for fine-line interconnects. You can think of it, the substrate at the top of the substrate between chips that are being interconnected. The x-ray acquisition that we did is to examine the quality of interconnection of micro bumps between stacked chips and allow you to see things that we couldn't see before, the industry couldn't see before, and we've been working for years on hybrid bonding.
We've been working for years on panel technology. We have lithography technologies that we're deploying in different packaging solutions. So we really feel like we have a strong portfolio, and we're examining the evolution of larger and larger systems with more and more chips, which create all these different materials and equipment problems like warpage, like thermal management, hotspots, just the ability to get the signals on and off the chips and what technologies should be used for that. Applied Materials is investing in a portfolio that we think will be very strong as that roadmap continues to develop. And we think it's a huge growth area for the industry.
Got it. On the foundry-logic side, one very large customer, of course, has been driving most of the industry growth. Are you starting to see any sense of diversification, there's an emerging new player in the industry, right? Have you started to see anything new there? Like how do you look at the diversification over the next few years?
Definitely. We said in our earnings call, I think that we're shipping to 4 customers today on leading edge and that is becoming more and more diverse and robust. And of course, that's a great thing for the industry. I think competition in the foundry business will help drive the roadmap. And from an equipment and a factory perspective, it drives more solutions. So I think that's a good thing. And we do see interest from new customers.
Got you. Okay. On gross margins, Brice, there is always this kind of good problem to have where your customers are making so much more money, right, by way of gross margin. So what levers does Applied have to kind of exert your position in the industry, right, and expand gross margins, right, from -- I mean, you're getting towards 50% now. How much more upside is there?
Yes. Investors might notice that we've started reporting our gross margins by reportable operating segment. So you can see our equipment business has 54.8% gross margins, and that's improved quite a bit over the last couple of years. Vivek, I know we've talked about -- we've been working on our pricing process, building a robust, disciplined process where we set targets for every tool. We set -- we base it on our value analysis of what the tool is providing.
And so we feel like we've done a very good job of making that a more robust process for the company, and that's helped us with our margin uplift. And I would just say that in general, Applied Materials' strategy is to work with customers on the forward technology. So when we think about EPIC and our platform that we're building, the lab that we're building in Sunnyvale, where we've announced 10 customer arrangements at this point where we have some of the top universities and all the top customers partnering with us on that platform to work on -- collaboratively work on the furthest out technologies together. That's been our strategy.
And so what that helps you connect the dots as those portfolios are introduced, our gross margin, we expect will increase over time because that long-lead work that you're doing is on the most difficult technology problems for those customers. And so that's been our strategy, and we're increasing our capability of pursuing that strategy by building the EPIC platform and having the customers join us and working together. And the simple way to think about that is your core, your newest tools and your newest capabilities and your top researchers are all there. And if we can have the customers join us there and bring their architectures and their most difficult problems, then we expect to speed up progress in that way.
Got it. You raised the growth on your Applied Global Services, AGS, business towards mid-teens. Do you think there's a point at which you see the growth rates on the product side and the services side converge? Or this is just a long-term kind of secular grower and right and it's not -- it's countercyclical to some.
Well even when it was low double digits, at that point, it was probably ahead of where the equipment is. So we do think it's secular, if you will. We think the underlying drivers are an ever-increasing installed base and those tools tend to have -- be long-lived. So when you put new tools in place, those can be tools that are serviced between 10 and 30 years literally and so it's long life from that perspective. And then we continue to announce new products in the service space.
Most recently, a lot of these products have been AI-driven, where we're using AI to help make predictive recommendations on maintenance and upgrades to the tools that help the customers with output. And so as we make new service product announcements that grows the value of each tool in the service space. So we do think that is secular and goes back to the sort of the secular growth in the equipment itself.
Got it. One question on China, Brice. It seems as if that exposure for the industry has kind of settled in this 25%, 30% type of zone. Do you think that, that's sort of the run rate from here? Or you think that it will actually come down over time?
Well, when you say it like that, that makes total sense to me because I think China had an ambition to be self-sufficient from an equipment perspective and a semi cap perspective. And the China share of global semi device demand is around 30%. So if it settles in that ZIP code, that makes sense from a long-term perspective to us. Our most recent quarter, I think, was 24% from a semi systems and services business, so not counting display. So 24% and that's about the level we'll operate in the very short term.
And then as the leading-edge grows so quickly, it will probably be a little bit smaller, as we get out a few quarters, but that's the right ZIP code.
Got it. And then on just capital allocation, use of cash. It's interesting over the last decade, we have seen analog companies in semiconductors, right, get very high multiples because of their free cash flow generation and returns. Although I think for semi-cap companies is actually not as well appreciated, right? You have also done a lot of buybacks and had added a lot of cash. But how do you think about capital allocation? Do you think there are opportunities to do M&A accelerate your growth? Or do you think it's still return of cash that will be the primary use of the...
Yes, I definitely would not say return of cash is our primary objective. Our primary objective is to grow the business. When I think of it, Vivek, our business has a greater than 30% return on invested capital, I expect that to be growing and so I think all the finance people here will be thinking, well, if you have that kind of return on investment capital, it probably suggests that you have more projects that you could do at a good return, and that's certainly the way we feel.
We're building more lab space. We expect to be able to add more projects that will be profitable for the company. So the first priority is to invest in the business and grow the business. And then to your point, there will be significant cash flow to distribute to shareholders and no change in strategy there. We do that through our dividends, which we've grown nicely over the last 4 years and our buybacks.
Are there opportunities to do tuck-in sight improve? There's a lot of talk of adding more AI-like capability, right, in kind of different parts of the business? But are you seeing any of those opportunities come up?
Absolutely. I mentioned two acquisitions that we've done just recently. So I think we're active in that way. And those will be -- when we do those, that will be to add to the portfolio and add to our portfolio capabilities. Applied has a very great interconnected portfolio, and that's what we think helps us work out on the edge of the future technology with our customers, and we'll continue to build on that.
Great. On that positive note, thank you so much, Brice. Really appreciate your time.
All right. Thank you. Thanks very much for all those questions.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference
Applied meldet ein deutliches Nachfrage‑Upgrade: Halbleiter‑Systeme >30% Wachstum, Services auf mittlere Teen‑Prozentwerte; kurzfristiger Engpass ist Reinraum/Fab‑Kapazität.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Nachfrage: AI‑getriebener Boom treibt simultan Leading‑Edge‑Logik, DRAM und Advanced Packaging; Folge: Auftragseingang und Wachstumsprognosen deutlich höher.
- Engpass: Kurzfristig wird das Wachstum durch verfügbare Reinraum‑/Fab‑Fläche gemessen, nicht durch Applieds Fertigungskapazität.
🚀 Strategische Highlights
- Wachstumsupgrade: Management hob Semiconductor‑Systems‑Wachstum von ~20% auf über 30% an; Services‑Wachstum nun in den mittleren Teens, dieses Jahr leicht darüber.
- Produkt‑Portfolio: Starke Marktpositionen in Leading‑Edge‑Logik, DRAM und Advanced Packaging; Fokus auf Hybrid‑Bonding, Panel‑Substrate und Fine‑Line‑Interconnects.
- M&A & Labs: X‑Ray‑Akquisition abgeschlossen, weitere Zukauf(s) für Feinstleitungs‑Technik in Arbeit; EPIC‑Lab in Sunnyvale mit ~10 Kundenarrangements.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Konkrete Zahlen: Equipment‑Rohertrag ausgewiesen bei 54,8% (segmentweise Berichterstattung).
- Planungstiefe: 8‑Quartals‑Rolling‑Forecast liefert präzise Tool‑ und Timing‑Angaben an Lieferanten.
- HBM‑Trend: Trade‑Ratio für gestapelte DRAM (HBM) steigt von ~3:1 auf ~4:1, erhöht DRAM‑Flächenbedarf und WFE‑Volumen.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Engpassreinraum: Analysten hoben Limitationen durch Reinraumfläche und lange Fab‑Bauzeiten (3–4 Jahre) hervor; Management bestätigt, dass Kunden Reinraum optimieren und Applied Lieferkapazität hat.
- Share vs. Markt: Nachfrage‑Mix ist Applied‑freundlich; Management erwartet weitere Marktanteilsgewinne in DRAM und Leading‑Edge durch Technologien wie 4F², 3D‑DRAM und hybride Packaging‑Lösungen.
- Geografie & Kapital: China‑Umsatz rund 24% (Systems+Services); Management sieht langfristig ~25–30% als realistisches Niveau. Priorität bleibt Reinvestition (ROI>30%), danach Ausschüttungen und Buybacks; gezielte Tuck‑ins für KI/Service‑Funktionen.
⚡ Bottom Line
Upgrade der Nachfrageprognose und verbesserte Margenaussichten stützen ein positives Risiko‑/Ertragsprofil: Applied ist technisch breit aufgestellt und investiert aktiv in IP, Labore und Zukäufe. Kurzfristig bleibt der Wachstumshebel von externen Fab‑/Reinraumkapazitäten abhängig, langfristig aber klarer Vorteil für Umsatz- und Margenwachstum.
Applied Materials — Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference
1. Question Answer
Thank you for coming, everyone. I'm Stacy Rasgon. Hopefully you know I'm Bernstein's Senior Analyst. I cover the U.S. semiconductor and semiconductor capital equipment space. And it's my honor to welcome our guests here today, Gary Dickerson, the President and CEO of Applied Materials.
Before we get started, I want to remind you if you have questions you'd like to ask during the presentation, you should have a link to our pigeon hole forum, where you can submit those, and we will have time for Q&A at the end.
So look, semi cap has been pretty remarkable. We've got a renaissance in the industry over the last several years, but it's really shifted into overdrive recently as AI has gone mainstream. The demand profiles that we're seeing are calling for -- I mean just simply more, more chips, more wafers, more tools.
In that world, like companies like AMAT, the contributions that they are bringing to that world are more important than ever as materials-driven innovation moves to the forefront of process technology development and enables the industry to satisfy this incredible amount of demand that at least for now, we still have. And to tell us all about what he thinks about it, it gives me great pleasure to welcome Gary and I've been looking forward to this conversational conference. So this should be fun. Gary, thank you so much for coming.
Thank you, Stacy. Really glad to be here. Always fun to hang out with you.
Yes. like -- maybe just to start on that point, I mentioned sort of a renaissance. So it wasn't that long ago that $100 billion in WFE was seen as just like aspiration. And we've blown through it, right? We might be 50% higher than that, like this year and growing potentially like for multiyears, I mean, you guys have talked about significantly increased visibility and a multiyear long-term growth cycle. Maybe just to start there, I mean, clearly, this is all driven by AI.
AI is sort of dragging everything in the space along with it, which certainly helps you guys. And -- what is AI actually done for wafer and equipment demand? Why are we seeing what we're seeing right now in this environment? And then maybe as you go through your -- think through your -- the business and the different segments and how AI is impacting all those, whether it's logic or DRAM or packaging?
Yes. I mean, again, AI is the biggest technology inflection of our lifetimes, really -- and we're using AI inside Applied Materials.
I want to ask you about that a little later, but...
Innovation, product development, operations, supply chain, our service, engineering, process engineering. And for me, the really big driver is top line growth. I mean, certainly, we're going to be more efficient and more productive. But I will bring multibillion-dollar products to market faster, even some later this year using AI technologies, and we will make our service engineers more productive so that we can deliver higher value services and increase the compound annual growth rate for that business.
And so I think that, again, this is just driving tremendous computing demand. And for Applied Materials, we're the leader in materials innovation in the most important and fastest-growing segments that are enabling AI. So leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging. Those three segments are way more than 80% of the incremental WFE spending in '26. We think that profile continues going forward.
And you talked about all of the discussions with customers, I'm in very frequent discussions with customers on delivery times, and we can talk about that. We've done a lot to improve our operations and supply chain. So we have ramp agility. But the other thing, again, I'm meeting CEOs and R&D leaders all the time is the AI computing innovations. So one thing everybody is focused on is tokens per second per watt, tokens per second is performance. Per watt is power and cost.
And again, those three segments, leading-edge foundry, logic, DRAM and advanced packaging are the most important for chip architecture innovations. So again, Applied as the leader, where we've said we're growing our systems equipment business more than 30% this year like mid-50s gross margins and continuing to go higher. So again, that's making a major difference for Applied.
And then advanced packaging is the other segment that is growing very quickly. Again, those architecture inflections, how you connect computing components together and how you move the data is incredibly important for tokens per second per watt. So again, Applied has the most enabling portfolio. We're in deep engagements deeper and longer than ever before, because we are co-innovating with our customers. So we're out 10 years in the future, multiple technology nodes and Applied is the key enabler of those new chip and packaging AI architecture inflections with this materials innovation portfolio that we have. So I've never had more fun, Stacy.
We can see that. We can see that. I want to take those 3 segments one at a time. We talk about leading-edge logic and DRAM and packaging because I do think those are the -- I agree with you. I think those are the 3 at least at this point, are probably driving the majority of what we're seeing. And maybe let's take them one at a time, maybe to start with advanced logic and foundry. What is it that you're doing? You've talked a lot about things like gate-all-around and. What is it that AMAT is doing? And how is that actually driving the business today?
Yes. So again, for AI, every node in foundry/logic gives you something like 30% power, 15% performance.
Do they still do that, by the way?
Well, nearly that, I would say. And so if you look at the transistor, Applied is by far the leader and also for wiring, it's a multibillion-dollar business. And I tell everybody in your smartphone, you have a processor chip with 20 billion transistors, 60 miles of wiring, and it costs $30. So what we do in the semiconductor industry is we're delivering miracles every year. I mean that's basically what...
As I've said, I'm amazed any of it works at all .
And so again, for gate-all-around, which is how you process the data in the transistor, there are more innovations on next-generation gate-all-around -- in the future, they're going to stack [ NMP ] transistors for CFET. In the wiring, there are tremendous innovations. Customers are also putting the power lines on the backside of the wafer, which gives them better power performance, 30% area scaling. So all of those areas applied as those architectures are adopted, we'll capture over 50% of those available markets and gain share. And so what we've said for foundry/logic is with gate-all-around and backside power, it increases our revenue per wafer start about 30% -- so we're...
You gave one. I can't remember what it was.
Yes. So basically, the combination of transistor and wiring goes from $12 billion to $14 billion and then for 100,000 wafer starts, but there's also share gains for us. And one thing I would say that is also very different, and this is when you talk about DRAM or foundry/ logic that's changed in my time in the industry. I think in the past, Applied was more providing equipment to customers. But over the last 7 or 8 years, we've built a team of integration innovators that are as good as any of our customers.
And if you -- in a transistor, you have something like 500 steps and wiring as many steps. And so there's co-innovation and co-optimization across that flow and about 30% of our revenues are also integrated systems where we're combining multiple technologies under vacuum because some of these films are an atom or 2 atoms thick. And so if you go to air, you oxidize and you damage electrical properties. So I think one thing that is really important for Applied Materials in enabling these AI computing innovations is this portfolio we have, our ability to optimize, and that's why our customers are joining EPIC. That's why we have these very, very deep partnerships with these customers, enabling AI computing innovation. So foundry/logic is certainly an area where Applied has tremendous strength, and we will grow share as these new architectures are adopted.
Got it. I'm going to get back to the EPIC center stuff and .
Okay. .
But I want to talk about DRAM now -- you've picked up -- I can't remember something like 10 points of market share over 10 years in DRAM.
Overall DRAM spending. Overall DRAM spending.
And now, I mean, clearly, I mean, if I'm looking at like one of these AI racks and I look at like just the wafer area of the semiconductors within the search, I mean, HBM DRAM must be 80%-plus. There's a lot of DRAM that that's going to be.
Oh, no question. And then HBM, you have to start 3 or approaching 4x the number of wafers because you're stacking and you have some yield loss to have the equivalent number of bits versus standard DRAM. So I mean that -- obviously, DRAM demand is extremely high. And for Applied Materials, again, as you said, we gained 10 points in a little over a decade in overall DRAM share. And Applied is by far the leader in wafer fab equipment, process equipment for DRAM. And so there, again, for AI computing, people want really fast memory. And so in the CMOS logic, they're innovating with metal gate and new versions of metal gate where Applied, again, has very, very high share to go faster. They're moving to FinFET, where again.
So the logic portion of the DRAM.
Logic portion of the DRAM because, again, how you move the data is incredibly important. So those are all areas where Applied has tremendous strength. So -- and again, we're in these multi-node, many year engagements with these different customers. We have a great portfolio of products. And we're also in these high-velocity co-innovation relationships with customers.
So as they're innovating with the CMOS logic for higher speed, as they're innovating for vertical channel transistor 4F-squared or 3D DRAM. Again, we have very deep partnerships, just like we do in leading-edge foundry logic, where those innovators integration teams, architecture teams are working with Applied Materials creating those future architectures. So what we've said in DRAM is that, again, we're positioned as these new architectures are adopted, the CMOS logic, the 4F-squared, 3D DRAM for significant share gains, continuing what we've been able to deliver in the last little over a decade.
What kind of time frames are we talking about for like 4F-squared or 3D DRAM?
Well, I'd rather have the customers give those time lines. So people are extending 6F-squared. And then between the 3...
4F-squared will be a smaller cell size, so a higher density of the memory bits on the...
Higher performance, lower power, higher area density, all of those things. But again, the bets that people are placing are not exactly the same in terms of time lines -- so I'd rather have them talk about -- but that's coming over the next -- again, the CMOS logic is the most near term because high-speed memory is so important. And that's, again, a tailwind for Applied from a market share standpoint. And then most people are 4F-squared and then 3D DRAM in that kind of sequence. And that's going to happen over the next number of years.
And it really sort of brings -- you really are engaged, I mean, 10 years out.
Oh, absolutely. Yes, again, for these architectures to be adopted, this is where -- this is really the strength of Applied's portfolio. If you look at these inflections when we look at leading-edge foundry logic, when you go to 14A or 1.4 people use different terminology or you go to these DRAM architectures, they're somewhere between 5 and 10 key innovations that determine timing of those architectures.
Applied is by far the leader. If you look at 3D DRAM, really, the top 3 key technologies are all from Applied Materials.
So what are those technologies?
Well, I don't know if I want to go into exactly what all of those things are. But again, this is where we do this high-velocity co-innovation because in some cases, you need an order of magnitude improvement in the equipment to enable the performance, power, cost, yield of those new architectures. And that's where -- so for DRAM, again, high confidence that we're going to continue to gain share there. And that's from a memory standpoint, especially for AI, fastest-growing segment in memory. And again, Applied is in a great position. We can talk about EPIC again, how we work with people with all of these architectures.
We'll get to you next. But first, I want to talk about packaging because this is another huge -- I mean, look, as people -- Moore's Law slowing just which the transistor scaling is slowing and you have to do other things. Packaging is certainly one of the -- how do you put together these different chips in new and interesting ways. And for AI, clearly, it's enormously important. And you guys must be the biggest advanced vendor.
Yes, we are. So again, packaging, I think, is one of the most exciting inflections in the entire industry. It's really how you connect computing components together. And so I think Jensen and others, they talk about wanting to make the packages as big as they can to connect as many computing components as possible at the highest density because it's so important for tokens per second per watt.
So Applied, we have, again, a very unique broad portfolio. That business this year is growing more than 50% for Applied Materials, multiple billions of dollars. And again, we're also deeply engaged through the ecosystem on new packaging architectures. So if you look at an AI server today in 3 or 4 years, the way you connect those computing components are going to be very different than what you see today. So there, again, people want larger body sizes. They want higher I/O density. Applied has the leading portfolio in enabling those inflections. And we have deep relationships with companies that are currently leading and also companies that are bringing new architectures, new packaging architectures for AI to market in the coming years.
Is this like panel or?
Panel is definitely one of those architectures that people are focused on. Again, warpage is an issue for packaging. So if you want to have higher I/O density, dealing with that is very important. And then just getting a larger body size. I mean, if you look at...
Glass substrates and...
Glass substrates or if you look at some of our largest customers, tech symposium, they talk about a number of reticle fields that you can connect in a single package. And so this is really important technology. And again, Applied is the leader. We've been investing for a number of years. We knew these inflections were going to have an enormous impact on AI, energy-efficient computing. And so again, over 50% growth this year, and that will be a very high compound annual growth rate for Applied going forward.
And the visibility that you have now seems better than probably -- I don't know if ever.
Ever.
Is it ever? Yes. I can what you said are you getting like 8-quarter like rolling forecasts and...
Yes. Yes. So I'd tell you the visibility we have in the technology road maps because we're co-creating those road maps is better than ever. And also from a demand standpoint, again, frequent conversations with customers on delivery times. And so we do have 8-quarter forecasts from every one of our customers and longer commitments from the customers. What's really important for us, again, we did anticipate that WFE could grow a significant amount.
So we made investments to nearly double our operations capacity. But in the supply chain, you also need the lead time so that we have that ready to ramp. And so for customers, it's not only that visibility or orders sooner, it's also exact configurations because you need to know what components in the supply chain you need for customers. So for us, for us to be able to ramp to meet the need, again, we're getting much better visibility from our customers than ever.
Got it. And I guess that gives you -- people to talk about a multiyear.
Yes.
Sound pretty confident of that.
Yes. No, look, I think that what we've been seeing is that computing demand is continuing to increase. Recently, people are talking a lot about Agentic AI. And so Agentic AI is layering on top of the demand that was already there. And that's more weighted to CPUs. The CPU, GPU ratio is more weighted versus where we've been. And then also DRAM is up higher, NAND is up higher, what we're modeling is 90% of the incremental WFE is in the leading foundry/logic and DRAM. So again, and then after Agentic AI, you have physical AI, and so.
They never stop it. How much of a constraint is clean room space? I had this view that like as strong as this year is this is -- we might grow WFE, say 20% this year. I know you guys have not given a WFE number, but the growth is going to be strong. But it's a constrained year because we don't have the clean rooms and they're coming online.
I guess how many -- you guys always talked about you track that, how many fab projects are you tracking? What kind of clean room space is coming on. And I don't know if you have a point of view on where growth could be if like clean rooms right now were unconstrained. Like how much unconstrained demand is actually out there?
Yes. I don't -- again, we certainly have a forecast for where we think WFE is going, base case, bull case, bear case. And it's been hitting at the bull case, pretty consistently.
I bit objectively even the bear case probably isn't that.
No, absolutely. No, absolutely. So we're tracking over 100 fabs. As you can imagine, there are a lot of incremental spending in the areas that are the fastest growing. I said over 80% is in those 3 areas. So that's basically what we're seeing. And I think relative to -- obviously, with 8 quarters, we have great visibility into '27. And from my perspective, I think AI, again, really changes how we work, how we live. I look at -- I told you earlier how we're using AI inside Applied Materials. The ROIs are tremendous. And we can see already that we are accelerating product time to market. So I believe the demand -- this is a multiyear wave that Applied is in the best position because we're in the -- we're leading in the fastest-growing segments that are enabling the tokens per second per watt.
Got it. Got it. So let's talk about this co-innovation with customers. Tell me about the EPIC center. So it's coming into its own now.
It is. Yes, we've announced 10 partners for EPIC. We have TSMC, Samsung, Micron, Hynix, Broadcom. We have Advantest, SCREEN, some universities. You'll see more announcements coming. And again, this is what I said earlier relative to the chip and packaging AI architecture inflections is incredibly important for the ecosystem, but certainly for our customers because whoever is first to market with design wins, that has an enormous impact on their business. So Applied, we have these new innovations that will enable these new architectures in EPIC. And so for customers to have first access to those innovations, like I said, some of these technologies, you need an order of magnitude improvement or the architecture won't happen. So having their innovators locating.
How does it work? So they have personnel...
Absolutely.
Facility working with your personnel to developing their processes that they're bringing into production.
Yes. And again, it's really this co-innovation, high-velocity co-innovation concept. So we're -- we have customer reticles. We're focused on enabling those architectures, as you can imagine. And by the way, we focus on high velocity and secure innovation is incredibly important. So we firewall innovators between the different customers, and we've been doing this for a while. But now having those people co-located, especially, again, in Silicon Valley within 50 miles, I think, is 40% of the S&P 500. And so if you think about materials to systems innovation through the technology stack, which is more and more important when I talk about packaging or talk about chip innovations, those kinds of things, -- having these people co-located is incredibly important for velocity because you can move in parallel versus a serial process.
So our goal really is to accelerate the time to market significantly, incredibly important for our customers. And then for us, being designed in with our equipment and our advanced services for those architecture inflections, obviously, is really important for our growth going forward. And the other thing I would say that's a real advantage for us is our visibility into those road maps, where to invest if we have -- if we're creating those architectures, -- it gives us a great idea how to optimize our R&D. And again, for customers, not only is it important for their design wins, but their R&D efficiency. If you can bring these architectures to market because every one of them costs an enormous amount of money, there's an incredible efficiency. So this co-innovation, we have very deep partnerships through the ecosystem. And EPIC, again, this is where the key materials innovations for chips and packaging will first be available, and we don't have an infinite number of innovators. So having people co-located there really increases that velocity.
Stuff they're working on in EPIC, how far out is it?
Oh, gosh. So I mean, we -- again, we have incredible visibility. We know performance yield of every one of these different partners.
Stuff that's going to be in production like in 10 years or?
Yes. I mean we're out to -- I mean, N2 is ramping now. Next is A14. We're doing A10, A7, A5. So again, I talked about these miracles, Stacy, that we deliver in this industry. And so we're working on those miracles that enable those future architectures or again, the DRAM road map. I mean some of these technologies are extremely compelling for the AI computing, but they're also incredibly challenging to create the innovations that enable those architectures.
So we're working 10 years out in the future, multiple technology nodes. And again, for us, it's being designed in with our equipment and services. Also, it creates a deep strategic relationship with these customers. So when I'm with the CEOs of our customers, we're focused on those future technology nodes. And for them, it's design wins in certain time frames, technologies that they need to hit those road maps that is really essential for their business.
Do you need other players' tools in there as well? I mean, I assume there's litho and other things in.
So we do have partners that are -- some announced, some that aren't announced relative to those innovation flows. The great thing for Applied is we have more of those innovation technologies than anybody -- it's not just the strength of our -- people talk about deposition. Again, we have technologies that are completely unique, epi, PVD, in addition to the rest of our deposition portfolio. So creating the materials. People really also don't understand the modification of the materials. So that's a multibillion dollar business for us and then there's shaping and then also the -- our -- we're the world leader in eBeam technologies for analysis of the materials.
But that combination of technologies enables you to create these future transistors or wiring or memory or packaging, all of those things. So I think this portfolio strength that we have -- and the way we're engaging with customers is really unique versus where we were, let's say, more than 5 years ago.
Yes. Now that makes a lot of sense. I want to talk about the services business. And I guess maybe you can talk a little bit about how it's changed over the last 5 to 10 years. I know there's a lot more you talked about recurring. You talked about use of AI. I mean, this has got to be an area where we're -- so how has this business changed? And -- maybe talk a little bit of what the services brings to you and to your customers? .
Yes. So services, right now, we're growing high teens compound annual growth rate. It's a little over 20% of Applied Materials revenue. And we said through cycle longer term, we'll grow mid-teens. I think there's an opportunity for even to drive that faster over the longer term. As you can imagine, for customers, one thing that's super important right now is output per square meter. Again, so...
Square meter of fab space.
Absolutely. The more output they can have, the better -- so yield is really important. Edge die yield is really important. And Applied, I really love this part of our business. We've driven tremendous service innovations. Over 2/3 of our business are service agreements and prescription or subscription revenue. So that's been growing actually faster than our overall service business. And we have over 35,000 chambers connected to AI servers in customer fabs and the majority of those are remotely connected. So that is really important because, again, as we're bringing these new service technologies using these digital solutions, we're optimizing output.
Chamber matching. That's a really important technology. So there are hundreds of thousands of opportunities per year. When -- and again, we're using AI to optimize with all of these different parameters for all of our process tools. But then once we make one golden in high-volume manufacturing, you want to make them all golden. You want the biggest process window to give you the highest yield.
And so we're innovating there with these service technologies. We're also innovating with predictive models versus reactive corrective maintenance. Again, all of those things, I think, are great opportunities for us to grow this. What we said is, again, kind of mid-teens growth rate going forward. It's a little over 20% of Applied revenue today. And I really believe, again, the value of the services are increasing as you're ramping these complex new architectures, great opportunity for Applied.
Got it. How much of that growth is like -- because it's an installed base business with just the installed base growing. And some of it is this content per tool, I guess.
Revenue. Yes. Yes.
How do those contribute to this? And are either accelerating? I got to imagine maybe the revenue per tool.
Revenue per tool is growing faster than the installed base. And again, these services as we're -- and again, this is where I'm also focused on AI. In some cases, where the dollar per task or hours per task were improving many, many, many times. So for me, the real important part is not are we saving thousands of service engineers. The important part is I can deliver high-value services and scale that much faster and drive the top line growth with those technologies. So again, really fantastic opportunity for Applied.
Got it. Got it. I want to talk about China. There's a few things going on there, clearly. Number one is there's been regulatory and other issues that have impacted your abilities as well as your peers to sell everything you would like to sell in.
Yes.
Which is -- there's also the growth of local competition. I got to be honest, like one of the biggest questions I get is what is the impact of some of these local players. I think etch and deposition are 2 of the areas where there's probably like a larger piece of the TAM is satisfied by the local guys. And as I would say, these are real companies there. They're not jokers, right? Just maybe talk a little bit about what is going on in China. What do you see on the competition front there? I guess anything you can tell us on the regulatory front one way or the other? I think there's some other stuff coming in the MATCH Act and other things that may be coming. So how should we think about China?
Yes. So '25, there was a large increase in restrictions. We had said that our business was restricted at about 10%, more than double in '25. So that did have a big impact.
China sales were still very good.
Yes. And so for today, for us, it's kind of mid-20s as our semi equipment and service business. So for us, China is really an ICAPS business, the IoT, communication, auto, power sensors. And this is where Edge AI is also a driver for that particular market. So in China this year, and in ICAPS globally, we believe that business will be flat to slightly up. So...
How much of your foundry logic is ICAPS today, by the way?
Well, we haven't -- we have said in the past, it was kind of equivalent. But actually, again, going forward, the leading edge driven by AI is growing much faster. So we think over time that ICAPS will grow kind of mid- to high single digits. And if you look at actually data center, wafer starts, this is an interesting statistic. Our -- will pass smartphone wafer starts, we believe, next year. So these large die, you're driving a tremendous growth.
So again, the growth rate for the leading edge is faster than the ICAPS market. But again, for us, that business is kind of flat to slightly up. We do have innovations. We started our ICAPS group. I remember April 12, 2019, because I thought that was a really good strategy for Applied. We have a great portfolio there. We're bringing new ICAPS innovations to market, new products that expand our total available market, new products in large segments that improve our competitiveness.
So we are driving innovations there. We have deep connectivity with customers on architecture innovations in power electronics, this co-innovation, sensors, photonics, a number of different areas where we're engaged. So I think, again, that business I have high confidence that we'll perform well there over time, but the growth rate is not going to be as fast as the leading edge, which is driven by AI.
Sure. To go back to China, the competition front, the low...
Yes. So again, that's where we're bringing these new products to market. And -- if you look at where we were able to compete, if you take out the restrictions, we performed well in China. And I think that with the pipeline of products that some later this year, some over the next 24 months, we'll expand our total available market. We have products that will improve our competitiveness. So I think where we can compete, I feel good about our ability to compete.
Can't compete everywhere, unfortunately. .
Unfortunately, yes. .
I want to talk about margins. So -- and I said this to Tim yesterday, but I always ask you the same question. It's always why do your gross margins have to start with the 4. And I don't have to don't anymore, don't start with the 4 anymore. I guess what's gotten you there, number one? And then number two, how should we think about the evolution of that margin structure going forward? There's a whole bunch of drivers. There's clearly operational efficiencies that you guys are driving. There's mix. Maybe there's pricing, like I don't know like for sure. So like how do we think about that?
Yes. I think that if I look at our conversations with customers, they're very different. Now it's about delivery times, access to our technology innovations to enable the new architectures, -- so we have been growing margins pretty consistently. I think you're going to continue to see us growing margins, both gross margin and operating margin a fair amount as we keep going forward. And so again, it's really the value that we're delivering in pricing. We have been increasing pricing. I think one thing that...
You've been increasing pricing of like stuff you already sell? Or is it more on like new.
Both. Yes. And so -- and again, different for different situations in terms of how we optimize all of that. But again, what's really important for customers is that we are able to make the investments in our operations, supply chain and infrastructure for the deliveries. And what's incredibly strategically important for them is the investments in the enabling technologies for these AI compute architectures for chips and packaging. So again, those are the discussions that we have. And then for me, what I think about is winning these architecture inflections and creating value, if we're creating value, we also have a great opportunity to capture value.
And one other thing I would say in the ecosystem, the profit pools are way larger than they have ever been. And so again, that gives us an opportunity to create value and share value with our customers. And again, I feel really good about our positions in these future AI chip and packaging architectures -- and we have an incredible pipeline of numericles that will enable these architectures and give us a great opportunity to create and capture value.
Got it. Maybe on the value capture. You talked some about like integrated tool sets. So I think you said some of it. So does that percentage go up over time? I have to imagine is this stuff features get smaller and this stuff gets harder. You're not really just selling a single process. You're literally selling a solution. We want to create a film that's this thick and it's conformal, and this and it takes 10 different processes to -- and then how do you -- like how do you think about capturing that incremental value versus sharing it with your customers? .
Yes. So I talked about the 60 miles of wiring, which is kind of mind-boggling. When you think about moving data with almost no resistance, through a wire, and it's even going higher than that. So some of these platforms, we have 7 technologies integrated under vacuum because, again, -- if you go to air, you can oxidize those few ADAM interfaces. So that business of our business is growing.
And the the number of technologies that we're integrating is also growing. We announced some new ALD technologies. And then, again, in those technologies, the surface interface is really, really important for electrical properties. Our PVD business, combined with selective ALD and CVD and copper reflow and all of these kinds of things.
That's a unique capability Applied has to enable these future architecture inflections -- and then it's not only the integrated products, the strength of our portfolio is our ability to optimize across these modules. So there's co-optimization to enable this tokens per second per watt across the portfolio. But the integrated is about 30%. The number of technologies we're integrating in the platform is increasing and super strategically important for customers for these architecture innovations.
Got it. I guess on that note, like I always think about the semi cap industry, I mean it's competitive that everybody kind of has their own niche. But at the same time, you clearly do compete -- I'm going to leave the Chinese guys out of it, but -- you got the Lams and the Tokyo elections of the world -- what is it that customers are looking for when they're choosing a new solution? Like what is that -- do -- what does that bake-off process look like? When does it happen? Is it the new node transition what is it that customers are looking for when they decide to actually award the process of record to you versus your competitors? .
Yes. So I think the most important thing for customers is the race for these new architectures. That is the most important thing. And whoever -- so when they're competing for design wins, they care about performance, yield and reliability. That is the most important thing. And when their customers are evaluating them for design wins, if you don't have performance yield and reliability, they don't care about the cost because they can't risk their system architectures on those technologies.
So for Applied, we're working through the whole tech stack and working with these customers on these new architectures, that is the most strategically important. I mentioned high-speed DRAM with the CMOS logic or any of these different types of inflections. So the first thing for Applied is again, connecting with them on what's critical for their design wins -- and then inside of that, you have a portfolio of solutions where Applied is driving innovations in each one of those different pieces or those integrated platforms.
But that connectivity, I think, is more and more and more important. So when we're engaging with someone on an N plus 1 architecture or an N plus 2 architecture, we're really focused on the electrical, like resistance, capacitance, threshold voltage or high-speed memory or those kinds of things. And then the technologies that enable those key performance, the tokens per second per watt and then there's a portfolio of Applied solutions in key unique Applied solutions that enable those technologies.
So again, the great thing for us, we have leadership -- we're in great positions in the fastest-growing segments that are enabling AI computing in leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and packaging. So again -- and then the other part of our portfolio that is actually growing very fast -- this is one of the fastest growing businesses in Applied is our inspection and measurement business.
So we said our semi business is growing over 30% this year Actually, that part of Applied Materials is growing much faster. We're the world leader in eBeam technologies. We have the lead in resolution and imaging speed with cold field emission. That will be over $1 billion in revenue this year. And we have an incredible pipeline Stacy of new products that are coming over the next couple of years. So I have high confidence. That one is one of our fastest-growing businesses. The revenue growth there is going to be multiple billions of dollars. But the other thing that's really important is that when you're -- when you're building all of these new architectures, the learning rate is crucial.
So Applied's eBeam technologies, we can see into those architectures and collect data, orders of magnitude faster. So again, that connectivity with our leadership and the materials innovation is also strategically important for Applied when we're engaging with these customers on the architecture innovations.
That makes a lot of sense. -- one other segment that you don't talk that much, it's small, but like why do you still have a display segment. What strategic value does that play for you? .
Yes. So display today is a little over 20% operating profit. We -- and it is growing at a decent rate. The biggest opportunity there for us is we do have an opportunity to enable a new OLED architecture for IT and TV. And so there has been a technical barrier. So today, you have single-digit adoption of OLED in those segments of the market. Applied has come up with an innovation. We're working with the leaders that overcomes that limitation. So it would take some time for that adoption. But I believe that, that can be a good growth rate for Applied, expanding the operating profit.
And so that's one thing. Just that business by itself, there is synergy when you talked earlier about panels being processing. So if we think about our leadership in handling glass, or all of the glass processing applied is the global leader in those technologies.
We're taking that learning into these new packaging architectures. So there's synergy -- we have -- by the way, this is an incredible team of innovators inside Applied Materials. So there's that synergy with where packaging innovation is going in the future.
We've got a few minutes left as you go to the lightning round .
Sure. Let's go .
And if anybody has other questions that you want to submit, you can do that. Are there any areas where you think you're participating less than your fair share in the super cycle due to competition or anything else?
No. Again, I mentioned earlier, we have really great visibility in the architectures, chip and packaging architectures that will enable AI computing innovation, the tokens per second per watt. So I feel great. And again, the really great thing for Applied is that -- we have incredible visibility because we are working and co-innovating and co-creating these architectures through the tech stack and through the ecosystem.
So we are investing in the areas that we think are going to drive the highest growth. We've made some small acquisitions. It's not possible to do the large acquisitions with the current situation. But there are areas where that can add hundreds of millions of dollars of growth and create synergies with the rest of Applied Materials. So I feel really good about that.
Got it. Here's an interesting one. Is Huawei's logic folding economically real or road map theater.
Well, I don't know if I want to comment on that. What I would say is that there's this concept of design technology co-optimization. Some of our largest customers have talked about that. You're moving the power lines from the front of the wafer to the back of the wafer. You're getting a 30% area savings, better power and performance. You have isolation walls in the transistor -- so there are those kinds of innovations that are being driven in the industry.
And so I would say this is kind of along the same lines, and one of our largest customers, they talk about how the percentage of their innovation enabled by design technology co-optimization, going up significantly, which is, by the way, great for Applied Materials. But that particular one I think it's too early to tell. I mean you have thermal issues, yield issues, many different kinds of things that are yet to be determined.
