HubSpot, Inc. Aktienkurs
Insights zu HubSpot, Inc.
Insights
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Mit KI besser investieren
aktien.guide Unlimited – alle Details der KI-Analysen
👉 Detailliertere Insights
👉 Exklusive Einblicke in Chancen & Risiken
👉 Klare Antworten auf deine Fragen
Ist HubSpot, Inc. eine Topscorer-Aktie nach der Dividenden-, High-Growth-Investing- oder Levermann-Strategie?
Als kostenloser aktien.guide Basis-Nutzer kannst Du die Scores zu allen 7.601 weltweiten Aktien einsehen.
aktien.guide Premium
aktien.guide Unlimited
Kennzahlen
📘 Marktkapitalisierung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Marktkapitalisierung zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen laut Börse aktuell wert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft Unternehmen in Größenklassen (Large, Mid, Small Cap) einzuordnen und gibt Hinweise auf Marktmacht und Stabilität.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Große Unternehmen gelten als stabiler, zahlen oft Dividenden, wachsen aber langsamer.
- Kleine Firmen können stärker wachsen, sind aber schwankungsanfälliger.
- Die Marktkapitalisierung ist ein guter Indikator für Unternehmensgröße, aber kein Maß für Unter- oder Überbewertung.
📘 Enterprise Value (Unternehmenswert)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Enterprise Value (EV) zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich kostet, wenn man es komplett übernehmen würde – inklusive Schulden und abzüglich Cash.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
(= Marktkapitalisierung + Nettoverschuldung)
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der EV ist eine realistischere Bewertungsbasis als die Marktkapitalisierung, da er die Kapitalstruktur berücksichtigt. Er ist Grundlage für Kennzahlen wie EV/FCF oder EV/Sales.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Der Enterprise Value zeigt, was ein Unternehmen tatsächlich wert ist – unabhängig davon, wie es finanziert ist.
- Er ist besonders wichtig für professionelle Investoren, da er eine objektivere Grundlage für Bewertungsvergleiche bietet als die Marktkapitalisierung allein.
- Ein Unternehmen mit hoher Verschuldung erscheint im EV teurer, eines mit viel Cash günstiger – auch wenn sie an der Börse gleich viel wert sind.
📘 Nettoverschuldung
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettoverschuldung zeigt, wie viele Schulden nach Abzug des verfügbaren Cashs tatsächlich verbleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen von Fremdkapital abhängig ist – und wie gut es in der Lage ist, seine Schulden kurzfristig zu bedienen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine niedrige oder negative Nettoverschuldung bedeutet hohe finanzielle Stabilität.
- Unternehmen mit viel Cash und geringer Verschuldung sind besser gerüstet für Krisen.
- Eine hohe Nettoverschuldung erhöht das Risiko – besonders bei steigenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
📘 Cash
📈 Was ist das?
Der Cashbestand zeigt, wie viele liquide Mittel einem Unternehmen sofort zur Verfügung stehen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Er gibt Auskunft über die finanzielle Flexibilität: Ein hoher Cashbestand ermöglicht Investitionen, Rückkäufe oder Krisenresistenz.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Cashbestand zeigt finanzielle Stärke und Handlungsspielraum.
- Cash kann für Investitionen, Schuldentilgung oder Aktienrückkäufe genutzt werden.
- Allerdings: Zu viel ungenutztes Kapital kann auch auf mangelnde Investitionsideen hinweisen.
📘 Anzahl ausstehender Aktien
📈 Was ist das?
Die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien gibt an, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell im Umlauf sind und von Investoren gehalten werden.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie ist die Grundlage für viele Kennzahlen wie Gewinn je Aktie (EPS), Marktkapitalisierung oder KGV.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Je weniger Aktien im Umlauf sind, desto höher fällt z. B. der Gewinn je Aktie aus – wichtig für Bewertung und Dividendenrendite.
- Aktienrückkäufe verringern die Anzahl ausstehender Aktien – und steigern den Wert je Aktie.
- Kapitalerhöhungen haben den gegenteiligen Effekt: mehr Aktien → Verwässerung der bestehenden Anteile.
📘 Kurs-Gewinn-Verhältnis (KGV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KGV zeigt, wie oft der Gewinn pro Aktie im aktuellen Aktienkurs enthalten ist – also wie „teuer“ eine Aktie im Verhältnis zum Gewinn ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KGV gehört zu den bekanntesten Bewertungskennzahlen. Es hilft Anlegern einzuschätzen, ob eine Aktie im Vergleich zu ihrem Gewinn eher günstig oder teuer erscheint.
🧮 Berechnung
📊 KGV (TTM) = bezogen auf den Gewinn der letzten 12 Monate (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KGV kann auf eine günstige Bewertung hindeuten – oder auf Probleme im Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein hohes KGV kann Wachstumserwartungen widerspiegeln – oder eine überbewertete Aktie.
📘 Kurs-Umsatz-Verhältnis (KUV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KUV zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen – unabhängig vom Gewinn.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KUV ist besonders bei wachstumsstarken oder noch nicht profitablen Unternehmen hilfreich. Es zeigt, wie hoch der Umsatz an der Börse bewertet wird.
🧮 Berechnung
Marktkapitalisierung = 8,88 Mrd. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 3,30 Mrd. $
Marktkapitalisierung = 8,88 Mrd. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 3,78 Mrd. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges KUV kann auf Unterbewertung hindeuten – oder auf schwache Margen.
- Ein hohes KUV kann hohe Erwartungen widerspiegeln – oder übermäßigen Optimismus.
- Besonders sinnvoll bei Wachstumsunternehmen, bei denen der Gewinn oder Free Cashflow (noch) keine Aussagekraft hat.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Umsatz (EV/Sales)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/Sales zeigt, wie viel Anleger für 1 € Umsatz eines Unternehmens zahlen, wenn man auch Schulden und Cash berücksichtigt – es ist eine kapitalstrukturbereinigte Version des KUV.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl eignet sich besonders für den Vergleich von Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Verschuldung – sie zeigt, wie teuer ein Unternehmen tatsächlich im Verhältnis zum Umsatz ist.
🧮 Berechnung
Enterprise Value = 7,18 Mrd. $ | Umsatz (TTM) = 3,30 Mrd. $
Enterprise Value = 7,18 Mrd. $ | Umsatz erwartet = 3,78 Mrd. $
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EV/Sales ist neutral gegenüber der Kapitalstruktur und eignet sich gut für Unternehmensvergleiche.
- Ein niedriges Verhältnis kann auf eine günstig bewertete Aktie hindeuten – ein hohes Verhältnis auf hohe Erwartungen oder Überbewertung.
- Besonders nützlich bei wachstumsstarken, noch nicht profitablen Firmen.
📘 Unternehmenswert zu Free Cashflow (EV/FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
EV/FCF zeigt, wie viele Jahre es dauern würde, bis ein Unternehmen seinen Unternehmenswert durch freien Cashflow „zurückverdient”.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Unternehmen auf Basis ihrer tatsächlichen Cash-Erträge zu bewerten – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder buchhalterischem Gewinn.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriges EV/FCF deutet auf eine günstige Bewertung bei starker Cashgenerierung hin.
- Ein hohes EV/FCF kann entweder auf Optimismus oder auf temporär schwachen Cashflow hindeuten.
- Besonders hilfreich bei reifen, profitablen Unternehmen mit stabilen Cashflows.
📘 Kurs-Buchwert-Verhältnis (KBV)
📈 Was ist das?
Das KBV zeigt, wie hoch der Marktwert eines Unternehmens im Verhältnis zu seinem bilanziellen Eigenkapital ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das KBV ist besonders bei Substanzwerten (z. B. Banken, Industrie) relevant. Es hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob ein Unternehmen unter oder über seinem buchhalterischen Vermögen bewertet ist.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein KBV unter 1 kann auf Unterbewertung oder schwache Rentabilität hindeuten.
- Ein KBV über 1 zeigt, dass der Markt dem Unternehmen Mehrwert über den Buchwert hinaus zuschreibt (z. B. Marken, Patente, Wachstum).
- Das KBV eignet sich besonders gut für Unternehmen mit stabilen, materiellen Vermögenswerten.
📘 Eigenkapitalquote
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalquote zeigt, wie hoch der Anteil des Eigenkapitals an der Bilanzsumme eines Unternehmens ist – also wie stark es sich aus eigenen Mitteln finanziert.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote steht für finanzielle Stabilität, Krisenfestigkeit und gute Bonität. Sie ist besonders relevant bei der Beurteilung der Verschuldung.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalquote signalisiert finanzielle Stabilität – besonders in Krisenzeiten.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf ein höheres Risiko oder eine aggressive Verschuldung hinweisen.
- Wichtig: Die Eigenkapitalquote sollte immer gemeinsam mit der Eigenkapitalrendite betrachtet werden. Nur so lässt sich beurteilen, ob ein Unternehmen nicht nur solide, sondern auch effizient wirtschaftet.
📘 Eigenkapitalrendite (ROE)
📈 Was ist das?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen mit dem Kapital seiner Aktionäre arbeitet – also wie viel Gewinn es pro Euro Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Eigenkapitalrendite ist eine zentrale Rentabilitätskennzahl. Sie hilft Anlegern zu erkennen, ob das Unternehmen eine attraktive Verzinsung auf das eingesetzte Eigenkapital erwirtschaftet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Eigenkapitalrendite spricht für ein starkes, effizientes Geschäftsmodell.
- Besonders interessant ist sie bei kapitalintensiven Firmen oder solchen mit hoher Eigenkapitalquote.
- Wichtig: Ein sehr hoher ROE kann auch auf hohe Schulden hinweisen – daher sollte sie immer im Kontext mit der Eigenkapitalquote betrachtet werden.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 Was ist das?
ROCE misst die Gesamtrentabilität eines Unternehmens – also wie effizient es das eingesetzte Kapital (Eigen- und Fremdkapital) zur Gewinnerzielung nutzt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Das eingesetzte Kapital ist das gesamte betriebsnotwendige Kapital, unabhängig von der Finanzierungsquelle.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROCE eignet sich besonders gut für den Vergleich unterschiedlich finanzierter Unternehmen. Es zeigt, wie effektiv ein Unternehmen Kapital investiert – unabhängig von der Kapitalstruktur.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROCE zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen sein Kapital effizient einsetzt – unabhängig davon, ob es durch Eigen- oder Fremdkapital finanziert ist.
- Je höher der ROCE im Vergleich zu ähnlichen Unternehmen, desto mehr Wert schafft das Unternehmen mit seinem investierten Kapital.
- Besonders wichtig ist der ROCE bei Firmen mit hohen Investitionen – z. B. in Industrie, Energie oder Infrastruktur.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 Was ist das?
ROIC zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen das Kapital investiert, das langfristig im operativen Geschäft gebunden ist – unabhängig davon, ob es aus Eigen- oder Fremdkapital stammt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
- NOPAT = „Net Operating Profit After Taxes“
- Investiertes Kapital = operatives Vermögen abzüglich nicht-verzinster Schulden
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
ROIC ist eine der präzisesten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung der Kapitalrendite – besonders im Vergleich zur Eigenkapitalrendite, weil es Verzerrungen durch Schulden vermeidet. Er zeigt, ob ein Unternehmen Mehrwert für alle Kapitalgeber schafft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher ROIC zeigt, wie gut ein Unternehmen mit dem tatsächlich investierten (betriebsnotwendigen) Kapital wirtschaftet.
- Im Unterschied zu ROCE wird nur Kapital betrachtet, das wirklich zur Finanzierung operativer Aktivitäten dient – und verzinst werden muss.
- Besonders hilfreich, um die Kapitalrendite von Unternehmen mit viel „überschüssigem“ Kapital oder zinsfreien Verbindlichkeiten realistisch zu vergleichen.
📘 Verschuldungsgrad (Leverage Ratio)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Verschuldungsgrad zeigt, wie stark ein Unternehmen durch verzinsliche Schulden (z. B. Kredite und Anleihen) im Verhältnis zum Eigenkapital finanziert ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Kennzahl hilft, das finanzielle Risiko und die Abhängigkeit von Fremdkapital zu beurteilen. Ein hoher Verschuldungsgrad kann die Eigenkapitalrendite steigern – birgt aber auch erhöhte Risiken bei Zinsanstiegen oder Liquiditätsengpässen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Verschuldungsgrad steht für finanzielle Stabilität und Unabhängigkeit.
- Ein hoher Wert kann auf erhöhte Risiken hinweisen – insbesondere bei schwankenden Zinsen oder konjunkturellen Schwächen.
- Wichtig: Immer im Kontext zur Branche und Kapitalintensität bewerten.
📘 Umsatz
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz zeigt, wie viel ein Unternehmen insgesamt mit seinen Produkten und Dienstleistungen verdient – also den Bruttoerlös vor Abzug von Kosten.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Umsatz ist eine der zentralen Kennzahlen zur Einschätzung der Unternehmensgröße, Marktstellung und Wachstumskraft.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein wachsender Umsatz zeigt eine steigende Nachfrage und kann ein guter Frühindikator für Gewinnsteigerungen sein.
- Vergleiche von aktuellem und erwartetem Umsatz geben Hinweise auf das Marktumfeld und Analystenerwartungen.
- Wichtig: Starker Umsatz allein genügt nicht – auch Margen und Profitabilität zählen.
📘 EBITDA
📈 Was ist das?
EBITDA steht für „Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens, bereinigt um bilanztechnische und finanzierungsbedingte Effekte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBITDA ist eine verbreitete Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der operativen Leistungsfähigkeit – insbesondere bei kapitalintensiven Unternehmen oder im internationalen Vergleich.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes oder wachsendes EBITDA spricht für starke operative Erträge – unabhängig von Bilanzierung oder Steuerlast.
- EBITDA ist besonders nützlich, um Unternehmen branchenübergreifend zu vergleichen.
- Wichtig: EBITDA ist keine offizielle Gewinnkennzahl – Abschreibungen und Finanzierungskosten werden ausgeklammert.
📘 EBIT
📈 Was ist das?
EBIT steht für „Earnings Before Interest and Taxes“ – also Gewinn vor Zinsen und Steuern. Es zeigt das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Finanzierungs- und Steueraufwand.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EBIT ist eine zentrale Kennzahl zur Beurteilung der Profitabilität aus dem Kerngeschäft – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder Steuersystem.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hohes EBIT deutet auf ein profitables Kerngeschäft hin – vor Zinslasten oder steuerlichen Effekten.
- Es erlaubt objektivere Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen mit unterschiedlicher Finanzierung.
- Im Vergleich mit EBITDA zeigt EBIT bereits den Einfluss von Abschreibungen auf das operative Ergebnis.
📘 Nettogewinn
📈 Was ist das?
Der Nettogewinn ist der verbleibende Jahresüberschuss (oder -fehlbetrag) eines Unternehmens – nach Abzug aller Kosten, Steuern, Zinsen und Abschreibungen
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Nettogewinn ist die zentrale Erfolgskennzahl – er zeigt, wie profitabel ein Unternehmen nach allen Kosten tatsächlich arbeitet.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein steigender Nettogewinn zeigt, dass das Unternehmen effizient wirtschaftet – trotz aller Kosten.
- Die Entwicklung des Gewinns beeinflusst z. B. direkt das KGV und weitere Kennzahlen.
- Im Zeitverlauf lässt sich ablesen, wie stabil und profitabel ein Geschäftsmodell wirklich ist.
📘 Free Cashflow (FCF)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow gibt Aufschluss über die echte finanzielle Stärke eines Unternehmens – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln. Er zeigt, wie viel Spielraum für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldenabbau besteht.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow bedeutet, dass ein Unternehmen echte Finanzkraft besitzt – unabhängig vom bilanzierten Gewinn.
- Er ist oft die solideste Grundlage für nachhaltige Dividenden und Aktienrückkäufe.
- Sinkender FCF kann ein Warnsignal sein – auch wenn der Gewinn stabil aussieht.
📘 Umsatzwachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Umsatzwachstum zeigt, wie stark sich die Erlöse eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert haben – tatsächlich (TTM) und auf Prognosebasis (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (Umsatz erwartet ÷ Umsatz Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein wachsender Umsatz ist ein zentrales Signal für steigende Nachfrage, Geschäftsausweitung und Marktanteilsgewinne – besonders bei Wachstumsunternehmen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachstum ist der Motor langfristiger Wertsteigerung – besonders bei Technologie- und Wachstumsaktien.
- Wichtig ist nicht nur das aktuelle Wachstum, sondern auch dessen Nachhaltigkeit.
- Prognosen zeigen, ob Analysten weiteres Potenzial erwarten – oder eine Verlangsamung.
📘 EBITDA-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBITDA-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBITDA ÷ EBITDA Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Ein steigendes EBITDA ist ein Zeichen für verbesserte operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Finanzierungsstruktur oder Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Starkes EBITDA-Wachstum signalisiert operative Effizienz und Skalierung – besonders relevant in Wachstumsphasen.
- EBITDA-Wachstum ist ein Frühindikator für Margen- und Gewinnentwicklung – sollte aber stets im Zusammenhang mit Umsatz und EBIT betrachtet werden.
📘 EBIT Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das EBIT-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark das operative Ergebnis eines Unternehmens (nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern) im Vergleich zum Vorjahr gewachsen ist.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwartetes EBIT ÷ EBIT Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Erwartetes Wachstum basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein direkter Indikator für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des operativen Geschäfts – unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (Abschreibungen).
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Steigendes EBIT signalisiert wachsende operative Rentabilität – auch unter Berücksichtigung von Abschreibungen.
- Das EBIT-Wachstum ist ein wichtiges Maß zur Beurteilung von Geschäftsmodellen mit hohen Investitionskosten.
- Im Zusammenspiel mit Umsatz- und EBITDA-Wachstum ergibt sich ein umfassendes Bild zur operativen Entwicklung.
📘 Nettogewinn-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Nettogewinn-Wachstum zeigt, wie stark der Jahresüberschuss eines Unternehmens gegenüber dem Vorjahr gestiegen oder gesunken ist – sowohl tatsächlich (TTM) als auch auf Basis von Prognosen (erwartet).
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Erwartet = (erwarteter Nettogewinn ÷ Nettogewinn Vorjahr − 1) × 100
Der erwartete Wert basiert auf Analystenschätzungen für das laufende Geschäftsjahr.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der Gewinn ist die entscheidende Ergebnisgröße für ein Unternehmen. Ein wachsender Nettogewinn deutet auf steigende Effizienz, stabile Kostenkontrolle und nachhaltige Ertragskraft hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Wachsender Nettogewinn stärkt die Bewertung, Dividendenfähigkeit und Kursfantasie.
- Stagnierender oder rückläufiger Gewinn trotz Umsatzwachstum kann auf Margendruck hinweisen.
📘 Free Cashflow-Wachstum
📈 Was ist das?
Das Free-Cashflow-Wachstum zeigt, wie sich der freie Mittelzufluss eines Unternehmens im Vergleich zum Vorjahr verändert hat – also der Betrag, der nach allen operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Free Cashflow ist der echte, verfügbare Geldzufluss. Wachstum in diesem Bereich ist ein Zeichen für finanzielle Stärke und steigende Flexibilität bei Dividenden, Rückkäufen oder Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Sinkender Free Cashflow kann auf steigende Investitionen, höhere Kosten oder stagnierende operative Erträge hindeuten.
- Besonders bei Dividendenwerten ist das FCF-Wachstum wichtig – denn Dividenden werden letztlich aus dem verfügbaren Cash gezahlt.
- Ein negativer Trend sollte genauer analysiert werden – er ist nicht zwangsläufig schlecht, aber potenziell ein Warnsignal.
📘 Bruttomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Bruttomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellungskosten (Material, Produktion) als Bruttogewinn übrig bleibt – also der „Rohgewinn“ eines Unternehmens.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Auch: Bruttomarge = Bruttogewinn ÷ Umsatz × 100
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Bruttomarge gibt Aufschluss über die Profitabilität eines Produkts oder Geschäftsmodells vor Fixkosten, Steuern und Zinsen. Sie zeigt, wie effizient ein Unternehmen produzieren oder einkaufen kann.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Bruttomarge deutet auf starke Preissetzungsmacht und effiziente Herstellung hin.
- Sinkende Bruttomargen können auf Kostensteigerungen oder Preisdruck hindeuten.
- Besonders im Vergleich zu Wettbewerbern liefert die Bruttomarge wertvolle Einblicke in die Geschäftsqualität.
📘 EBITDA-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBITDA-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz als operativer Gewinn vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen (EBITDA) übrig bleibt. Sie misst die operative Effizienz – ohne Verzerrungen durch Finanzierung oder Buchwerte.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBITDA-Marge hilft zu verstehen, wie viel operativer Gewinn ein Unternehmen aus jedem Euro Umsatz erzielt – unabhängig von Kapitalstruktur oder steuerlichem Umfeld.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBITDA-Marge zeigt starke operative Ertragskraft – unabhängig von Bilanzierungseffekten.
- Die Marge ermöglicht gute Vergleiche zwischen Unternehmen und Branchen.
- Ein stabiler oder wachsender Wert kann auf effiziente Kostenkontrolle und Skalierbarkeit hindeuten.
📘 EBIT-Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die EBIT-Marge zeigt, wie viel Prozent des Umsatzes als operativer Gewinn nach Abschreibungen, aber vor Zinsen und Steuern übrig bleiben.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die EBIT-Marge misst die operative Ertragskraft eines Unternehmens unter Berücksichtigung der Kapitalintensität (z. B. Maschinen, Anlagen). Sie eignet sich gut zum Vergleich von Geschäftsmodellen mit unterschiedlich hohen Abschreibungen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe EBIT-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen auch nach Abschreibungen effizient arbeitet.
- Sie ist besonders relevant in kapitalintensiven Branchen.
- Langfristig stabile oder steigende Margen sind ein Zeichen wirtschaftlicher Stärke und Preissetzungsmacht.
📘 Nettomarge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Nettomarge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz am Ende als „Reingewinn“ übrig bleibt – also nach Abzug aller Kosten, Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Die Nettomarge gibt an, wie effizient ein Unternehmen über alle Stufen hinweg wirtschaftet. Sie zeigt, wie viel Gewinn tatsächlich je Euro Umsatz übrig bleibt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Nettomarge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nicht nur operativ stark ist, sondern auch seine Finanzierung und Steuerbelastung im Griff hat.
- Vergleiche mit Wettbewerbern geben Einblicke in die wirtschaftliche Qualität.
- Sinkende Nettomargen trotz Umsatzwachstum können ein Warnsignal sein – etwa für steigende Kosten oder sinkende Effizienz.
📘 Free Cashflow Marge
📈 Was ist das?
Die Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug aller operativen Ausgaben und Investitionen tatsächlich als freier Mittelzufluss übrig bleibt.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Marge misst die echte Liquidität, die ein Unternehmen erwirtschaftet – unabhängig von Bilanzierungsregeln oder Abschreibungen. Sie ist besonders relevant für Dividenden, Rückkäufe und Investitionen.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Eine hohe Free-Cashflow-Marge zeigt, dass ein Unternehmen nachhaltig liquide Mittel erwirtschaftet.
- Sie ist ein starkes Signal für finanzielle Stabilität und Ausschüttungspotenzial.
- Wichtig ist der langfristige Trend – sinkende Werte können auf steigende Investitionen oder rückläufige operative Effizienz hindeuten.
📘 Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS)
📈 Was ist das?
Das Ergebnis je Aktie (EPS) zeigt, wie viel Gewinn auf eine einzelne Aktie entfällt – und ist eine der wichtigsten Kennzahlen zur Bewertung von Unternehmen.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die verwässerte Aktienanzahl berücksichtigt auch potenzielle neue Aktien, etwa durch Optionen, Wandelanleihen oder andere Umtauschrechte.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
EPS bildet die Basis für viele Bewertungskennzahlen wie KGV, PEG oder Payout Ratio. Es macht den Gewinn für Aktionäre vergleichbar – unabhängig von der Unternehmensgröße.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- EPS hilft, die Profitabilität pro Aktie zu erfassen – und ist besonders wichtig im Zeitvergleich oder im Vergleich mit Analystenschätzungen.
- Steigendes EPS kann ein Zeichen für stabiles Wachstum oder Aktienrückkäufe sein.
- Wichtig: Verwende verwässertes EPS für realistische Bewertungen – besonders bei stark aktienbasierten Vergütungssystemen.
📘 Free Cashflow je Aktie (FCF je Aktie)
📈 Was ist das?
Der Free Cashflow je Aktie zeigt, wie viel freier Mittelzufluss einem Unternehmen pro Aktie zur Verfügung steht – nach Investitionen, aber vor Dividenden oder Schuldentilgung.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Der FCF je Aktie zeigt, wie viel liquide Mittel pro Aktie tatsächlich im Unternehmen verbleiben – wichtig für Dividenden, Aktienrückkäufe oder Schuldentilgung. Im Gegensatz zum Gewinn ist er schwerer manipulierbar und daher besonders aussagekräftig.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Free Cashflow je Aktie ist ein Zeichen für hohe finanzielle Flexibilität.
- Er zeigt, wie viel Kapital ein Unternehmen effektiv einsetzen oder ausschütten kann.
- Besonders relevant für dividendenstarke Unternehmen oder solche mit starker Kapitalrendite.
📘 Short Interest
📈 Was ist das?
Short Interest zeigt, wie viele Aktien eines Unternehmens aktuell leerverkauft wurden – also von Investoren geliehen und verkauft, in der Erwartung fallender Kurse.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Der Wert zeigt den Anteil der Aktien, der aktuell auf fallende Kurse spekuliert wird.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Short Interest dient als Stimmungsindikator: Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Skepsis oder negative Erwartungen gegenüber dem Unternehmen hin – kann aber auch zu einem „Short Squeeze“ führen, wenn der Kurs plötzlich steigt.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein niedriger Short Interest deutet auf Vertrauen in das Unternehmen hin.
- Ein hoher Wert kann ein Warnsignal sein – oder eine Chance, wenn sich die Stimmung dreht.
- Besonders spannend in volatilen Märkten oder vor wichtigen Quartalszahlen.
📘 Employees
📈 Was ist das?
Die Mitarbeiteranzahl zeigt, wie viele Personen ein Unternehmen weltweit beschäftigt – ein Indikator für Größe, Struktur und Geschäftsmodell.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Sie hilft bei der Einschätzung von Skaleneffekten, Effizienz und Personalkosten. Zusammen mit Umsatz und Gewinn lassen sich Kennzahlen wie Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ableiten.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Viele Mitarbeiter bedeuten große operative Komplexität – aber auch hohes Umsatzpotenzial.
- Produktivität je Mitarbeiter ist ein wichtiger Indikator für Effizienz.
- Besonders spannend bei stark wachsenden Tech- oder Industrieunternehmen.
📘 Umsatz je Mitarbeiter
📈 Was ist das?
Der Umsatz je Mitarbeiter zeigt, wie viel Erlös ein Unternehmen durchschnittlich pro Beschäftigtem erwirtschaftet – eine Kennzahl für Effizienz und Produktivität.
🧮 Wie wird es berechnet?
Die Mitarbeiterzahl stammt in der Regel aus dem letzten verfügbaren Jahresbericht.
🏛️ Wofür ist es wichtig?
Diese Kennzahl hilft, Geschäftsmodelle zu vergleichen – insbesondere zwischen arbeitsintensiven und technologiegetriebenen Unternehmen. Ein hoher Wert deutet auf Automatisierung, Effizienz oder hohen Wertschöpfungsanteil hin.
🧮 Berechnung
🎯 Was bedeutet das für Anleger?
- Ein hoher Umsatz je Mitarbeiter spricht für ein skalierbares und margenstarkes Geschäftsmodell.
- Ein niedriger Wert kann auf arbeitsintensive Prozesse oder geringere Wertschöpfung hinweisen.
- Besonders hilfreich beim Vergleich von Tech- vs. Industrieunternehmen.
HubSpot, Inc. Aktie Analyse
Analystenmeinungen
42 Analysten haben eine HubSpot, Inc. Prognose abgegeben:
Analystenmeinungen
42 Analysten haben eine HubSpot, Inc. Prognose abgegeben:
Beta HubSpot, Inc. Events
🇩🇪 Neu: Alle Transkripte jetzt auch auf Deutsch verfügbar!
Abonniere Premium, um Transkripte und KI-Zusammenfassungen auf Deutsch zu lesen.
Vergangene Events
|
JUN
3
2026 Evercore Global TMT Conference
vor 21 Tagen
|
|
MAI
28
Jefferies Software
vor 27 Tagen
|
|
MAI
7
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
vor etwa 2 Monaten
|
|
APR
15
Special Call - HubSpot, Inc.
vor 2 Monaten
|
|
FEB
11
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
vor 4 Monaten
|
|
DEZ
10
Barclays 23rd Annual Global Technology Conference
vor 7 Monaten
|
|
DEZ
2
UBS TMT Conference
vor 7 Monaten
|
|
NOV
19
Wells Fargo's 9th Annual TMT Summit
vor 7 Monaten
|
|
NOV
5
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
vor 8 Monaten
|
|
SEP
10
Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
vor 10 Monaten
|
|
SEP
3
Analyst/Investor Day - HubSpot, Inc.
vor 10 Monaten
|
|
AUG
6
Q2 2025 Earnings Call
vor 11 Monaten
|
aktien.guide Basis
HubSpot, Inc. — 2026 Evercore Global TMT Conference
1. Question Answer
Well, we will kick it off. And for those that are listening in, really excited to have Yamini Rangan with us from HubSpot. Thanks very much for being here. I am ecstatic to have a conversation about what's going on at HubSpot with -- around AI. We were just talking about -- there's so much -- the velocity and the scope of this cycle is pretty remarkable.
I don't know, actually, we -- before I get into AI, why don't we just recap the quarter maybe really quickly with you. It was a really good quarter, 18% growth, net adds were above 10,000. Can you just talk about sort of what's driving sort of the business right now? Because I know everybody wants to just get to the AI upfront, but maybe we'll cycle back then jump forward.
Yes. Well, thanks a lot for having me. I really appreciate you taking the time. And yes, we'll start with Q1. Q1, it was a good quarter. From a revenue perspective, we beat guidance. From an operating margin perspective, we beat that, as well as like net adds.
And look, we are seeing the same trends and patterns that we have seen for many quarters now, which is that a lot of our customers, our customers are in the 2 to 2,000 to employee range. They are consolidating on fewer customer solutions. And we've seen this now, and we continue to see this going into this year, where if you look at a typical mid-market company with like 1,000 employees, they have maybe a bit of a homegrown system, they might have a legacy system or they might have a point solution. And they cannot get into AI without actually consolidating, bringing all of those insights into the same place.
And so I think like we've basically seen that same trend continue, and that strength is both upmarket as well as multi-hub. And again, the trend that we are seeing is that you can't just have marketing and sales and service in very siloed locations. You just have to have all of the data to start leveraging AI. So we continue to see consolidation and multi-hub adoption.
And then over -- what our customers are looking at is where do they get started in terms of their AI journey and what is that like -- road map look like. And we begin to see the emerging levers that we have talked about in the business, which is core seats and credits. And the combination is what we saw in Q1. And the combination of all of that gives us this very clear view of what the growth levers are and how we are continuing to drive growth.
Okay. And can you just talk about on the pricing and packaging? You guys have made some changes. Just obviously, you're trying to drive adoption. Customers are asking you, let's see the value. Just talk maybe holistically about how you're viewing that right now and some of the changes you made and maybe why?
Yes. And Kirk, I think like we were just talking about this. If you think about AI, the fundamental shift within AI is that before AI, as a SaaS provider, you provided access to your technology so that users could then deploy it, point, click, navigate, get work done. And therefore, the pricing model that we had in the SaaS world was pretty simple. You either get a subscription fee to your technology or you provide access to a specific role like sales or service, and that came in seats.
The fundamental shift with AI is that you are now delivering work, and the work looks like either a ticket that is resolved or it could be a qualified lead that you deliver or it could be a target prospect that you're delivering. And so you're delivering something completely different, which is not tied to the value of the seat that someone has. And therefore, it means we have to have credits.
And so you asked, like we're making some changes. I think the industry is making changes. If you ask 20 different vendors what their pricing strategy is, I think the strategy is experimentation. It's not like, oh, we figured it out and we know exactly what we're doing.
And so where we are in the process is that we believe that the future of pricing is still going to be hybrid. There will be a set of just table stakes AI capabilities that we will deliver per seat. And that is going to always be the case. And then there will be work that we are delivering that is not based on seat, and that will be credit-based.
What we did in Q2 is this. We took our agents -- not all AI features because we have hundreds of AI features. We specifically took agents, which is Prospecting Agent, Customer Agent, and we made those outcome-based because we believe that AI should always be about not outputs, it should be based on outcomes. And so we took our Customer Agent and we said we were going to cut the price, but we are also going to make it based on the number of resolutions.
So Customer Agent resolves tickets. It used to be based on the number of conversations. We moved it to resolutions, and we cut the price in half. Why did we do that? Because we truly believe that we are in the very early stages of technology adoption and we want to remove friction. We want people to say, "Oh, this is like a no-brainer for us," and they start adopting. The same thing with Prospecting Agent.
Now the combination of the moves that we made will have short-term negative headwinds in terms of net new ARR, which we have been explicit about. But we also believe that these are the kinds of moves that like actually provide the right foundation for consistent adoption as we look at the next few quarters, and that's why we did it.
Okay. That makes tons of sense. How does this impact the sales motion for you all? I think driving adoption is just key for anybody. We were talking about earlier, the only way to push back on like existential narratives is adoption and value being delivered. So what's the sales motion that now goes along with sort of a more almost value-based approach to pricing? What are you changing on that? What are you leaving alone?
I love the way you framed it, which is it is value-based sales, right? It is much more about value-based sales. So a couple of things that we're doing. The first thing is that customers want proof of value. Because, again, if you are buying a piece of application, that application needs to be deployed. You train your salespeople. Those salespeople use the product, and then they build pipeline. It's -- that was the old SaaS world.
Right now, you're actually deploying agents. And the week 1 that it's deployed, it better write e-mails like your best sales rep. It better qualify leads like your best BDR. And so the difference is that customers now evaluating agents want proof of value that it actually works in their environment given their conditions and their value proposition they need to do.
So what we did, again, we saw this in Q1, and we provided trial periods. And during the trial periods, we activate the agents, we make it work within their environment. They can play with it, tweak with it, understand the kinds of outputs that these agents are delivering, and that gives them a lot more confidence that they can scale with it. So that's the change.
But if you step back, Kirk -- and you've known this industry for a very long time. I think what you're just saying is that the sales motion itself is changing. It used to be that salespeople go, sell, demo, product, and then they close the deal. And then comes the implementation, and GSIs, partners implement it. Then throw it over to customer success, and customer success will come 6 months later and say, what have you adopted and kind of like improve that model.
That model is changing real time. You -- during sales, you have to prove the value. The first week that you implement, you have to show the value. By week 4, that value better have compounded. Otherwise, why pay for tokens, why pay for credits, why pay for any of the things that we're delivering?
And so one of the other things that we did in Q1 to set the stage for this is like we pulled our sales and customer success teams together under one leader. And what that enables us to do is to make the handoffs easier, think about incentives that drive the value sales motion, helps set up like the whole organization in terms of delivering value, which is a completely different motion.
We're going to look back and say, wow, like the AI didn't just change the technology and the platform. It's actually having pretty significant changes in terms of how you reach customers and how you communicate the value and how you showcase that value. And that is what is happening, and we are like leaning into it. So it feels like a set of changes that we are aggressively pushing, which we believe will have medium-term, long-term impact, but will cause a bit of a short-term headwind for us.
Yes. And when you think about customers getting value, I mean, to some degree, their data has to be in a place where they can actually use it correctly or drive the agents to get the outcomes they want and see the value. So I guess when you're talking to your sales and your go-to-market about this, is it really about, look, you have to understand where the customer is at from a data perspective? If they're not there, let's not push something that's going to have suboptimal value for them in the near term?
Is that something you feel like you're -- like when you look at your customer base, you've sort of segmented it so that you understand like who's ready to go, who has more care and feeding to do before they even get to the point where they can take advantage of agentic? Because to some degree, you're not -- like if their data is all over the place, no matter how great your agents are, it's not going to have the outcome they want.
Absolutely. 100%. And the two of us, we were talking about this. Like if you think about the classic adoption curve, you have innovators, and these innovators are okay if the technology is not there. They can string it together. They can work on weekends, they can Claude Code. And those innovators also happen to be on X and LinkedIn, being very loud about what they built over the weekend. That tends to be 2% of the entire customer base.
Then you have the early adopters of technology. And early adopters of technology will turn an agent on, will work with what they have, and they will also give us feedback and iterate with us. But then there is actually the early majority and late majority. The late majority folks don't have the data ready, don't have -- they're still in fragmented applications. And AI is not a magic wand that you can wave and say all of the data get to the same place.
And so for those folks that are somewhat later in the cycle, we talk to them about data readiness. We talk to them about getting a consistent view of all of their customer information, and that is absolutely critical. Without that, they cannot even get on AI. So I think what is even going to happen is that even if you're today not ready for AI, you know that you have to get ready. And the first step that they're taking is data readiness and making sure that they have the right foundation.
So we talk to a lot of customers there. And then for the customers who are ready and willing to kind of like adopt, then we have a very clear road map of where to start with agentic use cases, the ones we've talked about, Prospecting Agent, AEO, which we haven't talked about, as well as Customer Agent, and we get them on that.
So I think what is different this cycle is that it's moving faster, right? If you compare this to the cloud adoption cycle. 1999 is when like a lot of these companies like were found and formed. 2009, we were still having conversations about like cloud adoption and getting CIOs comfortable of moving from data centers into like public cloud. I think what's going to happen this cycle is that it's going faster. And so the conversations are really based on the maturity of the organization and where they are in the AI curve, but we are actually working with all of our 300,000 customers to help them navigate the big platform shift.
Yes. And when you think about your customer base, obviously, more -- a little bit more mid-market. If you're talking to a big enterprise, like we got to get our data in order, that could be like a 2-year project or take forever. Can your customers get there if they really focus on it in 6 months, 9 months so that late majority starts to become a targeted customer for you from an agentic perspective within 12, 18 months? Whereas I think if you're talking about big enterprises, that data sort of unification could take a long time.
You're talking about it in the right way. So the -- one of the fundamental reasons why HubSpot didn't acquire through the growth is because when we went from marketing automation to sales and service, we said the fundamental thing is that the customer data has to be in a single record. And so we made a choice a while ago that we were going to invest in platform primitives to help us build faster and innovate faster.
But the resultant benefit for customers is that when they adopt HubSpot, they don't have to do data unification across marketing, sales and service. And this is also why we've seen consistent multi-hub expansion over many years. It's because you now have data in -- at least the core customer data in a single place, and that helps.
Now if you're not already a HubSpot customer, it certainly is not like a year implementation. It mostly is weeks and months before they can implement, get the data ready in one place and then begin to adopt. So the cycle is much faster. I do think that this provides an impetus even for late majority from the previous cycle to really start getting their data ready so that they can be in a position to adopt AI. And we're definitely seeing and having those conversations with customers now.
Okay. And we talked about it a little bit earlier, but your view on pricing being a little bit of a mix or a hybrid of seats and consumption. Is there a right answer to that longer term for your customer base? Because it's not where you might want to be. It's really where the customers -- you want to meet the customers where they're at. Is there -- in 2 years or 3 years, like is there a way you think about that to be like, ah, it might be like 50-50? Or is it just -- it really just depends on adoption of these agents and how fast it goes?
I think that even 2 years, 3 years, who knows, 5 years, but 3 years out, pricing needs to be hybrid, and it needs to have a seat-based component and a credit and usage and outcome-based component. The reason is that there are so many things within a customer platform like HubSpot that is just table stakes. That just comes with the core platform, and we would not want to nickel and dime or make that all usage-based. So we'll have core seats that every go-to-market employee needs or a specialized sales or a service seat that a specialized team might need and provide a lot of the functionality as part of that.
And then we see what we deliver will become more usage-based. I actually don't know the exact split between seats and credit, but we will think that -- the way we think about the growth levers is that there will be core growth levers. The emerging growth levers are core seats, which have a lot of data and AI value, and credits, which will be what we deliver through work, and it will continue to kind of build in that. Again, a lot of like seat compression and how does this actually impact how you think about the pricing.
I think in the longer term, there will be some level of seat compression, but that will come from delivering even more value. Like if you take a look at our business, the teams that we have actually held in a headcount are support, for example, where we have deployed Customer Agent to augment our Tier 1. But then we are delivering much better like value through the same individuals.
And so I think in the fullness of time, there will be some seat compression, but the narrative of it's going to happen tomorrow it's going to happen in the next quarter, the timing might be off. I think it's like we believe that there is this hybrid world of seats plus credits.
Okay. That makes a ton of sense. Let's talk about AEO a little bit. You're seeing some benefit from it at your top of funnel already. Talk to us about how this sort of helps the broader conversation with customers, what the sort of opportunity is for that and what you all have learned?
Yes, absolutely. Look, there's a huge shift that is happening. People are not searching for information, clicking on blue links, coming into website. They are, in fact, going to LLMs and asking questions, but those questions tend to be much deeper. The average search was like 4 to 5 words, and the average question or prompt within LLM is like 23. So it's a deeper search. It's much more intentional. And when you get a very targeted answer with a citation, then people convert more. So that's the broader shift that's happening.
If you look within HubSpot's customer base this year, the content leads or the leads that you got from searching to your website, that's down 27%. That's like big. Now we've seen this because we were even more inbound-focused. We've seen this for the last 2 years. And certainly, from a HubSpot perspective, we have gone through a diversification of lead sources from content leads to social. We are much bigger on YouTube as well as podcasts as well as newsletters. So we've diversified the sources and we have experimented with AEO.
So it's not like sometimes people confuse that, oh, SEO is getting replaced by AEO. SEO is getting replaced by a diversification strategy across multiple channels where your content needs to show up. So content is important, but where it shows up is much more diversified.
And that's what we've seen internally. And we've built all of that into a playbook called the Loop that we launched at our conference last year. We've built that into our products. And at Spring Spotlight, which was in April for us, we launched an AEO solution. And that AEO solution basically can give you visibility. So you want to know how your brand shows up and how does that show up compared to your competitors, the share of voice, it can do that. The second thing it will do is to say, look at your share of voice and say your share of voice today is 62%. In order for you to get it to 70%, here are 5 actions that you need to take from a content perspective.
And where we are going with it is that you can seamlessly take those actions. And so at some point, in the next couple of years, if a B2B marketer does not have an AEO strategy, they're going to be left behind. So we do think that this is early and there's just a lot that is happening in the industry, but it's an exceptionally important part of your marketing channel strategy, and that's why we are leading the market with our AEO solution.
And what's the -- remind me, I probably know this, but what's the monetization strategy around that? Is this become just a central part of sort of the Marketing Hub in general? Or -- and this is sort of becomes more -- something that just brings more people in, you're helping them evolve? Or is there an opportunity to sort of take price a little bit as part of this as they get better, frankly, hopefully, better outcomes to go around it?
It's two parts. The first is that we launched a stand-alone solution, which means that if you don't have anything else and you don't want any other marketing solution from HubSpot, you can start with it. And the good news with that is it will start showing your share of voice and give you recommendations and you can just adopt it to get going. And we think of it as a front door if someone wants to look at this and they can start with that.
Now if you want to take content actions and you want to be able to drive much better multichannel content, then you do need Marketing Hub. So you would buy stand-alone and then upgrade into Marketing Hub Pro. That's the path. So it is a stand-alone solution.
The second way we think about it is it comes included within Marketing Hub Pro as well as Enterprise, which means it increases the value of our current solutions. But what we are finding early adopters do is that the base case, it will come with 25 prompts in 3 LLMs. Now if you look at our AEO strategy and how we've been able to get our visibility up, we have hundreds of prompts that we are tracking. And those hundreds of prompts give very different share of voice metrics and very different recommendations.
And so as Marketing Hub Pro+ customers begin to use AEO solutions, they are going to need more prompts and more visibility, and that will also consume credits. That's the same mechanism of included credits plus packs that you can buy. And so that's the second form of monetization. So that's -- you buy it stand-alone or you use it within our current products, and then you continue to use more of the prompts, then it will consume credits.
But you're aligned very closely with value to this?
Absolutely. I mean, I think that's -- it almost goes without saying, but in the prior cycle of SaaS, you were providing access to a technology that could add value. In AI, you're providing value. So everything has to be based on products delivering outcomes. And then you can monetize it, but you have to start with a very clear view of how you're delivering outcomes and value.
Yes. Nice thing about AI is it's very binary. As we were talking earlier, if you -- either deliver value, people will use it. If you don't, they don't have to turn on. It's -- I think it's very -- it's a positive over the long term for a lot of people that are delivering value.
Yes. Absolutely.
Obviously, a question I'm sure you get all the time is -- talk to us about sort of the interplay between the HubSpot platform and the model intelligence underneath it that will help power some of the answers and frankly, be sort of the brain behind sort of the orchestration layer that you have. What's your view on sort of the interplay between you all in Anthropic or an OpenAI? I think there's a better together scenario for most of these -- for these companies and you all, but can you just explain that a little bit or go through the way you think about it?
Yes. I mean, look, you know the narrative better than I do. It's like there is a very, very powerful technology which is LLMs, but the narrative has been like it wipes out all categories of software. And from the beginning, we've been saying that we think that LLMs and HubSpot are complementary. And now 3.5 years into it, our conviction is even more deep in terms of how complementary they are.
And you can look at this in multiple ways. The first way is like LLMs are powerful technology, but completely trained on publicly available information. And we have private information about a company, about marketing, about sales and about service. And so you have to make those two work. We can take the capabilities of the LLM, apply the context that we have, which is what do you do within marketing, sales and service, and then train the output so that it can be like much more targeted. So that's like one.
The second is everything that you get from LLMs are probabilistic. And everything that we need to do is a combination of probabilistic and deterministic. I just did my sales forecast. If they gave me a probabilistic answer, I would not be happy with a forecast that is probabilistic. I need a deterministic answer. I can go through that for many, many things within sales and marketing. So you need the combination of something that's probabilistic with deterministic.
The third thing I would say is LLMs are today, very, very single player. I can write an e-mail, I can write a blog. But if it's a marketing team that's working on a multi-language, multi-region campaign, it is a multiplayer mode. It's not a single player mode. And we bring that technology and make it available for multiple players.
And so for many of those reasons, we take a powerful technology and we apply it to the domain of marketing, sales and service and really help our customers get to outcomes. And that's why I think that we'll continue to work. And one of the leading indicators we see, Kirk, is that we were one of the first ones to launch connectors, connectors with ChatGPT, with Claude, as well as with Gemini.
And what we are finding in the patterns of users that are using those connectors is that they ask a lot of questions, but then they take a lot more actions within HubSpot. And the level of engagement in users with connectors is actually going up, which is a positive, which shows that there is like value in both. And I think that that's the pattern that we are beginning to see consistently.
And I think you guys have always been -- you've always been fans of sort of an open framework that you're going to have agents that want to come in, access some data on HubSpot through MCP or APIs, whatever it might be. How do you think about -- what's sort of the fair monetization strategy on that front? And I think a lot of companies are still figuring this out, frankly.
But I guess if a CFO wants to go get data, HubSpot to make a decision from a CFO perspective, you might not have a sales you might not have a Marketing Hub or a Sales Hub for them. If he want to bring information from HubSpot up to a dashboard to do his job, how do you think about the value you're bringing to that scenario? Because I think a lot of the incremental new use cases that are being built on Claude that you see are things that aren't necessarily -- they're not trying to replicate or replace what you are bringing. It's sort of a net new workflow. And I'm sure you want to be a part of that, right?
I mean, multiple thoughts there. First, we always care about being an open ecosystem, and that's been the posture from day 1. The second thought is that, again, contrasting between the SaaS world and the AI world. In SaaS, we delivered great user experience and great developer experience. So if you're a salesperson, you log into HubSpot, you had great experience on the graphical interface. If you are a developer, you had APIs to basically connect with HubSpot, extend, integrate all of those.
I think what is different with AI is that now we need to have agent experience. That means an agent can sit on top of HubSpot, either talk to HubSpot using MCP or talk to HubSpot with APIs or talk to HubSpot with CLIs. And why CLI? It's not like anything new. It's just that agentic coding was trained on command line interface. So it actually does a more efficient job with command line interface than actually APIs and other things.
So the fundamentals are the same. It's like better user experience, better developer experience and now better agent experience. So then the question becomes, how do you monetize it? We think about it in twofold. One is that we deliver data. And we've always had APIs that deliver data. We monitor the API usage. And unless you are kind of like bulk extracting every minute in real time, you don't trip that. And so if a CFO wants to really extract data, go ahead, do it.
We think that, that is not going to be the place of value as AI begins to develop. Here's why. You can, from HubSpot, basically say, I want all of my company information and I want to compute which companies have a propensity to close deals this month. You'll take company data, deal data, sales conversation data, you'll compute all of that outside of HubSpot, and you'll come up with a metric, which is called propensity to close. That's what you do with our data. Go ahead, do it. It will be inefficient, and you'll burn a lot of tokens and inference [ cost ] doing that.
The better way is that you can come to HubSpot and say give me accounts that are -- can have a high propensity to close, give me accounts that are high propensity to churn. And we would have done all of that because we have an insight layer, what is our growth context, and you can extract that and make a better decision as a CFO. What are you going to do as a CFO? You shouldn't be doing the first one. You should be doing the second one.
And the way we think about our API monetization is if you take data, go ahead, take it. And you'll get charged the same way, but we will be able to extract more value if we deliver more value through the insights. And that's what AI will do, and that's what our strategy is becoming. It's like 2-part, data API and insights API. And when we deliver the insights API in high volumes, we're going to be able to extract more. And that becomes a newer way in which we can monetize the agents interacting with us. And that's how we're thinking about it.
Look, this is all evolving. We're thinking deeply. We're experimenting. We're investing in all the right places, and then we'll see how this develops.
Okay. All right. Yes, please.
Can I throw off? How do you think about kind of the headless approach, right? I guess, subquestion to what you were talking about. You're now opening your existing product [indiscernible] you see in the future, you're leading the headless program, right? And maybe the problem is [indiscernible], so kind of flipping it?
Yes. I mean, look, headless is exactly what I described, which is an agent that can now have an experience running on top of HubSpot either through MCP or through API or through CLI. That is exactly what it is.
Now the question you're asking is, are you okay with that? I think absolutely. Like I said, we think that the future is our users using our agents or developers or agents developing on top of HubSpot and building, extending other agents. And we'll be able to monetize it either as data API or insights API and access to our platform.
And so our job is to deliver just best-in-class first-party agents, the agents that are in core marketing and core sales and core support that we have the domain expertise to, like our Customer Agent, Prospecting Agent, we want to deliver best-in-class agents there. And then we want to deliver a platform where other agents can sit on top and build additional automation, additional workflows, ability to extend to other agents. And when we do that, we have -- our thought process is like we'll monetize it in a very different manner.
And so there will be a balance of this. And again, think about the customer adoption journey that I talked about. If you are on the bleeding edge, then you're using agents and you're building on top of platforms, and we get to monetize it differently. If you are in the later majority, then you're not doing the headless development. What you're doing is actually adopting first-party agents that have been tested over and over again.
And I think that's our strategy. That's why the simplest way that we think about it is like agents run HubSpot and agents run on HubSpot, which is like first-party as well as the headless ecosystem approach that we're just talking about.
Can you talk about -- actually, I'm curious, how does that sort of concept start to impact like the thought process around like Starter customers? Meaning, if you think about it, you could start having Starter customers just sort of have an agent that they build, but then plug in a hub. Does it actually open the aperture? I'm kind of curious, you guys have done an amazing job bringing small customers in and then helping them grow with you.
Does AI, I guess, change that playbook at all at the low end of the market in terms of sort of that adoption? You guys have had lower-priced products that have brought them in, given them quick value. Just talk about that playbook, I guess, in a more agentic world.
Yes. I think that it's very -- AI is making more go-to-market folks builders. That's really the shift that we are beginning to see, right, which means that if you adopted HubSpot as a smaller team, a 5-person team and you started with marketing automation, you started with sales, the fundamentals of what we've provided are workflow sequences. Now it's like agentic automation and extensions, right? And you can continue to use those and grow.
I still think that there is a certain level of scale that you get to where the Starter is not going to have the scale that is required and you need to like upgrade, and that's been the path for us. We've had a play of bringing -- having a very compelling free product and then bringing it into Starter, converting the Starter volume into Pro. And I think what AI is going to allow us to do is that you can have a much more smoother curve because you don't have to jump from Starter to Pro. You can actually use a lot of the agentic capabilities, pay credits and kind of like extend the power of the platform before you kind of like jump to Pro.
But I think what it's also doing is that your ability to hone in on a use case and deliver value in minutes is really critical. And what we have been talking about, which is SaaS, much more about delivering a product that people begin to use and then get value. AI deliver value immediately, and that's the transformation that's happening within our Starter product as well, how quickly can you get to starter use case with an agent and begin to get value.
You guys are obviously using AI a ton internally, showing some good operating leverage. What's the thought process there? You all have always sort of really focused on and invested in R&D. You've always been a heavy R&D company. Can you kind of do both now? Is this sort of the perfect playbook for you to some degree where you can invest in AI, but also continue to get that kind of operating leverage out of AI internally?
Absolutely. And look, I think that we got on to this internal transformation as early as we got on to kind of like the product transformation and delivering value for customers. And what is not very obvious is that the way we build an AI product is like fundamentally different from the way you build a SaaS product.
And in order to do that, what the journey that we've gone through is started with copilots, GitHub, that kind of stuff [indiscernible] coding. Even with the technology and the level of capabilities that we see within the market, it hits a limit very quickly because it's not optimized to your developer environment. And if a HubSpot developer needs to build with the agentic coding, they need our libraries, our skills, our ability to test code and review code and get it through that process.
And so what we have done is we've optimized it. The industry now calls it like harness. Everything is like a cool harness. But what we've done is containerized it, optimized it for the internal developers. And so that gives us a lot more in terms of the pace of innovation. And we saw from the time that we actually started leveraging Cursor and Claude Code and the jump between that and our containerized optimized environment for HubSpot developers, the productivity jump is like massive. And that is because of all the things that I talked about.
And what we believe in is like we have now an agentic execution platform internally where building the next agent and the next agent becomes like much easier and faster because they are pulling from the same libraries, from the same skills, from the same optimized environment. And as the number of skills that our developers build increases, the ability to build an agent on top of that becomes easier. And for our customers, it results in a very consistent interface with agents, agent training. Like if you train 5 agents, you can see it in the same place rather than adopting 5 different agents from 5 different companies, training it and looking at the context differently. So I think like the internal transformation that we have done in the R&D will pay off in multiple years, but that is the leverage.
