AIB Group Aktienkurs
Ist AIB Group eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.921 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 21,79 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 4,90 Mrd. €
Marktkapitalisierung = 21,79 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 4,64 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 33,52 Mrd. € | Umsatz (TTM) = 4,90 Mrd. €
Enterprise Value = 33,52 Mrd. € | Umsatz erwartet = 4,64 Mrd. €
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Dividende je Aktie
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividende je Aktie zeigt, wie viel Geld ein Unternehmen pro Aktie an seine Aktionäre ausschüttet – typischerweise jährlich oder quartalsweise.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die absolute Größe der Auszahlung je Aktie – wichtig für alle, die regelmäßige Erträge suchen oder Dividendenstrategien verfolgen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile oder wachsende Dividende je Aktie ist oft ein Zeichen für ein solides Geschäftsmodell.
- Die Dividende je Aktie allein sagt aber nichts über die Rendite – dafür ist auch der Aktienkurs relevant (→ Dividendenrendite).
- Langfristig steigende Dividenden sind oft ein sehr gutes Merkmal (z. B. Dividenden-Aristokraten).
📘 Dividendenrendite
📈 Was ist das?
Die Dividendenrendite zeigt, wie hoch die Dividende eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zum Aktienkurs ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft dabei, Dividendenaktien vergleichbar zu machen – unabhängig vom absoluten Auszahlungsbetrag.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine stabile Dividendenrendite kann auf verlässliche Ausschüttungen hinweisen.
- Ein Vergleich der 1J- und 5J-Rendite hilft zu erkennen, ob das Dividendenwachstum mit dem Kurswachstum Schritt hält.
- Eine niedrige Rendite ist nicht zwingend negativ – sie kann auf starkes Kurswachstum hindeuten.
📘 Dividendenwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Dividendenwachstum zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen seine Dividende je Aktie über die Zeit gesteigert hat.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
5J: durchschnittliche jährliche Wachstumsrate (CAGR)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Stetig steigende Dividenden gelten als Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und Aktionärsorientierung – besonders interessant für langfristige Investoren.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein stabiles Dividendenwachstum ist ein Zeichen nachhaltiger Ertragskraft.
- Ein hohes Dividendenwachstum kann ein erheblicher Hebel deiner Rendite sein:
- Wenn ein Unternehmen z. B. 1 € Dividende zahlt und diese über 5 Jahre jährlich um 15 % erhöht, bekommst du im 5. Jahr bereits 2 € je Aktie – doppelt so viel wie zu Beginn!
📘 Ausschüttungsquote (Payout)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Ausschüttungsquote zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Unternehmensgewinns (pro Aktie) als Dividende an die Aktionäre ausgeschüttet wird.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Quote hilft einzuschätzen, ob eine Dividende auf Dauer tragfähig ist – besonders im Verhältnis zum erzielten Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige Ausschüttungsquote bedeutet: Das Unternehmen behält einen größeren Teil des Gewinns für Investitionen – typisch für Wachstumsunternehmen.
- Eine moderate Quote (z. B. 25–50 %) steht oft für ein gesundes Gleichgewicht zwischen Ausschüttung und Zukunftsinvestitionen.
- Hohe Ausschüttungsquoten können attraktiv wirken, sind aber riskanter, wenn die Gewinne schwanken oder sinken.
📘 Dividendensteigerungen in Folge (Erhöhungen)
📈 Was ist das?
Diese Kennzahl zeigt, wie viele Jahre in Folge ein Unternehmen seine Dividende pro Aktie erhöht hat – ohne Kürzung oder Aussetzung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein langer Track Record kontinuierlicher Erhöhungen spricht für Verlässlichkeit, solide Finanzen und aktionärsfreundliche Unternehmenspolitik.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein langer Zeitraum mit Dividendensteigerungen stärkt das Vertrauen – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Solche Unternehmen gelten als verlässlich und planbar für Einkommensinvestoren.
- Je länger die Serie, desto stärker das Commitment gegenüber den Aktionären.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
AIB Group Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
17 Analysten haben eine AIB Group Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
17 Analysten haben eine AIB Group Prognose abgegeben:
Beta AIB Group Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
APR
30
AIB Group plc, Q1 2026 Sales/ Trading Statement Call, Apr 30, 2026
vor 2 Monaten
|
|
MÄR
4
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
NOV
4
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
AUG
1
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 11 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
AIB Group — AIB Group plc, Q1 2026 Sales/ Trading Statement Call, Apr 30, 2026
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to AIB Group plc Q1 2026 Trading Update Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Finally, I would like to advise all participants that this call is being recorded.
I will now pass you over to our speakers for today's session, Chief Executive Officer, Colin Hunt; and Chief Financial Officer, Donal Galvin. Mr. Hunt, please go ahead.
Thank you, Nadia. Good morning, all, and thank you for joining us on our Q1 call. I have Donal with us, as Nadia said, this morning, and we will both be available to take your questions very shortly. But I'd like to make some brief introductory remarks.
We're very pleased with the performance of the business in the first quarter, and the group is performing very much in line with our own expectations. We entered 2026 with great momentum, and that has been maintained in terms of actuals and outlook. And I'm particularly pleased with loan growth of 1.7% in the quarter. And with a strong pipeline now building before us, we're confidently reiterating our guidance for 2026.
We're seeing a strong performance right the way across the franchise as the group fires on all cylinders. And the strength of the performance that we're reporting today reflects the ongoing resilience of the Irish economy in the face of marked geopolitical uncertainty. So with almost 1/3 of the year now behind us, we can comfortably assert that we are confident in our ability -- in our outlook for 2026 and beyond as well as in our ability to deliver strong sustainable returns to our shareholders today, tomorrow and over the medium term.
I'll stop there, and I'll turn over to you for your questions.
[Operator Instructions] And now we're going to take our first question, and it comes from the line of Denis McGoldrick from Goodbody.
2. Question Answer
Just 2, please, if I may. Firstly, I'm interested if you're seeing any impact yet on the business or on your customers from the higher fuel and energy costs?
And then secondly, could you walk us through the NII movements quarter-on-quarter and then the outlook as you see it for the remainder of the year?
Denis, thank you for your questions. I'll take the first one. Look, we're obviously monitoring the situation very, very closely. And -- but certainly, from all engagements that we've had with the network and with colleagues in the various business units, we are not seeing any impact coming through as of yet. Obviously, we are dealing with a very uncertain environment, but it is not having an impact on either the performance of the book in terms of the credit performance or indeed, it's not having an impact on the pipeline. And I have to say, just to reiterate the comments I made earlier, we're looking at a very strong pipeline over the course of the next number of months. The great thing about this business is you can see activity coming at you over the horizon. And certainly, the flow is very, very reassuring at this particular point in time. So short answer to your question, no impact discernible as of yet.
Yes. On the NIM NII question, I think if you're looking at a quarter-on-quarter, there's just 1 or 2 smaller items impacting there. We issued some Tier 2 at the very back end of 2025, a couple of days less in Q1. But overall, I would say that the NII guidance, we're certainly very firm on that. Obviously, we have not amended or adjusted any of our interest rate assumptions and maintained a year-end ECB position of 2%. The market has clearly moved quite a bit away from that. Just given the volatility, we have decided not to change any of those assumptions as of yet. But naturally, there is some upside there.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Diarmaid Sheridan from Davy.
Two, if I may, please. Maybe just firstly on NII and the structural hedge. Just the EUR 10 billion that you referred to in today's statement, is that separate to the EUR 10 billion that was referred to in the full year presentation? Or is it the same EUR 10 billion? And just the sensitivity to rates looks like it has fallen further from what you would have flagged at the full year presentation. So just wondering what might be behind that?
And then secondly, just on the disposals in the bond portfolio, was that tactical kind of a point in time in the quarter? Or is that an ongoing program? And are they being just put into cash for now? Or are you deploying them back into the bond market?
Thanks very much, Denis. On the structural hedge, it's not a new EUR 10 billion. We referenced that we executed EUR 10 billion early 2026. So none of the metrics that I talked about previously have changed. Overall, the sensitivities have slightly changed. I think the new number that we've provided you with for 100 basis points change is around EUR 256 million, and that's for 100 basis points change. And what I would say on that is that's pretty linear, okay, between 20, 50, 75. So depending on your view on rates, that's the position that you should look at. I mean we obviously recognize that the issues in the Middle East were going to be inflationary, put upward pressure on rates. But really looking into the '27, '28, '29 years, we really felt that we wanted to add some duration, which is why we executed that hedge, and we're very happy that we did.
With respect to the fixed income security, look, nothing really to report there. Every year, we will look at different segments where we want to participate, and we would have switched out of some sectors into new sectors, would have benefited from that. And that capital has already been redeployed into euro SSAs and euro sovereigns.
And we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Jordan Bartlam from Mediobanca.
I was interested on the deposit line. So we saw a small Q-on-Q decline there. I know there's a bit of negative seasonality typically. I just wonder, was that a little bit more adverse than you expect? And what was driving that decline? Are you perhaps seeing a little bit more competition from the new entrants in the market at this stage?
And then maybe just a very brief one on fees as well. So that was down 5% year-on-year. You flagged some positive one-offs last year. I just wonder if you could remind us what those were? And maybe a bit more color on just how you're seeing the fee-generating businesses performance right now. Is that aligned to your expectations? Is it outperforming or is it underperforming? So those would be my 2 questions.
Very good. Yes. On the deposit side, I would say very much in line with our expectations. If you can remember, Q1 2025, we also saw, let's say, a flat quarter with respect to growth. So it's somewhat of a seasonal effect. We still maintain our overall guidance for the year of 2%, 3% growth on the liability line. As you mentioned, the competition seems to be coming a little bit more prevalent. But certainly, as of yet, we're not seeing any significant outflows. So no change to our estimations on that one.
On fees, it was more related -- it was a Visa rebate that we would have received in quarter 1 of 2025 that wasn't repeated. So just that year-on-year analysis looks a little bit lower. Overall, on the fees and comms line, I think we're very comfortable to maintain our overall guidance. Obviously, one of the main areas of growth for us is going to be in the wealth and insurance space. Certainly for the first quarter of the year, we're very happy with the growth trajectory there. And otherwise, everything else is very much in line with our guidance.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Sheel Shah from JPMorgan.
Great. I've got 2, please. Firstly, you've mentioned the pipeline a few times on this call. Could you explain what you're seeing in the pipeline? Is it broad-based? Are you seeing any of the fiscal infrastructure plan feeding into the economy yet? So I'd be interested to get some color on that.
And then secondly, maybe just a follow-on on the last question. I'd like to get your thoughts on the competitive environment. We've had a few more neobanks enter the segment. We've had BAWAG's recent offer for PTSB. So more of a longer-term question, but your thoughts around lending and deposit margins considering the pickup in competition.
Okay. Thanks so very much indeed, Sheel, for the questions. We do believe that the national development plan is going to have a material impact on activity in our business. But we're really not going to see that in a material way until '27, '28. Very, very pleased with the progress that has been made in terms of -- or that is currently being made in terms of the reduction of barriers to the swift implementation of the government's ambitious NDP. The pipeline that we're referring to this morning is the pipeline that we see across our various operating divisions. So it's the pipeline in mortgages, it's the pipeline in corporate, good strong performance in business banking. And of course, Climate & Infrastructure Capital having a very, very strong start of the year and with a very strong pipeline ahead of us. So we're not yet seeing the impact of that NDP, but that will be a positive carrying us into '27 and '28, we believe.
In relation to the competitive environment, obviously, it is evolving in front of our eyes. We continue to see very, very strong flow in terms of new account openings. You have heard me talk in the past about us having a share of new account openings in Ireland of 49% to 50%. That is -- we believe that, that remains very stable in terms of our share. That said, it is an evolving competitive environment. We're going to continue to monitor it very, very closely. But we have the strongest franchise in the country, and we know what we need to do. What we need to do is to ensure that we have an attractive range of products and services that are appropriately priced and presented to our customers in the way that they want. And we do that every single day through our digital channels, through our customer engagement centers and through 170 branches.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Mike Evison from Autonomous.
Yes. I mean I'll just pick up on 2 things. On the loan growth point, obviously, it looks like the loan growth didn't come through new mortgage growth, which is broadly sort of flat year-on-year despite probably stronger system level trends. So I wondered if you could say anything to what you're seeing in housing completions or the housing market and the possible for mortgage growth there or whether you see growth coming from other lines, so that's of green lending and corporate lending.
And then just if you have any thoughts on the sort of ever-changing topic of investment accounts and SIU in Ireland. So it seems like the government might be moving away from the [ ISK ] style accounts. I wondered if you had any comments on what you saw as the potential impact there, please?
Okay. On the mortgage market, I can tell you that the -- obviously, we made some rate adjustments at the back end of last year. And the first impact you're going to see that is in terms of application activity and then that flows through to approvals. And we've seen some drawdown impacts in the month of March. And in fact, our market share in the month of March was the strongest that we've seen for about 13 months. So we're building a nice head of steam there in the mortgage market.
On the completion side, we have about 36,000 units last year, that was just a bit ahead of expectations. As a house, we expect completions this year to be about 39,000. We would have financed just shy of 1/3 of the new build last year in terms of output of homes, and we'd expect something similar on the development side. And in fact, our development pipeline is the strongest that it's been in many, many -- our development lending pipeline is the strongest it's been in many, many years. And we -- that augurs very positively for activity on the building side and indeed on the mortgage side going into '27 and indeed beyond.
On the SIUs, we've been -- we believe we have a responsibility to support the medium- to long-term financial well-being of all our customers. We strongly welcome the initiative in terms of SIAs. There seems to be now more of a preference on the part of government for an ISA style model. And -- but whatever shape that model takes, whatever is the final proposal brought or the final product shape proposed by the government, we'll be ready to go with it. We have a team. We have working groups established already within the organization to ensure that when that product is launched, and we expect to be launched later on this year, that we'll be ready to put it on the shelves of all our stores and have it in the hands of our customers.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Fatima Ghaznavi from KBW.
Just a couple from me. So on the share of new lending, you mentioned this is flat versus the end of 2025. Is this sort of a normalized level? Can we expect a 30% share of new lending going forward? Because sort of in 2025, we were seeing more of a decrease in the market share. And so would you say that's flattened out now?
And then also, when I look at the quarterly NII, it leaves a bit of work to do in the second quarter to meet consensus for the second half. Can you talk a bit more about the moving parts on the margin and whether you're sort of expecting that to pick up in the second quarter and whether these new hedge volumes will help that?
Yes, I'll take the second one. Yes, on NII, you're absolutely right, we do expect to see a pickup in the second quarter. A little bit of that is going to be driven by the cumulative effect of the higher asset growth. But obviously, we do expect to see some liability growth as well. So those 2 factors alone will lead to some improvement. And then obviously, in the second half of the year, we are expecting to see some rate effects.
On the mortgage market share, we don't specifically target market share. For all of our products, we're very disciplined in our pricing approach. Our market share is, in some respects, an outcome for us, but we remain very focused on the direct-to-consumer market for our main brands, where we're able to capture more financial activity with our customers. But we do expect the mortgage market to increase year-on-year, driven by those increased housing completions that Colin referenced. And obviously, AIB will have a very large role to play in that market.