By the way, that's using bonding technology. Applied has the leading hybrid bonding technology and an integrated platform. So as those architectures are adopted, we also have innovations there.
I think it's fair to say that those particular architectures are not unique to Huawei or the industry is looking at.
No, if you look at even like future transistor technologies, you're stacking NNP transistors. So it's really going more vertical and -- or like, say, power lines or transistors or all of those kinds of things or CMOS bonded to the array in memory. So separating out those IP blocks and connecting them in different ways is a trend that the overall industry is focused on.
Got it. Maybe one more. Do you think there's a disconnect between spending expectations from the hyperscalers and the labs versus what the semi industry can realistically deliver.
I feel very good about demand going forward, I would say. I do think, again, this is going to change how we work, how we live AI is going to be an enormous inflection. That's going to drive tremendous computing demand and the need for computing innovation and tokens per second per watt.
And Applied, like I said, we have made investments in our operations so we can scale our operations. It's really making sure that we have that alignment with customers. We have to have that early visibility to ramp our supply chain. So I feel good. I mean, we've made enormous improvements in operations and supply chain over the last few years, and we're in a way better position than we've ever been in that aspect.
Got it. So we've got about 1 minute left. I'll close out the way I always do. We've got a full room here, Gary. Why should they buy your stock?
We're in a great position. The fastest-growing areas in the industry, leading-edge foundry, logic, DRAM, packaging, that's over 80% of the growth in WFE. Those are areas where Applied has clear leadership. And those are the areas that are continuing to grow significantly over the next several years. And as I mentioned, our connectivity, our relationships with our customers are deeper than ever and critical to them winning designs with their customers.
So those future AI chip architectures, packaging architectures, Applied is in a great position to gain share, create value and capture value. So I have high confidence the growth rate for Applied is going to be very strong, both top line and bottom line going forward.
Got it. I think that's a wonderful place to leave. Gary, thank you so much. .
Thanks, Stacy. Thank you, guys.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference
Applied betont tiefe Co‑Innovation, Führungsposition in Foundry/DRAM/Packaging und spürbare Nachfrage durch AI (künstliche Intelligenz).
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: Applied Materials sieht sich als zentraler Enabler der AI‑Welle: tiefe, mehrjährige Co‑Innovation mit Kunden, breite Technologiepalette und höhere Visibility (mehrere Quartale) treiben Wachstum und Margen voran.
🚀 Strategische Highlights
- Fokussegmente: Leading‑edge Foundry/Logic, DRAM (Dynamic Random‑Access Memory) und Advanced Packaging machen laut Management >80% des zusätzlichen Investitionsvolumens aus.
- EPIC: Co‑Innovationszentrum (EPIC) mit Partnern wie TSMC, Samsung, Micron; Ziel: Time‑to‑market beschleunigen und Design‑Wins sichern.
- Services & Tools: Ausbau digitaler Services (35.000+ Kammern vernetzt), Integrations‑ und Inspektionslösungen (e‑Beam) als wachstumsstarke, margenstabile Säulen.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Konkretes: Keine neue Finanz‑Guidance; keine Zahlenanpassung – stattdessen Operative Investments (Kapazität deutlich erhöht), >8‑Quartal Visibility von Kunden und starke kurzfristige Nachfrage in Packaging (>50% Wachstum) wurden betont.
- Technologie: Betonung auf integrierten Systemen (≈30% des Umsatzes) und Material‑/Epitaxie‑Kompetenz; EPIC‑Roadmap reicht mehrere Nodes in die Zukunft.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Architektur‑Timelines: Analysten drängten auf Zeitpläne für 4F²/3D‑DRAM und Gate‑All‑Around; Management blieb bewusst zurückhaltend und verwies auf Kunden‑Roadmaps.
- China & Wettbewerb: Nachfrage in China bleibt bedeutend, aber Regulierungen und lokale Anbieter schränken adressierbaren Umsatz ein; Applied sagt, wo erlaubt, ist Wettbewerbsposition gut.
- Margen & Wertcapture: Diskussion über Preisgestaltung, Mix und integrierte Plattformen; Management sieht weiterhin strukturelles Aufwärtspotenzial bei Brutto‑ und Operativmargen.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Für Aktionäre bedeutet das Gespräch: klares, qualitatives Wachstumsnarrativ mit echter Technologie‑ und Kundenbindung. Wichtige Risiken bleiben Auslieferungs‑/Supply‑Chain‑Execution, regulatorische Einschränkungen in China und die tatsächliche Adoptionsgeschwindigkeit neuer Chip‑Architekturen.
Applied Materials — J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology
1. Question Answer
All right. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the third day of JPMorgan's 54th Annual Technology, Media and Communications Conference. My name is Harlan Sur. I'm the semiconductor and semiconductor capital equipment analyst for the firm. Very pleased to have Tim Deane, Senior Vice President at Applied Materials. Tim heads up Applied's Global Services business, what we call AGS, represents about 20% of Applied's overall revenues, drives a stable, but very high-growth services franchise, which is a key part of the systems-level solutions they develop and deploy to the world's leading semiconductor manufacturers.
Tim has been Applied -- been with Applied for over 30 years, in charge of AGS for the past 3 years and previously worked in the Semiconductor Systems Group for more than 25 years, leading the field operations team, business management, strategy and customer business and planning team. So Tim, thank you very much for joining us this morning.
Yes. Nice to be here, Harlan. Thanks.
We're going to start off at a high level. The team just reported very, very strong results and growth outlook last week. So I'm going to start off there, but we are going to touch upon Tim's AGS franchise because it's just -- it's a great ratable, highly profitable cash flow generative franchise. But starting off at a high level, team reported strong results outlook last week.
On the better revenue growth outlook for this calendar year, I think you guys are now calling for 30% growth in your systems business versus your prior growth outlook of 20%. On the incremental upside this year, is it being driven by new brick-and-mortar greenfield programs being pulled forward? Or are customers just accelerating technology migrations on existing capacity? Or just solidifying plans and now sort of locking in sort of tool slots, right?
And so trying to figure out like what drove that sort of incremental upside over the last 90 days? And then can you just talk about which end markets, advanced foundry logic, DRAM, advanced packaging contributed most to the sort of incremental improvement in the outlook?
Sure, Harlan. Happy to talk about that. So there's -- I would say there's not fundamentally a pull-in from '27 into '26. There's a lot of brick-and-mortar being built out there, greenfield facilities. So there's a pipeline of projects that are coming online. To the extent that customers can accelerate them, they obviously want to do it as quickly as possible given the environment. But there's a lot of creativity going on in the existing spaces out in the factories globally today.
There's at least one case where a customer procured a completed shell from another customer. And obviously, they're going to put product into that as quickly as they can, which helps us with our business. But the other areas that we see are primarily in-fab changes. So if customers are looking at their full production lines, if they see pinch points in their production, maybe an older generation tool that's a lower throughput that's limiting the output of the factory, we're seeing lots of cases where customers are coming to us and saying, okay, we're going to remove this platform. We're going to replace that with a higher productivity platform, which is good for wafer fab equipment.
Additionally, we see cases where -- or there's at least a case where a 200-millimeter factory was being shut down and repurposed into a packaging factory. So you were asking kind of which areas do we see the growth. Packaging has got intense growth pressure in demand in end markets. So we're seeing customers being as creative again as possible to get capacity in as quickly as possible.
And then we see another example where there's an older generation 2D NAND factory that's being converted to a DRAM factory. Again, DRAM, advanced packaging are kind of themes that you will hear over and over again where customers are trying to get more good die out. So that creativity is leading to these incremental upsides that we see. And then just from a services perspective, interject, as we work with customers across all their facilities, I think in every place that touches AI, those customers are coming to us saying, how can we optimize output for the factory, which is kind of driving the service business as well.
Yes. I think that's a little bit under the radar screen for most investors is that we all tend to think about greenfield capacity. We all tend to think about technology migration. But as you pointed out, there's a ton of installed capacity out there where throughput may not be as optimized, yield may not be as optimized, right? And any little improvements in current factory throughput or defect density improvements can have a pretty significant impact in terms of output and good die per wafer, which ends up being millions and millions of dollars for their customers, right?
No, that's a good point. If a fab is fully installed and that's operating, every percent of utilization improvement that you can make in a factory is a huge lever for productivity for customers. And as we partner with them, particularly in the factories, whether it's with upgrades to existing tools, placements of key tools or just service optimization, these are all kind of win-win scenarios that we see with customers. So it's a great environment out there to be working together really closely.
And at earnings, the team called out having historically high visibility, 8-plus quarters type of visibility to your backlog, customer forecast. And this gave the team the confidence last week to qualitatively talk about continued strong growth profile in WFE spend '27 and '28, right?
And in line with that, Brice talked about the Applied team having 100-plus projects, programs that are on your radar screen. These projects sit at different stages, some near-term ramps, some longer-term commitments. Some of these programs are technology migration focused, greenfield build-outs. What's the rough mix of this 100-plus project pipeline, right? Is it technology migration more biased? Is it greenfield capacity biased? And how does this pipeline sort of convert over the next, call it, 2 to 3 years?
Yes. So just the first part of your question about the 8 quarters visibility, I think -- those of us that were around post-COVID during that ramp, there was an awful lot of learning that happened during that period. In my prior role, I was kind of at the nexus of that with Applied working with customers as they were trying to kind of plan capacity on what was kind of an unexpected ramp.
This time, it's a little more of an expected ramp because we know with AI and the Agentic components of AI now that are coming online, there's just huge demand across, in particular, leading logic, DRAM, HBM and advanced packaging. Those are the ones that we see as kind of the primary drivers. So it's in our best interest as a supplier and a customer to collaborate as closely as possible because we want to make these transitions smooth.
Bringing up these factories is extremely complicated. We or me, I'm hiring people across the globe in order to do installs, meeting customer schedules. So the collaboration is coming naturally, I would say, at the moment, particularly with our largest customers because it's in our mutual best interest to do that.
Now on to the pipeline. So when we look at the pipeline, 100 projects is a lot. And I think Brice also mentioned, 10 or more that's come fairly recently. The biggest part of the greenfield capacity that's coming online is actually in the advanced logic and DRAM spaces because there's just not enough physical capacity today. There's so much silicon that's needed for these advanced technologies that it's really being driven by the greenfield space.
I would say advanced packaging is in the same boat, so to speak, just because we're moving from something that's been relatively straightforward for decades, we're moving kind of the front-end type processes into the back end, which is, again, requiring more physical space in the factories.
NAND is a little bit different. You get so much leverage on a NAND wafer whenever you upgrade. So as we're present in all the NAND factories around the world. We see the wafer starts have kind of dropped a little bit over the last couple of years in NAND as customers have converted from one technology to the next. So it's a little more complicated. The technology -- the wafer starts drop a little bit, but the bits go up significantly.
So there's a lot more leverage that you get with upgrade NAND as compared to the other spaces. We've done some analysis, a typical, say, HBM wafer versus a NAND wafer, you're getting somewhere between 40 and 50x the bits on kind of apples-to-apples comparison for an SLC NAND. If you go to quad level, you're quadrupling that. So we think there's just a huge amount of capacity, and it's very efficient for customers to do that as conversion. Now I think there will be some greenfield NAND over time, which is great for us. We're very -- we're actually kind of excited about that as well. But we just see the leverage in the other 3 spots for greenfield.
Got it. And semiconductor industry is on track to drive over $1 trillion in revenues this year. I mean it was just a couple of years ago that we were all talking about a $1 trillion market by 2030. And on your recent -- these are very valuable sessions, but in your recent Master Class, you brought up an important insight, which that the mix of leading edge -- the mix of spending was longer term thought to be 1/3 leading-edge foundry/logic, 1/3 memory, evenly split between DRAM and NAND and 1/3 sort of mature and specialty analog power products, which you guys call your ICAPS business.
But given the rapid growth AI and data center compute, networking and memory, which biases strongly towards leading-edge logic and memory architectures, there's now a strong divergence, it feels like in growth between these various segments. So help us understand like how do you see -- is there a new way to kind of think about the mix of spending by markets, not only this year, but over the next kind of few years?
Yes. So for this year, we think about 80% of the incremental wafer fab equipment spending is really in those 3 areas that you talked about, the advanced foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging. And that really is driven by the AI demand. If you look at the various waves that have come up over time with compute and then to mobile and now into AI, there are different focuses for each of those areas.
ICAPS is still a very important market for us. And I would say we're -- I think Brice made the comment that we're incrementally positive on it compared to where we were, say, 3 to 6 months ago. We think it's kind of flat to up both China and non-China. But the bulk of the spend is really going to be in those 3 focused areas where Applied is #1 in advanced foundry logic. We're #1 in kind of DRAM in a lot of areas and then also for the advanced packaging.
Again, going back to the -- you guys held a great Master Class on transistor and interconnect architectures, right, on current and next-generation platforms. One of the big differentiators in my view, at the transistor level is Applied's what you guys call integrated material systems, right?
That's right, IMS.
So various aspects of the gate formation or the interconnect formation, you've got a tool that integrates up to like 7 different processes into a single platform, right, surface treatment, etch, deposition, clean, anneal, integrated metrology and so on, right? And these integrated solutions now represent about 30% of Applied's overall system sales. Obviously, the benefits of IMS is not only technology enablement, but as you could appreciate, better defectivity, better -- higher throughput, lower overall system footprint, it seems like a big differentiator for Applied, but why is it that the mix of IMS-based platforms hasn't increased that much over the past several years? And how does IMS create opportunities for your AGS franchise?
Sure. So I do think IMS is one of the things that's really -- it's unique for Applied Materials, right? We have a very broad connected portfolio of products. And the ability to bring them together into a single mainframe where you don't break back and you don't expose the wafer to ambient is, in some cases, it's very critical. I think in that Master Class, if I counted correctly, there were 4 IMS platforms that we talked about, right?
There was Trillium that you mentioned for gate formation. There was an Epi and etch combination for forming the contact that was talked about and then 2 versions of copper berries integrated tools for the super tight pack lower layers is one configuration and then kind of the mid-layers is another configuration.
So from Applied's perspective, we will work with customers as closely as possible to integrate steps that make sense to integrate because it does drive complexity on a single platform, as you can imagine. What used to be a single PVD platform Endura now is a 7 different applications. So managing that platform in production and just kind of redundancy on the platform, you want to optimize for where that's really needed. And it's really these absolutely critical steps that we do that.
The other thing we do at Applied, again, because of the portfolio is we co-optimize applications. And that's another big piece of the business. So they can be sequential steps or nonsequential steps that still need to be co-optimized because they interact across multiple layers. I think a good example of this is we're seeing great synergy between our PDC group, our metrology inspection group and our development teams, in particular with PROVision, where you can do thousands of measurements across the wafer, we can optimize processes faster than we have in the past.
So we tend to look at it pretty holistically, where it makes sense to do an integrated platform with a customer, if that's the demand, then we will do it. And we are constantly co-optimizing applications kind of into the flow where it makes sense to give the customer a little more flexibility. So it's not really about increasing that number. It's really finding the optimal space in the flow. But again, I think this is one of the areas where Applied is truly unique in the industry because of all these capabilities that we have across different product lines.
And complexity -- system complexity in my mind, means good things for the services organization that supports that. Is that a fair -- is the service intensity a bit higher on these IMS platforms?
The service intensity is higher on the IMS platforms for the reasons that you stated. If you think about -- just think about parts, if you had a 7 or 8 chamber, 9-chamber Endura that was all PVD, there's a lot of commonality in the parts. If now you have an ALD and an anneal and you got CVD and PVD, those are all kind of unique capabilities. So it causes us to prepare differently with customers to support those tools to make sure they're getting maximum output in the factory.
Your DRAM revenues were $1.7 billion in the most recent quarter, up 18% year-over-year. The team has roughly gained 10 percentage points of WFE-related DRAM share over the last decade. The next 2- to 3-year DRAM road map is meaningful for Applied, right?
Yes.
6F-squared continues with its high-volume ramp on the next-generation 4F-squared and then eventual move to 3D DRAM architecture, Applied has been pretty consistent that materials intensity increases meaningfully at 4F-squared and especially at 3D DRAM. Can you just frame for us the share opportunity for Applied in 4F-squared specifically versus where you sit today at 6F? And is the right way to think about it, given the historical share gain track record that maybe Applied gains another, call it, 3 to 5 percentage points of WFE DRAM share at these upcoming inflection points?
Yes. So let me start by putting a little plug in for Master Class because on June 25, we are going to do a DRAM advanced packaging masterclass, kind of the level of detail that you saw with the advanced foundry logic. With 6F-squared, in particular, we see there's a lot of runway. Customers are pushing those technologies. Again, the demand -- Manish is coming up next. I'm sure he's going to talk about the demand in the end markets is pretty incredible.
So when you have a technology, you want to extend it as long as you can. And the place where we see the road map going for 6F-squared is really right into the sweet spot for Applied's portfolio. There's going to be more advanced wiring. We also see that the transistor formation is moving more to the advanced style that kind of moved into advanced foundry logic a few years ago. So we're able to take that knowledge, the experience on the tools, the productivity and cost down benefits that we've seen by optimizing those tools and move those into the DRAM into the next couple of years.
When we start talking about 4F-squared and 3D DRAM, again, we just -- we see that the materials engineering intensity on those applications going forward is also moving into the Applied space. And this is one of the fundamental reasons why we created this EPIC platform. So we've announced a number of customers, Samsung, Micron, Hynix, TSMC last week. Advantest is joining as a partner. We have universities coming in, RPI, ASU and Stanford. And just this morning, we announced that Broadcom is joining the EPIC platform as well. They're specifically advanced packaging -- they're specifically interested in advanced packaging.
And these processes today are so complicated, it takes an ecosystem to essentially bring these to market. So I think there's recognition that partnering in this vehicle, which is EPIC for Applied is going to be a way to accelerate that. And our goal is to take what was a 10-year development pipeline and ultimately cut it in half by bringing everybody into the same facility and co-optimizing in an environment where the innovator is there, the customers are there, the customers' customers are there, industry partners are there, just to fundamentally change the way that development is done.
And from a service perspective, I view this as the best thing ever because historically, when we've done development with customers, we've done a demo in our facilities, a couple of wafers or chiplets. Now we're going to be developing a process with a customer in a facility where we can put our AIx capability around it, our eco solutions around it. We'll have our service folks there working on developing a fingerprint on these brand-new tools so that when a customer puts it into their R&D facility, we can fingerprint it immediately, bring it up faster, increase speed to market for customers.
So it's a whole ecosystem from the upfront R&D process pure research, all the way through how do we optimize it and get it up into production faster for customers in their R&D and ultimately in the HBM facilities.
Yes. No, I think now is actually a great time. So let's focus on your AGS, your services franchise. As the Head of Applied Services business, you're in contact with all of your major customers. I mean what are their priorities right now? And how is the Applied team helping them out?
So the priority -- in a word, priorities are output. It's good die out. And so it's not just optimizing throughput on an individual tool. It's literally optimizing good die out on every single wafer. So we're leveraging some of the capabilities that we've been developing over the last 10 years in AGS, specifically the AIx platform, which is actionable insight accelerator. This is the way that we bring AI, predictive models, digital twins, recipe optimizers.
This is the way that we bring these to customers in the factory on their tools. So we're working very closely with them on a project basis and a contract basis to optimize output and again, primarily to optimize good die out in this environment. So it's great for us given 2/3 of the AGS revenue today is driven by long-term contracts. So we've got really tight relationships with customers, and they're leveraging the footprint that we have in the fab to help them drive output.
2/3 of the business, long-term contracts and close to high 90s type renewal rates.
So we publish at a greater than 90% renewal rate when our portfolio and services is pretty broad. So we have kind of basic level services, warranty-like services. And then we have managed and performance services, which we really co-optimize with customers, how they manage individual tools and we try to drive output. When we look at managed and performance, the renewal rates are actually quite a bit higher even on those levels. So the stickiness of this because of the value that it provides customers is quite high. And this is a change that we pivoted to about, I'd say, 10, 12 years ago, shifting to more of an outcome-based services type solution. And yes, it's growing quite rapidly.
Your services franchise, 20%, 22% of the company's total revenue base, very, very strong recurring revenues, as you just articulated, within striking distance of 30% operating margins. Through the first half of your fiscal year, AGS is driving 17% year-over-year growth. You did raise your long-term growth outlook from low double digits sort of percentage CAGR to sustainable annual growth in the mid-teens range, right, and potentially higher at least this first year. What's driving the higher growth outlook?
So if we look at the business in the sort of the component parts, so the contract business continues to grow, and it's growing faster in the managed and performance space, which is great. That's exactly what we want with customers because we think that's where we can provide the most value. Those contracts, we are -- I think our average contract length at the moment is about 2.9 years. And the sweet spot for us is somewhere in the 2.5 to 3-year range.
So we're kind of right where we want to be from a visibility standpoint. It helps us plan better for parts and people and performance with customers when we're in that range. So that piece of the business, we're very, very happy with. The next component, I would say, is sort of our on-demand business, and that's on-demand spare parts or if people need contracted labor to come in and do some work. That's a little more tied to factory utilization.
The factory utilization is high, we see the on-demand parts going up. So that's driven it up a little bit more in the near term in combination with this continued strength that we see in the services business. And then the third component of the business in AGS, which we don't talk about too much is we have a software franchise in AGS. So the manufacturing execution system, Smart Factory, the SIM system, Applied is actually the largest supplier of factory-level software for customers.
And that's a space that we see a lot of opportunity going forward, particularly as we think about what's happening in the larger market with AI and Agentic AI. So that platform is an opportunity for us to engage with customers in different ways than we have in the past. So we actually see strength in all 3 of those, and that's why we think there's an opportunity. I think Gary mentioned in the near term to be above that mid-double digit for the year.
Your installed base of tools last 5 to 10 years has been growing at about a 6% to 7% CAGR. Your services business has been growing up until recently, 11% to 13% CAGR. Now you're forecasting mid-teens as we just talked about going forward. Installed base is accelerating. The team is also seeing good traction driving attach to more higher value-added solutions. You talked about things like AIx. I'm wondering how much of this is also contributing to the AGS sort of growth outlook, right? Last, we got an update from the AGS team. Recurring revenue per tool, which is sort of reflective of capturing more value-added capabilities, recurring revenue per tool was growing at about a 5% CAGR. Has this value capture rate actually gone up due to capabilities like AIx, remote diagnostics, digital twins and things like that?
Yes. I think the way we look at it is we are -- we have an innovation pipeline that we think of in AGS. And this consists of these AIx capabilities, supporting these IMS tools, which are different for customers than an individual tool. And then there are other capabilities, cobots and other things that we kind of have in the portfolio that we can deploy to support customers. So as we aggregate these capabilities, what we see is customers are moving up the value chain with respect to the types of service that they're buying from Applied. So more into managed, more into performance type service because they're getting more value out of it.
The other thing I would say that's really important to consider is the process windows today that our customers are dealing with on these really advanced nodes, whether it's memory or advanced logic, they're really small. I mean they're very tight. So part of our focus the last couple of years has been to find ways that whenever there is an event that happens in the factory, first of all, we want to take corrective maintenance events, extend them out. We want to move corrective to preventive.
And we do that with these predictive models that have been created because the ability to take a corrective maintenance activity, move it into a predictive means that now we can work with a customer to schedule that. So they're with moving through the factory, we can look at where there's an optimal time to take the tool down and bring it back up. But it's not just basic maintenance anymore because the process windows are so tight. So we created a capability that we call CROSSMATCH a number of years ago, and we've automated it in partnership with our business units, and it allows us to do a quick fingerprint of the tool before it goes down for maintenance.
When it's a predictive model, we know exactly what we need to do. So we've got the folks trained to come in and do that change. We bring it back up. We refingerprint it and re-center the process so that you get the maximum amount of time from maintenance event to a maintenance event. And this is incredibly important for customers because it allows them to run the tools a little bit longer. And in this environment, as I mentioned, output is king and good die outer king. So if you're not centered in the process window, maybe your edge die go out a little sooner than they would have in the past. So customers are very focused on working with us to kind of optimize that space, and that's where we're seeing a lot of the pull currently, particularly in the contract business.
Got it. We did touch upon advanced packaging. It is a relatively new dynamic for the industry, right? And an incremental growth driver for Applied. We talked a little bit about this, but you mentioned the EPIC partnerships around next-generation advanced packaging development. You have a number of memory customers. Obviously, I think they're focused on things like HBM.
But you announced TSMC, which is more the 2.5D, 3.5D advanced packaging. Today, the Applied team announced a partnership with Broadcom, who also has a plan to bring in some in-house capability on next-generation advanced 2.5D, 3.5D advanced packaging architectures. So you've got this plethora of different sort of topologies for packaging, in which case you have a big portfolio of tools that supports all of these like -- how does all of this drive service intensity for the package part of the business from an AGS perspective? And is this a new sort of facet of growth for the AGS team as well?
I think it is a new opportunity for us. I mean we're #1 in packaging in HBM, and we've got a great position in 3D SoIC in particular. And those are the 2 fastest-growing portions of the packaging market as we see it. So as those tools go into factories, it creates a new opportunity for us on service.
Historically, there are sort of front-end tools and back-end tools, and there wasn't a lot of overlap between the 2 of them. With heterogeneous integration, advanced packaging, we're seeing the front-end requirements and that complexity, the sensitivity is moving to the back end. So those customers are looking for support from Applied on the service side because we've got the understanding of how those tools need to be maintained in an HVM environment. So I think we're in the very early stages of this as we see going forward. But I do think it creates an incremental opportunity for us in the service business in addition to the great opportunity that we have on the equipment side of the business.
In addition to the strong revenue growth that your franchise delivered in the April quarter, gross margins improved 30 basis points sequentially, 120 basis points year-over-year. Operating margins grew 100 basis points to 29%. That's the highest level in over 2 years, right? And on the gross margin improvements, how much of this is more attach of some of the higher value-added services offerings like AIx, software suite, remote monitoring, which I assume is gross margin accretive. And on the strong operating margins, you're within striking distance of 30%. And I know the team has historically thought they could drive AGS operating margins longer term into that sort of low 30% range. Is that still kind of the way we should think about the long-term operating margin construct?
Yes. We think about it 2 ways. And you kind of commented on them in your question. I mean the top line growth is really all about value creation for customers. The more value we can create, the more good die out, the higher output from the factories, customers are willing to do more service work with us, which we appreciate. And this really requires deep, deep integration with the customers into their factories, really good communication, complete alignment on what needs to be done in the facilities. So as we continue to put things into the service innovation pipeline, those are things that add value. That's primarily driving the top line.
The bottom line growth is really all about efficiency. I mean we have a pretty big operation, $6.5 billion or so operation on a run rate basis. And it's -- that infrastructure is there. And the more that you put through the infrastructure, the more efficient it is. So that's very important. We have continental distribution centers on each of the major geographies. We have 3 of them around the world. They've all been fully automated now with robotics. So where we were touching every part stocking, destocking, packing, now like 60% of that is done automatically.
So it's kind of touch-free until it goes into the box. So that allows us to increase velocity of material through those. It's more efficient from a stocking standpoint for us. And it's better for customers because we can turn things around with higher accuracy and faster.
So we're pretty relentless about looking about how we drive efficiency in the business. And that's really what's going to drive the operating margins for us. So again, we think about it 2 ways. Top line is all about value. Bottom line is all about efficiency, and it's -- in this infrastructure. So as utilization has gone up in our customer facilities, we're essentially -- it's not the exact same infrastructure because clearly, we're adding, but we're driving a lot more material through that infrastructure, so it's more efficient.
I see. And for the final question, I am going to tap into your many years of running the -- being a part of the semiconductor systems business. And now that the team breaks out your semi systems gross margins, it's been a positive surprise for us and for the market, right? Almost 55% gross margins, 35% operating margins for the systems business, significant improvement over the past 2 years, has been driven, I think, by higher value as you bring new capabilities like IMS to the market.
As you look at your pipeline of new solutions, does the incremental system gross margin for your next-generation tools carry higher product gross margins? And what is the team doing to drive better cost efficiencies of your systems, which could also help gross margins for the systems business going forward?
Sure. I think as you pointed out, this is really all about value creation, value creation for customers. When you look at these complex tools like an IMS tool, it's a unique capability for Applied to be able to do this. And so they're very high value for customers.
The other thing that if you just look at the data today, in the last, I think, 3 months, we released 5 really advanced new products, not just minor changes, but quite advanced, Trillium being one of them. There's a selective nitride deposition on the precision tool. There's a treatment tool for Veeva that was part of the Master Class. These are all unique capabilities that are helping customers solve really difficult problems, so they've got high value.
So we think -- as I think Brice and Gary both talked about, long range, as we continue to see more and more of these products moving out as the technology continues to evolve, it's going to be beneficial for Applied overall from a gross margin standpoint.
Perfect. Well, we're just about out of time. Tim, thank you for the update on the high-level overall business of Applied and the great insights on your AGS franchise. Thank you very much.
Yes. Thanks for having, Harlan. Appreciate it.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — J.P. Morgan 54th Annual Global Technology
Applied hebt Services und integrierte Systemlösungen als Kernwachstumsträger hervor; starke Nachfrage aus Logic, DRAM und Advanced Packaging treibt Umsatz und Margen.
Tim Deane (Leiter AGS) auf der JPMorgan-Konferenz: Fokus auf Output-Optimierung, AIx-Software, IMS-Plattformen und EPIC-Partnerschaften.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
Applied positioniert das Global Services (AGS)-Geschäft als wachstums- und margenstarke Ergänzung zum Systems‑Geschäft. Kundenpriorität ist "good die out" (maximale Ausbeute); AGS liefert das durch langfristige Verträge, KI-basierte Betriebsoptimierung (AIx) und Factory‑Software. Gleichzeitig treiben integrierte Materialsysteme (IMS) und ein breites Systemportfolio Nachfrage in Logic, DRAM und Packaging.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- AGS‑Modell: Zwei Drittel der AGS‑Umsätze aus langfristigen Verträgen; Renewal‑Raten >90% und Fokus auf managed/performance Services.
- AIx & Software: Predictive Models, digitale Zwillinge und Factory‑Execution‑Software erhöhen Attach‑Rates und wiederkehrende Erlöse.
- IMS & EPIC: Integrierte Materialsysteme als Differenzierer; EPIC‑Ökosystem (Kunden, Partner, Unis) soll Entwicklungszyklen deutlich verkürzen.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Pipeline: >100 Projekte mit Konzentration auf advanced foundry logic, DRAM und advanced packaging; kein breiter Pull‑in von 2027 nach 2026 erkennbar, sondern Mischung aus Greenfield und In‑fab‑Upgrades.
- Wachstumsupdate: AGS H1 YTD +17% YoY; Management hebt langfristiges AGS‑Wachstum auf Mid‑Teens an; Ziel für AGS‑Opmargen in den niedrigen 30% weiterhin angestrebt.
- Partnerschaften: EPIC erhält Zuwachs (u.a. Broadcom, Advantest, mehrere Universitäten) — betont Ko‑Entwicklung statt isolierter Kunden‑R&D.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Ursprung Upside: Nachfrageanstieg kommt sowohl aus Greenfield (Logic/DRAM) als auch aus In‑fab‑Optimierungen; konkrete Mix‑Konversionen über 2–3 Jahre nicht beziffert.
- Service‑Intensity: IMS‑ und Packaging‑Plattformen sind wartungs‑ und serviceintensiver, treiben Attach‑Rates und Parts/On‑demand‑Umsatz.
- Margenentwicklung: Systeme zeigen hohe Bruttomargen (~55%); AGS‑Roherträge und Automatisierung in Distribution/Logistik sollen Opmargen weiter stützen — Management bleibt optimistisch, aber nennt keine exakten Stufenpläne.
⚡ Bottom Line
Für Aktionäre bedeutet das Interview: Applied profitiert von einem diversifizierten Hebel — wachsendes, wiederkehrendes Servicegeschäft plus hochmargige System‑Innovationen (IMS, neue Produkte) geben bessere Umsatz‑ und Margensichtbarkeit. Kernrisiken bleiben Ausführung (Personal, globale Installationen) und die tatsächliche Konversion der Pipeline in Aufträge; Beobachten lohnt sich insbesondere bei EPIC‑Fortschritt, Attach‑Rates und AGS‑Marginentwicklung.
Applied Materials — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to the Applied Materials Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Mike Sullivan, Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. With me are Gary Dickerson, our President and CEO; and Brice Hill, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call includes forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ. Information concerning these risks and uncertainties is discussed in our most recent Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC.
Today's call also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to GAAP measures can be found in today's earnings press release and in our quarterly earnings materials, which are available on our website at ir.appliedmaterials.com. In addition, any comments regarding calendar 2026 refer to Q2 of this fiscal year through Q1 of fiscal 2027, which will be a 14-week quarter.
Next, I'll share some calendar items. I'm pleased to announce the second event in our 2026 Master Class series. We'll cover DRAM and advanced packaging on a live webcast on Thursday, June 25, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time.
Next, I'd like to remind you about our two special events during SEMICON West. On Monday afternoon, October 12, we invite you to the unveiling of the new EPIC Center in Sunnyvale, California. And on Tuesday morning, October 13, we hope you'll join Gary, Brice and our business unit leaders for our investor breakfast presentation at the Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco. You can join us in person or on a live webcast.
And with that introduction, I'd now like to turn the call over to Gary Dickerson.
Thank you, Mike. In our second fiscal quarter, Applied Materials delivered record revenue and earnings, along with our highest gross margin in more than 25 years. With rising demand and increasing long-term visibility from customers, we see an exceptionally strong foundation for sustained multiyear revenue and profit growth. The momentum in our business is being driven by three key factors: first, the rapid global build-out of AI computing infrastructure. Second, Applied's leadership positions in the most enabling and highest value areas of the market, particularly leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging. And third, strong execution across our operations and supply chain.
In my prepared remarks, I will provide an update on how our markets are evolving, explain how Applied is enabling the AI road map with our differentiated technology and exciting pipeline of new products and outline how we're transforming the way we work with customers, partners and across the company to drive higher velocity, increase operating leverage and scale more efficiently.
Over the past several months, global AI adoption has continued to accelerate as improvements in the performance and cost of AI computing are translating into real-world applications that deliver compelling returns for users. If I look at our own company as an example, today, we have more than 35,000 AI users across our global workforce. We are deploying AI to drive new scientific breakthroughs, accelerate research and development programs, optimize factory and supply chain operations, increase innovation and productivity and services and automate workflows across our corporate functions. This enables us to redirect resources towards higher value work and grow the business significantly faster than our headcount. Similar dynamics are playing out across a broad range of industries and organizations. Publicly available data indicates that global token generation has increased more than threefold in just the past three months.
Importantly, AI demand is not only growing rapidly, it's also diversifying. Since the beginning of the year, there has been a meaningful increase in agentic applications, which layer on top of continued growth in generative AI training and inference workloads. AI computing architectures are workload-specific and optimized for different generative, agentic or physical AI models. Agentic AI models do more than respond to queries, they plan, reason and execute tasks autonomously. They therefore require a computing architecture that is more CPU-intensive, while also increasing demand for DRAM and NAND. As agentic AI applications grow, they provide an additional tailwind for wafer fab equipment.
Last quarter, we said the availability of clean room space was a key factor pacing the rate of industry investment. As customers find new ways to reallocate or create space, we are seeing incremental requests for equipment deliveries in 2026, and we now expect our semiconductor equipment business will grow more than 30% this calendar year. Given the unprecedented demand environment, we are working closely with our customers on longer-range planning. Our largest customers are providing rolling 8-quarter forecasts, so we can prepare the required manufacturing capacity and service resources for their ramps. With this improved visibility, we see continued growth across this extended planning horizon into 2027 and beyond. And we are investing to support our customers' expansion plans.
For AI computing, leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging have the greatest impact on overall system performance, power efficiency and costs. As a result, we expect these three areas to account for more than 80% of the year-on-year growth in total wafer fab equipment spending in 2026 and see a similar profile in 2027. These are also the areas where Applied has strong leadership positions and an innovative pipeline of next-generation technologies. In leading-edge foundry logic, Applied is the clear #1 process equipment provider with highly differentiated solutions in materials deposition, modification and treatments, conductor etch and e-beam technologies. Gate-all-around nodes grow our available market considerably while also providing a catalyst for multiple points of market share gains. This quarter, we announced two new products that further strengthen our gate-all-around portfolio.
To meet the requirements of different AI workloads in the data center and at the edge, chip makers provide designers with a range of transistor options with some tuned for peak performance and others turned to use the lowest amount of power. This tuning is achieved through precise optimization of the materials in the metal gate stack. Our new Trillium ALD integrated material solution precisely deposits metals in the most complex gate-all-around transistor gate stacks. By integrating multiple metal deposition steps in a single platform, Trillium ALD provides angstrom-level thickness control of metal gate stack layers giving chip makers maximum flexibility to tune threshold voltages across different transistors.
In advanced foundry logic, shallow trench isolation or STI, is used to electrically separate neighboring transistors. These narrow isolation trenches are some of the smallest structures in a gate-all-around device. Our new precision PECVD system uses an industry-first selective bottom-up deposition process to place material exactly where it's needed and protect the STI structure from damage during subsequent processing steps. By preserving the original shape and height of the isolation trench, our new PECVD solution reduces parasitic capacitance and lowers leakage to boost device performance. In advanced packaging, Applied is also the overall leader with strong positions in high-bandwidth memory and 3D chiplet stacking. We expect to grow our packaging revenues more than 50% in calendar 2026 and are very well positioned at upcoming packaging inflections.
We recently announced our intent to acquire NEXX to further strengthen Applied's portfolio of panel-level technologies, which are designed to enable larger body packages for AI accelerators. In DRAM, AI computing is driving incredibly strong demand and customers are aggressively adding capacity at 6F squared nodes, while accelerating their development of next-generation device architectures. Applied is the #1 process equipment provider in memory today thanks to our very strong position in DRAM wiring, patterning and peripheral logic steps. We expect to gain additional DRAM market share at upcoming transistor and device architecture inflections. We will provide more details at our next master class in June, which will cover both our DRAM and advanced packaging technology road maps.
To accelerate the industry's road map further, we are changing the way we work with our customers and partners by creating a new model for collaboration and innovation. Applied's global EPIC platform is designed to significantly reduce the time it takes to commercialize breakthrough technologies all the way from early-stage research to full-scale manufacturing. For chip makers, EPIC provides earlier access to Applied's R&D portfolio and faster cycles of learning through the co-location of key innovators from customers, partners and Applied. In addition, EPIC co-innovation programs will provide us with greater multi-node visibility to guide R&D investments and resource allocation, increase R&D productivity and value sharing and accelerate design wins for applied equipment and services.
The centerpiece of the platform is the new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley which remains on track to begin operations in the fall. Earlier this week, we announced our EPIC co-development engagement with TSMC, who joined as a founding partner together with Micron, Samsung and SK Hynix. We're also excited to announce our first 3 EPIC university partnerships with ASU, RPI and Stanford as well as the development partner agreement with Advantest.