The other thing that you asked about is like how does that change our own operating leverage. And on the go-to-market side, any and every one of this, we've been like bleeding edge adopters. We have trained, we've experimented and we have scaled with that. And we are seeing certainly, areas where we are getting efficient. I talked a little bit earlier about Tier 1 support, where we've not hired anybody since 2024. And we have taken that and used that headcount in other places to get like leverage.
And that's one of the reasons why last year at Analyst Day, we provided a midterm target for our operating margin of 20% to 22%, and we reached that a year earlier, and we've increased our operating guidance this year. And I think when you come to our conference this September, we'll provide you the midterm and long term. And we feel that even though we're spending a lot in terms of agentic coding and our -- you'll see some pressure in gross margin, we feel confident that we can continue to drive operating leverage as a business. And that's because of how much we have done internal adoption and transformation with AI and how we continue to do that.
Okay. Any last questions? I have one more.
I guess part of the bad thesis behind the SaaS [indiscernible] is customers will start [ backloading ] their own solutions. Are you able to track when you have a customer churn? [indiscernible] Are you able to see like what percentage of your churned customers are going [ in-house ]? Is it something you're tracking or [indiscernible]?
Absolutely. And no, this is -- again, you cannot prove otherwise until it gets proven by itself, right? And so -- but we track our customers, why they buy, why they don't buy, and vibe coding is not coming up in conversations. I talk to customers every day of the week, and no one is saying, I'm just going to start like vibe coding.
I'll tell you the 3 customer conversations I had today. One was a transportation company, which is like all transportation logistics. Another one was a homebuilder, and the third was a skin clinic. None of them have the capabilities, nor do they have the interest to vibe code. That's number one.
The second thing is vibe coding is all about coding becoming easier, but not integrations. We have integrations with 2,000 other providers. So you vibe code CRM, and then who's going to connect it with the ERP, with the accounting system, with the project management system, with name your next tool? No one has that capability to build all of those integrations. And then that vibe coded developer now gets like an even better offer from another person and leaves, and then it's all gone.
And then finally, the vibe coding person has not enough domain expertise. We know what's happening in AEO. I can tell you that our best people in AEO will learn so much this month compared to the last 6 months because the industry and the domain is changing so rapidly. So how is the vibe coding person going to be able to do all of that? So look, I know the narrative, but coding has gotten easier. Delivering value out of applications is still very, very challenging, and we don't see that within our customers.
[indiscernible]?
I mean, I don't know if that...
[indiscernible]?
Yes, it's minimal. It doesn't register is the way I would say it.
And no change over the last 3 years?
No.
Do you think the lack of that is also a factor of -- like you have so many B2B customers, meaning these aren't sort of B2C companies, these are -- if you're a law firm delivering that -- like the time it takes to go vibe code something and if you deliver something to your own customers that doesn't work, there's reputational risk for a lot of your customers?
Certainly. I mean this week, I had a conversation with a midsized bank. And I was talking to their CRO and their CIO. And the midsized bank is like, first of all, vibe coding did not count. But most of what their conversation was how can we deliver trusted output that we can scale and grow with and how can we make sure that our data is safe and it's governed and it passes all of the security compliance and SOC. And how do we make sure that we are future-proofing this.
Even if they have the capabilities, like a midsized bank is not going to like want to vibe code it on the side and custom build it. I mean, look, throughout the history of technology innovations, there's always this moment of like custom building can replace something else. It's turned out that it is harder than just custom coding and building. There's a lot more to going beyond that.
Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should in many cases.
Absolutely.
So we'll leave it there. Thank you very much for your time. Appreciate it, Yamini.
Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — 2026 Evercore Global TMT Conference
HubSpot, Inc. — 2026 Evercore Global TMT Conference
HubSpot positioniert sich als Plattform‑zentrale für AI‑Agenten: hybride Preisgestaltung, Agent‑First‑Produkte und Monetarisierung über Credits sowie Insights‑APIs.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Fokus: HubSpot baut AI‑Agenten (z.B. Prospecting Agent, Customer Agent) als Kernangebote, um unmittelbare Outcomes statt reinen Seat‑Zugang zu liefern.
- Preisstrategie: Langfristig hybride Monetarisierung aus Seat‑Komponenten (Basisfunktionen) und nutzungs-/ergebnisbasierten Credits.
🚀 Strategische Highlights
- Agent‑First: Kern‑Agenten wurden outcome‑basiert gestaltet (z.B. Customer Agent: Preis halbiert, Abrechnung nach Resolutions statt Gesprächen) zur Beschleunigung der Adoption.
- AEO (Search): Launch einer AEO‑Lösung (Answer Engine Optimization) als Stand‑alone und in Marketing Hub Pro/Enterprise; zusätzliche Prompt‑Nutzung verbraucht Credits.
- Offenes Ökosystem: Connectors zu GPT/Claude/Gemini, Headless‑Ansatz via APIs/CLI/MCP; Plattform soll First‑party‑Agenten liefern und Drittanbieter‑Agenten zulassen.
🔍 Neue Informationen
- Q1‑Kontext: Q1: +18% Wachstum, Net Adds >10.000, Umsatz und operative Marge über Guidance — Management nennt kurzfristige ARR‑Headwinds durch Preisänderungen.
- Monetarisierung: Zwei‑Stufen‑Ansatz: rohe Daten‑APIs bleiben offen, echte Wertschöpfung und höhere Monetarisierung über Insights‑APIs (vorgefertigte Erkenntnisse) erwartet.
- Go‑to‑Market: Sales und Customer Success unter gemeinsamer Leitung, Trials und Proof‑of‑Value (Woche‑1/4) als zwingende Elemente der Verkaufs‑ und Implementierungsstrategie.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Datenreife: Kritische Nachfrage, welche Kunden sofort Agenten nutzen können — Management segmentiert nach Datenreife; viele Mid‑Market‑Kunden sind schnell einsetzbar, Großkunden brauchen länger.
- Preismodell‑Risiko: Nachfrage zu kurzfristigen ARR‑Effekten; Management räumt Headwinds ein, erwartet aber langfristig höhere Adoption und solides Wachstum durch Credits.
- In‑house‑Risk: Ob Kunden eigene Lösungen bauen (vibe coding) — Management sieht das Risiko aktuell als minimal; Integrationen, Security und Domain‑Expertise sprechen gegen Self‑Build.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Relevanz: Kurzfristig spürt HubSpot Anpassungskosten (Preisänderungen, Trial‑Investitionen), langfristig aber potenziell stärkere Monetarisierung durch Credits, Insights‑APIs und breite Agent‑Adoption; wichtig ist die Execution bei Daten‑Readiness, Trials und Partner‑Ökosystem.
HubSpot, Inc. — Jefferies Software
1. Question Answer
All right. Hi, everybody. Thanks for joining us. I'm honored to have the CEO of HubSpot, Yamini Rangan with us. Yamini, thanks so much for making the time to come down to beautiful Newport Beach, and appreciate you joining us.
And I think I'll kick off with probably the question everybody has been asking you, which is the AI strategy at HubSpot is resonating. You had the Spring Spotlight. You showcased a lot of new products. What's the main message or two that you want us to take away from that -- from the Spring Spotlight and what resonated most with your customers?
All right. Samad, thank you so much for having us here, and it is a wonderful day. It's turning out to be beautiful outside. So thanks a lot for having us here.
Spring Spotlight for HubSpot -- and maybe just a step back, our AI strategy is to help our customers become much more productive with our platform and also deliver work for customers. The second part, which is delivering work for customers, comes in the form of many first-party agents that we deliver for our customers.
And at Spring Spotlight, we launched AEO. We'll talk about AEO Agent. We'll talk about Prospecting Agent and Data Agent. And just to kind of like step back, the set of first-party agents that we are delivering to our customers are: one, to help them resolve their support tickets; two, on the sales side is to help them drive much better outreach so that they can continue to build their pipeline; and three, on the marketing side is to build awareness using new tools like AEO.
And that -- one of the things that we have learned is that you need to have great context. Context delivers better outcomes. Otherwise, AI is just going to deliver an output that looks like a slop. And there's a big difference between AI outputs and AI outcomes, and that's the set of innovation that we delivered at Spring Spotlight.
Where are we seeing adoption and initial kind of reaction? I think AEO, we'll probably talk a little bit more about AEO, but we announced a stand-alone product as well as capabilities of AEO built into Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise, and we're seeing a strong adoption and early trials there and continued adoption of the agents that we talked about, Customer and Prospecting Agent.
Great. And then look, I think there's a lot of either confusion or still learning where we are in terms of the relationship between the LLMs and between existing the existing software platforms. What relationship does HUBS have with the LLMs? Sam mentioned you by name on stage, Dario was at INBOUND last year. This year's lineup for INBOUND, hopefully, everybody is there. I think it's now -- I forgot what the rebranding of the name is.
UNBOUND.
UNBOUND. There we go. I just didn't want to screw that up. But -- so you have all these disruptors. Is it a complementary or competitive relationship? And just help people understand what they're misunderstanding?
Absolutely complementary. I think for the last couple of years, every single time we've gotten the question about LLMs and HubSpot in particular, applications in general, we've maintained that it is a complementary relationship.
And here's how I would say. If you think about an LLM, LLMs are trained on publicly available data on the Internet, petabytes of publicly available data. HubSpot has the data and the context of how go-to-market teams operate in 300,000 customers. That is why it's complementary. So you need the combination of LLM capabilities with the context of how sales or marketing or service and support functions within a company in order to deliver more growth and better leads. Because ultimately, our customers don't care about AI for the sake of AI. They care about more leads, better awareness, closed pipeline and better customer outcomes, and you need that context from HubSpot to be able to drive that.
Here's the thing. We are partners with all of them, right? We have a deep partnership with Anthropic, with OpenAI, with Gemini, and we continue to work very closely with them. We understand where they're going in terms of their road map. They talk about us as the SMB partner. And so it is a very complementary relationship.
The question in the market and the broader narrative is, are LLMs going to get like so good in terms of capabilities that they just destroy the value of the application layer? And this is where we have a point of view. The point of view is that you need probabilistic output of LLMs, but you need deterministic output within sales. If you are running sales and you are a CRO of a company and you just like run an LLM and you get a probabilistic answer of what your next forecast is going to be, it's not going to cut it. You're not going to be able to like drive that. So there's a combination of having both probabilistic as well as deterministic work.
The other part is all of the workflows, the logic is within applications. What do I mean by that? You can go to an LLM and say write me a blog. Pretty easy to write a blog. But if you go to an LLM today and say draw a campaign for me across 5 different channels, YouTube, LinkedIn, pick your channel. And I'm going to give you $1 million and I want you to run this campaign across 10 million contacts that I have and then make sure that the campaigns are attributed with the right revenue that they're driving, it has none of those capabilities. Those -- that's like the logic that exists within applications, LLMs can call on those logic. They call it really well, but they don't have that logic, and that's, again, why it's complementary.
The third thing that I would say is LLMs are single player. It's easy for one person to use an LLM and to share that output, but applications that drive growth are inherently multiplayer. If you have a sales team and the sales team has like 50 reps, every rep's pipeline change every single day needs to be represented as the team pipeline roll up, and that is not what an LLM does. And so again, very, very complementary.
Where I think is that LLM capabilities will continue to improve, but what HubSpot delivers on top of that is a growth context, knowing deep domain expertise within marketing, sales and service, but also contextualizing it to the business that we serve. That's why it continues to be very exciting and also complementary.
There is another -- bless you. There's another thing that you had mentioned in a meeting I heard earlier, and I think it's important, which you were asked about the pain points that HubSpot solves that maybe are underappreciated that an LLM can't. And I know you mentioned the contact side, but I was wondering if you could dig a little bit deeper into the pain points that HubSpot uniquely solves that maybe an LLM can't today like permissioning?
Yes, absolutely. And the conversation that we were having is like what are inherent value that like HubSpot customers buy us for. And the example that I would give is a marketing automation, right? Like think about a team within marketing that has to figure out what are the set of campaigns that they need to drive in a particular quarter across what channels, by allocating how much resources and how many contacts is that going to reach in multiple languages across multiple regions. Now think about the complexity of all of that. That is exactly what our solution provides, and that is not something that is easily extractable or easily done by an LLM.
The second thing that I mentioned is also the permissions. Now you think about a sales rep that has access to run certain sequences and is part of a sales hierarchy, you need to know their role. You need to know their permission. You need to know which team they belong. If they change roles and go to another team, you need to know where they are now going to roll up to. All of those permissions, the security, the governance associated with the actions they can take, that belongs to an application layer.
So you think about the content, the conversations that applications have, that's the growth context. You think about the workflows and the logic that applications have, that is not immediately replaceable. And you think about the multi-tenant, the multiplayer mode that we support with the right permissions. You put all of that together, this is why we -- again, going back to the point of like is it one day that there's just one application which is an LLM. That does not seem like the right approach to think about what is happening within the space.
Look, I'm old enough to remember when the hyperscalers are going to do everything. And I think we have more software than ever out there.
Exactly.
So I think another area that's been a big focal point, and I think it was maybe even more so early last year is on the disruption to SEO from Agentic search. And I know HubSpot recently, we mentioned AEO earlier. I was wondering if you could double-click into that, explain why that's important and how maybe customer behavior is changing and what the value of AEO is now in an LLM-centric world?
Yes, absolutely. Look, the leads that used to get generated were from people searching on Google, clicking blue links and coming to the website. The industry calls it content leads, leads based on content. That as a source for the top of funnel is actually declining.
And an interesting statistic for HubSpot customers, we track all of the content leads. This year alone, the top-of-funnel content leads have dropped by 27% across HubSpot's customer base. So you can begin to see that the content leads declining, which is basically SEO is having a huge impact. And every B2B marketing person out there is now looking to diversify their sources to other areas.
That is the same playbook that we've been on. We've diversified our set of sources. We had even more content leads, inbound leads that were part of our top of funnel. And for the past 2 years, we've been on the journey to diversify our lead sources from INBOUND to using social media with YouTube presence, with LinkedIn presence, to newsletters, to podcasts and now to AEO. So the first big trend that's happening in marketing is diversification of top-of-funnel lead sources. And that is the playbook that we launched with Loop. That is the set of products that we have within Marketing Hub.
What is new and interesting is Answer Engine Optimization, or AEO, which is how does a product or a brand show up in an LLM with citation. That is what AEO is. And what we have found is that if you show up within an LLM answer, the conversion is 3x better. Not 3% better, like 3x better because the person that's actually doing the prompting is deeper in their search. They have much more specific questions, and their -- the questions -- whatever the answers they get, they tend to act faster from that, and so the conversion rate is higher.
That is the reason why we launched a stand-alone tool for AEO. This was part of our Spring Spotlight release. And what it does is for our customers, it will say, what's their AI visibility? So basically give it a set of prompts and it'll say, what is your share of voice? If someone asked this question in an LLM, how many times do you show up? That's the first thing it does.
Then the second thing it does is it will give you recommendations. Well, you're not showing up in Reddit or this community. So make sure that your content is actually available in that. That's the second. And the third, which is coming pretty soon, is you can immediately use our content management tools to be able to drive content actions based on those recommendations. That's the AEO solution.
There's going to be a time where every B2B company has to have AEO solutions. There's no other way because that's where the industry is going. And so we have a stand-alone tool so customers can start with that, and it's also available as part of our Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise. And we think that this could be a new front door where people get started with AEO. And then when they begin to need to take like content actions, they can upgrade to Marketing Hub Pro and Enterprise. And so pretty excited about that opportunity.
So we've had all this technology transformation, you guys are driving the charge, but it's also led to some bold choices on the business side, business decisions. So let's talk about the pricing model change. There's been a lot of conversation around that. What were you seeing that drove you to move to outcome-based pricing for your agents? And what are the early results that you're seeing from the change?
Yes, absolutely. So just to provide context to our pricing model, we have a combination of seats and credits. That's our pricing model. What we do is for anybody that gets a core seat or a sales or service seat, we provide included credits, which means you begin to start using AI features as well as agents. In addition to that, they can buy packs of additional credits. Credits could be bought in packs of like 100, 1,000 and beyond.
And the way we think about credit consumption is that our first-party agents, the agents that HubSpot builds and we deliver work as outcomes will be based on outcomes that we deliver. Makes logical sense, right? If our Customer Agent is resolving tickets, then we'll only charge when we resolve a ticket. That is literally the change that we made. And if our Prospecting Agent is delivering a qualified lead, we will only charge when we deliver a qualified lead. I think that basically shows the confidence that we have within our product strategy and the level of outcomes that we are delivering for our customers based on that product strategy. And so we made those changes to really align our pricing mechanism to the product strategy and where we are going.
In addition to that, there are other parts of our product as well as platform that will consume credits, like a number of our customers build custom agents on top of HubSpot. Those are all just going to be based on credits consumed. So again, you'll have seats that have included credits. Credits can be consumed by first-party agents that deliver work. They can also be consumed through second party and custom agents and other things within the platform. And the combination of core seats and credits are kind of the emerging way in which we are monetizing AI across HubSpot.
Yes. Along with the model change, and I think there's just a lot of movement happening. You guys made some choices on the go-to-market side concurrent with that. So why was April the right time to invest in that sales enablement? And how should we think about that helping to accelerate AI traction in the quarters ahead?
Yes, absolutely. Let me unpack what we did and why that has a near-term impact in terms of net new ARR, but sets us up. So coming into this year, we -- in general, we plan for a virtual kickoff in the first quarter and enablement in the second quarter. That has always been the model. So it's not a new timing in terms of April.
But what was different this time is that we spent a lot of time transitioning our go-to-market teams to be able to position agents and therefore, credits and really driving the AI adoption. So there is a sales motion change that's happening, and we're ahead of that.
Specifically, if I unpack it, in Q1 this year, we saw our customers really wanting proof of value of agents that are delivering work. What does that mean? It means that if they want to use Prospecting Agent, they want to make sure that the e-mails that the Prospecting Agent are writing is really what their BDR or their sales rep or their team would actually write, and they want to feel comfortable with that output. So what we did was we actually gave a 28-day trial period for those types of agents.
And AEO Agent, Prospecting Agent, Customer Agent, we've given them trial periods. Now it has some impact of elongating sales cycles in the short term, but we intentionally made that choice in order to seed our customers with these agents so that they can continue to grow. That's like choice number one.
The second thing is we did take our sales team, we drove a lot of enablement and helping them communicate the value of agents and credits. And that has a short-term impact in terms of the quarter, but also getting them to understand the pricing model and where we are going with outcome-based pricing and getting comfort in that.
Now look, it has an impact near term, and we are very transparent and clear about that. But the rationale is we are in the very early stages of AI transformation. It's like mile 3 in 26 miles of like a marathon race that you're running. And what is important at this stage is removing blockers for customers, seeding the right Agentic use cases and making sure that the outcomes that we deliver are super clear. And when we do this in the early stage, we know that the right adoption will result from the changes that we're making. So a set of intentional changes to drive AI adoption over the following quarters.
Very helpful. And I know we've talked a lot about the innovation that you're doing on behalf of customers, but the company itself is internally transforming how you operate. And I know Dharmesh also speaks a lot to this in different forums, as have you. So I'm curious just as you guys are thinking about drinking your own champagne, I'll use that terminology, what type of transformation are you seeing from an internal perspective from AI? What tools is HubSpot unleashing for its own workforce?
Yes. As much as we have driven AI transformation within the product and the platform, we are driving internal transformation with AI, and we're probably bleeding edge adopters of AI. And that has two benefits. One is as we experiment, iterate and scale with AI, those translate into product in terms of the feedback directly in go-to-market. And second, we are much more authentic in communicating what works and what doesn't work with our customers. So that's why we are constantly on the bleeding edge.
Specifically in go-to-market, I would point to a handful of areas where we have seen really good results. The first is on -- in the marketing side, if you go to our website, 82% of web chats are handled by AI. And we have increased that percentage pretty significantly over the past few quarters. And that is something that again translates into product that we can deliver for customers.
The second is AEO, which we talked about. Even before we launched this AEO product for the last probably 6 quarters, we have experimented with AEO. Our leads coming in from AEO has really grown. Pretty small base, but grown significantly over the past few quarters, and we have continued to be #1 in CRM in terms of AI visibility. So those two are areas.
In sales, Prospecting Agent using intent sources and then driving e-mails so that our BDR teams and sales teams can actually have broader outreach as well as assistance in terms of deals, deals closing as well as summarizing, all of that we are doing, which has increased the productivity on the sales side pretty meaningfully over the last few quarters. And then on support, I'll say that we have not hired a single support -- Tier 1 support agent since 2024, and we've been able to use that productivity in other areas of the business.
And so in go-to-market, we are really in the bleeding edge of leveraging both agents as well as assistants on top of HubSpot's Agentic platform to drive our own productivity. And I'd say more importantly, 3.5 years into leveraging AI on the bleeding edge, it's one thing to get individual productivity with AI, right? And we are seeing that. You're using an LLM, I use LLM to write a whole bunch of things, and of course, that improves it.
But there is a difference from going from individual productivity to institutional productivity. And that requires reimagining teams, reimagining workflows, providing a common context and a set of areas that we can go deep. And that's the learning. And that's kind of the vision of where we are going next. We are driving the next level of transformation internally within HubSpot to be able to reimagine how we get work done.
Listen, it's something that we're grappling with every day. I know we had a little side chat about we've gotten 5 new tools, but the hours of my day haven't increased. And I think that's something we're all kind of struggling with right now to unlock that productivity.
And so -- but we are seeing -- you mentioned not having hired in support for some amount of time. And certainly, the leverage is there, right? Recently, the company took up its full year margin forecast. How are you thinking about the productivity gains and letting that margin flow through versus reinvesting given just the big opportunity ahead? How do you balance that from the CEO's perspective?
Yes. You balance it very carefully. And I think the way we think about it is that our revenue growth continues to grow, and there's a gap between net revenue growth and headcount growth. We've been very, very disciplined in terms of where we hire and what kind of talent we hire and how do we drive a level of AI fluency within the talent so that they can drive higher productivity. And that's exactly what you saw.
At Analyst Day last year, we provided a midterm target range in terms of non-GAAP operating margin of 20% to 22%, and we reached it a year ahead. And that is at the same time when we are investing in Agentic coding and our gross margins have gone down, right? We mentioned in Q1 that our gross margin went down. At the same time, we increased the full year operating margin guidance for the year, and that is what we are doing.
So the way we are accomplishing it is we'll continue to invest in AI innovation. We'll continue to invest in Agentic coding that drives our developer productivity. At the same time, we're going to find through disciplined hiring as well as transforming our internal productivity and tools to get the operating margin leverage. And we're more confident now in terms of setting better like operating margin targets for both the midterm as well as the longer term, and you'll hear more about this at our upcoming Analyst Day at UNBOUND.
Awesome. Well, Yamini, thank you so much for joining us. Like you mentioned, I look forward to seeing you in a couple of months at UNBOUND. But meanwhile, we hope that HubSpot does really well. We're big fans. So thank you for joining us.
Thank you. Really appreciate the support. Thank you, everyone.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Jefferies Software
HubSpot, Inc. — Jefferies Software
Fireside‑Chat: HubSpot setzt auf Agenten‑basierte AI (AEO, Prospecting, Customer Agent), outcome‑basiertes Pricing und interne AI‑Produktivität als Wachstumstreiber.
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot sieht sich als Anwendungsschicht über Large Language Models (LLMs): eigene, kontextbewusste Agenten liefern deterministische, multi‑user Workflows (Support, Sales Outreach, Marketing) statt generischer LLM‑Outputs und sollen so echte Geschäftsergebnisse (Leads, Pipeline, Tickets) schaffen.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- AI‑Agenten: Erste‑Parteien‑Agenten (Customer, Prospecting, AEO) sollen Arbeit für Kunden erledigen — z.B. Tickets lösen oder qualifizierte Leads generieren — und damit Produktivität und Upsell fördern.
- AEO (Answer Engine Optimization): Stand‑alone Tool plus Integration in Marketing Hub; AEO misst AI‑Sichtbarkeit, gibt Empfehlungen und erlaubt später direkte Content‑Aktionen.
- Preis & GTM: Kombination aus Seats und Credits; für Agenten gilt outcome‑basiertes Pricing (z.B. Zahlung pro gelöstes Ticket oder qualifiziertem Lead) und Sales‑Enablement mit 28‑Tage‑Trials.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Produkt:** Stand‑alone AEO veröffentlicht; AEO‑Funnel soll dreifach höhere Conversion liefern als klassische Content‑Leads.
- Preismodell: Outcome‑basierte Abrechnung für erste‑Parteien‑Agenten; Credits auch für Custom Agents.
- Adoption: Erste Trials laufen; HubSpot meldet intern 82% Web‑Chats durch AI und seit 2024 keine Neueinstellungen für Tier‑1 Support mehr.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- LLM vs App: Management betont Komplementarität: LLMs liefern probabilistische Outputs, HubSpot liefert deterministische, workflow‑ und permission‑basierte Logik für Teams.
- SEO‑Disruption/AEO: Content‑Leads sind rückläufig (HubSpot: −27% Top‑of‑Funnel Content‑Leads) — AEO adressiert LLM‑basierte Sichtbarkeit und soll bessere Conversion bringen (≈3x laut Management).
- Go‑to‑Market & Pricing: Outcome‑Pricing und 28‑Tage‑Trials sollen Vertrauen schaffen; kurzfristig verlängern Trials Sales‑Zyklen, langfristig aber höhere AI‑Adoption erwarten.
⚡ Bottom Line
HubSpot setzt klar auf AI‑Agenten plus AEO als Differenzierer und führt ein outcome‑basiertes Monetarisierungsmodell ein. Kurzfristig sind längere Sales‑Zyklen und Reinvestitionen zu erwarten; mittelfristig könnte stärkere AI‑Adoption zu ARR‑Upsell und operativer Hebelwirkung führen. Risiko: noch frühe Phase der Adoption, Erfolg hängt von Skalierung und Kundenakzeptanz ab.
HubSpot, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, and welcome toHubSpot's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. My name is Liz, and I will be your operator today. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to hand the conference over to Head Director of Investor Relations, Chuck MacGlashing. Please go ahead.
Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. Today, we'll be discussing the results announced in the press release that we issued this afternoon. With me on the call this afternoon is Yamini Rangan, our Chief Executive Officer; Dharmesh Shah, our Co-Founder and CTO; and Kate Bueker, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we start, I'd like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement included in today's press release. During this call, we'll make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws including statements regarding our financial guidance for the second fiscal quarter and full year 2026, future financial performance, business outlook and strategy. These statements reflect our views only as of today and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise them.
Please refer to the cautionary language in today's press release, our Form 10-Q and other SEC filings for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. During the course of today's call, we'll refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in today's press release.
Now it's my pleasure to turn over the call to HubSpot's Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan. Yamini?
Thank you, Charles, and welcome to everyone joining us today. I'll start with our Q1 2026 results and share what's driving our performance. Then I'll walk through our strategy and the progress we made with our Spring Spotlight product update and how they're delivering real outcomes for our customers. I'll close with how we are balancing growth and profitability as we transform as an AI-first company.
Let's dive in. Q1 was a solid quarter for HubSpot. -- with revenue growing 18.2% year-over-year in constant currency. We delivered 4 points of non-GAAP operating margin expansion year-over-year, bringing our operating margin to 17.8%. Q1 marked a meaningful milestone for HubSpot as our total customer count reached nearly 300,000 globally, driven by 10,800 net customer additions in the quarter. I'm pleased with how our AI strategy is translating into measurable growth outcomes for our customers.
We came into this year with clear levers to drive growth, and they're working. Our core growth levers of upmarket, multi-hub and platform consolidation and pricing tailwind remains solid. At the same time, our emerging AI monetization levers of core seats and credits are gaining traction.
Let me walk you through each one and how they drove Q1 performance. Our market momentum continues to be strong. Larger customers are consolidating on HubSpot to drive AI innovation and reduce total cost of ownership. In Q1, deals over 60,000 annual recurring revenue grew 37% year-over-year and deals over 120,000 ARR grew 64% year-over-year. Our partner ecosystem remains a core competitive moat with partners, sourcing and core selling many of our largest deals. AI adoption in B2B starts with clean data and unified context. That is what is driving our multi-hub and platform momentum.
Customers who bring together marketing, sales and service on HubSpot, get a single connected view of their customers and unified growth context that AI can act on. That value proposition is resonating. In Q1, 63% of new Pro customers landed with multiple hubs up 3 points year-over-year and 42% of our Pro+ installed base by ARR now owns 4 or more hubs, up 6 points year-over-year. Bottom line is this. customers are choosing HubSpot as the data and AI foundation for their go to market. In addition, our pricing model changes from 2024 continues to benefit overall growth. We lowered the price to get started and removed seat minimums to give customers a frictionless path to upgrade as they see value. That shift is largely complete.
About 90% of our installed base customers have migrated to the new pricing model, and 50% of our ARR has gone through their first renewal. We expect this pricing tailwind to continue as remaining customers come up for renewal and new customers upgrade based on the value we deliver. Now beyond our proven core levers, our AI monetization with core seats and credit is picking up pace. In 2025, we added significant AI data and platform value to the core set. Breeze assistant, smart starts, projects and company enrichment data are all now included. We also unbundled the Smart CRM, so customers can start with just a core seat. Our vision is to make Core Set an essential foundation for every go-to-market employees and the momentum back up that strategy.
Active core seat users grew 90% year-over-year and over 25% of Pro+ customers have now purchased additional core seats, up over 12 points year-over-year. Credit consumption is accelerating. Total credits consumed grew 67% quarter-over-quarter. The top use cases in Q1 were customer agent at 53% of credits consumed, Prospecting Agent at 17%, data agent at 16% and intent monitoring at 12%. Customer agents we found clear product market fit and now Prospecting Agent and data agent are gaining momentum, broadening the base of how customers get value.
Customers are not just trying AI. They're building it into how they work. Core seats and credits are becoming real growth levers. And as more use cases mature, we expect boats to compound. Now let me shift to the momentum from spring Spotlight and the progress on our strategy. Our AI strategy is simple: make AI work for growth companies. We have always won by deeply understanding the customer segment we serve and democratizing sophisticated technology for them. And that is exactly what we are doing with AI.
Today, companies are not struggling to find new AI tools. They're struggling to drive real growth outcomes. The difference comes down to context. AI without the right context produces output. AI with the right controducers outcome, and that is the gap HubSpot is built to close. The foundation of our platform is growth context. The specific knowledge that makes AI useful for go-to-market teams. It knows who the best customers are and why they buy. It knows how the best reps work and how deals close. It knows what progress pipeline looks like and where deals get stuck.
HubSpot captures all of this, business team, process, customer context across nearly 300,000 businesses in every industry. This becomes the shared foundation for agents to do real work and drive growth outcomes, as many of you saw at our investor webinar last month. We're not building AI features on top of CRM. We're building an agentic customer platform where growth context is the engine, agents can run on HubSpot and agents can run HubSpot -- running on HubSpot means any agent, ours or anyone else's can plug into HubSpot's data, context and capabilities as a building block.
Running HubSpot means agents can operate the platform end-to-end through our APIs, MCP server and whatever access methods come next. This openness is a strategic choice. The more agents that run on HubSpot, the more valuable our context becomes and the more valuable or context the stronger a platform gets. At Spring Spotlight, we launched key innovations to help customers drive outcomes with AI. Let me share the momentum we are seeing with our top agents.
Prospecting Agent handles the full prospecting life cycle, monitoring, buying signals, identifying high-intent prospects and crafting personalized outreach. Nearly 14,000 customers have activated it, up 33% quarter-over-quarter. Jotform an online form builder used by over 35 million people worldwide, train prospecting agents on their brand positioning and messaging and move to a fully automated setup, purchasing 625,000 credits per month to power it. In a direct test at Jotform, Prospecting Agent qualified leads on par with human reps, freeing the team to focus on customer meetings and closing deals.
Next, smart deal progression brings to life our vision of self-updating CRM. It listens to conversations, suggests CRM update, draft follow-up e-mails and recommends next steps so sales reps can focus on closing deals, not updating records. Customers are seeing a 10x improvement in CRM update accuracy, and we are seeing 75% repeat weekly usage. Data agent, which we launched last fall and updated at Spring spotlight is gaining significant traction. It enriches customer records, surfaces buying intent signals and prioritizes best fit accounts, giving marketing a better foundation for campaigns and sales a clearer view of prospects.
We're seeing significant growth in adoption. Over 9,000 customers have activated data agent, up 122% since last quarter and weekly usage is also up. We also enhance Customer Agent and expanded it to e-mail to help customers scale support with AI. We now have over 9,000 customers and the average resolution rate has climbed to 70%, up 5 points from last quarter, with some customers exceeding 90% resolution rates.
Now at the same time, we are reimagining marketing for the AI era. We launched HubSpot AEO at Spring spotlight. -- to help marketers see how their brand appears in AI tools like Chat, Gemini and perplexity and take actions to improve it. Early momentum is strong across paid, earned and owned with campaign activities earning millions of compression. This is beginning to drive trials and purchases of both stand-alone AEO and Marketing Hub Pro.
Customer outcomes across all of our updates this year speak for themselves. Limelight is booking meetings with prospecting agents at the same rate as their SDRs. Synergy is resolving 85% of support conversations autonomously, and Sandler grew leads 160% with our new AU tools. across sales, service and marketing. Our agents are doing real work and driving outcomes, exactly what we want to see. The confidence we have in our product strategy is also reflected in how we are evolving pricing. We believe AI value should be measured on outcomes. So we recently updated our pricing for agents to match.
Customer agents has moved to consuming credits based on resolved tickets and prospecting agents has moved to qualified leads recommended for outreach. Both agents now come with free 28-day trial so customers can see the value before they commit. This is outcome-based pricing in its simplest form. Customers pay when the agent works. We expect both our product updates at Spring Spotlight and pricing changes to accelerate adoption because when value is easy to observe, the decision to expand is easy to make.
Let me close with how we are balancing growth and profitability as we transform as an AI-first company. We are transforming how we build, how we grow and how we operate, and that transformation is showing up in our results. On how we build, 100% of our engineers now use AI tools, and we've seen a 73% increase in lines of code updated per engineer. We are shipping better products faster because we built a shared platform underneath our agents. Every new capability or skill we add makes the whole platform more powerful and our advantage compounds. On how we grow, -- we now have an agent first go-to-market motion from demand generation to prospecting to customer success, and it is working.
On how we operate. We are moving from individual productivity to team-level transformation to what we call institutional productivity, where the context and processes of the company are encoded and available to everyone when they need it. We are investing aggressively in AI innovation while expanding operating margins at the same time. We not only beat our Q1 operating margin target, but also expect to deliver 2 points of operating margin expansion in 2026. That is a meaningful step up, and it reflects the operating leverage we are building as an AI-first company.
In closing, our core growth drivers upmarket momentum, multi-hub adoption and pricing remains strong and durable. AI is adding 2 incremental levers, core seat and credit monetization. Together, they give us confidence in our ability to deliver durable growth while expanding profitability.
With that, I'll hand it over to our CFO, Kate Bueker, to walk you through our financial and operating results.
Thanks, Yamini. Let's turn to our first quarter 2026 financial results. Q1 revenue grew 23% year-over-year as reported and 18% in constant currency. Q1 subscription revenue grew 23% year-over-year, while services and other revenue increased by 22% and both on an as-reported basis. Domestic revenue grew 18% year-over-year in Q1. International revenue growth was 29% as reported and 18% in constant currency representing 49% of total revenue.
Yamini mentioned, Q1 marked a major milestone for HubSpot as our total customer count climbed to nearly 300,000, a 16% year-over-year increase. This was fueled by the nearly 10,800 net new customers we added during the quarter with a particular strength in starter customer additions. Average subscription revenue per customer was $11,700 in Q1, up 6 points year-over-year as reported and 2 points in constant currency. We continue to expect quarterly net additions in the $9,000 to $10,000 range, along with low to mid-single-digit ASRPC growth in constant currency, with growth ramping throughout 2026.
Customer dollar retention remained healthy in the high 80s, while net revenue retention was 103%, down sequentially as expected, but up over 0.5 point year-over-year. As a reminder, we typically see a seasonal step down in net revenue retention in Q1 following peak upgrade activity in Q4. For the full year 2026, we continue to expect net revenue retention to expand by 1, 2 points year-over-year, driven by a combination of seat expansion and increasing consumption of credits. Q1 calculated billings were $912 million, growing 19% year-over-year as reported and 17% in constant currency.
Non-GAAP operating margin was 18%, up 4 points compared to the year ago period. This expansion reflects our disciplined approach to hiring and the benefit from FX movements in our partner commissions program change partially offset by strategic investments in AI initiatives to drive both customer value and internal operating efficiencies. GAAP operating margin was 3% in Q1, compared to a negative operating margin of 4% in the year ago period. This 7 points of expansion reflects our non-GAAP operating income expansion and a 3-point reduction in stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenue.
Non-GAAP net income was $143 million, and non-GAAP net income per diluted share was $2.72, up 49% and 53% year-over-year, respectively. GAAP net income was $33 million in Q1 and GAAP net income per diluted share was $0.62. In the first quarter, the company generated $154 million of free cash flow or 17% of revenue. Our cash and marketable securities totaled $1.8 billion at the end of March. During the quarter, we bought back $211 million of stock under our current $1 billion share repurchase program. Our continued strong cash position provides us with the flexibility to return capital to shareholders while maintaining our focus on investing in organic innovation and opportunistic M&A, underscoring our conviction in our long-term opportunity.
Before turning to guidance, I want to share a bit more color on a couple of shifts we're seeing in our business. First, as we continue to move upmarket, we've seen a shift in linearity in our quarters to a more back-end loaded bookings cadence. We saw this dynamic again in Q1 and expect it will continue. Second, AI is transforming our selling motion. Customers want pricing more directly tied to outcomes, and they are increasingly looking for proof of value earlier in the sales process. In April, we made several pricing and packaging changes that are aligned with these customer expectations.
We believe these are the right actions to drive adoption and usage of our platform and ultimately, long-term growth. These include lowering the price of customer agents, moving to outcome-based pricing for customer and prospecting agents and introducing 28-day free trials for our agents and HubSpot AEO. In the near term, these changes may extend sales cycles as customers evaluate our agents and AEO as part of broader purchases. In addition, we made a deliberate investment in April to train our sales reps on the Spring Spotlight innovation and the shift to credit, which reduced sales capacity during the month. As a result, Q2 got off to a slow start and we've reflected these dynamics in our guidance.
We are confident that we have the right product and pricing strategy to drive durable growth and margin expansion over time as we transform as an AI-first company.
With that, let's dive into guidance for the second quarter and full year of 2026. For the second quarter, total as reported revenue is expected to be in the range of $897 million to $898 million, up 18% year-over-year on an as-reported basis and 16% in constant currency. Non-GAAP operating income is expected to be between $173 million and $174 million, representing a 19% margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is expected to be between $3 and $3.02. This assumes [indiscernible] fully diluted shares outstanding.
And for the full year of 2026, total as reported revenue is now expected to be in the range of $3.7 billion to $3.708 billion, up 18% year-over-year on an as-reported basis and 17% in constant currency, up 40 basis points from our previous guide. Non-GAAP operating income is now expected to be in the range of $762 million to $766 million, representing a 21% margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is now expected to be between $13.04 and $13.12. This assumes 51.8 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
Before we turn to some modeling notes, I'd like to provide context on our margin expansion trajectory. As Yamini shared, we are balancing growth and profitability as we transform as an AI-first company. We are transforming how we build, grow and operate. And this creates the opportunity for more meaningful margin expansion going forward. This is reflected in our updated 2026 guidance which now places us firmly within our 20% to 22% non-GAAP operating margin range, reaching our 2027 targets a year ahead of schedule.
This progress gives us even greater conviction in our ability to meet or exceed the targets we laid out at Analyst Day at an even faster pace. We'll have more to share on our margin expansion expectations at our Analyst Day this fall. We're also focused on driving GAAP operating margin expansion over time as we drive stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue down. In 2026, we expect SBC as a percentage of revenue to decline approximately 3 points to 14%, and we see the opportunity to bring this down further over time.
As you adjust your models, please keep in mind the following: we continue to expect our legacy Clearbit business to be a 40 basis point headwind to full year 2026 revenue growth. And finally, we continue to expect CapEx as a percentage of revenue to be 5% to 6% for the full year of 2026 and now expect free cash flow to be about $750 million.
With that, I will turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
[Operator Instructions] First question today is from Samad Samana with Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
I wanted to pull on the thread around the pricing model change for AI credits that you guys did in April, completely makes sense, driving better ROI for customers I was wondering, I know at the Spring Spotlight, you hosted the webinar that gave some usage statistics. But if you tie it to the change, how does the pricing change impacted customer adoption and utilization?
And then maybe I'll incorporate a component to the question as well, where the customer feedback suggests there's some meaningful spend growth coming from those that are consumer credits already. Any color that you can share on what the NRR for that cohort of customers looks like as well, just as we think about how the model evolves over time.
Yes. Thanks so much for that question. You're absolutely right. Spring Spotlight, we launched a number of product innovations that showcase the agent capabilities as well as how growth context is driving the outcome for our customers. And look, the way we think about it is pricing is one of the clearest signals that we can send about how much we believe in our product. And with all of the announcements, agent quality improved growth context improved outcomes are clear and we have high confidence.
And so we did 2 things coming into the quarter in terms of driving agent adoption. The first thing is that customers want proof of value earlier in the process before turning on agents. And that's understandable because we're no longer just providing applications that can drive adoption that can then drive growth, we're actually delivering work outcomes. So we added a 28-day trial for key use cases like AEO, prospecting and Customer Agent.
And then second, as you mentioned, customers really want to see pricing that is clearly tied to the outcomes and they want predictability of that spend. So as we came to the quarter, we dropped the price of Customer Agent, and we moved it to per resolved conversation so that when customers say, it's actually based on what we have delivered as an outcome. And similarly, for Prospecting Agent, we really are tying it to the qualified leads that we are delivering. Now both of these are really in response to customer feedback, both in terms of proving value as well in terms of understanding how that is tied to the pricing.
They are the right decisions that we have intentionally made and will have a clear impact in terms of adoption. The feedback is very early days because it's only been 3 weeks, but it has been very clearly positive. And look, what we are doing is methodically removing every blocker in terms of AI adoption so that our customers have confidence in terms of adopting AI and driving outcomes.
Kate, maybe you want to answer the NRR question.
Yes. Sure thing. And, we're not going to talk about cohortized net revenue retention. But what I would share is that we continue to believe that we can expand net revenue retention 1 to 2 points in 2026. And if you think about the drivers of that expansion, they are very much tied to our emerging growth levers of core seats and credit. And so we are looking at the credit adoption as a key driver of net revenue retention, especially in the back half of 2026.
Next question comes from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan.
Yamini, I'm wondering how commonly are you seeing a scenario which a customer would elect to use the Customer Agent rather than having to go out and hire more people and where the credit consumption for that Customer Agent ends up meaningfully above what the Service Hub subscription would have cost, say, $1,000 or $2,000 type of level sub. I'm just trying to get at -- is it clear to you how often you're going to net out quite positively by selling an agent rather than that traditional subscription?
Yes. Mark, thank you so much for that question. Look, our thesis and what we are seeing in early adoption is clearly that that it's not only that we are delivering great software that humans can use to drive productivity within go-to-market, but agents can deliver work. And I'll take the question on Customer Agent we are seeing 2 or 3 common use cases. The first use case for Customer Agent is that customers use it for after-hours or weekend at augmenting to their support team. The second is they are using it for Tier 1 support ticket so that their teams can now spend it on much more complex customer resolution and leave the Tier 1 support to our customer agents.
And I gave a couple of examples at the investor webinar. In one case, the customers turned on Customer Agent, used up the included 5,000 credits pretty quickly in the first couple of days and then turned it on for more of the augmentation use case. And then are now in the path of going from 100,000 credits to 300,000 credits on a monthly basis. That is clearly what we get above and beyond what we would have gotten from a service hub seat. And those are obviously initial patterns.
We are now seeing it over and over again, where customers are going beyond included credit and using it to resolve tickets that then increases our TAM. And that is what we're leaning into. And that is exactly why we're making the set of changes in terms of the pricing because we're so confident in terms of the resolution of tickets that we're ready to put our product strategy to work right there and that increases our ability to drive adoption of these agents as customers get comfortable with it.
And then just one quick add to how many comments is around. This is one of those examples where as the frontier model companies make the models better and better, customer agents and other AI features within HubSpot get better and better as well. So we see -- we will see as the models get better going from just the kind of Tier 1 support to higher level of support, we'll see increased resolution rates as the models get better. So this is one of those examples where as the kind of tied list on what the frontier miles are capable of, HubSpot gets increased leverage and our customers get increased value for super-excited about that.
Next question is from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays.
Can you talk a little bit about the retraining for the sales organization, doing that in April seems a little bit off because usually, that's what you do kind of at January, February time frame and when you have the sales kickoff, et cetera. It does feel like the product kind of got ready later, but can you kind of speak to kind of the timing there and also the impact a little bit more? You mentioned it a little bit, but a bit more detail.
Yes, Raimo, absolutely. Look, I think that this was really in tying to our Spring Spotlight innovation. And at Spring Spotlight, we launched a number of agents, and we've also changed our pricing mechanism, as we just talked about. And so we had the planned time to get the sales team out and be able to get them trained on both the innovation as well as the pricing model change. Now the thing that I will point out is this. Typically, yes, we would do it in the kickoff and the kickoff happened earlier in Q1. But what we're really taking the time to get the whole organization behind is the new selling motion because we are leaning into helping our customers adopt and transform with AI.
So specifically, we got the entire sales organization out to drive proof of value earlier within the sales process because that is what customers need. They want the confidence that our AI capabilities and agents will work in their environment and that requires our sales team to be clear articulate with proof of value earlier in that process. And then second, we want them to establish agent use cases and set it up for expansion. This is a learning curve as we get our entire organization to land with the right value and set it up for expansion, and that is exactly what we took the time to do and that is associated with the set of changes that we are driving in being an agent first good market company.
Look, we're changing a lot. We have high confidence in our product strategy. It's showing up in early adoption of agents, and we are evolving the pricing and go-to-market model to reflect the feedback that we get from customers. And more importantly, we know that there is a huge opportunity to be a trusted AI partner for our customers, and that's what we're leaning into.
Next question is from Terry Tillman with Truist.
I wanted to talk about like the credit growth and how to think about that I think Kate talked about potentially it's the second half where it really kind of picks up. But it was 67% Q-over-Q growth in 1Q, that seems strong. But how do we think about the ramp of that growth into 2Q and beyond? And what do you all see as maybe the next big breakout agent beyond just the Customer Agent of 53% attach or adoption rate?
Yes. Thank you so much for the question. We are definitely starting to see real usage beyond included credit. And it is happening because customers are getting clear, measurable value and outcome. And we were pleased to see total credits consumed up 67% quarter-over-quarter. But more importantly, that consumption is becoming much more balanced across use cases, right? I talked about Customer Agent Prospecting Agent, data agent, they're all very balanced now. They're kind of really growing which we like.
And so in terms of the question of what do we expect to see. Now in the current set of agents that we already have, we're really focused on improving the quality of the outcomes that we deliver. So Customer Agent, Cobin use case here the focus is improve the quality of resolution as well as expand the number of channels. And as we probably noted here, we -- the resolution rate has gone up from 20% last year to 70% now. It's one of the highest resolution rates in the industry. And in some customers, we're seeing even higher.
So all of the work that we're doing now to unlock and even bigger opportunity is to expand the e-mail channel and to increase the volume over a period of time. Similarly, for prospect and data agents, it is the quality of what these agents deliver and the outcomes that they can drive. Now beyond this, of course, there are a handful of other agents that we'll continue to like work on, but we have high confidence in the set of agents that we are driving.
One word I will say about AEO because that is now also part of Spring Spotlight and will begin consuming credits. Look, AEO is a big opportunity for us and we're leaning very hard into that. If we look at the organic traffic that our customers are seeing, it's down 27% this year. So almost every B2B marketer out there is looking for additional sources of leads and AEO happens to be one of the more effective nascent but very fast-growing one. And we launched AEO at Spring Spotlight. We now have over 15,000 Pro+ customers who activated it in trials.
Now the trials for a month. So it will take a little bit of time for those trial volumes to convert, but really great activity, and we just like to see that type of innovation. So we're innovating at an accelerated pace with our first-party agents. We're clearly seeing adoption beyond the included credit, and we are delivering even more as an open platform. So pretty excited about what we're seeing there.
Next question is from Jack Ader with KeyBanc Capital.
The -- one I had was really about -- it sounds like a lease or maybe I'm perceiving this message tonight shifting more towards margin delivery and kind of away from top line growth. So I just wanted to focus on that net new. You've talked about net new growing above revenue, I think it was 6 quarters coming into this quarter. And so I'm curious where that metric fell this quarter.
And then if we still expect to see acceleration in the subscription revenue line, this year? Or are these like go-to-market and kind of pricing changes or some of these April disruptions may be going to shift some of the growth trajectories out this year?
Yes. Thanks, Jackson. I guess maybe I'll just start with the high-level comment, which is you should not note this as a shift away from a focus on growth to a focus on profitability. We have always been committed to balancing growth and profitability, and we remain committed to balancing growth and profitability. So I'll just start there.
The second thing that I would say, in response to your questions around net new ARR, what we shared last quarter was that we expected net new ARR growth to be above constant currency revenue growth for the full year of 2026. And we continue to believe that we have all the ingredients we need to deliver net new ARR in excess of constant currency revenue growth for 2026. I will say that Q1 net new ARR growth was a bit below constant currency revenue growth. Again, it was against a more difficult comp than what we saw in Q4. And the sales enablement and sales motion changes that I talked about in the script and that you heard from Yamini, do challenge net new ARR growth in the short term, but they are the right things to do to seed and grow those agent use cases.
All that said, we think that the combination of our core growth drivers, right upmarket momentum, multi-hub adoption and pricing in combination with the increasing contribution throughout the year, of course, seeds and credit are the ingredients that we need to deliver net new growth in excess of constant currency revenue growth this year.
Next question is from Alex Zukin with Wolfe Research.
Yamini, maybe for you at a high level, you're seeing some of your peers do things around headless and make motions around kind of becoming an agent first platform, plugging into third-party agents that want to get that rich context to accomplish tasks across front-office workflows. How are you kind of -- what is your evolved thinking there? How is the new pricing model? How does it touch on that type of dynamic? And then Kate, I've got a quick follow-up for you. .
Thanks for the question. This is Dharmesh. I'll take this one because excited about the platform initiatives. So we're big believers in the idea of head list. Not big believers in this notion of human list. We think the right platform going into go-to-market for our customer base is going to be a combination of serving humans with a very personalized, modern user experience. I think that's going to continue to be important. And then we supplement that with a really, really good agentic experience, opening up APIs, opening up MCP, opening up CLIs.
We were the first company to launch MCP last year. First one is to build connectors for ChatGPT and lot of the major AI apps. Now what we're seeing now is that as kind of usage shift, we see an increased adoption of these kind of agentic-based consumer use cases. And the platform will be open. And so we really -- I won't say ambivalent, but we see the shift from the human usage to agentic usage and doesn't really matter if it runs on our run time, agents that we've built or if it's third-party apps and agents that have been built.
We think all of those agents are going to need a common foundation and the growth context that we talk about on this common platform. So we think this is a massive opportunity for us in the agentic era because there's going to be a need for an agentic customer platform exactly like what is building.
Next question is from Arjun Bhatia with William Blair.
Perfect. Actually, if I can follow up on that question about head list and how sort of credit consumption evolves as HubSpot provides context to maybe third-party agents. I'm curious if you at HubSpot would have a preference of whether a dollar or credit consumption is being used for a third-party agent versus your own proprietary agents? And does that make a difference at all in terms of sort of the feedback loop back into HubSpot's data and the future improvements in the context that you can provide depending on which agent it's you're powering essentially? .
Arjun, I really like that follow-up question. And maybe I'll kind of double down on what I said in the prepared remarks, which is that our vision is really simple. Agents run on HubSpot and a run HubSpot. And for us, any agent, whether it is first-party, second-party, third-party agent can easily plug into HubSpot data and intelligence as a building block, and we welcome that, right?
That is our ecosystem strategy, and we are pretty excited about that. Now specifically, this week, we shared our complete API strategy and how we want to be open and think about what our APIs will deliver both to first-party agents as well as second and third-party agents. And we think about the API as 2 layers. The first is the data layer. This has always been there. It's basic, right? You can get contacts, companies, deals, activities and they are open and accessible, and it's already powering thousands of integration. And, as always, we have a very open ecosystem stance, which means that bringing data into HubSpot history. And more importantly, the customer should have full confidence and trust that their data is there, right?
What is exciting and where we are going with our API strategy is we are adding an intelligence layer in terms of bringing our growth context into that intelligence layer or what does that really mean? I'll give you a super practical example. Today, a sales manager or sales director, can go to an LLM and they can say pull pipeline information from HubSpot and a mountain stage and that type of data will go in, and they can then ask what is the risk?
But what the LLM will provide at the time has no sense of what is normal within the last 30 days. What is normal across that industry if something is changing with the champion and the conversations that the deal has involved. So that is what the intelligence is that from our growth context and to make it super tangible, you can now make a single API call that can return that precomputed risk score. And so over a period of time, of course, people can continue to get the data, but we think that more and more both second and third-party agents will pull on this intelligence layer.
And the way we monetize that intelligence layer will be commensurate with value that we deliver because it will be amplified value. So it's a 2-part API strategy, continue to take data, but at some point, you're going to not find enough intelligence there. Then continue to take the growth context, and that is really the vision. And we're pretty excited about what this means in terms of having a thriving ecosystem around us.
Next question is from Brian Peterson with Raymond James.
I appreciate all your comments on sales capacity margins. But just curious, as we think about the rest of the year, any help on unpacking some of the moving parts or assumptions that are underpinning the outlook.
Yes, I appreciate the question. I want to start by taking you through maybe the math and assumptions that underlie our guidance. Just if you look at Q1, we beat our Q1 guidance by $18 million, and we raised our full year guidance by $9 million. In addition, we anticipate there is about $4 million of lower benefit from FX versus when we guided the full year in February. So all this implies an organic raise of about $13 million. So we passed through roughly 2/3 of the beat to our full year revenue guidance. .
Overall, Q1 was a solid quarter. We had strong business results that were supported by our consistent core growth drivers, upmarket, multi-hub pricing and that's what gives us the confidence to actually raise the full year guide, right? And so you saw, as a result, raising our constant currency revenue growth by 40 basis points from 16.2 to 16.6. You also heard both Yamini and I talk about the fact that we're seeing early traction from agents and AEO when we made an intentional choice there to better align our pricing and packaging with customer expectations, and that's going to help us seed and grow those important agent use cases.
