Highwoods Properties, Inc. Aktie

Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Highwoods Properties Q3 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

I will now hand the conference over to Brendan Maiorana, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Brendan, please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call this morning are Ted Klinck, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Leary, our Chief Operating Officer. For your convenience, today's prepared remarks have been posted on the web. If you have not received yesterday's earnings release or supplemental, they are both available on the Investors section of our website at highwoods.com.

On today's call, our review will include non-GAAP measures such as FFO, NOI, and EBITDAre. The release and supplemental include a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed at length in our press releases as well as our SEC filings. As you know, actual events and results can differ materially from these forward-looking statements, and the company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Ted.

Thanks, Brendan, and good morning, everyone. This quarter's operating results reflect the strengthening fundamentals we have anticipated across our portfolio and our markets. Demand for high-quality office space continues to be strong while supply continues to shrink. A powerful combination. The lack of high-quality office space with limited to no new construction in the strongest BBDs across the Sunbelt is driving a significant rent growth and higher occupancy in our portfolio.

During the quarter, we posted GAAP rent growth of 29% and cash rent growth of 4% on over 1.2 million square feet of second-gen leases, and delivered the second highest second-gen net effective rents in our company's history. Further, our portfolio occupancy increased 130 basis points since the end of June, and our lease rate is now over 90%. Strong lease economics, combined with a positive occupancy trajectory, bolsters our positive outlook for organic NOI growth over the foreseeable future.

In addition to our robust operating performance, we also made progress improving our portfolio quality during the quarter by selling $85 million of noncore properties in Richmond, Atlanta, and Raleigh. Year-to-date, we have sold $386 million of properties at an average cap rate below 8%. This total is approximately $150 million more than our original target at the beginning of the year. Plus, we continue to market additional noncore assets for sale and expect to close at least $100 million more by year-end. These disposition proceeds provide us with meaningful dry powder for future investments.

As we continue to recycle out of older, non-BBD located properties and invest in commute-worthy office buildings in the strongest locations across the Southeast, we expect a corresponding increase in our long-term FFO and cash flow growth rates.

Turning to our financial results, we delivered FFO of $0.89 per share, and once again increased our outlook for the full year, which is now $3.51 to $3.70 per share. At the midpoint, this is $0.025 higher than our prior outlook and $0.065 higher than the beginning of the year. We are especially pleased with the increase in our outlook since the beginning of the year, given $0.04 of higher than anticipated dilution due to increased disposition activity. With our strong operating results, our GAAP same-property NOI outlook has also strengthened. These strong trends illustrate the quality of our portfolio and the health of our markets, and gives us confidence the gains we've made during the past several quarters will sustain into future periods.

As I mentioned earlier, our leasing performance was excellent in terms of both volume and economics. We once again posted strong net effective rents. In the past 5 quarters, we have recorded 3 of our 4 highest net effective rent quarters in our company's history. New leasing volume was healthy with 300,000 square feet of new second-gen deals, which helped drive the lease rate to 90.1%. Our high lease rate, combined with limited expirations and known move-outs, gives us confidence we'll continue to drive occupancy higher.

On the disposition front, we sold $85 million of noncore properties in the third quarter. We sold a portfolio in Richmond for $53 million, a building in our Century Center park in Atlanta for more than $20 million, and 2 buildings in Raleigh for nearly $12 million. As reflected in our outlook, we expect to sell an additional $100 million to $250 million of noncore assets by the end of the year. Going forward, we will continue to prune our portfolio and redeploy that capital into higher quality, more resilient investments.

Turning to development, we are finishing up our current development pipeline with 23 Springs. Our $460 million, 642,000 square foot office tower in Dallas is Uptown BBD, where we have a 50% JV interest. 23 Springs is now 95% leased and projected to stabilize by the second quarter of next year. We expect to replenish our pipeline and have included $100 million to $400 million of new development announcements in our outlook for the remainder of the year. To this end, we have received interest from build-to-suit and sizable anchor prospects for potential new projects, which is further evidence of the lack of available high-quality blocks across our markets.

Companies are willing to pay premium rents, in many instances, substantially more than current top of market rents, to secure space they need to recruit and retain their talent. With construction time lines typically extending 2 to 4 years, any near-term development announcements will take time to show up in our financial results. However, in the current environment, we believe new development with manageable leasing risks presents attractive risk-adjusted returns that will lead to higher FFO and cash flows, a faster growth rate, and better quality portfolio over the long run. We remain active in identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions. To date, we haven't found opportunities with strong risk-adjusted returns like last year, when we closed on nearly $600 million of best-in-class properties across Dallas, Raleigh, and Charlotte.

Before I turn the call over to Brian, I want to reiterate the priorities we are focused on to drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. First, we will continue to drive occupancy towards stabilized levels in our operating portfolio. Second, we will capture strong rent growth and attractive economics on second-gen leasing. Third, we will recycle out of noncore CapEx-intensive assets in non-BBD locations and invest in properties with better cash flows and higher long-term growth rates. And fourth, we will do all of this while maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet.

We made meaningful progress on each of these priorities during the first 3 quarters of the year and believe we have an opportunity to significantly improve our growth rate, BBD mix, and portfolio quality over the next few years. We believe the focus on these 4 areas, combined with a strong fundamental backdrop in our core BBDs due to healthy demand, limited new supply, and increasing rents, will drive significant growth in cash flow and long-term value over the next several years. Brian?

Thanks, Ted, and good morning, everyone. Kudos to our team for another standout quarter. Ted touched on the supply and demand setup in our BBDs, and the national data shows just how broad it has become. Major brokerage houses are now telling the same story. Nationally, CBRE reported a 10th consecutive quarter of positive net absorption, with vacancy declining for a fifth straight quarter to 18.2%, and national asking rents growing 3.1% year-over-year, the fastest pace since 2016. JLL added that each of the past 4 quarters saw more leasing than any single quarter since 2019, with tenants now growing their footprints by an average of 13%.

At the same time, the office supply pipeline has all but dried up. CBRE projects 2026 will deliver 76% less square feet year-over-year and would represent the lowest year of deliveries since it began tracking the figure in 1990. Piling on, JLL reported that 9.6 million square feet was removed from the national inventory this quarter alone, and a total of more than 45 million square feet has been taken out of service since late 2023, describing landlord leverage in the trophy and new construction segments as extreme. The result is pricing power for what Cushman & Wakefield calls, "workplaces that are driving engagement and facilitating employee development." Or what Highwoods defines as commute-worthy environments and experiences. Amidst this backdrop, our team posted its largest quarterly leasing volume since 2024, and coupled with greater renewal success and consistent new leasing, our occupancy gains continue to track ahead of our original guidance earlier this year.

Turning to our markets, 3 once again stood out: Charlotte, Dallas, and Nashville. In Charlotte, the flight to quality is turning into a scramble for space in the nation's fastest growing city per the Census Bureau. Of the region's 2.9 million people, approximately 1 million live in the city of Charlotte, almost doubling in size since 2000. CBRE reported the fourth consecutive quarter of positive net absorption, 456,000 square feet. And for the second quarter in a row, every class of office posted occupancy gains. At the top of the market, what CBRE calls prime vacancy has dropped more than 650 basis points year-over-year to 7.7%, while asking rents in turn have climbed nearly 20%. With more than 1 million square feet of already leased space set to take occupancy market wide over the next year, and new construction 78% pre-leased, Charlotte is essentially out of the very best space. Our Uptown and SouthPark portfolio is capturing that scarcity directly, as evidenced by GAAP roll-ups of 77% and cash roll-ups of 19% during the quarter.

In Dallas, demand keeps getting stronger. Following nearly 920,000 square feet absorption last quarter, CBRE reported more than 1 million square feet of positive net absorption in the third quarter. Demand is most concentrated in the BBDs we've built our Dallas strategy around. Preston Center posted the lowest vacancy in all of Dallas-Fort Worth at 5.2%. Uptown was among the market's absorption leaders, and average asking rents in both submarkets are now well above $60 a square foot triple net.

Third to Nashville, which was once again our leasing volume leader and where we signed 455,000 square feet across 24 deals in the third quarter. 15 of these represents 111,000 square feet of new leasing, furthering the occupancy build back Nashville is achieving this year. Year-to-date, our Nashville team has now signed nearly 1 million square feet of leases, including more than 360,000 square feet across 41 new deals. The quarter was buoyed by 2 renewals, a 203,000 square foot commitment in Brentwood, and a 77,000 square foot lease in the West End. At Westwood South in Brentwood, a building we've highlighted on recent calls, we signed 38,000 square feet of new leases in the quarter and are now 88% leased, up from 0% at the beginning of the year. Our leasing activity in Music City is happening amid the recurring refrain of a dwindling supply in development pipeline. Last quarter, we noted active construction was limited to 450,000 square feet. Today, CBRE notes that same pipeline has shrunk to just 60,000 square feet across the entire market, while prime asking rents rose nearly 8% in a single quarter to $62 a square foot. With virtually nothing new on the way, commute-worthy space across our core BBDs of Downtown, West End, Brentwood, and Cool Springs is becoming scarce, reinforcing the organic growth embedded in our Nashville portfolio and pipeline.

We also saw encouraging results in Atlanta and here at home in Raleigh. In Atlanta, we signed 111,000 square feet across 12 deals, with cash roll-ups of 10% and GAAP roll-ups of 25%. And in Raleigh, we signed 105,000 square feet across 15 deals, with GAAP rents up 15% and net effective rents above our portfolio average. With no new construction underway in either Atlanta or the Triangle, our well-located assets in both markets are positioned to benefit.

In summary, with a commute-worthy portfolio, a vanishing supply picture, and a trophy asset team operating in the nation's most business-friendly states and markets, Highwoods is well positioned to keep delivering on occupancy gains, rental growth, and long-term value creation.

I'll now turn the call over to Brendan.

Thanks, Brian. In the third quarter, we delivered net income of $31.8 million, or $0.29 per share, and FFO of $100.1 million, or $0.89 per share. It was a relatively clean quarter, as we did not record any land sale gains, and there were no significant or unusual items to highlight.

Our balance sheet is in excellent shape. We made significant progress lowering our debt-to-EBITDAre ratio from 6.7x at the beginning of the year to 6.1x in the third quarter. We have nearly $280 million of cash on hand and nothing drawn on our $750 million revolving credit facility. During the quarter, we closed a $56 million secured mortgage at our 50/50 Midtown East JV, repatriating over $44 million from this recently stabilized development back to Highwoods. We also closed a $370 million delayed draw secured mortgage at our 50/50 23 Springs joint venture, which refinanced an existing construction loan at the joint venture level and repatriated an additional $55 million back to Highwoods. The only debt maturity we have between now and Q1 2028 is our March 2027 bond, which has a remaining balance of $286 million. This debt can be repaid at par starting on December 1 of this year. Given our strong cash position, we don't anticipate the need to raise capital to address this maturity.

We are working on 1 additional JV financing that we expect to close later this year or early next year, which will repatriate even more capital back to Highwoods and further strengthen our liquidity and unencumbered debt-to-EBITDAre ratio. Based on our current projections for NOI growth, we expect debt-to-EBITDAre to be modestly lower at year-end and continue to decline throughout 2027, assuming otherwise leverage-neutral investment activities.

We agreed to sell 1,056,000 shares on a forward basis through our ATM program at an average gross price of $32.24 per share for total net proceeds of $33.5 million. Given our strong cash position and no balance outstanding on our revolving credit facility, we have not yet settled these forward sale agreements. We expect to use this dry powder as we deploy capital into future investments.

As Ted mentioned, our occupancy improved 130 basis points from the end of Q2, and our lease rate is now 90.1%, up 50 basis points sequentially. We tightened our year-end occupancy outlook to 87.0% to 88.0%, with the midpoint remaining 87.5%. Given our significant backlog of signed, but not yet commenced leases, we remain confident occupancy will move higher by year-end. As you know, for the past few years, we have set a 300,000 square feet in new leasing second-gen volume as a good quarterly marker for us to drive occupancy higher. Given our lease rate is now above 90% and we have a more manageable forward lease expiration schedule with limited large known move-outs, we expect new leasing volumes will moderate going forward. We expect to continue pushing occupancy higher in future years, although it will obviously be more difficult to replicate the 250 basis points of improvement we expect in 2026.

As Ted discussed, we had strong financial and operating results during the quarter, with FFO of $0.89 per share. Same-property NOI growth, occupancy, and rent growth are all trending better than we originally anticipated. As expected, cash flow has been below normalized levels during 2026 as we spend upfront leasing capital to build occupancy before realizing the benefit of higher cash revenues. This is a normal part of the office business cycle. As occupancy increases, free rent periods will burn off, and leasing CapEx will normalize and ultimately result in a significant jump in free cash flow and dividend coverage more in line with our annual metrics earlier this decade.

Before I turn the call back to the operator for questions, I'd like to give some color on our financial outlook. We updated our 2026 FFO outlook to $3.51 to $3.70 per share, which is up $0.025 per share at the midpoint since our prior outlook in July, and includes the possibility of $0.14 per share of land sale gains at the high end and none at the low end. We have 1 possible transaction that could close prior to year-end and result in a large gain. At this point, it's difficult to know whether this transaction will close in 2026 or move into a future year. Excluding land sale gains already recorded this year, we've increased the midpoint of the outlook by $0.045. Stripping out all land sale gains, the midpoint of our outlook implies FFO of more than $0.90 per share for the fourth quarter, which puts us in strong position as we head into 2027. Consistent with our typical practice, we plan to provide our 2027 FFO outlook in February at the same time that we report fourth quarter 2026 results.

Our Q4 outlook obviously doesn't factor in the potential impact of any capital recycling activities. As Ted mentioned, we have $100 million to $250 million of potential additional dispositions that could close by year-end.

Overall, given our implied FFO outlook for the end of 2026, combined with ample cash on hand available for future deployment, we're upbeat about the trajectory of FFO and cash flow for the foreseeable future.

Operator, we are now ready for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Seth Bergey with Citi.

I just wanted to gather your comments about kind of the potential to do more dispositions and then continue to recycle capital into higher quality acquisitions. Just given the movement in the 10-year, can you just talk a little bit about the transaction environment? Have pricing expectations changed? And as debt costs have gone up, how do you kind of think about your required return expectations?

Seth, thanks for the question. Yes, look, as we mentioned, we have about $100 million to $250 million more of dispo. That's the guidance through the rest of this year. And look, I think everything's -- with the interest rates going up, I think everything's just taking more time, right? And I think just the uncertainty there, but I will tell you every one of the deals is under contract and we're working through due diligence. So we haven't lost anything. Nothing's been dropped yet. And it's really a mix of assets. It's Atlanta, Raleigh, Nashville, Tampa, Richmond, and 1 asset in Pittsburgh as well. So we've got a pretty good insight in what's going on, just given the number of transactions we have. So I think we're waiting and seeing, but so far everything's holding together. It's just taking longer to line up the capital stack from a disposition standpoint.

Now in acquisitions, I think it has slowed down. I think some of the assets around the market have been pulled, and I think, again, just everything is harder. So I think our return requirements have probably gone up a little bit, but not materially, but we continue to look. We just haven't found anything this year. Last year, we successfully bought about $600 million of assets. We just haven't found acquisitions that made our risk-return requirement this year, which is again, one of the reasons we're sort of shifting towards development where we think there's better risk-return requirements.

And then maybe kind of one more on your comments towards the end of the prepared remarks around just kind of the CapEx spend, just for us kind of where you are in the office leasing cycle. How should we kind of think about the levels of CapEx as we think about the fourth quarter and then just maybe as we think about the trajectory into 2027 relative to 2026?

Seth, it's Brendan. Maybe I'll take that one. So yes, we have been spending a lot of capital on the leasing side in 2026, kind of as expected. I think year-to-date, I believe we're north of $140 million of total leasing CapEx. That number is high. And I think it will moderate a little bit in the fourth quarter from where we've been for the first 3 quarters of the year, but still be pretty elevated for all of 2026. We still think that on a normalized basis, as occupancy stabilizes, and then as we look at the forward lease expiration schedule that we have, that -- our leasing CapEx, both in terms of TIs and leasing commissions, is going to moderate kind of into the low $100 million range. So probably $110 million, $115 million, maybe $120 million. So that reduction in leasing CapEx on a go forward basis, combined with the significant embedded cash NOI growth that we have as leases commence and cash commence, is going to create a pretty big jump in terms of free cash flow over time. So we feel good about that.

My expectation in terms of '27 is it'll be an okay year from a cash flow perspective, but certainly not back to what we think of as normalized levels. We think that that's more likely in 2028 and thereafter.

Your next question comes from the line of Blaine Heck with Wells Fargo.

With 23 Springs now essentially stabilized and the outlook contemplating up to $400 million of development announcements, can you just talk about what yields you're targeting given today's construction costs and whether the interest rate elevation and volatility is impacting your decision to commit to a development?

And then maybe just expand on how you weigh the delayed NOI from developments against acquisitions where you're getting immediate contribution. Do you think you can achieve enough of a spread in development yield versus cap rates to compensate you for that delayed NOI recognition?

Blaine, this is Ted. Maybe I'll take the first part, and then Brendan can jump in. Look, I do think higher interest rates, it's impacting our decisions a little bit, or at least we're weighing it. I do think that the headwinds of the higher interest rates are somewhat offset by tailwinds of just the fundamentals. I think the demand is so good that we're seeing out there, since we've started looking at some of these developments that we're feeling a lot of conviction that we can meet our underwritten yields. So it sort of weighs off each other a little bit. But in general, I think it's not going to stop us from doing anything, at least right now. Again, our developments that we're looking at are, some of them are build-to-suit and they're open book. So really, there's no real interest rate risk on that because it is an open book contract with the developer or with the tenant.

And then on the multi-tenant deals, again, the fundamentals seem really, really strong to us. Again, as we look at the yields, the development yields we can achieve relative are far in excess of acquisition cap rates. So we like that spread that's there today.

And then Blaine, it's Brendan. Just in terms of how we think about the NOI near-term with acquisitions relative to development, where obviously the time cycle on development takes time for that NOI to show up in financial results. We really look at risk-adjusted returns and think about where the highest risk-adjusted returns are, including everything associated with development and acquisitions. Those development returns that we look at include that carry that we have over the time frame. So we think about that there. We don't get too hung up in terms of the near-term financial impact if the risk-adjusted returns are higher on development.

The one thing that I would point out, though, is we've sold $150 million more in terms of dispositions this year than what we thought at the beginning of the year. That capital is sitting in cash, has not been reinvested, and at the same time, we've increased our outlook for FFO as we've migrated throughout the year. So I don't think we're too concerned about the negative impact, the negative carry in terms of disposition assets being recycled into development in the near-term if we feel like those are going to be good projects and good risk-adjusted returns upon delivery and stabilization.

Blaine, Brian. One little thing on maybe coloring of the users or anchors who we're talking to about potential developments or build-to-suits. The question comes up as to the rate volatility impacting their strategic capital decisions and what we continue to hear, and I know I'm a bit of a broken record on this is that, it's really a strategic talent decision as much as it is a capital decision, which is their greatest investment. And this week, everyone's down in Miami for ULI, and the emerging trends report has come out, and the #7 trend that they highlighted is AI and the human premium. And so, we are seeing that while the interest rates are definitely impacting the broader economy, folks who are pretty convicted around getting their people under one roof and growing. They're not rate agnostic per se, but they're not rate sensitive in getting their folks together.

Brendan, maybe sticking with you. Same-property cash NOI was essentially flat at 0.2%, while GAAP NOI grew 4.1%. Straight line rent jumped to $14 million versus $5.5 million a year ago. I guess, can you just walk us through how much of that gap is the free rent associated with the large amount of new leasing you've done and whether there are any specific leases where the free rent burn-off is going to meaningfully change that cash same-store trajectory?

Yes, Blaine. I mean, most of that delta is attributable to the occupancy build that you've seen, which initially carries that free rent that's there. So the delta between GAAP and cash is principally driven by that. And we've said this before, but there's a structural advantage or that cash NOI growth, cash same-property NOI growth has over GAAP same-property NOI growth, principally because of development, a little bit because of acquisitions. So anytime GAAP is higher than cash, that is a very strong indicator that cash NOI growth is set to increase meaningfully in future periods. So we expect that will be the case as we go forward as a number of these leases that are under free rent today, that free rent burns off, and then they start cash paying. So we've got -- there's a number that are out there, that will move into cash pay in '27, and then there's even some that will commence in '27 that will be in '28. But I think we feel good about the outlook in terms of cash same-property NOI growth for the foreseeable future.

Your next question comes from the line of Rob Stevenson with Huntington.

Ted, if you exclude the noncore markets, how much of the portfolio today is outside of your BBDs and are likely recycling candidates over time?