We are finalizing additional EPIC agreements that we will publicly announce in the coming months. To accelerate the transfer of new technologies from Applied's labs to customers' fabs, we are also driving new innovations in service. Service is another important growth driver for Applied as we increase the revenue we generate per tool on top of a growing installed base. As a result, we expect Applied Global Services to deliver a sustainable annual growth rate in the mid-teens and potentially higher this year.
Our advanced service solutions enable customers to accelerate production ramps and optimize output, yield and cost in their high-volume manufacturing environment. Today, we have more than 35,000 chambers connected to our proprietary AIx software capabilities that use AI-powered monitoring, diagnostics and analytics.
Before I hand it over to Brice, let me briefly summarize. AI adoption is accelerating and diversifying, fueling broad and durable demand for semiconductors and semiconductor equipment. Leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging are the most critical drivers of performance, power efficiency and cost for AI computing. As a result, we expect these three areas to account for more than 80% of the year-on-year growth in total wafer fab equipment spending in 2026 and see a similar profile in 2027. These are areas where Applied has strong market leadership today and a high-value pipeline of next-generation products, providing us with an exceptionally strong foundation for sustained multiyear revenue and profit growth.
Finally, through EPIC, our advanced services portfolio and rapid AI adoption across our operations, we are transforming how we work with customers, partners and inside Applied Materials, driving higher velocity, improving value capture and efficiently scaling the company as the industry grows. Brice, over to you.
Thanks, Gary. AI is driving wafer fab equipment spending to the areas where Applied has been investing the most and we see the positive mix continuing in the second half of the calendar year and well beyond. As the market shifted to our areas of strength in Q2, we delivered double-digit sequential and year-over-year growth across revenue, operating profit and earnings per share.
I'd like to thank our teams and partners for making these results possible by meeting strong customer demand for our AI enabling materials engineering technologies and systems. On today's call, I'll provide an update on the demand environment, discuss several strategic priorities, summarize our Q2 results and provide our Q3 guidance. Since we spoke February, the demand outlook has strengthened across almost every leading indicator we track. Cloud service providers continue to increase capital investments. Most leading-edge logic and DRAM fabs are running at full capacity. Our customers have announced more fab projects and are giving up the clearest and longest visibility we've ever had. Customers have been using a variety of techniques to increase clean room capacity this year, which is growing the market and our revenue expectations. And based on our latest discussions with them, we expect 2027 will be another strong record year for the industry.
Next, I'll summarize several of our strategic priorities. Our top priority is increasing output to serve our customers' growing demand. We've nearly doubled our manufacturing capacity to support them with expansions in the U.S. and Europe and an additional new manufacturing center in Singapore. We've increased our build plan, inventory positions and logistics capacity. We are systematically translating our 8-quarter customer demand forecast into a consolidated signal to our suppliers. Ensuring they have the visibility they need to make their own capacity and resource additions.
Next, I'll share how this translates to profitability, funding our collaborative R&D process, helps us identify the highest value technology challenges and gives us line of sight to the most compelling solutions. As we bring newly developed tools to market, our portfolio becomes more valuable and our gross margins expand. In fact, our non-GAAP gross margin has increased 800 basis points since Gary became CEO in 2013. It is now crossing 50% at the company level and approaching 55% in Semiconductor Systems. In addition, we are focused on driving higher operating profit and leverage with productivity tools and plans being deployed across the company. While fully investing in the R&D that grows our business and gross margins, we also expect to increase spending more slowly than revenue and deliver increasing operating profit.
Next, I'll summarize our Q2 results. We generated record revenue of $7.91 billion, which is up 13% sequentially and 11% year-over-year. Non-GAAP gross margin reached 50% in the quarter, increasing 80 basis points year-over-year driven by value-based pricing from our most differentiated products, coupled with ongoing manufacturing cost innovations. Non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 32.1%, up 140 basis points year-over-year. And we delivered record non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.86, which was up 20% year-over-year.
Turning to the segments. Semiconductor Systems delivered record revenue of $5.97 billion, which was up 16% sequentially and up 10% year-over-year. The transition to gate all around nodes, along with capacity additions at leading-edge FinFET nodes drove record foundry revenue as well as record revenue across ALD, epitaxy and materials treatments. DRAM revenue of $1.7 billion grew 18% year-over-year. Advanced packaging revenue is accelerating this calendar year within both foundry logic and DRAM, and investments are shifting toward our leadership positions in 3D stacking. Segment gross margin and operating margin both increased year-over-year.
Applied Global Services delivered record revenue of $1.67 billion, which is up 17% year-over-year, reflecting the benefit of higher fab utilizations. Services growth remained strong as our installed base expands and customers choose our most advanced services to boost output and yield. AGS also generated year-over-year increases in gross margin and operating margin. Other revenue of $280 million was in line with our expectations. China represented 24% of our semiconductor systems plus AGS revenue. We expect our business in China and our ICAPS business worldwide to be flat to slightly higher in the calendar year. Cash from operations was $845 million. Capital expenditures were $635 million, resulting in free cash flow of $210 million. We distributed $765 million to shareholders, including $365 million in dividends and $400 million in stock repurchases. In March, we announced a 15% increase to the quarterly cash dividend and achieved a goal we set several years ago to double the dividend per share.
Now I'll share our guidance for Q3. We expect company revenue of $8.95 billion, plus or minus $500 million, which is up nearly 23% year-over-year. We expect non-GAAP EPS of $3.36 plus or minus $0.20, which is up nearly 36% year-over-year. Within this outlook, we expect Semiconductor Systems revenue of around $6.9 billion, AGS revenue of about $1.75 billion and other revenue of around $300 million. We expect non-GAAP gross margin to increase modestly to approximately 50.1%, and we expect non-GAAP operating expenses of around $1.485 billion. Finally, we're modeling a non-GAAP tax rate of around 11%.
In summary, the growth in AI that we've been investing for is now in full force. As a result, the industry spending mix has shifted to leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging where Applied has built the #1 process equipment market positions. We are investing with confidence to support the strong long-term growth our customers are giving us visibility into and ensuring our suppliers do the same. Finally, we are using the benefits of the AI technologies we enable to accelerate innovation and revenue generation and increase operating leverage and shareholder returns.
Now Mike, please begin the Q&A session.
Thanks, Brice. To help us reach as many people as we can on today's call, please ask just one question and no more than one brief follow-up.Operator, let's please begin.
And our first question for today comes from the line of C.J. Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.
2. Question Answer
You talked about 8-quarter rolling visibility with customers. And I'm curious how that might be causing order patterns to change, perhaps upfront payments, a change in the pricing environment. I would love to hear how you're thinking about your relationship with customers, given how tight equipment is and will likely be for years to come.
Hi, C.J., it's Brice. Thanks for the question. So yes, for the large customers, we're definitely working on 8-quarter rolling visibility with them. That helps us primarily plan the supply chain. Our supply chain needs that kind of lead time in order to make their investments and expansions across the large group of suppliers. We've said before, we have on the order of 2,000 direct suppliers and a large number of components for each tool. So that's the primary reason. From a payments perspective, as you know, some of our customers do -- we do require deposits, but that's not across the board. On the pricing side of things, our pricing generally works as long-term contracts with customers based on projects, so you can picture it as a 2- to 3-year pricing contract for a particular project.
So pricing moves relatively slowly in the environment. What has been driving our pricing up over the past couple of years and helping us grow our gross margin over the past couple of years has been the gradual enriching of the portfolio. So every time we launch a new solution, it's typically a more important solution in terms of its value to customers, solving complex problems. That makes the portfolio stronger, and we price accordingly for that. And that's why you've seen our systems gross margins improve over the last 2 years. So I'll leave it at that. No -- at this point in time, no change in the overall model.
Yes. C.J., this is Gary. I would say relative to pricing, really, we're in a great position in the industry in that the most critical innovations for AI computing are in the sweet spot for Applied in leading-edge foundry logic DRAM in advanced packaging and really applied innovations or enabling these architecture inflections that are providing tremendous improvements in computing. So that puts us in a good position with tailwinds to drive pricing in the near term. And then also, as we're creating more value for our customers, it creates an opportunity for us to capture more value from Applied Materials. So I have high confidence that the margin progress that we've seen over the last few years is going to continue as we go forward.
As a quick follow-up, just on the gross margin side, a great guide with, I'm assuming, depressed China. How should we think about gross margins beyond the July quarter, particularly, as it appears as silicon will continue to grow sequentially well into 2027 and beyond?
Hi, C.J., thank you. So we guided 50.1% for the company-level gross margin. I'll just remind investors that we're now reporting our gross margin for each operating segment. So they'll be able to see that our Semi Systems gross margin is 54.8% in Q2, and that represents the improvements we're talking about. And on the systems, to your point, we expect to continue to make improvements, that's really driven by the gradual strength in portfolio as we launch new equipment. So the improvement will be slow, but we expect continued improvement in the gross margins. And that's really where you get that guide of 50.1%. So a slight increase for Q3 from Q2, and we would expect to be able to continue that process going forward as we launch new tools and solutions.
And our next question comes from the line of Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research.
For a 30% year-over-year equipment growth, so that looks like you're suggesting something like $14.5 billion, $15 billion in the second half of the calendar year for equipments? And I guess, I just want to verify that's true. And I guess what are your thoughts -- it was too early about calendar '27, but I mean given '26 is still a constrained year. I guess what are your thoughts on WFE growth versus your own growth in '26? And is there any reason to think that '27 couldn't be even better as cleaners become more available? I guess just how do we think about the trajectory of growth into '27 as the clean rooms like come online relative to what you're suggesting as we see into the back half of this year?
Yes. Stacy, good to hear from you. So on the 30% year-over-year equipment growth, it does suggest a second half on the order that you described. We do think that the demand signal is very strong. Our customers increased orders in the last 90 days, as Gary described, as customers are finding new floor space and clean room solutions. And I think investors should think about when they think about the road map of capacity. We've said before, we're tracking over 100 factory projects globally. We added more than 10 just in the last quarter. So you should expect a pipeline of new clean room coming on board, so customers can continue to grow the wafer starts across the end markets that we're talking about. So we do expect growth in WFE. We do expect growth in wafer starts overall, and we think that's headlined by the AI demand function.
Yes. Again, as Brice indicated, '27 still looks like a strong growth year for us. And I can tell you that I'm having constant conversations with customers, and they're looking at '27, and they're looking at '28. Again, because the compute demand is growing so quickly. Earlier on the call, we talked about agentic AI on top of what we've been seeing and that we're modeling incremental CPU demand, incremental DRAM and NAND demand, that's a meaningful increase on top of what we had been forecasting previously. And then you go beyond that with physical AI coming in the future, we think this demand environment is going to continue strong for a number of years. And certainly, as I'm having many conversations with customers, that is a major focus for them.
Got it. That's helpful. For my follow-up, I wanted to ask about your manufacturing capacity. So you see you doubled it. So is it all ready to go? Like how much revenue -- I guess how full -- maybe the question I'm asking is like if it was full, how much revenue capacity could you actually support, and is there actually more margin upside as that capacity that you brought online actually starts to fill up?
Stacy, yes. So on the first part, from a floor space perspective, it's ready to go and available. We would have to fit that up and hire people as we ramp. So we have the capability of significantly expanding the output. Last quarter, I said we could double as we're growing, it eats into that a little bit, but that's a rough approximation. So we have significant capacity available. Our job is to work with the supply chain and have the supply chain work at the same speed we are.
And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities.
If we look at WFE growth this year, it's very strong, but it is still the semiconductor industry growth, mainly because semis are being driven more by pricing rather than units. So Gary, I'm curious that as you look over the next 1 to 3 years, do you think that semi industry growth comes more from units, or it still continues to be reliant on pricing?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Vivek. Again, when I'm talking to our customers or our customers' customers, I think everyone sees tremendous increase in computing demand going forward. And I talked about all these layers of demand that are increasing as we go forward. So I think that, and as I mentioned also with customers, the focus -- I was just with a customer 2 days ago, they were worried about the supply all the way into 2030. So again, the computing demand, I think, is increasing. I'm not going to speculate on pricing.
What we do see, again, is broadening in terms of the customers that we're working with because everyone sees this increase in compute demand, and that is really great for Applied because all of the markets that are growing the fastest, the leading-edge foundry logic. We're seeing a broadening of demand, very strong demand for DRAM and high-bandwidth memory. The ecosystem working on new packaging architectures that drive major improvements in performance and power tokens per second per watt. So again, all of this is great for Applied. I'm not going to speculate on the units versus pricing. But what I would say is that the market environment for Applied has never been better and our positions in the market have never been better.
And for my follow-up, if your system sales are growing over 30%, and there's a lot of discussion that maybe growth accelerates next year. How should we think about growth in AGS given that level of growth? Is there some kind of correlation? Is there some kind of kind of lagging growth that we can start to see acceleration even in AGS at some point?
Hi, Vivek, it's Brice. Yes, thanks for that question. So we had previously communicated low double-digits growth expectation for AGS, our services business. And to your point, as the systems business is running higher, and we've raised expectations for the systems business, that means the AGS installed base will grow. So the service opportunity for AGS grows and as well as the spare parts and as factory utilizations have improved. So we are going to raise our expectations for AGS to mid-teens for sort of the normal environment. And we think this year will end up being a little bit higher than that because we have so many -- so much utilization improvement across the industry and so many new factories that, that gives extra bump. So I would say mid-teens from a medium-term modeling perspective and higher than that this year.
The other thing I would say on AGS, there's never been a time where output yield innovation is more valuable than today. And I mentioned earlier on the call that we have over 35,000 chambers connected to our AIx servers. So we're also driving service innovations with AI-enabled applications, predictive models to improve wafer fab output, yield and cost. So I think in addition to the growing equipment business that will help accelerate AGS growth. We're also driving higher value service innovations that will also support that growth.
And our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.
Brice, I wanted to go back to this up 30% -- at least 30% this year as well. So if I just do the math, I mean, it sort of implies that you barely grow off of the July levels, which doesn't seem possible given you're booked out for at least a year. So I would think you can probably grow at least the same number of dollars in Systems that you've been growing in the last 2 quarters. So that would put you like more above 40%. So I'm surprised you said above 30% and not above 40%. So are you just being conservative, or is there something like in the back half of the year where the sequentials can't grow as fast from an absolute Systems level. Can you just talk about that?
Sure. Just to reiterate, we're saying 30% growth year-over-year in our Systems business. And Tim, I think we're not giving explicit linearity for the out quarters, but we'd be comfortable if you just assumed it was linear from Q3 to Q4 to our fiscal Q1.
Okay. So it's going to grow about the same on a dollar basis? Brice is that -- sorry, just to clarify.
On a dollar basis, I would just draw a line and say it grows linearly from our Q3 guide through Q1.
Okay. Got it. And then, Gary, can I ask you about Huawei story, I mean, how do you think about -- I mean that letter in and of itself is not -- like it doesn't really hurt you at all. But how do you think about the risk of that broadening because there's a lot of examples of these fabs being co-mingled in these clusters, some of which you can ship to and some of which you can't. So is there a risk that this spreads and maybe it sort of then captures more in the net, where you can't ship to these fab complexes that have stuff that's allowed and stuff that's not allowed co-mingled in the same complex. Can you just talk about that?
Yes. Thanks, Tim. Let me just clarify. Relative to our semi equipment business, we'll grow 30% or more in the year. And it's really supply chain. That's one thing that is, I think, an issue for everybody. As Brice mentioned earlier, our operations can scale significantly beyond where we're at right now. But it takes time for the supply chain to respond. And certainly, we're working that as rapidly as we can. And I really do believe we've made tremendous improvements in our supply chain and our operations over the last several years.
So I feel really good about that. Relative to restrictions, I don't really want to comment on that. All of that has been factored into our guide for the quarter in our viewpoint on growth in the calendar year. And again, what I would say, if you look at the mix of business going forward, the AI compute innovations are really going to drive in '26, '27 and going forward, leading edge foundry logic, DRAM, high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging. And those are the areas where Applied has tremendous strength, and we are absolutely positioned to gain share as these inflections happen in all of those different markets.
And our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan.
In addition to technology migration and greenfield capacity build-outs, your customers are looking at their existing capacity footprints. They're trying to figure out how they can squeeze more wafers out of their fabs, it's more good die per wafer. So focusing essentially on throughput and/or focusing on yield or both, right. Is the Applied team seeing this? And is this an incremental driver of growth, more tool sales to alleviate bottlenecks maybe upgrades to improve tool throughput or maybe advanced services and analytics adoption to improve productivity and yields. Is this driving some of the incremental growth?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Harlan. Yes, absolutely. And I mentioned this a little bit earlier. Output and yield innovation is really a key focus for all of our customers. Again, it takes time for them to create more floor space to ramp their factories. So there is a huge focus and engagement, and this is really helping us to drive our service growth rate at a higher pace than we've seen in the past or even that we were anticipating in the past. And that's where I would also come back to how we're implementing AI inside Applied Materials. We have all of these connected chambers. Most of them are connected remotely, so we can have instantaneous experts connected into all of those different chambers. And again, this is elevating, increasing our expectations for our service growth rate going forward.
And then maybe for Brice, in addition to the strong growth in AGS, gross margins improved 30 basis points sequentially 120 basis points year-over-year. Operating margins grew 100 basis points sequentially to 29%, right? I think that's like the highest level in like the past 2 or 3 years. On the gross margin improvements, how much of this is just more attach of some of the higher value-added services like your AIx software suite, remote tool monitoring solutions, which I assume are all gross margin accretive. And then on the strong operating margins, I did notice that your OpEx for that segment was down about 8% sequentially. Was that just cost efficiency activities, or does that delta come back this quarter?
Thanks for the question. So on the gross margins there, I think the mix to more transactional and more spare parts in the quarter have helped us. So that's one of the drivers. You're right, the new service products that we're providing also help from a margin perspective. So I think those are the major drivers. And I think on the expense side, we did some restructuring that helped us with expenses. So -- but I would expect that we're continuing to invest in that business. We're building a training center. We're adding to our customer engineers and essentially expanding for the ramp at this point. So no change in expectations from a spending perspective. I think the margins are at a healthy spot at this point.
And our next question comes from the line of Atif Milk from Citi.
Gary, with your acquisition of NEXX in panel level packaging, can you help us understand how does that fit with your JV with Besi, what is the adoption time line for large panel packaging?
Thanks for the question, Atif. So I would say that we are the leader in packaging. I mentioned earlier on the call, we're going to grow that business over 50% this year. And I would say that in the entire semiconductor industry, this is one of the most exciting areas driving compute architecture innovation. So how you connect computing components together in large body sizes is an enormous focus for everybody. So at Applied, we have been investing. You mentioned the hybrid bonding technology and the acquisition of NEXX, that's a leading supplier of large area packaging, electroplating. There are a number of different innovations that we're driving. And this fits into that overall strategy where we also have a full-flow packaging EPIC Center, that is the only one in the industry.
We're engaged with all of our existing customers and then also there are a number of people working on new large body sized architectures again, to really drive tremendous improvements in performance and power the tokens per second per watt. So this is all part of that overall strategy that we've been investing in the last few years. You see, again, over 50% growth this year in our packaging business. Next year, we anticipate also a strong growth.
And the timing for those architectures, I would say that there is a tremendous amount of focus to bring those architectures to market as fast as possible. I'd really rather not comment on specific timing. I would just say that Applied, we have deep connectivity across the entire ecosystem with all of those people that are driving those new architectures. We have the broadest packaging portfolio in the industry. And we are really at the foundation of the key innovations needed to enable those new architectures.
Great. As my follow-up, Brice, I understand you guys do not comment on a particular project. But you said there are 10 new projects in the pipeline, and there's a lot of investor interest in Terafab. Will that be a project that will be in the pipeline, or is that more like next year?
Well, just to correct the record, I said more than 10. And you're right, I can't name any -- I can't be specific about any of those, sorry.
And our next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar from TD Cowen.
Gary, the first one for you. Applied had an interesting slide at SPIE that showed DRAM 1 delta node to be more litho intensive compared to 1 gamma. And obviously, you have 4F squared coming after that, which is more depth and etch intensive. So I'm wondering, do you expect 1 delta to be a big node and if so, could that slow down the depth and etch intensity in DRAM on an interim basis?
Yes. Thanks, Krish, for the question. So let me -- from an overall standpoint, DRAM, we are the #1 process equipment provider. And there's innovation happening at 6F squared, 4F squared and certainly going forward to 3D DRAM. So if I look at Applied in terms of near-term innovation, periphery CMOS logic being upgraded for higher performance and lower power transistors is a strong driver for our DRAM business, including very strong growth in epi. Of course, in DRAM, HBM packaging is a huge focus for everyone, stacking more chips vertically. And then for Applied Materials deposition with wiring and patterning, and we have very strong positions, leadership in conductor etch and e-beam technologies in DRAM.
So what I would say is that there is a lot of innovation happening in 6F squared that really extends our process equipment leadership and is contributing to the growth that we're talking about on the call here today, and we're even better positioned for 4F squared and 3D DRAM. I think if you remember, over the last a little more than 10 years, we gained 10 points of overall share in WFE and DRAM. We've been really performing incredibly well over the last few years and then this year is another great year for our DRAM business.
So I think for Applied, we're in a great position. And relative to litho intensity, I believe that going forward, for sure, materials intensity will increase, especially with 3D DRAM, and we're in a great position with 6F squared innovation, 4F squared and 3D DRAM.
Gary, just a quick follow-up either for you or Brice. I understand your customers are giving visibility into 2028. I understand for your capacity and personal planning purposes, but also some new greenfield and NAND scheduled for 2028. Is it fair to assume '28 could be another growth year for WFE after impressive '26 and '27, is it too early to make that call?
We don't think it's too early, Krish. I think we think it's secular growth. AI is the headline workload that's driving the secular growth. So we think you'll see more and more capacity plans from customers. That's the expectation is right now, it is factory limited as we've said, but we expect customers to continue adding projects to grow the outlook.
And our next question comes from the line of Shane Brett from Morgan Stanley.
My first question is, so the Gartner data showed that your conductor etch market share picked up about 300 basis points in 2025 despite weaknesses in other areas of your portfolio. Apologies if this is a bit of a trailing, backward-looking question. But how should we think about where those share gains came from? How should we think about your path towards being a market leader in this space where are those sort of incremental share gains going forward going to come from for your conductor etch business?
Yes, Shane, thanks for the question. So etch, let me talk about going forward, and then I'll talk about the overall market environment. So this year, etch will be one of our fastest-growing businesses this calendar year. and Applied as #1 in conductor etch for leading edge foundry logic gate-all-around nodes and #1 in conductor etch for DRAM. And both of those areas I talked about earlier on the call are some of the fastest-growing certainly in '26 and going forward. So we've been building a stronger position in leading-edge foundry logic. We've always been very strong in DRAM. .
And in our products, Sym3 is the fastest ramping product in Applied's history. We recently talked in one of our master classes about our new Sym3 Z platform. We've seen strong adoption there with more than 250 chambers, multi-hundreds of millions of dollars of growth in etch. So I think we're really, really in a great position. As I said, one of the fastest-growing businesses this calendar year. The other thing is really the opportunity for us to co-optimize across our whole portfolio.
So when we're working with our customers on new architectures, whether it's gate all around or wiring or new DRAM architectures, really that opportunity to co-optimize helps us -- we have great technology, but also we have great integration capabilities that's helping us grow this business at a high rate.
Great. And for my follow-up, this may be a little bit critical, but your process control market share continues to decline. Contrary to conductor etch where you are seeing share gains. My question is just how do you see the strategic importance of your process control business within your broader franchise?
Well, I believe this is one of our best opportunities overall within Applied Materials. So last year, we grew this business at a high rate. This year, PDC is going to be one of our fastest-growing businesses. And I'm very, very positive on the growth in '26, and I'm even more positive about our growth going forward. We have clear leadership in eBeam with our Cold Field Emission technology that gives us the highest resolution and the fastest imaging. This year, our optical inspection business is also on track for strong growth. We have a great pipeline of new technologies that we're going to introduce over the next couple of years that will also drive significant growth in PDC.
So one of our fastest-growing businesses this year positioned for strong growth in '27 and as we go forward. And the other thing I would add is there's great synergy with our eBeam leadership with the rest of Applied Materials in accelerating learning rate. So our process equipment teams, they're using this leadership in eBeam imaging to optimize processes at a faster pace. So that is helping us to drive growth in our process equipment business on top of PDC being a great growth business in and of itself. So again, I don't share your view on the perspective on the business. I think this is a great business, one of our fastest growing this year, and I'm very optimistic we're going to keep this growth going, going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Joe Quatrochi from Wells Fargo.
I was wondering if you could talk about your supplies position for greenfield versus upgrades. I would assume given that the portfolio depth and just the number of new greenfield fab projects expanding into next year. How do we think about just the accelerating growth opportunity for Applied relative to peers?
Joe, it's Brice. Yes, I think most of the projects we track are greenfield projects, especially on the logic side. We do very well on greenfield. That's probably the best intensity from Applied perspective. We also do well in upgrades. The one place that that's different is NAND. We don't participate as much in upgrades. But I think what you're seeing in the environment is just a continued search for more and more floor space and more equipment being put in place. You see that in DRAM, you see that in leading logic. And of course, that's been the case in ICAPS as new -- significant new capacity has been added over the last several years. So I think a lot of that investment is greenfield.
And then as a follow-up, increasing the AGS long-term growth expectation. Can you help us just kind of bridge the gap? I think the prior target had included the 200-millimeter business that's now moved into Systems. So I guess like how do we think about the impact of that to the increase in the growth expectation?
Yes. Joe, so that should be a clean look at this point. So we've moved the 200-millimeter equipment business and restated our financials or recast our financials. So that's all in our Systems business at this point. So when we look forward on AGS, we're only talking about the services business. And you may have heard, I just updated our outlook for that and said, mid-teens for the AGS business is sort of a good multiyear growth rate assumption. And then we expect to be higher this year because we have a increase in utilization across the ecosystem and an increase in the number of new fabs ramping relative. So there's a step up this year that helps that business be higher than the mid-teens.
And operator, we have time for two more questions today, please.
And our next question comes from the line of Jim Schneider from Goldman Sachs.
Your mix of business this quarter pivoted quite strongly again to foundry logic. I'm curious, as you look into the back half of this year or whether you see more of a return to spending in greater concentration to DRAM? And then on a preliminary basis as you looking into 2027, which do you expect to be the fastest growing technology area?
Thanks, Jim. Yes, in the second half, it goes back to the theme that we've been describing. You're going to see strong growth in leading-edge logic, in DRAM, in advanced packaging and actually NAND also. So you're seeing a pull really from the headliner AI across the entire end market grouping with the exception of ICAPS. So ICAPS goes back to -- there'll be some digestion with all the capacity that's been put in place the past couple of years. So -- and we didn't call a fast grower between DRAM and leading logic. I think both of those will be accelerating in the second half.
And then as you look at your customers' longer-term plans, can you share where they're seeing the greatest upside to the longer-term forecast across those same areas?
That's a good question. I think we haven't answered which one between DRAM and leading logic will be the most growth across the multiyear horizon. We think both of those will be very strong and actually advanced packaging goes right with it. On the NAND, we see -- we did raise our bit growth forecast for NAND. So probably a few percentage points and at least our view is, it will still be satisfied by upgrades. So we don't expect a lot of new wafer starts on the NAND side, but we do think the demand forecast for bits has gone up on NAND.
Yes. Jim, just also part of the question you asked earlier, we see a similar profile in '27 to what we're seeing in '26. And really, that's being driven by AI computing. The markets that are growing the fastest in '26. We think they continue to grow at that same rate as a percentage of the mix in '27 and going forward.
And our final question for today then comes from the line of Melissa Weathers from Deutsche Bank.
I just wanted to touch really quickly on the ICAPS side that, Brice, you kind of just talked about, but I think if we look at a lot of the analog reports, this earnings season, it does seem like inventories are starting to lean out and maybe utilization of those fabs are starting to get better. So I realize it's not the fastest-growing part of your business. But any updated outlook you guys have on maybe when we could see some more material spending on that core ICAPS business going forward?
Melissa, good question. And that's a great point. There are some strong areas in ICAPS. I think analog and photonics, power chips are all areas that we're seeing that are very strong. So that makes sense to us. I would just encourage investors to think ICAPS is still a very strong market. It's one of our largest markets. I think this is the first year in a few years where leading logic is actually ahead of ICAPS, but ICAPS is still plugging along, still adding capacity at a significant rate. It will just be -- it just won't grow a lot year-over-year until we digest the capacity.
The utilizations have improved in ICAPS. So to your point, I think 300-millimeter utilizations are in a very healthy range at this point. So when we look forward, we expect ICAPS from an equipment perspective, to eventually start growing at the same rate the devices are, which is mid- to high single digits. We just have to get past this period where utilizations catch up with the installed capacity.
Got it. If I can squeeze one last one in, in the end of the call. Just the EPIC Center, I know you guys are a couple of months away from unveiling that. So just any last couple statements you can make on what that could do to drive innovation. And I don't know if it would be share gains or competitive advantage, but anything on EPIC Center we should look forward to?
Yes. Melissa. I'm really excited about the EPIC Center. I mean, again, all of our customers and the entire ecosystem earlier is in a race for leadership or AI computing. That is really driving our businesses in leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM, high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging. And really, when you think about architecture innovation, Applied's material innovations are really at the foundation of all of those architecture innovations across all of those fast-growing segments. So having our customers and partners co-located with these technologies that are enabling the architecture innovations here in our EPIC Center and co-located with our innovators is going to be an acceleration for Applied and for the entire industry.
We've announced 8 partners that we talked about earlier, TSMC, Samsung, Hynix, Micron, Advantest, ASU, RPI, Stanford, and we will be adding more soon. For Applied, it gives us better multi-node visibility because, again, we're working many generations out in the future with all of these different companies and really co-innovating. We are working with them to create these new architectures in the EPIC Center. And it also enables us to be designed in with our equipment and our advanced services for those new architectures. So I'm really excited about the EPIC Center. I think this is the right strategy at the right time, and it's going to be an accelerator for our customers and for Applied Materials.
Well, thank you, Melissa, for your questions. And now, Brice, would you like to give us your closing thoughts?
Excellent. Thanks, Mike. We're really pleased with the investments we've made, puts us in a great position as AI drives incremental demand across the industry. We're in a strong position to grow revenue, expand margins and increased operating leverage. We have a number of upcoming events to call to your attention next week. Tim Dean from our services business will be at the JPMorgan conference in Boston. The following week, Gary will be at the Bernstein conference in New York. And a week after that, I'll be at the BofA conference in San Francisco. We hope to see many of you at those events. Mike, please go ahead and close the call.
All right. Great. Thank you, Brice. And we'd like to thank everybody for joining us today. A replay of the call is going to be available on the IR page of our website by 5:00 Pacific Time, and we would now like to thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Applied Materials — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Applied meldet Q2-Rekorderlöse und Margen; Management sieht AI-getriebene, mehrjährige Wachstumsphase, bleibt aber vorsichtig bei Supply-Chain- und Raumengpässen.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: $7,91 Mrd. (+11% Jahr‑über‑Jahr, +13% QoQ)
- Non‑GAAP‑Gross Margin: 50,0% (+80 Basispunkte YoY)
- Non‑GAAP EPS: $2,86 (+20% YoY)
- Semiconductor Systems: $5,97 Mrd. (+10% YoY)
- Applied Global Services (AGS): $1,67 Mrd. (+17% YoY)
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- AI‑Treibkraft: Management sieht beschleunigte und diversifizierte AI‑Nachfrage (Training, Inference, agentische Modelle) als Kernmotor für WFE‑Wachstum.
- Fokussegmente: Leading‑edge Foundry Logic, DRAM und Advanced Packaging sollen >80% des YoY‑WFE‑Wachstums 2026 ausmachen; Applied bestätigt Marktführerschaft in mehreren Prozessschritten.
- Ko‑Innovation & EPIC: Neues EPIC‑Center (Kooperationsplattform) plus Partner (TSMC, Micron, Samsung u.a.) zur Beschleunigung von Design‑Wins und Markteinführung.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q3‑Guidance: Umsatz $8,95 Mrd. ± $500 Mio.; Non‑GAAP EPS $3,36 ± $0,20; Non‑GAAP‑Gross Margin ~50,1%.
- Segmentziele: Semiconductor Systems ≈ $6,9 Mrd.; AGS ≈ $1,75 Mrd.; Other ≈ $300 Mio.; Non‑GAAP‑Steuersatz ≈ 11%.
- Längerfristig: Management erwartet >30% WFE‑Wachstum in Kalenderjahr 2026, Packaging‑Umsatz >50% in 2026; Hauptrisiken: Supply‑Chain, Reinraum‑/Floor‑Space‑Verfügbarkeit und geopolitische Restriktionen.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- 8‑Quartal‑Visibility: Analysten fragten zu Folgeaufträgen, Anzahlungen und Preisgestaltung; Management: langfristige Projektverträge, Deposits je nach Kunde, Preise bewegen sich langsam.
- Kapazität & Lieferkette: Nachfrage übersteigt aktuelle Lieferkettenkapazität; Applied hat Fertigungskapazität nahezu verdoppelt, sieht aber Supply‑Chain als limitierenden Faktor.
- AGS‑Korrelation: Analysten wollten Verbindung zwischen Systems‑Wachstum und Services; Management hebt mittelfristiges AGS‑Wachstum in die mittleren Teens hervor und höhere Rate 2026 wegen Utilization‑Effekten.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Implikation: Starke operative Daten (Rekordumsatz, 50%+ Gross Margin) stützen die These eines AI‑getriebenen, mehrjährigen Aufschwungs; Investoren sollten aber Supply‑Chain‑, Reinraum‑ und geopolitische Risiken sowie die Fähigkeit zur Skalierung von Services und Fertigung genau beobachten.
Applied Materials — 2026 Cantor Global Technology & Industrial Growth Conference
1. Question Answer
I think we're set to go. Well, good morning. Welcome to day 1 of Cantor Fitzgerald's Tech and Industrial Conference. This is our second year. Very pleased to have Applied Materials and Brice Hill, CFO of the company. Welcome.
Thank you. Thanks for hosting us. New York, wonderful weather.
Yes, yes. We brought this lovely weather for you. Be assured, it will snow on Thursday.
But to start, I think the world has dramatically changed in the last 3 months, both from your outlook, your competitors' outlook. You called for revenue growth for silicon of greater than 20% growth here in 2026. This is, of course, limited by clean room space availability, resulting in seeing plenty of room for another double-digit year in '27. Do you agree with this line of thinking? And what do you see as the biggest risk to this view?
Well, certainly, the demand signal is extremely strong. I've been talking to people about artificial intelligence and AI. And we've expected our business to pick up based on the demand. When we look at cloud service provider investments -- top cloud service provider investments and data center AI, CapEx are in the $600 billion this year, projected to be in the $700 billion next year. And we've seen a lot of pull from our customers for more advanced logic, more DRAM and more advanced packaging solutions.
Right now, the market is constrained with the leading-edge semiconductor components, those 3 areas. And we expect that demand signal to continue very strong and that dynamic of being constrained not to change in the foreseeable future. That's the expectation.
C.J., you mentioned that it's constrained by fab space. We did, of course, increase our expectations for this year. So there was more space available to utilize this year. But to your point, it's -- we think it's fully utilized at this point with the space available. So the ramp will be metered by space in leading logic and DRAM as we go through the, let's say, next -- it might be more than a year that we experience that.
So with that as a backdrop, are you starting to see customers slot tool availability in '27 and even '28?
We definitely see slotting into '27 at this point, but I'll back up and say foreseeing this ramp that we're talking about, we've been working with customers on improving our visibility to 2 years with all of our top customers. And in fact, all the customers across our network, we're asking for 2 years of visibility into the equipment that they need. And then, we provide that signal to our suppliers.
I've highlighted before that we have over 2,000 suppliers that we work with on a day-to-day basis. You have to give those suppliers a signal if they're going to change their capacity, if they're going to hire people and train people. You have to give them enough lead time to do that because this is a significant increase in output. And so we've got 2 years visibility from our customers. We're providing that to our suppliers. And when it gets closer, when it gets within 1 year, that's part level detail, so the suppliers can truly ensure they can meet your needs.
And in terms of the 2-year slotting, are all customers willing to share that information or only the majority, let's say?
Well, I looked at it this morning, just so I would -- I know that. But I would say it's -- thinking generally about the world, first of all, it's all customers. It's an ask of all customers. I will say that the visibility into the longer list of China customers is more difficult for that period of time. In some cases, they haven't completed those plans. But I think if you think about the largest customers, leading logic, DRAM, NAND, largest customers, those are very complete views.
So if you think about operational readiness, and I know your goal based on that backdrop is to be ready for everything. But this is the first cycle that I've ever seen, and that is a 26-year view, where you're seeing leading-edge logic, DRAM and even NAND all in an upturn. And when you put it all together, you're potentially talking about during COVID, where WFE grew by $35 billion nominal dollars, where this time, it could be $60 billion, $70 billion, $80 billion, $90 billion over a 1-, 2- or 3-year period. And so can the industry support that kind of rapid growth?
We think the industry can support that growth, and that's why the supply chain is so important in this process. As you highlighted, during COVID, we experienced -- there were different pockets of the supply chain that were very difficult to improve. We've never stopped working on supply chain since COVID. We've had to reengineer it to be more regionally self-sufficient. We've had to reengineer it to make sure we have fewer sole reliances across the supply chain.
We've made our own supply chain more global than it was in the past. We've increased our capacity. We've increased our inventory positions, and we've improved the signaling to the suppliers. So I would say at this point, we don't see any roadblocks to the supply chain being able to support the lift that we're talking about.
And maybe a wildcard question that's arisen in the last, I guess, 9 days of war and how important oil production is to helium. I guess, are you hearing anything from the supply chain around challenges there?
I don't have any perspective into our customers. I know from an Applied perspective, we have reviewed that, and we don't think it will be a constraint for Applied at this point in time, but that will be a good question for the customers and how much they use of that particular gas.
Perfect. So maybe moving on to end markets. You obviously talked about a number of growth drivers here in 2026. So maybe to narrow in, for leading-edge foundry, we're seeing a broadening of spend. I guess, maybe if you could speak to that? And is that breadth something that can really help '26? Or is that more of a '27, '28 story?
Well, what you're seeing, I think the strength, the fastest driver are these AI systems. Data center now is about 30% of demand for wafers on the leading edge. So that has just eclipsed demand for PC components on leading edge. We expect it to overtake smartphone components by 2029. So that data center growth on the leading edge is really where the strength of the demand cycle is coming from.
I just looked at a GPU system for 2027 that's being planned. It's got double the GPUs of a previous system. It's got about 50% higher transistor count per GPU. It's got 33% more memory per GPU. So when you tear apart these AI data center systems, you can really see the concentration continuing to improve in all the various compute and memory components.
And when those systems are built in more and more high-complexity solutions, that's what pulls on the advanced packaging techniques. But that leading edge, that is the strongest pull for leading edge. You asked for breadth. I think those 3 markets are all growing, and the market is constrained at this point on leading edge. And so we see 100% utilization across all the leading-edge nodes.
And maybe on DRAM, I guess, can you speak to kind of the dynamics there? Obviously, we're in a supply-constrained environment, but would love to hear kind of how you're thinking about your leverage to HBM. And as we transition to HBM4 and beyond, how Applied Materials' share of wallet should grow?