And certainly, Fatima, the trend that we're seeing coming through in terms of applications and approvals is very comforting at this point.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Seamus Murphy from Carraighill.
Just one relatively straightforward question. Just in terms of the FTE evolution in the quarter, I'm just wondering, I think I have -- I think you previously guided we have FTEs down 3% in the year, and they just a small amount in Q1. Can we still think in that context for '26 and '27, please?
Yes, we would expect our headcount to come down, Seamus. We would expect our headcount to come down by something in the order of 3% this year and the same number in next year, and that's very much in line with our experience in 2025 and the business plans for the year are fully in line with that reduction in total headcount of about 3%, and we expect that to continue into '27 as well and potentially beyond.
Now we're going to take our next question, and the question comes from the line of Borja Ramirez, Citi.
I have 2 questions, please. Firstly is on the capital, it's quite strong. I would like to ask if it's ahead of your prior expectations.
And then my second question would be on deposit growth going forward. According to the Central Bank of Ireland, given the uncertainty, there could be an increase in -- potentially in individual savings because of precautionary savings. So I would like to ask what are your views on this point?
Borja, yes, look, obviously, financial performance for quarter 1 was very strong as it was throughout [ 2026 ]. So we remain very capital generative. I would say the capital number ended up being exactly where we expected it to be. Maybe asset growth was slightly ahead of where we had imagined. But overall, no surprises for us on that one.
On the deposit growth side, what I would say to date is that we have not seen any cautionary activity, whether that be on the asset side for new lending, for new projects or similarly any unusual increases on the liability side that could be driven by the same factors. So as of now for Q1 and even towards the end of April, I would say very little impact to date from the volatility that has been created from the Middle East conflict. But obviously, things can change on a week-to-week basis, and we remain very vigilant.
Yes. And what I would just add in relation to that, Borja, is that we're starting with a very high savings ratio. The savings ratio in this country is at the upper end of the range for Europe. And secondly, what I would say is that was the most immediate impact of what's happening in the Middle East is its impact on the amount of income available for saving because it's having a dampening impact on disposable income net of fuel and energy costs. So we wouldn't expect there to be a significant bump in deposit flow as a consequence of the conflict in the Gulf.
I believe that's our last question this morning. So I thank you all for your questions, and thank you all for joining us this morning. We obviously have our AGM later on this morning, and we're very much looking forward to presenting a good set of results for the first half on this day, 3 months' time, 30th of July. At that point, I'd say good morning to you all, and have a good day.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now all disconnect. Have a nice day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
AIB Group — AIB Group plc, Q1 2026 Sales/ Trading Statement Call, Apr 30, 2026
AIB bestätigt die 2026-Guidance, zeigt solides Kreditwachstum (1,7% Q1) und hat durch Zins-Hedges die Zinsrisiken reduziert.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Kreditwachstum: +1,7% im Quartal, Management spricht von starkem Pipeline-Flow
- NII: Nettozinsergebnis: Guidance bestätigt, Q1 von kleineren Sondereffekten belastet
- Gebühren: -5% YoY, Folge eines einmaligen Visa-Rebates im Vorjahr
- Einlagen: leichte QoQ‑Senkung, Management sieht saisonalen Effekt und hält Jahresziel
- Kapital: Sehr solide, Ergebnis in Q1 entsprach Erwartung
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Guidance: 2026‑Prognose wurde bestätigt; Management ist zuversichtlich
- Zinsrisiko: Frühe 2026‑Ausführung eines strukturellen EUR‑10 Mrd. Hedges zur Duration‑Erhöhung
- Wachstumsschwerpunkte: Starke Pipeline in Mortgages, Firmenkunden und Climate & Infrastructure Capital; Fokus auf Wealth & Insurance
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Prognose: Guidance für 2026 bestätigt; keine Änderung der Zinsannahme (EZB Jahresende 2%)
- NII‑Ausblick: Management erwartet Anstieg in Q2 und weiteres Pickup in H2; Marktbewegungen bieten Upside
- Sensitivität: ~EUR 256 Mio Ergebniswirkung pro 100 Basispunkte Zinsänderung
- Risiken: Geopolitik (Nahost) inflations- und margentreibend; verstärkte Konkurrenz im Einlagen-/Kreditmarkt
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Energiestress: Bisher keine spürbaren Auswirkungen auf Kreditqualität oder Pipeline
- Hedge‑Clarification: EUR‑10 Mrd. ist nicht neu; Hedge zur Reduktion langfristiger Zinsrisiken, Sensitivitätsangabe gegeben
- Einlagen & Wettbewerb: Q1‑Rückgang als saisonal bewertet; keine signifikanten Abflüsse, Jahreswachstum 2–3% erwartet
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Stabiler Start ins Jahr: positives Kreditwachstum, kapitalgenerierend und bestätigte Guidance. Kurzfristig spannend bleibt die NII‑Entwicklung (Pickup in Q2/H2) und die Marktreaktion auf geopolitische Risiken; Aktionäre sehen ein konservativ gesteuertes, aber potenziell zinssensitives Gewinnprofil.
AIB Group — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to the presentation of AIB Group's results for 2025, a landmark year for our company. I'm going to spend some time outlining the macroeconomic backdrop and giving an overview of the progress on our '23 to '26 strategy before handing over to Donal, our CFO, who will bring us through the details of our financial performance. 2025 was another year of successful delivery by AIB Group against our strategic objectives, priorities and targets. We're pleased to be delivering a profit after tax of over EUR 2.1 billion, representing a RoTE of 25%.
In a looser monetary policy environment, our NII remained resilient, coming in ahead of expectations at EUR 3.75 billion. The strength of our financial performance and the scale of organic capital generation allowed us to grow our business, to invest in our business and to propose total distributions of EUR 2.25 billion, payout ratio of 105%, while still delivering an exceptionally strong capital outturn with CET1 ending the year at 16.2%. And 2025 was the year that AIB returned to full private ownership, having returned a cumulative circa EUR 21 billion to the Irish state.
So it was a landmark year, a year of progress and closure, a year that positions us to build an ever better, ever stronger, trusted AIB in the interest of all our stakeholders and the economies and the communities that we serve. We remain resolutely committed to the sustainability agenda, an agenda that sits at the core of our strategy and at the very heart of our purpose. We're making good progress towards meeting our long-established 2030 targets with almost EUR 23 billion of green and transition lending deployed since 2019. And last year's new green lending reached an all-time high for us of 43% of all new lending, well on track to hit the 70% target we've set for ourselves.
We're also continuing to decarbonize our own business with 92% of our electricity needs sourced from our virtual power purchase agreement from the output of 2 solar farms. The scale of the environmental and social lending opportunity and our excellent credentials in this space create the platform for continued success in ESG bond issuance, and I'm very proud of the fact that AIB is now one of the world's leading issuers of ESG paper globally.
Our confidence in the outlook for AIB in 2026 and beyond is underpinned by continuing solid and consistent performance by the Irish economy. Growth in modified domestic demand surprised somewhat on the upside in 2025, and is expected to hover around 2.5% to 3% over the next few years, a rate of expansion that is reasonable in an Irish context and stellar compared to our neighboring economies across the Irish sea and indeed further afield. Our population continues to grow, and it's likely to exceed 6 million in the next decade. And our labor force exceeded 2.8 million people at the end of last year, representing an increase of an incredible 59% since 2000. And now that demographic bounty is a key driver of Ireland's economic success, and it creates a very positive operating backdrop for AIB, Ireland's leading financial institution.
And while we've seen remarkable growth in the numbers of work in the country's GDP, the balance sheets of the country, businesses, households, individuals are all very conservatively positioned. Net government debt fell to 40% of gross national income last year and the downward trajectory is expected to remain a feature of the budgetary landscape over the coming years. Now the government is in a very strong position to deliver on its ambitious national development plan, which will see EUR 275 billion deployed in building a world-class public and social infrastructure here over the next decade.
And meanwhile, households continue to delever with debt to disposable income running at about 40% of the post-GFC peak with the savings ratio running at 15%, an indicator of which is very well reflected in our own liabilities performance. Ireland remains a preferred destination for foreign direct investment. Now we will, of course, continue monitoring the international trade climate, but it's only fair to say that the performance in 2025 surprised on the upside, both in terms of investment and also in terms of export volumes.
I made mention already of the government's NDP, a plan which will see a much needed ramping up of infrastructure -- of investment in critical infrastructure. And if this country is to consolidate and sustain its economic progress, we need to close existing gaps in housing, water, energy and transport infrastructure, and we need to do it at pace. We look forward to continued progress on the delivery of new housing with 2025 seeing over 36,000 new homes being completed. And that was the best output performance since the GFC, but it's still well a drift of the level of housing completions needed to satisfy demand.
And we expect to see housing output continuing to grow year in, year out with the level of completions forecasted 45,000 in 2028, representing an increase of some 25% on the 2025 performance. But given the scale of unsatisfied demand that's out there, housing supply is going to have to reach levels well ahead of in-year structural demand if the market is to return to equilibrium. So challenges remain, but we are seeing good progress, and we are optimistic about the supply outlook and the opportunities that creates for our lending businesses, both in mortgages and development finance.
Now looking back to the lending performance last year, new lending was 2% higher than in 2024. We saw a 4% decline in new mortgage lending in a growing market with our mortgage market share falling to 30%. Now I've remarked on many occasions that we do not target mortgage market share per se. Instead, we are focused on writing the right business at the right price. That said, it is important to note that not all mortgage market shares are the same. And we have a strong preference for having direct relationships with our customers as they embark on the biggest financial decisions of their lives. In the direct-to-consumer market, we remain by some distance, the leading player with a market share of 46% and the pipeline for the early months of 2026 looks very good.
Personal lending was 4% ahead and now 88% of personal loans are applied for digitally across the group. Total property lending saw an increase of 25% of the subdued base of recent years. Corporate lending had a good performance with new lending up 8%, but this was offset by a quieter year for Climate & Infrastructure Capital in a noisy external environment. A number of deals which we expected to close in December tipped into January, and that business is off to a very good start this year. Now given the macro backdrop and the strong and visible pipeline ahead for the operation divisions, we are confident in our ability to deliver a medium-term lending growth CAGR of 5% out to the end of 2027.
Our franchise remains exceptionally strong, and we are very pleased to be now serving more than 3.4 million customers with more new customers choosing AIB than any other financial institution in Ireland. And the trust that our customers, both long-standing and new place in us is underpinned by the resilience of our digital offering with level 1 service availability running at 99.99% in 2025 and by the strength of our physical presence with AIB having the largest branch network in Ireland. And that community engagement is key to our relationship with our customers, particularly for the very biggest moments in their financial lives who know that we are digitally trustworthy and we are there in person when it really matters.
I'm pleased with the response of our customers to our enhanced savings and investment offering through AIB Life and Goodbody with total AUM now comfortably exceeding EUR 18 billion with plenty of growth in the pipeline. On a stand-alone basis, AIB Life is now showing real traction with AUM reaching EUR 3 billion, which was a 20% increase in 2025. Now as Ireland ages and government policy evolves, we believe there is potential for significant additional growth in savings and investments in '26 and beyond. We remain the bank of choice for new account openings with the group enjoying a market share of 49% of the flow and 40% of the stock of current accounts in 2025.
Our Corporate and Business Banking franchise remains exceptionally strong, and we're going to continue to invest in secure and speedy digital enablement over the years ahead as we meet the evolving needs of these critical parts of Ireland's economic success. And of course, we remain the country's leading green bank, standing we will maintain as we grow the share of green lending and broaden and enhance the range of green products and services across the group.
Looking now at the first of our strategic priorities, the focus on customers, their expectations and their needs is key to the long-term success of AIB. Through a data-driven approach to customer segmentation, we understand those expectations and needs like never before. And that unrelenting focus on our customers is paying dividends in the form of Net Promoter Scores with all-time highs in 5 of the 6 key customer journeys being recorded in 2025.
Meanwhile, service levels in our customer engagement centers remain very strong, and we continue to invest in delivering an easier, more engaging and protective relationship with our customers. And we will use AI extensively to help us deliver that high-quality relationship of real trust. ABBYY, our AI digital assistant, whom we launched in December of 2024, is engaging now with an ever greater number of customers. Covering 66 customer journeys, ABBYY has assisted over 1.3 million customers since her rollout, and the feedback has been very positive, with particular reference being made to the speed and the ease of dealing with our digital assistant. 80% of our customers who call our engagement centers choose to continue dealing with ABBYY.
We are continuing to make steady progress on our second strategic priority, greening our business. We're playing an active role in financing the transition to a more sustainable future. We've now deployed almost EUR 23 billion of the EUR 30 billion Climate Action Fund. And we lent an additional EUR 6.3 billion in new green and transition lending in '25, with the greatest contribution coming from retail banking, predominantly in the form of green mortgages, which now account for 62% of all new Republic of Ireland mortgage lending.
Across corporate and business banking, we are the leading player in financing sustainable lending to the engines of economic development, while Climate and Infrastructure Capital is continuing to play an important role in funding solar, wind, bioenergy, waste-to-energy assets in Ireland, Britain, the European Union and in North America. The loan book in this division has now expanded to more than EUR 6 billion, and we expect to see further significant growth in '26 and beyond.
And notwithstanding our ambition to be a champion of the transition to a greener future, the scale of the opportunity is simply enormous and continues to grow, allowing us to be highly selective in choosing the technologies and the geographies where we are willing to put the group's capital to work. Our third strategic priority speaks to ever greater operational efficiency and resilience, and I am very pleased to report accelerating progress right the way across the organization. We've invested significantly in resilience because it is fundamental to customer trust, and trust is the prerequisite for any credible digital ambition.
We're continuing to strengthen, simplify and streamline AIB with a 40% decline in the number of legal entities within the group and ongoing decommissioning of legacy applications and increased digital automation of customer contact. We've invested wisely in AI with Copilot now deployed across the organization and the first wave of internal agentic assistance is now being deployed. We're making great progress in enhancing credit decisioning through nCino, which now handles 2/3 of all new SME lending. Our platforms remain resilient with world-class Level 1 service availability and 0 critical cyber incidents in 2025.
And the rollout of push notifications on our app is making a material difference to the quality of our everyday customer engagement. There is so much more to come with our next-generation app set to launch in the summer. And by design, it will be more agile and flexible than any other app previously deployed by us, and it will be capable of rapid and high-frequency enhancements. Allied with the imminent launch of Zippay across the Irish retail banks, our customers are going to enjoy and experience a significant improvement in the quality of their digital interaction with us over the coming months.
Now this foundation gives us the right to accelerate. Our new digital platforms can scale confidently because the underlying estate is stable, secure and well governed. The pace of technological change that we're seeing is unprecedented in the history of banking. Now our team has demonstrated clearly and consistently the efficiency, security, resilience and customer experience gains that they are capable of delivering. And given that track record of achievement and the speed of change that is now readily apparent, we believe that we can credibly build the future faster at AIB.
Our annual investment in the business has increased from an average of EUR 300 million recent years to EUR 350 million last year and will rise to EUR 400 million this year and beyond. And the bulk of that increase is devoted to strategic projects, which will allow us to continue enhancing our customer experience, our digital agility and the resilience and the durability of our systems. We will build the future faster here and in so doing, continue to earn the trust of our 3.4 million and growing customer base.