Let me -- maybe I'll answer it a different way. I think, if we get -- we have this $250 million or so that we want to get. Most of it's under contract or all of it's under contract. And then, once we get done with that, so that is $250 million, we'll have still a few remaining assets in our Century Center in Atlanta. And those are -- one is a long-term single-tenant deal, government-leased building, and a couple of multi-tenant buildings. And then it's really what we have in Pittsburgh, and PPG primarily. And so, after that, I think it's the $250 million, and then it's Century Center in Pittsburgh.

And then given Brian Leary's positive comments on Raleigh and access to capital from the sales, is there any reason why you wouldn't exercise your option of Bloc83?

No. The answer is no. I think the nice thing about it is, we do have -- it's an ongoing option. So we can just -- it's based on timing. Again, it works if we can get some of the dispo proceeds in the door and if we can figure out these development opportunities. So it's really more just a timing thing. We will -- absolutely, we've been thrilled with that acquisition and how it's performed over the past year. So it's definitely going to happen. It's just a timing thing.

And then last one for me. Brendan, what's the magnitude of the signed not commenced backlog that you talked about in your comments?

It's about 800,000 square feet. So that will come on over time. But again, I mean, I would -- don't expect that occupancy is going to move to 90% over the next several quarters, like in line with that lease rate, right? There's going to be puts and takes that come there. But I think the spread, which is 310 basis points today is wide versus where we historically operate. Usually, it's 200 or less. So we expect that that lease to occupied spread will narrow over time. But we do feel good just given that we've got roughly 800,000 square feet of new leases that are set to come into occupancy over time. And we think that creates a positive trajectory in terms of our occupancy outlook as we go forward over the next several quarters.

I guess, 1 follow-up to that would be, any sort of incremental known move-outs at this point versus what you guys have talked about in the past that we need to be aware of as we're thinking about '27?

Nothing major. I mean, I think we feel good about the expiration outlook, and we've talked about this before, in terms of kind of -- and I think often you and others ask about retention levels. I think we feel good about the retention levels both for where we are for fourth quarter and then as we think about 2027. What's remaining there, which excludes all of the early renewals that we've done and pushed out into future years, I think we're around 50% or so for retention on the remaining expirations for the next 5 quarters. That's higher than where we historically are. So that feels good to us, and is another reason why we feel optimistic about the occupancy trajectory as we go forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Nick Thillman with Baird.

Maybe commenting a little bit and looking into '27 for a run rate, adjusting for these potential disposition bucket. Ted, you made the comment that blended sales today are around 8% on a cap rate basis. You kind of alluded to some of the markets like Richmond, Century Center. I guess, how should we be thinking about the bucketed assets in that $100 million to $250 million of potential sales in fourth quarter for a cap rate basis? Is it closer to that 8%? Is it lower than that with the Bridgestone assets? Or is it more to that upper end of the low double digits that we saw in the third quarter?

Nick, really, it's all of that. As I mentioned, it's really -- the $250 million is really in 6 different markets. It's a mix of assets. I think if we sold all $250 million, the cap rate would be, call it low- to mid-9s, just a tick below mid-9s cap rate.

And then Brendan, you made the comment on new leasing. You had put that bogey out there, 300,000 per quarter to continue to build occupancy. But now with the progress you've made on that front, that number might be a little bit lower just given availability within the portfolio. I guess, what's the target that we should be looking at here? Is it closer to 200? Just some commentary there would be helpful.

Yes, Nick. It's probably, I think, to achieve the occupancy levels that we talked about a quarter ago, which is kind of, let's say, up 100 basis points or so as we migrate throughout '27, so we're 87.5%, give or take, at the end of this year, kind of in that 88.5% context by the end of next year. It's probably around 250 a quarter, give or take. Again, depends probably a little bit on where some of the expirations fall and whether or not we're able to renew those. But I think 250 is probably a pretty good bogey -- lower bogey to continue to drive occupancy higher.

And then maybe just following up on a question Blaine asked earlier on development yields. If we look at maybe your newer acquisitions with market rents, say maybe Bloc83 or The Terraces, I guess, how do those rents compare to the rents that you're talking with on build-to-suit projects? Is the differential 20%, 25%? I'm just trying to get a gauge on some of the opportunity there to push rate.

Yes, Nick. So our most recent acquisitions where we've done subsequent leasing, I would tell you, 600 Tryon we acquired roughly a year ago. So we leased up that vacancy. I think the building was like 83% leased when we bought it, and we're now in the mid-90s. We leased it up quicker and at much higher rents, over 10% higher rents than what we underwrote. So the market rents are really moving quickly. And I'd tell you today, if we did a lease today, it'd be even quite a bit higher than that.

Then The Terraces, I think we've just done 1 lease, and it's like 23% or 24% higher than our underwriting. Again, we bought that building in January. So rents continue to move both in Charlotte and Dallas very quickly. Different cadence through all of our markets, but more so in Dallas and Charlotte.

In Raleigh, we just did 1 renewal there, and I think it was maybe 4% or 5% higher. Not quite the level of Dallas and Charlotte.

Maybe one clip on is that's just to our underwriting, but to mark-to-market's even more than that, right, Ted, in terms of that?

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Abramowitz with Deutsche Bank.

So you've seen a nice acceleration in pricing power as reflected through the leasing spreads over the past couple of quarters. Just wondering if you could talk about your updated thoughts on how you see mark-to-market across the portfolio, and specifically, if you could help us frame how you're thinking about that in terms of lease trade-offs for 2027 and how that will impact the earnings trajectory.

Peter, it is Brendan. Maybe I'll take that. So just to answer the question directly, it's probably up about, let us call it about plus 10%. I think -- plus 7% mark-to-market across the portfolio. I think if you look at market rents across our portfolio, we're probably up about 10% kind of year-on-year. And then we've got in-place annual escalators that are, call it up around 3%. So you take that 3% off of kind of the in-place that has gone up that much versus 10% of market rents, and you kind of get to about a plus 7% compared to roughly flat a year ago. That's on a cash basis.

Cash spreads in any given quarter are going to kind of bounce around a little bit. So we'll see where those numbers shake out as we go forward. Obviously, on a GAAP basis, we've been successful pushing term out longer, and we've been successful with pushing annual bumps. So -- and free rent has come down a little bit. So all of those things benefit the GAAP spread. So I think that's part of the reason why you've seen those GAAP spreads accelerate faster than where we've seen the cash rent spreads.

Your next question comes from the line of Tom Catherwood with U.S. Bancorp.

Just wanted to go back to your answer to Nick's question and get a little bit more specific on the development rents. So maybe in your strongest markets, like your Nashvilles and Dallas and Charlottes, what rents do you need to justify new development, and what is that gap to kind of the market rents right now?

Sure. Look, Dallas is currently getting market rents in that, call it, $100 net, call it maybe $90 to $100 net, or $85 to $100 net rate, and that is what you need to justify new development today. So Dallas, we are there, right? So second, Charlotte probably needs $90 on a more of a gross basis, $90 to $95, probably. Highest rents achieved probably in the 70s, low 70s today. So what's that? Maybe 20% off, if you will. And then Nashville is probably in that same ballpark as well.

And then last one for me. In general, with space getting tighter in your markets, how much are tenants coming to you for early renewals? And could that have a benefit to cash flow in the coming years if you are able to do more renewals instead of new leasing?

Yes, look, you hit on a trend that we're seeing. I might even mentioned it, I cannot remember if it was last quarter. But we are absolutely seeing customers that have expirations. Typically, the larger customers have expirations. It used to be maybe 2 years out. Now, I would say it's 3 to 5 coming to us, and they're seeing that there's not going to be any new supply in the next several years. So they want to renew, probably lock in favorable economics, but also make sure they've got space that accommodates their needs if they want to upgrade their space. So without a doubt, we are seeing, and we are renewing, certain customers that have expirations that are well before the natural expiration date.

Tom, it's Brian here real quick. I think we've mentioned this in the past. We haven't been shy about being proactive kind of in this space where the majority of our assets are unsecured with regard to debt. We don't have a debt partner. We can reach forward with certain anchors and larger customers to secure them now and extend them. At the same time, many of them are expanding, too, so they want to go ahead and take care of that before they run out of space.

Your next question comes from the line of Dylan Burzinski with Green Street.

Brendan, I think you mentioned -- I joined late, so excuse me if I'm misquoting you, but I think you mentioned market rents are up 10% year-over-year across the portfolio. Ted, I know you sort of walked through some of the markets versus underwriting, but could you walk through sort of how that 10% shapes up across the various markets in which you own assets in?

Sure. Look, I think our strongest 2 markets where you've seen well in excess of 10%, again, it's Dallas and Charlotte. And I'd say Nashville's moving at a pretty good pace as well. And then after that, I think Tampa, we're seeing some real movement there. The interesting thing about Tampa is, there's no new space, new first-gen space. That may temper some of the rent growth for a bit. But again, despite the quality, so I think owners are going to have a good headwind or tailwind there as well.

And then I think you're seeing smaller rent increases in maybe Atlanta, Raleigh, and Orlando, I would say. But I think you're going to start seeing. We're starting to see a lot of momentum in Raleigh. There just happen to be a lot of first-gen spaces still being absorbed, but the demand has been pretty good, so I think that's going to pick up. So again, all of our markets are increasing. It's just the pace is different across the markets.

And I guess with that in mind, I know a lot of focus on the capital markets environment has been related to higher rates. But as you think about or as you look at or as you've seen buyer underwriting, right, as you guys are out in the market, are you seeing people lean into that rent growth story as they look out the next two, three years, and how has that maybe impacted pricing?

No, I think they have, Dylan. Again, we look at all the acquisitions that are out there and the pricing that we've seen on the deals that we've pursued. We just haven't matched up with our pricing expectations. So I think there's buyers out there that have got a pretty good view of -- or opinion of rent growth. They may be right at the end of the day. But we've seen some fairly aggressive pricing on some high-quality assets.

Your next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.

Just looking for some breadcrumbs on same-store NOI as we're thinking about sort of this year and how it could play out. Obviously, occupancy's been building, so it should be a tailwind next year. Just curious if you could provide some high-level comments on either any known expirations or commencements or free rents. Like how do we think about the puts and takes with same-store NOI as we start to flip the calendar?

Ron, it's Brendan. Yes, I mean, I think the biggest indicator, as I mentioned earlier is just when GAAP is high and it's higher than cash, then that's a strong signal that you're going to see cash have a corresponding increase in future periods. So there is likely to be a lot of conversion of current free rent, noncash rent into cash. This year, I think our straight line guidance is mid-$40 million range. That number is normally low to mid-20s, so that gives you a pretty good indication of how much higher we are in terms of noncash rent to free rent. So a lot of that will come online, combined with some occupancy gains, I think will drive same-property outlook on a cash basis. And probably in all likelihood, on a GAAP basis next year to above trend levels would be expectations, at least as we sit here today.

And then my second one, and sorry if this was asked, but on the acquisitions, the potential, obviously, number went down. The ones that slipped away, what happened there? Was it pricing? Was it competition? Just curious what happened to those deals that you guys thought could be possible but are no longer possible.

Yes, Ron, you might be referring to when we took the guidance down from $85 million at the low end to 0, and that is solely the timing of the acquisition on Bloc83, where we have an option -- ongoing option to acquire. We currently own 10% of that asset with our partner. We have an option to buy up to 50%, and it's really just a timing issue. We don't know if we will actually exercise that option late this year or sometime next year. There is not a question of if, it's just when right now.

And that's what drove the revision downwards.

There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Ted Klinck for closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for joining the call this morning, and thank you for your continued interest in Highwoods. We look forward to seeing everybody at NAREIT, and we will be having a bus tour. So if you are interested, just reach out to Brendan and get on the schedule. Thanks, everybody.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.

Good morning, and welcome to the Highwoods Properties Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

I would now like to turn the call over to Brendan Marana, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call this morning are Ted Klinck, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Leary, our Chief Operating Officer.

For your convenience, today's prepared remarks have been posted on the web. If you have not received yesterday's earnings release or supplemental, they're both available on the Investors section of our website at highwoods.com. On today's call, our review will include non-GAAP measures such as FFO, NOI and EBITDA.

The release and supplemental include a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures. Forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed at length in our press releases as well as our SEC filings.

As you know, actual events and results can differ materially from these forward-looking statements, and the company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements. With that, I'll turn the call over to Ted.

Thanks, Brendan, and good morning, everyone. We had another excellent quarter, delivering strong financial and operating results and executing on our key long-term initiatives. Let me start with 6 key highlights. First, leasing volume was healthy with over 1 million square feet of second-gen signings, including 326,000 square feet of new leases. .

Plus, we signed 63,000 square feet of first-gen leases in our development pipeline. Second, rent growth continued upward with cash rent spreads over 3% and GAAP rent spreads over 20%.

Plus, our net effective rents were 8% higher than our prior 5-quarter average and the second highest in our company's history. Third, our occupancy increased by 70 basis points sequentially or 110 basis points when adjusting for properties owned and in service for the entirety of the second quarter.

We expect occupancy will continue to improve as we move into the second half of the year. Fourth, our development pipeline now consists only of 23 springs in Uptown Dallas where we increased the lease rate to 93%, up 10 percentage points during the quarter and where we only have $28 million of projected spend to bring this property to stabilization.

Given strong leasing, we've accelerated the projected stabilization date of 23 springs by 9 months from the first quarter of 2028 to the second quarter of 2027.

Plus rents are meaningfully higher than original underwriting. Fifth, we made significant progress pruning our portfolio and replenishing our dry powder for future investments. We sold nearly $260 million of properties in the second quarter and expect to close on an additional $74 million of noncore dispositions over the next few weeks.

This will bring our disposition total to $375 million thus far in 2026. And sixth, we continue to advance discussions on potential new investment opportunities mostly around build-to-suit or substantially pre-leased development projects.

We have growing confidence that we'll have new development announcements later this year and into next year that will generate attractive risk-adjusted returns and replenish our future growth engine. This body of work over the past several quarters sets the stage for a significantly improved portfolio with an even stronger balance sheet than we currently have, all while delivering steady growth in earnings and cash flow over the foreseeable future.

Turning to Sunbelt office dynamics. We believe our portfolio is well positioned to deliver outsized rent growth given the lack of new supply currently under construction and dwindling blocks of high-quality space and BBD locations.

Simply put, existing customers and new prospects don't have a lot of options when seeking commute worthy office space. We're pushing rents across most of our BBDs and buildings and believe this dynamic, combined with occupancy growth will drive meaningful upside in NOI over the next few years.

To this end, we estimate vacancy rates across high-quality buildings and our core BBDs are at least 5% lower than the stated overall vacancy rates for these submarkets. CBRE recently published a study highlighting prime office vacancy to 640 basis points lower than nonprime office, which is the widest spread since CBRE began tracking this metric.

While a rising tide is likely to eventually buoy rent economics across a broad range of office products, current market dynamics are driving pricing power at communeworthy buildings and the strongest BBDs across the Sunbelt.

Turning to investment activity. We generated disposition proceeds of $260 million during the quarter, consisting of the sale of Bridgestone Tower in Nashville, and a noncore land parcel that we owned with a JV partner in Richmond.

Bridgestone Tower is an excellent building in a BBD location that we developed and delivered in 2017. The tower is 100% occupied with over 11 years of lease term and annual rent bumps well below average for our portfolio.

Essentially, we swapped Bridgestone Tower for 600 South Tryon in Charlotte, a building we acquired late last year is 8 years younger for a total investment of $30 million less with $1 million more in NOI upside upon stabilization higher annual red bumps, longer weighted average lease term and a diversified rent roll.

We expect to close an additional $74 million of noncore dispositions in the next few weeks, including a fully leased building in the Century Center in Atlanta, a 6 billion portfolio in Richmond. These sales will bring our year-to-date disposition total to $375 million.

We have several more assets currently in the market for sale at various stages and now expect to close at least an additional $100 million and maybe as much as $300 million by the end of the year. These potential sales include a combination of noncore buildings and land. With regard to acquisitions, as a reminder, we have the option to acquire an additional 40% interest in Block 83 in Raleigh for $85 million and have included this at the low end of our acquisition outlook for the balance of the year.

Last quarter, I mentioned we are starting to see inquiries for build-to-suit and highly pre-leased development opportunities. These conversations have continued to advance, giving us confidence around future development announcements.

These opportunities are all in existing core markets, some with potential development partners and some on company-owned land. As a result of these conversations, we now expect to announce at least $100 million of new development during the remainder of the year and potentially as much as $400 million.

Turning to the quarter. We delivered FFO of $0.90 per share, which included $0.04 of land gains. Our occupancy improved and given the strong leasing that we have completed in the first half of the year, we expect occupancy will continue to march higher in the second half of the year.

Based on our strong results year-to-date and confidence for the remaining 2 quarters, we have increased our 2026 FFO outlook to a range of $3.46 to $3.70 per share, which equates to $3.58 at the midpoint, an increase of $0.04 per share.

Excluding land sale gains, our range is up $0.01 per share despite $0.04 per share of dilution from higher-than-expected dispositions without reinvestment of excess cash proceeds. Given the meaningful dry powder we now have on the balance sheet, combined with a positive outlook for NOI growth across our portfolio, we expect to deliver healthy growth in NAV, FFO and cash flow over the foreseeable future.

Before turning the call over to Brian, I want to reiterate the strategic priorities we have highlighted over the past few years that will drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. First, we have mentioned for a couple of years, our focus on driving occupancy towards stabilized levels in order to deliver meaningful NOI growth.

We continue to prioritize occupancy. We are also pushing rents more aggressively which adds to our long-term NOI growth outlook. Second, we have been focused on delivering and stabilizing our development pipeline with our pipeline now delivered and nearing stabilization we are focused on replenishing this pipeline with new projects that will generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Third, we have been focused on improving our portfolio quality and long-term growth rate by recycling out of noncore CapEx-intensive assets and assets with lower growth profiles and investing in properties with better cash flows and higher long-term growth rates.

We have made meaningful progress in the first half of the year, expect additional improvements in the second half of 2026 and beyond. And fourth, we continue to maintain a strong and flexible balance sheet and have significant dry powder available for new investments.

With the progress we've made over the past several quarters, combined with a strong fundamental backdrop across our Sunbelt BBDs we are well positioned to deliver significant organic growth from our current portfolio and deploy our dry powder into new investments that will generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Brian?

Thanks, Ted, and good morning, everyone. Kudos to our team for our standout second quarter. The macro story here is simple. Our Sunbelt markets are outperforming the nation and a structural supply low is moving the market in our favor. Per CBRE, the national office construction pipeline has plunged to just 6.4 million square feet. The lowest level since 1996, back when there were 11 million fewer jobs using office space in America.

Between obsolete space getting demolished and new starts at all-time lows, there is a growing shortage of prime commute worthy space across our best business districts. We capitalized on that setup this quarter, signing over 120 leases including 41 new deals totaling 326,000 square feet that will directly drive future occupancy.

Most importantly, we're seeing attractive economics. GAAP rent growth jumped 20.9%. Cash rents were up 3.2% and net effective rents came in 8% higher than our prior 5-quarter average. Our operational performance this quarter highlights the ongoing strength of our Sunbelt BBD strategy.

CNBC recently ranked the top states for business and our footprint dominated the list, with North Carolina holding its top 2 streak since 2021, in Texas, Virginia, Georgia, Florida and Tennessee, all firmly in the top 10 with major announcements of new front office executive and revenue-generating operations at scale.

This business-friendly macro environment continues to drive employment growth corporate relocations and talent retention directly into our best business districts. Turning to our markets. Leasing volumes and improving metrics were consistent across the portfolio, and I'll highlight 3 markets where activity was especially strong, Charlotte, Nashville and Dallas.

In Charlotte, we continue to see the market act as a magnet for corporate talent. Uptown saw a major job in capital commitments from Capital Group and Sumitomo Mitsui, each taking approximately 200,000 square feet. And in the suburbs, Swiss pharmaceutical giant, Okta Pharma, recently announced a $1.5 billion headquarters in lab that will bring 1,500 overall jobs to the area.

CBRE reported that announcements like these helped drive over 550,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the quarter and pulled overall vacancy down to a 3-year low of 23%. Prime trophy availability has tightened below 4% and direct asking rents for that space broke $59 a square foot for the first time, a 60% premium over the market average.

Our 2.4 million square feet in South Park and Uptown Charlotte sit right in the middle of that scarcity with cash rent roll-ups of 10%, GAAP roll-ups of 29% and net effective rents averaging over $31 a square foot. Nashville was our leasing volume leader for the quarter.

Roughly half of our 241,000 square feet of leasing there was new business, adding to our first quarter momentum when we signed over 130,000 square feet of new leasing there as well. This volume of new leasing represents meaningful momentum for notable occupancy gains into next year.

The broader market reinforced that story, with Starbucks signing a long-term lease for the 250,000 square foot Southeast corporate office downtown and JLL recording 1.3 million square feet of leasing activity and 400,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the quarter, more than double the first quarter's pace.