Those decisions are going to have a near-term impact to net new ARR, but it's going to drive durable growth in the future. And so what our updated guidance implies is actually a step down in constant currency revenue growth to 16% in Q2 and then a modest acceleration for the remainder of the year. This is a reflection of the momentum we're seeing across our core growth drivers, but it also takes into account the offset from the pricing and packaging dynamics and then the slow start to Q2.
Like all that said, I think you know by now that we approach guidance very consistently, and we want to put forward guidance that we feel good about across a variety of scenarios. And our guidance for 2026 is not mandate that we see a reacceleration in net new ARR in the back half of the year to hit this.
Next question is from Keith Bachman with BMO.
Good lead in, Kate, I wanted to come back to that because you are assuming that that the pricing and packaging does contribute in the second half of the year where it's more modest expectations. So you're assuming things get better, and yet you've only had a couple of weeks to synthesize data, I think, 3 weeks.
And so I'm just wondering what candidly, the risk profile is on not being able to meet the improvement in growth rate associated with the second half? And just a follow-up, you said you're not assuming net new increases in the second half to meet the targets, but that I just wondered if you could speak to your confidence interval because presumably, that would impact the following year would -- there would be consequences to that. If you can't meet the net new growing in the second half of the year. So really 2 questions related to confidence associated with some of the guidance comments.
Yes. Yes. I mean, thanks for the question. I can understand that there's a lot going on here. Maybe I'll start by reiterating that there is a set of core growth drivers that have been delivering consistently over the last 6 to 8 quarters, right? And we've been talking about them every quarter. It's the strong and consistent momentum that we're seeing on market. It is a consistent trend toward multi-hub adoption, and it is a pact that we've seen the benefit of the pricing change that we made in 2024. .
We also have an expectation that there will be an increasing impact of seed and credit over time, but that is just one piece of the overall growth equation. And so when you think about what we are assuming in terms of guidance, right, we want to put forward guidance, so we feel great about hitting across a variety of scenarios. And our guidance assumes that does not assume that we have to see net new ARR acceleration from where we are in the back half of the year in order to deliver that 16.6% full year constant currency revenue guidance.
Next question is from Tyler Radke with Citi.
Can you just give us an updated view of kind of the -- if the stack ranking of growth drivers has changed this year? And I guess one of the areas you called out that hasn't been asked as much about is the core seat, which I think grew over 90% this year in the quarter. If you could just kind of give some color on how you expect that growth to play out in the midst of a bit of a greater focus on agents as well.
Yes, absolutely. Let me kind of like walk through each of the drivers and how we think about this setting us up for durable growth. I'll start with the core drivers and the way I stack rank the core drivers is up market momentum and multi-hub are kind of at the top. We've seen this consistently the number of customers with 500 or more seats have grown over 50% year-over-year, and that has been a consistent trend that we have seen. And that's because product needs the needs of upmarket customers, brand awareness is great, ecosystem is tuned in, and that also means multi-hub adoption is really solid.
So those 2 are at the top of the stack rank have been performing consistently as I shared in terms of the prepared remarks. And then another core driver that we have now seen in operation for the last couple of years is pricing. We changed pricing -- we lowered the pricing. We then really remove the seat minimums, and we've now seen that dynamic play out, and we know how these trends. And so that remains a driver. So that's the second one, I would say.
Now in terms of the emerging growth drivers, as you're rightfully pointing, it's core seats and credit. That's how we think about AI monetization. And in core fees, we've consistently quarter-over-quarter added a lot of value into core seats. Brief assistant, which is now consistently rated really high in terms of customer satisfaction. And adding all of the company enriched data into the core seat and as you pointed out, we saw nearly 25-plus percent of proceed customers upgrade to more core seats. And you can ask why because that's the gateway for all of our AI features. That's almost the foundation that you get started. It has like included in our credits, and that's the gateway in which customers begin to then turn agents on.
From there, from that foundation, we build on agents. And specifically, just to kind of really bring this back up what we did is we're listening to customers and we're removing friction points. And we just started with agent adoption, and we're making sure that customers turn it on, get the proof of value, get a trial period for it and make sure that they can then consume it based on the outcomes it's delivering and those 2 are the emerging drivers. So the way you should think about this is the growth formula we've been talking about is intact and the stack rank starts upmarket and multihub followed by pricing, then followed by emerging growth levers.
And the combination of all of that plus what we are doing in terms of the products is important, right? The product quality as well as the pace of innovation and how quickly we are driving adoption is really, really story here. And look, we're just getting started with this very big transformative shift with our customers. Customers continue to talk to us about how we can be the data and AI platform for their transformation and the conversations we're having makes us lean into this moment so that we can be the partner of choice for our customers in their AI transformation.
Next question is from Matt VanVliet with Cantor.
I wanted to dive in a little bit deeper on some of the longer sales cycles that you're talking about. How much of that is a factor of giving customers this longer trial period with agents as sort of one driver. Second being just kind of understanding better the pricing and packaging and maybe what the total cost of ownership is?
And then the third being the sales folks that were out of the market, maybe partners that now also have to have a little bit more training and pitched on kind of what's changed. Just curious on how sort of short lived this might be as that training happens versus customers continuing to take longer to evaluate ultimately what the platform brings.
Yes. I think that's a really good question. It's a combination of 3 things. The first one is as customers kind of like really look at AI, they do want to see how AI and agents within their environment is going to drive outcomes. And that's what we mean by proof of value. And the best way for us to show proof of value is to turn it on and give them a period where they can trial it, and that's exactly what we have done with AEO as well as Customer Agent and prospecting agents.
And we're confident in our product strategy. And when they begin to see value, that timing is going to moderate, right? I don't see that as something that will be a consistent long-term factor. We are still in the beginning of this transformation period. I think the second thing, which is we obviously are -- we talked about the sales enablement, the folks are back in seat and they are now fully trained. And I think we're making this transition. We're moving really fast, and there's a slightly different sales motion and people will adapt to it. And the set of pricing changes that we have leaned into helps them do that because it's pretty easy to go and now up to customers and say, "Hey, we deliver outcomes and our pricing is now tied to that value."
So look, I think all of this is reflected in the guidance. We had a solid Q1, and we've obviously made a set of changes that lean into the feedback that we are receiving from customers, and this gives us the confidence that we have the right feed and expand motion for the agentic use cases. And this is really us leaning into the AI adoption motion.
Next question is from Billy Fitzsimmons with Piper Sandler.
Perfect. The net customer adds quarter-over-quarter were nicely above the directional range provided last quarter. And obviously, net adds is only one measure of success, ARPU and the test of customers you're adding matters. But it was the second best quarter for customer adds in 7 quarters. And there's a narrative out there generally in software, not specific HubSpot that we've entered a harder environment to add net new customers.
And there's a variety of reasons for that. So curious what you're kind of seeing and hearing in real time around kind of the ads? And is this just better execution from HubSpot or -- on that front? Or is it more kind of timing of the lands and customer ads?
Yes. I appreciate the question, and maybe there's -- two general comments that I would make, which is we're obviously pleased with the number of net adds that we added in Q1. Q1 tends to be our highest starter ad quarter. And so we saw that again in -- and the expectation is that we would see that moderate back to that $9,000 to $10,000 range in sort of Q2 and beyond.
That said, you're making a really interesting observation, which is lots of companies are finding it harder to add new customers. And I think that our ability to consistently add new customers and retain have funnel has been a result of the fact that we have been investing to diversify our top of funnel for a number of years now, right? You saw us starting in 2022 by a company called the Hussle. We bought a company called Mindstream that has an AI-focused newsletter that is driving lots of top of funnel demand for us where we have YouTube and other media outlets.
We bought 2 incremental acquisitions in Q1, starter story and future PDS. So we keep leaning into this motion of diversification of top of funnel that is helping us retain our customer acquisition motion. The other thing that I would say is, we were really early in experimenting with AEO internally. And the team continues to grow AEO as a contributor to our top of funnel demand, it's still a relatively smaller part of our overall demand equation, but it is a highly effective one. It converts about 3x higher than other leads for HubSpot. And so we continue to just focus on building a durable demand engine as part of the overall HubSpot equation.
Thank you. This concludes the HubSpot First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Thank you to everyone who was able to join us today. You may now disconnect your lines.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
HubSpot, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Solides Q1-Wachstum (+18% ccy) bei gleichzeitigem Margenaufbau; AI‑Monetarisierung (Core Seats & Credits) zeigt frühe, beschleunigende Traktion.
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: $912M berechnete Billings; Gesamtumsatz Q1 +23% as‑reported / +18% in konstanter Währung.
- Profitabilität: Non‑GAAP-Betriebsmargin ~18% (expandiert um ~4 PPS YoY); Non‑GAAP‑EPS $2.72 (+53% YoY).
- Kunden: Fast 300.000 Kunden; 10.800 Nettozugänge im Quartal.
- Cash & Buybacks: $1.8B Barmittel, $211M Aktienrückkäufe im Quartal.
- AI‑Nutzung: Credits‑Verbrauch +67% QoQ; aktive Core‑Seat‑Nutzer +90% YoY; Data/Prospecting/Customer Agents gewinnen deutlich.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- AI‑First: HubSpot transformiert zur "AI‑first"-Plattform; Wachstum stützt sich auf Plattform‑Kontext ("growth context") statt nur auf einzelne Features.
- Monetarisierung: Zwei Hebel: Core Seats (Basiszugang) und Credits (Outcome‑bezogene Nutzung) – Early‑Traction sichtbar, Pricing‑Änderungen sollen Adoption beschleunigen.
- Open Platform: APIs/Intelligence‑Layer sollen Drittanbieter‑Agenten sowie eigene Agents bedienen und so Wertschöpfung und Feedback‑Schleifen verstärken.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q2‑Guide: Umsatz $897–898M (+18% as‑reported, +16% ccy); Non‑GAAP‑Betriebsgewinn $173–174M (19% Margin), Non‑GAAP‑EPS ~$3.00–3.02.
- FY‑Update: Umsatz $3.700–3.708B (+18% as‑reported / +17% ccy; +40 bps vs. vorheriger Guidance); Non‑GAAP‑Margin ~21%; Non‑GAAP‑EPS $13.04–13.12.
- Risiken & Annahmen: April‑Preispaket/Trials verlängern kurzfristig Verkaufszyklen; Clearbit‑Legacy ~‑40bps Headwind; erwartet FCF ~ $750M, CapEx 5–6% Rev.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Pricing vs. Adoption: Analysten fragten nach Wirkung der April‑Preise auf Credits‑Adoption; Management berichtet frühes positives Feedback, verweigert cohortisierte NRR‑Zahlen.
- Credit‑Ramp & Top Agents: Customer Agent ist führend (hohe Resolution), Prospecting und Data Agent zeigen beschleunigtes Wachstum; AEO‑Trials werden Credits konsumieren.
- Vertrieb & Linearität: Vertriebstraining im April reduzierte Sales‑Kapazität kurzfr.; Buchungs‑Cadence bleibt stärker back‑end‑loaded, Q2 startet langsam.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: HubSpot liefert robustes Umsatz‑ und Margenwachstum und bewegt sich glaubhaft in Richtung AI‑Monetarisierung; kurzfristig gedämpfte Linearity/Net‑New wegen Pricing‑Umstellungen und Sales‑Training. Für Anleger heißt das: gutes langfristiges Storytelling (Up‑market, Multi‑hub, AI‑credits) — kurzfristige Volatilität möglich, wichtigste Kennzahlen zur Beobachtung sind Credit‑Adoption, Net‑Revenue‑Retention und Back‑half‑Net‑New‑ARR.
HubSpot, Inc. — Special Call - HubSpot, Inc.
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to HubSpot's Spring 2026 Spotlight Investor Webinar. I'm Chuck MacGlashing, and I'm here with Yamini Rangan, our Chief Executive Officer; and Duncan Lennox, our Chief Product and Technology Officer.
Today, we'll walk through HubSpot's 2026 strategy and how the new products and innovations we released at Spring Spotlight yesterday are making AI work for growth companies. I'll also share an update on how HubSpot is transforming how it builds, grows and operates with AI.
Before we start, I'd like to draw your attention to our safe harbor statement. Statements made during this webinar that are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements reflect our views only as of today involve risks and uncertainties, and we undertake no obligation to update them. Please refer to our most recent SEC filings for a discussion of the relevant risk factors.
Now it's my pleasure to turn it over to HubSpot's Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan.
Thank you so much, Chuck. Welcome. Hello, everybody, and thanks so much for taking the time today to join us in this investor webinar. Look, the pace of innovation is just accelerating. There is a lot happening in the industry in just a matter of weeks, and there's a lot happening at HubSpot. We just had our spring spotlight yesterday and a lot of exciting updates. So we wanted to provide a product and strategy update.
There's just too much happening within the industry and HubSpot that we didn't want to wait until Analyst Day, which happens later in fall. Just as a reminder, we're still within our quiet period, so all of the financial updates will be part of our earnings call in early May.
With that, here is the agenda for today. I'm going to start by setting the stage with our 2026 strategy and the progress that we are making within that strategy. We are going to spend the bulk of time with Duncan Lennox. He's our Chief Product and Technology Officer, and he's going to walk through our Agentic customer platform and the agent updates from Spring spotlight. You're going to see a lot of the product demos, and you're going to see how context shows up as a distinct advantage in all of those demos. And then I'm going to close out by sharing how we are transforming how we build, grow and operate as an AI-first company.
Okay. With that, let's jump straight in. Our strategy is clear, and it is focused, make AI work for growth companies, reimagine marketing with a new playbook as well as products and accelerate upmarket growth with a platform that delivers the power and simplicity.
Let's start with AI. Look, there is no shortage of tools in the market for AI, but there's a huge gap between AI output and AI outcomes. And that is exactly the gap that we are focused on. We're focused on democratizing AI for companies with 200 to 2,000 employees in order to drive growth for them. Now small and mid-market companies, they don't have the time, and they don't have the expertise to keep up with the blistering pace of AI improvements that we see every week. We do it for them.
We are their growth partner in AI transformation and our AI strategy is really clear and focused. We want to deliver a platform that has all of the growth context, which will help both agents as well as the humans using our software to drive outcomes. And today, we're going to share the progress that we're making in both a set of first-party agents that we just updated as well as the growth context that drives that outcome.
Okay, let's talk about marketing. The pace here is accelerating really, really quickly. Now discovery of brands as well as products is shifting pretty dramatically to a diversified set of new channels, including LLMs and that is why I'm really excited to announce HubSpot AEO, HubSpot's answer engine optimization solution that we just launched yesterday.
Now this solution provides AI visibility so that you can see the share of voice. It provides prompt recommendations as well as content recommendations. And HubSpot customers can now buy this and use this in 2 ways. First of all, as a stand-alone solution. And that means there is a new front door for HubSpot's marketing solution, start just with AEO. And second, they can use all of these advanced capabilities with Marketing Hub Pro as well as enterprise.
I'm really excited about this launch and the value it's going to deliver for our customers. And then upmarket. Look, we continue to have strong product market fit in this segment of the market. Customers are looking to lower total cost of ownership, consolidate their stack and drive AI innovation. And with the updates that we are delivering this week, we are bringing more powerful agent capabilities as well as platform capabilities to help them grow and drive AI transformation. Very exciting updates and you're going to see us accelerate innovation throughout this year in these 3 key priorities.
At the same time, we're completely transforming the company. How we build, how we grow, how we operate as a company is changing and the pace of change there is accelerating internally. So I'm going to share more about the progress that we are making here in a few minutes. This is our 2026 strategy.
Now let's jump straight into the highlights from Spring Spotlight. And in order to do that, it is my absolute pleasure to welcome Duncan Lennox, our Chief Product and Technology Officer. Now Duncan is responsible for product, engineering and UX and he's setting this pace of innovation within the company.
Before HubSpot, Duncan spent time at Google to have their applied AI and prior to that at Amazon. So you are seeing scale and significant scale and he was also the co-founder and CEO of 2 companies in the sales and e-learning space for more than 2 decades. Duncan, welcome and take it away.
Thanks, Yamini. It's really great to be here with you all today. And Yamini just laid out our strategy for 2026. And at the heart of it is AI that doesn't just deliver output but actually drives outcomes for go-to-market teams. And I want to dig into what we believe is key to making that happen, which is context. And I'm going to walk you through how we think about context at HubSpot, why it's so important and demo products that we featured at our spring spotlight this week that uniquely use context to deliver real value and outcomes for customers.
At HubSpot, we're building the Agentic customer platform. And that means we capture all your customer context in one place, then make it available to both your team and AI, embedded AI and agents so they can work together to market, sell and service your customers. You might have seen this visual of the Agentic customer platform before and even heard others talk about the importance of context.
But we've thought deeply about the role that context will play, specifically for go-to-market teams. And I want to walk you through how that thinking has refined and shaped what we've built. First and foremost, not all context is created equal. Personal AI tools are building personal context, your preferences, your conversation history, your communication style. Then we've got enterprise tools that are building organizational context, so documents, wickies and institutional knowledge. But go-to-market teams need something different.
And that's why we are focused on building growth context, the specific dynamic understanding AI needs to drive outcomes across marketing, sales and customer success. And this isn't just a concept. We've built real infrastructure that will help customers capture and maintain their growth context. And we see growth context as having 5 dimensions.
Firstly, we've got business context, everything that makes your company yours, your unique positioning and voice, your pricing, your differentiation. Then we've got team context, how your best people actually work, the judgment, the methods, the instincts that live in calls and deal notes, not in your onboarding docs. Process context then is really the nuts and bolts of your workflows, what triggers a handoff, what makes a deal urgent, what your companies are actually built to do. Customer context, of course, is the full history of every relationship with every customer you have; what they bought, why they bought it, where friction happened and what comes next. And then finally, network context is the collective intelligence of HubSpot based on 18 years of working with hundreds of thousands of go-to-market teams, pattern recognition at a scale no single business could ever build on its own.
Okay. So let's walk through how all this comes together in the life of a customer. We're going to follow one company through the full journey, and that company is Sonder, an employee wellness platform. They work with businesses to give employees access to mental health support, well-being coaching and preventive care programs. And they're a real HubSpot customer and a great example of how shared context across the go-to-market team leads to growth.
So let's start where every business has to start - getting found. For Sonder, their target buyers are HR leaders and people and culture teams inside mid- to large enterprises. These are people who are actively looking for wellness solutions, but the way they're finding those solutions has changed a lot. The search bar is no longer the first stop. Buyers are going to ChatGPT. They're going to Perplexity. They're asking LLMs who to buy from before they ever click a link.
And if Sonder isn't showing up in these answers, they're invisible at the most important moment. And most marketing teams have no idea how their brand is represented in this new world of discovery. And the campaigns they're running are often built on assumptions rather than their actual customer data. And this is where HubSpot gives Sonder's marketing team an advantage with HubSpot AEO. It shows marketers how their brand and content appear in AI-generated answers, how they compare to competitors and what to do to fill that gap.
So let's use it to track Sonder's AI visibility. So to get started with AEO, the first thing Sonder will do is set up their brand profile. And HubSpot pulls from Sonder's brand kit that they've already configured, prefills their name, domain and any brand variations an LLM might use to refer to them, then Sonder reviews a list of key competitors generated by HubSpot based on their unique customer and business context. And Sonder can also add anything that might be missing. And lastly, we confirm a set of tracking prompts. These are the suggested questions buyers might use to search for businesses like Sonder that HubSpot generates based on customer context, things like what employee wellness platforms are recommended for midsized companies in Australia.
And if Sonder notices a prompt is missing, they can add their own like what should I budget for a global employee wellness platform. And with all the prompts set, they can do a quick review to make sure nothing is missing and start tracking.
Okay. Now that we've got that set up, let's take a look at Sonder's AEO dashboard. Here's where they can see things like their brand visibility, what percentage of those tracked prompts actually mention Sonder. They can also see their competitive share of voice, how they stack up against each competitor. Then we have the prompt dashboard where Sonder can manage the prompts that they're tracking. And if they want to go deep on any single prompt, they can click to see the actual responses that models are using. Then we get to the citations view. This tells Sonder which websites are driving the AI answers.
And finally, recommendations. This is key. Based on areas of low visibility, HubSpot AEO recommends actions Sonder can take to increase how often they appear for that search. That's exactly the kind of insight that informs their content strategy and lets them know where to invest. And here's the thing about these prompts. Get them right and you optimize how you show up in LLMs; get them wrong and you're spending resources trying to show up for questions no buyer is actually asking. Growth context makes the difference here. We pull from brand kit for your positioning, your value props, the foundations of your business. But as your customers engage through forms, e-mails and calls, their questions and areas of interest become critical customer context that informs the prompt suggestions. That's what makes HubSpot AEO more valuable over time. It's learning from your real customer conversations, not just your marketing copy.
Six months ago, Sonder had no idea whether they were showing up in AI answers at all, and now they do. And more importantly, they know exactly what to do about it. Now that Sonder has a better understanding of their AI visibility, let's use Breeze Assistant and Loop Marketing to build an awareness campaign to close that gap between them and their competitors.
Breeze Assistant is now a Loop marketing expert. It's built on the playbook we launched at INBOUND last year for marketing in the age of AI. As a quick refresher, Loop has 4 stages: Express, where you define your brand and ICP; Taylor, where you use AI to personalize content; Amplify, where you diversify your campaign across channels; and Evolve, where you learn and iterate with the help of AI. Sonder has already an established brand and ICP. It's mid- to large enterprise companies in Australia who've recently expanded.
Yamini talked about helping customers navigate marketing with the new playbook and now Breeze Assistant can help them do it. We know from HubSpot AEO that peer-reviewed sites and listicles are strong performing citations for Sonder. Breeze pulls those citations, and we ask it to draft a marketing brief so we can double down on the content that's working. Based on Sonder's brand and the customer data stored in HubSpot, Breeze Assistant builds a comprehensive brief, targeted at increasing the quality and volume of their citations in AI Answers.
Now, Sonder uses Marketing Studio to build out a full campaign. They pull in the content HubSpot AEO told them is working and use the remix functionality to create new assets like blog posts, social content and even a podcast. Now the marketing team collaborates live in the studio and within days, they have the new campaign in market. Now here's how HubSpot's context advantage makes Breeze Assistant different from other AI tools. Without context, the most AI can do is quote from a generic marketing playbook, but Breeze Assistant knows your business, your brand identity, your ICP, your product catalog, even customer feedback.
HubSpot doesn't just store thousands of contacts. It understands how you organize your market and the value proposition you're bringing to them. So when Breeze Assistant gives you loop marketing guidance, it's not generic best practices. It's grounded in your actual business. And it also knows where you are in HubSpot and what you're trying to do. So if you're looking at a contact record, it understands you need information about that specific contact.
If you're building a campaign, it suggests next steps based on your actual customer data. And it knows your role. So marketers get campaign strategy, sales reps get deal guidance. The recommendations aren't just helpful. They're specific to your job. New content is live and it's working. A Sydney tech company, about 400 people recently expanded, found Sonder through one of those peer review citations we just optimized for. The head of people visited the pricing page, spent time on the case studies and is now in the CRM as a high-intent lead. And this is exactly the moment where most sales organizations lose ground, not because the product isn't right, but because what happens next is too slow and too manual.
And it's not a rep problem, it's a context problem. The rep gets the lead notification, but they still need to figure out who else is in the buying committee, what the company is going through right now and what's going to land. And this research takes hours, if not days, and we all know time kills deals. And that's what the rebuild prospecting agent is designed to solve. Now instead of researching the companies that you enroll, the agent prospects for new leads based on your ICP and monitors those leads for new buying signals that tell the rep when it's a good time to reach out.
So when the rep opens the agent, they already see a prioritized list of companies showing intent right now. The rep can see each signal and exactly what triggered it and click through to the source. Every company also comes with a reason to reach out already written. The rep clicks in. One contact is already in the CRM who came through the campaign, but the agent also identified 2 others, a CPO and a CFO, so the rep adds them to the CRM. The agent has already drafted personalized outreach, pulling in the rep signature, referencing the buying signals and using Sonder's value proposition specifically for the role. It even knows the campaign content because that's all on HubSpot.
Context is what makes prospecting agent actually useful. It's pulling from your full CRM history every interaction, every conversion to understand which accounts close for your business, not just which ones look promising. The outreach isn't generic. It's grounded in your product positioning, a rep's role and priorities, what triggered the contact in the first place, past conversations and similar feedback from other customers. And it learns. The more your team uses it, the smarter it gets at finding accounts that actually convert.
And that's the true line here. The content Sonder created to improve their AEO citations brought this buyer in. The same customer context that informed the campaign is now informing the outreach. Okay, fantastic. The outreach worked. The Chief People Officer responded, sonder's rep had a discovery call and it went great. The budget is confirmed, requirements are clear and the next steps are agreed.
Now here's what normally happens. The rep tells themselves, they'll update the CRM after the next meeting. They're busy. But by the next morning, they've already forgotten some of what was said, the deal stalls, not because the customer wasn't interested, but because the rep ran out of bandwidth. And smart deal progression closes that gap. The moment the call ends, instead of reps patching notes together manually, HubSpot preps next steps for them. But it isn't just a to-do list. Smart deal progression knows more than just this call. It operates like a rep's second brain with the same deal and customer context. That means in the post-meeting recap, the rep can see a clean summary and action items, each one cited back to the transcript. So the rep isn't guessing. They can hear it for themselves and approve with confidence.
Action items are attributed to the right person, editable and can be saved as tasks in one click. The follow-up e-mail is also written. It summarizes the call, capture what was agreed and the rep can refine the tone right there with Breeze and after the tweaks, they hit Send. And this is where things get really interesting. Smart deal progression then makes suggestions for CRM updates like deal stage, amounts, next steps, all suggested, all accurate, all pulled from deal context.
The rep reviews and approves in seconds. The CRM is updated, nothing is left to memory. Look, I've said it already, I'll say it again. I genuinely think this capability is underappreciated. Smart deal progression is like giving every rep a second brain. It sees past e-mails, notes and deal activity, everything. So when it suggests next steps or follow-ups, it's reflecting the whole relationship, not what just happened on the last call. And it knows how your team actually sells. It understands your pipeline definitions, your deal stages, the way your team executes.
So when it suggests CRM updates or flags risks, those recommendations reflect where the opportunity actually stands, not some generic sales framework. Context turns a transcription tool into something that actually moves deals forward.
Okay. The deal Sonder was working just closed, fantastic. 400 employees at that Sidney tech company now have access to Sonder's platform, but this can often be where the relationship is made or lost. Employee well-being is a sensitive category. When an employee reaches out about accessing mental health support, they expect a response that knows them, their plan, their history, their situation. A generic automated reply in that moment doesn't just miss the mark, it does real damage to the relationship and trust.
But Sonder's support team can't personally handle every query at that level. That's the tension. And it's exactly why context here matters more, perhaps more than anywhere else. So let me show you how Sonder sets up customer agent for e-mail, their highest volume support channel. The first thing they do is set their expressions, the specific instructions that tell the agent how to behave, how it greets employees, closes conversations, when to apologize and which topics it should never answer autonomously, like anything involving clinical escalation, which Sonder always routes to a human. HubSpot provides out-of-the-box templates to make this fast, but Sonder can refine the instructions if needed.
Okay. Great. Now before going live, Sonder's team tests the agent with e-mail, simulating real customer queries without putting anything in front of actual customers. They can see exactly how it would respond and build confidence before they commit. Okay. Then deployment. Sonder starts with working hours only. The agent handles e-mail after hours and on weekends when the team isn't available. They also use a workflow to route by customer tier. So free plan users go to the agent, enterprise accounts go straight to a human. Billing and clinical questions are excluded entirely.
And here's what it looks like on the receiving end. An employee e-mails in asking about booking a wellness coaching session and whether her plan covers it. The agent reads the e-mail, pulls her record from the CRM, her plan tier, her session history, what she's accessed before and replies with exactly what she can book, how to do it on a direct link, formatted clearly, signed off professionally, thanks to our agent expressions and answered in seconds. She got an answer that felt like someone actually knew her because the agent did.
And that's what context in support looks like. Customer agent responds based on the complete context. It's pulling from your knowledge base, your product data and that individual customer's full history. So every response is tailored to the person and their situation, not just the ticket in front of them. And when a human needs to step in, the handoff actually makes sense because customer agent lives inside of HubSpot, so it sees the entire relationship. Your service rep isn't starting from scratch. They're starting with full context, what the customer tried, what the agent recommended and how to make the agent better based on your customer context with Smart QA.
And what you saw wasn't 5 separate product demos. It was one story. Sonder building awareness in a world where discovery has moved to AI answer engines. converting that awareness into pipeline by reaching the right people at the right moment using the right context and closing that deal because nothing slipped and then cementing the customer relationship through support that actually knows who it's talking to.
And we are already seeing real customer outcomes, thanks to HubSpot's context advantage. With Breeze Assistant, we're seeing 4x more leads created. Without business and market context, AI can only use generic marketing advice to create generic plans. With it, it gives you one that's actually targeted to your customers. That's the difference between campaigns that resonate and ones that don't.
With prospecting agents, we're seeing a 19% increase in e-mail send rate. And the increase in send rate is important, but the real measure here isn't value. HubSpot is focused on high-value outreach that reps want to sign their name to. Send rate went up, but we also went from reps rewriting 2/3 of the drafts that we produced to approving 2/3 of the draft without edits. That shift happened because the outreach is grounded in the growth context they needed, real buying signals and e-mails written in the rep's own voice. It feels authentic because it is.
Smart deal progression, we're seeing 10x improvements in CRM update accuracy. Anybody can build a CRM updating agent. What's hard is earning your sales team's trust. Reps hate filling out CRM data, but they're held accountable for it. So the bar is high. With growth context, not using just the current call, our suggestions are 10x more likely to be accepted, and that's what it means to actually save a rep time. And then with customer agent, we're seeing 70% of tickets on average resolved. We can achieve average rates this high because growth context means we surface the full customer history. And if the agent fails, we can tell you exactly why, whether it's a gap in your knowledge base or missing customer data. That's the flywheel here.
Every escalation makes the agent smarter for next time. And for HubSpot AEO, we're excited to have it in market, and we've seen incredible early results from customers who've been early testers. For example, in a matter of weeks, Sonder drove 8,000 new website visitors and moved their brand visibility score 2 points. ADO didn't just tell them the problem, it told them what to do about it. Docebo went from guessing at their AI visibility to leading their category with nearly 15% of leads now coming from AI sources, and that number is growing. And for Fresha, the question was simple, are we showing up? And now they know the answer and their traffic growth reflects that.
The thread running through all of these results is growth context, that rich set of information that go-to-market teams to actually deliver outcomes. And that is only possible on HubSpot. That's because growth context isn't one thing. It's business, team, process, customer and network context, all working together. Almost every meaningful AI action in the go-to-market process needs all of them. Point solutions might have one slice, but that's why they hit a ceiling.
Let's say you're preparing a prospecting e-mail. A point solution providing customer context might help you get their attention with a personal hook, but it won't match your voice or product positioning without business and team context. A support tool that's great at surfacing your knowledge base can answer some questions, but it won't know why the customer bought your product in the first place and be able to use that context to the team's advantage.
Even platforms that had been unified have found it incredibly challenging to solve this. Many may have the data, but they aren't and haven't been opinionated about the structure, so they can't understand how the pieces relate. HubSpot has always been deeply opinionated about what it takes to grow, opinions that were formed very early on about what a contact is, how a deal works, what a campaign does. These are the foundations that allow us to organize disparate data into rich complex infrastructure of growth context. That's what the Agentic customer platform is built on, and that's what HubSpot's context advantage makes possible.
I'm going to hand it back to Yamini to close this out by discussing how we transformed, how we build, grow and operate at HubSpot.
Well, thank you so much, Duncan, for that really comprehensive walk-through of agents as well as the context layer. I hope that was very informative in terms of what we launched and how growth context shows up. Look, I'm super excited about the outcomes that we can drive for customers with our agent customer platform. And that is exactly what everything is about, driving outcomes.
We've always taken sophisticated technology and democratized it for small and mid-market customers to drive outcomes, and that is exactly what we are doing with AI. So let me actually walk you through a few examples of what customers are adopting and how that is driving outcomes for those customers.
Okay. And let me start with Metrie. Now Metrie is a North American buildings material company. They have about 400 HubSpot users across multiple regions. Now they had a completely manual process to triage incoming e-mails. So they created a workflow and used customer agent to read every incoming e-mail, route that e-mail to the right queue and then respond to that request specifically with the growth context.
Now they used up their 5,000 included credits in 2 days. And then they bought 100,000 more to keep that agent running, and now they are well on the way to leverage nearly 300,000 credits. In Q1 2026 alone, customer agent handled over 16,000 customer conversations for Metrie. Quote turnaround time is down by 33% and order turnaround time is down by 35%. Clear example of a customer scaling with customer agent.
Then let's talk about ISSA. Now they are in Ed-Tech, and they run one of the largest fitness certification programs in the world, which means you can imagine that they get a constant stream of customer questions across chat, across e-mail as well as phone. And now they came to HubSpot to consolidate their entire fragmented support stack, and they went all in on AI from the start. They started leveraging customer agent as well as all of the AI features within Service Hub. And now customer agent handles 100% of their chat volume. And that means they have freed up all of their human agents to be able to handle more complex questions that comes in phone. And that means the phone abandoned rate has dropped by nearly 70%, clear example of leveraging platform capabilities as well as leveraging customer agent.
And then I'll finish up with an example on prospecting agent. And this is with Aventus. They are a fast-growing fintech company. They wanted to scale prospecting, but within their CRM, they had nearly 10,000 dormant contacts and inaccurate data, which means that every outreached e-mail they were sending, they were just getting a huge bounce rate back. So they wanted to fix that problem and drive growth.
So it started with adopting data agent. And Data agent helps enrich the company data, helps enrich the contact data and provides a very clear prospect score. From there, they started using prospecting agent to personalize the outreach across multiple channels, and that is working. Because of this, they've been able to replace point agents and other solutions and data that they were using.
In Q1, 50% of all of the engaged prospects interacted with prospecting agent, and that is driving more pipeline for Aventus. And you can see that they have continued to scale credit consumption based on this.
I hope you can see the clear momentum in both our product innovation as well as customer adoption and the kinds of use cases that we are seeing traction in. With that, I want to shift gears, and I want to talk about the internal transformation at HubSpot. We're transforming how we build, how we grow, how we operate and the pace and progress here is exciting.
We have fundamentally changed how we build products at HubSpot. Now we started with copilots like everybody did. We scaled very quickly from there with coding agents. And now we have a HubSpot-specific agentic execution platform that is compounding our advantage and driving the pace of innovation.
I'll walk through each of these phases. Now in Phase 1, it was all about copilots. We proved that AI could make every engineer go faster while maintaining the reliability of the product. That gave us organizational confidence as well as the data to move into agentic AI, and that was our Phase 2. So in Phase 1, if it was about making engineers go faster, Phase 2 was about using coding agents to do the work. So we moved from AI-assisted coding to fully autonomous agentic coding.
But here's the thing that we found. We found that off-the-shelf coding agents that we were using were okay. But at our scale, which is 1 million bills a day across tens of thousands of micro services was just not optimized for HubSpot. We needed an agent harness that was optimized specifically for our environment.
So we moved into Phase 3 pretty quickly, and we built that infrastructure ourselves, a Kubernetes-based agent execution platform where every single coding agent runs in an isolated container that replicates a real HubSpot developer environment, complete with internal build tools, the test suites and the service access that is needed. What does this mean? Well, this means that instead of building every agent from scratch, we have built a foundation once. How agents access data, what actions they can take, how they connect to the rest of the growth context within HubSpot, everything.
Now that decision has compounded really fast. Many of you know that we have always taken a platform-centric approach to development, and that has helped us maintain the pace of innovation and built that pace. You've seen that with reporting, automation, messaging, things that are platform primitives that helped us ship more capabilities across every hub.
That is exactly what we are doing with agentic execution. We now have the unified tools, the unified skills and all of our agents are interoperable. That means they speak the same language. They share the same tool sets, the same skills, and they draw from that same growth context. And that means our customers, they get a consistent experience regardless of which agent they are using because underneath it is a platform that is scaling. And that is a massive advantage. For our customers, it's an advantage. But for HubSpot, this is what enables the pace of innovation with AI. Really exciting.
Okay. Let's talk about how we grow. Now over the last 3 years, we've systematically rebuilt how we attract, engage and delight with AI agents as well as assistants. And the result is an agent-first go-to-market, a flywheel where agents are doing the work and humans are operating with higher leverage, but much deeper connections with our customers. And of course, the value is really clear in why we do this. When we are in the bleeding edge of go-to-market, we learn faster. We provide that feedback to product, and we also educate our customers in terms of best practices.
So what exactly is this agent-first go-to-market? Let me talk exactly about the agents that we are now using. In terms of how we are attracting the top of funnel is nothing as it looked like 3 years ago. We once had a bunch of content leads and inbound chat teams to be able to do it. Now top of funnel is an AI-powered demand generation engine. And it actually starts with the demand agent.
Demand agent builds up our TAM. It identifies our ideal customer profiles. It enriches the company and contact information through a variety of HubSpot as well as third-party sources, and it scores every single account, so we know what to prioritize. Then we use an inbound agent that handles roughly 82% of all of our website chats with no human involvement. It qualifies visitors, it handles competitive questions. It identifies real buying intent from who is on that, and it's now even beginning to start closing starter deals, pretty exciting.
And then we also have AEO agent. We've been proponents of this. We've been experimenting, iterating and working on AEO for the past couple of years. And that is why we are the #1 CRM with visibility across all of the LLMs. Our qualified leads are up significantly, and those leads convert 3x better. That's the transformation in the top of the funnel.
Then let us talk about how we engage our customers. We have built agents at every stage of the sales motion, and we have provided assistance to our reps using AI. Our prospecting agent does exactly that. It tracks the intent of our prospects. It then generates personalized messages that our BDR teams as well as our reps can use in terms of outreach. And that has improved the productivity.
At the same time, for active deals, reps have now a conversational assistant that sits on top of everything that they do. It provides risk scores. It provides similar one deals as they're having the conversation. And when reps and managers use it together to work a deal, the win rates go up. And finally, we've also built presales agent that handles technical questions and a demo agent that spins up a tailored demo environment on the spot for a specific prospect. So lots of innovation going on there.
And then finally, let's talk about the delight stage. Here is where we have seen 2 clear patterns emerge. The first is in support. We found product market fit here almost immediately. Customers got faster answers here. Our team got capacity back and obviously, AI has added to productivity. We have not hired a single Tier 1 support rep since 2024. So clear value that we are driving there.
In the case of customer success, the story is more interesting because that actually is providing an assistant for all customer success managers to understand the usage of a customer by specific use case, where they're using HubSpot, where they're not and how they can have deeper conversations with customers.
So really exciting to see this transformation within our go-to-market. And I'll kind of finish off with this. HubSpot is going through a process of massive AI transformation and metamorphosis. Over the last couple of years, we have inspired HubSpoters to leverage AI, provide access to tools. We have transformed the culture to be one of experimentation, and we have changed the organizational clock speed to go from annual planning to now operating in just 6 week sprints.
The result is an organization that is genuinely AI first with 95% of HubSpoters using AI weekly. We're just getting started. What we've also recognized is that employees becoming 10x more efficient with AI tools does not automatically mean the company is 10x more productive. There is a gap between AI driving individual productivity to AI driving institutional productivity, and that is what we are focused on.
We're investing in the infrastructure to provide context across all of the teams. We are reimagining workflows within specific teams and identifying pods that can actually drive this type of institutional productivity. That is the transformation that we are building towards.
So let me close this out. I hope you found this very useful. I hope you take away a few things. One is that we have a very clear and focused strategy. We want to make AI work for SMBs. We're reimagining marketing, and we are accelerating upmarket progress. We have a clear advantage - growth context. It shows up across the platform. It shows up in every single agentic use case that you saw in the product demos today. And our pace of product innovation is accelerating. We remain laser-focused on delivering great outcomes for our customers. We know that it is a massive opportunity for us.
Thank you so much for taking the time to join us for this update. I look forward to speaking to many of you in early May.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Special Call - HubSpot, Inc.
HubSpot, Inc. — Special Call - HubSpot, Inc.
📣 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: Spring Spotlight war ein produkt‑ und strategie‑Update: HubSpot setzt auf "Make AI work for growth companies" über das Agentic Customer Platform‑Konzept und eine fünfdimensionale Growth Context (Business, Team, Process, Customer, Network). Ziel: End‑to‑end‑AI von Discoverability (AEO) über Marketing (Breeze/Loop) und Prospecting bis zu Support (Customer Agent).
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Strategie: Drei Prioritäten: (1) Demokratisierte KI für SMBs, (2) Re‑imagined Marketing (HubSpot AEO als neues Produkt, sowohl Stand‑alone als auch integriert) und (3) Upmarket‑Beschleunigung durch plattformbasierte Agenten. Intern: eigene agentic execution‑Plattform (Kubernetes‑Container, einheitliche Skills/Tools) und Agent‑first Go‑to‑Market.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Neu: Produktlaunches und Early‑Adopter‑Ergebnisse wurden gezeigt (HubSpot AEO, Breeze Assistant, Prospecting/Smart Deal/Customer Agents). Operative Ergebnisse: Breeze → bis zu 4x mehr Leads; Prospecting → +19% E‑Mail‑Sendrate; Smart Deal Progression → 10x höhere CRM‑Update‑Genauigkeit; Customer Agent → ~70% Ticket‑Auflösung. Keine neuen finanziellen Guidance‑Zahlen (quiet period, Finanzdaten bei Earnings‑Call Anfang Mai).
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Starkes Produkt‑Momentum mit konkreten Kunden‑Outcomes und einer klaren Plattform‑Differenzierung durch Growth Context. Operative Kennzahlen untermauern Adoption, aber die finanzielle Relevanz bleibt bis zur Earnings‑Präsentation (früh Mai) zu verifizieren. Kurz: positives Signal für Produkt/Skalierung, finanzielle Bestätigung folgt.
HubSpot, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's Q4 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator today. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to hand the conference over to Head Director of Investor Relations, Chuck MacGlashing. Please go ahead.
Thanks, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Today, we'll be discussing the results announced in the press release that was issued after the market closed. With me on the call this afternoon is Yamini Rangan, our Chief Executive Officer; Dharmesh Shah, our Co-Founder and CTO; and Kate Bueker, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we start, I'd like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement included in today's press release. During this call, we'll make statements related to our business that may be considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as amended. In Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, all statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements, including those regarding management's expectations of future financial and operational performance and operational expenditures, expected growth, FX movement, and business outlook, including our financial guidance for the first fiscal quarter and full year 2026.
Forward-looking statements reflect our views only as of today and is except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language in today's press release and our Form 10-K, which will be filed with the SEC this afternoon for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.
During the course of today's call, we'll refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure used or discussed and a reconciliation of the differences between such measures can be found within our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 earnings press release in the Investor Relations section of our website.
Now it's my pleasure to turn over the call to HubSpot's Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan. Yamini?
Thank you, Chuck, and welcome, everyone, to the call. I'll start with our Q4 and Full Year 2025 results and the consistent themes driving those results. Then I will highlight our 2026 strategy, how we are positioned to lead and win with AI and the specific levers we are activating to drive growth. Let's dive in.
We had a solid finish to 2025. Q4 revenue grew 18.2% year-over-year in constant currency and full year 2025 revenue grew 18.2% in constant currency to $3.1 billion. We delivered another quarter of standout operating profit growth, with operating margin of 22.6% in Q4 and 18.6% for the full year. We now serve more than 288,000 customers globally. We added 9,800 net new customers in Q4 and more than 40,000 customers for the year. That growth at our scale says something important. Customers trust HubSpot during a time of transformative change in the industry driven by AI.
I'm also pleased to announce that our Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program of up to $1 billion, a clear signal of the confidence we have in our business and the growth opportunity ahead. Two teams drove our performance in 2025, strong core fundamentals and momentum with our Agentic customer platform.
First, our core fundamentals are solid. Upmarket momentum was consistent all year with a strong finish in December. Large companies are consolidating on HubSpot because we deliver the power they want with the ease of views they need. In 2025, deals over 5,000 in monthly recurring revenue grew 33%, and deals over 10,000 grew 41%. The number of customers with 500 or more seats grew fivefold, making it one of the strongest upmarket years. This is the direct result of years of focused product investment, the moat we have built with our partner ecosystem and our growing brand credibility with larger companies.
[ Rentokil ] Initial, a global leader in pest control, used Marketing Hub to increase leads by 76% and deliver a 671% ROI. That success led them to expand HubSpot. Now they use HubSpot's Enterprise product suite across more than 100 teams to scale their go-to-market strategy. [ Mercantile ] Bank, a financial institution with over 700 employees consolidated 6 separate solutions on to Marketing Hub and saw an immediate improvement in efficiency and personalization capabilities. This success prompted them to expand to Sales Hub, Service Hub and Content Hub and replace their legacy CRM, giving them a unified view of customer while lowering costs.
Multi-hub adoption accelerated again this year. In 2025, 62% of new Pro Plus customers landed with multiple hubs. We saw 2 common patterns with new customers. They landed with Marketing and Sales Hub or with marketing, sales, service, content and operations, 5 hubs operating as one go-to-market platform. Multi-Hub expansion is also showing up across our installed base with 40% of Pro Plus installed base by ARR, owning 4 or more hubs, up 6 points year-over-year. We are the genetic customer platform of choice for scaling companies, and Multi-Hub adoption is the new norm.
Our pricing changes also created meaningful tailwind in 2025. As a reminder, we lowered the price point to get started, removed seat minimums to make upgrades easy and added core seats that deliver platform value. That shift is largely complete. Approximately 90% of our legacy customers have moved into the new pricing model and almost 50% of our ARR has gone through their first renewal. The impact is showing up clearly in the data. We continue to see strength in net customer additions aided by the changes. And despite the questions we get on seed compression, we saw customers by more sales subseats, service [ subseats ] and core seats throughout the year. All of this reinforces our confidence that our core fundamentals are strong and built to drive durable growth.
Strong fundamentals matter, but what defined 2025 was our momentum in AI. We are clear about who we serve, growing companies with 200 to 2,000 employees. That's where we win, and that's what we build for. Our AI strategy is simple and focused on helping those companies grow. We embed AI across the platform. We deliver agents that do real work, and we give teams tools like Breeze Assistant and LLM connectors to turn their data into action. That strategy is resonating. AI native like [ Lovable, Pralserbase and Quint AI ] are choosing HubSpot as their platform to drive growth.
Now let's talk about AI adoption. Our agents gained real traction last year. Customer agent handle support tickets and answers questions across the full customer journey. More than 8,000 customers activated it last year and are seeing mid-60s resolution rates driven by product innovation. Prospecting agent help sales teams research accounts personal lines outreach and engage prospects. Over 10,000 customers have activated it, up 57% quarter-over-quarter. This is a clear use case with strong pull customers using it are booking nearly twice as many meetings compared to last year.
At INBOUND, we launched Data Agent, which automatically enriches customer data. More than 2,500 customers have already activated it, a clear signal that customers want AI to take on the manual work that flows teams down. And while it's still early, our usage-based credit model is starting to scale. In Q4, customer agent accounted for about 60% of credits consumed. Data Agent, prospecting agents and intent monitoring each contribute between 10% to 15% of credits consumed. All of this reinforces the clear point. AI is becoming a core driver of how our customers grow and therefore, how we grow.
Okay. Let's look ahead to 2026. Our strategy is clear and focused on 3 things: making AI work for growth companies, reimagining marketing with a new playbook and products, and accelerating up market growth with a platform that delivers both power and simplicity.
First, we are focused on making AI work for growth companies. While there is no shortage of AI solutions in the market, there is a real gap between generating AI output and driving growth outcomes. Closing that gap is what will unlock broad AI adoption, and that requires context, having the right information at the right time, with the judgment to know what to do with it. And that's where HubSpot has a clear advantage. Most AI tools ask customers to bring their own context, upload brand guidelines, teach the system who their customer is and how their business works then do it again for the next agent or LLM and again, that's backwards.
With HubSpot, context is shared and powers everything. Our AI vision is to lead with our agentic customer platform where unified customer data, business context, pure benchmarks across more than 288,000 customers and deep domain expertise, powers, workloads and agents.
To do this, we are bringing together 3 interconnected layers, context layer where customer understanding lives, action layer with our hubs and agents where they help do work, and a coordination layer to connect everything. You will see us accelerate this vision throughout this year. it will show up in powerful use cases where AI does real work for teams and drive measurable growth that is our AI strategy.
At the same time, marketing is going through the biggest shift we have seen in decades. Search traffic is declining as AI-generated answers becomes the starting point for product and brand discovery. Customers are spending time across more channels, and AI is creating new ways for companies to be found. We saw these changes coming and have deliberately diversified our marketing channels. Last year, YouTube bleeds grew 68%. [ New Letter ] leads grew 53%, and HubSpot became the most visible CRM in LLM generated answers. And now we're turning what we have learned into a playbook and products for our customers. We launched the loop, a new growth playbook for the AI era, along with AI-powered solutions to help teams put it into action. Data Hub gives customers clean, unified data foundation, essential for marketing in the AI era. And Marketing Studio provides an AI-powered workspace to plan and create campaigns faster. And our AEO tools give marketers a real opportunity to offset declines in traditional search. Customers are already seeing results.
[indiscernible], an AI-powered learning platform with over 1,000 employees shifted towards AEO as organic traffic declined. Using some spot, they improved their visibility in LLM and saw 13% of their leads come from new AI-driven sources. And [ Crunch ] Fitness, a global brand with over 1,200 employees and 500 franchise locations use HubSpot to deliver personalized on brand messages at scale, sending more than 15 million targeted e-mails a month and generating 2 million leads in a year. HubSpot helped define the inbound marketing era, and we are uniquely positioned to lead what comes next.
The third pillar of our strategy is to keep winning up market. Last year was one of our strongest upmarket years. That was driven by product innovation that delivered real results for larger customers. Within their first year on HubSpot, upmarket customers generated more leads closed more deals and improved ticket close rates. In 2026, we're doubling down on that momentum. We are aligning dedicated product resources to the needs of this segment and increasing sales capacity to drive growth. This is a large market where we have clear product market fit, a strong and energized partner ecosystem and significant room to grow. Our strategy shows up clearly in our growth levers. Our core drivers remain strong and durable, upmarket momentum, multi-hub adoption and pricing tailwinds. These are working consistently, and we expect them to continue to scale.
As we enter a more transformational phase with AI, we see 2 emerging growth levers, core seat adoption and credit. We have significantly expanded the value of the core seat by including brief assistant, enriched company data with buying intense signals and platform features that brings teams together. As a result, adoption of enrich data jumped from 51% to nearly 70% in Q4, a clear signal of the value customers are seeing with core seat. Our goal is to make the core seat the foundation for every go-to-market employee and to drive broad adoption across teams. And as customers rely on agents to do more work on their behalf we will scale credit consumption. Together, these levers expand how customers get value from HubSpot and how we accelerate growth.
With that, I'll hand it over to our CFO, Kate Bueker, to walk you through our financial and operating results.
Thanks, Yamini. Let's turn to our fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results. Q4 revenue grew 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 20% on an as-reported basis. Q4 subscription revenue grew 21% year-over-year, while services and other revenue increased 12% on an as-reported basis. Q4 domestic revenue grew 17% year-over-year and international revenue growth was 19% in constant currency and 24% as reported, representing 49% of total revenue.
For the full year of 2025, revenue grew 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 19% as reported. Full year subscription revenue grew 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 19% as reported. Services and other revenue grew 16% on an as-reported basis. We added 9,800 net new customers in Q4, bringing our total customer count to over 288,000, growing 16% year-over-year with particular strength in Pro Plus customer additions in the quarter. Average subscription revenue per customer was $11,700 in Q4, up 1 point year-over-year in constant currency and up 3 points on an as-reported basis.
Moving into 2026. We continue to expect net additions in the 9,000 to 10,000 range with low to mid-single-digit ASRPC growth in constant currency. Customer dollar retention remained in the high 80s in Q4, while net revenue retention increased sequentially as expected to 105%. For the full year of 2025, net revenue retention was 103.5%, up from 101.8% in 2024, reflecting continued momentum in seat expansion and the benefit from our pricing change.
Looking ahead to 2026, we expect to grow net revenue retention by another 1 to 2 points year-over-year, driven by a combination of continued seat expansion and ramping credit adoption. As a reminder, we tend to see a seasonal downtick in net revenue retention in Q1, followed by expansion as we move through the year.
Q4 calculated billings were $971 million, growing 20% year-over-year in constant currency and 27% on an as-reported basis. Q4 billings benefited from strong upmarket performance, resulting in a modest increase in overall billings duration in the quarter. For the full year of 2025, calculated billings were $3.4 billion, growing 19% year-over-year in constant currency and 23% on an as-reported basis.
The remainder of my comments will refer to non-GAAP measures. Q4 operating margin was 23%, up 4 points compared to the year ago period and 3 points sequentially. Full year 2025 operating margin was 18.6%, up 1 point year-over-year. We delivered operating leverage as a result of disciplined hiring as well as the ongoing benefits of our partner commission changes. Net income was $163 million or $3.09 in Q4 and $516 million or $9.70 per fully diluted share for the full year of 2025. Free cash flow was $209 million or 25% of revenue in Q4 and $595 million or 19% of revenue for the full year of 2025. Our cash and marketable securities totaled $1.8 billion at the end of December.
As Yamini shared, our Board has authorized a new $1 billion share repurchase program. While we remain focused on investing in organic product innovation and selective M&A, we also see the opportunity to return capital to shareholders through an additional share repurchase program. This reflects our continued confidence in the long-term opportunity ahead.
Before turning to guidance, I want to highlight several factors shaping our 2026 growth outlook and the underlying strength of our business performance. In 2025, net new ARR growth exceeded constant currency revenue growth in every quarter, with full year net new ARR growing 24% year-over-year, 6 points above constant currency revenue growth. Looking ahead, we expect full year 2026 net new ARR growth to outpace constant currency revenue growth, supported by the underlying trends Yamini outlined, continued upmarket momentum, multi-hub adoption and pricing benefits and the emerging impact of core seed adoption and credits. Going forward, we plan to share net new ARR growth on an annual basis as part of our Q4 earnings.