Yes. I think DRAM similar. It's being pulled by that same demand function. About 15% of the DRAM wafer starts right now are allocated towards high-bandwidth memory. High-bandwidth memory is a double opportunity for the equipment industry because not only are you selling equipment to make the DRAM, the high-bandwidth memory is more intensive from a wafer perspective. It takes 3x as much wafer area to make the same amount of memory with the high bandwidth component. And then, you stack the high-bandwidth memory. So there's additional process steps in order to stack that memory.
We think about 19 extra steps, 15 of those are equipment steps, where Applied Materials provides solutions, and we sell more than 50% of the value of the equipment that goes into those additional packaging steps for high-bandwidth memory. So very strong demand signal. I think the roadmap will continue to build out. Customers are working to accelerate floor space so that they can add capacity. And as new technologies come on, we think there'll be also other stacking and bonding solutions that the industry will develop, and we'll participate in. Those will be inflections that will be valuable for Applied.
And maybe I'm getting ahead on the service question. But I'm hearing upgrades of tools, whether it's even a micron adding an extra layer of EUV to clear up clean room space, replacing KrF tools for higher throughput. Are you seeing that particularly from the DRAM market?
We have. We have heard that -- I think we've heard that both for logic and DRAM, where customers will look to optimize floor space in various ways, and so, not surprising. We're trying to maximize output at this point in time.
And so maybe to combine leading-edge foundry and DRAM and the advanced packaging side of the house, your business has grown from $500 million to $1.7 billion, 2020 to 2024. But last year, it declined while others saw growth. Can you talk to the divergence? And how we should think about the business from here?
Yes. 2024, we're talking about advanced packaging. 2024 was a very strong year. There was the initial build-out of the HBM equipment on the DRAM side. And that was a high number. I think it was about $700 million in 2024. It was a little less in 2025 after that initial build-out. So that slowed down.
As we're looking forward, we put it in the fast lane of growth, C.J., when we talked about semi equipment growing more than 20% this year. The way to think about it is advanced logic or leading logic and DRAM and advanced packaging are all in the fast lane. So they'll grow faster than that 20-plus percent growth rate.
ICAPS and NAND will be on the slower growing side. So you can see the faster groups will grow much faster than the 20% and the slower is much lower. We've said ICAPS, for example, will be approximately flat this year is the expectation.
So back to the advanced packaging, we think it will be fast growing this year. We think there'll be continued investment in HBM, and that will continue to grow. And we think advanced packaging overall will continue to grow with that same AI packaging-driven need.
So Life in the Fast Lane, Eagles then.
Life in the Fast Lane.
So how about on NAND? That's a market that you've talked about is not growing as fast. However, we're obviously in a very tight environment. You've got 1 player adding wafers, everyone else adding layer counts. I guess, why do you think it's not comparable to the other parts of the market?
Well, I think NAND is interesting. The bit demand, the bit rate demand has been very strong and continues to be strong. I think we've said it's in the past that it's in the high teens for a bit for bit growth. The issue with NAND is that the technologies have been so excellent in terms of providing more bit density, each advance in the technology that you just don't need more wafer starts to grow the bit supply by 20% each year. And that's been what's happening.
So if you look at the NAND wafer starts over the last 4 or 5 years, they're relatively flat. We count about 1.4 million wafer starts a month on the NAND side. And that's been roughly flat. So what you see is companies adding capacity for those additional layers, but they don't need to expand the number of wafers out.
We think that continues for the near future. At some point, they'll have to add capacity, but it's not in the near future. So that's what keeps it at a lower growth level from an equipment perspective. But again, there's plenty of NAND demand, the bit demand in the marketplace.
Makes sense. And maybe the last part, ICAPS in China, obviously, a place of concern from investors. And so how do you think about the trends there given your overexposure to both?
Well, it's -- I don't know if I would agree with characterizing it as overexposed to ICAPS. ICAPS is our mature node technologies for Applied Materials. The ICAPS stands for IoT, communications, auto, power and sensor chips. So it's those chips that are built on like 28, 40, 45, 60-nanometer type nodes. We have a very strong position in those nodes.
And if you look over the last few years, we typically have for our Equipment and Services business in the high 20% of the business that goes towards China, and most of that demand has been ICAPS. We had a very small period of time, C.J., where our -- the reported percent of China business for Applied was much higher. And that was when we were serving DRAM. We had a build-out of DRAM capacity in China. So it went into the 40%. But otherwise, I would think, as an investor, 25% to 30% is the reasonable range where we're serving business in China, and all of that is our ICAPS business. So a very important business to us.
We don't think we're overexposed. And we think that business continues. It will be flat over the near future because there's been a significant amount of investment in capacity in China, but it's a very good business for us. A lot of that future growth will be on 28-nanometer. We have an excellent position in the 28-nanometer node. And where we can -- the customers that we can serve, we'll serve -- we'll do a good job of serving. We're also continuing to innovate in that space.
Makes sense. So it sounds like flat is -- means we're derisked. Curious -- I think President Trump and President Xi will have a meeting at some point in the next month or so. And I think there's hope for some sort of grand bargain. And just curious, given the very tight nature of both DRAM and NAND, do you think there could be relaxation of restrictions for perhaps the consumer memory market? Have you heard any inklings of that from Washington, D.C.?
We've heard nothing from Washington, D.C., as far as I know. I have read in the press what you mentioned that some device companies may be trying those memories because of the constraints in the market. Certainly, that would be upside to our outlook if we were able to serve those customers again. The China market has been constrained. That's one of the reasons we grew more slowly. It's been constrained by the trade rules. Currently, U.S. companies are more constrained by trade rules than non-U.S. companies. That's something that we continue to work with the government on. And that would be an upside to our forecast if we could serve those customers.
Perfect. Now, maybe moving to service. You've guided for double-digit growth here in 2026. At the same time, we discussed earlier, upgrades and customers at near peak utilizations. I guess, how are you thinking about the drivers this year? And is there a potential as we layer in maybe more aggressive capacity adds? I don't want to say an uptick to that number, but maybe that number proving to be conservative.
Well, our reported quarter, just reported quarter, our Service business grew 15% year-over-year. Low double digits is our outlook, and it's -- when you think about that business, every single quarter, the installed base of equipment that we can serve from a services perspective grows. We expect the installed base to grow 5% to 10% depending on the market each year. And we're adding service products every single year to our portfolio, which allows us essentially to provide more value to customers.
And finally, the attach rate to our equipment in terms of applying services goes up each year. Customers are building in new cities, new areas. They tend to use the services more because they're looking for qualified labor to help them ramp the factories. So those 3 dynamics help grow that Services business in low double digits.
And certainly, if we have higher utilization or we have more growth on the equipment side, then that grows that installed base and gives us upside to that. But we think that low double digits is a high confidence forecast.
Perfect. And then maybe a part of the business that's not asked much about these days, and you actually just put it into the other category display. I think there's been hope that there would be an OLED-led inflection at some point. Where are we in that? And at what point and what magnitude could that start to help the story?
Yes. OLED, very important. We've got some innovations. We launched a technology called MAX OLED, where we have more of the share of wallet in terms of producing the OLED solutions going forward. And we do think that there will be an inflection with more penetration in the laptop form factor and even larger devices. Television would be the place where you get the most screen size.
Nothing to announce at this point, but we think penetration for OLED will continue to increase across the industry. And we're not reporting that as a reportable segment any longer, but we did say that we would share in investors when the business changes in size. And so we can look forward to that going forward.
And I forgot to mention something on the services side that I want to come back to. We recently did a reorganization. We used to have our 200-millimeter equipment business inside of our Services business. We reorganized and moved that 200-millimeter equipment business and put it in our Semiconductor Equipment business. So when investors now look at our Services business, it is pure recurring revenue. So it is the spares you need for existing tools, and then, the services that we sell along with those tools.
And that gives us -- when we talk about that low double-digit growth rate and the confidence in that growth rate over time, about 2/3 of that business is under contract. Those are, on average, 2.9-year contract businesses -- contracts. There's a high renewal rate, over 90%, for those contracts. So those are all the elements that give us confidence that, that business will continue to grow at that rate.
Perfect. Maybe moving to gross margins. I think the market has been happily surprised, record 49.3% in the most recent guide. But I think as folks take kind of step back and think about where margins are pushing downstream at your customers, particularly memory, wondering why can't the equipment guys get more. And so, I know it's a very different market. You have to add value in order to derive that increase in pricing and margins. But curious, as you sit here, you've talked about trying to raise pricing. How should investors think about that progression? And what are the key underlying drivers that support those higher margins?
Yes, I think that's a great question. First of all, the portfolio becomes more valuable every year. And by the way, investors can look. We report -- now, with the new guidelines on segment reporting, if you look at our segments, for our Equipment business and our Services business, we report our gross margins. You can see those separately. It was 54.5% in recent quarter in our Equipment business.
So the portfolio, as we do our R&D and make our investments in R&D, we think the portfolio becomes more and more valuable every single year. You're working on higher complexity problems for the customers, in some cases providing integrated solutions that basically deliver modular level solutions to the customers, these become more and more valuable. And you should expect the gross margin to improve over time with that higher value.
At the same time, over the last couple of years, we've invested in our pricing process, which means we've got a much more sort of disciplined process in the company to determine the value of the equipment that we're selling to set a target price for the sales team to have the sales team try to achieve that targeted price. That's a much more disciplined process than what we've had before. Our pricing has gone up over the last 2 years with that general improvement in the overall portfolio, and we expect that to continue, C.J.
Perfect. And how does EPIC fit within kind of the gross margin story? Obviously, you're partnering even closer with your customers. You announced this morning a partnership with Micron. I would assume that, that speaks to years down the road of higher margins. But curious today, what's the impact of that investment? And then, how should we think about the progression of margins related to that partnership?
I think investors and customers expect Applied to be working 3 and 4 generations out with our customers. In order to do that, you need lab space. And so what we've built in Sunnyvale, right near our Santa Clara campus, is a large lab to host all of our customers and to do this long-range work with our customers on future technologies. That is really the core of the industry. You have to be 5 to 10 years out in the materials identification and the interaction between those materials in the tools that apply and remove those materials. It takes that sort of long-range investment to work with customers to provide those solutions.
And when we're effective, you get designed in early on. And so you know you have those designs, and in many cases, since they are modular level, those designs can last for generations and generations in process technology. So we needed more space to do that. And C.J. referenced an announcement this morning, one of our impressive customers, Micron, long-standing partner, has announced that they're going to be joining the EPIC Lab, and they'll be part of the collaboration process in the EPIC Lab. So that's a very important announcement for the company. It joined Samsung as another founding partner in the investment.
So we expect to have a large number of our customers in EPIC. It's a very important investment for the company in terms of the future of R&D for the company, and we're looking forward to opening it this fall and fitting it out with the tools that will be the newest generation tools and working with our customers on those.
And so as a plug, SEMICON West, October, I believe you'll be hosting a couple of events around this.
Absolutely. We're hosting an event around the opening of the facility, and it will be exciting and impressive.
Perfect. Perfect. Maybe to close, I think we've got little less than 5 minutes to talk about operating leverage. In late 2025, you had headcount reduction. And you guided OpEx relatively flattish into Q1, which is better than kind of normal seasonality. How should we think about, particularly thinking about a fairly steep recovery, in my view? How should we think about operating leverage for the Applied model going forward?
We expect to deliver operating leverage mechanically by raising spending at a slower rate than revenue growth. That is the expectation. But when you say, well, why is spending going up, most of our growth comes from organic investment. So we are building lab space. We are building manufacturing space. We are adding headcount for this ramp. When we sell more tools, we install and service those tools, so we're hiring the headcount and training the headcount to be ready for the ramps at our customers.
And this quarter, we added a number of new R&D programs that will expand our portfolio in the future, where, of course, we have high confidence in the ROI of those programs. And so with the higher confidence outlook, the longer outlook that we gave to the Street from a revenue perspective, we felt we were in a position to fund those programs.
And from an investor perspective, I would -- if you look at Applied, the way I think about it, we tend to reinvest about nearly half of our profits, and the rest, we distribute to shareholders through buybacks and our dividends. And so you will see Applied continuing to make investments in our core portfolio and in adjacent portfolios. And those are high return on investment products from our perspective.
What's the average cycle time from R&D investment dollar in to ramp HBM revenue out?
I think it's several years. So -- of course, it depends on the application because some applications are modifications of something that's existing, so that can go a lot faster. But if you have something that's 3 or 4 nodes out, that could be a 5-plus-year roadmap.
Perfect. You alluded to capital allocation, half of free cash flow. In the last 12 months, you bought back $4 billion of shares. You do sit in a position where you are above net cash breakeven. I tend to model you around net cash breakeven and return everything. Has your view changed at all? Is there a certain level of cash that you need to run the business? Or is that still a fairly decent kind of philosophy behind modeling capital returns?
I think the way I would look at it from a capital return perspective is we expect to return 80% to 100% of our free cash flow to investors over time. And that's not every quarter, C.J. So in the recent quarters, we've had pretty significant capital investments with the EPIC Lab that we're talking about. We had some other cash needs. So that will fluctuate on a quarter-to-quarter basis. But as you referenced, over the last year, our distributions, I think, were about 86% of free cash flow. So no change there.
Perfect. Maybe to close and thinking a bit longer term, particularly around your EPIC Center investment, how will you monitor or measure success with that investment?
I think that's -- if you look at speed of innovation for the company, that's what we're thinking EPIC will provide us, having our customers in our lab with the brand-new latest development technologies using those, that will speed innovation. The lab itself is built to speed up your ability to install hookup tools, change chambers, do new experiments. The lab is built to accelerate that process. I won't go into the construction details since we have 2 seconds left. But it is designed to speed the process up. It is designed to host customers, and we think that will accelerate our innovation and pace of innovation.
Well, perfect. I think we have to close there. Thank you all for coming, and thank you for coming, Brice.
Thanks, everybody.
Great to see you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — 2026 Cantor Global Technology & Industrial Growth Conference
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Nachfrage: Starke, AI-getriebene Nachfrage bei Leading‑Edge‑Logic, DRAM und Advanced Packaging treibt Applied; 2026er‑Wachstum der Halbleiterausrüstung wird >20% erwartet.
- Limitierung: Wachstum wird primär durch Reinraum‑/Fab‑Fläche (Slotting) begrenzt – Nachfrage ist vorhanden, Ramp wird aber „gemessen“ erfolgen.
- Vorbereitung: Applied verbessert Lieferketten‑Resilienz, fordert 2 Jahre Plan‑Visibility von Kunden und gibt diese Signale an >2.000 Zulieferer weiter.
🚀 Strategische Highlights
- Advanced Packaging / HBM: HBM zieht stark; ~15% der DRAM‑Starts sind HBM, HBM braucht ~3× Waferfläche und ~19 Zusatzschritte (≈15 Equipmentschritte), Applied deckt >50% des zusätzlichen Packaging‑Werts.
- EPIC‑Lab: Großes Kundenlabor in Sunnyvale zur 5–10‑jähr. Zusammenarbeit; Samsung schon Gründungsmitglied, Micron angekündigt — Öffnung im Herbst geplant.
- Services/Organisation: 200‑mm‑Equipment aus Services in Equipment verschoben; Services sind jetzt reiner wiederkehrender Umsatz (≈2/3 unter Vertrag, mittlere Laufzeit 2,9 Jahre, >90% Renewal).
🔭 Neue Informationen
- EPIC‑Ankündigung: Micron tritt EPIC bei (heute erwähnt) — konkrete Partnerverpflichtung zur Labornutzung ist neues Signal für langfristige Co‑Entwicklung.
- Margen/Preissetzung: Management betont disziplinierte Pricing‑Prozesse; Equipment‑Bruttomarge zuletzt bei ~54,5%, Gesamt‑Guide zuletzt bei 49,3% (Record‑Level laut Gespräch).
- Kapitalrückfluss: Ziel, 80–100% des Free Cashflow über Zeit zurückzugeben; in den letzten 12 Monaten ≈$4 Mrd. Aktienrückkäufe, ~86% FCF‑Ausschüttung vergangenes Jahr.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Slotting/Timing: Analysten drängten auf Sichtbarkeit für 2027/28 — Management sieht bereits Slotting in 2027, verlangt 2‑Jahres‑Signals von Top‑Kunden.
- China/Trade‑Risiken: Bedeutung von ICAPS (IoT, Communications, Auto, Power, Sensor) in China diskutiert; China ≈25–30% des Geschäfts, near‑term eher flach; keine Hinweise auf Lockerung der Beschränkungen.
- Supply‑Risiken & Kosten: Fragen zu Helium/Oil‑War‑Wildcard, Lieferkette und Raumoptimierungen; Applied sieht aktuell keine kritischen Engpässe, betont regionale Diversifikation und erhöhte Inventare.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Implikation: Applied steht strukturell vorteilhaft im AI‑Zyklus (Leading‑Edge, DRAM/HBM, Packaging). Kurzfristig limitiert Fab‑Platz das Umsatztempo; mittelfristig liefern EPIC, Pricing‑Disziplin und Services Skaleneffekte sowie hohe Free‑Cash‑Flow‑Rückflüsse für Aktionäre.
Applied Materials — Morgan Stanley Technology
1. Question Answer
All right. I think we'll get started. I am Shane Brett, U.S. semiconductor equipment analyst. With us today is Dr. Prabu Raja, President of the Applied Materials Semicon Products Group. Let's get started. Dr. Raja , can you start by giving the audience just an instruction and sense of what you do in your role at Applied Materials.
Thanks, Shannon. Yes, about me. Prabhu Raja. I joined Applied years back as an engineer, this is my first job, and I led some of the valuable businesses in Applied Materials like a PVD business and edged and integrated products. I spent lots and lots of time with the customers. Sometimes I think I spend more time in the flights than at home. And the recently I have been to multiple customers through Asia and also the governments right now, governments want to be talking about semiconductor. So the good news is I have a lot of valuable feedback from the customers on the demand, where they are, the challenges. And the bad news is I sleep about 3 hours these days. So if I mess up, just assume it's a jet lag, not me, yes. .
But the Air mode pretty good. Yes. right.
I guess just to get started then as President of the semi products group, just what are your key priorities, say, just where is your focus is with Applied?
So if you really look at those right now, it's all about demand. As I said, I talked to a lot of customers that demand is very high. They all want to know are they getting the tools on time. And I can tell you, pretty much I get e-mails every single day. I want to make sure that we're delivering on time. So we have incredible visibility from the customers. I'm focusing on making sure that we can scale and if we want to deliver the tools on time. That is right, right now. When you really look at the long term, so what do you think about when I'm the slide, what do you think about? I think about this semi-cap market, how big and how sustainable it is, number one. Number two, within semi cap, which part of it semicap is growing faster where we should focus on. Number three, the customers are having the tough challenges right now with all the inflections and how can we work together with the customers in solving those challenges.
These are the 3 high level is a wafer overall semi-cap market. As you can see that the demand is high, the fab utilization is pretty high. We are tracking around 100 fabs today. They're all in various stages, that part is really good. From what I hear from customers, they want -- need to be ready for the super cycle. That's what they call super cycle. I don't know what is the mean. Super cycle. That's why they say that, right? I want to make sure I'm not the bottom line, okay? Number two, if you really look at those, if you segment within those semi cap, not long ago, 1 year back, we say that a, it's a $1 trillion market by 2030. And 1/3 is leading-edge fondry logic, 130 Hiab, 130 memory. That's not changed. Now we are -- potentially, we can do $1 billion -- $1 trillion semi can do $1 trillion this year. Potentially, we can do that. And also, if you really look at the mix, what I see that is the fastest-growing markets are the ones which are enabling artificial intelligence right now, the data centers.
So we really look at those leading edge fondilogic, DRAM, advanced packaging. These 3 are growing faster. And the other ones are slow growth areas, we call it NAND and ICAPs, which are more in general computing. The good news is the fast-growing areas, 3 areas we talked about Applied is #1 in all those 3 areas. And we thought about the areas we invested in those areas. The last 1 is we talk about tough challenges. What are the customers concerned about. If you really look at those, a lot -- the multiple inflections are happening in this area. Each of this year, multiple inflections are happening in each of the areas. So what is customer doing? They are trying to integrate the devices to address their tough challenges. That means you put advanced logic and DRAM together through advanced packaging to solve their challenges. So what we are doing is, we are making it possible with our unique portfolio integrated solutions.
Got it. Got it. And I guess just on this operating environment, so you've talked about just semi cap model, your focuses and then the customer challenges. So we'll focus on the semi-cap model first. You threw out the word super cycle as it relates to sort of AI driving kind of this equipment market. How does that sort of AI drive this equipment market? How is it sort of beneficial to you guys focused on DRAM, logic and advanced packaging?
I think I talked about, I mean, 1 trillion -- 1/3, 1/3, 1/3. That's not there anymore right now. Right now, everything has changed right now. And a lot of right now really that what is a data center. That's all you've got to think of what is enabling a data center. When you really look at those advanced logic and -- sorry, leading edge, let me put the leading-edge logic, advanced packaging and DRAM. These are the fastest-growing markets as compared to that and as compared to the other market, and so the multiple inflections are happening in these areas right now. If you really look at the gate all around. It's extremely complex, and it's going through -- everything is going to 2D to 3D, right? Now you see that that a lot of complexity is there right now. And the complexity means that a lot of more steps, a lot of new steps are coming in more steps. And Applied is in a very good place to solve the complexities right now, okay? That's where I see that where the market is going.
And then I think the good part is we had a strategy, we call it inflection-focused innovations. And we kept talking about it for 4, 5 years, we talk about inflections are coming, coming, coming it's a time. Now we see that. Those wherever we strategize, wherever we invested, that is happening right now. So we are in a very good place in all those 3 areas. So that's why if you really segment it that's the area we are biggest focus right now is paying off.
Got it. So there's inflection focused innovations have sort of led you to DRAM leading logic and advanced packaging and sort of the stars have aligned with AI?
Yes. You are right.
Got it. Got it. I want to talk about 2026 because -- you sort of talked about more than 20% shipment growth for the calendar year. I think if the year plays out as you've sort of called it out to be, that will be the highest growth for Applied since 2021, which was back then the semiconductor industry, just equipment was a big bottleneck at that time with chipset just affecting a lot of other industries. Just how are -- how is the industry an applied prepared relative to 2021 to sort of meet this kind of massive surge of demand?
Okay. The short answer is we are in a much, much better place. I can tell you that. And it's a great opportunity. We are not going to let it go, okay? This is the number one. So you really look at those -- and like I said, I talk to customers a lot. They are giving us great visibility. They are forecasting the demand much, much earlier than ever before. The reason is they want to make sure they're getting the tools. I can see that demand is side, they want to make sure they're getting their tools. More important, when the tools are coming in, these tool needs to be installed. It has to be serviced and for that, you need a manpower much, much earlier, Applied does that.
So you can't just hire a college graduate and ask them to go and do that. These are complex areas you need to learn. So these guys need to be trained for 1 year or so. So for that reason, the customers are giving a visibility much, much earlier right now. That's a great visibility we get. And so that really helps us right now to plan and what do you do with that? -- You're right, COVID was stress test for us. We learned our lessons. And we fundamentally change how we do that in terms of how we plan, how we forecast and how we scale, how we execute, we fundamentally change that. We are in a much better place if you really look at those manufacturing. We can -- the capacity to double compared to what we had before COVID. And since we got a very good visibility from the customers, sometimes 2 years early, even beyond that, and what we do with the visibility is we are going and talking to our suppliers, partnering with the suppliers to early enough. We see where the bottlenecks potentially could be. We are well prepared for it. The suppliers are more ready right now. And the third part is that we talk about service and support. And we are expanding our service team. We are training them.
I think we are in a much better place. Like I said, we are not letting it go this time. For sure, we are more ready right now, yes.
Rallying 2,000 suppliers cannot be easy. So just how have you gone ready for this inflection? I know we kind of spoke about earlier, you guys kind of talk about a 5-year strategy. What were kind of the steps you put in place during the kind of 5 years leading up to this that allowed you to kind of meet this demand?
I think if you really look at those, Applied, if we look on Applied revenue, even after Applied revenue never went down. We didn't come down. We kept in the same every year, we kept increasing that increased the revenue in the last 20 years. That kind of helped us to customers to have more of a confident on us. Other ones we changed the model is right now. I really look at those with the customers, we truly work with our customers as partners rather than just a supplier customer related work with partners. I think we do the same thing for our suppliers. We work with them much more closely. So they're a lot more open, not only their capacity, they are also more open with their subsupplier capacities. So it's all about partnership, how closely work with them, how much visibility you give them this all together.
Got it. It's a tighter partnerships with your suppliers, but also with your customers, I mean you're talking about 2 years plus of visibility, just -- we're seeing 2 years plus visibility, but there's so many tech inflections right now, just this change in kind of rapid pace of complexity. How is that changing the way the equipment industry works with kind of your customers?
Yes. upon industry also talk about particularly Applied materials. Not long ago, I've been in industry for a long time. And they're scaling, if you really look at technologies, not that complex looking back and more predictable or litho-enabled scaling very predictable we had a handful of materials. And so customers had their own process design team. They're pretty much used to tell us, hey, what is my hardware spec, what is my process step. All I have to do is I got to meet the spec. Customers have their own -- the team, which can integrate everything together all steps together. Right now, the complexity has changed. It is really complex right now.
It's more of a customer supplier relationship with all the complexity we are talking about multiple inflections are happening, these inflections are incredibly complex, I can tell you that, like gate all around, you think about that. More than 2,000 steps. A lot of new materials are coming in. And more important, every angstrom matters. I can tell you the good example is in the transistor gate, the small 10-nanometer space. You've got to put 5 to 6 different materials. Everything is 1-nanometer thickness. So that's a 1 angstrom really matter, those kind of complexity. On the top of it, there is the step-to-step when it's out 2,000 steps, some of the steps that are interdependent Okay. So it's more like the Rubik cube that if you touch 1 step, 1 material, it impacts everything. It falls apart. So that complexity is increasing, right? That is more that part of it. On the top of it, the speed, speed is the game. And the customer want time to market becomes important. The customer -- they don't have a time to put together every pieces together.
So fundamentally, customers are working very closely with somebody applied materials. The reason is really look at Applied Materials. We understand the steps better than anyone because we have broad portfolios and with a broad portfolio, we understand the steps and how they're dependent on each other and also we can come with optimized solutes. -- better than anyone. And the customers are coming to us, they're working with us, partnering with us, 3 notes I had, in some cases, 3 to 4 notes I had. So when you have 3 to 4 loads I had and partnering with our customers working together to solve the problem rather than just meeting those hardware spec or process spec, now I become the part of solving the device challenges as a solution partner.
So that gives me incredible visibility on customer challenges, customer road map. I can use that to fund my R&D and more importantly, when you work that early, you are designed in into this. I'm telling you these complexities like a open heart surgery. Once you're designed in, you don't want to touch it, they fall apart. Okay. I think the biggest change is that the relationship what used to be like a supplier customers versus partners.
I think there's a really good segue because you spent kind of billions of dollars to invest in Epic. And kind of my question here is just how should we see kind of the ROI on that billions of dollars that was spent on Topic. You've had some nice customer announcements there. I'd love to hear about that. And just -- should we expect to hear about more customers when are you opening just kind of the road macaron when EPIC is going to come up and up running?
Yes. No, I talked about complexities, right? And also I talked about speed Okay. Right now, really look at those today, if you really look at those, how the innovation walks, innovation, the commercialization, let's call it, how it walks No, from university academic research, if you come with the new materials. Academic research to the equipments to semi manufacturers to the commercial chip takes 10 to 15 years. Go back and look at those finfet and Hikmetalgate, this all inventory somewhere around 10 years, 15 years, but that's the time it 10 to 15 years, it takes.
Right now, nobody has the time to wait for 10 to 15 years with the complexity. Speed is the game. Everyone wants to be the first. So what do they do? Rather than sequential way of innovating and commercialize, what Applied what we are doing is, can we do it in parallel. Can we co-innovate together. That means universities, equipment and customers can we work together in parallel in 1 place under 1 roof, Imagine you come with the new materials you can validate on the equipment, validate on the customer wafers. And your success rate goes up and the time of time to innovation to come has come down dramatically. That's the whole idea of success rate because I can tell you that otherwise success rate is too low because you can come with a new material, it doesn't work in the equipment. Right now we all work together, success rate goes up and also time to market goes down. I think that is the biggest benefit the customers see.
That's the reason that customers want to partner with us, not just customers but on universities and also the peers. They all want to be a part of it. Like you said, we announced with the Samsung. We are talking to and working with other customers, investees, major U.S. university days, also with the peers. And you'll see more announcements in coming months.
Okay. Well, let me word to that then. I guess let's talk about -- dive into the road map here. So leading-edge foundry logic. You sort of highlighted that from FinFET to GAA with backside power that sort of increases your revenue opportunity by about 30% for client fab capacity. Just where specifically, could you kind of give Cardon, where specifically applied is winning for those kind of inflections?
So let me see, when you say leading edge, fondlogic, the we are #1 that process equipment provider in the space right now. If you really look at those, there are 2 big pieces if you really look at those. The 1 big piece is that transistor, other big pieces of wiring. Let me start with the transistors, Okay.
Transistors are the ones I'm talking about the complexity. FinFET, we are #1, if you really look at non-lit, we're very close to 50%, maybe a little less than 50% share right now. That gear Talon makes it even more complex. Like I said, a number of steps are increasing significantly. A lot of new materials are coming in, and these materials are interdependent. They really interact with each other. So the complexity is happening where Applied has a leadership positions, like for example, EP is very critical. And PV is critical, metal yield is very critical. CVD is critical, implant treatment, you can see that where conductor etch -- those are the -- these inflections are happening, complexity is happening, their Applied material has a later sipes.
On the top of it, I talked about interdependencies between the steps. That means if you touch 1 step, it will impact the other step. So that means these all steps need to work together to get the solutions. That means Applied knows how to optimize better than anyone because we know all those pieces, and we know how to connect those pieces to make it work.
An integrated material solutions.
That's what we call it integrated material solutions right now, how we integrate -- in some cases, you can't take it out of the 2 machines. It's all under vacuum. And imagine I talked about 1 nanometer, the 10 atom. -- once imagine you are exposed to yes, it's not -- it's not the same material anymore, right? They all need to be integrated in 1 system. That's what Applied comes in and really helps. And the customer -- what they do is that these are the places we work together 3 to 4 NAND technologies ahead right now because this is not the 1 that you can just come and change it something. So we were 3 to 4 technologies I think it benefits both of us then for customers, they can do early validation on the wafer what we do and also time to market. For us, we get this visibility into the road map, visible into the technologies, road map, challenges, also our R&D funding. I don't have to put R&D in 10 different ways right now. I know I can validate I can fund it in an R&D funding guide of my R&D funding. And even more important, I'm designing. I know 3 notes earlier I'm designed in most cases. So win-win for both of us.
I want to talk about 2 more things within leading edge logic, wiring and just copper. I think the first question is just wiring module and leading-edge chips. How is it changing and where is the opportunity for Applied. And I guess the second part of that question is there's been concerns about PVD copper being at risk from ALD moly, Just what is your sort of answer to that concern?
Okay. Maybe particularly this topic is more personal to me because I joined the company in the PVD wiring. That is my first job, okay. And I've been hearing this. When I joined the company, people say that, hey, copper is going to end, PVDs going to end, don't join that group. That was 25, 30 years back. And yet copper continues to extend and PVD continue to extend. I think -- if you really look at the wiring, is a very valuable and large business for the company right now. And I really look at those in the -- today's GPU, there are 800 plus miles of wiring this is complex. Is look at those. And people -- the complexity in wiring is usually there as transistor. -- people don't give importance to the letting. Wiring is extremely complex. If you talk to the customers, any customer, they'll tell you, Litho is not my bottle like wiring is my bottleneck. That's the first thing they say that, wiring focus on wiring. That is the most important message. So what we see that is now 20-plus layers right now in the GPU right now. So we see that copper -- number of couples are increasing. -- layers are increasing. What is such change is what has changed is to put 1 layer. We used to have 3 different technologies integrated together 10 years back. Today, can imagine, the 7 different technologies are integrated into the 1 system, machine under vacuum to get 1 layer of wiring. Number of layers are increasing, number of technology steps inside each layer is increasing on the wiring. Wiring is big.
And I can tell you that with the breakthrough innovations, at least be our 3-plus nodes of copper rod extend. I can confidently say copper is going to extend for 3 more nodes or even more, okay? We have a path. And that brings to the molycon. There is always a misconception that moly is going to replace copper. Clearly, answer is no. Moly is not going to replace copper. Okay. Copper is going to stay here. Copper will continue to be here, continue to grow and more and more layers. Then moly comes in, really look at those wiring than you hear transistor. Something in between which connects them is contact. There are 3 layers of contacts today -- not -- yes, 3 layers softly contact. Tungsten is the materials -- contact material today Tungsten. That Molly has benefits over tungsten. That's where I see that people are talking about. They -- sometimes we call the contact autocase wiring. That also moly could be replacing tungsten. I think we recently announced a product, the spectral ALD mode. And with the foundry logic, -- we already have a PTR position right now because the ELD mall is replacing tungsten -- it's a very critical rarer it is. And really look at those moly is not as big as what you think really look at the market overall.
Copper is at least a magnitude or more than the mall itself Okay. And copper will stake continue to stay -- and Mali has its 1 place, it could inflect, but copper will be much, much bigger. Our copper will continue to grow. Quite honestly, copper is growing layers are faster than anything. -- the people that doubted you 25, 30 years ago, will be reminded in 5 years, that copper is still around. Copper will be still around. I can tell you that. I told you I worked with the customer 3 to 4 notes. I had, I know exactly what's going on. I do expect.
There you go. Next question I want to move on to DRAM because I think there's a perception that Applied is a bit more of a leading edge, like a foundry logic company, but you guys have gained a lot of share in DRAM over the last decade. Just can you kind of remind the audience where those DRAM share gains have come? Just how you sort of position yourself with this sort of inflection in DRAM spending?
Yes. So 1 thing always, I thought about underappreciated applied is that they think we are a pond-logic company. You're right, not a memory company, really look at DRAM I think over the last 10 years, we increased the market share in DRAM significantly. Where it came from is that patterning conventional patterning, UV patterning in both places, we increased the market share significantly, particularly UV patterning, we increased a lot more than conventional pattern. One thing. Number 2 is that the capacitor module -- that's a pretty complex structure.
We had a lot of key wins because a lot of new materials as a hard mark. We talk about the integrated approach. There is another term we use co-optimized approach. When we said integrated, 1 machine, multiple technologies are all inside the 1 we've seen, not exposed to yes, right? Co-optimize is the 1 that a, they don't have to build the same system, but they interact with each other so that we've got to optimize for each other steps. The step could be a neighboring step or even after 10 steps. Simple example is if you come with a new material, used to know how to deposit the material, if you know how to etch the materials, you should know how to remove the materials is to know how to analyze the material. If you give to the customer on new materials, if they talk to 4 different suppliers to take 7, 8 years, 10 years. They want you to come out with a complete solution for that, hey, give me everything so that I can just insert in my flow. That's where there'll be a lot of caves in capacitor. That is what happened.
The moving forward, let me break down to 2 conventional DRAM and HBMDRAM. Conventional DRAM is following logic road map, very simple. Transistor is going from planar transistor to high-k metal gate to FinFET. So where you get all the learnings? Nobody wants to reinvent the whole thing. Applied has a great share in arch of them, very easy plug and play there, right? Customer work with us. And DRAM also adopting copper layers, number of couple as are increasing in DRAM. So our market share position over many years in foundry logic is really helping us right now. When you go to it and on the top of it, you talk about even convene DRAM, you talk about 4 of score, you talk about 3D DRAM. These are less UV-seUVare more material sensitive. These are the ones, all materials engineering, everything going the third dimension. And this inflection will further help us because it's all a lot more materials, a lot more process technologies, a lot more integrated tools. That's for conventional data.
HPM is very simple, right? HBM, you need 3 to 4x more number of wafers per time -- that's it very simple. So that's where HBM is growing. On the top of it, the HBM packaging part alone is more process intensive. So that's where HBM is growing. It's a combination of inflecting what is happening, combination of number of copper layers growing and the combination of where the HBM is going right now. see. And I think we are really in a good place in all those DRAM influxes right now.
So just to summarize your take on DRAM kind of fam around just materials engineers and mterials engineering is expanding, which is sort of leading to the bigger opportunities for product?
That's correct. Yes.
Got it. I guess on the topic of HBM, at the very start, when you kind of talked about this AI inflection, we kind of called out DRAM, leading-edge logic and advanced packaging. And advanced packaging is is a small portion of your business, but is also a portion of your business where you're very dominant in HBM. Can you talk about just what are applied strength in advanced packaging? And where do you kind of see the opportunities to grow there?
Yes. Like I said, we are #1 in advanced packaging overall. HBr none really 26, what are the strong growth area. HBM packaging and 3D chiplet stacking. There are different names, different customer, different name people -- within advanced package within the even chiplet stacking. People called 3D stacking, whatever it is. So those areas are growing very strong. And Applied has a really good push on there. Really look at this advanced packaging, right? Packaging is nothing but wiring. On-chip firing whatever the learning what we have, we talk about copper wiring, what we had, all the wiring learning, what we had for so many years, all the machines we developed for so many years on wiring, Now all are being adopted off the chip right now. It's nothing but wiring right? So it's a good place to start with for us because all these products are already helping us or the learnings are there. That helps us.
On top of it, we already saw those inflection coming 10 to 12 years back. And personally, I was involved in this. I started this. In Singapore, we started a packaging lab. It's a complete flow lab in Singapore, we call it advanced packaging lab. Sometimes you call it Epic packaging. It does similar to what Epic what we have dream right now. What we do there is we have complete flow. We have customers coming in partnering with us, and to be our peers coming and partnering with us and some of the areas where we are not participating, we are working with them right now. And that gives us a great advantage if customer wants to validate a new skin, they come and work with us right there. That kind of help us.
So we saw that early, we started -- formed a packaging team and this integration flow really helps us right now. The 2 big inflection what is happening right now is bonding for sure. The other 1 is panel, really look at those. The bonding areas, we can see we have partnership with BSE and the panel area, we thought about it even 10 years back 7, 8 years back, there's a Tango system panel, we occurred the company right now. On the top of it, we are developing multiple products in tunnel right now. Since we have a display business for us, it's much easier. Now they have bigger tools to do the planet right now. On metrology, other area of focus on.
I guess my last question would be the sort of I look at this industry and think with market conditions being so tight, you have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to raise prices and improve gross margin.
I know this is coming yes.
What's your view on that?
Now if you really look at those in terms of margin, I think -- ever since Gary joined the company, we increased 7 percentage points margin right now. I think we are on the right track right now. I think we think a little different. I had many questions from you guys, hey, 1 time, can you increase the pricing and all? We think a little differently in this space right now. Right now, I talk about -- we believe in creating the value for the customer and sharing the value for the customer. That's what we believe in. Really look at those, I talk about complexity. I talk about working with our customers much earlier 3-plus notes I had. This all customer, what they care about is device performance, yield, reliability, time to market.