Active construction in Nashville is limited to just 450,000 square feet, 77% of which is already pre-leased. Meaning commute worthy space across our core BBDs of downtown West End, Brent Wood and Cool Springs is becoming scarce. This reinforces the organic growth embedded in our assets in Music City.

Finally, to Dallas. Headquartered there, CBRE noted that fundamentals continue to accelerate with nearly 940,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the second quarter. Vacancy was down 70 basis points sequentially to 25% and Class A asking rents rose north of $39 per square foot.

Our footprint in Uptown and Preston Center, where vacancy sits below 5%, is capturing that demand directly generating double-digit cash and GAAP rent spreads and net effective rents above $50 a square foot.

In summary, with a commute worthy portfolio, a limited supply picture, in a trophy asset team operating in the nation's most business-friendly states, Highwoods is well positioned to keep delivering on our simple strategy, occupancy gains, rental growth and long-term value creation. I'll now turn the call over to Brendan.

Thanks, Brian. In the second quarter, we delivered net income of $93.5 million or $0.85 per share and FFO of $100.7 million or $0.90 per share. The quarter included a $0.035 per share land sale gain from the disposition of a noncore parcel in Richmond that was sold by a JV in which we had a 50% interest. .

G&A was nearly $1 million higher than expected due to write-offs of previously capitalized predevelopment costs related to projects where our view of the highest and best use has changed. These write-offs are the primary reason our G&A outlook for 2026 increase compared to our prior outlook.

There were no other unusual items in the quarter. Our balance sheet remains in excellent shape. We have ample liquidity, no near-term debt maturities, and we made significant progress lowering our debt-to-EBITDA ratio from 6.7x to 6.2x in the second quarter.

We ended the quarter with $145 million of cash on hand and nothing drawn on our $750 million revolving line of credit. We extended the maturity date on our $150 million term loan from 2027 to 2031 and reduce the borrowing rate by 15 basis points. Subsequent to quarter end, we closed a $56 million secured mortgage at our 50-50 Midtown East JV, repatriating over $44 million from this recently stabilized development back to Highwoods, plus, as Ted mentioned, we expect to close over $70 million of asset sales in the next couple of weeks, which will result in a pro forma cash balance of more than $250 million and no borrowings outstanding on our revolver.

The only maturity we have between now and the first quarter of 2028 is our March 2027 bond, which has a balance of $289 million after we repurchased $11 million of the notes during the second quarter. This debt can be repaid at par starting in December. And given our strong cash position, we don't anticipate a need to raise capital to address this maturity.

We expect to close 1 or more additional JV financings during the remainder of the year, which will repatriate even more capital back to Highwoods and further strengthen our liquidity and unencumbered debt-to-EBITDA ratio. Based on our current expectations of NOI growth, we expect debt to EBITDA to be modestly lower at year-end and continued to decline throughout 2027, assuming otherwise leverage neutral investment activities.

We have only $28 million of remaining capital needed at our share to complete 23 Springs which is the only property remaining in our development pipeline after placing Midtown East in service during Q2 '26. Given even stronger-than-expected leasing, we now project 23 Springs will stabilize in the second quarter of 2027, which is 9 months earlier than our pro forma and with NOI meaningfully higher due to better-than-anticipated rents.

We are no longer capitalizing costs on this project, which will result in upside to FFO and cash flow as signed leases commence over the next 4 quarters. As Ted mentioned, our occupancy improved 70 basis points from the end of Q1, which includes a 30 basis point headwind from the sale of the 100% occupied Bridgestone Tower.

Even with the occupancy impact from the sale of Bridgestone Tower, we continue to expect to end the year with occupancy in a range of 86.5% to 88.5%, implying nearly 200 basis points of upside over the next 2 quarters at the midpoint of our year-end outlook.

Before I turn the call back to the operator for questions, I'd like to give some color on our financial outlook for the remainder of the year. We updated our 2026 FFO outlook to $3.46 to $3.70 per share, which is up $0.04 per share at the midpoint.

Excluding land sale gains, our FFO outlook is up $0.01 per share at the midpoint which includes $0.04 per share of dilution from higher-than-anticipated disposition activity and $0.01 from the aforementioned predevelopment cost write-offs. Neither of these headwinds were in our prior outlook.

To be clear about the dilutive impact from the additional 2026 disposition proceeds, our updated 2026 outlook assumes we will keep the excess disposition proceeds in cash for the remainder of the year. We ultimately expect to deploy these proceeds into new investments, which should drive accretion in both FFO and cash flow as we fully reinvest the proceeds into income-producing assets.

As far as our FFO expectations for the second half of 2026 are concerned and excluding any impact from land sale gains, we expect to end the year with an acceleration of FFO based on 3 main factors: First, our projected occupancy ramp is expected to be weighted more heavily in Q4 than Q3.

Second, we expect steady NOI gains at 23 Springs over the next few quarters. And third and finally, OpEx seasonality typically results in lower operating margins in Q3 compared to the other quarters during the year.

Overall, given our implied FFO outlook for the second half of 2026 combined with ample cash on hand available for future deployment were upbeat about the trajectory of FFO and cash flow for the foreseeable future. Operator, we are now ready for questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first question comes from Seth Bergey from Citi Group.

The sustainability of the dividend and funding some of the leasing CapEx. Just calculating kind of a pit an AFFO payout ratio of kind of over 100%. So just any kind of thoughts there and whether -- and how you kind of look to fund some of the additional development projects that you mentioned might be coming in the prepared remarks.

Seth, thanks for the question. Maybe this is Ted. I'll start out and maybe Brendan can jump in. Look, regarding the dividend, we discussed it with our Board virtually every quarter. If you look at -- we view as a dividend as a very important part of our total return.

So we're not going to overreact on a year or 2 of shortfalls if you go back to 2020, we've generated roughly $150 million of free cash flow above our dividend. So look, I think we feel very comfortable that we're going to get back to covering $2 a share next year, hopefully, but it's going to be significantly better than it is today. So I think we generally feel comfortable with it. .

Yes, Seth, it's Brandon. Maybe just to add a little additional color. I think a couple of options as we think about the dividend. So one, I think there's probably 3 main reasons why a company would look to make an adjustment.

One is if there's an acute leverage problem, which given kind of the leverage profile that we have, we feel very good about kind of where our leverage is and where that's heading. Number two, as a source of funds, given we've sold $375 million year-to-date, we have additional sales teed up.

We have lots of proceeds coming in the door. So we don't feel like we have difficulty in terms of raising capital. And then third, which I think is primarily what you're driving at is we have operating cash flow that is sustainable to support a payout ratio over time.

We believe that we do -- I think the reason why coverage is so low this year is, number one, there's an occupancy build. And with that comes generally free rent and then spend on leasing capital. So -- we've talked about kind of that straight-line adjustment, which is probably $20 million to $25 million higher in 2026 than a normalized level.

So we expect that, that cash flow will come on as we have a bunch of free rent that converts over into cash rent. Second, we've talked about how much NOI upside we have just as we have the development deliveries come online, and then we have normalized occupancy. And that's in the range of around $40 million.

And then third and finally, we've been spending a lot in terms of leasing CapEx. I think we spent $84 million in the first half of the year. That's an annualized run rate of close to $170 million. We really expect that, that number is going to come down to probably $120 million over time. So that's an additional $40 million to $50 million of cash flow.

So when you add all of that up and you get to normalized levels, we expect that cash flow levels will be in that neighborhood of $100-plus million higher than at least where the annual run rate is for the first half of the year. So we feel very good about that outlook. And I think we'll get back to those levels of cash flow retention that Ted mentioned we were a few years ago.

That's helpful. And then maybe just a follow-up. Can you kind of give a cap rate on some of the dispositions that you have teed up and I know you called out kind of the 4 of dilution to 2026. But just any color on how we should think about that impacting the Sun rate heading into ?

So again, Seth, it's Ted. Maybe I can start again. So I think we put in the press release last night with what we've sold so far this year, the $300 million -- and then the 74 or so that will close in the next couple of weeks, combined, that's roughly an 8% cap.

And then after that, as we mentioned, we do have some additional dispositions in the market that will close, whether it be late this year or I'm sure some will roll into next year, just who knows. Look, I think those are going to be higher. My gut is, those are going to be in the high single-digit cap rates.

Seth, just to kind of put a point on kind of the dilution outlook there. Obviously, we made up for the dilution in terms of keeping that cash on balance sheet from the excess proceeds. I think we've sold $135 million more than what we told you at the beginning of the year and included in the guide, we've made up for that with higher NOI on a go-forward basis. .

I think as you think about additional sales that we put in the outlook, but not in our FFO numbers, those could come in, and let's say, even if we use those proceeds only for debt reduction or maybe to fund development but you think about all of the cash that we have on hand and as we deploy that, I think you would mitigate even in the most conservative sense of use of additional proceeds coming on the door.

Given the excess cash that we have on hand, I think we would likely mitigate the vast majority of that dilution with then building that pipeline of kind of future earnings growth as those -- that capital was deployed into income-producing assets.

Next question comes from Renald Camden from Morgan Stanley.

Great. I guess, just the first 1 for me is just starting with development a little bit. Clearly, some success with 23 Springs, but I was wondering if you could comment broadly on sort of the flavor of additional development projects, such as Ovation or anything else?

Because I noticed the release sort of increased the potential for development the dollar amount.

Sure, Ron. Look, with regard to development, I mean, I think in the last several months, maybe even talked about on a prior quarter, we're starting to see some interesting development opportunities and it's numerous opportunities.

Really, we're seeing opportunities in most of our markets today. So we're certainly sharpening our pencil and trying to replenish our development pipeline. So we feel confident we're going to have at least an announcement or so in the next few months, but nothing is done yet.

We've got CAs signed on all the opportunities we're looking at. So hopefully, we'll have more to discuss, but I will say, just to reiterate, we do have a fair amount of development opportunities that we're looking at. right now.

And I think when I look at it with a historic low amount of new construction underway, just capitalized developers are going to have a first mover advantage -- and so if we can get some pre-leasing done, I think there's going to be a real opportunity to take advantage of this environment.

Brian, just to give you a little color on Ovation, just to remind everyone, we fully own the full close to 150 acres. We've got it fully re-entitled the density that's approved there from the city of Franklin which is the white hot Center of suburban growth and affluence in Nashville is 1.4 million square feet of office, within which our Mars Pet Care headquarters is in that number. .

We have 1,600 residential units entitled both for sale and for rent, 430,000 square feet of retail, 350 hotel rooms. So a great partnership with the city of Franklin. We've identified build the core partners who have aligned interest and capital and are looking forward to advancing and sharing as we finish the year when we're going vertical.

Great. And then just my second question, if you take just a big step back, thinking about the guidance for this year, just what's the number for the dilution from capital recycling, right? I know you said $0.04 of incremental dilution. What's sort of the total number from dilution from this year and then the land sale gains, presumably that creates a headwind for next year if it does not recur.

And then last but not least, on the same-store the cash number, I think, was reiterated. Just as you're gaining occupancy, just any sort of breadcrumbs about what tailwinds that could become in '27 as leases commence?

Ron, it's Brendan. I'll try. I'll try to tick through those questions. So if you go back to the beginning of the year, what we talked about was the recycling of capital with the acquisition primarily of 600 South Trion that was not stabilized, right?

It was stabilized from a lease perspective, but not stabilized from an occupancy perspective -- and we mentioned that, that had $0.07 of headwind in that number for our 2026 outlook. That number still holds.

But that goes away in 2027 as the -- that will be in the low 90s in terms of occupancy by the end of 2026 and then generate roughly a stabilized level of GAAP NOI in 2027.

And then in addition to that, we just disclosed kind of the $0.04 of additional dilution associated with the excess sale proceeds from Bridgestone Tower and then the 2 dispositions that we announced last night. So you kind of have a full $0.11 that was in there.

What we talked about initially was the dilution from 600 South Trian was largely offset by the land sale gains in that initial guide. So we're initially at 3.54%. You kind of had $0.08 of land sale gains, $0.07 a dilution from 600 South Trian, they roughly offset 1 another.

So I think a normalized level of kind of earnings power was in that mid-350s context for 2026. And then you'll kind of get that growth from 600 South Dry on next year that will come online. And then you've got organic growth from just the occupancy build and 23 spring.

So I think I tried to give some color in the prepared remarks about the trajectory of FFO in the back half of this year. I would expect that Q3 will be kind of ex land sale gains in line-ish with where we were in Q2, which suggests that you've got an accelerating FFO trajectory on Q4 and then on top of that, you've got additional gains that we would get in terms of 23 Springs as those leases commence in the first half of 2027.

And then I think we've talked previously about how we have a positive view of occupancy, not just in the back half of this year, but we think we're set up well to deliver occupancy gains in 2027 as well. We're going to sharpen our pencil and kind of give you more specifics at the beginning of the year on the 2027 outlook.

But I think we feel good about the trajectory of where that's all going.

Our next question comes from Blaine Heck from Wells Fargo.

Great. Ted, I wanted to follow up on your commentary on the potential for build-to-suit opportunities. I know you said there are opportunities in each market, but are there any specific markets that you're seeing that offer the best risk reward at this point? Any color on the profile of tenants that you guys are talking to or industry? And what's kind of your required return hurdle on a yield basis?

Sure. So with regard to the opportunities, really, it's the sectors, it's financial services and corporates for the most part. And markets plan, it is exactly what I said. We're really seeing opportunities in just about every 1 of our markets.

I guess we're really not looking at anything in Richmond and Orlando, but really have opportunities to look at across the spectrum. Again, not all of it's on our own land, some of it is and others, it would be on other people's land. But we're just super excited about the inbound activity that's occurred over the past, again, several months, but things seem to be picking up a little bit.

And given us some more confidence. So we'll see on that. But hopefully, we'll have more to talk about in the next quarter. So in terms of our required returns, as you know, we don't normally talk about it largely from a competitive standpoint. And then there's just a lot of factors that go into it.

And what market is it? Is it urban, suburban, what's the credit, what's the term, what annual bumps you're getting anticipated exit cap rate. There's just a lot of factors that make a comparison really hard to make on these transactions.

So every deal sort of a snowflake, if you will, to a certain degree. So -- but again, just the activity we're seeing, we're pretty excited about.

Okay. Great. Just following up on that. It does seem like you're leaning into development, but I guess, how are you thinking about the balance between investing in acquisitions where you get immediate yield and contribution -- NOI contribution versus developments where you have some incremental capitalized interest.

But the full NOI contribution is delayed kind of pushing out earnings growth relative to the kind of immediate gratification you could get from acquisitions? How do you think about the balance?

Yes. Look, we think about it all the time. Again, we're always evaluating the best use of our capital over the long term. I think over multiple cycles, we've rotated pretty well between acquisitions and development. And always looking for really what we think the best risk-adjusted returns.

So -- and if you think about the last '25 and early '26, we closed on about $600 million of acquisitions that we thought we were going to get very attractive with adjusted returns, and we've been incredibly pleased about it.

But as the development is picking up, we're seeing those development opportunities with higher yields and even the acquisitions. So again, we're looking at it over the long term, but it's -- but some we toggle between all the time. We're always discussing.

Our next question comes from Vikram Malhotra from Mizuho.

I guess, Brent, maybe I missed this, so sorry if I'm asking to repeat. But based on all the new leasing you've done this quarter and kind of what you can see into 3Q and maybe 4Q on renewals and the pipeline of new leasing do you mind sort of is there a possibility of sort of hitting towards the near end of the occupancy guide?

And as we look into '27, do you mind just giving the -- reminding us of any new move-outs that could impact the occupancy trajectory from lease to occupied?

Yes, Vikram. Thanks for the question. So I think from the occupancy outlook, just to give a very kind of like high level roll forward of where we stand today, which I think I did last quarter as well. We've got a little less than 800,000 square feet of expirations remaining in 2026.

We currently project that 200 to 300 million of that will renew, which means that we're in the -- at the midpoint of that range, there's about 550 vacates got it between now and year-end.

We have 1 million square feet that is signed that has not yet commenced that will commence by year-end 2026. So that dynamic there is plus 450,000 square feet of net absorption [Technical Difficulty] has to do need to have a little more spec new kind of come in and start and probably do a little bit better than at least what the midpoint is in terms of some of the retention that we have for the back half of the year.

That probably put us -- I think it would be unlikely to get to 88.5%, but maybe gets to that 88% level. I think to get down to the lower end of the range, probably -- again, it's probably just the reverse of those things. maybe retention is a little bit lower. And then there can always be sometimes an early move out here or there or we may proactively take space back to do a long-term extension or something like that. So those are probably the things that kind of move us around.

But what I would say is I think we feel very good about the leasing that we've done thus far year-to-date. -- and to be able to maintain the midpoint of the year-end outlook with selling Bridgestone Tower that was 100% occupied, that in and of itself had 30 basis points of headwind to that year-end number.

I think we feel very good about the progress that we've made halfway through the year. And then sorry, I think I mentioned about -- '27.

I think we were talking about earlier. We feel like we're well positioned, and we've got, I think, roughly 2.5 million square feet of expirations there.

None that are large. I think we have 1 that's over 100,000 square feet. I think we feel good about that renewal -- so not a whole lot there. There are some early term options that we've been notified on. We had expected those for a long, long period of time. So nothing surprising that's popping up.

So I think given the backdrop for '27, I think we feel good about the ability to drive occupancy higher as we migrate throughout next year as well.

And then do you mind just giving us a sense of the -- like how margins will progress given all the leasing you've already done that to commence in the second half and -- and just remind us any onetime impacts in terms of property tax true-ups or anything you're anticipating that would, I guess, change the trajectory of the NOI margin upside?

From a margin perspective, I would say just overall, without kind of getting into the quarterly numbers that are there. it's going to bounce around a little bit. It probably depends a little bit on kind of where mix issue and occupancy gets better versus comparatively worse.

But what I would say, generally, as you're thinking about incremental margins and leasing that falls to the bottom line, right? We were in that mid-85% kind of context in the second quarter. We were suggesting we're up kind of 200 basis points by end of this year.

And then I think we have opportunity to grow occupancy, a decent amount in 2027 as well. Typically, 100 basis points of occupancy for us is kind of $8-plus million of annual rent. That incremental margin on the occupancy gains is very high.

So probably somewhere in that 90% range. So rather than kind of get pinpoint down on what overall operating margins are, I think you can think about that context of the revenue gains and how much of that is going to fall to the bottom line?

I think it's probably a better way to think through that as what the impact is likely to be in terms of FFO and cash flow.

Next question comes from Nick Thillman from Baird.

Maybe I wanted to touch a little bit on just areas where you're seeing some strength in being able to push rate historically, you guys over the last couple of quarters, I mentioned Dallas and Charlotte are the areas where you're seeing some rent growth. But as we look at throughout the portfolio now, it sounds like even in Buckhead, you're starting to be able to push rents there as well.

As you just look at the portfolio comprehensively, what percentage of just the overall portfolio, are you being able to push rate now given that you're starting to see some inflection on the vacancy side that's making it a little bit more favorable for landlords here.

Nick, maybe I'll start and Brian can jump in if he has anything to add. Look, I just think the overall comment, like tumor activity in really all of our markets remains very active. Probably the best way to characterize it is that we haven't seen a summer slowdown this year.

I think the brokers are all working hard, both our internal leasing folks for the tenant reps. So our leasing funnel is full. -- largely consistent of our bread-and-butter type deals, working on a few larger renewals. But all of our markets are active. I'd tell you, our markets from a desirability where we think we have landlord pricing power.

It's really Dallas, Charlotte, in Nashville would be our top 3 markets. But yes, like you said, Buckhead is getting better, and we do have some pockets in some other markets, Westshore and Tampa. We're seeing some pretty good economics as well.

So you do have to go sort of market by market and submarket by submarket and really look at the competitive set. But we're starting to get pricing power. You said what percentage look, I don't know. Is it 60% to 65% maybe. We still got a few soft submarkets that are maybe lagging.

But in general, all of our markets are improving, just the cadence is different by market.

Nick, Brian, just to tag on a little bit. Nashville and Charlotte probably represent the greatest positive rate of change when you combine the quarter-over-quarter this year absorption and rate escalation.

So that's really nice look. Dallas is a huge metroplex market, but where we're at kind of sharpshooters within Preston Center and uptown. We've greatly benefited from increased rents and low -- I mean, low to no concessions the rest of the teammates across our markets are really blown away by some of the metrics in Dallas.

Even as you mentioned, Charlotte, 20% up probably year-to-date from an asking rent perspective, you mentioned Buckhead asking rents, they are probably up 5% year-over-year. So to Ted's point, we're kind of staking our ground where we can and we're going to lean in.

That's helpful. And then maybe following up a little bit on the disposition front. Ted, you mentioned high 9s, probably for the noncore sales when we talked in June, it seems as though you guys thought if conditions held that you could do up to $200 million of additional sales on the noncore front before year-end, but it seems as though what you're closing in 3Q and what you have kind of laid out, that's not embedded within guidance, you're feeling a little bit more opportunistic here on just the sales front.