With that, let's dive into our guidance for the first quarter and full year of 2026. For the first quarter, total as reported revenue is expected to be in the range of $862 million to $863 million, up 16% year-over-year in constant currency and 21% on an as-reported basis. Non-GAAP operating profit is expected to be between $144 million and $145 million, representing a 17% operating profit margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is expected to be between $2.46 and $2.48. This assumes 52.5 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
And for the full year of 2026, total as reported revenue is expected to be in the range of $3.69 billion to $3.7 billion, up 16% year-over-year in constant currency, and 18% on an as-reported basis, modestly above our guidance for Q1 constant currency revenue growth. Non-GAAP operating profit is expected to be in the range of $736 million to $740 million, representing a 20% operating profit margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is expected to be between $12.38 and $12.46. This assumes 51.8 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
As you adjust your models, please keep in mind the following. We expect our legacy Clearbit business to be a 40 basis point headwind to full year 2026 revenue growth moderating slightly from the 60 basis point headwind for 2025. Our EPS guidance for Q1 and full year 2026 includes the expected impact from our share repurchase program. And we expect CapEx as a percentage of revenue to be 5% to 6% for the full year of 2026 and free cash flow to be about $740 million.
With that, I will turn the call back over to Yamini for her closing remarks.
Okay. In closing, I'm energized by our position heading into 2026. We are moving with urgency and focus. Innovating quickly to help our customers grow with AI and evolving how we operate to support that pace. We have transformed how we build products and how we serve customers with AI and we are turning those learnings into real value for our customers.
We enter 2026 with clear momentum. Our core growth drivers remain strong, and our emerging AI levers are gaining traction. Together, they give us confidence in our ability to deliver durable growth. I want to thank our customers, partners and investors for your continued trust and support and a heartfelt thank you to HubSpotters around the world for staying focused on solving for our customers every single day.
With that, operator, please open up the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Samad Samana from Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
Yamini, I thought I'd kick off with just ripping off the Band-Aid that everybody is focused on. The software complex is under a ton of pressure on AI destruction fears. It's asked on every earnings call of every company. And you spoke a lot in your prepared remarks about contacts and moats, but can you dig deeper into how defensible HubSpot's role is as a system of record and maybe what your fear on LLM disruption is.
And related to that, how would you respond to investors that fear that more data will be sucked into and be retained in third-party agents and that this could threaten the role of a system of record itself. I know there's a lot to unpack there, but I think that's what we get asked the most every day now.
All right, Samad. Let's start with ripping off band-aid. I'll probably start with the disruption threat and specifically our moat to address that. Then I'll take the second part of your question, which is about value getting captured outside of SaaS as data gets sucked out of solutions. All right.
First off, in terms of disruption, there's a big difference between point [indiscernible] for solutions and platform. And that difference matters even more in the AI era. Look, in the last decade, HubSpot won as a platform because we were the source for customer data. With AI, we will win because we are the source of customer context and that matters. As I talk to customers right now, the biggest challenge we see with AI adoption, particularly in mid-market companies is not access to more AI tools, more LLM, more agents. There are plenty of those. The biggest challenge that I see is that there is a huge gap between AI output and AI outcomes.
And when I say outcomes, I mean more leads, more deals, more growth. And by the way, that's all our customers want to talk to us about. Mid-market companies don't care about AI for the sake of AI. They don't want to just adopt it. They care about driving growth and if AI can help with that, they will adopt it. And in order for AI and agents to drive outcomes, you need customer context. This is the context it wasn't the heads of people, but now you need the patterns of what works, what doesn't work in your business, in your industry, in your particular function, and then you need to be able to take an action on it and that is what a platform like HubSpot delivers.
I'll give you a practical example. You can ask an LLM to generate outreach for under prospects and then do the same thing in the platform with a history of interactions with the prioritization of what sales care is about with how your best reps handle competitive objections within your industry and then ask it to generate outreach. The difference is, one will be AI output and the other will be AI outcomes. One produces words, the other wins deals. One knows a lot about the external world, the platform knows specifically about the customers' world and what is happening today. There's this whole idea that AI is like a magic wand and you can attract away all of this problem and expect agents to work. It just will not. Context has to come from somewhere. It has to be trusted, it needs to be real-time and it needs to be actionable, and that is what a platform like HubSpot delivers.
Our strategy, as I just articulated, is to be that intelligent system of customer context and we have the data, but more importantly, we have the business context, the industry context and the domain context to deliver it, and that's why customers come to us. They rely on us for that context. They want to use more of our APIs and partners want to customize and build on top of us. And as AI adoption accelerates the value of our Agentic platform increases.
Okay. Now going to your second part of the question, which is, can all the data just be completely sucked out so that there is no value captured by SaaS. Well, first of all, that assumes that we will not build agents rapidly ourselves. We are building agents on top of that customer context, and it is working, and we're seeing that adoption. Second, it assumes that SaaS platforms are data. SaaS platforms are more than data. It is the logic, right? You can certainly get a nondeterministic output for a sales female, but try taking a nondeterministic output for your sales forecast. That is not possible. It workflows, like forecasting, routing approvals, permission, that is logic. It's not data to be sucked away.
And ownership, accountability and governance, all of those lives inside applications, and it's much easier to bring AI into these applications rather than try to extract all of this away as like as if it's just data, it is not.
And then the last thing I'll say is that we serve companies that have 200 to 2,000 employees. That mid-market segment is what we care about. They're focused on growing business. They're not managing model complexity. They're not looking at the latest LLM version. They're not stitching together AI infrastructure. They want AI that just works and drive measurable growth, and that's our focus, making AI simple, practical and actionable and driving outcomes for scaling companies. That's our strategy, and we think it's very defensible for the segment of customers that we are delivering value for.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader from KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Great. The question I had was on acceleration. The guidance for 16% constant currency growth this year. It's certainly not an acceleration, but all the bread crumbs that you're giving us on kind of net new ARR would mathematically just leads to acceleration. So I'm curious what the disconnect is there between guidance of slowing growth and net new ARR, which would hit that accelerating growth?
Yes, Jackson, thanks for the question. I'll just start by saying that we remain confident that we can reaccelerate and hit our 20% revenue growth goal. You're right, all of the leading indicators are pointing in the right direction. Net new ARR is like an important forward indicator of growth for us, and we've delivered net new ARR growth in excess of revenue growth now over the last 6 quarters. Our revenue guidance implies a modest acceleration throughout 2026. As I shared in my prepared remarks, net revenue retention is expected to expand by another 1 to 2 points this year. And we're also expecting that 2026, net new ARR growth is also going to outpace constant currency revenue growth. And that's supported by all of those underlying trends that Yamini talked about.
Continued upmarket momentum, continued multi-hub adoption, continued benefit from our ongoing pricing changes and then those emerging growth levers of core seat adoption and credits. The momentum that we're seeing with net new ARR is what gives us the confidence that we will be able to deliver a 20% revenue growth in the future.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Keith Bachman from BMO.
It's a good follow-on question to the previous one. Kate, I was hoping to dig a little more into the context of guidance. In particular, a few things I wanted to flush out. You talked about pricing and I just wanted to try to understand, a, how much pricing help was in '25 versus '26? And b, if you could comment a little bit about any guidance, so to speak, on how much core seat growth may add and/or credits as we think about what is embedded in guidance as you articulated?
And then the final one, I know a multipart question here, sorry, is could you give any color on what like-for-like seat growth was in '25 and how you think that may be different or the same in '26. So sort of 3 engines within the context of guidance of CY '26?
Yes. Maybe I'm going to just start by giving a high-level view of how we set guidance for 2026. And the short answer there is that we set guidance in a way that is very consistent with how we have always set guidance. And that is that we -- it's early in the year, we want to set guidance that we feel comfortable that we can meet or exceed throughout the year under a set of outcomes across economic and execution outcomes that are that capture a range. Again, it's early in the year, and we want to establish a set of guidance that we're comfortable that we can deliver against.
That said, like our guidance -- our starting point guidance for 2026, is higher than our starting point guidance for 2025. It's up about 0.5 point from last year. Our full year guidance this year is higher than our Q1 guidance. And so that would indicate that Q1 is going to be the low point for growth this year and that we're going to accelerate growth throughout the year. So it's early we wanted to put forward guidance that is consistent in terms of methodology that we're comfortable we can deliver against and that shows that we can reaccelerate revenue over time.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges from Goldman Sachs.
Yamini, I remembered your [ Dario ] Keynote from INBOUND. And Dharmesh, I know you spent a lot of time in the quality ecosystem. Maybe talk to us about how you see your leading-edge customers using a tool like [ Cord Cork ] alongside HubSpot to get to a better and complementary outcome with [indiscernible] working side by side.
Thanks for the question. So the topic [indiscernible] is still very early, and it's solving for a consumer-oriented use cases. So it's still very early to kind of see our customers using it. What we do see customers using is our cloud connector that connects an individual's account on cloud to HubSpot via our connector, and that's going getting increased usage. And what gives us a lot of kind of optimism is around what that's really doing is extending the customer platform that Yamini has been talking about and providing it via a new channel, which is these kind of AI applications like cloud and ChatGPT. So we're not seeing Claude Core yet, but we are seeing the kind of classic cloud connector and the ChatGPT connector being used.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Alex Zukin from Wolfe Research.
Maybe following on the previous question. To the extent that the modality develops around third-party agents and agent networks that continuously have to access both to read and to action information within HubSpot. Can you just give us a framework for how you're thinking about monetization in that type of environment? And then to some extent, how should we think about the to [indiscernible] for your question, kind of the potential for consumption tailwinds on ARR growth, net new ARR growth on the credit side for '26 and maybe beyond?
Alex, thanks a lot for the question. So I'll start with the first one and then talk about the credit consumption. So in the first part, the way we think about ourselves is we are an open platform. That's how we won in the last decade, that's how we will win in the next decade. And we want customers to bring in and use as much data as possible. So we're very open about that. We don't charge for customers, bringing in the data, the more complete the customer context, the better outcomes that we can deliver. So we don't try to restrict that and we try to enable that.
The second thing I would say is we also won partners building on top of HubSpot. And this could be workflows, this could be agents, this could be custom apps, and we want that to happen. And we've always been partner-friendly. We will continue to operate that way. The part that we will say we're very disciplined is around platform access at scale. If other agents or other platforms that are emerging are relying on our customer context, that access, we will monitor it, we will meter it and we will monetize it. And specifically, if it is high frequency, extraction of scale, if it's like bulk export of data or content, or context, we will govern it and monetize that accordingly.
So the way to think about our platform is we are open by design, but we're not a free data pipeline for everybody to take that information out. We're an intelligent customer platform. Access to that context is valuable and we'll price it in a way that is fair scalable and aligned to the value that we create for customers, which means we will also share the value. So that's in terms of our culture.
The second question you asked is around monetization, specifically of credits and how we think about that as tailwind now and maybe in the future. And I'll start by saying that we're beginning to see real usage beyond included credits and that's, again, happening because customers are getting clear measurable value. And the biggest driver today that we see is customer add. I talked about this, this has got clear product market fit and clear value and customers are using it to resolve support tickets, but they're also using it to answer tickets in terms of marketing as well as sales and it represents nearly 60% of the credits that are getting consumed right now.
We're also seeing very strong adoption in 3 other use cases. Prospecting agent has found really clear fit. And think about this agent can do account research, it can monitor your contacts, and then it can drive out reach based on the signal that you get about a company or a particular contact. And given how much disruption is happening in terms of the lead, this has got real pull. I talk to customers day in and day out of our prospecting agent.
Now what is interesting is how customers are buying credits. They're not just like thinking of this as an experiment. They're beginning to scale it. They're starting with what's included, then they replace real work and then they allocate more budget and that is a real positive green shoot. One of our customers [ Skytrack ] and [ Boltec ], they piloted this customer agent and started with 10,000 support chats a month, that agent was so effective that it used up all of the included credits in 4 hours. Then they allocated another $50,000 of their budget for credit and treated it more like a work replacement. So where we are is we have this cap holding in place. Agents are clearly adding value. They are being adopted. The credit mechanisms are in place. We're beginning to deliver value, and we see this as a tailwind and an emerging lever both in 2026 as well as many years to come.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Parker Lane from Stifel.
Yes. This is [ Jack McShane ] on for Parker. Yamini, would the Agentic ecosystem build-out seemingly accelerating throughout the quarter, whether it be through Frontier, [ Clad code ], [ OPIS ], et cetera. How did deal velocity trend in the quarter relative to prior periods? Are the weekly announcements of the next use case specific agent or a new model that specializes in coding, are those types of announcements causing any sort of confusion or slowdown in the pipeline? Maybe a better way of asking it is how are customers and prospects digesting to these announcements in real time?
I actually really like this question. I'll tell you there's a huge disconnect between what's happening in terms of announcements and how Investors are processing it and the actual conversations that we're having with customers in terms of AI adoption and use case. And again, I'll remind that the segments that we serve, there are 2 to 2,000 employee companies. They have a business to run, and they're not chasing every announcement that is happening out there. And if you look at the pipeline and what we are talking about, the first conversation that we have is how can they drive innovation and growth. It is not how can I adopt name the announcement of this week. It's really how can I drive adoption and growth and for ourselves, and we deliver that.
We deliver our platform. We deliver solutions that can -- that are easy to use, that have past time to implement, and they look to us to drive it. So we talked about Q4, in Q4, specifically upmarket was very strong. And if you look at the nature of the conversations we had, it was consolidating multiple applications is driving growth through innovation and then making sure that there is clear data and clean context to be able to get them to grow. That is the kind of conversation that we have. Again, huge disconnect and we had a very robust Q4.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis from UBS.
Kate, maybe just on the acceleration that we could see throughout this year. You mentioned a lot of growth drivers earlier, but could you just break out how much price is contributing to that versus some of the other growth drivers around seats and credit adoption, like could we be getting to the point that you mentioned earlier that credits are scaling, could that start to add a point to growth this year? Would just love to hear a little bit more about the breakout of those.
Yes. Thanks so much for the question. I actually think, Taylor, the easiest way to talk about it is through the trends that we're seeing in net revenue retention. As you know, net revenue retention was up this year, 105 in Q4, it was up to 103 for the full year, and that's about 1.7 points up from last year. The components of that, if you think about what was actually driving the expansion. It was very much all of the benefits of the seats pricing model change.
Now that is not pricing. The biggest impact actually is that we saw higher upgrade rates for seats across sales seats, service seats and core seats. As you remember, one of the things that happened with the pricing model change is that we lowered the barrier to get the barrier to entry to get started at HubSpot. So people bought the seats that they needed, and there was a much more natural upgrade path from there.
The other contributor was what you're talking about, which is as customers migrated and came up for a renewal we would -- they would see up to a 5% pricing increase, and that did help support net revenue retention in 2025. It will support revenue retention in 2026 again to a similar amount. But the bigger driver of the expansion this year and into next year were the other factors associated with the pricing change.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of [ Kirk Materne ] from Evercore ISI.
I was wondering, Yamini, if you could just talk about the benefits you're seeing from AI internally, just in terms of your own R&D and maybe sales and marketing efficiency, where you're seeing some real levers there? Just any anecdotal comments would be great.
Yes. Thanks a lot, Kirk. Look, we have been transforming HubSpot completely through AI, and I'll start with coding. The way we build products has transformed completely, 97% of the code that was committed last year was done with AI assist. And if you look at our top engineers, they are living and breathing in agenetic coding with Claude Code, and that's how we build. And that has certainly changed the pace of innovation, but also the types of innovation that we are able to bring to the customers. So that's like number one, it has changed dramatically.
And then when you think about our -- how we serve -- we have been on this path of transforming with AI. Support completely done, our support is the first year support and nearly 60% of our support is handled by AI, which means our teams are spending on much more complex cases. We've been using AI to transform marketing as well as prospecting. Our prospecting approach internally has changed the level of meetings and the level of pipeline that we bring and in a given quarter, 10,000 to 15,000 meetings are being set up internally through prospecting. And almost everything that we do from sales in terms of node capture, in terms of deal progression, in terms of smart guidance for getting deals. All of that has grown, which means at the end of the day, our efficiency in terms of support our efficiency in terms of sales and our efficiency in terms of building pipeline has increased.
And overall, as a company, we are leaning very hard into AI. We set ourselves a target last year to say we want every HubSpotter to be inspired and work in this new AI-first manner. And we put out targets, then we blew through it. At the end of the year, almost every HubSpotter is using AI every day of their week. And so we're transformed and that helps us, of course, to move faster and operate at speed. But more importantly, everything that we learn of what works and what doesn't, we're building it into the product, and we are sharing it as best practices for the customer. And so a really good story that we're happy with that. And we're going to continue to do that. Now it's like we are on to the second phase of AI transformation internally to scale up our efforts even more.
Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Rishi Jaluria from RBC.
Wonderful. This is Rishi Jaluria. Maybe I want to drill into one thing. So Yamini, I was struck by you mentioning [ Lovable ] as a customer during the prepared remarks. Talking specifically about a single customer, definitely it's striking that the market clearly is worried that by coding is going to replace incumbent platforms, but one of the leaders in [ Viecoting ] is using the intelligence to power that.
So my question is really this. As you think about your own adoption amongst AI natives, especially the cutting-edge ones that have the common household names over the past year in many cases over the past 6 months. Can you talk about why you might feel HubSpot is uniquely positioned for those companies? And why they're choosing to use you instead of leveraging all the [ Vicoating ] tools and [ Cloudco ] and [ CodeAx ], et cetera, to try to build their own.
Coding has gotten easier, but domain expertise and platform value has not just gone away, right? So people just equate coding to your ability to build everything. Look, I've just said that internally in terms of how we build products is completely transformed and we're building products completely. And of course, everybody within the company known as [ Vibe coding ] or how managers do it or U.S. managers do it. Our marketers do [ Vibe coding] , but it doesn't mean that we are turning around and replacing our core platform, a core HR platform, ERP platform. We're not building any of that.
And so I think there's a lot that is getting lost in terms of ability to code versus value of a platform. And that's what I would come back to, which is -- what we deliver is a platform, and it used to be that, that platform has unified data. That's why customers came to us. We were -- we built something organically. People came to us because there was value in unifying marketing, sales and service. But what has fundamentally changed now is that it's not just about the data, it's the context because context is what you need to make decisions, whether you're an agent or your team member that is making decisions on behalf of that agent, and that is what we deliver. And that is why all AI native companies, including the ones that you mentioned are starting with HubSpot as their platform of choice in terms of go-to-market.
Dharmesh, go ahead.
Yes. As someone that spends hours a day using Agentic coding tools. Both AI native companies and non-AI companies, the best companies spend the most amount of calories in adding value to their customers. They don't spend their engineering calories, going off [indiscernible] coding CRM or an ERP or an HR system, whatever, that just doesn't make sense. So just because it's possible. So we have, as Yamini mentioned, a large engineering team knows what they're doing, spending 97% of their kind of calorie using Agentic coding tools, they're not doing it to replace internal platforms.
So we think the best companies, both AI and non-AI we'll not be using [indiscernible] to replace core systems. They'll be doing it to add value to their customers. That's what [ Loveable ] is doing. And I think that's what's the best company in the world will continue to do.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Raimo Lenschow from Barclays.
This is [ Dave Cougar ] on for Raimo. Great to hear that YouTube and Newsletter leads are driving to differentiation with LLM generated Answers. Given the challenges of the SEO channel faced throughout 2025, should we think about that as a tailwind to top line throughout 2026?
I'll maybe talk about the Tofu trends, the top of the funnel trends. And look, yes, there's been overall decline in terms of content generated traffic, traffic that comes into the website, but that's something that we have seen coming. We have diversified the channels. We've talked about our playbook, and that playbook is working, right? And specifically, you mentioned a couple of like channels for us YouTube has grown newsletters, leads from Newsletters have increased more than 50% and AEO is increasing.
And I think like part of the way you should think about it is that the diversification strategy as well as our ability to lead with AI is going to help us continue to drive top of the funnel which is why you're seeing us double down on our guidance of net customer additions of 9 to 10,000 every quarter going forward. Last year, we added 40,000 customers, and this year, we'll continue to do it at that pace. And a lot of what we have done in terms of the playbook is what helps us drive customer additions even in a very challenging environment and marketing is completely changing.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Siti Panigrahi from Mizuho.
Great. Yamini, I just want to ask about the early adopters of AI agents, whoever using it. What kind of trends are you seeing in terms of them talking about their user expansion or seat expansion. Where is -- actually, that's getting funded, all the AI investment they are doing right now. Also, are you seeing any trend differently from your segment versus scaling mid-market companies.
Okay. Great question, Siti. So I'll start with like what are we seeing and then is there any difference between segments. In terms of the AI use cases, use cases that are getting resonance are the ones that show clear, measurable value and clear outcomes. So it's really about delivering value and showing clear outcomes that is driving the usage. I would say the strongest traction is customer agent. And I would also say prospecting agents, we talked about both of these agents data agent that we launched at INBOUND is another one. So all 3 agents are seeing really good traction and adoption.
And in terms of what customers look for? Is it easy to implement and get started and is it clear enough to see value. And can they get confidence that the credit consumption is somewhat predictable. And I think it checks the box in each of those areas.
The one thing I will talk about is core seat, right? Because when we think about AI monetization, it is both core seat as well as credit. And we've talked a lot about the credit. On the core seat side, as you remember, Siti, last year, we included Breeze Assistant into the core seat and now 50% of Core seat users have tried and are using Breeze Assistant. So we know that AI is adding value there. Similarly, we added all of the company enrichment data into cores. Again, the level of adoption for that core seat has really increased in the last couple of quarters. So our strategy to add a lot of AI and data value into the core seat is working. And the combination of core seat plus credit is what we think of as durable emerging levers in terms of AI tailwinds.
And in terms of what you mentioned in terms of upmarket and on market, look, broadly speaking, very similar trends. I think upmarket customers care a little bit more about data security. In fact, a lot of them talked to me about which prompts are encrypted, which prompts are retained and so on. So there's a little bit more sensitivity towards data security and prompt usage versus the down market segment, but the use cases are about same.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Peterson from Raymond James.
Yamini, I wanted to follow up on the unified data model. I'm curious where you think that near-term cross-sell opportunity is most significant? Historically, I think we've heard a lot about building on Marketing Hub with Sales Hub. But as you've kind of broadened out the portfolio, where do you see like the incremental product adoption really ramping up in 2026?
Maybe clarify the question a little bit when you said unified data model. Are you just talking about Multi-hub adoption? Or are you talking about something else?
Yes. Multi-hub adoption more from a cross-sell perspective. So as you're looking to kind of go back into your base, where do you see the biggest opportunity for cross-sell in '26?
Yes, that's a great question. Look, I think in terms of where our customers land they mostly land with marketing plus Sales Hub. That is a common man pattern or they land with all 5 hubs, right? Those are the 2 common patterns. If they land with Marketing Hub and Sales Hub, then what happens is that in a few months, they begin to see the need for Data Hub because in almost everything that you do with loop or in almost everything that you're doing with sales automation, you need better quality data, ability to ingest more data ability to real-time bring data through AI promts and that's what Data Hub provides. And so the next combination we see is Data Hub.
Service Hub is another one where there is a ton of like cross-sell opportunity, especially with the advancements that we have made with customer agents, but also across the full platform, embedding summarization of ticket, sentiment analysis as well as being able to respond quickly, we're beginning to see Service Hub adoption. So the patterns are land with Marketing Hub and Sales Hub expand to Service Hub, Data Hub and content hub. And we are continuing to invest across the platform, and that is the motion that we want to continue to build.
One moment for our next question. Our next question will be from the line Arjun Bhatia from William Blair.
Perfect. Thank you so much. I just talk to touch on maybe the other side of the net retention rate dynamics. I'm curious where sort of upsell and upgrade basically the non-seat-based expansion levers, how those are playing out and whether we've seen sort of an uptick there at all? And maybe as a part of that, I would just love to hear Yamini from you on how the kind of SMB broader SMB macro environment is evolving given we've heard a little bit of noise there.
Yes. Thanks, Arjun. We've been talking about the dynamics with net revenue retention for a number of quarters now. So I think that you're familiar. But we always start the conversation on NRR with customer dollar retention and customer dollar retention has remained really strong and consistent for us in the high 80s. It's like ticked up a little bit this year, and we expect the same in next year. Where we've seen really strong upgrade motion is in the seats upgrade motion adding Service Hub seat, adding Sales Hub seat, adding core seats, and we're starting to see a building trend around credit adoption.
The other upgrade motions that we've been talking about contact tier upgrades, some of the cross-sell motions. They've sort of been in this holding pattern for a while. That's the conversation we've been having over time. And people are adding contacts. They're just not doing it at a rate and pace that is increasing and our expectation is that those trends are going to continue here for some time. That said, as I shared, we do expect net revenue retention to be up 1 to 2 points next year, and that's going to be driven by the continued success in seat. Upgrade rates as well as building momentum around core seats and credits.
Thank you. This concludes the HubSpot Q4 2025 Earnings Call. Thank you to everyone who was able to join us today. You may now disconnect your lines.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
HubSpot, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: Q4‑Wachstum +18.2% YoY in konstanten Währungen; FY2025 Umsatz $3,1 Mrd (+18.2% konst.).
- Operative Marge: Q4 Non‑GAAP Operative Marge ~23%; Full‑Year 2025 operative Marge 18.6%.
- Kunden: >288.000 Kunden; +9.800 Nettozugänge in Q4, >40.000 für das Jahr; Kundenbasis +16% YoY.
- Net Revenue Retention: Q4 NRR 105%; FY2025 NRR 103.5% (Maß für Umsatzerhalt und Expansion bestehender Kunden).
- Cash & FCF: Q4 FCF $209M (25% v. Umsatz), FY FCF $595M; Barmittel $1.8 Mrd; Board genehmigt bis zu $1 Mrd Aktienrückkauf.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- AI‑Strategie: Fokus auf eine "agentic customer platform"—Kontextschicht + Aktions‑Layer + Koordination, AI‑Agenten sollen echte Arbeit erledigen und Wachstumsergebnisse liefern.
- Upmarket & Multi‑Hub: Starkes Upmarket‑Momentum (Deals >$5k MRR +33%, >$10k +41%); 62% der neuen Pro‑Plus Kunden starten mit mehreren Hubs; Multi‑Hub wird zur Norm.
- Monetisierung Hebel: Preisänderungen (+90% Legacy‑Migration) treiben Upgrades; zwei neue Hebel: breitere Core‑Seat‑Adoption und nutzungsbasierte Credits (Agenten treiben Credits‑Verbrauch).
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q1‑Guidance: Umsatz $862–863M (≈+16% konstant), Non‑GAAP Betriebsgewinn $144–145M, EPS $2.46–2.48 (52.5M verwässerte Aktien).
- FY‑Guidance: Umsatz $3.69–3.70 Mrd (+16% konstant), Non‑GAAP Betriebsgewinn $736–740M (~20% Marge), EPS $12.38–12.46 (51.8M Aktien).
- Weitere Annahmen: Nettozugänge 9–10k/Quartal, NRR +1–2 Pp erwartet, Clearbit‑Effekt ~40 Basispunkte Headwind, CapEx ~5–6% Umsatz, FCF ≈ $740M.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Solides Wachstumsprofil mit verbesserten Margen, klarer AI‑Monetisierungsstrategie (Core‑Seats + Credits) und $1 Mrd Rückkauf als Kapitalrückgabe‑Signal. Guidance wirkt konservativ fürs Jahresauftaktquartal, Management erwartet aber Re‑Beschleunigung im Jahresverlauf; Risiken bleiben Clearbit‑Effekt und AI‑Ökosystem‑Wettbewerb.
HubSpot, Inc. — Barclays 23rd Annual Global Technology Conference
1. Question Answer
Guys, welcome to our next session. Really happy to have Yamini from HubSpot here with us.
Good to be here, Raimo.
And it's nice. It's -- sorry, I've been working with [indiscernible] for like 20 years, and it's the first time I met Yamini in person, which is kind of for me, very special actually.
Thank you so much.
The -- let's start -- bigger picture. So 2025 was a year of like a lot of AI-supported product announcements, and that was across the market. How do you think the industry is going to change? Like it's more bigger picture question now, but it feels like we're in the middle of a big storm.
It is massive. You talk about 20 years. I mean, every 20 years, there is a fairly big technology shift. And I think the difference is that AI has an even bigger transformative impact, and it's just moving faster in terms of the market. And so I think big implications for almost every layer of the tech stack. But for us, we look at the -- just the potential of AI and our focus is simple. How do we take that and how do we apply AI to help our small and medium businesses grow. That really is the focus because you can imagine the market that we serve, 2 to 2,000-employee company, they are not really focused on, is it Sonnet 3.7, Gemini 3. They can't keep up with every model change that is happening. But they clearly understand that the playbook for growth, whether it is marketing or sales or customer success is changing. And so for us, as the landscape transform pretty significantly, we look at the opportunity to apply this technology, democratize it for the segment that we serve and help them grow.
And do you think we will see like -- that's the opportunity and the fear that we have in the market at the moment, do you think it will change the competitive landscape and there are these big tectonic shifts where we had the mainframe guys and they're no longer there and now we have the new guys. Do you think this is going to play out here?
Absolutely. Any new technology wave is going to change the competitive landscape. The value that LLMs provide, let's just assume that it is going to continue to increase, which means the value that we provide on top of LLM has to continue to increase. It will attract new entrants. And when I look at like HubSpot and how we plan to compete from the product perspective, our strategy is to ensure that we are delivering value on top of what AI can do. We really look at AI and LLMs being complementary to what the capabilities of HubSpot are. And so our strategy is to provide value on top of what LLMs provide and be exceptionally complementary.
We do have distribution capacity, which means when we build a new AI feature, the next day, we can get it into the hands of thousands of users, get feedback immediately, use that as reinforced learning and improve the ability of our models to deliver value. And so we have distribution capacity as well as the partner ecosystem.
I think when an early-stage technology like this comes in, I do think customers need a bit more handholding to where do they get started? How do you get going? What are the use cases you need to look at? And we have the benefit of a very large ecosystem of both application and partners that can drive this. So yes, the landscape is shifting. And for us, the strategy is adding value to our customers beyond what we did before.
And can you put some more concrete stuff on there is like, there's a lot of AI stuff that went GA, sorry, for you guys. Like where are you most excited about?
Exactly. In terms of our AI strategy. So let me start with our AI strategy. It is threefold. The first one is that we decided to embed AI into every part of our hub as well as the platform. The reason is we want to lower the friction. If someone is already using our product today, they should be able to take an AI feature tomorrow that is released and be able to use it in the flow of their work. And so strategy number one is embed AI across all of the hubs and platform. I'll come back to how that's going.
The second part of the strategy is deliver agents. We know that one of the biggest capability is the ability of agents to do work on behalf of humans -- with humans in the loop. And so we've launched 3 that have now in the process of going to GA. The first one is customer agent that resolves tickets. We have over 6,200 customers on that customer agent, resolving more than 60% of tickets through that. We have a prospecting agent that can do account research and can reach out to customers on behalf of the end customer. And we have 6,400 customers on prospecting agent and growing. And we have a data agent that we just launched. So there's a set of agents that we've launched. And we also deliver capabilities to help our customers create and customize their own agents.
So that's the second part of the strategy. And the third is to deliver a Breeze assistant, something that acts like a copilot that helps every go-to-market employee get better insights from the data in a very conversational manner. That is our AI strategy. And a lot of this has gone into GA over the past year, and we're seeing traction. In the embedded AI, which people are beginning to use, we can see direct improvements in terms of the leads generated deals closed, which is a pretty big area to move as well as service tickets that are being resolved and agents I kind of mentioned. So it's early stages of a fairly massive change in terms of our product architecture and how we deliver value, and we are very, very encouraged by both the adoption as well as the beginning of traction.
And how do you -- like since we the financial guys, like we kind of care about the money all the time, how do you think -- how do you -- how does it play out from a monetization perspective? And there's kind of what you can do now, but there's a question about the industry overall in terms of is it going to be table stakes, you need to have it and it's part of the product? Or can you kind of do higher value-add SKUs? Like how do you think about that?
Yes. So multiple parts of that question. How do we plan to monetize AI? How is that going? And broadly in the industry, as the industry is trying to figure out value-based, outcome-based kind of pricing metrics, how do we think about it? Great question.
So I think I'll start from our monetization philosophy, which is that we always start with delivering value before we monetize anything. Why? Because there's something called churn. If you do not deliver value, if you do not make sure that customers are using it and getting repeated value out of something that you deliver, then you're going to see growth. And then in the next 12 months, you're going to see churn. And it's really important for us from a monetization philosophy to deliver value consistently and then drive monetization. That is the philosophy, and we are strategically very patient in terms of how we approach monetization.
Then in terms of our pricing model, our pricing model is hybrid. We believe that the future will have some seat-based monetization and some usage or outcome-based monetization. We don't think that the industry is going to turn all the way to just credits and tokens and that's -- and especially when you think about the segment that we serve, which is 2 to 2,000 employees, small and mid-market customers, they want a level of predictability in terms of the budget and just having consumption or outcome-based is not going to work. And so we are very thoughtful in terms of having a hybrid monetization model with both seats as well as what we call credits or usage-based pricing.
So how is that going? And how is the monetization working? I think I'll go back to the strategy. The strategy is threefold: embedded AI, agents as well as assistant, Breeze Assistant. So the embedded AI also has monetization. What happens is that when customers use features, they are much more sticky and they also see value and they continue to upgrade. We've seen that this year in terms of Sales Hub seat upgrades. We've seen that this year in terms of Service Hub seat upgrades. They're using it more, they're getting value and they continue to buy more seats.
Now this is interesting. There's a whole conversation about seat compression. This year, we've seen seat upgrades in terms of Sales Hub seats and Service Hub seats. In terms of -- I'll finish the monetization thought. In terms of agents, agents are what we will monetize through credits. which means if we are resolving tickets, if we are doing outreach, if we are writing a blog or if we are managing data for our customers, that will consume credits. Credits are included within the tiers and then they can buy more than that. And what we have seen, it's been pretty early days in terms of credit consumption, but half of our credit consumption is coming through our customer agent and the other half is coming from prospecting agent, data agent, data syncs and so on. So that is the way we're doing.
And then finally, in terms of the value of our Breeze Assistant, we've embedded that into core seats, and we'll talk a little bit more about this. And so we are also seeing the level of uptick and usage in terms of core seats expand. So our monetization philosophy is hybrid, and we do it through our core hubs as well as credits as well as the core seats. And again, this is one of those where I would say that we're pretty early days in terms of this massive shift that's happening within our customer base, and we're very thoughtful in terms of how we monetize and create a tailwind for ourselves and our business over the many years to come.
Yes. And then will you -- will be -- should we see that in the NRR number in theory, if you upsell, if you have credit, et cetera, then...
In theory and in practice. You have to -- you should see that. I mean any -- like if you break down NRR, it is how do we retain customers, how do we upgrade customers. That's really the basis of that. And the more we retain customers by delivering value and the more customers upgrade either in terms of seats or additions, then it will show up in NRR. And that is the tailwind that we have.
Yes. Okay. Perfect. And then the other part of the story, and it's not AI actually is multi-hub, like -- where are we on that journey?
Correct. Exciting journey. I think if we step back all the way, Raimo, like we went from a single product marketing automation company to a multiproduct company to a whole platform. And as we have gone on that journey, what we have recognized is that customers really want visibility across multiple go-to-market functions. The biggest drain for go-to-market functions is that if you have a great marketing solution, but you are not connected to sales or if you have a great sales solution, but you don't know what support is asking for, then you cannot grow. And so our customers within the segment really focus on wanting better visibility across marketing, sales, service, so they look to us for multi-hub.
In addition, I would say that through the pandemic, post the pandemic, there were a lot of point solutions and it was easy to kind of deploy these point solutions, but it was exceptionally complex, both from a cost as well as the ability to maintain. And so when I talk to customers and as I look at like our pipeline, most of the conversations are how can I drive better visibility across my go-to-market functions? How can I lower my total cost of ownership and how can I drive growth? And that, in combination to how we've built our product over the past few years have really driven a multi-hub adoption to the point that I think the number of customers that buy single hubs is now about 10% to 11%. That means more than the majority are basically using multi-hubs within HubSpot.
Yes, yes, yes. And then as part of that -- it's actually not part of it. It's like another side story is also like you slightly moving upmarket or you're moving upmarket. Talk about the journey there a little bit in terms of -- and also like you worked in an organization that we're selling really enterprise. Like when you say upmarket, like how do you define it?
Exactly. That's a great question, Raimo. So I will say that I've been talking about the segment that we serve, which is customers with 2 to 2,000 employees. And we typically call 500 to 2,000 as really upmarket customers. So think about the difference between a 20-person company that we serve and maybe a 2,000-person company that we serve. So I would say like 500 to 2,000 is really where we consider as upmarket.
Now you said that the journey that we've been on, maybe taking it like maybe 3 to 5 years ago, we set on this journey of focusing on the segment of 500 to 2,000-person companies and really driving market share. So sometimes people say, you're going upmarket. It's not like we're going to go to enterprise. I've certainly worked in companies that serve 100,000 employees or 200,000 employees. That's not what we mean. We really mean that 500 to 2,000-person company, and we really want to drive market share acceleration within that segment.
And we've done three things in order to do that. The first is really building a product that is very powerful, but super easy to use. You think about a typical 500 or 1,000-person company, they do two things. They either have a whole bunch of point solutions that they're trying to kind of stitch together, which is super complex or they take an enterprise-class solution and try to make it work for their team, and they mostly find it's not usable or it's super hard to make changes and it doesn't serve the needs of the business. And so what we focused on is really making our product easy to use, super intuitive, at the same time, meeting the level of sophistication that is required by a 1,000-person company. And our product market fit has gotten really better over the last 5 years. It's not one feature, it's not one product. We've just consistently focused on making the product better for that segment.
Second thing that we did is really we took the partner ecosystem. We have about 7,000 partners that work within the solution partner ecosystem, and we pointed them upmarket. And we said, this is the segment that you should target. Here is where we can drive joint customer wins. And those partners who way back used to be marketing agencies have really transformed now into CRM implementers, full customer platform implementers, and they've done a really good job of helping our customers see the value of HubSpot.
And then third is brand and driving brand awareness with an upmarket customer segment, and we have consistently invested. And so the combination of those three, but also the consistency with which we have focused on that segment has helped us drive value into the upmarket customers. And I think we have a lot more room to increase market share within that segment.
And what do you -- talk a little bit about go-to-market. So If I can give you feedback, when I talk to partners, they are like, okay, HubSpot as a product up there is actually very well suited. But if I think about sales maturity, there's still a long way to go compared to like the guy that sits above you. Like what are you doing there?
Yes. I think it's there. I think there will always be like one side that kind of catches up. I think the product is absolutely there. From a go-to-market perspective, a couple of things. One is that we recognize the profile of a salesperson that is targeting a much larger company needs to be different. And so for the past few years, we have hired people. We have spent a lot of like investment in terms of enablement of how do you do committee selling, right? Like when most of the time, the buyer is no longer a single decision maker, it is committee buying. And typically, they have to present to their Board or a PE firm or a VC firm's investment, how do you actually do that? And so there's just been a lot of emphasis on the profile of people that we have brought there, but also the level of enablement. And when do you bring partners, how do you communicate with the customer as a team of partner, HubSpot and the teams that we bring together.
So I think we have invested a lot there. And I also think that one of the things that we have done this year is leverage AI internally in go-to-market to help with all of this. It's one thing to enable and drive material for our sales team. The other thing is like within the product to use AI to say what's the next best action or how do you kind of like have the right message for that customer. We are leveraging AI internally. But this is not a one-and-done thing. I think we have to constantly kind of like up-level the people that we bring in and constantly up-level the skills of the people that we currently have.
Yes, yes. Okay. Perfect. On that kind of more top line featured kind of part of our discussion, like if you bring it together, now I had like a good few e-mails from the audience then saying like, okay, well, you need to ask them at the end, like, okay, how do I have to think about your growth profile? If I'm listening to you now, it all sounds like there's a lot of things coming together. It makes a lot of sense. How does that translate into growth for you?
Yes. I think it's a great question. I think you've laid it out really well. If I look at the growth formula for HubSpot, the current set of levers that are working really well are the ones that you touched on, which is our multi-hub momentum as well as upmarket momentum. Both of these have been at play for multiple quarters in a row, and we feel confident that we can continue to execute with those current levers, and they have been able to drive growth. So those are the existing levers.
The thing that we haven't talked about is that in 2024, we made a set of pricing changes. And we lowered the seat price. We removed seat minimums, and we said that we are going to add a core seat, and those were the changes that we made. It first went through for our new customers. And then this year, in 2025, it's actually rolling through our installed base and will continue to roll through our installed base next year.
That is a tailwind. That is a tailwind for multiple reasons. One, because we decreased the seat minimums last year, customers bought exactly what they needed. And this year, they're coming in and upgrading and buying more seats. And so it creates a very healthy customer base. And so that impact has been good. The second is, as it rolls through our installed base, we first migrate them to this new seat pricing. And once they do that, the next renewal is when they see a price increment, and that has been a tailwind. It was a tailwind this year, and it's going to continue to be a tailwind going into next year. So those are the levers.
Now the two additional levers that we feel are emerging and will play out over the next many quarters is AI monetization. We talked a little bit about credits. When we have agents, agents consume credits. And when we have data, data things consume credits and the combination of those 2 today is super nascent, but we will see that flow through, and that will be an emerging lever for our growth. And so is core seat. We mentioned it briefly, but that is the platform seat. We've also embedded AI and data value into that core seat, and that becomes another lever.
So if I put this all together, we have clear current levers that are working, which is multi-hub upmarket and seat pricing, and we have emerging levers in terms of credits as well as core seat, which will play through for multiple quarters. And that gives us confidence that we can drive durable growth.
Yes, yes, yes. I mean if I look net new ARR is getting better, but the overall growth hasn't kind of moved yet. So is this just the timing because like there's something that needs to build on top of each other?
Yes. I love that you're talking about net new ARR. We shared a slide, and we have gotten tons of questions about it. So maybe I'll take a minute to clarify it. At Analyst Day, we shared our trend in terms of net new ARR. The rationale for sharing that is to say the underlying foundational levers have been consistent and have improved over the past few quarters. The lowest point of our net new ARR was Q1 2023. And since then, we have seen net new ARR improve, and it went over our revenue in second half of 2024. Now that is good news. You should take that as like the trend line for net new ARR is improving.
Having said that, revenue base is much larger than net new ARR. So it will take a bit of time for that net new ARR acceleration to drive up revenue growth. But our focus was to kind of show what changed in terms of the underlying levers. And it's a question of time in terms of where that impacts revenue because the base is like much broader.
Yes, yes. I mean it's funny if I talk to some of your peers, larger and smaller, that discussion comes up. They might not call it net new ARR, et cetera. But that kind of -- and maybe the question is actually then 2020, 2021, did you have like this crazy cohort as well that kind of was a headwind and now you kind of -- everyone in the industry had to work themselves out.
Absolutely. Absolutely. I mean if you zoom out and look at like what has happened within the software and application space for the last few years, 2020, massive pandemic, everybody didn't know what to do. Second half of 2020 and 2021, everybody bought digital tools. And we had like massive acceleration within our installed base in terms of as well as new, and we all saw massive growth.
Now you can look back in hindsight and say that, that growth was like pull-forward growth, but we saw massive growth. And then starting second half of 2022, we saw customers do a lot of budget optimization and consolidation. And we talked about this during those years and those quarters, and we saw a massive decrease in terms of net new ARR because of that level of consolidation after that acceleration that happened in the market. And then since 2023, Q1, we have seen net new ARR continue to improve.
And so I think we've been through a roller coaster. It certainly feels like that, but you can look back and see what happened during the massive acceleration followed by the budget optimization to now kind of like more sustainable growth. And that's the dynamic that we're all kind of seeing through. And I'm sure you're hearing it from other companies as well.
Yes. So some of that is mechanical in a way.
It shows up as mechanics. Sure. Yes.
Yes. Yes. Okay. Last couple of minutes, I wanted to talk a little bit about profitability, margins, et cetera. Like there's so much new innovation coming out. There's so much you could do like especially for you that has so many growth vectors that you potentially could go against it. Like how do you think about that framework growth versus margins?
Yes. We've always looked at it as balancing growth as well as profitability. Again, if you zoom out over the last 5 years, we've gone from 10% operating margin to this year where we are close to 18-plus percent in terms of operating margin. And that has been a very intentional strategy. And part of that strategy is that we have continued to invest in R&D. We have continued to improve gross margins, and we have continued to find efficiencies in terms of sales and marketing, and we put a short-term target as well as a medium-term target. The medium-term target is to get to 25% operating margin, and we are committed to driving balanced growth as well as profitability.
And then you mentioned gross margin. There is -- today, I got quite a few that talked about, oh, there were some industry guys that talked about gross margin for the SaaS world, et cetera. How do you -- from your perspective, like how do you think gross margins will evolve for you?
I mean, look, we're not going to talk about 2026, but at least this year, the dynamic for us in gross margin has been that we invested pretty heavily in terms of our upmarket customers, and we actually rolled out 3 new data centers, and that obviously consumes a little bit of capital, and that has been a little bit of a headwind, but the right kind of headwind in terms of gross margin as we have continued to invest for upmarket customers. And I think more broadly, we'll see. I think there is a lot that is changing in terms of AI, both in terms of cost compression and new innovation that is coming up, and there's just a lot of ability to switch across LLMs that provide the best most efficient kind of inference costs. And so I think we'll be exploring that as we go. But it's a very dynamic time within the industry.
Yes. No, perfect. Last question I wanted to ask is capital allocation. How do we have to think about M&A, share buybacks, et cetera?
Yes. We've been thinking about all of those. And as you can see. And over the last few quarters, we have done a number of tuck-in acquisitions. And our M&A philosophy has remained very consistent, which is we want to keep the customer experience very pristine. The value proposition of HubSpot is that we are easy to use. We are pretty fast time to value, and we have a unified customer way of providing information back to customers, and we want to keep that, maintain that integrity of that.
So we've always looked at tuck-in acquisitions where we can acquire teams or talent to accelerate the road map. This year, we acquired this company called Frame that actually improves unstructured data processing. We acquired this company called Dashworks that brings in information across multiple sources into HubSpot. We -- last year, we acquired this company called Cacheflow that really accelerated our CPQ and commerce road map. And so I think we'll continue to do those. And as you know, Raimo, we also did a $500 million buyback, which we completed faster than we originally set out. And so we will use the capital responsibly across internal expansion, M&A as well as buybacks.
Perfect. And look, perfect timing.
Perfect timing. Thank you so much. Such a pleasure.
Thank you. Yes.
Thanks a lot.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Barclays 23rd Annual Global Technology Conference
HubSpot, Inc. — Barclays 23rd Annual Global Technology Conference
📣 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot sieht KI als transformativen Hebel für seine Kernkundengruppe (2–2.000 Mitarbeitende). Strategie: KI in alle Hubs einbetten, autonome Agents anbieten und einen Breeze‑Copilot liefern. Ziel: KI demokratisieren, Adoption über hohe Distribution beschleunigen und so Kundenbindung sowie Upsell katalysieren.
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Three‑pillar‑Strategie: Embedded AI in Produkt‑Flows, spezialisierte Agents (Customer, Prospecting, Data) und Breeze Assistant als Copilot.
- Adoptionszahlen: Customer Agent: ~6.200 Kunden, löst >60% der Tickets; Prospecting Agent: ~6.400 Kunden; Credits‑Verbrauch bislang hälftig von Customer und Prospecting Agents.
- Go‑to‑Market: Multi‑Hub‑Momentum (nur ~10–11% Single‑Hub Kunden) und gezielte Upmarket‑Fokussierung (500–2.000 MA) als unmittelbare Wachstumshebel.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Konkretes: Agents sind breit ausgerollt (GA‑Fortschritt, Nutzungsmetriken genannt), Credit‑Monetarisierung läuft initial; Preisänderungen (niedrigere Seat‑Mindestmengen, Core‑Seat) rollen durchs installierte Base.
- Kapitalallo‑kation: Mehrere Tuck‑ins (u.a. Frame, Dashworks, Cacheflow) und ein abgeschlossener $500M Aktienrückkauf. Keine neue Jahres‑Guidance erwähnt.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Monetarisierung: Management betont "Value first", hybride Preisgestaltung (Seats + Credits). Monetarisierung ist früh, Credits entwickeln sich, Geduld ist Strategie.
- NRR & Timing: Net‑new‑ARR verbessert sich seit 2023; Management erwartet, dass das Wachstum zeitverzögert in Umsatz wirkt wegen großer Bestandbasis.
- Margins & Gross: Ziel mittelfristig 25% operative Marge; zu Gross‑Margin‑Prognosen für 2026 wurde keine Zahl genannt, Investitionen (Data Centers) drücken kurzfristig.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Das Management liefert ein klares Produkt‑ und Monetarisierungsnarrativ: breit eingebrachte KI‑Funktionen plus Agents und Upmarket/Multi‑Hub‑Momentum sind echte Hebel, Monetarisierung bleibt aber frühzyklisch. Wichtige Kurzfrist‑Trigger für Anleger: Credit‑Umsatzwachstum, Roll‑through der Seat‑Preisanpassungen und Net‑new‑ARR‑Trend.
HubSpot, Inc. — UBS TMT Conference
1. Question Answer
Awesome. Hello, everyone. I hope you're all enjoying the day, and thank you so much for attending this session. For those in the audience that don't know me, my name is Taylor McGinnis, and I head up the SMID-cap application, SaaS space here at UBS. And with me today, we have HubSpot's CEO, Yamini Rangan. So thanks so much for joining us, Yamini.
Thank you so much for having me.
Perfect. So before we get started, just a reminder, if you have a question, you can ask it in the app and then I'll try to save a few minutes at the end to address any of them. So with that, Yamini, should we kick it off?
Let's go.
Okay. Perfect. So Yamini, maybe to just start at a very high level, when we think about the horizontal application seat-based SaaS space, I think there's 2 big investor debates. So the first would be around potential AI disruption, and then the second would be related to where are we on the market maturity curve. So I'd love to get your thoughts first on those debates. Do you think any concerns related to that are genuine or overstated? And we'll go from there.
Okay. That's a really broad question. And look, I think AI is absolutely transformative. And it's going to be disruptive if you do nothing about it, but it is going to be a tailwind if you know how to bring AI to your customer segment in the way that they will take adoption, right? And so I think like my perspective is that I don't know if it is overblown or overhyped at this point, but I will tell you, like, minus the hype, we do think that it is transformational to bring AI to SMB customers within our segment that we focus on to help them grow. And I think the strategy for HubSpot has been how do we change and evolve our product strategy in order to be the best at applying AI for our customer segment. That has been the focus for us. And we have evolved our overall customer platform and architecture pretty significantly in the last 2 years, Taylor.
First of all, like if you think about the data, one of the fundamental transformations with AI is that you can now process unstructured data in real time to deliver value, right? That -- we could never do this. I started my career in sales, and there was no way for someone to listen to my call and to summarize that notes and write an email and send it to the customer. It was just not possible. That is unstructured data. So one of the first things that we have done is gone from just having really robust structured data to being able to capture all of the unstructured data that is in calls, that is in video transcripts that you'll have, to be able to capture that in real time, that's the data layer, and we have made a lot of the changes there.
The second thing with AI that you can do is you can build a context layer as an application that delivers a lot more value. So again, think about HubSpot as we deliver marketing sales and service solutions to our customers, the ability to understand that business deeply and the ability to connect their tone, their voice, their position, their value proposition across almost any agentic work that we can do, that happens in the context layer. And we're building that context layer where you can -- as an end user, you can say, "Write me an email," it immediately knows that your brand tone, your brand voice, your value proposition, it pulls from that instead of just kind of writing a generic email. So that context layer is what we have built within the agentic platform.
And then the third thing that is happening at the user interface layer is that we used to have point-and-click applications. You can go to any of the SaaS applications, point somewhere, click and create reports for yourself. Now you have conversational interfaces as well as agents doing that action. And that's a pretty big change where it's not just helping you do work, but it is actually doing work for you. And an example is a customer agent that resolves support tickets. And so we've built those agents that sit on top of the context layer that is built on top of structured and unstructured data.
And if you step back and think about that, that is a fairly big evolution in terms of the architecture, but it allows us to do what we care about doing, which is we want to help small, medium businesses grow, and we want to bring great AI solutions to do that. And in order to do that, we have really evolved our product strategy.
Yes. That's great context for how HubSpot is evolving with the introduction of AI. Focusing on the opportunity and the runway left, a common question that we get from investors is still with Marketing Hub, let's call it, roughly 50% of ARR, how much runway remains in that business? So maybe you could talk a little bit about -- you've introduced the new Loop Marketing, right, solution. How is that playing into how you're thinking about opportunity longer term? And what gives you comfort that there's still ample runway ahead?
I mean, look, marketing in 2022 and 2023, the channels were pretty saturated. People were trying to do what they were doing before in the playbooks, and there was just not a lot of like improvements in the playbook. But what has happened in the last couple of years with AI is that marketing has fundamentally changed. And it has changed in a couple of ways.
The first one, obvious one, everybody knows about this, is that AI Overviews are providing answers, which means people are not clicking blue links and coming to websites. And that means traffic to websites, content leads -- that's what we would call it, right, content leads have gone down. And that is a fairly big shift that has happened in the last couple of years. It's going to accelerate from here on out because as AI Overviews become global as well as AI Mode becomes global and pervasive, you're going to see content leads go down. So that's like #1 change.
At the same time, there is a new channel called AEO because now instead of customers going to Google and searching for information, they start in LLMs with a deeper question. And when they do that, that actually becomes a source for leads. So there's a completely new channel that's coming up. And in the industry, we call it AEO or Answer Engine Optimization, and that's super nascent. But what is interesting about AEO and Answer Engine Optimization is that because people ask very specific questions, then they convert faster. In fact, within HubSpot, we've seen leads from AEO sources, from LLMs convert 3x faster. Again, something that is unheard of within the marketing industry.
And so there is -- it's such a transformational time that is happening within marketing. And there was a lot of questions at the beginning of this year is, like, "How is HubSpot going to deal? Your website traffic has come down." Of course, but we've been watching this. We knew this was coming. And so specifically within HubSpot's top of funnel, we diversified. We went to YouTube. We opened up like 10 YouTube channels. We actually bought podcast networks, and we have expanded podcast. We actually acquired email newsletters. And so we diversified our sources of leads, and we've now been able to really go from content and education sources to people-led channels. And that was number one. And then we've experimented pretty heavily with AEO. We're the #1 in CRM in terms of AEO visibility as well as share of voice.
And so what we did, you mentioned Loop Marketing, at our conference INBOUND, which is a conference that we had in September this year, we shared a new playbook for how customers and companies can grow in the age of AI. And it starts with the playbook of diversifying channels, of leveraging AEO and really coming up with new ways to show up within LLMs as well as use AI to drive better personalization and conversion. And the reception from our customer base and partner base has been just exciting. They know that they need a new playbook. And when we launched this, it makes sense to them, and now they're in the process of adopting it.