We are now well embarked on the final year of the strategic cycle. And while we're very focused on delivering on our targets for 2026 and continuing to generate attractive shareholder returns, our minds are inevitably turning to the next strategic cycle, which will bring us to 2030. And as we move through the months ahead, our plans and our targets will take more concrete form and we'll seek Board approval for what comes next in December before we share the full details with our investors and the analyst community.
Now it would be premature of me at this stage to outline the set of performance indicators and parameters, which will guide the next phase of AIB's development. However, they will, I believe, be fully reflective of my own 2030 ambitions for this organization. I want AIB to be the best bank in Europe and the most trusted brand in Ireland. Now these may be audacious aspirations, but they're grounded in what we have already achieved together. We have made huge progress in recent years in reshaping and transforming the group in the interest of all our stakeholders.
We have the leading customer franchise. We're generating shareholder value, including a RoTE of 25% and return on assets of 1.4%. Our organization is in great shape with 370 basis points of organic capital generation and EUR 2.25 billion return to our shareholders. And I'm very excited about what I know it can and will deliver over the months and years ahead.
Now 2025 was a landmark year. We delivered against the commitments we set for ourselves. We performed ahead of expectations, and we did so with positive momentum across the business. However, 2025 was a milestone. It wasn't a destination. We've come a huge way in recent years with a strong capital base, a very clear strategic ambition and a market-leading position. AIB is well positioned for the future, and I remain convinced that our best days still lie ahead as we work relentlessly to build a better, stronger, more resilient AIB in the interests of all those who put their trust in us. Donal?
Thank you very much, Colin, and good morning, everyone. I'm very happy and pleased to be able to deliver the financial highlights for AIB for 2025. We've delivered a profit after tax of EUR 2.1 billion with a return on tangible equity of 25% and earnings per share of EUR 0.933. Our total income was EUR 4.5 billion, which was down 8% on the year. That's broken down between a net interest income reduction of 9% and net fee and commission income increase of 4%.
Our costs were slightly lower than expected at EUR 1.99 billion, which is up 1% on the year, and that gave us a cost/income ratio of 44%, and our FTEs were 3% lower year-to-year. Our gross loans increased 2% or 3% on an underlying basis to EUR 72.3 billion, and that included EUR 14.7 billion of new lending, which was up 2% year-on-year. Our asset quality remains resilient and our ECL coverage remains at 1.6%. We had an ECL charge of EUR 172 million, which represents a 24 basis points cost of risk. And our NPEs finished the year at 2.2% of gross loans, which is the lowest for a number of years in AIB.
Our funding position remains exceptionally strong. We have customer deposits of EUR 117.2 billion, and that represents a 7% increase on the year, which is well ahead of our own expectations. Within wholesale markets, we issued AT1, Tier 2, Euro senior and Dollar Senior, leaving us with a very strong funding position. Our capital at the end of the year, our CET1 was 16.2%, well ahead of regulatory requirements, but that incorporates very strong organic capital generation of 370 basis points and very strong performance on RWA optimization initiatives.
Our total distributions for the year are EUR 2.25 billion, representing a 105% ratio. EUR 263 million was already paid in November as an interim. We have a EUR 988 million proposed final ordinary cash dividend. And we've announced and already begun to execute a EUR 1 billion on-market buyback. I'll say on the income statement, I don't want to really repeat myself too much. Obviously, income was down 8%, as I previously mentioned. But notwithstanding that fact, we can see earnings per share flat year-on-year. Total cash dividend per share of EUR 0.5858 is up 58%. So really strong performance there, we feel on the returns.
Our bank levies and regulatory fees were EUR 114 million in the year, and that includes EUR 94 million for the Irish banking levy. As we look into 2026, we don't expect any material exceptional items and our bank levies and regulatory fees, we currently estimate will be around EUR 140 million. Net interest income of EUR 3.748 billion, down 9%. I'll just try to walk through the moving parts here. There's a 42 basis points benefit from our structural hedge program. Obviously, related to this, a 45 basis points reduction in net interest margin from cash held with central banks. Customer loans and investment securities are down 22 and 19 basis points, again, just reflecting those lower interest rates.
And on the liability side, we had a strong benefit from wholesale funding costs of EUR 119 million, and we had an associated cost of EUR 88 million as customers termed out some of their deposits. Our Q4 exit NIM was 2.69%, and it ends the year overall at 2.73%. This is an important slide, I think, for us to show how we have managed our interest rate exposure through the last number of years. Obviously, interest rates going from minus 50% up to 4% and landing down at 2% has meant that we have been -- have had to proactively manage our balance sheet.
As we give our guidance for 2026, the assumptions that we make is that we'll have an ECB deposit rate of 2% and that deposit beta will remain at 20% as it was throughout 2025. We're very comfortable with our NII resilience, which we believe we have shown over the last number of years. And what gives me the great confidence going into '26 and beyond is that we have a growing and granular deposit base, which we have seen grow significantly over the last number of years. We see growth in all of our core markets of around 5% per annum, and we very proactively manage our balance sheet. We do this through our structural hedge program.
I think last year, in the midyear, I would have referenced a EUR 15 billion increase in our structural hedge in 2025. Already this year, in the last number of days, we have executed an additional EUR 10 billion of structural hedge. The average yield on that was 2.3% and the average life was 5 years. So the impact that has is reducing our NII sensitivity to 100 basis point move or shock from EUR 378 million down to EUR 286 million. Some of the other moving parts with the structural hedge are that we expect to have EUR 6 billion of swaps maturing in '26, EUR 6 billion of swaps maturing in '27.
Throughout '24, '25 and even earlier this year, I've talked about wanting to extend the duration, which is now expected to be 5% -- 5 years by the end of 2026. So we expect at the end of '26 to have a received fixed yield of 2.3% on euros and 2.7% on sterling. In addition, as we've talked about before, we have a large quantum of fixed rate mortgages of around EUR 21 billion. They have a yield of 3.1% and a weighted average life of 1.9 years, and that's relevant because we leave them unhedged, really to add a little bit of natural duration to our balance sheet.
So I've really tried to summarize the position for year-end. We'll have an average life of 5.1 years on our euro hedge, and that will remain in place over the next number of years. And our received fixed yield is around 2.3%, so at stroke in the money. So looking through that and looking at that, that's what really underpins and gives us the confidence for our NII guidance to be circa EUR 3.8 billion in 2026.
Other income was EUR 756 million, and our net fees and commissions were up 4% in the year. I think the main standouts really was in our cards business, which was up 11%, our wealth and insurance business, which was up 7%. And as we've talked about previously, this is a huge area of focus for the organization going forward. We have EUR 18.3 billion of AUM, as Colin would have mentioned, a number of years ago. Obviously, that would have been a much lower number or approximately 0. But obviously, post the acquisition of Goodbody, post the start-up of our joint venture with AIB Life, we feel we have a very strong foundation.
So the Goodbody AUM is EUR 15.3 billion, which grew by 7% in the year. The AIB Life AUM is EUR 3 billion, which grew 20% in the year. I think in the coming years, what you should expect to see in this area is AUM growth of 10% per annum and revenue growth of 15% per annum. But that is going to be a massive area of focus for the organization linked to the huge customer numbers that we have, obviously, linked to a lot of the activity we are embarking on with respect to digitalization and personalization.
Other income, some of the other line items can always be a little bit more volatile. I try to just update and guide as the year progresses. But overall, for 2026, other income greater than EUR 750 million. Our cost performance was strong in 2025, outturn of EUR 1.99 billion, which is up 1%. A few different moving parts here. Staff costs were down 1%, mainly due to reduction in headcount. G&A expenses up 6%. We're seeing some inflationary impacts there, higher business volume impacts there and also higher OpEx-related investment spend. So not all of our technology spends get capitalized, some also goes through our OpEx, and you will see it here.
And our depreciation number is down 3% on the year, as we really tightly manage the execution of our big programs. So overall, that gives us a cost/income ratio of 44%. Like I said, our FTE reduction was down 3%, ending the year with 10,207 employees. And this is a trajectory we expect to maintain in the coming years. We believe that we'll be able to do it on an organic basis, obviously, as we go through the next number of years.
Colin mentioned that we were going to increase our investment spend from EUR 300 million to EUR 350 million, up to EUR 400 million now in 2026. And we're going to really look to accelerate our digitization, which will enable faster innovation, scalability, enhanced security and obviously, operational efficiency. As a result of this, you can expect to see our depreciation grow by 3% or 4% per annum, but that is obviously going to be partially offset by ongoing cost-saving initiatives and efficiencies that come from the rollout of these large programs.
But for 2026, we expect our cost to increase by 2%. With respect to asset quality, we had an ECL charge of EUR 172 million for the year, which represents a 24 basis points cost of risk. I'll just really simply break it down into 3 different areas. We had a write-back of EUR 52 million from macros, and that's really reflecting the fact that the way we saw the different range of outcomes post Liberation Day, the outturn, particularly in Ireland, ended up being significantly better.
We had a EUR 210 million net charge relating to underlying credit performances, which is really just the normal movement of credit between stages. And lastly, with our PMA, we had a small charge of EUR 14 million in the year, leading us overall to that charge of EUR 172 million. So we have an ECL stock of EUR 1.1 billion and an ECL cover rate of 1.6%. We have PMA of EUR 254 million represents around 26% of our ECL stock. So notwithstanding all of the volatility that remains in the world at the moment, we feel we are very, very conservatively provided.
So for 2026, we expect a cost of risk within the range of 20 to 30 basis points, and I look to narrow that as the year progresses. Main movements on the balance sheet side. Obviously, loans increased 2%, liabilities increased 7%. That obviously gives us an excess liquidity position. So what you're seeing here is an increase in the amount of investments we make in the treasury world. We bought an additional EUR 2.4 billion worth of bonds in the sovereign and supranational space in the Eurozone. And for 2026, I think you can expect to see that grow by another EUR 4 billion or EUR 5 billion.
Loans to banks was EUR 48 billion, which included EUR 36 billion at the CBI and GBP 3.8 billion with the Bank of England. Overall, our loans increased by 3% on an underlying basis or 2% on a reported basis. Big FX impacts in the year, slight impact from some disposals in the year. But overall, I think we are more confident now than ever that we will be able to reach and achieve our 5% asset growth targets for '26 and '27.
What we saw in 2025, I would say, was our wholesale businesses performed very strongly. Property market, still a little bit muted, recovering from the interest rate changes and valuation shock. Our personal consumer business performed very, very strong. And on our mortgage business, we saw growth overall in the year. As I look to 2026, I think what you can expect to see is growth in all of these areas, just slightly more. So our funding and capital position remains very strong. LDR of 61%, LCR of 204% and a net stable funding ratio of 163%. Our MREL ratio was 35.2% in excess of our requirements. So very, very strong foundation there.
But I think the big story on the liability side or the balance sheet side for 2025 was really deposits and the deposit growth. So notwithstanding the fact that we had a movement of around EUR 2.4 billion of our customers moving to term, we actually had an increase overall in our current account and demand deposits. So 7% growth was an exceptionally strong outturn, though we do expect that to temper somewhat in 2026, more in line with modified domestic demand. There's no other reason there, no competitive environments that we're necessarily concerned about. It's just we feel that 2025 was maybe an unusually large growth area, but that remains to be seen, and we will obviously be able to watch that quarter-by-quarter.
Capital generation for 2025 in AIB was exceptionally strong. We started the year at 15.1%. And then early in Q1, we had a Basel IV impact of 120 basis points. We had organic capital generation of 370 basis points from our business activity. We have a reduction of 390 basis points for distributions, as we've talked about. We engaged with the government and we canceled the warrants that they were granted in 2017 around the time of the IPO, and that had a cost of 70 basis points.
Given our strong business performance, we had really strong DTA utilization benefit of 40 basis points. with some other equity movements of 20 basis points cost, which is really just AT1 coupons. And then in other RWA movements, we have a number of RWA optimization items where we had a strong outperformance. That includes execution of a mortgage SRT in quarter 4, the sale of our 49% shareholding in AIB Merchant Services and also the implementation of a new IRB model for our Climate and Infrastructure Capital business, which also had a positive benefit.
That doesn't even incorporate the EUR 1.2 billion directed buyback that we did with the government in the first half of the year where we bought back EUR 1.2 billion of stock at a price of EUR 6.25 because that was obviously deducted from the prior year's returns. So the outturn of 16.2% is very strong, over 6% of capital generated in the year, which is really, really strong, and we're very happy with that, obviously, comfortably above all of our buffers.
With respect to how we think about capital, same as prior years, come in on the 1st of January and drive a stronger business performance as is possible. So obviously, 370 basis points was the outturn for 2025, but I think you should be thinking even for the medium term, greater than 320 basis points on a sustainable basis and our deferred DTA benefit of circa 35 basis points steady state going forward. We're going to invest in our business in 2 ways. Number one, increase our investment spend and change in technology up to EUR 400 million. And we're obviously going to utilize more of our capital as we grow our balance sheet on a 5% annualized basis.
We will continue to optimize our balance sheet wherever we can in whichever format we can. So we will do this through SRTs, where we've already issued 2 transactions, 2 different asset types. Obviously, the corporate transaction was done in '24. The mortgage -- AIB mortgage transaction was done in '25. And in 2026, we will look to execute an SRT transaction within our project finance or Climate and infrastructure capital portfolio. IRB model adoption and development is an ongoing theme. We do expect to have 80% of our balance sheet on IRB models by 2028. I've mentioned the benefit from the project finance model. 2026, we have 2 different portfolios, which we're hoping to review and conclude that being EBS mortgages and commercial real estate, but it's a little bit too early to know what the outturns there are going to be.
And lastly, we look to deliver market-leading distributions. We've paid out over 100% in 2024 and 2025. We've paid out EUR 6.5 billion in distributions since 2023. For our ordinary dividend policy, we look to pay a sustainable dividend within a 40% to 60% payout range. Our ordinary dividend will be paid in cash. Our interim dividend will be paid up at 1/3 of the prior year's ordinary distribution -- ordinary dividend per share. With respect to additional distributions, we have capacity for above policy payouts, subject to annual review and necessary approvals. We have optionality to utilize share buybacks, special dividends or a combination of both as we look to move towards our medium-term target of greater than 14%.
So wrapping it all up, our 2025 performance, we feel was strong, already achieved or outperformed our 2026 targets. 2026 guidance will be interest income circa EUR 3.8 billion, other income greater than EUR 750 million. Costs are expected to grow by 2%. We expect a cost of risk between 20 and 30 basis points. Loans will grow by 5%, and we expect deposits to grow by 2% or 3% and we will deliver a return on tangible equity greater than 20%. So for 2026 and beyond, we expect to deliver a strong performance in the final year of our strategy.
Moving into the next strategic cycle, we have a lot of positive momentum in our business. Sustainable business growth and returns, strong organic capital generation, increased investment in our business and market-leading shareholder distributions. Our medium-term targets continue to guide the business and will be refreshed for our next strategic cycle this time next year.
Thank you all very much.
Thank you very much indeed, Donal. And now we're going to take some time for questions, and we're going to the phone lines.
The first question comes from Denis McGoldrick in Goodbody.