So we back into what the sales were on like a cap rate basis for the 3Q and it's around like a 12%. So I assume there's some land sales numbers to get you closer to that 9% number. And then if I know we're looking at it from a headline cap rate number, but also maybe look at from a cash flow perspective, if we look at just your overall CapEx maybe as a percentage of NOI of the assets you're exiting on the noncore versus maybe what you're buying at here for like a 600 million just to give us a flavor of how this longer term shakes out for cash flow growth within the portfolio.

I know that was a lot to digest, but I wanted to kind of piece all those together.

Let me take the first half and maybe Brendan can take the second half. So look, I think you're generally right. in terms of our confidence level in getting more dispositions out the door.

I think there's -- we're seeing more buyers in the market. I think we're seeing more financing sources in the market. So it gives us confidence on sort of the noncore assets that we can push them out the door. Again, cap rate range, look, without a doubt, there's going to be some double-digit cap rates, but we have some other -- again, 1 of them we're selling in the next couple of weeks with a single tenant deal at a pretty low cap rate.

So it's a mix of assets, both single tenant multi-tenant. So you're going to see a mix of cap rates as well. And there is some land that's mixed in as well without a doubt, Nick. But I think in that high single digit, if that comprises both the lower and then the double-digit cap rates, I think you're going to be in that average of the high single digits.

Yes. And then, Nick, just in terms of the cash flow, your point is spot on. So I think the nominal cap rate, the nominal NOI tends to be high, but these assets carry a much wider CapEx load or much heavier CapEx load than what we see in the typical portfolio.

So when it distilled down to underlying cash flow levels, I think regardless of sort of use of those proceeds, it's probably likely to be accretive to cash flow. At worst, if it's kind of a debt paydown, I'd say it's probably roughly neutral.

Our next question comes from Peter Abramowitz from Deutsche Bank.

Yes. Ted, you certainly sound pretty optimistic on build-to-suit and other development opportunities. So I guess I just wanted to ask kind of could you contextualize maybe the change in tone from maybe what's changed to make development more feasible in your markets? .

I know the conversation for a while has been that you were having conversations behind the scenes, but a lot of it might slow down when you get to the point where new tenants realize that the rents that they have to pay to justify your construction costs.

So could you kind of contextualize maybe the pickup you're seeing in potential development opportunities around that conversation? What changed? Or is it just kind of market and deal specific?

Look, Peter, I think that's a great question. I think a couple of years ago, we are going down the road on some development opportunities. And when they saw the rents that were required, we had a couple that backed off. So it was probably to your question. So what are we seeing and what's different today? .

First, there is very little new construction that people can go to. So companies are looking out. They're seeing the low amount of development that's underway. And a lot of that is pre-leased even Peter. So there's really no large or very few large blocks of space that anybody can even take if they need space in 2 to 3 years, right?

So if you start building today, it's 2 to 3 years get delivered. So customers are looking out and prospects looking out 2 or 3 years, they're not seeing the high-quality space available. So they're having -- they know they have to pay the higher rents to do that. And then, look, we've had a couple that just these companies they want to be in their own building. It's from a culture standpoint.

So they're coming and saying, "Look, I understand you might be able to get a pretty good space in a building in a couple of years, but I want to be by myself just as part of our culture. So it's sort of a combination there. I think in a couple of our markets, a couple of trends were interesting, this is maybe off development.

We do see some of our customers coming to us 3 to 5 years before their expiration because they're looking out and seeing the premium space, there's not -- there's a lack of premium space. So they know they're going to have to pay up if they want to move. And that's going to prop development.

But that's also sort of going through our own portfolio on renewals. We've had some large customers that have expirations in 3, 4 or 5 years that are asking us to renew now, which I think goes to the office demand long term as well and the sustainability there.

But specifically on development, it's -- look, I just think they're willing to pay the rents now. They know they have to get in the high-quality space.

Peter, I'm not sure it adds much other than some additional color, I think, as Ted mentioned, when previous developments or build-to-suits were kind of underwritten with prospective anchors, they saw the rent running away as they saw costs running away.

And we keep thinking, "Oh, there's no office being built in this country, construction costs should go down. Well, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to ever go down, but it has moderated. And so now we're seeing in those kind of BBDs with no space available the rents outpacing the construction costs in terms of growth.

So it does create an inflection point to start making these things underwritable. The other thing and I'm a bit of a broken record for the last number of years I've been able to be on these calls is that when we talk to CEOs, we talk to the heads of the HR and people department, we talk to they tell us that 1% of what they spend every year and sort of their G&A is on utilities, 9% is on real estate, 90% is on people, and they're going to lean in on their 90%.

So they can grind down their 9% and it's been shown that a bad workplace experience from a built environment can kind of reduce your productivity and you receive it in your recruitment and all of that.

So they're leaning in to investing in a 9%, positively impact the...

All right. I appreciate that. And then another question on capital recycling. Just in the context of kind of the pickup in some of these incremental asset sales, could you talk about just interest in the Pittsburgh assets and kind of where that falls in the plan today in terms of timing expectations.

I would imagine just in light of kind of improving fundamentals around the country that broadly, you would expect to see a pickup in capital markets activity. But specific to those assets, could you speak to interest today and where in the process you are with those?

Sure. So as you know, we really have 2 assets. One is a multi-building project, PPG place. So where we are on that 1 is we're really locking down. We're in negotiations right now on several renewals really just to solidify the rent roll and long-term cash flow that we can present to a potential buyer.

So look, I think that's -- we're in process of doing that. That's going to take another few months at least. So we're just being patient as we get those deals done to lock down that rent roll -- so that's probably -- maybe we can get to that. It's 2027 sale we're hopeful for.

And then the other 1 is our Liberty Building 625 Liberty, that's out in the market right now. So we're going through the process, and we'll see how it plays out. But it is in the market for sale right now.

Our next question comes from Dylan Bazinsky from Green Street.

Maybe just a quick one. Can you kind of touch on sort of the acquisition pipeline, given you guys a dry powder that you guys have today, but also with the forthcoming dispositions?

And then maybe the sort of parallel to that, can you kind of talk about if the acquisition pipeline is robust, but robust enough and given where the stock spreads today is at a certain point, equity issuance and sort of taking advantage of that external growth afforded to you by the public market is an option that you guys would be open to?

Sure, Dylan. I'll start, and maybe Brendan can jump in. With regard to the acquisition pipeline, look, without a doubt, deal flow has picked up from last year, not all of the assets that we're seeing or assets that we're interested in.

But we are -- our acquisition and investment team is certainly active on underwriting deals. But look, we're weighing that against development as well. Again, it's all about risk-adjusted yields.

We're looking at virtually everything, whether it be core or value add. And we'd love a value-add deal where we can mark-to-market the rents and get a very attractive yield, but we do measure it against development as well.

So -- while there's more opportunities out there, more sellers are bringing their assets to the market, more buyers looking at assets or the capital markets without a doubt of more liquidity today than they have.

I wouldn't say there's anything we're looking a lot of the stuff, but there's nothing imminent from our standpoint on the acquisition side.

Dylan, it's Brendan. So just what I would say in terms of sources of capital for new opportunities that are there. Obviously, we've been very successful kind of selling assets $375 million done year-to-date, additional ones that we expect to get done in the back half of the year.

I think we are very focused on exiting the noncore pieces of the portfolio, and that's going to kind of happen regardless of recycling of those proceeds. So we will do that. I think if there are other sources of capital to raise.

We've been very judicious in terms of kind of the equity over time. So we contemplate that and it's sort of just what the opportunity set is that's there. But I think we're very confident that we're going to have sources of capital coming in from the noncore asset sales that we get done in the back half of the year here and then in all likelihood next year as well.

Our last question comes from the line of Michael Lewis.

from Tura Securities.

So I'm going to come back to the land and development theme. As prime space becomes more scarce and rents are going up, -- and yet on the other hand, you're selling land. So I understand it's on a case-by-case basis, but I guess a bigger picture question about how land fits into your strategy?

How much should you hold in an environment like this? How patient are you in holding it? You had a question earlier sort of about opportunity cost of that? So the rents going up and the build-to-suit is becoming more likely and yet selling down the land a little bit. Just maybe talk about that a little bit.

Sure, Michael. Look, the land that we're selling, just so I'm clear, is it's really noncore land is land that we look at I think 2 to 3 times a year, we look at our land bank and say, is that a good office land parcel?

Or is that better use for a different use. So we do have sort of land that we think is better for multifamily or better for retail. For the land parcels we are selling really are all parcels that we believe are better suited for a different use, but really not selling office land because we do think having a judicious land bank is very advantageous for us as we're chasing build-to-suits.

We can go through build-to-suit after build-to-suit that we would not have won if we didn't have land. So having the right amount of land is incredibly important for us as developers. It's just making sure we're selling what's not -- when some of the parcels were selling, they used to be office land parcels.

But we just think the market has moved. So not every piece of land we've owned 10 years ago as an office piece of land today. So we just take a hard look at it a few times a year, and we don't have that land let's get rid of it and let us go deploy into some other land.

Okay. And then the last question, I guess the last question on the call, this is a small one, but why repurchased $11 million of the 2027 notes with us like those are swapped at a really attractive rate, 3.78%. .

So I don't know if there's a swap burning off or if there was another reason why you would tackle those early.

Yes. Michael, it's Brendan. Yes, good question. It is -- that is the maturity that comes up in March of '27. They're payable at par starting in December. And given the excess proceeds that we had on the balance sheet, a lot of those proceeds were slated for that repayment.

So we just got those at a modest discount to par and took those on early rather than wait to pay those off in par sometime between December and March. So that was just the rationale for that.

I think we do more if there was more available, but they don't trade that often. And so it's a little bit difficult to get at those.

We have no further questions. I would like to turn the call over to Ted link for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you, everybody, for joining the call this morning, and thank you for your continued interest in Highwoods Properties. Have a great rest of the summer, and we look forward to seeing you all soon. .

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Good morning, and welcome to the Highwoods Properties First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]

As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the call over to Brendan Maiorana, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call this morning are Ted Klinck, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Leary, our Chief Operating Officer. For your convenience, today's prepared remarks have been posted on the web.

If you have not received yesterday's earnings release or supplemental, they're both available on the Investors section of our website at highwoods.com.

On today's call, our review will include non-GAAP measures such as FFO, NOI and EBITDAre. The release and supplemental include a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed at length in our press releases as well as our SEC filings. As you know, actual events and results can differ materially from these forward-looking statements, and the company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Ted.

Thanks, Brendan, and good morning, everyone. We had an excellent quarter executing on our key initiatives.

Leasing volume was strong across our in-service and development properties. This is clear from the 50 basis point increase in our leased rate on our in-service portfolio, 800 basis point increase in our leased rate on our developments. Both of these will deliver meaningful upside in NOI, cash flow and FFO over the next few years as occupancy ramps.

During the quarter, we invested $108 million in best-in-class commute-worthy properties in BBD locations in Dallas and Raleigh through joint ventures and sold $42 million of noncore properties in Richmond. All of this activity improves our portfolio and further cement the foundation for pushing our growth rate and cash flows meaningfully higher and will result in long-term value creation for our shareholders.

Even with our strong performance in the quarter, we recognize the broader narrative that advances in AI could reshape the workforce, and therefore, affect long-term office demand.

The range of potential outcomes is wide and varied, and at this point, there are many unknowns. What we do know, however, is that customers and prospects haven't diminished their appetite for space and are making long-term commitments to their in-office strategies, and activity across our portfolio, our markets and our BBDs is strong.

Leasing was solid in the quarter. Our leasing pipeline remains robust, high-quality space across our BBDs is dwindling, and there's little-to-no new supply expected during the foreseeable future.

This flight-to-quality dynamic creates a strong backdrop for occupancy gains and rent growth, both of which we experienced in the first quarter.

Additionally, creditworthy customers are willing to make long-term commitments as evidenced by our weighted average lease term on second gen lease volume of 7.5 years, more than 1 year longer than our recent average lease term.

Further, demographic trends across our footprint are favorable with business relocations and expansions reaccelerating, driving healthy population and job growth. We firmly believe high-quality commute-worthy properties in BBD locations owned by well-capitalized landlords are best positioned to capture increasing demand and improving economics.

Turning to the quarter. We delivered solid financial performance with FFO of $0.84 per share, and we maintained our outlook for the year. Our leasing performance was excellent. We signed 958,000 square feet of second-gen leases, including over 300,000 square feet of new leases.

We delivered GAAP rent growth of 19.4% and cash rent growth of 4.8%. Net effective rents were the second highest in company history and 9% higher than the prior 5-quarter average.

Expansions which we include as renewals, outpaced contractions at a ratio of nearly 2:1. In addition, we signed 107,000 square feet in the first gen leases across our development properties. Customers and prospects recognize the blocks of high-quality, BBD-located office space with well-capitalized owners are diminishing across our footprint, which gives us strong pricing power in the best submarkets.

We placed in service more than $200 million of 87% leased development properties during the quarter. GlenLake Three, which comprises 203,000 square feet of office and 15,000 square feet of retail is now 94% leased.

Across the street, we delivered GlenLake Two Retail, which is 100% leased to Crooked Hammock Brewery. The addition of 24,000 square feet of food and beverage options elevates GlenLake's offerings, and complements the nearly 1 million square feet of office we have here.

This has supported our ability to push rents across this park in West Raleigh. We also placed in service Granite Park Six in Dallas' Legacy BBD. This 422,000 square foot best-in-class office property is 80% leased. We also made strong progress leasing up our 2 remaining development properties. 23Springs, our 642,000 square foot development project in Uptown Dallas, continues to garner strong activity with the leased rate now 83%, up from 75% last quarter and 62% 12 months ago.

We have strong prospects to bring our leased rate at 23Springs into the 90s. In Tampa's Westshore BBD, our 143,000 square foot Midtown East development is now 95% leased, up from 76% last quarter, and 39% 12 months ago.

The office component at Midtown East is 100% leased. On a combined basis, the properties placed in service during the first quarter and in our remaining development pipeline are 86% leased, but only 48% occupied. As the leases commence, we will capture significant growth in NOI, cash flow and FFO.

We are starting to receive interest from build-to-suit and sizable anchor prospects for potential new developments. It's still early and it's hard to say whether any of these discussions will result in new projects, but the increased interest is encouraging and signifies limited inventory companies face in searching for large blocks of high-quality space.

On the disposition front, we sold a non-core portfolio in Richmond for $42 million. As reflected in our outlook, we expect to sell roughly $200 million of additional non-core assets by the middle of this year and are marketing other assets for sale. We believe we will be able to redeploy capital from non-core asset and land sales on a leverage-neutral basis that will further strengthen our cash flows and result in higher growth.

As we announced last week, we may also use noncore disposition proceeds to repurchase up to $250 million of outstanding shares of our common stock on a leverage-neutral basis.

We continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and highly pre-leased developments but repurchasing our shares as another capital deployment option we now have in our arsenal.

Before turning the call over to Brian, I want to reiterate the priorities we have highlighted over the past few years that will drive long-term value creation for our shareholders. First, we will continue to drive occupancy towards stabilized levels in our operating portfolio.

Second, we will deliver and stabilize our development pipeline. Third, we will improve our portfolio quality and long-term growth rate by recycling out of noncore CapEx-intensive assets in non-BBD locations and invest in properties with better cash flows and higher long-term growth rates.

And fourth, we will do all this while maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet. We made meaningful progress on each of these priorities during the first quarter. We believe the focus on these 4 areas, combined with a strong fundamental backdrop in our core BBDs due to the healthy demand and limited new supply will drive significant growth in cash flow and long-term value over the next several years. Brian?

Thanks, Ted, and good morning, everyone. Our operating results continue to reflect the advantage of owning commute-worthy, amenitized assets in the best business districts of high-growth SunBelt metros. .

Fundamentals across our markets continue to improve as evidenced by vacancy rates and sublease space declining. Rents are up, which combined with steady concession packages has resulted in higher net effective rents.

As far as supply goes, the best of the best and the best of the rest are in high demand with office construction in historic lows, or nonexistent in many markets, new office inventory is in scarce supply.

With demolitions outpacing deliveries nationwide, the flight to quality has become in many cases, an all-out sprint-to-quality, with users proactively inquiring for early extensions to lock in location and terms.

A common theme across our markets is that office rents pale in comparison to the investment customers have in their people, in that exceptional environments and experiences yield superior results when their people are in the office and being better together.

Customers are choosing well-located, highly amenitized Class A buildings with well-capitalized owners and customer-centric operations, and they are willing to pay for it.

They are moving to metro that continue to win people and companies with the highest quality of life and most business-friendly outlooks. This is the Highwoods portfolio. This is the Highwoods team and these are our SunBelt markets and BBDs.

Starting with Dallas, the metroplex remains 1 of the country's premier destinations for corporate headquarters and expansions, which shouldn't be a surprise at this point considering it is Site Selection Magazine's #1 city for headquarter relocations. And as in the state, Chief Executive Magazine has deemed as the best for business 21 consecutive years.

From 2018 through 2024, Dallas landed roughly 100 headquarter relocations with 11 more in 2025. The region continues to attract diverse firms across financial and professional services, advanced manufacturing, logistics and life sciences, seeking a central location, business-friendly environment and a deep labor pool. That macro story is consistent with the office fundamentals you see in the Q1 broker data.

According to Cushman & Wakefield, DFW recorded 117,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the first quarter of 2026, its fifth consecutive positive quarter with nearly 340,000 square feet of positive absorption in Class A as Class B continues to shed space.

Our Dallas portfolio is in Uptown, Legacy and Preston Center, which is the tightest submarket in the region with less than 6% vacancy and is home to 1 of our latest acquisitions, The Terraces. These BBDs are squarely in the path of demand. The mark-to-market, we're realizing via second-generation leasing, both in McKinney & Olive?and The Terraces is significant, generating GAAP rent spreads of 27%.

Turning to Charlotte. The city is increasingly recognized as a strategic hub that's being validated by headline corporate decisions. Among the 104 metros that Cushman & Wakefield tracks, Charlotte was #1 for job growth. To that end, and subsequent to our most recent earnings call in February, 3 global financial institutions have made major new job announcements. Already with an established home in Charlotte's South Park BBD, where we have almost 800,000 square feet, JPMorgan recently announced plans for an eventual 1,000 job regional hub, with 400 of those to be hired by 2028.

Two new entries to the market include Capital Group's planned new home in Uptown with 600 new employees, and after a nationwide search, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Group, 1 of Japan's largest banks, selected Uptown as well for a second U.S. headquarters, creating 2,000 jobs by the end of 2032, with an average salary for these 2,000 jobs projected to be over $165,000 a year.

This macro backdrop aligns perfectly with Q1 office fundamentals. CBRE noted approximately 410,000 square feet of positive net absorption in the first quarter and total leasing volume of roughly 1.4 million square feet, up nearly 74% year-over-year, with about 70% of that volume in Class A buildings.

In Uptown, the denominator is shrinking as millions of square feet of office space are being taken out of inventory for conversions to residential, hotel and retail uses. Strong demand for high-quality space and limited new supply are yielding a landlord favorable environment for driving leasing fundamentals.

Our Charlotte assets are directly benefiting from this demand which is why we're seeing strong rent roll-ups in net effective rent growth in Charlotte.

In Raleigh, the long-term story of in-migration and organic growth remains intact. Recent census estimates show the Raleigh metro is 1 of 10 fastest growing in the country between 2024 and 2025.

And statewide, North Carolina ranked first in domestic net migration; and third, an overall population gain for the same period, adding an estimated 146,000 residents.

CBRE's Tech report noted that the Raleigh area also produces nearly 5,000 tech graduates annually, reinforcing a sustainable pipeline of skilled workers. Office fundamentals reflect that strength in the best business districts and our team was busy for the quarter, signing over 200,000 square feet of second-generation space.

Our 2 new developments at GlenLake, which offer a mix of uses and are 95% leased, and Bloc 83, our recent mixed-use JV acquisition, which is 97% leased in Raleigh'S CBD are directly aligned with where both in-migration and corporate demand is strongest.

Finishing in Nashville, where strong population growth and a diversified economy continued to attract brand name employers, just last month, Starbucks announced a $100 million plan to open a Southeast corporate office in downtown Nashville for 2,000 employees, with some relocating from Seattle and the balance, new hires in Nashville. Office data for the first quarter shows that demand is focused on newer or newly amenitized Class A nodes and our 287,000 square feet of quarterly leasing with a weighted average lease term of 9.8 years and cash and GAAP rent spreads of 9.4% and 26.5%, respectively, bears witness to this data.

Across our footprint, we're aligning capital with the metros and submarkets that continue to win people, jobs and corporate investment. We're making sure our portfolio and people are prepared to deliver commute-worthy experiences to our customers and their teams. Our success this quarter supports this strategy, and we're confident we'll continue to serve us well. Brendan?