And so to answer your question, there's a lot that is changing. It's an exciting time in marketing. Our customers within the segment that we serve are looking to us for answers of how to drive growth when content leads and inbound leads are going down. And we now have the playbook. We have products that actually help with the playbook operationalization and an ecosystem that is ready to help our customers. And we think that there is a big opportunity ahead for us to grow marketing as well as just help our customers through the multi-hub journey there.
Yes. You raised a lot of interesting points. Because I think when you -- when investors heard about the potential SEO disruption, it created a lot of uncertainty on what happens with the HubSpot type of funnel. You just spoke about some of the things that you've done internally, right, to mitigate any impact and then also, too, that the shift to AEO and GEO actually creates new opportunity. So I'm curious, like, today, in your conversations, knowing we're still very early days, right, in this transition, is that resonating with customers? How are -- how is that playing out into contract negotiations, deal negotiations and what you're hearing about future traction with Marketing Cloud?
Yes. The first thing that I would say is that HubSpot's Marketing Hub was never an SEO product. SEO is a top-of-funnel tactic. And our marketing solutions have always been a full funnel platform and a solution. We've always had exceptionally strong email marketing. We've always had customer journey analysis across multiple sources and multiple channels that we support. And so I think, like, one maybe misconception is that SEO is the only thing that we did. We couldn't be farther from the truth. We are a full funnel marketing solution for our customers.
In terms of the conversations, I do think that we saw the inbound shift early because the volume of inbound leads that we're generating over the last decade was just really high. And so we were one of the first companies to see the inbound shift early and therefore, diversified pretty significantly. And so what resonates with our customers is now they are beginning to see it. Now they're beginning to see a lot of the website traffic go down. And so they are looking to us. The conversations that we have with our customers is how can you drive lead volume when one of your sources of lead volume is going down. Well, we talk to them about the playbook, and that resonates.
And so it is early days in terms of Loop. It took us quite a bit to kind of like establish inbound as the methodology, and we're very clear that, that is a similar opportunity for us to help our customers. So we have a lot of partner readiness that's going on. We have Academy, which is like we have an internal university where we train marketeers on the new strategies for how to grow with AI. That is now in full force, and the conversations are resonating.
Perfect. And in talking about a lot of these emerging growth opportunities, I think that's a good segue to the momentum that you guys are seeing on the bookings side and also the strength in net new ARR growth, which now has surpassed revenue growth. So first question there. I think part of what you guys have said in the past is the reason you disclosed that slide at the Analyst Day was because you saw that trend consistent over the last couple of quarters. So one, what's driving, right, that sustainable growth that you guys have seen today in net new ARR growth?
Oh my God, that one slide. I will tell you that just to step back, the reason we shared that trend is that we've -- as a business for multiple quarters in a row, we have seen consistent trends that have reaccelerated net new ARR from what was the low point in Q1 2023. And there are a handful of things that have driven and sustained that acceleration.
First one is upmarket momentum. For multiple years now, we have looked at our upmarket segment as a place where we have improved the product market fit. We've pointed our entire partner ecosystem to delivering solutions for our customers there, and our brand awareness has increased. And because of that, we see momentum upmarket with larger customers. And that has been multiple quarters in a row, and it has been consistent in terms of how we have executed there.
I think the other thing that we have seen over the past few quarters is platform consolidation as well as multi-hub momentum. One of the things that we find with customers is that when they use point solutions or now point agents, it becomes really hard to get insights about their customers and how they can drive growth. So one of the most common conversations I have with customers is how can I bring marketing, sales together so that I can get customer information in one place and therefore, insights to drive growth. Simply, that's what we do. That is the bread, butter, jam for us in terms of the conversations. And that has led to multi-hub momentum over the past few quarters. And so we wanted to share that there are consistent trends that are driving that acceleration of net new ARR, and we feel that those will continue to operate as we go forward into the next year.
And in addition to that, we think that there are 3 emerging levers for our growth. One is the seats pricing model change that we did last year. In 2024, we changed our seat-based model pricing. We lowered the seat minimums as well as the ASP. And our thesis was that, that will allow more customers to start with HubSpot and buy as they need and continue to grow, and that's exactly what we are seeing. Taylor, this year, we have shared that we've seen seat upgrades from the initial cohort of customers as well as the installed base rolling through the seat pricing model. That is a tailwind for our business and will continue to be so next year.
The other 2 emerging, and I'm sure you'll ask me more detailed questions there, is core seats, which we also launched last year. We have seen the adoption of core seats continue. And we also launched credits monetization this year. So if you look at the current trends that have been at play for multiple quarters in a row, we feel confident about that. And we have a set of new emerging levers for pricing as well as core seat and credits that will -- that gives us confidence that we can continue to execute well.
Yes. Perfect. That's all great color. So I appreciate all the insights. The next question that you got on this slide, which I'm sure you've gotten a lot of these questions today, is, does that potentially mean that you could see faster revenue growth on the back of net new ARR growth reaccelerating? So one, any comments you could give there? And two, is getting back up to that 20% plus still the target and goal?
Look, we want to grow faster than where we are today. Absolutely. And that is why we've tried to be very, very clear about the growth formula and -- which is a set of consistent levers that we currently have as well as a set of emerging levers. And I do think that AI is a multiple year tailwind, and some of the pricing changes that we have made also aids that tailwind. We're not ready to give 2026 guidance. I have Chuck somewhere here, and he will literally stare me down. So I'm not here to give any guidance in terms of 2026, but our aspiration is to grow faster than where we are today.
Perfect. Don't worry, Chuck. We'll leave it there. Maybe moving on to Data Hub. So Data Hub at INBOUND, it seemed like there was a greater emphasis on that, which resonates and makes a lot of sense because the common refrain that we hear is that in order to unlock a lot of the value with AI and the application layer, you need to get your data state in order. So is that the exact opportunity that HubSpot is targeting? And maybe you could just talk about some potential emerging growth opportunities out of Data Hub.
Yes. I think you're exactly right, Taylor. In order for you to unlock any value from AI, you need data in one place. And you don't just need data, you need high-quality data in one place. If you take a typical 500-person company, a lot of times, data is disparate in multiple places. They need to bring it together. And data is incomplete or just duplicate data. I mean I used to live in this RevOps world for many years. And the problem that you have is that even if you have customer data, it is inaccurate because it was not updated in real time, or it is duplicate because you will have the same Taylor McGinnis with multiple emails. Which email am I going to send to you based on what I know about you, that is a huge problem.
And if you don't have that sorted out, then you're not going to be able to put agents on top or a use case with AI on top to get the real value from it. And so Data Hub does exactly that. It does 3 things. The first thing it does is it helps bring data from across the go-to-market stack and across the enterprise stack into HubSpot. We have something called data sync that allows you to pull all of that information in one place.
The second thing it does is improve the data quality. We now have the ability to use LLMs to say, give me the exact name, email as well as the role of this person and fill that information out. That is something that you can now use LLMs to do and make sure that, that data that comes back is high quality as well as validated data. That's the second thing it does. And then -- we -- the third thing from a Data Hub perspective is we created a workspace for data analysts and RevOps analysts. It's called the Data Studio, where you can now make joins and make changes to that data and drive automations from there.
And that is the foundation to then be able to use a data agent or a customer agent on top of it. And so it is almost foundational to getting value out of AI. And we see that as a multi-hub opportunity. If someone wants to actually drive the Loop Marketing, they need clear data for segmentation, for personalization. So they need to start with Data Hub and get that high-quality data, then they'll be able to use Marketing Hub to drive better personalization. So it's a multi-hub opportunity to drive Loop Marketing for our customers as well as improvements on the sales side.
Yes. So moving up the stack into the AI agent layer, HubSpot introduced a number of AI agents. On the last earnings call, there were some pretty impressive statistics just in terms of the quarter-over-quarter customer growth that you're seeing with those offerings. So maybe you could just talk about the pace of adoption today, how that's trended relative to your expectations? And when do you think we're going to reach -- I know this is a hard question to answer, but when do you think we're going to reach that tipping point where we get more widespread production use of AI agents?
Yes. I would say we have widespread production use. I would say there's a lot more of adoption to go to. But if I step back, we have customer agent, prospecting agent and data agents. Those are the 3 featured agents that we have launched, and they are now in general availability. Customer agent resolves tickets, whether it's support tickets or sometimes sales and marketing questions, it resolves that. We have over 6,200 customers on the customer agent and with an average resolution rate over 60%, and that was in a fairly short amount of time since we got to general availability. Of course, the opportunity for us is to get it to multiple times that in terms of customer usage, and I'll talk about what will help us get there.
Prospecting agent is another one. It does something very, very important within sales, which is research accounts and helps you figure out which accounts that you need to prioritize and who within that account you need to contact. And that's one of the foundational, kind of, like, jobs within a BDR team or sales team that used to be exceptionally manual. There's almost -- like, nowhere -- when I started my career in sales, I used to, like, literally spend hours trying to get to which accounts do I need to do? Prospecting agent does that. And we are seeing really good traction in terms of that particular use case. We have over 6,400 customers that are using that particular use case.
I think you asked a question of how does it get, like, widespread. I do think that it starts with some executive within the customer account that wants to drive AI and wants to get value as well as growth out of AI. A lot of times, people have asked me this question of like, "Do you see more usage in upmarket customers or down-market customers, or what does it take?" I actually think it takes a leader within the organization to say, let's just not -- let's jump in and start adopting AI. That's the #1 thing that we look at. Then you need high-quality data. We talked about the data that is needed for AI. Then you need high-quality data, and then you basically need a road map for driving adoption. Where do you start? What are the set of use cases that you start and drive.
It's not dissimilar from every other technology cycle that we have seen. If you step back and think about the other technology cycles that we've gone through, you always have customers in 4 broad buckets. You have bleeding-edge customers that are running towards a new technology. If Gemini Model 3 comes out, then next day, they are actually beginning to use that. And that's like the first group. The second are early adopters. They wait to see that there's a little bit of momentum in certain use cases. That's the second group. And then there is a majority of customers that are waiting for early adopters to get really good benefits so that they can start. And then there are laggards that we're still talking to people who are -- for the first time, are adopting SaaS, right? And so we're seeing exactly that. When we talk to customers, we categorize them into 1 of these 4 buckets. And based on that, we help them come up with a road map of how they should be adopting AI.
And so I think I continue to believe it's like a huge tailwind, and it's all about delivering great customer value that is repeated, visible for them so that the adoption begins to kind of like increase in pace.
Yes. And another interesting move that HubSpot made in the AI space, it was the first B2B SaaS company to create a number of connectors LLM providers. So I'd love to talk about those partnerships, right? So on one hand, it seems like there's a lot of value that can be unlocked by partnering with the LLM providers. But then you have, as an example, OpenAI, where they released a number of videos showing what they're doing internally with AI agents, especially as it relates to front office use cases. So I think that, that sparked, amongst investors, a question of, well, could these LLMs start to get into the AI agent space, be potential competitors in the future to the SaaS incumbent.
So first question for you on this topic is, can you provide a bit more color on these partnerships? Are they mutually beneficial on both sides? And because on its DevDay, OpenAI actually showcased HubSpot using AgentKit, maybe you could just talk about what that is and what that means.
I mean there's a lot going on there.
A lot going on there.
Look, I mean, I was just really surprised with the reaction for the demos because almost every large company internally uses their own products. It's not been -- it's not a new thing for you to use your product internally and to -- like, Google has done this for years. They have an internal CRM. And Meta has done this for years. They have an internal CRM. And so I think, like, it doesn't mean that you're immediately going to productize it and build an ecosystem, build an army of sales reps and start working with customers and drive deployments. I think there's a lot between those 2.
But having said that, maybe taking a step back, we do believe that LLMs and HubSpot are complementary. There is tremendous complementary value that we add on top of each other, which is why we were one of the first CRMs to build connectors, like you said, with Claude, with OpenAI, with Gemini. This is a new surface right? If you think about LLMs, there are a new surface and a new operating system where people are asking questions. And we want to be the one that is bringing insights -- business insights into that surface.
If you go to an LLM and you say, 'Write me a sales email," it's going to write you a very generic sales email. But if you can bring the HubSpot context and say, "Based on what's in my pipeline, based on the last 20 conversations, write an email," that is a much better email that converts better. So I think our strategy has been let's take the value that LLMs provide, which is insights, and add the context of the business application in order to deliver exceptional value to our customers. And that's why we built these connectors.
And what we are seeing is that a lot of the high-level questions of, "Give me the trends between the last couple of weeks," happens within an LLM, and the actions that people take come back to HubSpot. "Let's build a campaign, let's create a set of sequences to reach out to 1 million-plus customers in our contacts." Those types of actions happen within HubSpot, and we're pretty comfortable with insights generating from LLMs and actions being taken within HubSpot.
The other thing is that as applications, we all need to be present within LLMs. We talked about AEO. When you think about AEO as a new source of leads, you have to be recognized within the LLM. And so partly, what we are also seeing is that when customers or prospects use an LLM to start with asking a question to generate insights, it also -- it's a pretty easy citation process to get them back into HubSpot, and there is tremendous value. We want to be the best AI go-to-market customer platform on top of LLMs that add value to our segment of customers, and that's literally the strategy we are executing.
Perfect. And then before I take one from the audience. You introduced this new pricing model, and you're one of the few SaaS companies that's actually talking about seeing a pickup in activity as it relates to seat expansion. So could you just elaborate in terms of what inning are we in terms of this transition? How you expect that to evolve going forward? And not to throw too many questions at you, but there's been the introduction of this credit space model as well too. So how are you thinking about for the customers that have adopted agents? Like what does that mix look like going forward? And how do you think about the balance of those 2?
Yes. So maybe I'll step back and talk about what is our pricing strategy and how do we think about the opportunity of core seats as well as credits. And if you step back, our pricing philosophy has always been very consistent, which is add value before we monetize. And we've been very disciplined about that approach because when we do that, we know how that delivers. Once we deliver the value, then we don't see the churn associated with it in the back end. So the repeat value and visible value to customers has been the North Star for us.
Having said that, our pricing is hybrid. The way we monetize is through persona seats like Sales Hub seat or Service Hub seat that is for a specific role. We also monetize through core seat, which we'll talk about in a minute, and credits for certain aspects of agentic actions. Those are the 3 mechanisms through which we monetize our product. The Sales Hub, Service Hub seats, you know it, it's been consistent. We have embedded a lot of AI value. And as our customers use AI features within that, we begin to see seat upgrades. We're seeing that within Service Hub seats. We're seeing that within Sales Hub seats. And as they engage with our platform and use embedded AI features, they continue to upgrade.
Core seats was something that we launched in 2024. And when we launched it, we actually added platform value. Now think about a user that wants to edit a CRM record. They want to create a new custom object or custom property. They needed the core seat. And when we did that, we saw pretty good traction, and we've built a $100 million business in a fairly short period of time with the core seats. What we did at INBOUND this year is we added AI and data value into the core seat. Typically, you'll see a lot of SaaS companies have a separate copilot, and they'll charge x dollars per month per copilot seat.
What we did is we took that, Breeze Assistant, which is like our copilot. We added it to the core seat. In addition, we took a lot of the data that we had from Clearbit, which is the company enrichment data and contact enrichment data, and we put that as part of the core seat. So now the core seat is what you will need for every go-to-market employee that is not using a Sales Hub or a Service Hub seat. And we think that as we add more AI and data value, we can drive a lot of adoption, and we are in the early innings of core seats growing within our customer base.
And then the last part, which you already mentioned, is credit. So agents use credits as well as Data Hub syncs use credits, and we're in the early stages of rolling that out. We talked about some of the early traction that we are seeing with customer agent and prospecting agent. And customers will get included credits, and once they are done using those credits, they can upgrade to $100 packs or $1,000 packs of additional credits. And so early days, but again, the combination of these 3 is how we monetize AI across the platform.
Perfect. And to wrap it up, just one from the audience. So the question is Loop seems more of a playbook than a product. It seems like this could evolve into an actual product and be a potential revenue opportunity for you going forward. So doesn't HubSpot have the right to win here given the breadth of the customer base for whom you're already solving demand gen problems for?
Yes. Loop is a playbook. Just like INBOUND was a playbook. INBOUND was not a product, and Loop is not -- it's very similar to that. And we think about giving -- when so much is changing within marketing, we want to provide a step-by-step approach customers can take in order to grow their top of funnel. One of the things that -- primary things they come to us for is, "We want to have digital presence, and we want to grow our top of funnel," and that is, "The playbook is Loop." Now what we have done is that for every step of the playbook, there's a combination of features within Marketing Hub, Content Hub and Data Hub that powers that playbook. So we talked about diversification of sources. Well, we have within Marketing Hub and Content Hub, the ability to drive content across multiple sources, and that is an example of how we deliver it.
So the way you should think about it is Loop is the playbook. We have Marketing Content and Data Hub that enables the steps within the Loop playbook. And we are now training our internal teams across customer success and sales as well as our partner ecosystem to help our customers drive that methodology and adopt it. And we do think it is a pretty big opportunity as customers look to us to help them navigate where AI is taking them.
Perfect. Well, we'll wrap it there. Thank you, everyone, for joining, and let's give Yamini a round of applause.
Thank you so much. Thanks a lot.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — UBS TMT Conference
HubSpot, Inc. — UBS TMT Conference
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot positioniert sich als AI-first Go-to-Market-Plattform für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen: Daten- (strukturiert + unstrukturiert), Kontext- und Agenten-Layer sollen Marketing, Vertrieb und Service enger verzahnen und Wachstum unterstützen.
- Strategie: Fokus auf Multi‑Hub‑Adoption (Marketing, Sales, Data), neue Playbooks (Loop Marketing) und Monetarisierung über Seats, Core Seats und Credits.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- AI-Architektur: Drei Schichten—Datenaufnahme, Kontextlayer, agentische UI—ermöglichen personalisierte, ausführende Automatisierung (z.B. Ticket‑Resolution, Prospecting).
- Adoption: Über ~6.200 Kunden nutzen den Customer Agent, ~6.400 den Prospecting Agent (GA) — frühe, aber substanzielle Produktionsnutzung.
- Monetarisierung: Seat‑Preismodell 2024 (niedrigere Mindestabnahmen), Core Seats (≈$100M Geschäft schnell aufgebaut) und Credits für Agenten/Data Syncs als neue Umsatzhebel.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Loop Playbook: Kein Produkt, sondern operationalisierter Marketing‑Playbook für AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) und Kanaldiversifikation; erste interne Enablement‑Maßnahmen laufen (Academy, Partner).
- Core Seat Upgrade: AI‑Assistenz und Datenanreicherung (Clearbit‑Daten) wurden in Core Seats integriert; Credits‑Rollout läuft noch.
- AEO‑Effekt: Leads aus LLM/AEO‑Quellen konvertieren laut Management ~3x schneller — neues Top‑of‑Funnel‑Verhalten.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- AI‑Risiko vs. Chance: Wie schnell wird AI zum Treiber vs. Disruptor? Management: klarer Tailwind, Adoption hängt von Datenqualität und Sponsor im Kunden ab.
- Marketing‑Runway: Wie nachhaltig Marketing Hub‑Wachstum bei SEO‑Verlust? Antwort: Kanaldiversifikation + AEO + neue Playbooks sollen das kompensieren.
- Wachstumshebel: Wird Net‑new‑ARR‑Momentum zu schnellerem Umsatzwachstum? Management bleibt vorsichtig, nennt keine 2026‑Guidance, aber Aspirationsziel: beschleunigen.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: HubSpot liefert ein klares AI‑Narrativ mit konkreten Produktbausteinen und ersten Nutzungsmetriken; mehrere Monetarisierungshebels (Seats, Core, Credits) sind aktiv. Positiv für langfristiges Multi‑Hub‑Upsell, kurzfristig bleibt Execution‑Risiko bei AEO‑Effekten, Adoptionstempo und Credits‑Monetarisierung zu beobachten.
HubSpot, Inc. — Wells Fargo's 9th Annual TMT Summit
1. Question Answer
I was tempted to leave the doors open because we always talk about having a fireside chats, but this is like having an oceanside chat. So like that's not too bad, especially on Day 2 of a conference. But for those who don't know me, I'm Ryan MacWilliams, mid-cap software analyst here at Fargo here for the 9th Annual Wells Fargo TMT Conference. With me today from HubSpot is CEO, Yamini Rangan.
Thank you, Ryan. Thanks for having us. It is a great location.
Like people are complaining on Day 1, and they're like, "Oh, it rained today." I was like, this is -- like I'm used to New York City in the winter right now. This is amazing.
Right. We'll take it in California. .
I'm jealous. Well, it's been an interesting time in software coming back after my break in launching coverage. And it does seem like it's kind of a rainy day in software right now, but that's a lot of opportunity. And I'm excited to hear about what HubSpot and what you're doing with AI. So for investors in the room, we're going to be speaking mostly around the product to start and then maybe some of the earnings at the end. So if you have questions, let me know, but we won't be taking questions directly from the room. So e-mail me at ryan.macwilliams@wellsfargo to get those in.
But Yamini, just to start, with your Investor Day, there's been a lot of new products from HubSpot at this point. What would you say like differentiates HubSpot's AI offerings?
Yes. We just had our annual conference a couple of months ago in September and we did launch a lot in terms of AI. It's an exciting time to be in the industry. Even though it feels rainy, it is actually an exciting time to be in the industry right now. And just to give context, our AI strategy is to take something that is super powerful and apply it to the segment that we serve, which is we serve small, medium businesses. And we want to take AI and apply it in a way that can help them grow. That is really the strategy.
And in order to do that, we are embedding AI into all of our products. So you saw a number of feature releases there. We're building agents that can help do work. We have featured agents that we launched at our conference, which is customer agent prospecting agent and data agent. And we have a world-class Breeze Assistant that forms like the Copilot that every go-to-market employee can use. So that has been strategy and we kind of launched a lot of products to drive that. And the reaction has been very, very positive. I mean, talk about AI adoption broadly and where we are seeing green shoots in terms of consistent usage.
If we step back, you asked a question what differentiates our AI strategy. The first thing is we know SMBs and we've taken an approach of taking super sophisticated technology and making it very accessible to SMBs. That's been the business that HubSpot has been in, and we're doing exactly the same thing with AI right now. And that is the #1 differentiator because we know SMBs, we know what they need and their day-to-day job and their day-to-day challenges, and that's like #1.
The second thing I would say is context, and I'm sure we'll talk a lot more about it. The way to think about HubSpot is we bring the context of every sales conversation, every campaign that was sent out, every e-mail that was generated, every deal that was closed and turns out while AI is really good at generating insight it needs context. Ryan, if you go to an LLM and say write me an e-mail, it's going to write some e-mail that might not actually convert the right outreach for you. But if you have the context of all of these conversations over a period of time, then it generates much better responses.
And so our differentiator is that we have 280,000 customers using us for marketing, for sales, for service across the customer journey. We've become a platform that small, medium businesses rely on to drive growth, and that context helps make AI much, much better. And the combination of the domain expertise plus the context that we bring in helps us drive AI adoption and give value back to our customers.
And a lot to touch on there. And on the domain expertise side, it's always so interesting to me when I hear like the bare cases on what AI can do versus application software and people are like, oh, what if you can recreate this exactly, but it's like, okay, what happens the next day, right? Like who is going to think about like what's the best ways for customers to make more money off their own customers, right, or new use cases from a customer service standpoint? And I was like, that's what HubSpot does. You have hundreds of people and like decades of experience doing this. So like it's not static in terms of like, okay, this is what a lot of can do with, okay, how do we continue to advance on the platform for what customers need.
Exactly. I mean, look, coding has become easier, but expertise is still important. And I do think that the domain expertise and being able to apply something to a certain segment and make it easier for them is still where there is value that is getting created. And we think that HubSpot today is adding way more value for our customers than we did 3 years ago because of AI. And so it doesn't just go away with AI.
And I think that's a great point in terms of like there's a difference between like the coding advances that we've seen from large language models because that's a publicly available data set, right, that has stack overflow and has a more deterministic outcome, right? Like code is either right or wrong. You can debate like a better way to do it, right? That's like chess. It's a much easier type of problem to solve. We're like, how does the B2B organization correctly address this one use case for their customer. That seems a little more challenging.
That's exactly right. .
So when it comes to HubSpot, you have a large customer set you've been working with for a long time, like they're going to be asking you for certain AI solutions that you can help with. But how does your data advantage also help build like a more holistic workflow?
Yes. So I think before we go into the workflow, maybe fundamentally, what is different in an agentic architecture that enables all of these workflows, right? So if you take it down to the foundation of this, you can do much more with unstructured data, like CRM and customer platforms have always had structured data in roles, in records, that's what we are good at. So an example is like a customer record. You have the name of the customer and the address of the customer, the revenue, that's a customer record. That is what we've always been good at.
Now with agentic -- becoming an agentic solution, you need to be able to handle unstructured data. the conversation that we just had, the transcript of a Zoom call, something that you said that is out on social that we can now grab, that is all the unstructured data. And what AI made it possible is to process all of that unstructured data and add it to the same context that you have. So that's the one big change at the data layer that we need to. And so our solution, it was easier for us to go from having all that structured data to now capturing e-mails, like Zoom, transcripts, video calls, audio calls, all of that and add that unstructured data layer.
The second thing that you need within an agentic platform is really orchestration. It's not just about dumping raw data but having the context across all of the data, where do you get feedback, was that answer good or not, which is evaluation and where do you have the memory of the questions that you've asked in the past. So the orchestration layer becomes really, really important with evaluation, feedback and memory, and that is what we have built. And then what is changing in terms of how applications work is it used to be that you would go and point, click and navigate to something. Now you can have conversational ways of asking software to do something for you and you have agents that actually do it.
So just to be like really clear, what has changed is the amount of data that you can process, the level of orchestration that you bring and how you can have a conversational way of interacting with software, that is literally what we have built over the last couple of years in terms of the foundation. And so then it becomes like how do you enable workflows? Well, because we have much better unstructured data, now the workflows become much better.
So instead of using a CRM where someone had to go and contact and create a contact and say, I met Ryan for the first time today, and this is a contact and this is the conversation. Instead, you can process all of that through the unstructured data that you're able to capture. So workflows become much more dynamic and workflows become with much more context of unstructured conversations that you're having, and that enables much better output for our customers.
Yes. We were just talking about that in regards to what we do every day. And how like before you log a call, and you're like, I'll put a couple of notes and it doesn't matter. But now that you know it's going to help you down the line. okay, maybe I'll add more detail there.
Sure. Yes. Exactly.
Your data second is even stronger. One of the funny things I keep running into is like we talk about like Oh, I'm going to do this, and it's going to write all my research for me. But sometimes it's just like summarizing an earnings call is like the most helpful thing right? So it's like some of the unstructured use cases are actually getting adopted faster or customers are more interested in. So far when it comes to your customer base, is there any use cases that might have surprised you or are things that your customers are more interested at this point?
Well, I mean, a ton. So I'll tell you, I got started in sales like multiple decades ago. And back then, the hardest part of the job was you'd get a set of accounts. let's say, at the beginning of the year, you got like 500 accounts. You just never had the time to look at 500 companies look at 5 people per company of who was the right contact? And are they going to buy? Are they ready to talk about your product? Like that was all manual work, Ryan.
What has been fascinating with AI is that the prospecting use case, specifically one where you can now use AI to go and grab the right information about each of your 500 prospects that you have, did they get funding? Are they adding marketing reps or sales reps or service reps? Are they mentioning initiatives that you can help? This is all kind of unstructured information and structured information that you can now get. And based on those intent signals, you can say, next Monday morning, these are the 10 that you need to talk to based on the intent. That is so much more value than we have ever been able to deliver. And so I think the prospecting use case.
The other ones are pretty obvious, like support is done, right? Like everybody knows that AI can be used to resolve support inquiries, and it's getting better and better across the different channels that we're supporting, marketing in terms of content creation. But to me, like sales as a function is fundamentally changing of where you spend time and where you get leverage out of AI, and it's just been fascinating to see our customers adopt that and get value.
Have you heard any pushback from salespeople who are saying, no, I'd rather dig around through all this information?
Oh god, no. Actually, salespeople, the things that they don't want to do is dig around for information put in notes of the calls that they have had show the work and activities that they have done to the managers so that they can contribute, like those are the kinds of things that salespeople do not want to do, which AI is actually really good at doing. What salespeople enjoy doing is being in front of customers and having deeper conversations. And when you take a lot of the extra work that you used to do and you make AI really good at that, then the time in front of customer and the relevance of the conversation that you're having with customers goes up, which means your close rates need to go up. And I think that's the exciting part of what AI can do for sales.
Yes. You can spend more time on actually selling with all the back-end work.
Exactly.
And as a former customer support agent, I can tell you a lot of those use cases, I'm okay with.
Oh yes. If you start in support, that's awesome.
Yes. It was, for student loans. Buy siders are tough, but they're not as tough as people calling in about their student loans. But when it comes to like your new consumption and credit usage model, For me, like I'm still really interested in apps here because I've used Cursor and Claude Code. And when I'm using those services, I'm clicking, AI do it for me constantly, right? So something like Claude Code, developers use like $6 a day worth of token usage. So that's something around like 40 or 50 times, you're clicking the AI do it for me button, right?
So when I think about that, it's like, oh, well, what people live in all day and the platforms they use all day, right, they'll start to like do the AI do it for me button or whatever it is Atlassian or HubSpot or what they're used to. So in terms of like that credit motion that's newer for HubSpot today, can you just discuss what you're seeing like the early customer trends and use cases where those comes?
Yes. And just to maybe step back. We talked about the AI strategy, which is embedded AI agents and Copilot or Breeze Assistant, and our monetization strategy is hybrid. We monetize AI both through seats as well as credits. And so for the example that you just gave, within HubSpot, if you are a Sales Hub user and you're clicking multiple times today to summarize the e-mail and get me the next follow-up e-mail, which you can do today. You can say, summarize that call and give me the follow-up e-mail, that is part of seats and that does not consume credits. So I just want to make sure that people understand that part of the way we monetize is through seats.
Now the credit specifically is for agent work that we do. our customer agents resolve support tickets and consumes credits. Our processing agent does the account research that we just talked about, and it consumes credits. Our data agent brings in data and cleans up data that consumes credits. And so there are a handful of agents as well as Data Hub that consumes credit. And that we launched in June for all of our customer agent customers, and it moved into installed base in August. So it's early days but in terms of credit consumption, Customer Agent is #1, leading, because it's been in general available mode. And our customers, we have over 6,000 customers resolving over 60% of their tickets using the Customer Agent and they're consuming credits.
And the second area is Prospecting Agent. This is where I do see a lot of promise because this is a known age-old problem for sales that we are now able to solve, and that's the second area. And the third is intense signals within data. So those are the areas that we are beginning to see. But look, it's early days. We believe that AI monetization for us is hybrid monetization, both through seats as well as credits, and we're seeing kind of all the right signals.
I actually appreciate that distinction as a part of your pricing strategy. So it's like if you're doing work in tandem with like HubSpot, then that's a part of the platform, right? But when it's doing work for you, that's where you can start to monetize those credits?
Exactly. And for example, our within Marketing Hub, you can be at content, you can remix content. That's all just part of Marketing Hub. But if you take agents that do actions for you, that's where it consumes credits. And so I'll probably keep repeating this, that our AI strategy is hybrid across seats and credits.
That makes sense to me. When it comes to software today, like if I was a power user of HubSpot, I use it all day every day and there's some one who use HubSpot like once or twice a day, you might be paying this amount on a per seat basis, right? And I don't know if that is going to be the same way in the next couple of years given some of the usage dynamics here. But in terms of who is adopting AI first that you've seen so far in your platform, is it power users? Is it SMBs versus like larger businesses? Or does it run the gamut?
Yes. It's a good question. I'll tell you, it is not based on the number of employees. In fact, the really distinguishing factor is, is there a C-suite leader that's pushing AI priority within the company. Like I've looked at it by industry, and I've looked at it by segments, and we've done a lot of analysis. It's really not based on the size of the industry. It is like, is there someone there that is top-down pushing AI because I would say that I know there's a very different narrative with investors, but when we talk to customers, there's still a level of fear and uncertainty and lack of trust with where is the data going and how do I make sure that my company's data is not used for some LLM training somewhere. So there's just a lot of like mistrust associated with that.
So the #1 factor is top-down kind of initiatives on AI. And once you get past like there's someone within the company that is looking for an AI road map, then I do see that there is a strong ops role. And in order for AI to really drive value, you need kind of what we used to call RevOps back then, and now we call them AIOps. And there's someone within the company, the power user is like an AIOps user that trains that gets the right quality of the data, trains the data, uses the AI features and then makes it available for everybody else. That role is kind of like the power role.
And when we see customers that have these AIOps roles and someone like a go-to-market engineer, that is leveraging AI, then the AI adoption actually accelerates within the company. And for a lot of our customers, they're still at the stage of, we want clean data that we can trust that we know is not being used outside of our company, and then we want to have a road map of reasonable set of use cases that we can experiment, scale and then grow with.
And it's amazing how like just one champion can really move the needle and you can activate a lot of others. Like we did a Wells Fargo off-site, and I had ChatGPT answer a question then I had everyone build the agent on their ChatGPT. And I think actually got commissioned about the number of ChatGPTs. They paid licenses we sold after. But once you get started to like, oh, I can do this, I can do this, then that makes sense to me. And that's actually a good segue into, I think the Data Hub strategy is one that kind of needs more airtime with investors here where your customers are already trained to like put everything they can in HubSpot and then activate off that. So you've rebranded that at the most recent Investor Day. Can you just talk about how Data Hub helps your broader AI road map?
Yes. And look, already today, we have talked about the criticality of data and context for AI to work and that is known. And if you step back, Data Hub does a few things. One is it pulls data outside of HubSpot into HubSpot. So we have things called data things that are kind of like integrations that pull data from across. And typically, we'll see HubSpot customers have anywhere between 8 to 14 integrations, but sometimes they're bringing data from more sources to bring into HubSpot. So that's like Data Hub and helps you do that.
The second thing that we are finding is that data quality is exceptionally important for AI to be accurate. And Data Hub actually helps you improve the quality. It can run a set of prompts to LLM. And so for example, if there's like a column of like funding data that you need, Data Hub will pull the right problems and get the funding data for every contact that you have within your database. So it improves the data quality. And then the third thing is it provides a workspace, we call it the Data Studio to now manipulate the data. You've brought in the data. The data has higher quality. Now can you build workflows and sequences and automation with that data so that your AI works better.
And so it's almost like a foundational workspace for AIOps and for RevOps to do much more with higher quality data. And that is kind of one of the reasons why we rebranded it from Ops Hub into Data Hub because you're really working on the foundational in a need for AI. And as we look into the future, we haven't talked about marketing. But in order for marketing playbook loop to work, you need higher quality data and Data Hub provides that. So that's the vision. And it's now one of those areas where if you're a Marketing Hub customer and you want to do AI, then you need to get like Data Hub as a foundation for it. And it's the same thing with Sales Hub. It's part of the multi-hub play that we have.
And we've kind of touched a lot about the data advantages and the differentiators of HubSpot here. But it's interesting when people was like oh, well, I use these AI cases. I'm like of what or how, right? So I mean, I think like the larger question that's been on top of mind for investors is like, does HubSpot add AI features first or do I end up doing a lot more of what HubSpot does. So we touched on a lot of these things today, but we'll have kind of just like you probably had this question over and over again over the last month, but we just kind of love to hear like all the things we talked about today like why you guys are better positioned in that world?
Yes. I like the framing, is it easier for a SaaS company to add AI? Or is it easier for an AI-native company to add like CRM. It's a very -- I like the question but foundationally, I'd go back to the conversation that we just had, Ryan. We've already become an agentic platform by adding unstructured data, by adding a context layer that ties together all of the data by building agents that can then take the context across that. We've kind of done a lot of the actual plumbing and the architectural changes that are needed to support becoming an agent platform.
If I were starting out as an AI native from scratch, I need to build still a CRM record and I need to build the structured data. Many of them are starting as point solutions. So let's say, you start as a support agent and dealing with support tickets. The minute you get a question on sales pricing, then you don't have that context. So you now have to extend and start building what are products that you sell, what is the pricing associated with it and what are the common questions and objections. So you have to go from structure to unstructured. You have to go from point solution to full platform, then you have to build the full context associated on top of it.
And then I would say a couple more things. We're still finding that AI features get adoption with feedback. So we have the advantage of building an AI feature and making it available for thousands of customers to use that we can get the feedback and improve AI development cycles are very iterative in nature based on customer feedback. But if you're an AI and native company and you're starting with 10 customers, where you're going to get that feedback. So there's an inherent advantage in agentic world that benefits from the scale of the number of customers.
And then the final thing I would say is you still need a partner ecosystem. AI is still one where you require someone to look at your road map to help you with what are the use cases to start and drive, and we have partners within the ecosystem. They're all driving AI readiness. So if you are a new company that is getting started as an AI native, you also need -- that's why you see a lot of forward deployed engineers, right? The model is like you not only build a product, but you also invest in forward-deployed engineers that go and sit in customer sites. And we have that, which is an ecosystem that we have. And so I think like there is platform advantages, there is scale advantages because of the distribution and then there is an ecosystem advantage that we have.
During the break between the jobs, I was sitting around thinking like I could probably try to build one of these. You know what I mean? And then as I did some research on it, it's like...
Did you?
I tried to build a project management tool and it looked a lot better in my head than it ended up being on paper. And it turns out like having the initial draft is a lot harder than having actual working SaaS, right? But as I talked to other developers, it was like would probably be one of the most difficult things to build given like the high data density, mission-critical workloads and unstructured data but it's such a big market opportunity that people are going to try.
Yes, absolutely.
And so when it comes to like you have the data already with your customers, and you're already training your models on that data that also extends like the time that a challenger would have to take in order to create the same, like use case based off your new training model.
Yes. I mean, look, I think we've always been in a very, very competitive or has never been a winner-take-all market or a noncompetitive market. It's always been the case. And I'd go back to like why do platforms win over point solutions. One of the most common use cases for HubSpot is that we'll go to customers and they'll say, our data is fragmented across 15 different solutions that are point solutions, and we've lost visibility of our growth. So that's like -- that continues to be the case in the agentic world.
When I talk to customers who have even attempted like different agents. They're like, well, we now cannot manage this across all of these different agents. And we want to look at your road map, if you have it, then we're just going to continue adopting with you. And so I think like it comes back to why platforms win over point solutions. It's the same reason why an agentic platform wins over point agents that are kind of sprawling across go-to-market.
I would love to touch on that point. Just like that complexity that you're speaking to. For me, like it's a very interesting dynamic of like, oh, I can custom build my and use case now. But like that's investors kind of thinking that's the case? Where like are you seeing customers being more willing to like know whether buy AI to start and build on my own?
Yes. I mean, custom building has gotten easier. But think about our segment true, right, which is a 500-person company and let's say, a manufacturing company in the middle of the country that's trying to grow their business. Now they have to figure out Sonnet 3.7 and ChatGPT 5.1, the latest Gemini that dropped today for 10 different use cases, and they're building a custom application on profit, that is not what an SMB wants to do. And while there is a narrative that yes, custom applications and custom agents are easier, average mid-market company still focuses on growing their business versus let me run and adopt AI just for the sake of it and build a customer application.
And you said this earlier, there's a lot in terms of building an agent, which is there's a front-end piece to it, there's a back-end piece to it, there's getting the right data into it and there's this constant iterate process of getting feedback and improving it. And in order for a company to do that, they really have to change their strategy and invest pretty significantly in either AI engineering talent or AI pods that just do that. And that is not the conversation that we hear with our customers, they, in fact, want us to make it like easier for them to adopt and they just trust us to do that because of the level of innovation that we have brought to them.
Absolutely. And the thing that worked yesterday is not going to work today. And you guys have definitely been on the forefront of speaking about how SEO is changing as a part of AI and you guys had the acquisition XFunnel in regards to SEO, and I love all this about it. We've been following pretty closely for what we cover. But can you just talk about your own efforts to solve some of those top of funnel changes? And then like how you're helping your customers with the new SEO?.
Yes. I mean it's a topic that we can spend quite a bit of time on. I mean if you step back we, as an industry used to put content and get people to click on the blue links and have people come to our website. Then we captured their e-mails and then we nurtured and then that became part of the marketing funnel. That is completely disrupted, right? Because AI overviews are providing the answers, and that is if you search half of them are not even searching, they're just going to an LLM to ask questions. But because of that, there is fairly massive drop in terms of a very specific type of lead call content leads, right? Content leads are the ones that have really gone down.
Now in terms -- you asked a question about how have we navigated it, I mean, I'd say that in 2022, even before ChatGPT came on and AI overviews were part of our language, we saw that customers were spending a lot of time on other channels, social channels, podcast, we're all listening to podcasts and we saw that everybody is listening to like hundreds of podcasts now. And so e-mail newsletters. And so starting 2022, we went through a process of diversifying our marketing channels. And that strategy has worked. We have 10 YouTube channels, and the leads from YouTube channels are growing between 80% and 90% year-over-year. We acquired a podcast network and we now have like over 100 podcasts within that network, and that generates leads.
We also acquired e-mail newsletters, which we did, people were scratching their heads saying, "Why are they doing this? But that has also increased the leads. And so for us, the story has been how to diversify out of content leads into all of these different sources. Now one of the channels happens to be AEO, and that is Answer Engine Optimization where you show up within an LLM. But that is still low -- it's nascent, right? It's pretty early days in terms of AEO and how you show up in answers. And the lead volume is still very low. It's single digits, but the conversion rates of the leads from LLMs is much higher. It is 3x because you're doing a much thorough, deeper questioning and you're ready to convert if you get the right answer.
And so that's kind of how we have navigated it. And the thing that we are really good at is once we figure something out, creating a playbook and getting our customers to be able to adopt and get the benefit of the playbook. So at our conference this year, we launched Loop, which is kind of the playbook of how to diversify your lead sources and drive a level of personalization. And so we launched that, we launched a set of products across Marketing Hub, Data Hub and content hub features that support that playbook, and we're early days, but kind of getting the new playbook out.
And I've now spoken to a lot of our customers Polestar inbound and they've started doing some of this, and it clicked. It's like, oh, I now see that here's how I need to diversify. Here's how I need to use AI for personalization and this is what is happening within the AEO channel. And so early days, but we feel like this opens up a big opportunity for us.
I mean there's always something, right? But it's like there's more complexity now is to reach our customers where they are, more personalization, like these are all things that they need some of the help with.
I think we're actually excited about it because if you look at the last 2 or 3 years in marketing, channels were saturated ROI was really, really hard to get, and conversion was slowing. And the playbook was like super difficult. And if you're in marketing within a small and medium business, you couldn't get even 1% to 2% improvement in any of these key metrics of lead conversion. But now there's a completely different way to do it. And the level of return that you get from figuring 1 or 2 of channels is just much better.
And so there's just a lot more excitement in terms of what you can do with AI within marketing. So while everybody talks about the disruption of SEO, what maybe is less understood is that A is actually creating a much bigger opportunity to optimize your marketing channels and strategies, and that's an exciting opportunity for us.
I have a few minutes left and this might be a bigger question. But for me, investors often ask like, oh, why don't they have all these like amazing products now this for every sulfur company. I'd like look, reasoning large language models came out at the end of last year. It takes time when you have hundreds of thousands of customers to put like really intricate products in. So besides like there'd be a little more seasoning across like all of AI within solutions, like what do you think really picks up the adoption curve for your customers?
Yes, I think that I would still say the technology is ahead of customers' ability to adopt the technology. And so I think you're absolutely right. LLMs came on board and a lot of us, we understand the transformative power of AI, and we've been building, but it's an iterative process and you got to get customer feedback to be able to make an AI feature better, and that's one part of it. The other part of it is helping customers through the do I have good quality data. Can I trust where my data is used can I make sure that my problems and all of the interactions are within my company's walls are not being used to train something else. And there's a level of just comfort around that, which is the adoption cycle.
And again, it's not dissimilar to any other technology cycle that we have seen in the past. And I've been in this industry when -- I joined the industry in '96 when that was like before we went into cloud, and it was very, very similar. Everybody saw the value of it, but it took a little while for people to begin adopting and it's the same thing that is happening. There is just transformative value in AI, but adoption comes from building trust, better quality data and then making it frictionless for customers to try something and then scale it. And that's the process that we're in.
I'm really sad to see what comes next, and I'm certainly not going to miss searching through our CRM for all the clients I talked to over the last 2 weeks.
That's exactly right.
And to those that comes through next. But guys, thank you for your time, and thank you, Yamini for coming.
Thank you. I really appreciate it.
Thank you.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Wells Fargo's 9th Annual TMT Summit
HubSpot, Inc. — Wells Fargo's 9th Annual TMT Summit
📣 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot positioniert sich als "agentic" Plattform für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen (SMB). KI wird systematisch in alle Hubs eingebettet, mit Fokus auf Kontext aus Kundendaten und praktischen Agents, die Arbeit erledigen. Monetarisierung ist hybrid: Sitzlizenzen (Seats) plus nutzungsbasierte Credits.
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Produkt: Vorstellung von Agents (Customer Agent, Prospecting Agent, Data Agent) und dem Breeze Assistant als Copilot für Go-to-Market-Teams.
- Datenarchitektur: Ausbau von strukturierten CRM (Customer-Relationship-Management)-Daten zu Unstructured-Data-Parsing (Transkripte, Calls, Social) plus Orchestrierung, Feedback/Evaluation und Memory.
- Monetarisierung: Hybridmodell: viele KI-Funktionen über Seats, agentengetriebene Automatisierung über Credits.
🔎 Neue Informationen
- Traction: HubSpot nennt ≈280.000 Kunden; Customer Agent in GA (Juni) und in Bestandskundschaft (August) mit >6.000 Kunden, die >60% ihrer Tickets über den Agenten lösen und damit führend beim Credit-Verbrauch sind.
- Marketing & Data: Rebranding zu Data Hub als Basis für AIOps; YouTube-Leads wachsen laut Management 80–90% YoY; neues Playbook "Loop" für Kanaldiversifikation.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Wettbewerb: Unterschied zu AI‑native Firmen: Management betont Plattform‑, Daten‑ und Skalenvorteil sowie Kundenfeedback‑Zyklen gegenüber Point‑Solutions.
- Adoption: Kritische Treiber sind Top‑Down‑Sponsorship und dedizierte AIOps‑Rollen; Misstrauen bzgl. Datennutzung bleibt ein Adoption‑Risiko.
- Monetisierung & Usage: Nachfrage nach Credits v. Seats, Early‑wins bei Support/Prospecting; Management nennt frühe, aber wachsende Verbrauchssignale.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: HubSpot nutzt seine große SMB‑Basis und reichhaltigen Kontextdaten, um KI‑Funktionalität skalierbar zu machen. Produkt‑Traction ist erkennbar (Customer Agent, Data Hub), Monetarisierung startet hybrid, aber Adoption und Vertrauensfragen bleiben zentrale Ausführungsrisiken — positives Potenzial bei moderatem Risiko.
HubSpot, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's Q3 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator today. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to hand the conference over to Head of Investor Relations at HubSpot, Chuck MacGlashing. Please go ahead.
Thanks, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's third quarter 2025 earnings conference Call. Today, we'll be discussing the results announced in the press release that was issued after the market closed.
With me on the call this afternoon is Yamini Rangan, our Chief Executive Officer; Dharmesh Shah, our Co-Founder and CTO; and Kate Bueker, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we start, I'd like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement included in today's press release. During this call, we'll make statements related to our business that may be considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended.
All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements, including those regarding management's expectations of future financial and operational performance and operational expenditures, expected growth, FX movement, and business outlook, including our financial guidance for the fourth fiscal quarter and full year 2025.
Forward-looking statements reflect our views only as of today and Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language in today's press release and our Form 10-Q, which will be filed with the SEC this afternoon for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.
During the course of today's call, we refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure used or discussed, and a reconciliation of the differences between such measures can be found within our third quarter 2025 earnings press release in the Investor Relations section of our website.
Now it's my pleasure to turn over the call to Spot's Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan. Yamini?
Thank you, Chuck, and welcome, everyone. Today, I'll share our Q3 2025 results and the key trends driving our performance. I'll then dive into what we launched at inbound, where we are seeing AI momentum and how we are reimagining marketing for the AI era. I'll wrap with our growth formula and how both our current and emerging levers create a durable path to growth.
Let's dive in. Q3 was another strong quarter for HubSpot. Revenue grew 18.4% year-over-year in constant currency, reaching $810 million. We delivered solid operating leverage with an operating margin of 20%, reflecting our ability to balance growth and profitability. Total customers increased by 10,900 in the quarter, bringing our global customer base to nearly $279,000. Our results were powered by 3 drivers that continue to show up quarter after quarter platform consolidation, multi-hub addiction and upmarket momentum. These themes are consistent compounding and reinforced the strength of HubSpot as we scale.
HubSpot is winning as a truly unified customer platform. Companies are consolidating their go-to-market stack on HubSpot to reduce total cost of ownership, gain a unified view of their customers and accelerate AI innovation. Multi-hub adoption has become the norm across both new and existing customers. 43% of Pro+ installed base by ARR now subscribed to our 3 core hubs, up 4 points year-over-year and 39% owned 4 or more hubs, up 6 points. This expansion shows the value customers see in growing with HubSpot, and it is clear proof that our platform first strategy is working.
Our upmarket segment is humming. Larger companies are choosing HubSpot cords power sophistication and speed to value. Deals over 5,000 monthly recurring revenue grew 35% year-over-year, reflecting the payoff from years of product investment, strong partner alignment and rising brand awareness amongst upmarket physician makers. A great example is QS, a global education services company with over 1,000 employees. They replaced a 20-year-old legacy CRM and chose HubSpot to power their AI-first transformation, citing our AI strategy, approach to agents and pace of product innovation as key reasons for signing a multiyear multi-hub agreement.
AI [ innovation ] took center stage this quarter. The highlight was, of course, our annual INBOUND conference. It was great to bring together 13,000 people in person, another 550,000 online from across our ecosystem. We launched more than 200 new updates and products that were well received by our customers and partners. The end and feedback from inbound reinforce that our AI strategy is resonating and customers see HubSpot as the platform to help them grow and win with AI. Our strategy is simple: Embed AI into hubs, our customers use every day, build agents that do work and create brief assistant and connectors that turn data into insight.
At INBOUND, we launched new features in every hub from AEO strategy tools in Content Hub to AI-powered e-mail in Marketing Hub and AI meeting assistance in Sales Hub. We introduced Data Hub, which helps customers bring their data together in one place to get more value from AI. We enhanced our featured agents, customer agent and prospecting agents launched a new data agent and opened up Brief Studio, so customers can build and customize their own agents. And we became the first CRM to connect directly with the 3 leading LLM, ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. These innovations are delivering real results for customers.
Customers who use our embedded AI features in marketing come get better results, higher click-through rates and over 50% higher lead conversion. Similarly, customers who use AI features in Sales Hub are winning almost 10% more deals. Our agents are also gaining strong adoption. Customer agent now has over 6,200 customers, up 48% from last quarter, with an average resolution rate in the 60s prospecting agents has been activated by 6,400 customers, up 94% from last quarter, and customers have used it to engage over 1 million prospects. Data agent is new, but already has 1,700 customers who have activated it. Breeze Assistant is the digital assistant for every market employee, and we have seen weekly active usage increased by 56% in the past 6 months as customers use it to summarize records, and uncover insights to drive performance.
A key part of our AI strategy is our LLM connector approach, and the momentum we're seeing here is impressive. Our ChatGPT Connector has been activated by more than 47,000 customers with 55% of them being Pros customers. and our Cloud Connector is already being used by over 6,000 customers. We believe that LLM and HubSpot are powerful together and complement each other. Why? Well, there are 3 reasons. First, LLMs create insights. HubSpot provides the context that makes insights possible for go-to-market teams. LLMs are great at generating ideas from public data or a user prompt, but HubSpot is where the full go-to-market context lives, every interaction, sales conversation, support ticket, marketing campaign. That context is necessary to turn generic AI output into insights that are accurate, relevant and actionable.
Second, LLM generate ideas. HubSpot turns them into action within a business context. On their own, elements can tell you what to do with HubSpot, you can actually do it. HubSpot is where companies build sophisticated workflows launched multichannel campaigns and take actions to drive growth. And third, LLM are great at single-player task, and HubSpot is built for multiplayer teams. HotSpot remembers each user, their role, preferences, team, what they have permissions to access and where they can take action. Now stepping back, HubSpot houses AI and is the customer platform where intelligence and context are applied, acted on and shared team. platforms were sticky pre-AI, they will be even stickier in the AI era.
Okay. Let's talk about how we are reimagining marketing for the AI era and the opportunity it creates for HubSpot. Marketing landscape is changing fast. Search traffic has declined globally as AI overviews provide answers. Customers are spreading their attention across channels and visiting fewer websites. At the same time, AI is creating entirely new opportunities via LLM like Answer Engine Optimization or AEO. At HubSpot, we saw these shifts coming early. We've been diversifying marketing channels and experiment with AO, and that strategy is working.
At INBOUND, we introduced the Loop, our new playbook for growth in the AI era. It gives customers clear step-by-step guidance on how to drive growth by combining human creativity with AI efficiency. And the response has been incredibly strong. with 270 million impressions on Loop content and over 100,000 views of the Loop playbook experience. We also launched new products to help customers put the loop into action, including Data Hub which makes it easy to build ideal customer profiles and marketing studio, which helps marketers personalized content based on buyer intent. A key part of the loop is helping customers show up in AI-generated answers. Our AEO greater and AEO strategy tools launched at INBOUND, make it easy for businesses to come up with a strategy and improve their visibility in LLM.
And last week, we announced an agreement to acquire XFunnel, one of the first and most complete platforms for tracking and improving how brands appear across LLMs. XFunnel shows when and how often your brand is mentioned in AI-generated answers and provides clear guidance on how to strengthen that presence. We'll natively build XFunnel into HubSpot, giving our customers even more ways to understand, improve and grow their brand visibility in the AI era.
Now let's talk about our growth formula and how we are unlocking new levers for HubSpot. Our core growth levers continue to perform, platform consolidation, multi-hub adoption and upmarket traction. At the same time, emerging levers are gaining momentum, including seats, pricing change, core seats and credits. We introduced the core seat last year to give customers edit access to the Smart CRM, the unified record that powers our platform and that strategy is working. At INBOUND, we made the core seat even more valuable by adding AI and data capabilities like Breeze Assistant part starts, projects and enrichment data.