2. Question Answer
Just 2, please, if I may. So firstly, you're guiding to circa EUR 3.8 billion NII for 2026. Can you talk us through the moving parts within that year-on-year, along with any color you could give on NII beyond this year, please? And then secondly, you delivered 7% deposit growth in 2025. But could you talk us through the mix within that between interest and noninterest-bearing and how you see that evolving this year?
Thanks, Denis. I'll take that one. Look, on the liability side, I think it's fair to say that the savings ratio in Ireland is a little bit higher than what people would have imagined. And I think the impact on the Irish banking system was pretty consistent. Notwithstanding that fact, we do think that the deposit market will normalize in 2026, which is why we think that the increase will be 2% to 3%. So it seems like a big drop, but I would argue that that's more due to 2025 outperformance, but we will be able to keep an eye on this on a quarterly basis.
I think we don't expect any particular change in mix. Our deposit beta in 2025 was around 20% 2026. We expect to see something similar. So I would just use the same mix as you go forward. And overall, with NII, really nothing new here. I think -- I mean, taking the year-end position of 2025, believing and putting that 5% growth over the coming years, I think, is how you will be able to get closer to the numbers I have.
Indeed, as I look at -- if I look at consensus for 2026, '27, '28, I've obviously given you '26 numbers, which are slightly better than consensus. '27 is in and around where we see things. I think 2028 consensus seems a little bit light on loans and obviously, on associated interest income. But for all of those years, '27, '28 will be greater than 20% return on tangible equity as well. I can certainly commit to that.
Thank you very much indeed, Donal. We're now going to Diarmaid Sheridan at Davy.
Two, if I may, please. Just firstly, on the capital and distributions. Could I just invite you to maybe talk to us about when you expect to get to your greater than 14% target, please? And I guess, Donal, you provided some of the outlining measures. But just given how strong capital generation is, I mean, unless you're significantly exceeding your distributions that you've exceeded -- that you've delivered in the last couple of years, it's kind of hard to see how it gets to that level without something maybe from an inorganic or maybe is there something we're missing?
The second question just on new lending, just in terms of what the key drivers to get from to bridge from that kind of 2% to 5% growth. I appreciate underlying 3% in '25. And specifically, just on the mortgage market, I get the point you make around the direct channel. Clearly, the broker channel has become a much more significant part. I just challenge you as to whether it's sensible to remain out of that channel? Or is that an area that you're comfortable not to play a significant role in.
Well, first of all, we don't remain out of the mortgage channel out of the intermediary channel. We have a presence there through Haven. And we've had a big prioritization of green mortgages in the past number of years. And in the final quarter of last year, we made some adjustments to our non-Green mortgage rates. We haven't really seen a huge increase in the size of the intermediary channel in the past number of years. But we do prioritize our direct relationship with our customers. That's what we want to maintain that direct relationship with our customers.
But certainly, on foot of the quality of our digital engagement, quality of our in-branch advisory service, the length and breadth of the country and given those price adjustments we made for non-green rates in the closing quarter of last year, what we're seeing coming through now in terms of pipeline is very, very encouraging about the volume of mortgage growth we're reporting in 2026.
Diarmaid, yes, I think with respect to the capital question, the -- moving towards our medium-term target of 14% being ambition for quite a period of time. That obviously as a baseline represents the amount of capital the organization thinks that it needs to run the business successfully, which is why we are focused on trying to get to that as soon as we possibly can. I would say 2025 was more around a significant outperformance on the capital front than any reluctance to return capital.
I mean, and I'd say every of the big initiatives that we worked on, we came out on the right side of that, which isn't always the case. But generating 6% of CET1 in any particular year is a particularly large amount. But look, that's what we worked hard to do. And on any opportunity where we get to look at our balance sheet or any of our activities and make things more efficient, we are going to do that. Even if it drags me or pulls me further higher away from 14%, we will do that, okay? So we executed a mortgage SRT in quarter 4, cost me money, generated 25 basis points of CET1, but it was an implied cost of equity of 3% or 4%, okay?
So we will continue to look to do the right things to optimize our capital. And on an annual basis, that's what puts us in a stronger position as possible to move towards that 14%, give our stakeholders, the regulator, the Board, the comfort and confidence for us to maintain payouts similar to the last number of years.
Thanks, Diarmaid. Now we're going to Sheel Shah at JPMorgan. Good morning.
Two questions from my side, please. Firstly, on the distributions. So the dividend payout ratio looks to be at the top end of your target range. Can I ask how you're thinking about the split of distributions going forward into '26 and beyond. Would you expect EPS to, for example, grow considering that we're already at the top of the payout ratio range and maybe attributable profits may be taking a bit of a step down next year?
And then secondly, can I ask about the investment spend and maybe sort of leaning towards the mobile app and your data insights. Could I ask how much sense do you have of the number of AIB customers that can be potential wealth customers. And how much leakage do you have in terms of AIB customers that maybe go to other providers for services? I'm wondering how much of this you can capture within the group going forward?
I'll take the second question and then Donal can do the distributions. Do you want to go first, Donal?
Yes. Look, with respect to the distributions, I mean, from the half year, obviously, we knew the position that we were going to be in, by and large, financially speaking. So I mean, the way we try to look at our distributions, we'll talk to investors, we'll engage with the regulator and then we'll have our own particular thoughts on what the right mix is. This is the first year for us, obviously, being out of state ownership. We announced a new dividend policy, obviously, last year as well, and we were very focused on ensuring that we delivered cleanly, clearly and consistently against that. .
So then the makeup with respect to the buyback and the cash dividend, it was -- I mean, a number of factors we had to take into account, one of them being market liquidity as well. We do a buyback that was particularly larger, it might even be difficult to execute within a particular year as well. So that's something that goes into our thoughts. We came out for the first time last year, and we said we'll pay a cash dividend within the range of 40% to 60%. And we decided to pay out at the top end of that range for 2025. Obviously, that's a strong indication of our desire to deliver strong returns to our shareholders.
But look, on a go-forward basis, the most important thing, having a conversation around distributions, it goes back to how we think about capital and how we manage ourselves. When we come in on the 1st of January, work hard, deliver on the plans, then you'll generate strong returns. Like without doing that, you're not even having a conversation. So that really is our focus, and then we look and analyze the best makeup of returns in the last quarter of the year.
Thanks very much indeed. In relation to the app, yes, we have 3.4 million customers, 85% of our customers are digitally active. The app is in the final stages of development. In fact, we have a pilot out there, which is getting very, very positive reaction at the moment, and we look forward to launching it in the summer months. And it's going to be a significant change to what we currently offer. It's going to be far, far more intuitive, far, far easier to navigate, far, far better functionality, and it will encompass all aspects of your relationship with AIB Group.
The simple truth is that we really didn't have savings and investment products in the wealth space until we acquired Goodbody and until we established AIB Life. And we've seen our AUM now grow to the point of 18.3%. There's significant further gains to be made there. I've absolutely no doubt about it over the next number of years, and the app is going to make a difference in that regard as well. But that isn't the sole reason that we're increasing our investment spend. What we're looking at is a progressive transformation of our architecture. We've built a data warehouse in the cloud, world-class. We are investing in a new credit life cycle management system. We are building a unified mortgage platform, all of which will allow us to respond to our customers' needs in a far, far more agile, rapid and secure way because ultimately, this is about trust.
We're going to turn now to Aman at Barclays. Good morning.
I wanted to just come back on capital, please. There's quite a few moving parts in terms of capital generation going forward. In particular, the SRTs and potential headwinds. So I think previously, you've kind of called out CRE, the kind of give back of the CRE component within Basel as a potential headwind. I don't know if you could kind of give us a kind of updated take on whether you still think that is the case. And if you could, in any way, quantify that, that would be really, really helpful.
And I just wanted to just ask a bit more about SRTs and around the quantum -- like is there a limit on the amount of SRTs aggregate or cumulative SRTs that you'd be looking to have out at any one point in time? I just want to get a sense of the kind of ongoing run rate of SRTs beyond the kind of existing stock when we're thinking about building out capital from here?
Yes. Look, with respect to commercial real estate, huge beneficiary from Basel IV effective rough numbers, the risk weightings went from around 100% down to 80%. I don't think that I'm going to have line of sight on that outturn until probably the end of 2026. And I don't actually expect an inspection until 2027. But I'm naturally just going to assume that we'll be given up some of that, but I can't quantify that at the moment.
With respect to SRTs, the way we think about those and the way I've talked about this from the start, I want to have a program set up on multiple asset classes executed over multiple years. The reason I want to do this, it's not necessarily for capital generation, okay? We have plenty of capital. And obviously, with every SRT, I'm moving away from 14%, but it's really, for me, an RWA optimization tool and a risk management tool. It helps us at entity level or a business level manage returns.
So corporate transaction done successfully in '24, AIB mortgages in '25. Similar sizes, like we look to target 20, 25 basis points of CET1 per transaction. We don't look to be very aggressive and do massive jumbo deals, okay, because it's -- that is not the exercise that we're trying to execute. 2026, we look at our Climate & Infrastructure business. It has a newly approved project finance model, a slotting approach. I'm going to imagine it will be -- there will be less inefficiencies. So the SRT may be less effective than others that we've done. It's just I want to have that asset class in an SRT program, which will help us risk manage it going forward.
Beyond that, I will look at commercial real estate. I need to understand all of the data that we're getting from our IRB analysis, and then that will help me figure out how we want to target that market. That's more than likely going to be 2027. And then EBS mortgages as well is another area and another portfolio that I want to look at. I need to wait for the EBS to complete and conclude its own IRB on-site inspection, again, so we can see what the underlying data is telling us.
I think they're the main asset classes that I want to get up and running. I want to have them up and running. They will endure. They will remain in perpetuity, certainly as long as they're allowed. I think the question sometimes comes up if different firms maybe max out, let's say, quantums, et cetera, then there's kind of questions from the regulator around associated counterparty risk. But we kind of want to do regular smaller transactions, very diverse investor base over the coming years. But each transaction look to save 20 to 25 basis points of CET1. Each transaction probably going to cost EUR 10 million, EUR 15 million. Cost of equity to date has been very, very attractive for us, but they are the kind of metrics you should be thinking about.
Thanks very much indeed. And now we're turning to Guy Stebbings at BNP. Good morning, Guy.
I think most of my questions are covered. But just one bigger pitch question for Colin. You talked about wanting to be the best bank in Europe in sort of longer term. Could be seen sort of quite an ambitious statement. I guess best bank means different things to different people. So just interested in terms of what sort of metrics you would be thinking about when benchmarking this as such.
Yes, it's an interesting question and one that was predicted to be landed on top of me today. Ultimately, this is -- we won't decide if we're the best bank in Europe. It will be our stakeholders that do. So whatever -- how do our customers regard us? How do our shareholders regard us. How do our employees regard us and of course, very importantly, how do our regulators look at us. And so it will be a compendium of their views that will determine if we will be a judge to be the best bank in Europe.
I know what the team here are capable of. I know the scale of the ambition that we have, and I am very confident that we are going to do our utmost to be ranked amongst all those stakeholder groups as the best bank in Europe. And we'll obviously be updating you in 12 months' time when we have the actual parameters and metrics around how we are going to evaluate that. But it will be in the eyes of the various important stakeholder groups that we deal with every single day.
Now turning to Rob Noble, Deutsche Bank.
Two for me, please. So the Climate Capital segment is the one that's growing fastest and presumably will grow fastest going forward as well. There's quite a pickup in Stage 3 loans and the cost of risk has stepped up. So what's going on in this division? And what sort of returns do you see that part of the business generating compared to the group as it scales up. And then just a follow-up on all the capital questions. At the bottom line, what sort of RWA growth you're expecting in 2026 pre the unknown IRB changes? And then do those IRB changes, do they affect your Pillar 2 requirement at all? And could that potentially lead you to lower the 14% core Tier 1 target?
Rob, thanks for the questions. I'll take that. With respect to Pillar 2, let's wait and see. Overall, we have very detailed programs in place, working with the regulator where we're trying to close out various items on the to-do list. We've been very, very, I would say, efficient in closing those down and over the last number of years have seen a slow, steady improvement in our add-ons, but we are very ambitious in this area as obviously, our add-ons are one of the key ingredients to our medium-term targets.
With respect to climate capital, a few different things there. So I mentioned that we have a new slotting model, which is approved, which is really what is used for the bulk of the activities in that area. We've begun to roll that out in quarter 3 and quarter 4. But looking through it all, if it had a -- if that business had a risk weighting density of around 90% pre that model, post the model, it's around 75%, okay? So that's one of the key inputs that you need for your returns analysis.
The margins on the business are pretty consistent in different jurisdictions. And I would probably think about that being like a 2.2% margin business or certainly, that's what we model for when we're looking at the business and its growth and its trajectory. Costs are very low, obviously, given it's a very small professional wholesale team. And then it comes down to the cost of risk. For 2025, that division stand-alone had a very high cost of risk of around 110 basis points.
Within that, there was around EUR 0.5 billion, EUR 500 million worth of fiber type transactions, all originated around 2019, 2020. And that's to do with the rollout of fiber throughout Europe, okay? Ireland, U.K., France, Germany, Italy, et cetera. So all of those deals are now -- or a lot of them, some are performing exceptionally well, such as in Ireland. U.K., not so much, delays from COVID, et cetera, et cetera, they are coming through now. So we took a few PMAs, quite an amount of PMAs, really just to ensure that in all eventualities, we were really well provided for.
So you are seeing refis and equity recaps happening in that business at the moment. But if you took out that fiber portfolio, the cost of risk for that book was probably 5 or 6 basis points. Certainly for our planning assumptions, we use a cost of risk of less than 20 basis points. So if you put all that together, you can see the growth trajectory, and you can see that this is an accretive business for AIB and very heavily supported and strategically important for us.
Thank you. Now I go to RBC. Good morning, Pablo.
I wanted to ask on fee income first. So you're guiding to AUM CAGR of 10% to 2028 with related revenue growth above that at 15% per year. So could you just please provide a bit more detail on what will drive that revenue growth going forward besides the demographic trends that you have already mentioned and perhaps also what the required investment -- additional investments are in that part of the business going forward?
My second question was more on your deposit growth. I know that you've mentioned you expect that deceleration to -- from the 7% that you saw in 2025 to be more in line with the evolution of MDD. And I believe you also mentioned that you didn't necessarily expect a material headwind from changes in the competitive environment in Ireland. So I just wanted to check what you have been seeing in the last months in this year as well. And if you expect any material disruption given potential new entrants into the market, the ongoing transaction in Ireland, et cetera?
Yes. Look, on the wealth, the way we're set up, and I'll just try to explain the guidance we gave you a little bit there. We imagine 10% AUM growth. I'd like to imagine that, that is on the conservative side. We have 2 businesses, high net worth within Goodbodys and then more mass market through AIB Life. Goodbody is obviously -- I mean, if we're able to acquire any smaller roll-up businesses in that space, we're really aggressively looking to pursue that avenue. And that will be, I would say, in Ireland, we would say EUR 1 million up of net worth.
The AIB Life business has performed really, really well. It only started up a number of years ago. That is now fully functioning within the AIB construct. So it's a joint venture with Great-West Lifeco, where there's 140 advisers operating throughout the country and working through AIB branches with AIB colleagues. I think the statistics were maybe 40,000 face-to-face meetings or 35,000 face-to-face meetings last year with our customers. And we do expect this to just grow as we continue to roll out new products. And obviously, as the population matures and also educates a bit more on wealth products.