Thanks, Brian. In the first quarter, we delivered net income of $31.3 million or $0.29 per share and FFO of $94 million or $0.84 per share. The quarter included a $17 million property sale gain from our disposition in Richmond that was included in net income but not included in FFO.

During the quarter, we received a term fee at an unconsolidated JV for a net $2.2 million or $0.02 per share from a customer moving from McKinney & Olive?to 23Springs, and we sold our interest in a third-party brokerage services firm, resulting in a $1.4 million gain.

These 2 items were included in FFO and were factored into our original FFO outlook. Otherwise, there were no unusual items in the quarter.

You may have noticed some minor changes to our supplemental package we released yesterday that we believe will make it easier to derive our share of joint venture NOI. We also broke out Dallas as its own market now that we have 3 in-service properties in Dallas, which will increase to 4 upon stabilization of 23Springs.

Our other markets now primarily consist of our noncore Pittsburgh and Richmond portfolios. We are pleased with our first quarter financial results, which demonstrate the resiliency of our operations and cash flows, even more consequential was this quarter's leasing activity on both the in-service portfolio and development pipeline, which positions us to increase occupancy and deliver NOI growth during the remainder of 2026 and beyond.

Our leased rate is 89.7%, up from 89.2%, 1 quarter ago. The spread between our leased and occupied rates of 470 basis points is 3x our normal historical spread, a strong indicator for future occupancy gains. We reiterated our year-end occupancy outlook of 86.5% to 88.5%, which implies a 250 basis point increase at the midpoint over the remaining 3 quarters of the year.

Our balance sheet remains in good shape. We had over $650 million of available liquidity at the end of the quarter and subsequent to quarter end, we closed a $100 million secured mortgage at Granite Park Six, resulting in over $50 million of capital to Highwoods. We expect to close 1 or more additional financings at JVs during the remainder of the year, which will repatriate capital back to Highwoods and improve our liquidity and unencumbered debt-to-EBITDA ratio.

Based on our current expectations of NOI growth and assuming $200 million of noncore asset sales, we expect to end the year with debt-to-EBITDAre in the low to mid-6s with additional reductions likely in future periods as NOI grows. We have only $40 million of remaining capital needed to complete our share of the development properties. These properties, combined with the developments placed in service this quarter, will deliver over $20 million of annual NOI growth compared to the Q1 '26 run rate.

As Ted mentioned, we have maintained our FFO outlook of $3.40 to $3.68 per share. It's still early in the year. And while we're off to a strong start with our leasing activity, most of these leases will have a financial benefit to 2027 and thereafter.

Before we turn the call over for questions, there are a couple of items to note. First, I mentioned the term fee and gain on sale we recorded in the first quarter, we do expect some additional term fees in the remainder of the year as is typical, but these are expected to be lower in subsequent quarters. We also expect some additional other income items in the second half of the year.

In total, these items are expected to be around $0.06 to $0.07 for full year 2026, which is approximately $0.05 lower than 2025.

Second, capitalized interest is expected to be lower for the foreseeable future as we will no longer capitalize interest expense at 23Springs or Midtown East. There is significant embedded NOI growth at these properties due to leases that are signed, but won't be fully online before the middle of 2027.

Third, as is typical G&A was higher in Q1 due to the expensing of annual equity grants. G&A is expected to be lower for the remaining quarters of the year. Given these factors and our expectation of steadily increasing occupancy during the final 3 quarters of 2026, we expect FFO to increase in the second half of the year.

Operator, we are now ready for questions.

[Operator Instructions]

Our first question comes from Seth Bergey from Citi.

I guess I just wanted to go back to some of your comments in the prepared remarks about discussions around potential new developments and then you obviously announced kind of the share reauthorization. I'm just curious kind of how do you think about capital allocation priorities? And how does those 2 opportunities kind of compare to each other today.

Seth, it's Ted. Look, I think -- we're always looking at the best ways to improve our long-term growth rate, strengthen our cash flows, make us more resilient cash flows and improve the quality of the portfolio. So I just think our stock buyback gives us another option to think about and gives us optionality.

I think over the years, we've proven to be pretty disciplined allocators of capital. We've rotated between acquisitions and development throughout various cycles, always looking at what's the best risk-adjusted return. And again, the stock buyback just gives us 1 more option to consider.

Last year, we were very active on the acquisition side. We acquired on our shared interest about $580 million worth of assets at what we can consider very attractive pricing. Now as you alluded to, we're becoming more constructive on development. There's the shortage of high-quality space. So we're fielding calls, whether it be build-to-suits or preleased office development that -- and development is hard these days, right? It's expensive. It's hard to finance. Interest costs are higher. So everything about development is really hard right now. But we think there's opportunities for well-capitalized developers to earn pretty attractive risk-adjusted returns.

So again, we look at everything, but development is certainly becoming more constructive.

And then just on the potential opportunity for dispositions. Just given kind of Iran and some of the changes in the 10-year and maybe some of the macro headlines around AI. Are you seeing any changes towards the type of capital that are interested in investing in office products and any changes in pricing?

I'd say the short answer is no, at least not yet. If you think about, since last year, call it, since early '25 through the disposition we had in January, we sold about $270 million roughly right at an 8% cap rate, which sort of matched up with our acquisitions.

So we've got a lot of assets out in the market. I think we've said we're going to try and get $190 million to $210 million done by midyear. We're on track to doing that. And we have other assets that are in the market as well and at various stages of the process. So we have not seen really any changes whatsoever in the profile of the buyers.

Next question comes from Blaine Heck from Wells Fargo.

You've had a solid start to the year on the leasing side. So I was hoping you could comment on the leasing economics you've seen thus far? And maybe how you would expect rent spreads and concessions to trend during the full year of 2026?

Maybe I'll start, Blaine and then Brian or Brendan can jump in. Look, as you alluded, we had a great start to the year with up almost 5% on cash, 19-plus percent on GAAP. And it can vary quarter-to-quarter. It can just be a mix, as you know. But I think in general, the macro -- our macro view is, look, there's a pretty good setup for office owners over the long term. Again, quarter-to-quarter can bounce around a little bit.

But look, what we know is demand remains strong in our markets. We're not seeing any impact whatsoever thus far on AI impact on AI. In fact, it's been a net positive to us. We signed a couple AI related users. So we're not seeing anything there. There's absolutely to Brian's point in his prepared remarks, there's a dwindling supply of high-quality space in the BBDs.

There's going to be a shortage of this space. I think in the next couple of years, given that no new construction -- ongoing constructions that I think, a historic low according to JLL.

So we're starting to see that, and that's going to accrue to the benefit, I think, to office owners. So look, again, we don't know exactly what the metrics are going to look like, but we do think there's a pretty good setup for owners of high-quality office space in our BBDs.

And then also, 1 other thing we've got to wind at our back is the in-migration. It's just continuing. Brian alluded to a few big announcements in Charlotte, but we're seeing that in Dallas. We're seeing that in other markets as well, obviously, to varying degrees. But just in general, everything about the supply-demand backdrop feels pretty good right now.

Hi, Blaine, this is Brian. I might just add a little anecdote to add on to that. But we've mentioned on previous calls that we have been proactive in many cases in connecting with customers well in advance of expirations since we had term and arguably kind of a catch market to push out those extensions because we don't have pending secured debt expirations and things like that, we could look beyond.

And they're now reaching out to us, too. So that's a kind of unique change. They want to secure where they're at. They want to secure terms and not get kind of caught at a mark-to-market a few years down. So I think that's also helpful. And so if you think about that K-shaped recovery, well, maybe it's not universal in terms of the entire portfolio, but we feel really good that the great majority is on the top side of that K, and we're benefiting from that.

Great. That's helpful color. And then, Ted, I wanted to follow up on your commentary on the potential for build-to-suit opportunities. Are there specific markets that you're seeing that demand increase in? Is there any color on the profile of tenants that you might be talking to? And then lastly, would those potential build-to-suits occur on land you already own? Or might you need to acquire some land if those come to fruition?

Yes. Let me make sure I hit all these. But market-wise, in various markets, so multiple markets, it's some of our top markets. I don't want to get real specific. We're competing on some of these. And some of them are still multistate competitions as well that we haven't won it from a market perspective. But it's in our larger markets, as you'd expect.

And customer wise, it varies from -- it can be financial services, regular corporates as well. So really, it varies across the board there. There's no -- I'd say there's no real theme to it. The only theme being shortage of space in the market, in the submarket they want to be in. So across the board, but it is in our larger markets, but multiple markets.

Great. That's helpful. And then is it on land that you already own? Or might you have to go out and purchase?

Yes. Sorry about that. I missed that one. It's both.

I just want to be clear, it's -- we wouldn't go out and buy land to land bank. I think it would only be subject to a build-to-suit that's there. So I don't want anybody to get the impression that the land inventory is going to go up. It's more likely to go down from here.

Our next question comes from Peter Abramowitz from Deutsche Bank.

Yes. I think last quarter, you talked about -- you needed around 700,000 square feet this year of vacancy leasing that would actually take occupancy to kind of hit the midpoint of your guidance and also mentioned, I think, a retention rate of around 35% or 40% under '26 expirations.

So just curious, I guess, on the leasing you did this quarter, the 300,000 square feet of new leasing, how much of that will kind of go towards that 700,000 for the full year that will actually take occupancy before year-end? And is kind of the math is still the same on the retention and the renewal side as well?

Yes. Peter, it's Brendan. Yes, good question. So the math pretty much rolls forward from everything that we did in the first quarter. And so the good thing is we moved that lease rate up. I think we had talked about at the beginning of the year that we had about 1.2 million square feet of leases that were signed that would commence by the end of 2026. .

We have moved a number of those leases into occupancy during the first quarter. But fortunately, we've replaced that. And so we still have about 1.2 million square feet of signed leases that will commence by the end of the year.

And then we had expirations. So what we have out of the remaining expirations, there's probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 850,000 to 900,000 square feet of likely kind of move outs based on what's left over.

So that leaves us positive net absorption from 3/31 of 300-plus thousand square feet, which means we have another 300,000 to 400,000 square feet to sign and start to get into this year. So we feel good about that. So that's down from that 700,000 that you mentioned kind of at the beginning of the year. And if we keep that pace of roughly 100,000 square feet of new per month, that kind of puts us right on track to get to the midpoint of that year-end occupancy range of 87.5%.

Okay. I appreciate that. That's helpful, Brendan. And then on the Richmond sales, I think you talked about sort of an overall blended cap rate for sales last year through January, but I wanted to ask, what was the cap rate specifically on that portfolio that you sold in Richmond?

Yes. Peter, it was again the blended. That's up on the upper end of that. I think it was maybe a low double-digit type cap rate but very low double digit.

Okay. And that's kind of incorporated in that blended number, I think you said around 8%.

That's correct.

Okay. Got you. And then 1 more, if I could. It looks like the -- in the same-store pool, operating expense growth was a little bit elevated in the quarter. Was there anything kind of unique to first quarter results that you wanted to call out? Or anything that we should kind of be mindful of going forward?

Yes, Peter, just as you can probably expect from the winter, right, we had some pretty cold weather, particularly kind of in February. So utility costs were up pretty significantly kind of year-over-year. That really drove the sizable increase in expenses. That was probably the biggest 1 that's there.

Given we were, I think, negative 60 basis points on same-store in the quarter, and we're expecting roughly flat kind of for the year. We think that, that number is probably going to be low again in Q2 and then positive in the back half of the year to average out to be flat for the full year on a cash basis and positive on a GAAP basis.

Our next question comes from Ronald Kamdem from Morgan Stanley.

Great. Just following up on that sort of same-store thread. And I just wonder if you can give some of the breadcrumbs as we're thinking about into 2027. So as the occupancy starts to ramp, presumably, you'd be at a better pace as you're comping into next year. Any other sort of puts and takes that we should be thinking about potential acceleration?

Yes, Ron. Yes, thanks for the question. Yes, I think you'll see that kind of second half '26 improvement in same store, I think in all likelihood carries into '27. So you should see good same-store results there. I think if -- from an earnings perspective, what I can kind of give some bread crumbs there in terms of thinking about first half of this year and then as you go into the back half of this year, which should be helpful as you think about next year numbers.

We had -- I mentioned in prepared remarks, right, we had the gain on the third-party brokerage sale. We had the term fee. Those combined were $0.03 in the quarter.

G&A is similarly sort of $0.03 higher in the first quarter. So those things kind of offset each other. I think we've got cap interest that will go away on 23Springs and Midtown East. That's probably a couple of pennies that is probably partially offset by a little higher NOI in Q2.

And then we mentioned that we've got the $200 million of dispositions that we expect to kind of have and that will be a little bit dilutive in terms of we're just going to kind of pay down the line of credit and probably keep the remainder in cash for the balance of the year in preparation for paying off the 2027 bonds.

All that means probably your second quarter is going to be a little lower than where Q1 was from an FFO perspective. And then if you think about getting to the midpoint of guidance ex-land sale gains, it obviously implies a pretty meaningful ramp in the back half of the year. So I think that's positive kind of as you think about the second half of '26 and then ultimately into '27.

Got it. That's helpful. My second question is just on the capital recycling front. So on the buy side, is it all -- it sounds like Dallas obviously is really interesting. Is the acquisition opportunities all in existing markets? Or is there some new markets in there? And then on the sell side, maybe an update on just the Pittsburgh portfolio situation and what you think timing maybe too soon for pricing, but that would be helpful as well could be on that.

Sure, Ron. On the acquisition side, yes, we're primarily focused on our existing footprint. We're very pleased with our footprint. We do want to grow in Dallas over time. So we'll see where the acquisitions are you sort of got to go where the opportunity is. But -- so it's been largely in our -- entirely in our existing markets for now.

And then on the dispo, really no update on Pittsburgh. We are going to be bringing to market 1 of the smaller assets here soon. And then -- but for the big asset, PPG Place. really no update. We're continuing to get some leasing done before we bring it to market. I think we're pleased with the capital markets are improving both the debt and the equity capital markets. So I think we're getting closer to launching, but I haven't set a date yet, we're trying to nail down a few leases before we do that.

Our next question comes from Dylan Burzinski from Green Street.

I guess just 1 on the build-to-suit opportunities, what sort of stabilized yield on cost that you guys require to kick 1 of those off in today's environment?

Yes. Dylan, again, it's hard to do a comparison, really hard to say. I mean, it's -- we don't really talk about just from a competitive standpoint. And virtually, every deal can be different, it's obviously based on the market, the submarket, the credit, the term, what annual bumps are getting. So it's hard to say. What I would tell you, though, is on a risk-adjusted basis, we think they're pretty attractive opportunities out there right now.

And then I guess just thinking about sort of '27 and obviously not going to get into guidance, but retention around 40% this year, I think for '26 expirations. Do you guys sort of view that as a low point in retention as we think about '27 and beyond? Or is there any 1 larger tenants in '26 that might not make sense to use that as like a '27 assumption? Just sort of trying to get a sense for the trajectory on retention as we think about the outer years.

Yes, Dylan, it's Brendan. Yes, I think your number is correct on '26 in that 40%-ish range as we were kind of migrating into '26. But just keep in mind, the '26 renewals, most of the '26 renewals that we did, we do early. So as you kind of migrate into any given year, you've got adverse selection bias because you early renew folks and then the ones you don't renew, they remain in that expiration schedule.

I think as we think about '27 as of now, we're probably somewhere in that 50% to 60% retention range on what's remaining in '27 and even that number is probably lower than what the ultimate kind of likelihood is given that we've got a number of expirations in '27 where we've got the underlying tenant that they have subleased to somebody else. That assumes that, that underlying tenant vacates and then we renew with the subtenant. That's not part of our retention calculation. So that would be part of a move-out and then signing on a new.

I think we'll do pretty well on '27 in terms of retention, which creates a good environment for us to continue to drive occupancy higher from year-end '26 as we migrate throughout '27.

[Operator Instructions]

Our next question comes from Vikram Malhotra from Mizuho.

Just 2 quick ones. I guess, first, on the trajectory from here, what do you kind of need to do? Maybe I missed this, what do you need to do new leasing wise for the rest of the year, kind of to hit that higher end or maybe even the midpoint of the year-end occupancy?

And then is there anything new in terms of additional move-outs or anything big we should just remind us going into next year in terms of potential move-outs. So that's just the first one.

And then the second, AI and leasing has been a big topic in San Fran in particular. Obviously, we've heard some in New York. I'm just wondering in your markets, are you hearing any AI-oriented firms look for space or expand away from sort of the West Coast.

Vikram, it's Brendan. Maybe I'll start on just kind of leasing needed to kind of hit those year-end numbers and then turn it over to Ted and Brian to talk about some of the specifics on the role in AI. So just in terms of leasing, I would say, to get to the year-end 2026 occupancy range that we have, and let's talk about the midpoint.

We think that's where we probably need to do roughly 100,000 square feet of new leasing per month kind of through probably June or July. That kind of gets us pretty well positioned, and those leases will move into. We think that those leases in all likelihood are going to move into occupancy by end of year.

But I think to continue to have occupancy move higher as we go forward into 2027, we'd like to see that pace continue in the back half of the year. And that, in all likelihood, will create a good environment for us to continue to drive occupancy higher as we go throughout 2027.

So I think we feel like we're in good shape kind of as we're through the first quarter of the year here. And we think we feel positive about the backdrop to allow us to continue to drive occupancy higher in '27, and I don't think there's any significant expirations in '27 that we're particularly worried about.

And then on the second question, AI, I alluded to it, maybe, I think, earlier in the call, we signed on AI-related tenant. They're focused on data centers, and that was in Dallas, Vikram. Other than that, throughout our markets, we really haven't seen much AI demand at all.

Our last question comes from Nick Thillman from Baird.

Can you hear me?

Yes.

Yes.

Okay. I cut out for a second. Sorry. Just 1 quick question on just overall utilization within the portfolio and just maybe getting an understanding of just sublease availability within the portfolio. Do you guys have like a number on just occupied space that's currently listed for sublease.

Yes. Actually, our sublease space is actually going down. I think it was down 6% or 7% last quarter. It is something we monitor. Now some of it just to be transparent. Some of it is it goes to direct vacancy. But some is being taken off the market and utilized by our customers.

So we have roughly 500 -- a little over 500,000 square feet in our portfolio that is currently being subleased today. But it is getting better, and we're seeing it both getting better in our portfolio, but the market as well.

We have no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Ted Klinck for any closing remarks.

Well, thanks, everybody, for joining the call, and thanks for your interest in Highwoods. We look forward to seeing you all at NAREIT, if not before, or the next call. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining today's Highwoods Properties Q4 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Regan, and I'll be your moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to Brendan Maiorana, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please proceed.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call this morning are Ted Klinck, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Leary, our Chief Operating Officer. For your convenience, today's prepared remarks have been posted on the web. If you have not received yesterday's earnings release or supplemental, they're both available on the Investors section of our website at highwoods.com.

On today's call, our review will include non-GAAP measures such as FFO and NOI and EBITDAR. The release and supplemental include a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed at length in our press releases as well as our SEC filings. As you know, actual events and results can differ materially from these forward-looking statements and the company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements. With that, I'll turn the call over to Ted.

Thanks, Brendan, and good morning, everyone. Before I talk about our Fourth Quarter and outlook for 2026, I'd like to begin by highlighting some of the reasons why we're upbeat about the next few years for Highwoods. First, -- the fundamental backdrop across our core Sunbelt BBDs is as strong as it's been in many years.

There is limited to no new supply across our markets, and dwindling blocks of available high-quality space. New users continue to migrate to the SunBelt. And even with mixed signals about the health of the overall economy, many existing companies in our footprint continue to grow their businesses. This dynamic has created rental rate growth, not just in face rates, but growth in net effective rents, including rent spikes in our best BBDs.

Given limited development starts forecasted for the foreseeable future, well-capitalized landlords with high-quality office in BBD locations in the SunBelt are positioned to drive meaningful growth in rents. Second, the convergence of occupancy gains, rental rate growth and stabilization of our development pipeline, should enable Highwoods to deliver outsized NOI and earnings growth the next few years.

We expect to drive occupancy higher by roughly 200 basis points from the end of 2025 to the end of 2026, plus our development properties are projected to deliver year-over-year growth in each of the next 3 years. For the last few quarters, we've been emphasizing approximately $50 million to $60 million of NOI growth potential across 8 buildings, 4 existing operating properties and 4 developments.

We have realized some of this growth in 2026, but most will benefit our NOI trajectory in 2027 and beyond. Third and finally, we are positioned to invest at attractive risk-adjusted returns. Future investments are also likely to drive additional growth. We've invested approximately $800 million or nearly $600 million at our share over the last 12 months.

These acquisitions, which were in the strongest BBDs of Charlotte, Raleigh and Dallas have a weighted average vintage of 4 years an initial lease rate of 93.5%, Walts of 9 years, rents approximately 15% below market and projected stabilized cash yields of roughly 8%. The combination of strong fundamentals for high-quality BBD office and limited buyer pools creates an excellent opportunity for us to deploy capital at attractive risk-adjusted returns.