And by unbundling the smart CRM, so customers can start right there. Our vision is to make the core seat essential with AI and data value for every go-to-market employee. Credits are another powerful emerging lever. They are our universal usage-based pricing system, covering AI agent actions and data hub pints and soon will extend across the entire platform. Credit tie our growth directly to customer value. And as customers use more data, use more AI and automation inside HubSpot, they'll grow with us. Together, core seats and credits expand how HubSpot captures value, building on our durable foundation and creating a long runway for growth.
As I wrap up, I want to share our conviction that HubSpot is positioned to lead in the AI era and drive durable long-term growth. We are innovating badly transforming into an agentic customer platform and operating efficiently at AI speed. We have durable differentiators and growth levers and we deeply understand our segment and what small and medium businesses need to grow with AI. We are uncovering new ways to drive efficiency and finding signals to show our customers what's possible with AI.
I'm more confident than ever in our strategy and our ability to deliver value for customers in this new era. Thank you to all our customers, partners and shareholders for your continued support and a huge thank you to all HubSpotters around the world for staying focused on solving for our customers every single day.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Kate to take you through our Q3 financial results in more detail. Kate?
Thanks, Yamini. Let's turn to our third quarter 2025 financial results. Q3 revenue grew 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 21% on an as-reported basis. Subscription revenue grew 21% year-over-year, while services and other revenue increased 19% on an as-reported basis. Q3 domestic revenue grew 17% year-over-year. International revenue growth was 20% in constant currency and 25% as reported, representing 49% of total revenue.
We added 10,900 net new customers in Q3, bringing our total customer count to 279,000, growing 17% year-over-year. Average subscription revenue per customer was $11,600 in Q3, up 1 point year-over-year in constant currency and up 3 points on an as-reported basis. While we're happy with the strong net adds in Q3, we continue to expect net additions to be in the range of 9,000 to 10,000 in Q4 and for ASRPC growth in constant currency to be up roughly 1 point.
Customer dollar retention remained in the high 80s in Q3, and net revenue retention was flat sequentially at 103% as expected. As I shared last quarter, we expect to see a step up in net revenue retention in Q4 and resulting in a couple point improvement in net revenue retention for the full year of 2025. Calculated billings were $804 million in Q3 and growing 19% year-over-year in constant currency and 18% on an as-reported basis.
The remainder of my comments will refer to non-GAAP measures. Q3 operating margin was 20%, up 1 point compared to the year ago period and 3 points sequentially. Net income was $140 million in Q3 or $2.66 per fully diluted share. Free cash flow was $147 million or 18% of revenue in Q3. Our cash and marketable securities totaled $1.7 billion at the end of September. In Q3, we repurchased 780,000 shares of common stock under our share repurchase program, representing $375 million.
With that, let's dive into our guidance for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025. For the fourth quarter, Total as reported revenue is expected to be in the range of $82 million to $830 million, up 16% year-over-year in constant currency and 18% on an as-reported basis. Non-GAAP operating profit is expected to be between $183 million and $184 million, representing a 22% operating profit margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is expected to be between $2.97 and $2.99. This assumes 52.7 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
And for the full year of 2025, total as reported revenue is now expected to be in the range of 3.113 billion to $3.115 billion up 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 19% on an as-reported basis. Non-GAAP operating profit is now expected to be in the range of $574 million to $575 million, representing an 18% operating profit margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is now expected to be between $9.60 and $9.62. This assumes 53.2 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
As you adjust your models, please keep in mind the following: we now expect CapEx as a percentage of revenue to be 6% for the full year of 2025, driven by higher capitalized software expenses. And we still expect free cash flow to be about $580 million for the full year of 2025.
With that, I will turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
[Operator Instructions] First question comes from the line of Samad Samana from Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
So Yamini, my question is for you. I think the core focus of investors is HubSpot getting back to 20% growth and I think investors were pretty excited and myself included seeing that accelerating ARR slide at the Analyst Day. We might have gotten ahead of ourselves, but how do you think about the path to get back to 20% growth? Can the current focus on that 200 and below segment support that level of growth? Or do you think that hitting the gaps on enterprise is necessary. Maybe just help us think through that.
Yes. Thanks a lot, Samad. I appreciate it. Look, we believe we can grow faster than where we are today, and we are focused on doing it in a durable disciplined way. The thing I would point out is that net new ARR is the leading indicator that we shared with you, and revenue is the lagging indicator with flow through. Now if I step back and look at the foundation, our core growth drivers are strong, and they are proven. We have a playbook that works, which is platform consolidation, moving upmarket and multi-hub momentum. And you can see that in our customer retention numbers, the seat upgrades that are consistent and the large deal momentum that are compounding quarter after quarter. And we're going to continue to expand our sales capacity as well as the productivity across all of our segments to capture that opportunity.
Then we have a set of emerging growth drivers that strengthened that outlook further and put us on a path of durable growth. And we shared that at Analyst Day, but I'll kind of walk through it. the pricing changes that we drove last year is a tailwind. We are seeing seat upgrades pick up. And as the change rolls through our installed base this year and next year, we'll continue to see growth from that. And AI is a multiyear tailwind. We are in the very early stages of this whole innovation cycle playing out, and we are acting with urgency to cement a leadership position and set ourselves up for long-term growth. And specifically, with AI, we see the opportunity to monetize both through seats as well as credit.
Now core seats, which we talked about at Analyst Day, it's becoming more valuable and it is embedded with AI data platform value, and that opens up a large opportunity credits gives us a new way to monetize usage for customers as they consume more AI and agent-driven actions -- so look, we are very excited about the emerging drivers, the strength that we see within the emerging drivers. And we're really excited about the upmarket momentum. We think we have plenty of TAM to be able to drive and grow faster than where we are. Most importantly, we have a track record of consistent execution and helping our customers grow, and that gives us confidence that HubSpot can be a durable growth business for years to come.
Our next question comes from the line of Mark Murphy from JPMorgan.
Yamini, several of your partners have said that they're pretty encouraged about their own growth potential moving into 2026. I'm curious if you see any signs that Google's AI overviews are actually driving an extra wave of interest for HubSpot to try to use your lube concept and your answer engine optimization tools so that they can gain their own kind of visibility in AI-generated answers. Is there anything tangible there that you can speak to?
Mark, thanks a lot for the question, and thanks all this for talking to our partners to uncover the underlying trends. Look, I would say marketing and the trends that we are seeing within marketing is a big opportunity for our customers and for HubSpot to grow. And specifically, you talked about what is happening with the marketing, but really we see it as a couple of things. One, AI overviews are providing answers, which means website visits are declining. And that means there is a need for a new playbook to diversify the channels that you are present and including AEO. And that is exactly what we launched at INBOUND.
At INBOUND, we launched the playbook, which you referenced, which is the loop. And I would say that the response from customers and partners have exceeded our expectations across every metric in terms of impressions, we had 270 million impressions, playbook compressions, number of conversations that's generating. And specifically, there are 3 parts of the playbook that are resonating with customers as well as partners. The first one is diversifying channels, and the #1 thing that you can do to counter SEO volume decline is to diversify your channels into YouTube and Insta and podcast and new flatters and that is resonating.
The second is, how do you actually use AI for deeper segmentation and personalization Look, there's just a lot of talk about AI driving disruption. But the bigger story is how AI can be helpful in using intent data to drive better conversion, and that is resonating. And then, of course, building visibility in LLMs through answer engine optimization that you mentioned. And all of that is resonating, and we're seeing lots of conversations within AEO. AEO is early. We got in earlier, and we have an AEO-radar out in the market that has been used by 70,000 customers already.
Our AEO strategy tools are getting used in order to look at this nascent channel. And last week, we announced XFunnel, which completes our platform of providing visibility to customers on which LLM they're showing up and how to improve their presence within that. And so look, if I step back, SEO is a big disruption, but this is also one of the biggest opportunities for our customers to figure out how to grow, and it is one of the biggest opportunities for HubSpot, which is why we have the playbook, we have products and we have the whole partner ecosystem activated to deliver on that, and we're super excited about the opportunity.
Our next question comes from the line of Parker Lane from Stifel.
Yamini, you continue to point to platform consolidation is 1 of the key drivers of the business. Traditionally, cost savings were one of the things that drove people towards that consolidation. How often are you seeing with the launch of Breeze and these new agency brought to the platform that a desire to really embrace agents and have a unified data source is the reason for consolidation versus just traditional cost savings?
Yes. That's a fantastic question. I think equal parts, I would say 3 reasons why customers talk to us about consolidating on a platform. The first one, as you said, is total cost of ownership. And remember, we've come from a period of people buying a lot of point solutions and tools and TCO kind of like bloating up, and that continues to be the #1 reason.
The second reason is actually getting all of the customer data and context into a unified platform. whether they're leveraging AI or they're just getting their whole digitization journey going, you need data and you need customer context across the whole journey. And if you have a lot of point solutions and a lot of point agents, you just do not have the visibility to drive insight.
And then I would say the third reason is really AI and wanting to adopt AI. And while AI is not always the primary driver. It is a clear pool in terms of the conversations. And what we hear from prospects from customers is that they want one platform that has all of the data and they want to be able to have a clear road map so that they can future proof their investments and they like what we are doing with our AI strategy, which is embedding AI across all of the hubs and making it easier for our customers to build on that road map. So I see all 3 reasons probably kind of split equally.
Our next question comes from the line of Alex Zukin from Wolfe Research.
I guess, Yamini, I'll be a little bit direct. If I look at the magnitude of the beat this quarter, it was a little bit lower than I think some people were thinking about. But at the same time, the raise for Q4 is I think the strongest raise on a constant currency basis that you guys have ever done. Is there any moving pieces that you can comment on in billings, I think, was a little bit of a decel. But then net new ARR, as you showed us that slide at the Analyst Day was really, really strong in the first half and seemingly in Q2. So any commentary on a forward-looking metric basis around how net new ARR performed in 3Q, maybe to disentangle some of the in-quarter versus guide confidence dimensions?
Yes, Alex, it's Kate. Maybe I'll take this and if Yamini has more to add. She's welcome to do at the end. We did outperform in Q3, we executed really well. And the outperformance was driven by all the things you heard Yamini talk about, continued strength of market, continued strength with multi-hub and continued strong seat expansion. We also saw some incremental FX tailwind versus what we expected when we guided last quarter, and we fully flowed that through our revised 2025 guidance.
I think you heard from Yamini, and I've talked about it in the past as well as at Analyst Day. It will take some time for our strong net new ARR growth to translate into an inflection in revenue growth. just given the scale and size of our installed base, but we've seen stability here over the last few quarters. All that said, our approach to guidance was consistent this quarter.
Our next question comes from the line of Keith Bachman from BMO.
Yes. Actually, it's a good segue from Alex. I wanted to ask a similar question, but I'll phrase it differently in that billings growth is one metric but the constant currency billings growth is generally in the last 6 quarters, been in a range of the highest 21%, the lowest 19%. So in that range for 6 straight quarters. And so, a, you've talked about a lot of goodness that's coming through the model. But what's the offset? What's been constraining? And particularly this quarter with 19% which was a little bit lower beat than you've had in the past quarters. What's not going as well that's constraining it?
And then also, Kate, per your last comment, you've mentioned that net new ARR has been strong, but it takes a while, but maybe you could put a little more context around that in that the stock is down pretty materially here in the after hours. How should investors think about when will the net new be fulfilling enough, if you will, to then translate or show up into the revenue growth. What is the -- any timing expectations that we should put in consideration?
Yes. Maybe I'll start with the billings question because I want to make sure that we are sort of aligned with the metric and our expectations for billings. My baseline expectation is that constant currency revenue growth and constant currency billings growth are going to track each other really closely. And that's because more than 90% of our billings come from revenue in period. Billings, as you know, is a bit noisier. It shows impacts of FX that shows impacts of the mix of net new ARR, and it shows duration pretty acutely.
And when you kind of look at what's happening in these factors this quarter versus last quarter, like we had a bit of a mix shift towards installed base selling, which has lower months upfront. And we saw less of a benefit of expanding duration versus what we saw in Q2. And so as a result, what you're seeing in billings growth is something that is still above revenue growth in constant currency, but just a little bit closer than what we saw in Q2. And for Q4, there's always going to be some variability here. But I would expect that constant currency billings and revenue are going to track each other.
If you want to address the net new ARR question as well.
Yes. I mean I think that what we have said, and you said it yourself, is like net new ARR is the leading metric Revenue is the lagging metric. And it will take repeating quarters of net new ARR growth above revenue for revenue to inflect. Net new ARR hit its low point in the first half of 2023. We saw a steady increase throughout 2024. And since the back half of 2024 through the first half of 2025 as we shared at Analyst Day, it has been above revenue growth. And so what we have seen is that our installed base ARR has started to inflect and then revenue will follow the inflection of the core installed base. It just will take time to get there.
Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter from Morgan Stanley.
I wanted to follow up on some of the emerging drivers. You called out the customer adoption of HubSpot agents has been strong and credits are going to be a lever for growth in the future. So although some of the subscription plans currently include some usage credits, Among your early adopters, what are -- are customers using up those credits? And kind of where are we on the path for customers to purchase additional ones? Just overall, some of the trends you're seeing in credit consumption or usage intensity that can give confidence to that lever become a larger impact in the near to medium term.
Elizabeth, thank you. Thank you for that question. We launched HubSpot credits. And as everybody knows, that is our universal usage-based pricing system. Today, it includes agent actions for any agent that is out in general availability and it also includes data hub things. Those are the 2 things. And as we go into the future, we'll add more and more usage-based features into that system. Now we have a clear framework for how we monetize credit. We focus on product and feature activation, then we drive repeat usage then consistent customer value. And from then on, we monetize. And having this disciplined structured approach ensures that when customers start paying for usage with credit, it's because they are getting clear value and repeatable value.
Now in terms of the patterns that we're seeing for credits monetization, it's been just about a quarter but customer agent is the strong growth driver of credits. It's delivering value. It's highly retentive. So when customers adopt customer agents, they continue to use it. we're seeing positive signals on credit growth, which is they start with the included credits and they continue to grow beyond that included credits with customer agent. The second one is data hub sync. This is where when you bring in data and when you use that data then it consumes credit, that's the second area where we're beginning to see credit consumption.
And then the third is prospecting agent. This is one where our customers use it to research accounts and scale their outreach campaign, and we're beginning to see clear trends. And I shared some of the adoption trends and metrics, which is also driving credit adoption. Look, it's early days, but we are very pleased with the progress so far in terms of credit consumption. The one thing that I will point out, and it's an important point is that credits are just 1 way for us to monetize AI.
Broadly, if you step back and think about it, credit monetization does not equal AI monetization at spot, and that's because we have embedded AI. And when that embedded AI drives value, then we see it in attach rates as well as seat upgrades, which we have been seeing now for a few quarters. We're also driving AI value within core seats. And we will see the monetization there as we shared in Analyst Day, and we'll continue to monetize usage-based components with credit. So overall, we feel very good about our AI strategy and the monetization strategy, and this is a solid foundation for credits to emerge as a lever for growth.
Our next question comes from the line of Tyler Radke from Citi.
Yes. One clarification and then sort of a product question. So just on the clarification, I know there's been a lot of questions just around the net new ARR trends. And I guess the clarification is, did the growth rate in net new ARR that you observed in the first half, did that continue or perhaps accelerate or decelerate into 3Q? And then, Yamini, you talked about a lot of customers, I think 47,000 customers using the chat connector. Just curious if you're seeing any interesting usage or expansion trends for customers that are using that versus customers that are not.
Yes, Tyler, I'll start with a short answer to your question on net new ARR growth. In Q3, net new ARR growth did remain above constant currency revenue growth.
Yes. And then on the second part of the question in terms of the LLM connectors and what kinds of use cases and what types of trends we are seeing there. Look, I think we'll start with why we build these connectors. It's because our customers and prospects are spending a ton of time in LLMs, and we want to bring the insights from HubSpot regarding their business and growth opportunities there. And the more deeper reason is this, LLM are basically the new AI operating system. And just like you had browser wars and mobile wars, there will be a clear winner in the AI operating system.
Now that has just a lot of implications across the industry, but there's a very specific implication for our customers and our ecosystem, which is that will be a way in which companies will be found. And that means it will become an AI referral source for companies. We see this in our AEO efforts. We are seeing this in our customers' AEO efforts, and that is why we want to be the best platform that enables that growth. And so that's the reason.
In terms of the traction, I shared some numbers. ChatGPT Connector is our fastest growing app in 5 years, 47,000 installations. And if I look at the patterns, I see a lot of directors and about using it for meeting prep. So they're using it to understand pipeline trends before they go into a weekly meeting or a board meeting. They are using it to get insights on what changed week-to-week or month-to-month. The second pattern that we see is doing deeper research and then being able to take actions within HubSpot.
For example, we were talking to customer base group they used to prompt from our library to identify the highest converting persona and then they built a nurture campaign in HubSpot, and that campaign open rates actually jumped from 8% to 40%. So huge improvement in terms of conversion rates. So we're seeing customers ask questions, get insight and then begin to you take the action within HubSpot. And that's the pattern that we want to see, get insights and then drive actions to drive growth within HubSpot and very encouraged by the patterns there.
Our next question comes from the line of Brad Sills from Bank of America.
I wanted to ask a question about ASP growth. It's been kind of bumping along at this kind of flattish level for several quarters. And historically, before we entered into some of these macro pressures, it was more in the 12% to 15% range. So my question is, what would it take to get ASP growth back to -- back in the green and moving up north? What are some of the unlocks there? I think in the past, Kate, you've talked about how you're still seeing some pressure on those upgrades. So maybe an update on that trend as well.
Yes. Thanks, Brad, for the question. I think you know that there are a number of factors that drive ASRPC and it is also a lagging indicator because revenue is the numerator for ASRPC. It's impacted by the volume and mix of our customers. It's impacted by new ASPs and as you rightly point out, upgrades. We continue to see a number of headwinds and a number of tailwinds around ASRPC growth. They're all going to sound very familiar to you. The headwinds are robust starter additions and the lower ASPs associated with new customers post our pricing change in 2024.
In terms of tailwinds, we continue to see momentum in large deals, multi-hub adoption and then increasingly seat upgrades and credits. We did see a bit of inflection in the third quarter with constant currency growth of ASRPC up 1%. We expect to see that continue into Q4.
One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Rishi Jaluria from RBC.
Wonderful. It's Rishi Jaluria from RBC here. I wanted to dive a little bit deeper into kind of the existing traction that you're seeing with your current AI products and agents, right, including the most recent announcements out of inbound. Obviously, you've seen some really good traction there. As we kind of think about new products that you're going to be working on and getting out into the market, totally understand it's going to take a while before this turns into direct monetization, whether through credits or any other way.
But how are you internally gauging the success of newer AI offerings and working directly with your customers to not only make sure that it's delivering kind of their value that I think they expect out of you, but also that the way they're using it is aligned with future contemplated pricing mechanisms that you have in place?
Rishi, that's a great question. And I think I'll kind of start with our strategy, the momentum and then how we are driving customer adoption because that is the right question to be begin in due. If we step back, our strategy for AI has been consistent and clear, which is we want to embed AI into all of our hubs and platform. we want to build agents that deliver work for our customers, and we want to deliver a brief assistant and connectors that convert data into insight. And the strategy has just been consistent across the board.
So when we look at momentum as well as traction in terms of the strategy, we look at all factors there. So the first thing is, is the embedded strategy is working. And the answer for us is very clear because embedded features are being used across Marketing Hub, Sales Club Service Hub they are improving the outcomes for our customers, things like conversion rate that I mentioned before, win rate and improvement in 10% win rate in sales. I mean, previously, before AI, I don't think that types of outcome would have been possible with Sales Hub, I think that's a huge improvement for our customers. And similarly, Service Hub customers who are using AI see much better ticket closure as well as much better customer sentiment.
So all of that translates into much better attach rates for us, which we have seen with Content Hub, which we've seen with Service Hub as well as adoption of sales seats as well as service subsea. The second part of the strategy, which is probably earlier in the journey is the agent journey, right? All of us within the industry, we know we're building agents that do work. And the adoption is slightly less than the embedded products. And for us, the 3 featured agents that we launched which is customer agent, prospecting agent and data agent, we look at what are the signs in terms of adoption as well as repeat usage. And customer agent is the most mature there. It has been in GA the longest. 6,200 customers with 62-plus percent resolution rate and credit consumptions that are really in the pattern that we expect. So really clear trajectory in terms of the agents.
And you ask broadly about customer adoption. Part of what is happening is that when you look at AI, people have road maps, but they are on very different portions of the adoption journey. So we work with our partners. We work with our customer success managers and we work with our customers to help them build a road map, and they like our strategy. They like that they're getting a platform that is future-proofed and all of that leads to traction. I continue to believe that AI is early, and this is going to play out for the next 5 years, 10 years, and we are setting ourselves up to be leaders within this and doing it in a way where we focus on small, medium businesses and helping them grow with this new technology. So very confident there.
Our next question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges from Goldman Sachs.
For the Yamini or Dharmesh, I would love to hear you talk a little bit about what are you seeing in terms of customer data states and the quality of those data estates. Yamini, you mentioned a handful of times this idea of converting data into insights. How would you describe customer readiness from a data hygiene standpoint? Is there a period of time where they have to work to clean up their data and/or work to standardize a HubSpot. I think you have a really unique position because of how your hubs are organically connected together. So maybe just a little more on what you're seeing in the environment with respect to that.
Yes. I'll start there, Gabriela, and I'm sure Dharmesh can add to it. That's a very broad question in terms of the state of data. And I would probably say that it's multiple the stage of data maturity for our customer depends on how mature they are within their stack. And I would maybe talk about -- the first is, if they already have data, is it high quality? And within our customer base, if they have adopted all of our hubs, then it tends to be in higher quality versus having point solutions that they're trying to bring together. But partly, we also have Data Hub that we launched at INBOUND that helps with improving data quality. That is exactly what the purpose is for Data Hub.
The second is it's not just about data quality. Can you get data across the customer journey -- and can you build a context layer on top of that data that enable you to do more with AI and this is where I have a very strong point of view that platforms that bring together data that the -- and helps build a customer context, they're going to be able to get much more done with AI. And then the third, which you didn't answer the question, but comes up in all our customer conversations is unstructured data. you can do a lot more with sales conversations with service conversations, pulling unstructured data together, and that is exactly where HubSpot shines.
Our ability to bring better quality data to bring data across the entire customer journey and to add both structured and unstructured data. Those 3 things are the foundation to get anything done with AI. And that's 1 of the reasons why we brought Data Hub to the forefront at inbound.
Our next question comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis from UBS.
Kate, maybe for you. I think if I heard you correctly, you reiterated the outlook for NRR to be a couple of points higher this year than last year. And if I look at what that potentially implies for 4Q, it looks like it could be closer to $106 million. So one, just wanted to check if I'm doing that math right. And if that is right, that would be probably the biggest uptick in NRR that you guys have seen over the last several quarters. So is that an indicator of some of what you're talking about of like seat expansion activity and the new pricing model throw through like evidence that you're starting to see that materialize into numbers and that alone potentially is a leading indicator? Or maybe you can just talk about like what are the puts and takes in that number and how to think about it going into next year?
Yes. I appreciate the question. Thank you. And you are right, I did reiterate that we expect net -- we continue to expect net revenue retention to be up a couple of points this year. And it does imply a nice step-up in NRR in Q4. The drivers of net revenue retention are the same as they've been all year. We continue to see healthy customer dollar retention we've seen very stable downgrades, which is a nice indicator that customers have rightsized. And then we've seen strong seat upgrades across both sales and service seats as well as core seats. And we have also seen a benefit and will continue into Q4 to see the benefit of the pricing increase for customers post their migration onto the new model.
Our next question comes from the line of Raimo Lenschow from Barclays.
This is [ Damon Cogen ] on for Raimo Lenschow. I guess piggybacking off the last question. I know it might be a little early for 2026. Would you be able to tell us a little bit about how you're thinking about net retention with stronger pricing, healthy renewal rates on new seeds model, multiproduct adoption, is there any reason to believe that this metric does not improve?
Yes, I appreciate the question. I'm sure that you're not surprised why, and I'll start by saying that I'm not going to make any specific comments around 2026. That's that we do think that there is a path for further improvement on net revenue retention over the longer term. We talked about some of the drivers, but I'll reiterate them for the sake of completeness here, like we are very confident that we can continue to support really healthy customer dollar retention. We've talked about the fact that we've seen downgrades stabilized nicely over the last year or so and actually cancellation in downgrades together were a benefit to net revenue retention in 2024.
The pricing model change is resulting in both stronger seat upgrade motions, but also we will expect to see a continued tailwind to net revenue retention from the pricing changes on the remaining 50% of our installed base that will go through the renewal post the end of 2025. And then finally, Yamini talked a lot about the core seats and credits as emerging drivers and they will begin to contribute in a more meaningful way in 2026. So again, nothing specific on 2026, but I do believe that this is a business that's capable of delivering higher net revenue retention.
Our next question comes from the line of Steve Koenig from Macquarie Capital.
Great. Some of your peers have also talked about expectation of net new ARR growth higher than revenue, but it's more of an anticipation than historically seeing that. and predicated on sales capacity expansion as being an important driver. I'm wondering, you touched upon many of the drivers that you see for potential acceleration but I'm also curious, to what extent is your sales capacity or execution tactics aside from the pricing model change. To what extent are you lined up to for further acceleration or changes to that strategy might be helping you?
I really like that question. I think that it's really good to ask us about the sales capacity and how we are teed up. And look, we have been investing in 2 fronts: one, in headcount, and we have consistently hired sales capacity in regions, in segments where we see clear opportunity and that has continued, and that will likely continue into 2026. We see further opportunities for expanding sales capacity. The second thing, which I'm really excited about is all the investments that we have made in terms of AI to transform our own go-to-market has had a clear impact in terms of sales productivity, how we are using intent data to drive our prospecting, how we are using data during the deal process, we call it guided selling.
So internally, every sales rep knows the insights that they need, they prepare better for meetings. They follow up faster for meetings. They have much better competitive insights during the call and post call. And all of that has had measurable impact in terms of sales productivity. So both sales capacity and sales productivity are really humming, and we see that continue going into 2026. So we feel pretty good about that.
Our next question comes from the line of Brian Peterson from Raymond James.
So I'd love to understand from your perspective, what you're seeing in terms of demand trends, maybe a little bit more by geography. We saw international was a little bit stronger this quarter. We picked it up in some of our partner checks. But as we think about the growth opportunity going forward, anything you can call out in terms of international versus North America in terms of growth expectations?
Yes, I appreciate the question. Look, we have not seen any material changes in terms of segments or industries or geographies. It continues to be very consistent with prior quarters. Now if I look at our pipeline, we see a handful of trends that is not geo-based but generally based on the products that we have launched and the momentum we are seeing. We saw a very positive response from inbound. Specifically, customers are excited about the loop they are excited about Data Hub, and I explained why Data Hub is almost and critical for value from AI. And I see a lot of our customers and prospects talking to us about customer agent prospecting agent.
All of that has landed really well. I continue to see multi-hub adoption as well as upmarket momentum. The large deal momentum this year has been consistent and compounding and we see that both in Q3 as well as entering into the Q4 in terms of the pipeline, and that has been a consistent driver. So not as much as segment or geo change, but really consistency in what is driving the demand across all of these regions.
And Brian, just one small point to make on the domestic versus international growth. You will just remember that the legacy Clearbit business is about 0.5 point of headwind to our growth in 2025. All of that business is domestic business. And so it's about a 1 point headwind to domestic growth this year.
Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader from KeyBanc Capital Markets.
I was just curious to ask on 2 things as far as the fourth quarter is concerned. Number one is, is there anything kind of seasonally here in the fourth quarter? I know you guys aren't giant deal dependent. But is there anything in terms of the fourth quarter bookings that could impact the timing, Kate, of when you expect that net new piece to be kind of large enough to accelerate growth as we head into '26? And then also, I think we're getting into the heart of the pricing renewals for some of your larger customers. And so just curious whether the pricing -- how those larger customers are handling the pricing increases, whether it's firmer or softer than you expected?
Yes. Thanks for the question. Look, I think that Q4 is always our most important quarter of the year in terms of being the largest net new ARR quarter with November and obviously, December being pretty critical. We do see a lot of the migrated customers coming up for renewal at the end of this year, and so that will impact Q4 a bit. And so far, they are performing as reported over the last couple of quarters.
Thank you. This concludes the HubSpot Q3 2025 Earnings Call. Thank you to everyone who was able to join us today. You may now disconnect your lines.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
HubSpot, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatz: $810 Mio (+18.4% YoY, konstant)
- Betriebsmarge: 20% (operating margin)
- Kunden: +10.900 Nettozugänge; gesamt ~279.000 (+17% YoY)
- NRR: Net Revenue Retention (NRR) 103% (sequentiell stabil)
- Cash & FCF: Kasse/Marktwerte $1,7 Mrd; Free Cash Flow $147 Mio (18% v. Umsatz)
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Plattformfokus: Kunden konsolidieren Go‑to‑Market‑Stack auf HubSpot; Multi‑Hub‑Adoption steigt (43% Pro+ nutzen 3 Kern‑Hubs).
- AI‑Strategie: AI wird in alle Hubs eingebettet; Agenten (Customer/Prospecting/Data) and LLM‑Connectoren (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) sollen Insights in Aktion überführen.
- Wachstumshebel: Upmarket‑Deals, Core‑Seats und Credits (usage‑based) als neue Monetarisierungswege neben Sitz‑Upgrades und Preisänderungen.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q4‑Leitplanke: Management erwartet für Q4 ein Umsatzband (Transcript nennt $82–$830 Mio; verwendet bitte das offizielle Press Release/10‑Q zur Prüfung).
- FY25: Umsatz nun $3,113–3,115 Mrd; Non‑GAAP Betriebsergebnis $574–575 Mio (~18% Marge); Non‑GAAP EPS $9,60–9,62.
- Sonstiges: Q4 Non‑GAAP Betriebsergebnis $183–184 Mio (≈22% Marge); CapEx ≈6% des Umsatzes; FCF Ziel ~ $580 Mio.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Weg zu 20%: Investoren fragten nach der konkreten Timeline zum Wiedererreichen ~20% Wachstum; Management betont Net‑New‑ARR als Leading‑Metric und Upmarket sowie Pricing/AI als Treiber.
- Billings vs. Umsatz: Analysten hinterfragten leichte Verzögerungen in Billings; CFO erklärt Mix‑ und Duration‑Effekte (mehr Install‑base‑Selling, weniger Upfront‑Monate).
- Credits & Monetarisierung: Nachfrage nach Nutzungsdaten; Management sieht frühe, positive Signale (Customer Agent, Data Hub Sync, Prospecting Agent) — Monetarisierung aber noch in frühen Phasen.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Starkes Quartal mit soliden Margen, klarer AI‑Roadmap und ersten Nutzungs‑Signalen für Credits; der Übergang von Net‑New‑ARR zu beschleunigtem Umsatzwachstum bleibt jedoch zeitverzögert. Aktionäre erhalten stabilen Cashflow und ein klar kommuniziertes Wachstumsszenario, das von Upmarket‑Momentum und AI‑Monetarisierung abhängt.
HubSpot, Inc. — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
1. Question Answer
All right. Fantastic. We will go ahead and kick it off. It's a real pleasure to welcome Yamini Rangan back on stage with me, CEO of HubSpot, particularly off of the massive success of INBOUND last week. Thank you so much for joining us.
Thank you, Gabriela. It's always a pleasure to come back and thanks for having us.
So I know how much energy you and your leadership team put into the messaging at INBOUND and the product and the functionality that you're announcing. Now that you've had a whole weekend to digestion process, would love to hear what stood out to you? What was the one takeaway from INBOUND that perhaps investors should be aware of?
Yes. For those of you who don't know, we have a conference called INBOUND, it's a customer conference. We had about 13,000 people. And for the first time, we did it here in San Francisco. For the last 15 years, we have done it in Boston. So this time, it was in Moscone. And I'd say that across the Board, the pace of innovation at HubSpot shown. We had 200-plus updates and features and product releases across the Board, across the entire platform.
But if I were to pick a couple of themes, I would say the first one is data. And we all know this is the foundation for anything to do with AI is data. And so we actually transformed what we had originally called an operations hub into a data hub -- and this now brings the data together. It uses AI to make it very smart, you can enrich any data by running LLM queries -- and it allows for customers to take that data, bring it into reports and workflows.
So I think almost every single customer I spoke to since INBOUND have mentioned data and the value of having the data in a simple streamlined manner in order to enable AI. And then the second big thing, which we will talk a lot about is marketing. There's just such a big change that's happening in marketing now, and our customers want us to guide them through the process with playbooks, with products as well as the entire ecosystem. So that was a big theme.
And then third, all the stuff that innovation that we have done in terms of AI, specifically the AI agents and the marketplace and the custom agent builder that we launched last week. I'm sure we'll talk about each of those, but those were the top 3 themes.
Yes, absolutely. Let's start on the data piece of it. One of the things that I've appreciated about HubSpot is you're the CRM and the front office suite for growing and scaling companies. So talk to us a little bit, when you look at your customer base, how far along do you think they are in getting that data strategy organized such that they're then ready to take the next steps and adopt AI agents?
Yes. And I think that's a broader question. One of the reasons why HubSpot consistently wins and more folks are consolidating on HubSpot is the data story. And so that has been part of the reason why we now have over 270,000 customers, and that's because of one simple thing. Our core platform brings together data for marketing sales, service ops teams. And if we ask our customers that's a single reason that they buy, it will be one of the top three reasons. And so I think that's number one.
Specifically, what's happening with AI is that you can now do much more in terms of looking at intense signals even before someone shows up on your website. That's a huge change in terms of what you can do with data and having the ability to capture intent signals on multiple channels, and then being able to take actions and then being able to drive agents is such a critical part of the strategy for scaling companies.
And you put these two together, you need to have a clear data story. To your question, where are our customers in the journey? Like any of those, they are in multiple parts of the journey. There are some that have been using HubSpot for years. They already have their customer data together. Now they want to get better intent signals and do much more sophisticated things with AI.
They are more advanced. And then there are some that are just starting their AI journey and realize that they need clean, not siloed data to begin the journey and they are starting. So I would say kind of across the spectrum.
Yes, absolutely. And the other thing you mentioned there is marketing. And I thought the way that you introduced the group really takes INBOUND and brings it into 2025. Tell us a little bit more about how you purchase this concept of the loop and how it takes into account the way that the interactions are changing between the brands and their customers.
Yes. So for those of you that were not there at our conference, we launched a new marketing playbook called the loop -- and the context is this. We all know that search is getting disrupted. And the easiest way to think about why search is getting disrupted is AI overviews are providing answers at the top of every search. And the data point that you should all remember is that 60% of Google searches today end up with 0 clicks, which means less traffic to website and less content leads.
So that is the disruption that is happening. The untold part of the story, the other part of the story is that what AI is taking away in terms of content leads it is doing something very different. It is allowing for you to capture intense signals, match your customers' intent with the information that they need to see and driving much better conversion in the marketing funnel. So in marketing language, if you want to say the top of the funnel is getting disrupted because of AI overviews.
The bottom of the funnel is actually transforming with better conversions from AI. So there are two parts to the story. And if you put these two together, marketing playbook needs to change. It needs to fundamentally look very different. And therefore, we launched a new playbook. We've been iterating on this playbook for the past couple of years. It's powered HubSpot's growth and now we launched it for our customers.
And the way to think about it is threefold. First of all, you should start with human voice and authenticity. Otherwise, AI is just going to give out [ SAM ]. Then you got to like use the data, all the intent signals that you can now gather about your customers to drive much better personalization of messages at scale, that's kind of the second step within the loop.
And then you've got to be in every channel. The diversification of channels in marketing is such an important part of the story. You cannot wait for customers to come to your website. You have to be in social channels. You have to be in podcast, you have to be newsletters and there is a new channel now called LLM and therefore, there's a whole approach in marketing called AEO, which is AI Engine Optimization.
So to put this in a nutshell, the marketing playbook is changing. What we launched is how you use human authenticity with AI's efficiency to diversify your content and channels and grow with AI. This is a big deal for our customers. This is a big massive opportunity for HubSpot, because we're not only providing the playbook that we launched, but we are also supporting it with our products across Content Hub, Data Hub and Marketing Hub. And we are helping them reimagining how they can drive growth with AI and was a pretty exciting moment for us to launch it.
And all week long and continuing into this week, we've been talking to customers about how to help them adopt it.
So you made a really interesting comment there on, this has been incubating at HubSpot for a couple of years as you've transformed your own internal marketing facility. So tell us a little more about that. What has been the iteration process internally? How do you feel about your own internal strategy to get new customers on HubSpot.
Yes. I think that's a great question, Gabriela. So a lot of the articles this year has been about search disruption. However, for us, the journey began in 2022, because in 2022, second half of 2022, we noticed that our customers were spending less time on blogs and much more time on social, on podcast and newsletters. And this was before AI overviews even came into the picture.
So we did a few things. We actually made a huge set of bets back then to diversify our marketing channels. Some of you may remember that back in 2022, we acquired a media company called the Hustle. And at the time, it was like what are we doing? But the reason we did that is we wanted a business podcast network. And that network strategy has diversified, and we now get 90% growth in terms of leads from that podcast network channel.
Same thing back in 2022, we also acquired a couple of newsletters, because we saw that e-mail newsletters is also a new way to reach customers, and that was pretty big. So the changes that we made in terms of our marketing channels and strategy started in 2022, and it was launching YouTube, launching Instagram, launching podcast network, launching newsletters and all of that has paid off.
And if you put it all together, we've seen a pretty dramatic shift in terms of HubSpot demand mix shifting over the past three years, leads obviously from blogs and web apps have gone down over the past three years. But at the same time, we've seen leads from social, from e-mail, newsletters and podcast more than double in that same three-year period.
So diversification is really important. One of the other things that we've started experimenting and this is early, it's new is AEO that I just mentioned. It's a pretty early approach to kind of being part of an answer rather than being part of the search result. SCO and the playbook of the prior generation was all about being in the top 5 blue links that you get.
Now there's a new approach and a methodology of showing up in the results, the one single answer that an LLM provides. And it's super nascent, but we've been experimenting with it. And what we are finding in terms of AEO is that the strategy, the content is the same. But the strategies that you need to use in order to come up in the answer is quite different than what you did to show up in the links and we've been experimenting with it.
Our internal leads from AI and LLM have grown tremendously over the past couple of years, small base. But the more interesting thing is that leads from LLMs are converting 3x better. And that is because when someone asks the question of an LLM, it is -- they are much deeper in research. They have much higher intent and they are ready to act. And this, again, by the way, is a big breakthrough for marketeers.
In marketing, you don't get 3x conversion improvement in any channel. You mostly get 5% to 10% improvement. So this is actually a pretty big breakthrough. And so now we're helping our customers begin to think about AEO strategy. And this is going to be multiple years in the making in terms of how to show up in an answer and how to figure out how LLMs work in terms of marketing messages.
But the bottom line is this. We diversified our channels. We've been ahead and looking at all of the changing dynamics within the marketing landscape and the things that HubSpot does really well is this. We iterate -- and then once we know the playbook, we educate our customers, and then we activate our entire ecosystem of solution partners to go out and help our customers win. That is what we did with INBOUND. It was playbook. It was a set of products, and it was an entire ecosystem behind it, and that's exactly the approach and strategy that we are taking with loop, and we think the opportunity is pretty massive for HubSpot.
This idea of AEO is a really interesting one. I know it's early days. Any initial observations as to what that strategy could look like? How do you figure out? Is it primarily through iterations. How do you figure out what works well and how to get that lead conversion.
Yes. I think -- to answer the question, there's -- you have to understand the difference between how to show up in a blue link and how to show up in an answer. The average LLM question is 23 words. And the average search was 5 words. And that begins to tell the difference between AEO and SCO. That means customers and prospects are asking very specific questions of LLM, -- it's not, "hey, what CRM should I use"?
It is I am -- would manufacturer in the Midwest serving population that looks like this ideal customer profile, what are the ways in which I can grow my lead. Now in order for you to show up in that answer, you got to have very specific staff, you have to have quotes. You have to repeat your content across multiple sources. And so there's a whole strategy and marketing customers are super excited to do it.
And the best way I would describe it is a ton of iteration and experimentation with your content. The way our teams are figuring it out is not just have one case study but have like very specific case studies for every industry with very high repetition of the content in multiple channels. And when you begin to do that, you're also going to need the visibility because what's happening within AEO is that you got to know, are you first of all showing up in the kinds of questions that you want to show up. You need marketing tools to be able to do that.
Then what is your share of voice within LLMs compared to all of your competitors? You need marketing tools to be able to do that? And then how do you drive better conversion of your content through LLMs and AI referrals, you need marketing tools to do that. And so I think that's where we get excited about the opportunity in front of us.
Yes, absolutely. And you're describing a strategy that has required a lot of heavy lifting from an R&D, from a product innovation standpoint. The question I want to ask you is, -- the beauty of HubSpot's tech stack with the primary color is you're able to do this kind of evolution or transformation. I wouldn't use the word seamlessly, but you're able to execute it in a way that's incredibly fast based. So my question is, are you seeing HubSpot separate out more from the existing SaaS competition because of the technical decisions that Dharmesh and Brian made very early on and because of how you've organized your R&D team?
Yes. I love this point about the primary colors that you're making. And we've said this for many years. A couple of choices that we made strategically really early on. One is that we're going to build our platform and organically build it, and that drives value for our customers, because when customers have to take a bunch of cobble together acquisitions and put it, they take the owners on like integrating it and unifying the data.
We want to take that paying for customers and that really has a huge impact in terms of a smaller company trying to grow. That was choice #1, which is like we'll build it. And then as soon as we made the decision, we also made a decision to be platform first -- and what that means is that we have a set of primitives within the platform. Think of it as automation, reporting, data and those primitives are across multiple applications and hubs, which means if we improve a platform level work in automation, that's going to show up in Marketing Hub. That's going to show up in Sales Hub and Service Hub.
And to your point, we've taken an exactly similar approach for AI. We have a set of AI primitives, AI skills being one within the platform, which allows us to build agents faster and build products and features within the hubs much better. And so -- what I think you're getting to is that is speed a moat. And I do think being platform first and having a set of core capabilities within the platform allows us to move with speed.
And one of the things that this translates into for our customers is just the pace of innovation. I talk to customers all the time, and I tell them when you buy HubSpot, you're future-proofing, your technology investment because we are driving a pace of innovation, and that deeply resonates with our customers.
Yes, absolutely. Well, let me flip the question around from a competition standpoint. You're iterating on an existing tech stack that was built 10-plus years ago. You set it up to succeed. But there are companies that have been born in the last 1, 2, 3 years that will say, we're starting with a clean sheet of paper. The AI native tech stack is fundamentally different from the SaaS tech stack. Therefore, we can build something clean and more beautiful, more dynamic, more disruptive. How would you respond to that claim that the AI native companies can be more successful relative to companies that are starting with an existing tech stack?
Is it fundamentally different in terms of the tech stack.
I wouldn't love to hear you. Yes.
I think that there are changes that AI is enabling. And I would characterize the changes that AI are enabling into 3 things. The first one is that context that AI can process is much broader. So if you think about an application like HubSpot, we always had structured data. That's what we are known for.
CRM is structured data of companies, contacts, deals, tickets. That's what we are known for. With AI, we can now process unstructured data and external intent signals at a much better pace than before. And so our contact layer has now transformed into bringing together structured data, unstructured data and external data that we got from the Clearbit acquisition.
And I would say that is huge differentiator for HubSpot and our architecture, because if you just start with unstructured data, you still have to go back and build. So if you're an AI-native startup starting with just e-mail or Gmail or calendar, for instance, you have to go back and build the structured data. So that's like number one.
The second change that is happening is where you take actions. It used to be that we can take actions or we can -- our customers would take actions on hubs, go to marketing hub, create a campaign, go to a sales hub and close your deals. That was the way in which our customers were using it. Now with AI, we're also doing work for them. And the agents that we have launched over the last 1.5 years, we now have 15 plus agents that we have built or the ecosystem is building, those agents do work, and that is the transformation that we've already enabled within our platform, and that gives the flexibility of our customers for go-to-market employees working in hubs to get work done or using agents to do more work for them.
So that's the second layer in terms of the transformation. And then we bring together all of this so that hybrid teams of humans and agents can work together. And that is kind of the orchestration layer. So what I would maybe suggest is that AI has enabled us to add more value by bringing in more data that we can help our customers with, more places to drive action and ability to orchestrate across hybrid teams.
And I don't think this is one where there is fresh sheet of paper actually has an advantage. I would say the context that you have from, in our case, 19 years, 270,000 customers worth of context is much deeper and that provides the right kind of foundation for AI to drive effort at work.
Yes. There's a really interesting concept here around concept -- around context. And what I want to better understand is you obviously partner with an incredible wealth of companies that can essentially enrich the customer experience because they partner with you. And so how do you govern what works or what your partners have access to via APIs, understanding that the customer owns their data such that you maintain the advantage of having the context, but you also enable partners to the extent you need to keep the customers happy.
And you are particularly talking about our application ecosystem or are you talking about our LLM providers that we have built connectors and APIs.
Actually, we should do both, because it leads into the LLM competition question.
Yes. I think -- so there's a lot that is changing in the world of LLM. It's a new AI OS that is getting formed, just like you had mobile platforms that enable a set of applications and you had AWS, there have always been like these foundational platforms.
We think that LLMs provide a new foundation for insights to show up. And my perspective is this, I think, AI and SaaS are complementary. And there are very key things that both bring together that add more value for our customers like HubSpot.
The first is LLM can absolutely deliver insights. But without the context of the customer, without the context of your sales pipeline, without the context of the campaigns that you have run across multiple regions, it cannot deliver growth insights. HubSpot brings the context for growth. Every campaign that we have launched, every e-mail that has been sent, everything within the sales pipeline, every deal that is closed. Every CPQ transaction -- that is the context within HubSpot.
And we're now enabling our customers to access that context and the insights from any location, including an LLM. So that's like number one. The second thing is that while LLM can take action on behalf of a single user, a sales rep wanting to write an e-mail, what HubSpot does is we maintain state across thousands of users whose roles are changing, whose permissions need to be monitored in a granular manner and whose task require the context of that particular team.
That doesn't just auto generate by itself. And so HubSpot maintains that state across thousands of users. And are you a salesperson, what pipeline can you have access, what action can you take, that context of the user is within HubSpot, and it's very complementary to what an LLM can do for a single user. So that's the second thing.
And then the other one I would say is that LLM are fantastic in terms of interactions and insights. We have the logic, HubSpot has the logic to take the action. So the way we see the complementary value of LLMs is that our customers can go and do a deep research. For example, on an ideal customer profile within a particular company. Once they've done the deep research if they need to launch multi-language, multi-country campaign that then reaches across 5 million contacts those actions. Those workflows, that logic and the ability to then drive leads, that is within HubSpot.
And so I know there's a raging debate going on, but I -- we have a very clear point that these two are very complementary, and we bring the context across the domain, the user as well as the rich understanding that we have in terms of SMBs to help them actually drive growth. And we're actually super excited, because what we see is the opportunity to drive even more value for customers by building AI deeply into our platform and our hubs.
Yes. I think you already articulated this really well. You had Dario from Anthropic on with you last week, and he was actually explicit in saying that he's not going to target marketing as a domain. And so in your opinion, is that a function of all the domain knowledge in the context that you were just talking about? Is there anything else that you would add as a barrier to entry for a large language model to get into marketing as a domain?
I mean, I don't know if it is a barrier to entry, but I think that our business is completely different. Like we spent all the time thinking about what our marketing team, our sales team and the service team in a 1,000-person company or a 2,000-person company needs. Now -- and we built a business around it. We understand it deeply. We get that context. And we deliver that context.
The example that I would give is an LLM can absolutely write an e-mail and generate an e-mail for a sales rep. But without knowing who is the buyer? What were the last 20 conversations? Who is the competitor? How do you handle objections for that competitor that e-mail is going to be generic -- and we have that type of context that then drives growth. And so I again go back to the perspective that there is a lot of complementary value that we can create. And you have the conversations with Anthropic CEO, Dario, like he said the same thing.
There's a lot that the platform can enable, but not really in the areas that we are focused on, which is why I do believe it's complementary.
Yes, absolutely. Okay. I want to talk a little bit about go-to-market and then the growth out. So one of the things that HubSpot as a leadership team has been very consistent in saying, you want the barbell approach. You want the growing and scaling companies in the 200 to 2,000 employee cohort, but you also still really care about the small companies joining HubSpot for the first time.
I'm curious if you've noticed any change in how those 2 cohorts, so the new early HubSpot customers versus the more established, perhaps the ones that you've displaced competitors on, how they're approaching some of the 15 AI agents that you're adopting. Does the education, does the go-to-market increasingly change between small companies and large companies?
I don't know if the adoption of AI is based on the size of the customer. I do think it comes from the level of AI fluency that they're trying to drive within the companies. And a lot of times, there's someone in the C-suite who is like pushing for AI. That is the most common denominator in terms of AI curious to AI leading, and we have a spectrum of customers all the way from AI curious to leading with AI.
But talking about the two parts of the strategy, we do think both are important. We care a lot about customers who are just getting started. In fact, we offer a set of free tools for them to get started free. And over the last couple of years, we've consistently removed the friction for a very small business that is just starting to scale.
We've lowered the price. We've removed seat minimums. We've made it easy for them to try by and grow with HubSpot. And by consistently doing that, we've seen the volume of additions from that continue to maintain. And that's our ongoing strategy. We want to make sure that we get started with our customers as early in their journey, and we continue to grow or help them grow and therefore, grow ourselves.
And then on the upmarket side, we've had a very successful playbook for the last few years, and it's been a consistent driver of our own growth, and that starts with having a great product that is easy to use, one of the #1 reasons why we get picked over competitors is because we are easy while being powerful and then you get the engagement.
And then we drive a level of adoption that typically you don't see in complex software -- and so our product has gotten better, the level of adoption from customers is better, and we have a partner ecosystem that has continued to grow and continue to scale upmarket customers in their ability to adopt HubSpot. And so both these parts of the strategy are just exceptionally important, and we have consistently proven that the playbook is working there.
And I know we've been talking now since 2021 on -- we've been through a period where the net retention rate at HubSpot has been under pressure because of the COVID over buying cycle. And so my question for you is, if we were to bring all of these product enhancements, you've had the pricing evolution, you've got the success that you're having going upmarket. When do you think that translates to a structurally higher net retention rate? Or maybe it's not a net retention, maybe it's a structurally higher growth rate. To put it simply, do you think that the company can accelerate growth? And how do you get there?
Yes, we absolutely think we can accelerate growth. In fact, at the Analyst Day last week, we shared how we have internally already reaccelerated our net new ARR. That is the forward-looking indicator in terms of growth. And what we have seen is a few things. One is that we have consistently been the platform that customers have consolidated on as they look at their tech stack, as they look at the level of complexity, if they want to lower cost and if they want to grow faster, they've consolidated, and that has been a trend over the past many quarters in terms of platform consolidation.
That plus the upmarket and downmarket momentum that we talked about, both -- all 3 of those have been current levers for growth, where we think the additional new emerging levers for growth are the things that we started talking about, which is marketing is going through a fairly massive transformation -- and we now have a clear playbook for our customers to follow that includes our data hub, our marketing hub and content hub.
So inherently, it is a multi-hub adoption story, and that's an emerging lever for growth. Very similar to that is sales. We just launched CPQ. And the combination of sales data and CPQ is a multi-hub driver for us to consistently grow -- in addition to that, for the last couple of years, we have walked you through our pricing changes and that nets to a consistent way in which we can drive more seat upgrades, both in terms of the sales service sub-seat as well the core seats. So that's an emerging lever.
And we feel that especially the core seat for us is a huge opportunity that is AI, data and platform adoption. So that's a new emerging lever for us. And we've talked about AI -- and as we drive AI adoption within our customer base, ARR potential increases. So just to net it out, we clearly think that we have internally reaccelerated that's going to show up in external metrics.
The way we have done that is by driving platform consolidation, consistent execution upmarket and downmarket. And now we have some emerging drivers of growth, which will be marketing sales, CPQ as well as the pricing changes that we made.
Yes. I want to stay on this concept of pricing for a few more minutes. I know how much time we spend with customers and making sure that HubSpot is delivering value to. So part and parcel with the AI adoption, you now have a move towards more value-oriented pricing or consumption-based. So what are some of the guiding factors that help you step the right price point for the usage-based pricing algorithm. And how do you execute on that layering into the model without compromising or cannibalizing.
Yes. A couple of different things there. So I would first start with our pricing philosophy. And we've consistently focused on driving value before we monetize. I know we've repeated this over and over. But the way we think about pricing is that we first need to identify use cases that deliver repeatable value for our customers.
And when we do that, then we have high confidence. So we're strategically patient. And that approach of value before monetization has worked with us for a very long time, and you've tracked us for a while. Now in terms of our pricing model itself, it is hybrid. It is seats plus credit that we just launched -- we launched credits last year at INBOUND, and we have consistently added to it.
Last year, we started with a couple of agents. This year, it now has customer agent. It now is prospecting agents. So all of the agent actions as well as the newly renamed Data Hub and the data things, they consume credits. And we think about it as if we are delivering AI value for a specific role within a hub, then that belongs to seat monetization. And if it is an agentic work that we are delivering or data that supports that agent that belongs to the credits.
And so we think that the hybrid model will work. So you asked the last part of the question, how can you make sure that if seats gets compressed and then credit stake, by having a hybrid model, we do think that if we deliver more value with AI -- and then we are delivering more value. So we're going to be able to monetize it with credits. And we have not seen seat compression.
But even when we do the hybrid model is going to help us make sure that we balance the value. But in any case, we are delivering more value. We're delivering more value from a seats perspective, and we're delivering value from AI and credit consumption perspective. And so I think overall, people always talk about [ PxQ ], we get like pretty fixated on [ PxQ ], but there is also a value equation. If price times value, if we are actually delivering more value than you're going to be able to monetize it. And that's why we have a hybrid pricing strategy.
Fantastic. Please join me in thanking Yamini for your time. Yamini thanks for your time.
Thank you for having me.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
HubSpot, Inc. — Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference 2025
🎯 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot positioniert sich als Plattform für KI‑gestütztes Wachstum: Data Hub zur Vereinheitlichung strukturierter und unstrukturierter Daten, AI‑Agents zur Automatisierung und ein neues Marketing‑Playbook («Loop») zur Kanaldiversifizierung.
- Ziel: Kunden beim Übergang von klassischen Such‑Leads zu LLM‑basierten Intent‑Signalen zu unterstützen; Produkt, Playbook und Partner‑Ecosystem sollen Adoption und Upsell treiben.