So that's what gives us the confidence in this area, massive area of focus for us, not just with respect to customer acquisition, but also connectivity with our mobile presence and mobile banking apps as well, making that as easy as we possibly can for customers. On deposits, it's -- look, it's where -- I'm trying to be as open and clear about this as possible. And I will admit over the last number of years, I have underestimated liability growth for the organization. We're certainly very comfortable with our position in the market, okay? 49%, 50% of all new accounts being opened, and that's a huge area of focus for us, 40% of the stock.
So we have no concerns necessarily over competitive threats in this area. It's just we felt that at some stage, a normal savings ratio deposit impact is going to come to pass. I was expecting a slightly different outturn in 2025. Obviously, I was wrong, and it was an outperformance. So let's see how it turns out in 2026. Is it conservative? I mean, who knows. But certainly, that's what our econometric models would show us. And indeed, if it's wrong, I'm sure we'll know it at the next quarterly Central Bank of Ireland report in any case.
Now we're past the top of the hour, and we're going to draw matters to a close there. Thank you so much indeed for your attendance and for your questions this morning. If you have any other questions or any points of clarification, please do reach out to Niamh, to Siobhain, to John and Bernie on the IR team, and we look forward to engaging with you and indeed our investors face-to-face as the roadshow commences later on today. Thank you so much indeed.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
AIB Group — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to the AIB Group Q3 2025 Trading Update Conference Call.
[Operator Instructions]
I would like to advise all participants that this call is being recorded. I will now pass you over to our speakers for today's session, CEO, Colin Hunt and CFO, Donal Galvin. Mr. Hunt, please go ahead.
Thank you so much, Nadia. Good morning, everybody. We are pleased to report another strong performance in the third quarter of this year, demonstrating the ongoing resilience of our business. On the back of this morning's release and pretty clear visibility now to the end of the year, we are nudging our NII guidance higher to greater than EUR 3.7 billion for the year as a whole, reporting 5% growth in new lending to the end of September with some particular strength being seen in personal lending and in our capital markets and U.K. businesses.
Our lending book remains very resilient, and we are now guiding our cost of risk for the full year at the lower end of the previously advised 20 basis points to 30 basis points range. The domestic economic backdrop remains supportive of our business, and we will enter 2026 with good momentum in terms of both activity and pipeline. I'm going to stop there for the moment, and I'm going to open to the floor for questions.
And now we're going to take the first question and it comes from the line of Diarmaid Sheridan from Davy.
2. Question Answer
Maybe firstly, on net interest income. Obviously, Colin, you referred to nudging off. I guess I wonder what the implications for 2026 are, if you look at the run rate in Q3. I guess we're going to assume there's going to be a little bit of growth given some of the other factors that you talked to in terms of balance sheet growth. So is a level of around EUR 3.8 billion, is that acceptable? Or is that something that you think is possibly achievable for 2026 net interest income?
And just secondly, I appreciated Q3, it will be decided upon at Q4. Just thoughts in terms of capital and distributions. Obviously, another very strong quarter in terms of capital generation. It's not in the number appreciated. But if we look out how much capital do you think you can return to get back to that 14% because you're trending very, very strongly at the moment. Each quarter is a little bit stronger than expected there. So is it still your expectation that you can get to 14% by full year 2027?
Hi Diarmaid, thank you very much. Look, on NII, I think as the year has progressed, we've got increasingly more confident on the outturn for the year, which is why we're very happy to upgrade our guidance greater than EUR 3.7 billion. Obviously, the moving parts there are interest rates, where I think we have well, certainly for 2026, a lot of confidence on where they're going to be. On the asset side, we do see growth of 3%, and we are expecting a strong fourth quarter from lending.
And then on the liability side, that has been really, really strong throughout the year. I think we started the year off with kind of a 2% growth target. It's more like more like 4% as we are now. November, December, normally quieter months for obvious reasons with respect to growth, but overall, a really, really strong outturn on deposits. I think that's going to have a natural follow-through into '26 and '27. We're not going to give guidance for '26 or '27. But I think if you take the '26 outturn, that is going to inevitably lead to a stronger performance for '26 and '27. And then you can adjust wherever you see ECB rate moves beyond that. But look, overall, very, very happy with the outturn for 2025.
On the distribution side, as you know, our goal is always on the first of January to come in and deliver a strong performance as we possibly can. We're very pleased with the performance year-to-date, really strong capital appreciation. We also managed to resolve and agree with the government, the retiring of the warrants, which is a very -- I think that's positive news for us and for investors as well. Just having a potentially dilutive instrument off the balance sheet. And in Q4, we also have in early December, we're going to look to close a mortgage SRT transaction. So a lot of positive things still to come towards the back end of the year. Look, as you rightly say, we engage in conversations with both our Board and our regulator towards the back end of the year, and normally we will update the market as year-end results with respect to our distribution thoughts.
You will see that we have throughout the year, not reported in your earnings really just to accrue those, and that's to give both the Board -- to give the Board maximum flexibility around its distribution deliberations. With respect to medium-term targets and reaching up 14 -- greater than 14% CET1 target, like all of our medium-term targets. These are very much key areas of focus for the organization, and we will drive towards exceeding and beating all of those targets.
Now we're going to take our next question and it comes from the line of Denis McGoldrick from Goodbody.
Just two please, if I may. One is just in relation to loan book growth. So that was up 1% year-to-date to the end of September. Maybe if you could talk us through the reasons why you're still comfortable that you can deliver the plus 3% this year and then the CAGR of 5% over the medium term? And then secondly, just on exceptional items in 2025. Obviously, that's been upgraded now to a credit of EUR 150 million. Maybe if you could again just talk us through the moving parts. Has the gain on Merchant Services landed a little bit higher than you expected?
On the loan book growth, Denis, on the loan book growth, like we've got 10 months activity now fully booked, and we have very clear line of sight to the end of the year. We're very comfortable with where the pipeline is and very comfortable with our expectation that we will deliver loan growth for the full year of the number that you alluded to earlier. So it's requiring less forecasting at this point of the year, as doubtless you're aware, but the pipeline is strong. And momentum into 2026 is going to be very good as well. So the business is in very big good shape, and we're very happy with where we're positioned across the various products.
Yes. And I mean I would add to that. I mean we had imagined we'd see growth of 5% in 2025 on a reported basis. We've adjusted that to 3% really to account for changes in foreign exchange of around 1%, and then we would have delevered some noncore assets, which had an effect of a 1% as well. But the underlying business areas, and the business growth and where we'd expect to see the growth is very much in line with our expectations, which is why we're very comfortable with the 3% for '25 and indeed, the 5% for '26 and '27.
On the exceptional side, a couple of things. The gain on sale from AIB Merchant Services is obviously the main driver there. But as we would have talked about previously, we've put behind us a lot of the old legacy type of items that may have found their way through that line in the past. And so there's just very little costs coming through related to any of those legacy type of items. I wouldn't be imagining that there will be gains going forward, but certainly, given those big restitutions and legacy items are closed. Going forward, we don't expect to see charges coming through that line.
The next question comes from the line of Benjamin Toms from RBC.
The first one just in relation to your NII guidance going into next year. One of your peers has talked about or implied guidance implies a material pickup in competition impacting margins into next year. How are you currently thinking about the potential for the increase in competitive pressure as we go into 2026? And then secondly, you've reiterated your cost guidance of less than EUR 2 billion for next year. Consensus isn't quite there yet. What are your confidence levels on this guidance? And what are the moving parts here?
Okay, good morning, Benjamin. On the competitive pressure, like we -- obviously, we've seen very significant structural change in the Irish banking market in the past 5 years with the departures of KBC and Ulster. We put ourselves into a position where we were the lead consolidator for the market, welcoming roughly half of all the customers who were migrating from the departing banks. But the competitive landscape just doesn't include just 3 financial institutions. We have competition every single day from credit unions, from neobanks, from fintechs, from the post office. So we are living in a competitive environment, I would argue already, and I don't see a material change in terms of the competitive landscape as we move into 2026.
It is important to note that we have a pretty consistent approach in this business about how we price products. We always maintain that we price them rationally, that we underwrite conservatively, and we're not driving our business forward on the back of significant temporary tightening of margins. We're very, very comfortable with where we stand, and we're very comfortable with the medium to long-term focus of our approach to pricing and underwriting.
Yes. Just coming in there on costs. Certainly, for 2025 between now and the end of the year, we're comfortable to hold that 3% number. Main driver really there is a slow gradual decrease in overall headcount, which you will have seen over the last number of quarters. That's obviously going to move into 2026 as well as we continue to automate and make our processes more efficient, we would expect to see headcount gains.
What I would say though is against that, you're obviously going to have inflationary impacts, which remain quite volatile, and then investment in technology that we make in our business as well. So all of those things put together is making up the overall cost base. But look, our medium-term target is EUR 2 billion. And like all of our medium-term targets, we will look to achieve or beat all of those.
Now we're going to take our next question, and it comes from the line of Chris Cant from Autonomous.
I just wanted to ask about capital, please. So Donal, you mentioned an SRT transaction in fourth quarter. I think consensus has in 58% and change RWAs for full year '25. So with the SRT, is that the right place for us to be set, please? Just conscious, you were actually a bit below that in the first half. And I know there's a bit of back-end loaded growth, but if you could give us a steer because I think some banks have talked about op risk RWA inflation coming through in the fourth quarter, too, that would be helpful.
And then just in terms of thinking about the capital ratio, if I take your 59% pro forma for the warrant, and I add in the year-to-date profits of 250 , you had a 46 bps interim dividend and then you've got another quarter of profit to come, it looks like you should be coming out somewhere around 18.7% in the fourth quarter and maybe a little bit higher if there's a meaningful impact from the SRT. If I think about where consensus is on an equivalent basis to kind of pre-distribution, it looks like consensus is about 18.5%, I think. But just, if you could comment on that because the capital, I understand why you've done the nonaccrual of profit, but it does make it quite difficult to track how the businesses capital position is trending relative to consensus, it looks to me like even with the warrant surprise, which is 70 bps rather than the 40 you guided earlier in the year, it looks like the business is probably 20 bps ahead of consensus at the year-end and maybe a touch higher given the SRT?
Yes. Thanks very much, Chris. Look, you walk through the CET1 numbers are absolutely bang on the money. So they're accurate. As you referenced, we have not reported any of our in-year profits. And really, the reason for that, we feel it is a conservative position, and it also gives us maximum flexibility in our deliberations and conversations with both the Board and the regulator at year-end when we review what our overall payout makeup is going to look like.
Look, I think as you rightly say, and as I look at consensus, it's probably fair to say that the benefit or the impact of the mortgage SRT is not fully incorporated. Now I do accept that at the half year, I didn't provide very much detail on that. But we will look to transact in early December on a mortgage SRT. There will be EUR 2 billion worth of loans. We'll look to save EUR 1 billion of RWAs and we expect the cost of equity of that to be less than 5%, and the CET1 benefits will be between 20 and 30 basis points. So I think that's perhaps where consensus could be slightly behind, so I'd encourage you to adjust for that.
But look, overall, as you rightly say, the business is very capital generative at the moment and notwithstanding the fact that we are generating a lot of core earnings from our business. We will continue to execute transactions like SRTs, where we think they make sense from an overall capital perspective, so that we can be as efficient with our overall capital stock as possible.
The next question comes from the line of Borja Ramirez from Citi.
I have one, in particular, linked to the Irish National Development Plan, which seems to be a sizeable investment into infrastructure and housing. I would like to ask what could be the potential opportunities for mortgage growth and maybe SME lending as well, please?
Good morning Mr. Borja. The most pressing issue facing the Irish economy in our society today is housing output. We've built something in the order of 33,000, 34,000 units in 2025 against the market backdrop, which probably needs something of the order of 60,000 units. And recognizing the primacy of the concerns around housing, the government has published a national development plan, which will commit total capital expenditure of about EUR 275 billion. So a very substantial amount of resource in the context of the size of the Irish economy, and that commitment is for a 10-year period. Very much focused on was enabling a significant increase in housing and indeed investment in transport and other critical social services as well.
Some of the resource will be deployed in modernizing our electricity grid and investing in water utilities and in so doing enabling an increase in the supply of service land, which should lead to an increase in total housing output. If you think about the housing market as it stands today, we finance the development of about 1/3 of the output. So if you are going to see investment which enables a significant increase in output, that is obviously going to have a positive impact in terms of the amount of capital we deploy to support residential development in this country, and we have an appetite so to do. It will obviously also have a positive impact in terms of the amount of mortgages being drawn in the economy as well.
So certainly, on the supply side, the MDP will have a pretty positive impact on the medium- and long-term performance of the business. And in the event that there needs to be support coming from the private sector for that capital deployment, we're very well equipped given our expertise in project finance in our Climate and Infrastructure Capital division to support the rollout of that much needed investment.
We take our next question Aman Rakkar.
Thanks very much for the chance to ask some questions. I had 2, please. One was just on your deposit guide for full year. I just wanted to check if you're expecting any meaningful seasonality in Q4 in deposits. I think at face value, your guide for full year deposits probably implies a flat outturn in Q-on-Q. So I kind of just wanted to interrogate whether that was a conservative comment or if there's any kind of noise in the balance sheet that you might want to point us to? Obviously, it's an important driver of net interest income at the moment. So that would be helpful.
And a follow-on capital. Look, clearly, you're set to end the year with really quite substantial levels of surplus capital despite the warrant charge, particularly post SRTs. I was kind of interested in what some of the constraints are that we should think about around your potential or prospective deliberations around distributions at year-end. It looks like based on consensus in your prior comments that payout ratio above 100% is clearly not an issue. So could you help us think about what the kind of parameters are that you'll be looking to operate within and to what extent it's kind of within AIB's control to determine how much it wants to distribute versus, say, a conversation with the regulator?
No problem. Listen, I would say on the liability side, we have -- we're really strong performance and outturn on growth throughout 2025 particularly in the Republic of Ireland, which is our core market. And that's across retail consumer segments and also SME and business segments. We're not prevalent, large in the wholesale corporate space. It's a little bit more competitive, but in that retail and SME space, very, very strong. So we've given guidance overall of 4%, which is an upgrade from 3%. We're always a little bit cautious really just coming into the end of the year, December, given one can naturally expect to see increased expenditure. Maybe a little bit conservative there. I would say, technically, it's probably more like 4.5% growth.
But historically, we have seen liabilities flat line throughout November and December. But overall, I would say, trajectory throughout the year really consistent. We do expect to see maybe just flat for November, December and then January '26, probably return to that more normalized type of runners. On the capital side, as you know, our dividend policy will state that there's a 40% to 60% cash dividend payout and then anything above that would be deemed as special or exceptional. So the 40% to 60% conversation is sort of within the gift of AIB and the Board, and that will be reviewed and agreed upon in December, where we'll also look at our overall capital, our overall capital position and the trajectory looking forward.