I think what we do is we partner with them, work together with them to address those challenges right now, 3 notes ahead. this is creating a lot of value to the customers. They've got a more chip, they've got a better chips. They are open to share the value right now. We see that already. We see that open to it. You see that complexity is happening where we have high share areas and partnering with the customer much earlier, and we have a control on the value what we can -- what customers can share with us. I think that's the way we think about setting the value. So what do you do with the value, something for a margin and also R&D investment. We want to increase R&D investment, sometimes we want to return to the shareholders in some areas. That is on overall value setting, but let's not forget that. We have a big, big focus on cost.
We talk about costs through technology, cost through innovation, how we can cut down the overall cost. We are working on both fronts. I'm very confident, not only we increase the margin over the years, I think it will continue to incrementally will increase this margin over the years.
Great. Well, on that positive note, that brings us to time. Thank you, Dr. Raja, and.
Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Morgan Stanley Technology
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Kernpunkt: Applied sieht ein KI‑getriebenes "Supercycle"‑Szenario: fokussierte Nachfrage an Leading‑edge Logic, DRAM und Advanced Packaging. Management betont ungewöhnlich hohe Kundensichtbarkeit (teilweise >2 Jahre), starke Lieferanten‑Partnerschaften und operative Vorbereitung auf deutlich steigende Shipments; EPIC soll Co‑Innovation und Time‑to‑Market stark verkürzen.
🔭 Strategische Highlights
- Marktfokus: Priorität auf drei Wachstumsfelder — führende Logik, DRAM und Advanced Packaging — in denen Applied laut Management #1‑Positionen hat.
- EPIC‑Ansatz: Investition in EPIC (Forschungs‑ und Validierungszentrum) zur parallelen Co‑Innovation mit Kunden, Universitäten und Partnern; Ziel: kürzere Validierungszyklen und höhere Erfolgsraten.
- Lieferkette & Service: Engere Partnerschaften mit >2.000 Zulieferern, frühere Bedarfsprognosen (~2 Jahre), Ausbau von Fertigungskapazität und Serviceteams sowie gezielte Ausbildung von Fachkräften.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Konkrete Signale: Management nennt Erwartung von >20% Shipments für Kalenderjahr 2026 und kündigt weitere Kunden‑/Partnerankündigungen rund um EPIC an; es gab jedoch keine neue formale Umsatz‑ oder Margen‑Guidance.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Vorbereitung vs.2021: Kritische Nachfrage zur Skalierbarkeit — Antwort: besseres Planungsmodell, doppelte Produktionskapazität vs. Vor‑COVID und frühzeitige Supplier‑Abstimmung.
- EPIC‑ROI: Nachfrage nach Kundenzügen — Management zeigt erste Samsung‑Zusammenarbeit und verspricht weitere Ankündigungen, ohne detaillierte Zeitpläne zu nennen.
- Technologie‑Risiken: Sorge zu PVD‑Kupfer vs. ALD‑Molybdenum — Management sagt: Kupfer bleibt zentral; Moly ergänzt Kontakte, ersetzt Kupfer nicht.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Positives operatives Bild: starke Nachfrage, technologische Führerschaft in integrierten Material‑Lösungen und konkrete Maßnahmen zur Skalierung. Bleibt offen: fehlende numerische Finanz‑Guidance und Ausführungsrisiken (Lieferengpässe, Fachkräftemangel). EPIC und Service‑Expansion sind die wichtigsten kurzfristigen Katalysatoren.
Applied Materials — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to the Applied Materials First Quarter of Fiscal 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the call over to Mike Sullivan, Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. With me are Gary Dickerson, our President and CEO; and Brice Hill, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call includes forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ. Information concerning these risks and uncertainties is discussed in our most recent Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. Today's call also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to GAAP measures can be found in today's earnings press release and in our quarterly earnings materials, which are available on our website at ir.appliedmaterials.com.
Before we begin, I have several calendar announcements. On Tuesday morning, February 24, Applied will host new product briefings at the SPIE lithography and Patterning Conference in San Jose, and you're welcome to join us in person. We are also very pleased to announce the first event in our 2026 master class series. We plan to cover transistors and wiring on Wednesday, April 8, at 9:00 in the morning Pacific Time and will host a live webcast.
Finally, we're excited to announce 2 special events during [indiscernible]. On Monday afternoon, October 12, we plan to host an investor open house event at the new Epic Center in Silicon Valley, California. We hope you'll join us there. And on Tuesday morning, October 13, we plan to host an investor breakfast in San Francisco. We hope to see you in person or on the webcast. And with that introduction, I'd now like to turn the call over to Gary Dickerson.
Thank you, Mike. In our first fiscal quarter of 2026, Applied Materials delivered revenue and earnings above the midpoint of our guided range. Our strong performance and outlook for 2026 and beyond are fueled by the acceleration of investments in AI computing. AI is at a tipping point where improvements in performance and cost translate to real-world applications that deliver meaningful productivity gains and return on investment for users. The race to build out AI infrastructure is driving unprecedented spending on semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing capacity and research and development.
Today, the most critical and fastest-growing markets are leading-edge logic, high bandwidth memory DRAM and advanced packaging. These are areas where Applied has strong leadership positions as well as an innovative pipeline of solutions to enable next-generation technologies. In my prepared remarks, I will provide my perspective on how our markets are evolving, explain the role we are playing to enable the AI road map and describe how we're turning the opportunities ahead of us into sustainable, profitable growth for Applied. Semiconductors are the heart of the AI technology stack. With the accelerated growth of AI end markets, we believe that global semiconductor industry revenues can potentially reach $1 trillion in 2026, several years earlier than prior predictions.
For Applied, we expect to grow our semiconductor equipment business more than 20% this calendar year. We see the demand profile weighted towards the second half of the calendar year with availability of customer clean room space being a key factor pacing the rate of investment. Our largest customers are giving us increased longer-term visibility to ensure we have operational capacity and service support in place for their ramps. Based on this visibility, we expect strong growth momentum to be carried into 2027.
Improvements in AI data center performance and cost directly impact AI adoption rates by increasing the number of tokens generated per second and lowering the total cost of ownership, which is dominated by energy consumption, more AI applications become economically viable. This need for higher performance and more energy-efficient AI computing is reshaping semiconductor industry investments and driving high growth rates for Applied in leading-edge logic, HBM DRAM and advanced packaging. In leading-edge logic, our customers are adding capacity at FinFET nodes while simultaneously ramping gate all around nodes. Applied is the clear #1 process equipment provider in leading-edge logic with strong leadership positions across materials deposition, modification and treatment as well as in conductor etch and e-beam technologies.
Gate-all-around nodes grow our available market considerably while also providing a catalyst for multiple points of market share gain. In DRAM, customers are aggressively adding capacity at 6F-squared nodes, while in parallel, developing next-generation DRAM device architectures. AI computing is driving significant demand for high-bandwidth memory DRAM, which has larger die sizes and requires 3 to 4x more wafer starts per dollar bit than standard DRAM.
In addition, the number of dies in the HBM stacks is increasing from 12 today to 16 and then 20 or more in the future. This further grows demand for wafer starts and advanced packaging. Applied is the #1 process equipment provider in memory today, thanks to our very strong position in DRAM, where we are the clear leader in materials deposition for both wiring and patterning as well as conductor etch and e-beam technologies.
In advanced packaging, the mix of customer investments is changing. We expect the fastest-growing market segments in 2026 to be HBM and 3D chiplet stacking. Applied has very strong market share in both of these areas, thanks to our leadership and materials deposition and removal technologies, which is enabling us to extend our overall leadership in advanced packaging. In NAND, we are forecasting modest growth in equipment demand in 2026 and and we expect NAND to remain less than 10% of wafer fab equipment spending.
In ICAP, customers who serve the IoT, communications, automotive, power and sensor markets, we expect wafer fab equipment to be approximately flat year-on-year, both globally and in China. At Applied Materials, our strategy is inflection-focused innovation. By focusing our R&D resources on the development of high-value solutions to enable major device architecture inflections, we are accelerating our customers' road maps and driving sustainable value capture and margin expansion for Applied.
Our innovators have generated an expansive pipeline of next-generation products. products we have released over the past several years are significantly contributing to our growth in 2026. One example of this is our unique cold field emission e-beam technology where we expect revenues to double this calendar year to more than $1 billion and support process diagnostics and control, being one of our fastest-growing businesses in 2026.
In addition, our leadership in CFE e-beam imaging accelerates learning rates for next-generation chip architectures and adoption of Applied's process equipment portfolio. In 2026, we are planning to launch more than a dozen new products, including 3 for advanced logic and DRAM, which we announced earlier this week. Our [indiscernible] radical treatment system delivers item-level precision engineering of nanosheet surfaces, which enables higher speed next-generation gate-all-around transistors. [indiscernible], which is the newest variant of our [indiscernible] etch platform enables angstrom level precision for critical edge steps in gate-all-around transistors and advanced DRAM.
This extends our conductor etch market leadership in advanced logic and DRAM. And our spectral ALD system enables selective deposition of monocrystal [indiscernible]a new material that can reduce contact resistance and advanced logic devices by up to 15%. We Applied is leading the transition from ALD Tungsten to ALD Moly and logic contact formation. As transistor counts and wiring layers increase, copper PVD steps will continue to grow significantly, remaining an order of magnitude larger than ALD moly.
This week, we also announced our first EPIC co-development agreement, Samsung Electronics. Applied's global Epic platform is designed to support high velocity co-innovation with our customers and R&D partners. For chip makers, EPIC will provide significantly earlier access to Applied's R&D portfolio, enabling faster cycles of learning and accelerated transfer of next-generation technologies into high-volume manufacturing.
For Applied, EPIC will give us better multi-node visibility to guide our R&D investments while improving R&D productivity value sharing and our ability to be designed in with our products and advanced service technologies. As our customers ramp complex new devices in high-volume manufacturing, we see accelerating demand for our advanced services, supporting a double-digit growth rate for our service business. We have many valuable service innovations that accelerate the transition of new technologies from lab to fab and then accelerate ramps to enable increased yield and output in high-volume production.
Several years ago, we launched Applied's proprietary AIX or actionable insight Accelerator software capabilities. Today, we have more than 30,000 chambers connected to AIX servers using AI-powered monitoring, diagnostics and analytics. Across these connected tools, we are seeing 30% faster response times, enabling increased wafer output for customers and better service engineer productivity for Applied. In addition, we now have automated all our major distribution centers with state-of-the-art AI-enabled robotic systems, significantly improving our parts delivery speed and accuracy as well as inventory optimization.
Before I hand over to Brice, let me briefly summarize. Semiconductors are the heart of the AI technology stack and as AI adoption accelerates, we see industry revenues potentially reaching $1 trillion in 2026. Our inflection-focused innovation strategy is generating an expansive pipeline of higher-value products that are extending Applied's leadership in leading-edge logic, memory and advanced packaging and enabling us to grow our semiconductor business more than 20% in 2026. And we are driving deeper co-innovation engagements with our customers to enable energy-efficient AI architecture inflections and accelerate the transfer of new technologies into high-volume manufacturing. Epic will come online later this year bringing together key innovators from our customers and applied to significantly increase value creation velocity. Brice, over to you.
Thank you, Gary, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. I'm pleased that Applied delivered strong first quarter results, and I'd like to thank our global teams and partners for their contributions. Looking ahead to Q2, we anticipate strong growth in our semiconductor systems business along with healthy gross margin and increasing profitability for the company. As Gary described, our business is strengthening with positive demand indications throughout the ecosystem. We are tracking higher levels of planned CapEx from cloud service providers. Semiconductor factory utilization is rising across all device types. Leading-edge foundry logic and DRAM capacity is essentially full and prices have increased. These dynamics are driving significantly longer visibility from our own customers who are increasing the number of new factory projects and fab expansion scheduled to be completed over the next several years.
As the largest supplier of process equipment and leading-edge foundry logic DRAM and advanced packaging, A major priority for us is ensuring we have the capacity to support our customers over this period. Over the past several years, we've nearly doubled our system manufacturing capacity and strengthened our supply chain operations. In recent quarters, we've given our direct suppliers longer visibility into our requirements, which has allowed them to proliferate the demand signal throughout the supply chain to secure the materials and labor needed to support growth.
At Applied, we've proactively increased our inventory by nearly $500 million year-over-year to meet the increasing build plans. As a result, we are well positioned to meet the increasing demand we are seeing from our customers. Next, I'll briefly summarize our Q1 results. Revenue of $7 billion was in the upper end of our guidance range and down 2% year-over-year. Revenue in China declined 7% year-over-year and represented 27% of combined semi equipment and AGS sales and 30% of overall sales. Non-GAAP gross margin was 70 basis points above the midpoint of our expectation and grew 20 basis points year-over-year to 49.1%.
Non-GAAP OpEx was in line with our expectation and grew 2% year-over-year to $1.34 billion, with an 8% increase in R&D investments largely offset by G&A spending reductions. Non-GAAP operating profit declined 4% year-over-year to $2.1 billion. Non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.38 was at the top of the guidance range and flat year-over-year. Included in our GAAP results is an accrual of $252.5 million related to an export controls compliance matter we disclosed in our 2022 10-K and later filings. The Department of Justice and SEC have closed their inquiries into this matter with no enforcement actions. We issued a press release and filed an 8-K related to the seat we reached with the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of [indiscernible], to resolve its inquiry and you can find all of our comments related to the matter in these documents.
Next, I'll summarize our segment results. As a reminder, beginning in Q1, our 200-millimeter systems business has moved from the Applied Global Services segment to the Semiconductor Systems segment. Corporate support costs previously reflected in Corporate and Other are now being fully allocated to our businesses. and display business results are now included in other. To help with your models, today's earnings press release and slide presentation include tables that provide a recast for these changes. Semiconductor Systems revenue exceeded our expectation in Q1 and included record DRAM revenue. On a year-over-year basis, revenue declined 8% to $5.14 billion.
Non-GAAP gross margin increased 100 basis points to more than 54% driven by our continued focus on value-based pricing, along with manufacturing cost improvements. Non-GAAP operating margin declined 80 basis points to 32.9%. Applied Global Services delivered record revenue of $1.56 billion, which exceeded our expectations and grew 15% year-over-year. Non-GAAP gross margin increased 210 basis points, and non-GAAP operating margin grew 320 basis points.
Turning to the balance sheet. We generated $1.69 billion in cash from operations. Free cash flow of $1 billion included elevated capital investments as we made continued progress building the Epic R&D center in Silicon Valley and further expanded our systems manufacturing capacity. Finally, we distributed $702 million to shareholders in cash dividends and stock buybacks. Over the past year, we've distributed over 85% of free cash flow to shareholders.
Now I'll share our guidance for Q2. We expect company revenue of $7.65 billion, plus or minus $500 million, which should be up around 9% sequentially. We expect non-GAAP EPS of $2.64 and plus or minus $0.20. Within this outlook, we expect Semiconductor Systems revenue of around $5.8 billion, AGS revenue of about $1.6 billion and other revenue of around $250 million. We expect non-GAAP gross margin to increase to approximately 49.3%. We expect non-GAAP operating expenses of around $1.415 billion. Given increased visibility and confidence in the industry's growth outlook, we are accelerating R&D co-development projects with our customers and partners. We remain highly focused on growth, productivity and margins. Finally, we are now modeling a non-GAAP tax rate of around 11%.
In summary, the investments we've made over the past several years have put us in a terrific position for profitable growth. The global expansion of AI infrastructure is translating to accelerating demand for our most enabling products in leading-edge foundry logic DRAM and advanced packaging. Along with advanced services that help our customers accelerate ramps and yields. Working closely with our customers, we're increasing the energy-efficient performance of logic chips, compute memory and systems and we are sharing in the value we create.
Applied is the materials engineering leader in the fastest-growing segments of the semiconductor market, and we are driving our operations teams and supply chain partners to increase capacity and output as our customers ramp in 2026 and 2027. Thank you for listening. And now, Mike, let's begin the Q&A.
Thanks, Brice. To help us reach as many people as we can on today's call, please ask just 1 question and no more than 1 brief follow-up question. Peter, let's please begin.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of CJ Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.
2. Question Answer
Gary, we've heard a wide range of WFE guys for 2026 from your peers ranging from low teens to as high as 22%. I know you don't like to guide to WFE, but how does your view stand for 2026 versus these comments? In particular, the 20% that you talked about vis-a-vis what you think WFE will be? And if you can kind of talk to where you think the drivers of share growth will be?
All right. Thanks for the question, C.J. And yes, we don't -- we haven't talked about WFE for a very long time. And as you mentioned, what we said earlier on the call, as we expect to grow our semi equipment business more than 20% this calendar year being second half weighted. And we also see limited clean room capacity pacing the rate of growth which means 27 is shaping up to be another strong year. What's driving the business is really AI. AI is fueling the growth for the most profitable companies in the world and energy-efficient computing is enabled by leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM, including HBM and advanced packaging. And we expect these will be the fastest-growing WFE segment in '26, '27 and for the next several years. In all of these high-growth markets, Applied has strong #1 process equipment positions, and we're positioned to extend our leadership and gain share. And then giving color into these markets in leading-edge foundry logic, we're #1 and on track to gain share and capture more than 50% of our served market in gate-all-around and wiring, including backside power and we're #1 in deposition, conductor etch and packaging. In DRAM, we're #1 in standard DRAM HBM DRAM and HBM packaging and I think many of you know that HPM wafers are growing as our customers need to start 3 to 4x more wafers to deliver the same number of bets. We are the leader in materials deposition for wiring and patterning with rapid growth in conductor etch and ebeam. We expect strong growth in '26, and we're positioned to gain share going forward in [indiscernible]. We're also #1 in advanced packaging overall and #1 in HBM. Packaging will be a high-growth business for us in '26 and for the next several years. The highest growth segments in '26 or HBM and 3D chiplet stacking where Applied has high share, thanks to our leadership in materials deposition and removal technologies. And then today, NAND and ICAP spending are less driven by AI, high-performance computing, and we see NAND up this year but growing slower and remaining less than 10% of total WFE and the ICAP market being flattish this year, both overall and in China, following elevated spending in recent years. So Bringing all of this together, CJ, as you said in your question, we expect to grow our semi equipment business more than 20% this calendar year and our #1 position in these [indiscernible] growing markets creates a great setup for Applied in '27 and for the next several years.
That's very helpful. And I guess, Brice, how are you thinking about your gross margins into the cycle particularly when we consider rising volumes, your value-based pricing as well as significantly better margins downstream at your customers?
Thanks, CJ. I'll take the question on the margins. What I'd like to say is that we made progress in gross margins, up 700 basis points since I became CEO, and we're now at the highest level in 25 years, and I strongly believe we're driving the right actions to sustainably increase the value we create for customers and for applied to share in the value we are creating. Our strategy, as I've talked about many times, is inflection-focused innovation, targeting the fastest-growing value pools that enable data center AI computing and especially foundry logic, DRAM, including HBM and packaging. These are the fastest-growing WFE segments where Applied has clear leadership and we're positioned to drive strong revenue growth and margin growth. We have a great pipeline of even higher value products, and we're taking high-velocity co-innovation with our customers to the next level with our EPIC platform. For Applied EPIC gives us better multi-node visibility to guide our R&D investments while improving our R&D productivity, value sharing and our ability to be designed in with our products and advanced service technologies. In EPIC, top customer R&D innovators will be located with our innovators and our customers will have earlier access to key innovations that will enable them in the race to be first to market with high-value chip and packaging technologies. And we're innovating not just in process equipment, but also with our e-beam and [indiscernible] AI-enabled software platform to accelerate cycles of learning to bring innovations to market much faster in short, as we enable our customers to deliver more valuable wafers,
[Audio Gap]
Congrats on the strong results. Gary or Brice, my first question is also on WFE. You kind of mentioned that both China and global ICAP will be flat this year. Kind of curious, how has the view evolved over the last 3 months? Since 3 months ago, the consensus you that China would be down in 2026, but now it looks like it's going to be flat. So I'm kind of curious what changed. And then I had a quick follow-up.
Chris, thanks for the question. Last quarter, we said we expected 26 to be a strong year, led by AI-driven markets, which includes leading-edge foundry, logic and DRAM, including HBM and that's still our view. We thought China and ICAP WFE would be down a little this calendar year, particularly due to the ongoing capacity digestion. We now see ICAPs, as I just mentioned, flattish overall, both globally and in China, and we continue to believe that in the longer term, that the ICAP's semiconductor market will grow in mid- to high single digits, which is significantly lower than what we see for markets being driven by AI data center growth, which include leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging.
Got it. Got it. And then just to follow up on advanced packaging. Gary, you mentioned HBM packaging and 3D chip it stacking is strong. Is there a way to quantify or look at advanced packaging this year versus last year? How it looks? And also the 20% growth you mentioned a greater than 20% growth for applied semis. How does advanced packaging stack within that framework?
Yes, Krish, this year, advanced packaging WFE spending is increasing, as I said earlier, in HBM and 3D chiplet stacking. And these are markets where Applied is #1 with very high share, and this is driving advanced packaging to be one of our highest growth businesses this year and extending our overall leadership. And I'd tell you, looking forward to the future for AI energy-efficient computing, our customers want new packaging substrates as large as possible to connect more GPUs memory and high-speed I/O at the highest density so they can deliver higher performance and lower power. There are innovations in new substrates and new architectures that will ramp in the next few years. And with our strong innovation pipeline in these inflections, I expect Applied's packaging business to continue to lead the industry and grow at a high compound annual growth rate for many years into the future.
Our next question comes from the line of Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research.
First, I wanted to touch on the more than 20% equipment growth. So you just guided $5.8 billion in equipment, I guess, for calendar Q1. So if I did my math right, I guess for the last 3 quarters of the calendar year, that 20 -- just even debt on 20% would give me something like $6.5 billion run rate for calendar Q2 through calendar Q4. And it sounds like it's even getting stronger through the year. So the exit rate sounds like it ought to be like larger than that. I guess what I'm asking is, is that math correct? And how are you thinking about the trajectory of achieving that 20% growth as we get through the year? Like how should we be thinking about an exit rate given that sort of implied average?
Stacy, it's Brice. You have the right pieces. We're signaling 20% -- greater than 20% for the calendar year. We're also signaling that the second half will be higher and so you've got our Q2 guide. We're not filling in the blanks in the middle because, frankly, we're still working on what that schedule will look like. But we know we have that level of demand to signal the 20%. So I think you're in the ballpark with your thinking, but we don't have the exact track.
Got it. That makes sense. But I guess, it also sounds like you think that momentum continues as we get into '27. So I guess is the limit on that growth right now is simply just clean room space? I guess if the clean rooms were there would that run rate be even higher? And does that suggest that as we get into '27, I mean, the beginning of '27, sounds like it ought to be even lower than like the end of '27 if that plays out as planned. Is that how you guys are thinking about it?
Yes. It's certainly metered by clean room this year in leading edge and DRAM. And so that is putting a cap on what can be done this year. just to the benefit of the whole ecosystem, we've obviously raised our outlook for this year. That's what you're hearing in this call. So there was space to add more capacity this year in DRAM leading logic than we had planned a quarter ago. So that's good news. But I think the customers have exhausted most of that space. Now for investors, all of our customers, I looked at the schedule. There's a number of factories coming online in '27. So we expect capacity to continue to be added every quarter. that will open up new opportunities for next year and we'll go into next year with still in a constrained position.
Stacy, the other thing I would add is I've had many discussions with our largest customer CEOs and R&D leaders. And I think this demand for AI data center is a significant wave that's going to last over a longer period of time. So when I talk to them and when they're communicating also externally, they're talking about extremely high compound annual growth rates. We talked about data center passing PCs and eventually smartphones in terms of total wafer starts. So I think it's too early to say exactly what the shape of '27 is going to look like. But as I said earlier, based on the customer conversations, I would expect 27% is also going to be a very strong year.
Our next question comes from the line of Mark Lipacis from Evercore ISI.
Gary, I want to ask a bigger picture question. based on your observation that the $1 trillion bogey for the semi industry is hitting a lot earlier than most people expected. I believe you used to suggest that the WFE intensity would be around 15% of this industry, and that was at $1 trillion that would support a $150 billion industry. But with the revenue accelerating and data center AI revenues kind of being the driver here, is 15%. Is that still the right way to think about WFE intensity in your view?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Mark. So WFE intensity has grown to around 15%. But really, for me, when I'm thinking about Applied Materials and what I'm driving is to focus on winning every segment, but to really make sure we outperform in the largest and fastest-growing markets. The semiconductor industry growth we envisioned is arriving sooner because of the AI data center growth. And as I said earlier, the fastest equipment markets growing are leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and including high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging because they enable energy-efficient AI data center performance. This is where Applied has been investing for many years to create strong leadership positions, and that's where we're seeing the fastest in market growth this year and I see that going many years into the future. And then back to the WFE intensity, our longer-term composition model is different than what we had talked about before. Before we talked about a 1/3 leading-edge foundry logic, 1/3 ICAP, 1/3 memory. And when those growth rates in those segments were roughly the same. This single capital intensity number was helpful in forecasting future growth, but now we're seeing a significant divergence in the end market growth rates. And I think it's time for a new growth framework. And then for Applied, again, we're in a great position in those fastest-growing markets. And if you look at leading-edge foundry logic and DRAM, those segments are going to be significantly larger than ICAPs and other memory segments is a part of the total mix.
Got you. And a follow-up, if I may. Based on that, does that necessarily put you in a position to, as you said, capture more value and from our standpoint, capturing more value is the code word for higher gross margin. So does the expansion of those markets get you to that point in time.
Yes. I mean, again, our focus is really and we've been focused on this for many years. I think I go back to 2019 when we first talked about this coming AI wave. And we've made tremendous investments inside Applied. We formed our Integrated Materials Solutions group in anticipation of this shift in WFE spending. And our focus is to create very high-value solutions for our customers. AI is a race for everyone to bring these new architectures to market. And as I said, in those segments that are enabling the AI data center, we're in a very strong position to bring very high-value solutions to our customers, and we'll be sharing in that value as we go forward. And certainly, again, we've driven margin growth over the last many years. I have very high confidence that we'll be able to sustain that margin growth going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.
So the -- I had a first question on AGS. So the OpExs are that it's not really growing much, but I have to believe that on a pro forma basis, that actually is growing because you're taking the 200-millimeter equipment business and you're putting that now into [indiscernible] so can you give us a sense of how big that is?
Tim, this is Brice. What you'll see in our numbers, we provided the recast numbers in our press release for that reorganization that moves 200-millimeter from our services business to our equipment business. You'll be able to see Crystal clearly in our numbers that Q1 has 15% year-over-year growth for AGS and our Q2 guide should be approximately over 12%, almost 13% year-over-year for AGS. So what we're signaling for AGS along the lines of your question is that it should grow at low double digits or better going forward. And that's based on having a 55,000 tool installed base. We'll grow that installed base every year at 5-plus percent. I think you heard Gary talking about we're launching new products in AGS, including our AIX, the Actionable Insights Accelerators products. And so high confidence in that business, it's all recurring revenue right now. 2/3 of it is under contract. The average contract 2.9 years, 90% renewal rate. And then you probably heard me talk about when we think about our dividend, we look at the cash profitability of our services business and it can afford our dividend payment at this point, and we like to make that connection since it's highly recurring revenue.
And then you said something, Brice, I think you said you've doubled the systems manufacturing capacity over the past -- I think you said a few years or maybe it was several years. So if I look back, like you were doing $5 billion a quarter in back in like '23. I'm just kind of -- I'm not sure if that's the base you're using. But -- so is the message that you could do like $10 billion in system sales, is that the -- when you say that you've doubled the -- your SSG could -- like is that the right number that you've gone from kind of 5% to 10% now?
I think the thought is fair. We're not going to put a number on it, but we have significant upside from a manufacturing perspective. We had preposition space available. We've built out a portion of that prepositioned space now. to help with the ramp that we're seeing, and we have more prepositioned space available. So we -- yes, we can comfortably scale much higher. And of course, the real job for us, we have approximately 2,000 suppliers. We've got to work with our suppliers. We're working to give them a strong signal. Gary talked about working with the customers to get 2 years' visibility, and we're working with them to get specific bill of materials so that the suppliers know exactly what we need with as much lead time as possible. So that's where the big lift is. And yes, we have we have plenty of upside in our output capabilities.
Yes. Tim, the only thing I would add is that in the discussions with customers, it's not so much the clean room capacity, as Brice said, it's supply chain, train service engineers, all of those things. So that's where the visibility for us has improved dramatically because customers understand that the supply chain takes some time, train service engineers take some time, and that's where we're getting significantly longer-term visibility with specific configurations better than we've ever had.
And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities.
I'm curious what is driving the second half acceleration because the conventional thinking is that a lot of this clean room for memory is constrained until the second half of next year. So it's not memory [indiscernible] it's more space and foundry or logic. I'm just curious what is specifically driving the second half acceleration in 2026.
I think Vivek, it's Brice. I think it is a clean room. We had an inkling of this last quarter we had expected the second half to be higher based on availability of space for DRAM and leading edge. And the good news is customers have been able to increase their expectations for this year. But I think that is metering both both DRAM and leading edge. We saw a number of new factory projects announced during this quarter. So our tracking of the number of factory projects globally keeps ticking up each quarter, as you would expect, with a growing number of wafer start outputs -- and I looked at the next year's schedule, there's a number of factories in DRAM and leading logic that are scheduled to come online next year. So there's -- customers are working to accelerate that as quickly as possible.
Got it. And for my follow-up, what proportion of WFE do you think right now is being driven by data center and AI? And what was it last year, just so that we get a sense for what is kind of the growth portion of WFE versus what is exposed to the nongrowth areas.
Yes. It's a good question. I think in the recent past, we've said more than 20% of leading-edge wafer starts have been directed towards data center. And that has shifted, obviously, since that's growing much faster. So this year, it's passing PCs from a consumption perspective of leading-edge wafer starts. We've moved up our forecast. We think data center will surpass smartphones in 2029. And the way I think of it, this may not be perfect, but the way I think of it is the sort of traditional data center, the racks and file servers and those sorts of things are growing between 10% and 20% and the AI-related components are growing between 30% and 40% at this point, which gives you something north of 20% at this point from a growth rate perspective.
And our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan Chase.
Congrats on the strong execution. I've got a follow-up on AGS. On the solid growth outlook for this year in the systems business, combined with the strong and increasing utilization of your customers, as you guys mentioned you're attaching more value-added services and we've got this huge installed base. So it just kind of all bodes well for the systems business. If I look at the trend over the past 6 calendar years, AGS has grown like at about 11% CAGR, right in the middle of your target of kind of low teens growth. But given the dynamics I just outlined, right, do you see AGS growing faster than that 10% to 12% sort of historical CAGR this calendar year? I mean you're already entering this year trending higher than that, right? You're at like 13%, 15% year-over-year growth. Any reason for us not to believe that this type of growth sustains through the calendar year?
It's a good question, Harlan. As you point out, our Q1 year-over-year grew 15%, and you've got all the right dynamics I think those are additive. The installed base grows, the number of new products grows and the value of those products grow. So that's what allows that business to grow faster typically than our semi business. So we also have some headwinds as we've lost some of that business when you quote the historical rate there, with the trade restrictions that we had, we had accounts that we lost, which kept the growth rate a little bit smaller than the types of rates we're seeing this quarter. So I think when we look at our forecast, we feel that we're confident with low double digits. And then there will obviously be a range around that. We can have quarters with high utilization that does better than the low double digits.
Yes. Harlan, the other thing I would add is I'm very excited about our service innovation pipeline. I mean the 30,000 chambers that are connected to AIX servers gives us an ability to deliver more valuable services to our customers, increase our service engineer productivity. And again, the pipeline for us there is very strong. And our customers are ramping these new very complex factories gate all around in the future backside power, and you've got these complex memory architectures that they're ramping. We're seeing more integrated platforms, more integrated steps. As you said, I mean, I feel very good about our growth in AGS going forward. And I think there's a really good opportunity for it to grow faster going forward.
Got it. I appreciate that. And Gary, your process diagnostics and control business is a smaller part of the portfolio and revenue mix, right? But nevertheless, it's so important to your customers. And as we articulated, supply team has a very strong position in EV metrology, defect review, even wafer inspection, [indiscernible] absolutely critical for advanced process nodes of your 3 end market drivers, DRAM advanced foundry logic, advanced packaging, like where are you seeing the strongest pool for your PDC solutions. And you articulated a very strong demand profile for this year. Is your PBC franchise approaching or exceeding that sort of $2 billion kind of annualized run rate this year potentially.
Yes. Thanks for the question. I'm not going to give a specific number, but it is one of the fastest-growing businesses for us this calendar year. And we have leadership in e-beam technology, e-beam imaging. And one thing I believe is you can't fix what you can't see. With that technology, we have the highest resolution, 10x faster imaging. And you mentioned this is very important for our process equipment business and for our customers to drive faster learning rates so that they can bring those innovations to market at higher velocity. So Heartland, we'll be announcing new technologies and new products that are really, really important for material characterization for our customers. So the growth rate this year is going to be one of the fastest across all of Applied Materials. And I have very, very high confidence this growth is going to continue at a high rate in '27 and going forward.
Our next question comes from the line of Jim Schneider from Goldman Sachs.
I was wondering if you could maybe just give us a sense in calendar '26 and '27 could you rank order the relative growth rates you expect for both foundry logic and DRAM? And do you expect 1 to be sustainably higher the other in the next several quarters?
Jim, it's Brice. We can't really do that. And the reason is -- when we look at the request from customers, it's metered by factory availability. So I think it's difficult to see what's happening in the market from a demand perspective. So the way we're communicating it in the way we're thinking about it, greater than 20% growth for the semi business. We highlighted that there's a couple of businesses that are growing more slowly, which is NAND and then ICAP's which will be flattish. And then we have a group of faster-growing businesses, which is the leading-edge DRAM and advanced packaging. And I think our perspective is the pull on those from AI is very similar across all of those. So those are in the fast lane. Those are a higher growth rate. you can tell by the math that you would do that there's a portion of our business that's slower or no growth, and there's those 3 portions that are much faster so you can sort of get a sense of what the growth rates will be. But it's very hard to differentiate between them because customers have fabs coming on at different times. So we just don't think about it that way. .
And then [indiscernible] I think you previously indicated that you would expect gross margins to potentially step up in the back half of calendar '20 as you get more revenue absorption on that. Are you still expecting that to be the case even without any help from China? And what will it take to kind of get gross margins at or above the 15% rate without help from China?
Yes. I think mechanically, we expect some modest improvements in gross margin, and there's a tailwind and there's a headwind. The tailwind is with greater than 20% growth in our semi business. Typically, that grows slower than our AGS business. AGS has a slower margin. So with the faster growth in semi, that's a tailwind for us. The flip side is we've highlighted that we expect a flattish China. So as the mix to smaller customers receive as we go through the course of the year, that's a headwind on gross margin. So we do think we have the opportunity to continue to improve gross margins. We think the progress will be, I'll say, very slow through the course of the year.
And our next question comes from the line of Melissa Weathers from Deutsche Bank.
I'm looking forward to those master classes coming back. I think that will be very interesting. I guess I wanted to ask, in the next couple of quarters before we get a lot of the greenfield adds in memory. It does seem like a lot of the focus is going to be on node conversions and trying to squeeze out more bits out of the existing wafer capacity. RECONNECT So can you remind us how to think about your opportunity in a node upgrade scenario versus greenfield? Because that's -- and is this mostly an AGS story? Or is there something else that we should appreciate.
Listen, I think if you're thinking about DRAM, I'm thinking most of the DRAM investments that are being made are greenfield. So we should see that level of investment. And then on the NAND side, there is a number of upgrades. We think of the NAND business as mostly conversion and upgrades, as you're suggesting, and we participate less in that from a share perspective. So it's a smaller business for us.
Yes. And the other thing I would add is I mentioned this earlier, with HBM DRAM, you're starting 3x more wafers. And as you go from HBM3 to HBM4, that goes from 3x to 4x. So again, that's a very powerful driver in terms of the overall DRAM business. And people are also wanting to stack more chips going from 12 to 16 to 20. So that's another powerful driver for the DRAM business.
Got it. And then, Brice, really quick. You flagged, I think, $500 million of inventory that you guys are building up ahead of these ramps. So is there any update to how we should be thinking about days inventory that you guys are comfortable holding on the books or any working capital changes?
The days right now are approximately 153. I don't think that will go up very much. But yes, over the last year, we built $500 million and $500 million of additional inventory. And what I'm signaling there is we have been prepping for a larger amount of output, and we feel like we're well prepared to deliver the revenue that we're forecasting. So -- but Melissa, I'm not anticipating that, that will get out of hand because, of course, the revenue is going up each quarter. So I think the days will stay fairly tight to that zone.
Operator, we have time for 2 quick questions, please.
Our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis from Jefferies.
Just a quick one on the model price. I'm just kind of curious [indiscernible] obviously, you're seeing a bare growth path. So I would expect you to ramp up ex. Were you able to get all that in this quarter? And how do you think about it for the year?
Yes. lane. You see for the Q1, investors will see that we were very controlled on our OpEx, not much growth year-over-year. For Q2, we do have approximately 6% and growth sequentially in Q2. And we are funding growth projects that we have throughout the portfolio. And some of those will be early projects that are related to the Epic lab that's coming aboard as we get to the end of this year. So as you know, most of our growth is caused by organic investments. So we will be growing our investment level, especially as EPIC comes on board. But our expectation is we'll grow the spending more slowly than revenue growth.
And then I want to ask you on gross margin. I appreciate the detail between systems and AGS. I'm just kind of curious, I think you said 54% for systems, I mean, had kind of popped up to that level. So as we think about playing around with that blend as systems grows faster, I just want to understand -- I think you said it, but 54% is the right level. I mean it was actually 54.5%. SP137639875 And I guess, would you see modest improvement? Is it on that 54% or just overall?
I think just overall, you'll see modest improvement as we continue to move forward. And I mentioned the headwind. The headwind is the customer mix as we go through the year. But the way we think about it is the portfolio continues to get more valuable. Every day we complete an R&D project. We're tuning that portfolio to the most valuable inflection. So we do think there's opportunity long term to continue to improve gross margin.
And our final question then for today comes from the line of Atif Malik from Citi.
And thank you for providing the full year semiconductor equipment growth outlook. I have 2 quick ones. First on DRAM. You talked about your customers are developing for at Square. Can you talk about your confidence in maintaining your market share at that inflection? And when will the decisions come out? And the second one on NAND, Bryce, you mentioned the NAND modest growth less than 10% of WFE. Are you expecting any capacity additions in NAND this year?
Yes, I'll start off on the DRAM market share. We've grown DRAM market share significantly over the last decade. It's our strongest business. We're going to grow share in 6F-squared, and we're also in a very strong position and I have very high confidence that we're going to continue to grow share in 4Q.
Okay. And Atif, I think if you're thinking about wafer output, NAND hasn't increased wafer output in several years. So we're expecting. We are shipping product, [indiscernible] of it to be upgrades on the NAND side. And the reason is the technology is so good at providing greater and greater bit density every node that is just able to meet demand with the number of starts that are in place.