⚡ Strategische Highlights
- Data Hub: Operations Hub wurde zur Data Hub erweitert; erlaubt Daten‑Enrichment, LLM‑Abfragen und zentrale Nutzung in Reports und Workflows.
- Marketing: Neues «Loop»‑Playbook (Human Voice + personalisierte Intents + Multichannel) und Experimentierfeld AEO (AI Engine Optimization) als Reaktion auf 60% «zero‑click»‑Suchtrends.
- Plattform: Platform‑first‑Ansatz mit AI‑Primitiven und >15 Agents plus Agent‑Marketplace/Custom‑Agent‑Builder für schnellere Feature‑Ausrollungen.
🆕 Neue Informationen
- Produkte: >200 Produkt‑Updates auf INBOUND; Data Hub, Agent‑Marketplace und Custom Agent Builder als konkrete Releases.
- Monetarisierung: Hybrid‑Preismodell: Seats plus Credits (Credits für Agent‑Arbeit und Data‑Nutzung); Credits letztes Jahr eingeführt und weiter ausgebaut.
- Validierung: Erste Beobachtung: Leads aus LLMs konvertieren ~3× besser—AEO ist noch nascent, aber vielversprechend.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Data‑Readiness: Kunden sind heterogen: einige haben saubere, zusammengeführte Daten; viele stehen noch am Anfang der AI‑Journey.
- AEO & Marketing: Wie funktioniert AEO vs. SCO? HubSpot sieht längeren Iterationszyklus, braucht spezifische Fallstudien und Reichweite über Kanäle.
- Monetarisierung: Hybridmodell (Seats+Credits), CPQ‑Launch und Pricing‑Änderungen sollen Net‑New‑ARR und Upgrades antreiben; Management nennt bereits interne Rebeschleunigung.
📌 Bottom Line
- Fazit: Starke Produkt‑ und Strategieoffensive: Data‑ und AI‑Fokus plus neues Marketing‑Playbook schaffen Hebel für Multi‑Hub‑Adoption und zusätzliche Monetarisierung (Credits). Kurzfristig Momentum; mittelfristig Potenzial für beschleunigtes ARR‑Wachstum, abhängig von Kundentransformation und AEO‑Reife.
HubSpot, Inc. — Analyst/Investor Day - HubSpot, Inc.
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to HubSpot's Analyst Day here at INBOUND in San Francisco for the first time, which we love. You can totally get used to this. It's great to see a ton of familiar faces in the room here. I appreciate everybody making the trip, some courses from near and other cases from afar. I also want to extend a warm welcome to those of you joining the webcast. I'm Chuck MacGlashing, and I have the pleasure of leading the Investor Relations team here at HubSpot. I hope you all had a chance to catch Yamini and Karen's keynotes from a bit earlier. I think they did a phenomenal job of highlighting all of the innovation that we've delivered over the last year for our customers, right? Ton of new product announcements today that we're incredibly excited about.
And of course, just why we're so excited about the year ahead. Are we getting feedback here? Okay. I'll keep going. Our safe harbor statement in all of its glory. No Analyst Day would be complete without one of these and a bunch of -- yes, just a lot of words. But you can find this stuff on our website at ir.hubspot.com. We'll be loading up all the presentations from today at the end of the day, just ask to be patient as we get that done post the sessions. On to the agenda and the fun stuff here. So in just a moment, our Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan, will take the stage to share our strategy and vision for driving durable and efficient growth in an AI era. After Yamini, our CFO, Kate Bueker, will take the stage to walk you through how we're executing and kind of delivering against that vision.
And then Yamini, Kate, Dharmesh and I will take the stage for about 45 minutes worth of Q&A up here. So get those questions ready. I would say Dharmesh has been a real trooper. So he's going to be up here to do Q&A with us. He has his main stage keynote right after. And so if you see him kind of rush out of here pretty quickly without exchanging a ton of pleasantries, you'll sort of understand why. And then around 1:00, maybe a few minutes after, we will -- there'll be an announcement.
We will pack up our stuff and head down to the main stage to watch Dharmesh's keynote on learning, building and growing at a period of unprecedented change. One other thing I'd call out too is just after we finish up, there will be about a 30-minute period of time where we'll have an ability to connect with the team and mingle a little bit just before we head down to the main stage there. So -- with that, it's great to see everybody excited about Act 2 here at Analyst Day, and let's go ahead and get started. Thank you.
[Presentation]
Hi, everybody. Welcome to Analyst Day. How is everyone doing? Great. Good to see so many of you here in San Francisco, my hometown. Nice to be there. And welcome to everyone who's joining us online as well. I'm really excited to share how HubSpot is leading in a world that is getting transformed with AI. Now our industry is just evolving at hyper speed, how we build product, how we deliver value and what customers expect from software is getting redefined in real time.
And in moments like this, clarity matters. So today, I want to provide a clear view of how HubSpot is leading with AI and why we are so excited about the opportunity ahead. Now here's what we hope you will take away. We are transforming our platform to be an AI-powered customer platform. We have rich customer context, which is our platform advantage. We are reimagining marketing beyond search with a new playbook, products that support it and an ecosystem behind it. And we are scaling upmarket and downmarket to drive durable growth. And we are transforming as a company to be AI first.
Now all of this positions us to lead and win in the era of AI. But there's a lot here. So let's dive in. We're going through a big technology shift. But more importantly, that is raising the bar for customers' expectations of us. And it is providing new ways in which companies can grow. Customers today expect us to resolve tickets, write blogs, schedule meetings, just like they would a coworker. So customers are expecting not just software that does the work for them, but actually does help them get more accomplished to grow.
That's a big shift, and that unlocks a huge opportunity for HubSpot. And when we look at this opportunity, -- we are moving from delivering software to delivering work. We're no longer limited by the software budgets. We are now tapping into the work budgets. And the way we are doing it is by augmenting all of those manual tasks within go-to-market teams with AI. And that means for HubSpot, it's not just defending a fixed market. It is leading and winning in a much larger, fast expanding market.
We see a generational opportunity here to deliver products that do work, not just support the work, to reimagine marketing beyond search with a new playbook, products and the whole ecosystem and to power millions of organizations that are now scaling with AI. We saw the shift early. We moved fast, and we are transforming our platform, our pricing and our entire company to lead and win in this new era of work. So let's get started with how we are transforming our platform. Our product strategy has been very clear and consistent.
We want to be the #1 AI-powered customer platform for scaling companies. For more than a couple of decades, we've built for SMBs. We know them. We know their goals, their challenges and how they grow. And now we want to be the best at applying AI to help them grow. And that means we are transforming ourselves into an Agentic customer platform. What does that mean? Well, before AI, we helped our customers take actions in hubs.
Now we are helping our customers take action in both hubs and agents. Before AI, the context was in structured data, company contacts, tickets, deals. Now it is in structured data, unstructured conversations and all of the external intent signals. Before AI, we enabled our customers to collaborate across their go-to-market teams. Now we are enabling hybrid teams of humans and agents to get work done. This is a complete reimagination of how companies can scale. And it actually allows HubSpot to add more value to our customers. And the way we are doing it is by bringing together 3 interconnected layers: context layer to know your customer, action layer where work happens and an orchestration layer to connect everything together. Each layer is powerful on its own and stronger together. So let me spin through each of these layers, starting with the context layer. This is the brain of our platform.
This is where all of that rich data comes together to know your customer. And at the center of it is the Smart CRM, a single source of truth for marketing, sales, support, operations teams to get accurate information about their customers and know them. Now -- this is so powerful that I really want to emphasize it because point solutions and point apps, they do not have all of this data across the entire customer journey. In acquired cobbled-together solutions, they just cannot bring this data together.
We bring together structured data, company contacts, deals, tickets, unstructured data from conversations that are typically in free flowing e-mails, chats, Zoom calls and external intent signal, real-time intent data across 200 million company profiles that fill in all of the gaps about customers. Without this unified context, AI cannot deliver work and humans cannot drive growth. That's why it's important. The next is our action layer where work happens.
All that rich context comes together for humans and agents to get work done. Now hubs like our Marketing Hub, Sales Hub, Service Hub were built for go-to-market teams to get work done. They launched campaigns there. They send e-mails, they close deals. They drive growth. And that is consistent with our strategy. Now in addition to that, we now have Breeze Assistant, which is the AI Chief of Staff for every go-to-market employee. They're aware of the role, the priorities and the context of the go-to-market employee and can provide insights and answers to help them do work.
And then agents do work. They are the AI coworker that can now take on more jobs like support, prospecting, account research and then allows the rest of the teams to do high-value work. Now there are a whole universe of agents out there. So I want to try and simplify HubSpot's approach to agents. We build featured agents for go-to-market teams to get work done. Now our prospecting agent will do account research and outreach. Customer agent will help support tickets, but also answer questions across sales and marketing. And the newly launched data agent today, it enriches customers' data with AI.
Each of these agents will get work done, but they can also call on each other to do more for our customers. Then, we are providing the ability for our customers and partners to build custom agents. Today, we launched Breeze Studio to build those custom agents and then list them within the marketplace, Breeze Marketplace. Breeze Studio, Breeze Marketplace and the whole first wave of these new agents went live today. And then we are empowering an entire community of citizen builders on agent.ai to create a network of agents for every go-to-market task.
We have more than 2 million users on agent.ai, and they have built over 46,000 agents. By being the place where work happens, we're being essential. HubSpot is now essential in the AI era. Okay. Let's talk about the orchestration layer. This is to connect everything together. Now this is where workflows across agents, humans and other applications. Before AI, we had a whole set of APIs to connect. And now we have APIs, MCP servers and also connectors to bring HubSpot everywhere. Now more importantly, orchestration layer is the place for intelligence.
Now think about this, in a hybrid team of humans and agents to work together, you need a few good handoffs. And for those handoffs to work, you need memory about roles, about relationships and the past work that has been done. You need evaluation of whether the output was good or not good. And you also need reasoning to know how the decisions were made. All of that intelligence is within the orchestration layer. And the orchestration layer is also home to studio, which is the place where you can build custom agents, both customers and partners.
Now you put all of this together, this is our AI-powered customer platform, delivering value for customers. We're setting the pace of innovation, and we are staying ahead in building this Agentic customer platform. Today, at INBOUND, we launched more than 200 new updates and features across the entire platform. Lots for you to go and see within the demo stations, but let me highlight the top few. We have transformed Operations Hub into Data Hub. This is where all of the data is going to come together. This is where we will enrich it with AI and activate it within workflows and automation for our customers.
Marketing Hub is getting reimagined to support the loop. And we launched the Breeze Studio Marketplace and a whole wave of new agents within Breeze. We unbundled the Smart CRM. We're going to talk about this in a few minutes, but Smart CRM now has AI, data and platform value in it, including projects. And we launched our AI-first CPQ within Commerce Hub. We've always had this vision of making it not just easy for sellers to sell, but also for buyers to buy. And that is exactly what we did with AI-first CPQ. We love launches. We like it.
But what we like even more is adding customer value and driving customer adoption. That's what we care about. And we're beginning to see clear customer adoption with our AI strategy. Now value for customers comes from embedded AI features across all of our hubs. It comes from agents that are now doing work for our customers, and it comes from Breeze Assistant and connectors that are just becoming part of everyday workflow. There are a ton of momentum stats here. I'm not going to go through all of them. But let me summarize. Embedded AI is driving growth for customers and therefore, driving growth for HubSpot.
You can see that in the Content Hub, driving value for customers, and therefore, the attach rate to Marketing Hub is now 50%. You can see that in Sales Hub, Service Hub, Marketing Hub, where it's adding value to every seat, and therefore, we are seeing strong seat upgrade motions. In terms of agent, we're beginning to see clear traction. We have over 5,000 customers on our customer agent, which answers questions across the customer journey. And the resolution rate now is 65%. Many of you will remember at earnings last month, we announced 55% resolution rate. Now it's 65%, best-in-class.
And the same thing is happening with prospecting agent and content agent, gaining clear traction. And then Breeze Assistant and connectors, they provide insights from HubSpot to everybody everywhere. We're the first CRM to announce connectors with OpenAI's ChatGPT, Cloud and today, Gemini that we just announced this morning. And here's our focus. We want to bring customer context into the LLMs, and we want to bring AI referrals, leads as well as actions back into HubSpot from those LLMs. That is how we're thinking about this. So we like this adoption and the momentum we are seeing with customers. But the question for all of you is, is this durable? What makes HubSpot unique and defensible in the AI era? Well, the answer is context. And what is context? It is what AI needs to do great work. Now think about this.
LLMs can, of course, write a sales e-mail. But without knowing who the buyer is, what the last 10 conversations were, who the competitor is and what's the best way to handle objections for that competitor, that e-mail will be generic. LLMs know everything that's in the public web, not what's in the sales pipeline, which, by the way, changes every minute. Agentic customer platform, we have that context. We know the relationship of the users, their roles, the tasks and the logic that is needed to take action on their behalf. And the richer that context, the better the outcomes that AI can drive. And nobody has richer customer context than HubSpot. And that is because we bring together data, user and domain context. So let's talk about this. Now data is what AI needs to do work, not just guess about the work to be done. And HubSpot has 19 years, 270,000 customers worth of those touch points. Every campaign launched, every e-mail sent, every deal closed, every CPQ transaction across the entire customer journey. That is the data that AI needs in order to do great work.
And we also need the user context. So AI knows who is asking and what permissions they can take based on the role. HubSpot maintains that state for the user, their roles, their preferences, their teams, the actions they can take. All of that is within HubSpot. We are built to maintain state across thousands of users in a business context, something LLMs are not designed to do. And then we have the domain context. We have the deep knowledge of SMBs and what drives growth within SMBs, what prospecting -- good prospecting looks like, which campaigns convert and what the good handoffs look like. And we are building all of that into HubSpot. So you put these 3 pieces together, data, user and domain context, that is HubSpot's unique advantage, rich customer context that powers every action customers take in order to drive growth. That's pretty exciting. But just don't take our word for it.
Let's actually listen. And before we do that, let's actually talk about how this shows up within the market. Now the question becomes how does this context shows as we compete and how do we win when we look at upmarket incumbents? Within upmarket, we win because we are easy to use, fast time to value, and we deliver that unified context. And we lower TCO. Now here's the thing. An example is Lendlease, who is a global real estate and construction company. Now here, we consolidated 20 different systems, including a legacy CRM, and we were able to reduce the total cost of ownership by 80%. And we completed this whole transformative project in under 7 months.
And take Liquidity Services. They are a global reverse supply chain company. They consolidated 8 different systems, including a legacy CRM and reduced their costs by 50%. And they were able to drive the pace of customer conversion up. When companies look to consolidate system, lower cost and increase growth, they choose HubSpot. Let's also talk about downmarket incumbents. Now smaller customers, they do tend to get started with simpler systems to manage their tasks or projects or to move away from spreadsheets. But as they grow, their needs grow as well. They choose HubSpot because of the depth of functionality, the breadth across marketing, sales, service and ops and the unified context that we provide. For example, [ BTEG ], they started with a simple CRM and they moved into HubSpot in order to get that better visibility and to get more sophisticated sales reporting, sales forecasting functionality.
And [indiscernible] , they consolidated across 100-plus automations to get a clear single view of the customer. So the breadth and depth and the unified context matters. And then we also have AI start-ups. Lots of them here. Now point solutions and point agents, they are good at something very specific, like support tickets. But the minute you ask a question about sales or marketing, they don't have the context for it. HubSpot provides that full context. Our agents, whether they are support, prospecting, sales, content agent, doesn't matter.
They provide and pull from that same unified context. And here's the thing. Over the past few quarters, we've seen a whole consolidation trend. And when we talk to our customers, they don't want point agents or point applications. They want one connected consolidated platform, and that is exactly what we are building. And the other thing is we look at the AI start-ups as our innovation lab. If there is a use case that works and is gaining traction, then we build it immediately into our platform. That speed, combined with the unified customer context, that is our advantage. So let's actually hear from a couple of customers on why they choose HubSpot.
[Presentation]
Yes. I hope that makes it super clear why customers are buying HubSpot. The next question is, what are they buying? And how are we evolving our pricing and monetization strategy to drive durable growth? Okay. Now our pricing philosophy has stayed consistent. It's always value first before we monetize. We really focus on use cases that drive repeatable value for customers because when they grow, we grow. And we are strategically patient because this approach of value before monetization has worked for us. But how we drive pricing is changing.
Our pricing model is hybrid. It has hubs, seats and credits. And we want to make it super easy for our customers to try, buy and grow with HubSpot. Now all of you know how subscription works. We've had that for many years. So let's actually double down and look at how we are evolving seats as well as credits to drive durable growth. And let's start with persona seats. Persona seats are simple. They provide access to very specific hubs like Sales Hub and Service Hub. So if you have a specialized role like a sales rep role, that's the workspace that you will go to and take actions to drive growth. Now when companies grow, they also buy other hubs, and they continue to add more seats. And when they grow, we grow.
This has been a consistent driver for HubSpot's growth. And in the last couple of quarters, we have seen very strong seat upgrade motion for both Sales and Service Hub. Next, let's actually talk about core seat. This is the next big driver of growth for HubSpot. When we launched core seats last year, the goal was simple. It was to unlock platform value. Now customers buy HubSpot's core seat to get admin capabilities, to create new custom objects, powerful workflows and it worked. Since the launch last March 2024, we've grown this to over $100 million in ARR with a strong seat upgrade motion. But now we are making this core seat game changing.
We are now at this inbound, unlocking the power of the core seat with AI, data and platform value. Breeze Assistant, projects, smart starts, the company data and contact enrichment data for 200 million companies, all now in this core seat. It is massive value for our customers. And here's the thing. That's why we have unbundled the Smart CRM, which means our customers can just buy the core seat and then add use cases as they go along, easy to buy and easy to use. Here's the big shift. By delivering the AI capabilities and the data foundation that is needed to get work done, we're now making the core seat essential for every go-to-market employee.
Super exciting. Okay. With that, let us talk about credits, which is our newest lever for growth. Now as HubSpot starts doing more work, we want to provide a flexible way in which our customers can pay that is not tied to the seats. And the usage-based pricing is the universal mechanism to do that. We launched it at INBOUND last year, and now it's expanding across the platform. And it includes things like AI agent actions, data hub syncs. And tomorrow, it's going to include anything that is usage-based within the entire platform. It's pretty simple. We have credits that's included within the tiers for every customer, and they can top it off with $10 or $100 increments.
The key thing is this, it scales with AI and data value, simple, flexible and powerful. Now you put this all together, you have persona seats, core seats and credits. They all grow with AI, data and platform value for customers, and therefore, they are a durable engine for our growth, pretty exciting. Now let's actually shift gears and talk about something that is top of mind for everybody, which is the big shifts that are happening within marketing and the opportunity that's ahead. I hope many of you caught the spotlight, and you can see why we are so excited about the opportunity that's ahead. Now here's a super quick recap from the spotlight. Search is getting disrupted. AI overviews are providing answers, and that means less traffic to the website.
But at the same time, AI is also doing something completely different. It allows you to capture intent signals. It allows you to match it to the customer and therefore, drive conversion. So marketing needs a new playbook, and that is exactly what we launched today. It's a new playbook for growth within the AI era. We call it the loop. And customers can execute the loop with our products. Our vision for marketing is very clear. It is humans and AI in the loop. We express our authenticity and taste and AI tailors it to our customers.
We amplify and reach our customers and AI evolves it and optimizes it. That's the future of marketing. It's also data-driven. All of that segmentation and personalization that you saw there, that is driven by data. Data is the foundation of everything that you need to do in the modern playbook. And it's AI-powered, agents features that are built throughout the marketing workflow. And this is exactly what we are building. Today, we launched more than a dozen new features and updates to bring this loop to life. If you look at this for Express, that's the newly transformed data hub. That's where you build your ideal customer profile. And within the marketing studio, you create the content to be able to get to your customers.
Within Taylor, the data agent, a personalization agent, and AI-powered segmentation, all of that enables you to match the intent of your customer to the information that they need to see. Within Amplify, we launched new AEO tools to get LLM visibility for customers. And we have our content hub that helps diversify the content across multiple channels. And within Evolve, we have a number of optimization tools that are powerful and provides the abilities for customers to grow. All of this powers our new growth playbook. This is how we are reimagining Data Hub, Marketing Hub and Content Hub to power this new growth playbook.
And we are just getting started with this innovation. It's super exciting. Look, when Brian and Dharmesh started this whole movement with INBOUND, it was a playbook. It was a set of products that supported the playbook and a whole ecosystem behind it. And we are using a very similar approach with Loop. We have a clear playbook. We have a powerful platform, and we have a thriving ecosystem that is scaling it. This is such a massive opportunity for HubSpot, one that we are positioned to lead and win, really exciting. Okay. Let's actually talk about upmarket and downmarket and how we are scaling both. Within upmarket, our strategy is clear. We want to deliver value to customers and therefore, grow the value of customers.
And the way we are doing this is by focusing on 3 things: build the right product, grow the right ecosystem and execute the right sales motion. Let's talk about our product. Going upmarket has been a multiyear focus for us. We want to build powerful tools that are super easy to use, and we have had consistent set of innovation, opening up the markets for sensitive data, journey orchestration, multi-account management, new global data centers. All of this innovation proves that we scale with businesses. And then let's talk about our partner ecosystem. We have a very strong partner ecosystem. Just this year alone, we added 750 new solution partners.
And we are focused on working with growth partners to serve upmarket customers and build with AI. Our partner activation, sourcing, co-selling, they're all up this year. And we have a solid app ecosystem, more than 1,900 integrations. The average number of active integrations that customers have grown from 10 to 14 over the last 5 years. And that shows that upmarket customers are using us as a platform. So together with this ecosystem, we are selling to more upmarket customers, delivering more value and scaling faster there. And then we have the right sales motion. We have upskilled our sales team to sell complex deals with confidence upmarket. Large deals are up 36% year-over-year. And 90% of the new deals for upmarket customers are multi-hub deals. That shows that the momentum is in deal size, but also product depth. Okay.
We have a proven playbook upmarket. What about downmarket? Our strategy here is to drive volume, deliver value and grow as customers grow. And we do that by having a freemium product that adds a ton of value. When businesses get started, they start on our freemium product. And today, we've added more AEO tools and AI tools into that free product like our AEO grader. That adds value. And from there, they convert into paid customers. We reduced the price of seats. We removed the seat minimums, and we have made onboarding AI first. So free to starter conversion is now at an all-time high, 50% growth year-over-year in free to starter conversion.
And then when they get into a Starter or Pro, we deliver compelling value. We become that customer operating system that customers depend on. And when they grow, we grow. So it's exciting. We have a solid distribution engine that is scaling upmarket as well as down market and providing durable long-term levers for us to grow. Now as we grow, we also think about how HubSpot is scaling, especially with AI. And this is where we recognized very early on that AI is not just transformative for our products, but also for the way in which we operate as a company.
In order for us to lead, we got to move at AI speed, and we have to get the confidence into our customer and partner ecosystem. So we're transforming how we work internally. And this is how the transformation looks like in action. We're building faster. Our engineers are using cursor, quad code, MCP servers and their productivity is up. 92% of code changes that we did this year is with AI assistance and productivity is up. 46% more code shipped per engineer this year compared to last year.
And we are serving customers better. 75% of our web chat and more than 50% of our support tickets are now resolved by AI. And AI is also scheduling meetings for our sales teams and increasing the win rate. And overall, at HubSpot, we're now becoming AI first. Every HubSpotter is using AI in their everyday work, and we've dedicated more than 20 days to drive AI learning and innovation into the company. This is how we lead and win with AI. So let me close out with why I am excited about HubSpot's opportunity ahead. We're transforming our platform to be an AI-powered customer platform. We have rich customer context. That is our platform advantage.
We have durable growth levers. We're scaling upmarket, down market, and we have hybrid monetization that scales with customer value. We are transforming ourselves to operate at AI speed. And we have the people, the passion and the product in order to lead and win in this new era of work. With that, it is my absolute pleasure to welcome Kate Bueker, our CFO, to come and share how all of this translates into durable, efficient growth. Thank you so much for your support, and I look forward to answering questions later.
All right. Hello, everyone. It is nice to see you in person again here at INBOUND. I'm excited to share how our strategy translates into durable and efficient growth for HubSpot. In terms of our agenda, I'm going to start with a reminder of our key financial priorities and talk about how we have delivered against them over the last year. Then I'll show how our AI-powered customer platform enables growth for HubSpot today and also into the future. And finally, I'll talk about how we're balancing growth and profitability.
I want to start by grounding us on our core financial principles. Here at HubSpot, we are determined to build a big, profitable and enduring business. As a result, our top priority is to deliver the fastest and most durable growth we can over the medium and long term. At the same time, we are building a healthy business that can scale over time and continue to deliver leverage. We have a consistent track record of delivering against these financial priorities. Since 2021, our revenue has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 24%. Our full year 2025 revenue guidance is for $3.1 billion, which represents a growth of 17% in constant currency.
This revenue growth has been enabled by consistent and strong customer growth. Over the last 4 years, we have grown our customer base at a compound annual growth rate of 22%. We had nearly 270,000 paying customers at the end of Q2, representing growth of 18% year-over-year. Over this period, we have also delivered consistent profitability growth. We have grown our non-GAAP operating profit at a compound annual growth rate of 48% and expect to deliver $570 million of operating profit in 2025. This represents almost 10 points of operating margin expansion since 2021.
Our growth has also translated into strong free cash flow. Since 2021, we have delivered $1.4 billion of free cash flow, and we have $1.9 billion of cash on the balance sheet at the end of Q2. We've used our free cash flow to retire our convertible notes, to acquire technology and teams to accelerate our product road map and to opportunistically return capital to shareholders. Since our earnings in early August, we have bought back an additional $175 million of shares, bringing our total share repurchase to $425 million out of our $500 million authorization.
Our strong balance sheet gives us the financial flexibility to continue to invest in growth, both organic and through acquisition and to opportunistically return capital to shareholders. Next, I want to talk about our levers for current and future growth of our business. I think about the opportunity in 2 broad buckets. We have a set of current levers that have been delivering results for our business for the last few years. We also have an emerging set of levers enabled by AI and new monetization that will support our growth into the future. Let's start with these current levers, which should be familiar to many of you.
We take a platform-oriented approach to address our market opportunity. And we believe that our platform is the key driver of our upmarket and downmarket momentum as well as our strong customer retention. Our upmarket momentum continues to accelerate, and we're seeing more large deals and more platform consolidation. The share of our new Pro Plus ARR that is multi-hub has grown steadily over the last 4 years. In the first half of 2025, nearly 80% of customer ARR came from customers who landed with multiple products and almost half is from customers who bought 3 or more HubSpot products. New and existing customers are consolidating their go-to-market technology stack on HubSpot.
Our strong platform traction with new customers as well as our continued success in cross-sell has led to an increasing adoption of our platform across our installed base. The share of our installed base ARR that has on a single hub is now just 12%, more than 60% of Pro Plus ARR is on 3 or more hubs and customer ARR on 5 or more hubs has grown from 0 to 28% in Q2. This is resulting in more large deals, which we define internally as more than $3,000 a month in recurring revenue. A growing portion of our Pro Plus installed base is large deals. About half of our Pro Plus installed base is in that $3000-plus bucket by the end of Q2. And $3000-plus MRR is growing quickly, 30% in the first half of 2025. $5000-plus MRR is growing even faster at 37%. Turning to our downmarket segment.
Our Starter Suite continues to deliver a compelling value proposition at the low end of our platform and fuels strong and consistent customer growth. Starter customers represent about half of our total customers, which is up 10 points over the last 4 years. Starter customers totaled 130,000 at the end of Q2, representing a nice upsell opportunity for HubSpot and an attractive ecosystem opportunity for third-party developers. Turning to retention. Customer dollar retention continues to be strong and stable, improving slightly year-over-year to 88%. As I've said in the past, customer dollar retention is the metric that we believe is most closely aligned to the value that our customers see in our product.
Platform consolidation, along with our focus on activation and customer usage continues to drive really nice and strong customer dollar retention. Over the past year, we have also seen an improvement in net revenue retention from 101.5% to just below 103%. While the customer dollar retention is the foundation, the improvement in net revenue retention over this period is a result of increased seat upgrade rates following our pricing change last year. This has been somewhat offset by continued headwinds in other upgrade motions like contact tiers.
As I shared in our earnings last quarter, we expect net revenue retention to be flat in Q3 and then up 2 to 3 points in Q4 with some help from the seat migration renewals. This platform-driven momentum has translated into net new ARR growth that has steadily improved over the last 2 years and has grown faster than revenue since the second half of 2024. While we report revenue growth every quarter, we typically share ARR metrics on a half year basis in our annual proxy statement, and our intention is to continue with that practice. That said, Yamini started her presentation by saying that clarity is important in times of change and uncertainty. And so I wanted to be very clear about the recent business performance.
As you can see, net new ARR was challenged beginning in 2022 as customers focused on optimizing their software spend and hit a low point in the first half of 2023. Over the last 2 years, we have seen building momentum and a nice step-up in net new ARR growth in the back half of 2024. Since then, net new ARR growth has outpaced revenue growth. We are executing well, and our growth is beginning to accelerate. So our current levers are working. We are also seeing a number of new levers for growth emerge. Let's take a look. We're in the midst of a pricing change, which is a multiyear tailwind, and we are adding significant AI and platform value that we will monetize via our core seat and through credits.
These are new and increasingly important levers for our business. Now before we look at the new way to look at the business, for the sake of completeness, I will share the old way that we have broken down our growth one last time, which is through the lens of our individual hubs. Marketing Hub ARR is north of $1.5 billion, growing 11% year-over-year as of the end of Q2. Sales Hub is growing 24% year-over-year and Service Hub growth sustained in the high 20s. And finally, Content Hub and our newly renamed and relaunched Data Hub are growing in the mid-50s and high 20s, respectively.
Overall, we're happy with the performance of our individual hubs. That said, and we talked about this last year, the individual hub lens does not reflect how we think about the value that we're delivering to our customers and how they are leveraging our platform. Let me share a few common buying patterns to show you what I mean. Our new marketing playbook, it's not just about Marketing Hub. It's about marketing plus data plus Content Hub, and that buying motion is growing fast. Customers are not buying a sales or service product in isolation.
They are looking for solutions to connect sales and service teams with data and now CPQ to eliminate the friction of customer handoffs. And the full power of our AI-first customer platform is resonating. Our mix of 5-plus hub customers is up 5 points versus last year. It's these multi-hub buying patterns along with core platform seats and credits that will drive our growth in the future. Speaking of seats, I want to give you a progress update on the impact of the pricing change. Now this is a slide that I shared with you at last year's Analyst Day.
When we talked about the pricing change last year, I shared that we expected it to have 2 large impacts on our business. First, we would add more customers and then the new model would result in better net retention. Let's see how we're doing against the first of those, which is adding more customers. Our pricing model eliminated the seat minimums, making it easier to get started with HubSpot. Post launch, we have seen the average number of Pro Plus portals added every quarter increase by 16%. In addition, customers under the new model are healthier because they buy only what they need upfront, and we have seen consistently better seat assignment rates. Second, we said that the new model would result in better retention.
Second, we said that the new model would result in better retention, and that is exactly what we are seeing. The share of customers who upgrade their sales or service seat is about 3 points higher under the new model. We also introduced the Core Seat as a way to monetize the value of our Smart CRM, and this has resulted in higher paid seat ratios. Approximately 20% of users required a paid seat in our legacy model. Today, about 60% of users who have purchased under the new model take a paid seat.
Finally, the migration of our existing customers is well underway. We expect that about 90% of our ARR will be through their technical migration this year and about half of our ARR will be through their first renewal by the end of 2025. When we step back and look at the overall impact of the pricing change, we continue to expect that it is a 2-point tailwind to net revenue retention in 2025 and a continued benefit in 2026.
Let's dive a bit deeper on the Core Seat. As I just shared, we introduced the Core Seat in March of 2024 as a way to monetize our Smart CRM. In just 18 months, Core Seat ARR has surpassed $100 million and is growing quickly, validating our thesis that there was a ton of value in our Smart CRM platform. As a refresher, the Core Seat provides CRM edit access and admin capabilities, allowing our customers to customize and extend the CRM to fit their business.
The Core Seat is typically used by marketing and sales operations teams and go-to-market leadership. With today's product announcements, the Core Seat becomes significantly more powerful and valuable. We've added meaningful AI and data capabilities, including AI assistant, note taker, smart data enrichment and project management capabilities. Everything that we're doing to expand the value of the Core Seat should result in more people having a seat on HubSpot. Our goal is to drive adoption of the Core Seat for every front office employee, significantly expanding our opportunity over time.
The other way we're monetizing AI is through Credits, a unified way to purchase any consumption-based HubSpot product. We introduced Credits at INBOUND last year, and we made the Customer Agent available for new purchases starting in June. Today, we added prospecting agent, buyer intent and data syncs to the Credits system. We'll use Credits when value scales with work rather than with people. And finally, all portals will have some Credits included to make it easy for customers to experiment with agents and other features.
Customer Agent was our first direct AI monetization via this Credits model. While we're still incredibly early, Customer Agent activation and usage continues to scale. As of the end of August, we had more than 5,000 customers, with resolution rates now over 65% and more than 1 million tickets resolved by Customer Agent.
Okay. Before we finish this section, I wanted to talk about how seat and credit monetization live together. In particular, I wanted to address the concern that the consumption models will negatively impact seats-based revenue over time. We believe that our hybrid model, this combination of seats and credits, isn't just sustainable. It's what is best for our customers and what is best for HubSpot.
While we're still in early days, I thought it would be helpful to share some early trends through a couple of customer examples. The first one is an upmarket AI services company that adopted Customer Agent in December. They are resolving about 35% of their total support volume via Customer Agent, and their goal was to significantly scale up their customer support without adding any headcount. They've retained all 18 of their service seats, and they've grown their overall MRR with HubSpot by 80%.
The second is a small business that gives higher education financing to companies. They adopted Customer Agent in March, and they wanted to use Customer Agent to resolve their WhatsApp ticket flow. Customer Agent is successfully resolving about 25% of their total inbound support volume, and this allowed them to go from 5 service seats to 4 service seats. The efficiency gains allowed them to grow their business, and they've since added more Core Seats and more credits. Despite the reduction in their service seats, their total MRR with HubSpot is up about 10%. Now I want to acknowledge that these are just 2 examples and that we are still very early, but we have not seen any abnormal downgrade behavior from customers who have adopted Customer Agent.
Okay. I want to wrap up this section by summarizing our levers for growth. Our current levers are delivering results. Our platform is working upmarket and down market and customers are growing and retaining on HubSpot. And our emerging levers are gaining traction. We're in the midst of a pricing change that it is a tailwind to growth as we expected. And finally, we're delivering a ton of value in AI and data, and we will monetize this via Core Seats and credits over time.
Okay. Now I want to shift gears and talk about how we are balancing growth and profitability. We're building a healthy and balanced business, and we have delivered consistent leverage throughout the history of HubSpot. Since 2021, we delivered an average of 240 basis points per year of operating margin expansion. We expect full year 2025 margin of 18.5%. Now you know we have medium- and long-term targets for operating profitability, 20% to 22% in 2027 and 25% long term. We are confident that we're on the right path to hit these targets and that we can continue to deliver strong innovation and leverage.
Okay. Before I dive into the shape of the P&L, I want to talk about the role of AI in helping to create incremental financial leverage for HubSpot. I think about the role of AI in 2 buckets. There's a set of functions or areas where we're going to continue to invest like engineering and sales, where AI is going to drive faster innovation and higher productivity. Yamini talked about the meaningful increases we're seeing in code generation and in productivity and win rates on the sales side. We're going to continue to lean in here. In other places, like support, marketing and G&A, we will use AI to drive efficiency. Support is a great example.
We have been using AI to resolve customer inquiries for a couple of years now in support and customer -- our agent handled about half of our customer tickets in the first half of 2025. As a result, we have been able to hold support headcount flat for over 2 years. In marketing, we are heavy users of AI for content generation and personalization, and we have seen both efficiency gains and also higher conversion rates as a result of AI. And finally, we have started to deploy AI tools across our employee life cycle that we believe will allow us to continue to scale our best-in-class G&A efficiency. The combination of these approaches will allow us to both grow and deliver leverage.
Let's talk about how this translates into our reported P&L, beginning with gross margins. As we shared last quarter, our gross margins this year are expected to be down slightly as a result of data center investments and higher R&D capitalization. Looking ahead to 2026, we expect some incremental COGS pressure from new product investments in unstructured data and from scaling AI and commerce.
Turning to OpEx. In R&D, we will continue to drive a fast pace of innovation, but AI productivity gains will allow us to grow R&D spend at or below revenue growth. For sales and marketing, AI tooling and improved rep productivity upmarket, along with better conversion efficiency at the low end will be key drivers of S&M leverage. And finally, we will realize modest additional gains in G&A by leaning into AI and automation. As I've said in the past, we may see a bit more or less leverage in any given year depending on the opportunities we see, but we will stay on track to hit our interim and long-term margin targets.
Let me close with my 3 key takeaways from today. HubSpot is the leading customer platform for scaling companies. Our business is accelerating, and we have a big opportunity to continue to drive momentum. AI creates big new opportunities for HubSpot to deliver work and to extend the value of our platform to every front office employee. And finally, we have delivered and expect to continue to deliver consistent leverage enabled by internal AI adoption. Thank you for your time today and for your continued support of HubSpot.
Great job. Yamini and Kate.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes. So we're going to have some mic runners. I can see hands already going up here and lots of hands. I might need to get an extra night at the hotel. So yes, we're going to be running around with mics here. I think we're going to have about 35 minutes just given the length of the presentations that we let Dharmesh [indiscernible] to get to. We're all chasing down there. But yes, why don't we go ahead and get started. Alex?
2. Question Answer
Guys, congratulations. That was an excellent presentation, even more excellent in San Francisco.
Yes. I know.
Self-serving.
So if you think about the message and the metrics that you guys presented, I think it's pretty clear you're helping customers with the real pain point, particularly with the playbook. And it sounds like the future is a hybrid monetization model. You're seeing an AI product, Customer Agent specifically already have an impact. And you're saying that new ARR growth is reaccelerating. When you think about the concept about durability, what are you trying to tell us about, a, how much of that acceleration is tied to the consumption monetization that you're already seeing? And what is the confidence level that we can sustain kind of that good -- I'm not going to put a number on it, but good net new ARR growth cadence that is ahead of revenue? And kind of when should we see that revenue growth come closer to that net new ARR growth?
Such a typical Alex Zukin question. 18 questions in one. Okay. I'm going to like start with the crux of what you're asking. How confident are you in the durability of the growth, and what is going to drive that? And then Kate will answer any guidance questions. We feel really confident. We feel really confident in terms of the growth levers and the ingredients that we have in order to drive durable, sustainable growth, not just in the next 2 years, but in the next 5 to 10 years. And I think Kate did a really nice job of laying this out, but I'll provide my perspective on it.
We are in the middle of incredible change within this industry. And I think the biggest change that's happening is within the marketing landscape. Change with search also is like the biggest opportunity with AI. And that is exactly what we are focused on. What we launched today with the playbook is exactly what our customers have been wanting. I've talked to so many CMOs in the last few months. They want a playbook. They want a step-by-step process to figure out how to drive growth within the marketing era, and that is exactly what we delivered.
And now we have the platform and the entire products to drive that. That is a multi-hub opportunity. It is not a single hub opportunity because in order for you to execute the loop, you need marketing hub, you need to start with the data foundation with data hub and you need the Content Hub. So we think that is a multi-hub opportunity. I think it's the same thing with sales. Sales is going through a fairly big transformation as well where prospecting is all about data and how you reach customers at the moment that they want to buy, and that is a multi-hub opportunity. So both of those are really big.
I talked about Core Seat. This is super interesting for us because one of the key things that we are doing, and I want to maybe emphasize this is our AI monetization is not just Credits monetization. It is actually going to be part of the embedded hubs. It's going to be part of the Core Seat. What we did this year and what we did just now is by unbundling the Core Seat and putting in AI value, data value and platform value, we've now made it important for every go-to-market employee to use it. That's a pretty big massive opportunity, and we're going to take full advantage of that opportunity.
And then it is, of course, Credits where as we deliver more work, then that provides a whole opportunity. So I would say marketing and multi-hub sales and multi-hub with CPQ involved and Core Seats as well as Credits, all of that means we deliver more value to customers. That is what we get excited about, and that's what you started your question with. We want to drive more value. And when we drive more value, we feel much more confident in the durable growth levers. Plus, we have the current levers that are kind of working. And so pretty excited.
I just wanted to double click on the Core Seat -- so I just wanted to double-click on the Core Seat opportunity. That $100 million number is very impressive. But how do we think about the size of the employee base at your customers? And what is maybe a long-term penetration rate there that is maybe a base case scenario for us to think about?
I think we really like the whole Core Seat opportunity. And just the simplest way to think about it is that we used to embed Smart CRM within every hub way back. Then last year, we separated out the Core Seat because there was enough platform value in it. And customers buy it because of admin capabilities, creating a new custom object. So anybody that needed to edit the platform, they bought the Core Seat, and that is now a $100 million business for us, plus it's a strong seat upgrade motion.
At earnings, I mentioned that we're seeing an upgrade motion of 25% for that Core Seat alone. And what we've done today is we've unlocked it with AI data as well as platform. And you remember Clearbit, we acquired this company, all of that company data and contact enrichment data now within that Core Seat. So we're super excited about it. The way to think about it is that today, admins, RevOps, FP&A folks, those are the ones that need it. And tomorrow, as Kate laid it out, every go-to-market employee needs will have it. And typically, in a scaling company, a mid-market company, there's between 30% to 40% of the whole employee base that is in go-to-market. So you can think about single digit to 30% to 40% of the employee base. Now this is not going to happen in 1 year. We're not talking about all of this happening in 1 year, but I think we're setting the foundation for a durable lever that pays off in the next few.
And just to be clear, Brian, it's really about like where we were was purely persona seats. So paid seats were for sales reps and customer support reps. And now where we are, you have like admin, so operations teams and sales leadership buying the Core Seat. What Yamini is describing as the future is that sort of 30% to 40% penetration of every front office employee.
Mark Murphy with JPMorgan. I know you're packing the town in pretty well when I try to get a Waymo in the morning, it's going to be -- instead of a 2-minute wait, it's a 17-minute wait.
Sorry, Mark.
No, we love having it here, made it so easy. I actually want to ask you about AI-powered e-mail. The -- an 82% increase in conversion rate, I mean I think 8% will be a lot. Can you explain how individualized are you making these outbound e-mails I mean that's a tremendous change on a major channel. And how do you control the cost of that? I mean if someone is sending -- if we send 1 million e-mails and each one is being scrubbed for what did the customer do and what did they buy and what are they interested in. It sounds a little LLM intensive. And I'm just wondering if you can help us understand that dynamic, how you manage that cost?
I'll start with the front end of the question, and you can talk about the second part. And Mark, thanks a lot. We like being here in San Francisco as well. So on the e-mail personalization, a lot has been said about just search disruption and what AI is doing to search. But the flip side of it is even more interesting that it actually drives better conversion. And specifically on that e-mail conversion, what we are doing is now we know how to capture the intent signal of each buyer, then we are using basically RAG to take that buyer and map them to the specific information that they need to get. So for example, it might be an academy class that they want to attend or a very specific demo that they need to see. So we're using that matching between the intent signal and LLMs to be able to send much better personalization.
We talked about it last year at INBOUND, and we've improved that e-mail personalization at scale. Now that's working for us. But today, you heard that it's also working for our customers. That's exactly what Kelly Services said in terms of driving better conversions as well as engagement. That's how we are doing it. And I think that's the new playbook. The playbook is not just waiting for search traffic to return. It's actually to do better personalization and segmentation. And then maybe you can talk about the COGS impact.
Yes. So Mark, we haven't seen material COGS impact from the personalization of e-mails. We have a -- what we call them the COGS squad. It's a cross-functional team. While some of them are in the back, you raise your hands, COGS squad, across finance, engineering, our product operations teams to really deep down, understand sort of the drivers of the AI-oriented costs as well as costs across our total platform. Where we have been seeing some pressure on margins, and I talked about this in my talk track, is really we opened a couple of new data -- or 3 new data centers in Q1. We have been investing in R&D outpaced with revenue over the last 3 to 4 years, and that's showing up in our R&D capitalization in COGS. That's the sort of pressure we're seeing. Next year, there will be some scaling of AI. I think the good news here is that we have revenue monetization associated with the things that are going to drive scaled-up costs for AI. And yes, we're watching it closely and continuing to monitor.
Just one quick comment on the kind of inference cost. We get very excited, including me, about the newer models and deep reasoning and deep research and all these kind of high-end features that are in OPUS and GPT 5 Pro. But like e-mail is a good example. The baseline capability that we need for a vast majority of go-to-market use cases are handled by something like a GPT 3.5 or a 4.0, right? So we don't need the frontier model capability for a vast majority of these use cases. And the cost of like GPT 4.0 has gone down 250x from the time it was released, right? So that slope still goes down. Yes, the advanced models are getting more expensive, but most of the models we need for most of the work that we do, including e-mail, is not those frontier models.
Brad Sills from Bank of America. Thanks so much for hosting another great event. Great to see you all. I wanted to ask a question about some of those early adopter customers, that 5,000 customer base that's on Customer Agent. What did it take to get those customers live? Was there a certain amount of effort involved at the data layer with data prep? Or was it more plug-and-play? HubSpot is known for simplicity and plug-and-play here? Or was it simply just these are features and these customers are turning on these features in a seamless manner? I would imagine the answer is different depending on the market segment that you're going after, but would love to get some color on what it took to get those customers live.
Yes. Good to see you, Brad. And so I think it's a spectrum in terms of driving adoption. We have customers where they have really good knowledge base to begin with. And the knowledge base plus the history of support tickets that they have already resolved is like a super easy starting point. And we've had customers where they've plugged the knowledge base, they've plugged the history of support tickets. And in less than a week, they begin to see clear AI resolution of support tickets. And so the setup sometimes is like 30 minutes. It is super easy. Now that's the best-case scenario when you have all of the documentation that is needed.
On the flip side, we've had customers where they don't have knowledge base, they don't have a support history with us, and they're beginning to kind of build that type of history where it takes a little while for them to start seeing the impact. And we've seen some customers that start with 20% to 30% in terms of AI resolution rate. And this is why we mentioned this last time, we have a knowledge-based agent. And that knowledge-based agent basically recognizes when you don't have a good knowledge base and it starts writing articles that can then go into the knowledge base with validation from users. And once you do that, you begin to see the resolution rates go up.
So it is a spectrum of both of these. And when you have documentation, it starts working. When you don't have it, then you begin to kind of like create that history in order to get there. But overall, that use case has found product market fit. 5,000 is just the beginning because we think that a customer agent is like the website of the old days, right, where when you were in the Internet era, you needed a website and you needed to get your digital presence started. You now need a Customer Agent, not just to answer support tickets, but to be able to answer any question about your product, your pricing, your marketing, the next event that is happening, you need that. And so we think it's going to be as ubiquitous as a website, and we're pretty excited about it.
Raimo Lenschow from Barclays. On that note, the one big debate we have in the industry at the moment is about like how Gen AI and kind of the SaaS model kind of will work together in the future and there's a discussion about the depth of SaaS, et cetera. Listening to you now and making a new focus on data and the data hub and the context as well, it kind of feels like there is the answer already that there's so much kind of knowledge in your system that you actually kind of -- you are needed and kind of that's actually the way you thrive in the future. Can you speak to that a little bit and if I'm on the right path here?
Just a couple of quick notes. One is SaaS effectively was a kind of deployment and business model kind of transformation, not that big of a like a technology transformation. So I think what endures is software. Software is a high margin, high leverage, you can put investment and solve a bunch of customer problems. So I think we have the largest opportunity as an industry in software that we've ever had before. The business models will change. I think SaaS in its purest form is unlikely to remain the way it is right now. That's why we see the hybrid pricing models.
But I'm just super bullish about the opportunity this creates because now we can solve problems with software that we were never able to do before. Before we built tools for humans to use, now we can actually do the work. So the value that software is going to produce over the coming decades is like orders of magnitude, I think, higher. The TAMs are just going to be bigger, and we're just starting to see the early innings of that game. But I don't think software is dead. SaaS as a pure business model might transform over time, but software as a way to make money and put capital to work, I think, is going to be amazing.
And I have to say, I have a very specific point of view, which is that AI and SaaS are complementary. I'm following all this raging debate about one eating the other. I think it's complementary because if you think about LLMs, they provide insights. And HubSpot, we provide the customer context to drive insights about growth. That is not there in an LLM. And then if you look at what an LLM is great at doing, taking action on behalf of one user. We are really good at maintaining state across thousands of users, their permissions, their roles and what actions that they can take in a business context. Those 2 are complementary. And all of the interactions now get started on LLMs. People are beginning to start with asking questions and all of the actions and then more importantly, the logic that is necessary to take the action in a business context, that belongs in HubSpot. So I think the combination is powerful. And our viewpoint is that we are going to deliver more value to customers. And look forward to seeing this raging debate continue, but we have a point of view.
Awesome. Someone has to represent the East Coast. I hear Boston is lovely this time of year.
Thank you, Samad. Yes.
All right. So this is either for Yamini or Dharmesh, either one, and maybe both. But if I think about a couple of the exciting things, there's Breeze Studio and the ability to build custom. And then also, I know Agent.ai is not part of the company, but you're building kind of this 2-million-person like developer curious or developer army out there. And so if I think about the ecosystem, how should we think about that allowing you to push more upmarket to larger customers that were maybe beyond your traditional focus area because of what it will allow them to build now? And then related to that, do both of these make you more attractive future partners for new ISVs that you maybe hadn't worked with before and SIs and I'll say global SIs, just to go ahead and push it forward a little bit? And will that pull you further upmarket potentially?
That's like an Alex Zukin question. You should start.
I can start. Yes, I'll start and feel free to add commentary. So Breeze Studio and the core kind of agent platform within HubSpot is built for HubSpot customers, HubSpot partners. That ecosystem is going to help us move upmarket. It solves that kind of higher-end agent problem. So these we have our featured agents built by professional developers built by HubSpot product team. And that's going to mirror the kind of evolution we've had within HubSpot for a long time, and we're very, very good at that. Think about Agent.ai as the other end of the spectrum that this is citizen builders solving simple tasks, simple use cases either for themselves or their small teams. The reason we're excited about it, and we think we want to cover this is kind of the bimodal approach to HubSpot is that we think there's going to be this entire new generation of agencies and software companies that are going to be made possible by AI. And they're going to need the tools to build they're going to market. And we think we can create that ecosystem, which is the next-generation agent ecosystem alongside the Breeze Studio and the Breeze marketplace that we have now, which is for our current core market. So we're sort of serving both ends of the spectrum. And just for the record, Agent.ai is actually part of HubSpot, it's part of our innovation team at HubSpot next project. So...
Yes.
Elizabeth Porter from Morgan Stanley. So just going back to the idea of addressing more of the front-office employee base, anyone that's involved in go-to-market. As you have some of these AI agents being built themselves, how are you able to use that to see what are people interested in kind of the workflows that you're building? And when you combine that with the fact that AI is allowing you to build even faster, can this start to pinpoint like new hub opportunities that you'd like to address?
Yes. Absolutely, all of the above, right? I think one of the core things about HubSpot is that we start with solving for the customer. And that's been our mantra for a very, very long period of time, and we can very easily see the adoption patterns. And I would say the adoption patterns within mid-market scaling companies is quite broad. It's all the way from AI curious to leading with AI. And it is -- while we are super excited about AI and the potential for AI, you got to know that the customers are in this broad spectrum of I'm just getting started. I want to be curious with AI all the way to I'm leading with AI.
And our approach has been 3 things, which is we want to embed AI and remove the friction of people even thinking about AI because believe it or not, our customers don't wake up thinking about AI. They wake up thinking about growth. They wake up thinking about how they can drive more leads and close more deals, and we want to embed AI into everything that they do so they can drive growth and focus on their job. And that's why we've had the strategy of not bolting on an AI solution, but building it as part of the customer platform.
Then the second thing is all the agents. And we -- Dharmesh just walked through it. We have everything from featured agents to agents that you can build yourself all the way up to citizen building agents. But the agents that we are building, we're looking at where customers need value, where there are manual tasks that need to be augmented. And prospecting is like a really big use case. We just launched it. It is now generally available, and we have a waitlist, which shows that doing account research, it's pretty tedious. I started my career as a salesperson, and I would spend hours reading like 10-Ks and 10-Qs, that is a use case. And so that's why we are building the prospecting agent.
Data agent, like today, Karen did a wonderful job of showing this. You cannot just go to the web and say, I want, for millions of my records, this particular data. Now you do. And so we found that you can create smart properties, you can go out to the web, you can run LLM searches and then bring that information back. And that just came from working with our customers. And so I think we'll continue on this path of embedding rich AI capabilities into the core and then building agents where we see a set of tasks that need to be augmented or we were not able to do that before. So super exciting and we'll continue to go from there.
Siti Panigrahi from Mizuho. I love having INBOUND here. Thanks for bringing to San Francisco.
Awesome.
I guess we need a vote by the end of the year.
I think we can vote. We know where the vote will be.
I want to go back to the slide you talked about AI, how it's transforming your business and other business as well. So you talked about driving lever. So help us understand how you're right now using AI? And are you still -- you talked about productivity improvement. Still are you hiring or any changes to the headcount? And Kate, we see the long-term margin you still kept at 25%. Why shouldn't we think about margin going even higher?
Well, you and I guess Alex Zukin's like questioning method is getting adopted across the board here. But maybe I'll start there, which is taking us back to the first slide that I opened with, which is the balanced principles that we have in sort of our core financial principles, which is around balancing growth and profitability. And our top priority being building a big profitable enduring company, and we are going to continue to invest to drive top line durable growth over the medium and long term. So I think that's the foundational reason that you -- we are not moving our margin targets.
That said, we feel really confident that we can continue down the path towards our interim and long-term margin targets. I think AI is a big part of that. And I think you heard from Yamini and hopefully from me as well that there is real broad adoption of AI across the organization at HubSpot. And everywhere is getting more productive. And I think the difference in the 2 buckets that I outlined is where are we going to take advantage of that productivity and sort of double down and continue to invest. And that's areas like engineering where we're seeing a lot more code generation and we can really -- we can even increase the pace of innovation that we're seeing. It's areas like sales where if rep productivity goes up, I want more reps, not less reps doing things.
And then there's the other bucket, which is where are we just going to focus on driving efficiency, right? And support, first use case with customer agent, first use case for us internally. We've been leveraging AI for support for a bunch of years and have steadily gotten leverage. We haven't added a support rep in 2 years. And so there'll be more and more places across our organization where we'll be able to drive efficiency because we're leveraging AI, and we won't have to add headcount. And so I do think you'll see over time, our headcount growth will be lower than it has been historically.