The outlook is very important. How do we see the macro environment? Do we see any significant troubles ahead? And obviously, in a world of increased uncertainties, there's always different scenarios you can imagine. But first and foremost, it's the responsibility of the Board to get comfortable and agree, and approve whatever applications are made to the regulator and their conversations that happened throughout November and December. And we feel like we've put ourselves in a very strong position, with a very strong performance and obviously, we've maintained a conservative stance with respect to our CET1 reporting by not reporting any of our in-year profits.
We're going to take our next question that comes from the line of Sheel Shah.
Can I ask about your level of confidence for the 2026 target of less than EUR 2 billion costs, please? Because that would imply maybe a sort of a flattish to maybe even down cost trajectory from '25 to '26 and considering inflation may be running a touch hotter than expected in Ireland IT expenditure, cyber and whatever else is probably going up, investments are probably increasing as well. So just to understand some of the moving parts to get to that EUR 2 billion number, especially because consensus maybe less optimistic on that number compared to where you stand?
Thanks,. What I would say on all of our targets, we obviously set them -- we set them about 2 years ago now. And we remain very committed to them. They are the key metrics by which we manage the business and on the cost target of less than EUR 2 billion for the year 2026, that is a vitally important management tool for us as we steer the bank through the months and quarters ahead towards the end of 2026. It is a real target. It is a firm target, and it is one that the executive team and the Board remain very, very committed to. It is worth, I suppose, I was pointing out that we are seeing through retirements and natural attrition. We are seeing an ongoing reduction in our total head count.
So if you look at the position at the end of September this year compared to the end of September last year, our total headcount is down by something in the order of about 20% and that's a trend that we would expect to see continuing as we move through 2026. We're not planning nor will we be doing any sort of special severance packages for the special voluntary severance programs, but we are seeing ongoing attrition. And of course, you always then have retirements in the normal course. And I would expect that the combination of that will see our head count edging lower as we move into '26 and towards the end of next year.
And now we're going to take our last question for today. And it comes of Robert Noble from Deutsche Bank.
Can I just -- the numbers on capital generation in Q3. It looks like you generated 100 basis points in profit. Does that include the exceptional gain from Merchant Services? Or is that just pure organic capital? If it is, I presume that if it's pure organic capital, I presume the cost of risk is near 0 this quarter. Is that the right way to think about it?
And just on like whether you put profits and capital or not, I'm not really sure what the difference is. I mean, we all know it's there. How does that actually legitimately change the conversation with the Board or the regulator? Because I mean it's exactly the same what payout ratio difference does it make in reality?
Yes. Look, I'll take the second question first. I think from the way I look at it is just, it's a very strong statement of intent from the very start of the year with respect to management's ambitions, with respect to how the view distributions and overall returns. And we wanted to be very clear and very strong on that from the very start of the year for that reason and no other. On the Q3 profits, the gain on sale for Merchant Services is included in there. So that's obviously a one-off item.
And then I think you touched on cost of risk there. Overall, as Colin said, it looks like it to be at the lower end of the range of 20 to 30 basis points, but we will look at our macros and our weightings in November or December as we normally do, and that's going to have an impact as well. Obviously, in the first half of the year, things looked a little bit more uncertain post Liberation Day. And we're really just trying to figure out how we see the macro environment in Ireland playing out in the coming years. But I would say it looks marginally better now than what it did 6 or 9 months ago.
Thank you, dear speakers, there are no further questions for today. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now all disconnect. Have a nice day.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
AIB Group — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning and welcome to the presentation of our interim results for 2025, our first set of results as a fully privatized company in over 15 years. As usual, I will spend a few moments reflecting on the highlights of the first half, give some time to the economic performance and outlook and update you on our progress on the group's 3 strategic priorities before I hand over to Donal, who will bring us through the financial details. And then as usual, we will open to the floor for questions. We are now halfway through our current strategic cycle. We're very pleased with the performance of the business and are confident in the outlook for this year and beyond.
In the first half of this year, we delivered a profit after tax of EUR 927 million, representing a return on tangible equity of 21.4%. We maintained an exceptionally strong capital position with a CET1 ratio of 16.4%, while the Irish state exited our share register at the end of the half with total proceeds of EUR 20.5 billion to date. The state stood behind AIB Group when that support is vital to our continued existence as a key part of the country's economic infrastructure, and we remain extremely grateful to the taxpayers of Ireland. Notwithstanding a significant easing of monetary policy, our net interest income remains resilient and in line with expectations at EUR 1.9 billion in the half. And on foot of the strong performance, we are pleased to be resuming the payment of interim dividends with a cash distribution of EUR 263 million. And this is the first interim dividend that AIB has paid in 17 years, reflecting the full post-crisis normalization of the group.
Sustainability sits at the very heart of our purpose, and we remain committed to our leadership standing in this critical area. The first half saw further significant progress with over EUR 19 billion now deployed in supporting the transition to a low-carbon future since 2019, including EUR 2.5 billion in new lending to the end of June, representing 36% of the total. We're firmly on track to meet our 2030 target of 70% of all new lending being green or transitional in nature. We continue to augment our range of sustainability products and services with real traction now in our consultancy services to business customers across both the AIB and Goodbody brands, while we were pleased to launch new low-cost green and transition loans for SMEs. We continue to be a leading issuer of ESG bonds with EUR 7.2 billion raised in total since 2020. And for our personal customers, we will continue to incentivize the purchase of energy-efficient homes through discounted mortgage rates.
Since 2024, we've made a cumulative total of EUR 4 billion available to 14,000 first-time buyers and we pledged to do even more. And finally, we continue to achieve broad gender balance across management levels throughout the organization. Turning to the economy. The world is grappling with a wide array of uncertainties driven by trade negotiations, tariffs and marked geopolitical tensions. That said, the Irish economy continues to perform well. While we expect growth to be more moderate than in recent years, as measured by modified domestic demand, which is the most relevant metric for our business. Our real rate of expansion of at least 2% is forecast over the next 3 years. And if anything, in the current year, the risk to that forecast is to the upside.
Our confidence in the outlook is underpinned by ongoing buoyancy in the labor market with employment continuing to grow strongly, now standing at an all-time high of 2.8 million people. Private sector balance sheets for both households and businesses are in health, with releverage at some 40% of its post GFC peak. While savings ratios remain very high at 14% something which is very clearly manifest in the liability side of our balance sheet. Ireland's demographic outlook is also very positive with population growth of 33% recorded in the last 20 years and a further increase of 8% expected in the next 5, which will bring the population in the Republic of Ireland to just shy of 6 million people. And that's a very strong backdrop for the economy and for our customer base, given our standing as the #1 choice by a country mile for new account openings. There has been a significant increase in trade tensions and uncertainty since the start of the year and that has the potential to weigh on economic activity.
However, the economy despite its market trade and investment openness has proven to be really resilient in 2025. Ireland, a leading destination for inward investment over many decades now remains a very attractive home for overseas headquartered companies. This is underscored with the news of the flow of IDA supported foreign direct investments grew by 37% in the first half of this year. Our standing as the only English-speaking common law member or the largest single market continues to be an important ballast to the country's economic performance. Matching the good health that we're seeing in household balance sheets, the fiscal position is strong. We welcomed the announcement last week that the National Development Plan will see capital expenditure of EUR 100 billion to 2030, with a further EUR 175 billion to 2035 with a focus on housing, energy, water, transport and research and development.
The plan lays out a significant increase in capital investment, which is designed to enhance our national infrastructure in housing, climate, energy and transport sectors. It will boost current activity, and it will enhance the competitiveness and the sustainability of our core markets. It also will create new lending opportunities for AIB over the years ahead, with the government targeting a critically needed doubling of housing to 60,000 units per annum by 2030. And there are a few countries that can offer such a promising in term economic outlook in an age of increased global uncertainties.. Returning to our own performance in the first half of 2025. We recorded new lending growth of 9%, bringing the total to EUR 6.9 billion opening 6 months of this year. Mortgage lending increased by 7%, giving the group a 32% market share. Personal lending was up by 4%, while property lending growing from a low base, reached EUR 1 billion, which was in line with the performance in the first half of '23. Corporate lending grew strongly by 13%, though this was offset by softer activity in Climate Capital, which is lumpy and uneven in nature as well as flat SME lending.
Green and transitional lending accounted for 36% of total new lending. Overall, we expect our loan book to grow by some 3% this year.and we continue to expect a CAGR of 5% to the end of 2027. AIB is Ireland's leading financial services group. The length of our franchise is underpinned by our geographic reach, the array of products and services, we present to our 3.35 million customers.and the quality and the resilience of our digital offering. Over half of those people opening personal current accounts in Ireland choose to bank with AIB, while we are also the leading bank for business with a 49% share of main current accounts. We are committed to an omnichannel approach, which is predominantly digital for everyday transactions and in person for the moments that matter. And that's a win formula and underpins the strength of our franchise and our extraordinary success in attracting new customers.
Turning to the first of our strategic priorities, customer first. We are now using our rich pools of data to better understand our various customer segments and their differing needs over the course of their financial life cycles. This is enabling us to build more targeted propositions, tailored communications and a better customer experience all around. We've segmented the franchise into 7 distinct cohorts. And today, we're putting a spotlight on the 25- to 34-year-old segment, comprising 18% of the retail banking customer base with diverse nationalities, strong growth momentum and whose needs are as outlined here, savings payments, credit flexibility and tailored financial advice. This approach is already reflected in a significant improvement in our Net Promoter Scores, which are hitting all-time highs for customer experience across the branch network, our call centers and our digital channels. And we continue to increase the number of customer journeys handled by Abbey, our AI Digistat, which now stands at 36% with an expectation that this will exceed 50% by year-end. We'll leave it open to our customers to speak with a person to assist them on these 36% journeys, and 85% of customers are choosing to engage with Abi, who is now handling over 3,000 calls every day.
Meanwhile, we are pleased with the reaction of our customers to our AIB life offering with a number of policyholders now standing at 50,000, an increase of 15% in the first half [indiscernible] further significant progress here as AIB Life becomes an ever more important part of our customer offering and our financial performance. We believe that the transition to a low carbon future presents AIB with an enormous opportunity and meet the capital, the expertise and the appetite to realize it. We have a target to deploy EUR 30 billion in funding by 2030 and we're now 64% of the way there. In the first half of the year, green drawdowns amounted to EUR 2.5 billion, 36% of all new lending with each of our business segments making a strong contribution, most obviously, Retail Ireland. We will continue to broaden our product and service range over the course ahead, and I was pleased to see AIB launch green loans for SMEs in the first half of the year. Climate Capital had a relatively soft 6 months in terms of new lending in a quiet market.but we are confident that the strong second half pipeline will see a robust performance for the year as a whole.
On the slide, we are highlighting 2 of the transactions we were involved in this year, which saw the Climate Capital team supporting Ireland's green transition as well as the development of critical social infrastructure. Operational efficiency is our third strategic priority with a key focus on simplification and digitalization. We've been investing some EUR 300 million on average per year over the past decade in the progressive modernization of our technology and we'll continue to do so. Highlights for the half of 2025 include the delivery of a new data center in the cloud, our third data center, the introduction of push notifications on our mobile app and DORA readiness delivered. We're also rolling out copilot to all our colleagues in an investment, which, as Microsoft has remarked, shows AIB leading innovation in Irish banking. We're excited about the potential of AI to assist us in delivering better services, better security and greater efficiency over the years ahead.
And that's building on the progress driven by our AI Center of Excellence, which we established in 2024. At the same time, we are continuing to invest in our security and our resilience, which we know central to customer trust. And I can report that we delivered Level 1 IT service availability of 99.99% in the first half. And our digital offering is delivering better outcomes to our customers with 66% of new business lending now on nCino platform, putting business customers in a position to draw within days of making a loan application. On the personal side of the house, 84% of our customers are now digitally active with 87% of personal loans applied for via the app. And interestingly, only 26% of mortgages are applied for digitally highlighting the reality that for the biggest financial decision to the moments that matter, the majority of our customers want to engage in person with our colleagues across the group.
Now that's just a taste of what's in the hopper and I look forward to updating you in future presentations as we relentlessly and resiliently drive efficiency gains through the business. So a lot to report on the 3 strategic priorities with lots more in the pipeline. Now for one last time, we will have a look at our progress and accommodating the state's exit from our share register. Through a combination of ABB's, BBBs and the state's trading plan, the government reduced its shareholding in AIB from 71% to 0 over the past 3.5 years. We welcome the return to full private ownership and we are very grateful to the support of Irish taxpayers to sustain this institution when that support was needed. As of today, we have now returned a total of EUR 20.5 billion to the state taking into account the proceeds of share sales, redeemed capital instruments, fee income, coupons, dividends and levies. We are in ongoing discussions with the Department of Finance regarding the potential purchase of the warrants issued at the time of the IPO in June 2017. And we estimate that a successful conclusion to those discussions would see a further circa EUR 0.3 billion being generated for the state.
Taking account of the EUR 100 million bank leverage to be paid in the second half of the year, total payments in the state are expected to reach EUR 20.9 billion by the end of this year. We've demonstrated clearly and consistently the ability of AIB to generate strong returns for our shareholders. Against a medium-term return on tangible equity target of 15%, we are upgrading our guidance now and expect the 2025 outturn to be above 20%. The first half result was 21.4%. We're confident in the ability of our business to deliver strong capital generation over the years ahead. We did 150 bps first half. And that will allow us to maintain a strong CET1 ratio above 14% to invest in our business and to make sustainable distributions to our shareholders. With our share register now normalized and the imperative of directed buybacks eliminated, we are very pleased to be resuming the payment of interim dividends with the 2025 interim cash distribution of EUR 263 million, representing 1/3 of the full year ordinary cash dividend in 2024. With the CET1 ratio of 16.4% in June, we're still well above our end 2026 CET1 target.
We have no desire to be a hoarder of excess capital over the medium term. and we will be considering further special distributions at Board level at year-end, of course, subject to regulatory approval with any announcements at the time of the full year results in early March next year. So AIB is in a position of great strength. We have built an exceptional customer franchise with heavy exposure to one of Europe's most dynamic economies. We've dealt comprehensively and conclusively with all the post-GFC legacy items. We are focused on delivering day in, day out in our plans, and we're creating sustainable real value for our shareholders. I've never been more optimistic about the medium and long-term outlook for AI. The group's legacy chapter is now firmly closed and we've entered a new era, focused relentlessly on the future, executing on our 3 strategic priorities and delivering on our purpose of empowering people to build a sustainable future.
Thank you very much, Colin and good morning, everyone. Thank you very much for joining us for our half 1 update. I'm going to run you through financial highlights for AIB. Profit after tax of EUR 927 million, which represents a return on tangible equity of 21.4% with total income of just over EUR 2.2 billion, which was down to 10%. And has made up of an interest income reduction of around 10%, and then our fees and commissions were up around 1%. With cost of EUR 979 million, which is up 3% as guided, that means a cost-to-income ratio of around 44%, a slight reduction in our FTEs. Our gross loans increased by to EUR 71.6 billion. And as Colin described, our new lending was very strong at EUR 6.9 billion, which was up 9% year-on-year. Asset quality remains very resilient, and our ECL coverage rate remains unchanged at 1.9%. We had an ECL charge for the first half of the year of EUR 85 million, which represents a 24 basis points cost of risk.