These items, combined with our proven track record and strong balance sheet gives us confidence that we're well positioned to grow for the foreseeable future. Our initial 2026 FFO outlook is 5.7% higher at the midpoint than our initial 2025 outlook.

Now turning to our fourth quarter. We had solid financial performance with FFO of $0.90 per share including $0.06 of land sale gains, resulting in full year 2025 FFO of $3.48 per share. Excluding land sale gains, full year FFO was $0.07 per share or 2% higher than the midpoint of our original outlook provided at the beginning of 2025.

We leased 526,000 square feet of second-gen space during the fourth quarter, including 221,000 square feet of new leases. In addition, we signed 95,000 square feet of first-gen leases on our development pipeline. Signings on second-gen space were a bit lower in the fourth quarter compared to earlier in the year. We believe that was largely just timing as already in 2026, signings have accelerated and the long-term trend continues to be positive.

Leasing economics continue to be healthy in the fourth quarter. Cash rent spreads were positive with GAAP rent spreads in the mid-teens. As we've long stated, we're most focused on net effective rents, which are strong again in the fourth quarter and helped make full year 2025 or high water mark.

For the year, net effective rents were 20% higher than in 2024 and 19% higher than 2022, our prior peak year. This performance underscores the improving fundamentals we're seeing across our markets and BBDs. Our $474 million development pipeline is now 78% pre-leased up from 72% last quarter and 56% 1 year ago.

GlenLake 3, our 218,000 square foot office and amenity retail development in Raleigh is 84% leased, with strong prospects to bring the property to the mid-90s. At Granite Park VI, our 422,000 square foot building in the legacy BD of Dallas, -- we signed 44,000 square feet since our last earnings call and are now nearly 80% leased.

We signed 51,000 square feet at 23 Springs, our 642,000 square foot mixed-use development in uptown Dallas, bringing the property to nearly 75% leased, up from 67% last quarter. At 23 Springs, current rents are 40% above our pro forma underwriting. Lastly, Midtown East and Tampa, our 143,000 square foot development is 76% leased and we have strong prospects for the remaining office space.

Given the strong demand we've experienced with our current developments and demand from sizable users across many of our markets, we're starting to have conversations with prospective build-to-suit and anchor customers for new projects. We've included the potential for up to $200 million of development announcements in our 2026 outlook.

We've been active on the investment front, especially late in 2025 and early in 2026. We acquired $472 million in 2025, including our $223 million acquisition of 600 at Legacy Union in the fourth quarter. 600 is a 411,000 square foot class AA office tower in Uptown Charlotte. This property was completed in 2025 and is currently 89% leased, up from 84% when we acquired the building in November.

We have strong prospects to bring the building into the mid-90s. Because the property has just delivered and is currently only mid-40s percent occupied, NOI will be temporarily lower in 2026. We expect to reach stabilized yields of around 8% on both a cash and GAAP basis with projected stabilization occurring on a GAAP basis in 2027 in cash in 2028.

In January, we acquired 2 buildings in the BBDs of Raleigh and Dallas for a total expected investment of $318 million. which our share was $108 million plus $13 million of preferred equity. First, we acquired the tariffs in Dallas for $109 million in a JV with our longtime local partner, Granite properties, in which we have an 80% interest.

The tariffs is a 173,000-square-foot best-in-class property that was built in 2017 and is located in Preston Center, a new BBD for Highwoods. We believe Preston Center is the most supply-constrained BBD in Dallas, where rents have grown substantially over the past few years giving us more than 30% mark-to-market upside on in-place leases.

After signing a lease following our acquisition, we are now 100% leased at the terraces. Second, we acquired Block 83 in Raleigh, a 492,000 square foot mixed-use asset that includes 2 10-story best-in-class office buildings with 27,000 square feet of ground floor amenity retail located in CBD Raleigh. We initially own a 10% interest in the joint venture that was formed to acquire Block 83. The North Carolina Investment Authority a new strategic investment partner for Highwoods owns the remaining 90%.

We have the option to increase our ownership in Block 83 to 50%. And -- on a combined basis, we expect the initial GAAP yield on Block 83 in terraces to be in the low to mid-8% range during 2026, while our initial cash yield will be around 7%, which is temporarily low due to free rent and terraces that will burn off during 2026 and result in stabilized cash yields in the mid- to upper 7s on a combined basis prior to achieving rent roll-ups at the terraces.

We expect to fund our recent acquisition activity on a leverage-neutral basis, primarily through the sale of noncore assets were properties where value has been maximized. We sold $66 million of noncore buildings and land across various markets in the fourth quarter and an additional $42 million of noncore properties in Richmond subsequent to year-end.

Our 2026 FFO outlook assumes we close $190 million to $210 million of additional dispositions by midyear. Upon stabilization of $600 million we expect this leverage-neutral rotation of capital to be modestly accretive to our unaffected FFO run rate while improving our long-term growth rate strengthening our cash flows and the increase in our portfolio quality.

To wrap up, we're excited about the outlook for Highwoods. First, given strong fundamentals across our markets pricing power is shifting towards well-capitalized landlords who own high-quality buildings. Second, organic growth potential embedded in the Highwoods portfolio will be realized primarily through occupancy gains in our operating portfolio and stabilization of our development pipeline.

Third, given our proven track record, we expect to continue to deploy capital at attractive risk-adjusted returns that enhance our long-term growth outlook, increase our portfolio quality and strengthen our cash flows. These factors, combined with our strong balance sheet and strong platform provide the foundation for sizable momentum over the next few years. I'm also confident in our outlook because of our engaged, hard-working and talented teammates who have long driven our consistent success. I thank the entire Highwoods team for their commitment and tireless dedication. Brian?

Thank you, Ted. Our Sunbelt markets delivered a strong finish to 2025, validating our BBD strategy and setting us up for another year of occupancy and rent growth in 2026. These cities are net winners with regard to inbound talent, corporate relocations and job growth, all are in the top 15 of the Urban Land Institute in PwC's top markets to watch and widely finished the year posting positive net absorption with office development pipelines at record lows, our best-in-class commute worthy portfolio and a strong balance sheet were the beneficiaries of a market in full flight to quality mode, which is driving healthy lease economics across our BBD portfolio. .

The year's body of work included 3.2 million square feet signed with strong GAAP rent spreads of 16.4%, all-time high net effective rents, significant leasing across the development pipeline and the meaningful backfill of long-communicated vacancies.

In the fourth quarter, we signed 88 deals with cash rent spreads of a positive 1.2% and weighted average lease terms of almost 6 years. Expansions outpaced contractions 2.5 to 1 for the quarter, over 3:1 for the year, and we ended 2025 over 89% leased with competitive supply decreasing construction pipelines at record lows and with our customers' conviction on having their best and brightest in the office resolute.

2025's positive leasing environment is continuing into the new year. Across our Sunbelt BBDs, market fundamentals continue to outperform the nation. New supply is almost nonexistent and inbound corporate relocations and growth marches on. Starting in Charlotte. The Queen City has not only kept its post-pandemic momentum, it found another gear according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics finishing 2025, having generated more nominal jobs than any other metro area, except New York City, which is 7x the size of Charlotte.

The City's economic development office reinforced this highlight naming 2025, the best year for business recruitment in a decade with 15 announcements totaling 4,000 jobs and with no sign of a slowdown in 2026. This included major corporate relocations or new regional hubs for the likes of Global Logistics Giants Maersk, Dollar Truck, Pack Life, SoFi, American Express, our new customer joining the recently acquired 600 at Legacy Union and Scout Motors 1,200 job global headquarters in the uptown adjacent neighborhood of plasma Midwood. CBRE noted leasing activity in 2025 echoed the region's job productivity, reaching its highest level in more than 6 years, roughly 5.2 million square feet of deals were signed with 75% of the volume related to leases that were either new or expansions, trophy and top-tier Class A space in uptown, South Park and South End are effectively full.

Development under construction is largely pre-leased and there is virtually no new speculative product in the pipeline. Against this backdrop, our 2.4 million square foot Charlotte portfolio already in the mid-90s leased, is positioned to capture further rate growth as leases roll.

This is evident in our portfolio by the pace and healthy economics of any reletting as well as the activity Ted mentioned at 600 since our acquisition. Heading west to Yal Street, Dallas is the #1 market to watch according to ULI and PwC for the second straight year.

In Big D, CBRE noted 2025 net absorption near its post-pandemic high. Class A office posted its fifth consecutive quarter of positive absorption. And with the recent acquisition of the Terraces impression Center, we now own 1.8 million square feet with our partners at Granite across Uptown, legacy and Preston Center, the 3 BBDs we initially targeted for investment when we entered Dallas 4 years ago and where the market strength is largely concentrated to the volunteer state where Cushman highlighted at Nashville's 2025 net absorption was 12th nationally overall with 900,000 square feet for the year and asking rents reaching all-time highs.

Avish & Young noted that after absorbing a wave of new construction, the pipeline has dropped to historical lows. Trophy office availability declined at a nationally leading rate and up to 2 million square feet or 13% of downtown office stock is being converted to announced hotel and residential uses.

Our portfolio concentrated in downtown Franklin and Brentwood is benefiting from this environment with steady leasing velocity and prospects that should allow us to both fill remaining vacancy and mark rents to market. To that end, Symphony Place in Downtown Park Place West in Franklin and our Westwood South building in Brentwood, all have strong pipeline of prospects to bring these buildings to stabilized levels.

Stepping back, 2025 confirm that our Sunbelt BBD focused portfolio is aligned with where tenants want to be. We are overweighted in the submarkets with the greatest absorption, tighter supply and rising Class A rents. This combination gives us line of sight to further occupancy gains and mark-to-market economics in 2026. This underscores our confidence in our ability to unlock the durable growth that is embedded within the Highwoods platform. Brendan?

Thanks, Brian. In the fourth quarter, we reported net income of $28.7 million or $0.26 per share. Our FFO was up $100.8 million or $0.90 per share, which includes $0.06 per share of land sale gains.

During the quarter, we issued $350 million of unsecured bonds and acquired 600 at legacy Union, which as Ted described, is a just completed trophy office building with low initial NOI as several signed leases have not yet commenced.

The impact of the bond issuance and the acquisition of 600 reduced FFO by $0.01 per share. Excluding these 2 items and the land sale gains, our fourth quarter results were in line with the midpoint of our upwardly revised 2025 outlook provided in October. Since our last earnings call, we've invested over $330 million to acquire best-in-class office and amenity retail properties across the strongest PBDs in Charlotte, Dallas and Raleigh.

We plan to fund these acquisitions on a leverage-neutral basis primarily through the sale of noncore assets or other properties where value has been maximized. We closed $66 million of dispositions in the fourth quarter and another $42 million so far this year.

Our early fourth quarter 2025 ATM issuances provided about $20 million of leverage-neutral purchasing capacity leaving us roughly $200 million of additional dispositions required to complete our asset rotation on a leverage-neutral basis. We plan to complete these additional dispositions by mid-year.

Before I review the impact of the recent investment activities on our 2026 outlook, I want to first highlight our asset recycling over the past 12 months. We've invested $580 million to acquire high-quality office buildings in the strongest BBD locations in the Sunbelt and sold $270 million of noncore properties upon stabilization of $600 million and after we sell another $200 million of assets, this leverage-neutral rotation will be modestly accretive to our near-term FFO, strengthen our cash flow, increase our long-term growth rate and improve our market mix and portfolio quality.

This rotation has resulted in a reduction to our portfolio age by over 2 years to a weighted average vintage of 2007. That's not easy on a roughly 27 million square foot portfolio. Now to our 2026 outlook. We're introducing an initial FFO range of $3.40 to $3.68 per share, which equates to 3.54 at the midpoint.

Since our last call in late October, we've completed a number of investment and financing transactions that will temporarily impact 2026, but not impact 2027 and thereafter. First, the acquisition of 600 at Legacy Union will have a dilutive impact on 2026 by approximately $0.07 per share, given the building is 89% leased, but currently only 44% occupied as several large leases won't commence until late in the year.

GAAP NOI at $600 is projected to be approximately $10 million in 2026 and more than $18 million in 2027 upon stabilization. Second, we opportunistically accelerated bond issuance into late 2025, that we had originally planned for late 2026 or early 2027. We made this decision given the strong backdrop in the bond market and to provide us temporary liquidity to fund the acquisitions of 600, the terraces and Block 83 prior to completing that leverage-neutral rotation of capital I described earlier.

This will leave us with excess cash on the balance sheet and no borrowings on our credit facility for much of 2026 but eliminates the need for a bond issuance later this year and will enable us to repay our $300 million March 2027 bond maturity with cash on hand and borrowings on the credit facility.

This short-term excess liquidity is expected to reduce 2026 FFO by $0.03 per share, but should not have any impact on our previously unaffected run rate for FFO for 2027 and beyond.

Third, because we have another $200 million of dispositions to go to complete our leverage-neutral rotation of capital, our leverage is temporarily elevated which increases our projected 2026 FFO by $0.01 per share. Said differently, if we had completed the planned additional $200 million of dispositions in January instead of the first half of the year, our FFO outlook would be $0.01 lower. Adding all these items together results in $0.09 per share of temporarily lower FFO in 2026 at the midpoint of our outlook, but doesn't have any impact on our 2027 FFO or subsequent years.

Finally, we've included up to $0.16 per share of land sale gains or $0.08 at the midpoint of the range. The potential land sale gains all relate to parcels that are under contract and scheduled to close later in 2026. Taken together, these items, none of which were known when we reported third quarter 2025 results in October have reduced the midpoint of our otherwise unaffected 2026 FFO outlook by $0.01 per share.

Just a couple of other items to note. First, we provided our projected year-end occupancy outlook rather than average occupancy, primarily due to the outsized impact of 600 at Legacy Union. At the midpoint, our year-end occupancy projection of 87.5% appears consistent with what we discussed on our last call, but it's actually a little stronger as our planned asset recycling activities are projected to reduce our year-end 2026 occupancy by 25 basis points compared to our portfolio at the end of the third quarter of 2025.

Second, same-property cash NOI is expected to be roughly flat in 2026, but GAAP NOI is estimated to be 150 basis points higher than cash NOI. As you know, when GAAP same-property NOI is higher than the corresponding cash metric, it's typically a strong indicator for future same-property cash NOI growth.

Finally, we expect our debt-to-EBITDA ratio to start the year elevated, but steadily decline after Q1 as planned disposition proceeds are used to reduce debt and EBITDA steadily grows as we migrate throughout the year.

Lastly, as you may have noticed, we made some routine SEC filings yesterday and this morning. Under SEC rules, S-3 shelf registration statements sunset every 3 years. It has been 3 years since our last shelf filing. As a result, last evening, we filed a new S-3 with the SEC.

This was a joint shelf filing by the REIT and the operating partnership that registers an indeterminate number of debt securities, preferred stock and common stock for future capital markets transactions. With this new shelf in place, we also needed to refresh our long-standing ATM program, which we filed via Form 424(b) this morning.

As you know, keeping an ATM program in place is 1 of the many arrows we like to keep in our capital-raising quiver. To be clear, the FFO per share outlook that we provided in last night's release assumes no ATM issuances during 2026.

Operator, we are now ready for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin our Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Seth Bergey of Citi.

I guess just to start off with kind of on the capital recycling. You talked a little bit in the opening comments around kind of enhancing your long-term growth rate. Just kind of in the context of kind of the 2026 guidance. Like when do you kind of expect to realize that elevated growth rate. Is that kind of like a 2027 story or something further beyond that.

Seth, it's Brendan. Maybe I'll try to answer that. So I think there's a couple of different things going on with the recycling activity. Obviously, the impact on 2026 numbers is onetime in nature that we try to lay out.

So that's that kind of $0.01, $0.09 onetime impact that's there. That goes away in 2027. So I think if you thought about stabilized growth and you reverted back to what your estimates were in October for 2027, nothing that we've done since October should have any impact on your 2027 outlook.

The asset recycling is neutral to modestly accretive to FFO in 2027. And the outlook on occupancy for year-end '26 is right in line with what we've mentioned in October. If anything, it's probably up 25 basis points kind of on a same-store basis. So that feels a little bit better.

So I guess, if you looked at the '26 numbers and backed out the land sale gains, you'd get a lower growth in '26, but then a very significant amount of growth in 2027. But I think the way that we think about it from a long-term perspective is if the internal growth of the portfolio is just a 3% NOI over time.

We continue to kind of grind that number higher by recycling into higher-growth assets and recycling out of lower-growth assets.

That's helpful. And then just going back to kind of the development pipeline and hitting kind of that 8% pre-lease number. How is kind of demand for kind of kind of the balance of that leasing on the development pipeline?

Seth, it's Ted. Look, I think demand. We're still seeing really good demand. I think if you think about the progress we made throughout '25, a year ago, we were 56% leased and then the last quarter, 72. So we just continue to grind higher throughout 2025.

And the demand remains good. As I mentioned, I think, on our prepared remarks, 2 of our developments, GlenLake 3 here in Raleigh, in Midtown East and Tampa. We have -- what we classify as strong prospects for the remaining space effectively. For Midtown East, it's all the remaining office space and for GlenLake, 3 gets us to mid-90s, I think, percent. And then you go over to Dallas. The 23 Springs, we're currently around 70%, almost 75%. We've got prospects to move higher there as well.

And then on Granite Park VI, it's a little quieter. We've got a couple of smaller prospects. I think it's just going to be a long slog. And there are any big users out there to get us from -- I think we're just shy of 80 today. So I think we're just going to hit some singles and we'll continue to march that higher as well over time. But we feel, overall, really, really good about our prospects.

Our next question comes from the line of Blaine Heck of Wells Fargo.

Great. I guess just digging in a little bit more to your tenant conversations. There's a narrative out there that the Sunbelt is more prone to AI displacement. So I was hoping you could comment on whether you've seen any impact to your investor or tenant base, I should say, from AI-related layoffs? And do you see any of your markets as having elevated exposure to potential displacement of jobs driven by AI kind of efficiency? .

Blaine, it's Ted. I'll start, and if Brendan or Brian want to jump in. Look, we really haven't. I mean, obviously, what we're trying to tell you on the call is what we're seeing with boots on the ground and we all see the narrative on AI, whether it be software companies a week or so ago, financials the other day. It's just not what we're seeing from our customers, and the demand. I mean we continue to see in migration coming to our markets. Companies are taking more space, not less space in our own operating portfolio. Expansions continue to outpace contractions.

So look, who knows what the ultimate outcome is going to be. I do think back office jobs are probably more susceptible to AI versus client-facing jobs, and that's most of our portfolio is client-facing jobs. So it's yet to be seen. But look, we're not hearing any of that out of our client base yet. .

Brian here, just to clip on, and Ted has mentioned this in the past, our bread and butter are smaller customers in general. So that has a sort of insulator effect on the AI, at least right now. I think folks are seeing it as a productivity tool as opposed to a job elimination towards the moment. But we know we're not inert the impacts we'll have on the overall job market. .

Okay. That's great to hear. Brendan sorry for the broken record question, but we're getting a lot of questions on cash flow. We've touched on the elevated CapEx before with all the leasing you're doing, but it does look like straight line will also be much higher this year. So I guess, again, can you give us an update on how long you see these elevated expenditures impacting cash flow -- and related to that, just touch on the payout ratio and your comfort of riding through some period of depressed cash flow as it pertains to the dividend.

Yes, Blaine, thanks. So what I would say, I guess, if we look at 2025 levels, and I think we were, call it, on overall cash flow, we might have been $13 million or $14 million kind of shy of coverage on the dividend, but that included $145 million of spend on leasing capital in 2025. And a normal year for us is about $100 million. .

And we committed $115 million during 2025. So any time there's more spend than what is committed, that's typically a pretty good indicator that your spend on future periods is going to go down. So I think it's likely that 2026 spend is probably going to be a little bit lower than $25 million.

I don't know if we'll be $30 million lower, but we think it's going to be lower. And then when you think about the amount of straight-line rent that's kind of in those numbers. That is future cash flow that's going to come online. And so we feel very good about kind of the long-term outlook of cash flow going forward from a combination of increased cash NOI that will come online over the next several quarters and a return to normalized leasing CapEx over time.

So that's going to create a significant amount of increased cash flow and we're comparing that to last year's numbers, where we were a little bit shy. But I think if you kind of normalize for all those things, that gets you back into that context of where we were a few years ago, which keep in mind from 2021 through 2024, I think we've retained a cumulative $150 million of cash flow above the dividend. So I think we feel very good about our ability to kind of get back there.

Our next question is from the line of Nick Thillman of Baird.

Maybe touching on the $200 million of noncore sales and the 0 to $17 million of land sale gains embedded in the guidance here. I guess, overall, as we're viewing that noncore sales, what percentage of that or if you could put a number around of that is related to landfills versus core asset sales and the type of -- maybe touching on the type of buildings you're also looking to dispose of within that pool.