And before we close, Brice, would you like to give us a little summary.
Thank you, Mike. I'm excited that our business is accelerating and that the R&D investments we've made give us a broad portfolio of highly enabling products for the fastest-growing areas of the market. [indiscernible] will be at the Morgan Stanley Conference in San Francisco on March 2. And I look forward to seeing many of you at the Cantor conference in New York on March 10. Now Mike, let's close the call, please.
All right. Well, thank you, Brice. And a replay of today's call is going to be available on the Investor Relations page of our website by 5:00 Pacific Time today. And we would like to thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Applied Materials — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: $7,0 Mrd., im oberen Bereich der Guidance, -2% YoY.
- Non‑GAAP-Marge: Bruttomarge 49,1% (+20 Basispunkte YoY; 70bp über dem Guidance‑Mittelpunkt).
- Ergebnis: Non‑GAAP EPS $2,38 (oben in der Guidance, flach YoY); Non‑GAAP EBIT $2,1 Mrd. (-4% YoY).
- Cash & FCF: Operativer Cashflow $1,69 Mrd.; Free Cash Flow $1,0 Mrd.; Ausschüttungen $702 Mio. (Dividenden + Buybacks).
- Segmentmix: Semiconductor Systems $5,14 Mrd. (-8% YoY); Applied Global Services $1,56 Mrd. (+15% YoY); China 27% (kombiniert) und Umsatz in China -7% YoY.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Kerntreiber: Management sieht AI‑Infrastruktur als Hauptwachstumstreiber; führt zu schnellerer Nachfrage in Leading‑Edge Logic, HBM DRAM und Advanced Packaging.
- Inflection‑Strategie: „Inflection‑focused innovation“ – Priorisierung von R&D für hohe‑Wert‑Produkte (z.B. CFE e‑beam, spektrale ALD) zur Marktanteilsgewinnen.
- Co‑Innovation (EPIC): EPIC‑Plattform (u.a. Co‑Development mit Samsung) soll Entwicklungszyklen beschleunigen und frühere Kundeneinbindung ermöglichen.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q2‑Ausblick: Umsatz $7,65 Mrd. ± $0,5 Mrd. (≈ +9% seq.), Non‑GAAP EPS $2,64 ± $0,20, Bruttomarge ≈49,3%, OpEx ≈$1,415 Mrd., steuerliche Rate ≈11%.
- 2026‑Prognose: Semiconductor‑Equipment >20% Wachstum calendar year, mit zweites Halbjahr‑Gewichtung; Risiken: begrenzte Clean‑Room‑Kapazität und China‑Mix.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- WFE‑Prognosen: Analysten fragten nach Treibern und Share‑Gewinn; Management bestätigt >20% für Applied und betont Führungspositionen in Kernsegmenten.
- Margenentwicklung: Nachfrage, Wert‑basierte Preise und Mix sollen Margen stützen; China‑Mix und AGS‑Anteil sind mögliche Gegenwinde, Verbesserung dürfte langsam erfolgen.
- Kapazität & Supply‑Chain: Engpass ist teils Clean‑Room‑Kapazität, teils Lieferkette und Service‑Personal; Applied hat Fertigungskapazität fast verdoppelt und Inventar um ≈$500M erhöht.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Bewertung: Starker Call: Applied profitiert deutlich von AI‑getriebener WFE‑Nachfrage, liefert operative Stärke und erhöht Guidance‑Sicherheit; kurzfristig begrenzen Clean‑Room‑Kapazitäten und China‑Mix das Tempo. Für Aktionäre: hohes Wachstumsprofil (>20% Equipment), solide Margen‑Upside und aktiver Kapitalrückfluss, aber weiterhin Branchen‑zyklische und geopolitische Risiken.
Applied Materials — UBS Global Technology and AI Conference 2025
1. Question Answer
Okay. We're going to get started. I'm Tim Arcuri. I'm the semi and semi equipment analyst here at UBS. I'm very pleased to have Applied Materials with us. We have Brice Hill, who is the CFO. Thank you, Brice.
Tim, what a great venue. Thanks for hosting us, and great to be here and appreciate everybody's interest in Applied Materials.
So Brice, let's just start and talk about just WFE in general. You're pointing to the first half of next year being sort of flat to modestly up in the second half, I think you think will be a little stronger, so a little more of a back half loaded year next year. What are the drivers for the second half of the year to kind of accelerate versus the first half? Is it mostly due to DRAM and the fab readiness issue?
Awesome. Well, you probably won't be surprised if I bring up AI as a significant tailwind for the industry. And for Applied Materials, people who know Applied Materials, we love materials engineering. And I think there is not a surprise that the world is just hungry for more and more energy-efficient compute. And that's what we work on as a company.
And I think there's been a concept for a long time of pervasive compute. If you can make compute less and less expensive, higher performance, lower power, then you're going to find all kinds of new opportunities and solutions. AI is a great example of this. Tim, you mentioned DRAM, probably the largest grower we see in the near future is leading logic. Leading logic is -- leading-edge logic is 100% utilized on some nodes right now. There's a big pull from the accelerators, the GPUs, the CPUs that run these AI data center components. And then, of course, DRAM goes with that. So you've got a pull on leading-edge logic and then you've also got a strong pull on DRAM. And so those are the 2 components.
When we look in the second half, we've been working with our customers for the last quarter on getting more and more visibility into the road map for the next couple of years. And the reason is we started hearing discussions about more capacity being put in place, and you have to prepare your supply chain if you're going to do that. It's one thing for Applied Materials to have capacity, but we have over 2,000 direct suppliers, all of those suppliers on the same page. And so we started making sure we have good visibility from our customers on what their plans are over the next couple of years. And yes, that's what we see as strong growth for leading-edge. Most of this is oriented towards the second half calendar, as we mentioned. DRAM will also go along with that. And then HBM, the high-bandwidth memory that also pulls on certain packaging capabilities that we provide a good portion of the equipment for. So that will be the strongest pull in the market.
Now I'll just -- I'll give you the offset for a second. The offset that we have is the mature node technologies. Applied Materials calls those the ICAPS, IoT, communications, auto, power sensors, the components that are built on the more mature process technologies. We still expect some digestion in that market, and I know we'll talk about that more. But the strength and the growth that we expect will be in the leading-edge in DRAM.
So you would say next year, it sounds like you think it's more of a leading-edge foundry year and maybe '27 is more of a DRAM here?
To me, I think they go together. I think leading-edge will be stronger in '26. That's just what we see talking to our customers. But as you know, it's a forecast when you're talking about a full year. We usually guide 1 quarter and the practice is because there's a lot of variability in demand. These things are -- the demand schedule, people ask us, well, why is it second half calendar year? Why not more capacity today? Of course, it depends on your customer schedules. The customers have factory build teams. They have installed teams. They have products to ramp.
So each customer has their own schedule as to when they can take equipment, install it and start executing and running that equipment. And so it's just customer dependent, and it happens to be more oriented towards the second half of the calendar year. Yes.
I mean I think this is my 27th year covering Applied. And I have never seen anything like what we're seeing over the next few years, whether it's '26 or '27, depends on when the fabs are ready, but we have memory companies talking about CapEx being up '26, '27 and even '28 now.
So can you just talk about sort of what you see from your customers? Is this really all being driven by AI? And I know you're not going to answer this. But I mean, how -- like when you think about how high WFE can go when you plan out your business and how much cash you're going to generate, how do you link WFE to sort of what's going on in AI? Do you think that at $1 trillion in semiconductor revenue, I think you probably think it's 15% WFE intensity. So that would be $150 billion in WFE. How do you kind of think about that?
Okay. Lots in that question. I think first, it would be wrong to think that it's only AI. Our perspective, even if you back the clock up 2.5 years before a lot of the AI sensation, we would say that semiconductors are secular growth. And it goes back to what I was just talking about, the belief in the company and focusing its research material engineering for lower power solutions, higher performance solutions. We believe that, that's on its way to pervasive compute, and you'll find more and more uses for compute.
And so the company believes that it's secular demand for semiconductors, secular demand growth, secular demand growth for different compute platforms. And if you back up and just look at leading-edge logic for a second, smartphones and PCs are the biggest share of that market from a device perspective. Data center has been growing the fastest. This year, it's overtaking PCs. We think it will overtake smartphones in 2029. So it is -- what you're describing with AI, it is a big tailwind for the industry. But if you took that away, there would still be -- we would still think there'd be solid growth from a compute perspective. And if you look at the ICAPS devices, our forecast for the ICAPS device is looking forward is mid- to high single-digit growth for that market also.
So let's put that there and say, no, we don't think it's only AI. We don't think that if AI demand suddenly dropped that there would be a significant change in the semiconductor equipment forecast. We don't think so. Now you ask, change the topic a little bit and say, okay, what do you think about gigawatts and how much demand is being driven by AI accelerators and AI data center. And the way we think about that is approximately 15% of the leading-edge logic capacity right now is oriented towards the data center, AI data center products, so GPUs and accelerators. And similarly, about 15% of DRAM wafer starts is oriented towards supporting HBM and AI components. And that 15% of those 2 large components of the industry is growing at, I'll estimate a mid-30% CAGR right now.
So if you can imagine that capacity in place, you're talking many factories and growing at a 30% CAGR, that is the tailwind that the industry is looking at. And yes, they're adding to their capacity plans because of that.
And do you have a metric? I know since Jensen has been talking in gigawatt terms and equating revenue to gigawatts, everyone's asked how to connect their revenue to gigawatts. And I know Lam has tried to put up a number and their number basically equates to something like $4 billion per gigawatt. I think it's closer to $3 billion. But is there some way that you tried to tie your -- or the WFE market to the number of gigawatts that are being installed? And if you're going to do that, how would you actually do that?
I think it's very difficult. But we replicate -- we can replicate the calculations people are doing to get those numbers. What you have to think about is when you're estimating the number of wafers required to build the components in a gigawatt of capacity, once people calculate the number of wafers needed to build those components, at least what I've seen, they typically multiply that by a capacity cost that's per month, okay? So you might multiply it by x billion for 100,000 wafer starts per month of capacity for wafers. So really, what you've just calculated is that you produce a gigawatt every month. And so you kind of have to figure out, is that what you want or you want to say that's 12 gigawatts a year.
So it's a difficult metric to use that way. That's why we thought it's easier for people to think about how much capacity is supporting that today, likely not on the very leading-edge, but close to the leading-edge. What's it growing at? And then our customers that are thinking 2 years down the road, 3 years down the road, they're taking that amount of capacity, and they're growing it at 35% or higher CAGR and trying to put that in place for the products of the future. So hopefully, that describes the metric is just hard to use because I don't think you can take those numbers and just simply multiply them by the number of gigawatts and get the capacity.
Yes, it's hard. Okay. Got it. And then let's just talk about your share. So this year, you did lose, I think, in the range of 200 basis points worth of WFE share. I think a lot of that was because of a bad mix. So can you just talk about that? You sort of tried to address some of this on the call. And how much of a factor is China in that lost share?
Yes. So when we look at share for 2025, I was just looking at my wife thinking, there's a few days left, Tim. We'll see how it shakes off.
But in China, U.S. companies are more restricted from a trade perspective than non-U.S. companies. So we have trade restrictions in China. There's some customers that we can't serve. There were additional customers we couldn't serve in 2025. We had previously described that we were restricted from approximately 10%, a little bit more than 10% of the market. That was a 2024 number. In 2025, that's more than doubled. In China, over the last couple of years, it has been about 40% of WFE.
And so the restrictions we have probably cost us about 1 percentage point in share just by itself, the incremental restrictions this year. So yes, we lose approximately 1 point of share. And then also this past year happened to be a strong year for NAND. NAND grew significantly in the year. We have lower share in NAND, and it was a good shipment year for lithography equipment and we don't sell lithography equipment. And so those mix components, we didn't participate as directly. We don't think that that's indicative of what we expect this year or even in the near future. Back to the initial comments, we expect leading-edge to grow significantly. Applied Materials is #1 from a process equipment on leading-edge. We expect DRAM to grow significantly. Applied Materials is #1 in process equipment for DRAM. We expect HBM to grow rate with that. We have the #1 position on HBM equipment, about 14 out of the 19 additional tools that are needed to do the processing and stacking.
And so our perspective is the demand drivers are in the right place for Applied Materials. We're doing the work to increase our share in each of those areas, leading-edge logic and DRAM and HBM. And we think that market is kind of moving towards us partly because of the tailwind of AI. And so hopefully, that answers your question. Yes, probably between 1 and 2 points of share loss this year, China and the mix, and then we expect our position to be really strong looking forward at the market.
So obviously, you believe you're going to be a share gainer next year. So however, much WFE grows next year, you're going to outgrow that number? Sounds like that's what you think.
Well, yes, and partly the other reason I didn't mention that I should mention, we don't expect any incremental trade restrictions in China. So in '25, we had incremental trade restrictions. We don't expect those at this point. So we should be able to compete and sell to our large number of ICAPS customers in China. We also think that, that market, if you look 2 years ago, that market was kind of focused on 60-nanometer, 45-nanometer, those kind of technologies.
We think for the next few years, it's going to be more oriented towards 28-nanometer. A lot of the new customers that we're getting even over the last year are 28-nanometer customers. Applied has a very strong position in 28-nanometer uses some of the same types of copper wiring and capabilities that you see on the leading-edge. And so we think that, that will help us compete in China.
Let's actually talk about China for a moment. So there was a piece of affiliates rule came in and cost you revenue and you said $600 million next year. And now that has been revoked and there's a year reprieve on that rule. So assuming now that the government's open back up, I would assume that you're getting licenses to ship to those customers again, but you probably gave away those slots at least in the current quarter. So there -- those become additive as we look out throughout next year.
But when you think about that $600 million number, the way that these customers typically operate is if you give them a year reprieve, they're going to try to get as much as they can in that year before they know that they're going to get banned again. So why would the add back not be more than $600 million now?
It could be, Tim. Of course, we don't know that, and none of us know that at this point, but there's another factor that would go along with the question you have. And that is the $600 million was a point in time. Those are the orders that we can see. And to your point, if you stay open for business, usually you get more orders. And so it's possible that, that book of business grows. You're right about the linearity. It will be through the year as we'll have to put those back into production and secure the right specs from the customers and go through that process with the supply chain. So it'll sort of be spread throughout the year. But yes, since we can serve those customers, we'll -- it's very possible we'll get more orders.
The other thing that I wanted to mention was we had also said that we had an impact of $110 million in our just reported Q4. And what happened with that was we were able to put those slots to other customers. So we essentially swapped revenues. So we still made our revenue. We beat our guide for Q4. And what we did was we built -- use those slots, those build slots for other customers, ship that business and that $110 million that reappears in Q1, and we're able to support that. We were partially built on all those tools. So that part ended up making no difference for us.
One thing just on the topic of China, one thing I heard on the call that was new was Gary was talking about building purpose-building tools for China that are lower cost. Can you talk about that? That's the first time that I've heard Applied talk about this, and I thought that this was something that the industry should always do to try to compete with these domestic Chinese tool companies. But can you talk about how you're going about that?
Yes. The way I think about it is they're not purpose-built for China, but they are purpose-built for either new technologies, especially in the power space or mature logic nodes, possibly memory, too, but the way -- the examples that I've seen are mostly in the mature logic space.
And so I think the basic idea is you don't need the same level of precision. You don't need the same level of features on the platform as you do at the very smallest geometries. So we have been reengineering -- since I've been at Applied, which is almost 4 years, you've been working on those platforms. So they are more focused platforms, more cost reduced. And yes, I think we'll have announcements later in the year about these products. But it fits that exact example. You don't necessarily have to take all of your features back to 28-nanometer that you're currently developing today. And that relieves also price pressure on your leading-edge equipment. So we think that's a good strategy. And the only nuance there was I don't think it's China only. We will have -- it will benefit our competitiveness in China, but it will benefit our competitiveness everywhere.
And you're going to be able to go in and offer performance that's commensurate or better than the domestic Chinese companies at lower price. Is that the...
Well, the -- in China, you face subsidies, you face all sorts of dynamics in China. So I won't make a comment about the price, but we certainly think TCO, the total cost of our equipment, especially with services will be pro competitive. It will be very competitive in China.
And I think just to follow on the same topic. So you and everyone else are talking about WFE and China being down next year. Now of course, that's what you thought a year ago and it turned out to be up this year. Can you just talk about why do you see it is down? I know you talked about some digestion in ICAPS in some of the mature node. But we've seen a lot of that this year. Your China business is down 20%. Some of your peers is actually up. So it seems to me like maybe you're undershooting what China is going to actually be next year.
Well, the first thing I'll admit is we could be wrong. We thought China would be lower -- we said China would be lower each year. And we expect that again, and the main reason is the whole world has to reckon with the amount of capacity that's been put in place in China, especially on the ICAPS nodes. And I think you see that around the global companies trying to figure out how much are they going to be able to sell in China versus how much is made inside country. And since that build was so large in '23, '24, '25 and the utilization, Tim, is, I would say, not high yet at this point and not high across ICAPS.
So there is some reckoning with that amount of capital that's been put in place. And that's the main reason. And of course, we talk to customers and we have forecast from customers. And to your point, they have been lower than what has happened in each year. They typically come up in China. But right now, because of how much capacity because of the low utilization, we're still expecting a lower year for ICAPS and a lower year for China, and that's what's built into our expectations.
Got it. Can we talk about AGS, your services business? What's the right growth rate for that business going forward? And can you talk about this AIx platform? And have you seen benefits from that yet?
Yes. So for our services business, AGS. One thing we've just done, we announced during our earnings call is we've done a reorganization, and we've taken the 200-millimeter equipment that was part of AGS, and we moved that into our semi equipment business. So now when you see us reporting in the future, all of the equipment will be in the semi equipment business and all the services, it will just be services, so just recurring revenues in the service business.
And I say that because it should be easy for investors now to see that our expectation is it will grow low double digits, so no change to that. It's difficult to see that last year because the 200-millimeter equipment have a lower year. Now that will be crystal clear, We expect it to grow low double digits. And the reason it grows faster than WFE, every single quarter as we ship tools, we add to the installed base. So that's like your opportunity set growing that you can sell services to. And each quarter, our capture rate has been rising. A lot of it is because customers are building new fabs and new cities, new areas. They need the help from qualified labor to help ramp and install the tools and service the tools.
And lastly, to your point, we're inventing and adding new products in the service business all the time. We call those AIx, those are actionable insights. And some of that is AI-generated insights for customers to optimize the yields on the tools. And that added product count for the equipment that we have is growing the revenue per tool. And we think this is a win-win for customers when they use our services, they operate at higher yields and higher performance. And of course, we get to supply the product for that. So it's a win-win with the customers.
Is there a way to characterize your revenue per tool in the installed base and how much that's changed over time?
It's not something that we've shared, but it does increase. I think it's increased every year for the last few years.
And is that primarily because you're learning how to price for the performance? Is that because customers want -- they want to sign service contracts, and you can price better in that way?
I think it's -- this is a services question, right? I think it's really the added value of the services. So like I mentioned, we have new products every year. Some of these products are data products, some of these products are better service products, and I think that grows the value. So I say it's more of that than the pricing component for the services business. We do have a pricing process for the services business. A lot of that is to recognize inflation from the supply chain and different FX changes, et cetera. So really, I think it's added capability in the services.
Got it. And that kind of dovetails into gross margin, which I wanted to talk about. That's been a real bright spot. You've done a great, great job there. I mean, at similar China portion of revenue in July '22, gross margin was 46.2%, and you're guiding it to 48.5% with a similar contribution from China. So if you try to break down what that 230 basis point delta is, what is that? Because you did talk about raising prices? And does that explain most of the increase or are there other things?
There's other things that mix certainly plays in there. But in the last year, our gross margin increase. I think we averaged 48.8% for the year in 2025. And we finished at 48.1%. We guided 48.4%. So we're right in that ZIP code right now. In the last year, most of the growth, 120 basis points has been because of our improved pricing.
On the cost side, we did improve costs, but we also faced some tariff headwinds. We also faced other additional costs we had to address like adding strategic inventory and those sorts of things. And so costs ended up being a little bit of a wash. The pricing component, and I've mentioned this before on some of the earnings calls, we've had a concerted effort the last 2 years to revamp our pricing and revamp our ability to study the value of both new tools and new capabilities that we're providing the market and then the existing and then set a price target for the sales team and go through that process. It's, I would say, more disciplined than it was before, and it's helping us ensure that we address the value.
And of course, we all know that our customers, a lot of the large customers are also benefiting. AI is a good example from higher prices. And so when we're able to enable some of that capability with our engineering solutions, then we can participate in some of that value. And I think you've asked us that question before, Tim. As we focus our portfolio on more and more enabling, Applied Materials is focused on 3 generations ahead, 4 generations ahead, working very closely with customers. If you're successful in moving your portfolio to more and more enabling solutions, then it should come with higher gross margins. And so that sets the right landscape for us to tackle that.
And you talked before, Brice, about leading-edge foundry/logic. So can you give us a sense of how much you think the etch and depth intensity in your SAM expands as you go from, say, N3 to N2 to A14?
The way we've described this is the gate-all-around process technology, the SAM that we articulated for that. For just the new transistor, the gate-all-around, our SAM grows from $6 billion to $7 billion. And then if a customer also deploys the backside power distribution, then it's exactly the same number set. It's a $6 billion SAM growing to a $7 billion SAM. That's the way we described the gate-all-around transition. So -- and within that, we also have, I think, some additional share gains that help us in the original $6 billion that we have.
So gate-all-around, huge inflection. We think it's a very powerful innovation for the industry. If you look at the power performance of a gate-all-around transistor with backside power delivery. If you look at the shrink capabilities and you look at the device performance, all significant improvements over the prior transistor. And so we think it will be a powerful node. And I've said, we expect it to ramp to 300,000 wafer starts of capacity per month. And we're somewhere in that journey probably still in the first half of that journey.
Great. Can we talk just for a moment about PVD? It's about 1/3 of your revenue based on Gartner numbers, even more than that of your earnings because it does have high margins. Can you just talk about the health of that franchise? I get some questions about the franchise and about what's going on in China. You hear some of the Chinese companies saying, "Oh, we're going to fully displace them for PVD applications". Can you just talk about the health of that franchise? Because it is probably your most important franchise.
Sure. We think that -- well, first, I'll just say, I just gave you the forecast again for our gate-all-around nodes. And a lot of that is built. PVD is the metal deposition that Applied uses to help build the copper interconnect wiring that connect all the transistors in a device we've talked about 100 -- over 100 miles of copper wiring for a large device. So you can picture transistors and basically up to 18 layers of copper interconnects on top of the transistors. Those are built by our tools. Those are built, PVD as one tool in that technique, and we're not changing our forecast. There's no change. We think that's a multigenerational solution. It's critical for low resistivity solutions. And yes, I think no change in our expectation for that franchise.
Great. It sounds like the next few years are going to be great for you. So thank you again, Brice, for the time.
All right. Good to see everybody. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — UBS Global Technology and AI Conference 2025
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Zentrale Aussage: Applied sieht KI (künstliche Intelligenz) als starken Nachfrage-Treiber, betont aber zugleich ein langfristiges, weltweites Wachstum für Halbleiter. Wachstumspotenzial liegt vor allem in Leading‑Edge‑Logic, DRAM (Arbeitsspeicher) und HBM (High‑Bandwidth Memory).
- Timing: Investitionen im WFE (Wafer Fab Equipment) werden als calendar‑jahr‑lastig erwartet — stärkeres Momentum in der zweiten Jahreshälfte.
🚀 Strategische Highlights
- Customer‑Visibility: Engere Abstimmung mit Kunden und Lieferanten zur Sicherung von Kapazität und Supply‑Chain‑Readiness für 2026/27.
- China & Marktanteile: Trade‑Restriktionen führten 2025 zu ~1–2 Prozentpunkten Share‑Verlust; Mixeffekte (NAND/Litho) verstärkten den Rückgang.
- Produkt‑strategie: Entwicklung kostenreduzierter, fokussierter Tools für reifere Nodes (nicht China‑exklusiv) und Ausbau der Services‑Plattform (AGS) inklusive AIx‑Datenprodukten.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Affiliates‑Reprieve: Aufhebung/Einjahres‑Reprieve der Regel könnte den zuvor genannten ~$600M‑Impact teilweise zurückbringen; Opportunität, aber zeitlich gestreckt.
- AGS‑Reorganisation: 200mm‑Tools wurden in das Equipment‑Reporting verschoben; AGS‑Wachstum wird als low‑double‑digit erwartet.
- Technologie‑SAM: Gate‑all‑around: SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market) steigt in ihrer Darstellung von ~$6bn auf ~$7bn pro Node‑Schritt.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Second‑Half‑Treiber: Nachfrage‑Treiber sind Leading‑Edge‑Logic plus DRAM/HBM; KI erklärt einen Teil, aber Applied betont eine breitere, säkulare Nachfrage.
- China‑Unsicherheit: Wie stark ist das Upside vom $600M‑Reprieve und werden verlorene Slots zurückgewonnen? Management sieht mögliches Add‑back, aber zeitlich verteilt.
- Margen & Services: Diskussion über Margenverbesserung (Pricing ≈ +120bps Beitrag) und Umsatz‑/Ertragshebel durch Services (AIx, höhere Revenue‑per‑Tool).
⚡ Bottom Line
- Investment‑Implikation: Positives strukturelles Momentum wenn Leading‑Edge, DRAM und HBM wie erwartet hochlaufen; Services und Pricing stützen Margen. Hauptrisiken bleiben China‑Regeln und Timing der Fab‑Bereitschaft — kurzfristig stark timing‑abhängig, mittelfristig wachstumsstark.
Applied Materials — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to the Applied Materials Fourth Quarter of Fiscal 2025 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the call over to Mike Sullivan, Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. With me are Gary Dickerson, our President and CEO; and Brice Hill, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that today's call includes forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ. Information concerning these risks and uncertainties is discussed in our most recent Form 10-Q and other filings with the SEC. Today's call also includes non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to GAAP measures can be found in today's earnings press release and in our quarterly earnings materials, which are available on our Investor Relations website at ir.appliedmaterials.com.
And with that introduction, I'd now like to turn the call over to Gary Dickerson.
Welcome back, Mike. Applied Materials delivered fiscal fourth quarter results above the midpoint of our guidance to complete another record year. 2025 was our sixth consecutive year of growth and over this period, we have grown revenue and earnings at annualized rates of approximately 12% and 20%. These results are made possible by our passionate and dedicated employees around the world. Over the past 12 months, we have built new capabilities, strengthened our product portfolio and streamlined our organization to prepare for the opportunities ahead.
Applied is in a tremendous position to benefit as AI computing fuels secular growth in semiconductors and wafer fab equipment. As this is our year-end call, I'll begin with a brief review of our performance in 2025, then I'll provide our latest market outlook. And finally, I'll describe how our inflection-focused innovation strategy enables us to extend our leadership in the most valuable and fastest-growing areas of the market as next-generation technologies ramp in volume production in 2026 and beyond.
Looking back at fiscal 2025, while it was a growth year for Applied, our growth rate was tempered due to increased trade restrictions and an unfavorable market mix. Over the past 12 months, multiple trade rule changes have reduced the size of our accessible market in China. Overall, China declined to 28% of our total systems and service revenues in fiscal 2025 and to 25% for our fourth quarter. In 2026, we expect wafer fab equipment spending in China to be lower, and we are not anticipating significant changes to market restrictions.
In the areas of the market where we can operate, we are competing well and maintaining market share. Outside of China, the fastest-growing areas of the market in 2025 were segments where Applied had low or no share. In leading-edge foundry logic, investment was more oriented toward advanced lithography. We believe this is a positive leading indicator for process equipment demand in 2026. NAND, where historically Applied has lower market share is on track to approximately double in 2025, even though it remains a relatively small portion of the wafer fab equipment market.
In DRAM, where Applied has strong process technology leadership, overall spending is tracking to be approximately flat for calendar 2025. Nevertheless, we strengthened our leadership position in DRAM growing revenues from leading-edge customers by more than 50% over the past 4 fiscal quarters. As we look ahead to 2026, we expect the spending mix to play more to Applied's strengths with leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and advanced packaging being the fastest-growing areas of the market.
I recently returned from an extended trip to Asia. My discussions with customers and partners reinforce my view that opportunities for the semiconductor industry and applied materials have never been greater. Our customers are engaging with us to ensure we are ready to support significant production ramps in the coming years. AI has reached a tipping point that is accelerating investment in next-generation computing infrastructure and advanced silicon.
Today, we are seeing a virtuous cycle of innovation and demand, advances in performance, energy consumption and cost of AI computing open up new AI applications that, in turn, significantly increased demand for AI compute capacity. Recent third-party forecasts predict that the semiconductor industry will grow at a compound annual rate between 10% to 15% over the next 5 years, driving a healthy increase in wafer fab equipment spending. We expect 2026 to be another growth year for Applied with our revenue being weighted toward the second half of the calendar year.
AI computing is not only fueling growth, but also reshaping the semiconductor road map and changing the way chips are designed and manufactured. Foundational semiconductor technology plays a critical role in increasing performance and bringing down the cost of AI in the data center and at the edge. Today, major technology inflections are underway in 5 key areas: leading-edge logic, high-performance DRAM, high bandwidth memory or DRAM stacking, advanced packaging for heterogeneous integration and power electronics.
At Applied, our core strategy is inflection-focused innovation. We partner with our customers to see technology inflections early. We focus our research and development on the most critical and valuable challenges on their road maps using deep co-innovation engagement models and we create highly differentiated solutions by connecting our broad portfolio of capabilities and technologies.
The 3 products we recently launched at SEMICON West are great examples of how this strategy works. Our new Xtera epitaxi system enables higher-performance gate-all-around transistors for 2-nanometer and beyond. Xtera creates void-free source drain structures that provide higher transistor speeds that are especially critical for AI computing. The Xtera system integrates epi, cleaning and etch, resulting in a 40% improvement in uniformity and 50% lower gas usage compared to traditional epi.
Kinex is the industry's first integrated die-to-wafer bonder. Hybrid bonding enables significant improvement in performance, power consumption and costs for both complex multi-chip packages and die stacking. Connect is a 6-step integrated system with onboard metrology that provides higher accuracy bonding, smaller interconnect pitches and higher yields for new logic and memory packaging architectures.
PROVision 10 is designed to improve yield in 3D devices and further extends our leadership in e-beam metrology. eBeam Metrology is critical for 3D devices as it can see through multiple layers of 3D chips and provide multilayer images to identify defects in varied structures. This system is the first to use cold field emission technology for metrology, which increases image resolution by 50% and imaging speed 10 times compared to conventional thermal field emission technology.
Overall, Applied is very well positioned at the most valuable technology inflections and in areas of the market that will grow fastest as AI is deployed on a large scale. The process tool of record positions that we have established over the past several years give us confidence that we will extend our strong leadership position in logic, DRAM and packaging as advanced technology nodes ramp in volume production.
Another key theme we consistently hear from our customers and our customers' customers is that co-optimization of the technology stack is more critical than ever. We are expanding our deep multiyear co-innovation engagements that focus on system technology co-optimization. Our high-velocity co-innovation model provides chip makers and chip designers much earlier access to next-generation process technology to accelerate their new chip and system architectures. This is a core value proposition of Applied Materials' Equipment and Process Innovation and Commercialization platform or EPIC. Construction of the platform's flagship facility the EPIC Center in Silicon Valley is on track, and we are excited to begin operations next year.
Our co-optimization strategies extend well beyond R&D. As our customers race to bring these complex new device architecture inflections to market, we are providing advanced service solutions that help them rapidly transfer new technology into their pilot lines and then rapidly optimize device performance, yield and cost and volume production.
In 2025, our core service business delivered another year of double-digit growth with more than 2/3 of our service revenue generated from subscriptions. In AGS and across Applied, we are rapidly adopting AI and digital tools. This enables us to drive higher velocity and productivity, innovate the way we work and streamline our organization to meet the opportunities ahead.
Before I hand over to Brice, I'll quickly summarize. Fiscal 2025 was our sixth consecutive year of growth, even as trade restrictions and an unfavorable market mix trimmed our growth rate for the year. As we look ahead, large-scale AI adoption will drive substantial investment in AI computing infrastructure, including advanced semiconductors and wafer fab equipment. Applied's inflection-focused innovation strategy positions us for another record year in 2026 as we gained share at the highest value technology inflections in the fastest-growing areas of the market. As next-generation technologies ramp in volume production over the coming years, we will extend our leadership in logic, DRAM and packaging.
Brice, over to you.
Thank you, Gary, and thanks, everyone, for joining today's call. I am pleased that Applied delivered record annual revenue, gross margin dollars, operating profit and earnings per share in fiscal 2025. Looking ahead into 2026, I believe we are in great position to benefit from favorable market trends.
Based on growing demand for AI data center capacity, we forecast that leading-edge foundry logic DRAM and high-bandwidth memory will be the fastest-growing areas of the semiconductor equipment market. We have strong leadership positions in these segments today, and we have targeted our R&D investments to create new products and technologies that will enable even faster and more energy-efficient transistors, chips and systems and drive growth for Applied.
In addition, we have been working closely with our customers to better understand their longer-term demand expectations and align our supply chain and manufacturing slots to meet their needs for advanced capacity. Based on our conversations with our customers and other industry players, we are preparing our operations and service organizations to be ready to support higher demand beginning in the second half of calendar 2026.
Next, I'll briefly summarize our fiscal 2025 results versus fiscal 2024. Revenue grew 4% to $28.4 billion with growth across all of our segments. Semiconductor Systems revenue was up 4%, growing even as the impact of trade restrictions significantly reduced our access to the market in China. The impact of these restrictions was equivalent to around 10% of the China market in fiscal 2024 and more than double that amount in fiscal 2025. On a global basis, we generated record foundry systems revenue, along with record DRAM sales outside China, and we posted record revenue in both Taiwan and Korea.
Applied Global Services revenue grew 3% to a record $6.4 billion. The recurring parts, services and software portion of AGS grew by double digits in the year with the 200-millimeter equipment business declined. We grew display revenue by 20%.
I am pleased that we increased non-GAAP gross margin by 120 basis points to 48.8%, the highest level in 25 years. We shipped a richer mix of advanced systems and increased prices broadly, helping to more than offset cost increases. Non-GAAP operating expenses grew 5% and primarily driven by a 10% increase in R&D investments. At the end of the year, we announced actions to reduce head count and enable us to scale applied more productively as we capture the growth opportunities we see in 2026 and beyond. We continue to shift spending to strategic areas, adding people in fields like advanced analytics that are critical to the speed and efficiency of our R&D programs and operations.
Non-GAAP earnings per share increased 9%. We generated nearly $8 billion in cash from operations. Free cash flow of $5.7 billion included elevated capital spending of $2.3 billion, over half of which was used in building the new EPIC Center in Silicon Valley, which will open next year and become the most advanced collaborative semiconductor equipment and process innovation facility in the world.
We distributed approximately $6.3 billion to shareholders. We paid $1.4 billion in cash dividends and the quarterly dividend per share was increased by 15% during the year to $0.46. Operating income from Applied Global Services more than covered the dividend payment. We allocated $4.9 billion to our share repurchase program and reduced shares outstanding by more than 3%.
Turning to fiscal Q4. We delivered revenue and non-GAAP EPS above the midpoint of guidance. China revenue declined to 29% of total company revenue, which is in line with our longer-term average and well below a peak of 45% in the first quarter of fiscal 2024. Non-GAAP gross margin was at the midpoint of guidance and up 60 basis points year-on-year, while non-GAAP operating expenses were slightly higher than our expectation and up 3% year-on-year.
Turning to the segments. Semiconductor Systems and AGS revenue exceeded our expectations for the quarter, while non-GAAP operating margin for both segments declined along with revenue on a year-on-year basis. Lastly, display revenue exceeded our expectation for the quarter and was up 68% year-over-year.
Next, I'll share several reporting changes we are making that will help us drive further efficiency gains and also give investors more visibility into our semiconductor and services businesses. First, as of Q4 fiscal 2025, our display business is being reported in Corporate and Other. There is no change to our display strategy. Next, as of Q1 fiscal 2026, we are moving our 200-millimeter equipment business from Applied Global Services to Semiconductor Systems. This change will increase our operational efficiency and enable investors to see all of our semiconductor systems revenue in one place.
Also, as a result, Applied Global Services will consist entirely of recurring revenue. This will make it easier for investors to track our subscription-like growth in services. Finally, as of Q1 of fiscal 2026, we are fully allocating corporate support costs to our businesses. This change will have the effect of reducing semiconductor systems and AGS operating margins, but also give our teams better visibility and opportunity to optimize these costs.
Now I'll share our guidance for Q1, which includes the reporting changes I just outlined. We expect company revenue of $6.85 billion, plus or minus $500 million, and non-GAAP EPS of $2.18, plus or minus $0.20. Within this outlook, we expect Semiconductor Systems revenue of around $5.025 billion. AGS should generate revenue of $1.52 billion. Corporate and Other revenue should be around $305 million composed primarily of display revenue.
We currently expect non-GAAP gross margin to be approximately 48.4% in Q1 and remain at that level until volumes ramp to support higher demand beginning in the second half of the calendar year. Non-GAAP operating expenses should be around $1.33 billion, which is up only slightly from fiscal Q4 because the actions we recently took are mostly offsetting the increase we normally see in Q1 due to the timing of annual merit increases and equity compensation expenses. Finally, we are modeling a tax rate of around 13%.
In summary, our customers are indicating to us that wafer fab equipment spending is likely to accelerate beginning in the second half of calendar 2026. In addition, we see a positive fab equipment spending mix developing for Applied. AI data center investments translate to strong demand for our most enabling products in leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and high-bandwidth memory along with advanced services that help our customers accelerate ramps and yields.
Thank you for listening. And now, Mike, let's begin the Q&A.
Thanks, Brice. To help us reach as many people as we can on today's call, please ask just 1 question and no more than 1 brief follow-up question. Operator, let's please begin.
Certainly. And our first question comes from the line of C.J. Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.
2. Question Answer
I guess, Gary, the world has clearly changed since NVIDIA reported August 26 and discussed $3 million to $4 trillion in infrastructure spending. Curious, your trip to visit with clients over the very near term, how your conversations have evolved in the last 2 months? How has your visibility changed? And how are you preparing your supply chain for this likely tremendous growth?
C.J., thanks for the question. Yes, I have been spending a lot of time with customers and just came back from a long trip to Asia. And I would say I was meeting with the R&D leaders and CEOs of our largest customers, and just like you said, AI is the biggest focus for all of our customers. It's driving the WFE mix to segments driven by AI, including leading-edge foundry, logic and DRAM, where Applied has strong #1 positions. And Applied is in deep high-velocity co-innovation relationships with all of these different customers. We have very high share.
If you look at the transistor for gate all around or backside power in leading-edge foundry logic, we have very strong visibility and co-innovation relationships with customers over 4 technology nodes, a decade out in the future. So very high visibility in terms of our positions in leading-edge foundry logic and in DRAM and high confidence we're going to outperform as those advanced chips ramp going forward in the future.