Our funding position remains very strong. Our customer accounts of EUR 112.5 billion, shows an increase of around EUR 2.6 billion, which is around 2%. We have a significant amount of MREL executed in the first half of the year, including AT1 and a number of senior nonpreferred transactions. Our CET1 ratio of 16.4% is very strong, comfortably ahead of all of our regulatory requirements and a large part of that increase is related to a Basel IV impact of around 120 basis points. We had very strong organic capital generation of 150 basis points, which we haven't included in the CET1 ratio. As Colin mentioned, we're delighted to be able to announce the resumption of our interim ordinary dividend of per share or EUR 263 million. On the income statement, I've already touched on some of the key highlights. We just need to draw your attention to some of the return metrics. Return on assets, 1.2%, we believe, is very strong. Earnings per share, EUR 0.39, really benefiting from all of the buybacks over the last number of years and the dividends per share are EUR 0.1232, as I just described. Number of items here that I typically don't have an opportunity to touch on later. I'll just run you through our bank levies and regulatory fees, we expect to be EUR 140 million for 2025, slightly less, I think, than consensus but we're very comfortable with that number.
And overall, an exceptional items for the first half of the year, we really haven't seen any material items, obviously, given a large number of the legacy issues have been concluded. But we do foresee a gain in the second half of the year, and this is going to be related to the sale of our 49% shareholding in AIB Merchant Services. So we'll have a P&L gain of over EUR 100 million and that equates to a CET1 benefit of around 35 basis points and there's a small RWA impact there as well. Flip side to this will be on a go-forward basis. We'll see less income from this investment, which has historically been around EUR 30 million and you'd have seen that on the associates line. For full year '25, EUR 140 million for levies and regulatory fees and EUR 100 million of an exceptional gain expected. Net interest income, just over EUR 1.8 billion for the first half, which is down 10% really driven by the change in the reduction in interest rates. I'll just walk you through the main moving parts here. Obviously, as rates go lower, the structural hedge is beginning to kick in and we see a benefit of EUR 283 million or 43 basis points. Cash loans to banks, which is really cash balance is excess cash held with the ECB of minus EUR 256 million or minus 43 basis points. EUR 109 million from investment security. Obviously, these are all asset swaps, securities, which accrue less in a lower rate environment and that has a 19 basis points effect.
And then overall, on customer loans, a reduction of around EUR 95 million, which is 20 basis points. Again, this is the ECB tracker related loans or wholesale loans, which are Euribor plus denominated. On the liabilities, obviously, there is an increase in the amount of interest paid on deposits against that given the lower rate environment, we have lower wholesale funding costs. So we have an exit NIM of 2.7% and overall 2.78% NIM for the first half. With respect to the outlook on net interest income, we believe that our interest income profile is now very resilient. We've come through a very volatile interest rate period over the last number of years. And I think we're getting a little bit more comfortable with where we see the yield curve. So our guidance of greater than EUR 3.6 billion is imagining a deposit rate of 1.75% by the end of the year.and a deposit beta, which at the first half of the year was 19% but we expect that to be around 20% for the full year.
Obviously, resilience has been a main theme over the last number of years. We feel we have a resilient balance sheet, which is growing at 5% per annum. We have a very granular deposit base, which I'll be able to break out in a little bit more detail. And with respect to proactive activity in the first half of the year, we would have increased our structural hedge by around EUR 15 billion and obviously taken advantage of the wider spread environment and steeper curves by buying an additional EUR 2.2 billion of Govi and SSA securities. Just to run through the hedge in a little bit more detail. I would have mentioned at the first quarter results that we executed an additional EUR 10 billion of hedge in January. We've also added to that in June by adding an additional EUR 5 billion. So total EUR 15 billion in the first half of the year and that's materially reduced our interest rate sensitivity from EUR 439 million down to EUR 306 million.
We expect to replace around EUR 7 billion of swaps in 2025 and approximately EUR 6 billion in 2026. By executing these transactions, the EUR 15 billion, we were looking to obviously reduce sensitivity, but at duration. So the average life of our euro hedge is now over 5.1 years. That's where we expect it to be by the end of 2025. With respect to receive fixed yields, we expect for euros, this to be around 2.3% and for sterling, 2.4%. And then a look at the duration overall on our balance sheet, we normally look at our fixed rate mortgage portfolio as well, which remains unhedged on our balance sheet. So the quantum there remains around EUR 20 billion and the average life of that is now around 2 years yield of 3%. So we feel that the outlook and the balance sheet position is very resilient, and we're very comfortable maintaining guidance of greater than EUR 3.6 billion for 2025.
Other income of EUR 358 million, stable and growing net fees and commission income, which is up 1% year-on-year. Some of the positives is that we're on card income, wealth and insurance and investment banking. And against that, we probably had a weaker first half and some of the other more volatile line items like equity investments. We bought back some debt securities, et cetera. I do think on those other income areas, we'll be able to outperform the second half of the year. And as I look at the fees and comms line, we expect a slight outperformance in the second half of the year. Some of the line items, I would say, such as FX may be impacted a little bit by some of the uncertainty, particularly in the SME segment. But putting all of that together, very comfortable to reiterate our other income guidance of EUR 750 million for 2025. I would draw your attention to the fact that we've restated the way we present these numbers. We have a large focus on wealth and insurance area. And we've really tried to break it out to make it really clear.
So you'll be able to follow this line item going forward. And also, we've disclosed what the AUM volumes are for 6 Goodbody's and AIB Life, which are the main drivers of that line. So we'll be able to talk to that in more detail in future outings. Costs of EUR 979 million, which is a 3% increase in line with guidance. Staff costs flat, really due to lower head count, offset by a little bit of inflation. Depreciation is down slightly year-on-year, and our G&A is up 12%, a little bit of inflation, but also some higher OpEx spend related to operational efficiency initiatives. That gives us a cost income ratio of 44%. And if you see our headcount here, slowly reducing, down 2% in the year, which is very much in line with what we would have talked about. We would expect to see that to continue to decrease on an organic basis. So costs for the year expected to be 3%, very much in line with what we talked about. In terms of asset quality and ECLs, we had a charge of EUR 85 million which represents a 24 basis points of risk. We've maintained our ECL cover rate of 1.9%. And if it was just to -- have a look here at the main 3 moving parts. We've obviously taken into account the wide range of outcomes in the geopolitical environment.
So we've had a charge of around EUR 23 million based off a change in. Underlying credit performance was around EUR 103 million. And then between PMAs and model changes, we had a small write-back of around EUR 41 million. Really taking a step back, notwithstanding the fact that the environment is quite uncertain, we haven't seen any sort of quality deterioration in any of our main markets. And we do believe that given the certainty in recent agreements between the EU and the U.S. that this should be quite stable for the rest of the year. But very happy to reaffirm our cost of risk guidance for the year of between 20 to 30 basis points.
Balance sheet wise, nothing really new to talk about here. I would have mentioned earlier that we would have increased the holdings of investment securities, really just to take advantage of widening spreads, particularly in core Europe and in SSAs. Given the fact that we have a significant amount of excess liquidity that seems to make a lot of sense. And we do think that we'll be able to add to that in the future, particularly in 2026, maybe another EUR 2 billion or EUR 3 billion to bring the total to around EUR 5 billion between '25 and '26. Overall, our equity position of EUR 14.3 billion reduced by EUR 1.1 billion and that's obviously due to the buyback and distribution paid in the first half of the year, partially offset by the H1 profit. Our loan book increased by 1% to EUR 71.6 billion. I'll just try and walk you through some of the main moving parts here. New lending very strong at EUR 6.9 billion, redemptions of EUR 5.5 billion, pretty much in line with our own expectations. Given the volatile external environment, some of our reporting currencies are a little bit weaker.
So there's an FX effect of around EUR 700 million and also an inclusion reduction from some NPE reductions. So notwithstanding the fact that we imagined a 5% asset growth for 2025 and in the first half of the year, a slight amount of uncertainty, we think that that's going to be more like 3%. But overall, as we look to the second half of the year and beyond, we're very happy and comfortable with our 5% CAGR out to 2027. Colin would have talked about the new lending in all of the main segments. And I'm really just looking at the total balance sheet effect here, really in the Republic of Ireland mortgage consumer space, strong growth, very comfortable there. Property, we've seen a slight increase there, albeit from a low base. And then within the wholesale construct, I would say, corporate strong, SME a little bit weaker. But overall, from a balance sheet perspective, that's flat. So for 2025 on a reported basis, we see growth of 3% in 2025, but growing strongly into '26 and '27 .
On the liability side, our position remains very strong. 81% of our funding is coming from deposits. 72% of these are in personal and SME balances less than EUR 1 million. 52% of our deposits are insured and 92% of our customer accounts are in the Republic of Ireland, really representing a very strong franchise in our main market. Our MREL ratio was 34.9%, well in excess of our 28.9% requirement, and we continue to transact around 3 MREL type transactions on an annual basis. LDR remains strong at 62%, LCR, very strong at 204% and our net stable funding ratio is very strong at 165%. Overall, on the liability side, we've seen growth of around 2% in the first half of the year. And that really -- that growth is coming, I would say, in personal and business areas. AIB is attracting 53% of new account openings, which has really given a strong performance on the liability side. So we expect overall liability growth to be at least 3% in 2025.
Our capital slide and our capital position of 16.4% is well ahead of regulatory requirements. And I think that this is a particularly strong and insightful slide. So we finished 2024 with a CET1 ratio of 15.1%. January, we would have had a benefit from Basel IV of 120 basis points. In the first half of the year, we've had a strong performance, generating 150 basis points. We've just announced an interim dividend of EUR 0.1232 which represents around 40 basis points or EUR 263 million, slight DTA benefit of 20 basis points, adjustment for AT1 coupons. That leaves us with a pro forma CET1 of around 17.5%. We then deduct during quantum of our earnings for the year of 1.1% to leave us with a reported CET1 of 16.4%. The exclusion of the remaining half on profits of 110 basis points really is pending a final decision on distributions at the year-end. We feel that, that provides -- gives us maximum flexibility on payouts and is very much in line with the regulatory expectations.
Just running through the headwinds and tailwinds out to 2026. Obviously, our goal is always to maximize our capital generation. sustainable profits greater than 270 basis points, DTA benefits of 30 basis points. So it looks like we're going to exceed that certainly for 2025. We're always going to invest in our business. That's a requirement on an ongoing basis. So we'll invest at least EUR 300 million on an annual basis, obviously require capital to support our balance sheet growth objectives of 5% growth per annum. With respect to headwinds and tailwinds, what I talked previously about the benefit of -- in CET1 of 35 basis points from our sale of AIB merchant services or a stake in AIB merchant services. We expect that transaction to close in Q3. We're in discussions with the Department of Finance to retire the IPO warrants with an cost of around 40 basis points. Again, we would hope to be able to conclude that in quarter 3. And we look to close the second of our SRTs in Q3 or Q4. I've talked previously about a multiyear, multi-asset program. So we're really targeting AIB mortgages in Q3 or Q4. We're going to look at EUR 2 billion worth of nominal to reduce EUR 1 billion worth of RWA. The CET1 benefit could be 20 or 30 basis points. The estimated cost of equity of that transaction is around 5%. But I'll be able to update you on that at a later stage.
On IRB models, adoptions and developments. I'd say as we stand here in '25, 50% of our risk-weighted assets are on IRB models. We want to move that up to 80% to 90% by 2030. And we think that that's going to increase fairly linearly by 10% per annum. There's a number of models, which are close to a conclusion, such as mortgages and project finance. We don't have any final conclusions on those, but I'm not expecting any negative outcomes. And with respect to distributions, obviously, as Colin would have mentioned, this is the first time we presented results when the governments are no longer a shareholder. And in prior years, engaging with the government on a directed basis was a very supportive thing for the government and very advantageous to AIB as well. So really, what we wanted to do today is outline a very clear distribution plan for all shareholders to understand. So an ordinary dividend perspective, we'll look to pay a sustainable dividend within a 40% to 60% payout policy range. The ordinary dividend is going to be paid in cash. We've obviously announced the resumption of our interim dividend today and we're going to set that at 1/3 of the prior year's ordinary dividend per share.
Coming the end -- towards the end of the year in quarter 4, we look at the overall performance of the business. We'll look at the outlook and the way that we're going to view additional distributions is that there will be capacity for above policy payouts subject to annual review and necessary approvals. And that we'll have the optionality to utilize share buybacks or special dividends or a combination of both as we move towards our medium-term target of 14%. Okay. Just to wrap all that up with respect to guidance. Net interest income greater than 3.6 million, other income circa EUR 750 million, a cost increase of 3, and cost of risk within 20 to 30 basis points range, levies and reg fees at EUR 140 million, an exceptional gain of EUR 100 million and assets and deposits to grow by around 3%. And overall, giving us a return on tangible equity of greater than 20% for 2025, moving us towards our 2026 medium-term targets.
So thank you very much, and I look forward to taking your questions.
I understand the first question we have this morning is coming from Denis McGoldrick in Goodbody.
2. Question Answer
Two please, if I may. One is just around your expectations on loan growth. And I guess maybe if you could give some additional color on what areas were slower than expected in H1. And more importantly, what gives you the confidence to retain the 5% CAGR for '25 to '27? And then just secondly, on bond activity. So I know the 12% increase in the first half of the year. Could you give some additional color as well then on what level of activity we can expect in H2 of this year? .
Thanks for that. I'll deal with the loan growth volume question, and I'll hand over to Donal for the second question. the business performed largely in line with our expectations in terms of volume growth. The exception was Climate Capital. The market was quieter than we've seen for some time. It's a business by definition where the lending is lumpy. It's uneven. And our confidence in the outlook is driven by the pipeline that we see before us. It's a very, very strong pipeline. And gives us confidence in our expectation to hit 3% loan growth -- circa 3% loan growth for the year as a whole and indeed in the outlook over the medium term. These are typically projects with a long lead time, extended delivery times but you can see them coming. And the pipeline, as I said, is very, very strong for the second half of the year after a first half, which was quieter than would have been expected, perhaps driven by some of the noise that we've had out there about Noble Energy in the first 6 months of the year. But looking out to the second 6 months and indeed beyond, we're very comfortable with the guidance given this morning.
Donal, here. So with respect to bond activity, we obviously recognized post liberation Day that curves are going to be a little bit steeper and spreads were a little bit wider. We don't think that, that's like for a moment in time. Most of the large Eurozone supernationals governments are going to be issuing more of that going forward to finance infrastructure and to type activity. So we don't think that there's any particular rush to take advantage of these wider spreads. But specifically to the question, we would have bought around EUR 2 billion in the first half of the year. And for the second half of the year, we just want to take a little bit of a break, look at the whole portfolio and make some adjustments if and where we see fit. And then looking at 2026, maybe look to add another EUR 3 billion. Like I said, I don't think these wider spreads are going to be going away anytime soon. And if anything could go a little bit wider.
We're turning now to Diarmaid Sheridan, Davy.
A couple, if I may. First of all, just on net interest income. Donal, your guide of greater than EUR 3.6 billion, I guess, consensus is maybe about 2% or so above that. Are you comfortable with that? Or do you think the greater than could be a little bit more than 2%. Secondly, just on distributions. And maybe, I guess, if we read between the lines of what you're saying to us is, you're going to look to buy and return kind of substantially all of the profit that you generate this year. Is that the correct way to think about this? And over what kind of time frame do you think you can get to the greater than 14% target? Because obviously, when you incorporate profitability, you're at significantly higher levels than that at the moment.