Nick, it's Ted. Yes. Of that $200 million or so, none of that land is not any part of that. The land sales we have will probably be later in the year, we would anticipate -- so look, as you know, we're regular sellers of noncore assets every year. And I think this year is going to be really no different. It's either as noncore assets or assets where we've maximized, we think we've maximized the value. So it's going to be a variety of markets as well. I think last year, we sold assets in Richmond, Atlanta, Raleigh, Tampa, Orlando, sold land in Orlando.

So it's just going to be a mix of older assets or assets where we've maximized the value as well. So it's going to look a lot like prior years probably.

That's helpful. And then, Brendan, maybe just a little bit on the occupancy bridge throughout the year. I know you remove the average occupancy within the press release, but in the U.K., you did mention it's going to be average occupancy of 85% to 87% throughout the year. I know there's a little bit of a drag related to some developments coming online. But maybe just touch on how you expect that occupancy to progress throughout the year?

Yes, Nick, good question. Yes, it is -- so we ended the year at 85.3%. That obviously included kind of a 70 basis point drag associated with the acquisition of 600 -- and then as you correctly point out, we've got developments, GlenLake 3 and Granite Park 6 that will move into the operating pool in the first quarter. Those are low in terms of occupancy, will not be low in occupancy by end of year, because the lease rate on those is relatively high.

But that's going to depress kind of first quarter numbers a little bit. And also keep in mind, we just sold roughly a little over 500,000 square feet of very highly occupied assets that are going to come out of that number and then what we're planning on selling for the remaining roughly $200 million also is fairly occupied.

So that's going to kind of bring the number down a little bit early in the year and then steadily improve kind of as we migrate second quarter, third quarter, fourth quarter.

Our next question is from the line of Dylan Bazinsky of Green Street.

You guys talked a lot about sort of how you're expecting to sort of complete the current capital recycling program within the first half of this year. I think in your guys' press release, you guys mentioned also potentially up to another $250 million of dispositions.

Just sort of curious, as you guys look at the portfolio today, I mean, do you guys get the sense that you're sort of nearing the final innings of pairing down some of the -- what you guys might call noncore assets. And then as you sort of think about uses of that capital, you also mentioned potential acquisitions. Just sort of curious how you guys are looking at things now that the stock has sold off quite a bit now or share repurchases, a potential use of that capital?

Dylan, it's Ted. I'll start. Look, I think as you know, you know us pretty well. I think if you've looked at our strategy throughout the years where we've been consistent capital recyclers always selling the bottom assets and recycling into newer, higher growth assets.

So I think that's something we're going to continue. And there's still -- obviously, we still have Pittsburgh that we do want to get out of and some other older assets on top of that. So there's still some work to do, but we've been -- again, as we said, we've been incredibly successful to do this capital rotation time and time again on a leverage neutral and FFO neutral to slightly accretive basis.

So -- and we feel comfortable with our ability to do that as well and that dilution. So Anyway, we feel comfortable about our long-term capital rotation plan. In terms of the buybacks, look, I think we talk about it with our board quarterly. It's obviously a capital allocation decisions you alluded to -- we're always looking to what's the best use of our capital. And we look at all of our alternatives, whether it's buybacks, acquisitions, development, which I think is becoming more interesting these days advertising in which we constantly get very attractive yields on our advertising projects, I think you're familiar with. So again, we look at what we're going to do over the long term. I'd never say never, but right now, I wouldn't say we're going to deviate from our standard operating procedure.

That's helpful. And then maybe just 1 last one. you mentioned potential development opportunities. I guess what sort of yield requirement would you guys need in today's investment environment to start any sort of either build-to-suit or that development project? .

Yes. Look, I think you've seen what we're buying on. One of the nice things about Highwoods is we're both a developer in an acquirer, so we can sort of toggle back and forth throughout the cycle. And just given the dearth of new development, we're starting to field more incoming calls on both developments and whether it be a build-to-suit or substantially pre-leased, pre-leased development starts.

So there's got to be a premium, right, on acquisitions to new developments. So look, we don't really discuss our development yields primarily from a competitive standpoint. I mean there's a lot of things that go into a development yield, whether it be it's the market, the submarket where we think the exit cap rate is, the term, the credit of the lease, what annual bumps are, so just a lot of factors that come into it. So we really don't get into those yields. But suffice it to say it'd be a premium over sort of what acquisition cap rates are today.

Our next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamden of Morgan Stanley.

Just 2 quick ones. Just going back to sort of the guidance, if you sort of back out the land sale gain and so forth. Just trying to think as the -- when you think about '25 versus '26, was there anything else sort of going into the number other than the dilution from the sales and the financing. Just wondering if there was anything else sort of fundamental driving that number.

Yes, Ron, it's Brendan. The only other thing that we've talked about is there's probably on a year-over-year basis, kind of call it, $0.05 of headwind on that other income line item that's there, which I think we talked about maybe on 1 of the last calls that the '25 was sort of elevated, '26 -- it's not 0, but it's probably more in line with a normalized year compared to kind of an elevated outlook.

So I think if you adjust for the onetime items associated with the acquisition and the financing in 2026 and you formalize kind of that other income line item, you get to a pretty healthy kind of growth rate at the core, which I think gives us confidence as we think about kind of the company going forward, where we've got good growth levers that are in there. So I think that's probably a fair way to think about kind of at the core, how much we're growing and how we think about that over an extended period of time.

Great. And then my second question was just on the leasing. Can you just remind us what sort of the new leasing bogey we should be thinking about to grow occupancy. It looked like it maybe it was a little bit lighter during the quarter. then picked up post quarter. Is that right? Just any color there would be helpful quarter .

As you mentioned, it certainly picked up here in the early part of the year. So just to kind of lay out context in terms of where we need to get to, to be at that 87.5 number by end of year. We've got about 2.1 million square feet of remaining expirations in 2026.

There's probably -- we expect about $1.3 million of that is likely to kind of move out. We currently have 1.2 million square feet of leases that are signed that are not yet in occupancy, that will be in occupancy during 2026. So that leaves kind of compared to where we are at the end of 2025. We're down about 100,000 square feet, maybe a little bit less than that. So what we need to do from a new leasing standpoint is do about 750,000 square feet of new, 700,000 to 750,000 square feet of new. And generally, we probably need to get those signed to have them in occupancy by kind of middle of the third quarter. So that's about 300,000 square feet of new per quarter.

And that creates about 250 basis points of net absorption our occupancy guide is 220. So we're going to lose about 25 basis points or so from the asset recycling that we talked about, just selling some of the things that we did, early in this year and then what we expect to do. So hopefully, that all makes sense, but we feel like all of that is very attainable relative to kind of what the business plan is.

Our next question comes from the line of Vikram Malhotra of Mizuho.

I guess, Brendan, I just wanted to go back, to be clear, on your comments around sort of the unaffected rate. I mean the FFO run rate not being affected as we go into '27. Just thinking about the positive benefit from the land sales, that's 1 time versus the dilution or the run rate occupancy from the acquisition trending up.

Do you mind just sort of going over that math again, just so we understand as we go from 4Q '26 into 1Q '27 kind of that step-up that you're alluding to versus maybe what we have modeled for 2027 FSO?

Yes, Vikram. So I guess what the NOI that we have for -- I'll break it down into kind of the 3 items. The NOI that we have at $600 million we disclosed when we acquired the building, our expectation for GAAP NOI in 2026 is $10 million. That number, we think, will be greater than $18 million in 2027 and there's really not a lot of leases that we need to do at this point to achieve that NOI projection for 2027.

NOI there will be low throughout the majority of 2025, but it will build a little bit as we progress throughout the year. So it's not going to be $2.5 million a quarter. It's going to start a little bit lower than that. But the largest lease that is not currently in occupancy is American Express, which Brian mentioned, and that comes into occupancy on December 1 of '26. So we really don't get a lot of benefit from that.

So most of that $8 million annual increase will kind of show up early in 2027 relative to 2026. So you're going to get most of that kind of in in '27. And then we're going to be fairly inefficient from a capital standpoint based on our projections as the disposition proceeds come in the door, and we'll have cash on hand for much of 2026, at least based on our current expectations.

We will use that cash and then likely borrowing on the credit facility to repay the March 2027 bond. So whereas that probably in your outlook for 2027, 3 to 4 months ago, you probably had some refi headwind in that number. Now in all likelihood, that's not going to be much of a headwind because kind of between cash and borrowing rate on the line that's roughly in line with kind of where where the interest rate is on that.

So those items kind of give you sort of built-in growth in 2017. And then we're obviously moving occupancy up throughout the year. The development properties are going to build in terms of the NOI contribution that they have throughout the year. So the combination of kind of all of those things drives a lot of build as we migrate throughout 2026 and then into 2027.

That's helpful. And just on that occupancy build, do you mind just walking through any large expirations or new known move-out side of this year or next year that could potentially cause that occupancy to take a step back, just relative to the last few years when you've had bigger move-outs, I'm just trying to get a sense of what the next 2 years look like.

Vikram, it's Ted. The nice thing is our forward, I'd say, 3-year outlook on expirations. It doesn't look anything like what it did in the last 3 years. So we feel really good about where we are. I mean we don't have any expiration or no move out greater than 100,000 square feet. Any expiration greater than 100,000 square feet until mid-27 and there's only 1 is greater than $100,000. That 1 we have is the only 1 we have through all the '27.

And we think that's a decent chance of renewing that one. So again, we feel really good with -- we have a few known move-outs that are in that 50,000 to 60,000 feet, but we've already backfilled half to 2/3 to even all of it. on some of those. So I think it's -- we feel really good about where we stand today about our forward expirations.

Our next question comes from the line of Peter Abramowitz of Deutsche Bank. .

Yes. Just wondering if you could talk about the expected pricing on asset sales, not only what you closed so far in fourth quarter and subsequent to year-end, but also the $200 million or so that you're going to close over the next 6 months. Just from a modeling perspective, kind of what's the NOI impact or cap rate on that. .

Maybe I'll start, then Brendan can jump in with any details. But look, as you alluded to, we sold $270 million in 2025 in the first month or so this year. And the blended cap rate there was -- it was a mix of assets. We sold -- really, we sold 8 assets to users last year. So we feel good about getting user pricing.

We sold 1 to a triple net lease buyer, sold 1 to a 1031 guy. So it's been a variety of assets in a variety of buyers. So sub-8% cap rate on that $270 million. And I think it's going to be similar or maybe a little bit better than that on the remaining couple of hundred million.

All right. And then maybe 1 for Brian. Just wondering if you could kind of go around the horn to some of the major markets and talk about concessions to bring tenants into occupancy there? Are they generally stable or still increasing or even declining? Just any color you can provide there would be helpful.

Sure, Peter. Thanks for the question. I would say, in general, they are stabilized. What we are seeing is that customers want the best space and that cost, it costs more than it did before. So they're willing to kind of commit to term to do that. So that's sort of how Brendan mentioned the amount of CapEx that's associated with leasing over the last year or so. I think we're seeing that, and we're happy to trade that.

Just going through the markets. So I'll tell you, Charlotte, Dallas, Nashville and Tampa, very competitive. Any space we might have available in Charlotte, we're getting looks well in advance, folks sort of jockeying for it. You heard in my prepared remarks, amount of job growth in Charlotte. There's really no space left for prime and top-tier Class A in uptown, South and/or South Park.

So that does help moderate that kind of pressure on concessions. Dallas, we're very fortunate in Dallas, obviously being uptown with the top of the market, building that's delivered and available now at 23 Springs, Preston Center with our new addition at the Terrace is full, 100%, as Ted mentioned, recently signed, and that's the lowest vacant BBD in the entire market, we will continue to lean in on the Granite Park 6 lease up there.

We underwrote it from a development standpoint to do that. So maybe that BBD at legacy has got bigger kind of spaces and typical bigger users. And we've been very, very happy with the development delivery of Midtown East and Tampa.

We're looking at triple net rents now into the 50s. So no, I'll tell you, it's competitive out there. We are still committed to occupancy, but we are able to move rate and obviously moderate concessions across the board and reduce them where we were most competitive.

Thank you. There are no questions at this time. [Operator Instructions] There seem to be no questions waiting at this time. So I'll pass it back over to management for any closing or further remarks.

Well, thank you, everybody, for joining the call today. We appreciate your time and your questions. If you have any follow-up questions, please feel free to reach out to us. Have a great day. .

That will conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.

Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining today's Highwoods Properties Q3 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Regan, and I'll be your moderator today. [Operator Instructions]

I will now pass the conference over to our host, Brendan Maiorana of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. Please proceed.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call this morning are Ted Klinck, our Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Leary, our Chief Operating Officer.

For your convenience, today's prepared remarks have been posted on the web. If you have not received yesterday's earnings release or supplemental, they're both available on the Investors section of our website at highwoods.com. On today's call, our review will include non-GAAP measures such as FFO, NOI and EBITDAre. The release and supplemental include a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Forward-looking statements made during today's call are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are discussed at length in our press releases as well as our SEC filings. As you know, actual events and results can differ materially from these forward-looking statements, and the company does not undertake a duty to update any forward-looking statements. Finally, we know many of you will be attending NAREIT's Annual Conference in December in Dallas. We are hosting a property tour the afternoon of Monday, December 8, to showcase our Uptown Dallas portfolio. If any of you would like to join the tour, please let us know.

With that, I'll turn the call over to Ted.

Thanks, Brendan, and good morning, everyone. We entered 2025 focused on the following strategic priorities: securing the embedded NOI growth potential in our operating portfolio by leasing up key vacancies. Capturing the embedded NOI growth potential in our development pipeline by leasing up our 4 completed but not yet stabilized assets. Continuing our proven playbook of recycling out of noncore assets that are more CapEx-intensive into higher quality, higher growth and better located properties that have stronger long-term cash flows and maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet.

We made meaningful progress on each of these priorities during the quarter, and believe we have opportunities to advance our progress even more significantly over the next few quarters. First, our second-gen leasing volume was strong with several sizable new leases inked in what we call our core 4 operating properties that have elevated vacancy. Alliance Center in Atlanta, In Symphony Place, Park West and Westwood South, all located in Nashville. We signed over 1 million square feet of second-gen volume, including 326,000 square feet of new leases. Our leasing volumes have been strong now for 8 consecutive quarters. These strong volumes have driven our leased rate 340 basis points higher than our occupancy rate at quarter end, which explains why we are so confident occupancy will rise by year-end 2025 and throughout 2026.

Back in February of this year, we stated that our core 4 had approximately $25 million of stabilized NOI upside above our 2025 outlook. At quarter end, we have locked in over 50% of this upside with signed leases and have strong prospects to lock in another 25%. In addition to the strong volumes, pricing power is starting to improve as office users encounter a dwindling supply of high-quality space owned by well-capitalized landlords. This is demonstrated by growth in net effective rents which hit a high watermark for us this quarter. We have long viewed net effective rents as the best indicator of underlying rent economics, which have been 18% higher over the trailing 4 quarters compared to our 2019 average.

Second, we signed 122,000 square feet of leases across our development pipeline, driving the lease percentage to 72%, up from 64% last quarter. This means we have now signed leases for over 70% of the $30 million stabilized annual future NOI growth potential from the 4 completed but not yet stabilized development properties. Plus, we have a strong pipeline of prospects to drive our lease percentage even higher over the next few quarters. We expect these properties will be a large driver of NOI growth in 2026 and 2027.

Third, we were active with investment activity as we acquired the Legacy Union parking garage in Charlotte's uptown BBD for a total investment of $111.5 million and sold a noncore property in Richmond for $16 million. The Legacy Union garage was funded on a leverage-neutral basis through a combination of noncore disposition proceeds, proceeds from common equity issuances via our ATM program and incremental borrowing. In the short time since the acquisition of the garage in August, we've signed a 16,000 square foot ground floor retail customer and secured 150 additional monthly parkers from a corporate user that is not a tenant in our Legacy Union portfolio. Given limited CapEx associated with garage ownership and a weighted average contractual term of roughly 9 years for 70% of our projected revenue, we believe our investment represents an excellent risk-adjusted return.

Fourth and finally, our balance sheet is in great shape. During the quarter, we extended our only consolidated debt maturity prior to 2027, which gives us plenty of flexibility as we evaluate future investment opportunities that would significantly enhance our portfolio quality and BBD locations.

Turning to the quarter. We delivered FFO of $0.86 per share. We have once again raised the midpoint of our FFO outlook. Our third consecutive quarter increasing our 2025 outlook, with the FFO midpoint now $0.08 higher than our initial outlook provided in February. We also raised the midpoint of our same-property cash NOI outlook by 50 basis points. While our year-end occupancy outlook leads to meaningful upside over the final 3 months of the year.

In addition to updating our financial and operational outlook, we also updated our outlook for investment activity, which indicates the potential for meaningful asset recycling over the next few quarters. We've highlighted the potential of up to $500 million of both acquisitions and dispositions during the next few quarters. So far this year, we've acquired 2 properties, both of which are high-quality, well-located assets with significant long-term growth potential. These assets were both acquired off market and an estimated combined cash NOI yield around 8% after factoring in the upside from the recent leasing activity and additional monthly parkers at Legacy Union.

We have a healthy pipeline of additional acquisition opportunities, coupled with numerous noncore properties in various stages of marketing for sale. With these asset recycling opportunities, we could make significant progress over the next several quarters with regard to further strengthening our portfolio quality, growth rate and cash flow. Similar to other major asset rotations that we've completed during the last decade.

To wrap up, we're extremely excited about the next few years for Highwoods. We expect to deliver strong embedded NOI growth from signed leases that haven't yet commenced across both our operating portfolio and development pipeline. And we have strong leasing prospects that could drive our future embedded growth even higher. As signed leases convert into occupancy, we see a clear pathway to higher earnings and cash flow and meaningful value creation across our 26.5 million square foot portfolio. Further, we see additional opportunities to sell older nonstrategic properties where risk-adjusted returns don't meet our objectives and recycle that capital into high-growth assets in the BBDs of our markets and attractive risk-adjusted returns.

With our proven playbook and a strong balance sheet, we are well positioned to execute on the opportunities ahead of us. Brian?

Thanks, Ted, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Our commute worthy strategy, centered on creating exceptional environments and experiences continues to differentiate Highwoods in a market constrained by a limited supply and a dearth of well-capitalized owners.

This quarter, our team once again delivered strong results. We signed more than 100 leases while maintaining a robust leasing pipeline spanning early, mid- and late-stage prospects across our entire platform. Most particularly in our Dallas, Tampa and Raleigh developments and our Highwoodtizing redevelopments in Nashville. The quarter's achievements were notable.

Net effective and GAAP rents reached new highs, while our 15.9% payback improved by 240 basis points relative to our 5-quarter average. Average net effective rents hit a new quarterly high led by strength in Dallas, Charlotte, Atlanta and Tampa. Our trailing 12-month average is now 18% above our pre-pandemic peak reached in 2019. GAAP rents were strong with an 18% increase compared to expiring rents at a record of $40-plus per square foot. We ended the quarter 85.3% occupied and 88.7% leased, consistent with what we've long communicated as our occupancy trough. With a [ limited ] near-term exploration outlook and more than 325,000 square feet of new leases signed during the quarter, we're well positioned to grow occupancy from here.

This quarter, once again, expansions outpaced contractions, 41 this time. Year-to-date, we've signed 47 total expansions, outpacing our full year results each of the past 2 years and net expansion so far this year approximate 70,000 square feet, our highest year since before the pandemic. We also signed 122,000 square feet of first-generation leases in our development pipeline, lifting our lease percentage to 72%, up 800 basis points sequentially. While leasing momentum was balanced across our markets, Dallas, Nashville, Charlotte and Tampa were standout performers.

Let's start with Dallas, a market that continues to shine across our portfolio. Dallas is, in many ways, an overnight success that's been decades in the making. Once defined by energy, it's now one of the most diverse and dynamic economies in the country. The Dallas metro population is projected to grow nearly 50% over the next 25 years, and about 400 new residents are moving in every single day. For 20 consecutive years, Chief Executive Magazine has named Texas, the best date for Business, and the Dallas Regional Chamber recently noted 10 major corporate and significant office using prospects are considering headquarter moves or large expansions. That strength is showing up in the data.

CBRE and Cushman & Wakefield both reported positive net absorption for the fourth straight quarter and both highlighted Uptown as the top submarket with regard to rate and demand. Our partnership with Granite Properties continues to perform exceptionally well.

In uptown, McKinney & Olive remained 99% occupied and our new 23Springs Tower, which opened this quarter has already reached 67% leased, up 500 basis points quarter-over-quarter with rents well above underwriting. Similar success is occurring at [indiscernible] at Granite Park Six where our lease percentage has increased 1,000 basis points to 69%. We have strong prospects for both of these buildings that will bring the lease rate to the mid-70s or higher.