The other thing that I heard and we've been seeing over the last couple of months is a major improvement in customer demand visibility. So customers, just like you said, they're planning large ramps of advanced factories, and they want to make sure our supply chain operations and service teams are ready to deliver. So we're getting more than 1 year visibility in some cases, 2 years visibility for a number of these different customers because as we talked about in the prepared remarks in the second half of '26, we will see significant ramps for these advanced factories. And again, customers want to make sure that, especially our supply chains are ready to deliver. And of course, the improved visibility is critical to our ability to ensure on-time delivery to customer needs. But I'd say that's, CJ, the biggest thing that's changed in the last couple of months.
Very helpful. And then maybe, Brice, you announced that the head count reduction over the last quarter. I'm curious how we should think about that and the implications to gross margins and OpEx into first half calendar '26 perhaps versus second half given the ramp that you've talked about?
Yes. Thanks, C.J. Good to hear from you. So on the reduction, if you look at our Q1 spend in our guide, you'll see that we don't have the uplift that we typically have in Q1, and for our annual pay raises and the share-based compensation increases that typically happen. So you'll be able to quantify the rough change in that quarter from that perspective. And just to highlight, that was a year's long program that we worked on to increase velocity and productivity across the company. And for the balance of 2026, we'll add back some skills that we need to fill in for the company. So it's really a wholesale evaluation of all the staffing model we have across the entire company.
Yes. C.J., maybe I'll add one other aspect of this. In strategic planning, we had a big focus on innovating the way we work, including AI and digital technologies. And driving, like Brian said, higher velocity and productivity, that's really at the foundation of how companies compete. So huge focus, especially on velocity across all of Applied Materials and then streamlining our organization to optimize future performance. And as we went through these changes, we also wanted to make sure, as I talked about, we see significant demand coming from our customers. So we wanted to make sure as we're doing this overall company and workforce optimization to improve the performance of Applied, we're also ready to meet those major customer ramps in the second half of '26 and then going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar from TD Cowen.
Gary, my first question is, as you mentioned, you're clearly gaining share in new technologies like gate all around and backside power delivery. But when I look at your leadership products, it feels like PVD is moving to ALD on the CVD, CMP and etch side besides the usual U.S. and Japanese competitors, there's increasing domestic China competition. So I'm kind of curious how to think about the momentum in those leadership products over the next 2, 3 years as you see increasing competition, both globally and from China? And then I have a follow-up for Brice.
Okay. Krish, there's a lot in that first question, but thank you for the question. So we have very strong positions, gate all around backside power Besides being #1 in process equipment for leading logic and foundry, we're also #1 in DRAM and advanced packaging, especially for high-bandwidth memory. And those are the most important segments for AI, energy-efficient computing and leading-edge foundry logic and DRAM will be the fastest-growing segments in 26 and for the next several years.
And Krish, we're performing well across all our products. Again, I am extremely confident that we will grow share, especially in these segments that are enabling AI energy-efficient computing. Again, we have deep relationships with all of these different customers across multiple technology nodes. We see strong demand for our products increasing demand for integrated systems for transistors, wiring and now [indiscernible] for packaging. So all of that, I'm very optimistic about.
And I'll come back to your PVD comment in just a minute here. The biggest change we've seen in our competitive position in the near term is trade restrictions. We used to serve the entire global WFE market before restrictions were implemented by '24, 2024, we were restricted from serving around 10% of China's WFE market, mainly in leading-edge logic and the domestic NAND market. And then in the last month of 2024 and the first month of 2025, the restrictions significantly increased for us and we could no longer serve China's DRAM market and some of the ICAP market.
So our impact grew to well over 20% of the China WFE market which I think everybody knows that the WFE market in China has been elevated this year and also over the past few years, with China approaching 40% of total WFE. So this change in restrictions was a very big impact, especially in 2025. And non-U.S. equipment companies don't have the same restrictions and so restricted customers can buy from those companies even if they would rather buy from Applied. And we've put a lot of time and studied this topic very carefully. And what we can see is that where we can compete, we are doing very well.
And then if I look at China going forward, our business has returned to normalized levels. We talked about kind of mid- on our semi business, our systems and AGS. And looking ahead, we don't anticipate significant new restrictions. In fact, we believe that our share in China ICAPS, where we can compete was flat from 2024 to 2025, and that's across, Chris, all of our different leadership products. And we think we can continue to hold and have an opportunity to even gain share going forward. And I say this because we have several major ICAPS new products coming for China and non-China that add to the strong products we have today, enabling us to enter new ICAP's markets and also better compete in cost-sensitive areas of the market. So we will increase our ICAPS' addressable market opportunity in China and worldwide. And again, where we can compete, I'm actually very optimistic with our position.
And then back to PVD, your question on PVD. So I'll tell you, Krish, PVD is doing great where we can compete. We grew PVD in '25, we have a positive outlook in '26 and into the future. And we talked earlier about AI, PVD is enabling low resistance wiring, and that's critical for faster and more energy-efficient chips. And with advanced chips, you have hundreds of miles of wiring in a single chip. And if you could imagine, that long wire keeps getting thinner and thinner and moving data through that wire at high speed with low power is incredibly hard, almost like Magic and Applied as the clear leader in wiring innovation.
So Krish, we see strong demand for PVD, strong growth into 2026 and into the future. We're also innovating. I talked about that pipeline of innovative products. We have new PVD innovations, specifically for ICAPS beyond all of the other things that we're doing that will help us in performance in that particular segment. And then the last thing, on the leading edge, we are -- we do have an increase in demand for the integrated products, including selective ALD and selective moly which we just had some big wins in the most critical applications. So long answer, Krish.
Gary, no, it's extremely helpful and very informative. Just a quick follow-up for Brice. Brice, how do you think about the impact of this 200-millimeter movement from AGS to semi? Is there a way to quantify it for Q1? Or how much was it in FY '25?
Yes. It's approximately $125 million, Krish, for Q1 and approximately the same number. So we're moving that from our services business to our equipment business, and we think that will be easier for us to manage and easier for investors to understand those 2 different reportable segments.
And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities.
You mentioned you expect fiscal '26 mix to work in your favor. You also mentioned the significant growth in the back half. I'm curious, do you think there is a put for WFE to grow high single digit close to double digits next year and for Applied to outperform that because you do seem to have better visibility and you also expect the mix to work in your favor. So I just hoping that if you could give us some sense of what the market could be doing? And how is the applied position with respect to that market?
Vivek, it's Brice. Thanks for your question. We do expect strong growth in '26, led by leading edge and DRAM. The headwind that we have, we do still expect some digestion in China and in ICAPS. So it's kind of a similar situation relative to 2025 but we think leading edge will be very strong. DRAM will be very strong. These are pulled by the headline of the AI solutions in those spaces, and then a little bit of digestion on the ICAPS side, but we do think it will be a growth year.
Okay. On the clarification side, Brice, how much of the $600 million BIS headwind is in Q1 and the rest of the year? And if I could squeeze in the real question for Gary. One of your peers suggested an $8 billion or so, I think WFE for every $100 billion or so in data center buildout, do you agree with that number? Do you have a different number? And how do you see the mix within that $8 billion playing to Applied's strengths?
Okay, Vivek. So starting with the affiliate rule that came out and affected our Q4 and then was suspended. So we had shared that $110 million was -- would be affected in our Q4. We didn't ship that in Q4, but we will ship that in Q1. So the first answer is that's included in our guide for Q1. And then the $600 million is still a good estimate for what's in the rest of 2026. And we didn't share any linearity for that. And in fact, it's still being closed in terms of delivery dates, et cetera. So I would think of that as through the rest of the year.
And then on the WFE per gigawatt, we spent some time thinking about this. We think the best way to think about this is about 15% of leading-edge wafer starts and DRAM wafer starts are allocated towards AI data center solutions. So if you think about capacity planning, that's growing at a mid-30 CAGR across the industry. So today, 15% of those 2 end markets growing at mid-30s. And so for companies that are planning capacity for 2 and 3 years out, they make that projection and that much WFE should be allocated towards data center. So we can talk more about that in a follow-up. But I think that's a good way to think about how much is being allocated.
Vivek, you asked about what does that mean, the AI demand means for mix and for Applied. So I talked about this earlier that the 2 fastest-growing segments for '26 and going forward are leading-edge foundry logic and DRAM, including high-bandwidth memory. And in both of those cases, again, we're clear #1, we're gaining share, high visibility and gate all around, and that will become clear as those advanced factories ramp in the latter half of '26. Again, we have very strong visibility, very strong positions. And the same thing is true with DRAM.
And I think longer term, if you look at gate-all-around backside power, we're positioned to capture more than 50% of our served market. So I have high confidence that we are gaining share and gate all around. I mean that's all of the discussions I had with these R&D leaders when I was in Asia in the last month. And then DRAM, high bandwidth memory, we're in really great position there. We've gained a significant amount of share over the last several years.
As FinFET ramps, we have strong leadership in FinFET. That's going to be adopted in DRAM. 4F squared, we also are in a great position. And then in HBM, future generations will adopt hybrid bonding, where we also have clear leadership. We announced Kinex at SEMICON West. So the mix is definitely working in our favor, and we're well positioned going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Stacy Rasgon from Bernstein Research.
For the first one, Brice, this second half lift in demand. So what does that imply for the trajectory in the first half? Like are you thinking revenue stays kind of in this ballpark until we hit the second half? Or does it grow a little bit and then it grows a lot maybe even if you wanted to quantify like second half versus first half split or something like that. But like how do we think about ROCE relative to the second half given the lift in the second half?
Yes, for the semi business, Stacy, and thanks for the question. For the semi business, we think it will be flattish until we see that growth. We will see a little growth in the AGS business. We expect that as we've shared, to be growing at low double digits, and that's fairly continuous growth through the course of the year. But for the semi business in the short term, it will be flattish.
Got it. So like by Q3, I guess, you're thinking?
Yes. For us, it will really be our Q4 and our Q1 of next year. So that's when it matches the calendar. So we'll see -- we expect a significant uplift there from leading edge, especially. And until then, it will be slower growth.
Okay. And I guess for my follow-up, you sort of mentioned gross margins kind of staying in this range until we see that lift. So do you expect like a material lift in gross margins when that material lift in revenue comes through? Like how do we expect like the gross margin trajectory on the back of those revenues as that comes through second half of next year?
Yes, the 48.4% guide for Q1 is good for this level of business. And I'll just highlight in Q1, we're also expecting a normal share from China shipment perspective. So it should be -- for the whole company, it should be in the order of 29% and less than that for AGS and our semi business. So that level without a significant uplift in the business, that's good for this size business. And then when we do get to the second half, added volume will help with cost improvements. And then over time, we continue to work on our pricing and cost programs. So you can see with the 120 basis point uplift that we had in 2025, most of that was driven by price improvement. And so we'll continue with that program, but it takes time to affect the margins.
Stacy, this is Gary. One thing I'd say in terms of margins, I do think that we will be able to drive sustainable improvements in margins over time. I mean one thing in the industry, you see a tremendous amount of profits being generated with the AI demand throughout the entire ecosystem and so our customers' profitability has improved significantly. And as I mentioned earlier, also we're enabling these incredible innovations. I mentioned the hundreds of miles of wiring in advanced chip. I mean, again, for AI, this is incredibly valuable. So as we continue to work with our customers, enabling those innovations that are critical for AI, bringing new products to market. I believe that we can sustainably drive our margins higher going forward.
And our next question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.
Brice, I'm trying to understand China a little better. So all these affiliates were banned and then they got reinstated. And the way that China usually operates is that they when they were rushing to get in front of the ban. And now I would think that they're going to come back and they're going to just try to get as much equipment as they can as fast as they can. So is the add-back not going to be more than 600? And in fiscal Q1, like are you taking slots away from the other customers to give to them? I guess, I'm trying to figure out how we don't add more than 600 back the way that these Chinese customers typically operate.
Thanks for the question, Tim. So yes, for the first quarter, $110 million is in the quarter. Those tools are built and will ship. For the balance, we weren't building those tools. We didn't know we would be able to ship them. And so it's going to take time to do the supply chain and actually make the builds, and we'll have to finalize the date with the customers. So they may have interest in working that process as quickly as possible. But I would just say the good way to think about this is cycle time and we'll spread it through the year.
Okay. And then I guess, Gary, I wanted to go back to PVD. So this is like 1/3 of your systems revenue per Gartner. So it's a super important piece of your business. And it does seem a little bit like ALD's eating into this franchise a little bit. I know it's super important. It's been growing. But how do you sort of protect that franchise from -- you have 1 franchise that you're very strong and then 1 where your share is not as high end. Do you think that we're all kind of maybe too concerned about the degree to which ALD eating it to PVD?
Tim, thanks for question. I absolutely think you're too concerned. Again, as I mentioned, I just spent a lot of time in Asia with our R&D leaders for our top customers and we have deep visibility into their technology road maps for generations. And I can tell you, again, we have high confidence PVD is going to continue to ramp. I mentioned the hundreds of miles of wiring and an advanced chip. And we have innovations that are really amazing innovations, and we are the leader in wiring. So if you think about an AI server, again, how you move the data at a very high speed with low power is enormously important. That's within a chip, chip to chip, there's so much innovation that's happening there.
But I don't know where this comes from on the ALD eating PVD share, that type of thing. All I can say is that we have extremely high visibility we have unique technologies, including PVD and we have unique ability to combine technologies into integrated platforms. One of those integrated platforms, we combine selective ALD together with PVD and 5 other technologies, that's part of what's enabling those hundreds of miles of wiring and Applied is really unique in being able to deliver those kinds of innovations. And that is enabling 50% improvement in resistivity. It's a $1 billion business for us every year. And so that is going to continue. And again, deep visibility into every -- the N+1, N+2, N+3, N+4 technology node.
Another innovation that we just won with leading foundry logic companies is integrating selective moly with PVD into an integrated platform for the most critical applications for our customers. So again, Tim, very high visibility. I agree with you. It's a great business. It's going to keep growing in '26 and keep growing as we go forward.
Our next question comes from the line of Atif Malik from Citi.
Welcome back, Mike. Brice, I'm just trying to understand the China commentary, you're expecting China to kind of stay at the mid-20s level for the silicon products into next year. So if the assumption is that the domestic China spending is coming down next year, why would this number be lower than the mid-25% and if the rest of the China is growing? I'm just trying to understand the moving pieces.
Yes. Thanks, Atif. So for Q1, that just happens to be what's in the mix but we do expect it, if we do have the digestion that we're expecting in China, then we will see it lower during the course of the year. and that will be more than offset to get a growth here that will be more than offset by the strength in leading edge and DRAM that we highlighted earlier. So -- and we'll just admit, I think we've been wrong for 2 years in a row, forecasting a digestion related to China, and it's been stronger each year. So we could be surprised on the upside as we go through.
But right now, Gary mentioned this a few minutes ago, China has been almost 40% of WFE. It's been elevated. They've been investing heavily to get to self-sustainability from a production perspective. So we don't have as good a visibility because of a large number of customers there and continued creation of new customers. So it's not as easy to forecast as the rest of the mature market.
Yes. I'll jump -- none thing I would say also Longer term, what we think is that ICAPS remains about 1/3 of WFE and then you have memory and leading-edge foundry logic. So China is really mostly an ICAPS market, and there has been this elevated spending over multiple years. We think that if you just look at end market demand, we think that moves back into that ZIP code over a longer period of time. When that happens, hard to anticipate exactly when that's going to happen, but that's what we think about over a longer period.
Great. And then, Gary, one for you, you visited several customers. Are your memory customers constrained by shell capacity? Why are we thinking about the second half inflection on the first half? I mean I understand the first half is being dragged lower by China. But is there a situation where the memory guys are constrained by shell capacity that explains why second half is going higher?
Well, I can take the question, Atif. So first, we would say that factory schedules of course, matter. So each company -- each customer has their own schedule for installation and ramp and qualification and the like. Our information on the macro level, we had several people ask this question, but our information on the macro level suggests that there is factory capacity from a space perspective, to ramp across the industry. And then you'll just have to ask each customer. That's a macro answer, you'll have to ask each customer for their situation. But we don't think the capacity is limiting the ramp at this point.
And our next question comes from the line of Charles Shi from Needham & Company.
I have a follow-up on China. You did mention outside of restrictions, you are not losing share but your U.S. peer the closest one, reported much stronger China revenue growth this year, I think they're probably growing at 20% year-on-year. You're probably declining more than 10% year-on-year. So just really trying to reconcile how are you're not losing share? Is there some nuances that we may be missing and that would suggest you actually did not lose share in China despite the numbers would suggest otherwise?
Charles, I'll start on this one. So I think the nuance we clarified that or we made an adjustment in there and said, if we look at the accounts that we can support, we're holding our share and competing well in China. And if you just take the macro number, we certainly lost share in China. I think Gary commented that if you go back to 2024, just over 10% of the market was restricted from -- for U.S. companies. And if you go to 2025, it's more than doubled. The restriction has more than doubled. So we've certainly lost share in China because a larger portion of the market is inaccessible to us. But when we look at the accounts that we can sell to, we feel we're competing very well.
Yes, Charles, this is Gary. I think we have done a lot of work on this. So -- and there's lots of different sources of data that can cross validate the numbers. And again, when we look at -- we can't comment on other people, their ability to serve global customers that are in China versus domestic customers, everybody is going to have a little difference in terms of what they're serving in China. Certainly, for us, NAND, the global NAND in China is not significant business. DRAM, however, which really was restricted at the beginning of our fiscal year, we have very high share in DRAM.
If you look at the top -- the leading DRAM companies in this last year, I think our business was up something like 50%. And so for Applied, DRAM going away had a really big impact on us. So again, Charles, I think we have pretty good confidence in maintaining share, where we can compete, but there's going to be a different mix for every company. I don't know, Brice, if you want to add anything else?
No, I think that covers it. Yes. The other thing that I would add to that, Charles, is the other part of that is not only the DRAM, but it's the NAND. So if you think about it, what was shipping. You have multinational NAND companies that are in China and they were presumably pretty strong. And as you may know that in our mix, that's the lowest area for us. So Gary talked about the DRAM impact. The other impact is NAND being strong. And both -- and that equation in the future on a global basis, we think is changing.
And our next question comes from the line of Joe Quatrochi from Wells Fargo.
I was wondering if you could help us understand just what was the size of the advanced packaging business in fiscal '25. And how did that grow?
Joe, it's Brice. It's a little bit lower than it was in 2024. So 2024 was buoyed by the shipments, the high shipments in the end of the year for HBM. So it's essentially been running at the same level for 2025 minus that extra shipments at the end of that year. So -- and then as we look forward, Gary is going to comment about the changing technologies for advanced packaging over time. We think we're well positioned for that. we still think that business will be growing significantly along with AI data center and all the different packaging capabilities that will be required over time.
Yes, Joe, so Applied is #1 in high-bandwidth memory. And so that business was not as strong in '25 as it was the previous year. So that was one thing that impacted our relative growth rate, but it's pretty close to flat year-over-year, '25 versus '24 with the HBM coming down versus where it was. What I would say is that we're still on track to what we've discussed before. We've grown the business around $500 million to about $1.5 billion today. And we're on track still to double this business to $3 billion or more over the next few years. And we're in a very good position.
As I said earlier, we're #1 in HBM. So as HBM ramps over time, that puts us in a good position. We have a great portfolio of products and especially this is -- I mentioned the trip in Asia and meeting with a lot of these R&D leaders, there's an enormous focus for our customers to go to larger packaging sizes, so they can connect more GPUs, CPUs and all these different computing components to improve performance and power an enormous amount. And so Applied is extremely well positioned in HBM. And we're also well positioned as these new technologies ramp for the future. So I think high confidence in being able to double this business again over the next few years.
That's helpful detail. Maybe as a follow-up on the China entity list of $600 million that maybe comes back here. Any help on what the split of that was for like AGS in terms of services. I assume that would basically just kind of turn right back on given you're able to service those customers.
Yes. You're right. There was some digesting that. We didn't offer that, and I don't have it at my fingertips. So there was a component of AGS, but I think the majority was equipment.
And our next question comes from the line of Shane Brett from Morgan Stanley.
First question is, you mentioned that your revenue from leading-edge DRAM customers is up 50% in fiscal '25, which is stronger than those customers DRAM WFE spending to my knowledge. Where specifically are these share gains of these leading-edge customers coming from? And now that you're past extremely tough China DRAM comps, just how you expect to DRAM business to track in 2026?
Yes, I'll start, Shane. So when you do the year-over-year comparison, it looks flat for us from a DRAM perspective, but what was happening in 2024, we shipped a significant amount of business to China customers. And so we basically had the same business in 2025 without the China customers. So all of that business went to the internationals and that equated to approximately a 50% growth for them. And we do expect DRAM to strengthen as we go into and should be healthy growth in the -- across the customers for DRAM investments.
Yes, Shane, just in terms of where are we gaining? Certainly, I mentioned earlier, high bandwidth memory, that's one part, one segment where Applied is clear #1, and that is helping us. The DRAM companies are driving innovation in I/O in Applied, that really leverages a lot of our leadership products and foundry logic. In fact, they're moving to going forward. That puts Applied in a good position even to gain more share as we go forward, we have a strong position in capacitor scaling. We have a really strong etch share in DRAM, and we've achieved patterning share gains. So those are a few areas.
And again, I would say, going forward, as these DRAM companies adopt hybrid bonding for HBM as they adopt FinFET as they adopt 4F squared, the vertical channel transistor architecture in all of those areas, we're positioned to gain share as those new technologies ramp.
Got it. And my second question may be a little bit critical. But your fiscal '25 foundry logic revenue is up about 3% year-over-year, but your U.S. peers who should be on a level playing field if you are recording extremely strong double-digit growth through the first 3 quarters of the year. Just what's your self assessment on this performance gap with those U.S. peers? And just how should we have confidence that Applied can outperform Foundry Logic WFE in 2026?
So foundry logic includes both leading edge and ICAPS customers. So those 2 things are mixed together. If you look, we had record revenue in Taiwan, record revenue in Korea and so our performance is extremely strong, and the leading edge, our revenue is up a significant amount. So you have all those things kind of mixed together, I think, in those -- in that data and because everybody is combining that.
And operator, we have time for one more question, please.
Certainly. And our final question for today then comes from the line of Jim Schneider from Goldman Sachs.
Relative to the strength you're TM2 across leading edge logic and DRAM, can you maybe guess which one might grow stronger than the other? And which one might start to recover first?
Sure, Jim. We think leading edge will be the strongest grower with DRAM second. So that's our forecast.
Yes. The one thing I would say, Jim, I think both of them are going to grow at a pretty strong rate. But it really -- in terms of when we see the revenue depends on fab timing. And so that's why we talked about kind of second half of calendar and those were the discussions I had with a lot of the Asian customers when I was traveling and the dramatic improvement in visibility. So that also you have to take into consideration when you think about the timing of when those ramps will happen.
And then maybe as a quick follow-up. Gross margins, you're expecting to increase in the back half once you get better absorption on the costs. I understand that but are there any other underlying initiatives you're doing to improve gross margins operationally that could cause kind of a further tailwind once we get there?
Sure. Thanks for the question. So on the gross margin side, if you look at '25, up 120 basis points from '24, the majority of that really has been improvement in our pricing processes, good change that we made. We highlighted in previous calls that we revamped our entire pricing program across the company. But we're also working on cost reductions. The cost reductions were offset to some degree by tariff headwinds and by some of the inventory management, et cetera. So the real driver during the year was the price process improvements. And those will continue as we go into -- so at the calendar second half, as we get more volume and you get some time for those to work, we should be able to improve the gross margins.
Thanks, Jim. And Brice, would you like to sum up today's call?
Thanks, Mike. I'm excited that the investments we're making in leading-edge foundry logic, DRAM and high-bandwidth memory, give us technology leadership at the same time, our customers are signaling an inflection in the AI-related fab equipment spending in the second half of calendar '26. I wish everyone a nice Thanksgiving, and I look forward to seeing many of you soon at the UBS conference in Scottsdale. Mike, please close the call.
All right. Thank you. And I'd like to let everybody know that a replay of today's call is going to be available on the IR page of our website by 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time today. In the meantime, thank you for your continued interest in Applied Materials.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Applied Materials — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz (FY25): $28,4 Mrd (+4% YoY)
- Non‑GAAP EPS (FY25): +9% YoY; Q4 Ergebnis und EPS über dem Guidance‑Mittelpunkt
- Gross Margin: FY25 non‑GAAP 48,8% (+120 Basispunkte YoY); Q4 non‑GAAP Gross Margin +60 Bp YoY
- Cash & Kapital: Ca. $8 Mrd operativer Cashflow, Free Cash Flow $5,7 Mrd; $6,3 Mrd an Aktionäre (Dividende + Buybacks)
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Strategie: "Inflection‑focused innovation" – gezielte F&E auf fünf Technologie‑Inflektionen (Leading‑edge Logic, DRAM, HBM, Packaging, Power Electronics) zur Bedienung AI‑getriebener Nachfrage
- Produkte: Neue Systeme (Xtera, Kinex, PROVision 10) als Beispiele für integrierte Plattformen; E‑beam‑Metrologie und Hybrid‑Bonding als Differenzierer
- Organisation: Umstrukturierung, Personalabbau und Reallokation (200‑mm von AGS zu Semiconductor Systems); EPIC Center (Equipment and Process Innovation and Commercialization platform) in Silicon Valley startet 2027
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q1‑Guidance: Umsatz $6,85 Mrd ± $0,5 Mrd; non‑GAAP EPS $2,18 ± $0,20
- Margen & Kosten: Q1 non‑GAAP Gross Margin ~48,4%; OpEx ~ $1,33 Mrd; Steuerrate ~13%—Margenniveau bis zum Volumenramp in H2 2026 erwartet
- Timing: Management erwartet Beschleunigung der WFE‑Ausgaben und stärkere Nachfrage ab H2 Kalenderjahr 2026; Reporting‑Änderungen (200‑mm Verschiebung, vollständige Allokation Corporate Costs) verringern segmentale operative Margen
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Supply‑Visibility: Management berichtet deutlich bessere Kunden‑Sichtbarkeit (teilweise 12–24 Monate) und plant Kapazitäten und Lieferketten für H2‑2026‑Ramps
- China & BIS‑Effekt: Diskutiertes ~ $600 Mio Headwind aus China‑Restriktionen; $110 Mio in Q1 inkludiert, Rest über das Jahr verteilt, Linearity unklar
- Technologie‑Wettbewerb: Sorgen zu PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) vs. ALD (Atomic Layer Deposition) beantwortet: Management betont PVD‑Innovation, integrierte Plattformen und weitere Produktwins
⚡ Bottom Line
- Kurzfassung: Applied präsentiert solide Abschlusszahlen, starke Cash‑Generierung und strategische Ausrichtung auf AI‑getriebene Inflektionen. Kurzfristig belasten China‑Restriktionen und Mix; mittelfristig sieht das Management klare Chancen für Marktanteilsgewinne in Leading‑edge, DRAM und Packaging, mit erwarteter Nachfragebeschleunigung ab H2 2026.
Applied Materials — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
1. Question Answer
Good morning, everybody. Welcome to the Goldman Sachs Communacopia Technology Conference. My name is Jim Schneider. I'm the semiconductor analyst here at Goldman Sachs. It's my pleasure to welcome Applied Materials and CEO, Gary Dickerson on to the stage today.
Welcome, Gary.
Thank you, Jim. Happy to be here.
Thanks for being here.
Maybe just kind of given your long-standing experience in this industry, you've seen many industry cycles. You've been Chair -- at the helm of Applied since 2013. It seems to me over the last 5 years, there's been some really confluence of secular and cyclical dynamics in the industry for semi-cap, a series of onshoring initiatives globally, U.S., Europe, Japan, China. At the same time, we've seen a number of technology changes from gate-all-around logic to 3D memory structures and the like. During the earnings call last month, you guided your October core revenue below the street. I've gotten an increasing number of investor questions asking whether this could be or signal the top of a down cycle. I'd love to get your perspective on whether you believe that's the case or not.
Yes. So I would say that for Applied, we've grown revenue. This will be the sixth year in a row. We're on track for the sixth consecutive year of revenue growth. And in terms of the industry, AI is the biggest inflection of our lifetimes. AI and robotics, I think, are the biggest productivity accelerators of our lifetimes. And that is driving increase in demand for compute and also for compute innovation. So if you think about AI as the key driver for the industry, the segments that will grow the fastest are also the segments where Applied has clear leadership, leading-edge foundry/logic, compute memory with DRAM and high-bandwidth memory and also advanced packaging.
And if you think about -- and I'll get back to your other aspect of your question. But if you think about kind of what we see going forward, I think the industry going to $1 trillion by 2030, being driven by the biggest inflections of our lifetimes that touch every single industry. I think that's really what our customers are focused on. And really, if you look at that 2/3 of the market, there are just a handful of customers that are racing for leadership. You have 3 companies in leading edge foundry/logic, 3 companies in DRAM and compute memory. And for those companies, what is absolutely crucial is being first to market for the architecture inflections. Again, and that's really everything.
Design wins for those companies are based on performance yield and reliability around those inflections and Applied Materials is in by far the best position to enable -- strategically enable design wins for our customers. Our portfolio is unique. We have a very broad portfolio of materials innovation technologies. We have about 30% of our revenue coming from integrated platforms that are absolutely crucial for those inflections. We have integration innovators uniquely in the industry. So we're driving high velocity co-innovation with all of those different companies, many technology nodes out in the future, 4 technology nodes a decade out in the future.
So again, for our customers, we've never had deeper or broader relationships. And then from an Applied perspective, our focus is really to be the most enabling company for those inflections because, again, that's really life and death for our customers. And we're much larger than our next closest competitors relative to our market share in those big markets, the amount of enabling technologies we have. And then for every one of these architecture inflections, there are a few tipping points that determine who wins and loses. So when the -- when the customers are racing for gate-all-around or backside power or new DRAM architectures or new packaging architectures, again, we have incredibly unique capabilities, unique innovators, very deep connectivity with all of those different companies.
And again, there are a few -- just a few of those companies where Applied is by far the leader and very high confidence that we're going to continue to lead and gain share through these architecture inflections. Then your question about downturn, I just don't see that. I mean, certainly, another part of the market is ICAPS, IoT, communication, auto, power sensors. And there is a period of digestion now. If you look at '23, '24, the 2 previous years, there was tremendous investment in ICAPS. So ICAPS is down this year. And we formed our ICAPS group actually April 12, 2019. I still remember when we pulled that group together, Applied has a very unique capability in this segment of the market.
And I feel really good. We can talk about that later about our ability to perform really well going forward in the ICAPS market. But the near term is really -- part of it is being driven by this digestion in ICAPS where you had just tremendous spending in the previous 2 years.
Yes. Yes, it makes sense, and we can get to...
And I think a year from now, this whole thing on downturn, we won't be talking about that. It will be very clear.
Excellent. Excellent. Very good. So maybe if we can kind of unpack some of the different moving pieces there. Let's talk about leading-edge foundry logic. Clearly, you've had a lot of market share strength with gate-all-around backside power. Those seem very relevant. Maybe talk about your position at the top customers in the industry, as you mentioned, very concentrated, especially in the leading-edge foundry logic space. I'll get a lot of investor questions wondering why you see a bit of an air pocket in that segment when others are guiding for relative strength. So maybe you could help investors contextual...
I think leading-edge foundry logic, we're still performing incredibly well. As I said, we have deep visibility. I mean we really are co-innovating with all of those different companies. So we have a really good understanding of performance yield across that whole landscape. I think it's also though lumpy so that really, the revenue is dependent on the timing of fab ramps. And so you don't have many customers there. There's been even more market concentration.
So really, the revenue timing is more dependent on the ramp timing. But again, from a standpoint of Applied's position, as you go through these architecture inflections, every single inflection, our customers are focused on energy-efficient computing. So 10% to 15% improvement in power, 20% to 30% improvement in performance. And they also are focused on 10%, 20% improvement in area scaling. Now more of the area scaling and really all of the power and performance is enabled by materials innovation. The areas where Applied has tremendous strength, far stronger than any of our competitors.
Yes. Maybe you talked about ICAPS a moment ago. You talked about some potential digestion given all the capacity that's been built. Can you maybe specifically address China? And what do you see as the forward demand outlook from your Chinese customer set, Chinese WFE spending sort of writ large? And do you think there's sort of a digestion in China as well as broader ICAPS?
Yes. So I would say, again, ICAPS, we are in this period of digestion, as I talked about earlier. The previous 2 years, you had very strong spending in ICAPS, including in China. And so in '25, the spending is less. And there's going to be a period of time where we go through this digestion. And longer term, I would say that ICAPS, we see as kind of mid- to high single-digit growth rate. If you think about robotics, edge AI feeding into all of the large language models in so many different kinds of applications, power electronics for the grid, for the automotive industry, image sensors, again, in so many different kinds of applications. We think that's going to grow kind of a mid- to high single-digit growth rate, but you do have a period of digestion that we're working through that will take some more time.
But then once you get through that, we do think that, again, that market is going to grow kind of mid- to high single digits. And then from an Applied standpoint, I mentioned we formed that group in 2019. We've performed really well in ICAPS, bringing many new products to market. And I think our strategy is different than some of our peers. We're not focused on just incremental modifications to existing architectures. We are definitely focused on -- we have integration innovators in ICAPS, just like we do on the leading edge, so on power, image sensors, any of those different device verticals. We're co-innovating with customers in ICAPS also.
We have a very robust pipeline of new products, products that will expand our total available market in ICAPS that are significant innovations that are important for design wins for our customers in those verticals. And another thing we're focused on through a large part of our portfolio is cost innovation. So again, for Applied, our main focus is to be the most enabling company for our customers in every one of those segments because that's strategically critical to their competitiveness and their design wins.
And then that enables us also to win ties in the areas that are cost competitive, but we can't win the ties if we're not -- if we don't have those cost competitive products. So I would say more so than ever, that pipeline of innovations that we're driving in ICAPS, both in areas that expand our total available market and improve our cost competitiveness, those are key strategies that we're driving in Applied. And I feel very positive that we will do well where we can compete. There are export controls that have limited our ability to compete in certain customers. So that is something that certainly has impacted our near term. But I feel really good about competing where we can compete. But there is going to be, again, this digestion period in ICAPS -- as also the customers -- new customers are ramping yields, that's also going to create some type of digestion period. But over time, again, all of this edge AI, robotics, these are areas that we feel the market opportunities are good over the longer term, kind of mid- to high single-digit growth rate.
Fair enough. Another one relative to China. Recently, a couple of weeks ago, we got an announcement out of the U.S. government that the license exemption for multinationals in China, Samsung, Hynix, Intel and TSMC have been rescinded starting early 2026. I'm just wondering if that is the same or a different issue than you noted on your last conference call relative to license and maybe sort of in the medium term, what impact do you expect from that change?
Yes. I'm not going to speculate on trade policies or the geopolitical policies, those types of things. Obviously, there's a lot of dynamics that are happening there. And what we talked about on the licenses were products where we're not restricted, where we're just not seeing anything flow. And I think that's been something over the past several months that many people have seen that same type of situation. I know some of the other tech companies have commented on that. So I think that -- and then on the multinationals that are in China, that's really a different issue. But again, I can't really speculate on how that will play out over time.
Okay. Very good. And maybe you don't want to talk about this, but I'm just kind of curious, given the preliminary tariff regime on semiconductors that's out there from the administration, curious as to whether you think structurally, that's going to drive sort of an increase in U.S. fab spending domestically.
Well, I think for sure, if the Trump administration is very focused on bringing more semiconductor manufacturing into the United States. There's no question about that. You see what's happening with TSMC in Arizona and many different companies, both in the leading edge, also in the ICAP space. And that's good for us for sure. We're making investments in the U.S. We're making investments in manufacturing. We talked about a few hundred million dollars investment that we made in Arizona. We have our EPIC center, equipment process and innovation commercialization center that will come online next year in Silicon Valley. And that's going to be a real accelerator for Applied Materials and the entire industry.
I talk about everybody racing, racing for leadership in those architecture inflections. And so being able to have our customer innovators co-located with our innovators, where Applied is, again, the clear leader in materials innovation is a really important strategy so that we can drive those innovations in parallel versus a slower serial type of an approach. So we're making big investments in the U.S. and also the -- bringing those fabs to the U.S. where they don't have an existing infrastructure in place also helps our service business. Our service business is over a $6 billion run rate, growing at a double-digit compound annual growth rate in the past and also going forward.
So as those companies are moving to new locations with very complex architecture innovations. Again, we're seeing more traction for our services. About 2/3 of our services today are long-term subscription agreements. So it's very sticky. We've grown our service business 24 quarters in a row. So that gives us a tailwind to continue that double-digit growth rate in that large service business for Applied Materials.
Very good. I want to turn to the end markets for a moment. I know you don't like to give a quantitative market estimate or outlook for WFE spending, but I'd love to get your perspective on directionally whether you think 2026 will be a growth year for the industry in light of the fact that you don't think we're entering a downturn? And then maybe within that envelope, do you think -- which of the end markets that you serve, you think is going to perform best versus lag a little bit?
Yes. So as you said, I'm not going to guide on 2026. But what I would say, I'm highly confident, again, connecting with CEOs constantly all the top companies that AI is going to drive -- our customers are telling us that data center wafer starts will pass PCs and smartphones. So again, the growth in leading-edge foundry logic, we feel very confident and very positive that, that compound annual growth rate over time is going to be very strong. In compute memory for DRAM and high-bandwidth memory for AI, those are critical technologies. And we talked about in our leading DRAM customers, that spending is up around 50% this year.
So again, we are restricted in China, so we can't serve the China memory companies. So that is something that's offsetting this tremendous growth in DRAM. We've gained 10 points of share in a little over a decade in DRAM. We can talk about the architecture inflections there later. But we're very positive on the growth rate in compute memory going forward. And then I would say packaging is another one where Applied, that's really our strongest overall share position. There's going to be tremendous innovation in how you connect all the computing components together. If you look at AI server architectures, the way they look 3, 4 years from now will be very different than what they look like today. So there are critical architecture inflections there.
Everybody wants to go to larger body sizes where you can connect more computing components together. And obviously, power and performance is absolutely crucial. How you move data between all of those computing components will be completely different in a few years versus what it looks like today. And Applied really has deep connectivity into those markets. ICAPS already talked about kind of a mid- to high single-digit growth rate once we get past this period of digestion. And then NAND is up a fair amount this year off of a very low base. And I would say we're -- if we look at the overall WFE mix going forward, we would say that the foundry/logic is about -- leading-edge foundry/logic is 1/3, ICAPS is 1/3, memory is 1/3, more weighted towards DRAM compute memory than storage memory NAND. That's kind of the way we see it going forward.
And I'm actually extremely positive. Again, we have high visibility relative to all of the fab investments. There's over 100 fabs that are being built by customers today. Again, the business is not linear because it depends on the timing of when those fabs are being built. You have a period of time now where you have digestion in ICAPS, but we're very positive relative to $1 trillion semiconductor industry, kind of mid-teens capital intensity and applied more of the spending going to materials innovation to enable power and performance architecture inflections over the next several years.