Yes. I think on the NII, the -- certainly very comfortable greater than 3.6%. I mean we had set that guidance, imagining ECB rates were going to be 2%. They're now a bit lower at 1.75%. I think the domain area that gives us the comfort to reiterate that is the growth on the liability side. We thought it might be 2%. It's already 2% at the half year. And in some respects, I think that the performance or outperformance will depend on where that's going to land. We've guided for 3% but we'll see how that one goes. I think on the distribution and the profits, we're in a new world now, okay? The government isn't on the share register. Directed buybacks are no longer going to be a feature. So what we really wanted to do today was set a really clear policy that was very easy to understand and effectively make AIB look like every other bank around the world is certainly in Europe. So we think it's appropriate to be very clear on what our interim dividend policy is going to be.
And then we're just being, I think, conservative by holding back on the interim profits or reporting of the interim profits. We feel that, that gives us maximum flexibility around payouts towards the end of the year. And then I think with respect to the 14% payout ratio, I mean this is obviously an evergreen item. I don't -- if we look at our CET1 ratio of 16.4%, we've got a medium-term target of 14%. I don't think that performance is relating to any form of trapped surplus capital that we're unable to access, particularly this year and slightly last year as well through RWA efficiencies, we probably have generated around 200 basis points, okay? And obviously, we're looking to move towards our medium-term target of 14%. But if we continue to be very successful on RWA initiatives, it might take us a little bit longer to reach that 14% CET1 ratio, but I don't think that that's necessarily a bad thing.
Okay. Thanks for that. Very clear. The next question is from Chris Cant, Autonomous.
I just wanted to follow up on -- okay. I think I managed to fix. I'm not sure what I did. So following up on capital distributions, Look, I guess the question is why I know interim buyback, why no interim special dividend. I mean, you had sort of an exceptional capital benefit in the first half with Basel IV That, to me, is the kind of thing that could definitely warrant a special dividend. It's a one-off item. It's not going to repeat. It's not part of your yearly profit, it shouldn't really form part of the payout ratio debate. So with the government of the shareholder register, I appreciate you moved to an interim dividend policy, but you were able to do an interim buyback last year, direct buyback? Why no interim buyback this year? I know interim special dividend. And is that what we should expect going forward? So is the cadence of capital return sort of menial interim dividend and then surplus capital return just on an annual basis. And in terms of your comment on the last question, coming down to 14% potentially more slowly if your kind of RWA actions are more successful than you think. Again, if special dividends are part of the equation here, why is it the case that you can't come on to target at the same speed, especially -- I understand there may be a sort of a liquidity limitation on the ability to deploy capital through open market buybacks. But if specials are going to be part of the equation. Why is it that you would need to come down to target more slowly?
Chris, yes, thanks for that. Look, in 2024, I would say, the conversations we had amongst ourselves was resumed interim dividend or focus on buyback -- directed buyback with the government. That was the most advantageous thing for us and for shareholders. So this year, we were really focused on trying to normalize our distribution policy and how we set ourselves out. So I think going forward, we do want to normalize the way in which we return to shareholders with an interim and then move the special or the additional conversations towards the end of the year. just gives everyone a little bit more time to understand the environment and ensure that we get to come for all of our stakeholders. So I would say yes, you should expect to see that kind of cadence going forward. .
And then with respect to items like Basel IV impacts and stuff like that, I mean, there's always things coming in and things coming out. I mean one wants to have things settle and you want to have comfort that you're not going to have any negative surprises. And that's not me saying that out. There is one on the horizon because there certainly isn't. But even with the existing environment at the moment and the geopolitical tensions, it really didn't seem like the appropriate time to be overly with respect to distributions. And notwithstanding the fact that we will continue to work hard on RWA efficiencies and generating more capital.
With that end '26 target of a CET1 ratio above 14% is real. And we will use all the tools at our disposal to get close to that by the end of 2026. And we look forward to having an informed debate at Board in the fourth quarter of this year and also to engaging with our regulators on what shape and size and form distributors will take for the full year. And look forward to making those announcements when we are standing up here at the start of March, delivering the full year results.
Now we're going to talk -- we're going to turn to Grace Dargan at Barclays. Good morning, Grace.
I just have a couple, Apologies. I'm going to follow up again on the distributions and maybe just very slightly differently. Given what you're saying and given the payout today, is there any reason we shouldn't think about 100% payout going forward? I presume from your comments, now that we should still be thinking about that. But any color around that would be helpful. Then secondly, just around the loan growth. Just coming back on that, I guess, the CAGR does imply quite a significant step up in loan growth. Cognitive of your comments around climate capital, but you do also have increasing competition in your domestic market. So isn't your growth potentially more challenging into '26 and '27 when you're pointing to a bigger step-up. And I guess, in that context, maybe could you just give a little bit of color about what you think of as the long-term mix of that loan book kind of nondomestic versus domestic as well.
Yes. I think we certainly agree for 2025 that we have created maximum potential for payouts that look like. But again, that's -- it's an additional distribution if it's and that's going to be subject to board and regulatory approval. With respect to loan growth, a couple of things. Our loan lending growth activity is pretty seasonal in nature in any case. Second half of the year is normally stronger than the first half of the year. So that's another reason that gives us a little bit of comfort. We've obviously got the benefit of looking at and seeing our own pipeline, which gives us a little bit more confidence. Things were muddied a little bit this year with geopolitics. The slight amount of uncertainty may be impacting SME, certainly impacting foreign exchange. And we just -- overall, I think with our -- with the comments we said on competition. I don't think in any of our main markets that, that is going to have any material impact in the coming years. So we're pretty confident with our 5% CAGR out to '27.
Yes. And one of the features, I think, which is probably underexplored in relation to the Irish banking market outlook is that we have a big constraint out there in terms of output at the moment in the housing market. We have seen a very significant increase in the volume of houses being built, but that's well shy of where it needs to be. And we've seen housing recover from about 2,000 units in the immediate aftermath of the GFC to where it stands today, just above 30,000 units. It needs to get to 60,000 units. We finance at the moment about 1/3 of the residential development, that's a market share that I'm pretty happy with. We don't necessarily target market share, but that gives you a sort of and impression of our appetite. And if we see a doubling coming through an output is very much center stage from a policy perspective in Ireland, well, that's obviously going to have an impact in terms of residential development finance and of course, on the mortgage market, where we have a very strong position with a market share of 32% in the first half of the year.
Now turning to Sheel Shah at JPMorgan.
Just a follow-up on the distribution policy, please. Can I ask about the discussions that went into setting this policy with regards to the Board and the regulator, Were there any pushbacks to this policy? And maybe thinking about -- it looks like it's a relatively cautious policy where if this policy was maybe set last year, with the economic climate in a different outlook. And obviously, if we assume that the government stake had gone for the purposes of this scenario, then maybe this policy would have been a bit more less conservative and especially with regards to the interim. So I'd like to get your thoughts on that, please.
We are -- as I always say about AIB, we're ambitious in our strategy and conservative in our execution. There was no pushback in relation to this particular policy that we've put in place. I think it's very, very clear. And as I said in my opening comments, we have no desire to be an excess hoarder of capital. Our focus this year and at this point was in kicking off an interim dividend and cash interim dividend for the first time in 17 years and a sort of a neat bookend to AIB's over the past 17 years since we last paid an interim dividend. But there was absolutely no pushback. And as I said earlier, we are very much looking forward to engaging with our colleagues on the Board and indeed with our regulator as we move towards the year-end because that target out there, that 14% target is a real target and we're going to have to make progress towards that.
Now we are going to Borja at Citi.
I have 2. Firstly, on the NII. So you increased the structural hedge by EUR 5 billion. That -- I guess that adds a bit of upside to your NII looking especially into 2026 and '27. So maybe there's even more upside to -- compared to consensus expectations in the NII. So if you could kindly comment on that because I'm not sure that the market is fully aware of this -- of the benefits of this? And secondly, I understand that from a process point of view, if you were to decide for a payout of over 100%, I understand if you have excess capital and macro is stable, then I understand there's no issue at all. So you would be able to pay a payout above 100% if from a process point of view?
Borja, I think you're probably looking at the NII correctly there. The additional EUR 5 billion duration over 5 years. We received over above EUR $230 million. So that position is already in the money, should we say. I think if I look at consensus for '26, pretty much bang in line, if look at consensus '27, maybe slightly lower than where we see it and predominantly due to rate expectation and increases and also, obviously, the increase in SHP. But certainly, '25 guidance consensus pretty strong and '26 is bang in line. .
With respect to the payout expectations, obviously, we have reported our CET1 without actually incorporating any of our in-year profits. And that indeed is to give us maximum optionality and flexibility, when we talk to the Board and the regulator at the end of the year for total payout discussions.
So no change in process at all.
We're now going to Ben at RBC.
The first is on costs. where there was a consensus currently doesn't have you hitting your less than EUR 2 billion cost target for next year. I'm just wondering whether you could for your current confidence level for hitting the '26 target, any moving parts that are worth calling out. Doesn't sound like there's any significant restructuring to come based on your organic FTE reduction comments? And then secondly, on Irish Wealth, which is frequently cited there of significant opportunity. If you look at Goodbody wealth balances, they're up only modestly really in Half 1. I think growth will clearly be a multiyear journey here, but how about the pace of growth? Or when should we think about the pace of growth picking up? And if it doesn't come through, can you just give us your thoughts about whether you might take any inorganic opportunities?
I'll do wealth, Donal will deal with costs. We didn't have products and services in wealth up until recently. And we filled that product gap through the acquisition of Goodbody, which we're really pleased with the performance there and also through our joint venture with AIB Life. AIB Life is doing very well. It is -- I think we're the first start-ups we've had in Ireland in the life space in many, many years. But it is a start-up and we're really pleased with how it's performing. We've got about 50,000 policies, 50,000 customers now and that number is growing at pace. This is a medium-term organic growth story. But that said, I've marked on a number of occasions that we remain very open to exploring potential corporate activity in this space in the event that a very attractive asset was to come loose. So we're not ruling out doing something inorganically. We remain very alive to the potential opportunity, and we would give a very, very strong consideration to making an acquisition in the space if an asset was to become available.
Overall, on the costs, are very much in line with guidance. Our staff cost numbers are probably slightly better, obviously, due to the lower number. We are continually investing in operational efficiency areas, which is looking to reduce our costs on an ongoing basis.and we're very, very focused on reaching our medium-term target of less than EUR 2 billion in 2026. .
Thanks, Donal. We're now turning to Sanjena at UBS.
Okay. Clearly, we're not going to have a question there. The last question is going to come from Guy Stebbings at BNP Paribas.
Thanks for taking the questions. I'll sort of go back on distributions again one last time if you don't mind and then I have one on NII. I think like a lot of investors, I'm struggling a little bit with the policy. You talked about having a more normal distribution and no desire to hoard capital. But I guess there are a lot of banks that do buybacks, et cetera, at the half year. have less capital, generate less capital. So it does make you look very conservative versus pretty much every bank in. So I'm just trying to get the bottom of why that is. Is that you as a management team coming to that judgment? Or is the bar just quite a bit higher from the regulator, if it's not a directed buyback. I know you said there's no push back to this policies in what you proposed today. There was no pushback.
But to be clear, did you consider at all an interim excess payment if the regulator says, no it was just never consumed. And then on net interest income, could you be very active on the hedging since it has come down very nicely. We're getting towards the end of the rate cutting cycle and good deposit volumes. So should we be thinking about very close to the sort of low point for run rate NII from here and start to pick up as sort of soon as H1 '26, perhaps?
The policy -- the management team's policy. We brought the proposal to the Board, and we got the support of the Board. Our priority in this period in the first 6 months of it was putting ourselves in a position where we could return to making interim distributions on a cash basis. We have now done that. And what we're making clear is that we will have a discussion towards the back end of the year. in relation to special distributions. We didn't have that discussion in the first half of the year. We were very much focused on the cash distribution and we're very, very pleased that we've got Board support for our policy, which I think is sensible and clear. And as I said already that we are very much looking forward to having those discussions in relation to how we get towards our 14% CET1 target for 2026 when we are reaching the end of this financial year.
Yes. I mean I would just add to that, in the last 2 years, we've returned EUR 4.3 billion to investors, which is 30% of our market cap. And so I think that compares very favorably vis-a-vis the other banks that I mentioned there. And obviously, 2025, we feel that we're going to have a very strong performance as well. So I think you can just look at the track record over the last number of years, and that should give you an indication of management's intent. I think with respect to the question on NII, look, I think we've reasonable visibility on the ECB rate curve. Deposits continue to grow, a structural hedge, which is already in the money and performing and loan growth that we do expect to ramp up and reach 5% velocity and growth. So indeed, yes, I think you should expect to see NII performing from here.
Thanks so much, indeed, Donal. We're just up at the top our now. There you have it. The IR team are, of course, available as ever to discuss the results and the outlook with you over the coming hours and indeed days, but I want to thank you for attending our presentation this morning. We look forward to engaging with you over the days, weeks and months ahead. Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
Finanzdaten von AIB Group
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Dez '25 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 4.903 4.903 |
6 %
6 %
100 %
|
|
| - Zinsertrag | 3.748 3.748 |
9 %
9 %
76 %
|
|
| - Zinsunabhängige Erträge | 1.155 1.155 |
8 %
8 %
24 %
|
|
| Zinsaufwand | 1.181 1.181 |
5 %
5 %
24 %
|
|
| Nichtzinsaufwand | -2.332 -2.332 |
5 %
5 %
-48 %
|
|
| Risikovorsorge für Kredite | 172 172 |
213 %
213 %
4 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 2.056 2.056 |
10 %
10 %
42 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen EUR.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur AIB Group-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
AIB Group Aktie News
Firmenprofil
Die AIB Group plc ist in der Erbringung von Finanzdienstleistungen tätig. Zu den Segmenten des Unternehmens gehören Retail Banking, AIB Capital Markets (Capital Markets), AIB UK, Climate Capital und Group. Das Segment Retail Banking umfasst die Bereiche Homes & Consumer sowie kleine und mittlere Unternehmen (SME). Das Segment Capital Markets bietet institutionelle, Firmenkunden- und Geschäftsbankdienstleistungen für seine größeren Kunden und Kunden, die spezifische Sektor- oder Produktkenntnisse benötigen. Capital Markets bietet seinen Kunden Devisen- und Zinsrisikomanagementprodukte, Cash-Management-Produkte, Handelsfinanzierungen, Mezzanine-Finanzierungen und Kapitalbeteiligungen. Das Segment AIB UK bietet Bankdienstleistungen für Unternehmen, Privatkunden und Geschäftskunden in zwei verschiedenen Märkten an, z. B. als sektororientierte Firmenkundenbank und als Vollservice-Retailbank. Climate Capital ist auf die Finanzierung von Großprojekten in den Bereichen erneuerbare Energien und Infrastruktur spezialisiert. Das Gruppensegment umfasst Wholesale-Treasury-Aktivitäten sowie Kontroll- und Unterstützungsfunktionen der Gruppe.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | Irland |
| CEO | Dr. Hunt |
| Mitarbeiter | 10.207 |
| Webseite | aib.ie |