Moving to Nashville. It remains one of the most compelling and resilient markets in the Sunbelt. Unemployment sits at just 2.9%, the lowest among our markets and is the epitome of an emerging landlord favorable market with the intersection of dwindling supply, increased inbound inquiries and a surging local economy, the construction pipeline has reached historical lows and nearly 12% of the downtown inventory, about 1.4 million square feet is being converted to hotel and residential uses. CBRE sums it up well, landlords in Nashville now have considerable pricing power with asking rates up more than 11% year-over-year. Our own portfolio mirrors that strength. Downtown Symphony Place is now 70% leased or out for leased with another 20% in active negotiation. In Franklin, Park Place West is over 80% leased or out for leased and Westwood South in Brentwood is progressing with solid mid-stage prospects for the entirety of the building. With over 100,000 square feet signed this quarter, our 5 million square foot natural portfolio continues to benefit from broad-based demand across all 4 of Nashville's core BBDs.

In Charlotte, the same fire and [ TAMI ] industries fueling growth in Dallas and other major markets are driving strong demand for the best Class A space available. According to CBRE, leasing is up 77% year-over-year, with 80% of that activity from new or expanding tenants and there are 17 active prospects, larger than 50,000 square feet in the market. Our 96% occupied portfolio and strong inbound activity validates these trends. With very little new supply, top end rents continue to rise and the calculus for new development is becoming more viable.

During the quarter, we signed 200,000 square feet in Charlotte, with net effective rents over $30 a square foot, gap rents approaching $50 a square foot and a low 10% payback. Office using employment in Charlotte grew 3.4% year-over-year reinforcing our confidence in the city's ongoing strength.

And finally, Tampa, where momentum continues to accelerate. CBRE reports 6 consecutive quarters of declining vacancy and the strongest absorption in the years with 1 million square feet of known move-ins ahead, the trend remains firmly positive. We signed 190,000 square feet of second-generation leases in Tampa this quarter. Plus our Midtown East development doubled its lease percentage after signing 53,000 square feet of first-gen leases across 2 full floors with triple net rents in the mid-40s. With only a corner restaurant space and one last floor of office remaining, they couldn't be happier with where we are in Midtown Tampa. Across our diversified Sunbelt portfolio, we benefit from a broad tenant base, spanning industries, company sizes and geographies, anchoring in both urban and suburban BBDs.

When you combine that diversification with our measured development activity, our continuous reinvestment in existing assets and our targeted acquisitions, the result is a portfolio built for resilience and sustained long-term growth. We're incredibly proud of how our team continues to execute, market by market and building by building. Delivering outcomes that reinforce the strength and momentum of the Highwoods value proposition. Brendan?

Thanks, Brian. In the third quarter, we delivered net income of $12.9 million or $0.12 per share and FFO of $94.8 million or $0.86 per share. The quarter was relatively clean without any notable unusual items. Our leasing metrics during the quarter were healthy with net effective rents the highest in our history. The strength in leasing economics, combined with the embedded NOI growth in our operating portfolio and development pipeline bodes well for our long-term cash flow outlook.

Cash flows during the quarter were impacted by the high expenditures of leasing capital ahead of our projected occupancy build. As leasing volumes normalize and NOI grows, we expect cash flow levels will improve significantly. Our balance sheet remains in excellent shape. Our debt to EBITDAre was 6.4x at quarter end. Similar to our cash flow outlook, we expect our debt-to-EBITDAre ratio will improve meaningfully as customers were signed but not yet commenced leases in our operating portfolio and development pipeline move into occupancy which should result in higher NOI and higher EBITDA. All else being equal, these move-ins would reduce our debt-to-EBITDAre by 0.5x.

We currently have $625 million of available liquidity with only $96 million left to complete our development pipeline. During the quarter, we extended the maturity on our $200 million variable rate term loan from 2026 to 2031, leaving us no consolidated debt maturities until 2027. While we have no immediate refinancing requirements, we are closely monitoring the capital markets and may seek to raise capital opportunistically to derisk future needs.

As Ted mentioned, we acquired the Legacy Union garage during the third quarter for a total investment of $111.5 million, including near-term planned building improvements. We funded this acquisition on a leverage-neutral basis, mostly through $59 million of equity issuances via our ATM program since the beginning of the third quarter plus some incremental borrowing and modest proceeds from noncore asset sales.

As a reminder, during the first quarter, we acquired the Advanced Auto Parts Tower for $138 million also on a leverage-neutral basis, but match funded that transaction entirely with proceeds from a noncore portfolio sale in Tampa. Both of these transactions demonstrate our proven track record of creatively funding acquisitions on a leverage-neutral basis. This is what we mean by frequently saying we have multiple arrows in our quiver. Acquiring Advanced Auto Parts Tower and the Legacy Union parking garage this year significantly improved our portfolio quality in BBD locations were immediately accretive to cash flow and roughly neutral to near-term FFO while providing long-term upside to these financial metrics.

As Ted mentioned, we updated our 2025 FFO outlook to $3.41 to $3.45 per share, which equates to a $0.02 increase at the midpoint. We added a year-end occupancy range to our outlook which implies 70 basis points of occupancy growth at the midpoint during the final 3 months of the year and underpins our confidence in growing occupancy as we move into 2026.

Finally, as you know, we plan to provide our 2026 outlook in February when we release our fourth quarter results. In the interim, there are 2 items I would like to highlight. First, we will begin expensing interest on our investments in the 23Springs and Midtown East development projects by the end of Q1 '26. Second, as Ted mentioned, we have secured nearly 2/3 of the $55 million to $60 million of stabilized NOI growth potential across the core 4 operating properties and are completed but not yet stabilized development through signed leases. All of these signed leases are projected to commence by the end of 3Q '26 which should create a positive NOI and earnings trajectory as we migrate throughout next year.

Operator, we are now ready for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question goes from the line of Seth Bergey of Citi.

I guess just in kind of the outlook items you noted the potential for increased acquisitions or dispositions. Would those kind of take you into any new markets or wherever you like to kind of increase your concentration into? Or would those reduce your exposure to any of your markets that you're currently in?

Seth, thanks for the question. Yes. So the acquisition opportunities we're looking at right now, none of them are new markets. They would all be adding to existing holdings in our existing markets. So -- and the ranges we put out there, it's -- as with the capital markets opening up, we're starting to see more opportunities really across the risk and return spectrum. So bid-ask spread seems to be narrowing. So sellers are bringing high-quality assets to the market. So yes, so we're taking a look at various opportunities across that spectrum, all in our existing markets.

And then on the dispose side, I think right now, we have -- we've closed year-to-date $168 million. That includes a small $7 million asset that closed after quarter end. And we've got several other assets in the market. I think we're going to close a couple of next week even that are -- the buyer is hard on and maybe even a few extra -- a few other deals by the end of the year and then a few will leak into early next year. And I think we have assets on the market and all of our markets with the exception of Charlotte and Dallas. So it's really just trimming the noncore assets across our portfolio. And I think you know we've been a regular seller of assets over the years. So I think we're just continuing the portfolio [indiscernible] that we've been doing for many years.

Great. And then just on financing assets, any potential acquisitions? Would you look to do more on the ATM? Or would you primarily fund those through other dispositions?

Seth, it's Brendan. I think Plan A would be recycling capital with disposition proceeds used to fund acquisitions or new investments. But I would say there's -- we've done both so far this year. So we funded the Advance Auto Parts Tower with a rotation of capital from disposition proceeds. We funded the garage in Charlotte on a leverage-neutral basis, primarily through ATM issuance. So I think both are available, but I would say that our Plan A would be used disposition proceeds. And given where the share price is now, the equity currency really isn't competitive. So I think disposition proceeds are most likely.

Our next question comes from the line of Blaine Heck of Wells Fargo.

It seems as though during the pandemic, we saw Atlanta benefit a lot from tenant migration from other markets. But in your prepared remarks, it's trucking like maybe Dallas was leading in that trend at this point. So I was hoping you could just give us an update on which markets are benefiting most from migration from other markets and whether the level of that activity has changed significantly in any of your specific markets?

Sure, Blaine. Thanks for the question. No, I think you're right. Based on Brian's comments, it's really Dallas is seeing a significant amount of in-migration. Brian alluded to 10 significant office requirements, the Dallas Chamber is working on right now. That may be down to 9 now given the recent announcement of Scotiabank putting a pretty big presence in Dallas, which Dallas won that requirement from Charlotte. So Dallas is incredibly busy right now, a lot of new requirements. Charlotte, I'd say, is right behind. Brian alluded to 17 office requirements that are greater than 50,000 feet. Most recently, there's a news article yesterday about Pacific Mutual 300-and-something jobs, high-paying jobs, I think average like $179,000 per job. So Charlotte's been incredibly busy.

Right behind that is Nashville. We actually had our board meeting in Nashville last week. And at the board dinner, we brought both the economic development person for the Chamber of Commerce as well as the state-wide economic development person. They spoke to our Board and basically said they're as busy as they've been in a long time. So from the office perspective. So I feel really good there.

Raleigh is busy. The North Carolina economic development folks are actually in our headquarters building here in Raleigh. So we see them quite a bit. And the office requirements are picking up in Raleigh as well. There's been a couple of good announcements in Atlanta as well. Tampa, we just got somebody from new out-of-state requirement in one of our buildings. So really, we're seeing it across our footprint. The in-migrations really, it seems to be accelerating.

Blaine, Brian here. One thing I might add is where they're coming from, still usual suspects, California, Midwest and Northeast, but we're also seeing some international inbound putting a toehold here in the states in these markets and growing.

Great. Second question, Brendan, you guys are clearly going through a period of elevated leasing activity. And with that comes to elevated CapEx, which you touched on in your remarks. I guess how long should we kind of expect these elevated capital expenditures to impact AFFO or FAD or cash flow. And related to that, anything you can say just to touch on your or the Board's comfort with the dividend level here would be helpful.

Yes. Good question, Blaine. I think it probably depends on how long we think the occupancy build goes for. So I think it's clear that we would expect elevated levels of CapEx kind of through next year as we've got kind of the signed but not yet commenced leases as you spend that capital. We've spent some of it already, but we're certainly planning on spending that as we migrate throughout 2026. But I think we are optimistic that our leasing pipeline is full, and we're going to kind of refill that signed but not yet commenced bucket of future customers. which will carry with it a high level of CapEx or an elevated level of CapEx. So I think we're optimistic that, that occupancy build is going to continue throughout 2027, which means in all likelihood, you're going to have higher leasing capital in not only just next year but in '27 as well.

But what I would say to that is I think if you look year-to-date, our leasing capital, we're probably trending $40 million sort of above what's a normalized year. And we're doing -- cash flow is low, but it's not -- it's still reasonable. We've got a lot of NOI growth. So even if you assume that leasing capital remains high, there's a lot of NOI growth that will come online next year and into early '27. So I think just from the NOI growth coming online, cash flow levels are going to improve.

And then as you have leasing costs normalize, they're going to improve even more. So I think we see a really clear pathway to very strong cash flow growth over the next several years, but there are a few legs to kind of -- or a few steps to kind of get to, to be there. But hopefully, leasing will continue to be strong. and leasing CapEx will probably remain elevated for the next couple of years.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rob Stevenson of Janney Montgomery Scott.

Brendan, what drives the $0.04 gap in the fourth quarter earnings guidance, what swings to the high and low end variable wise?

Rob, I would say, I mean, there's a little bit of discretion around expenses and those can be volatile quarter-to-quarter when you recognize kind of the reimbursement on a normalized level kind of ratably throughout the year. So I would say the biggest swing factor in terms of kind of normalized in that range is probably some discretionary expense spend. And so that probably kind of moved it you would say, a couple of pennies on either side. And then we always bake in a little bit of something here or there. So you never know, we factor in some bad debts those could be at the high end of the range or they could be 0. So that kind of moves things around.

And then to the extent that anything other unusual happens usually just take a little bit that's in there. But I would say from a leasing perspective, there's really not a lot of spec leasing that's going to drive revenue substantially higher or lower based in the forecast.

Okay. And then the commentary that you made looking out the next year with the core 4 leasing, does the occupancy there hit relatively ratably? Or there are certain quarters where there's a couple of big leases that hit that will really spike occupancy as we start thinking about the volatility of the occupancy number going forward?

Yes. I would say that it's pretty ratable from a build from Q2 through Q4. I think Q1, there's a little bit -- we typically kind of go down a little bit in terms of occupancy in Q1 just on normal seasonal factors. And then I think if you -- if we go through some of the biggest kind of expirations that we have, they tend to be early in the year, most of those are backfilled, but you've got downtime on those. So we've got a large lease in Dallas that's going to go from MNO. There's going to be downtime there. It is substantially back to -- so that's large lease kick in second quarter and then a little bit in third quarter.

So I think you'll probably see occupancy dip a little bit in Q1 from where it was at year-end '26, not -- I wouldn't say it's a huge amount. And then I think from Q2 to the end of the year, we think there's a pretty substantial increase from there.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then lastly, Ted, given the positive market comments around the portfolio that both you and Brian made earlier, can you talk about the Pittsburgh market and how close you may be getting there to the right time to exit some or all of those assets?

Sure. Every quarter, the capital markets have been getting better for the last 2 or 3 quarters. So we have regular dialogue with our adviser on those assets. And certainly, we're going to bring those to market when the time is right. Rob, I don't think we're quite there yet, but certainly, I think over the next couple of quarters, we may come to a decision, leasing velocity is really good and combine that with capital markets improving, I think we're getting closer.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Nick Thillman of Baird.

Brendan, you have been messaging sort of this ramp-up in occupancy 100 to 200 basis points throughout '26. Just wanted to double check on your comfort level there and then the underpinning assumptions is that similar leasing volume of this 300,000 square feet of new deals plus 50% retention, and that's how we get there is up the math. Just kind of just walk us through sort of that setup there.

Nick, thanks for the question. Yes. So just to reiterate, I think last quarter, we talked about -- we thought we'd sort of be around 86 for year-end '25. We put that outlook in -- we formalized that in the outlook last night in terms of their so right around 86. And then, yes, I think as we sit here late in '25, haven't given '26 guidance yet, but I think that 100 to 200 basis points of increase between year-end '25 to year-end 26, I think we're comfortable with that as we stand here now. Now we'll sharpen our pencil and kind of look at those assumptions and provide formal guidance in February. But I think as we sit here, I think we feel comfortable with that kind of outlook and believe we've got a good pathway of growth between year-end '25 and year-end '26.

And then I would say in rough numbers, I think that's about right in terms of -- there's probably around 50% retention. That number always goes down the closer you get to kind of those expirations. So it might be mid-40s as it stands now. But I think if we can do 300,000 square feet of new a quarter and we're kind of at the retention levels that we in that level, that's going to put us in a position to be between 87, 88 by year-end '26.

That's helpful. And then Ted, with the leasing volume remaining healthy here. On the acquisitions, what's the appetite for lease-up risk on sort of the pool of assets you're looking at? And along those lines, as we think about the earnings impact of selling versus buying, are you -- is this FFO dilutive, neutral? How should we think about that?

Yes. Great question. Maybe I'll start and then Brendan can chime in. Look, so we look at everything across the risk return spectrum, and we will absolutely take leasing risk. That's been our playbook coming out of GFC, and we will do so in instances where we feel very comfortable about the leasing prospects, the momentum in the market. And if we think we can lease it up and get paid for that lease-up risk, more importantly, right? So we are absolutely looking at assets to have vacancy risk that we can come in and add the Highwoodtizing, and lease those up and get paid for it.

Yes. Nick, just in terms of the earnings impact, there's obviously a lot of balls in the air. There's a lot of variables that likely means that things are going to be kind of -- could potentially be noisy sort of quarter-to-quarter.

I think the best way that we could probably frame this is, if we go back to some of the other large kind of asset rotations that we've done. So think about the market rotation plan where we went into Charlotte exited Memphis and Greensboro or the portfolio of office assets that we acquired from PAC and then subsequently sold a bunch of noncore. I think what we told you is if you sort of give us a year, the unaffected the FFO run rate should be unaffected from where it is pre all of those transactions. And our cash flow should be higher, and we will return our leverage to the normalized kind of glide path.

So there's obviously a lot of timing. So if dispositions happen first versus acquisitions that likely impacts it. There are some lease-up stuff that's there. But I think we feel pretty confident that if we're able to do things on a leverage-neutral basis that long-term FFO outlook is probably going to be unchanged. Cash flow is going to be higher. Leverage is probably unchanged, and we certainly think that there will be an uptick in terms of long-term growth rate and portfolio quality.

Our next question comes from the line of Dylan Burzinski of Green Street.

Ted, I think you mentioned that the capital markets environment continues to improve as we progress throughout 2025. But can you kind of just talk about sort of where for assets that you have sold where pricing expectations have come in relative to your initial expectations? And maybe if you can follow that up with just any sort of color or detail around bidding tents. Are we starting to see more institutional capital come back? Or is it still for the large part, mostly high net worth family office type money looking at the office space today?

Sure. First, on the pricing on the dispositions. And Dylan, it's all over the board. I mean, sort of what we're selling today, it's a mix of long-term single tenant with long weighted average lease term to land, to lower occupied assets to some of our older assets that are going to have a higher cap rate. But I would tell you pricing is all over the board. But in general, our pricing is, I would say, meeting or exceeding our expectations of when we are -- when we initially took the assets out to market.

So the bidder pools are a little deeper. And the buyers, if you go back 2 or 3 years, we didn't recognize a lot of buyers on the bid sheets. We're now starting to recognize the buyers on the bid sheets, so more familiar capital. Certainly, the debt capital markets are helping. I think on pricing, as they've gotten better, whether it be CMBS, the debt funds, you're starting to see some of the banks get more active as well. So just in general, there's more liquidity in the capital markets today, and that's starting to help on pricing.

With regard to the acquisitions, look, I do think there's more institutional capital coming making bids. It seems like from what we hear from the brokers, there's more bids on every deal, every subsequent deal that comes out to market. So I think there's been a lot of capital that if you go back a couple of quarters, they were office curious and now they're getting more active and really constructive on underwriting office acquisitions. So I think that is just going to help get this capital markets flywheel turn even more and which is going to be helpful for the office sector.

And then maybe one more, if I could. Just -- I know you guys are constantly turning the portfolio and selling noncore assets and reallocate that capital. But I guess as you look at the portfolio today, I mean, is there some percentage of it that you would sort of deem as noncore or that you have interest in disposing of over time?

We often get asked that, and it's really just a continuous portfolio improvement for us as we buy new assets, fund them with dispositions were sort of pulling from the bottom of the assets. So -- and what I would tell you is what was core or noncore a few years or core a few years ago, it might be noncore today just as a result of growth trends or where we think the long-term growth rate maybe is not what it was a few years ago. So we're always evaluating our portfolio. We do it a couple of times a year as a main management team and always reevaluating.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Ronald Kamdem of Morgan Stanley.

Just 2 quick ones. Clearly, the capital recycling is pretty imminent, as in the next sort of 6 months. Just curious in terms of just markets, are these all sort of existing markets, any new markets in there? And just remind us what markets you like to lean into, whether it's Dallas, Atlanta, what stands out?

Sure, Ron. Yes, you must have missed the early part of the call. We had the same question. So really, it's -- what we're looking at now, we're pretty happy with our footprint. And so we're going to -- we're looking at assets that are in our existing footprint that would upgrade the portfolio. So I don't think we've got any market -- our core markets that we wouldn't add to if the right opportunity comes in. But so we're looking at stuff really across our entire existing platform.

Great. And then my second question is just on an update on Ovation. I know you guys are not looking to do any sort of M&A development and so forth. But just current thinking there, sort of excitement, could that be at '26, '27? Just what the timing could be on that and what the thoughts are?

Ron, thanks for tossing one over the plate. This is Brian on Ovation. So we now have control over the entire site. So for a number of years, we were counting on others to deliver the place-making part of that, the core of the community. So we stepped up over the last few years to kind of take our fate into our hands. And we went through an exercise with the city of Franklin to get it completely kind of re-entitled in a more integrated mixed-use way that actually got us some additional residential density to go into this vibrant mixed-use place. We have the right retail and multiple use partners kind of being lined up. We've been in front of the prospects who would come in open shops and restaurants, and it's been really warmly received.

Nashville has very much shown up on every market for a retailer to fashion label, and so we feel like we're timing it right, things are lining up well. So timing, to your question. Ideally, we have some utility and site work to do next year and could be coming out of the ground vertically with the first phase, which would include office, retail and multifamily and the potential hotel in '27 opening in the fall of '28. We also love to see the rent growth in the market for mixed-use office, generating about a 20% premium. So that will be kind of core to the underwriting. But thanks for asking about Ovation and more to come.

Thank you. There are currently no questions at this time. [Operator Instructions]

Well, thank you, everybody, for joining the call today, and thank you for your interest in Highwoods. And if you have any follow-up questions, please feel free to reach out to any of us. Thank you.

Thank you. That will conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.