Great. It sounds like you got high conviction in the advanced leading-edge foundry and logic business. Maybe talk -- unpack the packaging business, the advanced packaging segment for a second. Maybe just give us a sense or can you contextualize roughly what scale business is that for you today and sort of going forward, what growth rate you expect that to go at? And how has that changed from maybe your expectations a year ago?
Yes. So it's over $1.5 billion. And we've said that in the next few years, we can double that business again to around $3 billion. We're in a very strong position with a broad portfolio of technologies. We're working with customers innovating many nodes out in the future to new packaging architectures. And I would say here, you're going to see tremendous architecture inflections over the next 2 or 3 years. Again, people want to connect more of these computing components together, especially for AI servers. So a lot of the innovation around those packaging architectures are really being driven by that inflection.
Applied not only has the broadest and most unique portfolio of technologies. We have new products that are in the pipeline that are really critical. Hybrid bonding is one that is going to be important for high-bandwidth memory, future architectures and important for chiplets for logic. And Applied also has a unique packaging R&D facility where we have full flow packaging. We're the only company that has that in the industry. And our customers, just like we're talking about EPIC co-innovating for those advanced chip technologies as a game changer for Applied and for our customers. We're doing the same thing in packaging.
So we're working with all of these companies innovating on these new architectures. We're even working with companies across the ecosystem on new packaging architectures. So again, very strong position, over $1.5 billion, growing to $3 billion, and it's going to keep going from there. Again, this is how you connect all these computing components together is really important to drive energy-efficient computing in the industry.
That's great. DRAM, you touched on it before. I'd like to just explore a little bit more. Can you maybe talk about -- you previously talked about, I believe, 75% of incremental HBM steps for HBM memory you're capturing. As this technology evolves, what's the right way to think about kind of how you benefit as we move from HBM3E 12-hi to 4 and 4E? And then separately, if you want to maybe touch on 4F-Squared cells, what that means for you?
Sure. So yes, high-bandwidth memory, we have a very high share. As you said, there's like 19 new steps, 14 new steps. We have a very strong position. And there is an architecture inflection where people will go to hybrid bonding for HBM. Again, we have the leading technology to enable that inflection. We have a strong partnership with Besi, and that's one of our integrated platforms. We have 6 technologies integrated into a single platform because as you're driving these bonding technologies, all of that interface engineering and surface preparation is incredibly important for yield for those particular inflections.
So very strong position in HBM, very high market share and a very strong position enabling the key technologies for those future architectures. In DRAM, overall, as I said, we've gained 10 points of overall DRAM share over -- a little over a decade. And in the future architecture inflections, you have FinFET for high-speed memory, that's going to be a big inflection where Applied has clear leadership and is enabling the inflection for our customers. And then in 4F-squared and 3D DRAM, those are very big inflections that are really enabled through materials and architecture innovations.
So Applied, when we're working with any of these companies, when I'm meeting the CEOs of our customers, there are a handful of innovations that are the tipping points for any one of these different architectures. So one of the CEOs and CTOs I talked to recently, the top 3 innovations for one of these future DRAM architectures were all from Applied Materials. So basically, the innovation won't happen unless we can co-innovate around those enabling technologies. So we have very deep connectivity. We're enabling this FinFET inflection. We're enabling these architecture inflections where you're going more vertical and they are really enabled by materials innovations versus lithography.
So over time, more of that, not only is the wafer fab equipment spending increasing, but your -- more of that is moving to Applied Materials. Last thing on HBM, I don't know if I mentioned this or not, but you have to start at least 3x more wafer starts for HBM because the die sizes are bigger and the yields are lower. So that's another factor that's driving growth in compute memory. But again, this is an area where Applied has outperformed with 10 points of share gain and very well positioned to outperform going forward.
Great. One last one on process, which is a deposition etch, you're clearly the market leader in deposition. Can you maybe talk about the runway you believe you have an etch? And where do you have an edge versus your competitors?
Yes. So we've been gaining share. We had our first $1 billion quarter in etch. We've been consistently gaining share in conductor etch, especially in DRAM, but also in foundry logic. We've gained share, especially with leading customers in foundry logic, significant market share with technology innovations we have within the etch business unit. The other thing I would say that not only do we have great technology and great innovations that we're enabling that have enabled us to gain several points of etch market share, but also there's this concept of co-innovation. So when you're creating these new architectures, you're creating new materials in those structures, you're shaping those structures, modifying those structures. That's a multibillion-dollar business for Applied Materials, and you're analyzing those structures.
So we have great innovations within our etch business unit that are enabling us to gain share. But even more important than that is our ability when we bring a new deposition material to the market, we're able to co-optimize that for customers so that they can accelerate time to market for those innovations. So that's another aspect that's enabling us to grow, but there's significant opportunities for us to continue to grow etch share in memory as these new architectures are adopted and also in foundry/logic.
Great. I want to ask a couple of questions on initiatives in your overall portfolio of business, if I could. How are you feeling about the overall mix of business that Applied has today? Are you sort of exclusively focused now on continuing to drive market share leadership in the semiconductor equipment space? Or can you imagine diversifying other revenue streams over time?
Yes. So I think the key thing for us, again, 2/3 of the market, there's a few customers. So being the most enabling company for those customers puts us in a very unique position. If we're enabling their design wins and their competitiveness, that creates a great opportunity across Applied's entire portfolio. So I'd say that's our #1 focus. Service, as I talked about, that's a double-digit compound annual growth rate. It's a very big business. You have these companies ramping these complex new architectures. We have a lot of service innovations. That's another one that we're driving. We have made progress in some of these adjacent markets. Display has come off a multiyear bottom with some increase in growth, operating profit kind of mid-20s, I think, this last quarter. I think that will continue to grow over time.
This inflection in OLED for IT is a good opportunity for us. We have some unique enabling technologies there that can enable new display architectures. So over time, again, that's not going to happen very quickly. But over time, that will get, I think, incrementally better. And we are looking at other areas where I think what we do is amazing. All of the materials innovations that we enable within Applied Materials, again, in your cell phone, you have 60 miles of wiring in your application processor chip. Think about that, a 60-mile long wire where you're moving data, lightning fast with no resistance, it is almost like magic what we're able to do. So we are looking at some of those adjacent markets.
Display will be incrementally better, I think, as we go forward. And there are a few other ones. But I would say still semi, if you look at least what we see, tremendous opportunities, the industry growing to $1 trillion, applied, the material intensity increasing, our unique position to enable those inflections that are critical for our customers is a great position to be in. So that's still the area that we're most focused on from an investment perspective.
Great. Just maybe finishing out a couple more. One is give you a chance to talk about EPIC for a second. Is that still on track to launch in spring of next year? And maybe contextualize for people, you talked about co-innovation with your customers, but what does that drive in terms of the financial results down the line?
Yes. So I talked about this concept of high velocity co-innovation. So in every one of these different segments, the companies that win the architecture inflections win big. And it's really -- it's the whole ball game from a competitiveness standpoint. So there is a race for those architecture inflections for all of our different customers. And it's very clear to us, again, we have such deep connectivity with every one of those different companies over multiple technology nodes. The companies that are moving at the highest velocity with a culture and leadership focused on co-innovation have been the leaders.
What we see with EPIC, and we shaped EPIC with our leading customers to go even higher velocity. So the ability to have those innovators next year in '26 in Silicon Valley with our innovators will accelerate those technology inflections. And our customers are focused certainly on their N+1, N+2 design wins. I mean that's really incredibly critical for them. But again, the earlier you start on those innovations from materials to systems, the ability to bring those architectures to market with high yield is everything for competitiveness.
So being able to work on the N+ 3 and N+ 4 technology nodes earlier, faster from an innovation standpoint is absolutely critical to our customers. So we shape the concept with them. And of course, for Applied, it enables us to be designed in with our equipment and our services as those new architectures are ramping to market. So again, I'm really excited about it. I hope everybody can come. We'll have a grand opening next year. But it's a great strategy for Applied Materials and a great strategy for the industry.
Great. Last question. I think you've met with a lot of investors since the earnings call and maybe here so far at the conference. Curious, as you reflect on investor commentary, what's the one thing that you think people are missing about the Applied story today?
I think Applied is in an incredibly unique position. Our ability to enable these inflections, our strategic enablement position at the top customers is a significant competitive advantage. And that's really where everything starts with each one of these different customers. Again, for them, it's critical for their design wins. We are incredibly well positioned going forward to gain share at these architecture inflections. Personally, I've never been more excited about the position for Applied. And then I'd say that our service business that's growing at a double-digit compound annual growth rate, I feel really positive on that, too. So I've been in the industry for a long time. I've been at 3 different companies where I've been incredibly successful. I would say I've never been more positive or excited than I am today.
Fantastic. Well, Gary, thank you for being here with us today. We appreciate it.
Great. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
📊 Kernbotschaft
- Takeaway: Applied sieht AI-getriebene Nachfrage als langfristigen Wachstumstreiber und bleibt überzeugt, Marktanteile bei führenden Foundry/Logic-, DRAM- und Packaging-Architekturen zu gewinnen.
- Zyklik: Kurzfristige "Digestion" in ICAPS (IoT/Communication/Auto/Power/Sensoren) und China-Beschränkungen, aber kein struktureller Downturn aus Sicht des Managements.
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Co‑Innovation: Betonung hoher Geschwindigkeit der Kooperation mit Top-Kunden über mehrere Technologie‑knoten; Ziel: Design‑Wins durch Material- und Integrationsvorsprung.
- EPIC: EPIC (Equipment, Process and Innovation Commercialization) Center in Silicon Valley als Beschleuniger für Co‑Innovation; Management bestätigt Start im Frühjahr nächsten Jahres.
- Portfolio‑Fokus: Starke Positionen in Deposition/Etch, HBM (High‑Bandwidth Memory) und Advanced Packaging; Services >$6 Mrd. Run‑Rate, 24 Quartale Wachstum.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Keine neue Guidance: Es gibt keine aktualisierte finanzielle Guidance im Gespräch; Management kommentiert operativen Kontext, nicht neue Zahlen.
- Konkrete Metriken: Packaging >$1.5 Mrd. heute mit Ziel ~ $3 Mrd., erstes $1‑Mrd.-Quartal für Etch, +10 Prozentpunkte DRAM‑Marktanteil über ~ein Jahrzehnt.
- Geopolitik: Einschränkungen/Exportkontrollen limitieren kurzfristig China‑Geschäft; Management vermeidet Prognosen zu Politik.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Zyklusfrage: Kritische Nachfrage, ob aktuelle Guidance ein Peak signalisiert – Management sieht kein Top of cycle, verweist auf fab‑Ramp‑Timing (Lumpy‑Revenues).
- China & Lizenzen: Fragen zu Lizenzentzug/Exemptions beantwortet Management zurückhaltend; erkennt aber beobachtbare Rückgänge in bestimmten Produktflüssen.
- Endmarkt‑Mix: Nachfrage nach Priorisierung: Management nennt Leading‑edge Foundry/Logic, Compute‑Memory (DRAM/HBM) und Packaging als stärkste Wachstumstreiber; ICAPS erwartet mittelfristig mittlere bis hohe einstellige CAGR nach Digestion.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Investment‑Implics: Call unterstreicht Applieds strukturelle Wettbewerbsstärke (Material‑ und Integrationsvorsprung, sticky Services) und bestätigt langfristiges AI‑getriebenes Wachstum, bringt aber keine neue finanzielle Guidance; kurz‑ bis mittelfristig bestehen Timing‑ und geopolitische Risiken.
Applied Materials — Deutsche Bank's 2025 Technology Conference
1. Question Answer
Okay. Great. Well, thanks, everybody, for joining us for the next session at our Deutsche Bank Technology Conference. I am Melissa Weathers. I lead up U.S. semi-cap equipment and memory research here at Deutsche Bank. And this morning, still, we are pleased to have Brice Hill, CFO of Applied Materials joining us. So thanks for joining.
Thanks for hosting us. Beautiful conference. Appreciate you having us here.
Okay. Before we begin, if anybody has any questions from the audience, feel free to raise your hand, and we can get a microphone over to you to get that answered. So I guess, I think to kick off, the smartest place to start would be you reported earnings 2 weeks ago. You talked about some -- maybe some incremental headwinds going into the second half of the year, maybe a little bit different than what you had been thinking 90 days ago. So I think just to level set everyone, can you remind us what was your messaging on that call? What are the key takeaways that you want investors to have taken from that call? And what are you seeing into your October quarter?
Yes, great. So when we think about this year, if we back up 90 days and even further than that, for Applied Materials and for the industry, we've been thinking how strong will DRAM and leading logic be this year? And will it be strong enough to offset any headwinds in ICAPS, the mature logic space? Because in the ICAPS space in China, there was a huge build-out in 2023 and 2024. So we've kind of expected 2025 to be slower, but on the positive side, with all the strength of AI, we've expected DRAM to be really strong, and we've expected leading logic to be really strong.
Q3 was record revenues for us, record earnings per share, and it was sort of exhibiting that sort of behavior. And we had expected leading logic to be sort of linearly accelerating through the course of the year. When we gave our guide for Q4, it was different than what we expected. The expected part and the headwind part is China. China is lower, lower than '24. We've been expecting that. Still a good market, but not going as fast as 2024.
What was unexpected was that leading-edge wasn't linear. Now we model, of course, all the customers' factories and the capacities and the timing of the equipment, but the pickup rate wasn't exactly what we expected. And I would dig into that a little bit because people ask us, well, what does that mean? Is there a slower demand? Is there a change in expectations? No change in expectations on leading logic. If we dig into it, if you look at the foundry ecosystem, the utilization on the leading edge processes is 100%. From a design perspective, reported designs, reported designs are higher on these nodes, in this node than prior nodes.
If you look at the performance of the process itself, a gate-all-around process is 20% to 30% more power efficient compute than the prior. So it's a good node to put a design on, especially in the AI space where you need more power efficiency going forward.
When we listen to the cloud service providers and their CapEx forecasts, I think investors know that their CapEx forecasts have only been going up. And when you look at those -- the CapEx on AI compute and high-performance compute systems, what do those systems consist of? They consist of accelerators, GPUs, processors, then with stacks of DRAM, the high-bandwidth memory around those systems and that has a lot of pull for DRAM, a lot of pull for leading logic. So that's what we expected just to continue.
However, the pickup rate from an equipment perspective is not linear. We're a little bit more tilted towards 1 large customer. It's going to be a little bit more tilted towards their factories and their timing. And so it will be more uneven than it was in the past from a build-out perspective. But I would just leave it as that was the piece that's unexpected. I would put it, Melissa, in the construct of, we expect leading logic and DRAM to grow over time and in fact, be the 2 largest and fastest equipment markets.
So I want to dig in more on to that leading-edge piece. So really quick, as we think about what your peers have said versus last quarters, the messaging across all the semi-caps has actually been pretty different, which is strange given that you all have the same customers. So how do you account for the difference in your outlook versus what your peers have talked about?
Yes, I do think we did see some companies say they saw signs of a slower business and we saw other companies. Every company is at a different timing window with respect to China shipments, with respect to whether they can serve China customers or not, if they have more exposure to NAND, which grew a lot this year or less exposure to NAND. So there is a lot to sort out, which is your job and makes it tough for you. For us, if you back up for Applied Materials, if I can just reiterate the strategy that Gary has put in place, we think DRAM and leading logic will be the 2 fastest equipment markets for the next 5-plus years.
The strategy of the company is to focus on developing new applications when the architectures change in those technologies. And what that really says is, that's the time when our customers reevaluate their equipment sets. They're making a change to the architecture like the gate-all-around processor. They've got new structures to build and they reevaluate the equipments that are going in. And so we're focusing our development efforts on when you see those architecture changes in leading logic, which should be gated-all-around, backside power and eventually CFET, if you look at DRAM, which should be 6F-Square then 4F-squared then 3D DRAM, when you see those architecture changes, Applied already has good share, and we expect to gain share once those transitions get implemented. So that's really the focus for the company in terms of the fastest-growing markets.
And when we think about AI, those strategies -- that strategy has been in place for a while. We didn't know about AI when we started working on those architectures. But AI is a perfect example of the market pull for compute memory, DRAM and of course, for compute logic.
While we're talking about AI, a lot of the high-end GPUs and even some of the ASICs still aren't at the very, very bleeding edge. So can you just talk about what are your expectations in terms of bleeding -- actual bleeding edge adoption for those processors? And could we ever get like 2-nanometer GPUs, and what's a view on that?
Firstly, so I'm not a chip architect, but we talked a little bit about this before. I would expect all of that to migrate to thought leading edge. And if it's not, the node that's currently ramping, then maybe the node after. And the reason is -- there's 2 reasons, but the main reason is power performance. The transistor, the gate-all-around transistor was designed to be better, power-efficient compute and more reliable than the FinFET transistor. It's in the architecture. It's more efficient, more reliable and consumes less power than the prior generation of technology. So I expect all those designs -- once they're comfortable with the tools and implementing and getting the design there and the process itself, I expect all those designs to go into that space.
It would be -- I think it would be a huge change for the whole industry if somehow that didn't evolve, and it's not the world -- I think everybody knows, the world is worried about power. The way to solve the power need is to make the compute more power efficient and there's multiple different ways, including in packaging to do that. And so I think you'll see all those designs move forward.
Maybe on the -- sticking with the near-term side, and then we can get into some of those long-term growth opportunities. WFE, I'm going to try and get an outlook from you for 2026. But as semi-cap investors, it's very difficult for us to get a clear picture of what could happen in 2026. You have all these different moving pieces between China, between the leading-edge and DRAM. So you don't have to give me a hard number. But as we think about the moving pieces into 2026, what -- how would you guide us? And like where should we start?
I think the dynamic will be similar from a growth perspective for 2026. We'll have strength driven by AI in DRAM and leading logic. We'll have continued growth of new packaging elements for that space in particular. And if there's a headwind, the headwind will still be in the China mature nodes, which we call ICAPS. The devices, ICAPS for investors, we talk about IoT devices, communications, the auto market, power, sensors, all those things that are built on essentially 14-nanometer and larger geometries, analog chips and the like. Because China invested so much in 2023 and 2024, even though the end markets for those mature logic devices are growing, growing at mid- to high single digits, there's a lot of capacity in place.
We're still adding customers. We're still adding capacity. So it's going to be slower developing for the next few quarters still than we're going to see in the end markets. So going back up to the top, we would expect growth generally over a 5-year period, especially in DRAM and leading logic. No reason to expect '26 to be different than that. That will depend on the macros. And then the headwind will be ICAPS. And the question is, is leading logic and DRAM going to grow strongly enough to offset that? So that's -- I think the dynamic is similar to what we've seen in the past few quarters.
Okay.
I would add 1 thing, sorry, Melissa. This year's growth, our semi equipment business is growing with our guide about 4%. So that gives you a -- assuming a constant share, that gives you some perspective on what the equipment business is doing this year. So you should see WFE growing this year. And we're just -- I'm just saying the trends -- there's not a reason to expect the trends to be different.
So on the leading-edge piece, that was definitely the biggest surprise to me in this most recent quarter. One of the things that you've talked about, which I found interesting is the difference in customer order patterns and order behavior pre-COVID, during COVID and then in this post-COVID world. So can you add a little bit more color, like how have your engagements with customers? Have they changed? What is your visibility going forward as to what those leading-edge customers are spending?
Yes. I think, if we start in China, we have more customers and a lot of them are newer customers. And if you compare them to long-standing customers that are larger, the long-standing customers have a mature process for forecasting their demand, forecasting their facilities and sharing that with vendors. So first of all, a lot more of the market has been in China or in Rest of World with less mature processes and with the policy uncertainties and trade uncertainties and tariff uncertainties, what we've seen is customers kind of wait till the last minute before they commit to the order that they're looking for, right?
And then looking at the mature, larger customers, we've actually seen the same behavior, sort of late commits to the orders that they're taking. And what we're doing is we're reminding everybody -- during COVID, we all struggled with supply chain because there was significant volatility in demand for the supply chains. Applied Materials can take more orders or take fewer orders in any particular quarter. But what's really hard is if you have 8,000 to 10,000 components in a system, and you're trying to move a large number of suppliers at the same time, they really can't move up and down that much. So what we're doing is reminding our customers we know there's more volatility in the environment, which hopefully will settle out, but we really need to have a perspective, what's the 2-year road map? What's a good 1-year build plan? And then for 6 months, we really have to have a clear perspective on what the builds and deliveries are.
I think we've split away from that a little bit, but I think everybody is on the same page that in order to manage the large ecosystem, we have to follow that behavior.
Are you seeing any signs of share shift?
If I look at leading-edge and DRAM where we're focused, we don't think there's any change in share. The share shift, of course, the biggest component is in China. This year, we announced early in the year that there was $400 million of business in our backlog that we would not be able to serve because of the entity listed customers in China. So we do have share loss there that's based on the rules that were put in place. But I would step back and just think about that for a second. If we think about the China business that we can't serve, the memory business, whatever is, leading-logic there and any restricted accounts, the question is going to be how long will this regime of rules be in place? I think there's 2 big questions. The first 1 is a technology question. Will there be new technologies invented in China that use different tools that are competitive? If that happens, then we don't have access to that share like we do today.
If you can't really keep up without access to the equipment, at least over the next 10 years, then more of that demand should shift back to the multinational vendors where Applied does provide that equipment. So I think that's the big -- that's a large unknown in the ecosystem right now. That's 1 thing that could happen that could benefit Applied. We recently saw that NVIDIA can sell components to China. That's going to put more demand on Applied tools. And so that's an example of how that could happen.
The second scenario would be if the government changes its stance from restricting equipment to actually it's okay if we provide equipment and China can build on top of that equipment. If that happens, that's another way where Applied could sell more equipment to that customer base or that use base. So I think that's a big unknown. But going back to your question, yes, where we see share shift is in China, and we expected that. It's rules-based, and the question for us when we talk about will we see overall share gain or not, we think we're going to gain share on leading-edge. We expect to gain share also on DRAM. And will that be large enough to offset any share loss in China? That's what we're looking at.
So there's been a lot of news in the semi sector over the last week or 2, particularly in the second-tier foundry players. I don't know if you heard, the U.S. government is now a shareholder of one of your large customers, Intel. And then also, we've had some news on the Samsung Foundry side as well. So a lot of activity on those second-tier foundry logic players. So as we think about those incremental developments, how is that factoring into your outlook for leading-edge logic spending?
Yes, I'll start with, it's not much of a factor. And the reason I say that is people used to ask us, investors used to ask us, "Hey, if the governments are incentivizing your customers to build in the U.S. or build somewhere else, isn't your demand forecast going up?" And we would say no. At the highest level, demand is driven by PCs, data centers, smartphones, and all that those incentives do is have a customer instead of building in Taiwan, they're going to build in the U.S. So the view was it mattered a little bit at the margin, but it didn't matter in total. Similarly, our expectation is that if the second-tier foundries are more successful, it's not going to be a major change in the way we look at the market. We -- at a high level, we would model the market for leading-edge and DRAM as an example, to be roughly the same. It does matter at the margin. And the way I think about it is, if you move the needle all the way to 1 side of the equation, you say there's only 1 foundry, then 1 foundry will operate at a very high utilization.
If you move it to the other side and you say there's 4 competing foundries, then they'll altogether operate at a little bit lower utilization because they're competing against each other. And so we think it matters at the margin, but hopefully for investors, it's sort of comforting. We don't think anybody is going to build extra fabs that don't have designs. When you're building a factory, you know whether you have a design or not, at least when you're ready to order the equipment. You know do I have a customer, are they taping out, are they ready to commit to volumes? And then you're ordering the equipment because there's enough time between your tape out and design win and actual start of production that you can install the equipment.
So we -- anyway, hopefully, that answers the question. It's a positive. Competition is a positive. It will help drive performance. It matters at the margin, but we're not changing our forecast -- our 5-year forecast because of this dynamic.
I think that's a prudent way to handle it. Maybe last question on the leading-edge piece and then maybe we can get into some China. On your call, you talked about 30,000 wafer starts per month of 2-nanometer. I don't recall if those're 2-nanometer gate-all-around. So one, can you clarify what -- which nodes that is?
And then also, as we think about like the timing of the build-out, clearly, maybe there's some seasonality or some -- a little low-end spending in the second half. But as we think about the scale of the 2-nanometer node, can you talk about what that could mean for the pace of growth that you're expecting for leading-edge nodes?
Yes. We -- so first of all, the number I think I used, bigger number, 300,000.
Sorry, 300,000.
300,000 wafer starts per month, that's what we think is a good expectation for the size of the gate-all-around node. So larger than the prior node and primarily driven by the capability, but the 20% to 30% power efficiency of the transistor that you can build on that node. So we think it's a good landing spot. If you look at nodes, some nodes are really good landing spots. They pick up a lot of designs. They're large. Other nodes have been smaller. I think the 10-nanometer node was an example of a node that was sort of an interim node, and then 7 was really strong in that example. So 2 should be a strong node from our perspective.
And then if you look at Applied Materials, we talk about how our SAM, our share of market has gone up from $12 billion for 100,000 wafer starts of capacity to $14 billion of SAM for 100,000 wafer starts. That's our opportunity to grow share and to sell more equipment into those nodes. And so if you look over the last year, 2 years, we sold $2.5 billion of gate-all-around type equipment in 2024. We said $4.5 billion in 2025, so there's $7 billion of equipment, 50% of that $14 billion number. So that would equate with roughly, by the end of this year, 100,000 wafer starts of capacity being put in place divided across 4 customers, right?
So we would expect there's a long way to go in this ramp. And somebody asked me earlier today, well, what's -- when does that ramp end? That ramp ends when your next node that has good volume starts ramping.
Great. So now let's touch on the China piece. There's a lot of moving pieces within your China business, it can be hard to keep up with. So as you look at your China business today, really strong growth in the last 2 years, starting to taper off going forward. How would you characterize the overall China business between -- you've got multinational spending, you've got some entity list restrictions and then you've also got just a normal digestion of some capacity put in place at the -- anything above 28-nanometer. So high level, can you summarize what you're seeing in China, what your outlook is there?
Yes. First of all, I think the perspective from inside Applied is really good market. Growing, I mean from the perspective of we're adding customers. This quarter, when we did our account reviews. I think there's a new customer that's building display drivers on 28-nanometer. There's another new customer that's building computer image sensors on 28-nanometer. And the last few years, the build-out in China has focused on even more mature nodes like 40, 45, 60. What we're seeing in the next couple of years is a lot more build-out is going to be on 28-nanometer. Applied Materials has a good footprint in 28-nanometer. We think a lot of these customers, when they start, they're going to use the same equipment set that the big foundries have used for 28-nanometer. So that plays to our advantage from that perspective. And we have excellent service capabilities that we think we'll be able to offer those newer customers who are more likely to use the services as it's qualified labor and sort of fab experts that come in and can help them ramp.
So from that perspective, growing market, a lot of it is driven by local incentives. Those new customers I talk about, they're incentivized to build a factory in a new province. And so -- and of course, we help with that. Having said all that, yes, 2024 was a really big year, and we think we won't have as big a market or as fast to market as we did in 2024 until -- I call it digestion, until the end market demand sort of catches up with the capacity that's been put in place.
If it were 1 customer and 1 part called a monolith, then you would say, "Oh, I don't need to add any capacity for more than a year because if I met 80% utilization and the market grows mid- to high single digits, I can at least wait a year before I need to buy any equipment." The issue is it's not 1 customer, it's lots of customers, lots of different products, lots of different factories. They're all scheduling construction, installation. So the market keeps going. So I think it's complex. We've had investors ask us, who are these customers? What are they building? Are they profitable? Do they have real businesses? We're all going to learn more, but we expect that market to continue to grow, continue to be strong. And then, of course, the end markets itself, we're talking ICAPs, mid- to high single digit growth over time. So the demand will catch up to the capacity, if you will.
Last thing on the restrictions. I sort of gave you my thoughts. This environment that we're living in with the restrictions, I don't think it's permanent from the perspective of the technologies are going to evolve and change one way or the other, either China will have successful road maps that are competitive or they'll have to shift back to multinationals or the actual rules environment will shift. And so we don't speculate on which way that goes, but hopefully, that gives you some -- investors a way to think about that dynamic.
Super helpful. Let's touch on ICAPS, but maybe the non-China piece of ICAPS. On your earnings call, you talked about some green shoots there. This has been a very prolonged cycle. We think we're all anxiously waiting for the analog and the broad-based semis world to reaccelerate. So what are those green shoots that you're seeing? And what's the -- what is your outlook on the ICAPS' rest of the world part of your business?
Yes. The easiest one is, we see utilization improving. So we see it in the current quarter. We see it in our outlook quarter, and we expect that to continue over the next few quarters. And what's happening underneath is, I think, the whole world, the rest of world is needing to reconcile how much capacity has been put in place in China? And how much will they serve? And if our rest of world companies thought they were selling into China, there's some rationalization that has to be done on the capacity plans. The green shoots are utilizations are starting to climb even after all the capacity that's been put in place, that's good. And the second is, specifically in our Q4 outlook, of course, China ICAPS is lower, but rest of world ICAPS is higher. And so it's indicative of some of the investments that we're expecting to see in rest of world. And in fact, our internal forecast call for rest of world ICAPS to grow over -- definitely over the 5-year period that we're forecasting, we call for growth in that space. So not giving a '26 guide, but we expect some of it's driven by 200-millimeter to 300-millimeter transitions, but the rest is driven by the underlying market is growing.
Is there any tech transition? I know the business is super broad, but what kind of innovation are you seeing in those ICAPS nodes?
I think the number 1 space to think about is power. So our teams work a lot on what's called compound semi, so new materials for substrates or for the transistor silicon itself. And I think that's where you see a lot of the innovative work is how do we make these components so they're much more energy efficient than prior technology generations. That's where you'll see a lot of the innovation.
Speaking of innovation, let's move on to DRAM. As you think about the current supply-demand balance within the DRAM market, I think some investors are concerned. There's a lot of questions on where will supply-demand shake out in 2026. So what trends are you seeing on the DRAM piece? Maybe let's talk about it as a whole and then we can get into HBM?
Well, the best trend HBM is AI-related components, including HBM, we think are growing at a 30% to 40% CAGR. And so when you look at HBM DRAM, I think about 15% of DRAM capacity wafers today are allocated for HBM production. That's growing at a 30% to 40% CAGR. And so that's where you see -- we're going to have a record -- either a record year or the second best year for DRAM this year. If you look back at 2024, we had a significant China business. So this year, we're at a record or close to a record, meaning the multinationals have made up all of that business we had in China in the prior year. I think that's close to 50% growth for the multinationals in DRAM. And so that's both a pull on the memory itself and also driven by that HBM.
So we think the trend, if you look across the 5-year horizon I highlighted earlier, we think DRAM could be the fastest-growing equipment market. It will be between DRAM and leading-logic over the next 5 years.
As we think about HBM specifically, that market is -- seems to be pretty binary in terms of capacity additions. We're waiting on clarity on qualifications at certain customers. So how are you -- what's embedded in your forecast? How do you, as a CFO, plan given that huge binary aspect of we don't know what supply is going to look like?
The good news is this is more similar to our -- the conversation we had about leading logic. We don't model HBM at the foundry level. We model HBM at, what do we expect the high-bandwidth memory market to look like? How fast is it growing? What's the macro? And then as far as subdividing that between the memory vendors, we don't do that. Of course, we do that when we're getting ready to take orders and ship equipment. But as far as when I say our DRAM forecast is to have that process technology, be one of the fastest growers over the 5 years, it's at that macro level how much HBM we expect to be deployed.
So I would just say, of course, it matters dearly to those vendors who wins those designs. But for us, we would say, we'll support all of them, and we certainly hope there's competition in the market.
So last couple of minutes that we have, I promise I'll get you a margin question as a CFO, but maybe really quick on the services side, the AGS piece. Maybe can you help us think about the 2 different pieces. You've got the 200-millimeter piece and then you've got core, which you're guiding to grow low double digits. So what trends are you seeing in that business? And then specifically, I think you've talked about the subscription side of the business or your subscription revenues is near 2/3 and growing. So can you talk about the drivers, what's driving that number higher?
Yes. I'm definitely trying to have highlight that business for investors by associating and highly correlating our dividend growth with that business. So we've signaled for the core part of that business, which is over 90% of what we report in AGS. For the core part of that business, more than 2/3 of it is subscription. So you can view that as recurring revenue. It's the services component and spare parts component of that business. And we do say that's growing at low double digits, and we expect it to continue to grow at low double digits.
And so if you think about the dividend, I'll hopefully exhibit that with the dividend as we go forward. And that will just put that at the top of mind for investors.
If you look at total AGS for the year, that component that's less than 10% of the business today, that's 200-millimeter equipment that is reported in that services business, and that has shrunk this year. And I think a lot of that has to do with the transition of 200-millimeter production to 300-millimeter production. We think there will be a continued 200-millimeter market. There are some technologies, especially in these compound semi space where the technology actually can't be built yet on a 300-millimeter. It doesn't -- just from a warpage perspective and from basically the heaviness of the material, et cetera, it doesn't work on a 300-millimeter wafer. So there will be a continued 200-millimeter market for as far as we can see, but it will be smaller, okay?
Back up to the top, that services business, we expect low double digits growth rate. And what -- the dynamic that's driving that and the reason it's faster than the equipment business is, every day that we ship a tool, our installed base grows. Our customers, a lot of them are being incentivized to build in different cities than they normally build in. And when you do that, you are looking for labor and looking for people that know how to work in a fab. And so Applied comes along and says we can provide 100 service technicians that are expert on this equipment that can help you yield and offer some AI-based intelligence as to how to tune that equipment. The pickup on that business is higher in this environment because of that dynamic. And finally, the services themselves are improving because we're using AI technologies to help improve the offerings.
All right. Last 30 seconds that we have, gross margins didn't get a lot of attention on your last earnings call, but where do we -- how should we think about the baseline of gross margins from here? Your mix is very influx. So help us on gross margins. And then I do want to ask on the value-based pricing initiatives...
Okay. So 48.1% gross margin for our guide with a lower China mix, which typically weighs on our gross margins. So we looked at our Q4 guide as sort of a normal. It's a normal China mix, relatively normal business mix. And so I think it's a good indication of where we are today from a gross margin perspective, and that's improved over the last couple of years. Our Q3 quarter of high 48% gross margins was 150 basis points above where we were a couple of years ago. So we've made a lot of improvements. The portfolio is shifting to more critical tools. We've got a better pricing process in place, so that's helping us. And of course, we're working -- there is some headwinds with the tariffs, but we're working through that. We have a global footprint. We feel good about our ability to manage that. So I think that is a good baseline, Melissa, and we'll continue to work on improvements in that.
Perfect. Well, we are out of time. Thank you so much, Brice, for joining us, and enjoy the rest of the conference, everybody.
Wonderful. Nice to see everybody. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Applied Materials — Deutsche Bank's 2025 Technology Conference
📣 Kernbotschaft
- Takeaway: Applied erwartet DRAM und Leading‑Logic als die beiden schnellstwachsenden WFE‑Märkte der nächsten 5+ Jahre, angetrieben von AI/High‑Performance‑Compute. Kurzfristig ist der Ramp bei Leading‑Edge ungleichmäßig (stärker auf wenige große Kunden konzentriert) und China dämpft die Nachfrage; mittelfristig bleibt strukturelles Wachstum intakt.
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Architekturfokus: Entwicklung auf Zeiten technologischer Architekturwechsel (Gate‑All‑Around, Backside Power, CFET; DRAM 6F→4F→3D) als Wachstumshebel und Share‑Gewinn.
- Node‑Sizing: GAA‑Node wird bei ~300.000 Wafer‑Starts/Monat erwartet; Applieds SAM je 100k WSP stieg von $12B auf $14B.
- Services: AGS‑Core: >2/3 Subscription (wiederkehrend), Wachstum im niedrigen zweistelligen Prozentbereich; trägt zur Dividenden‑Stabilität bei.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Konkretes: Management nennt 300k WSPM für GAA, $2.5B GAA‑Verkäufe 2024 vs. $4.5B erwartet 2025; ~ $400M Umsatz im Backlog wurde wegen Entity‑List‑Restriktionen ausgeschlossen.
- Margen/GUIDE: Q4‑Gross‑Margin‑Guide ~48.1%; Semi‑Equipment WFE‑Wachstum für das Jahr ~4% (bei konstantem Marktanteil).
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Leading‑Edge‑Timing: Warum der Pickup nicht linear ist — Antwort: kein Nachfragebruch, sondern Konzentration auf einzelne große Kunden und unterschiedliche Fabrik‑Timing.
- China/Share: Kritik an Entity‑List‑Auswirkungen: kurzfristige Share‑Verluste in China vorhanden; Dauer und Folgen bleiben unsicher.
- DRAM/HBM‑Risiken: HBM‑Kapazitäten sind binär; Applied modelliert HBM makro, nicht kunden‑/foundry‑specific.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Bewertung: Positives langfristiges Wachstumsszenario (DRAM + Leading‑Logic), kurzfristig aber volatil durch kunden‑spezifische Timing‑effekte und China‑Restriktionen. Wiederkehrende Services und verbesserte Margen dämpfen Zyklizität für Aktionäre.
Finanzdaten von Applied Materials
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Basis
| Jul '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 30.837 30.837 |
8 %
8 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 15.604 15.604 |
6 %
6 %
51 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 15.233 15.233 |
10 %
10 %
49 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 1.674 1.674 |
4 %
4 %
5 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | 3.972 3.972 |
13 %
13 %
13 %
|
|
| EBITDA | 10.114 10.114 |
12 %
12 %
33 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 527 527 |
22 %
22 %
2 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 9.587 9.587 |
11 %
11 %
31 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 9.267 9.267 |
36 %
36 %
30 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen USD.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur Applied Materials-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
Applied Materials Aktie News
Firmenprofil
Applied Materials, Inc. beschäftigt sich mit der Bereitstellung materialtechnischer Lösungen, die zur Herstellung neuer Chips und fortschrittlicher Displays verwendet werden. Das Unternehmen ist in den folgenden Segmenten tätig: Halbleitersysteme, angewandte globale Dienstleistungen und Display und angrenzende Märkte. Das Segment Semiconductor Systems umfasst Halbleiter-Investitionsgeräte für Abscheidung, Ätzen, Ionenimplantation, schnelle thermische Verarbeitung, chemisch-mechanische Planarisierung, Metrologie und Inspektion sowie Wafer Level Packaging. Das Segment Applied Global Services bietet Lösungen zur Optimierung von Ausrüstung, Leistung und Produktivität. Das Segment Display and Adjacent Markets bietet Produkte zur Herstellung von Flüssigkristallanzeigen, organischen Leuchtdioden, Beschichtungssystemen und Anzeigetechnologien für das Fernsehen, Personalcomputer, Tablets, Smartphones und verbraucherorientierte Geräte. Das Unternehmen wurde am 10. November 1967 gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in Santa Clara, Kalifornien.
aktien.guide Basis
| Hauptsitz | USA |
| CEO | Mr. Dickerson |
| Mitarbeiter | 36.500 |
| Gegründet | 1967 |
| Webseite | www.appliedmaterials.com |