We're not stopping hiring in R&D and sales anytime soon. I think that's the point that you made, and I completely agree with that. We're just going to continue there, and there are other places to get leverage.
Can we go ahead? Sorry, I didn't know my mic was live. Brett Huff from Stephens. Thanks for having this event. Appreciate it. And thanks for the clarity on a couple of the big questions that we've been getting, first around durability and second around disintermediation around AI. So I appreciate the clarity on those. To dig in a little bit on the AI question, you mentioned a couple of things, and we kind of have a theory as well that inferencing is really good for LLMs. But getting the data in and then getting an action out, we think probably remains the purview of systems like yours. Can you give us more meat on the bone on how do you defend against that sucking up the data or keeping the data because AIs are pretty good at managing structured and unstructured data and then talk about what specific actions can keep you embedded in that workflow.
Just -- we'll start off with one thing and then Yamini should chime in as well, is that when an LLM invokes HubSpot through one of our connectors, that's happening on behalf of a human that's happening on behalf of a user. That's provisioned in HubSpot. We know the security, we know the permissions. We know the -- all the things that are happening. This is not a bulk data. This is not a content business, right, which is like, oh, you can just slurp all the articles over the web and put them in the LLM and now it can do everything. That's disintermediation.
In our world, someone or something is going to need to manage all the things. It's not just a matter of the data. It's a matter of all the workflows around that data. It's a matter of all those users around that data. So the way I think we should be thinking about AI is think about it as a new operating system. So when we saw the Internet come along, it's like, oh, we have this new thing called a browser, and now software is going to plug into that browser. The browser became the interface that users interfaced with. And I think AI is going to become similar, but the browser did not disintermediate web applications. They actually drove a bunch of explosion of web applications. We're going to see the same thing with AI. I think there's going to still be a need for systems of record for structured data and unstructured data together and be able to kind of manage all those actions, do all the permissioning. I don't think that goes away. I think that's going to just be driven more -- be more and more important.
I think that's exactly right. And a lot has been said about even our connector strategy. And the question of like why do we feel so confident that we're building connectors into LLMs? Because we think that we have the growth context and the customer context. We know the users. We know the actions that they need to take. And we're not just like an article that is now in the Internet and therefore, the value is gone. We are actually the logic, millions and millions of lines of logic that is specific to a user, their role, their actions that they can take. That is what a SaaS application is, and it's not just like going to go away.
Now the reason we built connectors is, one, this is a new operating system, just like Dharmesh talked about. And within the new operating system, there are new customer behaviors and patterns of asking questions that is developing. And we want to be there. If we call ourselves a customer platform or just any platform, then you got to be where everybody else is. And if there's someone who's asking a question, we want to be there. But we want to bring that customer context into that conversation. And then when we do that, I hope you saw this in the spotlight, we light up, which means LLM now recognizes HubSpot. AI referrals get back from LLMs into HubSpot. Leads flow from LLMs back into HubSpot. And actions, the logic of the action still remains within HubSpot. And so we're learning so much from being one of the first out there and going through with this. So it's such an exciting time to be. Net of all of this is that this allows us to add more value to our customers, which means we will do that, and we will focus on just that.
Okay. Probably, I have time for one more question, so we can keep Dharmesh on time, and then we're going to have another half an hour or so to connect with all of you.
Taylor McGinnis at UBS. I'd love to press on the evolution of SEO. I think that was a big part of the keynote. So Yamini, maybe you can talk about what that means for the runway left and opportunity for Marketing Hub and Content Hub as we look ahead. And then, Kate, for you, I think you had a slide up, and it looks like Marketing Hub has been growing in the low teens. And I think you made a comment earlier about how one of the headwinds to NRR has been contacts and some rightsizing there. So how do you think about those growth drivers evolving, right, as we look ahead and especially given some of the new features announced today?
Yes. I'll take the first part. Absolutely clear that there's a huge shift within marketing. And what is changing, we've talked about it like really at length that traffic to websites are going down, but AI is making it possible to get to know your customer, drive better capture of intent and therefore, drive conversion better. And that is exactly what our reimagined Marketing Hub, Data Hub, Content Hub are going to enable our customers to do. Our customers are asking us for how do you drive leads in this whole shift that is happening. And we now have a clear answer and a clear playbook. Yesterday, we had our Partner Day. We activated the whole partner ecosystem. They are excited to talk about this playbook with our customers.
I want to address like one part of the question that you asked, which is what's the remaining runway for Marketing Hub. And maybe I want to clarify it. Our Marketing Hub has been a full-funnel solution. And SEO is a top-of-funnel tactic. So top of the funnel tactic in SEO is changing, but we've always had one of the best e-mail automation and sending engines out there in the market. We've always had diverse channels that we have supported from social channel to ads to a whole bunch of other channels. And now we are adding AEO into marketing as well as driving diversification within content. And so I think you should think about Marketing Hub plus Content Hub as a full-funnel platform that we are now reimagining to support the new playbook, which is loop. And that is exciting. It's a whole another set of opportunities for us that I'm super excited about.
Yes. Me too. And Taylor, I think your other question is really getting at what is really happening with net revenue retention, when are we going to see it inflect? And I think the -- I would say the long and short of it is that the components of net revenue retention really haven't changed. We've been talking about the same components over the last few quarters. We have this really nice and strong foundation of customer dollar retention. We are benefiting from the tailwind of the pricing change we made in sort of the middle of 2024, and that is going to continue to be the case.
What we have seen is that outside of that seats tailwind, we have not -- we have seen headwinds in sort of our net upgrade drivers. I'd say the good news is that the downgrade portion of that has been stable for about, I would say, 8 quarters or so. It's really that reinflection of the upgrade momentum that has been lagging here. And I would say I think it will -- we have the room to continue to increase net revenue retention over time. It's going to be a combination of like buyer behavior continuing to loosen up, but also some of the newer levers for growth that we've talked about over the course of today, starting to really gain scale over time.
Awesome. Well, great questions, everybody. I appreciate the support. I think we're going to break here, grab some lunch, come back into the room. Yamini, Kate and I will stick around and have an opportunity to catch up with you all separately. And Dharmesh, I think we're going to let you run.
I am going to run.
Good luck, Dharmesh.
Good luck, Dharmesh. Thank you so much for all the support.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Analyst/Investor Day - HubSpot, Inc.
HubSpot, Inc. — Analyst/Investor Day - HubSpot, Inc.
📣 Kernbotschaft
- Kern: HubSpot wandelt sich zur AI‑powered Customer Platform: Smart CRM‑Kontext + Orchestrierung + Agenten (Breeze Assistant, featured & custom agents) sollen nicht nur unterstützen, sondern Arbeit erledigen. Ziel: Multi‑Hub‑Penet ration über Core Seats und Credits, Wachstum sowohl up‑ als auch down‑market beschleunigen.
🎯 Strategische Highlights
- Plattform: Drei Schichten — Context (Smart CRM), Action (Hubs + Agents), Orchestration — sollen gemeinsam Daten, Rollen und Entscheidungslogik liefern und so Differenzierung sichern.
- Produkte: Fokus auf Agenten‑Ökosystem: Breeze Studio/Marketplace live, Data Hub (früher Operations Hub) und AI‑first CPQ; Marketing neu gedacht als "Loop" für AI‑getriebene Personalisierung.
- Monetarisierung: Hybridmodell aus Persona‑Seats, aufgewerteten Core Seats und Credits (Usage) als skalierbare Erlöshebel; Preisanpassungen sollen Retention verbessern.
🔭 Neue Informationen
- Launches: Mehr als 200 Produktupdates heute; Breeze Studio/Marketplace, Data Hub‑Umbenennung und AI‑CPQ sind ab jetzt verfügbar.
- Quantitativ: Core Seat > $100M ARR in ~18 Monaten; Customer Agent >5.000 Kunden mit ~65% Lösungsrate (vorher 55% berichtet).
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Durabilität: Analysts fragten nach Anteil der neuen ARR‑Beschleunigung durch Consumption (Credits) vs. Seats; Management betonte Multi‑Hub, Core Seat und Credits als kombinierte Treiber.
- Core Seat: Diskussion zu langfristiger Penetration — Management nennt 30–40% der Belegschaft als potenzielles Front‑Office‑Ziel (schrittweise, kein Jahres‑Effekt).
- AI‑Kosten & Adoption: COGS‑Druck durch Data‑Center und unstrukturierte Daten erwartet; viele Use‑Cases bedienen günstigere Modelle, Customer Agent‑Onboarding reicht von 30 Minuten bis mehreren Wochen je nach Knowledge Base.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Analyst Day liefert klares Repositioning: Produktinnovation + Hybrid‑Monetarisierung erweitern TAM und rechtfertigen Erwartungen auf beschleunigtes ARR‑Wachstum, zugleich gilt es Margendruck (Data‑Center, AI‑Skalierung) und die Geschwindigkeit der Core‑Seat/ Credits‑Adoption zu beobachten; Management sieht NRR‑Ablauf: Q3 stabil, Q4 +2–3 Punkte.
HubSpot, Inc. — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, and welcome to the HubSpot Q2 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Gigi, and I'll be your operator today.
[Operator Instructions]
I would now like to hand the conference over to Head of Investor Relations, Chuck MacGlashing. Please go ahead.
Thanks, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to HubSpot's Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Today, we'll be discussing the results announced in the press release that was issued after the market closed.
With me on the call this afternoon is Yamini Rangan, our Chief Executive Officer; Dharmesh Shah, our Co-Founder and CTO; and Kate Bueker, our Chief Financial Officer.
Before we start, I'd like to draw your attention to the safe harbor statement included in today's press release. During this call, we'll make statements related to our business that may be considered forward-looking within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements, including those regarding management's expectations of future financial and operational performance and operational expenditures, expected growth, FX movement, and business outlook, including our financial guidance for the third fiscal quarter and full year 2025.
Forward-looking statements reflect our views only as of today, and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language in today's press release into our Form 10-Q, which will be filed with the SEC this afternoon for a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.
During the course of today's call, we refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by Regulation G. The GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure used or discussed and a reconciliation of the differences between such measures can be found within our second quarter 2025 earnings press release in the Investor Relations section of our website. Now it's my pleasure to turn over the call to HubSpot's Chief Executive Officer, Yamini Rangan. Yamini?
Thank you, Chuck, and welcome, everyone. Today, I'll share our Q2 2025 results and the key trends driving our momentum. Then I'll talk about the shifts in marketing and how that's opening up a big opportunity for HubSpot and our customers. I'll close with our progress in AI and the momentum we're building. Q2 was a solid quarter for HubSpot with revenue growing 18% year-over-year in constant currency, accelerating nearly 1 point from Q1. We delivered strong operating leverage with a 17% operating margin. Total customers grew to 268,000 customers globally with over 9,700 net customer additions in the quarter. I'm pleased with our consistent execution and the momentum we're building at the customer platform of choice for scaling companies. Three teams stand out in our Q2 results: Platform strength, up market momentum and down market velocity. First, our platform continues to be a major driver of our success. It's simple. New and existing customers are consolidating their go-to-market tax on HubSpot to lower cost, get a unified view of their customers and drive AI innovation. 61% of new Pro Plus customers now land with multiple hubs, up 4 points from last year. More notably, 42% of our installed base by ARR now use all 3 core hubs, marketing, sales and service, also up 4 points. This is a clear sign that our platform first approach is working. Sales Hub and Service Hub are cranking. We've innovated rapidly with AI and made it easy for customers to buy seats and grow when they see value. Sales Hub seat upgrades are up 71% year-over-year with strong adoption of AI features like deal intelligence for prioritizing deals, guided actions to recommend next steps and AI meeting assistant to streamline prep and follow up.
Service Hub seat upgrades are up 110% year-over-year, fueled by growing use of AI. Another important part of our platform story is the growing impact of the core seat. We launched core seats in March 2024 for customers who need edit access to smart CRM, the brains of our customer platform. Since then, we have layered in more value with advanced reporting, workflows and admin capabilities. That's driving upgrades. 25% of Pro Plus customers on the Seats model have added more core seats. Smart CRM is where the full power of our platform comes together, and it's great to see customer adoption. Second, our upmarket momentum continues to accelerate. Our focus has been clear, build powerful features upmarket customers need while keeping the ease of use that drive adoption, work closely with our partner ecosystem to help customers see value fast and show tangible success to increase awareness. That focus is delivering results. Large deals are up and product innovation is resonating. Our partner motion is fueling growth with coal selling with our sales team up 29% year-over-year.
Brand awareness is at an all-time high, supporting growth. HubSpot is becoming the platform more upmarket companies choose to grow with. Third, we continue to see velocity in the down market segment. Our focus here has been to make the started year more valuable and easier to buy. Free to starter conversions are up, driven by faster time to value and smaller AI-powered onboarding. The pricing changes we rolled out in 2024, lowering the entry price and removing seat minimums are delivering results.
Last year, we took half a step back to take several steps forward, and now we're seeing the payoff. More customers coming in, upgrading when they see value and forming a stronger, healthier customer base.
Okay. Let's shift gears and talk about what's happening in search. Marketing is going through its biggest shift in decades, and that opens up big opportunities for HubSpot and our customers. Two massive trends are unfolding. First, organic search traffic is declining globally. AI overviews are giving answers, and fewer people are clicking through to websites. Second, AI search is rising. More people are turning to LLM for answers instead of searching for information. And that means the way companies get found is changing rapidly.
We saw these shifts coming and moved early to adapt and lead. First, we diversified channels to reach customers where they are. Just 10% of our leads come from blog traffic. The rest comes from a broader growing mix across channels. We've built 10 YouTube channels with 1.8 million subscribers, and Q2 was our best quarter ever for YouTube leads, up 96% year-over-year. On social, we have grown to over 2 million followers on LinkedIn and 600,000 on Instagram. In Newsletters, leads grew 50% year-over-year, powered by the Hustle we acquired in 2021 and Mindstream we acquired in 2024. And our podcast reached 5.2 million listeners in Q2 alone. The investments we made in diversifying channels is delivering results.
Second, we're figuring out how to show up in AI answers. When people ask questions in LLMs, they want specific, data, quotes, real insights. That's what gets cited. Our marketing team is testing, innovating and leading here. We're now cited in LLMs more than any other CRM and we are driving conversions from this emerging channel. This is a major shift in how companies get discovered, and we're not just adapting, we're helping our customers lead through it.
INBOUND was all about bringing together our playbook, products and ecosystem to deliver real value to customers. Now we're applying that same approach to help our customers grow in the AI era. We'll share more on our playbook, our vision for the future of marketing and the opportunity ahead at INBOUND.
Okay. Let's talk about AI innovation and the momentum we are seeing there. Our strategy is to be the best at applying AI to help small and medium businesses grow. To deliver that, we've evolved HubSpot into an AI-powered customer platform. AI is embedded across the entire platform, so customers get value from day 1 using the tools they already know. We deliver hubs that help customers do work, agents that do work for them and a smart CRM that powers it all with unified context and data. That combination is what sets HubSpot apart. And we're now turning AI into business results for our customers.
Customer agent is gaining traction with over 4,000 customers having adopted it. Resolution rates are now averaging 55%, up more than 5 points in just 1 quarter. A great example is [indiscernible] on course, which cut response times by 17% and improved CSAT even as ticket volume growth. Just as every company once needed a website, today, every company needs a customer agent that can handle questions across marketing, sales and support with full context, and that is exactly what we are enabling for our customers.
Prospecting agent is seeing strong early demand with over 3,700 customers using it and 17,000 on the waitlist. This agent watches for intense signals, researches prospects and send personalized outreach, saving time for reps. One of our customers crumms.com shared what used to take 10 BDRs now takes 3. And more importantly, we're reaching people who knew of us, but never engaged with us before.
And finally, content agent has helped 12,000-plus customers create content over the last year with some generating the majority of their content through AI. All of this points to real momentum in AI adoption. Our strategy to embed AI across all our hubs is delivering real results as well. Content Hub, our AI first hub continues to show strong momentum, especially as part of the broader marketing hub motion. In Q2, the attach rate to Marketing Hub was 48% and up 5 points year-over-year. That reflects a clear need.
Marketers want to create content across more channels and formats, faster and our AI features help them do that. AI adoption in Service Hub is also strong with more than 40% using AI features. In Q2, we launched AI feedback summaries and AI ticket sentiment to help service teams move faster and respond more intelligently, and we are continuing to innovate at speed.
Also in Q2, we became the first CRM to launch connectors with both ChatGPT and Claude. Over 20,000 customers have already used it to access insights across 23 million CRM records. Customers are already in LLMs asking questions. And these connectors give them fast direct answers from HubSpot. And HubSpot remains the platform where the data lives, where teams collaborate and where actions to drive growth get taken. Together, it's a powerful combination. Adoption has been strong among Pro Plus customers, especially for sales pipeline insights and executive decision-making.
Overall, we're pleased with the traction and value AI is delivering across the platform, and we're just getting started. Now we're not just building AI into our platform. We're becoming an AI-first company. AI is transforming how we work, how we serve customers and how we grow. Across the business, we're using AI to drive real innovation from booking meetings to handling support and it's working.
In Q2 alone, AI handled nearly half of our support chat and booked thousands of meetings for our sales team. We're also seeing a big impact on engineering productivity. Over 90% of our engineers use AI every week to move faster and focus on higher impact innovation. As we make this turn, we're making sure every HubSpotter is ready for the AI era. From company-wide innovation days to hands-on pilots and hackathons, teams are learning, testing and pushing what's possible.
To close, we have a differentiated platform approach, and we are executing with clarity and momentum. I'm confident in our strategy, proud of our pace of innovation and excited for what's ahead. I look forward to seeing many of you at our Analyst Day in September.
With that, I'll hand it over to our CFO, Kate Bueker, to walk through our financial and operating results. Kate?
Thanks, Yamini. Let's turn to our second quarter 2025 financial results. Q2 revenue grew 18% year-over-year in constant currency and 19% on an as-reported basis. The quarter-over-quarter increase in our revenue growth was driven by improving core business performance over the last 12 months and also benefited from the leap year headwind that impacted Q1. Subscription revenue grew 19% year-over-year, while services and other revenue increased 21% on an as-reported basis. Q2 domestic revenue grew 18% year-over-year. International revenue growth was 19% in constant currency and 21% as reported, representing 48% of total revenue. We added over 9,700 net new customers in Q2, ending the quarter with 268,000 customers growing 18% year-over-year.
Average subscription revenue per customer was $11,300 in Q2, flat year-over-year in constant currency and up 1 point on an as-reported basis. We expect net additions for Q3 and Q4 to be at the high end of our 9,000 to 10,000 range and ASRPC growth in constant currency to be up about 1 point. Customer dollar retention remained in the high 80s in Q2. Net revenue retention was 103%, up roughly 1 point sequentially, primarily driven by faster speed upgrades. For the full year of 2025, we expect net revenue retention to be up a couple of points year-over-year, again due to the impact of the seats change. Calculated billings were $814 million in Q2, growing 20% year-over-year in constant currency and 26% on an as-reported basis.
The strengthening of the U.S. dollar at the end of the quarter and its impact on deferred revenue resulted in an overall 6-point FX tailwind to as reported billings growth. The remainder of my comments will refer to non-GAAP measures. Q2 operating margin was 17%, flat compared to the year ago period and up 3 points sequentially. Net income was $117 million in Q2 or $2.19 per fully diluted share. Free cash flow was $116 million or 15% of revenue in Q2. Our cash and marketable securities totaled $1.9 billion at the end of June, including the impact of our convertible debt settlement and Q2 share repurchases. We bought back approximately 446,000 shares in Q2 and Q3 as part of our new share repurchase program and have $250 million of authorized purchases remaining under the program.
With that, let's dive into our guidance for the third quarter and full year of 2025. The macro environment remains uncertain, and our expectation is that these volatile conditions will continue for the remainder of the year, but we have a proven playbook that works in an environment like this. For the third quarter, total as reported revenue is expected to be in the range of $785 million to $787 million, up 16% year-over-year in constant currency and 17% on an as-reported basis. Non-GAAP operating profit is expected to be between $156 million and $157 million representing a 20% operating profit margin.
Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is expected to be between $2.56 and $2.58. This assumes 53 million fully diluted shares outstanding. And for the full year of 2025, total as reported revenue is now expected to be in the range of $3.08 billion to $3.088 billion, up 17% year-over-year in both constant currency and on an as-reported basis. We expect roughly a 0.5 point currency tailwind to as-reported revenue growth in 2025. Non-GAAP operating profit is now expected to be between $568 million and $572 million, representing an 18% operating profit margin. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share is now expected to be between $9.47 and $9.53. This assumes 53.4 million fully diluted shares outstanding.
As you adjust your models, please keep in mind the following: we now expect CapEx as a percentage of revenue to be 5% to 6% for the full year of 2025, driven by higher capitalized software expenses. We now expect free cash flow to be about $580 million for the full year of 2025 with seasonally stronger free cash flow in Q4.
Before we open the call for questions, I want to invite you to join us for our Annual Analyst Day at INBOUND, taking place on September 3 in San Francisco. We look forward to seeing you there. With that, I will turn the call back over to the operator for questions.
[Operator Instructions]
Our first question comes from the line of Samad Samana from Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
Congrats on a nice 2Q. Yamini, I wanted to pull on the thread where you were talking about maybe the changing nature of inbound. So it's good to hear about the traction of agents like customer and prospect in the value they're adding for clients. But if I zoom out now that you see how customers are deploying agents, is it changing how inbound itself is being done? I ask because there's a big investor debate on inbound in an agentic AI world. And as even humans changed their workflows or starting points for search. I'd love to know how hubs, which essentially created inbound is pushing the agenda for this next phase shift as well.
Samad, thank you so much for that question. Yes, there are major shifts that's happening in the top of the funnel, partly because of AI, but partly because of how buyer behavior is changing. Organic search is getting disrupted. And people are clicking fewer blue links because AI overviews are providing the answers. And then the second big shift that's happening is that people are now asking questions of M&M rather than even searching for information. So those are 2 big changes. And when you put that together, SEO, which is kind of what we said with inbound is no longer working as it well was. So we moved very early to adapt to the strategy, and I explained this in the earnings, and we have a big opportunity to help our customers navigate a lot of these changes.
Let me start with what we did internally and start with a few facts. A lot has been said about HubSpot's blog traffic. And I want to share that 10% of HubSpot's leads comes from block traffic. The other 90% comes from a diversified source of channels that are all growing. We recognized back in 2022 that overdependence on organic search was not sustainable, and we started diversifying our demand engines across multiple channels. And as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we diversified to social channels, YouTube, LinkedIn, Insta that has paid off significantly. We grew our business podcast network and that network today reaches millions of audiences via podcast every month. And our investments in newsletters, e-mail newsletters are paying off, and we're seeing the leads coming from that source grow 50% year-over-year.
So all of this has helped us continue to grow demand even when log driven traffic has declined. So the next year is that block traffic is coming down, but 90% diversified traffic is growing. And that is a playbook that we are helping our customers execute as they navigate all of these changes. At the same time, another change is happening because of AI, which is people are asking questions. And therefore, we are leaning into what's next which is AI engine optimization or the industry calls it AEO or GEO. And it's pretty simple. As people start to ask questions of LLM, there is a new place where companies need to show up, which is answers on these LLMs. And that is what we are experimenting, leaning and it's beginning to work.
And we are seeing that clicks from LLMs convert much better than organic search because buyers are deep in the research. They are asking specific questions and when you give an answer, they're ready to act. And so even though it's early stages, we are seeing conversion rate go up, and this is a new nascent emerging channel. So both of these shifts presents a huge opportunity for HubSpot and for us to help our customers navigate all of these changes.
You mentioned INBOUND. Look, HubSpot wrote the playbook on INBOUND, helping businesses grow through content. The importance of that content has not changed. What has changed is where people connect with that content. And as AI is reshaping the market, we're writing the next chapter we're showing our customers how to thrive in that world beyond search, and I'm so excited about this opportunity.
Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter from Morgan Stanley.
I wanted to follow up on the comment about 25% of Pro Plus customers adding more core seats. I was curious who are some of the types of personas that are getting access. And it may be a bit of a longer-term view, but as you expand kind of personas across the platform, how do you think about building the opportunity to build any solutions or specific workflows for those personas that may interact with HubSpot today, but may not be that core customer.
Elizabeth, I love this question. I think you're keying into one of our biggest growth levers for the future, which is the core seat and maybe just to explain, the core seat is what customers buy to get the full value of our smart CRM and think of the smart CRM as the brains of our platform. This is where the unified customer record sits.
This is where you get the full visibility of the customer, and it provides customers the most value. And we've been investing heavily on this layer of our platform and adding powerful capabilities for admins powerful capabilities for extending our platform. And last year, in March 2024, we launched the core seat. That value of the core seat is resonating within our customers. I shared that stat, which is 25% of our Pro Plus customers are upgrading and buying more seats. And they're doing this for a couple of reasons because they get powerful edit capabilities, they get ability to provide more automation and that does expand our core personas. You're right to point that in the question, the core persona that we have for sales, it's Sales Hub seat, for service it's Service Hub seats, but then core seat expands it beyond all of those 2 admins, to us, to finance folks, and that expands our opportunity. As we think about the future, we're going to add a ton of value into that core platform layer. This will have AI capabilities. It will have smart properties. And I think that we're going to be able to drive that as sustained growth going forward, pretty exciting opportunity for HubSpot.
Our next question comes from the line of Brad Sills from Bank of America.
Wonderful. It's great to see some of the early traction with agents. I did want to ask a question about that. Is there any data that you're looking at that can illustrate for us your engagement with those customers that are running agents? In other words, how often are we hitting the agent button coming back into HubSpot interactions. I know it's early, but for some of those customers that might have been on for a couple of quarters here, what are you seeing with regards to that level of engagement for those customers running agents?
I'll start with the agents, and then Dharmesh, feel free to add to it. So far, we have multiple featured agents that HubSpot has built. Customer agent and prospecting agent content agent, those are the ones that are featured agents. And I'm really pleased with the momentum that we are seeing with all of these agents I talked about customer agent, which has got 4,000 customers. We are seeing really good weekly usage and resolution rates there that are consistently about 50%, many of the customer agent customers are seeing 70% to 80% resolution rates. And we've seen more than 6x increase in resolution since January and surpassed over 1 million ticket deflection. Now if I step back and think about agent usage, our customers know that with agents, they can actually get help in doing work and that is a big shift. It's not just about delivering software to help people get productivity, but it's actually delivering work. And so the use cases that we are seeing traction are deflecting support tickets setting up meetings in terms of prospecting writing content that shows up in a variety of channels, those are all the early use cases that we're seeing traction. And I'm pretty excited about the momentum overall.
Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader from KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Yamini, I'd like to follow up on the core seats. Those 25 -- the 25% of customers that have come back and purchased more core seats. I'm just curious on 2 things. Number one, is it are you putting so much featured, like are the core seats so feature-rich that you might be cannibalizing a little bit of people coming and buying full seats for sales or service hubs, number one?
And number two, in the future -- or if there is a future state, where do you think you'll delineate between these are the things that we're going to build into core seats versus these are the things that we are going to live -- or leave to those full seats for Sales Hub, Service Hub and the like?
Those are great questions. And I'll take the first part of the question, what goes into the persona seats and what goes into the core seats. It's really clear. The use cases are super distinct. For sales, it is how do you drive deals, how do you forecast, how do you manage that entire process. That's what goes into the Sales Hub persona seats and then similarly for service, it's everything to do with your customer success workspace or your help desk or space. And so it's very, very distinct in terms of what goes into persona seats. Let me get your direct question on are we cannibalizing core seats. We don't think so. We've always had this approach for pricing where we add a lot of value and then we monetize value. And I think the core seat value is resonating, and we plan to continue to add value there.
The second part of the question you asked is what goes in the core seat and what maybe gets into AI and so on. And here's our early thinking on it. Everything that goes into the daily flow like a personal AI use case. So if it's a Copilot, it's going to belong to that core seat, anything that is in the daily flow of work that helps someone in the go-to-market organization, do better work that will be either in the persona seat or in the core seat if AI is actually doing work for you as in the case of customer agent resolving a support ticket or a prospecting agent setting up a meeting. That will belong in agents and will be monetized through credit. And so to step back, core seat is a platform opportunity. Persona seats are functional opportunities and AI credits will help us monetize the work that we get done and all of that provides durable ways for us to grow.
Our next question comes from the line of Mark Murphy from JPMorgan.
Kate, when we look at the billings growth of 20% constant currency and that, that is outpacing revenue growth by a couple of points. Do you think it's fair to conclude that the worm has turned here? In other words, the leading indicators or your net new bookings are outperforming the lagging indicator of revenue. I'm just wondering if you think it's fair to consider that, that equation maybe has inverted a little from where it was 4 to 6 quarters ago.
Mark, thanks for the question. I'm not sure that I know this worm analogy, but maybe I'll talk a little bit about our constant currency billings growth of 20%. We were actually -- we're pleased with the strength in the billings growth. You are right that billings tends to lead when the business is showing positive momentum. But I would remind you that we called out strength and upmarket in Q2 specifically, larger deals, more multi-hub deals. And these deals tend to have higher billing terms. So longer months upfront, which means an extension of duration. And this helps create a bit of a gap, a positive gap for constant currency billings growth relative to constant currency revenue growth. If you just think about kind of the next couple of quarters anyway. Our expectation is that the revenue and billings growth will track each other, but we will still see the small benefit from duration over the next couple of quarters.
Our next question comes from the line of Arjun Bhatia from William Blair.
Yamini, I had one for you. Going back to Agentic AI. I think Brad maybe touched on this a little bit, but I want to follow up. It seems like you're getting great adoption, right, in terms of the pure number of customers that are adopting HubSpot agents. I'm curious where you are in terms of consumption in the consumption model for your genetic capabilities? Are customers kind of still burning through their initial credits? Are you seeing them kind of come back to the well buy more credits. Where are we in that journey? Or should we expect that to be more of a 2026 plus dynamic?
Yes. Thank you, Arjun, for the question. Look, we have had a clear and consistent philosophy when it comes to monetization, which is we focus on value before monetizing and the signal that we very specifically look for in terms of monetizing is predictable value for customers. And that is exactly what we are seeing with customer agent. We're seeing predictable value really good resolutions and good adoption by customers, and that's why we added it to our credit-based pricing model. And you can assume that we will take a similar approach as the rest of the agents come into GA and continue to deliver value. So very excited about the progress that we are making in agent adoption and delivering value.
Now specifically on credit, we launched credit at INBOUND last year and added customer agent credit in June and it's rolling into our installed base of customer agent customers this week. So it's super early, and there's not that much in terms of very clear monetization patterns that we can say but we feel very confident that the usage and value that we are delivering translates into monetization. So overall, very happy with the progress we're making. It will have impact in 2026, but all of the leading indicators are very positive.
Our next question comes from the line of Michael Turrin from Wells Fargo Securities.
Great. Appreciate you taking the question and continue with the search topic had on in the prepared remarks. And also stands out, you're one of the few in software calling out growth contribution from seats and few different flavors with the new model. So I was just wondering if you could expand on whether you're finding the more patient monetization strategy you've taken there, a competitive advantage in this environment? And then just moving forward, you've touched on it with a few of the answers, but just how you're thinking about AI and the puts and takes of monetizing some of the value you're delivering there early versus waiting and during some of the durable growth like you've done with the seat model here.
Yes. Definitely, a lot of puts and takes there in terms of it and look, we are very disciplined when it comes to pricing and monetization and it does pay off. We really focus on delivering value before monetizing. And you mentioned the seats growth. We've seen it consistently. We have seen it in core seats. We're seeing it in Sales Hub seat upgrades seeing it in Service Hub seat upgrades and it comes down to how our philosophy is always focused on value. Last year, you know that we lowered the entry price and we removed the friction of customers upgrading to Pro on Service Hub and Sales Hub seats and the rationale for us doing that was to make it super easy for customers to buy and easy for customers to upgrade with HubSpot. And that is exactly what is playing through, and we see it in all of the upgrade motions that you talked about.
Now in terms of the puts and takes in terms of the pricing strategy, our pricing strategy is hybrid. We will have seats that monetizes the core value that we deliver for all of the personas that we support, and we have credits that will help us monetize the value that is not tied to seat and the combination of these 2, we think it's going to be really useful as the AI kind of adoption wave continues.
Now everybody talks about [indiscernible] time 2, and they talk about quantity going down. But the more important part of it is the quantity goes down only when the value goes up, and we have a very clear mechanism to monetize that value. So overall, feel very good in terms of the approach that we have taken, patience pays off and it is paying off for us.
Our next question comes from the line of Brent Bracelin from Piper Sandler.
Yamini, I think if you could spend the next 4 to 5 minutes talking about core seat. It seems super important. I'm sure we'll touch about more on that at the event here next month. But Kate, I wanted to go back to the quarter. The Americas growth accelerated by 1 point. Even if I back out FX, it looks like Q2 was highest dollar sequential increase in revenue that we've ever seen. It looks like it's the highest percent sequential increase in over a year. So as we just think about the fundamental drivers here of the upside in the quarter, was there any sort of onetime anomalies that we should think about outside of FX? Or is that just broad-based strength that you're seeing in the business driving that acceleration in Americas and again, pretty strong sequential increase in overall revenue.
Yes. Thank you so much for the question, and I appreciate your positive commentary on the performance in the quarter. We were happy with the performance in Q2. It came in largely as we expected. The sequential growth was nice. We beat by 21 -- or $21 million, had a little bit of help there from FX, probably another -- probably 5 of the 21, but we had a nice solid beat based on core business performance. Look, I think that what you should hear from us in and sort of the performance in Q2 and how we set our guidance for the full year is a few things. One is the business is performing well. Yamini mentioned the strength that we're seeing up market, our continued velocity down market, our overall traction and platform consolidation, like this is driving nice business momentum.
And we saw revenue growth in constant currency improved Q1 to Q2. The team is executing well. We had a strong execution through the first half of the year. Even though the external environment does remain a bit choppy, and then you're right, we saw some favorability in FX. Between Q1 and Q2, the dollar has weakened, it's a tailwind for us. And we included an additional $20 million of FX tailwind in the back half of the year and the guidance that we put forward.
Our next question comes from the line of Tyler Radke from Citi.
Kate, on the improved outlook for new customer adds? And then I believe also ASRPC for the back half. Could you just unpack the key drivers of that? I mean it sounds like a lot of great momentum, as Yamini was alluding to in terms of the non-box traffic sources, but is this simply a macro slightly better macro view? Or are you seeing kind of some incremental kind of organic improvements in lead generation, just given the diversified channel approach you're taking?
Yes. I mean, I guess I wouldn't overreact to quarter-over-quarter changes to net additions, like we see that move from 1 quarter to the next. We were happy to see net adds come in above our 9,000 expectation for Q2. We saw nice performance across both the starter tier and also the professional and enterprise tiers. In starter, what we saw was like a nice uplift in the free to start or conversion rate. And we saw some positive impact from an annual pricing promotion that we put in place at the beginning of June.
On the professional and enterprise side, it's just really consistent momentum quarter-over-quarter. And so like our expectation here over the next couple of quarters is that we continue to be in that 9,000 to 10,000 range at the top end of that range. And then ASRPC expectations is up roughly 1 point in constant currency in Q3 and Q4.
Our next question comes from the line of Keith Bachman from BMO.
I'd like to invite Dharmesh on if he's available. And the question is you've seen a number of trends in your technology career and there is a lot of cross currents associated, in particular with the Marketing Hub. And as you think about what the Marketing Hub is today, HubSpot is adding genic capabilities, whether part of that solution is there an additional add-on. But what does the solution look like in 2, 3 years that customers are buying? Is it still through the Marketing Hub or are you buying agents that are supported by it? I'm just trying to understand how you think the actual advent of agentic technology is going to change the construct of what a Marketing Hub is?
And then secondly is, how do you think the -- and maybe this is for Kate or Yamini, but how do you think the evolution of what customers are paying for may evolve? I know there's been a lot of talk about seats today, which is candidly great to see or here rather. But how does that evolve? In other words, do you think consumption grows over time as a percent of revenue?
Yes, I'll start off. Thanks for the question. In terms of things we're most excited about, we are excited about this kind of emerging new operating system. This is -- this AI operating system that's happening now. And so you saw us earlier this year release these connectors for both ChatGPT and Claude. And the idea behind these connectors is that in this kind of new age, users are going to be spending some time in the kind of frontier AI applications. And the reason we're excited is that now this gives us another point of leverage, which is how can we use the platform that we have and deliver more user and customer value. And as people spend more time there, we think we can take what we've done in the past and say, "Oh, we'll add APIs, we'll add ways for customers to get benefit from being on the HubSpot customer platform with this kind of new agentic world", we're going to see more and more use cases emerge on the Frontier apps, and we can build these connectors to kind of create more value for our customers.
I'll give you an example. If you're sitting inside ChatGPT, which, by the way, now has 700 million weekly active users, right, lots and lots of usage there. Someone could type in and say, "Oh, what was my best performing geo in Europe last quarter? and I want to send them an e-mail, right?" So it goes through the connector because ChatGPT knows that there's a native connector for HubSpot. The data comes back from HubSpot that says, here were your best promoting geos. Now these are approved, the e-mail being spent. So the interactions happening in ChatGPT, the action to be able to take on that insight that just came back happens inside of HubSpot. Now this is a very novel use case because now ChatGPT knows about the world, right? It knows about the web, everything that's on the Internet and HubSpot knows about your customers. And we can bring all those 3 things together to say, "Oh, I want to bring this data back from HubSpot, intersect it with what we know of the world and then take this action back within the customer platform and actually do things." I'm really excited about this new operating system, and we're sort of very kind of early to this market, and we believe in this kind of open platform that says, okay, well, we want to kind of pipe those insights in that data through and took action continues to happen in HubSpot. So that's what I'm most excited about.
And I think, Keith, there's also a lot of excitement in terms of what we can do within Marketing Hub to help our customers just adapt and navigate to all of the changes. And one thing I want to make very clear, search is getting disrupted, which means as CEO is not as effective as it is before. But here's the key. Content matters even more in the new world. The content needs to actually show up in social. It needs to show up in podcast and newsletters, it needs to show up in LLM answers, and that is exactly what Marketing Hub and Content Hub will do. You asked a specific question, how does this all look like? I think Marketing Hub and Content Hub, we have a huge opportunity to really transform how this content shows up for our customers, and that's exactly what we're building. And content agent helps marketers generate high-quality content the work that we've been doing to innovate on Content Hub, which is content we mix, podcast we mix.
What it does is actually helps our customers diversify because SEO is one piece of the broader marketing strategy we support and what we really support with is how we power our customers' ability to diversify channels across e-mail and social, journey analytics and so on. And so I think that we're pretty excited about the broader opportunity to help our customers with marketing. And as we do that and as we evolve our pricing strategy, we'll have a balance of seats and credits where we provide value in the seat to help our customers get productivity seats will grow where we do the work for customers like customer agent, credits will go. And I think that opens up a lot of opportunity for us.
Our next question comes from the line of Alex Zukin from Wolfe Research.
You guys both -- you have an [ international governed ] such great thoughtful answers to these kind of higher altitude questions. Maybe kind of in a similar vein, Yamini, are you -- given the disruption happening in and around marketing, are you seeing customers pause and evaluate and sales cycles either take longer or budgetary decisions be a little bit more interspersed or are you actually seeing this a call to action, where, to your point, content is more important than ever. You're seeing more engagement and time in app around putting -- broadening the surface area of where people are marketing.
And Dharmesh, for you, if if the UX layer, if the OS is now the LLM, to some extent, in however many years that reality happens, as you move up market, it feels like the monetization path with some of your competitors is to monetize data access, right, or monetize actions. When you think about monetizing not at the UX layer, but at this process layer. How does that change vis-a-vis your competitors? And how do you see that evolving?
Alex, you just sneaked in a multiple-part question there. But I will take the first part, which is on Marketing Hub and what we're seeing. Look, there's a lot shifting within marketing. And marketeers are not pausing to evaluate they're really focused on driving growth, driving leads and diversifying their sources, and that is what we see. I talk to CMOs all the time, and we talk about what is working today, what is not working. They're looking to HubSpot because they trust HubSpot. We've brought playbooks together. We brought product together that can help them execute on the playbook and we have an ecosystem of partners that we have activated to help them, and so they're coming to us. And it's actually causing a new CTA within marketing teams to evaluate their playbooks and we imagine what they need to do in the world beyond search. So that's why I think it's a big opportunity. And I can't work to share much more about this vision at INBOUND next month. And Dharmesh, I'll...
Yes. One thing I'd like to add, I'm going to add on to the marketing since we've talked a lot about marketing and INBOUND kind of intersected with agents. One of the -- the new things we've learned recently, I'll kind of catch you guys up. So we launched a product called Agent.AI at INBOUND last year. We had 47,000 users at that time. We just crossed the 2 million user mark, but 1 thing that was kind of surprising was this kind of emerging use case that was unexpected, which is people using agents as a lead magnet. So think of it agents as a form of content where before you might have said, "Oh, I'm going to create this research PDF or I'm going to create this excels press sheet that I'm going to give away in exchange for someone's e-mail address." Now what we see customers doing is creating agents, taking their domain expertise and whatever is embodying it inside of an agent and using as a lead magnet and using Agent.ai as a platform to do that.
Now the really cool thing is that now you can take that kind of domain expertise that you had and drive kind of kind of value for customers. So it's a new form of inbound, a new form of content that's very, very agentic, and it's exciting. Now -- and the cool feature in Agent.ai is the FDA using this lead magnet feature and you're a HubSpot customer, which you would need to be, those leads that you generate on Agent.ai go into your HubSpot account. So there's this nice flywheel effect that's happening there that I'm super excited about. I know that's not the question you asked, but that's a question I wanted to answer. So here we are.
Our next question comes from the line of Gabriela Bors from Goldman Sachs.
This one is for Dharmesh as well. Dharmesh, I love your perspective from a frontier model standpoint. As we see frontier models add more agents and agentic applications to their platform layer, how do you think about that being a source of competition longer term? And how important is the domain experience and the workflow experience that you have at HubSpot in that context?
Yes. I think a lot of the -- and what we're seeing now, I think we're going to continue to see for a while is the agent development that's happening within the [indiscernible] model where 1 or 2 things. There's going to be a very horizontal consumer-facing agentic capabilities, right? That says, "Oh, we're going to build something for a calendar or something that's kind of very broad-based versus kind of vertical B2B-focused things." And the other thing they're doing is kind of extending their platforms to allow third parties like HubSpot to be able to build more agent capabilities with better reasoning models, better tooling than tool calling. So those are the things that are happening.
In terms of the value of the domain expertise within -- and I'm biased here within industries like CRM and ERP and others, there's just so much embodied in. It's not just the data and the data model and the things that we're passing back the LLM. It's, in our case, 19 years' worth of domain expertise that's embodied in millions of lines of code that capture what a salesperson does all day and what a service rep might do all day. And I think that is going to be hard and sort of messy for frontier model to try and they have bigger fisher fry in my mind. They're going after the kind of 1 trillion opportunities, not the kind of individual vertical opportunities one at a time, but that's my thesis.
Our next question comes from the line of Brett Huff from Stephens Inc.
Congrats on the nice quarter. Mine's a little bit higher-level question. Given all the changes going on in AI moving up market, new products, et cetera, can you just remind us if there's been a reshuffle in sort of the stack rank of where you see growth coming. First most biggest sort of however you want to sort of rank them for us, which ones you're going after first, which ones might be bigger just to help reframe the debate or reframe sort of the growth pie as you guys think about it going forward with all the dynamics going on?
Absolutely. That's a very good question. Look, we have a current playbook that is working, and you can see it from the consistency of delivery of results from those. This is platform consolidation, moving upmarket and delivering compelling customer value in all of the seats. And that playbook is working. You see it in strong customer dollar retention, you see upgrade momentum and the large deal momentum. Those existing growth levers will continue going in the forward. In addition to that, there are a few durable growth drivers. We've always been able to thoughtfully and intentionally add reps in very specific segments and geographies, and we see continuing to do that.
The other lever, which we've talked about a lot on this call and previous calls is the pricing change that we drove last year. What we did was to lower seat minimums remove the friction and provide us an opportunity for growth, that's obviously paying through this year, but we'll continue to see that roll through our installed base into next year. That will be a durable lever for growth. And then finally, AI. This is a multiyear tailwind. We are taking a super patient and very strategic approach to AI, which is we are embedding it into the platform and delivering work through agents, and we have the ability to monetize both of those but first by focusing on the value. So to net it out, current playbook is working, we'll continue to drive value through the current playbook. We have rep-driven growth. We have pricing changes that adds to durable lever and AI, which is a multiyear tailwind. We feel very confident about that.
Our next question comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis from UBS.
So NRR improved a point in the quarter, and I know you've talked a lot about seeing some nice seat expansion activities. So is that largely just a function of the pricing model change? Or are you seeing any unlock or improvement in other expansion motion areas? And then I know the guide implies an improvement as we move throughout the year. But maybe you could just give a little bit more color in terms of where you think that could go? And what would need to happen to get well into the 105, 110 type range again?
Yes. Thanks, Taylor, for the question. It was nice to see the sequential improvement in net revenue retention. As we talked about in the prepared remarks, it was about 1 point increase quarter-over-quarter. When you think about the drivers of the net revenue retention, like they're very much the same as the ones that we've been talking about for a number of quarters now like it starts again with the healthy customer dollar retention at the foundation. It's been really stable in the high 80s now for a number of years. You're right, the primary reason for the expansion of net revenue retention is the strong seat upgrade performance. That is a combination of the core seat adoption that Yamini talked about as well as increased rates of seat upgrades across sales and service. Most of that, I would say all of that is a result of the seats bottle pricing change that we rolled out last year.
Outside of seats, we continue to see challenges in the other net upgrade motions customers remain very value focused, and we have not seen that unlock. That said, we do still expect that net revenue retention is going to be up a couple of points year-over-year with, call it, flat into Q3 and then a nice step up in Q4 as we start to see more of the migrated customers come up for renewal. So again, largely driven by the seed expansion motions and the pricing change.
Our next question comes from the line of Brian Peterson from Raymond James.
Congrats on a really strong quarter. Yamini, I wanted to follow up on your answer to efforts to diversify the sources at the top of the funnel. I'm curious, have you seen any material changes into how you're bringing in leads specifically for enterprise. And I'm also curious, how has your channel influence business trended this year versus your expectations? And what is their role as AI becomes much more important.
Yes. Great question. Look, I think on the diversification of our lead sources. That has been a play that has been multiple years in the [indiscernible] making and it's working, and it's working across our segments. We have our small business, mid-market and core segments, it's working across all of those segments. And so we're going to continue on that diversification strategy, and we're going to educate our customers to continue on that diversification strategy. Now specifically about our partner channel, partners are influencing about 40% of our ARR, and that has continued. They are co-selling as well as sourcing. And I mentioned this in the earnings prepared remarks that we're seeing partners source smaller and they are also core selling with our reps more, and they are a good way for us to deliver higher win rates, higher ASP deals within the upmarket. And more importantly, when they deliver the value, customers stay longer with us and they buy more into the future. So partner channel continues to be a good mode for HubSpot and has expanded into co-selling and sourcing. Thank you for the question.
Thank you. This concludes the HubSpot Q2 2025 Earnings Call. Thank you to everyone who was able to join us today. You may now disconnect your lines.
Transkripte auf Deutsch freischalten
- Alle Event Transkripte auf Deutsch
- Sofortige Übersetzung
- KI-Zusammenfassungen für die wichtigsten Insights
HubSpot, Inc. — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
HubSpot, Inc. — Q2 2025 Earnings Call
📊 Quartal auf einen Blick
- Umsatzwachstum: +18% im Jahresvergleich (YoY) in konstanter Währung, Beschleunigung um ~1 Punkt gegenüber Q1.
- Betriebsgewinnmarge: 17% Non‑GAAP Operating Margin, +3 Punkte q/q (starke operative Hebelwirkung).
- Kundenbasis: 268.000 Kunden, +9.700 Nettozugänge im Quartal.
- Calculated Billings: $814M, +20% YoY in konstanter Währung.
- Ergebnis & Cash: Nettoeinkommen $117M (EPS $2.19); Free Cash Flow $116M; Kasse/Marktwerte $1.9B.
🎯 Was das Management sagt
- Plattformfokus: Mehr Multi‑Hub‑Adoption: 61% neue Pro‑Plus Kunden mit mehreren Hubs; 42% der ARR‑Basis nutzen Marketing, Sales und Service zusammen — Plattformkonsolidierung als Wachstumshebel.
- AI‑Strategie: Agenten und eingebettetes KI‑Angebot: Customer Agent >4.000 Kunden, Prospecting Agent ~3.700 Kunden (+17.000 Warteliste), Content Agent >12.000 Kunden; AI soll Arbeit erledigen, nicht nur assistieren.
- Seats & Upgrades: Sales‑Seat‑Upgrades +71% YoY, Service‑Seat‑Upgrades +110% YoY; Core‑Seats (seit Mar 2024) bei 25% der Pro‑Plus Kunden als Upgrade‑Treiber.
🔭 Ausblick & Guidance
- Q3: Umsatzerwartung $785–787M (≈+16% CC), Non‑GAAP Betriebsgewinn $156–157M (≈20% Marge), Non‑GAAP EPS $2.56–2.58.
- FY2025: Umsatz $3.08–3.088B (+17% YoY), Non‑GAAP Betriebsgewinn $568–572M (18% Marge), Non‑GAAP EPS $9.47–9.53; Free Cash Flow ≈$580M; CapEx 5–6% des Umsatzes.
- Risiko: Makro‑Unsicherheit & Währungsbewegungen wirken fort; Management benennt FX‑Tailwind (~0,5pp) und vorsichtige Monetisierungs‑Timingrisiken für Agenten.
❓ Fragen der Analysten
- Inbound & Search: Analysten hoben Disruption durch LLMs hervor; Management betont Kanaldiversifikation (YouTube, Podcasts, Newsletters) und frühe AEO‑Tests, sieht höhere Konversionsraten aus LLM‑Antworten.
- Monetisierung Agenten: Nachfrage und Nutzung stark, Monetisierung über Credits gerade ausgerollt; Management bleibt geduldig — klare Umsatzzahlen aus Credits noch begrenzt.
- Core‑Seats & Cannibalisation: Fragestellung nach Kannibalisierung; Management sagt die Rollen seien unterschiedlich (Persona‑Seats vs. Plattform‑Core) und erwartet keine nennenswerte Kannibalisierung.
⚡ Bottom Line
- Fazit: Solides Operieren: starke Top‑Line‑Dynamik, deutliche Seat‑Upgrades und frühe AI‑Adoption schaffen Wachstumsoptionen. Kurzfristig stabiler Guidance‑rahmen und gute FCF‑Basis; mittelfristig hängt Upside von Agenten‑Monetisierung, NRR‑Pfad und makro‑/FX‑Entwicklung ab.
Finanzdaten von HubSpot, Inc.
Umsatz
Der Umsatz stellt die Summe aller Einnahmen eines Unternehmens z. B. für dessen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen dar.
Umsatz (TTM) einfach erklärtDirekte Kosten
Direkte Kosten sind die Kosten, die direkt im Zusammenhang mit der Herstellung des Produkts oder der Dienstleistung entstehen.
Bruttoertrag
Der Bruttoertrag gibt an, wie viel vom Umsatz nach Abzug der direkten Herstellkosten im Unternehmen verbleibt. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der Bruttomarge (engl. Gross Margin).
Brutto Marge einfach erklärtVertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten
Die Vertriebs- & Verwaltungskosten (engl. Selling, General & Administrative expenses, kurz SG&A) beinhalten alle Aufwände für Marketing und den Verkauf sowie die allgemeine Verwaltung des Unternehmens.
Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten
Die Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten (engl. research & development costs, kurz R&D) geben Auskunft darüber, wie viel das Unternehmen in die Forschung und die Entwicklung seiner Produkte investiert. Vor allem prozentual vom Umsatz und im Vergleich zu direkten Wettbewerbern sind die Kosten interessant.
EBITDA
Das EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen, Steuern und Abschreibungen. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von der EBITDA-Marge.
Abschreibungen
Abschreibungen stellen Wertminderungen von Vermögensgegenständen des Unternehmens dar (z.B. durch Abnutzung von Maschinen).
EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis)
Das EBIT (engl. Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ist der Gewinn des Unternehmens vor Zinsen und Steuern, das auch als operatives Ergebnis bezeichnet wird. Berechnet man den prozentualen Anteil vom Umsatz, spricht man von
der EBIT-Marge.
Nettogewinn
Der Nettogewinn stellt den Gewinn oder Verlust nach Abzug aller Kosten dar.
Nettogewinn einfach erklärtaktien.guide Premium
| Mär '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Umsatz | 3.298 3.298 |
21 %
21 %
100 %
|
|
| - Direkte Kosten | 539 539 |
30 %
30 %
16 %
|
|
| Bruttoertrag | 2.759 2.759 |
19 %
19 %
84 %
|
|
| - Vertriebs- und Verwaltungskosten | 1.766 1.766 |
14 %
14 %
54 %
|
|
| - Forschungs- und Entwicklungskosten | 920 920 |
12 %
12 %
28 %
|
|
| EBITDA | 221 221 |
484 %
484 %
7 %
|
|
| - Abschreibungen | 148 148 |
41 %
41 %
4 %
|
|
| EBIT (Operatives Ergebnis) EBIT | 73 73 |
210 %
210 %
2 %
|
|
| Nettogewinn | 100 100 |
534 %
534 %
3 %
|
|
Angaben in Millionen USD.
Nichts mehr verpassen! Wir senden Dir alle News zur HubSpot, Inc.-Aktie direkt und kostenlos in Deine Mailbox.
Auf Wunsch erhältst Du jeden Morgen pünktlich zum Frühstück eine E-Mail, die alle für Dich relevanten Aktien-News enthält.
HubSpot, Inc. Aktie News
Firmenprofil
HubSpot, Inc. entwickelt Softwarelösungen für das Internetmarketing. Das Unternehmen ist in den folgenden geografischen Segmenten tätig: Nord- und Südamerika, Europa und Asien-Pazifik. Das Unternehmen wurde am 4. April 2005 von Brian Patrick Halligan und Dharmesh Shah gegründet und hat seinen Hauptsitz in Cambridge, MA.
aktien.guide Premium
| Hauptsitz | USA |
| CEO | Ms. Rangan |
| Mitarbeiter | 9.021 |
| Gegründet | 2005 |
| Webseite | www.hubspot.com |


